Skip to main content
PMC home page
Plant Physiology logoLink to Plant Physiology
. 1991 Dec;97(4):1302–1305. doi: 10.1104/pp.97.4.1302

Role of the Root Apoplasm for Iron Acquisition by Wheat Plants 1

Fu-suo Zhang 1,2, Volker Römheld 1, Horst Marschner 1
PMCID: PMC1081162  PMID: 16668547

Abstract

The role of the root apoplasm for iron acquisition was studied in wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Ares) grown in nutrient solution under controlled environmental conditions. To obtain different levels of Fe in the root apoplasm, plants were supplied in the dark for 5 hours (preloading period) with various 59Fe-labeled Fe compounds [Fe(III) hydroxide; microbial siderophores: Fe rhodotorulic acid (FeRDA) and ferrioxamin (FeDesferal3), and synthetic Fe chelate (FeEDDHA)], each at a concentration of 5 micromolar. Large pools of apoplasmic Fe were formed after supplying Fe(III) hydroxide or FeRDA, but no such pools were observed after supplying FeDesferal or FeEDDHA. Depending on plant Fe nutritional status (preculture ± 0.1 millimolar FeEDTA), apoplasmic Fe was used to different extent for translocation to the shoot. Under Fe deficiency, a much greater fraction of the apoplasmic Fe was utilized than in Fe-sufficient plants, as a result of the different rates of phytosiderophore release. Because of the diurnal rhythm in release of phytosiderophores in Fe-deficient plants, the utilization of the apoplasmic Fe for translocation into the shoot started 2 hours after onset of the light period and was dependent on the concentration of Fe in the apoplasm, which followed the order: Fe(III) hydroxide ≫ FeRDA ≫ FeDesferal = FeEDDHA. From these results, it can be concluded that in soil-grown plants the apoplasmic Fe pool loaded by various indigenous Fe compounds such as siderophores in the soil solution can be an important Fe source in graminaceous species, particularly during periods of limited Fe supply from the soil.

Full text

PDF
1304

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Arnon D. I. COPPER ENZYMES IN ISOLATED CHLOROPLASTS. POLYPHENOLOXIDASE IN BETA VULGARIS. Plant Physiol. 1949 Jan;24(1):1–15. doi: 10.1104/pp.24.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bienfait H. F., van den Briel W., Mesland-Mul N. T. Free space iron pools in roots: generation and mobilization. Plant Physiol. 1985 Jul;78(3):596–600. doi: 10.1104/pp.78.3.596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Branton D., Jacobson L. Iron Localization in Pea Plants. Plant Physiol. 1962 Jul;37(4):546–551. doi: 10.1104/pp.37.4.546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarkson D. T., Sanderson J. Sites of absorption and translocation of iron in barley roots: tracer and microautoradiographic studies. Plant Physiol. 1978 May;61(5):731–736. doi: 10.1104/pp.61.5.731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cline G. R., Reid C. P., Powell P. E., Szaniszlo P. J. Effects of a hydroxamate siderophore on iron absorption by sunflower and sorghum. Plant Physiol. 1984 Sep;76(1):36–39. doi: 10.1104/pp.76.1.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Longnecker N., Welch R. M. Accumulation of apoplastic iron in plant roots : a factor in the resistance of soybeans to iron-deficiency induced chlorosis? Plant Physiol. 1990 Jan;92(1):17–22. doi: 10.1104/pp.92.1.17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Römheld V., Marschner H. Evidence for a specific uptake system for iron phytosiderophores in roots of grasses. Plant Physiol. 1986 Jan;80(1):175–180. doi: 10.1104/pp.80.1.175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Römheld V., Marschner H. Mechanism of iron uptake by peanut plants : I. Fe reduction, chelate splitting, and release of phenolics. Plant Physiol. 1983 Apr;71(4):949–954. doi: 10.1104/pp.71.4.949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Plant Physiology are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES