Skip to main content
Journal of Insect Science logoLink to Journal of Insect Science
. 2024 Jan 9;24(1):2. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/iead120

Genetic diversity and population structure of the Asian citrus psyllid in China

Aijun Huang 1,2,#, Jiayu Ma 3,#, Jin Yang 4, Bo Chen 5, Jun Zhou 6,7, Long Yi 8,9,
Editor: Amr Mohamed
PMCID: PMC10776205  PMID: 38195069

Abstract

The Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) is the main vector of Citrus Huanglongbing, the most damaging citrus disease, causing significant financial losses in the citrus industry. Global warming has expanded the habitat of this pest, allowing it to continue its northward migration to China. Population genetic information of ACP is fundamentally essential for species management. This study investigated the genetic diversity and population structure of Chinese ACP using the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene by dataset comprised 721 sequences from 27 geographic sites in China. Low haplotype diversity (0.323 ± 0.022) and low nucleotide diversity (0.00071 ± 0.00007) were observed in the entire population, which may indicate recent founder events. Twenty-three haplotypes were identified and clustered into 2 haplogroups: haplogroup I and haplogroup II. Haplogroup II included only 2 unique haplotypes, which occurred exclusively in the Southwest China ACP population. Genetic differentiation analyses were also indicative of Southwest China population was significantly differentiated from the remaining populations. Demographic history analysis showed that ACP population in China has experienced demographic expansion. Our results provided a better understanding of the genetic distribution patterns and structures of ACP populations in China.

Keywords: Asian citrus psyllid, citrus Huanglongbing, mitochondrial COI, genetic diversity, demographic history

Introduction

Asian citrus psyllid (ACP), Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae), is regarded as one of the most economically significant citrus pests worldwide (Grafton-Cardwell et al. 2013), not only because it causes severe damage to citrus by direct feeding on leaves, but more importantly it is also the primary vector of Citrus Huanglongbing (HLB), which is an unprecedented challenge posing in citrus production (da Graça et al. 2016). Available evidence suggests that the ACP may have originated in the Indian subcontinent (Hollis 1987) from where it subsequently spread to other tropical and subtropical regions of Asia. It was initially mentioned in Taiwan in 1907 (Kuwayama 1908) and was first recorded in mainland China in the Chaoshan area of Guangdong Province in 1934 (Hoffmann 1936), afterward, it was gradually noticed in several southern Chinese provinces, including Fujian, Guangxi, Sichuan, Jiangxi, Zhejiang, Hunan, Guizhou, and Yunan (Huang 1953, Yao 1985, Wang et al. 2016). Currently, it has happened in over 300 counties across 10 provinces of mainland China. The spread of ACP has promoted the spreading of HLB, causing enormous economic losses in citrus production in China (Zhou 2020). Furthermore, owing to global warming, ACP may continue to migrate northward (Wang et al. 2015), which may result in an increase in the incidence of insect-mediated plant diseases and the expansion of their host range (Merrill et al. 2008, Deutsch et al. 2018, Wu et al. 2020). Therefore, it is urgently needed for efficient management strategies to control both ACP and HLB.

Population structure is a crucial component of population genetics and can broadly be defined as the amount and distribution of genetic diversity within and among populations. Research on population genetic structure enables us to evaluate the levels of gene flow among populations in various geographic areas (Urbanelli et al. 2000), quantify genetic differentiation among populations (Weill et al. 2000), and infer population’s history, including changes in population size, ancestral populations, and range expansions or contractions (Porretta et al. 2007). Such studies can serve to elucidate the basic biology and ecology of insect pest species and, furthermore, aid in the development of efficient control measures.

Particularly, sequence variations in the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I (COI) gene region remain one of the most frequently employed genetic markers for conducting genetic structure and diversity analyses (Brown et al. 1979, Oines and Brannstrom 2011). The mitochondrial COI has been utilized to study ACP population structure and diversity in different geographical regions in China. Using this gene marker, Zhang et al. (2019) revealed a notable genetic variation between the population of Southwest China and other regions of southern China. From these observations, they further speculated on the possibility of 2 distinct invasion routes in China: one in Guangdong and the other in Yunnan. In addition, evidence suggests that ACP is still experiencing population expansion, which could be correlated with the extensive citrus cultivation (Meng et al. 2018). However, genetic diversity or structural studies necessitate sampling marked individuals from various environments, which mandates sampling must be extensive to be statistically useful. Nevertheless, data on the ACP genetic diversity and structure in China are inadequate, and further studies are required.

In this study, different geographic ACP samples collected from southern China were analyzed using mitochondrial COI as a molecular marker. The results will provide fundamental genetic information to deepen our understanding of the genetic diversity and structure of ACP in China and also help us further speculate on the origin and diffusion route of ACP in China.

Materials and Methods

Psyllid Sampling Collection

Between 2021 and 2022, a total of 570 ACP individuals (adults) were collected from commercial and unmanaged citrus groves at 19 sites in southern China, which is a major ACP occurrence region. The positioning system coordinates of each sampling site were obtained using a portable GPS instrument (Zhuolin A6, Hefei, China). Prior to DNA extraction, the collected specimens were preserved in 75% ethanol and kept at −20°C. In addition, 151 publicly available ACP mitochondrial COI sequences (Wang et al. 2017, Zhang et al 2019) were also contained in our analyses, and their sampling sites were Ruili (n = 20), Xishuangbanna (n = 24), and Binchuan (n = 20) of Yunnan Province, Shanwei (n = 20) in Guangdong Province, Guiling (n = 20) and Nanning (n = 20) in Guangxi Province, Xiamen (n = 20) in Fujian Province, and Taiwan (n = 17). In all, analyses were conducted in 721 sequences from 27 sampling sites (Table 1). According to geographic origin, all samples were classified into 4 groups: East China, South China, Central China, and Southwest China (Fig. 1).

Table 1.

Detailed information of ACP samples used in this study

Geographic region Sampling locations Geographical coordinates Plant host No. of individual Accession numbers
East China Yichun, Jiangxi (YCYF) N28.591° E114.985° C. reticulata 30 OP906166-OP906195
Yushui, Jiangxi (XYYS) N27.871° E114.91° C. reticulata 30 OP905956-OP905985
Fenyi, Jiangxi (XYFY) N27.857° E116.247° C. reticulata 30 OP905986-OP906015
Linchuan, Jiangxi (FZLC) N27.826° E114.595° C. reticulata 30 OP905686-OP905715
Nanfeng, Jiangxi (FZNF) N27.223° E116.494° C. reticulata 30 OP905896-OP905925
Ji’an, Jiangxi (JXJA) N26.805° E114.945° C. reticulata 30 OP905836-OP905865
Ningdu, Jiangxi (GZND) N26.247° E116.141° C. sinensis 30 OP905926-OP905955
Anyuan, Jiangxi (GZAY) N25.197° E115.355° C. sinensis 30 OP905866-OP9058995
Xiamen, Fujian (FJXM) N24.479° E118.0894° Murraya paniculata 20 MH970714-MH970719
Jinhua, Zhejiang (ZJJH) N29.556° E118.826° C. reticulata 30 OP906196-OP906225
Quzhou, Zhejiang (ZJQZ) N28.929° E118.797° C. reticulata 30 OP906226-OP906255
Taiwan (TW)a N23.699° E120.9605° Murraya paniculata 17 KX762326-KX762342
South China Zhaoqing, Guangdong (GDZQ) N23.426° E112.540° C. sinensis 30 OPO905716-OP905745
Shanwei, Guangdong (GDSW)a N22.804° E115.0983° Murraya paniculata 10 KX762380-KX762389
Guiling, Guangxi (GXGL)a N24.778° E110.4996° Clausena 20 KX762440-KX762459
Nanning, Guangxi (GXNN)a N22.524° E109.3485° Murraya paniculata 20 KX762460-KX762479
Central China Xinning, Hunan (SYXN) N26.537° E110.954° C. sinensis 30 OP906136-OP906165
Qidong, Hunan (HYQD) N26.907° E111.624° C. sinensis 30 OP905776-OP905805
Hengdong, Hunan (HYHD) N26.998° E113.119° C. sinensis 30 OP905806-OP905835
Huaihua, Hunan (HNHH) N27.872° E109.748° C. sinensis 30 OP905746-OP905775
Southwest China Xuzhou, Sichuan (YBXZ) N28.625° E104.424° C. sinensis 30 OP906076-OP906105
Cuiping, Sichuan (YBCP) N28.770° E104.625° C. sinensis 30 OP906106-OP906135
Liangshan, Sichuan (SCLS) N28.157° E103.501° C. sinensis 30 OP906046-OP906075
Panzhihua, Sichuan (PZH) N26.555° E101.933° C. sinensis 30 OP906016-OP906045
Ruili, Yunnan (YNRL)a N24.021° E97.8635° C. reticulata 20 KX762549-KX762568
Binchuan, Yunnan (YNBC)a N25.827° E100.5751° C. reticulata 20 KX762520-KX762539
Xishuangbanna, Yunnan (YNXS)a N21.99° E100.79° C. reticulata 24 MH970777-MH970800

aCOI sequences are downloaded from NCBI.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Sampling sites of ACP populations in China. The black solid circles are the sampling locations for this study, and the black hollow circles are locations of the downloaded sequences from GenBank.

DNA Extraction and Sequencing

Whole-body genomic DNA was extracted from individual specimens using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s protocol. The quality of the extracted DNA was assessed by NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA extracts within the A260 nm/A280 nm ratio range of 1.8–2.0 were used for subsequent analyses.

A fragment of the mitochondrial COI gene was amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primer sets COI-F (5ʹ-AGGAGGTGGAGACCCAATCT-3ʹ) and COI-R (5ʹ-TCAATTGGGGGAGAGTTTTG-3ʹ). Each PCR reaction was conducted in a 25.0 μl final reaction volume containing 12.5 μl of Premix Taq (TaKaRa), 0.5 μl each of forward and reverse primers (10 μM), 10.5 μl of nuclease-free water, and 1.0 μl of extracted DNA template. The amplification was performed using a Veriti 96-Well thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems, California, USA) with the following cycle conditions: denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min; followed by 35 cycles of 95 °C for 20 s, 56 °C for 20 s, 72 °C for 1 min; and a final elongation step at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were separated on 1.3% agarose and stained with SolarRed (Solarbio, Beijing, China). The target fragments were purified using the DNA purification kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, the purified fragments were delivered to the Suzhou Genewiz Biotech Company (Suzhou, China) for sequencing.

Data Preparation and Genetic Diversity Analysis

The COI sequences were manually edited using SeqMan 7.1.0 and aligned using ClustalW in MEGA 7. Genetic diversity parameters, including the number of polymorphic sites (S), synonymous (Ks) or nonsynonymous (Ka) substitution rates, haplotype diversity (Hd), number of haplotypes (H), and nucleotide diversity (π) were determined using DnaSP 5.10.01 (Librado and Rozas 2009). When Hd value <0.5 and π value <0.005 suggest a recent population bottleneck or founder event by a single or few lineages; Hd value >0.5 and π value <0.005 suggest recent population bottleneck followed by rapid population growth and accumulation of mutations; Hd value <0.5 and π value >0.005 suggest divergence between geographically subpopulations; Hd value >0.5 and π value >0.005 indicate a large stable population with long evolutionary history or second contact between differentiated lineages (Grant and Bowen 1998).

To evaluate the level of genetic differentiation among ACP populations, pairwise Fst and gene flow (Nm) among the 4 geographic regions (East China, South China, Central China, and Southwest China) were calculated using Arlequin software (Excoffier and Lischer 2010). The Fst value represents the level of differentiation among populations; specifically, 0 < Fst < 0.05 indicates slight genetic differentiation; 0.05 < Fst < 0.15 indicates moderately differentiation; 0.15 < Fst < 0.25 indicates high differentiation, Fst > 0.25 indicates severe differentiation. In turn, the Nm value presents the relative strength of the gene flow among populations. When Nm value <1, a low level of gene flow occurs, whereas when Nm value >1, a high level of gene flow occurs. The overall genetic variance was calculated by analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) (Excoffier and Lischer 2010).

Phylogenetic Analysis and Haplotype Network

To understand the phylogenetic relationships among different haplotypes, a neighbor-joining (NJ) tree were constructed with 1,000 bootstrap value using MEGA 7.0 software (Kumar et al. 2018). Haplotype network was visualized by PopART 1.7 (Population Analysis with Reticulate Trees) using the method of Templeton, Crandall, and Sing (TCS) (Clement et al. 2000, Leigh and Bryant 2015).

Demographic Analysis

The historical demographic expansions were examined by using 2 methods. First, neutral tests, including Tajima’s D (Tajima 1989), Fu and Li’s D, and Fu and Li’s F (Fu 1997) tests, were performed using DnaSP software. Second, mismatch distribution analysis was executed to detect historical population expansion events in Arlequin software. A multimodal pattern reveals that populations are at a demographic equilibrium, whereas a unimodal pattern suggests that populations are experiencing a dramatic demographic expansion. Arlequin software was also used to calculate the sum of the squared deviations (SSDs) between the observed and expected mismatches and the raggedness index (r) of the observed distribution. A small r value indicated that populations had undergone recent demographic expansions, and a significant value of SSD was an indication of relatively constant population size.

Results

Genetic Diversity

The target COI region (706 bp) was successfully amplified and sequenced for all 570 ACP specimens, and the acquired nucleotide sequences were deposited in GenBank under accession numbers: OP905686-OP906255 (Table 1). A total of 24 polymorphic sites were observed, of which 14 were singleton variable sites and 10 were parsimony informative sites. These polymorphic sites resulted in 23 haplotypes (Hap 1–Hap 23). Among the 23 haplotypes, 5 haplotypes were shared among 2 or more than 2 populations, and 18 haplotypes were restricted to 1 population (Fig. 2). Hap 1 was the most prevalent and widespread, representing 81.8% of all the samples, and occurred in all 4 populations. Hap 10 (7.9%) and Hap 12 (3.5%) were the second and third most frequent haplotypes, respectively, and Hap 12 was exclusively discovered in Southwest China, specifically, only in Xishuangbanna of Yunnan province. Meanwhile, the population in East China shares 3 and 1 common haplotypes with the populations in South China and Central China, respectively.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

ACP haplotypes phylogenetic analyses and geographic distribution. Bootstrap values are indicated at each node. The distribution and number of haplotypes in different populations are shown in the right panel.

Low haplotype diversity (0.323) and low nucleotide diversity (0.071) were observed in the entire ACP sample, indicating that populations may have experienced a recent population bottleneck or founder effect. Notably, ACP population from Southwest China exhibited high Hd (0.599) and low π (0.00172), implying that populations from this region may have experienced population bottleneck followed by rapid population growth and mutation accumulation. The remaining populations were with low Hd (0.137–0.213) and π (0.00022–0.00035) values, indicating possible bottleneck effects or founder events in the population history (Table 2). The nonsynonymous (Ka) and synonymous (Ks) rate ratio are used to measure selective pressure at the protein level. The Ka/Ks values for the East, South, and Central China populations were all lower than 1, suggesting that these three populations were predominantly affected by purifying selection, whereas that of Southwest population was greater than 1, indicating that this population was under natural selection.

Table 2.

Genetic diversity estimates of ACP populations

Populations N n Ka/Ks Haplotype Haplotype diversity (Hd) Nucleotide diversity (π)
East China 337 12 0.283 Hap1, Hap2, Hap3, Hap4, Hap5, Hap7, Hap9, Hap15, Hap18, Hap19, Hap20, Hap21, 0.137 ± 0.026 0.00022 ± 0.00004
South China 80 8 0.500 Hap1, Hap6, Hap7, Hap8, Hap9, Hap13, Hap14, Hap15, 0.213 ± 0.061 0.00035 ± 0.00011
Central China 120 4 0.029 Hap1, Hap16, Hap17, Hap18 0.199 ± 0.047 0.00029 ± 0.00007
Southwest China 184 6 1.099 Hap1, Hap10, Hap11, Hap12, Hap22, Hap23 0.599 ± 0.023 0.00172 ± 0.00016
All 721 23 0.707 Hap1–Hap23 0.323 ± 0.022 0.00071 ± 0.00007

N: number of individuals, n: number of haplotypes.

Haplotype Analysis

Phylogenetic analysis showed that the haplotypes from all populations could be divided into 2 haplogroups (I and II); haplogroup I is present in all populations, whereas haplogroup II consisted exclusively of the haplotypes from the population of Southwest China (Fig. 2).

The haplotype network was constructed based on the TCS inference method and was divided into two subdivisions: one included 21 haplotypes (Hap 1—Hap 11, Hap 13—Hap 22), distributed in all four populations, and the other included two haplotypes (Hap 12 and Hap 23) that were only distributed in Southwest China. The pattern of the network was star-like; the highest frequency of Hap 1 occupied a central position, and all other haplotypes arose from it through one or several mutational steps (Fig. 3). Due to its central position in the network, haplotype Hap 1 may be the maternal ancestral haplotype for the ACP populations analyzed herein.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

TCS network of ACP based on COI haplotypes. The sizes of the circles indicate the number of the individuals with each given haplotype.

Genetic Differentiation/Population Structure Analysis

Pairwise Fst tests indicated genetic differentiation among the 4 populations based on the mitochondrial COI gene (Table 3). Particularly, the Fst values among East China, South China, and Central China were lower than 0.05, indicating that these 3 populations were slightly differentiated, whereas the Fst values between Southwest China and the other 3 populations were all >0.15, suggesting a high level of genetic differentiation in the Southwest China ACP population. The pairwise Nm values between the 4 populations were >1, suggesting a high level of gene flow between the pair-member populations. The highest Nm value was found between East China and South China, while the values between Southwest China and the other 3 populations were relatively low (Table 3), suggesting limited gene flow exchange.

Table 3.

Pairwise Fst (lower left) and gene flow (Nm) (upper right) among different geographic populations of ACP based on mitochondrial COI gene

Geographic population East China South China Central China Southwest China
East China 101.29 6.15 1.11
South China 0.002 7.99 1.21
Central China 0.039 0.030 1.10
Southwest China 0.183 0.172 0.185

The overall nonhierarchical AMOVA test based on all the samples revealed the genetic structure of the populations. AMOVA analysis showed that 16.77% of the genetic variation occurred among populations, with the remaining 83.23% originating from within populations. Genetic variation occurred mainly within the population (Table 4).

Table 4.

AMOVA for entire ACP samples

Source of variation df Sum of squares Variance components Percentage of variation
Among populations 3 22.404 0.045* 16.77
Within populations 717 158.581 0.221* 83.23
Fixation index 0.168 P = 0.000

*Extremely significant difference (P < 0.01).

Demographic History

The neutral test of East China, South China, and the entire sample population showed significantly negative values for Tajima’s D, Fu and Li’s D, and Fu and Li’s F, and reached a significant level (Table 5), indicating that these populations departed from neutral mutation and experienced recent demographic expansion. Furthermore, the mismatch distribution of these 2 populations showed a unimodal profile (Fig. 4), also suggesting that both of the ACP populations may have undergone sudden demographic expansion, and the r values are small but SSD values are nonsignificant, both of these were in agreement with the results of neutral tests. The neutral test of the populations from Central China and Southwest China also showed negative values but did not reach a significant level.

Table 5.

Neutrality test and mismatch distribution analysis of D. citri populations

Populations Neutrality test Mismatch distribution analysis
Tajima’D Fu & Li’s D Fu & Li’s F SSD r
East China −2.053* −4.120** −4.031** 0.000 0.561
South China −2.126** −3.398** −3.510** 0.000 0.391
Central China −1.105 −0.627 −0.916 0.002 0.403
Southwest China −0.273 −2.283 −1.876 0.032 0.148
All −2.124** −5.564** −4.991** 0.004 0.247

Tajima’s D, Fu & Li’s D, and Fu & Li’s F: different methods of neutral test.

SSD: sum of the squared deviations.

r: raggedness index.

*Significant difference (P < 0.05),

**extremely significant difference (P < 0.01).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Mismatch distribution of CO1 genes of ACP populations: a) population from East China; b) population from South China; c) population of entire samples.

Discussion

Genetic Diversity

Herein, we present a systematic analysis of the ACP population diversity and structure based on the mitochondrial COI gene in China. Specifically, low haplotype diversity and nucleotide diversity were observed in the entire population, implying the population have experienced a recent population bottleneck or founder effect. The findings are consistent with a previous study (Zhang et al. 2019). While, in the previous study, small sample sizes at most of the sampling sites could result in the low diversity observed. In our study, the datasets comprised 721 samples, with 570 samples were collected from 19 locations, each of which contained no less than 30 samples from different orchards. The other 151 sample sequences were selectively downloaded from NCBI. The dataset from each site was carefully controlled to ensure statistical significance. The identical outcomes provide further confirmation of the low haplotype and nucleotide diversity of the ACP population in China based on the COI gene marker.

Phylogenetic and haplotype network analyses suggested the presence of 2 haplogroups: Haplogroup I and Haplogroup II in China. Haplogroup II included only 2 haplotypes; Hap 12 and Hap 23, which were exclusively found in the Southwest population. The analysis of genetic differentiation revealed a significant divergence between the Southwest ACP population and those from East, South, and Central China. These findings are in agreement with previously reported results that obtained with the use of COI gene markers or primary endosymbiont Wang et al. 2017, 2018, Zhang et al. 2019). Based on these results, it has been recommended that 2 introduction events occurred in China, one in Guangdong and the other in Yunnan (Zhang et al. 2019). Although unique haplotypes were identified in the Southwest China population in this or previous studies, Hap 1 was the dominant haplotype in Southwest China population as well as in other populations. Based on the haplotype network, Hap12 and Hap 23, the unique haplotypes identified in Southwest population were also from Hap 1 through several mutation steps, and their parental haplotypes were from the haplogroup I. Combining the gradually reported ACP occurrence history in citrus-growing provinces in China, the hypothesis that ACP entering China was a single introduction event cannot be completely ruled out.

It is worth noting that the ACP population from YNXS was solely consisted by the haplotype Hap12 and was completely distinct from the population composition in other sampling locations. This indicated severe population differentiation in this location. Similar results were also observed by Wu et al. (2018) based on the whole mitochondrial genome sequences, and they found that the analyzed ACP mitogenomes formed 3 major mitochondrial groups, MG1 group solely occurred in Southwest China. Potential explanations could be linked to limited migration ability of ACP, geographical isolation, and local environmental factors. The analysis of gene flow provides partial support for the aforementioned explanation, indicating a relative low gene flow between the Southwest ACP population and other 3 populations. Owing to the unique geographical and environmental factors in the southwestern region of China, such as the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, with elevations between 1,000 and 1,500 m, a unique meteorological environment, and with high biodiversity (Yang et al. 2015), the rapid expansion of psyllids after their introduction required adaptation to local environmental conditions, resulting in some unique mutations.

Demographic History

The entire ACP sample had significantly negative values for neutrality tests and unimodal mismatch distribution, both of these revealed historical population expansion. The population expansion may be influenced by 2 key factors: the expanding of citrus planting area (Meng et al. 2018) and living environment (Yang et al. 2006, Russell et al. 2014, Boina and Bloomquist 2015). China’s citrus planting area has increased from 640 km2 in 1980 to 5,668.07 km2 in 2019, the rapid expansion of citrus planting led to population expansion of ACP. In addition, higher temperatures and increased precipitation also provided suitable living conditions for ACP (Liu et al. 2016). Thus, expanding host cultivation areas and suitable living environment may positively relate with demographic population expansion of ACP.

Acknowledgments

Thanks for the support from the National Scholarship Council of China.

Contributor Information

Aijun Huang, College of Life Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China; National Navel Orange Engineering Research Center, Ganzhou 341000, China.

Jiayu Ma, College of Life Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China.

Jin Yang, College of Life Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China.

Bo Chen, College of Life Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China.

Jun Zhou, College of Life Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China; National Navel Orange Engineering Research Center, Ganzhou 341000, China.

Long Yi, College of Life Science, Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou 341000, China; National Navel Orange Engineering Research Center, Ganzhou 341000, China.

Funding

This work was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2021YFD1400805), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32160625), and the Jiangxi Province Talent Science and Technology Project (20225BCJ22005).

Author Contributions

Aijun Huang (Conceptualization [Equal], Formal analysis [Equal], Methodology [Equal], Software [Equal], Validation [Equal], Writing—original draft [Equal], Writing—review & editing [Equal]), Jiayu Ma (Conceptualization [Equal], Data curation [Equal], Formal analysis [Equal], Methodology [Equal], Software [Equal], Validation [Equal], Writing—original draft [Equal]), Jin Yang (Software [Equal], Validation [Equal]), Bo Chen (Data curation [Equal], Formal analysis [Equal], Project administration [Equal]), Jun Zhou (Project administration [Equal], Writing—review & editing [Equal]), and Long Yi (Conceptualization [Equal], Funding acquisition [Equal], Project administration [Equal])

Data Availability

All data are presented in the manuscript.

References

  1. Boina DR, Bloomquist JR.. Chemical control of the Asian citrus psyllid and of huanglongbing disease in citrus. Pest Manag Sci. 2015:71(6):808–823. 10.1002/ps.3957 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brown WM, George M, Wilson AC.. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979:76(4):1967–1971. 10.1073/pnas.76.4.1967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA.. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol. 2000:9(10):1657–1659. 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. da Graça JV, Douhan GW, Halber SE, Keremane ML, Lee RF, Vidalakis G, Zhao HW.. Huanglongbing: an overview of a complex pathosystem ravaging the world’s citrus. J Integr Plant Biol. 2016:58:373–387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Deutsch CA, Tewksbury JJ, Tigchelaar M, Battisti DS, Merrill SC, Huey RB, Naylor RL.. Increase in crop losses to insect pests in a warming climate. Science (New York, N.Y.). 2018:361(6405):916–919. 10.1126/science.aat3466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Excoffier L, Lischer HE.. Arlequin suite ver 35: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010:10(3):564–567. 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fu YX. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997:147(2):915–925. 10.1093/genetics/147.2.915 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grafton-Cardwell EE, Stelinski LL, Stansly PA.. Biology and management of Asian citrus psyllid, vector of the Huanglongbing pathogens. Annu Rev Entomol. 2013:58:413–432. 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Grant W, Bowen B.. Shallow population histories in deep evolutionary lineages of marine fishes: insights from sardines and anchovies and lessons for conservation. J Hered. 1998:89:415–426. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hoffmann WE. Diaphorina citri kuwamaya (Homoptera: Chermidae), a citrus pest in Kwangtung. Lingnan Sci J. 1936:15:127–132. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hollis D. A new citrus-feeding psyllid from the Comoro islands, with a review of the Diaphorina amoena species group (Homoptera). Syst Entomol. 1987:12(1):47–61. 10.1111/j.1365-3113.1987.tb00547.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang BK. Preliminary observations on citrus psylla, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Homoptera: Psyllidae). J Fujian Agric Coll. 1953:1:7–20. [Google Scholar]
  13. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K.. Mega X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018:35(6):1547–1549. 10.1093/molbev/msy096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kuwayama S. Die psylliden Japans. Trans Sopporo Nat Hist Soc. 1908:2:149–189. [Google Scholar]
  15. Leigh JW, Bryant D.. PopART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol. 2015:6(9):1110–1116. 10.1111/2041-210x.12410 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Librado P, Rozas J.. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009:25(11):1451–1452. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Liu Q, Fu YH, Zeng Z, Huang M, Li X, Piao S.. Temperature, precipitation, and insolation effects on autumn vegetation phenology in temperate China. Global Change Biol. 2016:22(2):644–655. 10.1111/gcb.13081 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Meng L, Wang Y, Wei WH, Zhang H.. Population genetic structure of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Liviidae): host-driven genetic differentiation in China. Sci Rep. 2018:8(1):1473. 10.1038/s41598-018-19533-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Merrill RM, Gutiérrez D, Lewis OT, Gutiérrez J, Díez SB, Wilson RJ.. Combined effects of climate and biotic interactions on the elevational range of a phytophagous insect. J Anim Ecol. 2008:77(1):145–155. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01303.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Oines O, Brannstrom S.. Molecular investigations of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) in the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae, in northern Europe and implications for its transmission between laying poultry farms. Med Vet Entomol. 2011:25(4):402–412. 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2011.00958.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Porretta D, Canestrell D, Bellin T, Celli G, Urbanelli S.. Improving insect pest management through population genetic data: a case study of the mosquito Ochlerotatus caspius (Pallas). J Appl Ecol. 2007:44:682–691. [Google Scholar]
  22. Russell D, Qureshi J, Halbert S, Stansly P.. Host suitability of citrus and zanthoxylum spp. for leuronota fagarae burckhardt and Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psylloidae). Fla Entomol. 2014:97:1481–1492. [Google Scholar]
  23. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989:123(3):585–595. 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Urbanelli S, Belllini R, Carrieri M, Sallicandro P, Celli G.. Population structure of Aede albopictus (Skuse): the mosquito which is colonizing Mediterranean countries. J Hered. 2000:84:331–337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang SQ, Xiao YL, Zhang HY.. Studies of the past, current and future potential distribution of Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Homoptera: Psyllidae) in China. Chin J Appl Entomol. 2015:52:1140–1148. [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang XL, Li XN, Feng XD, Wu LF.. Investigation on the Asian citrus psyllid (Diaphorina citri Kuwayama) and huanglongbing disease in China. Plant Quarantine. 2016:30:419–435. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang Y, Lu J, Beattie GAC, Islam M, Om N, Dao HT, Nguyen LV, Zaka SM, Guo J, Tian M, et al. Phylogeography of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) and its primary endosymbiont, ‘Candidatus Carsonella ruddii’: an evolutionary approach to host endosymbiont interaction. Pest Manag Sci. 2018:74:2185–2194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Wang Y, Xu C, Tian M, Deng X, Cen Y, He Y.. Genetic diversity of Diaphorina citri and its endosymbionts across East and Southeast Asia. Pest Manag Sci. 2017:73(10):2090–2099. 10.1002/ps.4582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Weill M, Chendre F, Brengues C, Manguin S, Akogbeto M, Pasteur N, Gullet P, Raymond M.. The kdr mutation occurs in the Mopti form of Anopheles gambiae s.s. through introgression. Insect Mol Biol. 2000:9(5):451–455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Wu F, Jiang H, Beattie GAC, Holford P, Chen J, Wallis CM, Zheng Z, Deng X, Cen Y.. Population diversity of Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) in China based on whole mitochondrial genome sequence. Pest Manag Sci. 2018:74(11):2569–2577. 10.1002/ps.5044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu Y, Li J, Liu H, Qiao G, Huang X.. Investigating the impact of climate warming on phenology of aphid pests in china using long-term historical data. Insects. 2020:11(3):167. 10.3390/insects11030167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Yang X, Li H, Liang M, Xu Q, Chai L, Deng X.. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships of citron (Citrus medica L) and its relatives in southwest China. Tree Genet Genomes. 2015:11(6):129. 10.1007/s11295-015-0955-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang Y, Huang M, Beattie GAC, Xia Y, Ouyang G, Xiong J.. Distribution, biology, ecology and control of the psyllid Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, a major pest of citrus: a status report for China. Int J Pest Manage. 2006:52:343–352. [Google Scholar]
  34. Yao WS. Brief introduction of huanglongbing in Yunan, Guizhou, Sichuan, Hunan, and Jiangxi province. Plant Prot. 1985:2:47–48. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang C, Xiong X, Liu X, Zou Z, Xin T, Wang J, Xia B.. Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Psylloidae) in China: two invasion routes and three transmission paths. J Econ Entomol. 2019:112:1418–1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhou CY. The status of citrus Huanglongbing in China. Trop Plant Pathol. 2020:45:279–284. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in the manuscript.


Articles from Journal of Insect Science are provided here courtesy of University of Wisconsin Libraries

RESOURCES