Abstract
Flickering light stimulation has emerged as a promising non-invasive neuromodulation strategy to alleviate neuropsychiatric disorders. However, the lack of a neurochemical underpinning has hampered its therapeutic development. Here, we demonstrate that light flickering triggered an immediate and sustained increase (up to 3 h after flickering) in extracellular adenosine levels in the primary visual cortex (V1) and other brain regions, as a function of light frequency and intensity, with maximal effects observed at 40 Hz frequency and 4000 lux. We uncovered cortical (glutamatergic and GABAergic) neurons, rather than astrocytes, as the cellular source, the intracellular adenosine generation from AMPK-associated energy metabolism pathways (but not SAM-transmethylation or salvage purine pathways), and adenosine efflux mediated by equilibrative nucleoside transporter-2 (ENT2) as the molecular pathway responsible for extracellular adenosine generation. Importantly, 40 Hz (but not 20 and 80 Hz) light flickering for 30 min enhanced non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) and REM sleep for 2–3 h in mice. This somnogenic effect was abolished by ablation of V1 (but not superior colliculus) neurons and by genetic deletion of the gene encoding ENT2 (but not ENT1), but recaptured by chemogenetic inhibition of V1 neurons and by focal infusion of adenosine into V1 in a dose-dependent manner. Lastly, 40 Hz light flickering for 30 min also promoted sleep in children with insomnia by decreasing sleep onset latency, increasing total sleep time, and reducing waking after sleep onset. Collectively, our findings establish the ENT2-mediated adenosine signaling in V1 as the neurochemical basis for 40 Hz flickering-induced sleep and unravel a novel and non-invasive treatment for insomnia, a condition that affects 20% of the world population.
Subject terms: Biological techniques, Molecular biology
Introduction
One of the most significant environmental factors affecting human physiology is light. As a non-invasive neuromodulation strategy, light stimulation has demonstrated potential for alleviating various pathological changes in animal models of depression,1,2 insomnia,3 and Alzheimer’s disease (AD).4 In particular, light flickering at 40 Hz is receiving increased attention for its ability to reverse pathological features of AD,4–6 ischemia,7 and traumatic brain injury8 in animals. The demonstration of gamma oscillation entrainment across multiple brain regions, including the hippocampus,5 and the reduction of amyloid loading with activated microglia and increased vascular densities and improvement of cognitive performance by combined visual and acoustic stimulation (GENUS) in AD mice,4,6 has led to the US FDA designating the 40 Hz flicker paradigm (GENUS equipment) as a “breakthrough device” in 2021 for further clinical investigation.9 Light flickering-induced neurochemical coupling mechanisms are the key to its therapeutic effect. Current research focuses on neural activity and oscillation induced by light, such as gamma oscillation entrainment,5,6,10 which is hypothesized to be a prerequisite, but not sufficient to account for the therapeutic effect. The neurochemical and molecular adaptations are critical determinants for the biological effects of 40 Hz light flickering as the treatment often requires more than 2 weeks to 2 months to achieve effective therapeutic benefits.4–6 40 Hz flickering reportedly alters neuroimmune signaling11,12 and neuromodulators such as acetylcholine,10 and gene expression profiles of many brain cell types5 were elevated following exposure. Yet, specific neurochemical basis for 40 Hz flickering effects remains undetermined, contributing to questions on variable effects of 40 Hz flickering.10 Thus, it is paramount to delineate the neurochemical mechanisms underlying 40 Hz light flickering to fully exploit its therapeutic potential.
Light flickering-triggered neural activity (e.g., spike activity or gamma oscillation) is especially energy demanding,12 requiring robust mitochondrial function and producing strong oxygen consumption with hemodynamic changes, as evidenced by blood oxygen level-dependent signals in the cortex.13,14 Given that adenosine is the main signaling molecule resulting from increased energy expenditure,15–17 we reasoned that light flickering-triggered neural activity represents a form of energy-demanding neural stimulation that leads to rapid adenosine generation. Extracellular adenosine, with its intrinsic link with energy metabolism, can simultaneously act as a modulator of neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity,18 and a homeostasis regulator of metabolism, motility, proliferation, and vasodilation.16,19 Therefore, we hypothesized that adenosine is crucial to the therapeutic effect observed with 40 Hz light flickering.
Among its multiple physiological and pathophysiological effects, adenosine is a well-known physiological regulator of homeostatic sleep requirements. Extracellular adenosine levels in the basal forebrain rise after prolonged wakefulness, resulting in increased sleep pressure.20–22 Adenosine’s somnogenic effect can be highlighted through the intracerebral or systemic administration of adenosine and its analogs or by pharmacological modulation of adenosine metabolism.23 Conversely, caffeine, the most widely consumed psychostimulant and a non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist, produces a strong arousal effect.22–24 Based on this reasoning, we propose that 40 Hz light flickering may be an effective somnogen by inducing an increase in cortical adenosine levels. The adenosine hypothesis of 40 Hz flickering may not only provide a neurochemical explanation for some observations that 40 Hz flickering produces drowsiness in AD patients9 and improves β-amyloid-induced sleep disturbance25 and rhythm disorder,26 but also offer a novel and non-invasive therapy for chronic insomnia, which affects 20% of the world population27 and up to 76% of these people with comorbidities.28
In this study, we established that cortical adenosine signaling is crucial for the biological effects of 40 Hz light flickering on sleep. We demonstrated here that light flickering triggered a rapid and sustained increase in extracellular adenosine levels in the visual cortex and other brain regions, which depended on the light flickering frequency, intensity, and wavelength. We identified cortical (glutamatergic and GABAergic) neurons as the cellular source and the intracellular adenosine generation from energy metabolism and adenosine efflux mediated by equilibrative nucleoside transporter-2 (ENT2, but not ENT1) as the molecular cascade responsible for extracellular adenosine generation by 40 Hz flickering. Furthermore, we uncovered that 40 Hz flickering induced somnogenic effect by modulating primary visual cortical (V1) activity via adenosine. Lastly, 40 Hz light flickering for 30 min promoted sleep onset and maintenance in mice and children with insomnia. Collectively, we have defined ENT2-mediated adenosine signaling in V1 as the neurochemical basis for 40 Hz flickering-induced sleep, and developed a novel and non-invasive treatment for insomnia with potentially wider therapeutic implications.
Results
40 Hz light flickering increases extracellular adenosine levels in frequency- and intensity-dependent manners in the visual cortex and other brain regions
To examine the role of extracellular adenosine in the biological effects of 40 Hz light flickering, we utilized a highly sensitive and selective G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-activation-based adenosine sensor (GRABAdo) to monitor changes in extracellular adenosine levels in response to 40 Hz light flickering.21 First, we injected an AAV expressing GRABAdo or a non-binding mutant of GRABAdo into the brains of mice at eight different brain regions that were activated (as indicated by c-Fos expression) by 40 Hz flickering,29 and inserted a multi-fiber probe to record the regional variations in extracellular adenosine levels induced by 40 Hz light flickering (Fig. 1a). We employed fiber photometry to assess fluorescence signals indicative of extracellular adenosine. Two weeks later after virus injections, after exposing mice to white light flickering (40 Hz, illuminance was 4000 lux or irradiance was 1.22 mW/cm2, 50% duty cycle) produced by a custom-made LED device4,30 (see below for characterization of light frequencies and intensities), we found there was a robust and sustained increase in extracellular adenosine levels in V1 and the superior colliculus (SC), with a ∆F/F of 20%–30% above the baseline. We also found a moderate increase in the basal forebrain (BF) and prefrontal cortex (mPFC) (∆F/F of 5%–10%), hippocampus (HPC), nucleus accumbens (NAc), and the ventral tegmental area (VTA) (∆F/F of 0%–5%), as depicted in Fig. 1b, c. The temporal features of adenosine elevation induced by 40 Hz flickering were similar across these brain regions, with little to no increase observed in the dorsomedial striatum (DMS) (Fig. 1b, c). In addition to the immediate surge in extracellular adenosine levels, we observed a substantial and delayed increase in adenosine levels in V1 after the cessation of 40 Hz light flickering (Fig. 1b). This increase reached its peak (with ∆F/F value up to 15%–20% higher than the baseline) at 30 min and lasted for up to 3 h before returning to the baseline levels (Fig. 1b). The specificity of this extracellular adenosine generation was validated by the absence of fluorescent signal increases in V1 neurons expressing the non-binding mutant of GRABAdo (Fig. 1b, black line).
Since V1 is likely the entrance route for the 40 Hz-induced biological effect with robust adenosine elevations, we further characterized the impact of different light frequencies (20, 40 and 80 Hz) and varying intensities of white light (1500, 3000, 4000, and 6000 lux) on extracellular adenosine production in V1 in response to light flickering (Fig. 1d). We found that the effect of light flickering on extracellular adenosine levels in the visual cortex was frequency-dependent: 40 Hz light flickering produced the maximum increase in extracellular adenosine levels that lasted the longest (2–3 h), while light flickering at 20 or 80 Hz resulted in discrete changes in extracellular adenosine levels in V1 (Fig. 1e, f). Thus, the frequency of light flickering plays a crucial role in determining the increase in extracellular adenosine levels in V1.
Moreover, we characterized the impact of varying intensities of white light (1500, 3000, 4000, and 6000 lux) on extracellular adenosine production and found that 40 Hz flickering at high light intensities (4000 and 6000 lux) induced robust (with a peak ∆F/F ~ 20%) and sustained (up to 3 h) increase of extracellular adenosine in V1 (Fig. 1g). By contrast, 40 Hz flickering at low intensities (<1500 lux) produced relatively moderate increase of extracellular adenosine with shorter duration (Fig. 1g, h). Thus, we have used 40 Hz frequency and 4000 lux (i.e., 1.22 mW/cm2 at 20 cm distance) for the rest of the experiment to analyze the impact of light flickering at the cellular and molecular levels. It should be noted that brief (30 min) light intensity is well tolerated within the safety limit in mice (5000 lux light within 10 h).2,31,32 Indeed, 40 Hz light flickering with 4000 lux (1.22 mW/cm2 at 20 cm distance, 30 min/day) for 30 min daily and continued for 14 days in mice did not affect the intraocular pressure (IOP) and retinal thickness (Supplementary information, Fig. S1g–i).
We sought to establish an electrophysiological correlation between extracellular adenosine generation and neural activity (as indicated by calcium signal) or gamma oscillation power (as detected by local field potential (LFP)) in response to light flickering at different frequencies before, during, and after the light flickering phase (30 min). Fiber optometry recording revealed a linear increase in calcium signals in V1 with increasing frequency. Specifically, light flickering at 10, 20, 40, and 80 Hz resulted in a linear rise in calcium signals in V1, with the strongest response observed at 80 Hz, producing the highest amplitude of the calcium peak (Fig. 1i, j). Furthermore, we found that felodipine (10 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection), a VGCC blocker, almost completely abolished the 40 Hz flickering-induced increase in extracellular adenosine levels compared to the vehicle group (Supplementary information, Fig. S2a, b). These results suggest that while neural activity (as indicated by calcium signal) is required for the induction of adenosine release, it does not correlate with the frequency specificity of light flickering. However, we found that the LFP oscillation was frequency-dependent, where each frequency of light flickering elicited specific LFP oscillation (Fig. 1k, l). Specifically, light flickering at 10, 20, and 40 Hz induced LFP oscillations distinctively at the alpha, theta, and gamma ranges, respectively. However, 80 Hz light flickering and direct current (DC) failed to induce oscillations at the gamma band (Fig. 1k, l). When comparing the LFP power in the flickering frequency, we found that the normalized power significantly increased at both 20 and 40 Hz compared to 10 Hz (40 Hz vs 10 Hz, P < 0.0001; 20 Hz vs 10 Hz, P = 0.0052) (Fig. 1l). Since gamma oscillation has been shown to be strongly correlated with a hemodynamic response (i.e., energy demand),13 and only 40 Hz light flickering induced LFP power increase in the gamma frequency, 40 Hz light flickering had the highest induced energy expenditure compared to the other frequencies.
Glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons are the main cellular source of light flickering-induced adenosine generation in V1
As adenosine can be released from both astrocytes and neurons,17,33 we investigated the cellular source responsible for the extracellular adenosine generation induced by 40 Hz light flickering in V1. First, we investigated the role of cortical neurons in extracellular adenosine generation induced by 40 Hz light flickering using AAV2/9-hSyn-taCaspase3-T2A-TEVp to induce selective neuronal apoptosis.21 We co-injected AAVs carrying glial-specific GfaABC1D-GRABAdo and neuron-specific hSyn-taCaspase3 into the visual cortex of one hemisphere and GfaABC1D-GRABAdo with hSyn-mCherry into the other hemisphere (Fig. 2a). Two weeks after achieving targeted expression, we confirmed the selective reduction in the number of neurons in V1 expressing hSyn-Caspase3 compared to the cortex expressing hSyn-mCherry using NeuN immunoreactivity (Fig. 2b). We found that in the hemisphere expressing mCherry, the extracellular adenosine levels gradually and progressively increased during 40 Hz light flickering and persisted for 150 min after the cessation of stimulation (Fig. 2c, d). Notably, the pattern of increased extracellular adenosine levels observed via GRABAdo expressed in astrocytes exhibited some dissimilarity compared to the pattern detected by GRABAdo expressed in neurons, indicating a subtle variation in local adenosine levels between neurons and astrocytes. Importantly, the visual cortex that expressed hSyn-Caspase3 did not exhibit any progressive rise in extracellular adenosine levels in response to 40 Hz light flickering. This suggests that V1 neurons are the primary cellular source of extracellular adenosine generation induced by 40 Hz light flickering.
We further dissected the specific contribution of glutamatergic neurons to extracellular adenosine generation by ablating glutamatergic neurons in the visual cortex. In vGluT2-CRE mice, we co-injected AAV2/9-EF1a-flex-taCaspase3 together with AAV2/9-hSyn-GRABAdo into one hemisphere (the visual cortex) and AAV2/9-EF1a-flex-mCherry together with AAV2/9-hSyn-GRABAdo into the other hemisphere (Fig. 2e). Two weeks after injection, we confirmed by vGluT2 immunofluorescence staining the selective reduction of vGluT2+ neurons in V1 expressing hSyn-Caspase3 compared to the cortex expressing hSyn-mCherry (Fig. 2f). In response to 40 Hz light flickering, V1 neurons expressing vGluT2-mCherry exhibited a substantial increase in extracellular adenosine levels (Fig. 2g, h). However, the ablation of glutamatergic neurons in V1 almost completely abolished the production of extracellular adenosine triggered by 40 Hz flickering, both during the initial and delayed phases, supporting the idea that glutamatergic neurons are an important cellular source of extracellular adenosine in response to 40 Hz light flickering.
We also determined the specific contribution of GABAergic neurons to extracellular adenosine generation by ablating GABAergic neurons in V1 via co-injecting AAV2/9-EF1a-flex-taCaspase3 and AAV2/9-mDIX-CRE together with hSyn-GRABAdo into one hemisphere and AAV2/9-EF1a-flex-mCherry and AAV2/9-mDIX-CRE together with hSyn-GRABAdo into the other hemisphere (Fig. 2i). Two weeks after the injections, we verified by GABA immunofluorescence staining the selective reduction of GABA neurons in the visual cortex expressing hSyn-Caspase3 compared to the cortex expressing hSyn-mCherry (Fig. 2j). We found that the hemisphere expressing AAV2/9-EF1a-flex-mCherry showed a robust and progressive elevation in extracellular adenosine upon exposure to 40 Hz flickering and lasted for 2.5 h after flickering cessation. In contrast, 40 Hz flickering-induced extracellular adenosine generation was largely attenuated in V1 expressing AAV2/9-EF1a-flex-taCaspase3 (Fig. 2k, l). Thus, GABAergic neurons are also a cellular source of extracellular adenosine in the visual cortex in response to 40 Hz light flickering. Gamma oscillation is conceptualized as an ability of excitatory neurons to generate spiking, which triggers synchronized activity of interconnected interneurons that feedback inhibit excitatory neurons to generate a transient silent period.34 When this inhibition declines, excitatory neurons spike again, leading to a new cycle of gamma. As both inhibitory and excitatory neurons are indispensable components of the local circuit network to generate gamma oscillation, lesioning of either inhibitory (GABA neurons) or excitatory (glutamatergic neurons) is expected to blunt rhythmic gamma oscillation and consequently adenosine generation. Overall, these data suggest that interactions between inhibition and excitation generate extracellular adenosine.
Lastly, we assessed the involvement of astrocytes in extracellular adenosine production induced by 40 Hz flickering by inhibiting astrocyte calcium signaling using hPMCA2w/b expression (Fig. 2m, n). We confirmed the selective expression of hPMCA2w/b in V1 astrocytes by immunohistochemistry, which showed its co-localization with GFAP immunoreactivity (Fig. 2n). We performed foot shock conditioning tasks to reveal that expression of AAV2/9-GfaABC1D-hPMCA2w/b in astrocytes partially suppressed astrocytic activation, as evidenced by a ~40% reduction in the calcium signal response in V1 compared to mice expressing AAV2/9-GfaABC1D-mCherry, which is consistent with a previous study (Supplementary information, Fig. S3a, b).35 We co-microinjected AAV2/9-GfaABC1D-hPMCA2w/b and GRABAdo into a single hemisphere of the visual cortex, while AAV2/9-GfaABC1D-mCherry and GRABAdo were injected into the other hemisphere. Two weeks after the injection, the increase in extracellular adenosine induced by 40 Hz flickering in V1 was not affected by the partial inhibition of astrocytic activity caused by hPMCA2w/b compared to the mCherry group (Fig. 2o, p), indicating that astrocytic activity does not play a crucial role in extracellular adenosine generation induced by light flickering. This result is consistent with a recent study showing that electric stimulation fails to induce adenosine release from astrocytes.36
The ENT2-mediated efflux of intracellular adenosine is the main source for 40 Hz flickering-induced extracellular adenosine generation in V1
We next aimed to identify the pathways responsible for the 40 Hz flickering-induced increase in extracellular adenosine that occurs after flickering stimulation cessation, distinguishing between extracellular and intracellular mechanisms. For extracellular adenosine production, 40 Hz flickering may trigger ATP release from neurons and astrocytes, followed by extracellular conversion to AMP and subsequently to adenosine via ecto-nucleotidases CD39 and CD73, respectively. We observed that extracellular adenosine levels in V1 of both wild-type (WT) and CD73-knockout (CD73-KO) mice displayed a largely similar delayed increase, peaking at 30 min and lasting for 3 h upon 40 Hz flickering stimulation (Fig. 3a–c). Thus, the extracellular formation of adenosine by ATP release (Supplementary information, Fig. S3c, d) and CD73-dependent conversion is not the primary source of the 40 Hz flickering-induced increase in extracellular adenosine in V1.
We next explored the contribution of intracellularly generated adenosine to the delayed and sustained rise of extracellular adenosine, which involves an augmented production of intracellular adenosine as a by-product of increased energy (intracellular ATP) consumption followed by an ENT1/2-mediated transmembrane efflux of adenosine. We first assessed the contribution of ENT1/2-mediated transmembrane transport of adenosine after 40 Hz flickering using the ENT inhibitor dipyridamole. We found that 40 Hz light flickering induced a robust and sustained increase (up to 2–3 h) in extracellular adenosine levels in V1 of mice treated with vehicle (0.5% methylcellulose), but this increase was almost completely abolished by pretreatment (30 min before light flickering) with dipyridamole (15 mg/kg) (Fig. 3d–f). Furthermore, when dipyridamole was administered immediately after stopping light flickering delivery, the increase in extracellular adenosine (after an initial increase during the flickering period) was largely prevented, indicating that the sustained increase in extracellular adenosine was also dependent on ENT activity (Supplementary information, Fig. S3e, f). On the other hand, 40 Hz light flickering increased the total amount of adenosine (~90% being intracellular adenosine), and the increase in the total amount of adenosine induced by 40 Hz flickering was not prevented by pretreatment with dipyridamole (Fig. 3g, h). Taken together, the observation that dipyridamole abolished the variation of extracellular adenosine levels but not the total (mainly intracellular) adenosine levels is in line with ENT-mediated adenosine efflux from the intracellular to the extracellular compartments.
The transmembrane transport of adenosine is mainly carried out by two different ENTs, with ENT1 having a relatively higher affinity and lower capacity for adenosine and ENT2 having a relatively lower affinity and higher capacity.37 We employed ENT1-KO and ENT2-KO mice36 to determine their individual contributions to 40 Hz flickering-induced extracellular adenosine generation in V1. As expected, 40 Hz flickering consistently produced a robust increase in extracellular adenosine levels in WT mice. In ENT1-KO mice, there was still a significant and sustained increase in extracellular adenosine levels in response to 40 Hz flashing, although slightly lower than that in WT mice at later time points (Fig. 3i–k). By contrast, the increase in extracellular adenosine generation during and after light flickering was almost completely abolished in ENT2-KO mice (Fig. 3l–n). These findings underscore the essential role of ENT2, rather than ENT1, in mediating the elevation of extracellular adenosine in the cortex induced by 40 Hz flickering, by promoting the transfer of adenosine from the intracellular to the extracellular compartment.
40 Hz flickering induces extracellular adenosine generation resulting from an AMPK-associated control of energy metabolism in V1
We further investigated the specific pathways responsible for intracellular adenosine generation in response to 40 Hz flickering, including stepwise ATP dephosphorylation, SAM-mediated transmethylation, salvage/de novo purine synthesis, and impaired adenosine metabolism via adenosine deaminase (ADA). We performed targeted UHPLC-MS/MS and qPCR analysis to specifically assess purine metabolites and the expression of key enzymes involved in purine intracellular metabolism (Fig. 4a). (a) Consistent with the cascade amplification of adenosine generation from stepwise ATP dephosphorylation driven by increased energy consumption, targeted UHPLC-MS/MS analysis revealed a rise in the total concentrations of adenosine, ADP, and AMP but without changes in ATP levels in V1 assessed 240 min after 40 Hz flickering stimulation (Fig. 4b–e). There were also no changes in the levels of cAMP and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) (Fig. 4f, g), indicating that these adenosine-generating pathways were not likely to contribute. (b) The targeted UHPLC-MS/MS analysis also revealed a decrease in inosine monophosphate (IMP) levels after 40 Hz flickering stimulation (Fig. 4h), suggesting that the salvage/de novo purine synthesis pathway was an unlikely contributor to the increased adenosine generation. (c) Intracellular adenosine can also be generated by the hydrolysis of S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) into adenosine and homocysteine (Hcy) via SAH hydrolase (SAHH) within the S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)-dependent transmethylation pathway.15–17 The targeted UHPLC-MS/MS analysis revealed no changes in SAM, SAH, or methionine (Met) associated with increased Hcy levels after 40 Hz flickering (Fig. 4i–l). Thus, it is unlikely that the increased generation of intracellular adenosine is due to the involvement of SAM-dependent transmethylation. (d) The UHPLC-MS/MS analysis showed elevated levels of inosine (Fig. 4m) and qPCR analysis revealed an increase in ADA mRNA, but not astrocytic adenosine kinase (ADK) mRNA (Fig. 4n, o), suggesting a compensatory increase in adenosine metabolism through deamination of adenosine to inosine via ADA (Fig. 4s) and not through phosphorylation of adenosine to AMP by ADK (Fig. 4s). This indicates that reduced adenosine metabolism is not a contributing factor to intracellular adenosine accumulation after 40 Hz flickering. Taken together, the UHPLC-MS/MS and qPCR analyses suggest that the increased intracellular adenosine generation induced by 40 Hz flickering is mainly associated with the stepwise ATP dephosphorylation for energy metabolism, rather than SAM-mediated transmethylation or SAH hydrolysis, or the salvage/de novo purine synthesis pathways, or the impaired adenosine metabolism via ADA (Fig. 4s). Altered energy metabolism with increased production of endogenous adenosine is critically dependent on AMPK, a key metabolic controller.38
To further confirm the involvement of increased energy metabolism in extracellular adenosine generation, we investigated the time (30 and 240 min after exposure) dependence of light flickering on phosphorylated AMPK by western blot analysis and AMPK mRNA by qPCR analysis in V1. After 40 Hz light flickering, we observed an increase in AMPK-α1 mRNA, but not AMPK-α2, in V1 at 240 min compared to control mice exposed to normal light (Fig. 4p, q). Similarly, 240 min after light flickering cessation, we observed a significant increase in phosphorylated AMPK in response to 40 Hz light flickering (Fig. 4r). Thus, the increased expression and phosphorylation of AMPK may contribute to the delayed and sustained increase in extracellular adenosine levels after light flickering.
Brief 40 Hz light flickering promotes sleep onset and maintenance without affecting slow-wave activity power in mice
To consolidate the adenosine hypothesis as the neurochemical basis for the biological effects of 40 Hz light flickering, we evaluated the effect of 40 Hz visual pulses on sleep, since adenosine is a well-known physiological regulator of homeostatic sleep needs. We investigated the effects of 40 Hz light flickering on sleep induction by delivering light stimuli at 10:00 AM (early light cycle) or 6:30 PM (the end of the light cycle) for 30 min and recorded EEG/EMG/locomotion for the next 12 h. On day 1, mice were exposed to normal light, and we recorded EEG/EMG/locomotion. On day 2, we exposed mice to 40 Hz light flickering early at 10:00 AM or 6:30 PM for 30 min and then recorded EEG/EMG/locomotion for the next 12 h (Fig. 5a, b; Supplementary information, Fig. S4a). By comparing the sleep duration on day 2 to that on day 1, we observed a significant increase in the sleep amount when we delivered 40 Hz flickering at 6:30 PM (Fig. 5c–g). However, 40 Hz light flickering at 10:00 AM was not effective probably due to a relatively higher sleep baseline during the light phase (Supplementary information, Fig. S4b, c). During the first 3 h of the dark phase, the previous 40 Hz flickering significantly increased the total duration of sleep by enhancing both slow-wave sleep (SWS) (Fig. 5d, e, increased by 2.3-fold, mean ± SEM from 11.18 ± 5.66 to 36.87 ± 3.338 min) and rapid-eye-movement sleep (REMS) (Fig. 5f, g, mean ± SEM from 0 ± 0 to 2.87 ± 0.76 min), compared to mice exposed to normal light. Moreover, we confirmed the frequency specificity of the somnogenic effect of light flickering by demonstrating that exposure to visual flashing at 20 or 80 Hz did not alter the sleep pattern (Fig. 5k–m). The detailed analysis of sleep amount at 30-min intervals revealed that the effect of light flickering frequency on sleep was not immediate but became evident and sustained for 2 h after flickering cessation (Fig. 5l). These findings are consistent with the frequency-specific effect on extracellular adenosine generation (Fig. 1e, f). The correspondence between the frequency-specific effect on extracellular adenosine production and sleep amount suggests that the sleep-promoting effect of 40 Hz flickering is due to increased extracellular adenosine signaling in the brain. Notably, there was no significant difference in the delta power density of wakefulness during light treatment (Fig. 5h), SWS during the dark phase and theta power density of REMS during the dark phase between mice exposed to normal light and those exposed to 40 Hz flickering, respectively (Fig. 5i, j). This observed lack of an impact of 40 Hz light flickering on SWS delta power density suggests that it may be a potential treatment for insomnia, as it promotes sleep without side effects of daytime fatigue and drowsiness.
The 40 Hz flickering-induced sleep-promoting effect requires ENT2 but not ENT1 activity
To further confirm the crucial role of extracellular adenosine signaling via ENT2 in mediating the sleep-promoting effect of 40 Hz flickering, we conducted sleep profile recordings (EEG and EMG) in mice deficient in either ENT1 or ENT2 after exposure to 40 Hz flickering for 30 min. In WT mice (ENT2-KO littermates), 40 Hz flickering stimulation increased SWS amount during the first 2 h by 1.1-fold (mean ± SEM from 11.77 ± 2.59 to 24.65 ± 4.49 min) (Fig. 6a–c). However, the sleep-inducing effect of 40 Hz light flashing was abolished in ENT2-KO mice and even lower than the normal light treatment, indicating that ENT2 is critical not only for mediating the sleep-inducing effect of 40 Hz light flickering but also for spontaneous sleep/wakefulness regulation (Fig. 6d–f). In contrast, 40 Hz flickering still significantly increased SWS in ENT1-KO mice, with the total amount of sleep increasing by 1.5-fold (mean ± SEM from 14.50 ± 5.08 to 31.43 ± 5.91 min) during the first 2 h (Fig. 6g–i), consistent with the lack of effect of ENT1-KO on extracellular adenosine levels. These findings support the conclusion that maintenance of extracellular adenosine activity via ENT2, but not ENT1, is required for the sleep-promoting effect of 40 Hz light flickering.
40 Hz light flickering promotes sleep via V1 adenosine signaling
To investigate the role of V1 in 40 Hz light flickering-induced sleep, we measured sleep after ablation of neurons in V1, and SC (which had a similar increase in adenosine after 40 Hz flicker light stimulus, Fig. 1b, c), by using AAV2/9-hSyn-taCaspase3 virus (Fig. 7a, b, f, g; Supplementary information, Fig. S7a–f). Pretreatment of 40 Hz light flickering in the last 30 min of light period failed to induce sleep in V1-neuron-ablated mice (Fig. 7d, e, normal light: 20.92 ± 2.78 min; 40 Hz flickering: 21.08 ± 3.20 min). However, in the SC-neuron-ablated mice 40 Hz light flickering only resulted in a non-significant increase of SWS (Fig. 7i, j, normal light:14.48 ± 3.53 min; 40 Hz flickering: 25.65 ± 3.60 min) in the first 2 h after dark onset. These data suggest that V1 is a key nucleus in mediating 40 Hz light flickering-induced sleep while SC’s involvement is relatively insignificant.
We hypothesize that the increased adenosine acts on A1 receptors (A1R, a Gi coupled GPCR), which is the predominant adenosine receptor subtype in V1 neurons to inhibit neural activities. We silenced V1 neurons using DREADD (designer receptors exclusively activated by designer drugs). Two weeks after AAV2/9-hSyn-hM4Di-mCherry injections into V1 to selectively express a modified human muscarinic receptor in neurons, vehicle or CNO (Clozapine N-oxide) at 1 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg were administered to mice by intraperitoneal injections (Fig. 7k, l; Supplementary information, Fig. S7 g, h). The time course and 2 h-amount of SWS of CNO injection at 1 mg/kg (35.58 ± 2.71 min) was similar to vehicle injection (30.79 ± 1.90 min) (Fig. 7m–o). The CNO at 3 mg/kg (43.62 ± 3.72 min) significantly increased SWS and REMS for 2 h after injections, indicating that reducing activity of V1 neurons has sleep-promoting effects (Fig. 7m–o; Supplementary information, Fig. S6a, b).
To confirm the sleep-promoting effects of adenosine on V1 neurons, we directly applied adenosine to V1. Injection cannulas were implanted for ten days (Fig. 7p, q), and adenosine (1.5 or 4.5 nmol/side) or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) was microinjected into V1 on days 11, 14, and 17 at 6:30 PM. We monitored the sleep patterns of the mice for the next 12 h, from 7:00 PM to 7:00 AM. The injection of adenosine at both doses resulted in a significant increase in the amount of SWS (ACSF group: 52.11 ± 5.11 min; adenosine 4.5 nmol/side: 96.24 ± 6.14 min; adenosine 1.5 nmol/side: 67.64 ± 3.18 min; mean ± SEM) during the first 3 h (Fig. 7r–t) with the higher adenosine dose producing more SWS (Fig. 7t). These data provide direct evidence that the local elevation of extracellular adenosine levels in V1 is sufficient to promote SWS and that the visual cortex plays a crucial role in mediating 40 Hz flickering-induced sleep via adenosine signaling.
40 Hz light flickering reduces sleep latency and wake time after sleep onset while increasing total sleep time (TST) and efficiency in children with insomnia
Finally, we conducted a self-controlled clinical study to assess the effectiveness of 40 Hz light flickering in promoting sleep onset and maintenance in 49 children with insomnia symptoms. The children admitted in this study had an average age of 9.63 ± 3.28 years and body-mass index (BMI) of 15.60 (14.70–18.00 kg/m2), both sexes balanced (44.90% female) (also see Table 1). This specific patient population was selected for its relatively milder insomnia and thus presumably sensitive to 40 Hz light flickering treatment. Because human sleep polysomnography (PSG) was generally monitored at night, we conducted this study by delivering 40 Hz light flickering at 8:30 PM for 30 min. We delivered light flickering stimulation by wearing the glasses with 40 Hz light flickering at 2000 lux for tolerability in children but still producing comparable light intensity (0.58 mW/cm2 at 2 cm distance). Indeed, this protocol did not affect IOP (Supplementary information, Fig. S1a), the choroidal vascular index, total choroidal area, luminal area, and retinal thickness of the adult volunteer eye (Supplementary information, Fig. S1b–f). No complaints of discomfort were recorded among participants (Supplementary information, Tables S1 and S2). The patients underwent sleep adjustment at the sleep center and their sleep parameters (including EEG and EMG) were monitored over two days. On the first day, sleep parameters were assessed for the patients’ baseline activities. On the second day of the study, the patients were exposed to 40 Hz light flickering for 30 min (8:30–9:00 PM) and their sleep parameters were recorded during the entire night (Fig. 8a, b). Analysis of the primary endpoint by comparing day 2 (40 Hz light flickering) with day 1 (baseline with normal light exposure) using PSG analysis revealed that 40 Hz light flickering significantly reduced sleep onset latency (SOL), which is the duration from light off to sleep onset (W = –767, P < 0.001), as depicted in Fig. 8c and Table 2. Furthermore, analysis of the secondary endpoints using PSG also showed that 40 Hz light flickering had a positive effect on TST (W = 905, P < 0.001, Fig. 8d and Table 2). Sleep efficiency (SE, total sleep time/total time in bed) was similarly enhanced by 40 Hz light flickering (W = 1055, P < 0.001, Fig. 8e and Table 2). Light flickering at 40 Hz reduced wake time after sleep onset (WASO, minutes of wake after sleep onset) (W = –924, P < 0.001, Fig. 8f and Table 2). We noted that 40 Hz light flickering had no significant effect on arousal frequency (AF, defined as the number of awakenings during the night; t(48) = 1.649, P = 0.106; Fig. 8g and Table 2). In addition, 40 Hz light flickering also shortened REM sleep onset latency (REM SOL, measured in minutes between sleep onset and the first epoch of REM sleep; t(48) = 4.521, P < 0.001, Fig. 8h and Table 2). Notably, the percentage of light sleep (Fig. 8i and Table 2) or deep sleep (Fig. 8j and Table 2) remained unchanged after 40 Hz light flickering (W = –322, P = 0.100; t(48) = 0.510, P = 0.612). We found that 40 Hz flickering increased REM sleep percentage (W = 447, P = 0.025, Fig. 8k). Taken together, 40 Hz light flickering for 30 min (between 8:30 PM and 9:00 PM) was found to enhance sleep onset and maintenance in children with insomnia.
Table 1.
Characteristics | |
---|---|
Age | 9.63 ± 3.28 years |
Female number | 22 (44.9% of all participants) |
BMI (kg/m2) | 15.60 (interquartile range is 3.30) |
Table 2.
Baseline (Day 1) | 40 Hz (Day 2) | P-value | |
---|---|---|---|
SOL (min) | 35.5 (16.3–66.8) | 16.5 (6.5–28.5) | <0.001*** |
TST (min) | 468.5 (411.0–494.0) | 532 (494.3–556.3) | <0.001*** |
SE (%) | 81.40 (74.7–86.5) | 90.4 (86.4–93.9) | <0.001*** |
WASO (min) | 57.50 (33.3–98.5) | 32(25.0–46.0) | <0.001*** |
AF (n) | 19.7 ± 1.1 | 21.5 ± 1.1 | 0.106 |
REM SOL (min) | 187.6 ± 10.21 | 138.7 ± 6.6 | <0.001*** |
Light sleep, N1 + N2 (%) | 66.7 (63.9–72.3) | 65.6 (61.9–69.8) | 0.100 |
Deep sleep, N3 (%) | 14.8 ± 0.9 | 14.4 ± 0.7 | 0.612 |
REM (%) | 18.5 (14.5–20.6) | 19.4 (16.6–21.5) | 0.025* |
n = 49. Data are presented as mean ± SEM or median (lower quartiles–upper quartiles).
N1 + N2 light sleep, N3 deep sleep.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Discussion
Our findings established cortical adenosine signaling as the neurochemical basis responsible for the sleep-inducing effects of 40 Hz light flickering. Our data describe a phenomenon of photo-electro-chemical coupling where 40 Hz light flickering triggered neural rhythmic fluctuations in LFPs, specifically in the gamma range. This energy-demanding process leads to heightened energy metabolism resulting in increased adenosine generation.15 The relationship between specific visual pattern stimulus selectively enhancing LFP oscillations in the gamma range is tightly linked to mitochondrial activity in the brain,12–14 accompanied by increased regional cerebral blood flow in healthy individuals.6,39,40 The observed changes in gamma oscillations and increase in extracellular adenosine levels occurred predominantly in the primary visual cortex. The increase in extracellular adenosine levels was induced by an increase in AMPK phosphorylation. AMPK is a key sensor and controller of cellular energy metabolism and a regulator of sleep quality.41,42 The intrinsic link between the high cellular metabolism imposed by gamma oscillation and adenosine generation, together with the multiple physiological effects of adenosine as a dual neuromodulator, and homeostasis regulator, uniquely position the adenosine signaling system to serve as the unique and pivotal neurochemical basis for the biological effects of 40 Hz light flickering. The present study also identified ENT2 as a key molecular regulator of the therapeutic effects of 40 Hz light flickering effect on sleep control since the genetic deletion of ENT2, but not ENT1, abolished the frequency-specific effects of light flickering on both extracellular adenosine generation and the induction and maintenance of sleep. The critical role of ENT2 in the generation of extracellular adenosine matches recent findings that neuronal activity-induced outflow of adenosine from neurons after high-frequency stimulation in the HPC is ENT-dependent.33,36,43 The greater importance of ENT2 compared to ENT1 may be attributed to its larger capacity to transport adenosine, with four times higher expression in neurons and astrocytes, allowing larger increases of extracellular adenosine levels in conditions such as light flickering.37,44
The present discovery that 40 Hz light flickering can specifically evoke an endogenous homeostatic regulatory mechanism operated by increased adenosine signaling, provides a novel, promising and non-invasive approach to insomnia treatment. Our experimental protocol delivered the 40 Hz light flickering during the end of the light cycle and recorded sleep 3 h during the dark cycle. Mice are nocturnal animals and hence, are more active during the dark cycle. We were able to measure an increase in time spent in SWS and REMS, demonstrating the effect of 40 Hz light flickering on sleep induction. Importantly, 40 Hz light flickering stimulation did not affect the ratio of deep to light sleep in children with insomnia, suggesting an improved SE without significant sleep rebound or side effects.20,45 This is further supported by the lack of effect on delta power density in mice. Our study found that the luminance intensity (4000 lux, 1.22 mW/cm2 at 20 cm distance in mice and 2000 lux, 0.58 mW/cm2 at 2 cm distance in humans), which is higher than that used in other 40 Hz studies (usually from 450–700 lux),4,46 is a critical factor to produce robust and sustained increase of adenosine level in the cortex. Our protocol of brief (30 min) light stimulus is well within the safety limit of 5000 lux light within 10 h3,31,32 and did not produce any alteration of retina structures and functions by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and blood assays in mice and humans. Our novel and non-invasive approach overcomes the bottleneck of adenosine drug-based therapies for insomnia with poor permeability of the central nervous system and adverse cardiovascular and liver effects.16,19
Traditionally, sleep-wake regulation is achieved by the subcortical (particularly, the brain stem and hypothalamus) network while the cortex is thought to be responsible for generating homeostatic sleep pressure and exerting top-down feedback connections to the subcortical region. However, this view has been challenged recently47–50 with the demonstration of the shared and structured global patterns of cortical activity50,51 and modulation of sleep state switch by optogenetic inhibition of the REM-like pattern in the mouse occipital cortex.50,51 Our analysis established the adenosine signaling in V1 neurons as the critical loci whereby 40 Hz light flickering promotes sleep. Our data showed that (i) specific lesioning of V1 (but not SC) neurons abolished the somnogenic effect of 40 Hz light flickering; (ii) chemogenetic inhibition (hM4Di-DREADD) of V1 neurons promotes sleep; (iii) the focal infusion of adenosine into V1 reproduces the somnogenic effects of 40 Hz light flickering. Notably, while adenosine control of spontaneous/physiological sleep is achieved by adenosine signal in the basal forebrain20 and involves relatively milder change of adenosine level (∆F/F = 2%–4%),21 pharmacological control of sleep-wake cycle by adenosine involves strong inhibition of V1 neurons by 40 Hz light flickering (with robust adenosine increase (∆F/F > 20%) or chemogenetic inhibition). Thus, while the visual cortex may be not involved significantly in spontaneous sleep/wake cycles,52,53 strong inhibition of V1 (via adenosine) is sufficient to break spontaneous routines and to trigger a switch between sleep/wakefulness vigilance stages. Whether V1 adenosine acts at adenosine A1 receptor to mediate the sleep-promoting effects of 40 Hz light flickering awaits for further investigation in future studies. Thus, adenosine signaling serves as a gateway for both physiological and pharmacological transitions from wakefulness to sleep by directly modulating activity in the BF and visual cortex respectively.
This identification of extracellular adenosine as the molecular and neurochemical underpinning of 40 Hz flickering fills the critical gap between bolstered neuronal activity (specifically gamma oscillation) and therapeutic effects in AD and ischemic pathologies such as beta-amyloid reduction and cognitive improvements that are controlled by the adenosine modulation system.18 For example, adenosine signaling can activate microglial cells4,5 and enhance vascularization in various tissues,6 including our recent demonstration that the A2A receptor controls microglial activation18,54 and retinal vascularization.55,56 The induction of adenosine signaling through 40 Hz flickering is expected to boost microglial activation and vascularization in the cortex, increasing the clearance of β-amyloid species and improving cognition in AD mice. Furthermore, the protective effect of light flickering at 30–50 Hz against ischemia-induced hippocampal neuronal death and disruption of hippocampal CA1 low gamma oscillations7 can be partially attributed to increased extracellular adenosine levels, which suppress excessive excitatory transmission by acting as a gatekeeper mechanism via the adenosine A1 receptor.18 Thus, this study reveals a novel and non-invasive treatment for insomnia with potentially wider therapeutic implications for other neuropsychiatric disorders, attributed to the dual roles of adenosine as both a neuromodulator and homeostatic regulator. Our current data show specific sleep-inducing and sleep maintenance effects of 40 Hz flickering light. Additional clinical studies with more insomnia patients including adult insomnia will be required to understand the effectiveness of 40 Hz flickering light in the treatment of insomnia. 40 Hz flickering light therapy has good potential for the treatment of jetlag where travelers across time zones will need to sleep at a time that is against their normal circadian rhythm.
Materials and methods
Animals
All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee and followed the guidelines for Animal Use in Research and Education at Wenzhou Medical University, China (NO. wydw2021-0563). C57BL/6 WT mice were purchased from institute-approved vendors (Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd.).
vGluT2-IRES-CRE mice JAX Strain (016963)57 and Nt5e (CD73) KO (CD73-KO) mice (JAX Strain 018986)58 were obtained from Jackson Laboratory. ENT1-KO mice, ENT2-KO mice,36 and GRABATP1.0 knock-in (GRABATP1.0-KI) mice were generated using CRISPR/Cas9 technology by Beijing Biocytogen and kindly provided by Dr. Yulong Li’s laboratory.36 The mice were housed in an enriched environment with ad libitum access to food and water under a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle. Mice with implants for EEG/EMG recording, optogenetic manipulation, and fiber photometry recording were housed individually.
Virus injection and cannula implantation
The mice were anesthetized with isoflurane and head-fixed in a stereotaxic apparatus (Kopf, USA) to expose the skull and drill a hole for injection and implantation. (i) A craniotomy was performed on top of V1 and a 0.5–1 mm-thick glass pipette was used to inject (20 nL/s) virus (0.2–0.4 µL) at the following coordinates (V1:AP: –3.6 mm, ML: ±2.4 mm, DV: –0.6 mm; SC:AP: –3.8 mm, ML: ±0.7 mm, DV: –1.2 mm; mPFC:AP: +1.96 mm, ML: ±0.36 mm, DV: –1.65 mm; HPC:AP: –2.4 mm, ML: ±1.70 mm, DV: –1.30 mm; DMS:AP: +1.2 mm, ML: ±1.25 mm, DV: –2.6 mm; BF:AP: +0.3 mm, ML: ±1.05 mm, DV: –4.75 mm; NAc:AP: +1.20 mm, ML: ±1.25 mm, DV: –3.9 mm; VTA:AP: −3.40 mm, ML: ±0.4 mm, DV: –4.0 mm) from the cortical surface using KDS LEGATO 130 (KD Scientific, China). The following AAV viruses were used in the current study: AAV2/9-hSyn-GRABAdo1.0 (titer ≥ 1 × 1013 vg/mL) and AAV2/9-GfaABC1D-GRABAdo1.0, which was a gift from Dr. Yulong Li’s laboratory.59 AAV2/9-hSyn-GRABAdo-mut (titer ≥ 1 × 1013 vg/mL), AAV2/9-EF1a-flex-taCaspase3-TEVp (titer ≥ 1 × 1013 vg/mL), AAV2/9-hSyn-taCaspase3-T2A-TEVp (titer ≥ 5 × 1012 vg/mL), AAV2/9-hSyn-CRE(titer ≥ 1 × 1013 vg/mL), AAV2/9-mDlX-CRE (titer ≥ 5 × 1012 vg/mL), AAV2/9-hSyn-tdTomato (titer ≥ 5 × 1012 vg/mL), AAV2/9-hSyn-DIO-mCherry (titer ≥ 5 × 1012 vg/mL), AAV2/9-hSyn-hM4Di-P2A-mCherry (titer ≥ 5.26 × 1012 vg/mL) and AAV2/9-GfaABC1D-hPMCA2w/b-mCherry (titer ≥ 5 × 1012 vg/mL) were produced by the viral production facility of the BrainVTA company (China). Viruses were stored at −80 °C freezer until the day of infusion. (ii) After viral injection, a 0.5–1 mm diameter craniotomy was performed to implant one or two optical fibers with FC ferrules (200 μm in diameter, NA 0.37) (Inper, China) into the above injection site (for optogenetic manipulation) or in (for fiber photometry recordings) the injection site, and the implants were fixed to the skull with dental cement. Mice with virus injections and implants were allowed to recover for at least 3 weeks before fiber photometry recordings or optogenetic manipulation experiments. Viral expression and the position of fiber implants in each mouse were confirmed histologically after the termination of the experiments. (iii) For EEG recording, four stainless steel screws were implanted, with two located over the primary motor cortex (∼2 mm anterior to the bregma and 1 mm lateral to the midline) and the other two over the parietal cortex (approximately 2 mm posterior to the bregma and 1 mm lateral to the midline). (iv) For EMG recording, two stainless steel wires were implanted in the neck muscle. After attaching both EEG and EMG electrodes to a head-mounted device (Cat# 2631, Bio-Signal Technologies, China), the assembly was secured with dental cement. (v) To inject adenosine through the implanted cannula, two 26-gauge stainless steel guide cannulas (Cat# 62003, RWD Life Science, China) were stereotaxically implanted into V1 at AP –3.6 mm, left-right ±2.4 mm from the bregma, and DV –0.5 mm from the skull top. Matched dummy cannulas (Cat# 62003, RWD Life Science, China) were inserted into the guide cannulas after surgery and removed only during microinjections. Microinjections of ACSF or adenosine solutions were performed using a tubing-nested 10-µL Hamilton syringe (Cat# 80365, Hamilton, USA). After all surgical procedures, mice were housed individually in clear acrylic cages under controlled temperature, humidity, and lighting conditions (12-h light/12-h dark schedule), with ad libitum access to food and water.
In vivo electrophysiology
Surgery
C57/BL6 mice aged 8–10 weeks were implanted with electrodes to record LFPs in V1. The surgical procedure, as previously described,60 involved anesthesia with isoflurane, head fixation in a stereotaxic apparatus (Kopf, USA), and exposing the skull. A cranial window (V1:AP: –3.6 mm, ML: ±2.4 mm, DV: –0.6 mm) was then prepared using a dental drill (RWD Life Science, China) on the left side for implantation. A 16-channel microwire array electrode (Cat# KD-MWA-16, Kedou, China) was inserted into V1 and grounded above the cerebellar hemispheres using two bone screws (Cat# 700-00122-00, RWD Life Science, China). The electrode was then secured in place with tissue glue (Cat#454, LOCTITE, Ireland) and dental cement (Cat# type II 2#, New Century Dental, China).
Recording
After a recovery period of 14 days following surgery, the mice were transferred to an electrophysiological recording chamber and allowed to acclimate for 20 min before recording began. When the experiment started, the mice were placed in a transparent and electromagnetically shielded box. Each mouse was connected to the recording system via Cereplex M (Cerebus, Blackrock Microsystems, USA), a 16-channel digitally programmable amplifier filtered (0.3 Hz–7.5 kHz), close to the animal’s head. The signals were sampled at 1000 Hz and refined with a low-pass filter at 250 Hz. The lamps generating different visual stimulation (DC, 10, 20, 40, and 80 Hz) were positioned face to face in front of the box. We isolated the stimulation and recording circuits to avoid any electromagnetic interference. We confirmed that there were no changes in the power of LFPs during visual stimulation in recordings from saline, dead mice (electrode implanted in V1), and negative contrast (electrode implanted in the primary motor cortex (M1)), which helped us exclude any potential photoelectric effect or other interference (data not shown). LFPs were initially recorded in V1 for 5 min under quiet and dark conditions, followed by 30 min of recording during visual stimulation with different frequencies (presented in random order for each mouse), and finally stopped after a 5-min post-stimulation period.
Analysis
The LFP data underwent a short-time Fourier transform with MATLAB R2020a and power within flickering frequency (specific frequency ±0.5 Hz) was calculated by integrating the power spectral density estimate using the rectangle method. We also normalized the LFP power within the flickering frequency to the max LFP power and normalized the adenosine level with a 40 Hz stimulus.
Light flickering stimulation
Light flickering stimulation was performed using a previously described method.4–6 Before the experiment began, the mice were placed in a PVC case, similar to their home cage but without bedding, and kept under dim lighting for 1 h. Two LED bulbs were positioned on the long side of the cage opposite each other and controlled by a single circuit-control relay in a dark room. White LEDs, which emit a combination of visible wavelengths ranging from 390 to 700 nm, were used to provide five types of stimulation (dark, light, 20, 40, and 80 Hz) for 30 min, with stimulation consisting of 12.5 ms light on and 12.5 ms light off and using 60 W. The LEDs used in the experiment had a correlated color temperature (CCT) of 4000 K and were operated at various intensities, ranging from 50 to 6000 lux, including 50, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, 4000, and 6000 lux. Before the onset of light, the irradiance was monitored by a dosimeter and the irradiance did not exceed ~1.5 mW/cm2 at the mouse position. Meanwhile, safety and tolerability assessments were performed continuously and illumination lasted a total of 30 min per day, applied for 14 contiguous days with 4000 lux (irradiance: 1.22 mW/cm2).
Preparation and administration of drugs
Dipyridamole was dissolved in a 0.5% methylcellulose solution at 1.5 mg/mL. CNO was dissolved in saline into the required concentrations. Felodipine was dissolved in 2% DMSO with normal saline and covered to avoid light exposure. Felodipine and the vehicle (2% DMSO in saline) were intraperitoneally injected at a dose of 10 mg/kg body weight before 40 Hz flickering exposure. To prepare the cannula microinjection solution, adenosine was dissolved in ACSF (126 mM NaCl, 26 mM NaHCO3, 10 mM glucose, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 2 mM MgCl2, and 2 mM CaCl2, pH 7.4) at the required doses (1.5 and 4.5 nmol/side) with an injection volume of 2 µL per side and injected slowly (~2 min) into the brain. All drug solutions were prepared approximately 30 min before injection. The injections were performed using a crossover design.
Fiber photometry recording and analysis
To record fluorescence from the calcium, adenosine, or ATP sensor, we attached an optical fiber (core diameter 220 μm, numerical aperture 0.37, Inper, China) to the implanted ferrule through a ceramic sleeve and recorded the emission fluorescence using a commercial fiber photometry system (Thinker Tech Nanjing Biotech Co., Ltd., China). The excitation light reached the V1 after passing through the fiber jumper (Thinker Tech Nanjing Biotech Co., Ltd., China) and ceramic insert core of the mouse head, thereby exciting the green fluorescence signal. To record fluorescence signals, the laser beam from a 488-nm laser (OBIS 488LS; Coherent) was reflected by a dichroic mirror (MD498; Thorlabs), focused by a 10× objective lens (NA = 0.3; Olympus) and then coupled to an optical commutator (Doric Lenses). Fiber recordings were performed on freely moving mice during flicker visual stimulation, and no data were excluded. The mice were connected to the fiber photometry recording system after being habituated in a transparent test cage and the signals were recorded for 900 s as a baseline before flicker visual stimulation. To determine the effect of V1 neurons during flicker visual stimulation, a 10-s on, 10-s off pattern was adopted following injection of gCAMP6s virus sensors.
The signal from each continuous experimental trial was normalized to the average fluorescence using a MATLAB program developed by Thinkertech. Briefly, the raw signals were first adjusted to account for photo-bleaching by considering the overall trend before further analysis. To examine the response intensity of adenosine or ATP to light flickering stimulation, we obtained fluorescence change values (ΔF/F) that were calculated as (F–F0)/(F0–Voffset), where the baseline fluorescence signal (F0) was the average signal over a 300-s control time window. Peri-event plots were generated to display ΔF/F values, using polynomials to correct the baseline. In addition, the multi-color single-channel recording system is used to verify the experimental results of the multi-channel fiber photometry system. We then measured the area under the curve of the ΔF/F plot to quantify the response of light flickering stimulation. Mean values are presented as a peri-event plot, and shaded areas represent standard errors of the mean SEM.
Polysomnographic recording and analysis
After at least one week of EEG/EMG implantation, the mice were housed individually in transparent barrels in a sound-proofed recording chamber with insulation and maintained on a 12-h light/12-h dark cycle with lights on at 7:00 AM. They were provided with ad libitum access to food and water. The mice were acclimated to the recording cable for at least 3 days before starting the recording process. The cortical EEG and EMG signals were amplified, filtered with a high-pass filter above 0.5 Hz and band-pass filtered between 5–45 Hz, digitalized at a 1000 Hz resolution using a tethered data acquisition system (Medusa, Bio-Signal Technologies, China), and synchronized with the infrared video. The power of the δ (0.5–4 Hz), θ (5–8 Hz), and α (9–14 Hz) bands, as well as δ band ratio and EMG/activity signal, were calculated and scored.50,61 For sleep behavior tests requiring light flickering treatment, light flickers of 20, 40, or 80 Hz at 4000 lux (illuminance, or irradiance was 1.22 mW/cm2, 50% duty cycle) were used. For sleep recording in the dark period, all light treatments were applied for 30 min just before the dark phase onset (the last 30 min in the light period), and animals were kept awake by introducing new nesting/food and hitting cage walls to ensure light perception. For sleep recording in the light period, all light treatments were applied for 30 min from the 3rd h after the light was on, and all animals were kept awake by introducing new nesting/food and hitting cage walls to ensure light perception.
The sleep stages in the recordings were scored by AI-driven software, Lunion Stage, developed by LunionData62 (https://www.luniondata.com/en/lunion_stage). The AI engine of Lunion Stage employs a convolutional neural network, which is a type of deep learning model. This model extracts spectrogram features from the EEG channel and movement features from the EMG channel. After being trained on manually labeled recordings by domain experts, the model’s accuracy is assessed on recordings from diverse sources, including different devices and subjects, and achieves an average accuracy exceeding 98%. The EEG/EMG data collected were analyzed in 4-s epochs, and three stages, namely slow-wave sleep, REMS, and wakefulness, were automatically recognized based on their spectral and waveform properties (Supplementary information, Fig. S5a–g).63 The scored results were examined and manual adjustments were made as needed. Based on the scored sleep stages, statistical analysis was performed on different vigilance states and groups.
Histology and immunohistochemistry
To verify viral expression and optical fiber placement, mice were deeply anesthetized and immediately perfused with 0.1 M PBS, followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). After being removed from the brain, the tissues were fixed overnight in 4% PFA and then dehydrated in a 30% sucrose solution. Brain samples were frozen in an embedding medium (Cat# NEG-50, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA), sectioned into 30-μm slices using a cryostat (HM525 NX, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA), and stored at –20 °C until further processing.
Brain sections were prepared for immunostaining by permeabilization with PBST (0.3% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 30 min, blocked with 2% normal goat serum or normal donkey serum for 1 h, and then incubated with a primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. The brain sections were washed in PBS before being incubated with a secondary antibody. Finally, brain sections were washed in PBS and mounted with mounting media. The following primary or secondary antibodies were used in the current study at the indicated dilutions: chicken anti-mCherry (Cat# ab205402, Abcam, 1:2000), rabbit anti-CRE (Cat# 69050–3, Novagen, 1:3000), rabbit anti-GFAP (Cat# ab7260, Abcam, 1:500), mouse anti-NeuN (Cat# ab77487, Abcam, 1:500), rabbit anti-GABA (Cat# PA5-32241, Invitrogen, 1:2000), guinea pig anti-vGluT2 (Cat# AB2251-1, Abcam, 1:200), donkey anti-chicken Alexa Flour 488 (Cat# A78948, Invitrogen, 1:1000), goat anti-guinea pig Alexa Fluor 647 (Cat# A21450, Invitrogen, 1:1000), donkey anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 594 (Cat# A21207, Invitrogen, 1:1000), and goat anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 647 (Cat# A21235, Invitrogen, 1:1000). The stained sections were visualized using either a confocal microscope (LSM900, Zeiss, Germany) or an epifluorescence microscope (DM6B, Leica, Germany).
To verify adenosine spreading after microinjection, 2 µL 1% fluorescein sodium (solved in ACSF) was injected into V1 using a tubing-nested 10-µL Hamilton syringe through the cannula, then after 1 h, mice were deeply anesthetized and immediately perfused with 0.1 M PBS, followed by 4% PFA. After being removed from the brain, the tissues were fixed overnight in 4% PFA and then dehydrated in a 30% sucrose solution. Brain samples were frozen in the embedding compound, sectioned into 40-μm slices using a cryostat (HM525 NX, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA), and stored at 4 °C until fluorescence scanning.
The quantification of NeuN was calculated by ImageJ. In brief, NeuN staining was visualized in Z-stack mode by confocal microscope. The mean fluorescence intensity in V1 was measured under the same signaling threshold and represented by mean gray value (signals divided by area) in ImageJ.
Targeted UHPLC-MS/MS
The mice were randomly assigned to one of three groups: the normal light group, the 30 min post-40 Hz flickering visual stimulation group, and the 240 min post-40 Hz flickering stimulation group. After flickering visual stimulation, the mice were sacrificed rapidly and the visual cortex was promptly collected, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at –80 °C until further analysis. To precipitate proteins from tissues, 200 μL of cold methanol:acetonitrile mixture (v:v = 1:1) was added, vortexed for 180 s, and the resulting supernatant was collected by centrifugation. The obtained supernatant was aliquoted into clean tubes, dried under N2 flow, and then re-dissolved in 100 μL of 1:1 (v:v) mixture of acetonitrile and water for subsequent UHPLC-MS/MS analysis.
A targeted assay was used to measure the levels of ATP, ADP, AMP, cAMP, IMP, Hcy, SAH, SAM, Met, inosine, and adenosine in V1 tissue. The analyses were conducted using a SHIMADZU CBM-30A Lite LC system together with an API 6500 Q-TRAP mass detector (AB SCIEX, USA), which was operated in ESI+ mode. To separate the molecules, a Kinetex C18 100A column (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 μm) was utilized.
Standard solutions of ATP, ADP, AMP, cAMP, IMP, Hcy, SAH, SAM, Met, inosine, and adenosine (Sigma-Aldrich, purity > 98%) were prepared at concentrations ranging from 1 to 1000 ng/mL and concentration calibration curves were established. Metabolite concentrations were determined using AB Sciex MultiQuant software (version 2.1, AB SCIEX, USA).
HPLC analysis of total tissue adenosine
The mice were randomly divided into four groups: normal light + vehicle, normal light + dipyridamole, 40 Hz flickering + vehicle, and 40 Hz flickering + dipyridamole. After the 30-min light flickering session, the mice were sacrificed by rapid decapitation, and the V1 area was dissected and stored at –80 °C until further analysis. To precipitate proteins from V1, a mixture of precooled adenosine inhibitors (500 μL of 1 mg/mL dipyridamole and 20 μL of 20 μg/mL EHNA) and acetonitrile in a 1:19 ratio (v:v) was added, and the sample was vortexed for 0.5 min and then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatant (100 µL) was injected into the HPLC system for analysis. Adenosine was separated by a Polaris 5 C18-A column (Agilent, 2.1 mm × 150 mm, 5 μm) at a temperature of 25 °C, with a detection wavelength of 258 nm. Isocratic elution was performed using a mobile phase consisting of 0.1% methanol, 0.1% (phase A), and 99.8% (phase B) at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The mobile phase B was prepared with 25 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate and adjusted to pH 7.0 using triethylamine.
Real-time qPCR analysis
To obtain V1 tissue, mice were first anesthetized with isoflurane. Then, V1 tissues were microscopically dissected from the brain and quickly transferred to TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA). RNA quantity and quality were assessed using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer. The reverse transcription process was carried out using a PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit (Vazyme, R323, China). The primers used for qRT-PCR included ENT1 (5′-CAGCCTCAGGACAGGTATAAGG-3′ and 5′-GTTTGTGAAATACTTGGTTGCGG-3′), ENT2 (5′-TCATTACCGCCATCCCGTACT-3′ and 5′-CCCAGTTGTTGAAGTTG AAAGTG-3′), ADA (5′-ACCCGCATTCAACAAACCCA-3′ and 5′-AGGGCGATGCCTC TCTTCT-3′), ADK (5′-AGAGTCGGTATTGAAAGTGGCT-3′ and 5′-CTAAAGCAA CTCACCGTCTCAT-3′), AMPKα1 (5′-GTCAAAGCCGACCCAATGATA-3′ and 5′-CGTACACGCAAATAATAGGGGTT-3′), AMPKα2 (5′-CAGGCCATAAAGTGGCAGTTA-3′ and 5′-AAAAGTCTGTCGGAGTGCTGA-3′), A1R (5′-GCCATCCCATTCGCCATCA-3′ and 5′-GCAATAGCCAAGAGGCTGAAGA-3′), A2AR (5′-GCCATCCCATTCGCCATCA-3′ and 5′-GCAATAGCCAAGAGGCTGAAGA-3′) and A2BR (5′-AGCTAGAGACGCAAGACGC-3′ and 5′-GTGGGGGTCTGTAATGCACT-3′). The expression levels of these genes were normalized based on the housekeeping gene β-actin. The SYBR Green fluorescence system was used for quantitative mRNA analysis with a StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR System (Life Technologies, USA), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Then, the mRNA expression level was determined using the ΔΔCt method, and β-actin was used as the calibrator gene. Target gene expression was determined as relative expression levels and each sample was analyzed at least in triplicates.
Western blot analysis
Primary visual cortices (V1) were quickly removed from euthanized C57BL/6J mice and stored at –80 °C. Tissues were lysed by sonication in ice-cold RIPA lysis buffer (Cat# P0013B, Beyotime, China) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Cat# B14001, Bimake, USA) and phosphatase inhibitors mix (Cat# B15001, Bimake, USA), kept for 30 min at 4 °C before centrifugation at 15,000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and the protein concentration was estimated using Enhanced BCA Protein Assay Kit (Cat# P0010S, Beyotime, China). Samples were diluted in 5× sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis buffer (Cat# P0015, Beyotime, China) and boiled at 95 °C for 10 min. Next, the samples were subjected to dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 10% gel. Anti-Phospho-AMPKα (1:1000, Cat#2535 S, Cell Signaling Technology), anti-AMPKα (1:1000, Cat# 2532S, Cell Signaling Technology), and anti-β-Actin (1:2000, Cat# 66009-1, Proteintech) antibodies were used to evaluate the relative amount of phospho-AMPKα.
The safety and tolerability assessment of 40 Hz flickering glass on healthy controls
Participant recruitment
We recruited 16 healthy controls at the first affiliated hospital of Wenzhou Medical University to assess the safety and tolerance of 40 Hz light flickering on August 20th, 2021. The following were the criteria for inclusion: (1) ages from 18 to 80; (2) BMI between 19 and 25 kg/m2; (3) >5 years of education; (4) voluntarily signing the informed consent. The following were the criteria for exclusion: (1) drug or alcohol abuse within 12 months; (2) unable to complete the questionnaire due to visual or hearing impairment; (3) refusal to sign informed consent. This study was agreed upon by the Medical Ethics Committee of Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (NO. 2021-130-K-99-01) and abided by the Declaration of Helsinki’s principles.
Procedures
This was a self-controlled study. Participants were admitted into the outpatient department and were measured for blood pressure and electrocardiogram (ECG). Venous blood was also obtained as the baseline. The 40 Hz intervention was carried out in a dimmed meeting room and participants wore flickering glass stimulating at 40 Hz for 30 min in the Department of Neurology of the first affiliated hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The 40 Hz flickering intensity was 2000 lux and 50% duty cycle (irradiance: 0.58 mW/cm2, CCT is 3800 K, Wenzhou Jiukuan Technology Co., Ltd., China). Participants were monitored during this 30 min-period and were forced to be awake and silent. Then these participants stopped the flicker and were reevaluated for blood pressure, ECG, and venous blood as post-flicker.
Blood sample evaluation and adverse event record
We evaluated the vein blood for hemoglobin, white blood cell counts, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase, creatinine, and other factors to detect the potential side effects of 40 Hz flicker such as hepatic or renal insufficiency. We also recorded the adverse events and the corresponding degree as well as the relevance to flicker.
IOP measure
IOP measurements of humans were obtained using the Optical Response Analyzer (Reichert Corp., USA) and have been described previously.64 In brief, both corneal-compensated and Goldman-correlated IOP measurements were collected. We used corneal-compensated IOP for this study since it is less affected by corneal thickness. The average of both eyes was used for downstream analysis.
OCT imaging
The swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) system (VG200S; SVision Imaging, China) contained an SS laser with a central wavelength of approximately 1050 nm and a scan rate of 200,000 A-scans per second. The system was equipped with an eye-tracking utility based on an integrated confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope to eliminate eye-motion artifacts. The axial resolution was 5 μm, and the lateral resolution was 13 μm. The scan depth was 3 mm. SS-OCT image was performed using a previously described method.65 Briefly, structural OCT of the retina macular was performed with 18-radian scan lines centered on the fovea area. Each scan line, generated by 2048 A-scan, was 12 mm long and separated from the adjacent lines by 10 °. Only horizontal scan images were used to analyze the thickness of the retina and choroidal. All analysis was performed by MATLAB R2017a which referenced these studies.66,67
The safety and tolerability assessment of 40 Hz flickering on mice
IOP measurements were performed using TonoLab rebound tonometry (Icare, Finland) in isoflurane-anesthetized (2.5% isoflurane and 0.8 L/min O2) mice as previously described.68 After 40 Hz light flickering (19:30–20:00), night-time IOPs were measured at the first stimulus for 30 min and last flicking at continuous for 14 days. An average of six individual readings was considered as one recording. The both eyes were used for downstream analysis.
Mice were anesthetized and pupils were dilated. 0.3% levofloxacin drop (Shenyang Sinqi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., China) was applied to the corneal surface. After the mouse was anesthetized, OCT scans were taken using an image-guided Spectralis OCT (Heidelberg, Germany). For the quantitative assessment of the retina reflectivity, we used the Freehand tool in ImageJ to delineate the retina thickness in OCT images and determine their mean intensity.
Clinical study on the effect of 40 Hz flicker on children with insomnia symptoms
Participant recruitment
The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of the School of Optometry and Ophthalmology and Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (No. 2022-130-K-99-01) before initiation and was carried out in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. This study was conducted between February 2022 and May 2023 at the Department of Pediatrics, Second Affiliated Hospital, and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Demographic data were collected from pediatricians, and any identifying information was eliminated to ensure anonymity. Data analysis was conducted by investigators blind to patients’ data and study design, and then interpreted by all authors. Potential participants and their parents were provided with detailed information regarding the purpose and procedures of the study (Chinese Clinical Trials. gov identifier: ChiCTR2300070938), and they were required to sign an informed consent form before participating (original copies are available upon request to the corresponding author). The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) children aged 4–16 years; (2) a diagnosis of insomnia for the first time according to the International Classification of Sleep Disorders, Third Edition (ICSD-III) without any prior treatment; (3) signed informed consent forms from both patients and their parents. The study’s exclusion criteria were: (1) a history of neurological, psychiatric, or sleep disorders; (2) caffeine abuse, or the use of psychotropic medications within the past 12 months.
Procedures
The study followed a self-controlled design, and PSG recordings were performed for two consecutive nights on all enrolled patients. On the first day, after habituation for at least half a day, baseline sleep parameters were measured. On day 2, patients underwent a 30-min session of 40 Hz light flickering using a flickering glass device with 2000 lux (irradiance: 0.58 mW/cm2; CCT: 3800 K, Wenzhou Jiukuan Technology Co., Ltd.) from 8:30 to 9:00 PM, and sleep parameters were recorded for the entire night. Demographic data, such as the participant’s name, gender, weight (kg), height (cm), and calculated BMI, were collected. Before the study began, all patients underwent extensive history recording, including presenting complaints and history of presenting complaints, and were given half a day to acclimate to the ward environment. Whole-night sleep recordings were obtained using PSG equipment (Embla s4500, USA). Airflow was evaluated using a nasal pressure and/or oronasal thermistor sensor, while heart rate and arterial blood oxygen saturation levels were monitored using a pulse oximeter (Nonin Medical Inc., USA) during night-time sleep. These parameters were obtained simultaneously and continuously throughout the night. Sleep stages were classified based on the 2012 Academy of Sleep Medicine manual guidelines.60
Outcomes
The primary objective was to evaluate the effects of 40 Hz flickering on sleep onset by measuring SOL (minutes from light off to sleep onset) with PSG and comparing it to baseline. The secondary outcomes were to assess improvement in sleep maintenance parameters such as TST (sleep period time minus the duration of intra-sleep awakenings), SE (total sleep time/total time in bed), WASO (minutes of wake after sleep onset), and AF (the number of nightly awakenings) compared to baseline. In addition to primary and secondary endpoints, this study also evaluated other sleep parameters including REM sleep onset latency (REM SOL, the time in minutes between sleep onset and the first epoch of REM sleep), percentage of light sleep (N1 + N2), and percentage of deep sleep (N3).
Statistical analysis
The analysts were blinded to interventions during the data analysis. GraphPad Prism 9.0 software (GraphPad Software) was utilized for statistical analysis. Data normality was checked using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. If the data were normally distributed, the mean ± SEM was used to express it, and a paired Student’s t-test was applied. Data that did not meet a normal distribution were reported as median (lower quartiles-upper quartiles) and analyzed with the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. For sleep time-course analysis, two-way ANOVA was performed and significance at each time point was evaluated by Student’s t-test.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank Drs. Shengtao Hou, Jianhong Zhu, Yuanguo Zhou, Weihong Song, and Shumin Duan for critical reading, discussion, and suggestions to improve the manuscript. We thank the Scientific Research Center of Wenzhou Medical University for their valuable consultation and provision of necessary instruments. This work was supported by the Science & Technology Initiative projects, the STI 2030-Major Project (2021ZD0203400 to J.-F.C.), the STI 2030-Major Project (2022ZD0208300 to Z.W.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82101556 to X.Z.; 82151308 to J.-F.C.; 31970948 and 31600859 to W.G.; 81971031 to Z.L.; 818700073 to X.C.; 81971064 to Y.Z.), the Research Fund for International Senior Scientists (82150710558 to J.-F.C.), the Key Research Project (2023C03079 to J.-F.C.) from Zhejiang Provincial Administration of Science & Technology, the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China grant (LQ22H090013 to X.Z.), the Start-up Fund (OJQDSP2022007 to J.-F.C.) from the Oujiang Laboratory (Zhejiang Lab for Regenerative Medicine, Vision and Brain Health) and the Program Project from the State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Optometry and Vision Science, Wenzhou Medical University (J01-20190101 to J.-F.C.).
Author contributions
Conceptualization: J.-F.C., Y.H., X.Z., T.X., Z.W., and Y.-L.L.; Methodology: X.Z., Y.H., and T.X.; Formal analysis: X.Z., Y.H., T.X., X.C., L.H., Y.L., Y.Z., X.X., H.S., Z.Y., Z.-W.L., L.S., T.F., and S.Z.; Investigation: J.-F.C., X.Z., Y.H., T.X., Y.-L.L., Z.Y., W.G., and Z.L.; Resources: Y.-L.L.., Z.W., Z.H., and J.Q.; Writing original draft: J.-F.C., Y.H., X.Z., and T.X.; Writing review & Editing: W.G., J.-F.C., Y.H., R.A.C, O.M., K.Z., X.Z., Y.-L.L., and T.X.; Visualization: Y.H., X.Z., T.X., and Y.L.; Supervision: J.-F.C.; Project administration: J.-F.C. and J.Q.; Funding acquisition: J.-F.C., X.Z., W.G., and Z.L.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
These authors contributed equally: Xuzhao Zhou, Yan He, Tao Xu, Zhaofa Wu.
Contributor Information
Kang Zhang, Email: kang.zhang@gmail.com.
Xiaohong Cai, Email: caixh839@sina.com.
Jia Qu, Email: jia.qu@163.com.
Jiang-Fan Chen, Email: chenjf555@gmail.com.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41422-023-00920-1.
References
- 1.Fernandez DC, et al. Light affects mood and learning through distinct retina-brain pathways. Cell. 2018;175:71–84.e18. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Huang L, et al. A visual circuit related to Habenula underlies the antidepressive effects of light therapy. Neuron. 2019;102:128–142.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Videnovic A, et al. Timed light therapy for sleep and daytime sleepiness associated with Parkinson disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74:411–418. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.5192. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Iaccarino HF, et al. Gamma frequency entrainment attenuates amyloid load and modifies microglia. Nature. 2016;540:230–235. doi: 10.1038/nature20587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Adaikkan C, et al. Gamma entrainment binds higher-order brain regions and offers neuroprotection. Neuron. 2019;102:929–943.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.04.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martorell AJ, et al. Multi-sensory gamma stimulation ameliorates Alzheimer’s-associated pathology and improves cognition. Cell. 2019;177:256–271.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zheng L, et al. Rhythmic light flicker rescues hippocampal low gamma and protects ischemic neurons by enhancing presynaptic plasticity. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:3012. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16826-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wang W, et al. Gamma frequency entrainment rescues cognitive impairment by decreasing postsynaptic transmission after traumatic brain injury. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2023;29:1142–1153. doi: 10.1111/cns.14096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chan D, et al. Gamma frequency sensory stimulation in mild probable Alzheimer’s dementia patients: results of feasibility and pilot studies. PLoS One. 2022;17:e0278412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Soula M, et al. Forty-hertz light stimulation does not entrain native gamma oscillations in Alzheimer’s disease model mice. Nat. Neurosci. 2023;26:570–578. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01270-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Garza KM, Zhang L, Borron B, Wood LB, Singer AC. Gamma visual stimulation induces a neuroimmune signaling profile distinct from acute neuroinflammation. J. Neurosci. 2020;40:1211–1225. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1511-19.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lord LD, Expert P, Huckins JF, Turkheimer FE. Cerebral energy metabolism and the brain’s functional network architecture: an integrative review. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33:1347–1354. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Niessing J, et al. Hemodynamic signals correlate tightly with synchronized gamma oscillations. Science. 2005;309:948–951. doi: 10.1126/science.1110948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Freeman RD, Li B. Neural-metabolic coupling in the central visual pathway. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2016;371:20150357. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2015.0357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Garcia-Gil M, Camici M, Allegrini S, Pesi R, Tozzi MG. Metabolic aspects of adenosine functions in the brain. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:672182. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.672182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Borea PA, Gessi S, Merighi S, Vincenzi F, Varani K. Pharmacology of Adenosine receptors: the state of the art. Physiol. Rev. 2018;98:1591–1625. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00049.2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Chu S, et al. Regulation of adenosine levels during cerebral ischemia. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2013;34:60–66. doi: 10.1038/aps.2012.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cunha RA. How does adenosine control neuronal dysfunction and neurodegeneration? J. Neurochem. 2016;139:1019–1055. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen JF, Eltzschig HK, Fredholm BB. Adenosine receptors as drug targets–what are the challenges? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2013;12:265–286. doi: 10.1038/nrd3955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Porkka-Heiskanen T, et al. Adenosine: a mediator of the sleep-inducing effects of prolonged wakefulness. Science. 1997;276:1265–1268. doi: 10.1126/science.276.5316.1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Peng W, et al. Regulation of sleep homeostasis mediator adenosine by basal forebrain glutamatergic neurons. Science. 2020;369:eabb0556. doi: 10.1126/science.abb0556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lazarus M, Chen JF, Huang ZL, Urade Y, Fredholm BB. Adenosine and sleep. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 2019;253:359–381. doi: 10.1007/164_2017_36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Reichert CF, Deboer T, Landolt HP. Adenosine, caffeine, and sleep-wake regulation: state of the science and perspectives. J. Sleep Res. 2022;31:e13597. doi: 10.1111/jsr.13597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Huang ZL, et al. Adenosine A2A, but not A1, receptors mediate the arousal effect of caffeine. Nat. Neurosci. 2005;8:858–859. doi: 10.1038/nn1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cimenser A, et al. Sensory-evoked 40-Hz Gamma oscillation improves sleep and daily living activities in Alzheimer’s disease patients. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2021;15:746859. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.746859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yao Y, et al. Non-invasive 40-Hz light flicker ameliorates Alzheimer’s-associated rhythm disorder via regulating central circadian clock in mice. Front. Physiol. 2020;11:294. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ancoli-Israel S, Roth T. Characteristics of insomnia in the United States: results of the 1991 National Sleep Foundation Survey. I. Sleep. 1999;22(Suppl. 2):S347–S353. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Katic B, et al. New approach for analyzing self-reporting of insomnia symptoms reveals a high rate of comorbid insomnia across a wide spectrum of chronic diseases. Sleep Med. 2015;16:1332–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tian T, Qin X, Wang Y, Shi Y, Yang X. 40 Hz Light flicker promotes learning and memory via long term depression in wild-type mice. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2021;84:983–993. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Singer AC, et al. Noninvasive 40-Hz light flicker to recruit microglia and reduce amyloid beta load. Nat. Protoc. 2018;13:1850–1868. doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0021-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhong X, et al. Fundus camera-delivered light-induced retinal degeneration in mice with the RPE65 Leu450Met variant is associated with oxidative stress and apoptosis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57:5558–5567. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wenzel A, Reme CE, Williams TP, Hafezi F, Grimm C. The Rpe65 Leu450Met variation increases retinal resistance against light-induced degeneration by slowing rhodopsin regeneration. J. Neurosci. 2001;21:53–58. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-01-00053.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wall MJ, Dale N. Neuronal transporter and astrocytic ATP exocytosis underlie activity-dependent adenosine release in the hippocampus. J. Physiol. 2013;591:3853–3871. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.253450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Antonoudiou P, Tan YL, Kontou G, Upton AL, Mann EO. Parvalbumin and somatostatin interneurons contribute to the generation of hippocampal gamma oscillations. J. Neurosci. 2020;40:7668–7687. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0261-20.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Yu X, et al. Reducing astrocyte calcium signaling in vivo alters striatal microcircuits and causes repetitive behavior. Neuron. 2018;99:1170–1187.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Wu Z, et al. Neuronal activity-induced, equilibrative nucleoside transporter-dependent, somatodendritic adenosine release revealed by a GRAB sensor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2023;120:e2212387120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2212387120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Chang CP, Wu KC, Lin CY, Chern Y. Emerging roles of dysregulated adenosine homeostasis in brain disorders with a specific focus on neurodegenerative diseases. J. Biomed. Sci. 2021;28:70. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00766-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Steinberg GR, Hardie DG. New insights into activation and function of the AMPK. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2023;24:255–272. doi: 10.1038/s41580-022-00547-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Adaikkan C, Tsai LH. Gamma entrainment: impact on neurocircuits, glia, and therapeutic opportunities. Trends Neurosci. 2020;43:24–41. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2019.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chan D, et al. Induction of specific brain oscillations may restore neural circuits and be used for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Intern. Med. 2021;290:993–1009. doi: 10.1111/joim.13329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Chikahisa S, Fujiki N, Kitaoka K, Shimizu N, Sei H. Central AMPK contributes to sleep homeostasis in mice. Neuropharmacology. 2009;57:369–374. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2009.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Zhou R, et al. A signalling pathway for transcriptional regulation of sleep amount in mice. Nature. 2022;612:519–527. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05510-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Lovatt D, et al. Neuronal adenosine release, and not astrocytic ATP release, mediates feedback inhibition of excitatory activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:6265–6270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120997109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Parkinson FE, et al. Molecular biology of nucleoside transporters and their distributions and functions in the brain. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2011;11:948–972. doi: 10.2174/156802611795347582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Korkutata M, et al. Enhancing endogenous adenosine A(2A) receptor signaling induces slow-wave sleep without affecting body temperature and cardiovascular function. Neuropharmacology. 2019;144:122–132. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.10.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang Y, et al. 40 Hz light flicker alters human brain electroencephalography microstates and complexity implicated in brain diseases. Front. Neurosci. 2021;15:777183. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.777183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hong J, Lozano DE, Beier KT, Chung S, Weber F. Prefrontal cortical regulation of REM sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 2023;26:1820–1832. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01398-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Tossell K, et al. Somatostatin neurons in prefrontal cortex initiate sleep-preparatory behavior and sleep via the preoptic and lateral hypothalamus. Nat. Neurosci. 2023;26:1805–1819. doi: 10.1038/s41593-023-01430-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Fan JM, et al. Cortical synchrony and information flow during transition from wakefulness to light non-rapid eye movement sleep. J. Neurosci. 2023;29:8157–8171. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0197-23.2023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dong Y, Li J, Zhou M, Du Y, Liu D. Cortical regulation of two-stage rapid eye movement sleep. Nat. Neurosci. 2022;25:1675–1682. doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01195-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wang Z, et al. REM sleep is associated with distinct global cortical dynamics and controlled by occipital cortex. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:6896. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34720-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Miller AM, Obermeyer WH, Behan M, Benca RM. The superior colliculus-pretectum mediates the direct effects of light on sleep. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:8957–8962. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Zhang Z, et al. Superior colliculus GABAergic neurons are essential for acute dark induction of wakefulness in mice. Curr. Biol. 2019;29:637–644.e633. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Dai SS, et al. Local glutamate level dictates adenosine A2A receptor regulation of neuroinflammation and traumatic brain injury. J. Neurosci. 2010;30:5802–5810. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0268-10.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Zhong DJ, et al. Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonism protects against hyperoxia-induced retinal vascular loss via cellular proliferation. FASEB J. 2021;35:e21842. doi: 10.1096/fj.202100414RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhou R, et al. Adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonists act at the hyperoxic phase to confer protection against retinopathy. Mol. Med. 2018;24:41. doi: 10.1186/s10020-018-0038-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Vong L, et al. Leptin action on GABAergic neurons prevents obesity and reduces inhibitory tone to POMC neurons. Neuron. 2011;71:142–154. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Augusto E, et al. Ecto-5′-Nucleotidase (CD73)-mediated formation of adenosine is critical for the striatal adenosine A2A receptor functions. J. Neurosci. 2013;33:11390–11399. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5817-12.2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wu, Z. et al. A GRAB sensor reveals activity-dependent non-vesicular somatodendritic adenosine release. bioRxiv10.1101/2020.05.04.075564 (2020).
- 60.Liu Y, et al. Non-invasive auditory and visual stimulation attenuates alpha-Synuclein deposition and improves motor and non-motor symptoms in PD mice. Exp. Neurol. 2023;364:114396. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2023.114396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shao C, Chen ZP, Yan C, Qian Y. 3D tracking of ferrous iron in the epileptic mouse brain and screening of iron homeostasis regulators with a two-photon fluorescent probe. STAR Protoc. 2022;3:101522. doi: 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhu J, et al. Effects of propofol and sevoflurane on social and anxiety-related behaviours in sleep-deprived rats. Br. J. Anaesth. 2023;131:531–541. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Chen M, et al. E4BP4 coordinates circadian control of cognition in delirium. Adv. Sci. 2022;9:e2200559. doi: 10.1002/advs.202200559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Gao XR, Chiariglione M, Arch AJ. Whole-exome sequencing study identifies rare variants and genes associated with intraocular pressure and glaucoma. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:7376. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-35188-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wu H, et al. Assessment of choroidal vascularity and choriocapillaris blood perfusion in anisomyopic adults by SS-OCT/OCTA. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2021;62:8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.62.1.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sonoda S, et al. Luminal and stromal areas of choroid determined by binarization method of optical coherence tomographic images. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2015;159:1123–1131.e1121. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2015.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Zhang Q, et al. A novel strategy for quantifying choriocapillaris flow voids using swept-source OCT angiography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59:203–211. doi: 10.1167/iovs.17-22953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Patel PD, et al. Impaired TRPV4-eNOS signaling in trabecular meshwork elevates intraocular pressure in glaucoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2021;118:e2022461118. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022461118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.