Skip to main content
Annals of Medicine and Surgery logoLink to Annals of Medicine and Surgery
. 2024 Jan 17;86(3):1275–1282. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001742

Severity and associated factors of postoperative pain in paediatric surgical patients aged 2 months–7 years at selected Addis Ababa Public Hospitals: a multicenter prospective longitudinal study

Fassil Mihretu Rede a,*, Eyayalem Melese Goshu b, Sulaiman Jemal muzien b
PMCID: PMC10923381  PMID: 38463099

Abstract

Background:

Postoperative pain is a common and distressing consequence of surgery in children. It can lead to suffering, prolonged recovery, impaired physical functioning, and even chronic pain. Effective postoperative pain management is crucial for improving patient outcomes. However, several factors hinder the accurate assessment and management of pain in children, particularly in low-income countries. This study aims to evaluate the severity of postoperative pain in paediatric patients and identify its predictors.

Materials and methods:

A longitudinal study was conducted on 235 paediatric surgical patients aged 2 months–7 years in Public Hospitals of Addis Ababa from January to April 2023. The primary outcome, pain severity, was assessed at three different times using a pain assessment tool. Cochran’s q-test was used to compare postoperative pain incidences. The Generalized Estimating Equation was used to determine predictor variables’ effects on pain severity over time. The study demonstrated the direction of association and significance using an AOR with a 95% CI at a P value of 0.05.

Result:

The incidence of moderate to severe postoperative pain was 36.6% at 12 h, 20% at 24 h, and 10% at 36 h. Patients with preoperative pain and preoperative anxiety were more likely to experience moderate to severe postoperative pain [adjusted odds ratio (AOR)=3.41, CI=1.15, 10.00 and AOR=2.28, CI=1.219, 4.277, respectively). Intraoperative predictors of postoperative pain severity included longer duration of surgery (AOR=6.62, CI=1.90, 23.00) and major surgery (AOR=5.2, CI=2.11, 12.88). Postoperative pain severity was reduced in patients receiving multimodal analgesia (AOR=0.24; CI=0.091, 0.652) and in patients assessed frequently in the postoperative period (AOR=0.09; CI=0.022, 0.393).

Conclusion:

A significant portion of paediatric surgical patients in this study experienced high levels of postoperative pain, particularly within the first 24 h. The most influential factors affecting pain severity were postoperative pain management strategies and assessment practices.

Keywords: paediatric surgery, paediatrics, postoperative pain, severity

Introduction

Highlights

  • Paediatric post-surgery patients experience moderate to severe pain at 12, 24, and 36 h. Factors determining pain severity include pain assessment, management, anxiety, preoperative pain, and surgery duration. Unlike other study Analyzing postoperative outcome measurements using the Generalized Estimating Equation.

  • model.

  • Frequently assessed pain is lower with multimodal analgesia and minor surgery, while prolonged and major surgery, preoperative pain, and anxiety increase pain suffering.

  • Proper pain management can reduce suffering; prolong hospital stays, and chronic pain, which significantly impacts children’s physical and mental function and developmental skills.

Paediatrics focuses on children from birth to 18 years old, considering developmental differences1,2. Hospitalized paediatric patients often experience pain, which can result from injury, disease, or surgical procedures35. Pain is defined as an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with tissue damage6. Postoperative pain, which occurs after surgery, can be categorized as mild, moderate, or severe and should be addressed3,5,7. Pain assessment techniques in paediatrics vary in their applicability, reliability, and validity for different age groups and types of pain5,8,9. Postoperative pain in paediatrics can have various consequences, including depression, insomnia, decreased physical and mental functioning, chronic pain, and prolonged hospitalization7,10. This condition significantly impacts children’s quality of life and hinders their developmental skills35,7.

Postoperative pain in paediatric patients varies depending on the type of surgery, setting, and other factors11. In Togo and Rwanda, studies have shown that postoperative pain management in paediatric surgery is often inadequate, with a significant percentage of children experiencing severe pain12,13. Factors such as preoperative anxiety, history of preoperative pain, type of surgery, and incision length are associated with postoperative pain14. Inadequate pain assessment and medication administration contribute to postoperative pain in Addis Ababa15. Assessing and treating pain in paediatrics is challenging due to behavioural and cognitive developmental differences5,8,9. There are myths in some places that paediatric patients do not perceive or remember pain, leading to ignorance of children’s pain11,1618. Sub-Saharan African and developing countries face challenges in reducing postoperative pain in paediatrics due to limited availability of drugs, instruments, regional analgesia experts, and professional attitude1922.

Access to safe paediatric surgery is a challenge in Ethiopia, where demand is increasing2326. Research on paediatric postoperative pain intensity is limited, and there is a need for pain control and assessment protocols for different age groups3,7,11. The FLACC tool is commonly used for assessing pain in children between 2 months and 7 years. Valid pain assessment tools for neonates and infants are not applicable in this context because blood pressure usually not measured1016. A study on paediatric postoperative pain intensity in sub-Saharan Africa is necessary to establish protocols and identify severity, barriers, and patient outcomes. This study aims to assess the severity and predictors of postoperative pain in paediatric patients to improve patient outcomes.

Methods

It is an institutional-based Prospective longitudinal study design conducted at three public hospitals From 5 January to 25 April 2023. This study has been registered with the Research Registration Unique Identifying Number This study is registered at research registry UIN 9418. Hyperlink https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#home/. This study is reported according to STROCSS 2021 guideline28.

Study area and period

The study was conducted in 3 public referral hospitals: Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital (TASH), Zewuditu Memorial Hospital (ZMH) and Menelik II Specialized Hospital (MSH). These hospitals were chosen based on their paediatric surgical patient load and level. (TASH) has 3 major operation theatres with 15 operation tables, while (ZMH) has 8 operation tables for surgical procedures of all age. (MSH) has 1 paediatric operation table and 7 for others. On average, 10 paediatric patients undergo elective surgery daily in 3 hospitals, resulting in 200 patients per month and 800 patients per 4 months. The study was conducted from 5 January 2023 to 25 April 2023.

Study design

Prospective longitudinal study design.

Source population

Source populations were paediatric patients undergoing surgery at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Zewuditu Memorial Hospital and Menelik II Specialized Hospital.

Study population

Study populations were all Paediatric patients aged 2 months–7 years undergoing surgery at Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Zewuditu Memorial Hospital and Menelik II Specialized Hospital.

Variables

Dependent variable

Severity of postoperative pain.

Independent variables

Sex, Age, type of surgery, analgesia type, time since surgery, preemptive analgesia used, preoperative pain, anxiety, frequency of pain assessment, extent of surgery, and institution were independent variables.

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

Paediatric patients from 2 month to 7 years at Addis Ababa governmental hospital from 5 January 2023 to 25 April 2023.

Exclusion criteria

Patients who become critical postoperatively, Children with cognitive impairment, cardiac and respiratory congenital anomaly, day case surgery, emergency surgery, and consent refusal, Patients who have cough preoperatively and postoperatively.

Sample size

The sample size was calculated by epi info software and manually using single population proportion assumption for first objective and double population proportion assumption for the second objective. It was calculated by considering Z 1-β the desired power (80%), Z1-α/2 critical value (95%), percent of event in unexposed, percent of event in exposed, ratio of subjects in unexposed to exposed, margin of error (5%) and frequency of outcome. Percent of events and frequency of outcomes were taken from different studies which have similarity in scope with this study objective (Table 1). The total number of desired study subjects to identify true risk after adding 10% non-response rate is 254 by taking the largest of the listed sample sizes.

Table 1.

Sample size for first and second objectives

(A) For the first objective (severity of postoperative pain)
Population size Frequency of outcome Margin of error Sample size Total sample size after adding 10% non-response rate = (1/1−0.1) ×SS Reference
568 50% 5 229 254 12
568 37% 5 220 244 25
568 22% 5 180 199 26
(B) For the second objective (factors affecting postoperative pain level)
Variables Ratio of unexposed to exposed % Of outcome in unexposed % Of outcome in exposed Sample size Total sample size after adding 10% non-response rate=(1/1−0.1)×SSa Reference
Preopb anxiety 1 30% 49.4 198 220 13
Preop pain 1 23% 54.1% 88 98 13
Neuro surgery 1 38% 58.8 182 202 13
a

SS, sample size.

b

Preop=to preoperational.

Manual sample size calculation done29.

Sampling procedures

The study calculated the required sample size for each PH using a formula: sample sizepopulation size × hospital size. TASH had 127 participants, ZMH had 51, and MSH had 76. The study stratifies age groups based on homogeneity within and heterogeneity between groups using validated pain assessment tools. Age groups from birth to 2 months are homogeneous, assessed using the CRIES tool. Age groups from 2 months to 7 years are strata 2, and those above 7 years is strata 3 since assessed by numerical rating scale (NSR) the study take only strata 2.

Each consecutive surgical patient’s aged 2 months–7 years were selected from hospital daily operation schedules.

Data collection procedures

The study involved trained nurses and anaesthesia professionals collecting data on preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative exposure variables. Six data collectors were involved, three preoperatively and three postoperatively. The exposure status was determined through anaesthesia record sheets, observation, and direct questioning. The questionnaire used literature variables. Pain levels were assessed using the FLACC scale, while preoperative anxiety was assessed using the modified30 Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale-short form (m-YPAS-SF). Data were collected in the holding area after obtaining consent. Inter-rater reliability for pain and anxiety was found to be good to excellent. Confidentiality was maintained throughout the research.

Outcome measurement

The FLACC scale which is widely used tool for children between 2 month and 7 years3,31,32 was used to ascertain the level of postoperative pain. The outcome data was collected by other trained data collector who didn’t know the exposure status of the patients at 12, 24, and 36 h.

Data analysis procedures

The data were collected using EpiData 3.1 software. For analysis, the primary outcome, pain severity, was categorized into two binary outcomes: mild to moderate pain and above-mild pain. The data were then exported to Stata/MP15 for longitudinal data analysis, accounting for repeated measurements from the same individuals. The Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) was employed to evaluate the marginal effects of independent variables on postoperative pain, while Cochran’s q-test was used to compare the incidence of postoperative pain between measurements. An autoregressive working correlation structure was selected to account for the dependency of observations within the same subject.

The multivariable analysis included variables with a P value less than 0.25, and the GEE was robust to multicollinearity. Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with a 95% CI and P value less than 0.05 was used to show the effect of determinant factors on the outcome variable. Descriptive and analytical statistics were presented using tables and graphs. The best fitting working correlation structure was selected based on the smallest QIC from different structures.

Data quality management

Pretest on pain assessment tools on 5% of study populations done in PH1. The tool’s inter-rater reliability was confirmed by three different raters, and content and face validity were ensured by advisors and experts. The investigator supervised data collection.

Result

Participant characteristics

The planed sample size were 254 paediatric postoperative patients but The final sample included 235 participants after excluding 19 participants who lost to follow-up. Each patient underwent 3 postoperative observations at different time points. Ninety-nine (42%) were females and 136 (58%) were males. General anaesthesia with endotracheal tube or laryngeal mask airway is the anaesthesia type for majority of the surgery (91.6%) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Characteristics of paediatric patients undergoing surgery at selected public referral hospitals (TASH, ZMH and MSH), January 2023–April 2023

Category (n=235) Frequency (percentage), n (%)
Age
 2 months–2 years 128 (54.45)
 2–5 years 53 (22.55)
 5–7 years 54 (22.97)
Participants per Hospital
 TASH 1 128 (54.47)
 ZMH2 49 (20.85)
 MSP 3 58 (24.68)
Sex
 Male 136 (57.87)
 Female 99 (42.13)
Type of surgery
 Urologic surgery 55 (23.40)
 GI (gastrointestinal) surgery 66 (28.09)
 Orthopaedic surgery 29 (12.34)
 Cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) 19 (8.09)
 Ear, nose and throat surgery (ENT) 24 (10.21)
 Neuro surgery 42 (17.84)
Type of sole anaesthesia
 General anaesthesia with endotracheal tube or LMA 214 (91.6)
 Sedation 18 (7.66)
 Regional anaesthesia 3 (1.28)

LMA, laryngeal mask airway;MSH, Menelik II specialized Hospital; TASH, Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital; ZMH, Zewditu memorial Hospital.

Trends of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative analgesics usage

The most common preoperative analgesic agent is Paracetamol suppository in 80%. Fentanyl commonly used for intraoperative analgesia in 76.5% of participants followed by multimodal and Paracetamol products (39%). Ketamine and Dexamethasone are also given intraoperatively but not primarily for the purpose of analgesia. Caudal epidural is the most widely used regional analgesia 35%, followed by local infiltration. Peripheral nerve blocks and spinal anaesthesia are rarely used during the intraoperative period (Table 3).

Table 3.

Types of analgesics used for perioperative pain management of paediatric surgical patients at selected public referral Hospitals, January 2023–April 2023

Category (n=235) Frequency (percentage), n (%)
Preoperative analgesia used
 Paracetamol suppository 17 (7.23)
 Fentanyl 2 (0.85)
Intraoperative analgesia used
 Fentanyl 183 (76.59)
 Morphine 5 (2.12)
 Paracetamol (Iv or suppository) 92 (39.14)
 Ketamine 103 (43.82)
 Dexamethasone 85 (36.17)
 Iv Lidocaine 62 (26.38)
 Only opioids 66 (28.09)
 Only Paracetamol (Iv or Suppository) 9 (3.83)
 Only regional analgesia 10 (4.26)
 Multimodal analgesia 148 (62.8)
Intraoperative regional analgesia used
 Local infiltration 36 (15.32)
 Intercostal nerve block 4 (1.70)
 Caudal epidural 85 (36.17)
 Spinal anaesthesia 2 (0.85)
 Not used 108 (45.96)
Postoperative analgesia used over the repeated measurements (n=705)
 Only opioids (fentanyl or morphine) 26 (3.68)
 Only paracetamol (Iv, syrup, Po or suppository) 375 (53.19)
 Only NSAIDs (diclofenac or ibuprofen syrup) 33 (4.68)
 Non-pharmacological method 12 (5.1)
 Multimodal 271 (38.44)

NSAIDs,Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

Postoperative pain assessment, analgesia administration and record practice

Majority of patients were assessed for pain once at each 12 h. Interval. On average, 59%, 20% and 18% were assessed 1, 2 and more than 2 times, respectively. Nearly 4.5% of patients were not assessed for pain. Postoperative analgesia was administered correctly in 83% of patients, but only 58% record it at each time interval (Table 4).

Table 4.

Postoperative pain assessment, analgesia administration and record practice of paediatric surgical patients at selected public referral hospitals, over the three time measurements January 2023–April 2023

Category (n=705) Frequency (percentage), n (%)
Pain assessment frequency
 None 31 (4.40)
 One time 401 (58.88)
 Two time 144 (20.43)
 Three and above 129 (18.30)
Analgesia given based on order
 Yes 588 (83.40)
 No 117 (16.60)
Analgesia given recorded
 Yes 413 (58.58)
 No 292 (41.42)
Pain assessment tool used
 Yes 56 (7.9)
 No 647 (91.77)

Severity of postoperative pain

The crude incidence of postoperative pain in paediatric surgical patients is 67%, 55%, and 41% at 12, 24 and 36 h, respectively (Table 5). Moderate to severe pain occurs in 36.6%, 20%, and 10% of patients at 12, 24, and 36 h. (Fig. 1). The average incidence of moderate to severe pain is 22.41% over three repeated measurements However, by Cochran’s q-test, the magnitude of postoperative pain is significantly different between each time measurements (P=0.00).

Table 5.

Incidence of postoperative pain at 12, 24 and 36 h from all paediatric surgical patients at selected public referral hospitals, January 2023–April 2023

Crude incidence at each time of measurement
Postoperative pain severity At 12 h 95% CI At 24 h 95% CI At 36 h 95% CI
Mild pain 32.3% 0.26–0.38 36.6% 0.30–0.42 30.64 0.25–0.36
Moderate pain 25.5% 0.20–0.34 17.5 0.13–0.22 10.2% 0.07–0.15
Severe pain 9.36% 0.06–0.14 1.28% 0.01–0.034 0.43% 0.001–0.03

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Postoperative pain level of paediatric surgical patients at selected Public referral Hospitals at each time measurements.

Factors associated with postoperative pain

This study analyzed postoperative pain severity in paediatric patients using the GEE model. The findings revealed that preoperative pain and preoperative anxiety were significant predictors of postoperative pain, with increased odds of developing postoperative pain (AOR=3.41, CI=1.15, 10.00 and AOR=2.28, CI=1.219, 4.277, respectively). However, other factors did not significantly impact postoperative pain severity after 12 h (Table 6).

Table 6.

Predictors of postoperative pain in pediatric surgical patients at selected public referral hospitals, January 2023–April 2023

Variables n=705 Category No to mild pain Moderate to severe pain COR P AOR (95% CI) P
Pain assessment frequency No 20 11 1 1 1 1
One time 303 98 0.40 0.054 0.13 (0.037, 0.46) 0.002**
Two times 111 33 0.32 0.026 0.11 (0.028, 0.45) 0.002**
Above two 113 16 0.13 0.001 0.09 (0.022, 0.39) 0.001**
Type of surgery Urologic 133 32 1 1 1
GI 145 53 1.57 0.193 0.66 (0.28, 1.53) 0.341
Orthopaedics 60 27 1.95 0.109 2.28 (0.79, 6.59) 0.125
CTS 43 14 1.51 0.402 1.50 (0.47, 4.79) 0.488
ENT 59 13 1.00 0.995 1.09 (0.35, 3.36) 0.883
Neuro 107 19 0.754 0.520 0.59 (0.19, 1.82) 0.362
Preemptive analgesia No 493 149 1 1 1 1
Yes 54 9 0.53 0.22 0.60 (0.15, 2.40) 0.477
Preoperative pain No 514 131 1 1 1 1
Yes 33 27 3.1 0.003 3.41 (1.15, 10.0) 0.026*
Preoperative anxiety No 397 95 1 1 1 1
Yes 150 63 3.5 0.000 2.28(1.21, 4.27) 0.01*
ASA One 357 90 1 1 1 1
Two 169 50 1.14 0.618 1.07 (0.55, 2.07) 0.83
Three 21 18 2.81 0.028 2.05 (0.60, 6.95) 0.25
Movement No 499 153 1 1 1 1
Yes 48 5 0.19 0.015 0.33 (0.08, 1.34) 0.122
Time since surgery 0.935 0.000 0.92 (0.90, 0.94) 0.000**
Duration of surgery in hour Below 1 h 189 15 1 1 1 1
1–3 h 269 82 4.03 0.000 3.43 (1.15, 10.1) 0.026*
Above 3 h 89 61 8.6 0.000 6.62 (1.90, 23.0) 0.003**
Extent of surgery Minor to moderate 258 18 1 1 1 1
Major 289 140 6.9 0.000 5.2 (2.11, 12.88) 0.000**
Postoperative analgesia used Others 43 16 1 1 1 1
Paracetamol 284 91 0.76 0.446 0.81 (0.34, 1.94) 0.638
Multimodal 220 51 0.353 0.006 0.24 (0.09, 0.652) 0.005**

AOR, adjusted odds ratio; ASA, American Society of Anesthesiologists; COR, Crude odds ratio; CTS, cardiothoracic surgery; ENT, ear, nose and throat surgery; GI, gastrointestinal.

*Significant.

**

Very significant.

Postoperative pain after 12 h. is primarily predicted by surgery duration and extent, with major surgeries having higher odds of pain 5.2 times and 6.2 times higher when surgery duration exceeds 2 h. (Table 6).

Postoperative factors affecting postoperative pain severity after 12 h. include surgery time, analgesia type, and frequency of pain assessment. Multimodal analgesia reduces pain by 0.24 times, while time elapsed by 12 h. reduces pain odds by 0.92 times (Table 6).

Discussion

The incidence of moderate to severe pain in studied hospitals is 36.6%, 20% and 10% at 12, 24 and 36 h. respectively. Many guidelines recommend pain above mild to be treated5. A study in Rwanda shows above half of paediatric surgical patients had severe postoperative pain in the first 48 h.13. This is higher than the result of this study the difference might be because of sample size and age category difference. Similar study conducted in University of Gondar, indicates that the overall prevalence of moderate to severe pain within the first 24 h. is 40% with different study design14. A study in Togo showed a higher pain score of 46% at 24 h, which differs from this study, in which the pain score was higher at 12 h. This may be due to the tools used and the study design12.

Several studies have identified intraoperative and postoperative pain assessment and management practices as the most crucial factors influencing postoperative pain severity34, a finding consistent with this study. Pain management protocols, standardized pain assessment tools, and regular pain assessment and management are essential for minimizing postoperative pain in paediatric patients3840. In this study, patients who underwent frequent pain assessments experienced a significant reduction in postoperative pain. Finding a consistent pain assessment tool suitable for all paediatric age groups and achieving accurate pain assessment in paediatrics remains a global challenge3,5. Developed countries have explored alternative approaches and technologies, such as mobile apps and computers, to improve pain assessment accuracy22,41,42. In many sub-Saharan countries, pain assessment is often neglected19. The studied hospitals demonstrate notable pain assessment initiatives in comparison.

Postoperative pain management is crucial for reducing severity but in lower-income countries, factors like drug availability, cost, and health professionals’ empathy, knowledge, and attitude can hinder its effectiveness13,14,38. For example, in the studied hospitals ketorolac and rectal diclofenac were not available and IV Paracetamol is too costly for most of patients. These drugs are recommended by The European Society for Pediatric Anesthesiology (ESPA) for minor to moderate surgeries to be routinely used as a base line treatment postoperatively11. Caudal analgesia and local infiltration at the wound site were practiced for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia but their effect wear off after 12 h. Peripheral nerve blocks which have longer duration of action greater than 12 h20,38,43,44 were used rarely. Peripheral nerve blocks are commonly performed in Western countries for various paediatrics surgeries with rare complications4547. However, in studied hospitals, the availability of equipment like nerve stimulator, ultrasounds, and the shortage of paediatric nerve block experts, contributes to lower practice.

Research from Italy and the Brain Pain Study Group has shown that multimodal analgesia significantly reduces postoperative pain levels, with varying effectiveness depending on the combination of drugs used27,35. Similarly, this study found that patients who received multimodal analgesia experienced a substantial decrease in postoperative pain severity, with a nearly 0.24-fold reduction compared to those who received a single analgesic agent. Postoperative pain management often involves using paracetamol and NSAIDs to minimize opioid use48. In the hospitals studied, most patients receiving multimodal analgesia received a combination of ibuprofen syrup and paracetamol, consistent with global guidelines. Several studies recommend the use of tramadol, ketamine, and dexamethasone as part of multimodal analgesia postoperatively, along with fentanyl to manage breakthrough postoperative pain in children38,49,50.

Studies indicate that patients with preoperative anxiety are more likely to experience postoperative acute pain.51,52. Patients having preoperative anxiety have higher postoperative pain incident (AOR=2.28) which is comparable with other studies like a study in Gondar University Hospital, patients with preoperative anxiety are 2.24 times more likely to develop postoperative moderate to severe pain than the control.

Several studies suggest that non-pharmacological management techniques and parental involvement can effectively reduce anxiety levels10. Non-pharmacological interventions such as distractions, relaxation, play therapy, music therapy, and other methods have been shown to decrease anxiety, improve pain control, and enhance patient cooperation37,51,53. However, these techniques were not adequately implemented in the studied hospitals, which may have contributed to higher anxiety-related postoperative pain levels. Consistent with previous findings, this study found a significant association between preoperative pain and postoperative pain14,54. While some studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of preemptive analgesia using Dipyrone and paracetamol in reducing postoperative pain, particularly in tonsillectomy patients4,55,56, this study did not observe such an effect. However, since the outcome was measured at 12 h intervals, it is possible that the short-acting effects of preemptive analgesia had diminished by this time, making it difficult to definitively determine its impact on pain reduction.

The type of surgical procedure was not found to be a significant determinant of postoperative pain, but the extent and duration of surgery were (AOR of 5.2 and 6.62, respectively). These findings align with previous studies, such as one conducted at Gondor University Hospital, which found that patients with incisions larger than 10 cm had a 3.9 times higher pain level than those with incisions smaller than 5 cm14. While some studies suggest that sex influences postoperative pain levels, with males experiencing higher pain due to a stronger neuroendocrine response, others indicate the opposite57,58. In this study, sex did not play a role in postoperative pain severity. Consistent with other studies, the highest incidence of pain occurred within the first 24 h, decreasing by 0.92 times after 12 h.

Conclusion

The incidence of moderate to severe pain is high in studied hospitals. The availability of consistent pain assessment tools, low emphasis towards pain management and assessment, limitation in resource and shortage of experts are undeniable reasons. Frequency of pain assessment, documentation and pain management practice needs high improvement to reduce postoperative pain. This study contributes to postoperative pain management knowledge in resource-poor areas, serving as a foundation for further research on pain severity and predictors in neonates and infants.

Limitation of study

The study measures outcome variables at specific time intervals, doesn’t consider pain levels in between, and doesn’t include all paediatric surgical patients. As strength it’s a multicenter study.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval for this study (protocol number; Anes/1/2022/2023/) provided by Addis Ababa University, institute review board, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, on 13 December, 2022. In addition, ethical clearance was obtained from Addis Ababa Public Health Research and Emergency Management Directorate.

Operational definitions

  • Postoperative pain: A pain perceived due to surgical intervention in the post-surgery and explained as no pain, mild pain, moderate pain and severe pain.

  • Severity of postoperative pain: The FLACC scale which ranging from 0 to 10 for intensity, score of 0 indicate no pain; 1–3 mild pain; 4–6 moderate pain; 7–10 severe pain as used in many pain studies27,3335.

  • Preoperative anxiety: The assessment of anxiety was made through direct observation using the ‘modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale-short form (m-YPAS-SF)’.

  • ASA Physical Status Classification: It is used to assess patient’s pre-anaesthesia conditions to estimate the perioperative risks which have 1–6 Grades, ASA 1 healthy nonsmoking whereas ASA 5 is a brain-dead patient.

  • Extent of surgery: Major surgery involves large incisions and trauma to tissues such as; craniotomy, thoracotomy, bowel resection. Moderate surgery is less invasive, such as inguinal hernia repair and tonsillectomy. Minor surgical procedures are minimally invasive with small incisions and superficial procedures performed laparoscopically36. In this study, moderate and minor surgeries are merged during analysis.

  • Multimodal analgesia: is the use of more than one group of analgesic agent targeting different receptors along the pain pathway with the goal of improving analgesia while reducing adverse effects4,37.

Consent

The study also obtained written informed consent from the study participants parents, guardians and hospitals which is prepared based on the IJS Patient Consent form. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal on request”.

Source of funding

The study got financial supports from Addis Ababa university,college of healthy science.

Author contribution

All authors contributed to conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, validation, writing, review, and editing; in addition, the first author contributed to the original draft. Also, all authors read and approved the revised manuscript for publication. F.M.R.: as a primary investigator he developed the proposal, trained the data collectors, analyzed the data and wrote the result and interpreted the result. E.M.: as a team member he developed the proposal, trained the data collectors, analyzed the data and wrote the result and interpreted the result, overall he leads the research team. S.J.M.: as a team member he developed the proposal, trained the data collectors, analyzed the data and wrote the result and interpreted the result and corresponding author.

Conflicts of interest disclosure

The authors declare there is no competing interest in this work.

Research registration unique identifying number (UIN)

  1. Name of the registry: Research Registration.

  2. This research registered in Research registration with Unique Identifying number UIN 9418; Hyperlink https://www.researchregistry.com/browse-the-registry#home/.

Guarantor

Fassil Mihretu Rede and Sulaiman Jemal Muzien.

Availability of data and materials

Data and materials will be shared upon reasonable request.

Provenance and peer review

the paper is “Not commissioned, externally peer-reviewed”.

Financial support and sponsorship

The study have got financial support from Addis Ababa University.

Acknowledgements

The authors express their heartfelt gratitude to Tikur Anbessa Specialized Hospital, Zewditu hospitals and Menelik II hospital staffs and Addis Ababa University for providing us the fund, ethical clearance, internet and Library service. The authors are thankful to the All-Powerful God and to the patients’ parents for approving the study. Addis Ababa University is also thanked for its financial support.

Footnotes

Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.

Published online 17 January 2024

Contributor Information

Fassil Mihretu Rede, Email: fasilmihretu@gmail.com.

Eyayalem Melese Goshu, Email: eyayalem.melese@aau.edu.et.

Sulaiman Jemal muzien, Email: sulaiman.jemal@aau.edu.et.

References

  • 1.Mahmood I. Pediatric physiology. Fundam Pediatr Drug Dosing 2016:13–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Williams K, Thomson D, Seto I, et al. Age groups for pediatric trials. Pediatrics 2012;129(suppl. 3):S153–S160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kahsay H. Assessment and treatment of pain in pediatric patients. Curr Pediatr Res 2017;21:148–157. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lovich-Sapola J, Smith CE, Brandt CP. Postoperative pain control. Surg Clin North Am 2015;95:301–318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zieliński J, Morawska-Kochman M, Zatoński T. Pain assessment and management in children in the postoperative period: a review of the most commonly used postoperative pain assessment tools, new diagnostic methods and the latest guidelines for postoperative pain therapy in children. Adv Clin Exp Med 2020;29:365–374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Raja SN, Carr DB, Cohen M, et al. The Revised IASP definition of pain: concepts, challenges, and compromises. Pain 2020;161:1976–1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Batoz H, Semjen F, Bordes-Demolis M, et al. Chronic postsurgical pain in children: Prevalence and risk factors. A prospective observational study. Br J Anaesth 2016;117:489–496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chang J, Versloot J, Fashler SR, et al. Pain assessment in children: validity of facial expression items in observational pain scales. Clin J Pain 2015;31:189–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bringuier S, Macioce V, Boulhais M, et al. Facial expressions of pain in daily clinical practice to assess postoperative pain in children: Reliability and validity of the facial action summary score. Eur J Pain (United Kingdom) 2021;25:1081–1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rosenberg RE, Clark RA, Chibbaro P, et al. Factors predicting parent anxiety around infant and toddler postoperative and pain. Hosp Pediatr 2017;7:313–319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Vittinghoff M, Lönnqvist PA, Mossetti V, et al. Postoperative pain management in children: Guidance from the pain committee of the European Society for Paediatric Anaesthesiology (ESPA Pain Management Ladder Initiative). Paediatr Anaesth 2018;28:493–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Sama HD, Bang’na Maman AFO, Djibril M, et al. Post-operative pain management in paediatric surgery at Sylvanus Olympio University Teaching Hospital, Togo. African J Paediatr Surg 2014;11(Issue 2):162–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kalala B, Ferguson D, Nizeyimana F, et al. A survey of pediatric postoperative pain management in Rwanda. Can J Anesth [Internet] 2021;68:1718–1720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mekonnen ZA, Melesse DY, Kassahun HG, et al. Prevalence and contributing factors associated with postoperative pain in pediatric patients: a cross-sectional follow-up study. Perioper Care Oper Room Manag [Internet] 2021;23(February):100159. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Belachew Dejene MM. Practice of postoperative pain management in under-five children in a tertiary hospital: a prospective crossectional study. Ethiop J Health Sci 2022;32:1117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dunbar PJ, Visco E, Lam AM. Craniotomy procedures are associated with less analgesic requirements than other surgical procedures. Anesth Analg 1999;88:335–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Chiaretti A, Russo I, Gargiullo L, et al. Current practice and recent advances in pediatric pain management. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2013;17(suppl 1):112–126. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Twycross AM, Williams AM, Finley GA. Surgeons’ aims and pain assessment strategies when managing paediatric post-operative pain: a qualitative study. J Child Heal Care 2015;19:513–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ayede AI. Neonatal pain management in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Child Adolesc Heal [Internet] 2020;4:713–714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kuo C, Edwards A, Mazumdar M, et al. Regional Anesthesia for Children Undergoing Orthopedic Ambulatory Surgeries in the United States, 1996-2006. HSS J 2012;8:133–136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Manyazewal T, Admassu W. Knowledge and attitude of anesthetists and PACU Nurses on Pediatric post operative pain management at Tikur Anbesa Specialized Hospital [Internet]. 2017. Available from: http://etd.aau.edu.et/bitstream/handle/123456789/975/TigistManyazewal.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
  • 22.Birnie KA, Campbell F, Nguyen C, et al. iCanCope PostOp: User-centered design of a smartphone-based app for self-management of postoperative pain in children and adolescents. JMIR Form Res 2019;3:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Torborg A, Cronje L, Thomas J, et al. South African Paediatric Surgical Outcomes Study: a 14-day prospective, observational cohort study of paediatric surgical patients. Br J Anaesth 2019;122:224–232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.CSA . Population Projections for Ethiopia 2007-2037. Cent Stat Agency Popul Ethiop 2013:188. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hubertus J, Abera G, Haileamlak A, et al. Establishment of a pediatric surgical unit at a university hospital in eastern africa. Children 2021;8:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Derbew M, Ahmed E. The pattern of pediatric surgical conditions in Tikur Anbessa Unversity Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ethiop Med J 2006;44:331–338. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Marchetti G, Vittori A, Ferrari F, et al. Incidence of acute and chronic post-thoracotomy pain in pediatric patients. Children 2021;8:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mathew G, Agha R, for the STROCSS Group . STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the Reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in Surgery. Int J Surg 2021;96:106165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sharma S, Mudgal S, Thakur K, et al. How to calculate sample size for observational and experiential nursing research studies? Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol 2019;10:1. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Jenkins BN, Fortier MA, Kaplan SH, et al. Development of a short version of the modified yale preoperative anxiety scale. Anesth Analg 2014;119:643–650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Babl FE, Crellin D, Cheng J, et al. The use of the faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale to assess procedural pain and distress in young children. Pediatr Emerg Care 2012;28:1281–1286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kochman A, Howell J, Sheridan M, et al. Reliability of the faces, legs, activity, cry, and consolability scale in assessing acute pain in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2017;33:14–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lee J, Delaney K, Napier M, et al. Child pain intensity and parental attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine predict post-tonsillectomy analgesic use. Children 2020;7:1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Milchak M, Dalal PG, Mccloskey DE, et al. Postoperative pain and analgesia in children undergoing palatal surgery : a retrospective chart review. J PeriAnesthesia Nurs [Internet] 2016;32:1–8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bronco A, Pietrini D, Lamperti M, et al. Incidence of pain after craniotomy in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2014;24:781–787. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.National institute for Health and Care Excellence . Routine preoperative tests for elective surgery. BJU Int 2018;121:12–16. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Frizzell KH, Cavanaugh PK, Herman MJ. Pediatric perioperative pain management. Orthop Clin NA 2017;48:1–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brasher C, Gafsous B, Dugue S, et al. Postoperative pain management in children and infants: an update. Pediatr Drugs 2014;16:129–140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wood MD, Correa K, Ding P, et al. Identification of requirements for a postoperative pediatric pain risk communication tool: focus group study with clinicians and family members. JMIR Pediatr Parent 2022;5:e37353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Elawady MS, Taman HI, El Said Saber HI. Evaluation of Paediatric Postoperative Pain Management among Nursing Staff Working in Tertiary University Hospitals: A multicentre Cross-sectional Study. Egypt J Hosp Med 2022;87:1342–1347. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sikka K, Ahmed AA, Diaz D, et al. Automated assessment of children’s postoperative pain using computer vision. Pediatrics 2015;136:e124–e131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ledowski T, Sommerfield D, Slevin L, et al. Surgical pleth index: Prediction of postoperative pain in children? Br J Anaesth [Internet] 2017;119:979–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Benka AU, Pandurov M, Galambos IF, et al. Effects of caudal block in pediatric surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial. Brazilian J Anesthesiol (English Ed 2020;70:97–103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kendigelen P, Ashyyeralyeva G, Emre S, et al. Pudendal nerve block versus penile nerve block in children undergoing circumcision. Urol J 2018;15:31–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Walker B, Long J, Sathyamoorthy M, et al. Complications in pediatric regional anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2018;129:721–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Seyedhejazi M, Motarabbesoun S, Eslampoor Y, et al. Appendectomy pain control by transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in children. Anesthesiol Pain Med 2019;9:1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Seyedhejazi M, Sheikhzadeh D, Adrang Z, et al. Comparing the analgesic effect of caudal and ilioinguinal iliohypogastric nerve blockade using bupivacaine-clonidine in inguinal surgeries in children 2-7 years old. African J Paediatr Surg 2014;11:166–169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wong I, St John-Green C, Walker SM. Opioid-sparing effects of perioperative paracetamol and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2013;23:475–495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vadivelu N, Schermer E, Kodumudi V, et al. Role of ketamine for analgesia in adults and children. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2016;32:298–306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Schnabel A, Reichl SU, Meyer-Frießem C, et al. Tramadol for postoperative pain treatment in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD009574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gabrielle Pagé M, Campbell F, Isaac L, et al. Parental risk factors for the development of pediatric acute and chronic postsurgical pain: a longitudinal study. J Pain Res 2013;6:727–741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rabbitts JA, Groenewald CB, Tai GG, et al. Presurgical psychosocial predictors of acute postsurgical pain and quality of life in children undergoing major surgery. J Pain 2015;16:226–234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ting B, Tsai CL, Hsu WT, et al. Music intervention for pain control in the pediatric population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2022;11:1–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Revuri VR, Moody K, Lewis V, et al. Pain and analgesia in children with cancer after hemipelvectomy: a retrospective analysis. Children 2022;9:237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Isis M, Stangler S, Pedro J, et al. Dipyrone as pre-emptive measure in postoperative analgesia after tonsillectomy in children : a systematic review. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol [Internet] 2021;87:227–236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zieliński J, Morawska-Kochman M, Dudek K, et al. The effect of pre-emptive analgesia on the postoperative pain in pediatric otolaryngology: a randomized, controlled trial. J Clin Med 2022;11:2713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Karišik M, Barhanović NG, Vulović T, et al. Postoperative pain and stress response: does child’s gender have an influence? Acta Clin Croat 2019;58:274–280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Moura LA, Oliveira ACD, Pereira G de A, et al. Postoperative pain in children: a gender approach. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2011;45:831–836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data and materials will be shared upon reasonable request.


Articles from Annals of Medicine and Surgery are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES