Skip to main content
Eurosurveillance logoLink to Eurosurveillance
. 2024 Jan 4;29(1):2300670. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.1.2300670

Relative vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalisation in persons aged ≥ 65 years: results from a VEBIS network, Europe, October 2021 to July 2023

Mario Fontán-Vela 1,2, Esther Kissling 3, Nathalie Nicolay 4, Toon Braeye 5, Izaak Van Evercooren 5, Christian Holm Hansen 6, Hanne-Dorthe Emborg 6, Massimo Fabiani 7, Alberto Mateo-Urdiales 7, Ala'a AlKerwi 8, Susanne Schmitz 8, Jesús Castilla 9,10, Iván Martínez-Baz 9,10, Brechje de Gier 11, Susan Hahné 11, Hinta Meijerink 12, Jostein Starrfelt 12, Baltazar Nunes 13, Constantino Caetano 13, Tarik Derrough 4, Anthony Nardone 3, Susana Monge 1,14; VEBIS-Lot4 working group15; VEBIS-Lot 4 working group, James Humphreys, Alexis Sentís, Joris Van Loenhout, Pierre Hubin, Katrine Finderup Nielsen, Chiara Sacco, Daniele Petrone, Patrizio Pezzotti, Itziar Casado, Aitziber Echeverria, Camino Trobajo-Sanmartín, Stijn Andeweg, Anja Bråthen Kristoffersen, Irina Kislaya, Patricia Soares, Carlos Dias, Ausenda Machado
PMCID: PMC10905661  PMID: 38179626

Abstract

To monitor relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) against COVID-19-related hospitalisation of the first, second and third COVID-19 booster (vs complete primary vaccination), we performed monthly Cox regression models using retrospective cohorts constructed from electronic health registries in eight European countries, October 2021–July 2023. Within 12 weeks of administration, each booster showed high rVE (≥ 70% for second and third boosters). However, as of July 2023, most of the relative benefit has waned, particularly in persons ≥ 80-years-old, while some protection remained in 65–79-year-olds.

Keywords: COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, vaccine effectiveness, hospitalisation, cohort design, electronic health records, multi-country study


Since 2021, the Vaccine Effectiveness, Burden and Impact Studies of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and influenza (VEBIS) project monitors vaccine effectiveness (VE) in real-world conditions to inform vaccination programmes in the European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) countries [1]. One project aims to monitor real-time COVID-19 VE using electronic health registries (EHR) in multiple countries, with initial findings previously published [2-4]. We report pooled VE results against hospitalisation due to COVID-19 by number of doses received and time since vaccination in a community-dwelling resident population aged ≥ 65 years between October 2021 and July 2023.

Design of a monitoring framework to evaluate vaccine effectiveness of COVID-19

The study period covers 22 months, including the sequential circulation of different Omicron BA subvariants and the administration of adapted vaccines against Omicron BA subvariants (Phylogenetic Assignment of Named Global Outbreak (Pango) lineage designation B.1.1.529), in the autumn 2022. See Supplementary Figure S1 for the variation in the proportion of selected severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants over the study period in the participating sites.

Eight sites participated in the study: Denmark, Navarra (Spain), Norway and Portugal from October 2021, Belgium from July 2022, Luxembourg between July 2022 and February 2023, the Netherlands from November 2022 and Italy from December 2022. Retrospective population-cohorts were constructed at each site following a common protocol [5,6]. Individual deterministic linkage was used to cross-match administrative databases with registries for COVID-19 vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 testing, hospitalisations and, in some instances, surveillance data. Estimates of VE were produced monthly to have a near real-time monitoring system of COVID-19 VE and to be able to detect changes in VE for informing public health decisions. To accumulate sufficient events to support VE estimation, each monthly estimate included an observation period of 8 weeks, with a lag of 1 month for data consolidation (i.e. estimates produced in January 2023 covered October–November 2022). This resulted in an overlap in the observation periods, which were rolled 1 month forward for each successive monthly estimate.

The detailed methodology is published elsewhere [5,6]. Briefly, hospitalisation due to COVID-19 was defined as a hospital admission due to a severe acute respiratory infection with a SARS-CoV-2 positive test from 14 days before to 1 day after admission [7] or as COVID-19 as the main diagnosis in admission or discharge records. Vaccination status was time-varying and categorised as: (i) complete primary vaccination administered ≥ 24 weeks earlier (reference category in all models), (ii) first booster administered ≥ 90 days after primary vaccination, (iii) second booster administered ≥ 90 days after the first booster and (iv) third booster administered ≥ 90 days after the second booster. Time after each booster was categorised as: (i) 0 to < 12 weeks, (ii) 12 to < 24 weeks and (iii) ≥ 24 weeks. Time 0 was defined as the end of the induction period, i.e. 14 days after administration of the first dose.

For each 8-week observation period, follow-up started on the first day and ended at the earliest date of either hospitalisation due to COVID-19, death, emigration outside the country or end of the observation period. Figure 1 shows the cumulative number of person-months by age, vaccination status and study site, reflecting the participation of each site and the timing of booster administration.

Figure 1.

Estimated person-months in VEBIS studies against COVID-19 hospitalisation in persons aged 65–79 and ≥ 80 years, by observation period, vaccination status, age-group and study site, eight European Union/European Economic Area countriesa, October 2021–July 2023

COVID-19: coronavirus disease 2019; VEBIS: Vaccine Effectiveness (VE), Burden and Impact Studies of COVID-19 and influenza.

a Participation in the study: Belgium (July 2022–July 2023), Denmark (October 2021–July 2023), Italy (December 2022–July 2023), Luxembourg (July 2022–March 2023), the Netherlands (November 2022–July 2023), Norway (October 2021–July 2023), Portugal (October 2021–July 2023) and Spain (Navarra) (October 2021–July 2023).

Figure 1

We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) adjusted by sex, age group (in 5-year age bands), previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, comorbidities and other variables as relevant at each site [3,4] We computed relative VE (rVE) as (1-HR) × 100%. Estimates were pooled using Paule-Mandel random-effect meta-analysis [8].

Relative vaccine effectiveness by time since the last dose

In persons aged ≥ 80 years, rVE of the first booster administered < 12 weeks earlier (Figure 2, Table 1), declined from 86% (95% CI: 73–93) in October–November 2021 to 55% (95% CI: 37–67) in April–May 2022. Estimates were inconsistent thereafter, possibly reflecting some individuals receiving the first booster during spring vaccination campaigns in 2022 (Belgium and Portugal). The relative VE of the first booster administered 12 to < 24 weeks earlier decreased from 73% (95% CI: 63–81) in December 2021–January 2022 to ≤ 50% in May–June 2022, with high uncertainty afterwards. When the first booster was administered ≥ 24 weeks earlier, the rVE was ≤ 50% throughout the study period and dropped to 15% (95% CI: −38 to 48) in June–July 2023. Similar estimates and overall trends were observed in persons in the age group of 65–79-years-old (Table 2).

Figure 2.

Estimated relative vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalisation in persons aged 65–79 and ≥ 80 years in overlapping observation intervals of 8 weeks by number of vaccine doses and time since the latest dose, eight European Union/European Economic Area countriesa, October 2021–July 2023

a Participation in the study: Belgium (July 2022–July 2023), Denmark (October 2021–July 2023), Italy (December 2022–July 2023), Luxembourg (July 2022–March 2023), the Netherlands (November 2022–July 2023), Norway (October 2021–July 2023), Portugal (October 2021–July 2023) and Spain (Navarra) (October 2021–July 2023).

Figure 2

Table 1. Estimated relative vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalisation in persons aged ≥ 80 years in overlapping observation intervals of 8 weeks by number of vaccine doses and time since the latest dose, eight European Union/European Economic Area countriesa, October 2021–July 2023.

Period Time since the last dose
< 12 weeks 12 to < 24 weeks ≥ 24 weeks
rVE (%) 95% CI Countries rVE (%) 95% CI Countries rVE (%) 95% CI Countries
First boosterb
1 Oct–25 Nov 2021 86 73 to 93 DK, ES, NO, PT NA NA
1 Nov–26 Dec 2021 89 81 to 93 NA NA
1 Dec 2021–25 Jan 2022 87 81 to 90 73 63 to 81 DK, ES, PT NA
1 Jan–25 Feb 2022 79 75 to 83 72 68 to 75 DK, ES, NO, PT NA
1 Feb–28 Mar 2022 73 67 to 78 69 64 to 73 NA
1 Mar–25 Apr 2022 59 50 to 66 DK, NO, PT 63 57 to 68 50 2 to 75 DK, ES, NO, PT
1 Apr–26 May 2022 55 37 to 67 55 34 to 68 48 37 to 57
1 May–25 Jun 2022 72 56 to 82 PT 41 30 to 51 39 29 to 48
1 Jun–26 Jul 2022 NA 25 −53 to 63 DK, NO, PT 42 25 to 55
1 Jul–25 Aug 2022 70 46 to 83 PT 28 −3 to 50 BE, DK, NO, PT 36 15 to 53
1 Aug–25 Sep 2022 NA NA 28 10 to 42 BE, DK, ES, NO, PT
1 Sep–26 Oct 2022 NA NA 30 12 to 44 BE, ES, LU, NO, PT
1 Oct–25 Nov 2022 NA NA 42 27 to 54 BE, DK, ES, LU, NO, PT
1 Nov–26 Dec 2022 NA 47 9 to 69 NO, PT 26 13 to 37 BE, DK, ES, LU, NL, NO, PT
1 Dec 2022–25 Jan 2023 −39 −104 to 6 IT 14 −502 to 88 IT, NO 14 −10 to 33 BE, DK, ES, IT, LU, NL, NO, PT
1 Jan–25 Feb 2023 NA −79 −179 to −15 IT 9 −23 to 33
1 Feb–28 Mar 2023 NA NA -8 −42 to 18 BE, DK, IT, LU, NL, NO, PT
1 Mar–25 Apr 2023 NA −82 −206 to −8 IT 11 −27 to 37 BE, DK, IT, NL, NO, PT
1 Apr–26 May 2023 NA −166 −342 to −60 IT 11 −31 to 40
1 May–25 Jun 2023 NA NA 18 −53 to 56 BE, IT, NL, NO, PT
1 Jun–26 Jul 2023 NA NA 15 −38 to 48 BE, ES, IT, NL, NO, PT
Second boosterc
1 Jun–26 Jul 2022 71 61 to 78 DK, PT NA NA
1 Jul–25 Aug 2022 62 53 to 70 DK, NO, PT NA NA
1 Aug–25 Sep 2022 60 45 to 71 BE, DK, NO, PT NA NA
1 Sep–26 Oct 2022 60 47 to 70 BE, NO, PT 30 −7 to 54 BE, LU, PT NA
1 Oct–25 Nov 2022 76 65 to 83 39 18 to 54 BE, LU, NO, PT NA
1 Nov–26 Dec 2022 72 62 to 79 BE, ES, NL, NO, PT 49 32 to 62 BE, LU, NL, NO, PT 21 −100 to 69 LU, NL
1 Dec 2022–25 Jan 2023 58 35 to 72 BE, ES, IT, NL, NO, PT 47 17 to 66 BE, IT, LU, NL, NO, PT 17 −49 to 53 BE, IT, LU, NL, PT
1 Jan–25 Feb 2023 48 24 to 65 48 5 to 71 BE, IT, NL, NO, PT 12 −29 to 40 BE, IT, LU, NL, NO, PT
1 Feb–28 Mar 2023 11 −12 to 29 IT, LU 29 −2 to 50 BE, ES, IT, LU, NL, NO, PT −2 −55 to 32
1 Mar–25 Apr 2023 19 −8 to 39 DK, IT 33 5 to 53 BE, DK, ES, IT, NL, NO, PT 1 −53 to 36 BE, IT, NL, NO, PT
1 Apr–26 May 2023 NA 38 1 to 60 26 −25 to 56 BE, DK, ES, IT, NL, NO, PT
1 May–25 Jun 2023 NA −16 −57 to 14 IT 14 −39 to 47 BE, ES, IT, NL, NO, PT
1 Jun–26 Jul 2023 NA NA 16 −26 to 44 BE, DK, ES, IT, NL, NO, PT
Third boosterd
1 Oct–25 Nov 2022 71 60 to 79 BE NA NA
1 Nov–26 Dec 2022 62 53 to 69 BE, NL, PT NA NA
1 Dec 2022–25 Jan 2023 48 26 to 63 BE, IT, NL, PT 53 38 to 64 BE, NL, PT NA
1 Jan–25 Feb 2023 44 13 to 65 16 −39 to 49 BE, IT, NL, PT NA
1 Feb–28 Mar 2023 40 −45 to 75 3 −77 to 47 48 14 to 69 BE, NL
1 Mar–25 Apr 2023 31 −81 to 74 BE, IT, NL −1,043 −253,127 to 95 9 −153 to 67 BE, NL, NO, PT
1 Apr–26 May 2023 56 −64 to 88 BE, IT, NO −1 −42 to 28 1 −67 to 42 BE, IT, NL, PT
1 May–25 Jun 2023 60 −237 to 95 −69 −319 to 32 BE, IT, PT 8 −77 to 34
1 Jun–26 Jul 2023 NA NA 16 −42 to 50

BE: Belgium; CI: confidence interval; DK: Denmark; ES: Spain (Navarra); IT: Italy; LU: Luxembourg; NA: not available; NL: the Netherlands; NO: Norway; PT: Portugal; rVE: relative vaccine effectiveness.

a Participation in the study: Belgium (July 2022–July 2023), Denmark (October 2021–July 2023), Italy (December 2022–July 2023), Luxembourg (July 2022–March 2023), the Netherlands (November 2022–July 2023), Norway (October 2021–July 2023), Portugal (October 2021–July 2023) and Spain (Navarra) (October 2021–July 2023).

b First booster rollout date: Belgium (September 2021), Denmark (October 2021), Italy (September 2021), Luxembourg (July 2021), the Netherlands (November 2021), Norway (October 2021), Portugal (October 2021) and Spain (Navarra) (October 2021).

c Second booster rollout date: Belgium (July 2022), Denmark (September 2022), Italy (April 2022), Luxembourg (April 2022), the Netherlands (February 2022), Norway (June 2022), Portugal (May 2022) and Spain (Navarra) (October 2022).

d Third booster rollout date: Belgium (September 2022), Italy (October 2022), the Netherlands (September 2022), Norway (March 2023) and Portugal (September 2022).

Countries with five events were included in the analysis.

Table 2. Estimated relative vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalisation in persons aged 65–79 years, in overlapping observation intervals of 8 weeks by number of vaccine doses and time since the last dose, eight European Union/European Economic Area countriesa, November 2021–July 2023.

Period Time since the last dose
< 12 weeks 12 to < 24 weeks ≥ 24 weeks
rVE (%) 95% CI Countries rVE (%) 95% CI Countries rVE (%) 95% CI Countries
First boosterb
1 Nov–26 Dec 2021 72 66 to 77 DK, ES, NO, PT NA NA
1 Dec 2021–25 Jan 2022 83 77 to 87 NA NA
1 Jan–25 Feb 2022 84 77 to 89 51 38 to 62 DK, ES, NO, PT NA
1 Feb–28 Mar 2022 82 79 to 85 68 51 to 79 NA
1 Mar–25 Apr 2022 81 77 to 85 DK, NO, PT 75 65 to 82 NA
1 Apr–26 May 2022 50 19 to 69 65 43 to 79 41 −98 to 82 NO, PT
1 May–25 Jun 2022 NA 48 25 to 63 48 34 to 58 DK, ES, NO, PT
1 Jun–26 Jul 2022 NA 20 −4 to 40 DK, NO, PT 36 21 to 48
1 Jul–25 Aug 2022 NA 13 −16 to 35 BE, DK, LU, NO, PT 48 32 to 61 BE, DK, ES, LU, NO, PT
1 Aug–25 Sep 2022 NA NA 44 21 to 60
1 Sep–26 Oct 2022 NA NA 18 −71 to 38
1 Oct–25 Nov 2022 NA NA 28 6 to 44
1 Nov–26 Dec 2022 NA NA 38 20 to 52 BE, DK, ES, LU, NL, NO, PT
1 Dec 2022–25 Jan 2023 24 −15 to 50 DK, IT -3 −97 to 46 IT, NO 35 18 to 48 BE, DK, ES, IT, LU, NL, NO, PT
1 Jan–25 Feb 2023 NA 9 −32 to 37 IT, NL, NO 33 26 to 40 BE, DK, ES, IT, NL, NO, PT
1 Feb–28 Mar 2023 NA 51 23 to 69 DK, IT, LU, NL, PT 20 10 to 29 BE, DK, ES, IT, LU, NL, NO, PT
1 Mar–25 Apr 2023 NA 9 −119 to 62 DK, IT, PT 15 4 to 25 BE, DK, ES, IT, NL, NO, PT
1 Apr–26 May 2023 NA NA 15 −1 to 28 BE, DK, IT, NL, NO, PT
1 May–25 Jun 2023 NA NA 11 −8 to 27 BE, ES, IT, NL, NO, PT
1 Jun–26 Jul 2023 NA NA 27 4 to 44
Second boosterc
1 Aug–25 Sep 2022 68 42 to 83 NO NA NA
1 Sep–26 Oct 2022 65 34 to 81 LU, NO NA NA
1 Oct–25 Nov 2022 77 66 to 83 LU, NO, PT NA NA
1 Nov–26 Dec 2022 76 68 to 81 BE, ES, NL, NO, PT 73 21 to 91 LU, NL, NO 14 −22 to 39 NL
1 Dec 2022–25 Jan 2023 67 53 to 77 BE, DK, IT, LU, NL, NO, PT 61 39 to 75 IT, LU, NL, NO, PT 11 −76 to 55 IT, NL
1 Jan–25 Feb 2023 62 56 to 67 BE, DK, IT, NL, NO, PT 54 41 to 64 BE, DK, IT, NL, NO, PT 25 2 to 42 DK, IT, NL, NO
1 Feb–28 Mar 2023 56 45 to 64 BE, IT, LU, NL, NO, PT 48 40 to 55 BE, ES, IT, LU, NL, NO, PT 20 8 to 30 IT, LU, NL, NO
1 Mar–25 Apr 2023 56 37 to 69 IT 46 36 to 54 BE, DK, ES, IT, NL, NO, PT 33 10 to 50 BE, IT, NL, NO, PT
1 Apr–26 May 2023 53 19 to 72 ES, IT 42 19 to 59 BE, DK, IT, NL, NO, PT 38 8 to 58 BE, DK, IT, NL, NO, PT
1 May–25 Jun 2023 NA 26 0 to 45 BE, IT, NO, PT 19 1 to 34 BE, DK, ES, IT, NL, NO, PT
1 Jun–26 Jul 2023 NA NA 31 3 to 50 BE, ES, IT, NL, NO, PT
Third boosterd
1 Nov–26 Dec 2022 65 53 to 73 NL NA NA
1 Dec 2022–25 Jan 2023 57 35 to 72 IT, NL 48 20 to 67 NL NA
1 Jan–25 Feb 2023 59 29 to 76 57 43 to 68 NA
1 Feb–28 Mar 2023 57 19 to 78 31 −34 to 65 IT, NL NA
1 Mar–25 Apr 2023 65 41 to 79 25 −60 to 65 51 26 to 68 NL
1 Apr–26 May 2023 NA 39 −22 to 69 53 30 to 69
1 May–25 Jun 2023 NA 17 −35 to 49 IT 0 −168 to 62 IT, NL
1 Jun–26 Jul 2023 NA NA 6 −71 to 49

BE: Belgium; CI: confidence interval; DK: Denmark; ES: Spain (Navarra); IT: Italy; LU: Luxembourg; NA: not available; NL: the Netherlands; NO: Norway; PT: Portugal; rVE: relative vaccine effectiveness.

a Participation in the study: Belgium (July 2022–July 2023), Denmark (October 2021–July 2023), Italy (December 2022–July 2023), Luxembourg (July 2022–March 2023), the Netherlands (November 2022–July 2023), Norway (October 2021–July 2023), Portugal (October 2021–July 2023) and Spain (Navarra) (October 2021–July 2023).

b First booster rollout date: Belgium (September 2021), Denmark (October 2021), Italy (September 2021), Luxembourg (July 2021), the Netherlands (November 2021), Norway (October 2021), Portugal (October 2021) and Spain (Navarra) (October 2021).

c Second booster rollout date: Belgium (July 2022), Denmark (September 2022), Italy (April 2022), Luxembourg (April 2022), the Netherlands (February 2022), Norway (June 2022), Portugal (May 2022) and Spain (Navarra) (October 2022).

d Third booster rollout date: Belgium (September 2022), Italy (October 2022), the Netherlands (September 2022), Norway (March 2023) and Portugal (September 2022).

Countries with five events were included in the analysis.

In persons ≥ 80-years-old, rVE of the second booster administered < 12 weeks earlier (Figure 2, Table 1) fluctuated between 71 and 60% from June to October 2022, following spring campaigns (Belgium and Portugal) and between 76 and 72% from October to December 2022, following autumn campaigns and decreasing thereafter. For a second booster 12 to < 24 weeks earlier, rVE varied without a specific time-trend between a maximum of 49% (95% CI: 32–62) and no relative protection (−16%; 95% CI: −57 to 14). No relative protective effect was estimated for a second booster ≥ 24 weeks earlier. In 65–79-year-olds, a similar overall trend was observed, although rVE < 12 weeks earlier remained ≥ 50% until April–May 2023. Estimated rVE of the second booster was 26% (95% CI: 0–45) when administered 12 to < 24 weeks earlier (estimate for May–June 2023) and 31% (95% CI: 3–50) when administered ≥ 24 weeks earlier (estimate for June–July 2023).

The third booster has been recommended to persons aged ≥ 80 years in the Netherlands since September 2022, in Belgium, Italy and Portugal since October 2022, and in Norway since April 2023. When administered < 12 weeks earlier, rVE of the third booster ranged between 71% (95% CI: 60–79) in October–November 2022 and 44% (95% CI: 13–65) in January–February 2023. However, it waned rapidly, with mostly null rVE beyond 12 weeks, albeit with high uncertainty. In persons 65–79-years-old, the third booster had been rolled out only in Italy and the Netherlands since October 2022. Between November 2022 and April 2023, rVE of the third booster administered < 12 weeks earlier ranged between 57 and 65%, although no relative protective effect of the third booster was observed between 12 and < 24 weeks (since February–March 2023) nor beyond 24 weeks (since May–June 2023).

Discussion

Our results have implications for COVID-19 vaccination roll-out and the monitoring framework. They suggest that successive booster vaccine doses were important for restoring individual protection against COVID-19 hospitalisation in the context of waning effectiveness. However, as of July 2023, most of the relative benefit has waned, particularly in individuals ≥ 80 years, while low relative protection was still observed in persons aged 65–79 years with a first or second booster.

Adapted vaccines against Omicron BA subvariants administered in the autumn 2022 vaccination campaign showed similar rVE when given as the second (76%) or third booster (71%), suggesting that the time since the latest dose is more important for protection than the total number of doses administered. After 12 weeks, rVE declined, especially for the third booster in persons ≥ 80-years-old. These estimates and waning patterns have been observed in other studies [9-13]. Since March 2023, the circulation of the Omicron XBB.1.5 sublineage, with a higher immunity evasion capacity [14], has been increasing, reaching around or above 50% of the isolates in the EU/EEA in July 2023 [15]. This could also partially explain the decrease in the rVE, as other studies suggested [9,16,17].

A multi-country approach can provide representative estimates for the EU/EEA and assess different vaccination roll-out strategies (more details on the roll-out of booster doses by country are provided in Supplementary Table S1). However, estimates may vary due to countries contributing differently and over time, challenging the interpretation of the time-trends. Despite using national databases, a low number of events during certain observation periods, as seen in Supplementary Tables S2–3, resulted in high uncertainty. Additionally, misclassification of hospitalisations not due to COVID-19 cannot be ruled out, despite the specific case-definition. Finally, with increasing number of doses and decreasing coverage of the last dose, comparability across different vaccination statuses regarding vulnerability and past infection can be compromised, despite adjusting for comorbidities, socioeconomic variables and registered SARS-CoV-2 infections (where available). Differential depletion of susceptible persons can also lead to spurious or overestimated waning results [18].

Although the effect of vaccination is likely to differ with respect to prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, we did not stratify by this variable due to suspected high misclassification. This would result from decreasing SARS-CoV-2 testing and increasing use of self-tests along the study period, particularly after the arrival of Omicron in 2021. Therefore, our estimates could be interpreted as an average population effect of the vaccine in country populations with given pre-existing immunity levels. Moreover, because vaccine recommendations are not expected to be made depending on previous infection status we believe our results are relevant from a public health perspective.

To conclude, our results suggest that time since the last booster dose is more important for the risk of hospitalisation than the number of booster doses. This supports seasonal COVID-19 vaccination in population ≥ 65 years at the start of periods with increased expected disease burden. Monitoring focused on the effectiveness of the seasonal vaccine dose is probably more appropriate for the current context.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all persons from the study sites involved in the data collection and the estimate production, as without their work these results wouldn’t be available for the scientific community and the public.

Supplementary Data

Supplementary Material

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Authors’ contributions: SM, AN, MFV, EK, NN and BN conceived the study and the methods. All authors from Public Health institutions at each study site were responsible for the data management and analysis at the site level. MFV and SM were in charge of pooling site estimates. MFV and SM drafted the first version of the manuscript, with the help of EK and AN. All the authors contributed to the interpretation of the results and critically reviewed the manuscript. All the authors approved the final version of this manuscript. All the authors within the VEBIS-Lot4 working group made a substantial contribution to the conception or design of the work, critically revised the manuscript, provided their final approval of the version to be published, and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

References

  • 1.Epiconcept. Vaccine Effectiveness, Burden and Impact Studies (VEBIS) of COVID-19 and Influenza. Paris: Epiconcept. [Accessed 6 Oct 2023]. Available from: https://www.epiconcept.fr/en/epidemio-project/vaccine-effectiveness-burden-and-impact-studies-vebis-of-covid-19-and-influenza
  • 2.Sentís A, Kislaya I, Nicolay N, Meijerink H, Starrfelt J, Martínez-Baz I, et al. Estimation of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation in individuals aged ≥ 65 years using electronic health registries; a pilot study in four EU/EEA countries, October 2021 to March 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27(30):2200551. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.30.2200551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kislaya I, Sentís A, Starrfelt J, Nunes B, Martínez-Baz I, Nielsen KF, et al. Monitoring COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalisation and death using electronic health registries in ≥65 years old population in six European countries, October 2021 to November 2022. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2023;17(11):e13195. 10.1111/irv.13195 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Interim analysis of COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation and death using electronic health records in six European countries. Stockholm: ECDC; 30 Nov 2023. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/interim-analysis-covid-19-vaccine-effectiveness-against-hospitalisation-and-death
  • 5.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Pilot protocol for a COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness study using health data registries: version 1.0. Stockholm: ECDC; 19 Sep 2022. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/covid-19-pilot-protocol-vaccine-effectiveness-study-using-health-data-registries
  • 6.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Protocol for a COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness study using health data registries. Stockholm: ECDC; 30 Jan 2023. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/protocol-covid-19-vaccine-effectiveness-study-using-health-data-registries
  • 7.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Case definition for COVID-19. Stockholm: ECDC; 31 May 2023. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-19/surveillance/case-definition
  • 8.Deeks J, Higgins J, Altman D. Analysing data and undertaking meta-analyses. In: Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page M, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4. Cochrane: 2023. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook
  • 9.Lin DY, Xu Y, Gu Y, Zeng D, Sunny SK, Moore Z. Durability of bivalent boosters against Omicron subvariants. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(19):1818-20. 10.1056/NEJMc2302462 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lau JJ, Cheng SMS, Leung K, Lee CK, Hachim A, Tsang LCH, et al. Real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron BA.2 variant in a SARS-CoV-2 infection-naive population. Nat Med. 2023;29(2):348-57. 10.1038/s41591-023-02219-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kirsebom FCM, Andrews N, Stowe J, Ramsay M, Lopez Bernal J. Duration of protection of ancestral-strain monovalent vaccines and effectiveness of bivalent BA.1 boosters against COVID-19 hospitalisation in England: a test-negative case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023;23(11):1235-43. 10.1016/S1473-3099(23)00365-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Andersson NW, Thiesson EM, Baum U, Pihlström N, Starrfelt J, Faksová K, et al. Comparative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4-5 and BA.1 mRNA booster vaccines among adults aged ≥50 years in Nordic countries: nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2023;382:e075286. 10.1136/bmj-2022-075286 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grewal R, Buchan SA, Nguyen L, Nasreen S, Austin PC, Brown KA, et al. Effectiveness of mRNA COVID-19 monovalent and bivalent vaccine booster doses against Omicron severe outcomes among adults aged ≥50 years in Ontario, Canada: a Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) Study. J Infect Dis. 2023:jiad419. 10.1093/infdis/jiad419 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tamura T, Ito J, Uriu K, Zahradnik J, Kida I, Anraku Y, et al. Virological characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 XBB variant derived from recombination of two Omicron subvariants. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):2800. 10.1038/s41467-023-38435-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Epidemiological update: COVID-19 transmission in the EU/EEA, SARS-CoV-2 variants, and public health considerations for Autumn 2023. Stockholm: ECDC; 7 Sep 2023. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/news-events/epidemiological-update-covid-19-transmission-eueea-sars-cov-2-variants-and-public
  • 16.Machado A, Kislaya I, Soares P, Magalhães S, Rodrigues AP, Franco R, et al. Bivalent mRNA vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 infections, hospitalisations and deaths in Portugal: a cohort study based on electronic health records, September 2022 to May 2023. medRxiv. 2023:2023.09.05.23295025. Preprint. http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2023.09.05.23295025 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1101/2023.09.05.23295025 [DOI]
  • 17.Fabiani M, Mateo-Urdiales A, Sacco C, Rota MC, Fotakis EA, Petrone D, et al. Relative effectiveness of bivalent Original/Omicron BA.4-5 mRNA vaccine in preventing severe COVID-19 in persons 60 years and above during SARS-CoV-2 Omicron XBB.1.5 and other XBB sublineages circulation, Italy, April to June 2023. Euro Surveill. 2023;28(32):2300397. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2023.28.32.2300397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lipsitch M. Challenges of vaccine effectiveness and waning studies. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(10):1631-3. 10.1093/cid/ciy773 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material

Articles from Eurosurveillance are provided here courtesy of European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control

RESOURCES