Abstract
We have undertaken the first large-scale molecular phylogenetic analysis of the Stylommatophora. Sequences of the ribosomal RNA gene-cluster were examined in 104 species of snails and slugs from 50 families, encompassing all the currently recognized major groups. It allows an independent test of the present classification based on morphology. At the level of families our molecular phylogeny closely supports the current taxonomy, but the deep branches within the tree do not. Surprisingly, a single assemblage including the families Achatinidae, Subulinidae and Streptaxidae lies near the base of the tree, forming a sister group to all remaining stylommatophorans. This primary division into 'achatinoid' and 'non-achatinoid' taxa is unexpected, and demands a radical reinterpretation of early stylommatophoran evolution. In particular, the Orthurethra appear to be relatively advanced within the 'non-achatinoid clade', and broadly equivalent to other super-familial clusters. This indicates that supposedly primitive features such as the orthurethran kidney are derived. The molecular tree also suggests that the origin of the Stylommatophora is much earlier than the main period of their diversification.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (176.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- CAIN A. J., SHEPPARD P. M. Selection in the polymorphic land snail Cepaea nemoralis. Heredity (Edinb) 1950 Dec;4(3):275–294. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1950.22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Felsenstein J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981;17(6):368–376. doi: 10.1007/BF01734359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fitch W. M., Margoliash E. Construction of phylogenetic trees. Science. 1967 Jan 20;155(3760):279–284. doi: 10.1126/science.155.3760.279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Higgins D. G. Sequence ordinations: a multivariate analysis approach to analysing large sequence data sets. Comput Appl Biosci. 1992 Feb;8(1):15–22. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/8.1.15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Philippe H., Laurent J. How good are deep phylogenetic trees? Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1998 Dec;8(6):616–623. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(98)80028-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987 Jul;4(4):406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith S. W., Overbeek R., Woese C. R., Gilbert W., Gillevet P. M. The genetic data environment an expandable GUI for multiple sequence analysis. Comput Appl Biosci. 1994 Dec;10(6):671–675. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/10.6.671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]