Insights and implications of sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis

Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Na Xie; Xiao-Dong Sun; Edouard C Nice; Yih-Cherng Liou; Canhua Huang; Huili Zhu; Zhisen Shen

doi:10.1038/s41413-023-00306-4

. 2024 Feb 18;12:8. doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00306-4

Insights and implications of sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis

Yuan-Yuan Zhang ¹, Na Xie ², Xiao-Dong Sun ², Edouard C Nice ³, Yih-Cherng Liou ⁴, Canhua Huang ⁵, Huili Zhu ^6,^✉, Zhisen Shen ^7,^✉

PMCID: PMC10874461 PMID: 38368422

Abstract

Osteoporosis, a metabolic bone disease characterized by low bone mineral density and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, has led to a high risk of fatal osteoporotic fractures worldwide. Accumulating evidence has revealed that sexual dimorphism is a notable feature of osteoporosis, with sex-specific differences in epidemiology and pathogenesis. Specifically, females are more susceptible than males to osteoporosis, while males are more prone to disability or death from the disease. To date, sex chromosome abnormalities and steroid hormones have been proven to contribute greatly to sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis by regulating the functions of bone cells. Understanding the sex-specific differences in osteoporosis and its related complications is essential for improving treatment strategies tailored to women and men. This literature review focuses on the mechanisms underlying sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis, mainly in a population of aging patients, chronic glucocorticoid administration, and diabetes. Moreover, we highlight the implications of sexual dimorphism for developing therapeutics and preventive strategies and screening approaches tailored to women and men. Additionally, the challenges in translating bench research to bedside treatments and future directions to overcome these obstacles will be discussed.

Subject terms: Osteoporosis, Osteoporosis

Introduction

Osteoporosis, the most prevalent metabolic bone disease, affects approximately 200 million individuals worldwide and is characterized by a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD) and progressive microarchitecture deterioration of bone tissue. These changes are associated with an increased risk of fragility fractures.¹ Prior to a fracture, osteoporosis is usually asymptomatic, but when a fracture occurs, it can be extremely painful and even life-threatening.² Fractures in the spine and hip, in particular, can lead to mortality, with approximately 20% of individuals experiencing osteoporotic hip fractures dying within six months.³ As life expectancy increases and the baby boomer generation ages, the burden of osteoporosis and fractures is expected to grow rapidly, resulting in a significant impact on morbidity and mortality rates.^4,5 Therefore, osteoporotic fractures are considered one of the most significant public health priorities by the World Health Organization.⁶

Osteoporosis and its complications exhibit particularly pronounced sex-related differences.⁷ Men are less susceptible than women to developing primary osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures due to their larger, stronger bones and slower rate of bone loss in adulthood.^8,9 However, men are more prone to secondary osteoporosis and have a higher overall mortality rate from osteoporotic fractures.¹⁰ These sexual dimorphisms in the prevalence and prognosis of osteoporosis and associated complications may be attributed to sex-specific pathological mechanisms, including estrogen receptors (ERs) and associated pathways, which are key regulators of bone homeostasis.^1,11–13 Despite this, extensive preclinical research and clinical studies have been conducted in both male animal models and men, primarily driven by concern about the influence of the hormonal cycle (e.g., menstrual cycle) on outcomes as well as the classification of women as “protected subjects” in clinical trials.^14,15

Currently, the sex of the patient, an important factor in the prevention, screening, and treatment of osteoporosis and fractures, has not been well taken into account. Most medications, guidelines, screening, and fracture risk prediction methods have been developed for women and subsequently adapted for use in men.¹⁶ Therefore, gaining further insights into the sex differences in osteoporosis, especially the underlying pathological mechanisms, can help guide the development of age- and sex-specific preventive, screening, and therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis and its complications.

A better understanding of the sex-specific pathophysiology of osteoporosis can contribute to the development of novel, tailored therapeutics and preventive approaches. This review aims to address the sexual dimorphism of osteoporosis, with a focus on the pathogenic mechanisms related to sex chromosome abnormalities, steroid hormones, and psychological stress in osteoporosis. Despite the intriguing and exciting research in this field, numerous issues remain to be further addressed to effectively translate transformative discoveries into beneficial treatments. Therefore, in this review, we also discuss the challenges and potential solutions that can accelerate the development of tailored therapeutics and screening strategies for osteoporosis.

Disparities in osteoporosis epidemiology according to sex

Aging, a decline in sex steroids, long-term use of glucocorticoids and diabetes contribute to osteoporosis by altering the balance between bone formation and resorption.¹⁷ Osteoporosis is commonly associated with postmenopausal women, which can be attributed to their longer lifespans and the sharp decline in estrogen levels that they experience.¹⁸ In addition to primary osteoporosis, which typically occurs due to aging and/or hormonal factors, secondary osteoporosis is associated with pharmacological agents (such as glucocorticoids (GCs)) or underlying diseases such as diabetes.^19–21 Notably, secondary osteoporosis is more prevalent in men than in women. Additionally, men face a higher risk of mortality following osteoporotic fractures than women. Despite limited evidence, there is still controversy surrounding sex-specific differences in GC-induced and diabetic osteoporosis.

Primary osteoporosis in older women and men

Osteoporosis is a metabolic disease that reduces bone mass and impairs bone microarchitecture, leading to skeletal fragility and an elevated risk of fractures.²² Historically, osteoporosis has been primarily associated with postmenopausal women, considering it a bone health issue that predominantly affects this group.²³

In fact, women over the age of 50 have an osteoporosis prevalence approximately four times higher than men in the same age group worldwide, making osteoporosis the most common cause of fractures among the elderly^24,25 (Fig. 1a). Although population-based prevalence data for osteoporotic fractures are lacking, current data demonstrate sex disparities in hip fractures²⁶ (Fig. 1a). In the European Union (EU), only 21% of the 20 million people with osteoporosis are male; however, it is important to note that men have a higher mortality rate following an osteoporotic fracture than women.¹⁰

Fig. 1 — The prevalence of osteoporosis in men and women throughout their lifetimes. a Left: The prevalence of osteoporosis in women and men aged 50 and older in selected countries. The sex-specific prevalence rates of osteoporosis in the world, China, European Union (EU) countries, and the United States (US) are presented for women and men aged 50 years and older. The criterion of the World Health Organization was applied for the diagnosis of osteoporosis. The following data sources were used to determine osteoporosis prevalence: osteoporosis prevalence worldwide and in EU countries (https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/facts-statistics/epidemiology-of-osteoporosis-and-fragility-fractures); osteoporosis prevalence in China, the survey of the China Ministry of Health; and osteoporosis prevalence in the US, The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Middle: The sex-specific prevalence of osteoporotic fractures in selected countries. Unlike osteoporosis, the population-based prevalence of osteoporotic fractures is difficult to obtain for men and women by country due to the lack of standard diagnostic criteria. The data represent the proportions of hip fractures in men and women worldwide, China, EU countries, and the US. Data on hip fractures in China were adopted from a study in Hefei, China.⁵²⁶ Data for hip fractures worldwide, in EU countries, and in the US originated from the following data source: (https://www.osteoporosis.foundation/facts-statistics/epidemiology-of-osteoporosis-and-fragility-fractures). Right: The cumulative mortalities among male hip fracture patients were higher than those of female patients at 6, 12, and 36 months. Data were adopted from the study in Denmark.³⁶ b The balance of bone formation and bone resorption changes during a lifetime due to decreased sex steroids, increased glucocorticoids, T2DM, and aging. Bone resorption can outweigh formation because of decreased osteoblastogenesis, enhanced osteoclastogenesis, reduced bone remodeling, and cell senescence. c Bone mass (upper), average sex hormone production (upper middle), prevalence of T2DM (lower middle), and urine cortisol levels (below) in men and women throughout their lifetime. The dots representing 24 h urine cortisol levels, shown as the 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles, were adapted from a study in Switzerland.⁴⁸ SASP senescence-associated secretory phenotype

Fracture patterns resulting from osteoporosis differ between males and females. Hip fractures, the most severe complication of osteoporosis, occur at a lower incidence in men than in women, with approximately one-third of cases occurring in males.²⁷ In a large-scale study of fractures conducted in the United States (US), male populations accounted for 27.9% of hip fractures in 2010, and this proportion is projected to increase to 37.8% by 2030.²⁸ In the MrOS MsOS (Hong Kong) studies, after a 14-year follow-up, the incident vertebral fracture rate was higher in women than in men, regardless of whether they had baseline osteoporotic vertebral deformity.²⁹ According to a nationwide cohort study in South Korea that enrolled 73 717 patients with osteoporotic fractures, the incidence rate of subsequent fractures within 24 months was higher in females than in males (10.37 vs. 9.14 per 100 person-years, respectively).³⁰ It has been reported that vertebral bone and long bones are formed by different stem cell populations, making vertebral bone a feasible target for a distinct set of diseases, such as tumor metastases.³¹ Furthermore, the differences in fracture patterns between the sexes may be because skeletal stem cell-mediated bone regeneration depends on estrogen signaling in female mice but not in male mice.³²

The mortality rate following osteoporotic fractures is greater in men than in women. As reported by a nine-year cohort study of individuals over the age of 60 with osteoporotic hip fractures, women have a predominance of fractures (64.68%), whereas men suffer higher mortality rates (20.42%; 95% CI: 13.76–27.08).³³ Men had a slightly higher likelihood of dying from all-cause mortality within a year after a hip fracture than women (22.8% vs. 19.5%).³⁴ A prospective study revealed that hip fracture decreased life expectancy, with men having a larger reduction than women.³⁵ Even after controlling for age, fracture sites, and medications, long-term survival analysis disclosed that the higher mortality for men is overwhelmingly significant compared to women (HR 1.70, 95% CI: 1.65–1.75, P < 0.001) (Fig. 1a).³⁶

In addition to the considerably high mortality rate associated with hip fractures in men, the mortality risk remains significant following most osteoporotic fractures. According to data from the Korea National Health Insurance Service, the cumulative mortality rate in the first year after initial distal radius fractures was higher in males than in females (2.24% vs. 1.30%).³⁷ Altogether, it is important to recognize that osteoporosis not only affects older women but also causes serious health issues for male populations.³⁸

GC-induced osteoporosis

GC-containing medications, including cortisone, prednisone, dexamethasone, and hydrocortisone, are the leading cause of secondary osteoporosis and severe osteoporotic fractures in both sexes.³⁹ GCs play a crucial role in maintaining skeletal homeostasis, but insufficient or excessive levels can lead to osteoporosis and fracture. Hip fracture risk is increased by endogenous GC deficiency conditions such as Addison’s disease, whereas long-term usage of synthetic GCs frequently induces rapid bone loss and an enhanced risk of fractures in a time- and dose-dependent way.⁴⁰ The risk of vertebral fracture is nearly three times higher, and the risk of hip fracture is approximately twice as high in individuals taking oral GCs.⁴¹ Although the degree of GC-induced bone loss varies greatly and no clear predictors have been validated for individual fracture risk, it is recommended to undergo a BMD test or receive osteoporosis treatment within six months of initiating GC therapy.⁴²

The sexual differences in susceptibility to and microarchitecture changes caused by GC-induced osteoporosis are contradictory. The prevalence of GC-induced osteoporosis is slightly higher in men than in women, with rates of 67% and 59%, respectively.⁴³ However, the prevalence of GC-induced osteoporosis was not significantly different between men and women in a large Japanese study with 25 569 patients. The study included a population with a mean age of 68.5 years, with 90.5% of patients being over the age of 50.⁴⁴

GCs have been shown to reduce areal BMD at the femoral neck in women, as well as the total femur and femoral neck in men.⁴⁵ In postmenopausal women, GC-induced osteoporosis is associated with changes in trabecular and cortical changes, whereas in men, it results in diminished trabecular thickness and connectivity.⁴⁶ Notably, only 12% of men and 23% of women who had not received prior osteoporosis management underwent BMD testing or received osteoporosis treatment while they were undergoing oral GC therapy, indicating that chronic GC users do not adequately undergo osteoporosis prevention treatment, with men being more undertreated than women.⁴⁷

Several factors conceal sexual dimorphism in GC-induced osteoporosis. As reported by a large population-based multicentric study, the 24-h urine excretion of cortisol increases with age in men but not in women (Fig. 1c).⁴⁸ These sex-specific cortisol changes may contribute to age-related osteoporosis, making the elucidation of sexual dimorphism even more difficult. GCs, whether endogenous overproduction or exogenous administration, may induce impaired insulin sensitivity and hyperglycemia, indirectly contributing to bone loss and osteoporosis.⁴⁹ The changes in sex hormones make the situation more complex.⁴³ GCs synergistically aggregate the deteriorating effects of estrogen decline in bone loss, resulting in higher rates of fragility fractures in postmenopausal women (41.9%) than in premenopausal women (5.4%).⁵⁰ Stanozolol derived from dihydrotestosterone (DHT) can enhance BMD and improve biomechanical properties in GC-induced osteoporosis, possibly due to the anabolic effects of androgen on the skeletal system.^51,52 It is challenging to examine the sexual dimorphism of GCs in osteoporosis because they are widely used, from rheumatic ailments in women to renal problems in children. Additionally, the majority of current research on GC-induced osteoporosis focuses on older populations, leaving limited information regarding the impact on premenopausal women and men under the age of 50.⁴⁶

Diabetic osteoporosis

Growing evidence suggests an elevated risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in patients with diabetes.^53–58 Patients with type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) often have lower bone strength and a higher risk of fractures.^59,60 Type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) leads to skeletal abnormalities, including increased cortical porosity and a deficit in bone material properties. Patients with T2DM face a higher risk of fractures, despite their BMD being increased or within the normal range.^56–58 In both Western European and East Asian populations, the prevalence of T2DM is higher in men than in women.^61,62 The sex differences in T2DM may be due to sexual dimorphism in the utilization of energy and metabolic substrates in metabolic organs, such as adipose tissue, muscle, and the liver.^63,64 It is plausible that these sexual variations in metabolic organs also contribute to the sex-specific differences in diabetic osteoporosis.

T1DM patients have a sexually dimorphic prevalence of osteoporosis, with women being at higher risk. Both men and women with T1DM have a 2- and 4-fold increased risk of hip and lumbar spine fractures, respectively.⁶⁰ A prospective, multicenter study found that the odds of fractures were higher in prepubertal females (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.21–6.52) than in postpubertal males (OR 2.44, 95% CI: 1.11–5.38).⁶⁵ In line with T1DM, the risks of osteoporosis in T2DM patients are higher in females than in males.^66,67 The prevalence of osteoporosis in female T2DM patients was significantly greater than that in male patients (21.9% vs. 13.0%), suggesting a sex difference in T2DM-associated secondary osteoporosis.⁵⁹ Increased vertebral fractures were reported in female T2DM patients (RR 1.3), while neither prevalent nor incident morphometric fractures were increased in male patients, although the point estimate (HR 1.28) was similar.⁶⁶ Similarly, the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study reported greater incident fracture rates in women with T2DM than in men (24.5/1 000 vs. 12.7/1 000 person-years).⁶⁸

The mortality risk following fracture in women and men with T2DM remains controversial. According to a population-based cohort study, men have greater total postfracture death rates than women.⁶⁹ A meta-analysis including 22 cohort studies also revealed a higher mortality risk in men than in women within five years after a hip fracture.⁷⁰ However, the Dubbo study reported that after adjusting for confounders, the risk of mortality in female T2DM patients was higher than that in males (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.30–2.16 vs. HR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.91–1.49). Given that the participants in the Dubbo study had average ages that were higher than 65, it is important to note that the average ages should be further evaluated to investigate the sex difference in mortality risk.⁶⁸

Analyzing sex dimorphism in diabetic osteoporosis poses significant challenges. One major challenge is that T1DM starts at a much earlier age than T2DM, even during adolescence. The age differences, coupled with variations in the status of sex hormones among patients participating in clinical observations of T1DM and T2DM, complicate the analysis. Additionally, T2DM patients have many comorbidities, such as rheumatic arthritis.⁷¹ Hence, these patients require treatment with GCs, which further worsens the osteopathy of these patients and adds complexity to studying sex differences. Furthermore, many factors complicate the discovery of sexual dimorphisms, such as varied methodologies for measuring fractures, biased study designs overlooking the status of sex hormones, limited transparent reports, and underpowered studies in males. The relatively small sample size used in research also limits the ability to reveal sex differences in diabetic osteoporosis.¹⁰

Molecular mechanisms underlying sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis

Bone development and remodeling throughout life are complex and occur differently in women and men.⁷² To gain insights into sex differences, it is necessary first to understand bone biology and then the cellular and molecular pathways underlying sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis.

Sex variations in bone cell functions and key signaling pathways

Approximately 80% of the skeletal mass comprises cortical bone, which provides strength and protection. The remaining 20% of the bone mass is made up of trabecular bone, which provides structural support and permits bone flexibility.^73,74 Bone mass plays a critical role in determining the risk of osteoporosis and fragility fractures, and it exhibits obvious sex differences. In females, bone mass often peaks in the early 20 s and undergoes a rapid decline after menopause, which is closely related to estrogen levels.⁷⁵ However, in men, bone mass frequently peaks in the late 20 s, with testosterone primarily responsible for the rapid and extensive increases in bone mass, strength, and dimensions. Typically, males have a higher peak bone mass and thicker cortical thickness than females (Fig. 1c).^76,77

Bone tissues comprise three major types of bone cells, namely, osteocytes, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts (Fig. 1b).⁷⁸ Among the three types of bone cells, osteocytes are the most abundant, accounting for approximately 90%–95% of cells in adult bone tissues. Osteocytes are considered terminally differentiated bone cells arising from osteoblasts.⁷⁹ In contrast to highly abundant and long-lived osteocytes, osteoblasts comprise only approximately 6% of the cells in adult bones and have a relatively short lifespan. Osteoblasts develop from bone marrow precursor cells, namely, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs).^80,81 Osteoclasts are multinucleated giant cells originating from bone marrow hematopoietic progenitors, which generate resident macrophages in various tissues and monocytes in peripheral blood and are formed by the fusion of these precursor monocytes and macrophages.⁸² Osteocytes, osteoblasts, and osteoclasts are all crucial components for maintaining normal bone function, and any disruption in their homeostasis underlies the pathogenesis of osteoporosis.⁸³

Bone remodeling, also known as the bone renewal process, mainly occurs during adult life and replaces old and damaged bone without changing bone shape to maintain bone quality.⁸⁴ Physiological bone remodeling is delicately regulated by a complex system involving multiple cells.⁸⁵ Dysfunctional remodeling results in bone fragility, such as osteoporosis.⁸⁶ Osteoclasts are drawn to sites of microdamage to replace old bone with new bone, and osteoclasts are known as bone-resorbing cells.⁸⁷ Upon completion of resorption by osteoclasts, osteoblasts fill the gap resorbed by depositing new bone and completing the bone remodeling cycle. For adult bone to sustain strength and mineral homeostasis, the bone resorbed by osteoclasts needs to be equivalent to that newly formed by osteoblasts. Crosstalk between osteoblasts and osteoclasts regulates bone remodeling.⁸⁸ Based on the interplay between osteoclasts and immune cells, osteoimmunity plays a pivotal role in bone remodeling.⁸⁹

Osteoclasts play unique and vital roles in bone development and extracellular matrix remodeling in the adult skeleton system.⁹⁰ Excess activity of osteoclasts favors bone resorption, leading to many skeletal diseases, such as osteoporosis.⁸² Osteoclasts develop and adhere to the bone matrix, which secretes lytic enzymes and acid to degrade bones.^82,91 The secretion of protons is necessary for acid proteases to dissolve bone minerals and digest the extracellular matrix, facilitating resorption.⁹² Carbonic anhydrase II provides the protons for extracellular acidification by H⁺-ATPase. Vacuolar H⁺-adenosine triphosphatase coupled with Cl- conductance on the membrane plays a major role in acidification of the osteoclast-bone interface.^93,94 However, the exact molecular mechanisms for osteoclast differentiation are still unclear. Notably, the receptor activator RANK and its ligand RANKL play essential roles as mediators in activating osteoclastogenesis and promoting bone resorption. This finding sheds new light on the molecular mechanisms underlying osteoclast differentiation and formation.^95,96

Osteoblasts are responsible for initiating new bone formation and remodeling.⁹⁷ Osteoblasts synthesize and secrete various extracellular proteins (e.g., type I collagen, osteocalcin, and alkaline phosphatase) essential for bone matrix formation. Collagenous and noncollagenous proteins in the matrix work with osteoblasts and osteoclasts to ensure normal bone metabolism.⁹⁸ Osteoblasts also contribute to the mineralization of bone tissues to maintain the calcium-phosphate balance in developing bone tissues.⁹⁹ In addition to the aforementioned primary biological functions, the other biological functions of osteoblasts include but are not limited to the following: (1) Osteoblasts produce hormones, among which the first known bone-derived hormone is osteocalcin, a calcium-binding protein and the most abundant noncollagen protein. Osteocalcin consists of 49 amino acid residues, regulating systemic glucose and energy metabolism, cognition, and reproduction.¹⁰⁰ In addition, osteocalcin triggers an involuntary physical reaction in response to a threat, aiding the ability to escape from danger.¹⁰¹ (2) Osteoblasts have specific receptors for vitamins and hormones, such as vitamin D (VD), estrogen, and parathyroid hormone (PTH). Therefore, they serve as target cells for these crucial hormones.¹⁰² (3) Osteoblasts express receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B (RANK) and its ligand (RANKL), an important mediator in activating osteoclasts and holding dual roles in coupling bone formation and resorption.¹⁰³ (4) Osteoblasts also release proteins that regulate phosphate excretion from the kidneys, such as fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23).¹⁰⁴ (5) Mature osteoblasts may transform into bone-lining cells, which are involved in governing the influx and efflux of calcium ions in bone tissues.¹⁰⁵ As previously mentioned, estrogens stimulate osteoblasts via ERs, which may explain the higher incidence of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women compared to older men. In addition to estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1), several transcription factors, such as the neural-specific transcription factor Engrailed 1, the dishevelled associated activator of morphogenesis 2, and noncoding RNAs, have been identified to have pivotal roles in osteoblast differentiation.^106,107

Osteocytes are usually embedded in the bone matrix and responsible for the mass of the bone tissues, which are also multifunctional and dynamic cells integrating hormonal and mechanical signals.¹⁰⁸ Osteocytes play a crucial role in the remodeling of bone tissues throughout life, exhibiting a range of essential functions. First, osteocytes secrete some growth factors, such as insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF), which stimulate osteoblasts and promote bone formation following fractures.¹⁰⁹ Second, osteocytes are the major responsive cells to mechanical stimulation.¹¹⁰ Third, osteocytes facilitate the exchange of ions across the bone. Fourth, osteocytes inhibit the differentiation of osteoblasts while promoting the differentiation of osteoclasts. Moreover, osteocytes express and secrete various regulatory proteins, such as sclerostin and Dickkopf 1,¹¹¹ which act as inhibitors of the Wnt signaling pathway. These two osteocyte-derived proteins contribute to the inhibition of bone formation.

Among hormones associated with bone homeostasis, PTH, secreted by the parathyroid gland, is crucial in regulating calcium and phosphate homeostasis and bone remodeling.¹¹² Bone and the kidney are the major target organs for the effects of PTH.¹¹³ PTH acts on all three types of bone cells. Specifically, PTH directly stimulates osteoblasts to form bone.¹⁰⁶ On the one hand, PTH indirectly activates osteoclasts to resorb bone, which further enhances the release of calcium into the blood. On the other hand, PTH also induces the release of FGF23 in osteocytes.¹¹⁴ These effects consequently lead to increased bone turnover and elevated circulatory calcium. In the kidney, PTH enhances the reabsorption of calcium and promotes the expression of 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1α-hydroxylase, which increases the production of calcitriol.¹¹⁵ Calcitriol is well known for elevating serum calcium levels by enhancing calcium absorption in the intestine, release from the bone, and reabsorption in the kidney.¹¹⁴ Owing to the pivotal roles of PTH, osteoporosis frequently occurs in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Interestingly, recombinant PTH was reported to increase bone density, reverse skeletal abnormalities, and improve the bone microstructure of patients with hypoparathyroidism.¹¹⁶ A combination of intermittent PTH and antiresorptive agents has been widely investigated and may be an alternative option for patients previously treated with bisphosphonates.¹¹⁷ Osteoblasts and osteocytes express the type-1 PTH receptor (PTH1R) and thus are the target cells of PTH.¹¹⁸

Following PTH/PTH analog binding to its receptor PTH1R in bone cells, a complex with low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6) is formed. Subsequently, the complex stimulates β-catenin dependent, Wingless, and Int-1 (Wnt)-ligand-independent Wnt signaling, which in turn enhances the expression of pro-anabolic genes.¹¹⁹ Together, 19 Wnt proteins exert their effects through binding to Frizzled receptors and LRPs as coreceptors, including LRP5 and LRP6.^120,121 To date, three Wnt signaling pathways have been discovered, including one canonical Wnt pathway (i.e., the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway) and two noncanonical Wnt pathways, including the Wnt/Ca²⁺-dependent pathway and the Wnt/planar cell polarity pathway.^122,123 The canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway plays a critical role in osteoporosis, mainly by promoting the differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells into osteoblasts.^124,125 The importance of Wnt signaling in bone health has been evidenced by multiple studies. For example, mutations of LRP5 disrupting Wnt signaling have been associated with osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome, characterized by reduced calvarial thickness.¹²⁶

In addition to PTH-mediated activation of Wnt signaling, the complex formed by the PTH/PTH analog can stimulate the formation of cAMP through adenylyl cyclase in bone cells.¹²⁷ The downstream effector molecules in PTH1R signaling, such as IGF-1, FGF2, and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), have been reported to play essential roles in osteoblast differentiation. FGF2 also regulates bone anabolism by mediating the effects of PTH by interacting with Wnt signaling.¹²⁸ Butyrate, a bacterial metabolite derived from gut microbiota,¹²⁹ orchestrates PTH-mediated effects in the skeletal system, predominantly stimulating bone formation and resorption by activating the Wnt signaling pathway.^130,131

Effects of sex chromosome abnormalities on osteoporosis

According to the widely accepted concept, sex differences arise from the inherent inequality of the sex chromosomes in XX and XY zygotes, which also cause sex disparities in osteoporosis phenotypes.^132,133 For instance, skewed X inactivation causes variable sex-specific expression of plastin 3 (PLS3), thereby resulting in X-linked osteoporosis.^14,134 PLS3 polymorphisms have been linked with skeletal fragility and early-onset osteoporosis in children and young adults.¹³⁵ Additionally, pathogenic mutations in PLS3 strongly correlate with fractures in men and postmenopausal osteoporosis in women.¹³⁶ Notably, considerable variations in PLS3 have been detected in women with heterozygous X chromosomes. These variations caused by PLS3 escaping X-inactivation or X-inactivation of the mutant allele may explain why women are less severely affected than men in X-linked osteoporosis.¹³⁷

Osteoporosis is associated with X-linked genetic disease, particularly in males.^138,139 Osteoporosis and low bone mass are prevalent comorbidities in hemophilia A (HA), a congenital X-linked recessive genetic disease.^140–143 The high prevalence of osteoporosis in HA patients has been reported to be closely associated with VD deficiency and hemophilic arthropathy.^144,145 In HA patients, the missing or defective expression of factor VIII (FVIII) disturbs bone homeostasis via the RANK/RANKL/osteoprotegerin (OPG) axis. The FVIII-induced production of thrombin regulates bone metabolism by upregulating interleukin-6 (IL-6), runt-related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2) and osteocalcin, as well as changing the cytokine profile (Fig. 2).¹⁴⁶ Global knockout of the FVIII gene induced trabecular bone accretion in male mice and diminished cortical compartment accretion in female mice. Furthermore, it resulted in repressed bone formation in male mice but increased resorption in female mice.¹⁴⁷

Fig. 2 — X-linked osteoporosis in males. X-linked osteoporosis is most likely more common in males, given the higher rates of mutation in genes, such as *PLS3* and factor VIII (*FVIII*), that are located on the X chromosome. *PLS3* deficiency induces an imbalance between bone resorption and formation, resulting in insufficient mineralization in osteoblasts, increased bone resorption in osteoclasts, and dysregulation of mechanosensing in osteocytes. A missing or defective clotting protein, factor VIII (FVIII), may directly disrupt bone homeostasis via the RANK/RANKL/OPG pathway in hemophilia A (HA) patients. The FVIII/VWF complex inhibits RANKL and increases the activity of OPG, thereby promoting osteogenesis. Activated FVIII detaches from VWF, binds to FIX, and then activates FX to FXa, which is responsible for the conversion of prothrombin into thrombin. Thrombin binds to PRL-1 to increase the production of IL-6, which further enhances the expression of RUNX2 and osteocalcin, decreasing the expression of RANKL. FVIII or FIX regulates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and reduces the production of sclerostin to further inhibit the Wnt signaling pathway. OPG osteoprotegerin, RANKL receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor α, IFN-γ interferon-γ; IL-1β, interleukin-1β, IL-6 interleukin-6, MAPK mitogen-activated protein kinase, COX-2 cyclooxygenase 2, PGE2 prostaglandin E2, EP4 PGE2 receptor 4, RUNX2 runt-related transcription factor 2

Another sex chromosomal abnormality with a high risk of osteoporosis is Klinefelter syndrome (KS), a common genetic condition characterized by an extra copy of the X chromosome in males. X-linked copy number variants may play a role in the elevated risk of osteoporosis, affecting approximately 40% of individuals with KS.¹⁴⁸ Patients with KS exhibit lower BMD than matched healthy people, which can be predicted by muscle mass, a history of testosterone treatment, age at diagnosis and bone markers.¹⁴⁹ Notably, a cross-sectional study showed that the bone mass phenotype in patients with KS was not associated with testosterone levels or the androgen receptor (AR) CAG polymorphism.¹⁵⁰ Interestingly, even men with KS who have adequate testosterone levels may have reduced bone mass, and testosterone replacement therapy does not always improve bone density in KS patients. Several factors, including low insulin-like factor 3 (INSL3), VD deficiency, reduced estrogen level, unfavorable fat/muscle ratio, and high follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), may contribute to osteoporosis in KS patients.¹⁵¹

Major sex hormones in bone metabolism

Similar to sex chromosome abnormalities, sex hormones, including estrogen, androgens and testosterone, also contribute to sex differences in the risk and pathophysiology of osteoporosis.¹⁵² Sex steroids act as essential regulatory sex hormones in bone modeling and remodeling processes by targeting bone cells, mainly osteoblasts and osteoclasts. The production of sex hormones changes dramatically and differently in men and women during their lifetime and is the most important factor for sex differences in osteoporosis (Fig. 1).

Estrogen’s powerful influence on bone homeostasis and its deficiency in osteoporosis

Among sex steroids that affect bone homeostasis and health, estrogen is undoubtedly the most important sex hormone in women and a major hormone in men.¹⁷ 17β-estradiol (estradiol, E2) is well known as the most potent estrogen with three major receptors, including classical estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) and estrogen receptor beta (ERβ), as well as nonclassical G protein-coupled estrogen receptor 1 (GPER1).¹⁵³ Estrogen, which reaches its peak during a woman’s 20 s and declines after menopause,^75,154 plays a critical role in tightly controlling bone mass in women. Postmenopausal bone loss, which is due to the associated decline in estrogen and usually occurs 5–15 years after menopause, is characterized mainly by an accelerated loss of trabecular bone, hence why postmenopausal osteoporosis is also referred to as trabecular osteoporosis.¹⁵⁵ According to a study on perimenopausal and postmenopausal women, the annual loss of BMD was approximately 2%–5% in the first several years of menopause followed by a notable increase in BMD loss, reaching 20%–30% at the femoral neck and 30%–40% at the spine ten years following the onset of menopause.¹⁵⁶

Estrogen is also associated with age-related osteoporosis in men.⁷⁵ A deficit of estradiol in older males contributes to reduced BMD due to a high turnover rate, poor microarchitecture, and rapid bone loss.^10,157 The direct role of estradiol deficiency in men’s osteoporosis is well supported by studies of men with congenital ER deficit (also referred to as congenital estrogen resistance) and aromatase deficiency.¹⁵⁸ Men with aromatase deficiency presented a phenotype similar to that seen in estrogen-resistant patients.¹⁵⁹ Nevertheless, unlike estrogen-resistant men, men with aromatase deficiency respond well to estrogen therapy and experience an increase in BMD following treatment.¹⁶⁰ Inhibition of aromatase significantly reduces the urinary markers of bone resorption and formation in men at a mean age of 68.¹⁶¹ Although the clinical phenotypes of the two human models of estrogen deficiency differ, adult men with congenital aromatase deficiency benefit from high-dose estradiol treatment.¹⁶² These findings provide direct evidence that estrogen deficiency is essential in bone loss in older men.

The molecular mechanisms of estrogen in bone homeostasis are complex. Over the past few decades, numerous studies have focused on the effects of estrogen on bone cells during growth, maturation, remodeling, or turnover in adults, shedding light on how estrogen deficiency contributes to osteoporosis.^{78,94,163,164} First, estradiol inhibits inflammation by repressing key pro-osteoclastic cytokines in T cells, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF), IL-1, IL-6, and IL-7.¹⁶⁵ The enhanced release of these cytokines in response to estrogen deficiency is associated with increased osteoclast differentiation and activity, as well as bone resorption (Fig. 3a).^166,167 Estradiol also reduces inflammation by downregulating the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway, inhibiting osteoclast formation and bone resorptive activity.^168,169 Second, estradiol promotes apoptosis of bone-resorbing osteoclasts (Fig. 3a).^170,171 Estradiol induces the expression of Fas ligand (FasL), a member of the TNF subfamily, in osteoblasts at the transcriptional level by binding to ERα. The activation of Fas/FasL signaling thereby induces osteoclast apoptosis in bone tissues.^172,173 Estradiol also inhibits osteoblast-driven osteoclastogenesis by regulating the membrane association of RANKL, another member of the TNF family, to decrease the amount and activity of osteoclasts.¹⁷⁴ Third, estradiol has pro-osteoblastic activity by upregulating the antiapoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2), leading to a net increase in new bone formation.^175,176 17β-estradiol relieves oxidative damage in osteoblasts by increasing the expression of miR-320-3p and decreasing RUNX2.¹⁷⁷ In aging female mice, the increase in FGF23 during a mild phosphate challenge is higher than that in male mice, possibly due to the direct effect of estradiol on osteocytes.¹⁷⁸ Additionally, estradiol directly upregulates the expression of alkaline phosphatase and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, both of which are recognized as biomarkers for osteoblast differentiation, thus leading to an increase in osteoblasts and the formation of new bone (Fig. 3a).¹⁷³

Fig. 3 — Mechanisms of sex steroid hormones on bone homeostasis. a Mechanism of estrogen action on bone cells. Estrogen is the most important sex hormone in women who undergo a hormonal shift in 17β-estradiol levels, transitioning from perimenopause to early postmenopause. The declining estrogen levels after menopause directly enhance the apoptosis of osteocytes to reduce bone remodeling, indirectly decrease osteoblastogenesis, and increase osteoclastogenesis by regulating RANKL. Estrogen regulates RANKL by acting on stromal cells and immune cells by changing cytokine profiles. b Schematic of the effects of male sex hormones on bone cells. The male sex hormone testosterone is an important regulator of bone cells, mainly osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Decreased testosterone levels in older men induce a decrease in DHT, which further represses the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts, increases apoptosis of osteoblasts, and reduces the synthesis of EMP. The decline in testosterone results in reduced estrogen levels, which further directly or indirectly decreases osteoblastogenesis and increases osteoclastogenesis to reduce BMD. ALP alkaline phosphatase, Bcl-2 B-cell lymphoma-2, ERα estrogen receptor alpha, ERβ estrogen receptor beta, FasL Fas ligand, IL-1 interleukin-1, IL-6 interleukin-6, IL-7 interleukin-7, IFN-γ interferon-γ, RANKL receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand, TNF-α tumor necrosis factor-alpha, Akt serine/threonine-protein kinase, AR androgen receptor, 5-AR congenital 5-alpha-reductase, BMD bone mineral density, DHT dihydrotestosterone, EMP erythromyeloid progenitor, PI3K phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase

ERs can affect the biological role and signaling pathways in the sex dimorphism of bones.¹⁷⁹ ERα and ERβ are abundantly expressed in osteocytes, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and immune cells, with different but overlapping distributions in females and males.¹⁷⁹ At the mRNA level, ERα is approximately 10-fold more abundant than ERβ in trabecular bone.¹⁸⁰ In addition, ERα plays a major role in mediating bone responses to estrogen in both sexes, whereas ERβ has minor protective effects in females and no significant effects in males.⁹⁹ Increasing attention has recently been directed toward the emerging roles of ERα in mechanotransduction signaling pathways in articular chondrocytes.¹⁸¹ In line with the above notion, bone formation was shown to be enhanced via upregulation of ERα in the process of fracture healing in mice following an application of mechanical strain induced by high-frequency low-magnitude vibration.¹⁸² Specifically, ERα activation induces the differentiation of MSCs into osteoblasts, the differentiation of osteoblasts into osteocytes, and apoptosis of osteoclasts.^1,183,184 The effect of estrogen on cortical and trabecular bone mass is mediated by a direct effect on osteoblasts and osteoclasts via ERα.¹⁵⁵ A novel resveratrol oligomer derivative exhibited potent anti-osteoporosis effects in ovariectomized rats by activating ERβ, indicating the potential effects of ERβ in osteoporosis in females.¹⁸⁵ Although GPER1 is expressed in osteoblasts, osteocytes, and osteoclasts, relatively few reports exist on its role in bone homeostasis.¹⁸⁶

Previous animal studies of bone cell-specific deletion of ERα have gained insights into its biological role and signaling pathways in the sex dimorphism of bones. ERα inactivation in extrahypothalamic neurons during late puberty increased bone length in female mice but not in male mice, suggesting that central ERα signaling affects bone growth and radial bone expansion via the growth hormone (GH)/IGF-1 axis, specifically in females.¹⁸⁷ ERα deletion in both osteoblasts and chondrocytes induced substantial trabecular bone loss and reduced cortical bone periosteal and endosteal diameters in female mice but not in male mice, indicating that ERα in osteoblast progenitors and hypertrophic chondrocytes played sexually different roles in bone mass regulation.¹⁸⁸ Deleting ERα in osteocytes decreased the trabecular bone mass only in male mice.¹⁸⁹ ERα knockout was associated with decreased bone turnover and increased trabecular bone volume in both female and male mice, while ERβ deletion had the same effects only in female mice.⁹⁹ ERα, but not ERβ, in osteocalcin-positive osteoblasts was suggested to boost the late stage of bone regeneration in female mice.¹⁹⁰ Ovariectomy induces enhanced expression of microRNA-148a and osteoporosis, and microRNA-148a increases apoptosis of osteoblasts by inhibiting ERα in female mice.¹⁹¹

These data demonstrate that estrogen is a crucial sex hormone that governs bone metabolism in both women and men and protects bone tissues through a variety of molecular mechanisms. Further insights into the sex- and age-related differential effects and mechanisms of estrogen and ERs will help in the development of tailored strategies to prevent and treat osteoporosis in specific populations.

Androgens in bone health and osteoporosis

Testosterone acts as an essential regulatory sex hormone in bone modeling and remodeling processes by targeting osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Testosterone can be converted to DHT, the most powerful androgen, which directly binds to the AR to induce androgenic activity (Fig. 3b).^17,192

Endogenous inadequacy of androgens due to disease may cause osteoporosis. Hypogonadism is a clinical and biochemical syndrome in which the testes cannot produce physiological concentrations of testosterone, usually indicated by a serum testosterone level of less than 300 ng/dL.¹⁹³ Due to acquired mild hormonal deficiencies, hypogonadism has been identified as one of the most common causative factors for secondary osteoporosis in men. Men with hypogonadism presented lower BMD and poorer bone microarchitecture.¹⁹⁴ Additionally, it has also been shown that testosterone benefits the BMD of hypogonadal men more than it does men with physiological levels of testosterone.^195,196 Some previous studies have shown that testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) enhanced BMD and improved bone turnover markers and microarchitecture in men with hypogonadism.^10,197–200 The results of testosterone trials also showed organ-specific effects for testosterone treatment in older males.²⁰¹ Despite the increasing use of testosterone supplementation for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, there are no studies supporting the use of TRT in reducing the risk of fractures in men. Therefore, further studies are needed to obtain deeper insights into the pathophysiology and clinical effects of testosterone on bone to improve the use of testosterone for this indication.

Androgen deficiency due to aging or androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer is another leading cause of osteoporosis. The decline of testosterone during aging is associated with reduced BMD, osteoporosis, and enhanced risk of fractures.^8,202 Rapid bone loss and severe deterioration of microarchitecture occur in prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.²⁰³ However, the exact levels of testosterone that may cause the development of osteoporosis and the onset of osteoporotic symptoms have not been established due to conflicting results in human studies.²⁰⁴

Testosterone has numerous functions in the skeletal system. Testosterone regulates periosteal apposition and increases bone growth, making male bones larger than female bones.²⁰⁵ Testosterone protects bones by modulating nonskeletal factors such as muscle strength.²⁰⁶ Moreover, testosterone stimulates the differentiation and proliferation of osteoblasts while suppressing the maturation and resorptive activity of osteoclasts. Testosterone deficiency in ovariectomized male rats stimulated RANKL production by osteoblasts, and elevated levels of RANKL enhanced bone resorption by promoting osteoblast differentiation, leading to decreased BMD (Fig. 3b).^207–209 Additionally, bioactive estrogen (estradiol, E2) and DHT, converted from testosterone by aromatase, contribute to the protective effects of testosterone on bone (Fig. 3b).^209–212 Of the three types of bone cells, osteoblasts are the direct target of testosterone-derived DHT and estradiol, which promotes bone formation and remodeling by binding to AR and ERs in men.^208,213 Notably, aromatase inhibitors result in a lower BMD and higher fracture risks in postmenopausal women with ER-positive breast cancer, suggesting a protective role of testosterone in women with estrogen deficiency.²¹⁴ Androgen also interacts with vitamin D₃ (VD3) to prevent the development of osteoporosis in men.²¹⁵ Treatment with DHT was reported to increase serum VD3 in mice, which further confirmed an association between androgens and VD homeostasis.²¹⁶ Studies by other researchers found that VD can suppress the peripheral conversion of androgen to estrogen catalyzed by aromatase.²¹⁷ Estrogens, but not androgens, increased the gene expression of VD-binding protein (DBP), a protein primarily responsible for the transport of circulating VD.²¹⁸ Interestingly, DBP gene polymorphisms were associated with BMD and the risk of fractures in male patients with osteoporosis.²¹⁹ Genome-wide association analysis of circulating DBP identified two variants associated with serum DBP levels.²²⁰ Although the beneficial effects of VD on bone, such as in the absorption and reabsorption of calcium, have been well documented, research on the interplay of VD and androgen needs further study to better understand its role in male osteoporosis.

AR mediates the maintenance and modulation of bone homeostasis. AR-deficient mice exhibited decreased bone mass, reduced volume of trabecular and cortical bone, and osteopenia in endochondral bones due to enhanced bone turnover and resorption.¹⁵⁵ Specific deletion of AR in bone cells, such as osteoblasts and osteocytes, reduced the trabecular bone mass. However, the absence of AR in cells other than osteoblasts and osteocytes can also regulate bone mass. Conditional knockout of AR in neurons of male mice exhibited obvious loss of cortical thickness and strength even with sufficient androgen.²²¹ Deletion of AR in B lymphocytes increased their numbers, suggesting androgen-mediated regulation of lymphocytes.²²² Testosterone inhibited the expression of IL-6 from immune cells, reducing the pro-osteoclastic effect.²²³ Conversely, testosterone deficiency may enhance the unfavorable impact of IL-6 on BMD. Blocking AR also significantly impaired bone repair in female rats.^223–225

In addition to older males with low testosterone levels, osteoporosis has been observed in young men with normal testosterone levels, which is categorized as idiopathic osteoporosis.¹⁰ Idiopathic osteoporosis is a heterogeneous disorder in young adults with decreased osteoblast function and impaired bone acquisition, and the exact pathological mechanism remains unclear.²²⁶ Men with low serum IGF-1, a major GH mediator that plays a crucial role in bone remodeling, have an elevated fracture risk, especially hip and vertebral fractures.¹⁰ In contrast, higher serum IGF-1 levels were reported to be associated with idiopathic osteoporosis in premenopausal females.²²⁷ The expression of the IGF-1 receptor on circulating osteoblast progenitor cells can predict the bone formation rate and effects of teriparatide treatment in patients with premenopausal idiopathic osteoporosis.²²⁸ Given that abnormally low levels of IGF-1 have been closely linked to suppressed bone formation in most male patients with idiopathic osteoporosis at a young age, those patients may benefit from recombinant GH as an alternative therapy.^10,229

Sex hormone-mediated oxidative stress and protective autophagy in osteoporosis

Age-related increases in reactive oxygen species (ROS) are inversely related to age-associated decreases in BMD and bone strength, which may contribute to age-related osteoporosis.²³⁰ Accordingly, the beneficial effects of estrogen and phytoestrogens on bone are attributed at least in part to their antioxidant properties (Fig. 4a).²³¹ In addition to aging, some age-related metabolic diseases are also associated with increased ROS levels.²³⁰ For instance, hyperglycemia and insulin resistance were shown to result in increased ROS production in T2DM patients due to the promotion of mitochondrial respiration.^55,232 Additionally, GC-induced ROS upregulate oxidative stress-related gene expression in osteoblasts and inhibit Wnt-induced osteoblastogenesis.²³³

Oxidative stress plays a critical role in osteoporosis progression.²³⁴ Long-term exposure to oxidative stress disrupts bone homeostasis, thereby contributing to osteoporosis.²³⁵ Aging-induced oxidative stress leads to enhanced osteoclast activity and reduced osteoblast activity.²³⁶ Aging, diabetes, GCs, and estrogen deficiency can all promote the production of ROS to induce excessive oxidative stress, which decreases osteoblastogenesis through TCF/LEF signaling.²³⁷ Oxidative stress also promotes the production of proinflammatory cytokines and miRNAs to increase osteoclastogenesis and decrease osteoblastogenesis.²³⁸ ROS are important components regulating the differentiation of osteoclasts.²³⁹ As a kind of ROS, H₂O₂ causes oxidative damage to multiple intracellular macromolecules, eventually leading to cell senescence and death.²⁴⁰ Notably, excessive oxidative stress can be neutralized and lowered by antioxidants, such as glutathione and N-acetyl cysteine (NAC). Therefore, they may induce beneficial effects on bone or even hold potential as therapeutic agents for osteoporosis.^97,234 Sudachitin, a polymethoxyflavone from Citrus sudachi, suppresses inflammatory bone destruction and osteoclastogenesis by decreasing ROS production in osteoclast precursors.²⁴¹ The powerful antioxidant NAC was shown to inhibit orchiectomy-induced osteoporosis in mice by repressing osteocyte senescence.²⁴² Vitamins K1 and K2 protect osteoblasts from H₂O₂-induced oxidative damage, suggesting a protective role of vitamin K in the mineralization, formation and remodeling of bones.²⁴³ Inhibiting p66^Shc decreases oxidative stress and promotes osteogenesis, which can be repressed by E2 and DHT (Fig. 4c).^244,245 Collectively, defense against oxidative stress represents a potent way to prevent osteoporosis in the elderly.²⁴⁶

Autophagy is a potential protective mechanism to protect bone cells from oxidative stress-induced damage and maintain homeostasis (Fig. 4b).^247,248 Under oxidative stress, excessive ROS can trigger autophagy through multiple signaling pathways, such as ROS/FOXO3,^249,250 ROS/AMPK,²⁵¹ ROS/Akt/mTOR,²⁵² HIF-1α/BNIP3,²⁵³ MAPK/ERK,²⁵⁴ and ROS/JNK/c-Jun.²⁵⁵ It has been well documented that autophagy, a self-degradation of damaged organelles, aggregated or misfolded proteins and other macromolecules, represents an essential key mechanism for preserving organismal and cellular homeostasis, including bone homeostasis.²⁵⁶ Thus far, three types of autophagy (macroautophagy, chaperone-mediated autophagy, and microautophagy) have been identified, of which macroautophagy is most closely related to human diseases, including osteoporosis.²⁵⁷ Dysfunctional autophagy induced by aging may be an essential mechanism for developing age-related osteoporosis.^155,258 Autophagic activity is also involved in growth factor-mediated effects on bone. For instance, an interplay between BMPs, strong osteogenic growth factors, and autophagic activity has been identified. The ligands of BMPs participate in modulating autophagy levels in muscle-related disease by regulating energy metabolism.^259,260 β-catenin-dependent canonical Wnt signaling, a validated signaling pathway with a critical role in the differentiation of stem cells to osteoblast lineage cells and the formation of mature osteoblasts in osteogenesis, is negatively correlated with autophagy.²⁶¹ Autophagy is also involved in the modulation of osteoclastogenesis and osteoclast function.²⁶² For instance, GCs induce bone loss by increasing autophagy in osteoclasts via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway.²⁶³ Many autophagy-related proteins (ATG), such as ATG5, ATG7, ATG4B, and MAP1LC3, have been reported to be important in promoting bone resorption.²⁶⁴ Targeting Atg7 repressed the activity of osteoclasts in ovariectomized mice while inhibiting autophagy in osteoblast aggregate bone loss in estrogen deficiency cases.^265,266 Cell-specific deletion of Atg7 in osteoblasts reduced bone formation by triggering endoplasmic reticulum stress.²⁵⁶ Modulating autophagy is a promising strategy for treating osteoporosis. Advanced glycation end product (AGE) accumulation in hyperglycemia causes senescence of bone marrow MSCs and induces senile osteoporosis, which can be reversed by enhancing mitophagy by overexpressing sirtuin-3.²⁶⁷ Enhancing autophagy in bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) promoted bone formation and osteogenic differentiation by activating mTOR and triggering the WNT/β-catenin pathway.²⁶⁸ Specifically, enhancing autophagy in osteoblasts by degrading the Notch intracellular domain boosted the differentiation of osteoblasts and relieved osteoporosis.²⁶⁹ Estrogens, especially 17β-estradiol, promoted protective autophagy in bone cells to inhibit ROS and promote cell survival (Fig. 4b).^270,271

Growing evidence suggests that the expression levels of many autophagy genes are regulated by sex hormones, such as estrogens and their receptors, contributing to the distinction between autophagy-mediated osteoporosis in men and women (Fig. 4d).^272–276 For instance, ATG3 is regulated by AR only, whereas Unc-51-like autophagy activating kinase 1 (ULK1) is the target gene, with its transcription level regulated by both AR and ERα. Bioinformatics analysis has revealed that ERα potentially regulates 19 autophagy genes, and 12 autophagy genes are potential target genes of ERβ in humans, with their expression levels regulated by ERs at the transcriptional level. Further analysis of the gene-related pathways has found that these genes play functional roles in the induction of phagophores, expansion, and fusion with lysosomes in autophagy.²⁷⁶ Among these autophagy genes potentially regulated by sex hormones and their receptors, ULK1 was confirmed to play a direct role in bone homeostasis and osteolytic metastasis.²⁷⁷ By silencing or overexpressing ULK1 in vitro and in vivo, ULK1 has been demonstrated to be directly involved in modulating OC differentiation via the ULK1/docking protein 3/spleen tyrosine kinase axis, while ULK1 upregulation inhibits OC-mediated bone resorption and thereby impedes bone loss.²⁷⁷ 17β-estradiol increases the expression of sirtuin-1 to promote autophagy via the AMPK/mTOR signaling pathway and inhibits apoptosis by activating FOXO3a signaling in osteoblasts.²⁷⁰ Estrogen deficiency in female rats decreases autophagy and enhances apoptosis in osteocytes, while estrogen replacement therapy enhances the viability of osteocytes by repressing apoptosis and maintaining autophagy.²⁷⁸ As illustrated by proteomic analysis, estrogen promotes autophagy in human osteoblasts during differentiation to promote survival and mineralization by upregulating RAB3 GTPase-activating protein.²⁷⁹

Research on sex-specific autophagy genes is still in its early stages. Interestingly, some sex-specific autophagy genes are regulated by either AR or ERs, while others are regulated by both AR and ERs (dual regulation). It is still unclear whether dual regulation occurs in the same or different biological processes. It has yet to be determined whether these sex-specific autophagy genes play functional roles related to sex differences in osteoporosis. Further insights into these autophagy genes regulated by sex hormones and receptors may provide new targets for developing novel therapeutic approaches and help tailor treatment strategies for osteoporosis.

Estrogen and testosterone in GC-induced osteoporosis

Despite their high therapeutic effectiveness, the use of GCs induces various side effects, including GC-induced osteoporosis.^42,280 Usually, bone loss may occur soon after the initiation of GC treatment, and the fracture risk may increase within months following treatment.⁴⁰ Specifically, GCs inhibit the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts, elevate the apoptosis of osteoblasts and osteocytes, and increase osteoclastogenesis.^281,282 GCs induce autophagy in osteoblasts and inhibit their proliferation by downregulating the Wnt and MAPK signaling pathways.²⁵⁸ For osteocytes, GCs induce their apoptosis by increasing the influx of Ca²⁺ and promoting the Pyk2-JNK signaling pathway.²⁸³ In addition, GCs promote the differentiation and maturation of osteoclasts and increase the number of osteoclasts by upregulating RANKL, thereby prolonging the osteoclast lifespan and resulting in bone loss (Fig. 5a).³⁹

Fig. 5 — Pathological mechanisms of osteoporosis induced by diabetes, glucocorticoids, and psychological stress. a Glucocorticoid (GC) inhibits the proliferation and increases the apoptosis of osteoblasts by downregulating Wnt signaling, repressing the production of sex steroids, decreasing calcium absorption, and reducing growth factors. GC decreases the differentiation of adipocytes in bone marrow by decreasing the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. GCs also promote the apoptosis of osteocytes by increasing the influx of Ca²⁺. GCs decrease apoptosis and promote the survival of osteoclasts by upregulating RANKL and downregulating M-CSF. b T2DM-associated osteoporosis is characterized by decreased bone turnover and impaired microarchitecture, which has a complex pathological mechanism and involves multiple signaling pathways. T2DM affects bone metabolism, demineralization, bone marrow adiposity, and calcium balance through hyperglycemia. Other coexisting conditions in T2DM, such as obesity, impaired renal function, hypercalciuria, reactive oxygen species (ROS), more advanced glycation end products (AGEs) accumulation, inflammation, and peptides in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, contribute to the higher prevalence of osteoporosis in T2DM patients. Estrogen and androgen can scavenge ROS directly or indirectly by changing cytokine profiles and exert protective effects by nonskeletal mechanisms such as the regulation of adipose tissues. Estrogen protects pancreatic β cells and increases insulin production to indirectly alleviate diabetic osteoporosis. c Psychological stress contributes to osteoporosis through the hypothalamic‒pituitary‒adrenal (HPA) axis and the brain-immune connection. Psychological stress promotes bone loss by regulating growth hormones, glucocorticoids, sex hormones, and pro-inflammatory cytokines. MSCs mesenchymal stem cells, M-CSF macrophage colony-stimulating factor, OPG osteoprotegerin, RANKL receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand, AGEs advanced glycation end products, ROS reactive oxygen species, SOST sclerostin, GLP-1 glucagon-like peptide-1, GI tract gastrointestinal tract, GIP gastric inhibitory polypeptide, IGF insulin-like growth factor, GC glucocorticoid, CRH cortisol-releasing hormone, GnRH gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, GHRH growth hormone-releasing hormone, SNS sympathetic nervous system, NPY neuropeptide Y, NMU neuromedin U, ACTH adrenocorticotrophic hormone, GH growth hormone, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, LH luteinizing hormone, PICs pro-inflammatory cytokines

Crosstalk between GCs, estrogen and testosterone plays key roles in osteoporosis. GCs inhibit gonadotropin secretion, resulting in decreased production of estrogen and testosterone, as well as increased bone resorption, which consequently contributes to osteoporosis.²⁸⁴ Testosterone in hypogonadal men has been shown to prevent bone loss at the lumbar spine in GC-induced osteoporosis, while the selective estrogen-receptor modulator raloxifene decreased fractures in postmenopausal females.²⁸⁵ Regarding osteoporosis, GCs and estrogens have opposing actions on multiple signaling pathways. Both GCs and estrogens can regulate the MAPK signaling pathway, in which estrogens increase the phosphorylation of p38 MAPK. In contrast, GCs decrease the phosphorylation of ERK-MAPK, leading to different effects on the proliferation of osteoblasts.^286,287 Furthermore, estrogens upregulate and phosphorylate the Akt protein, while GCs downregulate it.^288,289 As mentioned earlier, estrogens and phytoestrogens protect bone by alleviating GC-induced osteoporosis and antagonizing GC side effects. When translating these scientific findings into clinical practice, sex- and age-specific differences should be considered to enhance efficacy and decrease side effects. For instance, estrogens rapidly decline in postmenopausal women, so prolonged medication is recommended when they require GC therapy to diminish the risk of osteoporosis. Male patients needing GC treatment may benefit from combining GCs with phytoestrogens, such as poncirin,²⁹⁰ quercetin,^291,292 genistein,²⁹³ trigonelline,²⁹⁴ and icariin,²⁹⁵ to reduce the risk of developing GC-induced osteoporosis.^270,296 Overall, phytoestrogens show some benefits, but their effectiveness in the context of GC-induced osteoporosis is not well established and needs further investigation.

Diabetic osteoporosis

As a metabolic disorder, the influence of diabetes on bone tissues and cells is complex.^297,298 T1DM patients exhibit enhanced systemic inflammation, bone loss, and fracture risks, in which IL-10 is essential in promoting osteoblast maturation.²⁹⁹ Boys with T1DM exhibited significantly lower BMD at several sites than boys without T1DM, while these obvious differences were not observed in girls with T1DM. Factors affecting BMD in boys and girls with T1DM also differ notably.³⁰⁰ Male T1DM patients showed lower 25(OH)D levels and higher PTH levels than control individuals, while no such differences were found in females with T1DM.³⁰¹ All these reports suggest sex differences in the pathological mechanisms underlying T1DM-induced osteoporosis. Ovariectomy-induced estrogen deficiency aggregated T1DM-induced expression of TNF-α in osteoporosis in female mice, suggesting that TNF-α may play a more important role in females than in males in T1DM-induced osteoporosis.³⁰² Endogenous BMP-6 was shown to be reduced in male T1DM mice, which contributed to bone loss.³⁰³ Most studies on T1DM-induced osteoporosis are carried out using male animal models, so data on female animals are somewhat limited.

In contrast to T1DM, T2DM is a chronic metabolic disease characterized by insulin resistance. The pancreas still produces insulin, but not at sufficient levels, and the tissues and cells cannot respond appropriately to insulin. Unlike T1DM, which usually onsets at a young age, T2DM commonly occurs at an older age and frequently coexists with obesity. The prevalence of T2DM exhibits obvious sex differences during a lifetime (Fig. 1c). Similarly, males are more vulnerable to nutritional challenges and more likely to develop insulin resistance and hyperglycemia than females in nearly all animal models.³⁰⁴ However, female T2DM patients exhibited a higher relative risk of cardiovascular diseases and mortality than males, suggesting that hyperglycemia may neutralize the beneficial effects of estrogen.³⁰⁵ T2DM-associated bone disease is characterized by decreased turnover and impaired bone microarchitecture (i.e., enhanced cortical porosity and reduced cortical volume).⁶⁶ Although there was seemingly normal BMD or even greater levels of areal BMD in T2DM patients than in individuals without T2DM, a higher risk of developing fragility fractures was reported in T2DM patients.⁶⁷ However, the exact underlying mechanisms need to be further elucidated. Several diabetes-associated risk factors that may contribute to fragility fractures in T2DM patients have been identified, including obesity, insulin resistance, poor glycemic control, micro- and macrovascular complications, exogenous insulin therapy, and accumulation of AGEs.^66,67 Furthermore, T2DM and aging enhanced the production of senescent cells in various tissues, including bone tissues, in male diabetic rats.³⁰⁶ Multiple molecular pathways were activated in male diabetic rats and involved the effects of T2DM on bone metabolism, altered microarchitecture, and osteoporosis.³⁰⁷ Gene expression and glucose metabolism in osteoblasts are tightly regulated by insulin. Studies have shown that insulin stimulates the differentiation and proliferation of osteoblasts by binding to insulin receptors under normal conditions.^308,309 Due to insulin resistance and long-term exposure to uncontrolled hyperglycemia in T2DM, the metabolism of osteoblasts is severely impaired, which directly disrupts bone homeostasis mainly through osteoblast-mediated bone formation.³¹⁰ In addition to the aforementioned direct effects, T2DM also induces impaired renal function, hypercalciuria, aberrant AGE accumulation in collagen, inflammation, and diabetic retinopathy, which also facilitate the higher prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with diabetes (Fig. 5b).^56,308 In rodent models of T1DM and T2DM, estrogen (17β-estradiol) has been demonstrated to display protective effects on pancreatic β cells through ERs, and β cells are involved in maintaining bone homeostasis by regulating osteocalcin.³¹¹ Based on these findings, it has been proposed that enhanced ER action is a promising therapeutic approach to preserve functional β cell mass in diabetic patients (Fig. 5b).³¹¹ Physical exercise-induced skeletal irisin relieved T2DM-induced bone loss in female rats.³¹² High insulin levels enhanced cortical bone mass and influenced microstructure by regulating osteoblast- and osteoclast-related gene expression in male KK-Ay mice.³¹³ Canagliflozin improved bone microarchitecture by regulating the differentiation of osteoblasts via AMPK/RUNX2 signaling in male T2DM mice.³¹⁴ It should be pointed out that the majority of the current studies on diabetic osteoporosis are carried out in either male or ovariectomized female animal models, which is far from support elucidating sex differences. Animal models mimicking premenopausal diabetic women should be established. If studies are simultaneously carried out on both male and female animals, comparing results and reaching conclusions on sex differences will be easier. It is now important to find clues of sexual dimorphism of diabetic osteoporosis in risk factors and biochemical markers of both sexes.

In summary, diabetes is among the leading causes of secondary osteoporosis, and the diabetic population is increasing worldwide.³¹⁵ In China, it has been reported that the overall prevalence of total diabetes was 12.8%, ranging from 6.2% in Guizhou to as high as 19.9% in Inner Mongolia, and a higher prevalence was observed in men than in women.^291,316 Therefore, basic research and clinical studies must be accelerated to prevent and treat diabetic osteoporosis, especially in countries with a high prevalence of diabetes and a rapid growth of aging populations.

Psychological stress-induced osteoporosis

Both biological and psychosocial factors contribute to sex differences in the risks and outcomes of osteoporosis, among which psychosocial stress shows a greater influence on women than on men.³¹⁷ Although mental disorders and osteoporosis have distinct pathological mechanisms, several recent studies show that mental health disorders are strongly associated with osteoporosis,^318,319 and notably, this negative association differs between women and men.^320,321

A nationwide longitudinal study reported that patients with posttraumatic stress disorder had a much higher risk of osteoporosis (HR: 2.66, 95% CI [1.91, 3.71]) later in life. It should be noted that 76.3% of the subjects in this study were females.³²² The influence of psychological stress on postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with or without depression was also investigated. It was found that the lumbar vertebra and femur dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scores were significantly lower in women with osteoporosis and depression than in control patients.³²³ In another study, the correlation between chronic psychological stress and osteoporosis was investigated in 2 327 patients with depression and 21 141 matched control individuals. The results reported a significantly lower BMD in the vertebra, distal radius, and proximal femur and higher levels of bone resorption markers in patients with depression than in control individuals without depression.³²⁴ Analysis of the sex-specific difference between depression and osteoporosis indicated that women with depression responded more strongly to psychological stress and that osteoporosis was approximately three times more common in women than in men.³²³ In addition, women were more vulnerable to depression-associated low bone mass, whereas men with depression displayed significantly more bone loss than women with depression.³²⁴ Aside from the direct effects of psychological stress, pharmacological agents for treating mental disorders such as major depression or posttraumatic stress disorder exert drug-induced side effects on bones, leading to lower BMD and a higher risk of osteoporosis and fractures in patients with mental diseases.³²⁵ Antipsychotics can also induce hyperprolactinemia, which further increases the risk of osteoporosis.³²⁶

Serum 25(OH)D concentrations are associated with anxiety levels in postmenopausal women, indicating the role of VD in psychological stress and osteoporosis.³²⁷ Several studies have suggested that stress hormone signaling mediated by the hypothalamic‒pituitary‒adrenal (HPA) axis and the brain-immune connection may be essential contributors. Growth hormones, GCs, and inflammatory cytokines may mediate the adverse effects of psychological stress on bone loss, leading to osteoporosis (Fig. 5c).^328,329 How psychological stress regulates the development of osteoporosis still needs to be elucidated.

Due to the effects of sex hormones, sex chromosomes, or other intrinsic or extrinsic differences between the sexes (e.g., bioavailable estrogen, physical activity) in osteoporosis, it is necessary to take sex-specific genetic and environmental factors into serious consideration when planning future etiological studies of osteoporosis.

Strategies and challenges in the management of osteoporosis

As a metabolic disorder, bone homeostasis of formation and resorption is under the tight control of the endocrine system, and the disruption of homeostasis results in osteoporosis. Various osteoporosis treatments have been developed to primarily strengthen bone and reduce the risk of osteoporotic fractures (Fig. 6).^330,331 Based on their pharmacological mechanisms, the current medications for osteoporosis fall into two main categories^332,333: (1) antiresorptive agents that exert therapeutic effects through suppressing osteoclast-mediated resorption and, in turn, reduce the rate at which bones breakdown or resorb and (2) anabolic medications that activate osteoblasts and thereby stimulate new bone formation.^334,335 Given the sex- and age-specific differences in osteoporosis and its related complications, such as osteoporotic fracture, treatment strategies need to be tailored for women and men.³³⁶ The following section summarizes the current treatment options for osteoporosis for both sexes, discusses the challenges, and proposes future directions for improving the tailoring of medications.

Fig. 6 — Overview of current mainstream treatments for osteoporosis. Numerous endocrine system hormones, including the hypothalamic‒pituitary‒adrenal (HPA) axis, PTH, androgen, estrogen, and glucocorticoid, all tightly regulate bone homeostasis and may be powerful targets for osteoporosis treatment. Current mainstream treatments for osteoporosis are indicated in green. CRH cortisol-releasing hormone, GnRH gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, ACTH adrenocorticotrophic hormone, TSH thyroid stimulating hormone, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, LH luteinizing hormone, PTH parathyroid hormone, T3 triiodothyronine, ER estrogen receptor, RANKL receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B ligand

Current treatments for osteoporosis in female and male patients

Antiresorptive therapies for osteoporosis

Antiresorptive agents have been the mainstay of treatments for osteoporosis in the past three decades and have shown proven effects in decreasing fracture risks and increasing BMD. However, they have been reported to cause adverse reactions, such as atypical femoral fractures and jaw osteonecrosis, resulting in reduced reliance on these medications.¹¹⁹ To date, antiresorptive pharmaceuticals approved for osteoporosis comprise five major classes: bisphosphonates, sex hormones, selective estrogen receptor modulators, monoclonal antibodies, and calcitonin.³³⁷

Bisphosphonates

Bisphosphonates are the first-line, most widely used, and least expensive antiresorptive agents for osteoporosis.^338,339 Bisphosphonates are usually considered the first option for osteoporosis, and approved bisphosphonates include alendronate (Fosamax),^340,341 ibandronate (Boniva), risedronate (Actonel),^342,343 and zoledronate or zoledronic acid (Reclast).^344–347 These drugs have shown anti-fracture efficacy with a good safety profile and are recommended for treating osteoporosis and individuals with prior osteopenia (an increased risk of osteoporosis) or a history of fragility fracture.^348,349 Bisphosphonates are effective at increasing BMD and decreasing fracture risk in patients with diabetic osteoporosis.³⁵⁰ As shown by a retrospective study enrolling 7 830 subjects, preadmission use of bisphosphonate was associated with superior survival among critically ill patients.³⁵¹ The American College of Physicians recommends that male osteoporosis patients should be offered bisphosphonates to decrease the risk of vertebral fractures.³⁵²

In addition to the therapeutic effects of alendronate in treating male patients with primary osteoporosis, the agent is effective for males with a high risk of developing fractures.³⁴⁰ A network meta-analysis demonstrated that alendronate reduces osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and matrix breakdown, resulting in increased BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck, thereby decreasing the risk of new vertebral fracture.³⁵³ Using a national database, alendronate was found to reduce the risk of hip fractures with sustained safety in patients above 80 years old and prior fractures.³⁵⁴ Oral alendronate administered weekly also increases BMD, thereby improving GC-induced bone loss among male and female patients.³⁵⁵ In men with hypogonadism or eugonadism, alendronate significantly decreased the incidence of vertebral fracture compared with control individuals (0.8% in patients treated with alendronate vs. 7.1% in the control patients).³⁴⁰

Zoledronate is recommended for male patients needing intravenous treatment and is the only treatment demonstrated to decrease fracture risks in men.¹⁰ In addition to effects on fracture risk, zoledronate induced fewer vascular events, decreased the incidence of cancer, and reduced the mortality of osteogenic women older than 65 years old compared with a placebo.³⁵⁶ A retrospective cohort study using the Danish and Swedish health registries reported that zoledronate increased the risk of heart failure and death when compared to bisphosphonates. However, it is important to note that there was no increase in cardiovascular mortality in zoledronate users in comparison to those using bisphosphonates or untreated control individuals. This observation may be due to the higher baseline risks present in patients who begin zoledronate treatment.³⁵⁷

Current data about atrial fibrillation and bisphosphonates remain contradictory.^358,359 However, due to adverse skeletal effects, the use of bisphosphonates in patients with the highest risk of future fractures dropped from 15% in 2004 to 3% in 2013 in the US.³⁶⁰ Considering that bisphosphonate use in male patients treated with sex steroids helps restore the patients’ eugonadal status, it may be worthwhile investigating whether the combined use of bisphosphonates could improve the clinical efficacy of testosterone.

Estrogens and phytoestrogens

Pharmacological therapy for osteoporosis began in the 1940s when estrogen was found to reverse the negative calcium balance in postmenopausal women.¹⁶⁰ Estrogen facilitates the acquisition of bone mass during puberty and plays a crucial role in bone homeostasis.¹⁷ Estrogen levels sharply decline in menopausal women, which directly contributes to a decrease in BMD and predisposes this sex- and age-specific population to osteoporosis and a high risk of osteoporotic fractures.¹⁵⁴ In animal studies, ovariectomy-induced depletion of estrogen biosynthesis caused osteoporosis, which has been used to develop an animal model of postmenopausal osteoporosis.^361,362

The efficacy and safety of estrogens and phytoestrogens in patients with osteoporosis, especially postmenopausal female patients, have been extensively investigated.³⁶³ Hormonal therapy with estrogens reduced the incidence of all osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women in the Women’s Health Initiative (WHI) randomized controlled clinical trial. In the Women’s Health, Osteoporosis, Progestin, Estrogen (HOPE) clinical study program, 822 women were randomly assigned to three different treatment groups: the combined equine estrogen (CEE) group, the CEE plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) group, or the placebo group, and all participating women were given 600 mg/d elemental calcium. Compared to the placebo group, the hormone treatment groups showed a significant increase in BMD, specifically a 0–1.5% increase in hip BMD and a 0–3% increase in spine BMD. Furthermore, this clinical trial also observed drug-related side effects, such as breast pain and vaginal bleeding, with greater risk in the CEE + MPA group than in the placebo group.³⁶⁴ In addition to direct effects on osteoporosis, menopausal hormone therapy reduces the risk of T2DM, enhances insulin sensitivity, and improves glycemic control, which may exhibit indirect and long-term benefits to bone health.³⁶⁵

In addition to estrogen treatment for osteoporosis, naturally occurring phytoestrogens, such as quercetin,²⁹⁶ icariin,^366,367 kaempferol,^368,369 and genistein,^370,371 have shown therapeutic effects in female patients with osteoporosis.^372,373 Isoflavones, a kind of phytoestrogen with lower binding affinity than endogenous estrogens, can act as an ERβ selective ligand and an inhibitor of testosterone 5-α reductase to maintain the balance of estrogen/androgen to promote bone health.³⁷⁴

However, side effects induced by hormone treatment (e.g., breast pain and vaginal bleeding) were also observed.³⁶⁴ Overall, estrogen replacement therapy can be offered to perimenopausal or early postmenopausal women experiencing moderate to severe symptoms, as the benefits tend to outweigh the risks.³⁷⁵ However, it is important to note that long-term estrogen therapy has been associated with increased risks of cardiovascular events. Therefore, the route of administration, dose, and duration of estrogen treatment should be individualized after careful consideration.³⁷⁶ The excessive risk of breast cancer associated with estrogen replacement therapy has also raised significant concerns.³⁷⁷ Although many studies have shown the high efficacy of estrogen therapy, including improved BMD and reduced fractures, it is not used as the first-line therapy for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures primarily due to potential adverse events. The structural similarity to estrogen enables phytoestrogens to induce estrogenic or antiestrogenic effects by binding to ERs. There are also other health concerns related to phytoestrogen treatment, such as endocrine disruption and thyroid function disturbance.³⁷⁸

The therapeutic benefits and side effects of estrogens and phytoestrogens have also been investigated in specific male patients. The deficit of estradiol, the most potent estrogen, in older males has been shown to decrease BMD and increase bone loss.³⁷⁹ Estrogen therapy has effectively improved BMD in a specific male population with congenital estrogen resistance or congenital aromatase deficiency (congenital estrogen deficiency).³⁸⁰ These clinical studies in adult men with congenital aromatase deficiency have provided evidence in support of the benefits of hormonal therapy with estradiol on this specific male population.

In summary, estrogen therapy is usually considered for older women to relieve menopausal symptoms (i.e., hot flushes). The associated improvements in bone health should be considered when weighing the benefits and the risks of estrogen treatment. Estrogen therapy is now usually recommended for postmenopausal women at high risk of fractures who cannot take other anti-osteoporosis drugs. It is recommended that the lowest effective dose of hormone be used for the shortest effective time. In addition, hormonal therapy with estrogens may be considered the main treatment and prevention of osteoporosis in an appropriate female population. Moreover, estrogen therapy needs to be individualized in the specific population of adult men with congenital aromatase deficiency or estrogen resistance.

Selective estrogen receptor modulators

The past decade has witnessed the development and approval of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SREMs) to treat different estrogen-responsive conditions, including postmenopausal osteoporosis and breast cancer.³⁸¹ SREMs are structurally diverse compounds that act either as ER agonists or antagonists by interacting with ERs in target organs. Those approved or under clinical trials that have shown beneficial effects on BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (e.g., raloxifene,^382,383 lasofoxifene,^384,385 bazedoxifene³⁸⁶) are ER agonists in bone.^387,388

Among SREMs, raloxifene is the only approved agent in many countries for treating postmenopausal osteoporosis and preventing vertebral fractures in women, but it has not been approved for males.³⁸⁹ As recommended in the 2018 update of French recommendations on the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis, raloxifene should be considered for women with osteoporosis who are younger than 70 years old whose risk of nonvertebral fractures is low.³⁹⁰ In clinical trials, tamoxifen and toremifene, currently recommended for patients with advanced breast cancer, have shown beneficial effects on BMD in older women after menopause. A clinical trial including 8 556 women aged 59–80 years showed that lasofoxifene at a daily dose of 0.5 mg decreased the risk of nonvertebral and vertebral fractures.³⁸⁴

Furthermore, the clinical use of SERMs has been expanded to male patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy but needs to be carefully prescribed due to adverse events such as gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and psychiatric effects.³⁹¹ Two SERMs, clomiphene citrate and tamoxifen, have been used off-label in males with central hypogonadism, which enhances serum testosterone levels.³⁹² Moreover, SERMs in combination with immunotherapy were suggested to benefit patients with prostate cancer by regulating the tumor immune microenvironment.³⁹³

Various studies have indicated the adverse effects of the long-term use of SREMs.^394,395 SREMs have been reported to be associated with uterine cancer, venous thromboembolism, and fatal strokes, which remain a major concern for long-term therapy for osteoporosis.³⁹⁶

Currently, several new SREMs, such as bazedoxifene,^386,397 ospemifene,^398,399 and arzoxifene,^400,401 either alone or in combination, are under investigation for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.^381,402 As shown by a meta-analysis of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library databases, bazedoxifene seems to have good safety and efficacy in postmenopausal women.³⁸⁶ The findings are promising, as these newly developed SREMs have potentially higher efficacy and potency than previous agents. In preclinical studies, these drugs have demonstrated their effectiveness matching that of conventional hormone replacement therapy in experimental osteoporosis in animal models with improved safety profiles.^403,404 Human studies, including phase III clinical trials, are ongoing.

Calcitonin

Calcitonin is a peptide hormone released by the thyroid that binds to osteoclasts, potently suppresses osteoclast activity, and inhibits bone resorption.^405,406 The discovery of calcitonin functions in osteoclasts and osteoporosis led to the development of synthetic human calcitonin, such as salmon calcitonin (an analog of human calcitonin), as a therapeutic drug approved for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis.^407,408 Calcitonin is not recommended as the first-line therapy to treat osteoporosis but is particularly appropriate for patients with high-turnover osteoporosis.^409,410 This is mainly because other approved antiresorptive therapies, such as bisphosphonates, are more effective for treating osteoporosis and preventing osteoporotic fractures.^411,412 The other main reason is related to calcitonin-associated side effects.⁴¹³ For instance, the long-term use of calcitonin may elevate the risk of prostate cancer in men. In postmenopausal women, previous clinical trials of nasal calcitonin have noted rhinitis and epistaxis as the most common adverse effects, with incidence rates of 12% and 4%, respectively.⁴¹⁴ Put simply, calcitonin is a relatively less effective antiresorptive therapy for osteoporosis and related fractures, and its benefit does not outweigh the risk of treating osteoporosis.⁴¹⁵

Monoclonal antibodies

Understanding the roles of RANKL⁴¹⁶ and sclerostin⁴¹⁷ in bone metabolism and osteoporosis has contributed to the development of two monoclonal antibodies for treating osteoporosis and preventing fractures, namely, denosumab and romosozumab.^418,419

Denosumab is a human monoclonal IgG2 antibody against RANKL and has been approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, women with breast cancer taking aromatase inhibitors, and men at high risk of fracture, such as prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.^420–422 In addition, denosumab has been approved for treating GC-induced osteoporosis in both women and men at high risk of fracture. This approval was based on important findings from clinical studies on patients of both sexes who were treated with GCs and at increased risk of osteoporotic fractures.^203,423 Both male and female osteoporosis patients were given denosumab, and notably, during the two years of treatment, the incidence of vertebral fractures, including new and worsening fractures, decreased by nearly 66%.⁴²⁰ Denosumab has also been approved for male patients with osteoporosis.⁴²⁴ Denosumab can also increase BMD in males with primary osteoporosis or prostate cancer undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.^203,425 Despite the efficacy in improving BMD and reducing the incidence of fractures, several side effects may restrict the use of denosumab in specific patient populations. Upon discontinuation, the effects of denosumab rapidly reversed, which resulted in increased bone turnover and BMD loss,⁴²⁶ with the vertebral fracture rate increasing, even back to the level in untreated patients.^119,427 Denosumab thus should not be stopped without alternative treatment since a sudden arrest may result in a rebound in vertebral fracture risk.⁴²⁸ Denosumab is usually considered an alternative to bisphosphonates. Without a powerful bisphosphonate at denosumab discontinuation, the incidence of vertebral fractures is high, which raises great concerns.⁴²⁹

Romosozumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to sclerostin, an antagonist of the Wnt signaling pathway, resulting in the inhibition of bone resorption and stimulation of bone formation.^342,430 Romosozumab is currently indicated for postmenopausal osteoporosis patients at high risk of fractures or osteoporosis patients for whom other treatments have failed or were intolerable.^431,432 Romosozumab also decreased the risk of vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women at 12 and 24 months after transitioning from denosumab, and it was given for 12 months at a dose of 60 mg, which was administered subcutaneously every 6 months.⁴³³ A phase 2, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial showed that the discontinuation of romosozumab induced large declines in BMD, with the highest decrease in the lumbar spine (9.3%).⁴¹⁹ Although recent clinical studies have reported cardiovascular adverse reactions associated with romosozumab, the available evidence does not definitively establish a direct link between romosozumab and cardiovascular events.⁴³⁴ The discontinuation of denosumab is primarily linked to rapid bone loss in the majority of patients and an increased risk of vertebral fractures, underscoring the need for a careful assessment of the indications to start denosumab.^427,435,436 Additionally, relative to denosumab, the efficacy and safety of romosozumab still needs to be evaluated for women and men at high risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures other than postmenopausal osteoporosis, such as women with breast cancer treated with aromatase inhibitors or prostate cancer patients undergoing androgen deprivation therapy.^433,437

Anabolic medications for osteoporosis

Based on the hypothesis that osteocytes and osteoblasts can be irregularly stimulated to form new bones without decreasing bone resorption, anabolic therapies for osteoporosis are progressing rapidly.¹¹⁹ Anabolic medications, which act mainly by activating osteoblasts and osteocytes to promote new bone formation, are leading a new clinical paradigm.^438,439 Based upon the findings that PTH/PTH analogs show anabolic effects on bone cells, two anabolic agents, teriparatide and abaloparatide, have been approved by the FDA for the treatment of osteoporosis.^440,441 Teriparatide is a recombinant protein comprising the first 34 amino acids of PTH and functions as an agonist of PTH1R.⁴⁴² Abaloparatide, a 34-amino acid peptide, shares 76% homology with parathyroid hormone–related protein (PTHrP) and 41% homology with PTH (1–34). It is a second-generation anabolic drug and acts as a selective agonist of PTH1R.⁴⁴³ Downstream effectors in PTH1R signaling are also potential targets for osteoporosis.^444,445 For instance, targeting the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and its bone-specific inhibitor sclerostin has been one of the major strategies in developing therapeutic agents for osteoporosis.⁴⁴⁶ The recently approved monoclonal antibody romosozumab, which targets sclerostin, was designed to act on the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.^447,448 However, blocking sclerostin results in the activation of Wnt signaling and possible adverse cardiovascular outcomes.⁴⁴⁹

Teriparatide is a recombinant form of human PTH (rhPTH) with an anabolic capacity to improve osteoblast activity and subsequently new bone formation.^343,450,451 Teriparatide promoted bone healing in medication-induced osteonecrosis of the jaw compared to a placebo in an RCT.⁴⁵² Among anabolic medications for osteoporosis, teriparatide is the first approved drug in this category for osteoporosis in men and women at a very high risk of fractures.⁴⁵³ A PTHrP analog (abaloparatide) is a synthetic 34-amino acid peptide analog of PTHrP with a functional role in bone formation similar to PTH in stimulating new bone formation.⁴⁵⁴ A post hoc analysis of the Abaloparatide Comparator Trial In Vertebral Endpoints (ACTIVE), a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial, reported that fracture events were fewer following abaloparatide treatment in patients with T2DM, and differences were not significant between groups except nonvertebral fractures in the abaloparatide versus placebo groups (P = 0.04).⁴⁵⁵ Abaloparatide was approved by the FDA in 2017 for postmenopausal women at high risk of fracture.⁴⁴⁰ Both teriparatide and abaloparatide exert their effects by directly binding to PTH1R, leading to stronger stimulation of bone formation rather than resorption with a net gain in BMD.^456,457 Clinical trials in postmenopausal osteoporosis patients with a very high risk of fractures have shown that subcutaneous injection with teriparatide or abaloparatide for up to 21 months reduced incidental fractures (both nonvertebral and vertebral).⁴⁵⁸ Considering that treatment with either teriparatide or abaloparatide may increase serum uric acid, there should be some caution when prescribing these anabolic medications for patients with current or previous acute gouty arthritis.⁴⁵⁹ Teriparatide and abaloparatide may cause hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria; therefore, preexisting hypercalcemia, hypercalciuria, and a history of kidney stones are considered contraindications for the use of these drugs.^460,461

Downstream effectors in PTH1R signaling are also potential targets for osteoporosis.^444,445 For instance, targeting the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway and its bone-specific inhibitor sclerostin has been one of the major strategies in developing therapeutic agents for osteoporosis.⁴⁴⁶ The recently approved romosozumab was designed to target the canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, and the drug acts as a monoclonal antibody against sclerostin.^447,448

Taken together, anabolic medications, such as teriparatide, abaloparatide, and romosozumab, have shown greater therapeutic effects in randomized clinical trials on reducing clinical fracture risks in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and at very high risk of fracture in comparison with patients treated with oral bisphosphonates, the first-line, most commonly used, less costly antiresorptive medications for osteoporosis.^{10,119,438,462} The advantage of anabolic mediations over antiresorptive medications (e.g., bisphosphonates) in strengthening BMD and decreasing fracture risk is likely attributed to the stronger stimulation of bone formation than resorption, resulting in a net gain in BMD, an improvement in bone strength, and a reduction in osteoporotic fracture risk. Therefore, anabolic medications may be considered for osteoporosis of various causative factors (e.g., menopause in women, the use of GCs in men and women) in drug-naive male or female patients who are evaluated to have a very high risk of fractures. The use of anabolic medications may also be considered for osteoporosis patients who do not respond well to antiresorptive medications or have experienced treatment failure.^463,464

Despite their apparent advantage in reducing the risk of fractures, particularly in postmenopausal osteoporosis in women, anabolic medications have not become the first-line pharmacologic treatment for most osteoporosis patients. This is mainly attributed to several limitations, including relatively high cost, subcutaneous administration requirements, and concerns over long-term safety.⁴⁶⁵ However, researchers still have great hope for anabolic agents, and initiating the remodeling cascade by activating PTH1R by teriparatide and abaloparatide will inevitably enhance resorption. Thus, there is an urgent need to understand the direct effects of anabolic agents on each cell type and the influence on bone resorption, which will help to determine the population for whom it is most suitable and optimize the treatment strategy for osteoporosis.¹¹⁹

Challenges and future directions in the treatment of osteoporosis

Although the currently available osteoporosis medications have shown clinical efficacy in improving BMD and diminishing osteoporotic fractures (Table 1), there are undoubtedly challenges in treating different types of osteoporosis with common and distinct risk factors, including sex- and age-specific osteoporosis.^160,466 More exquisitely designed clinical studies are needed to assess the feasibility of these treatment options in various populations.

Table 1.

Differences in drug indications and benefits of osteoporosis medications between women and men

Medications	Sex differences in drug indications	Sex differences in benefits
Medications	Sex differences in drug indications	BMD	VFs	NVFs
Alendronate	Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis Women with osteoporosis due to steroid use	✔	✔	✔
Alendronate	Men with primary osteoporosis, hypogonadal osteoporosis or GIOP	✔	✔	✖
Ibandronate	Prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women	✔	✔	✔
Ibandronate	Not approved for the treatment of osteoporosis in men	✔	✖	✖
Risedronate	Postmenopausal osteoporosis or GIOP in women Men with osteoporosis	✔	✔	✔
Risedronate		✔	✖	✖
Pamidronate	Women with osteoporosis at high fracture risk	✔	✔	✔
Pamidronate	Women with osteoporosis at high fracture risk	✖	✖	✖
Zoledronic acid	Postmenopausal osteoporosis or GIOP in women Men with primary osteoporosis Men with GIOP	✔	✔	✔
		✔	✔	✔
		✔	✖	✖
Denosumab	Menopausal women at high fracture risk Men with primary osteoporosis Men with ADT-associated osteoporosis	✔	✔	✔
		✔	✖	✖
		✔	✔	✖
Strontium ranelate	Women with osteoporosis at high fracture risk Adult men with osteoporosis	✔	✔	✔
Strontium ranelate		✔	✖	✖
Teriparatide	Menopausal women with osteoporosis Men with primary osteoporosis	✔	✔	✔
Teriparatide		✔	✔	✖

Open in a new tab

✓ evidence available, ✖ lack of evidence or insufficient evidence, high fracture risk is defined as having multiple risk factors for fracture or a history of osteoporotic fracture

ADT androgen deprivation therapy, BMD bone mineral density, GIOP glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, NVFs nonvertebral fractures, VFs vertebral fractures

Intervention threshold for initiating osteoporosis treatment in women and men

According to a recent real-world study in China, a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures (greater than 7%) based on the Fracture Risk Assessment (FRAX) tool was identified as the intervention threshold for cost-effective osteoporosis treatment with zoledronate for postmenopausal women.⁴⁶⁷ In this respect, a certain age or a given risk factor does not represent a particular risk threshold. Therefore, further studies are needed to determine the normal ranges and thresholds in specific populations that need osteoporosis treatment, especially for postmenopausal women and older men, as well as younger women and men with multiple risk factors. A broader strategy for osteoporosis and generic bisphosphonates may be the only medication satisfying the necessary efficacy, safety, and cost.⁴⁶⁸ Clinical evaluation trials in males should also be performed.

Combined/sequential therapy

Combining anabolic agents and antiresorptive medications in sequential therapy for osteoporosis may result in greater clinical efficacy.^469,470 The sequence in which drugs are given in combined/sequential therapy is important for the overall efficacy.^119,462 Treatment sequence matters when sequential therapy is carried out with anabolic medications, such as PTH, teriparatide, and antiresorptive agents.^471–473 For instance, adding alendronate to the teriparatide treatment regimen was not shown to benefit male patients with osteoporosis.⁴⁷⁴ Therefore, in sequential therapy for sex-specific populations, including postmenopausal osteoporosis in women and GC-induced osteoporosis in men and women who are at a very high risk of fractures, anabolic medications are recommended to be used first for a short time to improve BMD and bone strength by boosting bone formation, followed by the long-term use of antiresorptive drugs.^436,475 Although sequential therapy reduces the risk of osteoporotic fracture with greater clinical efficacy than that of each drug alone, there are concerns about the side effects and high cost.

Nondrug practice in combination with current osteoporosis medications

The therapeutic benefit of osteoporosis medication in combination with alternative nondrug protocols has been increasingly recognized.⁴⁷⁶ The nondrug practice may include but is not limited to regular exercise, nutrition (intake of calcium and bioactive VD3), stopping excessive alcohol consumption, and quitting smoking.^477–479 Regular physical exercise, especially weight-bearing physical activities, can maintain or increase muscle function and strengthen bones, thereby reducing fractures in both men and women.^480,481 Regarding nutrition and supplements, it was suggested to consume foods enriched in calcium and VD or supplements of calcium and bioactive VD3 to combat osteoporosis.⁴⁸² If dietary calcium is inadequate, supplementation is recommended. The National Osteoporosis Society Vitamin D Guideline recommends a 25(OH)D level of at least 50 nmol/L and a maintenance dose of 800 IU/d.⁴²⁴ A meta-analysis identified increased risks of stroke with intakes of calcium above 1 000 mg daily, but only in female patients.⁴⁸³ Moreover, supplementation with a polyunsaturated fatty acid-enriched diet in growing and developing mice and rats can exert positive effects on osteoblasts and decrease the risk of osteoporosis.⁹⁷ Balanced nutrition, including protein, minerals, fruit and vegetables, should be emphasized for preventing fractures.⁴⁸⁴ A recent review revealed that nutrients from daily diets, such as unsaturated fatty acids, proteins, minerals, peptides, phytoestrogens, and prebiotics, can regulate bone metabolism and reverse bone loss and may prove to be an effective strategy to prevent and treat osteoporosis without subsequent side effects.⁴⁸⁵

Hormonal therapy with estrogens/phytoestrogens/androgens

When planning future clinical studies for treating osteoporosis and fractures with hormonal therapy, sex- and age-specific differences should be considered. Various doses, durations, regimens, and administration routes should also be investigated in future clinical studies to diminish side effects, especially in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. As levels of estrogens decline sharply in women after menopause, the benefits of estrogens on bone will be diminished or might even be lost in a proportion of postmenopausal women. If GC therapy is needed for inflammatory diseases in postmenopausal women, we propose that the dosage and duration of GCs should be reduced to avoid the risk of osteoporosis. Male patients taking GCs may benefit from combination with phytoestrogens, such as quercetin, poncirin, kaempferol, genistein, and icariin, to decrease the risk of GC-induced osteoporosis.^270,292,294 The Endocrine Society recommends testosterone replacement to males with symptoms of hypogonadism without contraindication to its use.⁴⁸⁶ However, the effectiveness of testosterone in increasing BMD is less obvious than anti-osteoporosis medication. Therefore, more evidence is needed.

More clinical trials with larger sample sizes in men

Clinical trials of anti-osteoporosis medications are more common in women than in men. Additionally, clinical trials in women usually have a larger sample size than those in men. BMD is usually used, rather than fractures, as the outcome in clinical trials in men. More clinical trials with large sample sizes in men are needed, considering the use of fractures as the outcome.⁴²⁴ In addition, the comorbidities in men are usually different from those of women, which should also be considered in designing clinical trials.

Raising awareness about osteoporosis and fractures, especially in men

Over the last decade, major international initiatives have been used to develop a systematic approach to decrease the risk of fragility fractures in both women and men.⁴⁸⁷ Considering the rapid growth of the aging population, the burden of osteoporosis is growing rapidly. However, most patients with osteoporosis and a high risk of fractures have not received any preventive care targeting future fractures.⁴⁸⁸ This undertreatment is usually referred to as the treatment gap, which may be due to limited awareness and poor compliance. For example, fewer male patients in the USA were tested or treated after a fracture than female patients (6% vs. 12%).⁴⁸⁹ Furthermore, there is a sex disparity in fracture patients and a lack of awareness of osteoporosis, particularly in older men.

Screening approaches for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures

Before proper treatment, patients at risk must be identified by screening tests and assessing their risks of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Several tools have been developed, but their performance in age- and sex-specific populations varies.^10,490,491 Screening intervals, frequencies, and potential adverse effects for sex-specific populations still need to be clarified and validated.

Screening tests for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures

Studies have shown that bone measurement tests can predict osteoporotic fractures,^492,493 especially in postmenopausal women and older men, of which dual-energy central X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the hip and lumbar spine is well accepted as the most commonly used test for BMD.^494,495 The major international guidelines for the management and treatment of osteoporosis recommend using BMD as measured by central DXA to define osteoporosis and the threshold at which to initiate treating osteoporosis with therapeutic drugs to prevent osteoporotic fractures.^496,497 Central DXA is recommended as the primary diagnostic modality for screening osteoporosis in women >65 and men >70 years of age.⁴⁹⁸ Moreover, central DXA is used to evaluate patients’ eligibility to be enrolled in clinical trials of anti-osteoporosis drugs.⁴⁹⁹

Aside from central DXA, peripheral DXA measuring the BMD of the lower forearm and heel and quantitative ultrasound (QUS) detecting bone mineral status in some peripheral sites are used as alternative tools to screen for osteoporosis and predict osteoporotic fracture risks.⁵⁰⁰ Although peripheral DXA and QUS are similar in predicting osteoporotic fracture risk, QUS can avoid the risk of radiation exposure.^501,502 Compared with central DXA measurements, both peripheral DXA and QUS are performed using portable devices, making these two measurement tests easier and less costly.

Risk assessment for osteoporosis and related fractures

Clinical risk factors for both sexes usually include a family history of hip fracture in first-degree relatives (e.g., parents), excessive alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, and low body weight.⁵⁰³ However, the clinical risk factors for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures vary in specific populations, including but not limited to sex- and age-specific populations (Tables 2 and 3). In addition to bone measurement tests, central DXA, peripheral DXA and QUS may help to identify the risk of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures for both sexes.^504,505

Table 2.

Differences in osteoporosis screening recommendations between women and men

Societies/Organizations	Recommendations for Women	Recommendations for Men
World Health Organization	>65 years	No recommendation
International Society for Clinical Densitometry Endocrine Society	>65 years; OR Postmenopausal women with risk factors	>70 years; OR 50–69 years with risk factors
The U.S Preventive Services Task Force	≥65 years without previous fractures or secondary causes of osteoporosis; OR <65 years with a 10-year fracture risk ≥ that of a 65-year-old woman without risk factors	No recommendation
American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists	>65 years	No recommendation
China Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics	>65 years	>70 years
UK National Osteoporosis Guideline Group	DXA scans for women at high risk of osteoporosis	DXA scans for men at high risk of osteoporosis
Canadian Osteoporosis Society	>65 years	>65 years

Open in a new tab

DXA dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, UK United Kingdom, U.S. United States

Table 3.

Sexual dimorphism in major risk factors and biochemical markers for risk assessment and stratification in screening for osteoporosis

Risk factors/Biochemical markers	Women	Men
Unchangeable risk factors
Older age, family history of osteoporosis, family history of fractures, previous fracture, small bone frame size, white or Asian ethnicity	✔	✔
Alterations in major sex hormone levels
A decline in estrogen at menopause Reduction in testosterone levels with aging	✔ ✖	✖ ✔
Lifestyle-related risk factors
Sedentary lifestyle or lack of physical activity, excessive alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking	✔	✔
Dietary risk factors
Inadequate calcium intake, Insufficient nutrients	✔	✔
Long-term use of some medications
Glucocorticoids Medications to reduce estrogen levels for breast cancer treatment Androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer Thyroid hormone medication for an underactive thyroid	✔ ✔ ✖ ✔	✔ ✖ ✔ ✔
Underlying medical conditions and diseases
Diabetes mellitus, hypogonadism, thyroid disorders, hyperparathyroidism, inflammatory diseases, chronic kidney disease, chronic liver disease, cancer, eating disorders, celiac disease, VD deficiency, psychological stress	✔	✔
Serum biochemical markers for risk assessment of osteoporosis
Serum osteocalcin, BALP, PINP for bone formation, CTX-I and NTX- I for bone resorption	✔	✔
Urinary biochemical markers for risk assessment of osteoporotic fractures
The urinary ratio of native (alpha) to isomerized (beta) CTX for risk of fractures, including hip, vertebral, and nonvertebral fracture	✔	✖

Open in a new tab

✓ evidence available, ✖ insufficient or lack of evidence

BALP bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, CTX-I carboxyterminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen, NTX-I amino-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen, PINP N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen

A study enrolling perimenopausal Japanese women demonstrated that body weight, BMI, height, and handgrip strength were positively correlated with BMD, which can predict future osteoporosis.⁵⁰⁶ Menopausal status should be considered a predominant risk factor for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in women. Before screening with bone measurement tests for postmenopausal women aged 65 years, clinical risk factors associated with a high risk of osteoporotic fractures should be assessed. Given that postmenopausal women can benefit from treatment in many clinical studies, an appropriate clinical risk assessment tool should determine who should undergo screening with bone measurement tests for postmenopausal women < 65 years old and with at least one risk factor.

Several clinical risk assessment tools for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures have been developed,^507,508 including the Osteoporosis Index of Risk (OSIRIS),^509,510 the Simple Calculated Osteoporosis Risk Estimation (SCORE; Merck),^508,511 the Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool (OST),^512,513 and the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument (ORAI).^514,515 In general, these clinical risk assessment tools are moderately accurate.

There are only a few clinical trials directly evaluating the effectiveness of osteoporosis screening, particularly the differences between sexes. The most commonly used clinical risk assessment tool in predicting fractures is the FRAX (University of Sheffield, UK).⁵¹⁶ The FRAX can assess a person’s 10-year risk of fracture.⁵¹⁷ FRAX effectively assesses the risk for female patients, but its accuracy may be lower in males.¹⁰ The OST was initially developed based on data from postmenopausal women in eight Asian countries, and this screening algorithm appeared to perform well in assessing osteoporosis risk in women.^307,518 The performance of the OST in men was also determined and compared with that of women. In a US Study, an OST score with a cutoff threshold of <1 could identify postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at the femoral neck with a sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 41%, respectively, while an OST score with a cutoff threshold of 3 can identify men with osteoporosis at the femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine with a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 55%, respectively.⁴⁹⁰ Similarly, the performance of most screening tools for the risk of osteoporosis has been reported to vary by sex, age, and ethnicity. A systematic review reported that the performance of none of the tools is consistently better than others, and simple tools such as the OST and ORAI often performed as well or better than complex tools such as the SCORE and FRAX.⁴⁹¹

Challenges and future directions for osteoporosis screening

Various studies support screening for osteoporosis with bone measurement tests (central and DXA, peripheral DXA, and QUS) in postmenopausal women aged < 65 years at high risk of osteoporosis.^505,519 Patients with cancer were also recommended to undergo fracture risk assessment since they have unique risk factors for osteoporosis.¹⁵¹ However, it is still inconclusive whether the benefits of screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures are superior to the potential hazards caused by bone measurement tests in men.¹⁰

Considering the complexity of osteoporosis, particularly sex-specific differences, as highlighted in this review, we propose screening concepts for osteoporosis to prevent fractures. (1) More efforts should be made to narrow the treatment gap. Fracture prediction tools such as FRAX and imaging modalities such as DXA provide great potential to identify individuals at high risk.⁵²⁰ However, there are still many at-risk individuals missing assessment and treatment. Novel assessment methods and reduced treatment side effects will help. (2) Sex- and age-specific screening intervals and frequencies should be considered. Some studies have suggested that screening intervals are determined mainly according to baseline BMD and age. Other studies found that repeating bone measurement tests 4–8 years following the initial screening was not advantageous. Regarding frequency, the current results are still limited, especially in men. (3) There are specific risk factors for different types of osteoporosis and sex-specific differences. In addition to common risk factors for osteoporosis, specific risk factors and their predictive value should be investigated in the future in different types of osteoporosis, such as GC-induced osteoporosis and diabetic osteoporosis. (4) There are potential adverse effects of screening using bone measurement tests. Until now, no studies have examined the possible adverse effects of screening for osteoporosis in men. It has been proposed that the dangers of screening may be similar between men and women. Further efforts to elucidate this mechanism should be made. (5) Noninvasive genetic tests and biomarkers for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis is well documented as a bone metabolic disease with a strong genetic component.⁵²¹ Genetic factors can explain approximately 50%–80% of the interindividual variation in BMD and 50%–70% of osteoporotic fractures.⁵²² Despite the strong genetic influence and heritability, genetic tests and molecular biomarkers specific to osteoporosis and its related fractures are lacking. Thus far, no such tests and markers have been used to screen for osteoporosis. In this context, and with the sex differences in osteoporosis, future studies are needed to develop noninvasive genetic tests and biomarkers for osteoporosis and fractures in both women and men.

Conclusions and perspectives

The sex of the patient and changes in sex hormone levels over a lifetime play pivotal roles in health and disease. Over the past decades, substantial preclinical research and clinical studies have been conducted in male animal models and men chiefly due to concerns about the influence of the hormonal cycle (e.g., menstrual cycle) on outcomes as well as the classification of women as ‘protected subjects’ in clinical trials.^14,15 Essentially, conclusions based on one sex have been used to develop disease treatment and management guidelines for both sexes. It is important to include both the sex of the patient and hormonal changes to improve clinical outcomes.¹⁶ With advances in precision medicine, sex differences in disease have gained increasing attention. In line with this, two scientific organizations, the Organization for the Study of Sex Differences (OSSD) and the International Society of Gender Medicine (ISGM), have been established to facilitate in-depth research and enhance the development of sex-specific therapies. Research on sexual dimorphism in health and disease is evolving to form a new scientific discipline.

Osteoporosis and related fragility fractures commonly affect both women and men, causing a severe and growing threat to global health. Relative to the predominantly higher prevalence of primary osteoporosis in women, men are more likely to be disabled and even die from osteoporotic fractures. The misconception that osteoporosis affects only women must be addressed. Moreover, implementing care for men at high risk of fractures is highly recommended to ensure timely identification and treatment and prevent devastating consequences. In addition to the epidemiological differences between sexes, basic research and clinical studies have shed light on multiple mechanisms underlying sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis, which will help develop more effective and sex-specific osteoporosis therapies and screening tools. Given the association between diabetes, GCs, and psychological stress with osteoporosis, both basic research and clinical trials need to be promoted and prioritized in the future.

In terms of basic research, it is necessary to overcome difficulties in obtaining samples with improved state-of-the-art biobanks and carry out multiomics research usually using difficult-to-be-obtained bone samples.⁵²³ The impact of cell heterogeneity should also be emphasized. Single-cell RNA sequencing provides valuable information on novel cell subtypes, cell-fate transitions, cell‒cell interactions and more. Thus, these findings contribute to a deep understanding of cell heterogeneity.⁵²⁴ The combination of single-cell sequencing technology and multiomics may provide new insights for elucidating the biological mechanism of sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis. It is too time-consuming and labor-intensive to conduct separate functional studies on individual gene variants, and the results are difficult to compare and analyze. Employing high-throughput technology and artificial intelligence to detect thousands of suspected susceptibility loci may shed light on new functional evidence. Deeply elucidating sexual dimorphism in the field of metabolism, especially the mechanism of amino acid, lipid, and glucose metabolism, will provide new viewpoints for understanding the molecular mechanism of osteoporosis and finding new pharmacological targets. Animal models should be carefully designed, encompassing species differences in sex hormones and receptors. Estrogen loss should be considered in animal models when investigating aging-related disorders in women, as female mice preserve functional levels of estrogen even in old age.⁵²⁵ If gonadectomy is used, whether the surgery is performed before or after sexual maturity will significantly influence efficiency. The soybean content in the food also influences the results. If isolated tissues or cells are used, the sex and level of sex hormones in the animal and the concentration of steroid hormone analogs in the culture medium should also be considered. Since most studies have been carried out using either male or female mice, the roles and mechanisms of some important molecules cannot be compared between the sexes. It is strongly suggested to carry out animal studies in both sexes, which will facilitate the comparison and discovery of sexual dimorphism.

In clinical trials, data should be analyzed and reported based on the status of steroid hormones. Current clinical trials of anti-osteoporosis medications in men usually have small sample sizes, and the primary endpoint of most trials is BMD rather than fractures. Larger clinical trials with fractures as the primary endpoint should be carried out for male osteoporosis patients. The rapidly developing field of artificial intelligence may help to develop age- and sex-specific screening and risk assessment tools.

In terms of patient education, although great progress has been made in the treatment of osteoporosis, the treatment gap of patients with high fracture risk is increasing, especially in men. It is very important to strive to enhance compliance. The treatment gap is due not only to the gap in awareness but also to the need for further basic and medical research, development of new medicines, clinical trials, and practice. The ever-widening gap calls for urgent attention, ranging from raising public awareness, especially in older men, to motivating researchers, clinicians, and national policies to improve care for individuals at high risk of osteoporosis and associated fragility fractures. As a disease with strong sexual dimorphism, elucidating the underlying mechanisms will help to tailor therapeutic and screening strategies and to close the treatment gap.

Acknowledgements

This work received support from the following sources: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 82170844 and 82270613), the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (Grants 2022YFH0045 and 2022YFH0102), the 111 Project (Grant B18035), the 1·3·5 project for Disciplines of Excellence at West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Grant ZYGD22007 and ZYJC21004), Ningbo Top Medical and Health Research Program (No. 2023030514), Ningbo Medical and Health Brand Discipline (Grant No. PPXK2018–02), Ningbo Clinical Research Center for Otolaryngology Head and Neck Disease (Grant No.2022L005), and the Ministry of Education, Singapore, (Grant MOE-000395-00) to LYC.

Author contributions

Y.Y.Z. authored the manuscript. N.X. and X.D.S. were responsible for creating the figures and tables. Z.S. and H.Z. provided guidance, contributed to the design, and edited the manuscript. E.C.N., Y.C.L., and C.H. reviewed and revised the manuscript. All authors have thoroughly reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Contributor Information

Huili Zhu, Email: hlzhu78@139.com.

Zhisen Shen, Email: szs7216@163.com.

References

1.Yang TL, et al. A road map for understanding molecular and genetic determinants of osteoporosis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:91–103. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0282-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Liang B, Burley G, Lin S, Shi YC. Osteoporosis pathogenesis and treatment: existing and emerging avenues. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2022;27:72. doi: 10.1186/s11658-022-00371-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Leibson CL, Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Ransom JE, Melton LJ. Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2002;50:1644–1650. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019;393:364–376. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32112-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Pagnotti GM, et al. Combating osteoporosis and obesity with exercise: leveraging cell mechanosensitivity. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019;15:339–355. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0170-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Cummings SR, et al. Goal-directed treatment for osteoporosis: a progress report from the ASBMR-NOF working group on goal-directed treatment for osteoporosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017;32:3–10. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Patsch JM, Deutschmann J, Pietschmann P. Gender aspects of osteoporosis and bone strength. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2011;161:117–123. doi: 10.1007/s10354-011-0891-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
8.David K, et al. Bone health in ageing men. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2022;23:1173–1208. doi: 10.1007/s11154-022-09738-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
9.Porcelli T, et al. Management of endocrine disease: male osteoporosis: diagnosis and management - should the treatment and the target be the same as for female osteoporosis? Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2020;183:R75–R93. doi: 10.1530/EJE-20-0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.Vilaca T, Eastell R, Schini M. Osteoporosis in men. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10:273–283. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Black DM, Rosen CJ. Clinical practice. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:254–262. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1513724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Sandovici I, Fernandez-Twinn DS, Hufnagel A, Constancia M, Ozanne SE. Sex differences in the intergenerational inheritance of metabolic traits. Nat. Metab. 2022;4:507–523. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00570-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Therkildsen J, et al. Sex differences in the association between bone mineral density and coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac computed tomography. J. Clin. Densitom. 2021;24:55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Mielke MM, Miller VM. Improving clinical outcomes through attention to sex and hormones in research. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:625–635. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00531-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Merkatz RB, Temple R, Subel S, Feiden K, Kessler DA. Women in clinical trials of new drugs. A change in food and drug administration policy. the working group on women in clinical trials. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993;329:292–296. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307223290429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Burra P, Zanetto A, Germani G. Sex bias in clinical trials in gastroenterology and hepatology. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;19:413–414. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00638-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Almeida M, et al. Estrogens and androgens in skeletal physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol. Rev. 2017;97:135–187. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00033.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Brown C. Osteoporosis: staying strong. Nature. 2017;550:S15–S17. doi: 10.1038/550S15a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Chandra A, Rajawat J. Skeletal aging and osteoporosis: mechanisms and therapeutics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:3553. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Pignolo RJ, Law SF, Chandra A. Bone aging, cellular senescence, and osteoporosis. JBMR Plus. 2021;5:e10488. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Ebeling PR, et al. Secondary osteoporosis. Endocr. Rev. 2022;43:240–313. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnab028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Compston J, et al. UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch. Osteoporos. 2017;12:43. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0324-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Eastell R, et al. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2016;2:16069. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Svedbom A, et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch. Osteoporos. 2013;8:137. doi: 10.1007/s11657-013-0137-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Dennison EM, et al. Fracture risk following intermission of osteoporosis therapy. Osteoporos. Int. 2019;30:1733–1743. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05002-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
26.Borgstrom F, et al. Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities. Arch. Osteoporos. 2020;15:59. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-0706-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Haentjens P, et al. Evidence from data searches and life-table analyses for gender-related differences in absolute risk of hip fracture after Colles’ or spine fracture: Colles’ fracture as an early and sensitive marker of skeletal fragility in white men. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2004;19:1933–1944. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.040917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Stevens JA, Rudd RA. The impact of decreasing U.S. hip fracture rates on future hip fracture estimates. Osteoporos. Int. 2013;24:2725–2728. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2375-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Wang YXJ, et al. Elderly men have much lower vertebral fracture risk than elderly women even at advanced age: the MrOS and MsOS (Hong Kong) year 14 follow-up radiology results. Arch. Osteoporos. 2020;15:176. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00845-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Shim YB, et al. Incidence and risk factors of subsequent osteoporotic fracture: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea. Arch. Osteoporos. 2020;15:180. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00852-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Sun J, et al. A vertebral skeletal stem cell lineage driving metastasis. Nature. 2023;621:602–609. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06519-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Andrew TW, et al. Sexually dimorphic estrogen sensing in skeletal stem cells controls skeletal regeneration. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:6491. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34063-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Peterle VCU, et al. Osteoporotic hip fracture-Comorbidities and factors associated with in-hospital mortality in the elderly: a nine-year cohort study in Brazil. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0272006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Klop C, et al. Mortality in British hip fracture patients, 2000-2010: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Bone. 2014;66:171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.Frost SA, Nguyen ND, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Excess mortality attributable to hip-fracture: a relative survival analysis. Bone. 2013;56:23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Kannegaard PN, van der Mark S, Eiken P, Abrahamsen B. Excess mortality in men compared with women following a hip fracture. National analysis of comedications, comorbidity and survival. Age Ageing. 2010;39:203–209. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Jung HS, et al. Incidence of subsequent osteoporotic fractures after distal radius fractures and mortality of the subsequent distal radius fractures: a retrospective analysis of claims data of the Korea National Health Insurance Service. Osteoporos. Int. 2021;32:293–299. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05609-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Hawley S, et al. Anti-osteoporosis medication prescriptions and incidence of subsequent fracture among primary hip fracture patients in England and Wales: an interrupted time-series analysis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016;31:2008–2015. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Compston J. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an update. Endocrine. 2018;61:7–16. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1588-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Chotiyarnwong P, McCloskey EV. Pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and options for treatment. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:437–447. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-0341-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Fracture risk associated with systemic and topical corticosteroids. J. Intern. Med. 2005;257:374–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01467.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Buckley L, Humphrey MB. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:2547–2556. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1800214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Briot K, Roux C. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. RMD Open. 2015;1:e000014. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2014-000014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Soen S, et al. Epidemiology of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and management of associated fracture risk in Japan. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2021;39:1019–1030. doi: 10.1007/s00774-021-01236-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
45.Leib ES, Winzenrieth R. Bone status in glucocorticoid-treated men and women. Osteoporos. Int. 2016;27:39–48. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3211-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Herath M, Langdahl B, Ebeling PR, Milat F. Challenges in the diagnosis and management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in younger and older adults. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 2022;96:460–474. doi: 10.1111/cen.14637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Albaum JM, Levesque LE, Gershon AS, Liu G, Cadarette SM. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis management among seniors, by year, sex, and indication, 1996-2012. Osteoporos. Int. 2015;26:2845–2852. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3200-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Ackermann D, et al. Reference intervals for the urinary steroid metabolome: The impact of sex, age, day and night time on human adult steroidogenesis. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0214549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Li JX, Cummins CL. Fresh insights into glucocorticoid-induced diabetes mellitus and new therapeutic directions. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022;18:540–557. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00683-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
50.Kageyama G, et al. Very high frequency of fragility fractures associated with high-dose glucocorticoids in postmenopausal women: a retrospective study. Bone Rep. 2017;6:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2016.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
51.Popp AW, Isenegger J, Buergi EM, Buergi U, Lippuner K. Glucocorticosteroid-induced spinal osteoporosis: scientific update on pathophysiology and treatment. Eur. Spine J. 2006;15:1035–1049. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0056-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
52.Liao JM, et al. Effects of stanozolol on bone mineral density and bone biomechanical properties of osteoporotic rats. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 2003;23:1117–1120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
53.Tomic D, Shaw JE, Magliano DJ. The burden and risks of emerging complications of diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022;18:525–539. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00690-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
54.Lin HH, et al. Association between type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis risk: a representative cohort study in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0254451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
55.Napoli N, et al. Mechanisms of diabetes mellitus-induced bone fragility. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017;13:208–219. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
56.Jang M, et al. Effect of duration of diabetes on bone mineral density: a population study on East Asian males. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2018;18:61. doi: 10.1186/s12902-018-0290-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
57.Si Y, Wang C, Guo Y, Xu G, Ma Y. Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Chinese mainland: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J. Public Health. 2019;48:1203–1214. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
58.Liu X, Chen F, Liu L, Zhang Q. Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2023;23:1. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01260-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
59.Leidig-Bruckner G, et al. Prevalence and determinants of osteoporosis in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2014;14:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
60.Jeddi S, Yousefzadeh N, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. Role of nitric oxide in type 1 diabetes-induced osteoporosis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2022;197:114888. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
61.Huebschmann AG, et al. Sex differences in the burden of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk across the life course. Diabetologia. 2019;62:1761–1772. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4939-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
62.Yuan H, et al. Type 2 diabetes epidemic in East Asia: a 35-year systematic trend analysis. Oncotarget. 2018;9:6718–6727. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
63.Goossens GH, Jocken JWE, Blaak EE. Sexual dimorphism in cardiometabolic health: the role of adipose tissue, muscle and liver. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:47–66. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-00431-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
64.Lonardo A, et al. Sex differences in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: state of the art and identification of research gaps. Hepatology. 2019;70:1457–1469. doi: 10.1002/hep.30626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
65.Eckert AJ, et al. Bone fractures in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes: age distribution, fracture location, and the role of glycemic. Control. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2021;36:2371–2380. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
66.Sheu A, Greenfield JR, White CP, Center JR. Contributors to impaired bone health in type 2 diabetes. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2023;34:34–48. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2022.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
67.Khosla S, Samakkarnthai P, Monroe DG, Farr JN. Update on the pathogenesis and treatment of skeletal fragility in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:685–697. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00555-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
68.Sheu A, Bliuc D, Tran T, White CP, Center JR. Fractures in type 2 diabetes confer excess mortality: the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study. Bone. 2022;159:116373. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
69.Martinez-Laguna D, et al. Excess of all-cause mortality after a fracture in type 2 diabetic patients: a population-based cohort study. Osteoporos. Int. 2017;28:2573–2581. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4096-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
70.Haentjens P, et al. Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Ann. Intern. Med. 2010;152:380–390. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
71.Patel V, et al. Diabetes-related complications and costs in medicare beneficiaries with comorbid rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes treated with abatacept versus other targeted DMARDs. Rheumatol Ther. 2022;9:1091–1107. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00453-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
72.Sfeir JG, Drake MT, Khosla S, Farr JN. Skeletal Aging. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2022;97:1194–1208. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
73.Gasser, J. A. & Kneissel, M. Bone physiology and biology. In bone toxicology. Molecular and integrative toxicology; (eds Smith, S., Varela, Samadfam, R.) (Springer, 2017).
74.Le BQ, et al. The components of bone and what they can teach us about regeneration. Materials (Basel) 2018;11:14. doi: 10.3390/ma11010014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
75.Manolagas SC. From estrogen-centric to aging and oxidative stress: a revised perspective of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Endocr. Rev. 2010;31:266–300. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
76.Chevalley T, Rizzoli R. Acquisition of peak bone mass. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022;36:101616. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2022.101616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
77.Zhu X, Zheng H. Factors influencing peak bone mass gain. Front. Med. 2021;15:53–69. doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0748-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
78.Plotkin LI, Bruzzaniti A. Molecular signaling in bone cells: regulation of cell differentiation and survival. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2019;116:237–281. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2019.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
79.Kitase Y, Prideaux M. Targeting osteocytes vs osteoblasts. Bone. 2023;170:116724. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
80.Qadir A, et al. Senile osteoporosis: the involvement of differentiation and senescence of bone marrow stromal cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:349. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
81.Zupan J, et al. Age-related alterations and senescence of mesenchymal stromal cells: implications for regenerative treatments of bones and joints. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2021;198:111539. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2021.111539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
82.Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003;423:337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature01658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
83.Lian WS, et al. MicroRNA-29a mitigates osteoblast senescence and counteracts bone loss through oxidation resistance-1 control of FoxO3 methylation. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021;10:1248. doi: 10.3390/antiox10081248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
84.Weivoda MM, Bradley EW. Macrophages and bone remodeling. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2023;38:359–369. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
85.Hu Y, et al. Strategies of macrophages to maintain bone homeostasis and promote bone repair: a narrative review. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022;14:18. doi: 10.3390/jfb14010018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
86.Loundagin LL, Cooper DML. Towards novel measurements of remodeling activity in cortical bone: implications for osteoporosis and related pharmaceutical treatments. Eur. Cell Mater. 2022;43:202–227. doi: 10.22203/eCM.v043a15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
87.Park-Min KH. Metabolic reprogramming in osteoclasts. Semin. Immunopathol. 2019;41:565–572. doi: 10.1007/s00281-019-00757-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
88.Kim JM, Lin C, Stavre Z, Greenblatt MB, Shim JH. Osteoblast-osteoclast communication and bone homeostasis. Cells. 2020;9:2073. doi: 10.3390/cells9092073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
89.Yao Y, et al. The macrophage-osteoclast axis in osteoimmunity and osteo-related diseases. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:664871. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.664871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
90.Wang L, et al. Mechanical sensing protein PIEZO1 regulates bone homeostasis via osteoblast-osteoclast crosstalk. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:282. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14146-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
91.Robling AG, Bonewald LF. The osteocyte: new insights. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2020;82:485–506. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
92.Kuno M. Cooperative electrogenic proton transport pathways in the plasma membrane of the proton-secreting osteoclast. Pflugers Arch. 2018;470:851–866. doi: 10.1007/s00424-018-2137-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
93.Teitelbaum SL. Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science. 2000;289:1504–1508. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5484.1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
94.Martin T, Gooi JH, Sims NA. Molecular mechanisms in coupling of bone formation to resorption. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2009;19:73–88. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v19.i1.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
95.Arai A, et al. Beclin1 modulates bone homeostasis by regulating osteoclast and chondrocyte differentiation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2019;34:1753–1766. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
96.Udagawa N, et al. Osteoclast differentiation by RANKL and OPG signaling pathways. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2021;39:19–26. doi: 10.1007/s00774-020-01162-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
97.Dirckx N, Moorer MC, Clemens TL, Riddle RC. The role of osteoblasts in energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019;15:651–665. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0246-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
98.Licini C, Vitale-Brovarone C, Mattioli-Belmonte M. Collagen and non-collagenous proteins molecular crosstalk in the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2019;49:59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2019.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
99.Emmanuelle NE, et al. Critical role of estrogens on bone homeostasis in both male and female: from physiology to medical implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:1568. doi: 10.3390/ijms22041568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
100.Karsenty G. Osteocalcin: a multifaceted bone-derived hormone. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2023;43:55–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-061121-091348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
101.Berger JM, Karsenty G. Osteocalcin and the physiology of danger. FEBS Lett. 2022;596:665–680. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
102.Wein MN, Kronenberg HM. Regulation of bone remodeling by parathyroid hormone. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2018;8:a031237. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a031237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
103.Takegahara N, Kim H, Choi Y. RANKL biology. Bone. 2022;159:116353. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
104.Takashi Y, Fukumoto S. Phosphate-sensing and regulatory mechanism of FGF23 production. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2020;43:877–883. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01205-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
105.Hong AR, et al. Transformation of mature osteoblasts into bone lining cells and RNA sequencing-based transcriptome profiling of mouse bone during mechanical unloading. Endocrinol. Metab (Seoul) 2020;35:456–469. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2020.35.2.456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
106.Chen T, Wang Y, Hao Z, Hu Y, Li J. Parathyroid hormone and its related peptides in bone metabolism. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021;192:114669. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
107.Wu J, et al. Long noncoding RNA ZFAS1 suppresses osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by upregulating miR-499-EPHA5 axis. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2022;539:111490. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2021.111490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
108.Delgado-Calle J, Bellido T. The osteocyte as a signaling cell. Physiol. Rev. 2022;102:379–410. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00043.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
109.Kitaura H, et al. Osteocyte-related cytokines regulate osteoclast formation and bone resorption. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:5169. doi: 10.3390/ijms21145169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
110.Zhang B, et al. Magneto-mechanical stimulation modulates osteocyte fate via the ECM-integrin-CSK axis and wnt pathway. iScience. 2023;26:107365. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
111.Florio M, et al. A bispecific antibody targeting sclerostin and DKK-1 promotes bone mass accrual and fracture repair. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11505. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
112.Ulmer CZ, Kritmetapak K, Singh RJ, Vesper HW, Kumar R. High-resolution mass spectrometry for the measurement of PTH and PTH fragments: insights into PTH physiology and bioactivity. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2022;33:1448–1458. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2022010036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
113.Bilezikian JP. Hypoparathyroidism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020;105:1722–1736. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
114.Arnold A, et al. Hormonal regulation of biomineralization. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:261–275. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00477-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
115.Mannstadt M, et al. Hypoparathyroidism. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2017;3:17055. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
116.Rubin MR, et al. PTH(1-84) administration reverses abnormal bone-remodeling dynamics and structure in hypoparathyroidism. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2011;26:2727–2736. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
117.Zhang C, Song C. Combination therapy of PTH and antiresorptive drugs on osteoporosis: a review of treatment alternatives. Front. Pharmacol. 2020;11:607017. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.607017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
118.Jolette J, et al. Comparing the incidence of bone tumors in rats chronically exposed to the selective PTH type 1 receptor agonist abaloparatide or PTH(1-34) Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2017;86:356–365. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
119.Estell EG, Rosen CJ. Emerging insights into the comparative effectiveness of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:31–46. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-00426-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
120.Massy ZA, Drueke TB. Gut microbiota orchestrates PTH action in bone: role of butyrate and T cells. Kidney Int. 2020;98:269–272. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
121.Leitch VD, Bassett JHD, Williams GR. Role of thyroid hormones in craniofacial development. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:147–164. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0304-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
122.Huybrechts Y, Mortier G, Boudin E, Van Hul W. WNT signaling and bone: lessons from skeletal dysplasias and disorders. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2020;11:165. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
123.Soos B, et al. Effects of targeted therapies on bone in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2022;18:249–257. doi: 10.1038/s41584-022-00764-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
124.Houschyar KS, et al. Wnt pathway in bone repair and regeneration - what do we know so far. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018;6:170. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
125.Baron R, Kneissel M. WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments. Nat. Med. 2013;19:179–192. doi: 10.1038/nm.3074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
126.Gong Y, et al. LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell. 2001;107:513–523. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00571-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
127.Sutkeviciute I, Clark LJ, White AD, Gardella TJ, Vilardaga JP. PTH/PTHrP receptor signaling, allostery, and structures. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2019;30:860–874. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2019.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
128.Xiao L, Fei Y, Hurley MM. FGF2 crosstalk with Wnt signaling in mediating the anabolic action of PTH on bone formation. Bone Rep. 2018;9:136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2018.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
129.Kermgard E, Chawla NK, Wesseling-Perry K. Gut microbiome, parathyroid hormone, and bone. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2021;30:418–423. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
130.Yu M, et al. PTH induces bone loss via microbial-dependent expansion of intestinal TNF+ T cells and Th17 cells. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:468. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14148-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
131.Li JY, et al. Parathyroid hormone-dependent bone formation requires butyrate production by intestinal microbiota. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130:1767–1781. doi: 10.1172/JCI133473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
132.Sun Z, Fan J, Wang Y. X-chromosome inactivation and related diseases. Genet. Res. (Camb) 2022;2022:1391807. doi: 10.1155/2022/1391807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
133.Migeon BR. X-linked diseases: susceptible females. Genet. Med. 2020;22:1156–1174. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0779-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
134.Makitie RE, Costantini A, Kampe A, Alm JJ, Makitie O. New insights into monogenic causes of osteoporosis. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2019;10:70. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
135.Costantini A, et al. Early-onset osteoporosis: rare monogenic forms elucidate the complexity of disease pathogenesis beyond type I. Collagen. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2022;37:1623–1641. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
136.Wolff L, et al. Plastin 3 in health and disease: a matter of balance. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021;78:5275–5301. doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-03843-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
137.van Dijk FS, et al. PLS3 mutations in X-linked osteoporosis with fractures. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:1529–1536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
138.Balasubramanian M, et al. Novel PLS3 variants in X-linked osteoporosis: exploring bone material properties. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2018;176:1578–1586. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
139.Brlek P, et al. X-Linked osteogenesis imperfecta possibly caused by a novel variant in PLS3. Genes (Basel) 2021;12:1851. doi: 10.3390/genes12121851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
140.Anagnostis P, Karras S, Paschou SA, Goulis DG. Haemophilia A and B as a cause for secondary osteoporosis and increased fracture risk. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis. 2015;26:599–603. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
141.Wang H, Bai X. Mechanisms of bone remodeling disorder in hemophilia. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2021;47:43–52. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
142.Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Valentino LA. Increased bone resorption in hemophilia. Blood Rev. 2019;33:6–10. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2018.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
143.Berntorp E, et al. Haemophilia. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2021;7:45. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00278-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
144.Gebetsberger J, Schirmer M, Wurzer WJ, Streif W. Low bone mineral density in hemophiliacs. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2022;9:794456. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.794456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
145.Abbasnezhad A, et al. Serum concentrations of vitamin D, calcium, phosphorus and trace minerals in adults and children with haemophilia A: association with disease severity, quality of life, joint health and functional status. Int. J. Hematol. Oncol. Stem Cell Res. 2020;14:56–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
146.Lin X, et al. Pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with hemophilia. Arch. Osteoporos. 2023;18:17. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01203-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
147.Weitzmann MN, et al. Reduced bone formation in males and increased bone resorption in females drive bone loss in hemophilia A mice. Blood Adv. 2019;3:288–300. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018027557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
148.Rocca MS, et al. The Klinefelter syndrome is associated with high recurrence of copy number variations on the X chromosome with a potential role in the clinical phenotype. Andrology. 2016;4:328–334. doi: 10.1111/andr.12146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
149.Bojesen A, et al. Bone mineral density in Klinefelter syndrome is reduced and primarily determined by muscle strength and resorptive markers, but not directly by testosterone. Osteoporos. Int. 2011;22:1441–1450. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1354-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
150.Ferlin A, et al. Bone mass in subjects with Klinefelter syndrome: role of testosterone levels and androgen receptor gene CAG polymorphism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;96:E739–E745. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
151.Ye C, Leslie WD. Fracture risk and assessment in adults with cancer. Osteoporos. Int. 2023;34:449–466. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06631-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
152.Arnold AP, Cassis LA, Eghbali M, Reue K, Sandberg K. Sex hormones and sex chromosomes cause sex differences in the development of cardiovascular diseases. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017;37:746–756. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
153.Morselli E, et al. The effects of oestrogens and their receptors on cardiometabolic health. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017;13:352–364. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
154.Karlamangla AS, Shieh A, Greendale GA. Hormones and bone loss across the menopause transition. Vitam Horm. 2021;115:401–417. doi: 10.1016/bs.vh.2020.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
155.Manolagas SC, O’Brien CA, Almeida M. The role of estrogen and androgen receptors in bone health and disease. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2013;9:699–712. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
156.Lambert MNT, Jeppesen PB. Isoflavones and bone health in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2018;21:475–480. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
157.Decaroli MC, Rochira V. Aging and sex hormones in males. Virulence. 2017;8:545–570. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1259053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
158.Rochira V, Balestrieri A, Madeo B, Spaggiari A, Carani C. Congenital estrogen deficiency in men: a new syndrome with different phenotypes; clinical and therapeutic implications in men. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2002;193:19–28. doi: 10.1016/S0303-7207(02)00092-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
159.Rochira V, Carani C. Aromatase deficiency in men: a clinical perspective. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2009;5:559–568. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2009.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
160.Khosla S, Hofbauer LC. Osteoporosis treatment: recent developments and ongoing challenges. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:898–907. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30188-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
161.Khosla S, et al. Relationship of serum sex steroid levels and bone turnover markers with bone mineral density in men and women: a key role for bioavailable estrogen. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998;83:2266–2274. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.7.4924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
162.Szulc P. Role of sex steroids hormones in the regulation of bone metabolism in men: evidence from clinical studies. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022;36:101624. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2022.101624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
163.Laurent MR, et al. Age-related bone loss and sarcopenia in men. Maturitas. 2019;122:51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
164.Levin VA, Jiang X, Kagan R. Estrogen therapy for osteoporosis in the modern era. Osteoporos. Int. 2018;29:1049–1055. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4414-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
165.Pietschmann P, Mechtcheriakova D, Meshcheryakova A, Foger-Samwald U, Ellinger I. Immunology of osteoporosis: a mini-review. Gerontology. 2016;62:128–137. doi: 10.1159/000431091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
166.Amarasekara DS, et al. Regulation of osteoclast differentiation by cytokine networks. Immune Netw. 2018;18:e8. doi: 10.4110/in.2018.18.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
167.Yao Z, Getting SJ, Locke IC. Regulation of TNF-induced osteoclast differentiation. Cells. 2021;11:132. doi: 10.3390/cells11010132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
168.Mishra P, Davies DA, Albensi BC. The interaction between NF-kappaB and estrogen in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2023;60:1515–1526. doi: 10.1007/s12035-022-03152-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
169.Krum SA, Chang J, Miranda-Carboni G, Wang CY. Novel functions for NFkappaB: inhibition of bone formation. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2010;6:607–611. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
170.Kameda T, et al. Estrogen inhibits bone resorption by directly inducing apoptosis of the bone-resorbing osteoclasts. J. Exp. Med. 1997;186:489–495. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.4.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
171.Kousteni S, et al. Reversal of bone loss in mice by nongenotropic signaling of sex steroids. Science. 2002;298:843–846. doi: 10.1126/science.1074935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
172.Garcia AJ, et al. ERalpha signaling regulates MMP3 expression to induce FasL cleavage and osteoclast apoptosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013;28:283–290. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
173.Krum SA, et al. Estrogen protects bone by inducing Fas ligand in osteoblasts to regulate osteoclast survival. EMBO J. 2008;27:535–545. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
174.Martin A, et al. Estrogens antagonize RUNX2-mediated osteoblast-driven osteoclastogenesis through regulating RANKL membrane association. Bone. 2015;75:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
175.Kousteni S, et al. Nongenotropic, sex-nonspecific signaling through the estrogen or androgen receptors: dissociation from transcriptional activity. Cell. 2001;104:719–730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
176.Pantschenko AG, et al. Effect of osteoblast-targeted expression of bcl-2 in bone: differential response in male and female mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2005;20:1414–1429. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
177.Xu Y, et al. 17 beta-Estradiol alleviates oxidative damage in osteoblasts by regulating miR-320/RUNX2 signaling pathway. J. Biosci. 2021;46:113. doi: 10.1007/s12038-021-00236-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
178.Tippen SP, et al. Age and sex effects on FGF23-mediated response to mild phosphate challenge. Bone. 2021;146:115885. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.115885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
179.Chen P, Li B, Ou-Yang L. Role of estrogen receptors in health and disease. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2022;13:839005. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.839005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
180.Nilsson S, et al. Mechanisms of estrogen action. Physiol. Rev. 2001;81:1535–1565. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.4.1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
181.Wang N, et al. Mechanotransduction pathways in articular chondrocytes and the emerging role of estrogen receptor-alpha. Bone Res. 2023;11:13. doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00248-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
182.Wehrle E, et al. The impact of low-magnitude high-frequency vibration on fracture healing is profoundly influenced by the oestrogen status in mice. Dis. Model. Mech. 2015;8:93–104. doi: 10.1242/dmm.018622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
183.Pang XG, Cong Y, Bao NR, Li YG, Zhao JN. Quercetin stimulates bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell differentiation through an estrogen receptor-mediated pathway. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018;2018:4178021. doi: 10.1155/2018/4178021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
184.Bradford PG, Gerace KV, Roland RL, Chrzan BG. Estrogen regulation of apoptosis in osteoblasts. Physiol. Behav. 2010;99:181–185. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.04.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
185.Hao XD, et al. Synthesis, estrogenic activity, and anti-osteoporosis effects in ovariectomized rats of resveratrol oligomer derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;102:26–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
186.Heino TJ, Chagin AS, Savendahl L. The novel estrogen receptor G-protein-coupled receptor 30 is expressed in human bone. J. Endocrinol. 2008;197:R1–R6. doi: 10.1677/JOE-07-0629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
187.Kim NR, et al. Estrogen receptor alpha signaling in extrahypothalamic neurons during late puberty decreases bone size and strength in female but not in male mice. FASEB J. 2020;34:7118–7126. doi: 10.1096/fj.202000272R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
188.Steppe L, Bulow J, Tuckermann J, Ignatius A, Haffner-Luntzer M. Bone mass and osteoblast activity are sex-dependent in mice lacking the estrogen receptor alpha in chondrocytes and osteoblast progenitor cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:2902. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
189.Windahl SH, et al. Estrogen receptor-alpha in osteocytes is important for trabecular bone formation in male mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:2294–2299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220811110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
190.Ikedo A, Imai Y. Estrogen receptor alpha in mature osteoblasts regulates the late stage of bone regeneration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021;559:238–244. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.04.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
191.Xiao Y, Li B, Liu J. MicroRNA‑148a inhibition protects against ovariectomy‑induced osteoporosis through PI3K/AKT signaling by estrogen receptor alpha. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;17:7789–7796. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
192.Swerdloff RS, Dudley RE, Page ST, Wang C, Salameh WA. Dihydrotestosterone: biochemistry, physiology, and clinical implications of elevated blood levels. Endocr. Rev. 2017;38:220–254. doi: 10.1210/er.2016-1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
193.Isidori, A. M. et al. Adult- and late-onset male hypogonadism: the clinical practice guidelines of the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) and the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE.). J. Endocrinol. Invest.45, 2385–2403 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
194.Chevalley, T. et al. Fracture prospectively recorded from prepuberty to young adulthood: are they markers of peak bone mass and strength in males? J. Bone Miner. Res.32, 1963–1969 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
195.Snyder PJ, et al. Effect of testosterone treatment on volumetric bone density and strength in older men with low testosterone: a controlled clinical trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2017;177:471–479. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
196.Zhang Z, Kang D, Li H. The effects of testosterone on bone health in males with testosterone deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2020;20:33. doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-0509-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
197.Golds G, Houdek D, Arnason T. Male hypogonadism and osteoporosis: the effects, clinical consequences, and treatment of testosterone deficiency in bone health. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2017;2017:4602129. doi: 10.1155/2017/4602129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
198.Jaschke N, Wang A, Hofbauer LC, Rauner M, Rachner TD. Late-onset hypogonadism: clinical evidence, biological aspects and evolutionary considerations. Ageing Res. Rev. 2021;67:101301. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
199.Rochira V, Antonio L, Vanderschueren D. EAA clinical guideline on management of bone health in the andrological outpatient clinic. Andrology. 2018;6:272–285. doi: 10.1111/andr.12470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
200.Salonia A, et al. Paediatric and adult-onset male hypogonadism. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2019;5:38. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0087-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
201.Yeap BB, Page ST, Grossmann M. Testosterone treatment in older men: clinical implications and unresolved questions from the Testosterone Trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6:659–672. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30416-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
202.Tran TS, et al. Relationship between serum testosterone and fracture risk in men: a comparison of RIA and LC-MS/MS. Clin. Chem. 2015;61:1182–1190. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.242339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
203.Smith MR, et al. Denosumab in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:745–755. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
204.Junjie W, Dongsheng H, Lei S, Hongzhuo L, Changying S. Testosterone replacement therapy has limited effect on increasing bone mass density in older men: a meta-analysis. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019;25:73–84. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666190206223244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
205.Vandewalle S, et al. Associations of sex steroids with bone maturation, bone mineral density, bone geometry, and body composition: a cross-sectional study in healthy male adolescents. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99:E1272–1282. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
206.Russo V, Chen R, Armamento-Villareal R. Hypogonadism, type-2 diabetes mellitus, and bone health: a narrative review. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2020;11:607240. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.607240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
207.Li X, et al. Increased RANK ligand in bone marrow of orchiectomized rats and prevention of their bone loss by the RANK ligand inhibitor osteoprotegerin. Bone. 2009;45:669–676. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
208.Mohamad NV, Soelaiman IN, Chin KY. A concise review of testosterone and bone health. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2016;11:1317–1324. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S115472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
209.Kirby DJ, Buchalter DB, Anil U, Leucht P. DHEA in bone: the role in osteoporosis and fracture healing. Arch. Osteoporos. 2020;15:84. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00755-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
210.Diab DL, Watts NB. Updates on osteoporosis in men. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 2021;50:239–249. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2021.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
211.Hammes SR, Levin ER. Impact of estrogens in males and androgens in females. J. Clin. Invest. 2019;129:1818–1826. doi: 10.1172/JCI125755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
212.Roberts KE, et al. Systemic therapies for preventing or treating aromatase inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal symptoms in early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022;1:CD013167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013167.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
213.Chin KY, Ima-Nirwana S. The effects of orchidectomy and supraphysiological testosterone administration on trabecular bone structure and gene expression in rats. Aging Male. 2015;18:60–66. doi: 10.3109/13685538.2014.954995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
214.Wang LT, Chen LR, Chen KH. Hormone-related and drug-induced osteoporosis: a cellular and molecular overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:5814. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
215.Bradley CA. Bone: a novel androgen-vitamin D link. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018;14:191. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2018.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
216.Lee SR, et al. 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone reduces renal Cyp24a1 expression via suppression of progesterone receptor. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2018;60:159–170. doi: 10.1530/JME-17-0187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
217.Vasile M, Corinaldesi C, Antinozzi C, Crescioli C. Vitamin D in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a view inside gender differences. Pharmacol. Res. 2017;117:228–241. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
218.Bikle D, Christakos S. New aspects of vitamin D metabolism and action - addressing the skin as source and target. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:234–252. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0312-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
219.Al-oanzi ZH, et al. Vitamin D-binding protein gene microsatellite polymorphism influences BMD and risk of fractures in men. Osteoporos. Int. 2008;19:951–960. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0516-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
220.Moy KA, et al. Genome-wide association study of circulating vitamin D-binding protein. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014;99:1424–1431. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.080309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
221.Jardi F, et al. Androgen receptor in neurons slows age-related cortical thinning in male mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2019;34:508–519. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
222.Wilhelmson AS, et al. Testosterone is an endogenous regulator of BAFF and splenic B cell number. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2067. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04408-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
223.Steffens JP, et al. The role of androgens on periodontal repair in female rats. J. Periodontol. 2018;89:486–495. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
224.Wu X, et al. Pyrroloquinoline quinone prevents testosterone deficiency-induced osteoporosis by stimulating osteoblastic bone formation and inhibiting osteoclastic bone resorption. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017;9:1230–1242. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
225.Shigehara K, Izumi K, Kadono Y, Mizokami A. Testosterone and bone health in men: a narrative review. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:530. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
226.Rozenberg S, et al. How to manage osteoporosis before the age of 50. Maturitas. 2020;138:14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
227.Goetz TG, et al. In premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis, lower bone formation rate is associated with higher body fat and higher IGF-1. Osteoporos. Int. 2022;33:659–672. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06196-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
228.Cohen A, et al. IGF-1 receptor expression on circulating osteoblast progenitor cells predicts tissue-based bone formation rate and response to teriparatide in premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017;32:1267–1273. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
229.Gennari L, Bilezikian JP. Idiopathic osteoporosis in men. Curr. Osteoporos Rep. 2013;11:286–298. doi: 10.1007/s11914-013-0164-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
230.Kitada M, Koya D. Autophagy in metabolic disease and ageing. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:647–661. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00551-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
231.Petrine JCP, Del Bianco-Borges B. The influence of phytoestrogens on different physiological and pathological processes: an overview. Phytother. Res. 2021;35:180–197. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
232.Alvarez-Almazan S, Filisola-Villasenor JG, Aleman-Gonzalez-Duhart D, Tamay-Cach F, Mendieta-Wejebe JE. Current molecular aspects in the development and treatment of diabetes. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2020;76:13–35. doi: 10.1007/s13105-019-00717-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
233.Frenkel B, White W, Tuckermann J. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2015;872:179–215. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2895-8_8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
234.Badila AE, et al. Bone regeneration and oxidative stress: an updated overview. Antioxidants (Basel) 2022;11:318. doi: 10.3390/antiox11020318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
235.Zhu J, March L. Treating osteoporosis: risks and management. Aust. Prescr. 2022;45:150–157. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2022.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
236.Agidigbi TS, Kim C. Reactive oxygen species in osteoclast differentiation and possible pharmaceutical targets of ROS-mediated osteoclast diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:3576. doi: 10.3390/ijms20143576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
237.Farr JN, et al. Osteoprotection through the deletion of the transcription factor rorbeta in mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2018;33:720–731. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
238.Iantomasi T, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammation in osteoporosis: molecular mechanisms involved and the relationship with microRNAs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:3772. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
239.Schroder K. NADPH oxidases in bone homeostasis and osteoporosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019;132:67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
240.Li Y, Chen L, Gao Y, Zou X, Wei F. Oxidative stress and intervertebral disc degeneration: pathophysiology, signaling pathway, and therapy. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022;2022:1984742. doi: 10.1155/2022/1984742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
241.Ohyama Y, Ito J, Kitano VJ, Shimada J, Hakeda Y. The polymethoxy flavonoid sudachitin suppresses inflammatory bone destruction by directly inhibiting osteoclastogenesis due to reduced ROS production and MAPK activation in osteoclast precursors. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
242.Chen L, et al. N-acetylcysteine prevents orchiectomy-induced osteoporosis by inhibiting oxidative stress and osteocyte senescence. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019;11:4337–4347. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
243.Muszynska M, Ambrozewicz E, Gegotek A, Grynkiewicz G, Skrzydlewska E. Protective effects of vitamin K compounds on the proteomic profile of osteoblasts under oxidative stress conditions. Molecules. 2020;25:1990. doi: 10.3390/molecules25081990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
244.Liu HD, et al. Melatonin alleviates hydrogen peroxide induced oxidative damage in MC3T3-E1 cells and promotes osteogenesis by activating SIRT1. Free Radic. Res. 2022;56:63–76. doi: 10.1080/10715762.2022.2037580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
245.Almeida M, et al. Estrogens attenuate oxidative stress and the differentiation and apoptosis of osteoblasts by DNA-binding-independent actions of the ERalpha. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010;25:769–781. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.091017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
246.Vatner SF, et al. Healthful aging mediated by inhibition of oxidative stress. Ageing Res. Rev. 2020;64:101194. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
247.Zhang S, Liu Y, Liang Q. Low-dose dexamethasone affects osteoblast viability by inducing autophagy via intracellular ROS. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;17:4307–4316. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
248.Yun HR, et al. Roles of autophagy in oxidative stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:3289. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
249.Xi G, Rosen CJ, Clemmons DR. IGF-I and IGFBP-2 stimulate AMPK activation and autophagy, which are required for osteoblast differentiation. Endocrinology. 2016;157:268–281. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
250.Kops GJ, et al. Forkhead transcription factor FOXO3a protects quiescent cells from oxidative stress. Nature. 2002;419:316–321. doi: 10.1038/nature01036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
251.Zhu Y, Zhou J, Ao R, Yu B. A-769662 protects osteoblasts from hydrogen dioxide-induced apoptosis through activating of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014;15:11190–11203. doi: 10.3390/ijms150611190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
252.Shi Y, et al. Monotropein attenuates oxidative stress via Akt/mTOR-mediated autophagy in osteoblast cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020;121:109566. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
253.Zhao Y, et al. Autophagy regulates hypoxia-induced osteoclastogenesis through the HIF-1alpha/BNIP3 signaling pathway. J. Cell Physiol. 2012;227:639–648. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
254.Kar R, Riquelme MA, Hua R, Jiang JX. Glucocorticoid-induced autophagy protects osteocytes against oxidative stress through activation of MAPK/ERK signaling. JBMR Plus. 2019;3:e10077. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
255.Suzuki M, Bandoski C, Bartlett JD. Fluoride induces oxidative damage and SIRT1/autophagy through ROS-mediated JNK signaling. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015;89:369–378. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
256.Li H, et al. Defective autophagy in osteoblasts induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and causes remarkable bone loss. Autophagy. 2018;14:1726–1741. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1483807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
257.Li Z, et al. Cell death regulation: a new way for natural products to treat osteoporosis. Pharmacol. Res. 2023;187:106635. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
258.Wang L, Heckmann BL, Yang X, Long H. Osteoblast autophagy in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. J. Cell Physiol. 2019;234:3207–3215. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
259.Yang J, Ueharu H, Mishina Y. Energy metabolism: a newly emerging target of BMP signaling in bone homeostasis. Bone. 2020;138:115467. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
260.Sartori R, Gregorevic P, Sandri M. TGFbeta and BMP signaling in skeletal muscle: potential significance for muscle-related disease. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;25:464–471. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2014.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
261.Gao C, et al. Autophagy negatively regulates Wnt signalling by promoting Dishevelled degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010;12:781–790. doi: 10.1038/ncb2082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
262.Wu DJ, et al. Autophagy-linked FYVE containing protein WDFY3 interacts with TRAF6 and modulates RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. J. Autoimmun. 2016;73:73–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
263.Fu L, Wu W, Sun X, Zhang P. Glucocorticoids enhanced osteoclast autophagy through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2020;107:60–71. doi: 10.1007/s00223-020-00687-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
264.Huang W, Gong Y, Yan L. ER stress, the unfolded protein response and osteoclastogenesis: a review. Biomolecules. 2023;13:1050. doi: 10.3390/biom13071050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
265.Wang J, et al. The role of autophagy in bone metabolism and clinical significance. Autophagy. 2023;19:2409–2427. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2023.2186112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
266.Lin NY, et al. Inactivation of autophagy ameliorates glucocorticoid-induced and ovariectomy-induced bone loss. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016;75:1203–1210. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
267.Guo Y, et al. Sirt3-mediated mitophagy regulates AGEs-induced BMSCs senescence and senile osteoporosis. Redox Biol. 2021;41:101915. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
268.Ruolan W, Liangjiao C, Longquan S. The mTOR/ULK1 signaling pathway mediates the autophagy-promoting and osteogenic effects of dicalcium silicate nanoparticles. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2020;18:119. doi: 10.1186/s12951-020-00663-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
269.Yoshida G, et al. Degradation of the NOTCH intracellular domain by elevated autophagy in osteoblasts promotes osteoblast differentiation and alleviates osteoporosis. Autophagy. 2022;18:2323–2332. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.2017587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
270.Wang Y, et al. Up-regulation of SIRT1 induced by 17beta-estradiol promotes autophagy and inhibits apoptosis in osteoblasts. Aging (Albany N. Y.) 2021;13:23652–23671. doi: 10.18632/aging.203639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
271.Sun X, Yang X, Zhao Y, Li Y, Guo L. Effects of 17beta-estradiol on mitophagy in the murine MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cell line is mediated via G protein-coupled estrogen receptor and the ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Med. Sci. Monit. 2018;24:903–911. doi: 10.12659/MSM.908705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
272.Song S, Guo Y, Yang Y, Fu D. Advances in pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022;237:108168. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
273.Thomas N, et al. Autophagy regulates craniofacial bone acquisition. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2019;105:518–530. doi: 10.1007/s00223-019-00593-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
274.Yang YH, et al. Estradiol inhibits osteoblast apoptosis via promotion of autophagy through the ER-ERK-mTOR pathway. Apoptosis. 2013;18:1363–1375. doi: 10.1007/s10495-013-0867-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
275.Kim SY, et al. ESRRA (estrogen-related receptor alpha) is a key coordinator of transcriptional and post-translational activation of autophagy to promote innate host defense. Autophagy. 2018;14:152–168. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1339001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
276.Shang D, Wang L, Klionsky DJ, Cheng H, Zhou R. Sex differences in autophagy-mediated diseases: toward precision medicine. Autophagy. 2021;17:1065–1076. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1752511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
277.Zhang Y, et al. Bisphenol A induces apoptosis and autophagy in murine osteocytes MLO-Y4: Involvement of ROS-mediated mTOR/ULK1 pathway. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021;230:113119. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
278.Florencio-Silva R, Sasso GRS, Sasso-Cerri E, Simoes MJ, Cerri PS. Effects of estrogen status in osteocyte autophagy and its relation to osteocyte viability in alveolar process of ovariectomized rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;98:406–415. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.12.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
279.Gavali S, et al. Estrogen enhances human osteoblast survival and function via promotion of autophagy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2019;1866:1498–1507. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2019.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
280.Adami G, Saag KG. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: 2019 concise clinical review. Osteoporos. Int. 2019;30:1145–1156. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04906-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
281.Chen F, et al. Glucocorticoid induced osteoblast apoptosis by increasing E4BP4 expression via up-regulation of Bim. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2014;94:640–647. doi: 10.1007/s00223-014-9847-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
282.Chen M, Fu W, Xu H, Liu CJ. Pathogenic mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2023;70:54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2023.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
283.Peng P, Nie Z, Sun F, Peng H. Glucocorticoids induce femoral head necrosis in rats through the ROS/JNK/c-Jun pathway. FEBS Open Bio. 2021;11:312–321. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
284.van Staa TP. The pathogenesis, epidemiology and management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2006;79:129–137. doi: 10.1007/s00223-006-0019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
285.Cheng CH, Chen LR, Chen KH. Osteoporosis due to hormone imbalance: an overview of the effects of estrogen deficiency and glucocorticoid overuse on bone turnover. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:1376. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
286.Engelbrecht Y, et al. Glucocorticoids induce rapid up-regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 and dephosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and impair proliferation in human and mouse osteoblast cell lines. Endocrinology. 2003;144:412–422. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
287.Greenblatt MB, Shim JH, Glimcher LH. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in osteoblasts. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2013;29:63–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
288.Xing Q, Feng J, Zhang X. Glucocorticoids suppressed osteoblast differentiation by decreasing Sema3A expression via the PIK3/Akt pathway. Exp. Cell Res. 2021;403:112595. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
289.Zhang Y, et al. Effects of estrogen on proliferation and apoptosis of osteoblasts through regulating GPER/AKT pathway. Cell Mol. Biol. (Noisy-Le-Grand) 2022;68:124–129. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2022.68.1.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
290.Yoon HY, Won YY, Chung YS. Poncirin prevents bone loss in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in vivo and in vitro. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2012;30:509–516. doi: 10.1007/s00774-012-0350-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
291.Li Y, et al. Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using 2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: national cross sectional study. BMJ. 2020;369:m997. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
292.Casado-Diaz A, Anter J, Dorado G, Quesada-Gomez JM. Effects of quercetin, a natural phenolic compound, in the differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) into adipocytes and osteoblasts. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016;32:151–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2016.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
293.Bitto A, et al. Genistein aglycone reverses glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and increases bone breaking strength in rats: a comparative study with alendronate. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009;156:1287–1295. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2008.00100.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
294.Rathi A, Ishaq M, Najmi AK, Akhtar M. Trigonelline demonstrated ameliorative effects in dexamethasone induced osteoporotic rats. Drug Res. (Stuttg) 2020;70:257–264. doi: 10.1055/a-1147-5724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
295.Feng R, et al. Icariin protects against glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in vitro and prevents glucocorticoid-induced osteocyte apoptosis in vivo. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2013;67:189–197. doi: 10.1007/s12013-013-9533-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
296.Wong SK, Chin KY, Ima-Nirwana S. Quercetin as an agent for protecting the bone: a review of the current evidence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:6448. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
297.Koromani F, et al. Vertebral fractures in individuals with type 2 diabetes: more than skeletal complications alone. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:137–144. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
298.Moayeri A, et al. Fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and possible risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2017;13:455–468. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S131945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
299.Rios-Arce ND, et al. Loss of interleukin-10 exacerbates early Type-1 diabetes-induced bone loss. J. Cell Physiol. 2020;235:2350–2365. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
300.Santiprabhob J, et al. Effect of gender, diabetes duration, inflammatory cytokines, and vitamin D level on bone mineral density among Thai children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Bone. 2021;153:116112. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
301.Verroken C, et al. Cortical bone size deficit in adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017;102:2887–2895. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
302.Raehtz S, Bierhalter H, Schoenherr D, Parameswaran N, McCabe LR. Estrogen deficiency exacerbates type 1 diabetes-induced bone TNF-alpha expression and osteoporosis in female mice. Endocrinology. 2017;158:2086–2101. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
303.Wang JF, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-6 attenuates type 1 diabetes mellitus-associated bone loss. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2019;8:522–534. doi: 10.1002/sctm.18-0150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
304.Tramunt B, et al. Sex differences in metabolic regulation and diabetes susceptibility. Diabetologia. 2020;63:453–461. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05040-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
305.Kautzky-Willer A, Leutner M, Harreiter J. Sex differences in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2023;66:986–1002. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-05891-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
306.Zhang P, et al. Insulin impedes osteogenesis of BMSCs by inhibiting autophagy and promoting premature senescence via the TGF-beta1 pathway. Aging (Albany N. Y.) 2020;12:2084–2100. doi: 10.18632/aging.102723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
307.An Y, et al. Activation of ROS/MAPKs/NF-kappaB/NLRP3 and inhibition of efferocytosis in osteoclast-mediated diabetic osteoporosis. FASEB J. 2019;33:12515–12527. doi: 10.1096/fj.201802805RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
308.Pouresmaeili F, Kamalidehghan B, Kamarehei M, Goh YM. A comprehensive overview on osteoporosis and its risk factors. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2018;14:2029–2049. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S138000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
309.Walsh JS, Vilaca T. Obesity, type 2 diabetes and bone in adults. Calcif Tissue Int. 2017;100:528–535. doi: 10.1007/s00223-016-0229-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
310.Wang L, et al. Insulin improves osteogenesis of titanium implants under diabetic conditions by inhibiting reactive oxygen species overproduction via the PI3K-Akt pathway. Biochimie. 2015;108:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2014.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
311.Tiano JP, Mauvais-Jarvis F. Importance of oestrogen receptors to preserve functional beta-cell mass in diabetes. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2012;8:342–351. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
312.Behera J, Ison J, Voor MJ, Tyagi N. Exercise-linked skeletal irisin ameliorates diabetes-associated osteoporosis by inhibiting the oxidative damage-dependent miR-150-FNDC5/Pyroptosis axis. Diabetes. 2022;71:2777–2792. doi: 10.2337/db21-0573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
313.Fu C, Zhang X, Ye F, Yang J. High insulin levels in KK-Ay diabetic mice cause increased cortical bone mass and impaired trabecular micro-structure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16:8213–8226. doi: 10.3390/ijms16048213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
314.Song P, et al. Canagliflozin promotes osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 differentiation via AMPK/RUNX2 and improves bone microarchitecture in type 2 diabetic mice. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2022;13:1081039. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1081039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
315.Yip WCY, Sequeira IR, Plank LD, Poppitt SD. Prevalence of pre-diabetes across ethnicities: a review of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) for classification of dysglycaemia. Nutrients. 2017;9:1273. doi: 10.3390/nu9111273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
316.Wang L, et al. Prevalence and ethnic pattern of diabetes and prediabetes in China in 2013. JAMA. 2017;317:2515–2523,. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
317.Kautzky-Willer A, Harreiter J, Pacini G. Sex and gender differences in risk, pathophysiology and complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr. Rev. 2016;37:278–316. doi: 10.1210/er.2015-1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
318.Shaffer JA, et al. Vitamin D supplementation for depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychosom. Med. 2014;76:190–196. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
319.Shin MK, Kim H, Choi SH, Kim BJ, Kwon O. Sex-specific bi‑directional association between osteoporosis and depression from the national representative data of South Korea. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:9500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13401-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
320.Yang M, et al. Sexual dimorphism in the relationship between Forkhead-Box P2 and BMI with cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:920352. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.920352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
321.Wippert PM, Rector M, Kuhn G, Wuertz-Kozak K. Stress and alterations in bones: an interdisciplinary perspective. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2017;8:96. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
322.Huang WS, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder and risk of osteoporosis: a nationwide longitudinal study. Stress Health. 2018;34:440–445. doi: 10.1002/smi.2806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
323.Kelly RR, McDonald LT, Jensen NR, Sidles SJ, LaRue AC. Impacts of psychological stress on osteoporosis: clinical implications and treatment interactions. Front. Psychiatry. 2019;10:200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
324.Azuma K, Adachi Y, Hayashi H, Kubo KY. Chronic psychological stress as a risk factor of osteoporosis. J. UOEH. 2015;37:245–253. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.37.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
325.Vaessen T, Hernaus D, Myin-Germeys I, van Amelsvoort T. The dopaminergic response to acute stress in health and psychopathology: a systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2015;56:241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
326.Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, Seeman MV. The association between hormones and antipsychotic use: a focus on postpartum and menopausal women. Ther. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 2019;9:2045125319859973. doi: 10.1177/2045125319859973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
327.Custodio IDD, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and cancer-related fatigue: associations and effects on depression, anxiety, functional capacity and health-related quality of Life in breast cancer survivors during adjuvant endocrine therapy. BMC Cancer. 2022;22:860. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09962-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
328.Catalano A, et al. Anxiety levels predict fracture risk in postmenopausal women assessed for osteoporosis. Menopause. 2018;25:1110–1115. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
329.Bottaccioli AG, Bottaccioli F, Minelli A. Stress and the psyche-brain-immune network in psychiatric diseases based on psychoneuroendocrineimmunology: a concise review. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2019;1437:31–42. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
330.Harvey NC, et al. Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures. Osteoporos. Int. 2017;28:1507–1529. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3894-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
331.Javaid MK, et al. A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network. Osteoporos. Int. 2020;31:1193–1204. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05377-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
332.Foessl I, Dimai HP, Obermayer-Pietsch B. Long-term and sequential treatment for osteoporosis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2023;19:520–533. doi: 10.1038/s41574-023-00866-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
333.Harvey NC, et al. Towards a cure for osteoporosis: the UK Royal Osteoporosis Society (ROS) Osteoporosis Research Roadmap. Arch. Osteoporos. 2022;17:12. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-01049-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
334.Tu KN, et al. Osteoporosis: a review of treatment options. P T. 2018;43:92–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
335.Wang QY, et al. Pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gerontology. 2021;67:639–649. doi: 10.1159/000514449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
336.van der Velde RY, et al. Trends in oral anti-osteoporosis drug prescription in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2012: variation by age, sex, geographic location and ethnicity. Bone. 2017;94:50–55. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
337.Sfeir JG, Pignolo RJ. Pharmacologic interventions for fracture risk reduction in the oldest old: what is the evidence? JBMR Plus. 2021;5:e10538. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
338.Center JR, Lyles KW, Bliuc D. Bisphosphonates and lifespan. Bone. 2020;141:115566. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
339.Black DM, Abrahamsen B, Bouxsein ML, Einhorn T, Napoli N. Atypical femur fractures: review of epidemiology, relationship to bisphosphonates, prevention, and clinical management. Endocr. Rev. 2019;40:333–368. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
340.Orwoll E, et al. Alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis in men. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;343:604–610. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008313430902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
341.Abrahamsen B, Eiken P, Prieto-Alhambra D, Eastell R. Risk of hip, subtrochanteric, and femoral shaft fractures among mid and long term users of alendronate: nationwide cohort and nested case-control study. BMJ. 2016;353:i3365. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
342.Saag KG, et al. Romosozumab or alendronate for fracture prevention in women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:1417–1427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
343.Kendler DL, et al. Effects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391:230–240. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32137-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
344.Lyles KW, et al. Zoledronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;357:1799–1809. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa074941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
345.Orwoll ES, et al. Efficacy and safety of a once-yearly i.v. Infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg versus a once-weekly 70-mg oral alendronate in the treatment of male osteoporosis: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010;25:2239–2250. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
346.Dhillon SZoledronic. Acid (Reclast((R)), Aclasta((R))): a review in osteoporosis. Drugs. 2016;76:1683–1697. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0662-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
347.Oryan A, Sahvieh S. Effects of bisphosphonates on osteoporosis: focus on zoledronate. Life Sci. 2021;264:118681. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
348.Ayers C, et al. Effectiveness and safety of treatments to prevent fractures in people with low bone mass or primary osteoporosis: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians. Ann. Intern. Med. 2023;176:182–195. doi: 10.7326/M22-0684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
349.Wang J, et al. Bisphosphonates for prevention of osteopenia in kidney-transplant recipients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos. Int. 2016;27:1683–1690. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3465-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
350.Eastell R, et al. Diabetes mellitus and the benefit of antiresorptive therapy on fracture risk. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2022;37:2121–2131. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
351.Lee P, et al. Preadmission bisphosphonate and mortality in critically Ill patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016;101:1945–1953. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
352.Qaseem A, et al. Treatment of low bone density or osteoporosis to prevent fractures in men and women: a clinical practice guideline update from the American College of Physicians. Ann. Intern. Med. 2017;166:818–839. doi: 10.7326/M15-1361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
353.Liu GF, et al. A network meta-analysis on the short-term efficacy and adverse events of different anti-osteoporosis drugs for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J. Cell Biochem. 2018;119:4469–4481. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
354.Axelsson KF, Wallander M, Johansson H, Lundh D, Lorentzon M. Hip fracture risk and safety with alendronate treatment in the oldest-old. J. Intern. Med. 2017;282:546–559. doi: 10.1111/joim.12678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
355.Stoch SA, et al. Once-weekly oral alendronate 70 mg in patients with glucocorticoid-induced bone loss: a 12-month randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J. Rheumatol. 2009;36:1705–1714. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
356.Reid IR, et al. Effects of zoledronate on cancer, cardiac events, and mortality in osteopenic older women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2020;35:20–27. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
357.Rubin KH, et al. Cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid in osteoporosis observational, matched cohort study using Danish and Swedish health registries. Bone. 2020;134:115296. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
358.Delli Poggi C, Fusaro M, Mereu MC, Brandi ML, Cianferotti L. Cardiovascular safety and effectiveness of bisphosphonates: from intervention trials to real-life data. Nutrients. 2022;14:2369. doi: 10.3390/nu14122369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
359.Fazmin IT, Huang CL, Jeevaratnam K. Bisphosphonates and atrial fibrillation: revisiting the controversy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2020;1474:15–26. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
360.Kim SC, et al. Impact of the U.S. food and drug administration’s safety-related announcements on the use of bisphosphonates after hip fracture. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016;31:1536–1540. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
361.Komori T. Animal models for osteoporosis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015;759:287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
362.Georgieva A, et al. Effects of ovariectomy-induced estrogen deficit on rat behaviour, lipid metabolism, inflammation, bone mineral density, and turnover. Folia Med. (Plovdiv.) 2021;63:385–391. doi: 10.3897/folmed.63.e55267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
363.Stepan JJ, Hruskova H, Kverka M. Update on menopausal hormone therapy for fracture prevention. Curr. Osteoporos Rep. 2019;17:465–473. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00549-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
364.Lindsay R, Gallagher JC, Kleerekoper M, Pickar JH. Effect of lower doses of conjugated equine estrogens with and without medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone in early postmenopausal women. JAMA. 2002;287:2668–2676. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
365.Lambrinoudaki I, Paschou SA, Armeni E, Goulis DG. The interplay between diabetes mellitus and menopause: clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022;18:608–622. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00708-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
366.Sun ZB, et al. Icariin may benefit the mesenchymal stem cells of patients with steroid-associated osteonecrosis by ABCB1-promoter demethylation: a preliminary study. Osteoporos. Int. 2015;26:187–197. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2809-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
367.Wang Z, et al. The effect of icariin on bone metabolism and its potential clinical application. Osteoporos. Int. 2018;29:535–544. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4255-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
368.Nowak B, et al. Oral administration of kaempferol inhibits bone loss in rat model of ovariectomy-induced osteopenia. Pharmacol. Rep. 2017;69:1113–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
369.Wong SK, Chin KY, Ima-Nirwana S. The osteoprotective effects of kaempferol: the evidence from in vivo and in vitro studies. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2019;13:3497–3514. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S227738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
370.Arcoraci V, et al. Antiosteoporotic activity of genistein aglycone in postmenopausal women: evidence from a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 2017;9:179. doi: 10.3390/nu9020179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
371.Wu Z, Liu L. The protective activity of genistein against bone and cartilage diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2022;13:1016981. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1016981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
372.Zhou Y, et al. Senolytics improve bone forming potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from aged mice. NPJ Regen Med. 2021;6:34. doi: 10.1038/s41536-021-00145-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
373.Slupski W, Jawien P, Nowak B. Botanicals in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nutrients. 2021;13:1609. doi: 10.3390/nu13051609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
374.Kim IS. Current perspectives on the beneficial effects of soybean isoflavones and their metabolites for humans. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021;10:1064. doi: 10.3390/antiox10071064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
375.Vigneswaran K, Hamoda H. Hormone replacement therapy–current recommendations. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2022;81:8–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
376.Gersh FL, O’Keefe JH, Lavie CJ. Postmenopausal hormone therapy for cardiovascular health: the evolving data. Heart. 2021;107:1115–1122. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
377.Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast, C. Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence. Lancet. 2019;394:1159–1168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31709-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
378.Rietjens I, Louisse J, Beekmann K. The potential health effects of dietary phytoestrogens. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017;174:1263–1280. doi: 10.1111/bph.13622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
379.Cannarella R, et al. Osteoporosis from an endocrine perspective: the role of hormonal changes in the elderly. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:1564. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
380.Gosset A, Pouilles JM, Tremollieres F. Menopausal hormone therapy for the management of osteoporosis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021;35:101551. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2021.101551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
381.Dimai HP, Fahrleitner-Pammer A. Osteoporosis and Fragility Fractures: currently available pharmacological options and future directions. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2022;36:101780. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2022.101780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
382.Wang Q, Dong X, Wang Y, Li X. Raloxifene as an adjunctive treatment for postmenopausal women with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch. Womens Ment. Health. 2018;21:31–41. doi: 10.1007/s00737-017-0773-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
383.Kang F, Zou Q, Huang J. The effects of raloxifene on endothelial function and Inflammation in Postmenopausal women: a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Exp. Gerontol. 2022;159:111682. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
384.Cummings SR, et al. Lasofoxifene in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:686–696. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
385.Andersson A, et al. Selective oestrogen receptor modulators lasofoxifene and bazedoxifene inhibit joint inflammation and osteoporosis in ovariectomised mice with collagen-induced arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;55:553–563. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
386.Peng L, Luo Q, Lu H. Efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e8659. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
387.Martinkovich S, Shah D, Planey SL, Arnott JA. Selective estrogen receptor modulators: tissue specificity and clinical utility. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2014;9:1437–1452. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S66690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
388.Mirkin S, Pickar JH. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs): a review of clinical data. Maturitas. 2015;80:52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
389.Ettinger B, et al. Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. JAMA. 1999;282:637–645. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.7.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
390.Briot K, et al. 2018 update of French recommendations on the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine. 2018;85:519–530. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
391.Wong SK, et al. The use of selective estrogen receptor modulators on bone health in men. Aging Male. 2019;22:89–101. doi: 10.1080/13685538.2018.1448058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
392.Ide V, Vanderschueren D, Antonio L. Treatment of men with central hypogonadism: alternatives for testosterone replacement therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;22:21. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
393.Tong D. Selective estrogen receptor modulators contribute to prostate cancer treatment by regulating the tumor immune microenvironment. J. Immunother Cancer. 2022;10:e002944. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
394.Chen HW, et al. Comparative adverse kidney outcomes in women receiving raloxifene and denosumab in a real-world setting. Biomedicines. 2022;10:1494. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10071494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
395.Zhu C, et al. Autophagy in bone remodeling: a regulator of oxidative stress. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2022;13:898634. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.898634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
396.Fuggle NR, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular safety of anti-osteoporosis drugs. Drugs. 2020;80:1537–1552. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01364-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
397.Yavropoulou MP, Makras P, Anastasilakis AD. Bazedoxifene for the treatment of osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2019;20:1201–1210. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1615882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
398.de Villiers TJ, Altomare C, Particco M, Gambacciani M. Effects of ospemifene on bone in postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2019;22:442–447. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2019.1631789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
399.Constantine GD, Kagan R, Miller PD. Effects of ospemifene on bone parameters including clinical biomarkers in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2016;23:638–644. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
400.Kendler DL, et al. Arzoxifene versus raloxifene: effect on bone and safety parameters in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos. Int. 2012;23:1091–1101. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1587-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
401.Arantes HP, et al. Correlation between 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and latitude in Brazilian postmenopausal women: from the Arzoxifene Generations Trial. Osteoporos. Int. 2013;24:2707–2712. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2366-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
402.Goldstein SR. Selective estrogen receptor modulators and bone health. Climacteric. 2022;25:56–59. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2021.1936485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
403.Borjesson AE, et al. SERMs have substance-specific effects on bone, and these effects are mediated via ERalphaAF-1 in female mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016;310:E912–918,. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00488.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
404.Luo P, et al. Bazedoxifene exhibits anti-inflammation and anti-atherosclerotic effects via inhibition of IL-6/IL-6R/STAT3 signaling. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021;893:173822. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
405.Neher R, et al. Human calcitonin. Nature. 1968;220:984–986. doi: 10.1038/220984a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
406.Yu P, Liu Y, Xie J, Li J. Spatiotemporally controlled calcitonin delivery: Long-term and targeted therapy of skeletal diseases. J. Control. Release. 2021;338:486–504. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
407.Rico H, Revilla M, Hernandez ER, Villa LF, Alvarez de Buergo M. Total and regional bone mineral content and fracture rate in postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with salmon calcitonin: a prospective study. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1995;56:181–185. doi: 10.1007/BF00298606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
408.Chesnut CH, 3rd, et al. A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study. PROOF Study Group. Am. J. Med. 2000;109:267–276. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00490-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
409.Knopp-Sihota JA, Newburn-Cook CV, Homik J, Cummings GG, Voaklander D. Calcitonin for treating acute and chronic pain of recent and remote osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos. Int. 2012;23:17–38. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1676-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
410.Henriksen K, Bay-Jensen AC, Christiansen C, Karsdal MA. Oral salmon calcitonin–pharmacology in osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2010;10:1617–1629. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2010.526104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
411.Downs RW, Jr., et al. Comparison of alendronate and intranasal calcitonin for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000;85:1783–1788. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.5.6606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
412.Woo T, Adachi JD. Role of bisphosphonates and calcitonin in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2001;15:469–481. doi: 10.1053/berh.2001.0161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
413.Cranney A, et al. Calcitonin for the treatment and prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2000;2000:CD001983. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
414.Reginster JY, Franchimont P. Side effects of synthetic salmon calcitonin given by intranasal spray compared with intramuscular injection. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 1985;3:155–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
415.Naot D, Musson DS, Cornish J. The activity of peptides of the calcitonin family in bone. Physiol. Rev. 2019;99:781–805. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00066.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
416.Zhang N, et al. Pros and cons of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis and implication for RANKL aptamer therapy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:325. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
417.Dreyer TJ, Keen JA, Wells LM, Roberts SJ. Novel insights on the effect of sclerostin on bone and other organs. J. Endocrinol. 2023;257:e220209. doi: 10.1530/JOE-22-0209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
418.Lewiecki EM, Bilezikian JP. Denosumab for the treatment of osteoporosis and cancer-related conditions. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012;91:123–133. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
419.McClung MR, et al. Effects of 24 months of treatment with romosozumab followed by 12 months of denosumab or placebo in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: a randomized, double-blind, phase 2, parallel group. Study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2018;33:1397–1406. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
420.Nakamura T, et al. Clinical trials express: fracture risk reduction with denosumab in Japanese postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis: denosumab fracture intervention randomized placebo controlled trial (DIRECT) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99:2599–2607. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-4175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
421.Deeks ED. Denosumab: a review in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Drugs Aging. 2018;35:163–173. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0525-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
422.Pang KL, Low NY, Chin KY. A review on the role of denosumab in fracture prevention. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2020;14:4029–4051. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S270829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
423.Sidlauskas KM, Sutton EE, Biddle MA. Osteoporosis in men: epidemiology and treatment with denosumab. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2014;9:593–601. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S51940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
424.Aspray TJ, et al. National Osteoporosis Society vitamin D guideline summary. Age Ageing. 2014;43:592–595. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
425.Casado E, et al. Multidisciplinary consensus on the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen-deprivation therapy. World J. Mens Health. 2022;40:74–86,. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.210061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
426.Zeytinoglu M, Naaman SC, Dickens LT. Denosumab discontinuation in patients treated for low bone density and osteoporosis. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 2021;50:205–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2021.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
427.Cummings SR, et al. Vertebral fractures after discontinuation of denosumab: a post hoc analysis of the randomized placebo-controlled FREEDOM trial and its extension. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2018;33:190–198. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
428.Tsourdi E, et al. Discontinuation of Denosumab therapy for osteoporosis: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS. Bone. 2017;105:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
429.Lamy O, Stoll D, Aubry-Rozier B, Rodriguez EG. Stopping denosumab. Curr. Osteoporos Rep. 2019;17:8–15. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00502-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
430.Paik J, Scott LJ. Romosozumab: a review in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Drugs Aging. 2020;37:845–855. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00793-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
431.Saag KG, Petersen J, Grauer A. Romosozumab versus Alendronate and fracture risk in women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:195–196. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1714810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
432.Geusens P, et al. The effect of 1 year of romosozumab on the incidence of clinical vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the FRAME study. JBMR Plus. 2019;3:e10211. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
433.Cosman F, et al. Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1532–1543. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
434.Wu D, Li L, Wen Z, Wang G. Romosozumab in osteoporosis: yesterday, today and tomorrow. J. Transl. Med. 2023;21:668. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04563-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
435.Lamy O, Gonzalez-Rodriguez E, Stoll D, Hans D, Aubry-Rozier B. Severe rebound-associated vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation: 9 clinical cases report. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017;102:354–358. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
436.Tsourdi E, et al. Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020;106:264–281. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
437.Lewiecki EM, et al. A phase III randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of romosozumab in men with osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;103:3183–3193. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
438.Ensrud KE, Schousboe JT. Anabolic therapy for osteoporosis. JAMA. 2021;326:350–351. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
439.Minisola S, et al. Update on the safety and efficacy of teriparatide in the treatment of osteoporosis. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2019;11:1759720X19877994. doi: 10.1177/1759720X19877994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
440.Miller PD, et al. Effect of abaloparatide vs placebo on new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:722–733. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
441.Díez-Pe rez A, Marin F, Eriksen EF. Effects of teriparatide on hip and upper limb fractures in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone. 2019;120:1e8. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
442.Hauser B, Alonso N, Riches PL. Review of current real-world experience with teriparatide as treatment of osteoporosis in different patient groups. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:1403. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
443.Brent MB. Abaloparatide: a review of preclinical and clinical studies. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021;909:174409. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
444.Liu W, et al. Targeted activation of AMPK by GSK621 ameliorates H2O2-induced damages in osteoblasts. Oncotarget. 2017;8:10543–10552. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
445.Molagoda IMN, et al. Fisetin promotes osteoblast differentiation and osteogenesis through GSK-3beta phosphorylation at Ser9 and consequent beta-catenin activation, inhibiting osteoporosis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021;192:114676. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
446.Marini F, Giusti F, Palmini G, Brandi ML. Role of Wnt signaling and sclerostin in bone and as therapeutic targets in skeletal disorders. Osteoporos. Int. 2023;34:213–238. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06523-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
447.Faienza MF, et al. Monoclonal antibodies for treating osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2018;18:149–157. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1401607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
448.Nealy KL, Harris KB. Romosozumab: a novel injectable sclerostin inhibitor with anabolic and antiresorptive effects for osteoporosis. Ann. Pharmacother. 2021;55:677–686. doi: 10.1177/1060028020952764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
449.Asadipooya K, Weinstock A. Cardiovascular outcomes of romosozumab and protective role of alendronate. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019;39:1343–1350. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
450.Corrado A, Sanpaolo ER, Di Bello S, Cantatore FP. Osteoblast as a target of anti-osteoporotic treatment. Postgrad. Med. 2017;129:858–865. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1362312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
451.Brent MB, Stoltenborg FE, Bruel A, Thomsen JS. Teriparatide and abaloparatide have a similar effect on bone in mice. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2021;12:628994. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.628994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
452.Sim IW, et al. Teriparatide promotes bone healing in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a placebo-controlled, randomized trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;38:2971–2980. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
453.Gossiel F, et al. Effect of teriparatide treatment on circulating periostin and its relationship to regulators of bone formation and BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;103:1302–1309. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
454.Pietrogrande L, Raimondo E. Abaloparatide for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Drugs Today (Barc). 2018;54:293–303. doi: 10.1358/dot.2018.54.5.2800621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
455.Dhaliwal R, et al. Abaloparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the ACTIVE study. JBMR Plus. 2020;4:e10346. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
456.Gilsenan A, et al. Teriparatide did not increase adult osteosarcoma incidence in a 15-year US postmarketing surveillance study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2021;36:244–251. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
457.Miller PD, Lewiecki EM, Krohn K, Schwartz E. Teriparatide: label changes and identifying patients for long-term use. Cleve. Clin. J. Med. 2021;88:489–493. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.88a.21011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
458.Finkelstein JS, Wyland JJ, Lee H, Neer RM. Effects of teriparatide, alendronate, or both in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;95:1838–1845. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
459.Neer RM, et al. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;344:1434–1441. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105103441904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
460.Li M, et al. Efficacy of generic teriparatide and alendronate in Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a prospective study. Arch Osteoporos. 2022;17:103. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01131-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
461.Hong P, et al. Is abaloparatide more efficacious on increasing bone mineral density than teriparatide for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis? An updated meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2023;18:116. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03595-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
462.Reid IR, Billington EO. Drug therapy for osteoporosis in older adults. Lancet. 2022;399:1080–1092. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02646-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
463.Camacho PM, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology Clinical Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis-2020 update. Endocr. Pract. 2020;26:1–46. doi: 10.4158/GL-2020-0524SUPPL. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
464.Shoback D, et al. Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: an endocrine society guideline update. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020;105:587–594. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
465.McConnell M, Shieh A. Polypharmacy in osteoporosis treatment. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2022;38:715–726. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2022.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
466.Curtis EM, Woolford S, Holmes C, Cooper C, Harvey NC. General and specific considerations as to why osteoporosis-related care is often suboptimal. Curr. Osteoporos Rep. 2020;18:38–46. doi: 10.1007/s11914-020-00566-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
467.Cui L, et al. Predicting the intervention threshold for initiating osteoporosis treatment among postmenopausal women in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on real-world data. Osteoporos. Int. 2020;31:307–316. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05173-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
468.Reid IR. A broader strategy for osteoporosis interventions. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:333–339. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-0339-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
469.Barrionuevo P, et al. Efficacy of pharmacological therapies for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women: a network meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019;104:1623–1630. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
470.Curtis EM, et al. Management of patients at very high risk of osteoporotic fractures through sequential treatments. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2022;34:695–714. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02100-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
471.Chandran M. The why and how of sequential and combination therapy in osteoporosis. A review of the current evidence. Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022;66:724–738. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
472.Lukert BP. Which drug next? Sequential therapy for osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020;105:e879–e881. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
473.McClung MR. Using osteoporosis therapies in combination. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2017;15:343–352. doi: 10.1007/s11914-017-0376-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
474.Finkelstein JS, et al. The effects of parathyroid hormone, alendronate, or both in men with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;349:1216–1226. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
475.Anastasilakis AD, Polyzos SA, Yavropoulou MP, Makras P. Combination and sequential treatment in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2020;21:477–490. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1717468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
476.Kanis JA, Svedbom A, Harvey N, McCloskey EV. The osteoporosis treatment gap. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014;29:1926–1928. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
477.Reid IR. Osteoporosis: evidence for vitamin D and calcium in older people. Drug Ther. Bull. 2020;58:122–125. doi: 10.1136/dtb.2019.000063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
478.Mangano KM, et al. Diet-derived fruit and vegetable metabolites show sex-specific inverse relationships to osteoporosis status. Bone. 2021;144:115780. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
479.Jackson RD, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;354:669–683. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
480.Little-Letsinger SE, et al. Exercise to mend aged-tissue crosstalk in bone targeting osteoporosis & osteoarthritis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022;123:22–35. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
481.Zhang J, et al. Is regular weight-bearing physical activity throughout the lifecourse associated with better bone health in late adulthood? Calcif. Tissue Int. 2022;111:279–287. doi: 10.1007/s00223-022-00995-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
482.LeBlanc ES, Zakher B, Daeges M, Pappas M, Chou R. Screening for vitamin D deficiency: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive services task force. Ann. Intern. Med. 2015;162:109–122. doi: 10.7326/M14-1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
483.Chung M, Tang AM, Fu Z, Wang DD, Newberry SJ. Calcium intake and cardiovascular disease risk: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2016;165:856–866. doi: 10.7326/M16-1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
484.Rizzoli R, Biver E, Brennan-Speranza TC. Nutritional intake and bone health. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9:606–621. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00119-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
485.Guo D, et al. Dietary interventions for better management of osteoporosis: an overview. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023;63:125–144. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1944975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
486.Bhasin S, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;103:1715–1744. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
487.Eisman JA, et al. Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2012;27:2039–2046. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
488.The Lancet Diabetes, E. Osteoporosis: a roadmap to close the treatment gap. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6:833. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30292-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
489.Ramachandran S, et al. Gender disparities in osteoporosis screening and management among older adults. Adv. Ther. 2021;38:3872–3887. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01792-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
490.Nayak S, Edwards DL, Saleh AA, Greenspan SL. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of clinical risk assessment instruments for screening for osteoporosis or low bone density. Osteoporos. Int. 2015;26:1543–1554. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3025-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
491.Rubin KH, Friis-Holmberg T, Hermann AP, Abrahamsen B, Brixen K. Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: complexity or simplicity? A systematic review. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013;28:1701–1717. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
492.Merlijn T, Swart KMA, van der Horst HE, Netelenbos JC, Elders PJM. Fracture prevention by screening for high fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos. Int. 2020;31:251–257. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05226-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
493.Overman RA, et al. DXA utilization between 2006 and 2012 in commercially insured younger postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Densitom. 2015;18:145–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
494.Parsons CM, et al. Systematic screening using FRAX((R)) leads to increased use of, and adherence to, anti-osteoporosis medications: an analysis of the UK SCOOP trial. Osteoporos. Int. 2020;31:67–75. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05142-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
495.Bandeira L, Lewiecki EM, Bilezikian JP. Romosozumab for the treatment of osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2017;17:255–263. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2017.1280455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
496.Lems WF, et al. Vertebral fracture: epidemiology, impact and use of DXA vertebral fracture assessment in fracture liaison services. Osteoporos. Int. 2021;32:399–411. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05804-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
497.Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal, I. et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 14, S189–S202 (2017).
498.Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal, I. et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density: 2022 Update. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 19, S417–S432 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
499.Zeng Q, et al. The prevalence of osteoporosis in China, a nationwide, multicenter DXA survey. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2019;34:1789–1797. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
500.Hans D, Baim S. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in the management of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. J. Clin. Densitom. 2017;20:322–333. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
501.Gao C, Song H, Chen B, Zhang Z, Yue H. The assessment of the osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in identifying osteoporotic fractures and falls among Chinese people. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2021;12:684334. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.684334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
502.Catalano A, et al. Quantitative ultrasound and DXA measurements in aromatase inhibitor-treated breast cancer women receiving denosumab. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2017;40:851–857. doi: 10.1007/s40618-016-0606-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
503.Herrmann M. Marrow fat-secreted factors as biomarkers for osteoporosis. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2019;17:429–437. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00550-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
504.Muehlematter UJ, et al. Vertebral body insufficiency fractures: detection of vertebrae at risk on standard CT images using texture analysis and machine learning. Eur. Radiol. 2019;29:2207–2217. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5846-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
505.Rizzoli R. Postmenopausal osteoporosis: assessment and management. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;32:739–757. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2018.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
506.Kanto A, et al. Risk factors for future osteoporosis in perimenopausal Japanese women. Menopause. 2022;29:1176–1183. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
507.Soreskog E, et al. Long-term cost-effectiveness of screening for fracture risk in a UK primary care setting: the SCOOP study. Osteoporos. Int. 2020;31:1499–1506. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05372-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
508.Kanis JA, et al. The use of 2-, 5-, and 10-year probabilities to characterize fracture risk after a recent sentinel fracture. Osteoporos. Int. 2021;32:47–54. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05700-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
509.Jonasson GB, et al. Evaluation of clinical and radiographic indices as predictors of osteoporotic fractures: a 10-year longitudinal study. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 2018;125:487–494. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
510.Karayianni K, et al. Accuracy in osteoporosis diagnosis of a combination of mandibular cortical width measurement on dental panoramic radiographs and a clinical risk index (OSIRIS): the OSTEODENT project. Bone. 2007;40:223–229. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.07.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
511.Jiang X, Good LE, Spinka R, Schnatz PF. Osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women aged 50–64 years: BMI alone compared with current screening tools. Maturitas. 2016;83:59–64. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2015.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
512.Bhat KA, et al. Utility of osteoporosis self-assessment tool as a screening tool for predicting osteoporosis in Indian men. J. Clin. Densitom. 2017;20:160–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2016.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
513.Subramaniam S, Ima-Nirwana S, Chin KY. Performance of osteoporosis self-assessment tool (OST) in predicting osteoporosis-a review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2018;15:1445. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
514.Ahmadzadeh A, Emam M, Rajaei A, Moslemizadeh M, Jalessi M. Comparison of three different osteoporosis risk assessment tools: ORAI (osteoporosis risk assessment instrument), SCORE (simple calculated osteoporosis risk estimation) and OST (osteoporosis self-assessment tool) Med. J. Islam. Repub. Iran. 2014;28:94. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
515.Vafa M, Soltani S, Zayeri F, Niroomand M, Najarzadeh A. The relationship between sodium intake and some bone minerals and osteoporosis risk assessment instrument in postmenopausal women. Med. J. Islam. Repub. Iran. 2016;30:377. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
516.Rubin KH, et al. Effectiveness of a two-step population-based osteoporosis screening program using FRAX: the randomized Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation (ROSE) study. Osteoporos. Int. 2018;29:567–578. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4326-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
517.Kanis JA, et al. Adjusting conventional FRAX estimates of fracture probability according to the recency of sentinel fractures. Osteoporos. Int. 2020;31:1817–1828. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05517-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
518.Koh LK, et al. A simple tool to identify asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporos. Int. 2001;12:699–705. doi: 10.1007/s001980170070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
519.Carey JJ, Chih-Hsing Wu,P, Bergin D. Risk assessment tools for osteoporosis and fractures in 2022. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2022;36:101775. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2022.101775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
520.Fuggle NR, et al. Fracture prediction, imaging and screening in osteoporosis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019;15:535–547. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0220-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
521.Al-Barghouthi BM, et al. Transcriptome-wide association study and eQTL colocalization identify potentially causal genes responsible for human bone mineral density GWAS associations. Elife. 2022;11:e77285. doi: 10.7554/eLife.77285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
522.Ralston SH, Uitterlinden AG. Genetics of osteoporosis. Endocr. Rev. 2010;31:629–662. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
523.Jin P, et al. Pathology, proteomics and the pathway to personalised medicine. Expert Rev. Proteomics. 2018;15:231–243. doi: 10.1080/14789450.2018.1425618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
524.Wang T, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing in orthopedic research. Bone Res. 2023;11:10. doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00245-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
525.Ucer S, et al. The effects of aging and sex steroid deficiency on the murine skeleton are independent and mechanistically distinct. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017;32:560–574. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
526.Wang J, Wang Y, Liu WD, Wang F, Yin ZS. Hip fractures in Hefei, China: the Hefei osteoporosis project. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2014;32:206–214. doi: 10.1007/s00774-013-0484-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR1] 1.Yang TL, et al. A road map for understanding molecular and genetic determinants of osteoporosis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:91–103. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0282-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR2] 2.Liang B, Burley G, Lin S, Shi YC. Osteoporosis pathogenesis and treatment: existing and emerging avenues. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2022;27:72. doi: 10.1186/s11658-022-00371-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR3] 3.Leibson CL, Tosteson AN, Gabriel SE, Ransom JE, Melton LJ. Mortality, disability, and nursing home use for persons with and without hip fracture: a population-based study. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2002;50:1644–1650. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR4] 4.Compston JE, McClung MR, Leslie WD. Osteoporosis. Lancet. 2019;393:364–376. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32112-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR5] 5.Pagnotti GM, et al. Combating osteoporosis and obesity with exercise: leveraging cell mechanosensitivity. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019;15:339–355. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0170-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR6] 6.Cummings SR, et al. Goal-directed treatment for osteoporosis: a progress report from the ASBMR-NOF working group on goal-directed treatment for osteoporosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017;32:3–10. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR7] 7.Patsch JM, Deutschmann J, Pietschmann P. Gender aspects of osteoporosis and bone strength. Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2011;161:117–123. doi: 10.1007/s10354-011-0891-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR8] 8.David K, et al. Bone health in ageing men. Rev. Endocr. Metab. Disord. 2022;23:1173–1208. doi: 10.1007/s11154-022-09738-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR9] 9.Porcelli T, et al. Management of endocrine disease: male osteoporosis: diagnosis and management - should the treatment and the target be the same as for female osteoporosis? Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2020;183:R75–R93. doi: 10.1530/EJE-20-0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR10] 10.Vilaca T, Eastell R, Schini M. Osteoporosis in men. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10:273–283. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00012-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR11] 11.Black DM, Rosen CJ. Clinical practice. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;374:254–262. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1513724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR12] 12.Sandovici I, Fernandez-Twinn DS, Hufnagel A, Constancia M, Ozanne SE. Sex differences in the intergenerational inheritance of metabolic traits. Nat. Metab. 2022;4:507–523. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00570-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR13] 13.Therkildsen J, et al. Sex differences in the association between bone mineral density and coronary artery disease in patients referred for cardiac computed tomography. J. Clin. Densitom. 2021;24:55–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2019.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR14] 14.Mielke MM, Miller VM. Improving clinical outcomes through attention to sex and hormones in research. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:625–635. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00531-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR15] 15.Merkatz RB, Temple R, Subel S, Feiden K, Kessler DA. Women in clinical trials of new drugs. A change in food and drug administration policy. the working group on women in clinical trials. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993;329:292–296. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199307223290429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR16] 16.Burra P, Zanetto A, Germani G. Sex bias in clinical trials in gastroenterology and hepatology. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022;19:413–414. doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00638-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR17] 17.Almeida M, et al. Estrogens and androgens in skeletal physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol. Rev. 2017;97:135–187. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00033.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR18] 18.Brown C. Osteoporosis: staying strong. Nature. 2017;550:S15–S17. doi: 10.1038/550S15a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR19] 19.Chandra A, Rajawat J. Skeletal aging and osteoporosis: mechanisms and therapeutics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:3553. doi: 10.3390/ijms22073553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR20] 20.Pignolo RJ, Law SF, Chandra A. Bone aging, cellular senescence, and osteoporosis. JBMR Plus. 2021;5:e10488. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR21] 21.Ebeling PR, et al. Secondary osteoporosis. Endocr. Rev. 2022;43:240–313. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnab028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR22] 22.Compston J, et al. UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch. Osteoporos. 2017;12:43. doi: 10.1007/s11657-017-0324-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR23] 23.Eastell R, et al. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2016;2:16069. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR24] 24.Svedbom A, et al. Osteoporosis in the European Union: a compendium of country-specific reports. Arch. Osteoporos. 2013;8:137. doi: 10.1007/s11657-013-0137-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR25] 25.Dennison EM, et al. Fracture risk following intermission of osteoporosis therapy. Osteoporos. Int. 2019;30:1733–1743. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05002-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR26] 26.Borgstrom F, et al. Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunities. Arch. Osteoporos. 2020;15:59. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-0706-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR27] 27.Haentjens P, et al. Evidence from data searches and life-table analyses for gender-related differences in absolute risk of hip fracture after Colles’ or spine fracture: Colles’ fracture as an early and sensitive marker of skeletal fragility in white men. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2004;19:1933–1944. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.040917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR28] 28.Stevens JA, Rudd RA. The impact of decreasing U.S. hip fracture rates on future hip fracture estimates. Osteoporos. Int. 2013;24:2725–2728. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2375-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR29] 29.Wang YXJ, et al. Elderly men have much lower vertebral fracture risk than elderly women even at advanced age: the MrOS and MsOS (Hong Kong) year 14 follow-up radiology results. Arch. Osteoporos. 2020;15:176. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00845-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR30] 30.Shim YB, et al. Incidence and risk factors of subsequent osteoporotic fracture: a nationwide cohort study in South Korea. Arch. Osteoporos. 2020;15:180. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00852-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR31] 31.Sun J, et al. A vertebral skeletal stem cell lineage driving metastasis. Nature. 2023;621:602–609. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06519-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR32] 32.Andrew TW, et al. Sexually dimorphic estrogen sensing in skeletal stem cells controls skeletal regeneration. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:6491. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34063-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR33] 33.Peterle VCU, et al. Osteoporotic hip fracture-Comorbidities and factors associated with in-hospital mortality in the elderly: a nine-year cohort study in Brazil. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0272006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR34] 34.Klop C, et al. Mortality in British hip fracture patients, 2000-2010: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Bone. 2014;66:171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2014.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR35] 35.Frost SA, Nguyen ND, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Excess mortality attributable to hip-fracture: a relative survival analysis. Bone. 2013;56:23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR36] 36.Kannegaard PN, van der Mark S, Eiken P, Abrahamsen B. Excess mortality in men compared with women following a hip fracture. National analysis of comedications, comorbidity and survival. Age Ageing. 2010;39:203–209. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afp221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR37] 37.Jung HS, et al. Incidence of subsequent osteoporotic fractures after distal radius fractures and mortality of the subsequent distal radius fractures: a retrospective analysis of claims data of the Korea National Health Insurance Service. Osteoporos. Int. 2021;32:293–299. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05609-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR38] 38.Hawley S, et al. Anti-osteoporosis medication prescriptions and incidence of subsequent fracture among primary hip fracture patients in England and Wales: an interrupted time-series analysis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016;31:2008–2015. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR39] 39.Compston J. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: an update. Endocrine. 2018;61:7–16. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1588-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR40] 40.Chotiyarnwong P, McCloskey EV. Pathogenesis of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and options for treatment. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:437–447. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-0341-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR41] 41.Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L. Fracture risk associated with systemic and topical corticosteroids. J. Intern. Med. 2005;257:374–384. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01467.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR42] 42.Buckley L, Humphrey MB. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;379:2547–2556. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1800214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR43] 43.Briot K, Roux C. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. RMD Open. 2015;1:e000014. doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2014-000014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR44] 44.Soen S, et al. Epidemiology of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and management of associated fracture risk in Japan. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2021;39:1019–1030. doi: 10.1007/s00774-021-01236-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR45] 45.Leib ES, Winzenrieth R. Bone status in glucocorticoid-treated men and women. Osteoporos. Int. 2016;27:39–48. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3211-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR46] 46.Herath M, Langdahl B, Ebeling PR, Milat F. Challenges in the diagnosis and management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in younger and older adults. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 2022;96:460–474. doi: 10.1111/cen.14637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR47] 47.Albaum JM, Levesque LE, Gershon AS, Liu G, Cadarette SM. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis management among seniors, by year, sex, and indication, 1996-2012. Osteoporos. Int. 2015;26:2845–2852. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3200-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR48] 48.Ackermann D, et al. Reference intervals for the urinary steroid metabolome: The impact of sex, age, day and night time on human adult steroidogenesis. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0214549. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR49] 49.Li JX, Cummins CL. Fresh insights into glucocorticoid-induced diabetes mellitus and new therapeutic directions. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022;18:540–557. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00683-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR50] 50.Kageyama G, et al. Very high frequency of fragility fractures associated with high-dose glucocorticoids in postmenopausal women: a retrospective study. Bone Rep. 2017;6:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2016.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR51] 51.Popp AW, Isenegger J, Buergi EM, Buergi U, Lippuner K. Glucocorticosteroid-induced spinal osteoporosis: scientific update on pathophysiology and treatment. Eur. Spine J. 2006;15:1035–1049. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-0056-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR52] 52.Liao JM, et al. Effects of stanozolol on bone mineral density and bone biomechanical properties of osteoporotic rats. Di Yi Jun Yi Da Xue Xue Bao. 2003;23:1117–1120. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR53] 53.Tomic D, Shaw JE, Magliano DJ. The burden and risks of emerging complications of diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022;18:525–539. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00690-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR54] 54.Lin HH, et al. Association between type 2 diabetes and osteoporosis risk: a representative cohort study in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2021;16:e0254451. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR55] 55.Napoli N, et al. Mechanisms of diabetes mellitus-induced bone fragility. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017;13:208–219. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR56] 56.Jang M, et al. Effect of duration of diabetes on bone mineral density: a population study on East Asian males. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2018;18:61. doi: 10.1186/s12902-018-0290-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR57] 57.Si Y, Wang C, Guo Y, Xu G, Ma Y. Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Chinese mainland: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J. Public Health. 2019;48:1203–1214. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR58] 58.Liu X, Chen F, Liu L, Zhang Q. Prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2023;23:1. doi: 10.1186/s12902-022-01260-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR59] 59.Leidig-Bruckner G, et al. Prevalence and determinants of osteoporosis in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2014;14:33. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-14-33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR60] 60.Jeddi S, Yousefzadeh N, Kashfi K, Ghasemi A. Role of nitric oxide in type 1 diabetes-induced osteoporosis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2022;197:114888. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR61] 61.Huebschmann AG, et al. Sex differences in the burden of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk across the life course. Diabetologia. 2019;62:1761–1772. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4939-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR62] 62.Yuan H, et al. Type 2 diabetes epidemic in East Asia: a 35-year systematic trend analysis. Oncotarget. 2018;9:6718–6727. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.22961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR63] 63.Goossens GH, Jocken JWE, Blaak EE. Sexual dimorphism in cardiometabolic health: the role of adipose tissue, muscle and liver. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:47–66. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-00431-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR64] 64.Lonardo A, et al. Sex differences in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: state of the art and identification of research gaps. Hepatology. 2019;70:1457–1469. doi: 10.1002/hep.30626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR65] 65.Eckert AJ, et al. Bone fractures in children and young adults with type 1 diabetes: age distribution, fracture location, and the role of glycemic. Control. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2021;36:2371–2380. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR66] 66.Sheu A, Greenfield JR, White CP, Center JR. Contributors to impaired bone health in type 2 diabetes. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2023;34:34–48. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2022.11.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR67] 67.Khosla S, Samakkarnthai P, Monroe DG, Farr JN. Update on the pathogenesis and treatment of skeletal fragility in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:685–697. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00555-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR68] 68.Sheu A, Bliuc D, Tran T, White CP, Center JR. Fractures in type 2 diabetes confer excess mortality: the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study. Bone. 2022;159:116373. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR69] 69.Martinez-Laguna D, et al. Excess of all-cause mortality after a fracture in type 2 diabetic patients: a population-based cohort study. Osteoporos. Int. 2017;28:2573–2581. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4096-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR70] 70.Haentjens P, et al. Meta-analysis: excess mortality after hip fracture among older women and men. Ann. Intern. Med. 2010;152:380–390. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-6-201003160-00008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR71] 71.Patel V, et al. Diabetes-related complications and costs in medicare beneficiaries with comorbid rheumatoid arthritis and diabetes treated with abatacept versus other targeted DMARDs. Rheumatol Ther. 2022;9:1091–1107. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00453-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR72] 72.Sfeir JG, Drake MT, Khosla S, Farr JN. Skeletal Aging. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2022;97:1194–1208. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2022.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR73] 73.Gasser, J. A. & Kneissel, M. Bone physiology and biology. In bone toxicology. Molecular and integrative toxicology; (eds Smith, S., Varela, Samadfam, R.) (Springer, 2017).

[CR74] 74.Le BQ, et al. The components of bone and what they can teach us about regeneration. Materials (Basel) 2018;11:14. doi: 10.3390/ma11010014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR75] 75.Manolagas SC. From estrogen-centric to aging and oxidative stress: a revised perspective of the pathogenesis of osteoporosis. Endocr. Rev. 2010;31:266–300. doi: 10.1210/er.2009-0024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR76] 76.Chevalley T, Rizzoli R. Acquisition of peak bone mass. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022;36:101616. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2022.101616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR77] 77.Zhu X, Zheng H. Factors influencing peak bone mass gain. Front. Med. 2021;15:53–69. doi: 10.1007/s11684-020-0748-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR78] 78.Plotkin LI, Bruzzaniti A. Molecular signaling in bone cells: regulation of cell differentiation and survival. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol. 2019;116:237–281. doi: 10.1016/bs.apcsb.2019.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR79] 79.Kitase Y, Prideaux M. Targeting osteocytes vs osteoblasts. Bone. 2023;170:116724. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2023.116724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR80] 80.Qadir A, et al. Senile osteoporosis: the involvement of differentiation and senescence of bone marrow stromal cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:349. doi: 10.3390/ijms21010349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR81] 81.Zupan J, et al. Age-related alterations and senescence of mesenchymal stromal cells: implications for regenerative treatments of bones and joints. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2021;198:111539. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2021.111539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR82] 82.Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL. Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003;423:337–342. doi: 10.1038/nature01658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR83] 83.Lian WS, et al. MicroRNA-29a mitigates osteoblast senescence and counteracts bone loss through oxidation resistance-1 control of FoxO3 methylation. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021;10:1248. doi: 10.3390/antiox10081248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR84] 84.Weivoda MM, Bradley EW. Macrophages and bone remodeling. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2023;38:359–369. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR85] 85.Hu Y, et al. Strategies of macrophages to maintain bone homeostasis and promote bone repair: a narrative review. J. Funct. Biomater. 2022;14:18. doi: 10.3390/jfb14010018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR86] 86.Loundagin LL, Cooper DML. Towards novel measurements of remodeling activity in cortical bone: implications for osteoporosis and related pharmaceutical treatments. Eur. Cell Mater. 2022;43:202–227. doi: 10.22203/eCM.v043a15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR87] 87.Park-Min KH. Metabolic reprogramming in osteoclasts. Semin. Immunopathol. 2019;41:565–572. doi: 10.1007/s00281-019-00757-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR88] 88.Kim JM, Lin C, Stavre Z, Greenblatt MB, Shim JH. Osteoblast-osteoclast communication and bone homeostasis. Cells. 2020;9:2073. doi: 10.3390/cells9092073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR89] 89.Yao Y, et al. The macrophage-osteoclast axis in osteoimmunity and osteo-related diseases. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:664871. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.664871. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR90] 90.Wang L, et al. Mechanical sensing protein PIEZO1 regulates bone homeostasis via osteoblast-osteoclast crosstalk. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:282. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14146-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR91] 91.Robling AG, Bonewald LF. The osteocyte: new insights. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2020;82:485–506. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021119-034332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR92] 92.Kuno M. Cooperative electrogenic proton transport pathways in the plasma membrane of the proton-secreting osteoclast. Pflugers Arch. 2018;470:851–866. doi: 10.1007/s00424-018-2137-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR93] 93.Teitelbaum SL. Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science. 2000;289:1504–1508. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5484.1504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR94] 94.Martin T, Gooi JH, Sims NA. Molecular mechanisms in coupling of bone formation to resorption. Crit. Rev. Eukaryot. Gene Expr. 2009;19:73–88. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukarGeneExpr.v19.i1.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR95] 95.Arai A, et al. Beclin1 modulates bone homeostasis by regulating osteoclast and chondrocyte differentiation. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2019;34:1753–1766. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR96] 96.Udagawa N, et al. Osteoclast differentiation by RANKL and OPG signaling pathways. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2021;39:19–26. doi: 10.1007/s00774-020-01162-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR97] 97.Dirckx N, Moorer MC, Clemens TL, Riddle RC. The role of osteoblasts in energy homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019;15:651–665. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0246-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR98] 98.Licini C, Vitale-Brovarone C, Mattioli-Belmonte M. Collagen and non-collagenous proteins molecular crosstalk in the pathophysiology of osteoporosis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2019;49:59–69. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2019.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR99] 99.Emmanuelle NE, et al. Critical role of estrogens on bone homeostasis in both male and female: from physiology to medical implications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:1568. doi: 10.3390/ijms22041568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR100] 100.Karsenty G. Osteocalcin: a multifaceted bone-derived hormone. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2023;43:55–71. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-061121-091348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR101] 101.Berger JM, Karsenty G. Osteocalcin and the physiology of danger. FEBS Lett. 2022;596:665–680. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.14259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR102] 102.Wein MN, Kronenberg HM. Regulation of bone remodeling by parathyroid hormone. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2018;8:a031237. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a031237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR103] 103.Takegahara N, Kim H, Choi Y. RANKL biology. Bone. 2022;159:116353. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR104] 104.Takashi Y, Fukumoto S. Phosphate-sensing and regulatory mechanism of FGF23 production. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2020;43:877–883. doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01205-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR105] 105.Hong AR, et al. Transformation of mature osteoblasts into bone lining cells and RNA sequencing-based transcriptome profiling of mouse bone during mechanical unloading. Endocrinol. Metab (Seoul) 2020;35:456–469. doi: 10.3803/EnM.2020.35.2.456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR106] 106.Chen T, Wang Y, Hao Z, Hu Y, Li J. Parathyroid hormone and its related peptides in bone metabolism. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021;192:114669. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR107] 107.Wu J, et al. Long noncoding RNA ZFAS1 suppresses osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by upregulating miR-499-EPHA5 axis. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2022;539:111490. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2021.111490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR108] 108.Delgado-Calle J, Bellido T. The osteocyte as a signaling cell. Physiol. Rev. 2022;102:379–410. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00043.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR109] 109.Kitaura H, et al. Osteocyte-related cytokines regulate osteoclast formation and bone resorption. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:5169. doi: 10.3390/ijms21145169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR110] 110.Zhang B, et al. Magneto-mechanical stimulation modulates osteocyte fate via the ECM-integrin-CSK axis and wnt pathway. iScience. 2023;26:107365. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR111] 111.Florio M, et al. A bispecific antibody targeting sclerostin and DKK-1 promotes bone mass accrual and fracture repair. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11505. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR112] 112.Ulmer CZ, Kritmetapak K, Singh RJ, Vesper HW, Kumar R. High-resolution mass spectrometry for the measurement of PTH and PTH fragments: insights into PTH physiology and bioactivity. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2022;33:1448–1458. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2022010036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR113] 113.Bilezikian JP. Hypoparathyroidism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020;105:1722–1736. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR114] 114.Arnold A, et al. Hormonal regulation of biomineralization. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:261–275. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00477-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR115] 115.Mannstadt M, et al. Hypoparathyroidism. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2017;3:17055. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR116] 116.Rubin MR, et al. PTH(1-84) administration reverses abnormal bone-remodeling dynamics and structure in hypoparathyroidism. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2011;26:2727–2736. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR117] 117.Zhang C, Song C. Combination therapy of PTH and antiresorptive drugs on osteoporosis: a review of treatment alternatives. Front. Pharmacol. 2020;11:607017. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.607017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR118] 118.Jolette J, et al. Comparing the incidence of bone tumors in rats chronically exposed to the selective PTH type 1 receptor agonist abaloparatide or PTH(1-34) Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2017;86:356–365. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2017.04.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR119] 119.Estell EG, Rosen CJ. Emerging insights into the comparative effectiveness of anabolic therapies for osteoporosis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:31–46. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-00426-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR120] 120.Massy ZA, Drueke TB. Gut microbiota orchestrates PTH action in bone: role of butyrate and T cells. Kidney Int. 2020;98:269–272. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR121] 121.Leitch VD, Bassett JHD, Williams GR. Role of thyroid hormones in craniofacial development. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:147–164. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0304-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR122] 122.Huybrechts Y, Mortier G, Boudin E, Van Hul W. WNT signaling and bone: lessons from skeletal dysplasias and disorders. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2020;11:165. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR123] 123.Soos B, et al. Effects of targeted therapies on bone in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2022;18:249–257. doi: 10.1038/s41584-022-00764-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR124] 124.Houschyar KS, et al. Wnt pathway in bone repair and regeneration - what do we know so far. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018;6:170. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2018.00170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR125] 125.Baron R, Kneissel M. WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments. Nat. Med. 2013;19:179–192. doi: 10.1038/nm.3074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR126] 126.Gong Y, et al. LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell. 2001;107:513–523. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00571-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR127] 127.Sutkeviciute I, Clark LJ, White AD, Gardella TJ, Vilardaga JP. PTH/PTHrP receptor signaling, allostery, and structures. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2019;30:860–874. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2019.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR128] 128.Xiao L, Fei Y, Hurley MM. FGF2 crosstalk with Wnt signaling in mediating the anabolic action of PTH on bone formation. Bone Rep. 2018;9:136–144. doi: 10.1016/j.bonr.2018.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR129] 129.Kermgard E, Chawla NK, Wesseling-Perry K. Gut microbiome, parathyroid hormone, and bone. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2021;30:418–423. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR130] 130.Yu M, et al. PTH induces bone loss via microbial-dependent expansion of intestinal TNF+ T cells and Th17 cells. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:468. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14148-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR131] 131.Li JY, et al. Parathyroid hormone-dependent bone formation requires butyrate production by intestinal microbiota. J. Clin. Invest. 2020;130:1767–1781. doi: 10.1172/JCI133473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR132] 132.Sun Z, Fan J, Wang Y. X-chromosome inactivation and related diseases. Genet. Res. (Camb) 2022;2022:1391807. doi: 10.1155/2022/1391807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR133] 133.Migeon BR. X-linked diseases: susceptible females. Genet. Med. 2020;22:1156–1174. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-0779-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR134] 134.Makitie RE, Costantini A, Kampe A, Alm JJ, Makitie O. New insights into monogenic causes of osteoporosis. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2019;10:70. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR135] 135.Costantini A, et al. Early-onset osteoporosis: rare monogenic forms elucidate the complexity of disease pathogenesis beyond type I. Collagen. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2022;37:1623–1641. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR136] 136.Wolff L, et al. Plastin 3 in health and disease: a matter of balance. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2021;78:5275–5301. doi: 10.1007/s00018-021-03843-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR137] 137.van Dijk FS, et al. PLS3 mutations in X-linked osteoporosis with fractures. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:1529–1536. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1308223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR138] 138.Balasubramanian M, et al. Novel PLS3 variants in X-linked osteoporosis: exploring bone material properties. Am. J. Med. Genet. A. 2018;176:1578–1586. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR139] 139.Brlek P, et al. X-Linked osteogenesis imperfecta possibly caused by a novel variant in PLS3. Genes (Basel) 2021;12:1851. doi: 10.3390/genes12121851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR140] 140.Anagnostis P, Karras S, Paschou SA, Goulis DG. Haemophilia A and B as a cause for secondary osteoporosis and increased fracture risk. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis. 2015;26:599–603. doi: 10.1097/MBC.0000000000000330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR141] 141.Wang H, Bai X. Mechanisms of bone remodeling disorder in hemophilia. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2021;47:43–52. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1718890. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR142] 142.Rodriguez-Merchan EC, Valentino LA. Increased bone resorption in hemophilia. Blood Rev. 2019;33:6–10. doi: 10.1016/j.blre.2018.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR143] 143.Berntorp E, et al. Haemophilia. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2021;7:45. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00278-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR144] 144.Gebetsberger J, Schirmer M, Wurzer WJ, Streif W. Low bone mineral density in hemophiliacs. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2022;9:794456. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.794456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR145] 145.Abbasnezhad A, et al. Serum concentrations of vitamin D, calcium, phosphorus and trace minerals in adults and children with haemophilia A: association with disease severity, quality of life, joint health and functional status. Int. J. Hematol. Oncol. Stem Cell Res. 2020;14:56–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR146] 146.Lin X, et al. Pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with hemophilia. Arch. Osteoporos. 2023;18:17. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01203-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR147] 147.Weitzmann MN, et al. Reduced bone formation in males and increased bone resorption in females drive bone loss in hemophilia A mice. Blood Adv. 2019;3:288–300. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018027557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR148] 148.Rocca MS, et al. The Klinefelter syndrome is associated with high recurrence of copy number variations on the X chromosome with a potential role in the clinical phenotype. Andrology. 2016;4:328–334. doi: 10.1111/andr.12146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR149] 149.Bojesen A, et al. Bone mineral density in Klinefelter syndrome is reduced and primarily determined by muscle strength and resorptive markers, but not directly by testosterone. Osteoporos. Int. 2011;22:1441–1450. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1354-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR150] 150.Ferlin A, et al. Bone mass in subjects with Klinefelter syndrome: role of testosterone levels and androgen receptor gene CAG polymorphism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011;96:E739–E745. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR151] 151.Ye C, Leslie WD. Fracture risk and assessment in adults with cancer. Osteoporos. Int. 2023;34:449–466. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06631-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR152] 152.Arnold AP, Cassis LA, Eghbali M, Reue K, Sandberg K. Sex hormones and sex chromosomes cause sex differences in the development of cardiovascular diseases. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2017;37:746–756. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.116.307301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR153] 153.Morselli E, et al. The effects of oestrogens and their receptors on cardiometabolic health. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2017;13:352–364. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2017.12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR154] 154.Karlamangla AS, Shieh A, Greendale GA. Hormones and bone loss across the menopause transition. Vitam Horm. 2021;115:401–417. doi: 10.1016/bs.vh.2020.12.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR155] 155.Manolagas SC, O’Brien CA, Almeida M. The role of estrogen and androgen receptors in bone health and disease. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2013;9:699–712. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR156] 156.Lambert MNT, Jeppesen PB. Isoflavones and bone health in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2018;21:475–480. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR157] 157.Decaroli MC, Rochira V. Aging and sex hormones in males. Virulence. 2017;8:545–570. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1259053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR158] 158.Rochira V, Balestrieri A, Madeo B, Spaggiari A, Carani C. Congenital estrogen deficiency in men: a new syndrome with different phenotypes; clinical and therapeutic implications in men. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2002;193:19–28. doi: 10.1016/S0303-7207(02)00092-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR159] 159.Rochira V, Carani C. Aromatase deficiency in men: a clinical perspective. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2009;5:559–568. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2009.176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR160] 160.Khosla S, Hofbauer LC. Osteoporosis treatment: recent developments and ongoing challenges. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:898–907. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30188-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR161] 161.Khosla S, et al. Relationship of serum sex steroid levels and bone turnover markers with bone mineral density in men and women: a key role for bioavailable estrogen. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998;83:2266–2274. doi: 10.1210/jcem.83.7.4924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR162] 162.Szulc P. Role of sex steroids hormones in the regulation of bone metabolism in men: evidence from clinical studies. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022;36:101624. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2022.101624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR163] 163.Laurent MR, et al. Age-related bone loss and sarcopenia in men. Maturitas. 2019;122:51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR164] 164.Levin VA, Jiang X, Kagan R. Estrogen therapy for osteoporosis in the modern era. Osteoporos. Int. 2018;29:1049–1055. doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4414-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR165] 165.Pietschmann P, Mechtcheriakova D, Meshcheryakova A, Foger-Samwald U, Ellinger I. Immunology of osteoporosis: a mini-review. Gerontology. 2016;62:128–137. doi: 10.1159/000431091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR166] 166.Amarasekara DS, et al. Regulation of osteoclast differentiation by cytokine networks. Immune Netw. 2018;18:e8. doi: 10.4110/in.2018.18.e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR167] 167.Yao Z, Getting SJ, Locke IC. Regulation of TNF-induced osteoclast differentiation. Cells. 2021;11:132. doi: 10.3390/cells11010132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR168] 168.Mishra P, Davies DA, Albensi BC. The interaction between NF-kappaB and estrogen in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurobiol. 2023;60:1515–1526. doi: 10.1007/s12035-022-03152-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR169] 169.Krum SA, Chang J, Miranda-Carboni G, Wang CY. Novel functions for NFkappaB: inhibition of bone formation. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2010;6:607–611. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR170] 170.Kameda T, et al. Estrogen inhibits bone resorption by directly inducing apoptosis of the bone-resorbing osteoclasts. J. Exp. Med. 1997;186:489–495. doi: 10.1084/jem.186.4.489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR171] 171.Kousteni S, et al. Reversal of bone loss in mice by nongenotropic signaling of sex steroids. Science. 2002;298:843–846. doi: 10.1126/science.1074935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR172] 172.Garcia AJ, et al. ERalpha signaling regulates MMP3 expression to induce FasL cleavage and osteoclast apoptosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013;28:283–290. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR173] 173.Krum SA, et al. Estrogen protects bone by inducing Fas ligand in osteoblasts to regulate osteoclast survival. EMBO J. 2008;27:535–545. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR174] 174.Martin A, et al. Estrogens antagonize RUNX2-mediated osteoblast-driven osteoclastogenesis through regulating RANKL membrane association. Bone. 2015;75:96–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR175] 175.Kousteni S, et al. Nongenotropic, sex-nonspecific signaling through the estrogen or androgen receptors: dissociation from transcriptional activity. Cell. 2001;104:719–730. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR176] 176.Pantschenko AG, et al. Effect of osteoblast-targeted expression of bcl-2 in bone: differential response in male and female mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2005;20:1414–1429. doi: 10.1359/JBMR.050315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR177] 177.Xu Y, et al. 17 beta-Estradiol alleviates oxidative damage in osteoblasts by regulating miR-320/RUNX2 signaling pathway. J. Biosci. 2021;46:113. doi: 10.1007/s12038-021-00236-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR178] 178.Tippen SP, et al. Age and sex effects on FGF23-mediated response to mild phosphate challenge. Bone. 2021;146:115885. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.115885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR179] 179.Chen P, Li B, Ou-Yang L. Role of estrogen receptors in health and disease. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2022;13:839005. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.839005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR180] 180.Nilsson S, et al. Mechanisms of estrogen action. Physiol. Rev. 2001;81:1535–1565. doi: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.4.1535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR181] 181.Wang N, et al. Mechanotransduction pathways in articular chondrocytes and the emerging role of estrogen receptor-alpha. Bone Res. 2023;11:13. doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00248-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR182] 182.Wehrle E, et al. The impact of low-magnitude high-frequency vibration on fracture healing is profoundly influenced by the oestrogen status in mice. Dis. Model. Mech. 2015;8:93–104. doi: 10.1242/dmm.018622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR183] 183.Pang XG, Cong Y, Bao NR, Li YG, Zhao JN. Quercetin stimulates bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell differentiation through an estrogen receptor-mediated pathway. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018;2018:4178021. doi: 10.1155/2018/4178021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR184] 184.Bradford PG, Gerace KV, Roland RL, Chrzan BG. Estrogen regulation of apoptosis in osteoblasts. Physiol. Behav. 2010;99:181–185. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.04.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR185] 185.Hao XD, et al. Synthesis, estrogenic activity, and anti-osteoporosis effects in ovariectomized rats of resveratrol oligomer derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2015;102:26–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR186] 186.Heino TJ, Chagin AS, Savendahl L. The novel estrogen receptor G-protein-coupled receptor 30 is expressed in human bone. J. Endocrinol. 2008;197:R1–R6. doi: 10.1677/JOE-07-0629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR187] 187.Kim NR, et al. Estrogen receptor alpha signaling in extrahypothalamic neurons during late puberty decreases bone size and strength in female but not in male mice. FASEB J. 2020;34:7118–7126. doi: 10.1096/fj.202000272R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR188] 188.Steppe L, Bulow J, Tuckermann J, Ignatius A, Haffner-Luntzer M. Bone mass and osteoblast activity are sex-dependent in mice lacking the estrogen receptor alpha in chondrocytes and osteoblast progenitor cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:2902. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR189] 189.Windahl SH, et al. Estrogen receptor-alpha in osteocytes is important for trabecular bone formation in male mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:2294–2299. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220811110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR190] 190.Ikedo A, Imai Y. Estrogen receptor alpha in mature osteoblasts regulates the late stage of bone regeneration. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2021;559:238–244. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.04.112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR191] 191.Xiao Y, Li B, Liu J. MicroRNA‑148a inhibition protects against ovariectomy‑induced osteoporosis through PI3K/AKT signaling by estrogen receptor alpha. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;17:7789–7796. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR192] 192.Swerdloff RS, Dudley RE, Page ST, Wang C, Salameh WA. Dihydrotestosterone: biochemistry, physiology, and clinical implications of elevated blood levels. Endocr. Rev. 2017;38:220–254. doi: 10.1210/er.2016-1067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR193] 193.Isidori, A. M. et al. Adult- and late-onset male hypogonadism: the clinical practice guidelines of the Italian Society of Andrology and Sexual Medicine (SIAMS) and the Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE.). J. Endocrinol. Invest.45, 2385–2403 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

[CR194] 194.Chevalley, T. et al. Fracture prospectively recorded from prepuberty to young adulthood: are they markers of peak bone mass and strength in males? J. Bone Miner. Res.32, 1963–1969 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR195] 195.Snyder PJ, et al. Effect of testosterone treatment on volumetric bone density and strength in older men with low testosterone: a controlled clinical trial. JAMA Intern. Med. 2017;177:471–479. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.9539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR196] 196.Zhang Z, Kang D, Li H. The effects of testosterone on bone health in males with testosterone deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Endocr. Disord. 2020;20:33. doi: 10.1186/s12902-020-0509-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR197] 197.Golds G, Houdek D, Arnason T. Male hypogonadism and osteoporosis: the effects, clinical consequences, and treatment of testosterone deficiency in bone health. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2017;2017:4602129. doi: 10.1155/2017/4602129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR198] 198.Jaschke N, Wang A, Hofbauer LC, Rauner M, Rachner TD. Late-onset hypogonadism: clinical evidence, biological aspects and evolutionary considerations. Ageing Res. Rev. 2021;67:101301. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2021.101301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR199] 199.Rochira V, Antonio L, Vanderschueren D. EAA clinical guideline on management of bone health in the andrological outpatient clinic. Andrology. 2018;6:272–285. doi: 10.1111/andr.12470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR200] 200.Salonia A, et al. Paediatric and adult-onset male hypogonadism. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2019;5:38. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0087-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR201] 201.Yeap BB, Page ST, Grossmann M. Testosterone treatment in older men: clinical implications and unresolved questions from the Testosterone Trials. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6:659–672. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30416-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR202] 202.Tran TS, et al. Relationship between serum testosterone and fracture risk in men: a comparison of RIA and LC-MS/MS. Clin. Chem. 2015;61:1182–1190. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2015.242339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR203] 203.Smith MR, et al. Denosumab in men receiving androgen-deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;361:745–755. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR204] 204.Junjie W, Dongsheng H, Lei S, Hongzhuo L, Changying S. Testosterone replacement therapy has limited effect on increasing bone mass density in older men: a meta-analysis. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2019;25:73–84. doi: 10.2174/1381612825666190206223244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR205] 205.Vandewalle S, et al. Associations of sex steroids with bone maturation, bone mineral density, bone geometry, and body composition: a cross-sectional study in healthy male adolescents. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99:E1272–1282. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR206] 206.Russo V, Chen R, Armamento-Villareal R. Hypogonadism, type-2 diabetes mellitus, and bone health: a narrative review. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2020;11:607240. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.607240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR207] 207.Li X, et al. Increased RANK ligand in bone marrow of orchiectomized rats and prevention of their bone loss by the RANK ligand inhibitor osteoprotegerin. Bone. 2009;45:669–676. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR208] 208.Mohamad NV, Soelaiman IN, Chin KY. A concise review of testosterone and bone health. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2016;11:1317–1324. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S115472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR209] 209.Kirby DJ, Buchalter DB, Anil U, Leucht P. DHEA in bone: the role in osteoporosis and fracture healing. Arch. Osteoporos. 2020;15:84. doi: 10.1007/s11657-020-00755-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR210] 210.Diab DL, Watts NB. Updates on osteoporosis in men. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 2021;50:239–249. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2021.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR211] 211.Hammes SR, Levin ER. Impact of estrogens in males and androgens in females. J. Clin. Invest. 2019;129:1818–1826. doi: 10.1172/JCI125755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR212] 212.Roberts KE, et al. Systemic therapies for preventing or treating aromatase inhibitor-induced musculoskeletal symptoms in early breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2022;1:CD013167. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013167.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR213] 213.Chin KY, Ima-Nirwana S. The effects of orchidectomy and supraphysiological testosterone administration on trabecular bone structure and gene expression in rats. Aging Male. 2015;18:60–66. doi: 10.3109/13685538.2014.954995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR214] 214.Wang LT, Chen LR, Chen KH. Hormone-related and drug-induced osteoporosis: a cellular and molecular overview. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:5814. doi: 10.3390/ijms24065814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR215] 215.Bradley CA. Bone: a novel androgen-vitamin D link. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2018;14:191. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2018.14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR216] 216.Lee SR, et al. 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone reduces renal Cyp24a1 expression via suppression of progesterone receptor. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 2018;60:159–170. doi: 10.1530/JME-17-0187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR217] 217.Vasile M, Corinaldesi C, Antinozzi C, Crescioli C. Vitamin D in autoimmune rheumatic diseases: a view inside gender differences. Pharmacol. Res. 2017;117:228–241. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.12.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR218] 218.Bikle D, Christakos S. New aspects of vitamin D metabolism and action - addressing the skin as source and target. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:234–252. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0312-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR219] 219.Al-oanzi ZH, et al. Vitamin D-binding protein gene microsatellite polymorphism influences BMD and risk of fractures in men. Osteoporos. Int. 2008;19:951–960. doi: 10.1007/s00198-007-0516-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR220] 220.Moy KA, et al. Genome-wide association study of circulating vitamin D-binding protein. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014;99:1424–1431. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.080309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR221] 221.Jardi F, et al. Androgen receptor in neurons slows age-related cortical thinning in male mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2019;34:508–519. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR222] 222.Wilhelmson AS, et al. Testosterone is an endogenous regulator of BAFF and splenic B cell number. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:2067. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04408-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR223] 223.Steffens JP, et al. The role of androgens on periodontal repair in female rats. J. Periodontol. 2018;89:486–495. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR224] 224.Wu X, et al. Pyrroloquinoline quinone prevents testosterone deficiency-induced osteoporosis by stimulating osteoblastic bone formation and inhibiting osteoclastic bone resorption. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017;9:1230–1242. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR225] 225.Shigehara K, Izumi K, Kadono Y, Mizokami A. Testosterone and bone health in men: a narrative review. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:530. doi: 10.3390/jcm10030530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR226] 226.Rozenberg S, et al. How to manage osteoporosis before the age of 50. Maturitas. 2020;138:14–25. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2020.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR227] 227.Goetz TG, et al. In premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis, lower bone formation rate is associated with higher body fat and higher IGF-1. Osteoporos. Int. 2022;33:659–672. doi: 10.1007/s00198-021-06196-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR228] 228.Cohen A, et al. IGF-1 receptor expression on circulating osteoblast progenitor cells predicts tissue-based bone formation rate and response to teriparatide in premenopausal women with idiopathic osteoporosis. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2017;32:1267–1273. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR229] 229.Gennari L, Bilezikian JP. Idiopathic osteoporosis in men. Curr. Osteoporos Rep. 2013;11:286–298. doi: 10.1007/s11914-013-0164-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR230] 230.Kitada M, Koya D. Autophagy in metabolic disease and ageing. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2021;17:647–661. doi: 10.1038/s41574-021-00551-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR231] 231.Petrine JCP, Del Bianco-Borges B. The influence of phytoestrogens on different physiological and pathological processes: an overview. Phytother. Res. 2021;35:180–197. doi: 10.1002/ptr.6816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR232] 232.Alvarez-Almazan S, Filisola-Villasenor JG, Aleman-Gonzalez-Duhart D, Tamay-Cach F, Mendieta-Wejebe JE. Current molecular aspects in the development and treatment of diabetes. J. Physiol. Biochem. 2020;76:13–35. doi: 10.1007/s13105-019-00717-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR233] 233.Frenkel B, White W, Tuckermann J. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2015;872:179–215. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2895-8_8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR234] 234.Badila AE, et al. Bone regeneration and oxidative stress: an updated overview. Antioxidants (Basel) 2022;11:318. doi: 10.3390/antiox11020318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR235] 235.Zhu J, March L. Treating osteoporosis: risks and management. Aust. Prescr. 2022;45:150–157. doi: 10.18773/austprescr.2022.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR236] 236.Agidigbi TS, Kim C. Reactive oxygen species in osteoclast differentiation and possible pharmaceutical targets of ROS-mediated osteoclast diseases. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:3576. doi: 10.3390/ijms20143576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR237] 237.Farr JN, et al. Osteoprotection through the deletion of the transcription factor rorbeta in mice. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2018;33:720–731. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR238] 238.Iantomasi T, et al. Oxidative stress and inflammation in osteoporosis: molecular mechanisms involved and the relationship with microRNAs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023;24:3772. doi: 10.3390/ijms24043772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR239] 239.Schroder K. NADPH oxidases in bone homeostasis and osteoporosis. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2019;132:67–72. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.08.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR240] 240.Li Y, Chen L, Gao Y, Zou X, Wei F. Oxidative stress and intervertebral disc degeneration: pathophysiology, signaling pathway, and therapy. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2022;2022:1984742. doi: 10.1155/2022/1984742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR241] 241.Ohyama Y, Ito J, Kitano VJ, Shimada J, Hakeda Y. The polymethoxy flavonoid sudachitin suppresses inflammatory bone destruction by directly inhibiting osteoclastogenesis due to reduced ROS production and MAPK activation in osteoclast precursors. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0191192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR242] 242.Chen L, et al. N-acetylcysteine prevents orchiectomy-induced osteoporosis by inhibiting oxidative stress and osteocyte senescence. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019;11:4337–4347. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR243] 243.Muszynska M, Ambrozewicz E, Gegotek A, Grynkiewicz G, Skrzydlewska E. Protective effects of vitamin K compounds on the proteomic profile of osteoblasts under oxidative stress conditions. Molecules. 2020;25:1990. doi: 10.3390/molecules25081990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR244] 244.Liu HD, et al. Melatonin alleviates hydrogen peroxide induced oxidative damage in MC3T3-E1 cells and promotes osteogenesis by activating SIRT1. Free Radic. Res. 2022;56:63–76. doi: 10.1080/10715762.2022.2037580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR245] 245.Almeida M, et al. Estrogens attenuate oxidative stress and the differentiation and apoptosis of osteoblasts by DNA-binding-independent actions of the ERalpha. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010;25:769–781. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.091017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR246] 246.Vatner SF, et al. Healthful aging mediated by inhibition of oxidative stress. Ageing Res. Rev. 2020;64:101194. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR247] 247.Zhang S, Liu Y, Liang Q. Low-dose dexamethasone affects osteoblast viability by inducing autophagy via intracellular ROS. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;17:4307–4316. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.8461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR248] 248.Yun HR, et al. Roles of autophagy in oxidative stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:3289. doi: 10.3390/ijms21093289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR249] 249.Xi G, Rosen CJ, Clemmons DR. IGF-I and IGFBP-2 stimulate AMPK activation and autophagy, which are required for osteoblast differentiation. Endocrinology. 2016;157:268–281. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR250] 250.Kops GJ, et al. Forkhead transcription factor FOXO3a protects quiescent cells from oxidative stress. Nature. 2002;419:316–321. doi: 10.1038/nature01036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR251] 251.Zhu Y, Zhou J, Ao R, Yu B. A-769662 protects osteoblasts from hydrogen dioxide-induced apoptosis through activating of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014;15:11190–11203. doi: 10.3390/ijms150611190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR252] 252.Shi Y, et al. Monotropein attenuates oxidative stress via Akt/mTOR-mediated autophagy in osteoblast cells. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020;121:109566. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR253] 253.Zhao Y, et al. Autophagy regulates hypoxia-induced osteoclastogenesis through the HIF-1alpha/BNIP3 signaling pathway. J. Cell Physiol. 2012;227:639–648. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR254] 254.Kar R, Riquelme MA, Hua R, Jiang JX. Glucocorticoid-induced autophagy protects osteocytes against oxidative stress through activation of MAPK/ERK signaling. JBMR Plus. 2019;3:e10077. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10077. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR255] 255.Suzuki M, Bandoski C, Bartlett JD. Fluoride induces oxidative damage and SIRT1/autophagy through ROS-mediated JNK signaling. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2015;89:369–378. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR256] 256.Li H, et al. Defective autophagy in osteoblasts induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and causes remarkable bone loss. Autophagy. 2018;14:1726–1741. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1483807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR257] 257.Li Z, et al. Cell death regulation: a new way for natural products to treat osteoporosis. Pharmacol. Res. 2023;187:106635. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR258] 258.Wang L, Heckmann BL, Yang X, Long H. Osteoblast autophagy in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. J. Cell Physiol. 2019;234:3207–3215. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR259] 259.Yang J, Ueharu H, Mishina Y. Energy metabolism: a newly emerging target of BMP signaling in bone homeostasis. Bone. 2020;138:115467. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR260] 260.Sartori R, Gregorevic P, Sandri M. TGFbeta and BMP signaling in skeletal muscle: potential significance for muscle-related disease. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;25:464–471. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2014.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR261] 261.Gao C, et al. Autophagy negatively regulates Wnt signalling by promoting Dishevelled degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010;12:781–790. doi: 10.1038/ncb2082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR262] 262.Wu DJ, et al. Autophagy-linked FYVE containing protein WDFY3 interacts with TRAF6 and modulates RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis. J. Autoimmun. 2016;73:73–84. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2016.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR263] 263.Fu L, Wu W, Sun X, Zhang P. Glucocorticoids enhanced osteoclast autophagy through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2020;107:60–71. doi: 10.1007/s00223-020-00687-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR264] 264.Huang W, Gong Y, Yan L. ER stress, the unfolded protein response and osteoclastogenesis: a review. Biomolecules. 2023;13:1050. doi: 10.3390/biom13071050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR265] 265.Wang J, et al. The role of autophagy in bone metabolism and clinical significance. Autophagy. 2023;19:2409–2427. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2023.2186112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR266] 266.Lin NY, et al. Inactivation of autophagy ameliorates glucocorticoid-induced and ovariectomy-induced bone loss. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2016;75:1203–1210. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-207240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR267] 267.Guo Y, et al. Sirt3-mediated mitophagy regulates AGEs-induced BMSCs senescence and senile osteoporosis. Redox Biol. 2021;41:101915. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2021.101915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR268] 268.Ruolan W, Liangjiao C, Longquan S. The mTOR/ULK1 signaling pathway mediates the autophagy-promoting and osteogenic effects of dicalcium silicate nanoparticles. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2020;18:119. doi: 10.1186/s12951-020-00663-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR269] 269.Yoshida G, et al. Degradation of the NOTCH intracellular domain by elevated autophagy in osteoblasts promotes osteoblast differentiation and alleviates osteoporosis. Autophagy. 2022;18:2323–2332. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2021.2017587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR270] 270.Wang Y, et al. Up-regulation of SIRT1 induced by 17beta-estradiol promotes autophagy and inhibits apoptosis in osteoblasts. Aging (Albany N. Y.) 2021;13:23652–23671. doi: 10.18632/aging.203639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR271] 271.Sun X, Yang X, Zhao Y, Li Y, Guo L. Effects of 17beta-estradiol on mitophagy in the murine MC3T3-E1 osteoblast cell line is mediated via G protein-coupled estrogen receptor and the ERK1/2 signaling pathway. Med. Sci. Monit. 2018;24:903–911. doi: 10.12659/MSM.908705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR272] 272.Song S, Guo Y, Yang Y, Fu D. Advances in pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies for osteoporosis. Pharmacol. Ther. 2022;237:108168. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR273] 273.Thomas N, et al. Autophagy regulates craniofacial bone acquisition. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2019;105:518–530. doi: 10.1007/s00223-019-00593-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR274] 274.Yang YH, et al. Estradiol inhibits osteoblast apoptosis via promotion of autophagy through the ER-ERK-mTOR pathway. Apoptosis. 2013;18:1363–1375. doi: 10.1007/s10495-013-0867-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR275] 275.Kim SY, et al. ESRRA (estrogen-related receptor alpha) is a key coordinator of transcriptional and post-translational activation of autophagy to promote innate host defense. Autophagy. 2018;14:152–168. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1339001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR276] 276.Shang D, Wang L, Klionsky DJ, Cheng H, Zhou R. Sex differences in autophagy-mediated diseases: toward precision medicine. Autophagy. 2021;17:1065–1076. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1752511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR277] 277.Zhang Y, et al. Bisphenol A induces apoptosis and autophagy in murine osteocytes MLO-Y4: Involvement of ROS-mediated mTOR/ULK1 pathway. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021;230:113119. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR278] 278.Florencio-Silva R, Sasso GRS, Sasso-Cerri E, Simoes MJ, Cerri PS. Effects of estrogen status in osteocyte autophagy and its relation to osteocyte viability in alveolar process of ovariectomized rats. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;98:406–415. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.12.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR279] 279.Gavali S, et al. Estrogen enhances human osteoblast survival and function via promotion of autophagy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2019;1866:1498–1507. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2019.06.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR280] 280.Adami G, Saag KG. Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: 2019 concise clinical review. Osteoporos. Int. 2019;30:1145–1156. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-04906-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR281] 281.Chen F, et al. Glucocorticoid induced osteoblast apoptosis by increasing E4BP4 expression via up-regulation of Bim. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2014;94:640–647. doi: 10.1007/s00223-014-9847-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR282] 282.Chen M, Fu W, Xu H, Liu CJ. Pathogenic mechanisms of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2023;70:54–66. doi: 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2023.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR283] 283.Peng P, Nie Z, Sun F, Peng H. Glucocorticoids induce femoral head necrosis in rats through the ROS/JNK/c-Jun pathway. FEBS Open Bio. 2021;11:312–321. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.13037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR284] 284.van Staa TP. The pathogenesis, epidemiology and management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2006;79:129–137. doi: 10.1007/s00223-006-0019-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR285] 285.Cheng CH, Chen LR, Chen KH. Osteoporosis due to hormone imbalance: an overview of the effects of estrogen deficiency and glucocorticoid overuse on bone turnover. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:1376. doi: 10.3390/ijms23031376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR286] 286.Engelbrecht Y, et al. Glucocorticoids induce rapid up-regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1 and dephosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase and impair proliferation in human and mouse osteoblast cell lines. Endocrinology. 2003;144:412–422. doi: 10.1210/en.2002-220769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR287] 287.Greenblatt MB, Shim JH, Glimcher LH. Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in osteoblasts. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2013;29:63–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101512-122347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR288] 288.Xing Q, Feng J, Zhang X. Glucocorticoids suppressed osteoblast differentiation by decreasing Sema3A expression via the PIK3/Akt pathway. Exp. Cell Res. 2021;403:112595. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR289] 289.Zhang Y, et al. Effects of estrogen on proliferation and apoptosis of osteoblasts through regulating GPER/AKT pathway. Cell Mol. Biol. (Noisy-Le-Grand) 2022;68:124–129. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2022.68.1.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR290] 290.Yoon HY, Won YY, Chung YS. Poncirin prevents bone loss in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in vivo and in vitro. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2012;30:509–516. doi: 10.1007/s00774-012-0350-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR291] 291.Li Y, et al. Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using 2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: national cross sectional study. BMJ. 2020;369:m997. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR292] 292.Casado-Diaz A, Anter J, Dorado G, Quesada-Gomez JM. Effects of quercetin, a natural phenolic compound, in the differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) into adipocytes and osteoblasts. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2016;32:151–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2016.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR293] 293.Bitto A, et al. Genistein aglycone reverses glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis and increases bone breaking strength in rats: a comparative study with alendronate. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2009;156:1287–1295. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2008.00100.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR294] 294.Rathi A, Ishaq M, Najmi AK, Akhtar M. Trigonelline demonstrated ameliorative effects in dexamethasone induced osteoporotic rats. Drug Res. (Stuttg) 2020;70:257–264. doi: 10.1055/a-1147-5724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR295] 295.Feng R, et al. Icariin protects against glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in vitro and prevents glucocorticoid-induced osteocyte apoptosis in vivo. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2013;67:189–197. doi: 10.1007/s12013-013-9533-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR296] 296.Wong SK, Chin KY, Ima-Nirwana S. Quercetin as an agent for protecting the bone: a review of the current evidence. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:6448. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR297] 297.Koromani F, et al. Vertebral fractures in individuals with type 2 diabetes: more than skeletal complications alone. Diabetes Care. 2020;43:137–144. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR298] 298.Moayeri A, et al. Fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and possible risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2017;13:455–468. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S131945. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR299] 299.Rios-Arce ND, et al. Loss of interleukin-10 exacerbates early Type-1 diabetes-induced bone loss. J. Cell Physiol. 2020;235:2350–2365. doi: 10.1002/jcp.29141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR300] 300.Santiprabhob J, et al. Effect of gender, diabetes duration, inflammatory cytokines, and vitamin D level on bone mineral density among Thai children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Bone. 2021;153:116112. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR301] 301.Verroken C, et al. Cortical bone size deficit in adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017;102:2887–2895. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00620. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR302] 302.Raehtz S, Bierhalter H, Schoenherr D, Parameswaran N, McCabe LR. Estrogen deficiency exacerbates type 1 diabetes-induced bone TNF-alpha expression and osteoporosis in female mice. Endocrinology. 2017;158:2086–2101. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR303] 303.Wang JF, et al. Bone morphogenetic protein-6 attenuates type 1 diabetes mellitus-associated bone loss. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2019;8:522–534. doi: 10.1002/sctm.18-0150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR304] 304.Tramunt B, et al. Sex differences in metabolic regulation and diabetes susceptibility. Diabetologia. 2020;63:453–461. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-05040-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR305] 305.Kautzky-Willer A, Leutner M, Harreiter J. Sex differences in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2023;66:986–1002. doi: 10.1007/s00125-023-05891-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR306] 306.Zhang P, et al. Insulin impedes osteogenesis of BMSCs by inhibiting autophagy and promoting premature senescence via the TGF-beta1 pathway. Aging (Albany N. Y.) 2020;12:2084–2100. doi: 10.18632/aging.102723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR307] 307.An Y, et al. Activation of ROS/MAPKs/NF-kappaB/NLRP3 and inhibition of efferocytosis in osteoclast-mediated diabetic osteoporosis. FASEB J. 2019;33:12515–12527. doi: 10.1096/fj.201802805RR. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR308] 308.Pouresmaeili F, Kamalidehghan B, Kamarehei M, Goh YM. A comprehensive overview on osteoporosis and its risk factors. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2018;14:2029–2049. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S138000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR309] 309.Walsh JS, Vilaca T. Obesity, type 2 diabetes and bone in adults. Calcif Tissue Int. 2017;100:528–535. doi: 10.1007/s00223-016-0229-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR310] 310.Wang L, et al. Insulin improves osteogenesis of titanium implants under diabetic conditions by inhibiting reactive oxygen species overproduction via the PI3K-Akt pathway. Biochimie. 2015;108:85–93. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2014.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR311] 311.Tiano JP, Mauvais-Jarvis F. Importance of oestrogen receptors to preserve functional beta-cell mass in diabetes. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2012;8:342–351. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2011.242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR312] 312.Behera J, Ison J, Voor MJ, Tyagi N. Exercise-linked skeletal irisin ameliorates diabetes-associated osteoporosis by inhibiting the oxidative damage-dependent miR-150-FNDC5/Pyroptosis axis. Diabetes. 2022;71:2777–2792. doi: 10.2337/db21-0573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR313] 313.Fu C, Zhang X, Ye F, Yang J. High insulin levels in KK-Ay diabetic mice cause increased cortical bone mass and impaired trabecular micro-structure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16:8213–8226. doi: 10.3390/ijms16048213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR314] 314.Song P, et al. Canagliflozin promotes osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 differentiation via AMPK/RUNX2 and improves bone microarchitecture in type 2 diabetic mice. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2022;13:1081039. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1081039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR315] 315.Yip WCY, Sequeira IR, Plank LD, Poppitt SD. Prevalence of pre-diabetes across ethnicities: a review of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) for classification of dysglycaemia. Nutrients. 2017;9:1273. doi: 10.3390/nu9111273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR316] 316.Wang L, et al. Prevalence and ethnic pattern of diabetes and prediabetes in China in 2013. JAMA. 2017;317:2515–2523,. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR317] 317.Kautzky-Willer A, Harreiter J, Pacini G. Sex and gender differences in risk, pathophysiology and complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocr. Rev. 2016;37:278–316. doi: 10.1210/er.2015-1137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR318] 318.Shaffer JA, et al. Vitamin D supplementation for depressive symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Psychosom. Med. 2014;76:190–196. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR319] 319.Shin MK, Kim H, Choi SH, Kim BJ, Kwon O. Sex-specific bi‑directional association between osteoporosis and depression from the national representative data of South Korea. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:9500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-13401-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR320] 320.Yang M, et al. Sexual dimorphism in the relationship between Forkhead-Box P2 and BMI with cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:920352. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.920352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR321] 321.Wippert PM, Rector M, Kuhn G, Wuertz-Kozak K. Stress and alterations in bones: an interdisciplinary perspective. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2017;8:96. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR322] 322.Huang WS, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder and risk of osteoporosis: a nationwide longitudinal study. Stress Health. 2018;34:440–445. doi: 10.1002/smi.2806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR323] 323.Kelly RR, McDonald LT, Jensen NR, Sidles SJ, LaRue AC. Impacts of psychological stress on osteoporosis: clinical implications and treatment interactions. Front. Psychiatry. 2019;10:200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR324] 324.Azuma K, Adachi Y, Hayashi H, Kubo KY. Chronic psychological stress as a risk factor of osteoporosis. J. UOEH. 2015;37:245–253. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.37.245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR325] 325.Vaessen T, Hernaus D, Myin-Germeys I, van Amelsvoort T. The dopaminergic response to acute stress in health and psychopathology: a systematic review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2015;56:241–251. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR326] 326.Gonzalez-Rodriguez A, Seeman MV. The association between hormones and antipsychotic use: a focus on postpartum and menopausal women. Ther. Adv. Psychopharmacol. 2019;9:2045125319859973. doi: 10.1177/2045125319859973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR327] 327.Custodio IDD, et al. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D and cancer-related fatigue: associations and effects on depression, anxiety, functional capacity and health-related quality of Life in breast cancer survivors during adjuvant endocrine therapy. BMC Cancer. 2022;22:860. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09962-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR328] 328.Catalano A, et al. Anxiety levels predict fracture risk in postmenopausal women assessed for osteoporosis. Menopause. 2018;25:1110–1115. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR329] 329.Bottaccioli AG, Bottaccioli F, Minelli A. Stress and the psyche-brain-immune network in psychiatric diseases based on psychoneuroendocrineimmunology: a concise review. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2019;1437:31–42. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR330] 330.Harvey NC, et al. Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures. Osteoporos. Int. 2017;28:1507–1529. doi: 10.1007/s00198-016-3894-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR331] 331.Javaid MK, et al. A patient-level key performance indicator set to measure the effectiveness of fracture liaison services and guide quality improvement: a position paper of the IOF Capture the Fracture Working Group, National Osteoporosis Foundation and Fragility Fracture Network. Osteoporos. Int. 2020;31:1193–1204. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05377-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR332] 332.Foessl I, Dimai HP, Obermayer-Pietsch B. Long-term and sequential treatment for osteoporosis. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2023;19:520–533. doi: 10.1038/s41574-023-00866-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR333] 333.Harvey NC, et al. Towards a cure for osteoporosis: the UK Royal Osteoporosis Society (ROS) Osteoporosis Research Roadmap. Arch. Osteoporos. 2022;17:12. doi: 10.1007/s11657-021-01049-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR334] 334.Tu KN, et al. Osteoporosis: a review of treatment options. P T. 2018;43:92–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR335] 335.Wang QY, et al. Pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in elderly people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gerontology. 2021;67:639–649. doi: 10.1159/000514449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR336] 336.van der Velde RY, et al. Trends in oral anti-osteoporosis drug prescription in the United Kingdom between 1990 and 2012: variation by age, sex, geographic location and ethnicity. Bone. 2017;94:50–55. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2016.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR337] 337.Sfeir JG, Pignolo RJ. Pharmacologic interventions for fracture risk reduction in the oldest old: what is the evidence? JBMR Plus. 2021;5:e10538. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR338] 338.Center JR, Lyles KW, Bliuc D. Bisphosphonates and lifespan. Bone. 2020;141:115566. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR339] 339.Black DM, Abrahamsen B, Bouxsein ML, Einhorn T, Napoli N. Atypical femur fractures: review of epidemiology, relationship to bisphosphonates, prevention, and clinical management. Endocr. Rev. 2019;40:333–368. doi: 10.1210/er.2018-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR340] 340.Orwoll E, et al. Alendronate for the treatment of osteoporosis in men. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;343:604–610. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200008313430902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR341] 341.Abrahamsen B, Eiken P, Prieto-Alhambra D, Eastell R. Risk of hip, subtrochanteric, and femoral shaft fractures among mid and long term users of alendronate: nationwide cohort and nested case-control study. BMJ. 2016;353:i3365. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i3365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR342] 342.Saag KG, et al. Romosozumab or alendronate for fracture prevention in women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017;377:1417–1427. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR343] 343.Kendler DL, et al. Effects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018;391:230–240. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32137-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR344] 344.Lyles KW, et al. Zoledronic acid and clinical fractures and mortality after hip fracture. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007;357:1799–1809. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa074941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR345] 345.Orwoll ES, et al. Efficacy and safety of a once-yearly i.v. Infusion of zoledronic acid 5 mg versus a once-weekly 70-mg oral alendronate in the treatment of male osteoporosis: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, active-controlled study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2010;25:2239–2250. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR346] 346.Dhillon SZoledronic. Acid (Reclast((R)), Aclasta((R))): a review in osteoporosis. Drugs. 2016;76:1683–1697. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0662-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR347] 347.Oryan A, Sahvieh S. Effects of bisphosphonates on osteoporosis: focus on zoledronate. Life Sci. 2021;264:118681. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR348] 348.Ayers C, et al. Effectiveness and safety of treatments to prevent fractures in people with low bone mass or primary osteoporosis: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis for the American College of Physicians. Ann. Intern. Med. 2023;176:182–195. doi: 10.7326/M22-0684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR349] 349.Wang J, et al. Bisphosphonates for prevention of osteopenia in kidney-transplant recipients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Osteoporos. Int. 2016;27:1683–1690. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3465-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR350] 350.Eastell R, et al. Diabetes mellitus and the benefit of antiresorptive therapy on fracture risk. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2022;37:2121–2131. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR351] 351.Lee P, et al. Preadmission bisphosphonate and mortality in critically Ill patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016;101:1945–1953. doi: 10.1210/jc.2015-3467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR352] 352.Qaseem A, et al. Treatment of low bone density or osteoporosis to prevent fractures in men and women: a clinical practice guideline update from the American College of Physicians. Ann. Intern. Med. 2017;166:818–839. doi: 10.7326/M15-1361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR353] 353.Liu GF, et al. A network meta-analysis on the short-term efficacy and adverse events of different anti-osteoporosis drugs for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J. Cell Biochem. 2018;119:4469–4481. doi: 10.1002/jcb.26550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR354] 354.Axelsson KF, Wallander M, Johansson H, Lundh D, Lorentzon M. Hip fracture risk and safety with alendronate treatment in the oldest-old. J. Intern. Med. 2017;282:546–559. doi: 10.1111/joim.12678. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR355] 355.Stoch SA, et al. Once-weekly oral alendronate 70 mg in patients with glucocorticoid-induced bone loss: a 12-month randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. J. Rheumatol. 2009;36:1705–1714. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.081207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR356] 356.Reid IR, et al. Effects of zoledronate on cancer, cardiac events, and mortality in osteopenic older women. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2020;35:20–27. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR357] 357.Rubin KH, et al. Cardiovascular and skeletal safety of zoledronic acid in osteoporosis observational, matched cohort study using Danish and Swedish health registries. Bone. 2020;134:115296. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR358] 358.Delli Poggi C, Fusaro M, Mereu MC, Brandi ML, Cianferotti L. Cardiovascular safety and effectiveness of bisphosphonates: from intervention trials to real-life data. Nutrients. 2022;14:2369. doi: 10.3390/nu14122369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR359] 359.Fazmin IT, Huang CL, Jeevaratnam K. Bisphosphonates and atrial fibrillation: revisiting the controversy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2020;1474:15–26. doi: 10.1111/nyas.14332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR360] 360.Kim SC, et al. Impact of the U.S. food and drug administration’s safety-related announcements on the use of bisphosphonates after hip fracture. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2016;31:1536–1540. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR361] 361.Komori T. Animal models for osteoporosis. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2015;759:287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR362] 362.Georgieva A, et al. Effects of ovariectomy-induced estrogen deficit on rat behaviour, lipid metabolism, inflammation, bone mineral density, and turnover. Folia Med. (Plovdiv.) 2021;63:385–391. doi: 10.3897/folmed.63.e55267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR363] 363.Stepan JJ, Hruskova H, Kverka M. Update on menopausal hormone therapy for fracture prevention. Curr. Osteoporos Rep. 2019;17:465–473. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00549-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR364] 364.Lindsay R, Gallagher JC, Kleerekoper M, Pickar JH. Effect of lower doses of conjugated equine estrogens with and without medroxyprogesterone acetate on bone in early postmenopausal women. JAMA. 2002;287:2668–2676. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.20.2668. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR365] 365.Lambrinoudaki I, Paschou SA, Armeni E, Goulis DG. The interplay between diabetes mellitus and menopause: clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2022;18:608–622. doi: 10.1038/s41574-022-00708-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR366] 366.Sun ZB, et al. Icariin may benefit the mesenchymal stem cells of patients with steroid-associated osteonecrosis by ABCB1-promoter demethylation: a preliminary study. Osteoporos. Int. 2015;26:187–197. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2809-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR367] 367.Wang Z, et al. The effect of icariin on bone metabolism and its potential clinical application. Osteoporos. Int. 2018;29:535–544. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4255-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR368] 368.Nowak B, et al. Oral administration of kaempferol inhibits bone loss in rat model of ovariectomy-induced osteopenia. Pharmacol. Rep. 2017;69:1113–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.pharep.2017.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR369] 369.Wong SK, Chin KY, Ima-Nirwana S. The osteoprotective effects of kaempferol: the evidence from in vivo and in vitro studies. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2019;13:3497–3514. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S227738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR370] 370.Arcoraci V, et al. Antiosteoporotic activity of genistein aglycone in postmenopausal women: evidence from a post-hoc analysis of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Nutrients. 2017;9:179. doi: 10.3390/nu9020179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR371] 371.Wu Z, Liu L. The protective activity of genistein against bone and cartilage diseases. Front. Pharmacol. 2022;13:1016981. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1016981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR372] 372.Zhou Y, et al. Senolytics improve bone forming potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells from aged mice. NPJ Regen Med. 2021;6:34. doi: 10.1038/s41536-021-00145-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR373] 373.Slupski W, Jawien P, Nowak B. Botanicals in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nutrients. 2021;13:1609. doi: 10.3390/nu13051609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR374] 374.Kim IS. Current perspectives on the beneficial effects of soybean isoflavones and their metabolites for humans. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021;10:1064. doi: 10.3390/antiox10071064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR375] 375.Vigneswaran K, Hamoda H. Hormone replacement therapy–current recommendations. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2022;81:8–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2021.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR376] 376.Gersh FL, O’Keefe JH, Lavie CJ. Postmenopausal hormone therapy for cardiovascular health: the evolving data. Heart. 2021;107:1115–1122. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-316323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR377] 377.Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast, C. Type and timing of menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis of the worldwide epidemiological evidence. Lancet. 2019;394:1159–1168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31709-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR378] 378.Rietjens I, Louisse J, Beekmann K. The potential health effects of dietary phytoestrogens. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2017;174:1263–1280. doi: 10.1111/bph.13622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR379] 379.Cannarella R, et al. Osteoporosis from an endocrine perspective: the role of hormonal changes in the elderly. J. Clin. Med. 2019;8:1564. doi: 10.3390/jcm8101564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR380] 380.Gosset A, Pouilles JM, Tremollieres F. Menopausal hormone therapy for the management of osteoporosis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021;35:101551. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2021.101551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR381] 381.Dimai HP, Fahrleitner-Pammer A. Osteoporosis and Fragility Fractures: currently available pharmacological options and future directions. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2022;36:101780. doi: 10.1016/j.berh.2022.101780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR382] 382.Wang Q, Dong X, Wang Y, Li X. Raloxifene as an adjunctive treatment for postmenopausal women with schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch. Womens Ment. Health. 2018;21:31–41. doi: 10.1007/s00737-017-0773-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR383] 383.Kang F, Zou Q, Huang J. The effects of raloxifene on endothelial function and Inflammation in Postmenopausal women: a Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Exp. Gerontol. 2022;159:111682. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR384] 384.Cummings SR, et al. Lasofoxifene in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010;362:686–696. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR385] 385.Andersson A, et al. Selective oestrogen receptor modulators lasofoxifene and bazedoxifene inhibit joint inflammation and osteoporosis in ovariectomised mice with collagen-induced arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;55:553–563. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR386] 386.Peng L, Luo Q, Lu H. Efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017;96:e8659. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR387] 387.Martinkovich S, Shah D, Planey SL, Arnott JA. Selective estrogen receptor modulators: tissue specificity and clinical utility. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2014;9:1437–1452. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S66690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR388] 388.Mirkin S, Pickar JH. Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs): a review of clinical data. Maturitas. 2015;80:52–57. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR389] 389.Ettinger B, et al. Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. JAMA. 1999;282:637–645. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.7.637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR390] 390.Briot K, et al. 2018 update of French recommendations on the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine. 2018;85:519–530. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2018.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR391] 391.Wong SK, et al. The use of selective estrogen receptor modulators on bone health in men. Aging Male. 2019;22:89–101. doi: 10.1080/13685538.2018.1448058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR392] 392.Ide V, Vanderschueren D, Antonio L. Treatment of men with central hypogonadism: alternatives for testosterone replacement therapy. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;22:21. doi: 10.3390/ijms22010021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR393] 393.Tong D. Selective estrogen receptor modulators contribute to prostate cancer treatment by regulating the tumor immune microenvironment. J. Immunother Cancer. 2022;10:e002944. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-002944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR394] 394.Chen HW, et al. Comparative adverse kidney outcomes in women receiving raloxifene and denosumab in a real-world setting. Biomedicines. 2022;10:1494. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10071494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR395] 395.Zhu C, et al. Autophagy in bone remodeling: a regulator of oxidative stress. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2022;13:898634. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.898634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR396] 396.Fuggle NR, et al. Assessment of cardiovascular safety of anti-osteoporosis drugs. Drugs. 2020;80:1537–1552. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01364-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR397] 397.Yavropoulou MP, Makras P, Anastasilakis AD. Bazedoxifene for the treatment of osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2019;20:1201–1210. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1615882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR398] 398.de Villiers TJ, Altomare C, Particco M, Gambacciani M. Effects of ospemifene on bone in postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2019;22:442–447. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2019.1631789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR399] 399.Constantine GD, Kagan R, Miller PD. Effects of ospemifene on bone parameters including clinical biomarkers in postmenopausal women. Menopause. 2016;23:638–644. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR400] 400.Kendler DL, et al. Arzoxifene versus raloxifene: effect on bone and safety parameters in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos. Int. 2012;23:1091–1101. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1587-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR401] 401.Arantes HP, et al. Correlation between 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and latitude in Brazilian postmenopausal women: from the Arzoxifene Generations Trial. Osteoporos. Int. 2013;24:2707–2712. doi: 10.1007/s00198-013-2366-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR402] 402.Goldstein SR. Selective estrogen receptor modulators and bone health. Climacteric. 2022;25:56–59. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2021.1936485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR403] 403.Borjesson AE, et al. SERMs have substance-specific effects on bone, and these effects are mediated via ERalphaAF-1 in female mice. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016;310:E912–918,. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00488.2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR404] 404.Luo P, et al. Bazedoxifene exhibits anti-inflammation and anti-atherosclerotic effects via inhibition of IL-6/IL-6R/STAT3 signaling. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021;893:173822. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR405] 405.Neher R, et al. Human calcitonin. Nature. 1968;220:984–986. doi: 10.1038/220984a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR406] 406.Yu P, Liu Y, Xie J, Li J. Spatiotemporally controlled calcitonin delivery: Long-term and targeted therapy of skeletal diseases. J. Control. Release. 2021;338:486–504. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2021.08.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR407] 407.Rico H, Revilla M, Hernandez ER, Villa LF, Alvarez de Buergo M. Total and regional bone mineral content and fracture rate in postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with salmon calcitonin: a prospective study. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1995;56:181–185. doi: 10.1007/BF00298606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR408] 408.Chesnut CH, 3rd, et al. A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study. PROOF Study Group. Am. J. Med. 2000;109:267–276. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00490-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR409] 409.Knopp-Sihota JA, Newburn-Cook CV, Homik J, Cummings GG, Voaklander D. Calcitonin for treating acute and chronic pain of recent and remote osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos. Int. 2012;23:17–38. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1676-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR410] 410.Henriksen K, Bay-Jensen AC, Christiansen C, Karsdal MA. Oral salmon calcitonin–pharmacology in osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2010;10:1617–1629. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2010.526104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR411] 411.Downs RW, Jr., et al. Comparison of alendronate and intranasal calcitonin for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000;85:1783–1788. doi: 10.1210/jcem.85.5.6606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR412] 412.Woo T, Adachi JD. Role of bisphosphonates and calcitonin in the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2001;15:469–481. doi: 10.1053/berh.2001.0161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR413] 413.Cranney A, et al. Calcitonin for the treatment and prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2000;2000:CD001983. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR414] 414.Reginster JY, Franchimont P. Side effects of synthetic salmon calcitonin given by intranasal spray compared with intramuscular injection. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol. 1985;3:155–157. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR415] 415.Naot D, Musson DS, Cornish J. The activity of peptides of the calcitonin family in bone. Physiol. Rev. 2019;99:781–805. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00066.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR416] 416.Zhang N, et al. Pros and cons of denosumab treatment for osteoporosis and implication for RANKL aptamer therapy. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:325. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR417] 417.Dreyer TJ, Keen JA, Wells LM, Roberts SJ. Novel insights on the effect of sclerostin on bone and other organs. J. Endocrinol. 2023;257:e220209. doi: 10.1530/JOE-22-0209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR418] 418.Lewiecki EM, Bilezikian JP. Denosumab for the treatment of osteoporosis and cancer-related conditions. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2012;91:123–133. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2011.268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR419] 419.McClung MR, et al. Effects of 24 months of treatment with romosozumab followed by 12 months of denosumab or placebo in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: a randomized, double-blind, phase 2, parallel group. Study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2018;33:1397–1406. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR420] 420.Nakamura T, et al. Clinical trials express: fracture risk reduction with denosumab in Japanese postmenopausal women and men with osteoporosis: denosumab fracture intervention randomized placebo controlled trial (DIRECT) J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014;99:2599–2607. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-4175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR421] 421.Deeks ED. Denosumab: a review in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Drugs Aging. 2018;35:163–173. doi: 10.1007/s40266-018-0525-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR422] 422.Pang KL, Low NY, Chin KY. A review on the role of denosumab in fracture prevention. Drug Des. Devel. Ther. 2020;14:4029–4051. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S270829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR423] 423.Sidlauskas KM, Sutton EE, Biddle MA. Osteoporosis in men: epidemiology and treatment with denosumab. Clin. Interv. Aging. 2014;9:593–601. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S51940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR424] 424.Aspray TJ, et al. National Osteoporosis Society vitamin D guideline summary. Age Ageing. 2014;43:592–595. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afu093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR425] 425.Casado E, et al. Multidisciplinary consensus on the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis and fragility fractures in patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen-deprivation therapy. World J. Mens Health. 2022;40:74–86,. doi: 10.5534/wjmh.210061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR426] 426.Zeytinoglu M, Naaman SC, Dickens LT. Denosumab discontinuation in patients treated for low bone density and osteoporosis. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am. 2021;50:205–222. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2021.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR427] 427.Cummings SR, et al. Vertebral fractures after discontinuation of denosumab: a post hoc analysis of the randomized placebo-controlled FREEDOM trial and its extension. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2018;33:190–198. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR428] 428.Tsourdi E, et al. Discontinuation of Denosumab therapy for osteoporosis: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS. Bone. 2017;105:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR429] 429.Lamy O, Stoll D, Aubry-Rozier B, Rodriguez EG. Stopping denosumab. Curr. Osteoporos Rep. 2019;17:8–15. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00502-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR430] 430.Paik J, Scott LJ. Romosozumab: a review in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Drugs Aging. 2020;37:845–855. doi: 10.1007/s40266-020-00793-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR431] 431.Saag KG, Petersen J, Grauer A. Romosozumab versus Alendronate and fracture risk in women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:195–196. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1714810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR432] 432.Geusens P, et al. The effect of 1 year of romosozumab on the incidence of clinical vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the FRAME study. JBMR Plus. 2019;3:e10211. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR433] 433.Cosman F, et al. Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1532–1543. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR434] 434.Wu D, Li L, Wen Z, Wang G. Romosozumab in osteoporosis: yesterday, today and tomorrow. J. Transl. Med. 2023;21:668. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04563-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR435] 435.Lamy O, Gonzalez-Rodriguez E, Stoll D, Hans D, Aubry-Rozier B. Severe rebound-associated vertebral fractures after denosumab discontinuation: 9 clinical cases report. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017;102:354–358. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-3170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR436] 436.Tsourdi E, et al. Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy: a systematic review and position statement by ECTS. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020;106:264–281. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR437] 437.Lewiecki EM, et al. A phase III randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of romosozumab in men with osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;103:3183–3193. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR438] 438.Ensrud KE, Schousboe JT. Anabolic therapy for osteoporosis. JAMA. 2021;326:350–351. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.0233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR439] 439.Minisola S, et al. Update on the safety and efficacy of teriparatide in the treatment of osteoporosis. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2019;11:1759720X19877994. doi: 10.1177/1759720X19877994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR440] 440.Miller PD, et al. Effect of abaloparatide vs placebo on new vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:722–733. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.11136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR441] 441.Díez-Pe rez A, Marin F, Eriksen EF. Effects of teriparatide on hip and upper limb fractures in patients with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone. 2019;120:1e8. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR442] 442.Hauser B, Alonso N, Riches PL. Review of current real-world experience with teriparatide as treatment of osteoporosis in different patient groups. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:1403. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR443] 443.Brent MB. Abaloparatide: a review of preclinical and clinical studies. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021;909:174409. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR444] 444.Liu W, et al. Targeted activation of AMPK by GSK621 ameliorates H2O2-induced damages in osteoblasts. Oncotarget. 2017;8:10543–10552. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR445] 445.Molagoda IMN, et al. Fisetin promotes osteoblast differentiation and osteogenesis through GSK-3beta phosphorylation at Ser9 and consequent beta-catenin activation, inhibiting osteoporosis. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2021;192:114676. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2021.114676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR446] 446.Marini F, Giusti F, Palmini G, Brandi ML. Role of Wnt signaling and sclerostin in bone and as therapeutic targets in skeletal disorders. Osteoporos. Int. 2023;34:213–238. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06523-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR447] 447.Faienza MF, et al. Monoclonal antibodies for treating osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2018;18:149–157. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1401607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR448] 448.Nealy KL, Harris KB. Romosozumab: a novel injectable sclerostin inhibitor with anabolic and antiresorptive effects for osteoporosis. Ann. Pharmacother. 2021;55:677–686. doi: 10.1177/1060028020952764. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR449] 449.Asadipooya K, Weinstock A. Cardiovascular outcomes of romosozumab and protective role of alendronate. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2019;39:1343–1350. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.119.312371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR450] 450.Corrado A, Sanpaolo ER, Di Bello S, Cantatore FP. Osteoblast as a target of anti-osteoporotic treatment. Postgrad. Med. 2017;129:858–865. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1362312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR451] 451.Brent MB, Stoltenborg FE, Bruel A, Thomsen JS. Teriparatide and abaloparatide have a similar effect on bone in mice. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2021;12:628994. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.628994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR452] 452.Sim IW, et al. Teriparatide promotes bone healing in medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: a placebo-controlled, randomized trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 2020;38:2971–2980. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR453] 453.Gossiel F, et al. Effect of teriparatide treatment on circulating periostin and its relationship to regulators of bone formation and BMD in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;103:1302–1309. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR454] 454.Pietrogrande L, Raimondo E. Abaloparatide for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Drugs Today (Barc). 2018;54:293–303. doi: 10.1358/dot.2018.54.5.2800621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR455] 455.Dhaliwal R, et al. Abaloparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the ACTIVE study. JBMR Plus. 2020;4:e10346. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR456] 456.Gilsenan A, et al. Teriparatide did not increase adult osteosarcoma incidence in a 15-year US postmarketing surveillance study. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2021;36:244–251. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR457] 457.Miller PD, Lewiecki EM, Krohn K, Schwartz E. Teriparatide: label changes and identifying patients for long-term use. Cleve. Clin. J. Med. 2021;88:489–493. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.88a.21011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR458] 458.Finkelstein JS, Wyland JJ, Lee H, Neer RM. Effects of teriparatide, alendronate, or both in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;95:1838–1845. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR459] 459.Neer RM, et al. Effect of parathyroid hormone (1-34) on fractures and bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2001;344:1434–1441. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105103441904. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR460] 460.Li M, et al. Efficacy of generic teriparatide and alendronate in Chinese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a prospective study. Arch Osteoporos. 2022;17:103. doi: 10.1007/s11657-022-01131-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR461] 461.Hong P, et al. Is abaloparatide more efficacious on increasing bone mineral density than teriparatide for women with postmenopausal osteoporosis? An updated meta-analysis. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2023;18:116. doi: 10.1186/s13018-023-03595-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR462] 462.Reid IR, Billington EO. Drug therapy for osteoporosis in older adults. Lancet. 2022;399:1080–1092. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02646-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR463] 463.Camacho PM, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology Clinical Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis-2020 update. Endocr. Pract. 2020;26:1–46. doi: 10.4158/GL-2020-0524SUPPL. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR464] 464.Shoback D, et al. Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: an endocrine society guideline update. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020;105:587–594. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR465] 465.McConnell M, Shieh A. Polypharmacy in osteoporosis treatment. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2022;38:715–726. doi: 10.1016/j.cger.2022.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR466] 466.Curtis EM, Woolford S, Holmes C, Cooper C, Harvey NC. General and specific considerations as to why osteoporosis-related care is often suboptimal. Curr. Osteoporos Rep. 2020;18:38–46. doi: 10.1007/s11914-020-00566-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR467] 467.Cui L, et al. Predicting the intervention threshold for initiating osteoporosis treatment among postmenopausal women in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis based on real-world data. Osteoporos. Int. 2020;31:307–316. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05173-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR468] 468.Reid IR. A broader strategy for osteoporosis interventions. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2020;16:333–339. doi: 10.1038/s41574-020-0339-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR469] 469.Barrionuevo P, et al. Efficacy of pharmacological therapies for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women: a network meta-analysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2019;104:1623–1630. doi: 10.1210/jc.2019-00192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR470] 470.Curtis EM, et al. Management of patients at very high risk of osteoporotic fractures through sequential treatments. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2022;34:695–714. doi: 10.1007/s40520-022-02100-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR471] 471.Chandran M. The why and how of sequential and combination therapy in osteoporosis. A review of the current evidence. Arch. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022;66:724–738. doi: 10.20945/2359-3997000000564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR472] 472.Lukert BP. Which drug next? Sequential therapy for osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2020;105:e879–e881. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR473] 473.McClung MR. Using osteoporosis therapies in combination. Curr. Osteoporos. Rep. 2017;15:343–352. doi: 10.1007/s11914-017-0376-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR474] 474.Finkelstein JS, et al. The effects of parathyroid hormone, alendronate, or both in men with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2003;349:1216–1226. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa035725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR475] 475.Anastasilakis AD, Polyzos SA, Yavropoulou MP, Makras P. Combination and sequential treatment in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2020;21:477–490. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2020.1717468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR476] 476.Kanis JA, Svedbom A, Harvey N, McCloskey EV. The osteoporosis treatment gap. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2014;29:1926–1928. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR477] 477.Reid IR. Osteoporosis: evidence for vitamin D and calcium in older people. Drug Ther. Bull. 2020;58:122–125. doi: 10.1136/dtb.2019.000063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR478] 478.Mangano KM, et al. Diet-derived fruit and vegetable metabolites show sex-specific inverse relationships to osteoporosis status. Bone. 2021;144:115780. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR479] 479.Jackson RD, et al. Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006;354:669–683. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR480] 480.Little-Letsinger SE, et al. Exercise to mend aged-tissue crosstalk in bone targeting osteoporosis & osteoarthritis. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022;123:22–35. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2021.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR481] 481.Zhang J, et al. Is regular weight-bearing physical activity throughout the lifecourse associated with better bone health in late adulthood? Calcif. Tissue Int. 2022;111:279–287. doi: 10.1007/s00223-022-00995-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR482] 482.LeBlanc ES, Zakher B, Daeges M, Pappas M, Chou R. Screening for vitamin D deficiency: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive services task force. Ann. Intern. Med. 2015;162:109–122. doi: 10.7326/M14-1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR483] 483.Chung M, Tang AM, Fu Z, Wang DD, Newberry SJ. Calcium intake and cardiovascular disease risk: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Intern. Med. 2016;165:856–866. doi: 10.7326/M16-1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR484] 484.Rizzoli R, Biver E, Brennan-Speranza TC. Nutritional intake and bone health. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2021;9:606–621. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00119-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR485] 485.Guo D, et al. Dietary interventions for better management of osteoporosis: an overview. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2023;63:125–144. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1944975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR486] 486.Bhasin S, et al. Testosterone therapy in men with hypogonadism: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;103:1715–1744. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR487] 487.Eisman JA, et al. Making the first fracture the last fracture: ASBMR task force report on secondary fracture prevention. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2012;27:2039–2046. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR488] 488.The Lancet Diabetes, E. Osteoporosis: a roadmap to close the treatment gap. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6:833. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30292-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR489] 489.Ramachandran S, et al. Gender disparities in osteoporosis screening and management among older adults. Adv. Ther. 2021;38:3872–3887. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01792-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR490] 490.Nayak S, Edwards DL, Saleh AA, Greenspan SL. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of clinical risk assessment instruments for screening for osteoporosis or low bone density. Osteoporos. Int. 2015;26:1543–1554. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3025-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR491] 491.Rubin KH, Friis-Holmberg T, Hermann AP, Abrahamsen B, Brixen K. Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: complexity or simplicity? A systematic review. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2013;28:1701–1717. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR492] 492.Merlijn T, Swart KMA, van der Horst HE, Netelenbos JC, Elders PJM. Fracture prevention by screening for high fracture risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos. Int. 2020;31:251–257. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05226-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR493] 493.Overman RA, et al. DXA utilization between 2006 and 2012 in commercially insured younger postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Densitom. 2015;18:145–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2015.01.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR494] 494.Parsons CM, et al. Systematic screening using FRAX((R)) leads to increased use of, and adherence to, anti-osteoporosis medications: an analysis of the UK SCOOP trial. Osteoporos. Int. 2020;31:67–75. doi: 10.1007/s00198-019-05142-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR495] 495.Bandeira L, Lewiecki EM, Bilezikian JP. Romosozumab for the treatment of osteoporosis. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2017;17:255–263. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2017.1280455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR496] 496.Lems WF, et al. Vertebral fracture: epidemiology, impact and use of DXA vertebral fracture assessment in fracture liaison services. Osteoporos. Int. 2021;32:399–411. doi: 10.1007/s00198-020-05804-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR497] 497.Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal, I. et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 14, S189–S202 (2017).

[CR498] 498.Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal, I. et al. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Osteoporosis and Bone Mineral Density: 2022 Update. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 19, S417–S432 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]

[CR499] 499.Zeng Q, et al. The prevalence of osteoporosis in China, a nationwide, multicenter DXA survey. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2019;34:1789–1797. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.3757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR500] 500.Hans D, Baim S. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) in the management of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. J. Clin. Densitom. 2017;20:322–333. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2017.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[CR501] 501.Gao C, Song H, Chen B, Zhang Z, Yue H. The assessment of the osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in identifying osteoporotic fractures and falls among Chinese people. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) 2021;12:684334. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.684334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Insights and implications of sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis

Yuan-Yuan Zhang

Na Xie

Xiao-Dong Sun

Edouard C Nice

Yih-Cherng Liou

Canhua Huang

Huili Zhu

Zhisen Shen

Abstract

Introduction

Disparities in osteoporosis epidemiology according to sex

Primary osteoporosis in older women and men

Fig. 1.

GC-induced osteoporosis

Diabetic osteoporosis

Molecular mechanisms underlying sexual dimorphism in osteoporosis

Sex variations in bone cell functions and key signaling pathways

Effects of sex chromosome abnormalities on osteoporosis

Fig. 2.

Major sex hormones in bone metabolism

Estrogen’s powerful influence on bone homeostasis and its deficiency in osteoporosis

Fig. 3.

Androgens in bone health and osteoporosis

Sex hormone-mediated oxidative stress and protective autophagy in osteoporosis

Fig. 4.

Estrogen and testosterone in GC-induced osteoporosis

Fig. 5.

Diabetic osteoporosis

Psychological stress-induced osteoporosis

Strategies and challenges in the management of osteoporosis

Fig. 6.

Current treatments for osteoporosis in female and male patients

Antiresorptive therapies for osteoporosis

Bisphosphonates

Estrogens and phytoestrogens

Selective estrogen receptor modulators

Calcitonin

Monoclonal antibodies

Anabolic medications for osteoporosis

Challenges and future directions in the treatment of osteoporosis

Table 1.

Intervention threshold for initiating osteoporosis treatment in women and men

Combined/sequential therapy

Nondrug practice in combination with current osteoporosis medications

Hormonal therapy with estrogens/phytoestrogens/androgens

More clinical trials with larger sample sizes in men

Raising awareness about osteoporosis and fractures, especially in men

Screening approaches for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures

Screening tests for osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures

Risk assessment for osteoporosis and related fractures

Table 2.

Table 3.

Challenges and future directions for osteoporosis screening

Conclusions and perspectives

Acknowledgements

Author contributions

Competing interests

Contributor Information

References

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases