Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) are a leading cause of nosocomial infections and subsequently present an urgent global public health threat.1 OXA-23 is the most frequently reported carbapenemase in CRAB and such isolates are most often multidrug-resistant, leaving few therapeutic options.1 Cefiderocol (FDC), a recently approved siderophore cephalosporin, represents a promising treatment option for CRAB infections, particularly since reported resistance rates in non-metallo-beta-lactamase-producing CRAB remain low.2 FDC resistance in A. baumannii has previously been reported to be associated with mutations and/or deletions in the TonB-dependent receptors PiuA and PirA,3 the carriage of certain beta-lactamases (e.g. MBLs and PER-type),4 and mutations within the penicillin binding protein PBP-3, the main target of FDC.3 In this study, we describe the in vivo development of FDC resistance following treatment, mediated by a previously undescribed mutation in the promoter region of TonB-dependent receptor, PiuA.
An 80-year-old woman was admitted to the ICU of the University Hospital ‘Città della salute e della scienza di Torino’ (Turin, Italy) due to a severe burn injury (20% TBSA). Empirical antibiotic therapy with piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin was started. On day 52, she presented with fever and elevation of inflammatory markers. Blood cultures were positive for an FDC-susceptible CRAB isolate (AB1). FDC plus fosfomycin were started and the patient clinically improved. After 10 days, she presented with fever and an FDC-resistant CRAB isolate was isolated from a blood culture (AB2). FDC treatment was stopped, fosfomycin plus ampicillin/sulbactam were started, and the patient clinically improved. Susceptibility testing, performed by broth microdilution and interpreted according to EUCAST guidelines,5 showed that isolates AB1 and AB2 exhibited FDC MICs of 1 and 32 mg/L respectively, and were additionally resistant to both imipenem and meropenem (Table 1). Isolates were subject to Illumina WGS and subsequent analyses were performed using the Center for Genomic Epidemiology Platform (https://www.genomicepidemiology.org/) as previously described.6 Both isolates belonged to ST2 (according to the Pasteur MLST scheme)7 and harboured an identical resistance gene content, including a carbapenemase encoding gene blaOXA-23 and the intrinsic beta-lactamase genes blaOXA-66 and blaADC-293. The isolates additionally harboured a gene encoding the aminoglycoside-modifying enzyme ArmA. ST2 A. baumannii is the most dominant type globally (a member of Global Clone 2) and is considered a high-risk clone, often associated with the production of carbapenemases, particularly OXA-23.1 SNP analyses using Snippy (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy) identified that the only difference between both isolates was a 3 nt deletion, located 35 bp upstream of a TonB-dependent siderophore receptor gene, piuA. This deletion was located between the −35 and −10 elements of a predicted σ70 promoter, resulting in a ‘weaker’ promoter sequence, predicted to result in decreased RNA polymerase binding. To investigate the impact of this deletion on gene expression quantitative RT–QPCR was performed on both isolates, AB1 and AB2. Briefly, isolates were grown in iron-depleted Mueller–Hinton media to mid-exponential growth phase (OD600 ∼0.5), before RNA extraction using the Monarch® Total RNA Miniprep Kit (New England Biolabs), DNA digestion using TURBO™ DNase (ThermoFisher) and cDNA synthesis using LunaScript (New England Biolabs). Quantitative PCR was performed on a Qiagen RotorGene using the Promega SYBR green PCR mix and the following primers: for piuA, AB_piuA_qF (5′-CAGTTGGTGGCAGCATCAAT-3′) and AB_piuA_qR (5′-TGCTGCAATGCCATTTCCAA-3′), and for rpoB, AB_rpoB_qF (5′-ACGCCTAAAGGTGAAACTCAGTTAA-3′) and AB_rpoB_qR (5′-GTACCAGATGGAACACGTAAAGATG-3′). All assays were performed on three biological replicates, and the delta delta Ct method was used to calculate relative expression levels. Analyses identified that the piuA was significantly downregulated (∼3-fold reduction; Table 1) in isolate AB2, and subsequently this was determined to be the mechanism responsible for elevated the FDC MICs. To investigate the fitness cost of this insertion, growth curves were performed on three biological replicates for each isolate, in iron-depleted Mueller–Hinton media over an 8-hour period. This showed the promoter mutation in strain AB2 resulted in a significant fitness cost, ranging from a 15% to 30% reduction in growth, over the early to late exponential growth phase (OD600 0.3–0.8), relative to AB1. This can be explained by the fact that iron is essential for cell function, and the limited uptake through a functional PiuA could be expected to compromise cell fitness.8
Table 1.
Genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of isolates AB1 and AB2
MICs (mg/L) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Isolate | ST | Beta-lactamase genes | Other resistance genes | FDC | IPM | MEM | SNPs | Relative piuA expression |
AB1 | 2 | bla OXA-23, blaOXA-66, blaADC-293 | armA, aph(3’)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, msr(E), mph(E), sul2, tetB | 1 | 128 | 64 | NA | 1 |
AB2 | 2 | bla OXA-23, blaOXA-66, blaADC-293 | armA, aph(3’)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, msr(E), mph(E), sul2, tetB | 32 | 128 | 64 | 3 nt deletion upstream of piuA | 0.35 |
FDC, cefiderocol; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem.
In conclusion, this study illustrated the in vivo development of FDC resistance in an OXA-23-producing ST2 A. baumannii isolate, as a direct consequence of FDC therapy. A single mutation event was sufficient to result in a 32-fold increase in FDC MIC although this resistance was shown to come at a fitness cost to the bacterium. This demonstrates the ability of A. baumannii to mutate and adapt to cope with challenge by FDC, and underlines that despite being a promising therapeutic option for the treatment of CRAB, FDC should be prescribed sparingly to preserve its use. Studies on the evaluation of the most effective combinations for treating infections due to multidrug-resistant A. baumannii infections are ongoing. They include drugs such as FDC, ampicillin/sulbactam sulbactam/durlobactam colistin and rifampicin. The use of FDC in combination with another antibiotic is debatable for preventing emerging resistance to FDC, and certainly requires further investigation.
Contributor Information
Jacqueline Findlay, Medical and Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Gabriele Bianco, Microbiology and Virology Unit, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Department of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Matteo Boattini, Microbiology and Virology Unit, University Hospital Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy; Department of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Patrice Nordmann, Medical and Molecular Microbiology, Faculty of Science and Medicine, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland; Swiss National Reference Center for Emerging Antibiotic Resistance (NARA), University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Funding
This work was funded by the University of Fribourg and the University of Turin.
Transparency declarations
All authors, none to declare.
References
- 1. Hamidian M, Nigro SJ. Emergence, molecular mechanisms and global spread of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Microb Genom 2019; 5: e000306. 10.1099/mgen.0.000306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Seifert H, Müller C, Stefanik D et al. In vitro activity of cefiderocol against a global collection of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12: 1172. 10.3390/antibiotics12071172 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Malik S, Kaminski M, Landman D et al. Cefiderocol resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: roles of β-lactamases, siderophore receptors, and penicillin binding protein 3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2020; 64: e01221-20. 10.1128/AAC.01221-20 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Poirel L, Sadek M, Nordmann P. Contribution of PER-type and NDM-type β-lactamases to cefiderocol resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2021; 65: e0087721. 10.1128/AAC.00877-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing . Clinical Breakpoint Table v. 13.1. https://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_13.1_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf.
- 6. Findlay J, Perreten V, Poirel L et al. Molecular analysis of OXA-48-producing Escherichia coli in Switzerland from 2019 to 2020. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2022; 41: 1355–60. 10.1007/s10096-022-04493-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Diancourt L, Passet V, Nemec A et al. The population structure of Acinetobacter baumannii: expanding multiresistant clones from an ancestral susceptible genetic pool. PLoS One 2010; 5: e10034. 10.1371/journal.pone.0010034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Kramer J, Özkaya Ö, Kümmerli R. Bacterial siderophores in community and host interactions. Nat Rev Microbiol 2020; 18: 152–63. 10.1038/s41579-019-0284-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]