Skip to main content
BMJ Open logoLink to BMJ Open
. 2024 Mar 8;14(3):e079856. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079856

Determinants of iron-rich food deficiency among children under 5 years in sub-Saharan Africa: a comprehensive analysis of Demographic and Health Surveys

Emmanuel Osei Bonsu 1,, Isaac Yeboah Addo 2, Caleb Boadi 3, Elijah Frimpong Boadu 4, Sylvester R Okeke 2
PMCID: PMC10928746  PMID: 38458798

Abstract

Background

Iron deficiency is a major public health problem that affects the physical and cognitive development of children under 5 years of age (under-5 children) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). However, the factors associated with the limited consumption of iron-rich foods in the region are poorly understood.

Objective

This study examined the prevalence and determinants of iron-rich food deficiency among under-5 children in 26 SSA countries.

Design

This nationally representative quantitative study employed pooled data from Demographic and Health Surveys conducted between 2010 and 2019.

Methods

Representative samples comprising 296 850 under-5 children from the various countries were used. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine the associations between the lack of iron-rich food uptake and various sociodemographic factors.

Result

The overall prevalence of iron-rich food deficiency among the children in the entire sample was 56.75%. The prevalence of iron-rich food deficiency varied widely across the 26 countries, ranging from 42.76% in Congo Democratic Republic to 77.50% in Guinea. Maternal education, particularly primary education (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.68) and higher education (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.64), demonstrated a reduced likelihood of iron-rich food deficiency in the sample. Likewise, paternal education, with both primary education (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.75) and higher education (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.73) showed decreased odds of iron-rich food deficiency. Postnatal visits contributed significantly to reducing the odds of iron-rich food deficiency (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.95), along with antenatal visits, which also had a positive impact (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95). Finally, residents in rural areas showed slightly higher odds of iron-rich food deficiency (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.28).

Conclusion

Based on the findings, interventions targeting iron-food deficiency in the SSA region should take into strong consideration the key determinants highlighted in this study.

Keywords: community child health, nutritional support, nutrition & dietetics


STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY.

  • One strength was that the study used nationally representative data from 26 sub-Saharan African countries, hence promoting a more valid, comprehensive and reliable analysis.

  • One limitation was the inability to establish causality among the variables due to its cross-sectional nature.

  • Another limitation was the potential impact of differences in data collection timing across countries on the accuracy and precision of assessing deficiencies in iron-rich food intake within the sample.

  • Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) data primarily rely on self-reported information which increases the likelihood of social desirability and information recall bias.

  • The lack of potential confounding variables, such as cultural factors in the DHS data, represents a significant limitation in understanding the complete array of factors influencing the deficiencies in iron-rich food intake in the sample.

Introduction

Although iron deficiency is a significant public health concern,1–3 there is an absence of an international agreement on measuring the iron status of populations, especially, in under-5 children.4–6 This has led to the common practice of estimating the prevalence of iron deficiency by relying on the prevalence of anaemia, determined through measurements of blood haemoglobin concentration.4–6 Nevertheless, available estimates from the WHO indicate that approximately 33% of non-pregnant women, 40% of pregnant women and 42% of children worldwide are affected by iron deficiency.5–7 These statistics highlight the hidden but widespread nature of iron deficiency, especially in children and the need for effective interventions and policies to address this significant public health problem.

Iron deficiency has detrimental effects on the physical and cognitive development of children.8 9 Evidence indicates that iron deficiency is associated with cognitive impairment, psychomotor disorders and behavioural problems.10 The most commonly observed cognitive domains impacted by iron deficiency include attention, emotion, intelligence and sensory perceptions.10 Additionally, iron deficiency has the potential to adversely impact the capacity for learning and acquisition of professional skills.10 Taken together, iron deficiency has detrimental effects on the physical and cognitive development of under-5 children.

It is widely known that children in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) face a substantial burden of iron deficiency, posing a significant threat to their well-being.11 A review paper has indicated that the general occurrence of iron deficiency anaemia among African children, as defined by the WHO, stood at 34%, whereas it reached 52% when considering the estimate adjusted for inflammation and malaria.11 The review highlights the alarmingly high occurrence rates of iron deficiency in the region, emphasising the urgent need for interventions.

The most practical and viable method for reducing iron deficiency in under-5 children in SSA is by promoting the consumption of iron-rich foods.12–14 Iron-rich foods are essential dietary sources containing a significant amount of bioavailable iron, a crucial mineral vital for proper bodily functioning and development.15 These foods hold a pivotal role in preventing iron deficiency, especially among children under 5, and are vital for overall health and well-being.16 Examples of such iron-rich foods encompass a diverse range of options, including red meat (beef, lamb and pork), poultry (chicken and turkey), fish and seafoods (salmon, tuna, sardines, clams and mussels), legumes (lentils, chickpeas, black beans, kidney beans and soybeans), tofu, fortified cereals, dark leafy greens like spinach, nuts and seeds (pumpkin seeds, sunflower seeds and almonds), dried fruits (raisins, apricots and prunes) and quinoa.14 17 18

Despite the recognition of iron deficiency in children as a critical public health issue in SSA, there remains a substantial gap in recognising the prevalence of iron-rich food deficiency and the factors associated with the lack of iron-rich food consumption in this priority population. Previous studies, for instance,12 19 20 have primarily focused on determining the prevalence of adequate consumption of iron-rich foods among children aged 6–23 months in SSA, with limited studies specifically investigating iron food deficiency in SSA children. An approach focusing strictly on iron-rich food deficiency allows for a deeper analysis of the factors that contribute to iron deficiency, going beyond merely assessing the consumption of adequate iron-rich foods. Thus, previous studies that only focused on the consumption of adequate iron-rich foods might not have captured the full picture of iron deficiency. By examining factors associated with iron deficiencies, researchers, nutritionists, health promoters and policy implementers in SSA can refine existing interventions and develop new approaches that are better suited to address the root causes of the problem.

This current paper aims to address the existing knowledge gap by examining the prevalence of non-consumption of iron-rich foods and conducting a comprehensive analysis of the factors associated with the limited consumption of iron-rich foods among under-5 children in SSA. The study uses the latest data from Demographic and Health Surveys (DHSs) conducted between 2010 and 2019 in 26 SSA countries. The documentation of factors linked to the inadequate uptake of iron-rich foods holds significant importance for various stakeholders, including nutritionists, public health workers, health promoters and policy-makers. The findings from this present study can provide valuable insights for the formulation of tailored interventions and policies aligned with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), specifically SDG 2 (Zero Hunger) and SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being).21–23 Thus, this paper contributes to the broader global efforts to combat iron deficiency and improve overall nutritional and health outcomes in under-5 children.21–23

Methods

Overview

DHSs are nationally representative household surveys that collect data on various indicators related to population, health and nutrition. The DHS project, funded primarily by the US Agency for International Development and administered by Macro International, aims to support government and private agencies in developing countries in conducting national sample surveys on population, maternal and child health. The main objectives of the DHS programme include the following: (1) promoting the dissemination and utilisation of DHS data among policymakers, (2) expanding the international population and health database, (3) advancing survey methodology and (4) developing the skills and resources necessary for conducting high-quality DHSs in participating countries.24

Data source

For this study, we used the most recent pooled data from the DHSs dataset of 26 SSA countries conducted between 2010 and 2019.25 The study specifically focused on representative national child data of children under the age of 5 (0–59 months), selected using a two-stage sampling design. The DHS datasets are known for providing reliable information on child health, maternal health, fertility, family planning and nutrition. The countries included in the study were Burkina Faso (2010), Benin (2017), Congo Democratic Republic (2013–2014), Congo (2011–2012), Cote D‘Ivoire (2011–2012), Cameroon (2018), Ethiopia (2016), Ghana (2014), Guinea (2018), Kenya (2019), Liberia (2019), Lesotho (2014), Madagascar (2021), Malawi (2015–2016), Mali (2018), Mozambique (2015), Namibia (2013), Nigeria (2018), Sierra Leone (2019), Senegal (2010–2011), Chad (2014–2015), Togo (2013), Tanzania (2015–2016), Uganda (2016), Zambia (2018) and Zimbabwe (2015). The total sample size for under-5 children used in the analysis was 296 850.

Patient and public involvement

No patient was involved in this study.

Study variables

The dependent variable in this study was ‘no consumption of iron-rich foods or iron-rich food deficiency’. In the DHS, iron-rich foods were assessed by asking mothers of under-5 children whether their child had consumed specific items (eggs, fish, organ meat, leafy vegetables, beef meat) in the 2 weeks preceding the survey. Based on this DHS methodology, we defined ‘iron-rich deficiency’ as a state wherein an individual, typically assessed through dietary patterns, lacks adequate consumption of foods recognised for their high iron content, resulting in insufficient iron intake within a given period. This deficiency was determined by evaluating an individual’s diet and identifying whether they regularly consume items known to be rich in iron, such as red meat, fish, poultry, leafy green vegetables, beans or fortified cereals.8 9 In other words, a novel approach was employed to ascertain if a child had not consumed any of the specified iron-rich foods. This involved the creation of a composite variable that was scored as follows: a score of 0 indicated that the child had consumed at least one iron-rich food, while a score of 1 indicated that the child had not consumed any of the specified iron-rich foods. This innovative method aligns with the established DHS methodology for assessing iron-rich food intake.

Based on empirical gaps in previous studies,12 19 20 we considered 12 explanatory variables, which included child variables, maternal variables and paternal variables. Child variables included sex (1=male, 2=female), age (1=6–18 months, 2=19–37 months, 3=38–59 months) and anaemia level (1=anaemic, 2=not anaemic). Maternal variables encompassed educational level (1=primary, 2=secondary, 3=higher), marital status (1=not married, 2=married), wealth index (1=poor, 2=middle, 3=rich), residence (1=urban, 2=rural), media exposure (1=no, 2=yes), postnatal visit (1=no, 2=yes) and antenatal visit (1=no, 2=yes). Paternal variables included educational level (1=primary, 2=secondary, 3=higher) and work status (1=no, 2=yes).

The selected child variables—sex, age and anaemia level—were crucial to understanding disparities in iron-rich food intake among children, as these factors have shown substantial associations with dietary patterns and health outcomes in prior research.26 27 Maternal variables, including educational level, marital status, wealth index, residence, media exposure, postnatal visit and antenatal visit, were considered due to their recognised influence on household dietary practices, access to healthcare and socioeconomic status, all of which can significantly impact children’s nutritional intake.28 29 Additionally, the inclusion of paternal variables—educational level and work status—was deemed relevant, acknowledging the role of paternal involvement and socioeconomic contributions in influencing household dietary habits and children’s overall well-being.30 31 This comprehensive set of variables aimed to provide a holistic understanding of the multiple factors shaping iron-rich food intake among children, thereby contributing to a more nuanced analysis.

Data analysis

Stata/SE V.14 software was used to analyse the data. The study employed the ‘svyset’ command, incorporating the sample weight, strata and primary sampling unit variables to address both primary and secondary stages within the DHSs. This approach facilitated the calculation of weighted percentages and frequencies for categorical variables, ensuring robust analysis. Additionally, to estimate variance accurately, the study applied robust SEs, emphasising a comprehensive approach aimed at enhancing the transparency, rigour and clarity of the analysis in accommodating the complexities inherent in the two-stage sampling design employed within the study.

Prior to analysis, the data underwent cleaning, editing and recoding. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between the absence of iron-rich food consumption and sociodemographic characteristics. A correlation matrix was used to assess multicollinearity. Variables that were more correlated with the outcome variables were taken out of the final model. Variables with a p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Sociodemographic characteristics of participants

Out of the total sample of 296 850 under-5 children included in the study, slightly over half (50.6%) were males. Approximately 36.2% of the children fell within the age group of 6–18 months. The majority of under-5 children (64.4%) were classified as anaemic, indicating a high prevalence of anaemia among this population. Moreover, more than half (56.5%) of the children were found to not be consuming iron-rich foods. In terms of maternal demographic characteristics, the majority of mothers (65.9%) had attained at least primary education. Married mothers accounted for a substantial proportion (87.5%), while the remaining 12.5% were not married. A significant proportion of mothers (89.5%) attended antenatal care (ANC), reflecting a relatively high utilisation of antenatal services. Regarding paternal characteristics, a notable proportion of fathers (35.9%) had higher education levels. The majority of fathers (66.2%) were actively employed, indicating their involvement in the workforce. These sociodemographic characteristics provide a snapshot of the population under study and highlight important factors that may influence the consumption of iron-rich foods among under-5 children (table 1).

Table 1.

Sociodemographic characteristics of the sample

Variables Frequency=296 850
N (%)
Weighted %
(CI)
Child characteristics
Sex
Male 150 109 (50.57) 50.63 (50.40 to 50.86)
Female 146 741 (49.43) 49.37 (49.14 to 49.59)
Age group (months)
6–18 104 758 (36.34) 36.23 (36.01 to 36.44)
19–37 98 993 (34.34) 33.99 (33.77 to 34.20)
38–59 84 540 (29.32) 29.78 (29.52 to 30.03)
Anaemia level
Anaemic 63 597 (64.68) 64.43 (63.77 to 73.10)
Not anaemic 34 733 (35.32) 35.57 (35.02 to 36.11)
Iron-rich food
Consumption 77 008 (43.54) 43.44 (42.90 to 43.99)
No consumption 99 869 (56.46) 56.56 (56.01 to 57.10)
Mother’s characteristics
Mother’s educational level
No education 116 107 (39.11) 34.38 (33.82 to 34.95)
Primary 101 269 (34.12) 38.47 (37.72 to 39.22)
Higher 79 467 (26.77) 27.15 (26.58-.27.72)
Marital status
Not married 37 990 (12.80) 12.51 (12.25 to 12.78)
Married 258 858 (87.20) 87.49 (87.22 to 87.75)
Wealth
Poor 100 609 (33.89) 36.04 (35.33 to 36.75)
Middle 138 281 (46.58) 43.72 (43.00 to 44.43)
Rich/wealthy 57 960 (19.53) 20.24 (19.88 to 20.61)
Residence
Urban 85 396 (28.77) 30.08 (29.14 to 31.03)
Rural 211 454 (71.23) 69.92 (68.97 to 70.86)
Media
No 139 841 (48.10) 47.00 (46.49.66 to 47.52)
Yes 150 914 (51.90) 52.99 (52.48 to 53.51)
Postnatal
No 110 479 (58.80) 58.96 (58.28 to 59.63)
Yes 77 400 (41.20) 41.04 (40.37 to 41.71)
Antenatal
No 22 514 (11.20) 10.55 (10.13 to 10.97)
Yes 178 470 (88.80) 89.45 (89.02 to 89.86)
Father’s characteristics
Father’s educational level
No education 87 680 (35.83) 35.59 (34.77 to 36.42)
Primary 68 639 (28.05) 28.51 (27.94 to 29.09)
Higher 88 366 (36.11) 35.90 (35.00 to 36.81)
Work status
No 95 576 (34.16) 33.84 (33.27 to 34.41)
Yes 184 252 (65.84) 66.16 (65.58 to 66.73)

N represents total frequency.

No iron-rich food consumption by sociodemographic characteristics

The study revealed that a higher proportion of male (51%) children did not consume iron-rich foods. Among children in different age groups, the majority of those aged 6–18 months (58%), 19–37 months (21%) and 38–59 months (21%) did not have iron-rich food in their diets. Furthermore, a significant number of children who were identified as anaemic (70%) also did not consume iron-rich foods.

In terms of maternal characteristics, it was found that the majority of mothers with no education (45%) did not provide their children with iron-rich foods. Among married mothers, the majority (91%) did not incorporate iron-rich food into their children’s diets. Additionally, mothers belonging to the middle-class (47%) wealth categories did not feed their children with iron-rich foods. Furthermore, a majority of mothers (88%) who attend ANC did not include iron-rich foods in their children’s meals. Regarding paternal characteristics, it was observed that a majority of fathers (41%) with no formal education did not provide their children with foods rich in iron.

These findings highlight the concerning patterns of low iron-rich food consumption among children and indicate the influence of maternal and paternal characteristics on this issue. Addressing these factors and promoting awareness about the importance of incorporating iron-rich foods into children’s diets is crucial for combating iron deficiency and its associated health implications (table 2).

Table 2.

Proportion of ‘no iron-rich food consumption’ by sociodemographic characteristics

Variables No consumption of Iron-rich food
Weighted frequency (%)
Weighted %
(CI)
Child characteristics
Sex
Male 49 749 (50.53) 50.17 to 50.96
Female 48 710 (49.47) 49.03 to 49.82
Age group
6–18 56 274 (58.25) 57.75 to 58.37
19–37 20 236 (20.95) 20.60 to 21.17
38–59 20 098 (20.80) 20.75 to 21.37
Anaemia level
Anaemic 23 016 (70.27) 69.46 to 71.08
Not anaemic 7810 (29.73) 28.91 to 30.54
Mother’s characteristics
Mother’s educational level
No education 44 179 (44.87) 44.86 to 46.73
Primary 31 077 (31.57) 30.84 to 32.28
Higher 23 194 (23.56) 21.99 to 23.31
Marital status
Not married 9282 (9.43) 8.83 to 9.53
Married 89 174 (90.57) 90.47 to 91.16
Wealth
Poor 45 902 (32.81) 31.90 to 33.62
Middle 20 248 (46.62) 45.72 to 47.53
Rich/wealthy 32 309 (20.56) 20.07 to 21.18
Residence
Urban 26 537 (26.95) 25.08 to 27.18
Rural 71 922 (73.05) 72.81 to 74.92.
Media
No 46 575 (48.29) 47.52 to 49.00
Yes 49 879 (51.71) 50.99 to 52.47
Postnatal
No 33 994 (62.23) 61.79 to 63.34
Yes 20 635 (37.77) 36.52 to 38.21
Antenatal
No 7028 (12.43) 11.95 to 13.18
Yes 49 509 (87.57) 86.81 to 88.04
Father’s characteristics
Father’s educational level
No education 34 948 (40.70) 40.58 to 42.64
Primary 22 811 (26.57) 26.08 to 27.53
Higher 28 099 (32.73) 30.73 to 32.46
Work status
No 37 399 (39.04) 38.33 to 39.87
Yes 58 396 (60.96) 60.13 to 61.67

Prevalence of non-consumption of iron-rich food among under-5 children in SSA

Figure 1 indicates an overview of the prevalence of non-consumption of iron-rich foods among under-5 children in various SSA countries. The results of this study indicate that a significant proportion of children in several countries did not have a dietary intake of iron-rich foods. For instance, in Guinea and Burkina Faso, a staggering 77% of under-5 children did not consume iron-rich food. Similarly, in Benin, the prevalence of non-consumption was 60%, while in Cote d‘Ivoire and Ethiopia, it was 59% and 77%, respectively. Other countries with notable prevalence rates of non-consumption of iron-rich foods included Kenya (54%), Guinea (78%), Liberia (58%), Sierra Leone (59%), Senegal (65%), Chad (70%) and Uganda (56%). These findings highlight a concerning trend of inadequate intake of iron-rich foods among children in these countries, suggesting a significant public health concern. Efforts to improve awareness, education and accessibility to iron-rich food sources are crucial in addressing this issue and reducing the prevalence of non-consumption among children in SSA.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Prevalence of no iron-rich food among under-5 children by countries in SSA. SSA, sub-Saharan Africa.

Determinants of non-consumption of iron-rich foods

Table 3 presents the determinants associated with the non-consumption of iron-rich foods among under-5 children in SSA. Several factors demonstrated a significant association with the lack of dietary intake of iron-rich foods. Children who were not anaemic had a lower likelihood of non-consumption of iron-rich foods (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.92), indicating a potential protective effect of anaemia status on dietary intake. Maternal education played a crucial role, with both primary education (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.68) and higher education (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.64) showing a reduced likelihood of non-consumption. Residence in a rural area was associated with a higher likelihood of non-consumption (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.28), suggesting that access to iron-rich foods may be limited in rural settings. Media usage (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.99), postnatal visits (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.95) and antenatal visits (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.95) were all associated with a decreased likelihood of non-consumption, highlighting the importance of healthcare utilisation and access to information. Paternal education also played a role, with both primary education (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.75) and higher education (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.73) showing a reduced likelihood of non-consumption. Additionally, paternal working status was associated with a lower likelihood of non-consumption (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.84). These findings underscore the multifaceted nature of factors influencing the dietary intake of iron-rich foods among children in SSA. Improving maternal education, enhancing healthcare utilisation, addressing rural–urban disparities and promoting paternal involvement may contribute to mitigating the barriers and improving the consumption of iron-rich foods among this vulnerable population.

Table 3.

Associations between no intake of iron-rich foods and participant characteristics

Variables Model I (unadjusted) Model II (adjusted)
OR (95% CI) P value OR (95% CI) P value
Child characteristics
Anaemia level
Anaemic Ref. Ref.
Not Anaemic 0.96 (0.91 to 1.00) 0.071 0.86 (0.80 to 0.92) <0.001
Mother’s characteristics
Mother’s educational level
No education Ref. Ref.
Primary 0.61 (0.59 to 0.64) <0.001 0.62 (0.57 to 0.68) <0.001
Higher 0.55 (0.53 to 0.58) <0.001 0.58 (0.52 to 0.64) <0.001
Marital status
Not married Ref. Ref.
Married 1.27 (1.20 to 1.34) <0.001 1.17 (0.87 to 1.56) 0.290
Wealth
Poor Ref. Ref.
Middle 1.18 (1.12 to 1.23) <0.001 0.99 (0.91 to 1.08) 0.869
Rich/wealthy 1.15 (1.10 to 1.21) <0.001 1.05 (0.96 to 1.15) 0.282
Residence
Urban Ref. Ref.
Rural 1.24 (1.19 to 1.31) <0.001 1.12 (1.10 to 1.28) 0.004
Media
No Ref. Ref.
Yes 0.96 (0.93 to 0.99) 0.016 0.96 (0.93 to 0.99) 0.003
Postnatal
No Ref. Ref.
Yes 0.80 (0.77 to 0.83) <0.001 0.90 (0.83 to 0.95) 0.001
Antenatal
No Ref. Ref.
Yes 0.64 (0.60 to 0.68) <0.001 0.84 (0.74 to 0.95) 0.004
Father’s characteristics
Father’s educational level
No education Ref. Ref.
Primary 0.59 (0.56 to 0.62) <0.001 0.69 (0.63 to 0.75) <0.001
Higher 0.56 (0.53 to 0.59) <0.001 0.66 (0.60 to 0.73) <0.001
Work status
No Ref. Ref.
Yes 0.75 (0.72 to 0.78) <0.001 0.78 (0.73 to 0.84) <0.001

Model 1: unadjusted covariates.

Model 2: adjusted for anaemia level, mother’s education level, marital status, wealth, residence, media, postnatal visit, antenatal visit, father’s education and work status.

Significant values (p-values<0.05) are in bold.

As depicted in table 3, some variables were excluded from the final model due to issues of multicollinearity. These variables encompassed a range of factors such as anaemia level, mother’s education level, marital status, wealth status, residential location, media exposure, postnatal (PNC) and ANC visits, father’s education, and work status. Their exclusion from the final model was necessary to ensure the statistical integrity of the analysis, as these variables exhibited high intercorrelation, potentially influencing the model’s accuracy and interpretability.

Discussion

Iron deficiency has detrimental effects on an individual’s physical and cognitive development, with under-5 children being particularly vulnerable. In SSA, evidence shows that children face a significant burden of iron deficiency which poses a substantial threat to their development and well-being.11 However, despite the recognition of iron deficiency in children as a critical public health issue in SSA, little has been done to understand the factors associated with deficiencies in iron-rich food consumption in SSA. Hence, this study has conducted a comprehensive analysis of the factors associated with the limited consumption of iron-rich foods among under-5 children in SSA.

Out of the 296 850 under-5 children observed in this study, a little over 56% did not consume the required iron-rich foods, while 43.7% consumed iron-rich foods as part of their diets. The percentage of children consuming iron-rich foods in SSA is significantly lower compared with other jurisdictions, such as Ireland at 90%,32 Australia at 82.6%,33 Mexico at 63.1%27 and China at 51%.34 The low iron-rich food uptake among under-5 children in this present study, especially in Guinea demonstrates a pressing need for targeted and evidence-based policy interventions to address the iron-food deficiency in SSA. Policy-makers in SSA countries should prioritise the development and implementation of comprehensive nutrition policies and programmes that focus on promoting iron-rich food consumption among young children. Such policies may include nutritional education and awareness campaigns targeted at parents, caregivers and healthcare providers to raise awareness about the importance of iron-rich diets for children’s overall health and development.

Among the 26 SSA countries studied, the top 4 countries with the highest prevalence of non-consumption of iron-rich food were Guinea (77.50%), Ethiopia (77.44%), Burkina Faso (77.06%) and Chad (69.87%), while the countries with the lowest prevalence were Congo Democratic Republic (42.76%), Mozambique (43.73%), Zambia (44.11%) and Congo (46.43%). The variations in the prevalence of non-consumption of iron-rich food among the 26 SSA countries studied show the need for targeted and context-specific policy interventions to address iron-food deficiency in the region. Policy-makers should focus on designing tailored strategies to target the countries with the highest prevalence of non-consumption, namely Guinea, Ethiopia, Burkina Faso and Chad. Thus, in these high-prevalence countries, comprehensive nutrition policies should be formulated and implemented to raise awareness about the importance of iron-rich diets for children’s health and development. Several factors including, economic reasons, sociocultural determinants, dietary preference, lack of nutrition knowledge and natural factors may have accounted for this variation in the prevalence. Studies have revealed the high cost of animal-source foods and low household income as key to low consumption of iron-rich foods.20 35 For instance, in terms of sociocultural practices, a study by Tiruneh et al, revealed that in some parts of Ethiopia, animal-source foods are usually considered luxury food rather than an essential part of daily children’s diet, and thus, consumed during special occasions. Such factors indicate that besides the economic factors, the social norms and beliefs across the SSA regions may contribute to the variations in prevalence.20

Findings from this study further indicate the association of maternal and paternal characteristics with the low uptake of iron-rich foods among under-5 children in SSA. It was found that mothers and fathers with no education were likely to not provide their children with iron-rich foods. This is consistent with results obtained in Nepal,36 Mexico37 and Ethiopia.20 According to Prickett and Augustine, children born to mothers with formal education are more likely to have healthy child-feeding practices.38 There are several plausible reasons why parents with no formal education might be less likely to provide their children with iron-rich foods. First, the absence of formal education might limit these parents’ access to critical information sources such as healthcare providers, educational materials or reliable channels that emphasise the importance of iron-rich foods in a child’s diet.39 Moreover, families without educational backgrounds often face financial constraints, potentially hindering their ability to purchase or afford foods that are rich in iron.40 Additionally, parents lacking education might experience feelings of disempowerment or a lack of confidence in making informed decisions about their children’s nutrition.41 They may rely on alternative sources of information that might not prioritise nutritional needs. Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest that unlike those with no formal education in SSA, mothers with some level of formal education were more exposed to information on the benefits of childhood nutrition, which may have influenced their better feeding experience.39 In light of this finding, it is important to promote childhood nutritional counselling, especially for mothers with lower levels of education in order to foster better nutritional status of under-5 children in SSA. Policy-makers should invest in educational campaigns that specifically address the significance of iron-rich foods for children’s development and health outcomes. These campaigns can provide practical information on the types of iron-rich foods available, their benefits and how to incorporate them into daily diets. Additionally, efforts should be made to enhance access to formal and informal educational opportunities for parents with lower levels of education. By increasing access to education, particularly in disadvantaged communities, parents can be better equipped to make informed decisions about their children’s nutrition and well-being.

Moreover, the wealth status was associated with good consumption of iron-rich foods. The findings show that children from rich/wealthy households are more likely to consume iron-rich foods as compared with middle-wealth households and poor households. This is consistent with a study in Mexico42 and other low-income countries.43 Wealth status may be linked to better consumption of iron-rich foods due to several interconnected factors. First, wealthier individuals typically have greater financial resources, enabling them to afford a wider variety of nutritious foods, including those rich in iron.12 44 They can purchase diverse foods that are naturally high in iron or fortified with iron supplements, thus improving their overall dietary intake.44 Additionally, higher wealth status often correlates with improved access to markets, supermarkets or specialty stores offering a broader selection of fresh fruits, vegetables, meats and fortified food products.45 This accessibility facilitates easier acquisition of iron-rich foods, contributing to a more balanced diet.45 Furthermore, wealthier individuals tend to prioritise health and well-being, which often translates to a more health-conscious lifestyle.46 They may be more inclined to follow recommended dietary guidelines and invest in foods known for their nutritional value, including those rich in iron, to maintain optimal health for themselves and their families.46 It could, therefore, be assumed that the high household wealth status provides the household with the needed financial resources to access and afford iron-rich foods for their children. Low-income households need to look out for affordable iron-rich foods such as vegetables, beans and fruits.

We further found that mothers who attended ANC and/or PNC were more likely to include iron-rich foods in their children’s meals than those mothers who did not attend ANC and PNC. Our findings corroborate a study in Nepal,36 which indicated that the prevalence of good consumption of iron-rich foods is higher in children of mothers who attended ANC and PNC visits than in children whose mothers did not attend ANC and PNC visits. Plausible reasons for this finding may include the point that ANC and PNC sessions offer valuable opportunities for health education.47 During these sessions, mothers commonly receive information and guidance on proper nutrition for themselves and their infants, hence, encouraging them to prioritise iron-rich foods in their children’s meals.48 Also, healthcare providers during ANC and PNC visits offer tailored advice and recommendations specific to the mother and infant’s health needs.48 They may emphasise the inclusion of iron-rich foods, providing practical suggestions and tips on how to incorporate these foods into the child’s diet effectively.48 Moreover, through regular check-ups and follow-up visits, healthcare providers monitor the child’s growth and development.48 This ongoing engagement reinforces the importance of nutrition, prompting mothers to remain vigilant about including iron-rich foods to support their child’s overall health and well-being. Therefore, considering the importance of ANC and PNC visits in child nutrition, it is important to provide and encourage community-based ANC and PNC in SSA.

Furthermore, the findings indicate that residence in a rural area is associated with a higher likelihood of non-consumption of iron-rich foods (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.28). This suggests a lack of accessibility and affordability of iron-rich foods in rural settings. This may be due to several reasons, including poor financial resources of rural households, lack of health facilities for ANC and PNC visits, low level of education in rural areas and lack of information, all of which have been found to influence the access to iron-rich foods.12 19 Concerning access to information, it was found that mothers who were exposed to media were more likely to feed their children with iron-rich foods than mothers without media exposure (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93 to 0.99). This is consistent with findings from a study by Dhawan et al which examined the effectiveness of mass media and nutrition education interventions for infants and young children feeding.49 Typically, mass media provides a significant source of information, which is important for providing education and training to mothers about nutrition and appropriate feeding practices for their children.50

Finally, we found that children who were not anaemic had a lower likelihood of non-consumption of iron-rich foods (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.80 to 0.92), indicating a potential protective effect of iron-rich foods from anaemia. Studies have emphasised that poor intake of iron-rich foods in diet and unavailability of iron-rich foods are some of the major causes of anaemia, commonly referred to as iron deficiency anaemia.51 For instance, it is a common practice to estimate the prevalence of iron deficiency by relying on the prevalence of anaemia in the blood.4–6 Given that non-consumption of iron-rich foods is associated with compromised physical and cognitive development, the prevention of iron deficiency is crucial.

Strengths and limitations

This study demonstrates several notable strengths that significantly enhance its credibility and contribution to the existing body of knowledge. First, the study employed nationally representative data encompassing 26 SSA countries. This extensive coverage underscores the validity and reliability of the analysis by providing a broader representation of the region’s diverse populations, cultures and socioeconomic contexts. Moreover, a distinctive strength lies in the study’s innovative focus on ‘deficiencies’ in iron-rich food intake, diverging from previous research that predominantly centred on the consumption of iron-rich foods. This unique approach adds depth and breadth to the existing literature by shifting the examination towards assessing ‘deficiencies’ in iron-rich food intake.

While acknowledging the study’s strengths, it is important to interpret the findings within the context of certain limitations. First, the dataset used in the analysis for different countries was collected at different points in time, potentially under-representing the current prevalence of non-consumption of iron-rich foods. It is not unlikely that the prevalence of non-consumption of iron-rich foods may have been improved over the years as some data were collected over a decade ago. In addition, DHS data are largely self-reported thereby potentially causing information recall challenges and making social desirability responses likely, potentially affecting the accuracy of reported dietary habits. Due to the cross-sectional design employed in this study, establishing causality among the variables under investigation was not feasible, limiting the study to establishing associations. Cross-sectional studies capture data at a single point in time, providing a snapshot of the relationship between variables but lacking the capability to ascertain the direction or causative influence among them over time. As such, correlations and associations were rather established, and inferring causal relationships between the variables remains outside the scope of this study’s methodology. Additionally, the absence of cultural variables in the DHS data represents a significant limitation in understanding the full picture of factors influencing iron-rich food intake among under-5 children in SSA. Culture plays a fundamental role in shaping dietary practices and food choices, and its influence on nutrition is critical to consider when developing effective interventions. Also, some variables, particularly age and sex were dropped from the final model due to multicollinearity which could have affected the model’s completeness and interpretability.

To address these limitations in future research, longitudinal studies encompassing multiple time points could track changes in dietary patterns over time, ensuring more accurate and current representations of iron-rich food consumption trends. Using mixed-methods approaches, such as combining self-reporting with objective measures, might mitigate the biases associated with self-reported data. Further research should consider incorporating cultural variables to better understand and tailor interventions to specific cultural contexts. Despite these limitations, the findings of this study provide scientific evidence that could be further explored and/or used to design population-specific interventions to improve the nutritional health and well-being of under-5 children in SSA.

Implications for policy

The findings of this study have implications for public health policy and practice. The relatively high proportion of under-5 children not consuming iron-rich foods, despite the health benefits of these foods, indicates the policy gaps in existing maternal and child health in some of the SSA countries. The results of this study have implications for the reformulation and re-evaluation of poverty alleviation and/or eradication policies and strategies as the findings suggest that poverty is a significant determinant of non-consumption of iron-rich foods. Also, there is a significant between-country disparity in the prevalence of non-consumption of iron-rich foods in the subregion. This indicates a need to strengthen health advocacy and equitable policies to reduce within- and between-country disparities in nutritional health among under-5 children. The results of this study also have implications for enhancing nutritional education for children and both parents to achieve the child’s nutritional objectives. Specifically, the findings underscore the pressing need for targeted policy actions to uplift the nutritional status of under-5 children in SSA. First, enhancing maternal and child health policies could involve incorporating specific nutrition-focused interventions, such as the inclusion of iron-rich food provisions in government-supported maternal and child health programmes. This might entail the establishment of nutrition supplementation programmes or the integration of nutrition counselling during ANC and PNC visits. Second, addressing poverty-related undernutrition could involve policy initiatives like subsidising or providing vouchers for nutrient-dense foods targeting economically disadvantaged families. For instance, implementing a voucher programme that enables families with limited financial means to access nutritious foods like fortified cereals, legumes and vegetables. Additionally, promoting equitable access to nutritional resources across SSA countries might involve creating cross-border collaborations to share successful nutritional intervention strategies and establish regional policies ensuring standardised access to fortified foods and nutritional supplements. Furthermore, incorporating comprehensive nutrition education into school curricula and early childhood development programmes could involve policies mandating nutrition education in primary school syllabi or integrating nutrition workshops for caregivers in early childhood centres, emphasising the importance of balanced diets and iron-rich foods for child health. Deploying these specific policy interventions tailored to SSA’s context holds immense potential to significantly enhance the nutritional outcomes for under-5 children in the region. To this end, it is important to develop viable policies which target the school and early childhood education as contexts to realise child nutritional and overall health goals. Further studies should enhance our understanding of the sociocultural determinants influencing the deficiencies in the consumption of iron-rich foods by employing qualitative and longitudinal research methods. Additionally, conducting a more comprehensive and detailed comparative analysis to examine the factors that influence the intake of iron-rich foods between children over the age of 5 and those under would significantly augment our insights into this area of study.

Conclusions

This study results showed a relatively high prevalence of non-consumption of iron-rich foods among under-5 children in SSA as only two in five children reported adequate consumption of iron-rich foods. Maternal and paternal education, household wealth indices and place of residence were found as significant determinants of non-consumption of iron-rich foods. Based on these findings, it is imperative for effective interventions aimed at reducing household poverty and empowering parents and caregivers with requisite nutritional knowledge and skills to be developed to address the challenge of non-consumption of iron-rich foods among under-5 children in SSA. This way, immediate and future health implications of iron deficiency would be prevented among this population.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
Author's manuscript

Footnotes

Contributors: EOB and IYA conceived the study. EOB conducted the multilevel analysis. EOB, IYA, SRO, EFB and CB drafted and critically reviewed the manuscript. IYA supervised the entire study. EOB is acting as a guarantor. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were not involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data availability statement

Data are available in a public, open access repository. All datasets used for this study are available at: https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval

This study used publicly accessible survey data from the MEASURE DHS programme, for which ethical approval and participant consent were not required. Permission was obtained from http://www.dhsprogram.com to download and use the data for this study. The datasets used in the analysis do not contain any personally identifiable information or household addresses.

References

  • 1. Benson CS, Shah A, Stanworth SJ, et al. The effect of iron deficiency and anaemia on women’s health. Anaesthesia 2021;76 Suppl 4:84–95. 10.1111/anae.15405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Mattiello V, Schmugge M, Hengartner H, et al. Diagnosis and management of iron deficiency in children with or without anemia: consensus recommendations of the SPOG pediatric hematology working group. Eur J Pediatr 2020;179:527–45. 10.1007/s00431-020-03597-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. McCarthy EK, Murray DM, Kiely ME. Iron deficiency during the first 1000 days of life: are we doing enough to protect the developing brain. Proc Nutr Soc 2022;81:108–18. 10.1017/S0029665121002858 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. von Haehling S, Jankowska EA, van Veldhuisen DJ, et al. Iron deficiency and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2015;12:659–69. 10.1038/nrcardio.2015.109 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. WHO . Assessing the iron status of populations: including literature reviews. 2007. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241596107
  • 6. WHO . WHO guidance helps detect iron deficiency and protect brain development. 2020. Available: https://www.who.int/news/item/20-04-2020-who-guidance-helps-detect-iron-deficiency-and-protect-brain-development
  • 7. Kassebaum NJ, Jasrasaria R, Naghavi M, et al. A systematic analysis of global anemia burden from 1990 to 2010. Blood 2014;123:615–24. 10.1182/blood-2013-06-508325 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Cappellini MD, Musallam KM, Taher AT. Iron deficiency anaemia revisited. J Intern Med 2020;287:153–70. 10.1111/joim.13004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Sundararajan S, Rabe H. Prevention of iron deficiency anemia in infants and toddlers. Pediatr Res 2021;89:63–73. 10.1038/s41390-020-0907-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Pivina L, Semenova Y, Doşa MD, et al. Iron deficiency, cognitive functions, and neurobehavioral disorders in children. J Mol Neurosci 2019;68:1–10. 10.1007/s12031-019-01276-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Muriuki JM, Mentzer AJ, Webb EL, et al. Estimating the burden of iron deficiency among African children. BMC Med 2020;18:31. 10.1186/s12916-020-1502-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Akalu Y, Yeshaw Y, Tesema GA, et al. Iron-rich food consumption and associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in sub-Saharan Africa: a multilevel analysis of demographic and health surveys. PLoS One 2021;16:e0253221. 10.1371/journal.pone.0253221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Chouraqui JP. Dietary approaches to iron deficiency prevention in childhood—a critical public health issue. Nutrients 2022;14:1604. 10.3390/nu14081604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Van Elswyk ME, Murray RD, McNeill SH. Iron-rich complementary foods: imperative for all infants. Curr Dev Nutr 2021;5:nzab117. 10.1093/cdn/nzab117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Moustarah F, Mohiuddin SS. Dietary iron. 2019. Available: https://europepmc.org/books/nbk540969
  • 16. Donker AE, van der Staaij H, Swinkels DW. The critical roles of iron during the journey from fetus to adolescent: developmental aspects of iron homeostasis. Blood Rev 2021;50:100866. 10.1016/j.blre.2021.100866 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hallberg L. Advantages and disadvantages of an iron-rich diet. Eur J Clin Nutr 2002;56 Suppl 1:S12–8. 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601348 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Taneja DK, Rai SK, Yadav K. Evaluation of promotion of iron-rich foods for the prevention of nutritional anemia in India. Indian J Public Health 2020;64:236–41. 10.4103/ijph.IJPH_65_20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Eshetu HB, Diress M, Belay DG, et al. Individual and community-level factors associated with iron-rich food consumption among children aged 6–23 months in Rwanda: a multilevel analysis of Rwanda demographic and health survey. PLoS One 2023;18:e0280466. 10.1371/journal.pone.0280466 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Tiruneh SA, Ayele BA, Yitbarek GY, et al. Spatial distribution of iron rich foods consumption and its associated factors among children aged 6–23 months in Ethiopia: spatial and multilevel analysis of 2016 Ethiopian demographic and health survey. Nutr J 2020;19:115. 10.1186/s12937-020-00635-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Daru J. Sustainable development goals for anaemia: 20 years later, where are we now. Lancet Glob Health 2022;10:e586–7. 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00127-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lopez de Romaña D, Greig A, Thompson A, et al. Successful delivery of nutrition programs and the sustainable development goals. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2021;70:97–107. 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.03.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Mensi A, Udenigwe CC. Emerging and practical food innovations for achieving the sustainable development goals (SDG) target 2.2. Trends Food Sci Technol 2021;111:783–9. 10.1016/j.tifs.2021.01.079 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. ICF International . The DHS program office. 2023.
  • 25. ICF . The Demographic and health data Repository, Available: https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm
  • 26. Orsango AZ, Habtu W, Lejisa T, et al. Iron deficiency anemia among children aged 2–5 years in Southern Ethiopia: a community-based cross-sectional study. PeerJ 2021;9:e11649. 10.7717/peerj.11649 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. De la Cruz-Góngora V, Villalpando S, Shamah-Levy T. Prevalence of anemia and consumption of iron-rich food groups in Mexican children and adolescents: Ensanut MC 2016. Salud Publica Mex 2018;60:291–300. 10.21149/8824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Nguyen PH, Sanghvi T, Kim SS, et al. Factors influencing maternal nutrition practices in a large scale maternal, newborn and child health program in Bangladesh. PLoS One 2017;12:e0179873. 10.1371/journal.pone.0179873 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Verney A, Reed BA, Lumumba JB, et al. Factors associated with socio‐demographic characteristics and antenatal care and iron supplement use in Ethiopia, Kenya, and Senegal. Matern Child Nutr 2018;14 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e12565. 10.1111/mcn.12565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Emmett PM, Jones LR. Diet and growth in infancy: relationship to socioeconomic background and to health and development in the Avon longitudinal study of parents and children. Nutr Rev 2014;72:483–506. 10.1111/nure.12122 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Thane CW, Walmsley CM, Bates CJ, et al. Risk factors for poor iron status in British toddlers: further analysis of data from the National diet and nutrition survey of children aged 1.5–4.5 years. Public Health Nutr 2000;3:433–40. 10.1017/s1368980000000501 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. McCarthy EK, Ní Chaoimh C, Kenny LC, et al. Iron status, body size, and growth in the first 2 years of life. Matern Child Nutr 2018;14:e12458. 10.1111/mcn.12458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Scott JA, Gee G, Devenish G, et al. Determinants and sources of iron intakes of Australian toddlers: findings from the SMILE cohort study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:181. 10.3390/ijerph16020181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Yu P, Denney L, Zheng Y, et al. Food groups consumed by infants and toddlers in urban areas of China. Food Nutr Res 2016;60:30289. 10.3402/fnr.v60.30289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Arimond M, Ruel MT. Dietary diversity is associated with child nutritional status: evidence from 11 demographic and health surveys. J Nutr 2004;134:2579–85. 10.1093/jn/134.10.2579 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Baek Y, Chitekwe S. Sociodemographic factors associated with inadequate food group consumption and dietary diversity among infants and young children in Nepal. PLoS One 2019;14:e0213610. 10.1371/journal.pone.0213610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Villalpando S, Shamah-Levy T, Ramírez-Silva CI, et al. Prevalence of anemia in children 1 to 12 years of age: results from a nationwide probabilistic survey in Mexico. Salud Publica Mex 2003;45 Suppl 4:S490–8. 10.1590/s0036-36342003001000005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Prickett KC, Augustine JM. Maternal education and investments in children’s health. J Marriage Fam 2016;78:7–25. 10.1111/jomf.12253 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Pomati M, Nandy S. Assessing progress towards Sdg2: trends and patterns of multiple malnutrition in young children under 5 in West and central Africa. Child Ind Res 2020;13:1847–73. 10.1007/s12187-019-09671-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Penne T, Goedemé T. Can low-income households afford a healthy diet? Insufficient income as a driver of food insecurity in Europe. Food Policy 2021;99:101978. 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101978 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Erzse A, Goldstein S, Tugendhaft A, et al. The roles of men and women in maternal and child nutrition in urban South Africa: a qualitative secondary analysis. Matern Child Nutr 2021;17:e13161. 10.1111/mcn.13161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Sánchez-Pimienta TG, Batis C, Lutter CK, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages are the main sources of added sugar intake in the Mexican population. J Nutr 2016;146:1888S–96S. 10.3945/jn.115.220301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Mayén A-L, Marques-Vidal P, Paccaud F, et al. Socioeconomic determinants of dietary patterns in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;100:1520–31. 10.3945/ajcn.114.089029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Hamilton RW, Mittal C, Shah A, et al. How financial constraints influence consumer behavior: an integrative framework. J Consum Psychol 2019;29:285–305. 10.1002/jcpy.1074 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Mackenbach JD, Nelissen KGM, Dijkstra SC, et al. A systematic review on socioeconomic differences in the association between the food environment and dietary behaviors. Nutrients 2019;11:2215. 10.3390/nu11092215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Gromada A, Rees G, Chzhen Y. Worlds of influence: understanding what shapes child well-being in rich countries. United Nations Children’s Fund 2020. Available: http://saruna.mnu.edu.mv/jspui/bitstream/123456789/8646/1/Worlds-of-Influence-understanding-what-shapes-child-well-being-in-rich-countries-2020..pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Downer T, McMurray A, Young J. The role of antenatal education in promoting maternal and family health literacy. Int J Childbirth 2020;10:52–64. 10.1891/IJCBIRTH-D-20-00012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Alehegn MA, Fanta TK, Ayalew AF. Exploring maternal nutrition counseling provided by health professionals during antenatal care follow-up: a qualitative study in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia-2019. BMC Nutr 2021;7:20. 10.1186/s40795-021-00427-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Dhawan D, Pinnamaneni R, Viswanath K. Association between mass media exposure and infant and young child feeding practices in India: a cross-sectional study. Sci Rep 2023;13:19353. 10.1038/s41598-023-46734-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Baker P, Machado P, Santos T, et al. Ultra‐processed foods and the nutrition transition: global, regional and national trends, food systems transformations and political economy drivers. Obes Rev 2020;21:e13126. 10.1111/obr.13126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Shubham K, Anukiruthika T, Dutta S, et al. Iron deficiency anemia: a comprehensive review on iron absorption, bioavailability and emerging food fortification approaches. Trends Food Sci Technol 2020;99:58–75. 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments
Author's manuscript

Data Availability Statement

Data are available in a public, open access repository. All datasets used for this study are available at: https://dhsprogram.com/data/available-datasets.cfm.


Articles from BMJ Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES