ABSTRACT
Although vaginitis is closely related to vaginal microecology in females, the precise composition and functional potential of different types of vaginitis remain unclear. Here, metagenomic sequencing was applied to analyze the vaginal flora in patients with various forms of vaginitis, including cases with a clue cell proportion ranging from 1% to 20% (Clue1_20), bacterial vaginitis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and BV combined with VVC (VVC_BV). Our results identified Prevotella as an important biomarker between BV and Clue1_20. Moreover, a gradual decrease was observed in the relative abundance of shikimic acid metabolism associated with bacteria producing indole as well as a decline in the abundance of Gardnerella vaginalis in patients with BV, Clue1_20, and healthy women. Interestingly, the vaginal flora of patients in the VVC_BV group exhibited structural similarities to that of the VVC group, and its potentially functional characteristics resembled those of the BV and VVC groups. Finally, Lactobacillus crispatus was found in high abundance in healthy samples, greatly contributing to the stability of the vaginal environment. For the further study of L. crispatus, we isolated five strains of L. crispatus from healthy samples and evaluated their capacity to inhibit G. vaginalis biofilms and produce lactic acid in vitro to select the potential probiotic candidate for improving vaginitis in future clinical studies. Overall, we successfully identified bacterial biomarkers of different vaginitis and characterized the dynamic shifts in vaginal flora between patients with BV and healthy females. This research advances our understanding and holds great promise in enhancing clinical approaches for the treatment of vaginitis.
IMPORTANCE
Vaginitis is one of the most common gynecological diseases, mostly caused by infections of pathogens such as Candida albicans and Gardnerella vaginalis. In recent years, it has been found that the stability of the vaginal flora plays an important role in vaginitis. Furthermore, the abundant Lactobacillus-producing rich lactic acid in the vagina provides a healthy acidic environment such as Lactobacillus crispatus. The metabolites of Lactobacillus can inhibit the colonization of pathogens. Here, we collected the vaginal samples of patients with bacterial vaginitis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and BV combined with VVC to discover the differences and relationships among the different kinds of vaginitis by metagenomic sequencing. Furthermore, because of the importance of L. crispatus in promoting vaginal health, we isolated multiple strains from vaginal samples of healthy females and chose the most promising strain with potential probiotic benefits to provide clinical implications for treatment strategies.
KEYWORDS: bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, metagenomics, vaginal flora, Lactobacillus
INTRODUCTION
Vaginitis, a prevalent gynecological condition, represents a recurrent challenge for women worldwide. Clinically, it is characterized into bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and trichomonas vaginitis (TV) based on the nature of the infection (1, 2). Due to various factors, some women may experience multiple types of vaginitis simultaneously. Moreover, disruptions in vaginal flora due to BV have been associated with an elevated risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (3, 4) and human papilloma virus (HPV) infections (5). Clinical symptoms of BV commonly include an abundance of clue cells (vaginal epithelial cells heavily coated with bacteria) that make up more than 20% of the vaginal flora (6, 7). Interestingly, there are women who exhibit symptoms and have between 1% and 20% clue cells in their vagina yet do not meet the clinical criteria for a BV diagnosis (8, 9). The presence of clue cells in these instances provokes concerns regarding the health status of the vaginal flora.
Previously, the primary treatment options for BV and VVC involved the use of metronidazole and clindamycin (10–12). More recently, however, probiotics have gained increasing public acceptance due to their non-destructive impact on vaginal flora stability (13–15). Lactobacillus species, which represent the predominant bacteria in the vaginal flora of healthy females, produce metabolites to inhibit the colonization of pathogenic bacteria, such as Gardnerella vaginalis, and provide an acidic environment (pH 4.5) in the vagina (16, 17). Various studies have evaluated the effects of different Lactobacillus species in patients with vaginitis, including Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus gasseri, and Lactobacillus crispatus (18–20).
Many studies have explored the vaginal microbiota using advanced next-generation sequencing, with a particular focus on 16S rRNA sequencing analysis (2, 21–24). However, the accuracy of species-level annotation using 16S rRNA sequencing is limited (25). In contrast, metagenomic sequencing provides a more comprehensive and in-depth characterization of the complexity of the microbiome (26).
Here, we employed metagenomic sequencing to investigate the structural and variances of the functional potential in the vaginal microbiota between healthy females and those with different types of vaginitis. This allowed us to identify specific biomarkers associated with different forms of vaginitis. We further conducted a comparative analysis of samples contained 1%–20% clue cells and those from healthy women and BV patients to clarify their relationships and differences. We also investigated the similarities and differences between individuals with BV, VVC, and BV combined with VVC. By isolating and evaluating high-performing Lactobacillus strains from the vagina of healthy females, this study aims to provide the evidence for generating hypotheses for potential treatment strategies.
RESULTS
Significant structural differences in vaginal flora between healthy women and patients with vaginitis
Metagenomic sequencing was carried out on samples obtained from 41 patients with vaginitis and 8 healthy females, resulting in 226.56 Gb of raw data and 221.92 Gb of filtered clean data. The average number of raw reads sequenced per sample was 36,082,562, and the average number of non-host reads sequenced per sample was 3,324,968 (Tables S1 and S4). Based on metagenomic sequencing, the vaginal microbiota of the five groups was classified into 39 phyla, 816 genera, and 1,523 species. Results showed significant differences in the diversity of the vaginal microbiota between the healthy group and the BV, VVC, Clue1_20, and VVC_BV groups (R = 0.2846, P = 0.001; Fig. 1A and B). Notably, marked differences were observed between the healthy and BV and Clue1_20 groups or between the BV and VVC groups based on the Shannon index (P < 0.0001, P < 0.05, and P < 0.05, respectively; Fig. 1F). There were significant differences between the BV and healthy groups or the Clue1_20 and healthy groups based on the Simpson index (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively; Fig. 1F). Marked differences were observed between the BV and healthy and Clue1_20 and VVC groups based on the Chao1 and ACE indices (P < 0.001, P < 0.05, and P < 0.001, respectively; Fig. 1F). These findings indicated distinct variations in the vaginal microbiota of healthy individuals and patients with vaginitis. Furthermore, the vaginal microbiota in vaginitis patients displayed greater complexity compared to that of healthy women.
Fig 1.
The comparisons of the vaginal microbiome composition between healthy females and patients with different types of vaginitis. (A and B) Phylum-level β-diversity among the five groups based on principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) and Bray-Curtis analysis of similarities (Bray-Curtis Anosim) (R = 0.2846, P = 0.001). (C and D) Top 20 most abundant bacteria in five groups at the phylum (C) and genus (D) levels. (E) The comparison of the relative abundance of Candida albicans, Gardnerella vaginalis, Lactobacillus crispatus and Prevotella among the five groups. (F) The differences of α-diversity in the five groups. (G) The different microbes between the healthy and BV group by LEfSe (P < 0.05 and LDA > 3.5). (H) The different microbes between the healthy and Clue1_20 group by LEfSe (P < 0.05 and LDA > 3). (I) The different microbes between the healthy and VVC group by LEfSe (P < 0.05 and LDA > 3). (J) The different microbes between the healthy and VVC_BV group by LEfSe (P < 0.05 and LDA > 3). (K) The heatmap of the relative abundance of Lactobacillus contained in the five groups. nsP-value >0.05, *P-value < 0.05; **P-value < 0.01; ***P-value < 0.001; ****P-value < 0.0001 in panels E and F.
To gain a comprehensive understanding of the whole composition of the vaginal microbiome in the five groups, a vaginal microbiome profile was generated. At the phylum level, Firmicutes was dominant in the healthy group (98.58%), while Actinobacteria (59.54%), Firmicutes (26.81%), and Bacteroidetes (10.23%) were dominant in the BV group. Moreover, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes were dominant in the Clue1_20 group (56.20% and 34.89%, respectively), VVC group (22.30% and 74.18%, respectively), and VVC_BV group (29.74% and 56.48%, respectively) (Fig. 1C).
At the genus level, Lactobacillus (98.20%) was substantially more abundant in the healthy group compared to the other groups (Fig. 1D). Moreover, in the BV group, Gardnerella (55.34%) was the most abundant, followed by Lactobacillus (19.73%) and Prevotella (7.84%). In the Clue1_20 group, Gardnerella (54.80%) and Lactobacillus (30.40%) were the most abundant, followed by Prevotella (1.78%). In the VVC group, the vaginal flora was dominated by Lactobacillus (65.52%), Gardnerella (21.41%), and Streptococcus (6.02%), while Lactobacillus (50.76%), Gardnerella (28.81%), and Prevotella (5.42%) were dominant in the VVC_BV group (Fig. 1D). Specifically, at the species level of Lactobacillus, L. crispatus and Lactobacillus iners were the dominant Lactobacillus in the healthy group (66.58% and 29.34%, respectively), BV group (3.56% and 16.03%, respectively), Clue1_20 group (4.15% and 15.46%, respectively), VVC group (16.08% and 46.41%, respectively), and VVC_BV group (3.34% and 45.24%, respectively). The relative abundance of Lactobacillus jensenii in the Clue1_20, VVC, and VVC_BV groups was 3.45%, 2.71%, and 2.03%, respectively, but extremely low in the BV and healthy group. In the Clue1_20 group, the relative abundance of Lactobacillus johnsonii and L. gasseri was 4.16% and 2.04%, respectively, but extremely low in others. In addition, Lactobacillus helveticus (0.39%), Lactobacillus amylovorus (0.46%), and Lactobacillus acidophilus (0.10%) were richer in the healthy group than other groups (Fig. 1K).
We next conducted linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) between each patient group and the healthy group to identify bacterial biomarkers. Significant changes were observed in seven microbes at the species level between the healthy and BV groups (LDA >3.5) (Fig. 1G). G. vaginalis, Mobiluncus curtisii, Prevotella intermedia, Aerococcus christensenii, and Prevotella melaninogenica were significantly enriched in the BV group, while L. crispatus and Lactobacillus sp. C25 were significantly enriched in the healthy group. Significant changes were observed in 13 microbes at the species level between the healthy and Clue1_20 groups (LDA >3) (Fig. 1H). G. vaginalis, Mageeibacillus indolicus, Paracoccus liaowanqingii, A. christensenii, Propionimicrobium sp. Marseille P3275, Microbacterium testaceum, and Microbacterium sp. BH 333 were significantly enriched in the Clue1_20 group, while L. crispatus, Lactobacillus sp. wkB8, Vibrio ziniensis, Lactobacillus sp. C25, L. helveticus, and Vibrio diabolicus were significantly enriched in the healthy group. Significant changes were observed in four microbes at the species level between the healthy and VVC groups (LDA >3) (Fig. 1I). Candida albicans was significantly enriched in the VVC group, while L. amylovorus, L. sp. C25, and L. helveticus were significantly enriched in the healthy group. Significant changes were observed in eight microbes at the species level between the healthy and VVC_BV groups (LDA >3) (Fig. 1J). G. vaginalis, Ralstonia mannitolilytica, Pseudomonas sp. phDV1, C. albicans, Bradyrhizobium symbiodeficiens, P. liaowanqingii, Propionimicrobium sp. Marseille P3275, and Brugia timori were significantly enriched in the VVC_BV group.
Based on the above results, we generated box plots to visualize differences in five bacterial biomarkers among the five groups (Fig. 1E). Compared to the healthy group, the relative abundance of C. albicans was remarkably higher in the VVC_BV group (P < 0.01) as well as in the VVC group (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the BV and VVC_BV groups (P < 0.05). Compared to the healthy group, the relative abundances of G. vaginalis and Prevotella were significantly higher in the BV (P < 0.001), Clue1_20 (P < 0.01), and VVC_BV groups (P < 0.05). Furthermore, results also showed that the relative abundance of L. crispatus was significantly higher in the healthy group compared to the BV, Clue1_20, VVC, and VVC_BV groups (P < 0.001, P < 0.01, P < 0.01, and P < 0.01, respectively; Fig. 1E). These findings corroborated our earlier observations.
Relationship between percentage of clue cells and vaginal flora structure
Clue cells were vaginal epithelial cells that have G. vaginalis attached to their surfaces (7). Samples from women with 1%–20% clue cells in the vagina were collected and compared with samples from BV patients and healthy women. According to β-diversity analysis, the healthy group showed significant differences from the BV and Clue1_20 groups, while no significant differences were detected between the BV and Clue1_20 groups (R = 0.3895, P = 0.001; Fig. 2A).
Fig 2.
The relationships of the vaginal microbiome composition among the healthy, Clue1_20, and BV groups and the comparison of the vaginal microbiome composition among the BV, VVC, and VVC_BV groups. (A) The difference of β-diversity among the healthy, Clue1_20, and BV groups (Bray-Curtis Anosim, R = 0.3895, P = 0.001). (B) Top 20 most abundant bacteria at the species level in the healthy, Clue1_20, and BV groups. (C) The comparison of the relative abundance of Prevotella between the BV and Clue1_20 groups. (D) The box plot of the relative abundance of 13 species of Prevotella between the BV and Clue1_20 groups. (E) The comparison of the relative abundance of Lactobacillus iners among the five groups. (F) Top 20 most abundant bacteria at the species level in the healthy, Clue1_20, and BV groups (mean data). (G) The difference of β-diversity among the BV, VVC, and VVC_BV groups (Bray-Curtis Anosim, R = 0.3012, P = 0.001). (H) The different microbes between the BV and VVC groups by LEfSe (P < 0.05 and LDA >3). (I) The different microbes between the BV and VVC_BV groups by LEfSe (P < 0.05 and LDA >2.5). (J) The different microbes among the VVC and VVC_BV groups by LEfSe (P < 0.05 and LDA >3). nsP-value >0.05, *P-value <0.05; **P-value <0.01; ***P-value <0.001 in panels C, D, and E.
At the family level, microbial community analysis revealed that differences in the prevalence of Prevotellaceae were the main distinction among the BV, Clue1_20, and healthy groups, with a notable increase in the BV group (7.78%) compared to the Clue1_20 (1.76%) and healthy groups (0.22%) (Fig. S1). Lactobacillaceae, also one of the main distinctions among the three groups, was markedly lower in the Clue1_20 (30.04%) and BV groups (19.84%) compared to the healthy group (98.25%) (Fig. S1). To further explore the differences between the BV and Clue1_20 groups, all Prevotellaceae bacteria detected in the samples were examined, and the overall relative abundance of them in the BV group was significantly higher than that in the Clue1_20 group (P < 0.01; Fig. 2C). Results demonstrated that the relative abundances of 4 of the 13 species were significantly higher in the BV group than in the Clue1_20 group, including P. intermedia, Prevotella jejuni, Prevotella sp. oral taxon 299, and Prevotella ruminicola (P < 0.05; Fig. 2D). Moreover, at the species level of Lactobacillus, the healthy group was dominated by L. crispatus (66.58%) and L. iners (29.34%), while the BV (16.04%) and Clue1_20 (15.46%) groups were dominated by L. iners (Fig. 2B and F). Furthermore, there was no significant difference of the relative abundance of L. iners in five groups (P > 0.05; Fig. 2E). On the contrary, G. vaginalis was dominant in the BV (55.23%) and Clue1_20 (54.55%) groups; however, its relative abundance was far lower in the healthy group (0.82%) (Fig. 2F). The above findings demonstrated that the relative abundance of Lactobacillus was highest in the healthy group, followed by the Clue1_20 and BV groups, while G. vaginalis showed the opposite trend.
Structural comparison of vaginal flora in patients with different types of vaginitis
Results of principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed significant differences between the BV and VVC groups but no significant differences between the VVC and VVC_BV groups or between the BV and VVC_BV groups (R = 0.3012, P = 0.001; Fig. 2G). Based on LEfSe analysis, the BV and VVC groups of 19 microbes were significantly different at the species level (LDA >3; Fig. 2H). L. crispatus and Streptococcus intermedius were higher in the VVC group, while G. vaginalis, P. intermedia, A. christensenii, P. melaninogenica, P. asaccharolytica, and Sneathia vaginalis were higher in the BV group. The BV and VVC_BV groups of seven microbes were significantly different at the species level (LDA >2.5; Fig. 2I). C. albicans and Pseudomonas sihuiensis were enriched in the VVC_BV group, while L. crispatus, Gloeothece verrucosa, Sulfurihydrogenibium sp. YO3AOP1, Ignavibacterium album, and Arsenophonus nasoniae were enriched in the BV group. We observed that 10 microbes at the species level were significantly different between the VVC and VVC_BV groups (LDA >3; Fig. 2J). Prevotella scopos, Prevotella denticola, Prevotella dentalis, Porphyromonas asaccharolytica, Prevotella oris, Megasphaera elsdenii, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Ascaris suum, Phocaeicola dorei, and Butyricimonas faecalis were greater in the VVC_BV group. Results showed that the structure of vaginal flora in the VVC_BV group was similar to that of the BV group.
Significant differences in vaginal flora functional potentials between healthy women and patients with vaginitis
The microbial metabolic pathways were compared between the healthy group and other disease groups. Notably, in the BV group, pathways related to carbohydrate synthesis, such as the superpathway of coenzyme A biosynthesis III (mammals), chorismate biosynthesis I, sucrose biosynthesis II, and UMP biosynthesis III, as well as inosine-5′-phosphate biosynthesis I and III, were increased, while adenosine ribonucleotides de novo biosynthesis, coenzyme A biosynthesis II (mammals), and pyruvate fermentation to acetate and lactate II were decreased (P < 0.001; Fig. 3A). In the Clue1_20 group, pyruvate fermentation to acetate and lactate II, tRNA charging, and UDP-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine biosynthesis I were lower, while S-adenosyl-L-methionine salvage I and UMP biosynthesis III were higher compared to that in the healthy group (P < 0.01; Fig. 3B). In the VVC group, several pathways related to fungi were enriched, including coenzyme A biosynthesis II (eukaryotic) and mevalonate pathway I (eukaryotes and bacteria) (P < 0.01; Fig. 3C). Other enriched pathways in the VVC group were similar to those enriched in the BV group, such as UMP biosynthesis II and III (P < 0.01; Fig. 3C). The VVC_BV group was also enriched in pathways related to fungi, including coenzyme A biosynthesis II (eukaryotic) and coenzyme A biosynthesis I (prokaryotic); however, L-lysine biosynthesis II and S-adenosyl-L-methionine cycle I were decreased (P < 0.01; Fig. 3D). In conclusion, the potential functions of the vaginal flora in the Clue1_20 group were closer to those in the healthy than those of the BV group. Furthermore, not only bacteria-related pathways were predicted in the VVC_BV group, which were similar to those in the BV group, but also fungus-related pathways similar to those in the VVC group.
Fig 3.
The comparisons of the vaginal microbiome functional potential among the five groups. (A) The different metabolic pathways between the healthy and BV groups (P < 0.001). (B) The different metabolic pathways between the healthy and Clue1_20 groups (P < 0.01). (C) The different metabolic pathways between the healthy and VVC groups (P < 0.01). (D) The different metabolic pathways between the healthy and VVC_BV groups (P < 0.01). (E) The comparison of the activity of L-lysine biosynthesis III among the five groups. (F) The comparison of the activity of pyruvate fermentation to acetate and lactic acid among the five groups. nsP-value >0.05, *P-value <0.05; **P-value <0.01; ***P-value < 0.001 in panels E and F.
Lactobacillus provided an acidic environment for the vaginal environment of healthy women. The above analysis revealed significant enrichment of pathways related to pyruvate fermentation to acetate and lactate and amino acid biosynthesis in the healthy group. Thus, we compared these two pathways related to the potential function of Lactobacillus in five groups. As expected, they were significantly higher in the healthy group than BV, Clue1_20, VVC, and VVC_BV groups (P < 0.001, Fig. 3E; P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively, Fig. 3F).
Functional potential comparison of vaginal flora among patients with different types of vaginitis
The BV group exhibited greater enrichment in certain bacterial pathways compared to the VVC group, including NAD de novo biosynthesis I (from aspartate), queuosine biosynthesis (de novo), and methylerythritol phosphate pathway I and II (P < 0.001; Fig. 4A). The main differences in bacterial pathways between the VVC and VVC_BV groups were NAD de novo biosynthesis I (from aspartate) and preQ0 biosynthesis (P < 0.05; Fig. 4B). Furthermore, the BV and VVC_BV groups showed marked differences in the Bifidobacterium shunt and S-adenosyl-L-methionine salvage I pathways, which are primarily rich in bacteria (P < 0.01; Fig. 4C). According to the Bray-Curtis Anosim analysis, the functional potential of the vaginal flora in the VVC_BV group was close to the VVC group (R = 0.0473, P = 0.224) and BV group (R = 0.0449, P = 0.342) (Fig. 4D and E).
Fig 4.
The differences of pathways of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis and related bacteria among the five groups and the comparison of the vaginal microbiome potential function among the BV, VVC, and VVC_BV groups. (A) The different metabolic pathways between the VVC and BV groups (P < 0.001). (B) The different metabolic pathways between the VVC and VVC_BV groups (P < 0.05). (C) The different metabolic pathways between the BV and VVC_BV groups (P < 0.01). (D) The correlation analysis for metabolomic data of the VVC and VVC_BV groups (Bray-Curtis Anosim, R = 0.0473, P = 0.224). (E) The correlation analysis for metabolomic data of the BV and VVC_BV groups (Bray-Curtis Anosim, R = 0.0449, P = 0.342). (F) The different metabolic pathways between the Clue1_20 and BV groups (P < 0.05). (G) The comparison of the relative abundance of the superpathway of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis among the five groups. (H) The comparison of the relative abundance of chorismite biosynthesis I (from 3-dehydroquinate) among the five groups. (I) The comparison of the relative abundance of bacteria producing indole among the five groups. (J and K) The comparisons of the relative abundance of tryptophansynthase beta chain (J) and tryptophanase (K) among the five groups. nsP-value >0.05, *P-value <0.05; **P-value <0.01; ***P-value <0.001 in panels G, H, I, J, and K.
Relationship between aromatic amino acid biosynthesis and indole in the vagina of BV patients
Our study revealed significant enrichment of chorismate biosynthesis from 3-dehydroquinate and superpathway of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis in the BV group compared to the Clue1_20 group (P < 0.05; Fig. 4F). Further analysis using box plots across the five groups demonstrated that these pathways were the richest in the BV group, followed by the VVC_BV and Clue1_20 groups (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P < 0.01, respectively; Fig. 4G and H). Moreover, we examined the proportion of bacteria capable of producing indole and found that comparing to the healthy group, 25 bacterial counts were enriched in the BV group (P < 0.001), followed by the VVC_BV group (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively; Fig. 4I; Table S2). We conducted gene family-level analysis to assess the abundance of genes involved in tryptophan biosynthesis and metabolism, specifically the genes encoding tryptophansynthase β chain and tryptophanase. Results showed that the relative abundance of the encoding tryptophansynthase β chain gene was decreased in the healthy group and increased in the BV and Clue1_20 groups (P < 0.01; Fig. 4J and K). In conclusion, the BV group exhibited higher relative abundance in the aromatic amino acid biosynthesis pathway related to the abundance of BV-associated pathogens capable of producing indole compared to the Clue1_20 group.
Probiotic properties of L. crispatus isolated from the vagina of healthy women
Given the highest relative abundance of L. crispatus in the healthy group and the above findings on the possible effect of Lactobacillus, selective isolation of L. crispatus was performed to explore its possible role in the vaginal environment. Five strains of L. crispatus were isolated from vaginal samples taken from the healthy group. Their lactic acid production capacity was examined using a lactic acid content assay kit, with the international standard LGG (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG) serving as a control. Results showed that MV0809 exhibited the highest lactic acid production ability, following by MV0808 (P < 0.001; Fig. 5A). Next, we evaluated the ability of L. crispatus to inhibit G. vaginalis biofilm formation. We measured the biofilm activity and formation of G. vaginalis (Fig. S3). The biofilms of G. vaginalis (CFU/mL) were cultured with the cell-free supernatant (CFS) of L. crispatus for 24 h. Results indicated that MV1002 (P < 0.01) and MV0808 (P < 0.001) exhibited greater inhibitory effects compared to the other strains (Fig. 5B). Thus, among the isolated strains, MV0808 demonstrated the best capacity in terms of producing lactic acid and inhibiting G. vaginalis biofilm formation.
Fig 5.
The probiotic properties of L. crispatus isolated from the vagina of healthy women and the aromatic amino acid synthesis pathways and indole metabolism in bacteria. (A) The capacity of L. crispatus in producing lactic acid among the five L. crispatus strains. (B) The capacity of L. crispatus in inhibiting G. vaginalis biofilms among the five L. crispatus strains. (C) The aromatic amino acid synthesis pathways and indole metabolism in bacteria. nsP-value >0.05, *P-value <0.05; **P-value <0.01; **P-value <0.001 in panels A and B.
DISCUSSION
In our study, we employed metagenomic sequencing to characterize the biomarkers associated with various types of vaginitis. Our findings proposed transitional pattern hypothesis in the vaginal microbiota between healthy females, women with 1%–20% clue cells, and patients with BV. Furthermore, we characterized the vaginal microbiota relationships among patients with BV, VVC, and both BV and VVC. These findings expanded our understanding of the distinct characteristics of vaginal microbiota in females with vaginitis.
With the accumulation of research, our understanding of vaginal microecology in women continues to grow (27). In the current study, we conducted a comparative analysis between each disease group and the healthy group to gain an overview of the structural and potentially functional characteristics of the vaginal flora. In the healthy group, L. crispatus was the dominant bacteria in most samples, likely playing a significant role in the vaginal flora, but was decreased in the other groups (28). Compared to the healthy individuals, each disease group exhibited distinct bacterial biomarkers and individual functional pathways potentially. G. vaginalis was enriched in both the BV and Clue1_20 groups, although with a higher percentage in the former. Additionally, Candida was enriched in the VVC_BV and VVC groups, contributing to VVC infection (29). The high relative abundance of C. albicans in the VVC group was consistent with previous findings (30–32). However, Candida content was still lower in the VVC_BV group than in the VVC group. Interestingly, the VVC_BV group showed an increase in anaerobic bacteria, such as G. vaginalis and Prevotella, which were clinically considered the main pathogens of BV (33, 34). In the functional prediction of the flora, we found that certain pathways probably associated with Lactobacillus, including lactic acid and amino acid biosynthesis, were significantly enriched in the healthy group. Studies have indicated that healthy women with rich Lactobacillus in the vagina possess higher levels of amino acids in the vagina compared to patients with HPV or BV (35, 36). Particularly, ε-poly-L-lysine can inhibit the biofilm formation of G. vaginalis (37, 38). Moreover, women with gynecological diseases tend to exhibit a higher vaginal pH than healthy women due to the lower lactic acid in the vagina (pH 4.5) (39–42). Therefore, we selected two representative pathways, L-lysine biosynthesis III and pyruvate fermentation to acetate and lactic acid, for comparison in five groups and discovered that they were increased in the healthy group but decreased in other disease groups. Our finding was consistent with the report that pathways related to amino acid biosynthesis were lower in BV patients than in healthy women (36). In addition, the coenzyme A biosynthesis II (eukaryotic) pathway, associated with eukaryotic processes, was found to be enriched in both the VVC_BV and VVC groups. In conclusion, the enrichment of specific pathways in each group was closely related to the composition of their respective microbial species. The potential microbial function in the Clue1_20 group was close to the BV group. Moreover, the functional prediction results in the VVC_BV group exhibited similarities to those observed in the BV and VVC groups. These findings provided valuable insights into the distinct microbial and metabolic patterns associated with different vaginitis conditions.
We next explored the relationship between the presence of 1%–20% clue cells in the vagina and BV. Traditionally, the clinical diagnosis of BV is determined by vaginal discharge and odor, vaginal pH, and the proportion of clue cells (>20%), identified via microscopic examination (7, 43, 44). Clue cells are vaginal epithelial cells that show a presence of adherent bacteria, such as G. vaginalis (45). Some women with 1%–20% clue cells in the vagina experience symptoms similar to those of patients with BV (46). However, few studies have explored the condition of 1%–20% clue cells in women (47). In contrast to previous research, we included vaginal samples with 1%–20% clue cells in the study to explore differences compared to the BV and healthy groups. Our results hypothesized Prevotella as the most significantly different bacteria between the BV and Clue1_20 groups, showing an increase in the BV group and a decrease in the Clue1_20 group. A total of 14 species of Prevotella were present in our samples, with P. intermedia being the most abundant in the BV group. The conclusion of our study was consistent with the fact that P. intermedia had been reported as a potential risk factor for BV in women (48). Additionally, Lactobacillus was found to be the most abundant bacteria in the healthy group but was found at the lowest abundance in the BV group. Notably, the abundance of Lactobacillus in the Clue1_20 group was closer to that in the healthy group. L. iners is the dominant bacterium of community state type (CST-III) in the major vaginal community state types in women (49). However, previous studies have shown that L. iners may not show the same beneficial effects as other Lactobacillus from the vagina such as L. crispatus (50, 51). In this study, we found that although there was no significance on the relative abundance of L. iners in the three groups, L. iners was the predominant Lactobacillus in the Clue1_20 and BV groups. Based on these findings, we postulated that the vaginal condition with 1%–20% clue cells represented a transitional state between the healthy and BV groups, characterized by an abundance of L. iners and G. vaginalis, but lower content of Prevotella than BV.
Our study also showed that chorismate biosynthesis and superpathway of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis, known as the shikimic acid pathway in bacteria, were significantly enriched in the BV and VVC_BV groups. Chorismate biosynthesis constitutes that part of the shikimic acid pathway that facilitates the synthesis of tryptophan in bacteria (Fig. 5C) (52). Tryptophan is a known aromatic amino acid present in bacteria (53, 54). Due to the presence of the tryptophanase enzyme, some species of vaginal pathogens such as Prevotella, Chlamydia, and certain bacteria associated with BV possess the ability to degrade tryptophan into indole (55–59). Moreover, the levels of indole in the vaginal environment of BV patients are significantly higher than those in healthy individuals (59). Thus, we first assessed the abundance of indole-producing bacteria in the collected samples in accordance with the research of Noa et al. (55), and the result was in line with the above reports. Notably, the relative abundances of these bacteria were significantly higher in the BV group, followed by the VVC_BV group, which contained more bacteria associated with BV. Then, we observed higher abundance of the gene encoding tryptophansynthase in the BV group than in other groups. In summary, we speculated that there were more indole-producing bacteria in the vagina of patients with BV, which might be related to the disease progression.
In addition, we conducted in-depth comparisons of the vaginal flora among BV, VVC, and mixed (VVC_BV) infections. Previous studies have suggested that Candida can produce metabolites with the ability to inhibit bacterial growth, although there is no evidence to support the notion that it selectively inhibits only Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria, such as Lactobacillus (33, 60). Our analysis of the comparison between the BV and VVC groups showed the related result that the presence of Lactobacillus in the vaginal flora of VVC patients was markedly higher than that in BV patients. Therefore, we speculated that Candida might not inhibit the growth of Lactobacillus, which was consistent with the conclusions of Macklaim et al. (33, 61). In addition, our study showed that the vaginal flora of the VVC_BV group was also higher in G. vaginalis, which was similar to the situation of patients with BV. In functional prediction, we also found that most of the pathways enriched in VVC_BV group, such as coenzyme A biosynthesis pathway related to fatty acid synthesis, were associated with BV disease progression (62, 63). Previous report showed that the high concentrations of fatty acids in the vagina could trigger elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines (64). All in all, the above results indicate that the infection of BV combined with VVC was complicated.
According to the above study and the previous reports, we observed that L. crispatus was the dominant bacteria in the vagina of healthy women (65). As a result, we isolated and confirmed the positive effects of Lactobacillus in the vaginal flora based on in vitro experiments. Due to the important role of lactic acid in the vaginal environment, we first tested the ability of L. crispatus strains to produce lactic acid. Additionally, colonization of G. vaginalis in the vagina of BV patients has been shown to correlate with its biofilm formation (66, 67). Current studies indicated that Lactobacillus could inhibit the biofilm formation of G. vaginalis (68, 69). Then basing on this, we investigated the inhibitory capacity of L. crispatus strains isolated from healthy women against G. vaginalis biofilm formation and lactate production in vitro. Previous studies have shown that Lactobacillus rhamnosus has a good effect on enhancing the restoration of the vaginal flora of BV patients. Besides, it has the capacity to inhibit the biofilm formation of pathogenic bacteria such as G. vaginalis (70–72). Therefore, it was used as the control strain in our study. Our findings indicated that the MV0808 strain showed considerable potential as a probiotic candidate. As such, this strain would be the focus of future research endeavors, offering exciting possibilities for the development of targeted probiotic interventions in vaginitis management.
However, we did not conduct metabolomic analysis on the samples due to the high requirements for vaginal secretion content. As a result, we were unable to confirm whether the abundance of indole in the BV group was higher than that in other groups. Metabolome analysis could better support the conjecture regarding the relationship between indole and the transition state of the healthy and BV, which was a limitation of this study.
In conclusion, our study provided valuable insights into the characteristics of the vaginal flora in different types of vaginitis. We found that the presence of 1%–20% clue cells in the vagina might be a transitional state between a healthy flora and BV. Next, we would conduct the prospective study with repeated sampling of volunteers and found that the co-infected patients exhibited a flora composition more likely to that of VVC, and their potentially functional pathways showed similarities to BV and VVC. This observation highlights the complexity of mixed infections and may have clinical implications for treatment strategies. Furthermore, considering the importance of L. crispatus in promoting vaginal health, we isolated multiple strains from vaginal samples of healthy individuals and selected the most promising strain with potential probiotic benefits. Our future research will focus on evaluating the antibacterial efficacy of L. crispatus against indole-producing pathogens for developing targeted therapeutic interventions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Human subjects
The study was cross-sectional and approved by the Ethics Committee of the West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (2022-054) and strictly adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Each volunteer provided signed informed consent. All recruited volunteers were patients and healthy females at the Gynecological Outpatient Clinic of West China Second University Hospital from China, and each female underwent vaginal microecological examination including cleanliness, clue cell content, pH, hydrogen peroxide concentration, sialidase (SNa), leucocyte esterase, and the presence of budding yeast cells with or without pseudohyphae and trichomonas. The criteria for inclusion in the study were as follows: (i) aged between 24 and 55 years, (ii) a history of sexual activity, (iii) a regular menstrual cycle, (iv) no use of antibiotics or estrogens in the previous 30 days, (v) no use of vaginal medication or lavage in the previous 7 days, and (vi) no cervix-related surgeries in the previous 3 months. The 49 samples were divided into five groups: healthy (N = 8), BV (N = 15), Clue1_20 (N = 11), VVC (N = 10), and VVC_BV (N = 5).
Sample collection
Vaginal secretions were collected using sterile medical cotton swabs, which were then placed in sterile tubes and frozen at −80°C. BV was diagnosed when the number of clue cells exceeded 20, pH ≥4.5, and the amine test was positive (7, 73). Likewise, VVC was diagnosed based on the presence of budding yeast cells and pseudohyphae (74). In addition to the inclusion criteria, healthy volunteers should also meet the following: (i) no history of gynecological diseases and urinary tract infections in the previous three months; (ii) a normal vaginal microbiome test; (iii) a negative HPV test; and (iv) no clue cells, budding yeast cells, and pseudohyphae in the vagina.
DNA extraction and metagenomic processing
Extract the total DNA according to the TIANNamp Bacteria DNA Kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., China) instructions and measure DNA concentration and quality by the NanoDrop. The Covaris ultrasonic crusher was used to randomly break DNA into less than 500-bp fragments. After constructing the library, the detection of library mass and concentration were performed, respectively, by Qubit 2.0. The integrity of the DNA fragment and the size of the insert were measured by AATI (Advanced Analytical Technologies) and quantified by QPCR (Quantitative Real-time PCR). The concentration of the final library was >5 ng/µL in a volume of 50 µL. The qualified DNA library was sequenced bilaterally on the Illumina NovoSeq 6000 platform (Novogene Co., Ltd., China). Trimmomatic was used to remove low-quality reads. Based on Bowtie2 (version 2.4.2), sequences coming from the human genome were removed. Raw data have been submitted to the China National GeneBank DataBase (https://db.cngb.org/) with the accession number CNP0004576. Samples of the healthy group were downloaded from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Sequence Read Achieve (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra) with the accession number CNP0004123, which are the samples in the paper to be published in our laboratory. The DNA extraction and sequencing methods for the healthy samples are the same as those for the disease group.
Gene assembly and function prediction
Assembly analysis was performed by MEGAHIT (version 1.2.9) with the option “--min-contig-len 300” (75). Prodigal (version 3.0.2) was used to obtain gene prediction results with the option “-p meta.” In addition, CD-HIT (version 4.5.6) was used with default parameters (identity 95%; coverage 90%) to cluster and to remove redundant sequences, thus obtaining non-redundant gene set sequences (unigenes). Salmon (version 1.3.0) was used to compare clean reads to unigenes to obtain information on the relative abundance of genes with the option “--meta.” The annotation results obtained by database comparison were corresponded to the abundance information table of each gene, and the abundance information corresponding to the gene annotation results was obtained. Anatomy of the potential functional content of QC sequences (UniRef90 gene family and MetaCyc metabolic pathway) (76). The abundance of gene families and microbial metabolic pathways were assessed by HUMAnN3 using MetaCyc and UniRef90 EC filtering databases (77) and normalized by copies per million. Default parameters were used for software without specified parameters. Besides, STAMP (version 2.1.3) was used to predict the different functional pathways among the five groups with ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) test.
Identification of taxa in metagenomes
Kraken2 (version 2.1.2) and Bracken (version 2.5.0) were used for species taxonomic annotation (78). The LEfSe was used to perform differential analysis of taxa. In addition, in the LEfSe analysis, P < 0.05 and LDA >2 obtained by linear discriminant analysis were considered statistically significant. PCoA was used to evaluate the similarities or differences in the composition of the sample communities based on Bray-Curtis distances by adonis (79). The statistical analysis was performed by R (version 4.2.3) using vegan (version 2.6-4) and ggplot2 (version 3.4.4) packages, and the P value was calculated by Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test with P < 0.05.
Microbial strains and growth conditions
Lactobacillus crispatus strains were isolated from the vaginal secretion of healthy females collected in the West China Second University Hospital. They were grown anaerobically in MRS (DeMan, Rogosa and Sharpe medium) broth for 24 h (37°C, CO2) as well as Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain (LGG) (ATCC 53103). Gardnerella vaginalis strain (ATCC 49145) was cultured in NYC III broth under anaerobic conditions for 24 h (37 ℃, CO2).
Capacity to produce the lactic acid
L. crispatus (1 × 106 CFU/mL) in MRS broth were centrifuged (10,000 × g, 10 min, 4°C) and left for the supernatant. Filter the supernatant through 0.22-µm filter membrane to obtain the CFS. Then, follow the lactic acid content assay kit (Shanghai Yuanye Bio-Technology Co., Ltd). LGG was the standard strain serving as the control. Results were the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments (each with n = 3).
Capacity to inhibit the biofilm of G. vaginalis
A 100-µL G. vaginalis (1 × 108 CFU/mL) was incubated in each cell of a 96-well microplate for 24 h (37°C, CO2) to form the biofilm. Crystal violet (CV) staining (Guangdong Huankai Microbial Sci. & Tech. Co., Ltd.) was used to evaluate the viability of G. vaginalis biofilm at incubation for 8, 16, 18, and 24 h. The biofilm incubated for 24 h was selected for the following experiment. Add 100-µL NYC III broth and 100-µL CFS of L. crispatus (1 × 106 CFU/mL) to the cells with G. vaginalis biofilm and incubate them for 24 h. CV staining was used to examine the candidate strains’ capacity. Discard the liquid and gently wash the cell with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times; add 100-µL methanol to fix the cells for 15 min. Discard methanol, air dry, add 100-µL 0.5% (wt/vol) CV, and stain for 20 min. Wash with PBS three times, discard 0.5% CV, and air dry. Add 100-µL 33% (vol/vol) acetic acid for 30 min. The optical density (OD) at 590 nm was measured by the microplate [Thermo Fisher Scientific (China-HK) Holding Co., Ltd.] (72). LGG was the standard strain serving as the control. Results were the mean ± SEM from three independent experiments (each with n = 3).
STORMS Checklist
This study has been completed according to the STORMS Checklist (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10065440).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Thanks for support go to the West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University.
Jiarong Song arranged the samples, did the experiment, analyzed the data, and wrote the article. Xue Dong collected the samples and helped to analyze the data. Yue Lan analyzed the data.
Y.L. analyzed the data and gave some advice. X.L. provided input on the article. X.K. helped to arrange the samples and do the experiment. Z.H. revised the content of the article. B.Y. provided guidance on the writing of the article. M.H. provided guidance on the writing of the article. Y.L. provided guidance on the writing of the article. W.M. revised the content of the article. L.Z. revised the content of the article. H.Y. revised the content of the article.
Contributor Information
Zhenxin Fan, Email: zxfan@scu.edu.cn.
Tao Guo, Email: ivan.gt@163.com.
Naseer Sangwan, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.01377-23.
Top 20 most abundant bacteria in the BV, Clue1_20, and healthy group at the family level.
The average proportion of host data of the five groups in this study.
The biofilm formation activity of G. vaginalis.
Quality control data of metagenomic sequencing for all samples in this study.
Indole-producing bacteria in this study.
The proportion of human DNA of each sample in this study.
The average number of non-host reads sequenced per sample in this study.
Detailed description of the potential functional pathway.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Zhao T, Xiao X, Xiao L, Wu XM, Yuan T. 2022. Bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, and trichomonal vaginitis in reproductive-age women in Yunnan, China: a descriptive study. J Obstet Gynaecol 42:3187–3192. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2022.2109134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Yuan D, Chen W, Qin J, Shen D, Qiao Y, Kong B. 2021. Associations between bacterial vaginosis, candida vaginitis, trichomonas vaginalis, and vaginal pathogenic community in Chinese women. Am J Transl Res 13:7148–7155. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Taha TE, Hoover DR, Dallabetta GA, Kumwenda NI, Mtimavalye LA, Yang LP, Liomba GN, Broadhead RL, Chiphangwi JD, Miotti PG. 1998. Bacterial vaginosis and disturbances of vaginal flora: association with increased acquisition of HIV. AIDS 12:1699–1706. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199813000-00019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Alcendor DJ. 2016. Evaluation of health disparity in bacterial vaginosis and the implications for HIV-1 acquisition in African American women. Am J Reprod Immunol 76:99–107. doi: 10.1111/aji.12497 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Carter KA, Srinivasan S, Fiedler TL, Anzala O, Kimani J, Mochache V, Wallis JM, Fredricks DN, McClelland RS, Balkus JE. 2021. Vaginal bacteria and risk of incident and persistent infection with high-risk subtypes of human papillomavirus: a cohort study among kenyan women. Sex Transm Dis 48:499–507. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001343 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Bautista CT, Wurapa E, Sateren WB, Morris S, Hollingsworth B, Sanchez JL. 2016. Bacterial vaginosis: a synthesis of the literature on etiology, prevalence, risk factors, and relationship with chlamydia and gonorrhea infections. Mil Med Res 3:4. doi: 10.1186/s40779-016-0074-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Amsel R, Totten PA, Spiegel CA, Chen KCS, Eschenbach D, Holmes KK. 1983. Nonspecific vaginitis. diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am J Med 74:14–22. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(83)91112-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Hardy L, Cerca N, Jespers V, Vaneechoutte M, Crucitti T. 2017. Bacterial biofilms in the vagina. Res Microbiol 168:865–874. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2017.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Swidsinski A, Loening-Baucke V, Swidsinski S, Sobel JD, Dörffel Y, Guschin A. 2022. Clue cells and pseudo clue cells in different morphotypes of bacterial vaginosis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:905739. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.905739 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Abou Chacra L, Fenollar F, Diop K. 2021. Bacterial vaginosis: what do we currently know? Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:672429. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.672429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kumar N, Behera B, Sagiri SS, Pal K, Ray SS, Roy S. 2011. Bacterial vaginosis: etiology and modalities of treatment-a brief note. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 3:496–503. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.90102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sobel JD, Sobel R. 2018. Current treatment options for vulvovaginal candidiasis caused by azole-resistant Candida species. Expert Opin Pharmacother 19:971–977. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1476490 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. López-Moreno A, Aguilera M. 2021. Vaginal probiotics for reproductive health and related dysbiosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 10:1461. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Mizgier M, Jarzabek-Bielecka G, Mruczyk K, Kedzia W. 2020. The role of diet and probiotics in prevention and treatment of bacterial vaginosis and vulvovaginal candidiasis in adolescent girls and non-pregnant women. Ginekol Pol 91:412–416. doi: 10.5603/GP.2020.0070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Wang Z, He Y, Zheng Y. 2019. Probiotics for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:3859. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16203859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Chee WJY, Chew SY, Than LTL. 2020. Vaginal microbiota and the potential of Lactobacillus derivatives in maintaining vaginal health. Microb Cell Fact 19:203. doi: 10.1186/s12934-020-01464-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Mei Z, Li D. 2022. The role of probiotics in vaginal health. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:963868. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.963868 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Qi F, Fan S, Fang C, Ge L, Lyu J, Huang Z, Zhao S, Zou Y, Huang L, Liu X, Liang Y, Zhang Y, Zhong Y, Zhang H, Xiao L, Zhang X. 2023. Orally administrated Lactobacillus gasseri TM13 and Lactobacillus crispatus LG55 can restore the vaginal health of patients recovering from bacterial vaginosis. Front Immunol 14:1125239. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1125239 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. van de Wijgert JHHM, Verwijs MC, Agaba SK, Bronowski C, Mwambarangwe L, Uwineza M, Lievens E, Nivoliez A, Ravel J, Darby AC. 2020. Intermittent lactobacilli-containing vaginal probiotic or metronidazole use to prevent bacterial vaginosis recurrence: a pilot study incorporating microscopy and sequencing. Sci Rep 10:3884. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60671-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Cohen CR, Wierzbicki MR, French AL, Morris S, Newmann S, Reno H, Green L, Miller S, Powell J, Parks T, Hemmerling A. 2020. Randomized trial of lactin-V to prevent recurrence of bacterial vaginosis. N Engl J Med 382:1906–1915. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1915254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Dols JAM, Molenaar D, van der Helm JJ, Caspers MPM, de Kat Angelino-Bart A, Schuren FHJ, Speksnijder AGCL, Westerhoff HV, Richardus JH, Boon ME, Reid G, de Vries HJC, Kort R. 2016. Molecular assessment of bacterial vaginosis by Lactobacillus abundance and species diversity. BMC Infect Dis 16:180. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1513-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Tao Z, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Lv T, Chen R, Wang L, Huang Z, Hu L, Liao Q. 2019. The pathogenesis of Streptococcus anginosus in aerobic vaginitis. Infect Drug Resist 12:3745–3754. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S227883 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Anukam KC, Reid G. 2007. Organisms associated with bacterial vaginosis in Nigerian women as determined by PCR-DGGE and 16S rRNA gene sequence. Afr Health Sci 7:68–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Ruiz-Perez D, Coudray MS, Colbert B, Krupp K, Kumari H, Stebliankin V, Mathee K, Cook RL, Schwebke J, Narasimhan G, Madhivanan P. 2021. Effect of metronidazole on vaginal microbiota associated with asymptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Access Microbiol 3:000226. doi: 10.1099/acmi.0.000226 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Laudadio I, Fulci V, Palone F, Stronati L, Cucchiara S, Carissimi C. 2018. Quantitative assessment of shotgun metagenomics and 16S rDNA amplicon sequencing in the study of human gut microbiome. OMICS 22:248–254. doi: 10.1089/omi.2018.0013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Jiang Q, Liu X, Yang Q, Chen L, Yang D. 2021. Salivary microbiome in adenoid cystic carcinoma detected by 16S rRNA sequencing and shotgun metagenomics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:774453. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.774453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Łaniewski P, Ilhan ZE, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2020. The microbiome and gynaecological cancer development, prevention and therapy. Nat Rev Urol 17:232–250. doi: 10.1038/s41585-020-0286-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. McKinnon LR, Achilles SL, Bradshaw CS, Burgener A, Crucitti T, Fredricks DN, Jaspan HB, Kaul R, Kaushic C, Klatt N, Kwon DS, Marrazzo JM, Masson L, McClelland RS, Ravel J, van de Wijgert JHHM, Vodstrcil LA, Tachedjian G. 2019. The evolving facets of bacterial vaginosis: implications for HIV transmission. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 35:219–228. doi: 10.1089/AID.2018.0304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kalia N, Singh J, Kaur M. 2020. Microbiota in vaginal health and pathogenesis of recurrent vulvovaginal infections: a critical review. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 19:5. doi: 10.1186/s12941-020-0347-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Hamad M, Kazandji N, Awadallah S, Allam H. 2014. Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of vaginal candidiasis in the UAE. Mycoses 57:184–190. doi: 10.1111/myc.12141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Farr A, Effendy I, Frey Tirri B, Hof H, Mayser P, Petricevic L, Ruhnke M, Schaller M, Schaefer APA, Sustr V, Willinger B, Mendling W. 2021. Guideline: vulvovaginal candidosis (AWMF 015/072, level S2K). Mycoses 64:583–602. doi: 10.1111/myc.13248 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Krishna Chaaithanya I, Mujumdar Y, Anwesh M, Aranha C. 2022. Novel genotypes of vaginal Candida glabrata isolates from premenopausal asymptomatic women with vulvovaginitis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 276:249–250. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Macklaim JM, Clemente JC, Knight R, Gloor GB, Reid G. 2015. Changes in vaginal microbiota following antimicrobial and probiotic therapy. Microb Ecol Health Dis 26:27799. doi: 10.3402/mehd.v26.27799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Łaniewski P, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. 2021. Bacterial vaginosis and health-associated bacteria modulate the immunometabolic landscape in 3D model of human cervix. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 7:88. doi: 10.1038/s41522-021-00259-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Borgogna JC, Shardell MD, Santori EK, Nelson TM, Rath JM, Glover ED, Ravel J, Gravitt PE, Yeoman CJ, Brotman RM. 2020. The vaginal metabolome and microbiota of cervical HPV-positive and HPV-negative women: a cross-sectional analysis. BJOG 127:182–192. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Srinivasan S, Morgan MT, Fiedler TL, Djukovic D, Hoffman NG, Raftery D, Marrazzo JM, Fredricks DN, Huffnagle GB. 2015. Metabolic signatures of bacterial vaginosis. mBio 6:e00204-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00204-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Turovskiy Y, Cheryian T, Algburi A, Wirawan RE, Takhistov P, Sinko PJ, Chikindas ML. 2012. Susceptibility of Gardnerella vaginalis biofilms to natural antimicrobials subtilosin, ε-poly-L-lysine, and lauramide arginine ethyl ester. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2012:284762. doi: 10.1155/2012/284762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Cavera VL, Volski A, Chikindas ML. 2015. The natural antimicrobial subtilosin A synergizes with lauramide arginine ethyl ester (LAE) ε-poly-L-lysine (polylysine), clindamycin phosphate and metronidazole, against the vaginal pathogen Gardnerella vaginalis. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 7:164–171. doi: 10.1007/s12602-014-9183-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Linhares IM, Summers PR, Larsen B, Giraldo PC, Witkin SS. 2011. Contemporary perspectives on vaginal pH and lactobacilli. Am J Obstet Gynecol 204:120. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Melis GB, Ibba MT, Steri B, Kotsonis P, Matta V, Paoletti AM. 2000. Role of pH as a regulator of vaginal physiological environment. Minerva Ginecol 52:111–121. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Donders GGG, Gonzaga A, Marconi C, Donders F, Michiels T, Eggermont N, Bellen G, Lule J, Byamughisa J. 2016. Increased vaginal pH in Ugandan women: what does it indicate?. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 35:1297–1303. doi: 10.1007/s10096-016-2664-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Matsumoto A, Yamagishi Y, Miyamoto K, Oka K, Takahashi M, Mikamo H. 2018. Characterization of the vaginal microbiota of Japanese women. Anaerobe 54:172–177. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Discacciati MG, Simoes JA, Amaral RG, Brolazo E, Rabelo-Santos SH, Westin MCA, Montemor EBL. 2006. Presence of 20% or more clue cells: an accurate criterion for the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis in papanicolaou cervical smears. Diagn Cytopathol 34:272–276. doi: 10.1002/dc.20418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Reiter S, Kellogg Spadt S. 2019. Bacterial vaginosis: a primer for clinicians. Postgrad Med 131:8–18. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2019.1546534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Scott TG, Curran B, Smyth CJ. 1989. Electron microscopy of adhesive interactions between Gardnerella vaginalis and vaginal epithelial cells, McCoy cells and human red blood cells. J Gen Microbiol 135:475–480. doi: 10.1099/00221287-135-3-475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Donders G. 2010. Diagnosis and management of bacterial vaginosis and other types of abnormal vaginal bacterial flora: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 65:462–473. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0b013e3181e09621 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Figueiredo PG, Sarian LO, Tambascia JK, Simões JA, Rabelo-Santos SH, Discacciati MG, Derchain S. 2008. Increased detection of clue cells in smears from cervical intraepithelial lesions with reduced expression of COX-2. Diagn Cytopathol 36:705–709. doi: 10.1002/dc.20900 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Balle C, Esra R, Havyarimana E, Jaumdally SZ, Lennard K, Konstantinus IN, Barnabas SL, Happel A-U, Gill K, Pidwell T, Lingappa JR, Gamieldien H, Bekker L-G, Passmore J-A, Jaspan HB. 2020. Relationship between the oral and vaginal microbiota of South African adolescents with high prevalence of bacterial vaginosis. Microorganisms 8:1004. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8071004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Ravel J, Gajer P, Abdo Z, Schneider GM, Koenig SSK, McCulle SL, Karlebach S, Gorle R, Russell J, Tacket CO, Brotman RM, Davis CC, Ault K, Peralta L, Forney LJ. 2011. Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108 Suppl 1:4680–4687. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002611107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Carter KA, Fischer MD, Petrova MI, Balkus JE. 2023. Epidemiologic evidence on the role of Lactobacillus iners in sexually transmitted infections and bacterial vaginosis: a series of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Sex Transm Dis 50:224–235. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001744 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Holm JB, Carter KA, Ravel J, Brotman RM. 2023. Lactobacillus iners and genital health: molecular clues to an enigmatic vaginal species. Curr Infect Dis Rep 25:67–75. doi: 10.1007/s11908-023-00798-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Wu S, Chen W, Lu S, Zhang H, Yin L. 2022. Metabolic engineering of shikimic acid biosynthesis pathway for the production of shikimic acid and its branched products in microorganisms: advances and prospects. Molecules 27:27. doi: 10.3390/molecules27154779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Gao J, Xu K, Liu H, Liu G, Bai M, Peng C, Li T, Yin Y. 2018. Impact of the gut microbiota on intestinal immunity mediated by tryptophan metabolism. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 8:13. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Lott JS. 2020. The tryptophan biosynthetic pathway is essential for Mycobacterium tuberculosis to cause disease. Biochem Soc Trans 48:2029–2037. doi: 10.1042/BST20200194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Ziklo N, Huston WM, Hocking JS, Timms P. 2016. Chlamydia trachomatis genital tract infections: when host immune response and the microbiome collide. Trends Microbiol 24:750–765. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.05.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Sasaki-Imamura T, Yoshida Y, Suwabe K, Yoshimura F, Kato H. 2011. Molecular basis of indole production catalyzed by tryptophanase in the genus Prevotella. FEMS Microbiol Lett 322:51–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02329.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Aiyar A, Quayle AJ, Buckner LR, Sherchand SP, Chang TL, Zea AH, Martin DH, Belland RJ. 2014. Influence of the tryptophan-indole-IFNγ axis on human genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection: role of vaginal co-infections. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:72. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00072 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Fang Z, Pan T, Wang H, Zhu J, Zhang H, Zhao J, Chen W, Lu W. 2022. Limosilactobacillus reuteri attenuates atopic dermatitis via changes in gut bacteria and indole derivatives from tryptophan metabolism. Int J Mol Sci 23:7735. doi: 10.3390/ijms23147735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Sharma J, Gupta K, Schwebke JR, Geisler WM, Muzny CA. 2022. Association of bacterial vaginosis with higher vaginal indole levels. Sexual Trans Dis 49:e53–e55. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Mandeva RD, Ermakova IT, Lozinov AB. 1981. Metabolite excretion by yeasts of the genus Candida in media lacking sources of N, P, S, or Mg and having different carbon sources. Mikrobiologiia 50:62–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Liu M-B, Xu S-R, He Y, Deng G-H, Sheng H-F, Huang X-M, Ouyang C-Y, Zhou H-W, Ravel J. 2013. Diverse vaginal microbiomes in reproductive-age women with vulvovaginal candidiasis. PLoS ONE 8:e79812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Shimura H, Mitsui T, Kira S, Ihara T, Sawada N, Nakagomi H, Miyamoto T, Tsuchiya S, Kanda M, Takeda M. 2018. Metabolomic analysis of overactive bladder in male patients: identification of potential metabolite biomarkers. Urology 118:158–163. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. An G, Zhang Y, Fan L, Chen J, Wei M, Li C, Chen X, Zhang L, Yang D, Wang J. 2021. Integrative analysis of vaginal microorganisms and serum metabolomics in rats with Estrous cycle disorder induced by long-term heat exposure based on 16S rDNA gene sequencing and LC/MS-based metabolomics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 11:595716. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.595716 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Delgado-Diaz DJ, Tyssen D, Hayward JA, Gugasyan R, Hearps AC, Tachedjian G. 2019. Distinct immune responses elicited from cervicovaginal epithelial cells by lactic acid and short chain fatty acids associated with optimal and non-optimal vaginal microbiota. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 9:446. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Krog MC, Hugerth LW, Fransson E, Bashir Z, Nyboe Andersen A, Edfeldt G, Engstrand L, Schuppe-Koistinen I, Nielsen HS. 2022. The healthy female microbiome across body sites: effect of hormonal contraceptives and the menstrual cycle. Hum Reprod 37:1525–1543. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac094 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Swidsinski A, Verstraelen H, Loening-Baucke V, Swidsinski S, Mendling W, Halwani Z. 2013. Presence of a polymicrobial endometrial biofilm in patients with bacterial vaginosis. PLoS One 8:e53997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053997 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Swidsinski A, Mendling W, Loening-Baucke V, Ladhoff A, Swidsinski S, Hale LP, Lochs H. 2005. Adherent biofilms in bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol 106:1013–1023. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183594.45524.d2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Castro J, Martins AP, Rodrigues ME, Cerca N. 2018. Lactobacillus crispatus represses vaginolysin expression by BV associated Gardnerella vaginalis and reduces cell cytotoxicity. Anaerobe 50:60–63. doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2018.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Qian Z, Zhu H, Zhao D, Yang P, Gao F, Lu C, Yin Y, Kan S, Chen D. 2021. Probiotic Lactobacillus sp. strains inhibit growth, adhesion, biofilm formation, and gene expression of bacterial vaginosis-inducing Gardnerella vaginalis. Microorganisms 9:728. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9040728 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Petricevic L, Witt A. 2008. The role of Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus Lcr35 in restoring the normal vaginal flora after antibiotic treatment of bacterial vaginosis. BJOG 115:1369–1374. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01882.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Petrova MI, Imholz NCE, Verhoeven TLA, Balzarini J, Van Damme EJM, Schols D, Vanderleyden J, Lebeer S. 2016. Lectin-like molecules of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG inhibit pathogenic Escherichia coli and Salmonella biofilm formation. PLoS One 11:e0161337. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161337 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Sabbatini S, Monari C, Ballet N, Decherf AC, Bozza S, Camilloni B, Perito S, Vecchiarelli A. 2020. Anti-biofilm properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3856 and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus ATCC 53103 probiotics against G. vaginalis. Microorganisms 8:1294. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Paladine HL, Desai UA. 2018. Vaginitis: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician 97:321–329. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. van Schalkwyk J, Yudin MH, Infectious Disease Committee . 2015. Vulvovaginitis: screening for and management of trichomoniasis, vulvovaginal candidiasis, and bacterial vaginosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 37:266–274. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30316-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. van der Walt AJ, van Goethem MW, Ramond J-B, Makhalanyane TP, Reva O, Cowan DA. 2017. Assembling metagenomes, one community at a time. BMC Genomics 18:521. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3918-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Wallen ZD, Demirkan A, Twa G, Cohen G, Dean MN, Standaert DG, Sampson TR, Payami H. 2022. Metagenomics of Parkinson’s disease implicates the gut microbiome in multiple disease mechanisms. Nat Commun 13:6958. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34667-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Youngblut ND, Ley RE. 2021. Struo2: efficient metagenome profiling database construction for ever-expanding microbial genome datasets. PeerJ 9:e12198. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12198 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Govender KN, Eyre DW. 2022. Benchmarking taxonomic classifiers with illumina and nanopore sequence data for clinical metagenomic diagnostic applications. Microb Genom 8:mgen000886. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000886 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Yang S, Liu Y, Yang N, Lan Y, Lan W, Feng J, Yue B, He M, Zhang L, Zhang A, Price M, Li J, Fan Z. 2022. The gut microbiome and antibiotic resistome of chronic diarrhea rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and its similarity to the human gut microbiome. Microbiome 10:29. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01218-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Top 20 most abundant bacteria in the BV, Clue1_20, and healthy group at the family level.
The average proportion of host data of the five groups in this study.
The biofilm formation activity of G. vaginalis.
Quality control data of metagenomic sequencing for all samples in this study.
Indole-producing bacteria in this study.
The proportion of human DNA of each sample in this study.
The average number of non-host reads sequenced per sample in this study.
Detailed description of the potential functional pathway.





