Skip to main content
Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine logoLink to Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine
. 2023 Oct 5;10(1):69–74. doi: 10.1002/cdt3.97

LDL‐C rebound after long‐term evolocumab treatment and intravascular imaging evidence in a familial hypercholesterolemia patient with early‐onset myocardial infarction

Zhifan Li 1, Shuang Zhang 1, Zheng Yin 1, Wenjia Zhang 1, Yonggang Sui 1, Jianjun Li 1, Kefei Dou 1, Jie Qian 1, Naqiong Wu 1,
PMCID: PMC10914014  PMID: 38450306

Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) have elevated low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) levels and are at high risk of premature cardiovascular disease. 1 Heterozygous FH (HeFH) is one of the commonest genetic disorders, and is more frequent among those with ischemic heart disease (IHD), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and premature IHD. 2 FH screening, followed by effective lipid‐lowering therapy (LLT) including proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor can slow or even reverse plaque progression and reduce risk. 3

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a promising intravascular approach in visualizing coronary plaque morphology, assessing disease progression, and monitoring response to treatments with high axial resolution (10–15 µm). 4 Several related clinical trials have demonstrated that statins alone or in combination with PCSK9 inhibitors produce regression of atherosclerosis. 5 , 6 , 7

Here, we presented a patient with premature IHD, who was a probable HeFH and received evolocumab (Repatha®) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We followed his clinical and laboratory results for over 3.5 years, and used OCT to monitor vascular response to PCSK9 inhibitor treatment.

A 34‐year‐old man with hyperlipidemia and hypertension self‐presented to the emergency department due to exertional chest pain for 3 days on November 23, 2019. His height, body weight, and body mass index were 170 cm, 95 kg, and 32.9 kg/m2, respectively. Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) was mildly elevated at 0.297 ng/mL, and electrocardiogram demonstrated ST‐T changes in I, aVL, II, III, aVF, V5–V9 leads, suggesting acute inferior, lateral, and posterior myocardial infarction. After medical stabilization, he underwent coronary angiography (CAG), revealing triple vessel disease (Figure 1) and received percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty to the left circumflex artery (LCX) with a stent on November 24, and another drug balloon dilation at posterior descending artery (PDA) on December 3. Standard postoperative treatment was given and the patient had no episodes of chest tightness accompanied by a regression of cTnI.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Coronary angiography suggestive of triple vessel disease. Eighty percent stenosis in the proximal segment of the left circumflex and occlusion in the distal segment of the criminal vessel, 70% stenosis in the proximal and middle segment of the left anterior descending branch, 90% stenosis in the proximal segment of the first diagonal branch (D1), 90% stenosis in the proximal segment of the posterior left ventricular branch, and 95% stenosis in the middle segment of the posterior descending artery.

Laboratory examinations showed that his LDL‐C and triglyceride (TG) levels were upper normal (Figure 2). Considering his LDL‐C level remained at 3.45 mmol/L after combined oral LLT (statin + ezetimibe), we estimated his baseline LDL‐C to be over 6.50 mmol/L. Besides, his father has a history of hyperlipidemia and PCI. According to the criteria of the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN), 8 the patient could be diagnosed as probable FH (his DLCN score = 8).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Variations of LDL‐C and other lipid profiles. apoA1 (g/L), apolipoprotein A1; apoB (g/L), apolipoprotein B; FFA (mmol/L), free fatty acid; HDL‐C (mmol/L), high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐C (mmol/L), low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; Lp(a) (mg/L), lipoprotein(a); sdLDL (mmol/L), small dense‐low density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC (mmol/L), total cholesterol; TG (mmol/L), triglyceride.

Based on early onset acute coronary syndromes (ACS) combined with multiple high‐risk conditions, the patient could be defined as very high‐risk ASCVD patient according to American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guideline, 9 and was managed with evolocumab, a PCSK9 monoclonal antibody, 140 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks on the basis of statin and ezetimibe therapy (rosuvastatin 10 mg qn + ezetimibe 10 mg qd). The above LLT lowered his LDL‐C levels by 42%–50% in the first year, which maintained at 1.74–1.99 mmol/L (Figure 2). Similar to the changes in LDL‐C, his total cholesterol, TG, and apolipoprotein B also decreased by about 50%. High‐density lipoprotein cholesterol increased slightly (from 0.75 mmol/L to about 1 mmol/L), while lipoprotein(a) decreased in the first month, then increased to more than double in the next 3 months, and then decreased to slightly above baseline levels (Figure 2).

On November 10, 2020, the patient was admitted for a 1‐year re‐examination. He reported no recurrent symptoms and normal in physical and laboratory examinations. CAG showed that the original LCX artery stent was patent, and there was no restenosis at the drug balloon treatment site of PDA artery. The left anterior descending artery (LAD) stenosis did not progress, and a drug balloon dilation was performed in the middle segment of the LAD. Meanwhile, OCT was performed to view proximal segment of LAD, suggesting dissection, but not involving the middle membrane (Figure 3A). Due to fluctuations in LDL‐C levels with evolocumab 140 mg biweekly and LDL‐C levels not meeting the guideline recommendations for very high‐risk patients, the patient's physician adjusted the dose of evolocumab to 140 mg subcutaneously every 10 days. For the next 3 months, his LDL‐C levels decreased by 57%–60% from baseline, maintained at 1.39–1.54 mmol/L (Figure 2).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Comparison of OCT results of the patient. (A) The first OCT was performed in the proximal segment of LAD as a reference, suggesting dissection but not involving the middle membrane. (B) After 1 year, OCT showed that the MLA was slightly smaller than the baseline (1.86 vs. 1.94 mm2), but a satisfactory lumen enlargement in the non‐MLA sites, from 4.59 to 5.83 mm2. The attenuation of macrophages was significantly weaker, and the accumulated angle was also reduced. These results suggested a trend of thickening of the fibrous cap and a change in the nature of the plaque from a lipid plaque to a fibrous plaque. LAD, left anterior descending branch; MLA, minimum lumen area; OCT, optical coherence tomography.

When the patient was hospitalized for a 2‐year thorough examination on November 8, 2021, CAG showed no progression in stenosis and OCT showed a trend of thickening of the fibrous cap and a shift in plaque properties from lipid to fibrous (Figure 3B). However, his LDL level rebounded to 2.30 mmol/L. In March 2022, the patient consulted for lipid‐lowering and weight loss, which increased from 88 to 98 kg in the past year. He reported no changes in his lifestyle or medication use other than an increase in dietary intake. We adjusted evolocumab to 420 mg once a month (three injections at a time) according to guidelines for FH patients, and advised the patient to lose weight and inject liraglutide (a glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonist) regularly. After 2 months, the patient lost 5 kg of weight, and LDL‐C decreased from 2.79 to 2.05 mmol/L, which had further reduced to 1.82 mmol/L in August 2022 (Figure 2). In December, the patient reported that his appetite increased greatly and his weight gained after recovery from SARS‐CoV‐2 Omicron infection. His LDL‐C level raised up again and maintained at about 2.35 mmol/L in recent 8 months (Figure 2).

Hypercholesterolemia is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. Intensive LLT can significantly reduce the risk of ASCVD morbidity and mortality, especially in patients with high baseline LDL‐C levels. 10 FH patients are more likely to develop atherosclerosis and early‐onset cardiovascular events due to inadequate LLT. 11 Numerous studies have shown dose‐dependent associations between LDL‐C levels and the risk of cardiovascular events and recurrence, and that lowering LDL‐C reduces the risk of major cardiovascular events. 12 Currently, several guidelines for lipid management recommend population risk stratification and appropriate lipid‐lowering targets. 9 , 13 , 14 , 15 For secondary prevention, if LDL‐C remained ≥70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) after treatment with the maximum tolerated dose of statin plus ezetimibe, PCSK9 inhibitors may be considered. 9

PCSK9 is mainly synthetized in the liver and plays an important role in cholesterol metabolism by inhibiting low‐density lipoprotein receptors (LDLR) recycling. 16 It is also intertwined with endothelial cell apoptosis, autophagy, platelet activation and aggregation, reduction of vascular stability, and local inflammation of atherosclerosis. 17 , 18 PCSK9 inhibitors can increase the expression of LDLR on the surface of hepatic cells with the resultant decrease in plasma LDL‐C, thus reducing the incidence of ASCVD events. 19 Considering that this ACS patient had received statin and ezetimibe, LDL‐C targets were still not reached, so we added PCSK9 inhibitor early in his hospital stay to improve the lipid‐lowering efficacy. It is worth mentioning that evolocumab (Repatha®) is the first PCSK9 inhibitor approved for marketing in China, and was approved for a wider range of indications including pre‐existing ASCVD and HeFH on November 22, 2019. Therefore, this patient is one of the first local patients to receive evolocumab and has been using it continuously for more than 3.5 years.

OCT is a high‐resolution intravascular imaging technique that provides accurate values of diseased vessels, identifies plaque pathology, and helps to accurately determine lesions, assess stent effectiveness, and detect plaque healing for clinical benefit. 5 The recently published HUYGENS study demonstrated that early combination of intensive LLT with evolocumab for 1 year after ACS significantly increased the minimum fibrous cap thickness and reduced the maximum lipid arc and macrophage index in vulnerable plaques in coronary arteries. 7 This suggests that we may consider early initiation of the combination therapy with evolocumab in very high‐risk patients. Excitingly, OCT confirmed that our patient's plaques turned stable.

Notably, the patient showed LDL‐C rebound after receiving evolocumab. The first thing to consider was whether he developed resistance to PCSK9 monoclonal antibody. In the Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events, LDL‐C reduction was attenuated over time due to the presence of antibodies for another PCSK9 inhibitor “bococizumab.” 20 Neutralizing antibody assay was not performed in this case due to limited conditions, and current studies did not find any resistance to evolocumab. 21 Besides, the recent FOURIER‐Open‐label‐extension study showed a strong and sustained reduction in LDL‐C for up to 8.4 years after using evolocumab, with no neutralizing antibodies detected. 22

Additionally, the patient gained weight after 1.5 years of medication. After weight loss, LDL‐C decreased again by maintaining the same dose of evolocumab (420 mg monthly), suggesting that evolocumab still has a good lipid‐lowering effect. However, the patient's weight regained after Omicron infection, and his LDL‐C level also rebounded despite the maximum dose of evolocumab (420 mg ih qm). The China Health and Nutrition Survey showed that adults with higher dietary cholesterol intake had higher odds of hypercholesterolemia, and energy intake from animal protein was positively associated with LDL‐C. 23 , 24

Thus, obesity and unhealthy eating habits may be important causes of lipid fluctuations. We recommended the patient to a lifestyle specialty clinic, hoping that a professional lifestyle intervention with dietary control and significant weight loss will enable the patient to achieve optimal LDL‐C reduction with evolocumab. This also suggests us that patient health education and lifestyle improvement are still important for lipid management at a time when more potent lipid‐lowering medications are available.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conception/design, manuscript review: Naqiong Wu. Provision of study materials, supervision: Naqiong Wu, Wenjia Zhang, Yonggang Sui, Jianjun Li, Kefei Dou, Jie Qian. Collection and/or assembly of data, manuscript preparation: Shuang Zhang, Zheng Yin, and Zhifan Li. Data analysis, visualization, interpretation, and manuscript writing: Zhifan Li. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ETHICS STATEMENT

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Fuwai Hospital. The authors certify that they have obtained patient consent forms.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors would like to thank the patient for his cooperation. This work was supported by the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2021‐I2M‐1‐008).

Li Z, Zhang S, Yin Z, et al. LDL‐C rebound after long‐term evolocumab treatment and intravascular imaging evidence in a familial hypercholesterolemia patient with early‐onset myocardial infarction. Chronic Dis Transl Med. 2024;10:69‐74. 10.1002/cdt3.97

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Santos RD, Gidding SS, Hegele RA, et al. Defining severe familial hypercholesterolaemia and the implications for clinical management: a consensus statement from the International Atherosclerosis Society severe familial hypercholesterolemia panel. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4:850‐861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Beheshti SO, Madsen CM, Varbo A, Nordestgaard BG. Worldwide prevalence of familial hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:2553‐2566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Raal FJ, Hovingh GK, Catapano AL. Familial hypercholesterolemia treatments: guidelines and new therapies. Atherosclerosis. 2018;277:483‐492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Maehara A, Matsumura M, Ali ZA, Mintz GS, Stone GW. IVUS‐guided versus OCT‐guided coronary stent implantation. JACC Cardiovasc Imag. 2017;10:1487‐1503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Araki M, Park SJ, Dauerman HL, et al. Optical coherence tomography in coronary atherosclerosis assessment and intervention. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022;19:684‐703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Nicholls SJ, Puri R, Anderson T, et al. Effect of evolocumab on progression of coronary disease in statin‐treated patients: the GLAGOV randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;316:2373‐2384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Nicholls SJ, Kataoka Y, Nissen SE, et al. Effect of evolocumab on coronary plaque phenotype and burden in statin‐treated patients following myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Imag. 2022;15(7):1308‐1321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Nordestgaard BG, Chapman MJ, Humphries SE, et al. Familial hypercholesterolaemia is underdiagnosed and undertreated in the general population: guidance for clinicians to prevent coronary heart disease: consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:3478‐3490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139:e1082‐e1143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Navarese EP, Robinson JG, Kowalewski M, et al. Association between baseline LDL‐C level and total and cardiovascular mortality after LDL‐C lowering: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. JAMA. 2018;319:1566‐1579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Atherosclerosis and Coronary Heart Disease Group of the Chinese Society of Cardiology of Chinese Medical Association; Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology . Chinese expert consensus on screeningdiagnosis and treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia (in Chinese). Chin J Cardiol. 2018;46:99‐103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ference BA, Ginsberg HN, Graham I, et al. Low‐density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. 1. Evidence from genetic, epidemiologic, and clinical studies. A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2459‐2472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Atherosclerosis and Coronary Heart Disease Working Group of Chinese Society of Cardiology; Editorial Board of Chinese Journal of Cardiology . Chinese expert consensus on lipid management of very high‐risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease patients (in Chinese). Chin J Cardiol. 2020;48:280‐286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Jellinger PS, Handelsman Y, Rosenblit PD, et al. American Association of clinical endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology guidelines for management of dyslipidemia and prevention of cardiovascular disease. Endocr Pract. 2017;23:1‐87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:111‐188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Stoekenbroek RM, Lambert G, Cariou B, Hovingh GK. Inhibiting PCSK9—biology beyond LDL control. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018;15:52‐62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Ding Z, Pothineni NVK, Goel A, Lüscher TF, Mehta JL. PCSK9 and inflammation: role of shear stress, pro‐inflammatory cytokines, and LOX‐1. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116:908‐915. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Qi Z, Hu L, Zhang J, et al. PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9) enhances platelet activation, thrombosis, and myocardial infarct expansion by binding to platelet CD36. Circulation. 2021;143:45‐61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Sabatine MS. PCSK9 inhibitors: clinical evidence and implementation. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16:155‐165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ridker PM, Tardif JC, Amarenco P, et al. Lipid‐reduction variability and antidrug‐antibody formation with bococizumab. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1517‐1526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Toth PP, Descamps O, Genest J, et al. Pooled safety analysis of evolocumab in over 6000 patients from double‐blind and open‐label extension studies. Circulation. 2017;135:1819‐1831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. O'Donoghue ML, Giugliano RP, Wiviott SD, et al. Long‐term evolocumab in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2022;146:1109‐1119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Huang Q, Jiang H, Zhang B, et al. Threshold‐effect Association of dietary cholesterol intake with dyslipidemia in Chinese adults: results from the China Health and Nutrition Survey in 2015. Nutrients. 2019;11:2885. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Meng S, Cui Z, Li M, et al. Associations between dietary animal and plant protein intake and cardiometabolic risk factors‐A cross‐sectional study in China Health and Nutrition Survey. Nutrients. 2021;13:336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Chronic Diseases and Translational Medicine are provided here courtesy of Chinese Medical Association

RESOURCES