Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 7.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Immunol. 2023 Oct 19;54(1):e2250274. doi: 10.1002/eji.202250274

System failure: Systemic inflammation following spinal cord injury

Damon J DiSabato 1,2,3, Christina M Marion 1,2,3, Katherine A Mifflin 1,2,3, Anthony N Alfredo 1, Kyleigh A Rodgers 1, Kristina A Kigerl 1,2,3, Phillip G Popovich 1,2,3, Dana M McTigue 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC10919103  NIHMSID: NIHMS1968585  PMID: 37822141

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) affects hundreds of thousands of people in the United States, and while some effects of the injury are broadly recognized (deficits to locomotion, fine motor control, and quality of life), the systemic consequences of SCI are less well-known. The spinal cord regulates systemic immunological and visceral functions; this control is often disrupted by the injury, resulting in viscera including the gut, spleen, liver, bone marrow, and kidneys experiencing local tissue inflammation and physiological dysfunction. The extent of pathology depends on the injury level, severity, and time post-injury. In this review, we describe immunological and metabolic consequences of SCI across several organs. Since infection and metabolic disorders are primary reasons for reduced lifespan after SCI, it is imperative that research continues to focus on these deleterious aspects of SCI to improve life span and quality of life for individuals with SCI.

Keywords: Spinal cord injury, Inflammation, Lungs, Bone marrow, Liver, Bladder, Gut, Adipose tissue

Introduction

Spinal cord injury (SCI) typically results from trauma or falls, and can strike people of all ages and backgrounds. SCI is commonly viewed as a problem of motor control and sensory loss, resulting in at least partial paralysis. However, those with lived SCI experience have called for more attention into major concurrent issues, such as the increased risk of infections, bladder dysfunction, and predisposition to obesity, diabetes, and liver disease [1]. This review highlights work showing that SCI drives systemic immune dysregulation across the body, negatively impacting major organ systems and general homeostatic mechanisms such as metabolic function and hematopoiesis.

The immune response to injury within the spinal cord itself is well characterized. Primary mechanical damage triggers a secondary cellular response largely orchestrated by resident CNS microglia [24]. Beyond promoting repair by clearing cellular and myelin debris after injury, microglia begin a signaling cascade that recruits monocyte-derived macrophages and contributes to subsequent scar formation around the lesion [3, 57, 8, 9]. The glial scar largely consists of astrocytes and serves to wall off the hemorrhagic lesion from spared tissue. NG2+ glia also interdigitate within the glial scar and regulate the density of the astrocytic border [10]. Within the lesion core, fibroblasts are recruited with pericytes and extracellular matrix proteins to form a dense fibrotic scar in mice [1114]. The glial and fibrotic scars are recognized to have dual roles after SCI; on one hand they prevent lesion spread and additional neural degeneration, but they are also thought to reduce long-term axon regrowth [15, 16].

In addition to triggering long-lasting intraspinal inflammation, SCI causes systemic immune dysregulation throughout the body. This is because organs innervated below the injury lose regulatory feedback from the sympathetic nervous system (SNS). More specifically, SCI results in the loss of descending inhibitory control from the brain on preganglionic sympathetic neurons below the lesion, leading to dysregulated and enhanced efferent signaling which modulates immune system throughout the body [17, 18]. For instance, as outlined in Fig. 1, the lungs are partially innervated by sympathetic nerves originating at thoracic levels T1–T4 [19]. Nerves from T5–T9 synapse on post-ganglionic neurons within the celiac ganglion, which then project to the liver, gallbladder, stomach, pancreas, spleen, and duodenum. The kidneys and adrenal glands are innervated between T10–T12 via the aorticorenal ganglion. Nerves emerging between lumbar levels L1 and L2 synapse within the superior mesenteric ganglion to innervate the large and remaining small intestine, whereas L2 fibers passing through the inferior mesenteric ganglion innervate the descending and sigmoid colon, rectum, bladder, and reproductive organs. Parasympathetic control of these organs mostly derives from the vagus nerve, but parasympathetic input to the distal colon and bladder originates in the sacral spinal cord. Nearly all SCI result in some loss of autonomic control below the level of injury. Since cervical injuries occur most frequently, the potential for all these organs to be affected is high. This permanent autonomic dysregulation causes systemic immune and metabolic dysfunction.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Sympathetic innervation of organ systems. Spinal cord injury (SCI) results in a loss of descending inhibitory control over the sympathetic nervous system. The organ systems affected by injury-induced sympathetic overdrive depend on the level of injury, with the most common injuries sustained in the lower-cervical levels of the spinal cord. Sympathetic preganglionic neurons arise from the thoracic and upper lumbar regions of the cord before passing through the sympathetic chain and synapsing with postganglionic neurons throughout the body. The effects of SCI vary depending on the organ, ranging from immune dysfunction and loss of resident macrophages to increased inflammation and infiltration of peripheral leukocytes. Together, SCI-induced immune dysfunction forms a complex syndrome of symptoms and complications.

The effects of SCI on systemic immunity and inflammation

Spinal trauma can result in SCI-induced immune deficiency syndrome (SCI-IDS), which is characterized by lasting impairment of innate and adaptive immunity. SCI-IDS results from complete or partial disconnection of supraspinal control over immune organs [20, 21]. This increases susceptibility to pathogens and, consequently, the SCI population experiences more infections compared with the general public [22].

Infections in the first year after SCI are an independent risk factor for reduced motor function, illustrating the important interaction between infections and recovery [23]. Further, seemingly minor infections can lead to severe and lethal outcomes; consequently, those with SCI are more likely to die from preventable infections relative to noninjured individuals. Our own work has focused on several aspects of aberrant post-SCI immune regulation, including within the bone marrow, lung, gut, liver, and bladder [2428]. However, much more work is needed to understand and reverse the overall impaired immune function after SCI.

Paradoxically, while SCI causes SCI-IDS, it also results in local tissue inflammation. Here we will highlight post-SCI inflammation and immune deficiency in a tissue-specific manner. For a more detailed discussion on this overall immune system paradox, the reader is referred to the in-depth review published by Schwab et al. [29].

Bone marrow and spleen

Bone marrow is the primary generative lymphoid organ and is responsible for producing almost all immune cells in the body. Therefore, normal bone marrow function is paramount for fighting infection. Recent data in preclinical models show that SCI causes acquired “bone marrow failure syndrome”, defined by immune cell precursors in the bone marrow undergoing excessive proliferation but failure to mobilize to the blood to fight infection [24]. Features of bone marrow failure syndrome also occur in humans and persist indefinitely [21, 30, 31].

Secondary lymphoid organs are also impacted by SCI, which exacerbates negative infectious outcomes. For instance, the function of the spleen, a major reservoir for adaptive immune cells including B and T lymphocytes, is adversely affected by SCI. SCI causes both acute and prolonged splenic atrophy due at least in part to lymphocyte apoptosis [32]. For cells that do survive, their functions are impaired. For example, immunizations in SCI animals fail to elicit high-titer, antigen-specific antibody responses indicating that T- and B-lymphocyte interactions are inefficient after SCI [33, 34]. Evidence suggests that excess intrasplenic norepinephrine and glucocorticoids after SCI promote lymphocyte death [33]. Indeed, pharmacological blockade of these hormones prevents lymphopenia, offering hope to improve the immune system’s infection fighting ability after SCI.

The lungs

Pulmonary complications such as impaired breathing and infection (e.g. pneumonia) after SCI are well-documented and have detrimental effects on recovery, mortality, and morbidity [23, 3538]. While paralysis of the respiratory muscles contributes to these complications, especially in individuals who suffer cervical SCI, impairments in tissue-resident pulmonary immunity also play a role. Unfortunately, interventions to alleviate one pulmonary complication frequently exacerbate another. For instance, mechanical ventilation, often necessary to alleviate labored breathing, can cause ventilator-induced lung injury, and evidence suggests that this phenomenon is worsened in individuals with SCI [3941]. One study found that mechanical ventilation in rats with SCI had exacerbated pulmonary inflammation characterized by pulmonary neutrophilia, indices of epithelial damage, increased inflammatory cytokines, and increased oxidative stress [40]. Further, ventilation-induced damage to the lung fed back to exacerbate intraspinal inflammation in rats [41], demonstrating that pathology in peripheral organ systems can negatively impact spinal cord after injury.

Postinjury changes in pulmonary immunity also occur independent of ventilation. For instance, evidence suggests an injury-driven pulmonary paradox where both pulmonary inflammation and immunosuppression occur after SCI. Regarding pulmonary inflammation, studies show that lung inflammation is linked to systemic inflammation in the systemic inflammatory response syndrome, especially in lower-level incomplete injuries [4244]. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome is an acute phenomenon occurring after CNS injury when circulating inflammatory cells, particularly neutrophils, invade uninjured peripheral organs including the liver, lung, and kidney. This cellular influx causes tissue damage and multiorgan system failure [4244].

However, as stated above, systemic immunosuppression also occurs after SCI, including in the lung, especially after high-level complete injuries [20, 27, 33, 34, 45, 46]. In this situation, acute loss of pulmonary lymphocytes is accompanied by reduced alveolar macrophages and impaired immune signaling [27]. Importantly, immune suppression in the lung likely accounts for the increased risk of pulmonary infection after SCI [27]. This increased risk of pulmonary infection can also have a direct impact on motor recovery, as previous clinical work shows that an acute pulmonary infection can impair recovery up to 5 years later, again emphasizing the potential impact of systemic pathology on CNS outcomes after SCI [23].

Concomitant acute neutrophilia and lymphopenia detected in preclinical models also reflects patient data. An examination of blood leukocytes in SCI patients found that at 0–1 dpi SCI patients had elevated blood neutrophils, and that by 1–3 dpi there was an observed decrease in blood lymphocytes [47]. These blood leukocyte changes are associated with motor outcomes and pulmonary infections: acute neutrophilia correlates with impaired motor recovery while an increase in the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio increases risk of pulmonary infection [47]. While one might predict that elevated neutrophils would prevent acute infection, it appears as though the combination of neutrophilia and lymphopenia drives infection. The mechanisms responsible for the changes in the levels of these two leukocyte populations after SCI or how their interactions change in response to injury are still unknown, and understanding this paradox will be critical for preventing pulmonary infection after SCI. In summary, current research suggests that pulmonary immune dysfunction after SCI, characterized by enhanced tissue-specific inflammation and immunosuppression (Fig. 2), plays important roles in recovery by increasing infection risk and exacerbating CNS-driven impairments in motor function.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The lung microenvironment after spinal cord injury (SCI). The lung experiences both increased inflammation and immune dysfunction after SCI. Inflammatory neutrophils traffic to the lung following SCI where they degranulate and release inflammatory mediators, causing tissue damage and diminished lung function. At the same time, sympathetic dysregulation causes a loss in alveolar macrophages and lymphocytes. Some of the decrease in lymphocyte counts can be linked to bone marrow failure syndrome, while the loss in alveolar macrophages increases risk for lung infection. In sum, the lung experiences both acute inflammation and chronic immunosuppression after SCI.

Urinary tract, bladder, and kidney

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are some of the most common and troublesome complications following SCI [48]. Indeed, one study following SCI subjects over time showed 100% of subjects developed >1 UTI on average per year over a 40-year span after injury [49]. These infections arise from various sources including kidney failure, problems with bladder voiding, introduction of bacteria by catheterization, and inflammatory cell trafficking and cytokine release in the bladder, kidneys, and urinary tract [48, 50]. Each primary tissue experiences inflammation and infection uniquely, and thus merit discussion in this review (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Spinal cord injury (SCI) causes inflammation and dysfunction within the urinary tract. The urinary tract becomes both inflammatory and more susceptible to infection following SCI. The kidneys undergo glomerulonephritis and an influx of leukocytes from the circulation. These cells release inflammatory mediators such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF to propagate and sustain inflammation. As glomeruli necrotize, the kidneys fail to properly clear creatinine which results in excess blood and protein in the urine. Increased sympathetic signaling to the bladder can cause a breakdown of the urothelium and leakage of urine into the bladder wall. This results in leukocyte trafficking and inflammation within the bladder. Sustained sympathetic signaling can also impair detrusor muscle function and prevent incomplete urine voiding, which increases the risk for infection.

Those with SCI remain permanently at risk for renal deterioration, necessitating consistent follow-up examinations [51]. Since the kidneys are principally innervated by efferent fibers arising from spinal cord levels T8 to L1, differences in renal inflammation vary as a function of injury level but are likely present in the majority of injured individuals [52]. Renal deterioration results in reduced creatinine clearance and proteinuria (increased protein in the urine), both of which are associated with increased mortality after SCI [53]. Proteinuria is caused by chronic kidney disease and loss of glomerular function [54, 55]. This loss of function is associated with inflammatory signaling in the kidney, known as glomerulonephritis, at acute and chronic times following SCI [44, 56]. Indeed, inflammatory cytokines such as TNF, IL-1β, and IL-6 rise in the kidney following SCI [56] and are associated with renal infiltration of monocytes, granulocytes, and lymphocytes [43, 44, 57]. Immune cells and cytokines in the kidney directly impact the filtration functions of glomeruli and contribute to increased mortality following SCI. Therefore, it is crucial to better understand and examine the renal inflammatory response to SCI.

In addition to renal complications, SCI typically leads to neurogenic bladder, or the loss of bladder control [58]. Bladder dysfunction occurs rapidly after SCI and is accompanied by significant urothelial disruption, reduced tight junction proteins, and increased permeability of the bladder wall to water and urea within hours of injury [59, 60]. These changes in urothelial structure and function persist chronically in individuals with SCI [61]. Since the bladder is innervated by spinal autonomic neurons primarily at the L1–L2 spinal levels, virtually all SCI will lead to bladder dysfunction [62]. Indeed, SCI patients with cervical and thoracic SCI were shown to have comparable chronic bladder pathology and to be similarly plagued by recurrent UTIs [61, 63].

As a result of postinjury changes, inflammatory mediators are present in bladder walls from acute to chronic stages. Indeed, urothelial biopsies from chronic SCI subjects had elevated levels of inflammatory mediators and apoptotic cells [63]. Despite these inflammatory mediators, postinjury UTI risk remains permanently high for several reasons. First, incomplete voiding of urine increases risk for infection [64], along with increasing the risk for more immediate and serious complications such as autonomic dysreflexia [65, 66]. Long-term catheterization adds additional risks for infection and can directly introduce bacteria into the urinary tract [67, 68]. Further, dysregulated neurogenic control and frank disruption of the urothelium and urothelial tight junctions facilitate bacterial binding to the bladder wall and increased leukocyte infiltration [69]. Inflammatory signals associated with these immune cells exacerbate disruption of the bladder epithelium [60, 70]. However, the inflammatory response to UTI was shown to be muted in rodents with SCI, which, if translated to human SCI, could contribute to the risk for recurrent UTI in the SCI population [71]. Notably, the precise inflammatory mechanisms underlying increased UTI risk after SCI have not been elucidated. Bladder dysfunction and UTI significantly reduce quality of life in the SCI population, and thus more research is required to fully assess bladder and urinary tract inflammation and its effects on bladder function.

Gut dysbiosis

The SNS regulates motility, mucosal secretions (e.g. mucin, acids), vasodilation, and epithelial permeability in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Sympathetic preganglionic neurons controlling the small and large intestines are located primarily in the spinal cord segments T5-L2 [7274]. Therefore, an injury to the spinal cord at almost any level will adversely affect autonomic control of the gut to some degree. The SNS also heavily innervates the gut-associated lymph tissues (GALT), including mesenteric lymph nodes and Peyer’s patches, thereby directly affecting immune function.

After SCI, intestinal inflammation is evident in the GALT and throughout the intestines [26, 7578]. In SCI mice, elevated cytokine production (TNF, IL-1β, TGF-β1, IL-10) and compositional changes in leukocytes in the Peyer’s patches and mesenteric lymph nodes are evident for at least 1-month postinjury [26]. Similarly, at 8 weeks post-SCI in rats, inflammatory cytokines (IL-12, MIP-2, IL-1β) were increased in the intestines and correlated with the relative abundance of distinct species of gut bacteria [77].

Delayed intestinal transit occurs after SCI and likely contributes to gut inflammation [79]. High thoracic SCI markedly reduces colonic contractions and duodenal blood flow concomitant with reduced mucosal crypt depth, blunted intestinal villi, and elevated inflammatory markers (ICAM-1, CCL2, CCL3) [75, 78]. SCI increases collagen in the colon, which is associated with inflammatory colitis and diminished colonic compliance [78]. Intestinal barrier permeability also rises after SCI, which increases risk for systemic inflammation and can negatively affect locomotor recovery [26, 80, 81].

In addition to altering structural and cellular composition within the intestines and GALT, elevated SNS activity impacts the enteric microbiota. In the neurogenic bowel (i.e. a functionally impaired bowel due to nerve injury), impaired intestinal transit caused by increased SNS activity limits the delivery of necessary nutrients to microbiota in the distal colon. Likewise, hyperreflexive SNS activation impairs mucin production which hinders production of the mucus layer, an important niche and barrier colonized by enteric microbiota. Loss of the mucin barrier increases interactions between gut bacteria and gut epithelia, eventually causing infection, inflammation, and gut dysbiosis. Finally, catecholamines released by SNS activation directly alter the growth rate, virulence factor production, and adherence of various types of gut microbiota in vitro [8285]. Indeed, the post-SCI inflammatory changes in the GI tract are accompanied by long-lasting changes in the gut microbiome leading to gut dysbiosis [26, 76, 77, 86, 87]. After SCI, fecal microbiota transplants or treatments that increase levels of beneficial gut bacteria are associated with reduced inflammation and lower intestinal permeability, suggesting that these processes are tightly linked with gut dysbiosis [88, 89]. Taken together, gut inflammation after SCI likely results from altered SNS input to gut, immune dysfunction in the GALT, and gut dysbiosis, which together significantly compromise GI function.

The effects of SCI on metabolic function

A separate but related consequence of SCI is dysregulation of metabolism. This issue manifests in every level of metabolic function, from system-wide metabolic dysfunction to the organ level and down to subcellular mitochondrial function [90]. The liver is a major metabolic organ that exhibits chronic pathology after SCI. We previously published a detailed review of this phenomenon [91], but the topic is revisited here in the context of systemic inflammation. It is particularly crucial to understand the link between adipose tissue and the liver after SCI (Fig. 4), as dysregulated lipid metabolism contributes a host of disorders that can be classified as metabolic syndrome (MetS), a leading cause of death and driver of healthcare costs in the SCI population.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Development of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis after spinal cord injury (SCI). SCI causes a breakdown in the mucosal membrane of the gut and leakage of gut microbiota into circulation. These microbes are carried into the liver via the portal vein and can activate toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling and initiate inflammatory signaling. Adipose tissue is infiltrated by peripheral leukocytes after SCI, resulting in adipocyte apoptosis and lipolysis. The FFAs released into circulation can overwhelm the processing capacity of hepatocytes and contribute to steatosis in the liver. Inflammatory mediators such as TNF and IL-1β result in inflammatory propagation via NF-κB and ceramide synthesis via serine palmitoyl transferase. Ceramides in turn contribute to steatosis and to NF-κB activity. The resulting nonalcoholic steatohepatitis increases the risk of developing cirrhosis and liver cancer.

Liver

In the liver, MetS manifests as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), an advanced stage of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, the nomenclature of which was recently changed from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [92, 93]. NASH is characterized by lipid accumulation, inflammation, and cell damage. NASH is typically associated with diet-induced obesity in able-bodied individuals, but NASH has been observed acutely in lean post-SCI rodents. Indeed, mid-thoracic SCI in rats causes rapid hepatic cytokine expression, lipid droplet accumulation, iron sequestration, and overt liver damage [28, 91, 94]. Post-SCI liver pathology is likely driven in part by dysregulation of SNS signaling to the liver. Clinical studies showed episodic increases in serum norepinephrine in SCI subjects, suggesting repeated outbursts of SNS outflow [95]. Notably, norepinephrine causes a 4-7-fold induction of TNF expression by Kupffer cells, the resident hepatic macrophages, revealing the pro-inflammatory nature of excess SNS signaling to the liver [96, 97].

TNF plays a central role in NASH development due to its ability to both propagate inflammatory signaling via NF-κB and initiate ceramide synthesis through increased serine palmitoyl transferase production [98, 99]. Notably, our prior work confirmed rapid induction of hepatic ceramide synthesis after SCI in rats [28]. Ceramides, a waxy lipid species, can increase TNF synthesis by activating TLR-4 [100], thereby perpetuating a deleterious cycle. Ceramides released systemically can cross the blood–brain barrier to induce CNS toxicity and protein aggregation in diseases including Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Huntington’s diseases [101].

Liver inflammation can also be driven by gut dysbiosis, increased gut permeability, and the transportation of microbes from the gut to the liver via the portal vein [102, 103]. Our prior work showed both sustained endotoxemia and bacteria directly populating the liver after SCI [25, 26] and, using metagenomics, showed drastic alterations in the gut virome and microbiome [104]. Gut dysbiosis has also been detected in the SCI population [86, 105, 106]. Since gut microbes entering the liver can activate TLR-4 and potentiate liver inflammation and damage, this is an important target for research to identify therapeutic treatments to prevent SCI-induced liver damage [107, 108].

Not only does SCI induce liver pathology, but liver inflammation can feed back to exacerbate intraspinal inflammation and pathology. For instance, depleting Kupffer cells prior to SCI reduced neutrophil trafficking to the injured cord, while increasing hepatic NF-κB signaling before SCI increased acute neutrophil translocation to the CNS [109]. This central role for Kupffer cells is likely mediated by their capacity to produce growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines, notably TGF-β1, TNF, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-18, CXCL2, CCL2, ROS, and prostaglandins. All of these signals stimulate monocytes and neutrophils to enter the inflamed liver and enhance the acute systemic inflammatory response [42, 110].

Our work recently showed that if the liver is inflamed at the time of SCI, not only is acute inflammation enhanced, chronic metabolic pathology is worse, intraspinal tissue lesions are larger, and locomotor recovery is impaired [25]. Thus, the status of liver inflammation at the time of SCI is a disease-modifying factor that can regulate the ultimate level of recovery. Notably, the importance of liver status in humans was recently shown to be valid in a clinical study, where SCI patients with pre-existing liver (or kidney) pathology had increased in-hospital mortality rates [111].

Chronic hepatic pathology translates to a four-fold increased risk for developing cirrhosis and a seven-fold increased risk for hepatic carcinoma after SCI [112]. Further, liver inflammation is related to systemic insulin resistance, renal disease, and has recently been recognized as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease [113], all conditions occurring at higher incidence and increased severity in the SCI population [114116]. Thus, understanding drivers and consequences of liver inflammation and pathology is crucial for restoring homeostasis, metabolic health, and overall recovery after SCI.

Adipose tissue

Clinical studies indicate that over two-thirds of individuals living with SCI are considered obese, as defined by the World Health Organization [117119]. Adipose tissue mass increases after SCI in the absence of overt obesity, with visceral adipose tissue mass in SCI adults being up to 58% greater than in able-bodied individuals, even after controlling for body weight and caloric intake [120122]. This again illustrates the high risk for MetS in SCI individuals [122125].

Classically, adipose tissue was thought to be an inert energy storage depot. However, recent studies show adipose tissue is a potent endocrine organ which secretes numerous hormones and adipokines [126]. Visceral white adipose tissue (WAT) becomes inflamed as adipose accumulates, and increased adiposity induces a chronic, low-grade inflammatory state [121, 127]. In obese WAT, infiltrating macrophages form “crown-like structures” surrounding enlarged, dying adipocytes [128]. Elevated TNF after SCI can suppress WAT insulin receptor signaling, leading to insulin resistance and release of circulating free fatty acids via lipolysis [96, 129, 130].

Though elevated TNF is central to developing cardiometabolic disease and systemic inflammation, other adipokines may contribute to SCI-induced metabolic dysfunction. For instance, IL-1β is increased in subcutaneous and visceral WAT and serum of obese individuals with MetS [131, 132], a finding which was replicated in mouse visceral WAT after mid-thoracic contusion SCI [133].

Similar to other organs, WAT pathology may occur in part from enhanced SNS signaling after SCI. It is known that SCI increases norepinephrine and WAT lipolysis below the lesion level [122], and SNS input is necessary for leptin-stimulated lipolysis in WAT [134]. Dysregulated SNS activation after SCI due to loss of descending control from the brainstem could thus drive aberrant WAT lipolysis [135]. Additionally, activation of α2-adrenergic receptors stimulates TNF production by macrophages and can further contribute to insulin resistance and NF-κB activation [136]. To reduce cardiometabolic risk and improve overall health in the SCI population, future studies are needed to understand the role of adipose tissue inflammation in post-SCI MetS development.

Conclusion

SCI shortens lifespan, which is due, at least in part, to systemic inflammation and MetS-related pathology [137]. Thus, postinjury MetS and inflammation in general remain crucial topics of research. The complexity of each organ’s response to SCI provides compelling targets for future studies, but a systems-based approach is required to address the various nuances and differences between tissues. For example, the paradoxical immunosuppression paired with neutrophilia in the post-SCI lung demonstrates why broad immune modulation will prove difficult in achieving positive results. Given the varying issues presented in this manuscript, we propose that a true solution to SCI-induced dysfunction, both in the spinal cord and in peripheral systems, will require holistic knowledge and flexible, tissue-specific approaches.

Acknowledgements:

This work was supported by NIDDK R01-DK126008 (to DMM) & NINDS R01-NS099532 and R35-NS111582 (to PGP). CMM was supported by NINDS F32-NS119371. KAK and KAM were supported by the Craig H. Neilsen Foundation (grants 890085 to KAK, and 647110 to KAM). KAR was supported by NINDS T32-NS105864 (to PGP). Schematics created with BioRender.com.

Abbreviations:

GALT

gut-associated lymph tissues

GI

gastrointestinal

MASLD

metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

MetS

metabolic syndrome

NASH

nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

SCI

spinal cord injury

SCI-IDS

SCI-induced immune deficiency syndrome

UTI

urinary tract infections

WAT

white adipose tissue

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Data availability statement:

Data sharing is not applicable as no new data were generated for this study.

References

  • 1.Morse LR, Field-Fote EC, Contreras-Vidal J, Noble-Haeusslein LJ, Rodreick M, Shields RK, Sofroniew M et al. , Group SCIW meeting proceedings for SCI 2020: launching a decade of disruption in spinal cord injury research. J. Neurotrauma 2021. 38: 1251–1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ahuja CS, Wilson JR, Nori S, Kotter MRN, Druschel C, Curt A and Fehlings MG, Traumatic spinal cord injury. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017. 3: 17018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brennan FH, Li Y, Wang C, Ma A, Guo Q, Li Y, Pukos N et al. , Microglia coordinate cellular interactions during spinal cord repair in mice. Nat. Commun 2022. 13: 4096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Donnelly DJ and Popovich PG, Inflammation and its role in neuroprotection, axonal regeneration and functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol 2008. 209: 378–388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Beck KD, Nguyen HX, Galvan MD, Salazar DL, Woodruff TM and Anderson AJ, Quantitative analysis of cellular inflammation after traumatic spinal cord injury: evidence for a multiphasic inflammatory response in the acute to chronic environment. Brain. 2010. 133: 433–447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bellver-Landete V, Bretheau F, Mailhot B, Vallieres N, Lessard M, Janelle ME, Vernoux N et al. , Microglia are an essential component of the neuroprotective scar that forms after spinal cord injury. Nat. Commun 2019. 10: 518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fleming JC, Norenberg MD, Ramsay DA, Dekaban GA, Marcillo AE, Saenz AD, Pasquale-Styles M et al. , The cellular inflammatory response in human spinal cords after injury. Brain. 2006. 129: 3249–3269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Orr MB and Gensel JC, Spinal Cord Injury Scarring and Inflammation: Therapies Targeting Glial and Inflammatory Responses. Neurotherapeutics. 2018. 15: 541–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sroga JM, Jones TB, Kigerl KA, McGaughy VM and Popovich PG, Rats and mice exhibit distinct inflammatory reactions after spinal cord injury. J. Comp. Neurol 2003. 462: 223–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hesp ZC, Yoseph RY, Suzuki R, Jukkola P, Wilson C, Nishiyama A and McTigue DM, Proliferating NG2-cell-dependent angiogenesis and scar formation alter axon growth and functional recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. J. Neurosci 2018. 38: 1366–1382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fehlberg CR and Lee JK, Fibrosis in the central nervous system: from the meninges to the vasculature. Cell Tissue Res. 2022. 387: 351–360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Goritz C, Dias DO, Tomilin N, Barbacid M, Shupliakov O and Frisen J, A pericyte origin of spinal cord scar tissue. Science. 2011. 333: 238–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Li Z, Yu S, Hu X, Li Y, You X, Tian D, Cheng L et al. , Fibrotic scar after spinal cord injury: crosstalk with other cells, cellular origin, function, and mechanism. Front. Cell Neurosci 2021;15: 720938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Soderblom C, Luo X, Blumenthal E, Bray E, Lyapichev K, Ramos J, Krishnan V et al. , Perivascular fibroblasts form the fibrotic scar after contusive spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci 2013. 33: 13882–13887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Faulkner JR, Herrmann JE, Woo MJ, Tansey KE, Doan NB and Sofroniew MV, Reactive astrocytes protect tissue and preserve function after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci 2004. 24: 2143–2155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Yang T, Dai Y, Chen G and Cui S, Dissecting the dual role of the glial scar and scar-forming astrocytes in spinal cord injury. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020. 14: 78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Peruzzotti-Jametti L, Donega M, Giusto E, Mallucci G, Marchetti B and Pluchino S, The role of the immune system in central nervous system plasticity after acute injury. Neuroscience. 2014. 283: 210–221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Wulf MJ and Tom VJ, Consequences of spinal cord injury on the sympathetic nervous system. Front Cell Neurosci. 2023. 17: 999253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Agur AMR, Lee MJ and Grant JCB, Grant’s Atlas of Anatomy, 1999, 10th ed. /Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Meisel C, Schwab JM, Prass K, Meisel A and Dirnagl U, Central nervous system injury-induced immune deficiency syndrome. Nat. Rev. Neurosci 2005. 6: 775–786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Rodgers KA, Kigerl KA, Schwab JM and Popovich PG, Immune dysfunction after spinal cord injury: a review of autonomic and neuroendocrine mechanisms. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol 2022. 64: 102230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.DeVivo MJ, Black KJ and Stover SL, Causes of death during the first 12 years after spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil 1993. 74: 248–254. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Failli V, Kopp MA, Gericke C, Martus P, Klingbeil S, Brommer B, Laginha I et al. , Functional neurological recovery after spinal cord injury is impaired in patients with infections. Brain. 2012. 135: 3238–3250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Carpenter RS, Marbourg JM, Brennan FH, Mifflin KA, Hall JCE, Jiang RR, Mo XM et al. , Spinal cord injury causes chronic bone marrow failure. Nat. Commun 2020. 11: 3702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Goodus MT, Carson KE, Sauerbeck AD, Dey P, Alfredo AN, Popovich PG, Bruno RS et al. , Liver inflammation at the time of spinal cord injury enhances intraspinal pathology, liver injury, metabolic syndrome and locomotor deficits. Exp. Neurol 2021. 342: 113725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kigerl KA, Hall JC, Wang L, Mo X, Yu Z and Popovich PG, Gut dysbiosis impairs recovery after spinal cord injury. J. Exp. Med 2016. 213: 2603–2620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mifflin KA, Brennan FH, Guan Z, Kigerl KA, Filous AR, Mo X, Schwab JM et al. , Spinal cord injury impairs lung immunity in mice. J. Immunol 2022. 209: 157–170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Sauerbeck AD, Laws JL, Bandaru VV, Popovich PG, Haughey NJ and McTigue DM, Spinal cord injury causes chronic liver pathology in rats. J. Neurotrauma 2015. 32: 159–169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schwab JM, Zhang Y, Kopp MA, Brommer B and Popovich PG, The paradox of chronic neuroinflammation, systemic immune suppression, autoimmunity after traumatic chronic spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol 2014. 258: 121–129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chernykh ER, Shevela EY, Leplina OY, Tikhonova MA, Ostanin AA, Kulagin AD, Pronkina NV et al. , Characteristics of bone marrow cells under conditions of impaired innervation in patients with spinal trauma. Bull. Exp. Biol. Med 2006. 141: 117–120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Iversen PO, Hjeltnes N, Holm B, Flatebo T, Strom-Gundersen I, Ronning W, Stanghelle J et al. , Depressed immunity and impaired proliferation of hematopoietic progenitor cells in patients with complete spinal cord injury. Blood. 2000. 96: 2081–2083. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Noble BT, Brennan FH and Popovich PG, The spleen as a neuroimmune interface after spinal cord injury. J. Neuroimmunol 2018. 321: 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lucin KM, Sanders VM and Popovich PG, Stress hormones collaborate to induce lymphocyte apoptosis after high level spinal cord injury. J. Neurochem 2009. 110: 1409–1421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lucin KM, Sanders VM, Jones TB, Malarkey WB and Popovich PG, Impaired antibody synthesis after spinal cord injury is level dependent and is due to sympathetic nervous system dysregulation. Exp. Neurol 2007. 207: 75–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kopp MA, Watzlawick R, Martus P, Failli V, Finkenstaedt FW, Chen Y, DeVivo MJ et al. , Long-term functional outcome in patients with acquired infections after acute spinal cord injury. Neurology. 2017. 88: 892–900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Satkunendrarajah K, Karadimas SK and Fehlings MG, Spinal cord injury and degenerative cervical myelopathy. Hand. Clin. Neurol 2022. 189: 241–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Thietje R, Pouw MH, Schulz AP, Kienast B and Hirschfeld S, Mortality in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury: descriptive analysis of 62 deceased subjects. J. Spinal. Cord. Med 2011. 34: 482–487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Thietje R, Kowald B, Bothig R, Schulz AP, Northmann M, Rau Y and Hirschfeld S, Long-term survival and causes of death in patients below the age of 60 with traumatic spinal cord injury in Germany. J. Clin. Med 2021. 11: 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.AK Ak and Anjum F, Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury (VILI). In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL), 2022. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Truflandier K, Beaumont E, Maghni K, De Marchie M, Charbonney E and Spahija J, Spinal cord injury modulates the lung inflammatory response in mechanically ventilated rats: a comparative animal study. Physiol. Rep 2016. 4: e13009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Truflandier K, Beaumont E, Charbonney E, Maghni K, de Marchie M and Spahija J, Mechanical ventilation modulates pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in spinal cord tissue after injury in rats. Neurosci. Lett 2018. 671: 13–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Bao F, Omana V, Brown A and Weaver LC, The systemic inflammatory response after spinal cord injury in the rat is decreased by alpha4beta1 integrin blockade. J. Neurotrauma 2012. 29: 1626–1637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bao F, Brown A, Dekaban GA, Omana V and Weaver LC, CD11d integrin blockade reduces the systemic inflammatory response syndrome after spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol 2011. 231: 272–283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Gris D, Hamilton EF and Weaver LC, The systemic inflammatory response after spinal cord injury damages lungs and kidneys. Exp. Neurol 2008. 211: 259–270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ueno M, Ueno-Nakamura Y, Niehaus J, Popovich PG and Yoshida Y, Silencing spinal interneurons inhibits immune suppressive autonomic reflexes caused by spinal cord injury. Nat. Neurosci 2016. 19: 784–787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zhang Y, Guan Z, Reader B, Shawler T, Mandrekar-Colucci S, Huang K, Weil Z et al. , Autonomic dysreflexia causes chronic immune suppression after spinal cord injury. J. Neurosci 2013. 33: 12970–12981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Jogia T, Lubstorf T, Jacobson E, Scriven E, Atresh S, Nguyen QH, Liebscher T et al. , Prognostic value of early leukocyte fluctuations for recovery from traumatic spinal cord injury. Clin. Transl. Med 2021. 11: e272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Salameh A, Mohajer MA and Daroucihe RO, Prevention of urinary tract infections in patients with spinal cord injury. CMAJ. 2015. 187: 807–811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Gao Y, Danforth T and Ginsberg DA, Urologic management and complications in spinal cord injury patients: a 40- to 50-year follow-up study. Urology. 2017. 104: 52–58. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Garcia Leoni ME and Esclarin De Ruz A, Management of urinary tract infection in patients with spinal cord injuries. Clin. Microbiol. Infect 2003. 9: 780–785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Elmelund M, Oturai PS, Toson B and Biering-Sorensen F, Forty-five-year follow-up on the renal function after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2016. 54: 491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Bonavia A and Singbartl K, A review of the role of immune cells in acute kidney injury. Pediatr. Nephrol 2018. 33: 1629–1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Greenwell MW, Mangold TM, Tolley EA and Wall BM, Kidney disease as a predictor of mortality in chronic spinal cord injury. Am. J. Kidney Dis 2007. 49: 383–393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Reich HN, Tritchler D, Cattran DC, Herzenberg AM, Eichinger F, Boucherot A, Henger A et al. , A molecular signature of proteinuria in glomerulonephritis. PLoS One. 2010. 5: e13451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ruggenenti P, Perna A, Mosconi L, Pisoni R and Remuzzi G, Urinary protein excretion rate is the best independent predictor of ESRF in non-diabetic proteinuric chronic nephropathies. “Gruppo Italiano di Studi Epidemiologici in Nefrologia” (GISEN). Kidney Int. 1998. 53: 1209–1216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Parvin S, Williams CR, Jarrett SA and Garraway SM, Spinal cord injury increases pro-inflammatory cytokine expression in kidney at acute and sub-chronic stages. Inflammation. 2021. 44: 2346–2361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hubscher CH, Montgomery LR, Fell JD, Armstrong JE, Poudyal P, Herrity AN and Harkema SJ, Effects of exercise training on urinary tract function after spinal cord injury. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol 2016. 310: F1258–1268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Taweel WA and Seyam R, Neurogenic bladder in spinal cord injury patients. Res. Rep. Urol 2015. 7: 85–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Apodaca G, Kiss S, Ruiz W, Meyers S, Zeidel M and Birder L, Disruption of bladder epithelium barrier function after spinal cord injury. Am. J. Physiol. Renal. Physiol 2003. 284: F966–976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Herrera JJ, Haywood-Watson RJ 2nd and Grill RJ, Acute and chronic deficits in the urinary bladder after spinal contusion injury in the adult rat. J. Neurotrauma 2010. 27: 423–431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Jiang YH, Liu HT and Kuo HC, Urothelial dysfunction and chronic inflammation in patients with spinal cord injuries at different levels and correlation with urodynamic findings. Neurourol. Urodyn 2015. 34: 757–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Alizadeh A, Dyck SM and Karimi-Abdolrezaee S, Traumatic spinal cord injury: an overview of pathophysiology, models and acute injury mechanisms. Front. Neurol 2019. 10: 282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wu SY, Jiang YH, Jhang JF, Hsu YH, Ho HC and Kuo HC, Inflammation and barrier function deficits in the bladder urothelium of patients with chronic spinal cord injury and recurrent urinary tract infections. Biomedicines. 2022. 10: 220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Liu CW, Attar KH, Gall A, Shah J and Craggs M, The relationship between bladder management and health-related quality of life in patients with spinal cord injury in the UK. Spinal Cord. 2010. 48: 319–324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Giannantoni A, Di Stasi SM, Scivoletto G, Mollo A, Silecchia A, Fuoco U and Vespasiani G, Autonomic dysreflexia during urodynamics. Spinal Cord. 1998. 36: 756–760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Hou S and Rabchevsky AG, Autonomic consequences of spinal cord injury. Compr. Physiol 2014. 4: 1419–1453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Munasinghe RL, Yazdani H, Siddique M and Hafeez W, Appropriateness of use of indwelling urinary catheters in patients admitted to the medical service. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol 2001. 22: 647–649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Siroky MB, Pathogenesis of bacteriuria and infection in the spinal cord injured patient. Am. J. Med 2002. 13 Suppl 1A: 67S–79S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kullmann FA, Clayton DR, Ruiz WG, Wolf-Johnston A, Gauthier C, Kanai A, Birder LA et al. , Urothelial proliferation and regeneration after spinal cord injury. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol 2017. 313: F85–F102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Acharya P, Beckel J, Ruiz WG, Wang E, Rojas R, Birder L and Apodaca G, Distribution of the tight junction proteins ZO-1, occludin, and claudin-4, -8, and -12 in bladder epithelium. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol 2004. 287: F305–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Chaudhry R, Madden-Fuentes RJ, Ortiz TK, Balsara Z, Tang Y, Nseyo U Wiener JS et al. , Inflammatory response to Escherichia coli urinary tract infection in the neurogenic bladder of the spinal cord injured host. J. Urol 2014. 191: 1454–1461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Browning KN and Travagli RA, Central nervous system control of gastrointestinal motility and secretion and modulation of gastrointestinal functions. Compr. Physiol 2014. 4: 1339–1368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Levatte MA, Mabon PJ, Weaver LC and Dekaban GA, Simultaneous identification of two populations of sympathetic preganglionic neurons using recombinant herpes simplex virus type 1 expressing different reporter genes. Neuroscience. 1998. 82: 1253–1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Mabon PJ, LeVatte MA, Dekaban GA and Weaver LC, Identification of sympathetic preganglionic neurons controlling the small intestine in hamsters using a recombinant herpes simplex virus type-1. Brain Res. 1997. 753: 245–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Besecker EM, Deiter GM, Pironi N, Cooper TK and Holmes GM, Mesenteric vascular dysregulation and intestinal inflammation accompanies experimental spinal cord injury. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol 2017. 312: R146–R156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Myers SA, Gobejishvili L, Saraswat Ohri S, Garrett Wilson C, Andres KR, Riegler AS, Donde H et al. , Following spinal cord injury, PDE4B drives an acute, local inflammatory response and a chronic, systemic response exacerbated by gut dysbiosis and endotoxemia. Neurobiol. Dis 2019. 124: 353–363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.O’Connor G, Jeffrey E, Madorma D, Marcillo A, Abreu MT, Deo SK, Dietrich WD et al. , Investigation of microbiota alterations and intestinal inflammation post-spinal cord injury in rat model. J. Neurotrauma 2018. 35: 2159–2166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.White AR and Holmes GM, Anatomical and functional changes to the colonic neuromuscular compartment after experimental spinal cord injury. J. Neurotrauma 2018. 35: 1079–1090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Holmes GM and Blanke EN, Gastrointestinal dysfunction after spinal cord injury. Exp. Neurol 2019. 320: 113009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Herrera J, Bockhorst K, Bhattarai D and Uray K, Gastrointestinal vascular permeability changes following spinal cord injury. Neurogastroenterol. Motil 2020. 32: e13834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Liu X, Liang F, Zhang J, Li Z, Yang J and Kang N, Hyperbaric oxygen treatment improves intestinal barrier function after spinal cord injury in rats. Front. Neurol 2020. 11: 563281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Beata S, Michal T, Mateusz O, Urszula W, Choroszy M, Andrzej T and Piotr D, Norepinephrine affects the interaction of adherent-invasive Escherichia coli with intestinal epithelial cells. Virulence. 2021. 12: 630–637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Belay T and Sonnenfeld G, Differential effects of catecholamines on in vitro growth of pathogenic bacteria. Life Sci. 2002. 71: 447–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kinney KS, Austin CE, Morton DS and Sonnenfeld G, Norepinephrine as a growth stimulating factor in bacteria–mechanistic studies. Life Sci. 2000. 67: 3075–3085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lyte M, Arulanandam B, Nguyen K, Frank C, Erickson A and Francis D, Norepinephrine induced growth and expression of virulence associated factors in enterotoxigenic and enterohemorrhagic strains of Escherichia coli. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol 1997. 412: 331–339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Li J, Van Der Pol W, Eraslan M, McLain A, Cetin H, Cetin B, Morrow C et al. , Comparison of the gut microbiome composition among individuals with acute or long-standing spinal cord injury vs. able-bodied controls. J. Spinal. Cord. Med 2022b. 45: 91–99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Schmidt EKA, Torres-Espin A, Raposo PJF, Madsen KL, Kigerl A, Popovich PG, Fenrich KK et al. , Fecal transplant prevents gut dysbiosis and anxiety-like behaviour after spinal cord injury in rats. PLoS One. 2020. 15: e0226128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Jing Y, Yang D, Bai F, Zhang C, Qin C, Li D, Wang L et al. , Melatonin treatment alleviates spinal cord injury-induced gut dysbiosis in mice. J. Neurotrauma 2019. 36: 2646–2664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Jing Y, Yu Y, Bai F, Wang L, Yang D, Zhang C, Qin C et al. , Effect of fecal microbiota transplantation on neurological restoration in a spinal cord injury mouse model: involvement of brain-gut axis. Microbiome. 9: 59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Slater PG, Dominguez-Romero ME, Villarreal M, Eisner V and Larrain J, Mitochondrial function in spinal cord injury and regeneration. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2022. 79: 239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Goodus MT and McTigue DM, Hepatic dysfunction after spinal cord injury: a vicious cycle of central and peripheral pathology? Exp. Neurol 2020. 325: 113160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, Francque SM, Sanyal AJ, Kanwal F, Romero D et al. , A multi-society Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Ann Hepatol. 2023: 101133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Staufer K and Stauber RE, Steatotic liver disease: metabolic dysfunction, alcohol, or both? Biomedicines. 2023. 11: 2108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Goodus MT, Sauerbeck AD, Popovich PG, Bruno RS and McTigue M, Dietary green tea extract prior to spinal cord injury prevents hepatic iron overload but does not improve chronic hepatic and spinal cord pathology in rats. J. Neurotrauma 2018. 35: 2872–2882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Karlsson AK, Elam M, Friberg P, Sullivan L, Attvall S and Lonnroth P, Peripheral afferent stimulation of decentralized sympathetic neurons activates lipolysis in spinal cord-injured subjects. Metabolism. 1997. 46: 1465–1469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Lund MC, Clausen BH, Brambilla R and Lambertsen KL, The role of tumor necrosis factor following spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Cell Mol. Neurobiol 2023. 43: 925–950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zhou M, Yang S, Koo DJ, Ornan DA, Chaudry IH, Wang P, The role of Kupffer cell alpha(2)-adrenoreceptors in norepinephrine-induced TNF-alpha production. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001. 1537: 49–57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Lu S, Wang Y and Liu J, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha signaling in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and targeted therapies. J. Genet. Genomics 2022. 49: 269–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Pagadala M, Kasumov T, McCullough AJ, Zein NN and Kirwan JP, Role of ceramides in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Trends Endocrinol. Metab 2012. 23: 365–371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Schilling JD, Machkovech HM, He L, Sidhu R, Fujiwara H, Weber K, Ory DS et al. , Palmitate and lipopolysaccharide trigger synergistic ceramide production in primary macrophages. J. Biol. Chem 2013. 288: 2923–2932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Czubowicz K, Jesko H, Wencel P, Lukiw WJ and Strosznajder RP, The role of ceramide and sphingosine-1-phosphate in Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Mol. Neurobiol 2019. 56: 5436–5455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Balmer ML, Slack E, de Gottardi A, Lawson MA, Hapfelmeier S, Miele L, Grieco A et al. , The liver may act as a firewall mediating mutualism between the host and its gut commensal microbiota. Sci. Transl. Med 2014. 6: 237ra266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Ju C and Tacke F, Hepatic macrophages in homeostasis and liver diseases: from pathogenesis to novel therapeutic strategies. Cell Mol. Immunol 2016. 13: 316–327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Du J, Zayed AA, Kigerl KA, Zane K, Sullivan MB and Popovich PG, Spinal cord injury changes the structure and functional potential of gut bacterial and viral communities. mSystems. 2021. 6: e01356–e01320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Li J, Morrow C, Barnes S, Wilson L, Womack ED, McLain A and Yarar-Fisher C, Gut microbiome composition and serum metabolome profile among individuals with spinal cord injury and normal glucose tolerance or prediabetes/type 2 diabetes. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil 2022a. 103: 702–710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Zhang C, Zhang W, Zhang J, Jing Y, Yang M, Du L, Gao F et al. , Gut microbiota dysbiosis in male patients with chronic traumatic complete spinal cord injury. J. Transl. Med 2018. 16: 353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Kigerl KA, Mostacada K and Popovich PG, Gut microbiota are disease-modifying factors after traumatic spinal cord injury. Neurotherapeutics. 2018. 15: 60–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Milosevic I, Vujovic A, Barac A, Djelic M, Korac M, Radovanovic Spurnic A, Gmizic I et al. , Gut-liver axis, gut microbiota, and its modulation in the management of liver diseases: a review of the literature. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2019. 20: 395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Campbell SJ, Anthony DC, Oakley F, Carlsen H, Elsharkawy AM, Blomhoff R and Mann DA, Hepatic nuclear factor kappa B regulates neutrophil recruitment to the injured brain. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol 2008a. 67: 223–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Campbell SJ, Zahid I, Losey P, Law S, Jiang Y, Bilgen M, van Rooijen N et al. , Liver Kupffer cells control the magnitude of the inflammatory response in the injured brain and spinal cord. Neuropharmacology. 2008b. 55: 780–787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Blex C, Kreutztrager M, Ludwig J, Nowak CP, Schwab JM, Lubstorf T, Ekkernkamp A et al. , Baseline predictors of in-hospital mortality after acute traumatic spinal cord injury: data from a level I trauma center. Sci. Rep 2022. 12: 11420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Rankin KC, O’Brien LC, Segal L, Khan MR and Gorgey AS, Liver adiposity and metabolic profile in individuals with chronic spinal cord injury. Biomed. Res. Int 2017. 2017: 1364818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Inciardi RM, Mantovani A and Targher G, Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as an emerging risk factor for heart failure. Curr. Heart Fail. Rep 2023. 20: 308–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Garbuzenko DV, Pathophysiological mechanisms of cardiovascular disorders in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Bed. Bench 2022. 15: 194–203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Theofilis P, Vordoni A and Kalaitzidis RG, Interplay between metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease and chronic kidney disease: epidemiology, pathophysiologic mechanisms, and treatment considerations. World J. Gastroenterol 2022. 28: 5691–5706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Zaman CF, Sultana J, Dey P, Dutta J, Mustarin S, Tamanna N, Roy A et al. , A multidisciplinary approach and current perspective of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review. Cureus. 2022. 14: e29657. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Gater DR jr, Obesity after spinal cord injury. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am 2007. 18: 333–351, vii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Gater DR jr, Farkas GJ and Tiozzo E, Pathophysiology of neurogenic obesity after spinal cord injury pathophysiology of neurogenic obesity after spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj. Rehabil 2021. 27: 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Gorgey AS, Dolbow DR, Dolbow JD, Khalil RK, Castillo C and Gater DR, Effects of spinal cord injury on body composition and metabolic profile - part I. J. Spinal Cord Med 2014. 37: 693–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Edwards LA, Bugaresti JM and Buchholz AC, Visceral adipose tissue and the ratio of visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue are greater in adults with than in those without spinal cord injury, despite matching waist circumferences. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 2008. 87: 600–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Farkas GJ and Gater DR, Neurogenic obesity and systemic inflammation following spinal cord injury: a review. J. Spinal Cord Med 2018. 41: 378–387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Karlsson AK, Insulin resistance and sympathetic function in high spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1999. 37: 494–500. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Bauman WA and Spungen AM, Disorders of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in veterans with paraplegia or quadriplegia: a model of premature aging. Metabolism. 1994. 43: 749–756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Gater DR jr, Farkas GJ, Berg AS and Castillo C, Prevalence of metabolic syndrome in veterans with spinal cord injury. J. Spinal. Cord. Med 2019. 42: 86–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Gorgey AS, Mather KJ and Gater DR, Central adiposity associations to carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in individuals with complete motor spinal cord injury. Metabolism. 2011. 60: 843–851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Grant RW and Dixit VD, Adipose tissue as an immunological organ. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015. 23: 512–518. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Kahn CR, Wang G and Lee KY, Altered adipose tissue and adipocyte function in the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome. J. Clin. Invest 2019. 129: 3990–4000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Kang YE, Kim JM, Joung KH, Lee JH, You BR, Choi MJ, Ryu MJ et al. , The roles of adipokines, proinflammatory cytokines, and adipose tissue macrophages in obesity-associated insulin resistance in modest obesity and early metabolic dysfunction. PLoS One. 2016. 11: e0154003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Cawthorn WP and Sethi JK, TNF-alpha and adipocyte biology. FEBS Lett. 2008. 582: 117–131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Stammers AT, Liu J and Kwon BK, Expression of inflammatory cytokines following acute spinal cord injury in a rodent model. J. Neurosci. Res 2012. 90: 782–790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Moschen AR, Molnar C, Enrich B, Geiger S, Ebenbichler CF and Tilg H, Adipose and liver expression of interleukin (IL)-1 family members in morbid obesity and effects of weight loss. Mol. Med 2011. 17: 840–845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Pahwa R, Singh A, Adams-Huet B, Devaraj S and Jialal I, Increased inflammasome activity in subcutaneous adipose tissue of patients with metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev 2021. 37: e3383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Bigford GE, Bracchi-Ricard VC, Keane RW, Nash MS and Bethea JR, Neuroendocrine and cardiac metabolic dysfunction and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in adipose tissue and pancreas following chronic spinal cord injury in the mouse. ASN Neuro. 2013. 5: 243–255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Zeng W, Pirzgalska RM, Pereira MM, Kubasova N, Barateiro A, Seixas E, Lu YH et al. , Sympathetic neuro-adipose connections mediate leptin-driven lipolysis. Cell. 2015. 163: 84–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.La Fountaine MF, Cirnigliaro CM, Kirshblum SC, McKenna C and Bauman WA, Effect of functional sympathetic nervous system impairment of the liver and abdominal visceral adipose tissue on circulating triglyceride-rich lipoproteins. PLoS One. 2017. 12: e0173934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Spengler RN, Allen RM, Remick DG, Strieter RM and Kunkel S, Stimulation of alpha-adrenergic receptor augments the production of macrophage-derived tumor necrosis factor. J. Immunol 1990. 145: 1430–1434. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Shavelle RM, DeVivo MJ, Brooks JC, Strauss DJ and Paculdo DR, Improvements in long-term survival after spinal cord injury? Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil 2015. 96: 645–651. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable as no new data were generated for this study.

RESOURCES