Abstract
Hookah, or waterpipe, is a tobacco smoking device that has gained popularity in the United States. A growing body of evidence demonstrates that waterpipe smoke (WPS) is associated with various adverse effects on human health, including infectious diseases, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), particularly thrombotic events. However, the molecular mechanisms through which WPS contributes to disease development remain unclear. In this study, we utilized an analytical approach based on the Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) to integrate chemical, gene, phenotype, and disease data to predict potential molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of WPS, based on its chemical and toxicant profile. Our analysis revealed that CVDs were among the top disease categories with regard to the number of curated interactions with WPS chemicals. We identified 5674 genes common between those modulated by WPS chemicals and traditional tobacco smoking. The CVDs with the most curated interactions with WPS chemicals were hypertension, atherosclerosis, and myocardial infarction, whereas “particulate matter”, “heavy metals”, and “nicotine” showed the highest number of curated interactions with CVDs. Our analysis predicted that the potential mechanisms underlying WPS-induced thrombotic diseases involve common phenotypes, such as inflammation, apoptosis, and cell proliferation, which are shared across all thrombotic diseases and the three aforementioned chemicals. In terms of enriched signaling pathways, we identified several, including chemokine and MAPK signaling, with particulate matter exhibiting the most statistically significant association with all 12 significant signaling pathways related to WPS chemicals. Collectively, our predictive comprehensive analysis provides evidence that WPS negatively impacts health and offers insights into the potential mechanisms through which it exerts these effects. This information should guide further research to explore and better understand the WPS and other tobacco product-related health consequences.
1. Introduction
Hookah/waterpipe is a traditional tobacco smoking device that has gained popularity in the United States. Current reports in the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study shows that waterpipe use among adults increased by 5.2 % between wave 1 (2013) and wave 5 (2019) with more use among males in comparison to females [1]. The use of waterpipes was not restricted to adults, as younger generations, mainly middle and high school students are also users of waterpipes, which is very concerning and may point toward a public health crisis in the future as a result of the consumption of these products at such a young age [2]. Notably, the popularity of waterpipes is mainly tied to the perception that they provide a “safer” alternative to traditional cigarettes, aside from the availability of different flavors [3].
There is a growing body of evidence showing that waterpipe usage and waterpipe smoke (WPS) is associated with a wide variety of negative effects on human health. For instance, WPS is linked to infectious diseases transmission [4], deterioration of pulmonary function and inflammation [5,6], cancer [7], tobacco dependence [8], epigenetic dysregulation [9] and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) [10], especially thrombotic events [11]. Furthermore, other studies showed an increase in biomarkers of coagulation, such as fibrinogen [12]. We and others have previously reviewed some of these negative health effects [13,14]. Thus, studies provided ample evidence – some of which was supported by animal studies – that exposure to WPS is linked to the development of disease states [15–17]. WPS systemic and widespread impact on human health is not surprising, given the fact that it carries a substantial toxic profile that was, interestingly, described to exceed that of traditional cigarettes [18–20]. Furthermore, reports have indicated that WPS has substantially more hazardous puffing topography compared to traditional cigarette smoking, which needs to be taken into consideration when evaluating the health effects of WPS [21]. Nonetheless, and despite accumulating evidence regarding its negative health effects, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind WPS-induced disease states remains poor, but will be the main focus of this study.
Due to the advancement of technology, data storage, and increasing efforts in research, much data has been accumulated over the years that can help understand and study the mechanisms of diseases and chemical effects on the human body. Some of these resources are publicly available and considered reliable and helpful sources of information. Using this accumulated data not only reduces the cost of research but also provides a more systematic investigative approach as those resources accumulated a large amount of data that can help reflect a general overview of the studied subject area [22].
The CTD (Comparative Toxicogenomics Database) is an exceptional resource that offers valuable information on the complex interplay between environmental chemicals, genes, phenotypes, and diseases. This carefully curated database, built upon the dedicated efforts of scientists and researchers, serves as a powerful tool for academics, industry professionals, and health experts alike [23]. To predict the potential molecular mechanisms and phenotypes that drive disease states in the context of exposure to WPS chemicals, we used CTD to determine the molecular mechanisms underlying chemically-influenced diseases. In the present study, we showed that CVDs have the second highest number of curated interactions in relation to WPS’s toxic profile. Among all CVDs, we focused on those that are thrombosis-based, and hypothesized that the WPS’s chemical profile will have a distinct molecular signature/impact that leads to thrombotic CVDs. Our analysis specifically investigated the gene interactions, phenotypes, pathways, and disease associations of chemicals generated by waterpipes (WPS). Indeed, our approach predicted that WPS can potentially cause a number of diseases, including thrombotic CVDs, through common and unique phenotypes and signaling pathways, through the impact of these chemicals on certain genes. Our data should help inform therapeutic guidelines and prevention efforts aimed at reducing the public health burden related to WPS.
2. Methods
2.1. Data
2.1.1. Database
The public Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD) [24] provides a collection of manually curated and predicted information related to chemical-gene, disease-gene, and chemical-disease associations. Accessed in March 2022.
2.2. Data summarization
WPS chemicals profile was extracted from literature that investigated WPS mainstream emission [25–28] (see the list of all chemicals in Supplemental Table 2). WPS chemicals were then categorized into ten groups, namely: “carbon monoxide”, “heavy metals”, “nicotine”, “nitrogen dioxide”, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons “PAHs”, “particulate matter”, “phenolic compound”, “reactive oxygen species”, Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines “TSNAs”, and Volatile organic compounds “VOC”, and curated disease association of these chemicals was queried from the CTD. These data were then merged in a table using the chemical categories, summarized by calculating the number of curated interactions and visualized in order through bar graphs. When data
| (1) |
| (2) |
about the organism was provided, only human data was used for the analysis. Furthermore, given our interest and focus on CVDs, they were combined in a separate table and more details included. Finally, the data of affected pathways were downloaded from CTD, and important pathways were identified and ranked based on their statistical significance.
2.3. Chemical-Disease-Phenotype Gene overlap Triad (CDPGT overlap)
2.3.1. Data acquisition automation
In-house python script was written to automate data acquisition/download from the CTD database using Pandas read_csv command with URL. The Query URL template was http://ctdbase.org/tools/batchQuery.go?inputType={}&inputTerms={}&report={}&format=tsv where inputType took was either “chem” for chemical or “disease”, and inputTerms in [“phenotype curated”, “genes curated”] (Table 1).
Table 1.
CTD URL queiy terms.
| Data item | inputType | inputTerms | report |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chemical phenotype | chem | Chemical name | phenotype curated |
| Disease genes | disease | Disease name | genes curated |
| Chemical disease | chem | Chemical name | disease curated |
| Chemical genes | chem | Chemical name | genes curated |
2.3.2. Network building
Four queries were automatically submitted to the CTD database to acquire the data required to build a network consisting of the following: one disease node, one chemical node and multiple phenotype nodes (Fig. 1). Edges were inserted between Disease–Chemical, Disease–Phenotype and Chemical–Phenotype. The weights of these edges had two values, the Jaccard similarity coefficient score [29] (Eq. (1)) and the overlap coefficients [30] (Eq. (2)) of the genes in both nodes. Interaction triads were prioritized first by minimum value of Jaccard similarity of the three edges (the minimum value reflects the overall similarity between the genes of all the three nodes), but when Jaccards similarities are equal, overlap coefficient score were used next. Only the top ten interactions were selected for further downstream analysis and discussion.
Fig. 1.

Edges weight measured by two measurements, Jaccard similarity and Overlap index. Those weights coincide very well with the number of common genes between the nodes. This network prioritizes the Triads of (Disease, Chemical, Phenotype) by the value of the minimum Gene similarity Network GS = Gene Similarity.
2.4. Packages used
“Networkx” for network building and analysis, “seaborn” for visualization, “Pandas” for data retrieval and manipulation from CTD website (https://ctdbase.org/), “ggvenn” R pacakge and “matplotlib-venn” for venn diagram plotting.
3. Results
3.1. WPS chemical-disease association
Our primary analysis of the ten WPS chemical groups showed that they are linked to a total of 1653 curated disease associations in CTD, which were grouped into multiple categories with cancer and CVDs notably having the highest number of curated associations (Fig. 2). Our analysis showed that heavy metals have the highest total curated disease interactions (762), followed by particulate matter 151, volatile organic compounds 282, and nicotine (201). Interestingly, cancer was found to be the main category of diseases across all WPS chemicals with heavy metals having the highest number of curated interactions, followed by volatile organic compounds and TSNAs. Within cancer as a category, the main types were lung, breast, and stomach. Not surprisingly, carbon monoxide (CO) showed no interaction with cancer disease categories, which is consistent with the fact that CO has not been classified as a cancer causing substance. In fact, CO has been proposed as treatment for some types of cancer [31]. The second category of diseases that emerged as having “high” interaction with WPS chemicals was CVDs, with heavy metals and particulate matter having the highest curated interactions, followed by nicotine. Carbon monoxide was also represented in CVDs category. The third main category of diseases was mental disorders which showed highest curated interactions with heavy metals, followed by particulate matter, nicotine and reactive oxygen species. In terms of mental disorders themselves, cognition disorders, autism, and Alzheimer’s disease showed the highest curated interaction with the WPS chemicals. Other disease categories that were identified, include: nervous, respiratory, digestive, kidney, and genetic diseases (Fig. 2). All individual chemical-disease relationships are provided in the Supplemental Table 1.
Fig. 2.

The top 20 categories of diseases with direct relationships to chemicals in WPS; detailing the number of curated interactions in these categories and distribution by chemical, PAHs - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, TSNAs - Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines, VOC - Volatile organic compounds.
3.2. WPS impacted genes
Using WPS chemical categories as an input into the CTD, we determined that WPS chemicals are associated with 13,266 curated genes. In order to examine if there are common genes affected by both the WPS chemicals and those of traditional tobacco, the two were intersected. To this end, traditional tobacco genes were obtained from CTD by searching the term “Tobacco Smoke Pollution”, which revealed a list of 13,857 tobacco gene signatures. After intersecting both lists, there were 5674 genes common between both tobacco smoking and WPS chemicals (Fig. 3), which although might indicate shared/common impact, there is a possibility of differential impact as well, between tobacco and WPS.
Fig. 3.

Protein coding genes overlap between WPS chemicals and tobacco smoke.
3.3. Most common molecular pathways impacted by WPS chemicals
Our analysis showed that there were 12 signaling pathways that were shown to be significant in relation to WPS chemicals, and are possibly involved in WPS-induced disease development. Among those signaling pathways, we found the chemokine signaling, MAPK signaling, and Rabl signaling pathways, which all are important in inducing CVDs [32–34]. These data also show that across all enriched pathways, particulate matter has the most statistical significance in comparison to other WPS chemicals (Fig. 4).
Fig. 4.

Most common molecular signaling pathways impacted by WPS chemicals.
3.4. Cardiovascular disease association of WPS chemicals
Cardiovascular diseases, the number one killer in the United States, were the second most common adverse outcomes category based on the number of curated interactions (226) to WPS chemicals. Thus, and given our interest in this area, we examined thrombotic CVDs to compute potential impacted genes and biological mechanisms to provide new insight to bridge the gap between WPS chemical exposure and cardiovascular outcomes. According to our analysis, the highest number of chemical-disease relationships in this category is attributed to heavy metals and particulate matter, followed by nicotine. Among the top CVDs with the highest number of curated interactions, are hypertension, atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and heart failure (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.

Top 10 CVDs with the highest curated interactions with WPS chemicals. PAHs - Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, TSNAs - Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines, VOC - Volatile organic compounds.
Next, we sought to understand the main pathological phenotype related to exposure to WPS chemicals that might participate in producing CVDs. Our results show that across all WPS chemicals, oxidative stress was the most prominent pathological process, followed by apoptotic process, cell proliferation, and lipid catabolic process (Fig. 6). Within the oxidative stress processes, reactive oxygen species and particulate matter had the most curated interactions, followed by heavy metals. It is worth mentioning herein that oxidative stress is among the main pathological processes that are known to instigate thrombotic CVDs [35,36].
Fig. 6.

The number of curated phenotype interactions related to WPS chemicals.
3.5. Predicting the mechanistic pathways for WPS-induced thrombosis-based cardiovascular diseases
In order to understand the mechanism(s) of the deleterious effects of WPS chemicals on the cardiovascular system, we created a network using CTD curated content. We mainly focused on chemicals that had the highest curated interaction in terms of association with CVDs, namely “particulate matter”, “heavy metals” and “nicotine”, and we selected thrombotic CVDs, namely “myocardial infarction/MI”, “stroke”, and “pulmonary embolism/PE” as the main thrombotic events that are linked to WPS chemicals.
Overall, our data show that there were eight phenotypes that are shared between all of the three chemical across the three thrombotic conditions (Fig. 7A). These eight phenotypes were mainly related to inflammation (“GO:0006954”), apoptosis (“GO:0006915”), cell proliferation (“GO:0008284”), and response to hypoxia (e.g.GO:0001666). There were also several themes of phenotypes that emerged, and that are exclusive to each of the thrombotic diseases. For instance, MI was associated with 6 phenotypes, including oxidative stress (“GO:0006979”), cellular response to DNA damage (“GO:0006974”), and regulation of transcription (“GO:0006355”) (Fig. 7A). We also observed that stroke was tied to nine exclusive phenotypes, including regulation of blood pressure (“GO:0008217”), cellular calcium ion homeostasis (‘GO:0006874’), and brain development (“GO:0007420”) (Fig. 7A). Finally, we observed exclusive phenotypes that are associated with PE and those are chemotaxis (“GO:0006935”), platelet activation (“GO:0008233”), hydrogen peroxide catabolic process (“GO:0042744”), and positive regulation of vasoconstriction (“GO:0045907”).
Fig. 7.

(A) Common phenotypes between myocardial infarction, stroke and pulmonary embolism across the three common WPS chemicals. (B, C & D) Number of overlapped and distinctive phenotypes for each chemical. MI - myocardial infarction, PE - pulmonary embolism.
On an individual level of WPS chemicals, our network analysis showed that nicotine is predicted to cause thrombotic CVDs by impacting many genes. Based on our “gene similarity” ranking criteria, 44 genes were shown to be important in producing two patterns of phenotypes (Fig. 7B). First, three common phenotypes that pertain to inflammatory response (“GO:0006954”), response to hypoxia (“GO:0001666”) and positive cell proliferation (“GO:0008284”). The second pattern of phenotypes produced by nicotine was found to be distinctive to each thrombotic disease (see Fig. 4), for example nicotine impacts regulation of the blood pressure phenotype (“GO:0008217”) was distinctive to stroke, whereas oxidative stress (“GO:0006979”) and positive regulation of vasoconstriction (“GO:0045907”) were unique to MI and PE, respectively.
Concerning the involvement of particulate matter as part of WPS chemicals induced-CVDs, 79 genes emerged based on our similarity ranking criteria. These genes were linked to four common phenotypes namely, inflammation (“GO:000695”), response to hypoxia (“GO:0001666”), positive regulation of cell migration (“GO:0030335”), and protein binding (GO:0005515). We were able to predicate a unique effect of particulate matter on the three tested thrombotic diseases. For instance, particulate matter was related to oxidative stress (“GO:0006979”) and angiogenesis (“GO:0001525”) in myocardial infarction, MAPK cascade (“GO:0000165”), brain develop-ment (“GO:0007420”), and cellular calcium ion homeostasis (“GO:0006874”) in stroke, and positive regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic process (“GO:2000379”), peptidase activity (“GO:0008233”), and platelet activation (“GO:0030168”) in PE (Fig. 8).
Fig. 8.

Overview of the effects on genes and pathways exerted by the three selected chemicals on the three selected diseases (MI, stroke and PE). For the full network, check Supplemental file 3.
As for heavy metals, there were 73 genes involved and they revealed a common phenotype related to inflammation, apoptosis, and response to hypoxia across thrombotic diseases. The phenotype related to regulation of response to oxidative stress (“GO:0006979”) was unique in relation to heavy metals in MI. Moreover, heavy metals and stroke showed a unique phenotype related to regulation of blood pressure (“GO:0008217”) and immune response (“GO:0006955”). Finally, PE and heavy metals had a phenotype related to angiogenesis (“GO:0001525”) and platelet activation (“GO:0008233”) among others (Fig. 8). collectively, these data suggest that WPS chemicals participate in producing thrombotic CVDs through general effects as well as specific and targeted impact.
4. Discussion
In this study, we utilized the CTD database to predict the disease associations of WPS chemicals and the underlying molecular pathways that potentially drive such diseases in the context of thrombotic CVDs. There were ten chemical categories that included 58 chemicals detected in WPS, and which we used in this analysis. These chemicals were analyzed for their curated disease association, interacting genes, phenotypes, and signaling pathways. The top disease categories that were found to associate with these chemicals in CTD were cancer, CVDs, nervous system diseases, mental disorders, digestive diseases, and respiratory diseases. In agreement with our analysis, studies have indicated that WPS is linked to cancer [37], high blood pressure [38], myocardial infarction, coronary diseases [39,40], and neurological diseases [41]. It is important to note that the capacity of WPS to cause pathological conditions is also supported by a number of well-designed animal studies. For example, we and others have shown that acute exposure to WPS increases the risk of thrombosis, in mice, through enhancing platelet function [42,43]. Furthermore, WPS has been shown to increase bronchial apoptosis, which can potentially cause COPD and lung emphysema, in addition to its ability to cause direct lung injury [17,44]. Other studies have shown that WPS can cause cardiac dysfunction [45], memory impairment [46] and metabolic syndrome [47]. Therefore, it’s clear that the results from our predictive analysis- which is based on the chemical profile of WPS- not only align with the experimental data but also add further insight into the effects of WPS.
Importantly, further analysis showed that the main WPS chemicals exhibiting the highest curated interaction with diseases are heavy metals, particulate matter and nicotine. These chemicals are known for their toxicity and ability to induce disease states, including CVDs [48–50]. For instance, studies have shown that the accumulation of heavy metals is detrimental to health [51]. Cadmium -one of WPS’s main heavy metals [52,53]- is known to accumulate significantly in the tobacco plant [54], and its cadmium oxide form, which is generated during tobacco smoking, can deposit locally or get absorbed into the general circulation where it interacts directly with blood content and vessels [54]. As a consequence, cadmium concentrations in the blood can be up to five times higher in tobacco smokers, compared to non-smokers [55,56]; and is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality [57]. Similarly, other heavy metals that are also part of WPS chemical profile, such as copper and zinc were found to induce oxidative stress and apoptosis, due to their ability to accumulate intracellularly [58,59]; which can contribute to the development of disease states.
As for particulate matter, which is a mixture of liquid and solid particles of different sizes and shapes, it has been associated with negative health outcomes, especially cardiopulmonary diseases [60]. In fact, studies have shown that particulate matter of smaller size, namely ultra-fine particles can penetrate deeper and hence produce more severe negative health effects [61]. While the mechanism of particulate matter-induced disease is not well understood, inflammation and oxidative stress were proposed as the main underlying processes [62].
Apart from its addictive properties, nicotine is known to associate with other serious health effects that impact the cardiopulmonary, reproductive and urinary systems. Furthermore, studies have shown that nicotine could be a potential carcinogen, in both humans and animals [63,64]. As a major tobacco constituent, nicotine appears to play a critical role in increasing the risk of acute coronary diseases and other thrombotic cardiovascular events, such as MI and stroke. These effects of nicotine are thought to be linked mechanistically to sympathetic stimulation and the development of atherosclerosis. Nevertheless, there is still no clear mechanism as to how nicotine induces CVDs.
Another important finding from our study is that although we were able to show an overlap between the WPS chemicals curated genes and tobacco smoke curated genes, it appears that differential effects do exist between the two, which might lead to different diseases or variations in the severity of the development of pathological conditions. This line of thinking might be supported by the notion that while WPS and cigarettes have similarities, there are differences in their chemical profiles. For example, studies have shown that in a single WPS session, one can be exposed to nine times the carbon monoxide and close to 2 times the nicotine, relative to a single cigarette [65]. It also reported that a typical waterpipe session involves inhaling smoke volume equivalent to up to 160 cigarettes [66].
Previous reports have shown that WPS is involved in multiple signaling pathways that are linked to disease states including TNF-α/NFκB [67,68]. To this end, our analysis revealed the enrichment of signaling pathways, such as MAPK, cytokines, and the PI3K-Akt. Of note, previous studies have shown that these pathways are involved in a host of disease conditions, including, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, and CVDs [69–73]. There were separate pathways that were also identified, such as the FoxO singling pathway that regulates apoptosis, cell-cycle control, glucose metabolism, and oxidative stress [74]. Interestingly, particulate matter has shown the highest statistical significance with these pathways according to the CTD. Thus clearly, more attention needs to be paid to the WPS produced particulate matter, and how it participates in causing disease states.
In terms of the mechanism of WPS-induced thrombotic CVDs, there is currently a gap in this regard. To address this issue, we sought to integrate the data obtained from CTD to build a network to predicate the underlying molecular mechanism, including identifying genes and phenotypes that are predicted to contribute to the pathogenesis of thrombotic diseases. Using two gene similarity criteria, we were able to show that thrombotic diseases such as MI, stroke, and PE are made of different phenotypes. These phenotypes are the result of potential interactions between the genes and the environmental exposure; the WPS chemicals in this case. As per the CTD’s creators [75], the phenotypes are differentiated from the actual diseases and are considered pre-disease states, and therefore, multiple phenotypes can be involved in producing one disease.
To that end, we were able to demonstrate that common WPS chemicals such as nicotine, particulate matter, and heavy metals (showed high curated interaction with CVDs) can produce general phenotypes across the three different thrombotic diseases. Consequently, our analysis highlights the role of phenotypes such as inflammation and apoptosis as main drivers of thrombotic diseases in the context of WPS chemicals. As such and importantly, the interplay between inflammation and thrombosis is known to be important in the development of CVDs [76]. Moreover, studies have shown that smoking is responsible for the oxidation and inflammation that impacts arteries and increases the risk of thrombosis [77]. Similarly, apoptotic processes were shown to be involved in the creation of conditions that favor thrombosis, and have established roles in CVDs. For example, it was found that apoptotic endothelial cells may initiate plaque erosion and enhance platelet aggregation and thrombosis in vivo, and therefore can lead to acute ischaemic events [78]. This comprehensive view of the intertwined relationship between thrombosis and other processes, such as inflammation and apoptosis should help not only in better understanding thrombotic diseases in the context of WPS chemicals but also informing (new) treatment strategies that target these processes and yield better outcomes [76,79,80].
When data were analyzed based on individual WPS chemicals, similar patterns were observed; for example, nicotine showed phenotypes that are driving inflammation, response to hypoxia, and cell proliferation. These patterns are consistent with the current evidence that these phenotypes are indeed involved in the pathophysiology of thrombotic CVDs [81–88]. On the other hand, nicotine showed distinctive phenotype patterns that were specific to each one of the thrombotic diseases; for instance, regulation of blood pressure was specific to stroke; oxidative stress appeared only with MI; and positive regulation of vasoconstriction was exclusive for PE. Importantly, these predictions are consistent with studies that linked nicotine with these phenotypes. For example, it was shown that chronic nicotine inhalation can increase blood pressure [89] which is a high risk factor for stroke [90]. Similarly, data have shown that chronic exposure to nicotine can accelerate oxidative stress, which damages endothelial cells, which in turn increases MI size [91]. Interestingly, regarding PE, our analysis showed that nicotine is predicted to associate with positive regulation of the vasoconstriction phenotype, which was shown to play an important role in the pathophysiology of PE [92]; this is likely due to vasoactive mediators, released mainly by activated platelets [93].
Of the WPS chemical profile, particulate matter and heavy metals showed a similar trend, namely general phenotypes across the three thrombotic diseases, which was dominated mainly by the inflammatory phenotype. In addition, they also showed specific phenotypes related to MI, stroke, and PE. Thus and for example, particular matter showed enrichment of oxidative stress and angiogenesis in relation to MI. Interestingly, studies have shown that angiogenesis is promoted by oxidative stress, either directly or through the active oxidation of lipids [94]. Similarly, heavy metals showed enrichment of the oxidative stress phenotype in myocardial infarction, which seems to suggest similar mechanisms between both WPS chemicals. Not surprisingly, platelet activation, which is a major player in thrombus formation, especially in PE [95], was among the enriched phenotypes that linked particulate matter and heavy metals to the former. It is worth noting that smoking is associated with an elevated risk for PE [96]. Taken together, WPS chemicals, namely nicotine, particulate matter and heavy metals, are predicted to make major contributions to the pathogenesis of thrombotic CVDs, through a host of common as well as specific phenotypes. Furthermore, our findings provide new and important insight into WPS-induced CVDs.
5. Conclusion
In conclusion, utilizing the WPS chemical profile, we were able to make predictions regarding the negative health effects of waterpipes, in particular in the context of thrombosis-based CVDs. Furthermore, we were able to identify potential mechanisms by which some of the most important chemical constituents of WPS, namely nicotine, particulate matter and heavy metals, can participate in the genesis of thrombotic diseases, mainly through instigation of inflammatory phenotypes, and other disease specific phenotypes, such as oxidative stress, regulation of blood pressure and platelet activation. Our finding are also in agreement with other published work that investigated the harmful effect of WPS. Collectively, this study provides valuable insight to highlight the mechanism(s) behind smoke-related CVDs, and more importantly, to inform new treatment strategies that can yield better outcomes. We also hope that this study contributes to the growing body of evidence highlighting the potential adverse health effects of WPS chemicals on CVDs and other disease conditions. Finally, these findings underscore the need for greater public health efforts to raise awareness about the potential health risks associated with waterpipes/WPS and to develop effective prevention and intervention strategies to reduce WPS-related morbidity and mortality.
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121694.
Supplementary Material
Funding
Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, the National Heart, Lung, And Blood Institute and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development of the National Institutes of Health under Awards Number R21ES029345, R03ES030486, R56HL158730, R21HD105187, R21ES034512 and R01HL145053. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Footnotes
CRediT authorship contribution statement
AA, FA and FK: conceptualization of the manuscript; AA: drafted the manuscript; AA and AM: data extraction and analysis, draft editing, and interpretation of results; FA, FK, KM and ZB: manuscript editing, critical revision and results discussion. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Declaration of competing interest
The authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest and none was reported.
Data availability
We used a publicly available database. We are happy to share the code and any other information with other researchers who are interested.
References
- [1].Volodina OV, Formation of future teachers’ worldview culture by means of foreign-language education, in: P Sci Edu 57.3, July 2022, pp. 126–159. [Google Scholar]
- [2].Gentzke AS, Wang TW, Cornelius M, Tobacco product use and associated factors among middle and high school students - National Youth Tobacco Survey, United States, 2021, Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. Surveill. Summ 71 (5) (Mar. 2022) 1–29, 10.15585/mmwr.ss7105a1. ISSN: 1545-8636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Kuk AE, Bluestein MA, Chen B, et al. , The effect of perceptions of hookah harmfulness and addictiveness on the age of initiation of hookah use among population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) youth, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19 (9) (Apr. 2022) 5034, 10.3390/ijerph19095034. ISSN: 1660-4601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].Sinclair RG, Somsamouth K, Sahar D, Englert R, Singh P, Microbial contamination in the communal-use lao tobacco waterpipe, Int. Health 13 (4) (July 2021) 344–349, 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa078. ISSN: 1876–3405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Meo SA, AlShehri KA, AlHarbi BB, et al. , Effect of shisha (waterpipe) smoking on lung functions and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) among Saudi young adult shisha smokers, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 11 (9) (Sept. 2014) 9638–9648, 10.3390/ijerph110909638. ISSN: 1660–4601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Khabour OF, Alzoubi KH, Al-Sawalha N, et al. , The effect of chronic exposure to waterpipe tobacco smoke on airway inflammation in mice, Life Sci. 200 (May 2018) 110–114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Mamtani R, Cheema S, Sheikh J, Cancer risk in waterpipe smokers: a meta-analysis, Int. J. Public Health 62 (1) (Jan. 2017) 73–83, 10.1007/s00038-016-0856-2. ISSN: 1661-8564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].Al-Omoush TK, Alzoubi KH, Khabour OF, et al. , Polymorphism (rs16969968) and its association with waterpipe smoking addiction among jordanians, Arab. J. Basic Appl. Sci 27 (1) (2020) 450–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].Sabi SH, Khabour OF, Alzoubi KH, Cobb CO, Eissenberg T, Gene promoter induced by waterpipe smoking in blood lymphocytes and oral epithelial cells, Inhal. Toxicol 32 (3) (Feb. 2020) 124–130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].Alomari MA, Khabour OF, Alzoubi KH, Shqair DM, Eissenberg T, Central and peripheral cardiovascular changes immediately after waterpipe smoking, Inhal. Toxicol 26 (10) (Aug. 2014) 579–587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].Al-Amri A, Ghalilah K, Al-Harbi A, et al. , Waterpipe smoking and the risk of myocardial infarction: a hospital-based case-control study, Tob. Induc. Dis 17 (2019) 87, 10.18332/tid/114074. ISSN: 1617–9625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Muddathir ARM, Abd Alla MI, Khabour OF, Waterpipe smoking is associated with changes in fibrinogen, FVII, and FVIII levels, Acta Haematol. 140 (3) (Sept. 2018) 159–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [13].Qasim H, Alarabi AB, Alzoubi KH, et al. , The effects of hookah/waterpipe smoking on general health and the cardiovascular system, Environ. Health Prev. Med 24 (1) (Sept. 2019) 58, 10.1186/s12199-019-0811-y. ISSN: 1347–4715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].Kadhum M, Sweidan A, Jaffery AE, Al-Saadi A, Madden B, A review of the health effects of smoking shisha, Clin. Med. (Lond.) 15 (3) (June 2015) 263–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].Zaarour RF, Prasad P, Venkatesh GH, Waterpipe smoke condensate influences epithelial to mesenchymal transition and interferes with the cytotoxic immune response in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines, Oncol. Rep 45 (3) (Mar. 2021) 879–890, 10.3892/or.2021.7938. ISSN: 1791-2431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Alarabi AB, Karim ZA, Ramirez JEM, et al. , Short-term exposure to Waterpipe/Hookah smoke triggers a hyperactive platelet activation state and increases the risk of thrombogenesis, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 40 (2) (Feb. 2020) 335–349, 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.313435. ISSN: 1524–4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [17].Nemmar A, Al-Salam S, Beegam S, Yuvaraju P, Ali BH, Waterpipe smoke exposure triggers lung injury and functional decline in mice: protective effect of gum Arabic, Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev 2019 (Apr. 2019), 8526083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [18].Khabour OF, Alzoubi KH, Bani-Ahmad M, Acute exposure to waterpipe tobacco smoke induces changes in the oxidative and inflammatory markers in mouse lung, Inhal. Toxicol 24 (10) (Aug. 2012) 667–675, 10.3109/08958378.2012.710918. ISSN: 1091-7691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [19].Sepetdjian E, Shihadeh A, Saliba NA, Measurement of 16 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in narghile waterpipe tobacco smoke, Food Chem. Toxicol 46 (5) (May 2008) 1582–1590, 10.1016/j.fct.2007.12.028. ISSN: 0278–6915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [20].Primack BA, Carroll MV, Weiss PM, et al. , Systematic review and meta-analysis of inhaled toxicants from waterpipe and cigarette smoking, Public Health Rep. 131 (1) (Feb. 2016) 76–85, 10.1177/003335491613100114. ISSN: 1468–2877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [21].Cobb CO, Shihadeh A, Weaver MF, Eissenberg T, Waterpipe tobacco smoking and cigarette smoking: a direct comparison of toxicant exposure and subjective effects, Nicotine Tob. Res 13 (2) (Feb. 2011) 78–87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [22].Nicola G, Liu T, Gilson MK, Public domain databases for medicinal chemistry, ISSN: 0022–2623, 1520–4804, J. Med. Chem 55 (16) (Aug. 2012) 6987–7002, 10.1021/jm300501t. URL: 10.1021/jm300501t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [23].Davis AP, Wiegers TC, Johnson RJ, et al. , Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD): update 2023, Nucleic Acids Res. 51 (D1) (Jan. 2023) D1257–D1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [24].Davis AP, Grondin CJ, Johnson RJ, et al. , Comparative Toxicogenomics Database (CTD): update 2021, Nucleic Acids Res. 49 (D1) (Oct. 2020) D1138–D1143, 10.1093/nar/gkaa891. URL: doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [25].Monn C, Kindler P, Meile A, Brandli O, Ultrafine particle emissions from waterpipes, Tob. Control 16 (6) (Dec. 2007) 390–393, 10.1136/tc.2007.021097. ISSN: 1545-8636, 10.1136/tc.2007.021097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [26].Shihadeh A, Investigation of mainstream smoke aerosol of the argileh water pipe, URL, Food Chem. Toxicol 41 (1) (Jan. 2003) 143–152, 10.1016/S0278-6915(02)00220-X, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S027869150200220X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [27].Schubert J, Muller FD, Schmidt R, Luch A, Schulz TG, Waterpipe smoke: source of toxic¨ and carcinogenic VOCs, phenols and heavy metals?, URL, Arch. Toxicol 89 (11) (Nov. 2015) 2129–2139, 10.1007/s00204-014-1372-x, 10.1007/s00204-014-1372-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [28].Elsayed Y, Dalibalta S, Abu-Farha N, Chemical analysis and potential health risks of hookah charcoal, URL, Sci. Total Environ 569–570 (Nov. 2016) 262–268, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.108, https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0048969716312827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [29].Fuxman Bass JI, Diallo A, Nelson J, et al. , Using networks to measure similarity between genes: association index selection, Nat. Methods 10 (12) (Dec. 2013) 1169–1176, 10.1038/nmeth.2728. ISSN: 1548–7105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [30].Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL, Hierarchical organization of´ modularity in metabolic networks, Science (New York, N.Y.) 297 (5586) (Aug. 2002) 1551–1555, 10.1126/science.1073374. ISSN: 1095-9203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [31].Zhou Y, Yu W, Cao J, Gao H, Harnessing carbon monoxide-releasing platforms for cancer therapy, Biomaterials 255 (Oct. 2020), 120193, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120193. URL: doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [32].Muslin AJ, MAPK signalling in cardiovascular health and disease: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets, Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 115 (7) (Oct. 2008) 203–218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [33].Liu J, Zheng X, Wu X, The Rab GTPase in the heart: pivotal roles in development and disease, Life Sci. 306 (Oct. 2022), 120806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [34].Dusi V, Ghidoni A, Ravera A, De Ferrari GM, Calvillo L, Chemokines and heart disease: a network connecting cardiovascular biology to immune and autonomic nervous systems, Mediat. Inflamm 2016 (2016), 5902947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [35].Pashkow FJ, Oxidative stress and inflammation in heart disease: do antioxidants have a role in treatment and/or prevention? Int. J. Inflamm 2011 (2011), 514623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [36].Alarabi AB, Lozano PA, Khasawneh FT, Alshbool FZ, The effect of emerging tobacco related products and their toxic constituents on thrombosis, Life Sci. 290 (Feb. 2022), 120255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [37].Mamtani R, Cheema S, Sheikh J, et al. , Cancer risk in waterpipe smokers: a meta-analysis, Int. J. Public Health 62 (1) (July 2016) 73–83, 10.1007/s00038-016-0856-2. URL: doi: 10.1007/s00038-016-0856-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [38].Kadhum M, Jaffery A, Haq A, Bacon J, Madden B, Measuring the acute cardiovascular effects of shisha smoking: a cross-sectional study, JRSM Open 5 (6) (June 2014), 205427041453112, 10.1177/2054270414531127. URL: doi: 10.1177/2054270414531127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [39].Al-Amri A, Ghalilah K, Al-Harbi A, Waterpipe smoking and the risk of myocardial infarction: a hospital-based case-control study, Tob. Induc. Dis 17 (December) (Dec. 2019), 10.18332/tid/114074. URL: 10.18332/tid/114074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [40].Morovatdar N, Poorzand H, Bondarsahebi Y, et al. , Water pipe tobacco smoking and risk of coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. En, Curr. Mol. Pharmacol 14 (6) (2021) 986–992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [41].Liu Y, Li H, Wang J, et al. , Association of cigarette smoking with cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers of neurodegeneration, neuroinflammation, and oxidation, JAMA Netw. Open 3 (10) (Oct. 2020), e2018777, 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18777. URL: doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.18777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [42].Alarabi AB, Karim ZA, Ramirez JEM, et al. , Short-term exposure to waterpipe/hookah smoke triggers a hyperactive platelet activation state and increases the risk of thrombogenesis, Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol 40 (2) (Feb. 2020) 335–349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [43].Volodina OV, Formation of future teachers’ worldview culture by means of foreign-language education, in: P Sci Edu 57.3, July 2022, pp. 126–159. ISSN: 1095–9203, https://pnojournal.wordpress.com/2022/07/01/volodina-3/. [Google Scholar]
- [44].Bodas M, Van Westphal C, Carpenter-Thompson R, Mohanty DK, Vij N, Nicotine exposure induces bronchial epithelial cell apoptosis and senescence via ROS mediated autophagy-impairment, Free Radic. Biol. Med 97 (Aug. 2016) 441–453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [45].Nakhaee MR, Joukar S, Zolfaghari MR, Effects of endurance exercise training on cardiac dysfunction induced by waterpipe tobacco smoking, Addict. Health 11 (2) (July 2019), 10.22122/ahj.v11i2.234. URL: 10.22122/ahj.v11i2.234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [46].Alzoubi KH, Halboup AM, Alomari MA, Khabour OF, Swimming exercise protective effect on waterpipe tobacco smoking-induced impairment of memory and oxidative stress, Life Sci 239 (Dec. 2019), 117076, 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.117076. URL: doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.117076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [47].Al-Sawalha NA, Almahmmod Y, Awawdeh MS, Alzoubi KH, Khabour OF, Effect of waterpipe tobacco smoke exposure on the development of metabolic syndrome in adult male rats, URL: PLOS ONE 15 (6) (June 2020), e0234516 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234516 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0234516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [48].Mishra A, Chaturvedi P, Datta S, Harmful effects of nicotine, URL: Indian J. Med. Paediatr. Oncol 36 (01) (Jan. 2015) 24–31, https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.151771https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-5851.151771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [49].Pope III CA, Burnett RT, Krewski D, et al. , Cardiovascular mortality and exposure to airborne fine particulate matter and cigarette smoke: shape of the exposure-response relationship, Circulation 120 (11) (Sept. 2009) 941–948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [50].Lamas GA, Navas-Acien A, Mark DB, Lee KL, Heavy metals, cardiovascular disease, and the unexpected benefits of chelation therapy, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 67 (20) (May 2016) 2411–2418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [51].Jaishankar M, Tseten T, Anbalagan N, Mathew BB, Beeregowda KN, Toxicity, mechanism and health effects of some heavy metals, Interdiscip. Toxicol 7 (2) (June 2014) 60–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [52].Khabour OF, Alzoubi KH, Al-Sheyab NA, Plasma and saliva levels of three metals in waterpipe smokers: a case control study, Inhal. Toxicol 30 (6) (May 2018) 224–228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [53].Bao X, Asgari A, Najafi ML, et al. , Exposure to waterpipe smoke and blood heavy metal concentrations, Environ. Res 200 (Sept. 2021), 111460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [54].Satarug S, Moore MR, Adverse health effects of chronic exposure to low-level cadmium in foodstuffs and cigarette smoke, Environ. Health Perspect 112 (10) (July 2004) 1099–1103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [55].Nair AR, Degheselle O, Smeets K, Van Kerkhove E, Cuypers A, Cadmium-induced pathologies: where is the oxidative balance lost (or not)? Int. J. Mol. Sci 14 (3) (Mar. 2013) 6116–6143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [56].Barregard L, Fabricius-Lagging E, Lundh T, et al. , Cadmium, mercury, and lead in kidney cortex of living kidney donors: impact of different exposure sources, Environ. Res 110 (1) (Jan. 2010) 47–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [57].Tellez-Plaza M, Guallar E, Howard BV, Cadmium exposure and incident cardiovascular disease, Epidemiology 24 (3) (May 2013) 421–429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [58].Ajab H, Yasmeen S, Yaqub A, et al. , Evaluation of trace metals in tobacco of local and imported cigarette brands used in Pakistan by spectrophotometer through microwave digestion, J. Toxicol. Sci 33 (4) (Oct. 2008) 415–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [59].Santon A, Albergoni V, Sturniolo GC, Irato P, Evaluation of MT expression and detection of apoptotic cells in LEC rat kidneys, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1688 (3) (Apr. 2004) 223–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [60].Braun M, Koger F, Klingelhofer D, Müller R, Groneberg DA, Particulate matter emissions of¨ four different cigarette types of one popular brand: influence of tobacco strength and additives, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 (2) (Jan. 2019) 263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [61].Brown JS, Gordon T, Price O, Asgharian B, Thoracic and respirable particle definitions for human health risk assessment, Part. Fibre Toxicol 10 (1) (Apr. 2013) 12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [62].Schraufnagel DE, The health effects of ultrafine particles, Exp. Mol. Med 52 (3) (Mar. 2020) 311–317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [63].IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans, Tobacco smoke and involuntary smoking, IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum 83 (2004) 1–1438. ISSN: 1538–7933. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [64].Hoffmann D, Adams JD, Carcinogenic tobacco-specific N-nitrosamines in snuff and in the saliva of snuff dippers, Cancer Res. 41 (11 Pt 1) (Nov. 1981) 4305–4308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [65].Sweeney C, Xie W, Regan MM, et al. , Disease-free survival (DFS) as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) in localized prostate cancer (CaP), J. Clin. Oncol 34 (15 suppl) (May 2016), 5023–5023. [Google Scholar]
- [66].Cobb C, Ward KD, Maziak W, Shihadeh AL, Eissenberg T, Waterpipe tobacco smoking: an emerging health crisis in the United States, Am. J. Health Behav 34 (3) (May 2010) 275–285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [67].Xiong Y, Xi S, Gara SK, et al. , Hookah smoke mediates cancer-associated epigenomic and transcriptomic signatures in human respiratory epithelial cells, JTO Clin. Res. Rep 2 (7) (July 2021), 100181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [68].Hammad AM, Swiss GMS, Hall FS, et al. , B, Nrf2, and GLT-1, Neuroscience 463 (May 2021) 128–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [69].Kim EK, Choi E-J, Pathological roles of MAPK signaling pathways in human diseases, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1802 (4) (Apr. 2010) 396–405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [70].Fisk M, Gajendragadkar PR, Mäki-Petäjä KM, Wilkinson IB, Cheriyan J, Therapeutic potential of p38MAP kinase inhibition in the management of cardiovascular disease, Am. J. Cardiovasc. Drugs 14 (3) (June 2014) 155–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [71].Raman D, Sobolik-Delmaire T, Richmond A, Chemokines in health and disease, Exp. Cell Res 317 (5) (Mar. 2011) 575–589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [72].Dusi V, Ghidoni A, Ravera A, De Ferrari GM, Calvillo L, Chemokines and heart disease: a network connecting cardiovascular biology to immune and autonomic nervous systems, Mediat. Inflamm 2016 (May 2016), 5902947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [73].Fruman DA, Chiu H, Hopkins BD, et al. , The PI3K pathway in human disease, Cell 170 (4) (Aug. 2017) 605–635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [74].Essers MAG, Weijzen S, de Vries-Smits AMM, et al. , FOXO transcription factor activation by oxidative stress mediated by the small GTPase ral and JNK, EMBO J. 23 (24) (Dec. 2004) 4802–4812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [75].Davis AP, Wiegers TC, Wiegers J, et al. , Chemical-induced phenotypes at CTD help inform the predisease state and construct adverse outcome pathways, Toxicol. Sci 165 (1) (Sept. 2018) 145–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [76].Stark K, Massberg S, Interplay between inflammation and thrombosis in cardiovascular pathology, ISSN: 1759-5002, 1759-5010, Nat. Rev. Cardiol 18 (9) (Sept. 2021) 666–682, 10.1038/s41569-021-00552-1, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-021-00552-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [77].Scott J, Pathophysiology and biochemistry of cardiovascular disease, URL: Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev 14 (3) (June 2004) 271–279, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2004.04.012 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0959437X04000589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [78].Tricot O, Mallat Z, Heymes C, Relation between endothelial cell apoptosis and blood flow direction in human atherosclerotic plaques, URL: Circulation 101 (21) (May 2000) 2450–2453, https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.101.21.2450 https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.CIR.101.21.2450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [79].Rodriguez AL, Wojcik BM, Wrobleski SK, Statins, inflammation and deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review, URL, J. Thromb. Thrombolysis 33 (4) (May 2012) 371–382, 10.1007/s11239-012-0687-9, 10.1007/s11239-012-0687-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [80].Mallat Z, Tedgui A, Apoptosis in the vasculature: mechanisms and functional importance, Br. J. Pharmacol 130 (5) (July 2000) 947–962. ISSN: 0007–1188. DOI:. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [81].Misra MK, Sarwat M, Bhakuni P, Tuteja R, Tuteja N, Oxidative stress and ischemic myocardial syndromes, Med. Sci. Monit 15 (10) (Oct. 2009). RA209–219. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [82].Kurian GA, Rajagopal R, Vedantham S, Rajesh M, The role of oxidative stress in myocardial ischemia and reperfusion injury and remodeling: revisited, Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev 2016 (May 2016) 1656450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [83].Krijnen PAJ, Nijmeijer R, Meijer CJLM, et al. , Apoptosis in myocardial ischaemia and infarction, J. Clin. Pathol 55 (11) (Nov. 2002) 801–811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [84].Liu J, Wang H, Li J, Inflammation and inflammatory cells in myocardial infarction and reperfusion injury: a double-edged sword, Clin. Med. Insights Cardiol 10 (June 2016) 79–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [85].Anrather J, Iadecola C, Inflammation and stroke: an overview, Neurotherapeutics 13 (4) (Oct. 2016) 661–670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [86].Allen CL, Bayraktutan U, Oxidative stress and its role in the pathogenesis of ischaemic stroke, Int. J. Stroke 4 (6) (Dec. 2009) 461–470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [87].Radak D, Katsiki N, Resanovic I, et al. , Apoptosis and acute brain ischemia in ischemic stroke, Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol 15 (2) (2017) 115–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [88].Rezania S, Puskarich MA, Petrusca DN, et al. , Platelet hyperactivation, apoptosis and hypercoagulability in patients with acute pulmonary embolism, Thromb. Res 155 (July 2017) 106–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [89].Oakes JM, Xu J, Morris TM, Effects of chronic nicotine inhalation on systemic and pulmonary blood pressure and right ventricular remodeling in mice, Hypertension (Dallas, Tex.: 1979) 75 (5) (May 2020) 1305–1314, 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [90].Feigin VL, Norrving B, Mensah GA, Global burden of stroke, Circ. Res 120 (3) (Feb. 2017) 439–448, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [91].Zhao L, Dai W, Carreno J, Acute administration of nicotine induces transient elevation of blood pressure and increases myocardial infarct size in rats, Heliyon 6 (11) (Nov. 2020), e05450, 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05450. ISSN: 2405–8440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [92].Smulders Y, Pathophysiology and treatment of haemodynamic instability in acute pulmonary embolism: the pivotal role of pulmonary vasoconstriction, URL, Cardiovasc. Res 48 (1) (Oct. 2000) 23–33, 10.1016/S0008-6363(00)00168-1, 10.1016/S0008-6363(00)00168-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [93].Oates JA, FitzGerald GA, Branch RA, Clinical implications of prostaglandin and thromboxane A2 formation (1), N. Engl. J. Med 319 (11) (Sept. 1988) 689–698, 10.1056/NEJM198809153191106. ISSN: 0028-4793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [94].Kim Y-W, Byzova TV, Oxidative stress in angiogenesis and vascular disease, Blood 123 (5) (Jan. 2014) 625–631, 10.1182/blood-2013-09-512749. ISSN: 1528–0020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [95].Chung T, Connor D, Joseph J, Platelet activation in acute pulmonary embolism, J. Thromb. Haemost 5 (5) (May 2007) 918–924, 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02461.x. ISSN: 1538–7933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [96].Goldhaber SZ, Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, A prospective study of risk factors for pulmonary embolism in women, JAMA 277 (8) (Feb. 1997) 642–645. ISSN: 0098-7484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
We used a publicly available database. We are happy to share the code and any other information with other researchers who are interested.
