Abstract
Capturing and converting CO2 through artificial photosynthesis using photoactive, porous materials is a promising approach for addressing increasing CO2 concentrations. Porphyrinic Zr‐based metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) are of particular interest as they incorporate a photosensitizer in the porous structure. Herein, the initial step of the artificial photosynthesis is studied: CO2 sorption and activation in the presence of water. A combined vibrational and visible spectroscopic approach was used to monitor the adsorption of CO2 into PCN‐222 and PCN‐223 MOFs, and the photophysical changes of the porphyrinic linker as a function of water concentration. A shift in CO2 sorption site and bending of the porphyrin macrocycle in response to humidity was observed, and CO2/H2O competition experiments revealed that the exchange of CO2 with H2O is pore‐size dependent. Therefore, humidity and pore‐size can be used to tune CO2 sorption, CO2 capacity, and light harvesting in porphyrinic MOFs, which are key factors for CO2 photoreduction.
Keywords: Adsorption, artificial photosynthesis, CO2 capture, metal-organic framework, spectroscopy
MOFs combined with photochemistry for CO2 photoreduction have great potential for addressing the challenge of reducing CO2 emissions. Herein, a combined visible‐infrared spectroscopic approach is reported to study the initial step of CO2 photoreduction: adsorption of CO2 in the presence of water into porphyrinic Zr‐MOFs. The findings will serve as guideline to tune adsorption site and photophysical properties of the photosensitizer.
Introduction
Metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) are porous materials consisting of metal nodes and organic linkers. Due to their large surface areas and tunable porosity, MOFs have been extensively studied for gas separation and gas capture applications.[ 1 , 2 ] In particular, the capture of the major greenhouse‐gas CO2 has gained significant attention and a vast number of MOFs have been investigated in terms of their CO2 sorption capabilities.[ 3 , 4 ] In recent years, porphyrin‐based Zr‐MOFs have been added to the Zr‐based MOF family as efficient material for carbon capture.[ 5 , 6 , 7 ] Incorporating photoactive porphyrin‐dyes as linker into the framework is particularly attractive as it extends the MOF's scope of application to the photochemical conversion of the captured CO2 into e. g. formate, methane or methanol.[ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ] Since water is often used as a source of protons,[ 14 , 15 ] investigating competitive adsorption of CO2 and H2O on active sites is crucial to understand the CO2 activation and find the optimal reaction conditions to increase reaction rates in artificial photosynthesis. So far, only the externally applied CO2 and H2O concentrations have been regulated in closed photoreactors at the start of the photoreduction.[ 14 , 15 ] Thereby, no insights into the actual CO2 and H2O concentrations in the MOF pores and how both adsorbates affect each other could be obtained. In addition, the optoelectronic properties of the porphyrin linker are highly sensitive to changes in solvent and acidity and have yet to be studied as function of adsorbed CO2 and H2O concentration. Interactions with water or intermediates of the photoreaction might cause the protonation of the imine‐N in the porphyrin macrocycle. This results in the disruption of the π‐electron conjugated system and the loss of planarity (Figure 1c), [16] which in turn triggers a change in color from violet to green. This is of particular interest for photoreactions, as it affects the spectral overlap of the photoactive material with the excitation light source. In conjunction with the bending of the porphyrin macrocycle, the N−H groups become more accessible and their basicity increases, which has been shown to enhance catalytic activity. [17] However, the influence of the protonation and structural changes of the porphyrinic linker on the photoreduction of CO2 are yet to be determined.
We suspect the interplay between CO2 and H2O sorption sites and the photophysical state of the porphyrin linker to be a key aspect in the photoreduction. Yet, their simultaneous observation was hampered by the lack of experimental equipment. Standard gas sorption experiments are limited to one adsorbate and co‐adsorption of binary systems, i. e., CO2 and H2O, can only be studied indirectly. Furthermore, no insights into photo‐physics of the MOF or linker can be obtained.
To overcome these limitations, we combined CO2 sorption with in situ Fourier transform‐infrared (FT‐IR) spectroscopy in attenuated total reflection (ATR) configuration and ultraviolet‐visible diffuse reflection spectroscopy (UV‐vis DRS) to directly investigate the co‐adsorption process of CO2 and H2O and its influence on the optoelectronic properties on photoactive MOFs (Figure 1b). We investigated the CO2 adsorption into two porphyrinic Zr‐MOFs, namely PCN‐222 and PCN‐223 (Figure 1c–f), consisting of Zr6O4(OH)4 clusters and tetrakis(4‐carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (TCPP) linkers in the absence and presence of water. These PCN‐MOFs were chosen as they consist of identical Zr‐clusters and porphyrin linkers, but differ in their pore size (micro‐ and mesoporous PCN‐222 and fully microporous PCN‐223, Figure 1d,e), which drastically influences the sorption characteristics and accessibility of the Zr‐cluster. In combination with density functional theory (DFT) simulations, we determined two CO2 sorption sites close to the Zr‐cluster and the porphyrin macrocycle, which depend on the presence of water (Figure 1a). In situ UV‐vis DRS revealed that the shift in sorption site is accompanied with a bending of the initially flat porphyrin macrocycle. Lastly, we have studied the competition between CO2 and H2O and found different exchange behaviors depending on the pore size and if the PCN‐MOF has been brought in contact with high humidity. These insights allow to match the CO2 sorption site with photoactive centers (either porphyrin or Zr‐cluster) as well as tuning the photo‐physics of the photosensitizer (porphyrin) during CO2 photoreduction in porphyrinic MOF materials.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis and Characterization of Metal‐Organic Frameworks
PCN‐222 and PCN‐223 based on tetratopic tetrakis(4‐carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (TCPP) and Zr‐clusters were synthesized solvothermally using different mediators. [18] Both PCN‐MOFs consist of Zr6 clusters surrounded by 8 and 12 TCPP linkers, respectively, and differ in cluster connectivity (see Figure 1c–f). While in PCN‐222 all linkers are connected via a bridging of the carboxylate to two Zr atoms, in the structure of PCN‐223 additional four linkers are added to Zr−OH groups that are unoccupied in PCN‐222 (see Figure 1f, chelating carboxylates to only one Zr at highlighted in yellow). X‐ray diffraction (XRD) confirmed the formation of PCN‐222 and PCN‐223 phase‐pure crystal structures (ESI Figure S2). N2 sorption yielded Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) surface areas between 2100–2340 m2 g−1. Type IV and type II isotherms were observed for PCN‐222 and PCN‐223 respectively, confirming the presence of both mesopores and micropores in PCN‐222 and only micropores in PCN‐223 (ESI Figure S3). The presence of the asymmetric and symmetric ν(COO−) band at 1606 cm−1 and 1420 cm−1 in the FT‐IR ATR spectra confirmed the bridging of the carboxylate of TCPP to two Zr atoms of the Zr‐cluster (Figure 1g, region iii), Figure S4).[ 19 , 20 ] An additional band at 1551 cm−1 is visible in the region of the asymmetric carboxylate vibration in the spectrum of PCN‐223. We attributed this vibration to the different linker connectivity and the four TCPP linkers chelating to only one Zr atom in the Zr‐cluster. The FT‐IR ATR spectra of both PCN‐MOFs showed a band at 3673 cm−1 (Figure 1g) that corresponds to the μ3‐hydroxyl groups on the Zr‐cluster.[ 20 , 21 ]
CO2 Sorption onto Metal‐Organic Frameworks and Porphyrin Linker
PCN‐222 and PCN‐223 films were drop casted from acetone suspensions on Si ATR crystals and placed into a gas flow cell fixed in an FT‐IR spectrometer. A sapphire window on top of the flow cell allowed for fiber‐coupled UV‐vis DRS from the Si ATR crystal (see Figure 1b). Gases and vapors were supplied by means of mass flow controllers and the adsorption and desorption of CO2 into PCN‐222, PCN‐223 and TCPP was recorded using FT‐IR ATR spectroscopy (see Experimental Section and ESI for detailed description of the setup). The resulting FT‐IR ATR spectra can be divided into three regions of interest (Figure 1g): i) ν(μ3‐O−H) vibration of Zr−OH clusters between 3700–3600 cm−1, ii) the asymmetric stretching vibration of adsorbed CO2 around 2340 cm−1, and iii) the fingerprint region of the PCN‐MOF between 1800–1200 cm−1. Figure 2a shows the FT‐IR ATR spectra acquired during CO2 adsorption for PCN‐222, PCN‐223 and the free linker TCPP in region (ii) after subtraction of gas‐phase CO2 signals (Figure S5).
A strong νas(C=O) band at 2340 cm−1 was observed for PCN‐222 and PCN‐223, which was red‐shifted with respect to the gas phase CO2 IR band at 2345 cm−1 due to the interaction of physiosorbed CO2 with the PCN‐MOF framework. In contrast, the νas(C=O) band of CO2 adsorbed onto TCPP was found at 2336 cm−1. Both νas(C=O) positions have been observed in UiO‐66:[ 22 , 23 ] The band at 2340 cm−1 has been assigned to CO2 located close to the μ3‐OH groups of the Zr‐cluster, while the band at 2336 cm−1 appeared after full dihydroxylation of UiO‐66, i. e., complete removal of Zr−OH groups. The latter band has been assigned to physiosorbed CO2 stabilized through purely dispersive interaction with the π‐system of the terephthalic acid linkers. [6] In addition, we concluded that only weak interactions between PCN‐MOF and CO2 take place, as evidenced by the absence of coordinated species typically observed in MOFs with open metal sites at wavenumbers higher than 2340 cm−1. [24] We calculated the CO2 adsorption isotherms at 20 °C using the νas(C=O) band areas as function of the applied CO2 concentrations (Figure 2b). The observed CO2 adsorption capacities of 0.6 mmol g−1 and 1.0 mmol g−1 at p(CO2)=0.75 bar for PCN‐222 and PCN‐223, respectively, were in line with values reported in literature (Figure 2b, see ESI for further explanation) and the fact that PCN‐222 hosts half the microporous CO2 sorption sites compared to PCN‐223.[ 5 , 25 , 26 , 27 ] For the non‐porous, free linker, we retrieved a sorption capacity of 0.1 mmol g−1 at p(CO2)=0.75 bar, indicating that porosity and/or interaction with Zr clusters is necessary to adsorb CO2 in the studied PCN‐MOFs. Accordingly, a 30 cm−1 red‐shift of the Zr−OH band at 3673 cm−1 (Figure 2c) was observed during exposure to CO2 in both PCN‐MOFs, which we attribute to CO2⋅⋅⋅HO−Zr interactions. [28] Note that this band shift was not visible in the TCPP FT‐IR ATR spectrum as no free Zr−OH‐groups are present in the free linker. Lastly, FT‐IR ATR spectra obtained during CO2 adsorption showed minor changes in the MOF fingerprint region, which indicated negligible interactions of the adsorbed CO2 molecules with the PCN‐MOF framework (Figure S6). This was in line with the UV‐vis spectra obtained upon CO2 adsorption that showed no spectral changes (Figure S7).
The variations in the νas(C=O) band position of adsorbed CO2 in the free linker and PCN‐MOFs, shown in Figure 2a, indicated that CO2 adsorbed on different adsorption sites. We performed DFT simulations to gain further insights into the nature and strength of the CO2 binding sites in the PCN‐MOFs and the free linker (see Experimental Section for computational details). The calculated sorption site of CO2 on the Zr‐cluster representative of PCN‐222 and PCN‐223 are depicted in Figure 3a and b, respectively, where TCCP linkers were represented by benzoic acid moieties with the C‐atoms in para position to the carboxylate groups fixed at the position in the solid to facilitate the calculations (Figure S8 for more detailed view). Since the phenyl‐rings of the TCCP linker are rotated out of the plane of the porphyrin molecule in the solid, there is little or no electron delocalization between the porphyrin and the phenyl moieties. Hence, not including the porphyrin macrocycle was not expected to have a significant influence on the computational results. According to the models, CO2 molecules interact with free OH‐groups of the Zr‐clusters in both PCN‐MOFs, and are further stabilized in the pocket formed by the phenyl‐rings of the linkers. Note that the stabilization is due to a combination of van der Waals interactions as well as hydrogen bonding between CO2 and Zr−OH groups (Figure S8). Such a contribution of dispersion stabilization has been reported previously for similar Zr‐based MOFs and similar distances between the oxygen atom of CO2 and the HO−Zr group of 2.36 Å were found.[ 3 , 22 , 23 ] The different Zr‐cluster connectivity of PCN‐222 and PCN‐223 led to slightly different sorption sites: While CO2 interacts with the free outer‐sphere Zr−OH groups present in the cluster of PCN‐222, these Zr−OH groups are occupied by the linkers in PCN‐223. Therefore, CO2 interacts with the inner‐sphere Zr−OH groups closer to the center of the cluster. In addition, the distance between the carbon atom of CO2 and phenyl‐groups is larger in PCN‐223 compared to PCN‐222 (Figure S8). Figure S9 illustrates the CO2 sorption site on the free base TCPP linker. The CO2 molecule is stabilized close to the center of the porphyrin macrocycle, however, the distance between CO2 and N−H groups in the porphyrin core exceeds the typical length for H‐bonding. Consequently, no significant changes were experimentally observed in the fingerprint region of FT‐IR ATR spectra and the UV‐vis spectra upon CO2 sorption on the TCPP linker (Figure S6, S7).
To validate our models, we calculated the νas(C=O) band positions of CO2 adsorbed on PCN‐MOFs (2338 cm−1) and the free TCPP linker (2335 cm−1). These values correlated well with the experimentally observed band positions, 2340 and 2336 cm−1 for the PCN‐MOFs and TCCP respectively (Figure 2a), and are in accordance with previously reported values on a similar MOF (i. e. UiO‐66). [23] Moreover, to further verify the CO2 sorption site, we compared the CO2 adsorption enthalpy determined from temperature‐dependent CO2 sorption experiments and via computational methods (Figure 3c,d). Experimentally, we used the absorbance (A) of νas(C=O) at temperatures between 15 to 60 °C to calculate the CO2 adsorption enthalpy ΔHads based on the van ‘t Hoff equation. [29] This method is based on the assumption that A is proportional to ΔH ads, which is the case for low CO2 coverages. To justify this assumption, we determined the average number of CO2 molecules per Zr‐cluster using the sorption capacity of the PCN‐MOFs (Figure 2b) and divided this value by the theoretical Zr‐cluster density in the crystal structure of the PCN‐MOFs. Thereby, we found that 0.8 and 0.7 CO2 molecules per Zr‐cluster were present at the highest CO2 concentration (p(CO2)=0.75 bar) in PCN‐222 and PCN‐223, respectively.
The ΔHads (CO2) was derived from the slope of the linearized plot at different CO2 pressures (Figure 3c, Figure S11). CO2 adsorption enthalpies of −31, −28 and −23 kJ mol−1, for PCN‐222, PCN‐223 and TCPP at p(CO2)=0.75 bar were thereby obtained (Figure 3d). Furthermore, similar trends as function of p(CO2) and ΔHads values have been reported for UiO‐66.[22,23] Due to the low CO2 loading in TCPP, a plateau of ΔHads was not reached in the given p(CO2) range but ΔHads converged to the simulated value for the highest CO2 pressure. Due to the convergence observed for TCPP and the fact that only the highest p(CO2) yielded a number of CO2 molecules per Zr‐cluster close to one, which was used for the computational considerations (Figure 3a,b), we chose to compare the experimentally and computationally obtained ΔHads values at the highest CO2 pressure (p(CO2)=0.75 bar). At this partial pressure, the experimentally obtained ΔHads agreed with the DFT simulated adsorption energy of −34.3, −26.6, and −22.9 kJ mol−1 for PCN‐222 cluster, PCN‐223 cluster and TCPP, respectively. Note that, even though a greater redshift of the dispersion‐stabilized band at 2336 cm−1 compared to the interaction with the Zr‐cluster would indicate a stronger interaction between CO2 and PCN‐MOF, and thus a lower adsorption enthalpy, at the first glance, other effects such as change in bond length or angle of the CO2 molecule play a role in the band position as well. [30] The excellent agreement of both the adsorption enthalpy and band position, and the found shifts in Zr−OH band (Figure 2c) confirm the sorption site of CO2 into PCN‐222 and PCN‐223 close to the Zr‐cluster as shown in Figure 3a‐b.
Water Adsorption into PCN‐222 and PCN‐223
Water vapor was applied at different partial pressures p/p 0(H2O)=0–0.8, and FT‐IR ATR and UV‐vis spectra were recorded for each p/p 0(H2O) to determine the interaction of the PCN‐MOF structure with adsorbing water. The FT‐IR ATR spectra of both PCN‐MOFs showed a gradual increase of bands between 3200–3400 cm−1 and at 1640 cm−1, that correspond to adsorbed water (Figure 4a, Figure S12‐13). Although the adsorbed water bands were mostly removed upon flushing with dry N2 (Figure 4b, blue spectrum), an irreversible general broadening of the IR bands corresponding to the PCN‐MOFs was observed (Figure S12). The absence of an increase in bands associated with free COOH‐moieties of the linker (typically found around 1700 cm−1) indicates that no unattached linkers, i. e. defects, were formed during wetting. In addition, a sharp negative band at 3673 cm−1 appeared that was not recovered upon N2 flushing (Figure S13). This band indicates the irreversible bonding of water to the Zr‐cluster, unaffected by N2 flushing at room temperature. This experimental finding was supported with DFT simulations that yielded a considerably higher adsorption enthalpy of water compared to CO2, of −74.7 and −52.6 kJ mol−1 for PCN‐222 and PCN‐223 (vs. −34.3 and −26.6 kJ mol−1 for CO2), respectively. In addition to ν(μ3‐O−H), a negative band at 3324 cm−1 appeared at p/p 0(H2O) >0.6 and >0.4 for PCN‐222 and PCN‐223, respectively, which was also irreversible upon N2 flushing, and was associated with the ν(N−H) band in the porphyrin macrocycle. Distortions of the ν(N−H) band upon interaction with H2O and CO2 have been observed in MOFs with linkers with amine‐moieties. [31] The appearance of the ν(μ3‐O−H) and ν(N−H) bands coincided with a steep increase in the water sorption isotherms, which were obtained from the integral of the entire ν(O−H) region of the FT‐IR ATR spectra and are given in Figure 4b. The water concentration shows a sharp rise at p/p 0(H2O)=0.6 and 0.4 for PCN‐222 and PCN‐223, respectively. This indicates the the condensation of water in the pores, which depends on the pore size. Smaller pores lead to earlier pore condensation, resulting in a lower onste at p/p 0(H2O) for the microporous PCN‐223 compared to the mesoporous PCN‐222. [32] The shift of the ν(O−H) band maximum from 3200 cm−1 to 3400 cm−1 upon pore condensation further indicates the presence of non‐surface‐bound, liquid‐like water, which is mainly present in the case of fully filled pores.[ 32 , 33 ] Non‐closing isotherms indicated that slight amounts of water remained in the pores after flushing with N2. Note that, when a p/p 0(H2O) below the critical pressure for pore condensation is applied, the FT‐IR ATR spectral changes of the OH‐groups of the Zr‐cluster were reversible and no changes in the ν(N−H) band were observed (Figure S14). These findings suggest that irreversible binding of water and structural changes of the PCN‐MOF framework only took place upon entire pore filling by condensed water.
The observations in the FT‐IR ATR spectra correlated with the spectral features found using in situ UV‐vis spectroscopy: For p/p 0(H2O)<pore condensation, small bands between 600–700 nm could be reversed upon N2 flushing (Figure S16). For p/p 0(H2O)>pore condensation very strong differential signals between 450–750 nm were visible, which did not recover upon N2 flushing (Figure 4c for PCN‐223, Figure S16 for PCN‐222). A series of reference experiments indicated that the UV‐vis spectra are due to a change in the sample refractive index during pore condensation, and to the protonation of pyrrole moieties in the porphyrin, which causes a bending of the macrocycle previously observed for the TCPP linker and PCN‐222 upon acidification (see Figure S17 and discussion in the ESI).[ 16 , 34 , 35 ]
That a partial porphyrin protonation takes place upon condensation of water in the PCN‐MOFs pores is a very peculiar finding, as the bending of the porphyrin macrocycle is typically only reported for protonated TCPP species obtained by the addition of acid. XRD and N2 physisorption confirmed that the structural changes are limited to the linker, while the PCN‐MOF structures remained intact (see Figure 4d, Figure S18–19).
CO2 Sorption on Pre‐Wetted Metal‐Organic Frameworks
Having confirmed that water sorption causes irreversible structural changes in the linkers of PCN‐MOFs, we determined the influence of these changes on the CO2 sorption sites and the CO2 sorption capacity of PCN‐222 and PCN‐223. After applying p/p 0(H2O)>pore condensation and flushing with N2, we collected CO2 isotherms at different temperatures, to derive the CO2 adsorption enthalpies analogous to the previous section. Thereby we found four significant changes compared to the CO2 sorption into pristine PCN‐MOFs: i) the νas(C=O) band position shifted from 2340 cm−1 in the pristine case to 2336 cm−1 in the case of wetted PCN‐MOFs (Figure 5a); ii) the band intensity of the ν(μ3‐O−H) band at 3673 cm−1 decreased less as a function of CO2 pressure, compared to the CO2 sorption into the pristine PCN‐MOFs (Figure 5b); iii) the sorption capacity for PCN‐222 was enhanced 1.8‐fold and was now similar to PCN‐223, while the sorption capacity of PCN‐223 remained unchanged (Figure 5c); and iv) the adsorption enthalpies decreased from −31 to −22 kJ mol−1 for PCN‐222 and from −28 to −24 kJ mol−1 for PCN‐223 at p(CO2)=0.75 bar. A decrease in adsorption enthalpy alongside an increase in sorption capacity as found for PCN‐222 may seem counterintuitive. However, as we will explain in detail later, we attribute this behaviour to the presence of newly formed sorption sites. In contrast, we did not observe any changes for the wetted TCPP linker.
After wetting, the obtained CO2 adsorption enthalpies and νas(C=O) band positions matched the values obtained for the free linker. This indicated that, after pore condensation with water, a shift in sorption site from the Zr‐cluster to the porphyrin macrocycle occurred (Figure 5e). This was further supported by the smaller change in Zr−OH band intensity upon CO2 adsorption compared to the pristine case, which stems from the interaction of the OH‐group with CO2 (Figure 5b). This suggested that these sites were occupied by water molecules after water adsorption, and were thus not accessible for CO2 anymore. No changes in UV‐vis spectra upon CO2 sorption into both wetted PCN‐MOFs were visible (Figure S20). As the color of the porphyrin linker is highly sensitive to changes in pH value, we expected a change in the UV‐vis spectra if carbonic acid would have formed from water and CO2. The absence of spectral changes as well as no corresponding FT‐IR bands in the fingerprint region of the FT‐IR ATR spectra suggested that no carbonates or carbonic acid formed and that water and CO2 remained unchanged in the pores.
We assign the increase in sorption capacity of PCN‐222 to newly generated CO2 sorption sites within the mesopores. This has been observed for other MOFs, [36] including UiO‐66, where CO2 only adsorbs into the small tetrahedral cages (ca. 0.8 nm) for the pristine MOF and only after wetting, sorption sites in the larger octahedral cages (ca. 1.1 nm) can be occupied by CO2 and the sorption capacity increased by 20 %.[ 37 , 38 ] Similarly, mesoporous MIL‐100 showed a 5‐fold increase in CO2 capacity after wetting with H2O and a decrease in adsorption enthalpy, which was ascribed to microporous pockets formed by pre‐adsorbed water in the mesopores of MIL‐100, which are attractive for CO2 sorption. [36]
In line with previous findings, we here propose that water opens up new sorption sites in the 3.6 nm mesopores of PCN‐222, most likely close to the porphyrin macrocycle, and therefore yields a higher sorption capacity and a lower adsorption enthalpy. In contrast, PCN‐223 has a higher sorption capacity already in the pristine state, which we attribute to the higher microporosity (only 1.1 nm sized‐pores) compared to PCN‐222. Therefore, we assume that no new pore spaces could be generated that would have allowed to accommodate more CO2 molecules. To further support the claim that the sorption site is influenced by humidity‐induced structural changes in the PCN‐MOF, we performed CO2 sorption in PCN‐222 treated with p/p 0(H2O)=0.2 and 0.4, i. e. before water condensation. This did not cause any changes in CO2 sorption capacity or νas(C=O) band position (Figure S14). Furthermore, CO2 sorption experiments performed on pre‐acidified PCN‐222 with 0.01 M HCl yielded identical sorption capacities and band positions as obtained for the fully wetted PCN‐MOF, which suggested that protonation of the PCN‐MOFs occurs after condensation from the gas phase (Figure S21).
Competitive CO2/H2O Sorption
Lastly, we studied the competition of sorption sites between CO2 and H2O. To this end, increasing water vapor pressures were applied in the presence of a fixed CO2 pressures at p(CO2)=0.15 bar, which represents a typical flue gas concentration. The thereby obtained concentrations measured as the band areas of adsorbed CO2 (νas(C=O)) and H2O (ν(O−H)) are given in Figure 5d and S21. Figure 5d shows the influence of increasing water vapor pressure on adsorbed CO2 for pristine (dark blue and brown traces) and wetted (light blue and beige traces) PCN‐MOFs. For the pristine PCN‐MOFs, a gradual decrease in CO2 concentration was found up to p/p 0(H2O)=0.7 and 0.5 for PCN‐222 and PCN‐223, respectively, which correspond to the water pore condensation onsets for each PCN‐MOF (Figure 4b). After water condensation in the PCN‐MOF pores, the CO2 concentration decreased to 32 % and 8 % at p/p 0(H2O)=0.8 for PCN‐222 and PCN‐223, respectively, of the initial CO2 adsorption concentration in pristine PCN‐MOFs. For wetted and pristine PCN‐223, we found an almost identical trend for the competitive CO2/H2O adsorption (Figure 5d). On the other hand, wetted and pristine PCN‐222 behaved very differently: Firstly, the CO2 sorption capacity was increased by 1.8 times after wetting as discussed previously. Secondly, even though the CO2 concentration started at higher values, it declined rapidly as soon as water vapor was present. We attributed these differences in CO2/H2O exchange trends to the difference in pore sizes and the related possibility to form water sorption pockets for CO2 (see previous section). In the microporous PCN‐223, no such pockets were formed and we found an almost linear relationship between adsorbed CO2 and applied H2O vapor concentration for the pristine and wetted PCN‐223. This indicates that H2O gradually replaces CO2 molecule by molecule. This is in contrast to the mesoporous PCN‐222: The formed water pockets were filled with H2O and replaced CO2 already at low water vapor pressures. For comparison, we analyzed ZIF‐8, a hydrophobic MOF, with a CO2 sorption capacity in the range of PCN‐222 and PCN‐223.[ 39 , 40 ] The high hydrophobicity of ZIF‐8 prevented the penetration of water into the pores and only negligible amounts of water were found during the FT‐IR experiment (Figure S24). The νas(C=O) band remained at the same position after wetting compared to the pristine ZIF‐8 (Figure S24) and the CO2 sorption capacity was largely unaffected by the presence of water vapor. Finally, the water isotherms of PCN‐222 and PCN‐223 in the presence and absence of CO2 (Figure S23) showed a similar trend as in a previous study on the MOF CALF‐20: [41] The water adsorption was influenced by the presence of CO2 and shifted the pore condensation onset to higher humidity.
Conclusions
The uptake and the physicochemical interaction of CO2 within the micro‐ and mesopores of porphyrinic Zr‐MOFs were studied in the absence and presence of water vapor. Experimentally collected data from in situ FT‐IR and UV‐vis spectroscopy was in line with molecular simulations. Thereby we found the following crucial implications for further studies employing PCN‐MOFs for artificial photosynthesis:
Active site of the photoreaction. In the absence of water, the CO2 sorption sites are close to the Zr‐cluster and stabilized by dispersion forces within the pocket of phenyl‐rings of the linker. However, when water is present in concentrations above the dew point, the sorption site of CO2 is shifted away from the Zr‐cluster towards the porphyrin macrocycle. As it is still unclear if the photoenergy is passed to the CO2 molecule via an energy transfer from the porphyrin macrocycle or a charge transfer from the Zr‐cluster,[ 12 , 42 ] tuning the CO2 sorption site intentionally to the vicinity of either site, by simple wetting of the PCN‐MOF, could shine new light on this open question.
Structure and electronic properties of the photosensitizer. In situ UV‐vis spectroscopy revealed that water interacts with the porphyrin linker and as a consequence a bending of the macrocycle takes place. The bending disrupts the π‐system of the linker and alters the color and thus the spectral overlap of the PCN‐MOFs with the excitation light source used for the artificial photosynthesis. An effect on the energy or charge transfer properties of the photosensitizer can be expected, as it has been observed for uncoordinated porphyrin.[ 43 , 44 ] In addition, the basicity of the macrocycle is increased, which can affect the photocatalytic reaction as well.
Competitive adsorption. CO2/H2O competitive adsorption experiments at CO2 concentrations similar to flue gas (i. e., 15 %) showed that the exchange of CO2 with H2O is dependent on the MOF pore‐size, hydrophobicity of the MOF material, and on its previous exposure to humidity. The availability of both reaction partners, i. e., CO2 and H2O, plays an important role in the photoreaction. We showed that the externally applied CO2 and H2O gas phase concentrations do not directly relate to the CO2 and H2O concentrations found in the MOF pores and that it depends on the wetting history of the MOFs. However, based on our findings, the CO2/H2O ratio in the MOF pores can be tuned to desired ratios.
Carbonic acid intermediates. No experimental evidence for hydrated species of CO2, i. e., carbonic acid or carbonates, were found. This indicates that CO2 and H2O do not react in PCN‐MOFs under the employed experimental conditions.
Overall, these findings can serve as guideline to rationally tune the CO2/H2O ratio in MOF pores, the photophysical properties of the photosensitizers, as well as the sorption site in the PCN‐MOF pores. This is important to better understand the photoreaction mechanism and identify the catalytic active sites to design efficient and selective photoactive materials for artificial photosynthesis.
Experimental Section
Metal‐organic frameworks synthesis and characterization
PCN‐222 was synthesized according to literature. [18] 50 mg 5,10,15,20‐(tetra‐4‐carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (TCPP; 98 %, PorphyChem) and 35 mg ZrCl4 (Alfa, 99.5+%) were dissolved in 50 mL dimethylformamide (DMF, TCI, 99 %) using ultrasonic mixing. 14 mL formic acid (FA, TCI, >98 %) were added and the reaction mixture was heated to 120 °C for 16 h in glass vials. After cooling down to room temperature, the purple powder was separated by centrifugation and washed three times with DMF and acetone (AC; VWR, 99.9 %). The powder was dried at 80 °C overnight. PCN‐223 was synthesized according to literature. [18] 50 mg TCPP and 35 mg ZrCl4 were dissolved in 50 mL DMF using ultrasonic mixing. 10 mL propionic acid (PA; Merck,99 %) were added and the reaction mixture was heated to 120 °C for 16 h in glass vials. After cooling down to room temperature, the purple powder was separated by centrifugation and washed three times with DMF and acetone. Subsequently, the MOF powders were soaked in acetone for a day and separated by centrifugation. The powder was dried at 80 °C overnight. 1 mg of MOF powder was responded in 0.2 mL acetone and the suspension was drop casted on the Si ATR crystal heated at 80 °C. ZIF‐8 (500 nm crystal size) was purchased at ACS materials.
UV‐vis spectra of MOF suspensions in water, acetone, toluene (VWR, 99.9 %) and 0.01 M HCl (Honeywell, p.a.) were determined using a Lambda 950S UV‐vis‐NIR spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer) equipped with a deuterium and a halogen light source, a photomultiplier (PMT) detector (UV‐vis region), and a 150 mm integrating sphere coated with Spectralon®. Suspensions were filled in quartz cuvettes with d=2 mm and placed in front of the integrating spere. X‐ray diffraction (XRD) data were collected on a Bruker D8 Advance X‐ray powder diffractometer in Bragg‐Brentano geometry operating with a Cu Kα X‐ray tube (λ=1.5418 Å) at 40 kV and 40 mA. Powder samples were ground and placed on a silicon single crystal sample holder. XRD patterns were recorded at room temperature between 2° to 25° at a rate of 1 s/step and a step size of 0.02°. N2 isotherms were recorded on a Sync 400 (3P Instruments) using N2 (Linde, 5.0). Samples were activated under a dynamic vacuum at 150 °C for 12 h prior the measurement. A liquid N2 bath was used to maintain a temperature of 77 K for each measurement.
Experimental setup for gas sorption
Figure S1 shows the gas flow cell and attenuated total reflection (ATR) setup that was placed in a Perkin Elmer Three Fourier‐transform infrared (FT‐IR) spectrometer equipped with a N2‐cooled mercury cadmium telluride (MCT) detector, which has been adapted from Ref. [45,46]. 1/8 inch fluoropolymer (PFA) tubing was connected to the gas flow cell using M5 adapters (Festo). For each spectrum 128 scans were averaged (1 min/spectrum). Attenuated total reflectance (ATR) crystals (20×10×0.5 mm, 45°) cut from double side polished Si wafer and a depth of penetration dp =0.52 μm (ν=1600 cm−1) and an effective pathlength of =0.64 μm =0.32 μm, yielding at total effective pathlength of ( + )/2*N=9.65 μm with N=20 were used. The temperature of the aluminium flow cell was controlled using a thermoelectric cooling (TEC) controller (TEC‐1091, Meerstetter) and a 20×20 mm Peltier element.
CO2 mixtures were obtained by mixing pure CO2 (Linde, N.4) and N2 (Linde, 5.0) streams. Water vapor with different p/p 0(H2O) was generated by mixing a dry N2 flow with a moistened N2 flow obtained from bubbling through water at room temperature by means of mass flow controllers (Bronkhorst) to achieve a total flow of 100 mL min−1. The actual water vapor concentrations were determined by transmission IR spectroscopy in a 10 cm transmission cell with ZnSe windows. For calibration, transmission spectra were integrated in the O−H bending region between 1700–1800 cm−1. Concentrations were obtained from the band areas using reference spectra of 1 ppm/m water from the PNNL database. The application sequence was started with flushing pure N2 flushing for 10 min. Subsequently, the partial pressure was increased/decreased and kept for 3 min to reach step to reach equilibrium.
Fiber‐coupled UV‐vis spectroscopy in diffuse reflectance (DR) mode from the Si ATR crystal was performed using an Avantes Avaspec‐ULS2048CL‐EVO‐RS spectrometer and an AvaLight‐DH‐S‐BAL light source. A reflection probe from Avantes (FCR‐7UV400) was placed above the flow cell to measure through the sapphire window.
Computational details
The calculations were done with the ADF program, versions 2020.102 and 2022.101[47][48] using a double‐ζ plus polarization function [DZVP] basis set. [49] Relativistic effects were accounted for by the Zeroth Order Regular Approximation (ZORA) approach.[ 50 , 51 , 52 ] We have used the meta‐GGA M06‐L density functional; [53] all electrons were included in the calculations (i. e., no frozen cores or effective core potentials were used). The numerical accuracy setting of the ADF program was specified as “good”. The standard ADF criteria for geometry optimization were applied. For the clusters representing the MOFs, the carbon atoms in para position to the carboxylate groups were fixed at the positions in the solid. The reported sorption energies were corrected for the Basis Set Superposition Error (BSSE) by means of the counterpoise method. [54] For calculating vibrational frequencies we used the Mobile Block Hessian method.[ 55 , 56 ]
Supporting Information
Characterization (N2 sorption, FT‐IR spectroscopy, and X‐ray diffraction) of MOFs; computational details, supplemental FT‐IR and UV‐vis DRS data of pristine and wetted PCN‐MOFs are provided in the Supporting Information. The authors have cited additional references within the Supporting Information.[ 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ]
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
1.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the Netherlands Center for Multiscale Catalytic Energy Conversion (MCEC), an NWO Gravitation program funded by the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OC&W), of the government of the Netherlands, and by the ARC‐CBBC (Advanced Research Center–Chemical Building Blocks Consortium). The authors thank Joren Dorresteijn (Utrecht University) for SEM imaging. B.B. acknowledges additional funding by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) under the project number J4607‐N and by the Dutch Research Council (NWO) under the grant number OCENW.XS22.4.067. The experimental setup was manufactured at the scientific instrumentation domain at the Faculty of Sciences of Utrecht University. We thank SURF (www.surf.nl) for the support in using the National Supercomputer Snellius.
Baumgartner B., Prins P. T., Louwen J. N., Monai M., Weckhuysen B. M., ChemCatChem 2023, 15, e202300722.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1. He Y., et al., Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 373, 167–198. [Google Scholar]
- 2. Li H., et al., Mater. Today 2018, 21, 108–121. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Boyd P. G., et al., Nature 2019, 576, 253–256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ding M., et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019, 48, 2783–2828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lv D., et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2018, 57, 12215–12224. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Feng D., et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 10307–10310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Feng D., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 17714–17717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Huang H., et al., Small 2022, 18, 2200407. [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sharma N., et al., Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019, 280, 372–378. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Zhang H., et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 14310–14314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Xu H. Q., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 13440–13443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Benseghir Y., et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 18103–18115. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chen E.-X., et al., Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704388. [Google Scholar]
- 14. Sadeghi N., et al., J. CO2 Util. 2016, 16, 450–457. [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bin Fang Z., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020, 142, 12515–12523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Smith K. T., et al., Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 953–956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Roucan M., et al., Chem. Commun. 2017, 54, 26–29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Shaikh S. M. et al., Inorg. Chem. 2019, 58, 5145–5153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Valenzano L., et al., Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 1700–1718. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Hadjiivanov K. I., et al., Chem. Rev. 2021, 121, 1286–1424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Cavka J. H., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13850–13851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wiersum A. D., et al., Chem. Asian J. 2011, 6, 3270–3280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Grissom T. G., et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 13731–13738. [Google Scholar]
- 24. Fitzgerald S. A., et al., J. Phys. Chem. C 2015, 119, 5293–5300. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Zhang K., et al., Cryst. Growth Des. 2017, 17, 543–549. [Google Scholar]
- 26. Li Z., et al., Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018, 194–202. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Carrasco S., et al., Organometallics 2019, 38, 3429–3435. [Google Scholar]
- 28. Li J., et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202207259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Garrone E., et al., Chem. Soc. Rev. 2005, 34, 846–857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Yao Y., et al., Phys. Rev. B: Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2012, 85, 064302. [Google Scholar]
- 31. Sumida K., et al., Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 724–781. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Baumgartner B., et al., Langmuir 2019, 35, 11986–11994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Medders G. R., et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2014, 5, 2897–2902. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Deibert B. J., et al., Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 9636–9639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Shaikh S. M., et al., Faraday Discuss. 2019, 216, 174–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Soubeyrand-Lenoir E., et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 10174–10181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Jajko G., et al., Chem. A Eur. J. 2021, 27, 14653–14659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Hossain M. I., et al., Chem. Eng. Sci. 2019, 203, 346–357. [Google Scholar]
- 39. Erdosy D. P., et al., Nature 2022, 608, 712–718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Pérez-Pellitero J., et al., Chem. A Eur. J. 2010, 16, 1560–1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Bin Lin J., et al., Science 2021, 374, 1464–1469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Xu C., et al., Chem. Sci. 2018, 9, 3152–3158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Harriman A., et al., J. Photochem. 1984, 27, 205–214. [Google Scholar]
- 44. Gonçalves P. J., et al., Chem. Phys. Lett. 2005, 407, 236–241. [Google Scholar]
- 45. Baumgartner B., et al., Sens. Actuators B 2020, 302, 127194. [Google Scholar]
- 46. Baumgartner B., et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202201725. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. te Velde G., et al., J. Comput. Chem. 2001, 22, 931–967. [Google Scholar]
- 48.ADF 2022.1, SCM, Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, http://www.scm.com.
- 49. Van Lenthe E., et al., J. Comput. Chem. 2003, 24, 1142–1156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Van Lenthe E., et al., J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 99, 4597–4610. [Google Scholar]
- 51. Van Lenthe E., et al., J. Chem. Phys. 1994, 101, 9783–9792. [Google Scholar]
- 52. Van Lenthe E., J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 8943–8953. [Google Scholar]
- 53. Zhao Y., et al., J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 125, 194101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Boys S. F., et al., Mol. Phys. 1970, 19, 553–566. [Google Scholar]
- 55. Ghysels A., et al., J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 164108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Ghysels A., et al., J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 224102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Smith K. T., et al., Chem. Commun. 2022, 58, 953–956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Kedenburg S., et al., Opt. Mater. Express 2012, 2, 1588–1611. [Google Scholar]
- 59. Rheims J. et al., Meas. Sci. Technol. 1997, 8, 601–605. [Google Scholar]
- 60. Hale G. M., et al., Appl. Opt. 1973, 12, 555–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Peck E. R., et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1966, 56, 1059–1063. [Google Scholar]
- 62. Presselt M., et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 14096–14106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.