Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2001 Feb 7;268(1464):319–324. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1364

Genealogical portraits of speciation in montane grasshoppers (genus Melanoplus) from the sky islands of the Rocky Mountains.

L L Knowles 1
PMCID: PMC1088609  PMID: 11217904

Abstract

Grasshoppers in the genus Melanoplus have undergone a radiation in the 'sky islands' of western North America, with many species originating during the Pleistocene. Despite their recent origins, phylogenetic analyses indicate that all the species exhibit monophyletic or paraphyletic gene trees. The objectives of this study were to determine whether the monophyletic genealogies are the result of a bottleneck at speciation and to investigate the extent to which the different phylogenetic states of eight species (i.e. monophyletic versus paraphyletic gene trees) can be ascribed to the effects of speciation. A coalescent simulation was used to test for a bottleneck at speciation in each species. The effective population sizes and demographic histories of species were compared across taxa to evaluate the possibility that the paraphyly versus monophyly of the species reflects differential rates of lineage loss rather than speciation mode. While coalescent analyses indicate that the monophyly of Melanoplus species might not be indicative of bottlenecks at speciation, the results suggest that the paraphyletic gene trees may reflect the demography of speciation, involving localized divergences in the ancestral species. With respect to different models of Pleistocene divergence, the data do not support a model of founder-effect speciation but are compatible with divergence in allopatric refugia.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (142.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aris-Brosou S., Excoffier L. The impact of population expansion and mutation rate heterogeneity on DNA sequence polymorphism. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Mar;13(3):494–504. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avise J. C., Shapira J. F., Daniel S. W., Aquadro C. F., Lansman R. A. Mitochondrial DNA differentiation during the speciation process in Peromyscus. Mol Biol Evol. 1983 Dec;1(1):38–56. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bertorelle G., Slatkin M. The number of segregating sites in expanding human populations, with implications for estimates of demographic parameters. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Sep;12(5):887–892. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brower A. V. Rapid morphological radiation and convergence among races of the butterfly Heliconius erato inferred from patterns of mitochondrial DNA evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 5;91(14):6491–6495. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.14.6491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brown W. M., George M., Jr, Wilson A. C. Rapid evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Apr;76(4):1967–1971. doi: 10.1073/pnas.76.4.1967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carson H. L. Speciation as a major reorganization of polygenic balances. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1982;96:411–433. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chesser R. K., Baker R. J. Effective sizes and dynamics of uniparentally and diparentally inherited genes. Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1225–1235. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.3.1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Crandall K. A., Templeton A. R. Empirical tests of some predictions from coalescent theory with applications to intraspecific phylogeny reconstruction. Genetics. 1993 Jul;134(3):959–969. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.3.959. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dynesius M., Jansson R. Evolutionary consequences of changes in species' geographical distributions driven by Milankovitch climate oscillations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 1;97(16):9115–9120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Eyre-Walker A., Gaut R. L., Hilton H., Feldman D. L., Gaut B. S. Investigation of the bottleneck leading to the domestication of maize. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 14;95(8):4441–4446. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hewitt G. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature. 2000 Jun 22;405(6789):907–913. doi: 10.1038/35016000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hey J., Kliman R. M. Population genetics and phylogenetics of DNA sequence variation at multiple loci within the Drosophila melanogaster species complex. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Jul;10(4):804–822. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol. 1980 Dec;16(2):111–120. doi: 10.1007/BF01731581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Knowles L. L. Tests of pleistocene speciation in montane grasshoppers (genus Melanoplus) from the sky islands of western North America. Evolution. 2000 Aug;54(4):1337–1348. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00566.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Marjoram P., Donnelly P. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in subdivided populations and implications for early human evolution. Genetics. 1994 Feb;136(2):673–683. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.2.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Rogers A. R., Harpending H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol Biol Evol. 1992 May;9(3):552–569. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Slatkin M., Hudson R. R. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):555–562. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tajima F. Evolutionary relationship of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics. 1983 Oct;105(2):437–460. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.2.437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Takahata N. Allelic genealogy and human evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 Jan;10(1):2–22. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a039995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Templeton A. R. The theory of speciation via the founder principle. Genetics. 1980 Apr;94(4):1011–1038. doi: 10.1093/genetics/94.4.1011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wakeley J., Hey J. Estimating ancestral population parameters. Genetics. 1997 Mar;145(3):847–855. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.3.847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES