Skip to main content
MedComm logoLink to MedComm
. 2024 Jan 25;5(2):e470. doi: 10.1002/mco2.470

Heat shock protein 90: biological functions, diseases, and therapeutic targets

Huiyun Wei 1, Yingying Zhang 1, Yilin Jia 1, Xunan Chen 1, Tengda Niu 1, Aniruddha Chatterjee 2, Pengxing He 1,, Guiqin Hou 1,2,
PMCID: PMC10811298  PMID: 38283176

Abstract

Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is a predominant member among Heat shock proteins (HSPs), playing a central role in cellular protection and maintenance by aiding in the folding, stabilization, and modification of diverse protein substrates. It collaborates with various co‐chaperones to manage ATPase‐driven conformational changes in its dimer during client protein processing. Hsp90 is critical in cellular function, supporting the proper operation of numerous proteins, many of which are linked to diseases such as cancer, Alzheimer's, neurodegenerative conditions, and infectious diseases. Recognizing the significance of these client proteins across diverse diseases, there is a growing interest in targeting Hsp90 and its co‐chaperones for potential therapeutic strategies. This review described biological background of HSPs and the structural characteristics of HSP90. Additionally, it discusses the regulatory role of heat shock factor‐1 (HSF‐1) in modulating HSP90 and sheds light on the dynamic chaperone cycle of HSP90. Furthermore, the review discusses the specific contributions of HSP90 in various disease contexts, especially in cancer. It also summarizes HSP90 inhibitors for cancer treatment, offering a thoughtful analysis of their strengths and limitations. These advancements in research expand our understanding of HSP90 and open up new avenues for considering HSP90 as a promising target for therapeutic intervention in a range of diseases.

Keywords: client protein, co‐chaperone, disease, HSP90, inhibitor


Targeting the dynamic cycling of HSP90 and its interaction with co‐chaperones can promote protein maturation and client protein degradation, potentially offering effective antineoplastic strategies.

graphic file with name MCO2-5-e470-g002.jpg

1. INTRODUCTION

Heat shock proteins (HSPs) represent a vast family of proteins present in both eukaryotic and bacterial organisms. The HSP family includes various members categorized based on their molecular weight, such as HSP70, HSP90, and HSP60. These proteins act as molecular chaperones, assisting in protein folding, preventing protein aggregation, and aiding in the repair of damaged proteins under stress conditions and their expression is induced in response to heat shock and other stressors. 1 , 2 Among the HSP family members, HSP90 holds significant importance. The chaperone mechanism of HSP90 is a critical regulator of proteostasis in eukaryotic cells, governing protein stability under both normal physiological conditions and stress‐induced scenarios. Studies have found that the expression of HSP90 in tumors is 2−10 times higher than in normal cells. 3 , 4 , 5 Normally, HSP90 is highly abundant in both eukaryotic and bacterial cells. However, when expose to stress, HSP90 levels increase by approximately 4−6% compared with normal conditions. 6 , 7 HSP90 plays a crucial role in various essential cellular processes and regulates signaling pathways associated with cell proliferation, differentiation, migration, angiogenesis, protein folding, transportation, and degradation. 8 , 9 Through these functions, HSP90 facilitates the expression of genetic variants in its client proteins, thereby enhancing an organism's ability to adapt and survive in stressful environments. 10 Moreover, highly abnormal HSP90 expression is associated with various pathological states, such as neurodegenerative disease, inflammation, aging‐related diseases and cancer. 11 Especially, HSP90 exhibits high levels of expression across nearly all cancer types including lung, esophageal, gastric, breast, and colorectal cancer. 12 , 13 As a result, client proteins and inhibitors of HSP90 are a promising avenue for various diseases and cancer therapy. By targeting HSP90 and degrading its clients, multiple downstream signaling pathways can be effectively blocked, resulting in a reduction of the feedback activation effect and leading to more effective treatment. 14 Therefore, HSP90 is a very promising target for the treatment of cancer and other diseases.

In this review, we begin by exploring the biological context of the HSPs. We then delve into the structural characteristics and biological functions of HSP90. Our discussion further examines the interplay between HSF‐1 and HSP90, along with the dynamic chaperone cycle of HSP90. With a focus on its relevance in various diseases, notably cancers, we outline the inhibitors used for HSP90 in cancer treatment, detailing both their benefits and limitations. Through this comprehensive analysis, we underscore the profound relationship between HSP90 and human health, pointing toward promising avenues for future medical advancements and treatments.

2. BIOLOGICAL BACKGROUND OF THE HSP FAMILY

In the early 1960s, Italian biologist Ferruccio Ritossa made a groundbreaking discovery, identifying HSPs. 15 , 16 He placed drosophila flies at temperatures exceeding their normal physiological range and observed that the chromosome ends of salivary glands were unexpectedly “puffing.” This puffing phenomenon was caused by the activation of regulatory factors, which induces the transcription of specific genes and overexpression of particular proteins in response to heat stress. These adaptive responses help cell survival under stress conditions. 17 The proteins found to be overexpressed in these situations were identified as HSPs or stress proteins, which are a class of proteins that becomes notably more abundant when cells experience physical, chemical or mechanical damage or stress induced by factors such as high temperature, ischemia, hypoxia, oxidative stress, nutritional deficiency, inflammation, cancer, UV exposure, or trauma. 18 This reaction is commonly referred to as the heat shock or heat stress response. HSPs are widely distributed throughout tissues and organs, facilitating the correct folding and maturation of numerous proteins, such as matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), mesenchychymal‐epithelial transition factor (Met), and human epermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), thereby helping cells in their adaptation to stressful environments. Consequently, they are a prominent target in the field of tumor therapy research. 13 , 19 , 20

HSPs can be categorized into five distinct families: Small HSP, HSP60, HSP70, HSP90, and HSP110. These families differ in molecular weight and exhibit diverse structures and functions. Small HSPs play a role in triggering an immune‐regulatory response, prompting macrophages to counteract inflammation. 21 HSP60, a typical mitochondrial molecular chaperone, assists nascent polypeptides in achieving their native conformation. 22 HSP70 promotes cell survival, while HSP90 plays a multifaceted role in both neoplastic and normal cellular functions. 23 , 24 Additionally, overexpression of HSP110 in cultured mammalian cells increases thermal tolerance. 1 , 25 Among all the HSP family members, HSP90 holds a paramount role as a critical chaperone, orchestrating the folding and maturation of over 400 client proteins and stands out as one of the most crucial and versatile players in cellular processes, 26 which makes it a central focus in scientific research and therapeutic development.

3. BIOLOGICAL FUNCTION AND STRUCTURE OF HSP90 COMPLEX

Eukaryotic cells contain four primary variants of HSP90, strategically distributed in various cellular compartments. HSP90α and HSP90β are predominantly located in the cytoplasm, while 94 kDa glucose‐associated regulatory protein (GRP94) is situated in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and tumor necrosis factor receptor‐associated protein 1 (TRAP1) resides within the mitochondrial stroma. 27 Notably, HSP90α, also known as inducible HSP90, can be readily induced by heat or other stressors, whereas HSP90β is consistently expressed under normal conditions. 28 The unique localization of each HSP90 subtype performs a distinct functional roles. 29 Hsp90α promotes the chronic inflammation of cancer‐associated fibroblasts. 28 Meanwhile, HSP90β plays a pivotal role in regulating lipid homeostasis, influencing the formation of endodermal progenitor cells, and promoting the cell migration and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma. 30 , 31 , 32 GRP94 is mainly associated with processes related to cell proliferation and metastasis in cancer. 33 Finally, TRAP1 plays a vital role in metabolic regulation, dynamically adapting to shifting environmental conditions, and serving as a safeguard against potential harm. 34 Following, we will embark on a comprehensive examination of the specific structural attributes and functional roles of these four discrete HSP90 subtypes.

3.1. HSP90

HSP90 functions as an ATP‐dependent molecular chaperone and exists in a homodimeric form, with options of HSP90αα or HSP90ββ; dimerization is necessary for its active chaperone function. 35 , 36 HSP90 comprises three distinct domains: the amino‐terminal domain (NTD), the intermediate domain (MD), and the carboxy‐terminal domain (CTD). 35 , 37 , 38 The NTD and MD are connected by a flexible charged linker, playing a regulatory role in their interaction and enabling the rearrangement of domains during chaperone cycle of Hsp90.39 The NTD serves as the nucleotide‐binding site and specifically binds ATP in its pocket. It is also the primary target for nucleotide‐binding of HSP90 inhibitors. 9 When ATP binds to the NTD of HSP90, it induces a conformational change and monomer distortion, converting the open V‐shaped conformation of HSP90 to a closed state. 40 The client protein is wrapped between the two monomers, and as ATP hydrolysis occurs, the released energy drives the conformational cycle ultimately leading to release of the mature protein. The MD binds to client proteins and co‐chaperones and also serves as the binding site of protein kinase B (Akt). 39 CTD, a nonspecific domain, can bind both adenine and pyrimidine nucleotides, in contrast to the NTD, and facilitates dimerization of HSP90. CTD contains a significant Met‐Glu‐Glu‐Val‐Asp motif, a crucial interaction site for chaperone molecules in the tetratricopeptide repeat domain. 41 Furthermore, the second nucleotide‐binding site in CTD remains in a closed and inactive state until the ATP‐binding site in the N‐terminal domain (NTD) is engaged. Consequently, the CTD can regulate the activity of the N‐terminal ATPase. 42 The distinctive structural features of HSP90 indicates its function flexibility, laying a foundation for research on HSP90‐specific inhibitors.

3.2. GRP94

GRP94 is highly conserved in mammals and primarily located in the ER. 43 As the most prevalent glycoprotein in the ER, GRP94 is also recognized as an ER stress protein and shares a 50% homology with cytoplasmic HSP90. 44 GRP94 has three primary conformations: Extended, partially extended and closed. The extended conformation primarily promotes binding of client protein and nucleotide to GRP94. 45 Similar to HSP90, GRP94 experiences conformational changes when interacting with client proteins and co‐chaperones, transitioning from an open V‐shaped state to a closed state during this process. Furthermore, GRP94 consists of three primary domains: NTD, MD, and CTD, albeit with some distinctions when compared with HSP90.9 For example, the NTD end of GRP94 is longer than that of HSP90, suggesting conformational differences. 46

GRP94 possesses a relatively shorter charged linker, enriched in lysine residues, resulting in a higher acidity. Furthermore, it is characterized by numerous calcium‐binding sites. Upon binding with Ca2+, GRP94 regulates its ability to bind polypeptides by promoting binding to the protein's N‐terminal region, which can affect GRP94's conformation and activity. 47 The charged junction region of GRP94 regulates conformational changes during ATP hydrolysis; a deficiency in the linker may affect the activation of HSP90 ATPase and its ability to hydrolyze and bind client proteins. 48

3.3. TRAP1

TRAP1 is primarily situated in the mitochondrial stroma, with a smaller portion fraction located in the outer membrane. 49 In comparison with cytoplasmic HSP90, TRAP1 exhibits a higher degree homology. 50 Structurally, TRAP1 is composed of NTD, MD and CTD domains, although it lacks a flexible charged linker, a feature present in HSP90. Notably, TRAP1 functions autonomously, without the assistance of co‐chaperones such as P23 and HSP70/90 organizing protein (HOP). 49 TRAP1's affinity for ATP is up to 10 times greater than that of HSP90, and it displays heightened sensitivity to HSP90 inhibitors such as geldanamycin (GM) and radicicol. 9 , 51 , 52 Additionally, TRAP1 can be activated by heat stress, with its expression increasing over 200‐fold under elevated temperature conditions. 53

In summary, HSP90 is a versatile molecular chaperone that relies on ATP for assisting in protein folding, with each HSP90 subtype playing a distinct biological role. These subtypes are integral to a range of physiological and pathological processes by maintaining protein homeostasis in response to stress. 29 It is noteworthy that the heat shock factor‐1 (HSF‐1) serves as the central regulator, intricately connecting with HSP90 to regulate a sound of signaling proteins expression and activity. HSP90 and HSF1 orchestrates the cellular response to stressors, ensuring the cell's ability to adapt and thrive in challenging conditions. 54

4. CROSS‐TALK BETWEEN HSF‐1 AND HSP90

HSF1 is a highly conserved transcription factor, exhibits widespread expression in various eukaryotic organisms. It serves as the master regulator of the heat shock response, controlling the transcription of HSPs. 55 In ordinary physiological circumstances, HSF‐1 primarily associates with HSP90, alongside co‐chaperones P23 and FK506‐binding protein 52 (FKBP52), maintaining an inactive state. 56 , 57 , 58 Nevertheless, when exposed to stress‐inducing circumstances, such as burns or high fever, HSF‐1 protein dissociates from its complex and forms homotrimers, which subsequently translocate to the nucleus. Inside the nucleus, these HSF‐1 homotrimers bind to heat shock transcription elements (HSEs) and transform into active trimers. Subsequently, they interact with the HSP90 promoter region, obtaining specific DNA‐binding capabilities and transcription‐enhancing activities. This leads to an increase in the transcription of HSP90, HSP70, and other co‐chaperones, while concurrently suppressing the transcription of other genes. 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 This mechanism plays a pivotal role in maintaining stable and elevated HSP90 expression under stress conditions. Once a sufficient quantity of HSP90 proteins is synthesized, they exert inhibitory effects on HSF‐1 expression, contributing to protein homeostasis through a feedback loop. These molecular chaperones also have substantial implications for the expression of oncogenes like Met, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), RAF, and Akt. 63 , 64

Studies have shown that elevated expression of HSF‐1 in tumor cells promotes the initiation and progression of tumors by stimulating transcription of oncogenes, regulating tumor cell proliferation and anabolism, and contributing to evasion of apoptosis. 65 , 66 , 67 Consequently, HSF‐1 has garnered significant attention as a promising therapeutic target for various cancer types, 66 , 68 , 69 , 70 with HSF‐1 inhibitors holding promise as potential antitumor agents, increasing the efficacy of HSP90 inhibitors (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Interaction between HSP90 and HSF‐1. In unstressed conditions, HSF‐1 remains in an inactive state by forming a complex with HSP90 and FKBP52. However, under stress, HSF‐1 is released from this complex, leading to the formation of active homotrimers. These active HSF‐1 homotrimers translocate to the nucleus, where they initiate the transcription of HSPs. HSF1 inhibitors can prevent its nuclear translocation, thus modulating its activity. HSP, heat shock protein; HSF‐1, heat shock factor‐1; FKBP52, FK506‐binding protein 52; HSE, heat shock transcription element.

Apart from targeting HSF‐1, another promising avenue in cancer treatment is focusing on the dynamic chaperone cycle of HSP90. This approach has garnered growing interest in recent years, primarily driven by the recognition that the HSP90 chaperone mechanism plays a crucial role in maintaining protein homeostasis within eukaryotic cells, both under normal physiological conditions and during times of stress. 71

5. HSP90 DYNAMIC CHAPERONE CYCLE

Within eukaryotic organisms, HSP90 plays a vital role as a molecular chaperone, guiding client proteins through their intricate folding process. This function ensures the stability of these proteins and facilitates accurate assembly of protein complexes, ultimately promoting their maturation. Furthermore, HSP90 contributes to reducing the accumulation of harmful stress‐induced proteins by facilitating their degradation through co‐chaperones such as activator of heat shock 90 kDa protein ATPase homolog 1 (AHA1), HOP, co‐chaperone cell division cycle 37 (CDC37), and P23. These co‐chaperones aid in directing the client proteins to undergo degradation via either the ubiquitin/proteasome or lysosome pathways (Figure 2). 72 , 73 , 74 , 75

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

HSP90 chaperone cycle. HSP90 chaperone undergoes dynamic cycling process, transitioning between open and closed states to promote maturation of polypeptide clients into functional proteins with the help of ATP and a variety of co‐chaperones. Targeting Hsp90 and its interaction with co‐chaperone could lead to the degradation of client proteins by 26S proteasome. HSP, heat shock protein; CDC37, co‐chaperone cell division cycle 37; HIP, the Hsp70‐interacting protein; Ub, ubiquitin; Pi, pyrophosphoric acid; N, NTD; M, MD; C, CTD; HOP, The Hsp70/Hsp90 organizing protein; Aha1, activator of heat shock 90 kDa protein ATPase homolog 1.

The HSP90 chaperone is intricately involved in a dynamic cycling process, continuously transitioning between open and closed states. Extensive studies focusing on steroid receptors in yeast cells have delved into the intricacies of this HSP90 chaperone cycle. 76 , 77 In the open state, the two N‐termini of the HSP90 monomer are spatially separated, and with the assistance of co‐chaperones, they bind to client proteins in an unbound state. An example of this process is CDC37, which plays a pivotal role in recruiting polypeptide clients, including newly synthesized natural peptides or misfolded steroid hormone receptors. 78 Subsequently, these client proteins interact with the HSP70/HSP40 complex, safeguarding them against potential aggregation. The stability of protein complex's is further enhanced by HSP70‐interacting protein (HIP), which promotes the conversion of ADP to ATP. 79

HSP90 initiates its action by binding to client proteins, which are wrapped by the HSP70/HSP40 protein complex. The interaction between HSP90 and HSP70 is facilitated by the adaptor protein HOP, which simultaneously binds to both HSP90 and HSP70. 80 The introduction of immunophilins such as FKBP51 and FKBP52 to the HSP90 homodimer results in the formation of an active heteroprotein complex, leading to the simultaneous release of HSP70, HIP, and HOP. 81 Upon the binding of ATP to the NTD of HSP90 in the heteroprotein complex, HSP90 undergoes a transition from an open to a closed state. However, HSP90 inhibitors can disrupt this process by competing with ATP for the NTD binding site, ultimately leading to protein degradation by the proteasome. 82 In the absence of inhibitors disrupting the folding cycle, other co‐chaperones like P23 and AHA1 become actively engaged. AHA1 binds to the MD of HSP90, stimulating ATP hydrolysis. This interaction supports the folding of the bound client proteins and enhances the release of immunophilins and co‐chaperones. 83 , 84 Finally, ATP is hydrolyzed, resulting in the release of ADP, pyrophosphoric acid, any remaining co‐chaperones, and the fully matured client proteins. HSP90 then reverts to its open conformation, ready for another cycle. 71 , 85

6. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN HSP90 AND VARIOUS DISEASES

The attainment of a well‐defined three‐dimensional structure is essential for proteins to function effectively within cells. Unfortunately, protein misfolding and subsequent aggregate formation frequently underlie various diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. 11 The misfolding and aggregation of specific proteins have been linked to the actions of HSP90 chaperone machinery, 86 implicating HSP90 chaperone and its regulation in the pathogenesis of these diseases, and rendering it as a potential target for therapeutic interventions in several diseases.

6.1. HSP90 in neurodegenerative diseases

A recent study utilizing a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has presented compelling evidence that the presence of insoluble tau in neuronal cells disrupts the solubility of numerous other proteins, resulting in a systemic breakdown of cellular homeostasis. 87 In AD patients, the characteristic Tau tangles and β‐amyloid deposits colocalize with HSP90, and HSP90 plays a pivotal role in the regulation of their aggregation and degradation. 88 Intriguingly, work form Chen et al. 89 has suggested that the neurotoxicity induced by β‐amyloid can be mitigated through the use of the HSP90 inhibitor, 17‐AAG, which in turn contributes to the restoration of synaptic function. Moreover, FKBP51, in collaboration with HSP90, exerts control over glucocorticoid receptor activity through a brief negative feedback loop. This intricate regulatory mechanism holds implications for psychiatric disorders like depression. 56 , 90 Beyond AD, HSP90, along with its co‐chaperones, also plays a role in the regulation of Huntington's and Parkinson's diseases. 91

In summary, the HSP90 chaperone machinery plays a widespread role in the pathogenesis and potential therapeutic approaches for various neurodegenerative diseases. It achieves this by orchestrating the balance between HSP90 and different co‐chaperones, with the Hsp90/Cdc37 complex emerging as a potential target for the regulation of proteins associated with neurodegenerative conditions. 91

6.2. HSP90 in cerebro‐cardiovascular diseases

HSP90 plays a pivotal role in facilitating the maturation of inducible NO synthase protein by engaging with the apoenzyme within cells and subsequently orchestrating heme insertion in an ATP‐dependent manner. 92 Notably, Aceros et al. 93 were the first to demonstrate that celastrol activates prosurvival signaling pathways, upregulating cytoprotective HSF1 and HO‐1, which are responsible for enhancing cardiac cell survival, particularly under hypoxic conditions. Further contributing to the realm of cardiac health, research led by Zhang X's team 94 revealed that inhibiting S‐nitrosylation (SNO)‐HSP90 effectively mitigates fibrosis by disrupting the transforming growth factor‐β (TGF‐β)/SMAD3 signaling pathway, presenting a promising avenue for potential therapies aimed at addressing cardiac remodeling.

It was also found that the HSP90 inhibitor GA has the capacity to activate HSF1, resulting in heightened expression of Hsp70 and Hsp25, which in turn leads to a reduction in brain infarct volume and improved post‐ischemic behavioral outcomes. 95 Meanwhile, Qi et al. 96 proposed that 17‐DMAG not only reduces infarction but also ameliorates neurological deficits, while simultaneously inhibiting blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption by downregulating MMP9. Additionally, 17‐DMAG at a dosage of 5 mg/kg was shown to curtail hematoma expansion effectively and contributed to improved neurological outcomes. 97

In summary, the utilization of HSP90 inhibitors in conditions associated with BBB dysfunction holds promising potential for novel therapeutic interventions aimed at benefiting affected populations. 98

6.3. HSP90 in infectious diseases

The cytosolic P. falciparum Hsp90 (PfHsp90) is a pivotal player in the development of the parasite, particularly during its intra‐erythrocytic stage within the human host. 99 Protozoans, including Leishmania donovani and P. falciparum, the culprits behind leishmaniasis and malaria respectively, rely on HSP90 to navigate the temperature and pH variations they encounter throughout their life cycles, making the HSP90 system crucial for differentiation and development. 100 , 101 Consequently, the use of species‐specific inhibitors targeting parasite HSP90 presents a promising approach to impede their proliferation. 100

Recent studies underscore the significant role of HSP90 in viral infections. 102 , 103 The demand for chaperones in viral infections is apparent, as viral proteins exhibit rapid translation rates, multifunctionality, and a need for conformational flexibility and proteolytic processing. For instance, duck hepatitis B virus’ reverse transcriptase relies on HSP90, alongside other chaperones such as HSP70/HSP40 and co‐chaperones like HOP and p23, acting as substrate release factors and supporting the incorporation of pre‐genomic RNA (p‐gRNA) into nucleocapsids. 104 , 105 , 106 Additionally, the high mutation rate of viruses can result in the accumulation of potentially unstable proteins, and HSP90 serves as a buffer to these unstable proteins, aligning with its role in phenotypic evolution. 71 Given these attributes, virus‐infected cells exhibit heightened sensitivity to HSP90 inhibitors compared with uninfected cells, offering a promising avenue for addressing virus‐related diseases.

6.4. HSP90 in aging diseases

Aging stands as the principal risk factor for numerous chronic degenerative diseases and as for cancer, with the accumulation of senescent cells in various tissues significantly contributing to the aging process and age‐related maladies. 107 Kim et al. 108 shed light on a fascinating positive feedback loop: the suppression of HSF1 activates the p38–NF‐κB–SASP pathway, subsequently propelling senescence. Conversely, overexpressing HSF1 inhibits the p38–NF‐κB–SASP pathway and partially alleviates senescence. Thus, the downregulation of HSF1 plays a pivotal role in either inducing or sustaining DNA damage signaling‐induced cell senescence. 108 Recently, HSP90 inhibitors have been tested in multiple mouse models of aging to determine their potential to extend healthy lifespan, mitigate frailty, and enhance stem cell functionality. Notably, 17‐DMAG has demonstrated impressive senolytic effects, contributing to the enhancement of mouse health and longevity. 109 Furthermore, an independent study revealed that in senescent cells, the application of 17‐DMAG (100 nM) led to a reduction in the levels of p‐AKT while leaving the levels of AKT, a client of Hsp90, Hsp90, and actin unaffected. This finding suggests that 17‐DMAG disrupts the interaction between AKT and Hsp90, preventing AKT phosphorylation. 107 Conversely, GA has exhibited a contrasting behavior, inducing senescence at lower concentrations (0.1 μM) and demonstrating senolytic effects at higher concentrations (1 μM). 109 Consequently, the role of Hsp90 in senescence is intricate and remains incompletely understood. The fundamental question lingers: Does Hsp90 inhibit aging? The answer appears to be both affirmative and negative. Hsp90 antagonists exhibit properties that can either promote or hinder the aging process, a distinction primarily dictated by the concentration of inhibitor molecules and the cellular environment. 110

6.5. HSP90 in cancer

Tumor cells find themselves under constant stress due to the presence of mutant proteins and their rapid proliferation, which exerts additional pressure on the regulation of protein homeostasis. The intricate and dynamic nature of the acidic tumor metabolic microenvironment further exacerbates these proteostatic challenges. HSP90, functioning as a molecular chaperone, assumes a critical role in promoting the survival of cancer cells, largely because of the substantial reliance of these cells on HSP90‐assisted signaling pathways. 71 Beyond the well‐known HSP90 clients like the tumor suppressor p53 and the oncoprotein SRC, a myriad of other HSP90 clients, including protein kinases, telomerase, hypoxia‐inducible factor 1α (HIF‐1α), and Akt, are deeply entrenched in the processes that fuel tumor growth. 23 , 111 , 112 , 113 It is worth noting that tumors exhibit a significant upregulation of HSP90 levels, and heightened HSP90 expression in breast cancer, for instance, has been linked to reduced patient survival rates. 114 Consequently, HSP90 stands as a pivotal enabler of oncogene addiction and a key player in facilitating the survival of cancer cells, and inhibition of HSP90 can lead to the degradation of these client proteins, making it a target for anticancer therapies. 115

Cancer represents a significant global health challenge. The GLOBOCAN 2020 report from the International Agency for Research on Cancer revealed that in 2020 alone, about 19.3 million new cancer cases emerged, resulting in close to 10.0 million deaths globally. 116 Projections for 2040 are even more concerning, anticipating a rise in cancer cases to 28.4 million, marking a 47% increase from 2020.116 Such data underscore the imperative to delve deeper into the intricate molecular mechanisms of tumors and pinpoint potential therapeutic interventions. 117 In this context, the exploration of HSP90 and its inhibitors emerges as a pivotal avenue for advancing cancer treatment strategies.

7. HSP90 AS A PROMISING TARGET FOR CANCER THERAPY

HSP90 exerts a substantial influence in various tumors and is closely associated with the pathological progression of carcinoma. 118 , 119 , 120 Therefore, understanding the intricate relationship between HSP90 and cancer holds the promise of uncovering pivotal insights that could lead to the development of more rational and effective cancer treatment strategies.

7.1. Roles of HSP90 and its co‐chaperones in cancer

The chaperone function of HSP90 is intricately reliant on the coordination of co‐chaperones, which play a crucial role in supporting HSP90's unique function and maintaining cellular homeostasis. In tumor cells, where HSP90 is typically activated, oncogenes are heavily dependent on HSP90 to maintain their stability via chaperone circulation. Moreover, some overexpressed or mutated kinases, as well as oncogenic transcription factors, interact with HSP90 to drive tumor progression. HSP90 acts as a “double‐edged sword” that can be beneficial or harmful to human biology. 5 In normal cells, the affinity between client proteins and HSP90 is relatively low, but HSP90 could still be beneficial to maintain the quality and stability of these client proteins. 121 , 122 , 123 By orchestrating the formation of a super multimolecular chaperone complex, HSP90 stabilizes the conformation of client proteins, interrupting their degradation and activating crucial pathways such as PI3K/Akt/mTOR and mitogen‐acivated protein kinase (MAPK), which are pivotal in regulating tumor cell proliferation and survival. Furthermore, HSP90 acts as a facilitator to accelerate degradation of abnormal aggregation proteins and molecules proteins, thus contributing to the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. However, in the context of tumors and their interactions with co‐chaperones such as HSP70, HOP, HSP40, and P23, HSP90 exhibits heightened ATPase activity, promoting the maturation of carcinogenic client proteins.

A current compilation of HSP90 clients and interactors is available on Didier Picard's website at https://www.picard.ch/downloads/HSP90interactors.pdf. 124 To date, a roster of over 400 known HSP90 client proteins has been assembled, most of which are oncogene products or key regulators of signal transduction pathways, significantly promoting the initiation and progression of cancer. 125 Furthermore, the progression of cancer heavily relies on essential signaling pathways, each prominently featuring key oncoproteins recognized as HSP90 clients (Figure 3). For instance, the signaling cascade of TGF‐β plays a critical role in governing various cellular processes, including cell proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and migration. 126 Notably, Met, a receptor for hepatocyte growth factor, experiences substantial upregulation in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and gastric cancer, facilitating tumor invasion and participating in angiogenesis. 127 , 128 Similarly, the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor promotes angiogenesis, providing nutrition for the survival of breast cancer cells. 129 Meanwhile, janus kinase (JAK2) and tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) possess the capability to induce the phosphorylation and activation of signl transducerand activator of transcription 1 (STAT1 )and STAT3, with the JAK2/tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2)/STAT‐1/3 signaling axis being closely associated with tumor promotion. 130 , 131

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

HSP90, clients and typical events in cancer. HSP90 plays a central role in six major oncogenic pathways involving client proteins, including the JAK/STAT, SMAD, NF‐κB, MAPK, PI3K/Akt, and Wnt/β‐catenin signaling pathways. These pathways collectively drive processes such as cell proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and motility in cancer. HSP, heat shock protein; TYK, tyrosine kinase; IKK, IkappaB kinase; RTK, receptor tyrosine kinase; IGFR, insulin/IGF‐1 transmembrane receptor; PIP2, phosphatidylinositol 4,5‐bisphosphate; PIP3, phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5‐trisphosphate; PDK, pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase; LRP, low‐density lipoprotein (LDL)‐related protein; Dsh, dishevelled protein; GSK3, glycogen synthase kinase 3; CK1, casein kinase 1; APC, adenomatosis polyposis coli.

Additionally, HSP90 plays a pivotal role in each of the three critical stages of tumor invasion: the degradation of the extracellular matrix, cell adhesion, and invasion into new sites. HSP90 is responsible for activating MMP2, significantly contributing to tumor migration and invasion. 132 , 133 , 134 Other HSP90 clients include IκB kinases that regulate NF‐κB activation, 135 and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3), regulated by the Wnt pathway and promoting cancer progression. 136 When HSP90 binds to the prosurvival kinase Akt, it hinders proteasome‐mediated degradation of Akt, thereby reinforcing the functional stability of PI3K/Akt signaling and promoting cell survival. 12 , 137

HSP90 client proteins are classified into several categories, including protein kinase Met, human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 (HER‐2) and EGFR, transcriptional subtype like Akt and mutant p53, cell cycle regulators including cyclin D and CDK4, HIF‐1α, apoptosis‐related such as Bcl‐2 and BAX, and structural proteins comprising microtubules and microfilaments. 138 , 139 , 140 , 141 , 142 , 143 , 144 In terms of affinity, some client proteins and HSP90 exhibit a particular order, with HER2, mutant EGFR, Raf‐1, Akt, mutant v‐raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 and wild‐type EGFR showing preference for HSP90 interaction. 145 These proteins, prone to conformational changes, are heavily dependent on HSP90 to maintain their functionality. 23

As the activation and overexpression of HSP90 in various cancers including lung cancer, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer, researchers have aimed to target HSP90 to interfere with the interaction with client proteins., This disruption results in the irreversible degradation of client proteins by the proteasome or lysosome pathway. 23 , 146 , 147 This strategy effectively blocks the survival pathway in tumor tissues or cells. Consequently, inhibiting HSP90 represents an attractive and selective strategy for effective treatment of cancer. 82

7.2. Association between HSP90 and tumor resistance

Considering the malignant characteristics of tumors, particularly their propensity to metastasize and resistance to treatment, combating resistance is a significant challenge. 148 Resistance often arises from genetic mutation or epigenetic changes triggered by prolonged exposure to chemotherapeutic agents. These changes activate alternate signaling pathways and lead to the overexpression of corresponding protein kinases or transcription factors, resulting in multidrug resistance. 149 This resistance mechanism is closely related to the chaperone function of HSP90, as most of these proteins are HSP90 clients. For example, in the treatment of NSCLC with the EGFR‐targeting inhibitor gefitinib, the initial response is considerable. However, prolonged drug use can significantly decrease the antitumor effect due to the mutation of EGFR or the activation of Met, which in turn triggers downstream RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and ERBB3/PI3K/Akt signaling pathways, promoting tumor proliferation and reducing sensitivity to gefitinib. 150 , 151 , 152 , 153 However, combination therapy with second‐generation HSP90 inhibitors such as STA9090 effectively counteracts resistance to gefitinib in NSCLC treatment. 154 Similarly, resistance to the second‐generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor TAE684 in human neuroblastoma often results from mutations in ALK F1174L. 155 , 156 , 157 Nonetheless, the HSP90 inhibitor AUY‐922 can hinder multiple signal transduction pathways by facilitating the degradation of various HSP90 client proteins, including Akt, ERK, and STAT3. This action effectively obstructs cell cycle progression and proves to be an effective means for overcoming resistance to ALK inhibitors in human neuroblastoma. Consequently, combination therapy with HSP90 inhibitors and targeted drugs can effectively inhibit multiple carcinogenic signaling pathways, enhancing the antitumor effects of targeted drugs. By targeting the active sites of HSP90, inhibitors of HSP90 inhibit its chaperone activity, interrupt multiple signaling pathways involved in tumor progression, cut off the tumor cell nutrition supply, block collateral circulation, and reduce tumor resistance caused by targeting a single factor. Therefore, targeting HSP90 is a promising and effective strategy for addressing cancer resistance, 115 , 158 , 159 , 160 and various HSP90 inhibitors have been developed and are currently undergoing evaluation in preclinical and clinical settings. 23 , 29 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164

8. HSP90 INHIBITORS FOR CANCER TREATMENT

HSP90 inhibitors are classified based on their mechanism of action as NTD or CTD inhibitors. The former, which are most commonly used, competitively bind to the ATP pocket on the NTD of HSP90. In contrast, the latter can block the dimerization of HSP90 and have a more flexible binding site compared with the NTD inhibitors. 82 Furthermore, HSP90 inhibitors can be further divided into natural and synthetic inhibitors based on their source. Natural HSP90 inhibitors are extracted from plants and microorganisms. Based on their chemical structure, synthetic HSP90 inhibitors fall into different classes such as resorcinol, benzoquinone, purine‐based, CTD, and protein–protein interaction (PPI) compounds (Figures 4A–E). Furthermore, pimitespib (Figure 4F), an inhibitor with a distinct structure from the four aforementioned types, has received approval in Japan. 165

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Chemical and 3D structures of representative inhibitors of HSP90. (A) Resorcinol compounds. (B) Benzoquinone compounds. (C) Purine‐based compounds. (D) CTD compounds. (E) PPI compounds. (F) Pimitespib.

8.1. Resorcinol compounds

Radicicol, a naturally compound extracted from the fungus Monosporium bonorden, exhibits strong inhibitory effects on HSP90 chaperone activity. 166 , 167 Radicicol demonstrates a robust binding affinity to NTD ATP pocket of HSP90, approximately 50 times stronger than GM. 167 While radicicol exerts notable antitumor activity in vitro, its effectiveness against tumors in vivo is limited, potentially due to its conversion into inactive metabolites within the body. 168 As a result, researchers have developed radicicol derivatives centered on the resorcinol core structure of these compounds. These derivatives have shown promising biological activity both in vitro and in vivo, as demonstrated through structure‐activity relationship analysis. 169 , 170 Further information regarding this type of inhibitor in clinical trials is outlined in Table 1.

TABLE 1.

Clinical information of heat shock protein 90‐targeting resorcinol agents to inhibit ATPase cycle (NTD). a

Drug MW (g/mol) Phase Status Disease Key endpoints NCT
NVP‐AUY922 465.50 II T Pancreatic adenocarcinoma DCR, ORR, PFS, OS, SDD NCT01484860
Metastatic disease
Myeloproliferative neoplasm ORR NCT01668173
C Non‐small cell lung cancer ORR, OS, PFS NCT01854034
Non‐small cell lung cancer (ALK‐positive) ORR, PFS, DCR NCT01752400
NVP‐AUY922 + cetuximab

465.50

2756.23

I C Recurrent colon cancer DLT, PRR, OS NCT01294826
Recurrent rectal cancer
Stage IV colon cancer
Stage IV rectal cancer
Colon adenocarcinoma
Rectal adenocarcinoma
AUY922 465.50 I/II C Breast cancer SD, efficacy, PK, PD NCT00526045
Hematological neoplasm
AT13387 409.52 I C Solid tumor Safety, tolerability, MTD, PK, PD NCT01246102
Breast cancer
AT13387 + crizotinib

409.52

450.34

I/II C Non‐small cell lung cancer DLT, ORR, NCT01712217
AT13387 + imatinib

409.52

493.60

II C Gastrointestinal stromal tumor Tumor size, PFS, OR, PK NCT01294202
AT13387 + olaparib

409.52

434.46

I C Metastatic malignant solid neoplasm MTD, DLT NCT02898207
Metastatic primary peritoneal serous adenocarcinoma
Metastatic triple‐negative breast carcinoma
Platinum‐resistant fallopian tube carcinoma
Platinum‐resistant ovarian carcinoma
STA9090 364.40 I C Hepatocellular carcinoma Phase 2 dose, AEs, TTP, PFS, OS NCT01665937
II Ocular melanoma PFS, DCR, ORR NCT01200238
Breast cancer ORR NCT01273896
Colon and rectal cancer ORR NCT01111838
T Melanoma 6‐month PFR, BOR, OS NCT01551693
C Esophagogastric cancer Efficacy, PFS NCT01167114
Small cell lung cancer 8‐Week PFR, ORR, PFS, OS NCT01173523
STA9090 + bortezomib + dexamethasone

364.40

384.24

392.47

I C Multiple myeloma MTD NCT01485835

STA9090 + paclitaxel

+ trastuzumab + pertuzumab

364.40

853.92

298.26

277.40

I C HER2‐positive breast cancer MTD, ORR NCT02060253
Male breast cancer
Recurrent breast cancer
STA9090 + docetaxel

364.40

807.88

I C Solid tumor malignancy Safety, PK NCT01183364
STA9090 + crizotinib

364.40

450.34

I C Advanced lung cancer MTD, efficacy, OS, safety profile NCT01579994
STA9090 + capecitabine

364.40

359.35

I C Rectal cancer Tumor response, disease progression NCT01554969
KW‐2478 574.66 I C

Multiple myeloma

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

B‐NHL

AEs, PK, PD, RP2D NCT00457782
KW‐2478+ Bortezomib

574.66

384.24

I/II C Multiple myeloma ORR, PK NCT01063907

Abbreviations: AEs, adverse events; B‐NHL, B‐cell Non‐Hodgkin's Lymphoma; BOR, best overall response; C, completed; CR, complete response; DCR, disease control rate; DLT, incidence of dose limiting toxicity; DLT, dose limiting toxicities; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; MW, molecular weight; NTD, amino‐terminal domain; NCT, number of clinical trial; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression‐free survival; PR, partial response; PRR, patient response rate; PK, pharmacokinetics; PD, pharmacodynamics; PFR, progression‐free rate; RP2D, recommended phase II dose; SD, safe dose; SDD, stable disease duration; T, terminated; TTP, median time to progression.

a

The data were obtained from https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/.

NVP‐AUY922 is an exemplary derivative that has shown remarkable anticancer activity at the cellular level. When combined with doxorubicin, it significantly triggers apoptosis in the breast cancer cell line MCF‐7 and concurrently reduces VEGF expression. 171 Notably, NVP‐AUY922 is among the extensively studied HSP90 inhibitors, exhibiting promising results in phase II clinical trials for various cancer types (registration numbers. NCT01484860 and NCT01854034). 172 , 173

AT13387, also called onalespib, is a second‐generation nonansamycin and fragment‐derived HSP90 inhibitor that effectively inhibits cell proliferation and survival in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), induces apoptosis of NPC cells by downregulating HSP90‐related substrate proteins such as EGFR, Akt, and cyclin‐dependent kinase 4 (CDK4), and inhibits tumor growth in xenograft models. 174 , 175 , 176 Moreover, a phase II clinical trial of AT13387 combined with imatinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) has completed (No: NCT01294202). While it has exhibited well tolerance, its antitumor activity has proven to be limited. 177

STA9090 is a groundbreaking catechol triazolone HSP90 inhibitor known for its effective reduction of ocular and liver toxicity, a distinctive feature attributed to its unique structure lacking benzoquinone. Furthermore, it has demonstrated superior safety and selectivity compared with other HSP90 inhibitors, making a remarkable advancement in the field. 178 Studies have shown that STA9090 exhibits notable ability to inhibit tumor cell proliferation, with a half‐maximal inhibitory concentration of less than 1 μM/L, making it highly clinically applicable. 178 , 179 , 180 In a phase I trial (No: NCT02060253) involving patients with HER2‐positive metastatic breast cancer, the combination of STA9090 with low concentrations of paclitaxel and trastuzumab has yielded promising results. Additionally, pertuzumab, an inhibitor of HER2, has effectively reduced resistance to single‐drug treatments, further enhancing its efficacy. 181 , 182 In addition, a phase I clinical trial of STA9090 (No: NCT01579994), which evaluated the combination of STA9090 and crizotinib for the treatment of advanced lung cancer, has been completed, demonstrating a superior antitumor effect compared with the use of either agent alone. 183

KW‐2478, a nonansamycin and nonpurine compound, exhibits substantial anticancer potential through its targeted action on Hsp90's N‐terminal domain, disrupting its chaperone function and potentially eliminating NSCLC cells. 184 , 185 Nevertheless, a notable limitation in researching KW‐2478 is the absence of a comprehensive crystal structure involving HSP90 NTD‐KW‐2478, impeding further structural refinements and a deeper understanding of KW‐2478′s molecular mechanisms. 184 Zeng and colleagues’ 186 study highlights KW‐2478′s capability to inhibit CML cell growth and induce apoptosis by inhibiting HSP90α, impacting the BCR/ABL and MAPK pathways. It also suggests promise for tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)‐resistant and intolerant patients, pending dosage optimization. On the other hand, Zhao et al.’s 187 research reveals that KW‐2478 lacks antiviral activity against porcine deltacoronavirus (PDCoV), while HSP90 inhibitors like 17‐AAG and VER‐82576 show potential in reducing PDCoV‐induced proinflammatory cytokines, positioning them as prospective candidates for PDCoV treatment. Furthermore, a phase I/II study (No: NCT01063907) evaluating KW‐2478 in combination with bortezomib demonstrated favorable safety profiles and initial clinical activity. This study indicated that KW‐2478, in conjunction with bortezomib, was well‐tolerated by patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, with no significant overlapping toxicity. 188

8.2. Benzoquinone compounds

GM was the pioneering HSP90 NTD inhibitor to be discovered. 189 Falling under the category of benzoquinone ansamycin antibiotics, GM has exhibited notable antitumor activity in vitro. 190 , 191 Initially, it was thought that GM directly targeted TYKs to exert its antitumor activity. However, subsequent work revealed that these antitumor effects are mediated by competitively combining to the ATP pocket within HSP90. This binding causes a conformational change that disrupts the formation of super‐complexes involving HSP90, co‐chaperones and client proteins. As a result, client proteins are irreversibly degraded, effectively blocking tumor‐dependent growth signaling pathways. 192 , 193 Despite its promising antitumor activity, the presence of benzoquinones in GM's structure causes severe hepatotoxicity and low solubility, thereby limiting its clinical application. 194 Fortunately, derivatives with reduced toxicity and similar anticancer effects to GM have been discovered (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Clinical information of heat shock protein 90‐targeting benzoquinone agents to inhibit ATPase cycle (NTD). a

Drug MW (g/mol) Phase Status Disease Key endpoints NCT
17‐AAG + gemcitabine hydrochloride

585.69

299.66

II C Pancreatic adenocarcinoma 6‐month SR, OS, TtDP NCT00577889
Recurrent pancreatic cancer
Stage IV pancreatic cancer

17‐AAG +

rituximab

585.69

144,544.40

I T B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia MTD, MEPD NCT00098488
Prolymphocytic leukemia
Refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia
17‐DMAG 616.75 I C Large cell lymphoma MTD, RP2D NCT00089271
Anaplastic large cell lymphoma
Angioimmunoblastic T cell lymphoma
IPI‐493(17‐AG) 545.63 I T Hematological malignancy EoSE, EoEE NCT01193491
Advanced malignancy MTD, RP2D NCT00724425
IPI504 624.20 II C Prostate cancer Safety, Tolerability NCT00564928
I Solid tumor MTD, PK, CR, PR NCT00606814

Abbreviations: C, completed; CR, complete response; EoSE, evaluation of safety endpoints; EoEE, evaluation of efficacy endpoints; MEPD, minimally effective pharmacological dose; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; MW, molecular weight; NTD, amino‐terminal domain; NCT, number of clinical trial; OS, overall survival; PR, partial response; PK, pharmacokinetics; RP2D, recommended phase II dose; SR, survival rate; T, terminated; TtDP, time to disease progression.

a

The data were obtained from https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/.

One of these derivatives, 17‐allylamine‐17‐demethoxygeldanamycin (17‐AAG), not only retains the GM's inhibitory activity against HSP90 but also exhibits decreased hepatotoxicity. 195 Experimental results have highlighted 17‐AAG's capacity to selectively target tumor tissues with elevated HSP90 expression. Upon binding to HSP90, the drug induces tumor cell apoptosis even at lower concentrations. This phenomenon may be attributed to the abnormal activation of HSP90 in tumor cells, while it remains inactive in healthy cells, or possibly due to 17‐AAG's higher affinity toward HSP90 in tumor cells. Due to these antitumor advantages, 17‐AAG represents the first generation of successfully developed GM derivatives and the first HSP90 inhibitor to undergo worldwide clinical researches. 196 , 197 , 198 , 199 However, despite its potential, a phase II trial involving gemcitabine and 17‐AAG (No: NCT00577889) revealed unsatisfactory results in treating pancreatic cancer compared with gemcitabine alone. Specifically, targeting checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) by inhibiting HSP90 with 17‐AAG did not achieve the desired outcomes for pancreatic cancer treatment. 200 To achieve better therapeutic effects, 17‐AAG is currently combined with other target anticancer agents. For example, the combination of 17‐AAG with paclitaxel synergistically induces tumor cell apoptosis and has shown significant antitumor effects in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, NSCLC and bladder cancer. 201 , 202 However, 17‐AAG has a large molecular weight, an unstable structure, poor solubility, and is easily metabolized by liver enzymes, leading to low bioavailability. 196

To address these limitations, several benzoquinone compounds such as IPI‐493, IPI‐504 and 17‐DMAG have been synthesized. These compounds are NTD HSP90 inhibitors and share a similar mechanism with 17‐AAG. 203 , 204 , 205 Compared with GM, IPI‐493 exhibits enhanced bioactivity (with an EC50 of 34 nmol/L) and has demonstrated significant anti‐GIST effects while decreasing toxicity to some extent. 203 Studies have revealed that when used in combination with TKIs like imatinib or sunitinib, IPI‐493 exerts a more potent antitumor effect than when used alone. 203 , 206 Furthermore, the combination of various HSP90 inhibitors with TKIs shows promising potential in overcoming resistance to imatinib or sunitinib in GIST models. 203 , 207 , 208 However, phase I trial of IPI‐493 (No: NCT01193491) for hematological malignancy was terminated due to safety reasons.

Scaltriti et al. 209 showed that IPI‐504 exhibits a promising antitumor effect in primary or acquired drug resistance models of HER2‐positive breast cancer caused by inactivation of the tumor suppressor PTEN or PI3K downregulation. 209 , 210 Antitumor effects of combination of IPI‐504 and trastuzumab have been demonstrated in advanced or metastatic HER2+ breast cancer patients in a phase II trial (No: NCT00817362). 211 The standalone phase II trial of IPI‐504 (No: NCT00564928) for prostate neoplasms concluded in 2012; however, it exhibited limited efficacy and was associated with unacceptable toxicity in some patients. On the other hand, the phase II trial of IPI‐504 (No: NCT01362400) demonstrated clinical activity in patients with NSCLC, particularly among those with ALK rearrangements. Unfortunately, the phase III trial of IPI‐504 (No: NCT00688766) in GIST was terminated in 2012 due to safety concerns associated with hepatotoxicity. 212 , 213

8.3. Purine‐based compounds

PU3 was the pioneering HSP90 NTD inhibitor designed based on the purine structure. This compound contains the same 6‐amino‐purine ring as ATP and competitively binds to the NTD of HSP90 with ATP. 214 , 215 Using purine as the core scaffold, researchers have carried out structural optimizations to create PU3 analogs, such as PU24FCl and BIIB021 (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Clinical information of heat shock protein 90‐targeting purine‐based agents to inhibit ATPase cycle (NTD). a

Drug MW (g/mol) Phase Status Disease Key endpoints NCT No.
PU‐H71 512.37 I T

Solid tumor

lymphoma

DLTs, AEs, MTD NCT01581541
C Metastatic breast cancer MTD NCT03166085
BIIB021 318.76 II C Advanced solid tumor Safety, tolerability, PK NCT01017198
GIST Safety, changes in FDG‐PET imaging NCT00618319
BIIB028 465.83 I C Advanced solid tumor Safety, tolerability, PK, PD NCT00725933
CUDC‐305 (Debio 0932) 442.58 I T Non‐small cell lung cancer DLTs, AEs NCT01714037
CUDC‐305 (Debio 0932) 442.58 I C

Solid tumors

Lymphoma

DLTs, AEs, safety, efficacy NCT01168752

Abbreviations: AEs, adverse events; C, completed; DLTs, cycle 1 dose‐limiting toxicities; GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumor; MW, molecular weight; MTD, maximum tolerated dose; NTD, amino‐terminal domain; NCT, number of clinical trial; PK, pharmacokinetics; PD, pharmacodynamics; T, terminated.

a

The data were obtained from https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/.

PU24FCl rapidly targets tumor tissue and accumulates, exhibiting a range of antitumor activities. 216 Further structural modification results in the development of PU‐H71. Studies have shown that PU‐H71 triggers apoptosis of triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells and downregulates expression of key factors such as VEGF, EGFR and Akt, thus inhibiting tumor growth. 217 , 218 , 219 A phase I clinical trial assessed the safety and feasibility of combining PU‐H71 with nab‐paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer, showing promising results (No: NCT03166085). 220

BIIB021 is a synthetic, novel, and orally available HSP90 inhibitor commonly used for the clinical treatment of solid tumors. 221 , 222 , 223 Possessing stable physical and chemical properties, BIIB021has been successfully assessed with a clinical phase II trial (No: NCT00618319) in GIST, yielding positive and effective outcomes. Furthermore, BIIB021 administration has been observed to induce apoptosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells by downregulating essential proteins, such as Akt and EGFR, which play a pivotal role in overcoming tumor cell resistance to radiotherapy. 221 , 224 , 225 In thyroid carcinoma cells, BIIB021 exhibits synergistic activity with triptolide, inducing cytotoxicity and degradation of HSP90 clients. 226 Three phase I clinical trials involving patients with advanced solid tumors (registered as NCT01017198, NCT00618735, and NCT00345189) have been successfully completed, demonstrating the efficacy of BIIB021 treatment without any reported ocular or pulmonary toxicities. 223

BIIB028, a second‐generation HSP90 inhibitor and a prodrug of BIIB021, has undergone structural optimization, resulting in enhanced antitumor activity compared with BIIB021. 227 Currently, BIIB028 is undergoing a phase I study involving patients with advanced solid tumors (No: NCT00725933); BIIB028 has been demonstrated good tolerability, indicating its potential for further exploration in other cancer types.

CUDC‐305, also known as Debio 0932, is a second‐generation oral HSP90 inhibitor. 228 This compound exhibits the ability to inhibit a wide range of signaling pathways, including the PI3K/AKT and RAF/MEK/ERK pathways. Importantly, it has been demonstrated to induce apoptosis while inhibiting cell apoptosis in models of breast cancer and MV4‐11 acute myelogenous leukemia. 229 Additionally, a separate study suggested that Debio 0932 may hold promise in the treatment of psoriasis, based on observations of psoriasis remission in a xenograft model. 230 However, it is worth noting that Debio 0932 was terminated in phase II clinical trial due to the absence of a clear dose–effect relationship and limited clinical activity. 228

8.4. CTD compounds

CTD compounds primarily consist of natural molecules derived from plants and microorganisms, and additional information regarding this type of inhibitor in clinical trials are summarized in Table 4.

TABLE 4.

Clinical information of heat shock protein 90‐targeting CTD agents to inhibit dimerization of Hsp90. a

Drug MW (g/mol) Phase Status Disease Key endpoints NCT no.
Novobiocin 612.62 I T Osteomyelitis AEs, cost of care, clinical failures NCT02099240
EGCG 458.37 Not applicable C Acne vulgaris Acne severity, standardized clinical photographs NCT01687556
I/II R

COVID‐19; pneumonia; malignant

neoplasm

AEs

NCT05758571
Not applicable Unknown b Nasopharyngeal carcinoma OS, RFS, EBV reactivation rates NCT01744587
Early I R Colon cancer Change in methylation NCT02891538

EGCG

+ clomiphene citrate +

letrozole

458.37

268.74

285.30

I C Uterine fibroids PK, Hepatic safety NCT04177693

Abbreviations: AEs, adverse events; C, completed; COVID, coronavirus disease; EGCG, epigallocatechin gallate; MW, molecular weight; NCT, number of clinical trial; NTD, amino‐terminal domain; OS, overall survival; PK, pharmacokinetics; R, recruiting; RFS, recurrence‐free survival; T, terminated.

a

The data were obtained from https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/.

b

Study has passed its completion date and the status has not been verified in >2 years.

Novobiocin and coumarin A1 are naturally occurring amino coumarin antibiotics isolated from Streptomyces species. Unlike the HSP90 inhibitors discussed earlier, which primarily target the NTD, novobiocin exerts its potent effects by primarily targeting the second ATP‐binding site located in CTD of HSP90. This interference disrupts the dimerization of HSP90, leading to the induced degradation of various client proteins, including RAF‐1, EGFR, and mutant p53, through the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. 231 , 232

Epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), the primary constituent of replenix, exerts its effects by inducing conformational changes in HSP90. This, in turn, interferes with the chaperone function of HSP90 and leads to a subsequent reduction in the expression of various HSP90 client proteins, such as Raf‐1, ErbB2, p‐ERK, p‐Akt, and Bcl‐2. 233 , 234 , 235 Clinical trials of EGCG are currently ongoing (No: NCT02580279 and NCT02891538). 236

Deguelin, classified as a flavonoid compound, exerts its effects by binding to the ATP pocket located in CTD of HSP90. This binding results in notable antiangiogenic, apoptosis‐inducing, and antiproliferative properties both in vitro and in vivo. 237 Chen et al. 238 demonstrated that deguelin hampers the proliferation of colorectal cancer cells by triggering apoptosis, primarily through the activation of the p38 MAPK signaling pathway. However, it has been associated with the induction of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease. 239 To overcome this undesired side effect, scientists have developed and modified an analog of deguelin known as L80. L80 not only induces apoptosis in tumor cells but also circumvents the risk of causing neurodegenerative diseases, addressing the concern associated with the original compound. Cho et al. 240 revealed that L80 effectively suppresses cell proliferation in TNBC cells while simultaneously inhibiting multiple signaling pathways, including AKT/MEK/ERK/JAK2/STAT3, within these cancer cells. Importantly, L80 does not induce cytotoxicity in normal cells, suggesting its potential as a targeted therapy for TNBC while sparing healthy cells.

The novel compound NCT‐50, an analog of novobiocin–deguelin, has demonstrated a remarkable capability in disrupting HSP90 function by directly binding to the ATP‐binding pocket of CTD of HSP90. As a result, NCT‐50 effectively downregulates the expression and activity of numerous HSP90 client proteins, including HIF‐1α, highlighting its promising potential as an anticancer drug targeting HSP90. 241

NCT‐547, developed as a lead‐optimized derivative of L80, exhibits significant activity in HER2‐positive breast cancer. It functions by promoting the degradation of full‐length HER2 and truncated p95HER2 while reducing the heterodimerization of HER2 family members. These actions contribute to its effectiveness in targeting HER2‐related pathways in breast cancer. 242

NCT‐58, a novel CTD HSP90 inhibitor, was rationally synthesized using O‐substituted analogs of the B‐ and C‐ring truncated scaffold of deguelin. This compound effectively suppresses cell proliferation and angiogenesis in a mouse xenograft model resistant to trastuzumab treatment. Remarkably, NCT‐58 achieves these effects without inducing a heat shock reaction (HSR), making it a promising candidate for overcoming trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. 243

NCT‐80, derived from a B‐ and C‐ring truncation of deguelin, effectively interferes with the interaction between HSP90 and STAT3. This interference results in reduced protein stability of STAT3 and inhibits STAT3‐mediated activation of the Wnt signaling pathway, demonstrating a potent antitumor effect in NSCLC. 244

SL‐145 is an innovative C‐terminal HSP90 inhibitor derived from a C‐ring truncated deguelin derivative. It has demonstrated the ability to induce apoptosis in TNBC cells by effectively suppressing Akt, MEK/ERK, and JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathways. Importantly, SL‐145 achieves these effects without triggering the HSR. 245

Zhang et al. 246 demonstrated that penisuloxazin A reverses the epithelial‐mesenchymal transformation of breast cancer cells and enhances the cytotoxicity of natural killer cells against breast cancer cells. Dai et al. 247 showed that penicisulfuranol A inhibits multiple HSP90 client proteins, induces apoptosis and inhibits xenograft tumor growth of HCT116 cells both in vitro and in vivo without inducing HSP70.

Cisplatin, a commonly used chemotherapy drug for various types of solid tumor, does not affect the formation of the HSP90–P23 complex, but suppresses formation of the HSP90–HSP70 complex. 248 , 249 It can inhibit the function of HSP90 by acting on the CTD of HSP90, thus inducing tumor cell apoptosis. 248 The cisplatin derivative LA‐12 induces degradation of classical client proteins of HSP90 such as mutant p53. Compared with cisplatin, LA‐12 has a higher affinity for HSP90 and kills cisplatin‐resistant cancer cell lines. 250 These results suggest that CTD inhibitors of HSP90 are promising anticancer agents worthy of further study.

8.5. PPI compounds

Inhibitors targeting the NTD and CTD of HSP90 represent an active area of development. However, the complexity and specificity of protein spatial structure make it challenging to directly inhibit HSP90, forcing researchers to explore alternative strategies to overcome these obstacles. 46 In the dynamic and coordinated cycle of HSP90 chaperone activity, various co‐chaperones, including CDC37, P23, HOP, and AHA1, collaborate to facilitate the correct folding of numerous proteins, shielding them from undesired degradation. 71 , 251 , 252 This insight suggests a potentially effective therapeutic approach, which involves indirectly inhibiting HSP90 function by interfering with or disrupting the interaction between HSP90 and its co‐chaperones. 160 One potential approach is the development of PPI compounds, which represent a novel type of HSP90 inhibitor. Details regarding this type of inhibitors in clinical trials are summarized in Table 5.

TABLE 5.

Clinical information of heat shock protein 90‐targeting protein–protein interaction (PPI) agents. a

Drug MW (g/mol) Mechanism Phase Status Disease Key endpoints NCT no.
Withaferin‐A + DOXIL

470.60

543.53

Inhibiting PPI (HSP90–CDC37) I/II Not yet recruiting Recurrent ovarian cancer PFS, ORR, AEs NCT05610735
Withaferin‐A 470.60 Inhibiting PPI (HSP90–CDC37) Not applicable C Skin abnormality Changes in appearance of facial redness or pigmentation NCT04872946
Cucurbitacin D 516.67 Inhibiting PPI (HSP90–CDC37/P23) III C Otitis media with effusion

Resolution of tympanic effusion

Complete auditory recovery

NCT02858388
Curcumin 368.38 Inhibiting PPI Not applicable C Prostate cancer AEs, DTI NCT03211104
II R Pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia Safety, efficacy NCT05045443
II C Head and neck cancer

Muscle mass,

BMI,

serum NF‐kB level

NCT04208334
Advanced head and neck cancer

Muscle mass,

BMI,

serum NF‐kB level

Curcumin + piperine

368.38

285.34

Inhibiting PPI II R

Prostate cancer;

multiple myeloma

PFS NCT04731844
Smoldering multiple myeloma
Curcumin 368.38 Inhibiting PPI I Active, not recruiting Breast cancer Tumor proliferation rate, AEs NCT03980509
R Colon cancer Safety, tolerability NCT01294072
Curcumin + bioperine

368.38

285.34

Inhibiting PPI Not applicable C Multiple myeloma PBMC, NF‐kB NCT00113841
Curcumin + gemcitabine

368.38

263.20

Inhibiting PPI II C Pancreatic cancer

Response rate,

survival, TTP

NCT00192842

Abbreviations: AEs, adverse events; BMI, body mass index; C, completed; DTI, duration of treatment interruption; MW, molecular weight; NCT, number of clinical trial; ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression‐free survival; PPI, protein–protein interaction; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; R, recruiting; TTP, time to tumor progression.

a

The data were obtained from https://www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Gedunin preferentially binds to P23, competitively blocking the normal binding of P23 to HSP90, which leads to degradation of client proteins such as HER2 by the ubiquitination/proteasome pathway. 253 Gedunin has been used in the treatment of malaria and other infectious disease. 254 Similarly, tripterine, while not a specific HSP90 inhibitor, effectively binds to cysteine residues on CDC37, disrupting the PPI between HSP90 and CDC37. This disruption leads to the instability and subsequent degradation of several HSP90 client proteins, including Akt and CDK4. 255 Researchers such as Zuo et al. 256 have observed that tripterine inactivates PI3K/AKT and JNK pathways, promoting the degradation of client proteins in MDA‐MB‐231 cells. Another compound, Withaferin‐A (WA), a major component of Withania somnifera, is also capable of interfering with the interaction between HSP90 and CDC37. 257 Numerous studies have highlighted the potent antitumor effects of WA in cell and animal models of TNBC. 258 , 259 , 260

Curcumin, a polyphenol first isolated from the root of herbaceous Curcuma longa in 1815, is well‐known for its potent antitumor and anti‐inflammatory activity. 261 Jung et al. 262 observed that curcumin induces the degradation of ErbB2 and Lee et al. 263 showed that curcumin increases degradation of HSP90 mRNA. The efficacy of curcumin in treating head and neck neoplasms has been investigated through successful phase II clinical trials (No: NCT04208334 and NCT01160302), demonstrating that curcumin treatment is safe and well‐tolerated. Furthermore, patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia are currently being recruited for the evaluation of curcumin In a phase II clinical trial (No: NCT05045443).

Fan et al. 264 conducted a study revealing the remarkable properties of CO818, a curcumin derivative, in its interaction with and inhibition of the ATPase activity of HSP90. Similarly, Abdelmoaty et al. 265 demonstrated that CO818 effectively induces the degradation of HSP90 client proteins, including RAS, RAF, MEK, ERK, and AKT. This inhibition directly impacts the RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and PI3K/AKT pathways. Interestingly, CO818 achieves its effects by impeding the binding between HSP90 and its clients, while leaving their transcription unaffected. Consequently, the HSP90 clients are degraded through the proteasome pathway rather than the lysosome pathway. These findings present CO818 as a promising candidate for targeted cancer therapy. 265

3,4,2′,4′‐Tetrahydroxychalcone (butein), a chacolnoid isolated from various plant sources, induces the degradation of several HSP90 clients, including MMP2, MMP9, EGFR, Akt, STAT3, and VEGF in various cancer cell lines. 266 , 267 , 268 Paclitaxel, a natural anticancer drug, interferes with mitosis and inhibits tumor cell proliferation by stabilizing microtubules and preventing microtubule depolymerization. It has notable antitumor effects in ovarian, breast, and uterine cancer. 269 , 270 Although paclitaxel binds to HSP90 and has an antiproliferative effect, the detailed mechanism of action remains unclear.

Hall et al. 271 showed that the compound cucurbitacin D, derived from Cucurbita texana, inhibits the maturation of HSP90 clients without inducing the HSR. This effect was achieved by disrupting the interaction between HSP90 and its co‐chaperones, CDC37 and P23. Interestingly, another compound called 3‐epi‐isocucurbitacin D did not impact the HSP90 co‐chaperone interaction but still led to client protein degradation through an alternative mechanism, disrupting HSP90 client maturation in a different way.

Furthermore, taxifolin, a natural phytochemical, was also found to be a significant HSP90 inhibitor. Taxifolin binds to HSP90 and disrupts the interface residues of the HSP90 and CDC37 complex, playing a crucial role in inhibiting HSP90 and offering a novel approach for cancer treatment. These findings highlight the potential of these compounds as promising candidates for further exploration in cancer research. 272

In recent research, a promising small molecule inhibitor called DDO‐5936 has been identified as a potential HSP90 disruptor. This inhibitor effectively interferes with the PPI between HSP90 and CDC37, both in laboratory settings (in vitro) and in living organisms (in vivo), specifically in colorectal cancer. 159 Furthermore, Chen et al. 273 conducted a study on another inhibitor known as DCZ3112, which also targets the HSP90–CDC37 PPI. This compound has shown significant potential as a targeted approach against HER2‐positive breast cancer, especially in cases where patients have developed acquired resistance to anti‐HER2 antibodies. Combining DCZ3112 with anti‐HER2 antibodies could offer a promising strategy for combating this type of breast cancer and overcoming treatment resistance.

In summary, PPI inhibitors targeting HSP90 have shown the ability to downregulate clients without affecting the ATPase activity of HSP90, making them promising candidates for clinical application. However, challenges remain in the development of PPI inhibitors, particularly in improving binding activity to HSP90 and effectively anchoring the flat binding sites. 274

8.6. Pimitespib

Pimitespib, marketed as Jeselhy®, stands as the sole HSP90 inhibitor to have gained approval in the Japanese market for the treatment of GIST in June 2022.165 This oral small molecule inhibitor is specifically designed to target HSP90 α and β isoforms and is currently in development by Taiho Pharmaceutical for treating various solid tumors, including GIST. A phase Ib clinical trial, registered as JPRN‐jRCT2031220179, was conducted as an open‐label study focused on dose‐finding and expansion. The results from this trial revealed that when pimitespib was administered at a dose of 160 mg in combination with nivolumab, it displayed manageable safety profiles and exhibited antitumor activity. Notably, this combination therapy showed particular effectiveness in patients with microsatellite‐stable colorectal cancer. 275 Furthermore, in a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase III trial, registered as JPRN‐jRCT2080224033, involving 86 patients with advanced GIST refractory to standard TKIs, pimitespib demonstrated significant clinical benefits. The results indicated that pimitespib significantly improved progression‐free survival and overall survival after adjusting for cross‐over effects when compared with a placebo. Importantly, the treatment maintained an acceptable safety profile. 163 However, it is essential to note that adverse events associated with this treatment, particularly diarrhea (occurring in 74.1% of cases) and decreased appetite, should not be overlooked.

In summary, these inhibitors mentioned above, ranging from small molecules to natural compounds, have shown promise in targeting HSP90 and its isoforms, offering new avenues for the treatment of various diseases, particularly cancer. While significant progress has been made in understanding the intricacies of HSP90 inhibition, further research is needed to optimize their development, improve their specificity, and minimize adverse effects. The dynamic landscape of HSP90 inhibitors continues to evolve, and their potential for personalized medicine and combination therapies holds great promise for the future.

9. CONCLUSION AND PROSPECTS

Given the close association of HSP90 with the pathogenesis of various diseases, particularly cancer, targeting this molecular chaperone to eliminate aberrant cells while protecting normal ones holds immense therapeutic potential. This review provides a comprehensive assessment of the multifaceted functions and characteristics of HSP90 as a molecular chaperone, its involvement in a wide array of diseases, and its intricate connections with cancer resistance. With its abundance and distinct structural characteristics, HSP90 has rightfully become a focal point of research and innovation, attracting considerable attention and investigation. 9 , 276 , 277 , 278

However, harnessing the potential of HSP90 is not without its challenges. One notable issue is the tendency of certain NTD HSP90 inhibitors to upregulate the expression of HSP70 and other HSPs, ultimately promoting cytoprotection and yielding less than satisfactory results. This dilemma has spurred the development of the CTD and PPI inhibitors, which show promise in avoiding this protective response. Furthermore, while HSP90 inhibitors have demonstrated remarkable therapeutic effects in mechanistic studies, clinical trials have not consistently yielded the expected outcomes. As of now, only one HSP90 inhibitor, pimitespib, has gained approval in Japan for GIST treatment. The lack of specificity in these inhibitors, largely due to the sequence identity among the four HSP90 isoforms, particularly the 85% similarity between HSP90α and HSP90β, remains a significant limitation. 9 , 279 Therefore, it is important to continue research on isoform‐selective inhibitors, with the aim of mitigating generalized HSP90 inhibition. For instance, Mishra et al. 280 , 281 analyzed differences between Hsp90α and Hsp90β in the ATP binding site, then used fluorescence assays to create highly selective inhibitors for Hsp90α and Hsp90β without raising Hsp90 levels, a significant advance in isoform‐selective inhibitors.

In addition, the complex regulatory role of HSF‐1 in HSR presents another avenue of exploration. 59 HSP90 inhibitors, in combination with HSF‐1 inhibitors, could potentially offer a novel therapeutic strategy. Moreover, some researchers also believe that molecular dynamics studies of drug binding to HSP90 have a significant impact on drug efficacy. Yang et al. 282 used molecular dynamics simulations to highlight van der Waals interactions as key forces in inhibitor‐HSP90 binding. Hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions were also identified, with specific hotspots on HSP90. Chen et al. 283 corroborated the role of these interactions in enhancing binding. Additionally, molecular dynamics simulations were used to evaluate the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity and physicochemical properties of potential anticancer molecules targeting HSP90. 284 , 285 While research on HSP90 binding kinetics is ongoing, it holds promise for improved clinical use of HSP90 inhibitors in the future.

In summary, the studies focused on HSP90 in cancer treatment present several feasibility and prospect. Firstly, given the intricate interactions involving HSP90, co‐chaperones, and client proteins, HSP90 inhibitors are designed to regulate key clients in cancer by disrupting their normal interactions. However, current research primarily centers on understanding the effects of inhibitors on individual cell death processes, with complexities such as chaperone‐mediated autophagy and necrosis. One of the key challenges in utilizing HSP90 as a therapeutic target is selecting the appropriate inhibitors that can either promote normal cell survival or inhibit overall tumor cell activity. 286 Next, NTD inhibitors of HSP90 have the capacity to activate HSR and elevate HSP70 expression, providing robust cellular protection. Lower doses of HSP90 inhibitors can effectively trigger the HSR without causing widespread cytotoxicity. Therefore, determining the appropriate dosages of HSP90 inhibitors is a crucial aspect of cancer treatment. Despite these challenges, HSP90's role in addressing cancer remains highly promising. Third, targeting the indirect inhibition of HSP90 activity through the silencing of co‐chaperones, a mechanism commonly employed by natural inhibitors like celastrol and gedunin, presents an effective strategy to circumvent drug resistance. HSP90 client proteins are deeply involved in homeostasis processes, and the selectivity of HSP90 inhibitors against “tumor HSP90” offers significant advantages. Natural HSP90 inhibitors have contributed significantly to enhancing our understanding of the connection between HSP90 and cancer, as well as the identification and development of novel semi‐synthetic or fully synthetic HSP90 inhibitors. Although off‐target toxicity remains a substantial challenge with natural HSP90 inhibitors, progress is evident through the development of natural product‐based derivatives aimed at creating highly effective and less toxic HSP90 inhibitors. 287 To fully realize this potential, further work is essential that are concentrated on designing highly specific inhibitors for the distinct Hsp90 isoforms, advancing the development of derivatives based on natural HSP90 inhibitors, optimizing dosages for these agents, and enhancing our understanding of their interactions with key co‐chaperones. The ongoing clinical trials are essential for evaluating the safety and efficacy of these inhibitors. Furthermore, emerging technologies like cryo‐electron microscopy (cryo‐EM) and advancements in structural biology are anticipated to unveil the finer details of HSP90–client interactions. This deeper understanding will enable the design of even more precise inhibitors.

In conclusion, understanding and work on HSP90 is far from being over. While the challenges in targeting HSP90 for cancer and disease treatment are evident, they are by no means insurmountable. The field represents high complexity, but also brimming with new possibilities. As we continue to unravel new understanding of HSP90 and its inhibitors, we inch closer to harnessing its therapeutic potential for the benefit of human health. This review serves as a stepping stone in this exciting scientific endeavor, opening doors to novel therapeutic strategies and offering hope for improved treatments in diverse disease contexts.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

G. H., H. W., and P. H. conceived and designed the study. H. W. wrote the manuscript. Y. Z. performed the literature review. Y. J., X. C., and T. N. constructed the figure the tables. A. C. revised and edited the manuscript. G. H. and P. H. revised the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

ETHICS STATEMENT

Not applicable.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The present study was supported by the Joint Fund for Scientific and Technological Research and Development Program of Henan Province, China (No. 222301420093), the National Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province, China (No. 232300421178), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. U2004101)

Wei H, Zhang Y, Jia Y, et al. Heat shock protein 90: biological functions, diseases, and therapeutic targets. MedComm. 2024;5:e470. 10.1002/mco2.470

Contributor Information

Pengxing He, Email: hepengxing@zzu.edu.can.

Guiqin Hou, Email: hougq@zzu.edu.cn.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Not applicable.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wu J, Liu T, Rios Z, Mei Q, Lin X, Cao S. Heat shock proteins and cancer. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2017;38(3):226‐256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Lubkowska A, Pluta W, Strońska A, Lalko A. Role of heat shock proteins (HSP70 and HSP90) in viral infection. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(17):9366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Gorska M, Popowska U, Sielicka‐Dudzin A, et al. Geldanamycin and its derivatives as hsp90 inhibitors. Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2012;17(6):2269‐2277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mori M, Hitora T, Nakamura O, et al. Hsp90 inhibitor induces autophagy and apoptosis in osteosarcoma cells. Int J Oncol. 2015;46(1):47‐54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Jafari A, Rezaei‐Tavirani M, Farhadihosseinabadi B, Taranejoo S, Zali H. HSP90 and co‐chaperones: impact on tumor progression and prospects for molecular‐targeted cancer therapy. Cancer Invest. 2020;38(5):310‐328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Mahalingam D, Swords R, Carew JS, Nawrocki ST, Bhalla K, Giles FJ. Targeting HSP90 for cancer therapy. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(10):1523‐1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Garnier C, Lafitte D, Tsvetkov PO, et al. Binding of ATP to heat shock protein 90: evidence for an ATP‐binding site in the c‐terminal domain. J Biol Chem. 2002;277(14):12208‐12214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Seclì L, Avalle L, Poggio P, et al. Targeting the extracellular HSP90 co‐chaperone morgana inhibits cancer cell migration and promotes anticancer immunity. Cancer Res. 2021;81(18):4794‐4807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Hoter A, El‐Sabban ME, Naim HY. The HSP90 family: structure, regulation, function, and implications in health and disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(9):2560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Zabinsky RA, Mason GA, Queitsch C, Jarosz DF. It's not magic—hsp90 and its effects on genetic and epigenetic variation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2019;88:21‐35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Bohush A, Bieganowski P, Filipek A. Hsp90 and its co‐chaperones in neurodegenerative diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(20):4976 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kryeziu K, Bruun J, Guren TK, Sveen A, Lothe RA. Combination therapies with HSP90 inhibitors against colorectal cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2019;1871(2):240‐247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Saini J, Sharma PK. Clinical, prognostic and therapeutic significance of heat shock proteins in cancer. Curr Drug Targets. 2018;19(13):1478‐1490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Blagg BS, Kerr TD. Hsp90 inhibitors: small molecules that transform the hsp90 protein folding machinery into a catalyst for protein degradation. Med Res Rev. 2006;26(3):310‐338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Jee B, Dhar R, Singh S, Karmakar S. Heat shock proteins and their role in pregnancy: redefining the function of ‘‘old rum in a new bottle. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:648463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. De Maio A. Extracellular heat shock proteins, cellular export vesicles, and the stress observation system: a form of communication during injury, infection, and cell damage. It is never known how far a controversial finding will go! Dedicated to Ferruccio Ritossa. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2011;16(3):235‐249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Jego G, Hazoumé A, Seigneuric R, Garrido C. Targeting heat shock proteins in cancer. Cancer Lett. 2013;332(2):275‐285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Aswad A, Liu T. Targeting heat shock protein 90 for anti‐cancer drug development. Adv Cancer Res. 2021;152:179‐204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Yun CW, Kim HJ, Lim JH, Lee SH. Heat shock proteins: agents of cancer development and therapeutic targets in anti‐cancer therapy. Cells. 2019;9(1):60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Shan Q, Ma F, Wei J, Li H, Ma H, Sun P. Physiological functions of heat shock proteins. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2020;21(8):751‐760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. van Noort JM, Bsibsi M, Nacken P, Gerritsen WH, Amor S. The link between small heat shock proteins and the immune system. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;44(10):1670‐1679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Nakamura H, Minegishi H. Hsp60 as a drug target. Curr Pharm Des. 2013;19(3):441‐451. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Trepel J, Mollapour M, Giaccone G, Neckers L. Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(8):537‐549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Kumar S, Stokes J, Singh UP, et al. Targeting hsp70: a possible therapy for cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016;374(1):156‐166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Moseley P. Stress proteins and the immune response. Immunopharmacology. 2000;48(3):299‐302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Li L, Chen NN, You QD, Xu XL. An updated patent review of anticancer hsp90 inhibitors (2013‐present). Expert Opin Ther Pat. 2021;31(1):67‐80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Birbo B, Madu EE, Madu CO, Jain A, Lu Y. Role of HSP90 in cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(19):10317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zuehlke AD, Beebe K, Neckers L, Prince T. Regulation and function of the human hsp90aa1 gene. Gene. 2015;570(1):8‐16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Seo YH. Organelle‐specific hsp90 inhibitors. Arch Pharm Res. 2015;38(9):1582‐1590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Zheng ZG, Zhang X, Liu XX, et al. Inhibition of hsp90β improves lipid disorders by promoting mature srebps degradation via the ubiquitin‐proteasome system. Theranostics. 2019;9(20):5769‐5783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Jing R, Duncan CB, Duncan SA. A small‐molecule screen reveals that hsp90β promotes the conversion of induced pluripotent stem cell‐derived endoderm to a hepatic fate and regulates HNF4A turnover. Development. 2017;144(10):1764‐1774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Meng J, Chen S, Lei YY, et al. Hsp90β promotes aggressive vasculogenic mimicry via epithelial‐mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncogene. 2019;38(2):228‐243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Kim JW, Cho YB, Lee S. Cell surface GRP94 as a novel emerging therapeutic target for monoclonal antibody cancer therapy. Cells. 2021;10(3):670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Masgras I, Laquatra C, Cannino G, Serapian SA, Colombo G, Rasola A. The molecular chaperone trap1 in cancer: from the basics of biology to pharmacological targeting. Semin Cancer Biol. 2021;76:45‐53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Li J, Buchner J. Structure, function and regulation of the hsp90 machinery. Biomed J. 2013;36(3):106‐117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Mayer MP, Le Breton L. Hsp90: breaking the symmetry. Mol Cell. 2015;58(1):8‐20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Girstmair H, Tippel F, Lopez A, et al. The hsp90 isoforms from s. Cerevisiae differ in structure, function and client range. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Biebl MM, Buchner J. Structure, function, and regulation of the hsp90 machinery. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019;11(9):a034017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Jahn M, Rehn A, Pelz B, et al. The charged linker of the molecular chaperone hsp90 modulates domain contacts and biological function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111(50):17881‐17886. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Shiau AK, Harris SF, Southworth DR, Agard DA. Structural analysis of e. Coli hsp90 reveals dramatic nucleotide‐dependent conformational rearrangements. Cell. 2006;127(2):329‐340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Blundell KL, Pal M, Roe SM, Pearl LH, Prodromou C. The structure of FKBP38 in complex with the meevd tetratricopeptide binding‐motif of hsp90. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Soti C, Vermes A, Haystead TA, Csermely P. Comparative analysis of the ATP‐binding sites of hsp90 by nucleotide affinity cleavage: a distinct nucleotide specificity of the c‐terminal ATP‐binding site. Eur J Biochem. 2003;270(11):2421‐2428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Koch G, Smith M, Macer D, Webster P, Mortara R. Endoplasmic reticulum contains a common, abundant calcium‐binding glycoprotein, endoplasmin. J Cell Sci. 1986;86:217‐232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Gupta RS. Phylogenetic analysis of the 90 kd heat shock family of protein sequences and an examination of the relationship among animals, plants, and fungi species. Mol Biol Evol. 1995;12(6):1063‐1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Dollins DE, Immormino RM, Gewirth DT. Structure of unliganded GRP94, the endoplasmic reticulum hsp90. Basis for nucleotide‐induced conformational change. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(34):30438‐30447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Garg G, Khandelwal A, Blagg BS. Anticancer inhibitors of hsp90 function: beyond the usual suspects. Adv Cancer Res. 2016;129:51‐88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Biswas C, Ostrovsky O, Makarewich CA, Wanderling S, Gidalevitz T, Argon Y. The peptide‐binding activity of GRP94 is regulated by calcium. Biochem J. 2007;405(2):233‐241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Scheibel T, Siegmund HI, Jaenicke R, Ganz P, Lilie H, Buchner J. The charged region of hsp90 modulates the function of the n‐terminal domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(4):1297‐1302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Felts SJ, Owen BA, Nguyen P, Trepel J, Donner DB, Toft DO. The hsp90‐related protein trap1 is a mitochondrial protein with distinct functional properties. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(5):3305‐3312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Song HY, Dunbar JD, Zhang YX, Guo D, Donner DB. Identification of a protein with homology to hsp90 that binds the type 1 tumor necrosis factor receptor. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(8):3574‐3581. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Leskovar A, Wegele H, Werbeck ND, Buchner J, Reinstein J. The atpase cycle of the mitochondrial hsp90 analog trap1. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(17):11677‐11688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Chen B, Piel WH, Gui L, Bruford E, Monteiro A. The HSP90 family of genes in the human genome: insights into their divergence and evolution. Genomics. 2005;86(6):627‐637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Altieri DC, Stein GS, Lian JB, Languino LR. TRAP‐1, the mitochondrial hsp90. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823(3):767‐773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Somogyvári M, Khatatneh S, Sőti C. Hsp90: from cellular to organismal proteostasis. Cells. 2022;11(16):2479 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Sural S, Liang CY, Wang FY, Ching TT, Hsu AL. HSB‐1/HSF‐1 pathway modulates histone H4 in mitochondria to control mtdna transcription and longevity. Sci Adv. 2020;6(43). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Criado‐Marrero M, Rein T, Binder EB, Porter JT, Koren J 3rd, Blair LJ. Hsp90 and FKBP51: complex regulators of psychiatric diseases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373(1738):20160532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Mazaira GI, Daneri‐Becerra C, Zgajnar NR, Lotufo CM, Galigniana MD. Gene expression regulation by heat‐shock proteins: the cardinal roles of hsf1 and hsp90. Biochem Soc Trans. 2018;46(1):51‐65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Storer CL, Dickey CA, Galigniana MD, Rein T, Cox MB. FKBP51 and FKBP52 in signaling and disease. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2011;22(12):481‐490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Kurop MK, Huyen CM, Kelly JH, Blagg BSJ. The heat shock response and small molecule regulators. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;226:113846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Puustinen MC, Sistonen L. Molecular mechanisms of heat shock factors in cancer. Cells. 2020;9(5):1202 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Kühnel A, Schilling D, Combs SE, Haller B, Schwab M, Multhoff G. Radiosensitization of HSF‐1 knockdown lung cancer cells by low concentrations of hsp90 inhibitor NVP‐AUY922. Cells. 2019;8(10):1166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Prodromou C. Mechanisms of hsp90 regulation. Biochem J. 2016;473(16):2439‐2452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Calderwood SK. Heat shock proteins and cancer: intracellular chaperones or extracellular signalling ligands? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018;373(1738):20160524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Chatterjee S, Burns TF. Targeting heat shock proteins in cancer: a promising therapeutic approach. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(9):1978 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Wang G, Cao P, Fan Y, Tan K. Emerging roles of hsf1 in cancer: cellular and molecular episodes. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. 2020;1874(1):188390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Carpenter RL, Gökmen‐Polar Y. Hsf1 as a cancer biomarker and therapeutic target. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2019;19(7):515‐524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Kumar S, Tomar MS, Acharya A. Hsf1‐mediated regulation of tumor cell apoptosis: a novel target for cancer therapeutics. Future Oncol. 2013;9(10):1573‐1586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Cyran AM, Zhitkovich A. Heat shock proteins and hsf1 in cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:860320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Chin Y, Gumilar KE, Li XG, et al. Targeting hsf1 for cancer treatment: mechanisms and inhibitor development. Theranostics. 2023;13(7):2281‐2300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Alasady MJ, Mendillo ML. The multifaceted role of hsf1 in tumorigenesis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2020;1243:69‐85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Schopf FH, Biebl MM, Buchner J. The HSP90 chaperone machinery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2017;18(6):345‐360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Oroz J, Blair LJ, Zweckstetter M. Dynamic aha1 co‐chaperone binding to human hsp90. Protein Sci. 2019;28(9):1545‐1551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Li T, Jiang HL, Tong YG, Lu JJ. Targeting the hsp90‐Cdc37‐client protein interaction to disrupt hsp90 chaperone machinery. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Bhattacharya K, Picard D. The hsp70‐hsp90 go‐between Hop/Stip1/Sti1 is a proteostatic switch and may be a drug target in cancer and neurodegeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2021;78(23):7257‐7273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Zhu S, Tytgat J. Evolutionary epitopes of hsp90 and p23: implications for their interaction. Faseb j. 2004;18(9):940‐947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Lopez A, Dahiya V, Delhommel F, et al. Client binding shifts the populations of dynamic hsp90 conformations through an allosteric network. Sci Adv. 2021;7(51):eabl7295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Baker JD, Ozsan I, Rodriguez Ospina S, Gulick D, Blair LJ. Hsp90 heterocomplexes regulate steroid hormone receptors: from stress response to psychiatric disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;20(1):79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Stetz G, Verkhivker GM. Functional role and hierarchy of the intermolecular interactions in binding of protein kinase clients to the hsp90‐Cdc37 chaperone: structure‐based network modeling of allosteric regulation. J Chem Inf Model. 2018;58(2):405‐421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Walter S, Buchner J. Molecular chaperones–cellular machines for protein folding. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2002;41(7):1098‐1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Murphy PJ, Kanelakis KC, Galigniana MD, Morishima Y, Pratt WB. Stoichiometry, abundance, and functional significance of the hsp90/hsp70‐based multiprotein chaperone machinery in reticulocyte lysate. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(32):30092‐30098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Caplan AJ, Mandal AK, Theodoraki MA. Molecular chaperones and protein kinase quality control. Trends Cell Biol. 2007;17(2):87‐92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Solárová Z, Mojžiš J, Solár P. Hsp90 inhibitor as a sensitizer of cancer cells to different therapies (review). Int J Oncol. 2015;46(3):907‐926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Meyer P, Prodromou C, Liao C, et al. Structural basis for recruitment of the atpase activator aha1 to the hsp90 chaperone machinery. Embo J. 2004;23(6):1402‐1410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Harst A, Lin H, Obermann WM. Aha1 competes with Hop, p50 and p23 for binding to the molecular chaperone hsp90 and contributes to kinase and hormone receptor activation. Biochem J. 2005;387:789‐796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Li J, Richter K, Buchner J. Mixed hsp90‐cochaperone complexes are important for the progression of the reaction cycle. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18(1):61‐66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Dutysheva EA, Utepova IA, Trestsova MA, et al. Synthesis and approbation of new neuroprotective chemicals of pyrrolyl‐ and indolylazine classes in a cell model of Alzheimer's disease. Eur J Med Chem. 2021;222:113577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Pace MC, Xu G, Fromholt S, et al. Changes in proteome solubility indicate widespread proteostatic disruption in mouse models of neurodegenerative disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136(6):919‐938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Shelton LB, Koren J 3rd, Blair LJ. Imbalances in the hsp90 chaperone machinery: implications for tauopathies. Front Neurosci. 2017;11:724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Chen Y, Wang B, Liu D, et al. Hsp90 chaperone inhibitor 17‐AAG attenuates Aβ‐induced synaptic toxicity and memory impairment. J Neurosci. 2014;34(7):2464‐2470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Jinwal UK, Koren J 3rd, Borysov SI, et al. The hsp90 cochaperone, FKBP51, increases tau stability and polymerizes microtubules. J Neurosci. 2010;30(2):591‐599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Gracia L, Lora G, Blair LJ, Jinwal UK. Therapeutic potential of the hsp90/Cdc37 interaction in neurodegenerative diseases. Front Neurosci. 2019;13:1263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Ghosh A, Chawla‐Sarkar M, Stuehr DJ. Hsp90 interacts with inducible NO synthase client protein in its heme‐free state and then drives heme insertion by an ATP‐dependent process. Faseb j. 2011;25(6):2049‐2060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Aceros H, Der Sarkissian S, Borie M, Stevens LM, Mansour S, Noiseux N. Celastrol‐type HSP90 modulators allow for potent cardioprotective effects. Life Sci. 2019;227:8‐19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Zhang X, Zhang Y, Miao Q, et al. Inhibition of HSP90 s‐nitrosylation alleviates cardiac fibrosis via tgfβ/smad3 signalling pathway. Br J Pharmacol. 2021;178(23):4608‐4625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Lu A, Ran R, Parmentier‐Batteur S, Nee A, Sharp FR. Geldanamycin induces heat shock proteins in brain and protects against focal cerebral ischemia. J Neurochem. 2002;81(2):355‐364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Qi J, Liu Y, Yang P, et al. Heat shock protein 90 inhibition by 17‐dimethylaminoethylamino‐17‐demethoxygeldanamycin protects blood‐brain barrier integrity in cerebral ischemic stroke. Am J Transl Res. 2015;7(10):1826‐1837. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Hu D, Mo X, Luo J, et al. 17‐dmag ameliorates neuroinflammation and BBB disruption via SOX5 mediated PI3K/Akt pathway after intracerebral hemorrhage in rats. Int Immunopharmacol. 2023;123:110698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Uddin MA, Akhter MS, Kubra KT, Barabutis N. Hsp90 inhibition protects brain endothelial cells against lps‐induced injury. Biofactors. 2022;48(4):926‐933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Dutta T, Singh H, Edkins AL, Blatch GL. Hsp90 and associated co‐chaperones of the malaria parasite. Biomolecules. 2022;12(8):1018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Roy N, Nageshan RK, Ranade S, Tatu U. Heat shock protein 90 from neglected protozoan parasites. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823(3):707‐711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Hombach A, Ommen G, Sattler V, Clos J. Leishmania donovani P23 protects parasites against HSP90 inhibitor‐mediated growth arrest. Cell Stress Chaperones. 2015;20(4):673‐685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Geller R, Taguwa S, Frydman J. Broad action of hsp90 as a host chaperone required for viral replication. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823(3):698‐706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Mohl BP, Roy P. Hsp90 chaperones bluetongue virus proteins and prevents proteasomal degradation. J Virol. 2019;93(20):. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Hu J, Anselmo D. In vitro reconstitution of a functional duck hepatitis B virus reverse transcriptase: posttranslational activation by hsp90. J Virol. 2000;74(24):11447‐11455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Hu J, Toft D, Anselmo D, Wang X. In vitro reconstitution of functional hepadnavirus reverse transcriptase with cellular chaperone proteins. J Virol. 2002;76(1):269‐279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Hu J, Toft DO, Seeger C. Hepadnavirus assembly and reverse transcription require a multi‐component chaperone complex which is incorporated into nucleocapsids. Embo J. 1997;16(1):59‐68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Fuhrmann‐Stroissnigg H, Ling YY, Zhao J, et al. Identification of HSP90 inhibitors as a novel class of senolytics. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Kim G, Meriin AB, Gabai VL, et al. The heat shock transcription factor hsf1 is downregulated in DNA damage‐associated senescence, contributing to the maintenance of senescence phenotype. Aging Cell. 2012;11(4):617‐627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Dutta Gupta S, Pan CH. Recent update on discovery and development of hsp90 inhibitors as senolytic agents. Int J Biol Macromol. 2020;161:1086‐1098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Fuhrmann‐Stroissnigg H, Niedernhofer LJ, Robbins PD. Hsp90 inhibitors as senolytic drugs to extend healthy aging. Cell Cycle. 2018;17(9):1048‐1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Pahwa R, Dubhashi J, Singh A, et al. Inhibition of hsp 90 is associated with potent anti‐tumor activity in papillary renal cell carcinoma. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2022;41(1):208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Saber S, El‐Fattah EEA, Abdelhamid AM, et al. Innovative challenge for the inhibition of hepatocellular carcinoma progression by combined targeting of HSP90 and STAT3/HIF‐1α signaling. Biomed Pharmacother. 2023;158:114196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Lagadari M, Zgajnar NR, Gallo LI, Galigniana MD. Hsp90‐binding immunophilin FKBP51 forms complexes with htert enhancing telomerase activity. Mol Oncol. 2016;10(7):1086‐1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 114. Pick E, Kluger Y, Giltnane JM, et al. High HSP90 expression is associated with decreased survival in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67(7):2932‐2937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Whitesell L, Lindquist SL. HSP90 and the chaperoning of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(10):761‐772. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209‐249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Hassannia B, Vandenabeele P. Vanden Berghe T. Targeting ferroptosis to iron out cancer. Cancer Cell. 2019;35(6):830‐849. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Zhao R, Houry WA. Hsp90: a chaperone for protein folding and gene regulation. Biochem Cell Biol. 2005;83(6):703‐710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Xu Q, Tu J, Dou C, et al. HSP90 promotes cell glycolysis, proliferation and inhibits apoptosis by regulating PKM2 abundance via Thr‐328 phosphorylation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Cancer. 2017;16(1):178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Liu F, Wang L, Yi S, Liu Q, Xu X, Su M. Clinical and biological significances of heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells and anti‐cancer effects of hsp90 inhibitor. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019;120:109533. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Scheibel T, Buchner J. The hsp90 complex–a super‐chaperone machine as a novel drug target. Biochem Pharmacol. 1998;56(6):675‐682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Pratt WB, Gestwicki JE, Osawa Y, Lieberman AP. Targeting hsp90/hsp70‐based protein quality control for treatment of adult onset neurodegenerative diseases. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;55:353‐371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Saibil H. Chaperone machines for protein folding, unfolding and disaggregation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2013;14(10):630‐642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Zuehlke A, Johnson JL. Hsp90 and co‐chaperones twist the functions of diverse client proteins. Biopolymers. 2010;93(3):211‐217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Chaudhury S, Narasimharao Meka P, Banerjee M, Kent CN, Blagg BSJ. Structure‐based design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of hsp90β‐selective inhibitors. Chemistry. 2021;27(59):14747‐14764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Shang Y, Xu X, Duan X, et al. Hsp70 and hsp90 oppositely regulate tgf‐β signaling through chip/stub1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;446(1):387‐392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Pasquini G, Giaccone G. C‐MET inhibitors for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2018;27(4):363‐375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Kawakami H, Okamoto I. MET‐targeted therapy for gastric cancer: the importance of a biomarker‐based strategy. Gastric Cancer. 2016;19(3):687‐695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Changchien CY, Chang HH, Dai MS, et al. Distinct JNK/VEGFR signaling on angiogenesis of breast cancer‐associated pleural fluid based on hormone receptor status. Cancer Sci. 2021;112(2):781‐791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Fan CS, Chen CC, Chen LL, et al. Extracellular hsp90α induces myd88‐IRAK complex‐associated ikkα/β‐NF‐κB/IRF3 and JAK2/TYK2‐STAT‐3 signaling in macrophages for tumor‐promoting m2‐polarization. Cells. 2022;11(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Akahane K, Sanda T, Mansour MR, et al. HSP90 inhibition leads to degradation of the tyk2 kinase and apoptotic cell death in t‐cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia. 2016;30(1):219‐228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Baker‐Williams AJ, Hashmi F, Budzyński MA, et al. Co‐chaperones timp2 and AHA1 competitively regulate extracellular HSP90:client MMP2 activity and matrix proteolysis. Cell Rep. 2019;28(7):1894‐1906. e1896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Ou Y, Liu L, Xue L, et al. Trap1 shows clinical significance and promotes cellular migration and invasion through STAT3/MMP2 pathway in human esophageal squamous cell cancer. J Genet Genomics. 2014;41(10):529‐537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Janiszewska M, Primi MC, Izard T. Cell adhesion in cancer: beyond the migration of single cells. J Biol Chem. 2020;295(8):2495‐2505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Broemer M, Krappmann D, Scheidereit C. Requirement of hsp90 activity for ikappab kinase (IKK) biosynthesis and for constitutive and inducible IKK and nf‐kappab activation. Oncogene. 2004;23(31):5378‐5386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Nusse R, Clevers H. Wnt/β‐catenin signaling, disease, and emerging therapeutic modalities. Cell. 2017;169(6):985‐999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Redlak MJ, Miller TA. Targeting PI3K/Akt/HSP90 signaling sensitizes gastric cancer cells to deoxycholate‐induced apoptosis. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56(2):323‐329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Wayne N, Mishra P, Bolon DN. Hsp90 and client protein maturation. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;787:33‐44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Lachowiec J, Lemus T, Borenstein E, Queitsch C. Hsp90 promotes kinase evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(1):91‐99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Wu H, Dyson HJ. Aggregation of zinc‐free p53 is inhibited by hsp90 but not other chaperones. Protein Sci. 2019;28(11):2020‐2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Hallett ST, Pastok MW, Morgan RML, et al. Differential regulation of g1 CDK complexes by the hsp90‐Cdc37 chaperone system. Cell Rep. 2017;21(5):1386‐1398. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Zhang PC, Liu X, Li MM, et al. At‐533, a novel hsp90 inhibitor, inhibits breast cancer growth and HIF‐1α/VEGF/VEGFR‐2‐mediated angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Biochem Pharmacol. 2020;172:113771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Hasan A, Haque E, Hameed R, et al. Hsp90 inhibitor gedunin causes apoptosis in a549 lung cancer cells by disrupting hsp90:beclin‐1:bcl‐2 interaction and downregulating autophagy. Life Sci. 2020;256:118000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Wu Y, Ding Y, Zheng X, Liao K. The molecular chaperone hsp90 maintains golgi organization and vesicular trafficking by regulating microtubule stability. J Mol Cell Biol. 2020;12(6):448‐461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Sawai A, Chandarlapaty S, Greulich H, et al. Inhibition of hsp90 down‐regulates mutant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and sensitizes EGFR mutant tumors to paclitaxel. Cancer Res. 2008;68(2):589‐596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Wang B, Chen Z, Yu F, et al. Hsp90 regulates autophagy and plays a role in cancer therapy. Tumour Biol. 2016;37(1):1‐6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Sakellari M, Chondrogianni N, Gonos ES. Protein synthesis inhibition induces proteasome assembly and function. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2019;514(1):224‐230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Cassetta L, Pollard JW. Targeting macrophages: therapeutic approaches in cancer. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2018;17(12):887‐904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Bukowski K, Kciuk M, Kontek R. Mechanisms of multidrug resistance in cancer chemotherapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science. 2004;304(5676):1497‐1500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Mitsudomi T, et al. MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating erbb3 signaling. Science. 2007;316(5827):1039‐1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Wee P, Wang Z. Epidermal growth factor receptor cell proliferation signaling pathways. Cancers (Basel). 2017;9(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Wang M, Yuang‐Chi Chang A. Molecular mechanism of action and potential biomarkers of growth inhibition of synergistic combination of afatinib and dasatinib against gefitinib‐resistant non‐small cell lung cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2018;9(23):16533‐16546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Smith DL, Acquaviva J, Sequeira M, et al. The HSP90 inhibitor ganetespib potentiates the antitumor activity of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibition in mutant and wild‐type non‐small cell lung cancer. Target Oncol. 2015;10(2):235‐245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Debruyne DN, Bhatnagar N, Sharma B, et al. ALK inhibitor resistance in ALK(f1174l)‐driven neuroblastoma is associated with axl activation and induction of EMT. Oncogene. 2016;35(28):3681‐3691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Heuckmann JM, Hölzel M, Sos ML, et al. ALK mutations conferring differential resistance to structurally diverse ALK inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(23):7394‐7401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Heukamp LC, Thor T, Schramm A, et al. Targeted expression of mutated ALK induces neuroblastoma in transgenic mice. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(141):141ra191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Huang G, Cong Z, Wang X, et al. Targeting HSP90 attenuates angiotensin ii‐induced adventitial remodelling via suppression of mitochondrial fission. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116(5):1071‐1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Wang L, Zhang L, Li L, et al. Small‐molecule inhibitor targeting the hsp90‐Cdc37 protein‐protein interaction in colorectal cancer. Sci Adv. 2019;5(9):eaax2277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Dutta Gupta S, Bommaka MK, Banerjee A. Inhibiting protein‐protein interactions of hsp90 as a novel approach for targeting cancer. Eur J Med Chem. 2019;178:48‐63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Pillai RN, Ramalingam SS. Hsp90 inhibitors. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7(16):S407‐408. Suppl 5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Neckers L, Workman P. Hsp90 molecular chaperone inhibitors: are we there yet? Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(1):64‐76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Kurokawa Y, Honma Y, Sawaki A, et al. Pimitespib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor (chapter‐gist‐301): a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled phase iii trial. Ann Oncol. 2022;33(9):959‐967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Konstantinopoulos PA, Cheng SC, Supko JG, et al. Combined parp and HSP90 inhibition: preclinical and phase 1 evaluation in patients with advanced solid tumours. Br J Cancer. 2022;126(7):1027‐1036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Hoy SM. Pimitespib: first approval. Drugs. 2022;82(13):1413‐1418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Wang R, Han Z, Liu B, et al. Identification of natural compound radicicol as a potent fto inhibitor. Mol Pharm. 2018;15(9):4092‐4098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Schulte TW, Akinaga S, Soga S, et al. Antibiotic radicicol binds to the n‐terminal domain of hsp90 and shares important biologic activities with geldanamycin. Cell Stress Chaperones. 1998;3(2):100‐108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Soga S, Neckers LM, Schulte TW, et al. KF25706, a novel oxime derivative of radicicol, exhibits in vivo antitumor activity via selective depletion of hsp90 binding signaling molecules. Cancer Res. 1999;59(12):2931‐2938. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Shiotsu Y, Neckers LM, Wortman I, et al. Novel oxime derivatives of radicicol induce erythroid differentiation associated with preferential g(1) phase accumulation against chronic myelogenous leukemia cells through destabilization of bcr‐abl with hsp90 complex. Blood. 2000;96(6):2284‐2291. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Turbyville TJ, Wijeratne EM, Liu MX, et al. Search for hsp90 inhibitors with potential anticancer activity: isolation and sar studies of radicicol and monocillin i from two plant‐associated fungi of the sonoran desert. J Nat Prod. 2006;69(2):178‐184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Mohammadian M, Feizollahzadeh S, Mahmoudi R, Toofani Milani A, Rezapour‐Firouzi S, Karimi Douna B. Hsp90 inhibitor; NVP‐AUY922 in combination with doxorubicin induces apoptosis and downregulates VEGF in MCF‐7 breast cancer cell line. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020;21(6):1773‐1778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172. K Rochani A, Balasubramanian S, Ravindran Girija A, Maekawa T, Kaushal G, Kumar DS. Heat shock protein 90 (hsp90)‐inhibitor‐luminespib‐loaded‐protein‐based nanoformulation for cancer therapy. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(8). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Piotrowska Z, Costa DB, Oxnard GR, et al. Activity of the hsp90 inhibitor luminespib among non‐small‐cell lung cancers harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(10):2092‐2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Chan KC, Ting CM, Chan PS, et al. A novel hsp90 inhibitor at13387 induces senescence in ebv‐positive nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells and suppresses tumor formation. Mol Cancer. 2013;12(1):128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175. Canella A, Welker AM, Yoo JY, et al. Efficacy of onalespib, a long‐acting second‐generation HSP90 inhibitor, as a single agent and in combination with temozolomide against malignant gliomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(20):6215‐6226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Mehta RK, Pal S, Kondapi K, et al. Low‐dose hsp90 inhibitor selectively radiosensitizes hnscc and pancreatic xenografts. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(19):5246‐5257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Wagner AJ, Agulnik M, Heinrich MC, et al. Dose‐escalation study of a second‐generation non‐ansamycin HSP90 inhibitor, onalespib (at13387), in combination with imatinib in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour. Eur J Cancer. 2016;61:94‐101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Subramaniam DS, Warner EA, Giaccone G. Ganetespib for small cell lung cancer. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2017;26(1):103‐108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Ying W, Du Z, Sun L, et al. Ganetespib, a unique triazolone‐containing hsp90 inhibitor, exhibits potent antitumor activity and a superior safety profile for cancer therapy. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(2):475‐484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Youssef ME, Cavalu S, Hasan AM, Yahya G, Abd‐Eldayem MA, Saber S. Role of ganetespib, an HSP90 inhibitor, in cancer therapy: from molecular mechanisms to clinical practice. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Eyermann CE, Haley JD, Alexandrova EM. The hsp‐RTK‐Akt axis mediates acquired resistance to ganetespib in HER2‐positive breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12(1):126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Jhaveri K, Wang R, Teplinsky E, et al. A phase i trial of ganetespib in combination with paclitaxel and trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 (HER2)‐positive metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2017;19(1):89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. Wong KM, Noonan S, O'Bryant C, Jimeno A. Alectinib for the treatment of ALK‐positive stage iv non‐small cell lung cancer. Drugs Today (Barc). 2015;51(3):161‐170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Li HJ, Wang QS, Han W, et al. Anti‐nsclc activity in vitro of hsp90(n) inhibitor kw‐2478 and complex crystal structure determination of hsp90(n)‐kw‐2478. J Struct Biol. 2021;213(2):107710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Yong K, Cavet J, Johnson P, et al. Phase i study of kw‐2478, a novel hsp90 inhibitor, in patients with B‐cell malignancies. Br J Cancer. 2016;114(1):7‐13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Zeng D, Gao M, Zheng R, et al. The HSP90 inhibitor kw‐2478 depletes the malignancy of BCR/ABL and overcomes the imatinib‐resistance caused by BCR/ABL amplification. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2022;11(1):33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Zhao Y, Xiao D, Zhang L, et al. HSP90 inhibitors 17‐AAG and ver‐82576 inhibit porcine deltacoronavirus replication in vitro. Vet Microbiol. 2022;265:109316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Cavenagh J, Oakervee H, Baetiong‐Caguioa P, et al. A phase i/ii study of kw‐2478, an hsp90 inhibitor, in combination with bortezomib in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Br J Cancer. 2017;117(9):1295‐1302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Supko JG, Hickman RL, Grever MR, Malspeis L. Preclinical pharmacologic evaluation of geldanamycin as an antitumor agent. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1995;36(4):305‐315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Miyata Y. Hsp90 inhibitor geldanamycin and its derivatives as novel cancer chemotherapeutic agents. Curr Pharm Des. 2005;11(9):1131‐1138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Fukuyo Y, Hunt CR, Horikoshi N. Geldanamycin and its anti‐cancer activities. Cancer Lett. 2010;290(1):24‐35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. Stebbins CE, Russo AA, Schneider C, Rosen N, Hartl FU, Pavletich NP. Crystal structure of an hsp90‐geldanamycin complex: targeting of a protein chaperone by an antitumor agent. Cell. 1997;89(2):239‐250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Franke J, Eichner S, Zeilinger C, Kirschning A. Targeting heat‐shock‐protein 90 (hsp90) by natural products: geldanamycin, a show case in cancer therapy. Nat Prod Rep. 2013;30(10):1299‐1323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Neckers L, Schulte TW, Mimnaugh E. Geldanamycin as a potential anti‐cancer agent: its molecular target and biochemical activity. Invest New Drugs. 1999;17(4):361‐373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Niikura Y, Ohta S, Vandenbeldt KJ, Abdulle R, McEwen BF, Kitagawa K. 17‐AAG, an hsp90 inhibitor, causes kinetochore defects: a novel mechanism by which 17‐AAG inhibits cell proliferation. Oncogene. 2006;25(30):4133‐4146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Talaei S, Mellatyar H, Asadi A, Akbarzadeh A, Sheervalilou R, Zarghami N. Spotlight on 17‐AAG as an hsp90 inhibitor for molecular targeted cancer treatment. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2019;93(5):760‐786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197. Wagatsuma A, Takayama Y, Hoshino T, et al. Pharmacological targeting of HSP90 with 17‐AAG induces apoptosis of myogenic cells through activation of the intrinsic pathway. Mol Cell Biochem. 2018;445(1‐2):45‐58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198. Saxena V, Naguib Y, Hussain MD. Folate receptor targeted 17‐allylamino‐17‐demethoxygeldanamycin (17‐AAG) loaded polymeric nanoparticles for breast cancer. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2012;94:274‐280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199. Pastvova N, Dolezel P, Mlejnek P. Heat shock protein inhibitor 17‐allyamino‐17‐demethoxygeldanamycin, a potent inductor of apoptosis in human glioma tumor cell lines, is a weak substrate for abcb1 and abcg2 transporters. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021;14(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. Pedersen KS, Kim GP, Foster NR, Wang‐Gillam A, Erlichman C, McWilliams RR. Phase ii trial of gemcitabine and tanespimycin (17aag) in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a mayo clinic phase ii consortium study. Invest New Drugs. 2015;33(4):963‐968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201. Kim SH, Kang JG, Kim CS, et al. The effect of 17‐allylamino‐17‐demethoxygeldanamycin alone or in combination with paclitaxel on anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells. Endocrine. 2015;48(3):886‐893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202. Nguyen DM, Lorang D, Chen GA, Stewart JHT, Tabibi E, Schrump DS. Enhancement of paclitaxel‐mediated cytotoxicity in lung cancer cells by 17‐allylamino geldanamycin: in vitro and in vivo analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;72(2):371‐378. discussion 378–379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203. Floris G, Sciot R, Wozniak A, et al. The novel HSP90 inhibitor, ipi‐493, is highly effective in human gastrostrointestinal stromal tumor xenografts carrying heterogeneous kit mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(17):5604‐5614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204. Hanson BE, Vesole DH. Retaspimycin hydrochloride (ipi‐504): a novel heat shock protein inhibitor as an anticancer agent. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009;18(9):1375‐1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205. Mellatyar H, Talaei S, Pilehvar‐Soltanahmadi Y, et al. Targeted cancer therapy through 17‐dmag as an hsp90 inhibitor: overview and current state of the art. Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;102:608‐617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206. Hersey P, Bastholt L, Chiarion‐Sileni V, et al. Small molecules and targeted therapies in distant metastatic disease. Ann Oncol. 2009;20(6):vi35‐40. Suppl 6. Suppl. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207. Smyth T, Van Looy T, Curry JE, et al. The HSP90 inhibitor, at13387, is effective against imatinib‐sensitive and ‐resistant gastrointestinal stromal tumor models. Mol Cancer Ther. 2012;11(8):1799‐1808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208. Nilsson B, Nilsson O, Ahlman H. Treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours: imatinib, sunitinib—and then? Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2009;18(4):457‐468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209. Scaltriti M, Serra V, Normant E, et al. Antitumor activity of the hsp90 inhibitor ipi‐504 in HER2‐positive trastuzumab‐resistant breast cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2011;10(5):817‐824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210. De Mattos‐Arruda L, Cortes J. Breast cancer and HSP90 inhibitors: is there a role beyond the HER2‐positive subtype? Breast. 2012;21(4):604‐607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211. Modi S, Saura C, Henderson C, et al. A multicenter trial evaluating retaspimycin hcl (ipi‐504) plus trastuzumab in patients with advanced or metastatic HER2‐positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013;139(1):107‐113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212. Sequist LV, Gettinger S, Senzer NN, et al. Activity of ipi‐504, a novel heat‐shock protein 90 inhibitor, in patients with molecularly defined non‐small‐cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(33):4953‐4960. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213. Wagner AJ, Chugh R, Rosen LS, et al. A phase i study of the HSP90 inhibitor retaspimycin hydrochloride (ipi‐504) in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors or soft‐tissue sarcomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(21):6020‐6029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214. Shin SC, El‐Damasy AK, Lee JH, et al. Structural basis for design of new purine‐based inhibitors targeting the hydrophobic binding pocket of hsp90. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(24). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215. Taldone T, Chiosis G. Purine‐scaffold hsp90 inhibitors. Curr Top Med Chem. 2009;9(15):1436‐1446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216. Vilenchik M, Solit D, Basso A, et al. Targeting wide‐range oncogenic transformation via pu24fcl, a specific inhibitor of tumor hsp90. Chem Biol. 2004;11(6):787‐797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217. Anwar MM, Shalaby M, Embaby AM, Saeed H, Agwa MM, Hussein A. Prodigiosin/pu‐h71 as a novel potential combined therapy for triple negative breast cancer (tnbc): preclinical insights. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):14706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218. Caldas‐Lopes E, Cerchietti L, Ahn JH, et al. Hsp90 inhibitor pu‐h71, a multimodal inhibitor of malignancy, induces complete responses in triple‐negative breast cancer models. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106(20):8368‐8373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219. Soudan H, Saeed H, Eldemellawy M, et al. Heat shock protein 90α inhibitor, pu‐h71 in combination with dhea promoting apoptosis in triple‐negative breast cancer cell line mda‐mb‐231. Acta Biochim Pol. 2020;67(4):561‐570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220. Dunphy MPS, Pressl C, Pillarsetty N, et al. First‐in‐human trial of epichaperome‐targeted pet in patients with cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26(19):5178‐5187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221. Wang XT, Bao CH, Jia YB, et al. Biib021, a novel hsp90 inhibitor, sensitizes esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to radiation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;452(4):945‐950. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222. Yin X, Zhang H, Lundgren K, Wilson L, Burrows F, Shores CG. Biib021, a novel hsp90 inhibitor, sensitizes head and neck squamous cell carcinoma to radiotherapy. Int J Cancer. 2010;126(5):1216‐1225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223. Saif MW, Takimoto C, Mita M, et al. A phase 1, dose‐escalation, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of biib021 administered orally in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(2):445‐455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224. Lundgren K, Zhang H, Brekken J, et al. Biib021, an orally available, fully synthetic small‐molecule inhibitor of the heat shock protein hsp90. Mol Cancer Ther. 2009;8(4):921‐929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225. Taldone T, Gozman A, Maharaj R, Chiosis G. Targeting hsp90: small‐molecule inhibitors and their clinical development. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2008;8(4):370‐374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226. Kim SH, Kang JG, Kim CS, et al. Synergistic cytotoxicity of biib021 with triptolide through suppression of PI3K/Akt/mtor and NF‐κB signal pathways in thyroid carcinoma cells. Biomed Pharmacother. 2016;83:22‐32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227. Hong D, Said R, Falchook G, et al. Phase i study of biib028, a selective heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, in patients with refractory metastatic or locally advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(17):4824‐4831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228. Isambert N, Delord JP, Soria JC, et al. Debio0932, a second‐generation oral heat shock protein (hsp) inhibitor, in patients with advanced cancer‐results of a first‐in‐man dose‐escalation study with a fixed‐dose extension phase. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(5):1005‐1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229. Bao R, Lai CJ, Qu H, et al. Cudc‐305, a novel synthetic HSP90 inhibitor with unique pharmacologic properties for cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15(12):4046‐4057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230. Stenderup K, Rosada C, Gavillet B, Vuagniaux G, Dam TN. Debio 0932, a new oral hsp90 inhibitor, alleviates psoriasis in a xenograft transplantation model. Acta Derm Venereol. 2014;94(6):672‐676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231. Donnelly A, Blagg BS. Novobiocin and additional inhibitors of the hsp90 c‐terminal nucleotide‐binding pocket. Curr Med Chem. 2008;15(26):2702‐2717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232. Le Bras G, Radanyi C, Peyrat JF, et al. New novobiocin analogues as antiproliferative agents in breast cancer cells and potential inhibitors of heat shock protein 90. J Med Chem. 2007;50(24):6189‐6200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233. Hou Z, Sang S, You H, et al. Mechanism of action of (‐)‐epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate: auto‐oxidation‐dependent inactivation of epidermal growth factor receptor and direct effects on growth inhibition in human esophageal cancer KYSE 150 cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65(17):8049‐8056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234. Fridrich D, Teller N, Esselen M, Pahlke G, Marko D. Comparison of delphinidin, quercetin and (‐)‐epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate as inhibitors of the EGFR and the erbb2 receptor phosphorylation. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2008;52(7):815‐822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235. Eddy SF, Kane SE, Sonenshein GE. Trastuzumab‐resistant HER2‐driven breast cancer cells are sensitive to epigallocatechin‐3 gallate. Cancer Res. 2007;67(19):9018‐9023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236. Zhao H, Zhu W, Zhao X, et al. Efficacy of epigallocatechin‐3‐gallate in preventing dermatitis in patients with breast cancer receiving postoperative radiotherapy: a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Dermatol. 2022;158(7):779‐786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237. Gao F, Yu X, Li M, et al. Deguelin suppresses non‐small cell lung cancer by inhibiting EGFR signaling and promoting gsk3β/FBW7‐mediated mcl‐1 destabilization. Cell Death Dis. 2020;11(2):143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238. Chen L, Jiang K, Chen H, et al. Deguelin induces apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells by activating the p38 mapk pathway. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:95‐105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239. Boyd J, Han A. Deguelin and its role in chronic diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;929:363‐375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240. Cho TM, Kim JY, Kim YJ, et al. C‐terminal HSP90 inhibitor l80 elicits anti‐metastatic effects in triple‐negative breast cancer via STAT3 inhibition. Cancer Lett. 2019;447:141‐153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241. Hyun SY, Le HT, Nguyen CT, et al. Development of a novel hsp90 inhibitor nct‐50 as a potential anticancer agent for the treatment of non‐small cell lung cancer. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):13924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242. Park JM, Kim YJ, Park S, et al. A novel HSP90 inhibitor targeting the c‐terminal domain attenuates trastuzumab resistance in HER2‐positive breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19(1):161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243. Park S, Kim YJ, Park JM, et al. The c‐terminal HSP90 inhibitor nct‐58 kills trastuzumab‐resistant breast cancer stem‐like cells. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7(1):354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244. Lee HJ, Min HY, Yong YS, et al. A novel c‐terminal heat shock protein 90 inhibitor that overcomes STAT3‐wnt‐β‐catenin signaling‐mediated drug resistance and adverse effects. Theranostics. 2022;12(1):105‐125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245. Kim JY, Cho TM, Park JM, et al. A novel HSP90 inhibitor sl‐145 suppresses metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer without triggering the heat shock response. Oncogene. 2022;41(23):3289‐3297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246. Zhang A, Qi X, Du F, Zhang G, Li D, Li J. Pnsa, a novel c‐terminal inhibitor of HSP90, reverses epithelial‐mesenchymal transition and suppresses metastasis of breast cancer cells in vitro. Mar Drugs. 2021;19(2). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247. Dai J, Chen A, Zhu M, et al. Penicisulfuranol a, a novel c‐terminal inhibitor disrupting molecular chaperone function of hsp90 independent of ATP binding domain. Biochem Pharmacol. 2019;163:404‐415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248. Mortensen ACL, Mohajershojai T, Hariri M, Pettersson M, Spiegelberg D. Overcoming limitations of cisplatin therapy by additional treatment with the HSP90 inhibitor onalespib. Front Oncol. 2020;10:532285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249. Park DJ, Park JE, Lee SH, Eliceiri BP, Choi JS, Seo YJ. Protective effect of msc‐derived exosomes against cisplatin‐induced apoptosis via heat shock protein 70 in auditory explant model. Nanomedicine. 2021;38:102447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250. Vondálová Blanářová O, Jelínková I, Hyršlová Vaculová A, Sova P, Hofmanová J, Kozubík A. Higher anti‐tumour efficacy of platinum(iv) complex la‐12 is associated with its ability to bypass m‐phase entry block induced in oxaliplatin‐treated human colon cancer cells. Cell Prolif. 2013;46(6):665‐676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251. Karagöz GE, Rüdiger SG. Hsp90 interaction with clients. Trends Biochem Sci. 2015;40(2):117‐125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252. Siddiqui FA, Parkkola H, Vukic V, et al. Novel small molecule hsp90/Cdc37 interface inhibitors indirectly target k‐ras‐signaling. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(4). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253. Brandt GE, Schmidt MD, Prisinzano TE, Blagg BS. Gedunin, a novel hsp90 inhibitor: semisynthesis of derivatives and preliminary structure‐activity relationships. J Med Chem. 2008;51(20):6495‐6502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254. Patwardhan CA, Fauq A, Peterson LB, Miller C, Blagg BS, Chadli A. Gedunin inactivates the co‐chaperone p23 protein causing cancer cell death by apoptosis. J Biol Chem. 2013;288(10):7313‐7325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255. Zhang T, Li Y, Yu Y, Zou P, Jiang Y, Sun D. Characterization of celastrol to inhibit hsp90 and cdc37 interaction. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(51):35381‐35389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256. Zuo A, Zhao P, Zheng Y, Hua H, Wang X. Tripterine inhibits proliferation, migration and invasion of breast cancer mda‐mb‐231 cells by up‐regulating microrna‐15a. Biol Chem. 2019;400(8):1069‐1078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257. Yu Y, Hamza A, Zhang T, et al. Withaferin a targets heat shock protein 90 in pancreatic cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2010;79(4):542‐551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258. Mallipeddi H, Thyagarajan A, Sahu RP. Implications of withaferin‐a for triple‐negative breast cancer chemoprevention. Biomed Pharmacother. 2021;134:111124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259. Kim SH, Hahm ER, Arlotti JA, et al. Withaferin a inhibits in vivo growth of breast cancer cells accelerated by notch2 knockdown. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016;157(1):41‐54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260. Wang HC, Hu HH, Chang FR, et al. Different effects of 4β‐hydroxywithanolide e and withaferin a, two withanolides from solanaceae plants, on the Akt signaling pathway in human breast cancer cells. Phytomedicine. 2019;53:213‐222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261. Giordano A, Tommonaro G. Curcumin and cancer. Nutrients. 2019;11(10). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262. Jung Y, Xu W, Kim H, Ha N, Neckers L. Curcumin‐induced degradation of erbb2: a role for the e3 ubiquitin ligase chip and the michael reaction acceptor activity of curcumin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1773(3):383‐390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263. Lee YS, Chen X, Widiyanto TW, Orihara K, Shibata H, Kajiwara S. Curcumin affects function of hsp90 and drug efflux pump of candida albicans. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;12:944611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264. Fan Y, Liu Y, Zhang L, Cai F, Zhu L, Xu J. C0818, a novel curcumin derivative, interacts with hsp90 and inhibits hsp90 atpase activity. Acta Pharm Sin B. 2017;7(1):91‐96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265. Abdelmoaty AAA, Zhang P, Lin W, Fan YJ, Ye SN, Xu JH. C0818, a novel curcumin derivative, induces ros‐dependent cytotoxicity in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells in vitro via disruption of hsp90 function. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2022;43(2):446‐456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266. Ma CY, Ji WT, Chueh FS, et al. Butein inhibits the migration and invasion of SK‐HEP‐1 human hepatocarcinoma cells through suppressing the erk, JNK, p38, and upa signaling multiple pathways. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59(16):9032‐9038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267. Padmavathi G, Rathnakaram SR, Monisha J, Bordoloi D, Roy NK, Kunnumakkara AB. Potential of butein, a tetrahydroxychalcone to obliterate cancer. Phytomedicine. 2015;22(13):1163‐1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268. Tuli HS, Joshi R, Aggarwal D, et al. Molecular mechanisms underlying chemopreventive potential of butein: current trends and future perspectives. Chem Biol Interact. 2021;350:109699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269. Shi X, Sun X. Regulation of paclitaxel activity by microtubule‐associated proteins in cancer chemotherapy. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017;80(5):909‐917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270. Kessous R, Matanes E, Laskov I, et al. Carboplatin plus paclitaxel weekly dose‐dense chemotherapy for high‐grade ovarian cancer: a re‐evaluation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021;100(3):453‐458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271. Hall JA, Seedarala S, Rice N, Kopel L, Halaweish F, Blagg BS. Cucurbitacin d is a disruptor of the HSP90 chaperone machinery. J Nat Prod. 2015;78(4):873‐879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272. Verma S, Singh A, Mishra A. Dual inhibition of chaperoning process by taxifolin: molecular dynamics simulation study. J Mol Graph Model. 2012;37:27‐38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273. Chen X, Liu P, Wang Q, et al. Dcz3112, a novel hsp90 inhibitor, exerts potent antitumor activity against HER2‐positive breast cancer through disruption of hsp90‐Cdc37 interaction. Cancer Lett. 2018;434:70‐80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274. Li L, Wang L, You QD, Xu XL. Heat shock protein 90 inhibitors: an update on achievements, challenges, and future directions. J Med Chem. 2020;63(5):1798‐1822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275. Kawazoe A, Itahashi K, Yamamoto N, et al. Tas‐116 (pimitespib), an oral HSP90 inhibitor, in combination with nivolumab in patients with colorectal cancer and other solid tumors: an open‐label, dose‐finding, and expansion phase ib trial (epoc1704). Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(24):6709‐6715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276. Maloney A, Workman P. HSP90 as a new therapeutic target for cancer therapy: the story unfolds. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2002;2(1):3‐24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277. da Silva VC, Ramos CH. The network interaction of the human cytosolic 90 kda heat shock protein hsp90: a target for cancer therapeutics. J Proteomics. 2012;75(10):2790‐2802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278. Pearl LH, Prodromou C. Structure and mechanism of the hsp90 molecular chaperone machinery. Annu Rev Biochem. 2006;75:271‐294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279. Maiti S, Picard D. Cytosolic hsp90 isoform‐specific functions and clinical significance. Biomolecules. 2022;12(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280. Mishra SJ, Khandelwal A, Banerjee M, et al. Selective inhibition of the hsp90α isoform. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2021;60(19):10547‐10551. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281. Mishra SJ, Liu W, Beebe K, et al. The development of hsp90β‐selective inhibitors to overcome detriments associated with pan‐hsp90 inhibition. J Med Chem. 2021;64(3):1545‐1557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282. Yang F, Wang Y, Yan D, et al. Binding mechanism of inhibitors to heat shock protein 90 investigated by multiple independent molecular dynamics simulations and prediction of binding free energy. Molecules. 2023;28(12). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283. Chen J, Wang J, Lai F, Wang W, Pang L, Zhu W. Dynamics revelation of conformational changes and binding modes of heat shock protein 90 induced by inhibitor associations. RSC Adv. 2018;8(45):25456‐25467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284. Karthik HN, Murali Sharma P, Garampalli RH. Molecular docking and dynamics simulation study of quinones and pyrones from alternaria solani and alternaria alternata with HSP90: an important therapeutic target of cancer. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2023:1‐13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285. Dike PP, Bhowmick S, Eldesoky GE, Wabaidur SM, Patil PC, Islam MA. In silico identification of small molecule modulators for disruption of hsp90‐Cdc37 protein‐protein interaction interface for cancer therapeutic application. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2022;40(5):2082‐2098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286. Peng C, Zhao F, Li H, Li L, Yang Y, Liu F. HSP90 mediates the connection of multiple programmed cell death in diseases. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(11):929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287. Costa T, Raghavendra NM, Penido C. Natural heat shock protein 90 inhibitors in cancer and inflammation. Eur J Med Chem. 2020;189:112063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from MedComm are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES