ABSTRACT
Previous studies have profiled the gut microbiota among psoriatic patients compared to that among healthy individuals. However, a comprehensive understanding of the magnitude, direction, and detailed compositional and functional profiles remains limited. Additionally, research exploring the gut microbiota in the context of both plaque psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is lacking. To assess the taxonomic and functional characteristics of the gut microbiota in PsO and PsA patients and investigate potential links between the gut microbiota and disease pathogenesis. We collected fecal samples from 70 psoriatic patients (44 PsO and 26 PsA) and 25 age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC) and employed deep metagenomic sequencing to characterize their gut microbiota. We noted significant alternations in the gut microbiota compositions of both PsO and PsA patients compared to those of HC. Despite limited effect sizes in alpha diversity (12.3% reduction of microbial richness but unchanged evenness in psoriatic patients) and beta diversity (disease accounts for 3.5% of total variations), we consistently observed substantial reductions of Eubacterium rectale in both PsO and PsA patients, with PsA patients exhibiting even lower levels of E. rectale than PsO patients. Additionally, two Alistipes species were also depleted in psoriatic patients. These microorganisms are known to play crucial roles in carbohydrate metabolism pathways, mainly producing short-chain fatty acids with anti-inflammatory effects. Overall, our observations supplemented the profiling of altered gut microbiota in patients with PsO and PsA at the species level and described a link between the dominant short-chain fatty acid-producing bacterial species and systemic immunity in psoriatic patients.
IMPORTANCE
In this observational clinical study with sufficient sample size and metagenomic sequencing to profile the gut microbiota, we identified consistent signals of the depleted abundance of Eubacterium rectale and related functional genes among psoriatic patients, including those with psoriatic arthritis. E. rectale may serve as an ecologically important functional unit in the gut microbiota, holding potential as a diagnostic marker and target for therapeutic interventions to achieve lasting effects. Our findings provide comprehensive gut microbiota profiling in psoriasis, resolving previous contradictions and generating new hypotheses for further investigation. These insights may significantly impact psoriasis management and related conditions.
KEYWORDS: Eubacterium rectale, gut microbiota, metagenomics, psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis
INTRODUCTION
The gut microbiota is critical in the defense against pathogens, metabolism, and maintaining barrier functions (1, 2). Their immunomodulatory potential on distant organs has been increasingly recognized (3, 4): plaque psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) (5), rheumatologic arthritis (6), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (7), and Alzheimer’s disease (8) have all been associated with the dysbiosis of gut microbiota. The concept of the gut–organ axis has been proposed to encapsulate this type of correlation (4).
Psoriasis is a common, chronic, immune-related cutaneous disease with many comorbidities, such as PsA, metabolic syndrome, and NAFLD (9). The pathogenesis is complex and not fully elucidated, involving both environmental and endogenous factors, among which the T-helper (Th)−17/Interleukin (IL)−23 axis has been established as its key immunological mechanism, which is the basis of biologics treatment (10–12). Notably, multiple lines of evidence have suggested that the gut microbiota is critical in maintaining host immune homeostasis, especially affecting the balance of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and effector T cells such as Th1, Th2, and Th17 (13). In particular, one study on imiquimod-induced mouse models shows that gut microbiota significantly affects the manifestation of the psoriatic phenotype through a Th17-mediated T-cell response; notably, germ-free mice or conventionally housed mice treated with antibiotics exhibited reduced psoriatic skin inflammation (14). This evidence supports the hypothesis that altered gut microbiota may contribute to psoriasis pathogenesis by modulating the immune response (15).
Previous studies have profiled the taxonomic and functional characteristics of the gut microbiota in patients with psoriasis based on amplicon or metagenomic sequencing (16–20). Chen et al. identified an imbalance between the phylum Firmicutes and Bacteroides in psoriasis patients through 16S sequencing and suggested the overrepresentation of bacterial chemotaxis and carbohydrate transport in their gut microbiota (16). Todberg et al. reported lower community diversity in the gut microbiota of psoriatic patients, and the severity of the condition was correlated with these changes using metagenomic sequencing (20). However, due to limitations in cohort sizes and technical challenges, the effect size, direction, and specific disease-associated components of the altered gut microbiota remain unclear. Moreover, research on gut microbial characteristics in PsA is lacking despite its potential role in shaping this distinct phenotype. In this study, we performed a cross-sectional profiling of PsO, PsA, and age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC) using metagenomic sequencing. We carefully examined the composition and function of the gut microbiota in these patients compared with that in HC. In addition, as previous studies have shown contradictory results on the impact of biologic treatment on the gut microbiota (21, 22), we explored the association of gut microbiota with the therapeutic effectiveness among those patients who received biologics (TNF-α inhibitors or IL-17 inhibitors).
RESULTS
Patients, sampling, and sequencing characteristics
We enrolled 95 participants in this study, consisting of 44 patients with PsO, 26 patients with PsA, and 25 HC. The baseline demographic information and clinical characteristics of these three groups are summarized in Table 1. The results of laboratory tests were also collected (Table S1).
TABLE 1.
Healthy control (N = 25) | Plaque psoriasis (N = 44) | Psoriatic arthritis (N = 26) | |
---|---|---|---|
Age, Mean (SD) | 33.2 (11.8) | 33.0 (9.0) | 43.2 (9.3) |
Gender, Female, N (%) | 15 (60%) | 20 (45%) | 8 (31%) |
Height (cm), Mean (SD) | 166.3 (7.7) | 166.3 (8.0) | 168.4 (10.1) |
Weight (kg), Mean (SD) | 59.4 (8.6) | 67.7 (14.2) | 68.1 (14.5) |
BMI, Mean (SD) | 21.4 (2.2) | 24.3 (3.7) | 23.8 (3.8) |
Smoking history, N (%)a | 4 (16%) | 11 (25%) | 9 (35%) |
Drinking history, N (%)b | 6 (24%) | 10 (23%) | 8 (31%) |
PASI, Mean (SD) | 5.8 (3.6) | 10.4 (13.1) | |
BSA, Mean (SD) | 6.2 (4.8) | 14.0 (21.7) | |
High blood pressure, N (%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (15%) | |
Diabetes, N (%) | 1(2.3%) | 0 (0%) | |
Cardiovascular disease, N (%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (3.8%) | |
Immune rheumatism, N (%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | |
Fatty liver, N (%)c | 12 (55%) | 8 (57%) | |
Liver stiffness, Mean (SD) | 5.13 (0.83) | 5.54 (1.24) |
Smoking history contains current and former smokers.
Drinking history including current and former drinkers.
Among patients with available data (22 out of 44 plaque psoriasis patients and 12 out of 26 psoriatic psoriasis patients completed liver stiffness examination).
BMI, body mass index; BSA, body surface area; PASI, psoriasis area and severity; SD, standard deviation.
A total of 96 samples, including one internal quality control (QC) sample, were sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq PE150 platform. On average, 42.3 (standard deviation, ±1.9) million raw paired-end reads were obtained, with 39.5 (±1.8) million (~11.9 ± 0.6 Gb/sample) after a stringent quality trimming process, suggesting excellent sequencing quality. The analysis of the internal QC sample meets our pre-defined QC criteria.
Alternations of the compositions and functional profiles of the gut microbiota in PsO and PsA
We observed decreases in the gut bacterial species count in samples from patients with PsO and PsA together (Fig. 1a) or separately (Fig. 1b), compared to HC; the extent of these decreases is approximately 12%, which indicates a medium effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.73). The Shannon diversity index of species compositions remains essentially the same between psoriatic patients (PsO and PsA) and HC (Fig. S1). The permutational analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) test (based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities of species compositions) after correcting for other covariates (i.e., age, gender, BMI) also revealed a significantly altered gut microbiome in psoriatic patients compared to HC for both disease groups together (P < 0.001), with an approximate effect size (PERMANOVA R2) of 3.6% (Fig. 1c), or separately (P < 0.001 and R2 = 4.5% for PsO vs HC, P < 0.001 and R2 = 5.6% for PsA vs HC, Fig. 1d). No significant community-level differences were observed in the gut microbiota between PsO and PsA.
We used KEGG pathway maps to profile the microbial functions in the gut microbiota and found significant differences between disease groups (together or separately to HC) with effect sizes ranging from 4.3% to 7.0% (Fig. S2). Again, no significant differences were found in KEGG profiles comparing PsO to PsA patients (P = 0.149).
In addition, when stratifying the patients using PASI scores as mild (PASI <3), moderate (3 ≤ PASI ≤ 10), and severe (PASI>10), no significant difference was observed, regardless of whether PsO and PsA were analyzed separately (Fig. S3) or together (results not shown). Contrary to previous research (20), these results may suggest that the severity of psoriasis does not alter the gut microbiome. Additionally, we did not observe a correlation between the fatty liver, a common comorbidity previously shown to modify the gut microbiome, and the gut microbiome among psoriasis patients (Fig. S4).
Eubacterium rectale and other species are highly depleted in PsO and PsA
To identify key bacterial species contributing to the alternations in the gut microbiota in psoriatic patients, we conducted a preliminary analysis using Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) coordinates. This analysis revealed a strong correlation between the relative abundance of E. rectale and PC1 (rho = 0.720, P < 0.001). In the species composition plot (Fig. S5), samples with reduced levels of E. rectale were predominantly from PsO or PsA patients.
Using a logistic regression-based framework (23), we performed the differential abundance analysis, which confirmed that E. rectale was highly depleted in PsO and PsA, with an FDR-adjusted P (Padj) <0.01 and an estimated odds ratio of 0.021 (Fig. 2), almost 50 times more likely to appear in healthy individuals than in psoriasis patients. In addition to E. rectale, two Alistipes species, A. finegoldii and A. shahii, were also highly depleted (Padj <0.001) in psoriasis patients; all these species were more than five times more likely to present in HC. Several Bacteroides species, including B. ovatus, B. finegoldii, B. stercoris, B. caccae, and B. coprocola, were enriched in HC with a low Padj (Fig. 2). The findings were further confirmed using a linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) (Fig. S6). While comparing PsO to PsA patients, no species showed significant differential abundance after FDR adjustment; however, E. rectale appeared to be further reduced in PsA patients (with an OR of nearly 0.1 and an unadjusted P-value of 0.059, Fig. S7a)
When examining the KEGG pathways, starch and sucrose metabolism (ORref = healthy =0.514, adjusted P-value (Padj) = 0.018), bacterial chemotaxis (OR = 0.308, Padj = 0.016), flagellar assembly (OR = 0.320, Padj = 0.021), and butanoate metabolism (OR = 0.586, P = 0.028/Padj = 0.157) were significantly depleted in psoriasis patients compared to that in HC (Fig. 3), to which E. rectale was the major contributor (Fig. S8). Meanwhile, only one KEGG pathway, synthesis, and degradation of ketone bodies (KEGG pathway 00072) was highly and significantly depleted in PsA compared to that in PsO patients (OR = 0.22, Padj = 0.044), suggesting this pathway is nearly five times more likely to be present in PsO (Fig. S9).
Because, typically, only a small portion of metagenomic sequences could be mapped to fully constructed KEGG pathway maps (in our case, ~20% of all sequences, Fig. S10a), we explored the functional profiles of the gut microbiome at gene family and gene ortholog levels, greatly increasing the sequence usage. About 65% of sequences could be mapped to a KEGG gene family (Fig. S10a), corresponding to 3,075,698 gene families, among which 1,077,614 appeared in more than 80% of samples (prevalent features) and were therefore tested. A total of 765 gene families were significantly different, with more than five-fold changes (OR ≤0.2 or ≥5), all enriched in HC compared to all psoriatic patients (Fig. S10b). Nearly all these genes (717 genes) were from E. rectale strains. When the gene families were grouped as KEGG orthologs (KOs), 7,532 KOs were identified, and 55 prevalent KOs were highly significant after FDR correction with >5-fold changes, all enriched in HC (Fig. S10c). Most of these KOs were associated with cellular processing (KEGG category 09140, 17 KOs), environmental information processing (KEGG 09130, 11 KOs), and carbohydrate metabolism (KEGG 09101, 10 KOs). When examining the species’ contributions to these KOs, we again found that E. rectale was the dominant (if not the sole) contributor. In addition, signatures of Alistipes and Bacteroides can be found in several KOs; however, there are much fewer dominant contributions (Table S2). Many KOs also had a high effect size (OR ≤0.2 or ≥5) when comparing PsO and PsA, but their P-values were rather high before or after FDR adjustments (Fig. S7b). Therefore, no KO can be identified as differential in this comparison. Given the consistent signal of E. rectale in both relative abundances and functional profiles, we conducted tests to determine whether the relative abundance of E. rectale could effectively distinguish psoriatic patients from HC. Our analysis yielded a moderately good Area Under the Curve scores, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 in the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (Fig. S11). These results indicate that E. rectale shows promise as a potential diagnostic marker for differentiating psoriatic patients from healthy individuals.
To further validate the E. rectale signal, we assembled metagenomic sequences to recover the genomic bins in each sample, arguably the most sensitive method for assessing microbial community compositions. A total of 1,187 non-redundant genomic bins were obtained, with a range of 52 to 270 bins per sample, among which bins identified as E. rectale (Agathobacter rectalis in GTDB taxonomy) were recovered in 62 samples. Comparisons of the estimated relative abundance of these bins revealed significantly higher levels of E. rectale bins in healthy individuals compared to psoriatic patients (Fig. S13a). Furthermore, a nested PCR protocol described by Kageyama and Benno (24) was employed to further confirm our findings. As shown in Fig. S13b, we successfully identified E. rectale-specific bands in 70 samples, with 24 out of 25 samples from healthy individuals exhibiting clear bands. This pattern highly correlates with the abundance of E. rectale-specific bins, providing additional validation for the enrichment of E. rectale in healthy individuals.
The baseline gut microbiota is not correlated with the effectiveness of biologics
A sub-cohort of 22 psoriasis patients (13 PsO and 9 PsA) who were treated with either Secukinumab or Adalimumab were followed across their treatment durations, and the association between their baseline microbiota and the treatment effectiveness was explored. Given the nature and common regimen of the two treatments, we used PASI75 (a PASI score exceeding 75%) to mark the effectiveness of Adalimumab (Ada group) and PASI90 for Secukinumab (Sec group) and 32 weeks post-treatment as the evaluation endpoint. A total of 12 patients (six PsO and six PsA patients) reached PASI75 by 32 weeks, but no significant differences were found in the baseline gut microbiota comparing the 12 responders to the ten non-responders (PERMANOVA P = 0.349 after correcting for PsO vs PsA and biologics), suggesting the effectiveness of biologics may not be correlated with their baseline gut microbiota. Meanwhile, despite significant differences in effectiveness between the two biologics (log-rank sum test, P = 0.002, Fig. S12), no significant differences were found in PsO to PsA (P = 1.000).
DISCUSSION
In this study, we performed metagenomic sequencing analysis to explore the altered gut microbiota among a large cohort of patients with psoriasis compared to HC. We demonstrated a noticeable reduction of gut microbial diversity in both PsO and PsA and the reduction of several species that may have probiotic effects; several microbial functional pathways, such as butanoate metabolism, may be related to the lost species.
Consistent with previous findings, we observed significant changes in microbial compositions among psoriatic patients: a reduction in the richness but not overall evenness (as measured by the Shannon index) and a significantly altered community-measured beta diversity. However, the effect sizes of these alternations were limited, ranging from small to medium [based on the guidelines summarized in (25)]. These results are consistent with previous reports after reviewing the size of reported differences in the respective studies (5, 17, 19, 20) and may also explain an opposite direction, as reported by Shapiro et al., because a small effect is susceptible to the effects of covariates, technical errors, or random errors (18).
In addition to community-level alternations among psoriatic patients, we identified several differentially abundant features that may have potential health implications. We identified consistent signals from E. rectale. E. rectale, recently proposed as an Agathobacter rectalis comb. nov. under the family of Lachnospiraceae, is a gram-positive, non-spore-forming, obligately anaerobic, monoflagellated bacterium (26). In addition to its well-known ability to produce butyrate, it can also produce acetate, hydrogen, and lactate (26). Furthermore, the abundance of KEGG KOs and functional pathways associated with this species were highly depleted in psoriasis patients, making a solid case that E. rectale could be the central piece of a microbial ecological functional unit, which may have health implications. Depletion of the butyrate-producing Eubacterium or E. rectale has also been reported in other diseases: Takahashi and colleagues observed a reduced relative abundance of Eubacterium genera in patients with Crohn’s disease (27), and Vermeiren et al. reported a reduced diversity of fecal Clostridium coccoides/E. rectale species in patients with ulcerative colitis (28). Loomba et al. found that E. rectale was abundant in mild or moderate NAFLD, whereas Escherichia coli was the dominant species in advanced fibrosis (7). In parallel, these results suggest that the gut microbiota dysbiosis, particularly the depleted levels of E. rectale in the disease cohorts, may be related to the damaged mucus barrier and the progression of liver fibrosis. Additionally, we found that A. finegoldii and A. shahii species were significantly reduced, which is consistent with previous findings in psoriasis and a cohort of patients with Crohn’s disease (5, 19, 29). It is interesting to note that the species profiles depleted in psoriasis were somehow similar to those of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, in whom all the above-mentioned bacterial species are thought to play a protective role.
Most of the species depleted in psoriasis in this study were possible producers of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), which is supported by our functional analysis results, as starch and sucrose metabolism, bacterial chemotaxis, and butanoate metabolism were all depleted in psoriasis patients. In addition to the butyrate-producing E. rectale, Alistipes, especially the A. shahii species, have been shown to elevate propionate levels in the gut (30). SCFA is a preferred fuel for the colonocytes and is essential for maintaining the epithelial barrier (31, 32). Propionate is associated with gluconeogenesis in the liver and may have potential beneficial effects (32, 33). Meanwhile, these SCFA-producing organisms may exert their protective effects by regulating the immune system. It has been shown that SCFAs could induce the differentiation of effector T cells and Tregs and suppress the polarization of Th17 cells (32, 34). These immunomodulatory effects of gut microbiota have been demonstrated by fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) in animal models and even humans. The imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like mouse model, which received FMT from healthy donors with a Lactobacillus supplement, showed a protective effect against Treg/Th17 imbalance (35). Moreover, clinical trials have shown that FMT also appears effective in treating IBD patients (36).
Intriguingly, we did not observe a significant correlation between the baseline gut microbiota and the clinical prognosis of MAB treatments. Among the differentially abundant species identified by comparing psoriasis patients with HC, none showed a significant difference between responders and non-responders. Interestingly, E. rectale appeared to have a much lower relative abundance in responders than in non-responders, although not significantly (P = 0.17, median abundanceresponders = 0.68% vs median abundancenon-responders = 10.39%). It can be hypothesized that biologics would work better in psoriasis patients depleted with E. rectale functional groups.
Overall, our observations provide further evidence of detailed alternations in the gut microbiota at the species level in one of the larger cohorts of psoriasis patients, assess the magnitude and aspects of these alternations, and provide comprehensive evidence of the altered species and functions. However, there are several limitations due to the nature of this exploratory study, as we can only speculate on the potential association between the altered gut microbiota and psoriasis rather than reaching a more plausible hypothesis on the causal relationship. Furthermore, we did not have access to the metabolomic profile of either host or microbial communities to directly confirm the role of SCFAs in psoriasis, although our results strongly suggest a role for SCFAs. Nevertheless, we have generated several hypotheses that should be tested in longitudinal observational studies or even randomized clinical trials, such as the depletion of possible probiotic bacterial species, including E. rectale, A. finegoldii, and A. shahii, or the therapeutic potential of SCFAs supplementation or the live bacterial strains.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Participants
This study was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the biomedical research ethics committee of the West China Hospital of Sichuan University (Approval number: 2020–234). Psoriasis patients were enrolled in the Department of Dermatology & Venereology of West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from September 2020 to March 2021. Healthy subjects from the same region were recruited as controls. All of them were informed of the purpose of this study and signed the consent form before the process began. The number of subjects to include for each group was calculated using the micropower algorithm (37): assuming an effect size of 4% comparing the microbial community differences (based on weighted beta diversity measurement) between disease groups and healthy subjects, 20 subjects per group were required to afford a power of 0.90 and therefore were originally targeted.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
The inclusion criteria for the participants required 18–65 years. The psoriasis group consisted of diagnosed plaque psoriasis patients, then into subgroups by screening for the presence of PsA: psoriasis patients who met the Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) were included in the PsA subgroup, while other patients were in the PsO subgroup. HC from the same geographic regions were matched by age and gender. The exclusion criteria applied to all the participants in this study, including during pregnancy and lactation, who used systematic medication (such as immunosuppressants, biologics, antibiotics, and probiotics) in the past three months with other immune-related diseases (inflammatory bowel disease), severe infectious diseases, malignancies combined, and received gastric surgery.
Sample collection and processing
Fresh fecal samples were collected from participants at the first visit; approximately 30–50 g were sampled in a sterile container and stored at −20℃ immediately. These samples were transferred to −80℃ within 6 h and stored until DNA extraction. Microbial DNA was extracted using the Qiagen DNeasy 96 PowerSoil Pro QIAcube HT kits according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Extracted DNAs were delivered to a commercial genomic sequencing service lab, Novogene, for library preparation using the NEBNext Ultra II DNA kit and sequencing using Illumina NovaSeq platforms.
A nested PCR protocol was adopted to further validate the presence of E. rectale (24). Briefly, a pair of full-length, universal 16S primers were used to amplify the bacteria DNAs (Forward: 27F 5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′, Reverse: 1492R 5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′); 10 ng of extracted DNA were used for the amplification with the following conditions: one cycle of pre-denaturation at 95°C for 3 minutes, 25 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 20 seconds, annealing at 55°C for 30 seconds, elongation at 72°C for 30 seconds, and one cycle of post-elongation at 72°C for 5 minutes. Following the generation of primary amplicons, the E. rectale-specific amplicons were generated using primer pair (Forward: rec-F:5′-CATIGCTICTCGGTGCCGTC-3′, Reverse: rec-R:5′-ATITGCTCGGCTTCACAGCT-3′) and 2 µL of primary amplification products, with the following conditions: one cycle of 95°C for 3 minutes, 20 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 20 seconds, annealing at 65°C for 15 seconds, elongation at 72°C for 30 seconds, and one cycle of post-elongation at 72°C for 5 minutes. The resulting amplicons were tested on an electrophoresis gel system, and an amplicon of roughly 440 bps was expected.
Metagenomic sequencing analysis
The PE150 reads from Illumina NovaSeq were obtained and processed using our in-house pipeline, which consists of the following tools: fastp v0.20 (38) was used to trim the sequencing and PCR adapters and filter short sequences (<50 bp), followed by kneaddata v0.10 (39) to trim the low-quality reads (a sliding window of 4 and an average quality score of 20 were used) and decontaminate against the hg19 human genome; humann2 v2.8.1 (40) was used to generate taxonomy profiles and functional profiles with the KEGG database (41). Alpha diversities based on taxonomy profile were obtained in the form of metagenomic species count and Shannon index using vegan v2.6.2. Beta diversities of taxonomy or functional profiles were obtained using the Bray–Curtis distance, and PCoA was performed using the cmdscale function in vegan v2.6.2 (42).
Metagenomic assembly was performed with the previously generated clean reads using our in-house pipeline, consisting of the following steps: megahit v1.2.9 (43) was used for assembling, followed by a parallel binning step using concoct v1.1.0 (44), maxbin2 v2.2.7 (45), and metabat2 v2.15 (46), respectively; the binning results were filtered and merged using DAS Tool v1.1.6 (47) with bin completeness over 75%, contamination rate less than 25%, and total length over 500 kb. Merged bins were dereplicated using dRep v2.2.3 (48) and annotated using GTDB-Tk v2.3.2 (49) and GTDB release 202 (50) with the bin counts generated by salmon v0.13.1 (51).
Statistical analysis
Welch’s two-sample t-test was used for tests in the whole blood count and lipid panel. A significance level of 0.05 was set. For microbiome analysis, Wilcoxon’s rank sum test or Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed for univariate comparison (e.g., tests for alpha diversities), with the Conover–Iman test (52) as the post hoc when necessary. A comparison based on beta diversities was performed using Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) (53), adjusted for covariates using vegan v2.6.2 (42). The R2 calculated during the tests was used as an approximate measurement of effect sizes.
For the abundant differential features, a logistic regression-based framework was applied (23). After prevalence filtering (usually a cut-off of 0.2 is used, except for the KEGG gene family and KOs tests due to the too many features, in which case a cut-off of 0.8 is used), the relative abundance is modeled as the probability of the features to be presented in the samples and converted by a logit function and input as the response variable in the logistic regression. The coefficients obtained can be converted to an odds ratio estimate after an exponential transformation. The P-values obtained were subjected to FDR adjustment. A combination of adjusted P-values (statistical significance, typically <0.2) and odds ratios (a measure of effect size, typically <0.2 or >5) are used to infer differential abundant features. Specific cut-off values were selected given the number of tests and overall expectations of the effect size and were noted in the results whenever necessary. The linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) (54) was performed through an R implementation lefser (55) to validate the fatty liver disease (NAFLD) findings. The mean total estimated clade counts for each sample from MetaPhlAn2 outputs (through Humann2) were used as the normalization factor; 0.05 was used for initial Wilcoxon and Kruskal–Wallis test screening; and an LDA score >2 was used to select the final significant features.
The cumulative incidence of responding to biologic treatments was evaluated using the ggsurvfit v0.2.1 package (56) and compared using the log-rank sum test available through the survival v3.1.8 package (57). In addition, phyloseq v1.30.0 (58) was extensively used in the analyses. All statistical analyses were done in R v3.6.3 (59). All codes for data analysis and creating illustrations are hosted on Github at https://github.com/ETaSky/xbiome_psoriasis_ms.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We would like to express our deepest appreciation to the patients who participated in this study. We are also thankful to the funders for the supports.
Contributor Information
Jincheng Wang, Email: wangjincheng@xbiome.com.
Wei Li, Email: liweihx_hxyy@scu.edu.cn.
Wei-Hua Chen, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China.
DATA AVAILABILITY
The sequencing data after quality trimming and removing of host sequences that support the findings of this study are openly available in NCBI SRA with accession number PRJNA938297.
ETHICS APPROVAL
This study was conducted under the criteria of the Helsinki Declaration (revision in 2013) and was approved by the biomedical research ethics committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.01154-23.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. de Vos WM, Tilg H, Van Hul M, Cani PD. 2022. Gut microbiome and health: mechanistic insights. Gut 71:1020–1032. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2021-326789 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Thursby E, Juge N. 2017. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem J 474:1823–1836. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. De Pessemier B, Grine L, Debaere M, Maes A, Paetzold B, Callewaert C. 2021. Gut-skin axis: current knowledge of the interrelationship between microbial dysbiosis and skin conditions. Microorganisms 9:353. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9020353 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Ahlawat S, Asha, Sharma KK. 2021. Gut-organ axis: a microbial outreach and networking. Lett Appl Microbiol 72:636–668. doi: 10.1111/lam.13333 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Scher JU, Ubeda C, Artacho A, Attur M, Isaac S, Reddy SM, Marmon S, Neimann A, Brusca S, Patel T, Manasson J, Pamer EG, Littman DR, Abramson SB. 2015. Decreased bacterial diversity characterizes the altered gut microbiota in patients with psoriatic arthritis, resembling dysbiosis in inflammatory bowel disease. Arthritis Rheumatol 67:128–139. doi: 10.1002/art.38892 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Wu X, Liu J, Xiao L, Lu A, Zhang G. 2017. Alterations of gut microbiome in rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 25:S287–S288. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.484 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Loomba R, Seguritan V, Li W, Long T, Klitgord N, Bhatt A, Dulai PS, Caussy C, Bettencourt R, Highlander SK, Jones MB, Sirlin CB, Schnabl B, Brinkac L, Schork N, Chen CH, Brenner DA, Biggs W, Yooseph S, Venter JC, Nelson KE. 2017. Gut microbiome-based metagenomic signature for non-invasive detection of advanced fibrosis in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell Metab 25:1054–1062. e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.04.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Vogt NM, Kerby RL, Dill-McFarland KA, Harding SJ, Merluzzi AP, Johnson SC, Carlsson CM, Asthana S, Zetterberg H, Blennow K, Bendlin BB, Rey FE. 2017. Gut microbiome alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Sci Rep 7:13537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13601-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Ni C, Chiu MW. 2014. Psoriasis and comorbidities: links and risks. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 7:119–132. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S44843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Nakajima K. 2012. Critical role of the interleukin-23/T-helper 17 cell axis in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. J Dermatol 39:219–224. doi: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2011.01458.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Alesa DI, Alshamrani HM, Alzahrani YA, Alamssi DN, Alzahrani NS, Almohammadi ME. 2019. The role of gut microbiome in the pathogenesis of psoriasis and the therapeutic effects of probiotics. J Family Med Prim Care 8:3496–3503. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_709_19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 12. Lebwohl M. 2018. Psoriasis. Ann Intern Med 168:ITC49–ITC64. doi: 10.7326/AITC201804030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. De Francesco MA, Caruso A. 2022. The gut microbiome in psoriasis and Crohn’s disease: is its perturbation a common denominator for their pathogenesis. Vaccines (Basel) 10:244. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10020244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Zákostelská Z, Málková J, Klimešová K, Rossmann P, Hornová M, Novosádová I, Stehlíková Z, Kostovčík M, Hudcovic T, Štepánková R, Jůzlová K, Hercogová J, Tlaskalová-Hogenová H, Kverka M. 2016. Intestinal microbiota promotes psoriasis-like skin inflammation by enhancing Th17 response. PLoS One 11:e0159539. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. O’Neill CA, Monteleone G, McLaughlin JT, Paus R. 2016. The gut-skin axis in health and disease: a paradigm with therapeutic implications. Bioessays 38:1167–1176. doi: 10.1002/bies.201600008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Chen YJ, Ho HJ, Tseng CH, Lai ZL, Shieh JJ, Wu CY. 2018. Intestinal microbiota profiling and predicted metabolic dysregulation in psoriasis patients. Exp Dermatol 27:1336–1343. doi: 10.1111/exd.13786 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Huang L, Gao R, Yu N, Zhu Y, Ding Y, Qin H. 2019. Dysbiosis of gut microbiota was closely associated with psoriasis. Sci China Life Sci 62:807–815. doi: 10.1007/s11427-018-9376-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Shapiro J, Cohen NA, Shalev V, Uzan A, Koren O, Maharshak N. 2019. Psoriatic patients have a distinct structural and functional fecal microbiota compared with controls. J Dermatol 46:595–603. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hidalgo-Cantabrana C, Gomez J, Delgado S, Requena-Lopez S, Queiro-Silva R, Margolles A, Coto E, Sanchez B, Coto-Segura P. 2019. Gut microbiota dysbiosis in a cohort of patients with psoriasis. Br J Dermatol 181:1287–1295. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17931 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Todberg T, Egeberg A, Zachariae C, Sørensen N, Pedersen O, Skov L. 2022. Patients with psoriasis have a dysbiotic taxonomic and functional gut microbiota. Br J Dermatol 187:89–98. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Valentini V, Silvestri V, Marraffa F, Greco G, Bucalo A, Grassi S, Gagliardi A, Mazzotta A, Ottini L, Richetta AG. 2021. Gut microbiome profile in psoriatic patients treated and untreated with biologic therapy. J Dermatol 48:786–793. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.15680 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Yeh NL, Hsu CY, Tsai TF, Chiu HY. 2019. Gut microbiome in psoriasis is perturbed differently during secukinumab and ustekinumab therapy and associated with response to treatment. Clin Drug Investig 39:1195–1203. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00849-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bittinger K, Zhao C, Li Y, Ford E, Friedman ES, Ni J, Kulkarni CV, Cai J, Tian Y, Liu Q, et al. 2020. Bacterial colonization reprograms the neonatal gut metabolome. Nat Microbiol 5:838–847. doi: 10.1038/s41564-020-0694-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kageyama A, Benno Y. 2001. Rapid detection of human fecal Eubacterium species and related genera by nested PCR method. Microbiol Immunol 45:315–318. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2001.tb02624.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Ben-Shachar MS, Lüdecke D, Makowski D. 2020. Effectsize: estimation of effect size indices and standardized parameters. JOSS 5:2815. doi: 10.21105/joss.02815 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Rosero JA, Killer J, Sechovcová H, Mrázek J, Benada O, Fliegerová K, Havlík J, Kopečný J. 2016. Reclassification of Eubacterium rectale (Hauduroy et al 1937) Prévot 1938 in a new genus Agathobacter gen. nov. as Agathobacter rectalis comb. nov., and description of Agathobacter ruminis sp. nov., isolated from the rumen contents of sheep and cows. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 66:768–773. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Takahashi K, Nishida A, Fujimoto T, Fujii M, Shioya M, Imaeda H, Inatomi O, Bamba S, Sugimoto M, Andoh A. 2016. Reduced abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria species in the fecal microbial community in Crohn’s disease. Digestion 93:59–65. doi: 10.1159/000441768 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Vermeiren J, Van den Abbeele P, Laukens D, Vigsnaes LK, De Vos M, Boon N, Van de Wiele T. 2012. Decreased colonization of fecal Clostridium coccoides/Eubacterium rectale species from ulcerative colitis patients in an in vitro dynamic gut model with mucin environment. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 79:685–696. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01252.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Willing BP, Dicksved J, Halfvarson J, Andersson AF, Lucio M, Zheng Z, Järnerot G, Tysk C, Jansson JK, Engstrand L. 2010. A pyrosequencing study in twins shows that gastrointestinal microbial profiles vary with inflammatory bowel disease phenotypes. Gastroenterology 139:1844–1854. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Li J, Sung CYJ, Lee N, Ni Y, Pihlajamäki J, Panagiotou G, El-Nezami H. 2016. Probiotics modulated gut microbiota suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma growth in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E1306–15. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1518189113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Riviere A, Selak M, Lantin D, Leroy F, De Vuyst L. 2016. Bifidobacteria and butyrate-producing colon bacteria: importance and strategies for their stimulation in the human gut. Front Microbiol 7:979. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Morrison DJ, Preston T. 2016. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes 7:189–200. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2015.1134082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Louis P, Flint HJ. 2017. Formation of propionate and butyrate by the human colonic microbiota. Environ Microbiol 19:29–41. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Smith PM, Howitt MR, Panikov N, Michaud M, Gallini CA, Bohlooly YM, Glickman JN, Garrett WS. 2013. The microbial metabolites, short-chain fatty acids, regulate colonic Treg cell homeostasis. Science 341:569–573. doi: 10.1126/science.1241165 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Chen HL, Zeng YB, Zhang ZY, Kong CY, Zhang SL, Li ZM, Huang JT, Xu YY, Mao YQ, Cai PR, Han B, Wang WQ, Wang LS. 2021. Gut and cutaneous microbiome featuring abundance of Lactobacillus reuteri protected against psoriasis-like inflammation in mice. J Inflamm Res 14:6175–6190. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S337031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Paramsothy S, Paramsothy R, Rubin DT, Kamm MA, Kaakoush NO, Mitchell HM, Castaño-Rodríguez N. 2017. Faecal microbiota transplantation for inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crohns Colitis 11:1180–1199. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjx063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Kelly BJ, Gross R, Bittinger K, Sherrill-Mix S, Lewis JD, Collman RG, Bushman FD, Li H. 2015. Power and sample-size estimation for microbiome studies using pairwise distances and PERMANOVA. Bioinformatics 31:2461–2468. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. 2018. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics 34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. McIver LJ, Abu-Ali G, Franzosa EA, Schwager R, Morgan XC, Waldron L, Segata N, Huttenhower C. 2018. bioBakery: a meta’omic analysis environment. Bioinformatics 34:1235–1237. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Franzosa EA, McIver LJ, Rahnavard G, Thompson LR, Schirmer M, Weingart G, Lipson KS, Knight R, Caporaso JG, Segata N, Huttenhower C. 2018. Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nat Methods 15:962–968. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0176-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Kanehisa M, Furumichi M, Sato Y, Ishiguro-Watanabe M, Tanabe M. 2021. KEGG: integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 49:D545–D551. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa970 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Oksanen J, Simpson GL, Blanchet FG, Kindt R, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, et al. 2022. vegan: community ecology package, v2.6-2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
- 43. Li D, Liu C-M, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam T-W. 2015. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct de Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics 31:1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Alneberg J, Bjarnason BS, de Bruijn I, Schirmer M, Quick J, Ijaz UZ, Lahti L, Loman NJ, Andersson AF, Quince C. 2014. Binning metagenomic contigs by coverage and composition. Nat Methods 11:1144–1146. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wu Y-W, Simmons BA, Singer SW. 2016. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics 32:605–607. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv638 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, Wang Z. 2019. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ 7:e7359. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Sieber CMK, Probst AJ, Sharrar A, Thomas BC, Hess M, Tringe SG, Banfield JF. 2018. Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy. Nat Microbiol 3:836–843. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0171-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. 2017. dRep: A tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISME J 11:2864–2868. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Chaumeil P-A, Mussig AJ, Hugenholtz P, Parks DH. 2019. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the genome taxonomy database. Bioinformatics 36:1925–1927. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Parks DH, Chuvochina M, Rinke C, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A, Hugenholtz P. 2021. GTDB: an ongoing census of bacterial and archaeal diversity through a phylogenetically consistent, rank normalized and complete genome-based taxonomy. Nucleic Acids Res:D785–D794. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab776 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. 2017. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods 14:417–419. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Dinno A. 2017. conover.test: Conover-Iman test of multiple comparisons using rank sums, v1.1.5. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=conover.test
- 53. Anderson MJ. 2017. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA), p 1–15. In . Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [Google Scholar]
- 54. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C. 2011. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Khleborodova A. 2022. lefser: R implementation of the LEfSE method for microbiome biomarker discovery
- 56. Sjoberg DD, Baillie M, Haesendonckx S, Treis T. 2022. ggsurvfit: flexible time-to-event figures
- 57. Therneau TM, until TL, Elizabeth A, Cynthia C. 2022. survival: survival analysis, v3.4-0. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=survival.
- 58. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S. 2013. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Team RC . 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The sequencing data after quality trimming and removing of host sequences that support the findings of this study are openly available in NCBI SRA with accession number PRJNA938297.