Abstract
Consumption of dietary fiber and anthocyanin has been linked to a lower incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC). This study scrutinizes the potential antitumorigenic attributes of a black rice diet (BRD), abundantly rich in dietary fiber and anthocyanin. Our results demonstrate notable antitumorigenic effects in mice on BRD, indicated by a reduction in both the size and number of intestinal tumors and a consequent extension in life span, compared to control diet‐fed counterparts. Furthermore, fecal transplants from BRD‐fed mice to germ‐free mice led to a decrease in colonic cell proliferation, coupled with maintained integrity of the intestinal barrier. The BRD was associated with significant shifts in gut microbiota composition, specifically an augmentation in probiotic strains Bacteroides uniformis and Lactobacillus. Noteworthy changes in gut metabolites were also documented, including the upregulation of indole‐3‐lactic acid and indole. These metabolites have been identified to stimulate the intestinal aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway, inhibiting CRC cell proliferation and colorectal tumorigenesis. In summary, these findings propose that a BRD may modulate the progression of intestinal tumors by fostering protective gut microbiota and metabolite profiles. The study accentuates the potential health advantages of whole‐grain foods, emphasizing the potential utility of black rice in promoting health.
Keywords: black rice diet, colorectal cancer, gut metabolites, gut microbiome
Black rice diet can regulate gut microbial homeostasis in the colorectal cancer (CRC) mice model, enhance the abundance of beneficial bacteria, create aromatic hydrocarbon receptor ligand metabolites, activate the intestinal aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) pathway, and suppress the development of CRC.
Highlights
The black rice diet (BRD) can slow down the development of colorectal tumors in Apc Min/+ and azoxymethane/dextran sulfate sodium (AOM/DSS) colorectal cancer (CRC) model mice.
The BRD increases the abundance of intestinal probiotics, such as Bacteroides uniformis and Lactobacillus, while reducing potential intestinal pathogens.
The upregulated metabolites indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid in BRD are ligands of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) pathway, which slow down the development of CRC by activating intestinal AHR receptor gene expression.
A moderate consumption of BRD is expected to become a potential strategy for the prevention and treatment of CRC by improving gut microbiota and metabolites.
INTRODUCTION
Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most common cause of cancer‐related death and the third most common cancer [1]. As a gastrointestinal cancer, the risk of CRC is associated with a variety of diets [2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. The consumption of whole grains has been linked to a lower risk of CRC [7]. Recently, a meta‐analysis summarized the prospective evidence and reported a 10% decreased risk of CRC per additional 10 g/day total dietary fiber intake [8]. The potential protective impact of dietary fiber and consumption of whole grains on CRC risk is plausible from a biological perspective. Whole‐grain foods are key sources of dietary fiber and might mitigate the risk of CRC by promoting stool bulk, diluting harmful agents in the stool, and reducing transit time, ultimately limiting the interaction between carcinogens and the colorectal lining [9, 10, 11]. Moreover, the fermentation of fiber by bacteria generates short‐chain fatty acids, which could offer safeguards against CRC [12]. Antioxidants, vitamins, trace minerals, phytate, phenolic acids, lignans, and phytoestrogens are other ingredients found in whole grains that may also help prevent CRC [13]. Intake of whole grains has been linked to a lower risk of CRC due to their high folate and magnesium levels [14].
Unlike numerous other types of cancer, CRC actively interacts with trillions of gut microbes during the process of tumor development. In the meantime, the gut microbiota's makeup can either promote or inhibit the development of CRC [15]. Additionally, metabolites produced by microorganisms, such as bile acids and short‐chain fatty acids, might have a significant impact on the development of CRC [16, 17]. Although both whole grain consumption and a balanced gut microbiome are associated with an antagonistic effect on CRC development, the intricate relationship between whole grain intake, gut microbiome alterations, and metabolite changes in CRC development is not well understood.
Rice is a fundamental dietary staple in numerous regions globally. Black rice, being a type of rice, distinguishes itself from polished rice mainly due to its maintenance of the bran layer that is rich in various nutrients and bioactive compounds. Multiple studies have indicated that anthocyanin pigments in the bran layer of black rice exhibit significantly higher antioxidant activity [18, 19]. The bran layer also has a great fiber content. This fiber has the ability to attach to bile acids and carcinogens, which helps in the restoration of the lining of the colon [20, 21]. However, research on using black rice as a dietary system to explore its impact on the development of CRC is currently lacking. In this study, we used black rice diet (BRD), which is a whole‐grain diet rich in anthocyanin, to demonstrate the potential role of BRD in inhibiting CRC development using two CRC mouse models. We discovered that BRD antagonizes CRC development in mice through maintaining gut microbial homeostasis with enrichment of probiotic and depletion of pathogenic bacteria. This research is highly relevant for the advancement of preventative methods against cancer and the promotion of health‐oriented products, such as functional foods.
RESULTS
BRD protects against CRC development in both ApcMin/+ and azoxymethane/dextran sulfate sodium (AOM/DSS) mouse models
BRD that meets nutritional requirements of adult mouse with a consistent concentration of energy and nutrients as a control diet (CD) is the prerequisite to study the health effects of black rice. We thus took AIN‐93M, the widely used purified diet made from refined ingredients for mature rodents [22], as the CD, while semipurified and isoenergetic diets containing 50% black rice, besides refined ingredients, as BRD.
To investigate the impact of black rice on CRC development, we administered CD or BRD to the gene mutant mouse model Apc Min/+ from the completion of the adaptation feeding until natural death (Figure 1A). We observed a 15.4% extension in the maximum life span of mice fed BRD (255 days) compared with those fed CD (221 days), with an average life span extension of 20% in the BRD group (mean life span: 190.8 days) compared with the CD group (mean life span: 159 days) (Figure 1B). At harvest, BRD‐fed mice had lower body weight than CD‐fed mice (Figure 1C). Epidemiological data suggest that obesity is associated with a 30%–70% increased risk of colon cancer in men [23]. The colorectal tumor count and size were reduced in mice that were fed a diet containing BRD than in those that were given a CD, as shown in Figure 1D. Histological analysis of colon samples indicated that mice fed with BRD had a decreased incidence of adenocarcinoma, high‐grade dysplasia, and low‐grade dysplasia compared to CD‐fed mice (Figure 1E). The sections of the colon from animals fed with BRD showed a lower number of Ki‐67‐positive cells, indicating reduced cell proliferation (Figure 1F). Meanwhile, expressions of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) were reduced in BRD‐fed mice (Figure 1G), indicating again decreased cell proliferation in BRD‐fed mice. The above findings indicated that BRD can alleviate the development of intestinal tumors in Apc Min/+ mice.
The intestinal barrier serves as a protective mechanism that prevents the entry of harmful substances into the bloodstream, thereby averting a cascade of pathophysiological alterations [24]. To investigate the influence of gut barrier function on the inhibition of colorectal development by black rice, we assessed the effect of BRD on the permeability of the colon in mice. We measured the concentration of lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which are the main components of the outer membrane of Gram‐negative bacteria, in the serum. The serum content of LPS was lower in mice fed a BRD diet than in mice fed a CD diet (Figure 1H). The transmission electron microscopy analysis of the gut barrier structure confirmed that the colonic intercellular junctions in mice fed with BRD were relatively normal. However, mice fed with CD showed abnormalities in their colonic intercellular junctions, including widening of spaces in the apical junctional complex and paracellular gap (Figure 1I). Goblet cells are a type of specialized epithelial cells that play a crucial role in the creation of mucus barriers within the intestines [25]. Colon tissues were stained using periodic acid–Schiff, to determine the number of goblet cells in each crypt. The results showed that the average number of goblet cells was higher in mice fed with BRD compared with animals fed with CD (Figure 1J). Furthermore, the levels of tight junction proteins, which are essential for maintaining the integrity of the gut barrier, namely ZO‐1, occludin, and claudin‐3, were shown to be elevated in mice fed with BRD (Figure 1K–N). The results showed that BRD provided protection not only to the mechanical barriers of the gut but also to its chemical barriers.
Considering increased gut permeability can lead to chronic inflammation [26], we further examined the inflammation level of the CRC mice. The enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) results demonstrated that the BRD downregulated the expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) and interleukin‐6 (IL‐6), while upregulating anti‐inflammatory cytokines IL‐4 and IL‐10 (Figure 1O‐R). It suggested that the BRD lowered the serum inflammation levels in Apc Min/+ mice.
To corroborate these findings, we employed the AOM/DSS‐treated C57BL/6 mouse model to ascertain whether the BRD's effect was specific to a particular CRC mouse model (Supporting Information S1: Figure S1A). Analogous to the Apc Min/+ model, BRD‐fed AOM/DSS‐treated mice exhibited increased mean survival time of 29.5%, lower body weight, reduced tumor number and volume, improved gut barrier function, and attenuated inflammation levels (Supporting Information S1: Figure S1B–R). These consistent observations suggested that BRD may suppresses colorectal tumor development in multiple mouse models.
Gut microbiota mediates the protective effects of BRD against CRC development
Microbiota in the gut rely on dietary substrates and often serve as mediators for the cancer accelerating or suppressing effects of food [27, 28]. We thus checked the contribution of BRD‐modulated microbiota to intestinal health by transferring fecal samples of BRD‐fed mice or CD‐fed mice to germ‐free mice (Figure 2A).
To test the hypothesis, we examined cell proliferation, intestinal barrier function, and inflammation levels between GF‐BRD (germ‐free mice gavaged with fecal samples of BRD‐fed mice) and GF‐CD (germ‐free mice gavaged with fecal samples of CD‐fed mice) mice as we performed above in the comparison between BRD‐fed and CD‐fed CRC mice. In terms of cell proliferation, we found that GF‐BRD mice exhibited decreased high‐grade and low‐grade dysplasia compared with GF‐CD mice (Figure 2B). The attenuated Ki‐67‐positive cells in colon tissues were demonstrated in GF‐BRD mice compared with GF‐CD mice (Figure 2C). In keeping with this, PCNA protein was disintegrated in GF‐BRD mice (Figure 2D). In terms of gut barrier function, the decreased number of goblet cells in colon tissues (Figure 2E) and LPS level were demonstrated in serum of GF‐BRD mice (Figure 2F). Transmission electron microscopy confirmed the relatively normal colonic intercellular junctions in GF‐BRD mice, whereas confirmed the abnormalities of colonic intercellular junctions in GF‐CD mice, including widening of spaces in the apical junctional complex and paracellular gap (Figure 2G). Moreover, increased expression of ZO‐1, claudin‐3, and occludin were demonstrated in colon tissues of GF‐BRD mice compared with GF‐CD mice (Figure 2H–K). Consistently, ELISA results showed that the expression of anti‐inflammatory cytokine IL‐4 and IL‐10 was upregulated in GF‐BRD mice (Figure 2L,M), whereas expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokine TNF‐α and IL‐6 was downregulated in GF‐BRD mice (Figure 2N,O). All these results demonstrated gut microbiota and metabolite play a key role in mediating the protective effects of BRD in colorectal tumor development.
BRD altered gut microbial composition and increased the abundance of Bacteroides uniformis in CRC mouse models
To further find out the beneficial microbiota against colorectal tumor development that could be upregulated by BRD, we sequenced and compared the metagenomes of BRD‐ and CD‐fed CRC mice, as well as CD‐fed wild‐type (WT) mice, at pre‐cancerous stage and tumor stage for both CRC models.
In the Apc Min/+ model, although the “Simpson Index” [29], used to measure species diversity in ecology, showed no differences among various dietary groups (Figure 3A), microbial composition variations were detected across different diet groups using the Bray–Curtis metric (Figure 3B), which is used to compare the similarity or dissimilarity between samples or communities [30]. To ascertain the specific bacterial changes associated with each diet group, we compared the BRD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice and CD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice, as well as the CD‐fed WT mice and CD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice, at 14 weeks (represents the precancerous stage) and 22 weeks (represents the tumor stage). We observed that B. uniformis were more abundant in the BRD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice and CD‐fed WT mice than CD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice (Figure 3C,D and Supporting Information S2: Table S2). Co‐occurrence analysis revealed that B. uniformis was negatively correlated with harmful bacteria of Escherichia coli [31], while positively correlated with probiotics of Lactobacillus johnsonii [32] and Lactobacillus reuteri [33], suggesting B. uniformis may play a beneficial role in slowing down CRC development (Figure 3E).
We also compared the metagenomes of GF‐BRD and GF‐CD mice. Principal co‐ordinates analysis results showed that the β‐diversity of microbes of GF‐BRD mice and GF‐CD mice exhibited differences (Supporting Information S1: Figure S2A). GF‐BRD mice exhibited enrichment of B. uniformis (Supporting Information S1: Figure S2B and Supporting Information S2: Table S3), supporting the beneficial role of B. uniformis in CRC development.
In the AOM/DSS CRC model, the BRD group presented increased Shannon and Simpson indices (Supporting Information S1: Figure S3A), representing higher alpha diversity at both the pre‐cancerous stage (following the first DSS treatments) and tumor stage (following the third DSS treatments). Bray–Curtis distance analysis revealed differences between the BRD and CD (Supporting Information S1: Figure S3B), suggesting that the BRD enhanced gut microbial diversity and altered their composition. Similar to the Apc Min/+ model, in tumor stage, B. uniformis was more abundant in CD‐fed WT mice and BRD‐fed CRC mice than CD‐fed CRC mice, while pathogenic E. coli was less abundant in CD‐fed WT mice and the BRD‐fed mice (Supporting Information S1: Figure S3C,D and Supporting Information S2: Table S4).
Additionally, co‐occurrence analysis demonstrated that B. uniformis was positively correlated with beneficial L. johnsonii and negatively correlated with harmful E. coli (Supporting Information S1: Figure S3E), suggesting again the advantageous effects of B. uniformis in CRC development.
B. uniformis is a potential beneficial bacterium in patients with CRC
To explore whether B. uniformis also potentially plays a role in CRC development in humans, we analyzed six sets of published metagenome data to determine human intestinal bacterial abundance. Following a unified process, our meta‐analysis revealed that B. uniformis was more abundant in healthy individuals compared to patients with CRC (Figure 3F), suggesting the advantageous effects of B. uniformis in patients with CRC.
Additionally, we studied the effects of B. uniformis by coculture experiments with two distinct human CRC cell lines, SW620 and HCT116. Compared with cells cocultured with E. coli or blank control, cells cocultured with B. uniformis showed slower growth (Figure 3G), supporting again that B. uniformis may suppress CRC development in human.
BRD altered intestinal metabolite composition and enhanced tryptophan metabolism pathway
To investigate the alterations in host and microbiota metabolism in response to different diet‐mediated microbial changes, we conducted fecal metabolic profiling of Apc Min/+ and AOM/DSS models at the pre‐cancerous stage and tumor stage.
In Apc Min/+ cancer model, principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrated that samples were clustered according to different diets, indicating that metabolite composition varied between BRD‐fed mice and CD‐fed mice (Figure 4A). To ascertain the differential metabolite associated with each diet group, we compared the BRD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice and CD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice, as well as the CD‐fed WT mice and CD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice, at 14 weeks and 22 weeks. A total of 203 common differentially metabolites were identified between CD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice and BRD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice, as well as between CD‐fed WT mice and CD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice (Figure 4B and Supporting Information S2: Table S5). Among them, indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid, were both among the top upregulated outlier metabolites in BRD‐fed mice at 14 weeks and 22 weeks (Figure 4B). Next, we classified the sources of these differentially metabolites. The results found that, in addition to other types, metabolites from microorganisms, hosts, and shared metabolites accounted for most of the remaining metabolites (15.30%) (Figure 4C). Enrichment analysis of co‐upregulated metabolites from the BRD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice and CD‐fed WT mice revealed that the tryptophan metabolism pathway was enhanced (Figure 4D). l‐tryptophan, indole, and indole‐3 lactic acid within this pathway are considered metabolites of host‐microbial cross‐talk and are enriched under the influence of the BRD‐diet mice (Figure 4E). In addition, the spearman correlation coefficient showed that the three metabolites were positively correlated with B. uniformis (Figure 4F), which confirmed that all three could participate in the tryptophan metabolism pathway through the MetOrigin database (Supporting Information S2: Table S6).
To corroborate the generalizability of these findings, we assessed the metabolome of the AOM/DSS model in a similar manner. The results aligned with those from the Apc Min/+ model, as PCA highlighted the substantial differences between the BRD and CD Supporting Information S1: Figure S4A). In total, 828 differential metabolites were identified during periods of inflammation and cancer between the BRD‐fed AOM/DSS mice and CD‐fed AOM/DSS mice, as well as between the CD‐fed WT mice and CD‐fed AOM/DSS mice (Supporting Information S1: Figure S4B and Supporting Information S2: Table S7). Among them, indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid were both one of the top upregulated outlier metabolites in BRD‐fed AOM/DSS mice (Supporting Information S1: Figure S4B). Notably, 24.95% of the differential metabolites originated from microbes, hosts, and both (Supporting Information S1: Figure S4C). In agreement with previous findings, these metabolites were also implicated in the tryptophan metabolic pathway (Supporting Information S1: Figure S4D).
To further elucidate the impact of the BRD on the host mice, serum metabolism was investigated. PCA results revealed that the metabolites in serum affected by the BRD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice and the CD‐fed Apc Min/+ mice displayed substantial differences at 22 weeks (Supporting Information S1: Figure S5A). A total of 223 metabolites exhibited significant disparities between the two groups (Supporting Information S1: Figure S5B and Supporting Information S2: Table S8), of which 31.82% originated from microorganisms and host‐microorganism sharing (Supporting Information S1: Figure S5C). Concentration analysis of the aforementioned serum metabolites demonstrated that tryptophan metabolism remained enriched in the BRD‐fed mice (Supporting Information S1: Figure S5D). These findings suggest that the BRD activates the tryptophan metabolism pathway involved in microbe–host cross‐talk, which may be one of the essential factors influencing the intestinal health of the host.
Indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid inhibit cell proliferation and cell junction impairment
To investigate the possible functional functions of metabolites altered by BRD in the development of CRC, two CRC cell lines were exposed to various metabolites. Levels of indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid were higher in mice fed with BRD than those in mice fed with CD. Coculture tests demonstrated that both indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid exerted inhibitory effects on cell growth in CRC cell lines HCT116 and SW620, as illustrated in Figure 5A and Supporting Information S1: Figure S6A–C, respectively. Meanwhile, cell cycle analysis showed that indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid treatment moderated cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase in HCT116 and SW620 cells compared with vehicle controls (Figure 5B and Supporting Information S1: Figure S6D–F). Consistent with these observations, downregulated protein expressions of PCNA and cyclin D1 were identified upon indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid treatment in CRC cell lines (Figure 5C and Supporting Information S1: Figure S6G–I). Furthermore, we examined whether indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid could affect epithelial barrier function. Increased protein expressions of occludin and claudin‐3 were observed in indole‐treated and Indole‐3‐lactic acid‐treated HCT116 and SW620 cells compared with their vehicle controls, inferring that indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid could protect barrier function (Figure 5D and Supporting Information S1: Figure S6J–L). The collective findings suggest that BRD hinders the progression of CRC, partially by increasing the levels of the anticancer metabolites indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid.
Indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid activate host aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) to inhibit CRC development
Indole, a metabolite derived from tryptophan metabolism by gut microbiota, has been shown to activate the AHR in the host [34]. AHR is a ligand‐activated transcription factor that regulates the expression of various genes involved in detoxification, cell proliferation, and immunity [35]. Activation of AHR by indole has been associated with inhibition of CRC development [36].
To obtain the core target genes of AHR and their functional information, 7497 target genes enriched in the vicinity of transcription start site (TSS) by 5000 bp upstream and downstream were downloaded from GTRD (http://gtrd.biouml.org/), and genes with site‐Count > 2 were considered as the core target genes of AHR, totaling 2805 genes (Supporting Information S1: Figure S7A). Subsequently, we explored the expression patterns of AHR downstream target genes. Using k‐means clustering method, we categorized these genes into four clusters based on expression patterns in three groups of intestinal samples (WT, CD, and BRD). Among these clusters, two interesting clusters of genes come into view. Cluster2 exhibited a pattern where gene expression was higher in the WT and BRD‐fed mice compared to the CD‐fed mice. In contrast, cluster3 showed a pattern where gene expression was lower in the WT and BRD‐fed mice (Figure 5E). After extracting genes from these two clusters, pathway enrichment analysis was performed. Genes in cluster2 were enriched in pathways closely related to gut function, including tight junctions and glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis. On the other hand, genes in cluster3 were predominantly enriched in pathways associated with immune and inflammation, such as immune cell differentiation and receptor signaling, nuclear factor‐κB signaling, and phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase‐Akt signaling, indicating a close association between unregulated AHR target genes in response to the BRD and gut health.
To further validate whether the expression of downstream genes in the AHR signaling pathway is activated by indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid, this study conducted real‐time polymerase chain reaction to compare the gene expression levels between the CD‐fed and BRD‐fed mice. The results revealed upregulation of AHR downstream target genes, including Cyp1a1, Cyp1b1, Znrf3, Esr1, and Ptgs2, in the BRD‐fed mice (Figure 5F). Furthermore, in the colon tissues of germ‐free mice that received fecal transplants from mice in the BRD‐fed mice, we observed an elevated expression level of AHR downstream target genes Znrf3 and Cyp1b1 (Supporting Information S1: Figure S7B).
To further investigate whether indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid inhibit CRC development by activating the AHR signaling pathway, we selected the AHR pathway inhibitor CH‐223191 [37] to assess its effects on the proliferation of two CRC cell lines. Our findings revealed that the inhibitory properties of indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid on cellular proliferation were nullified upon the administration of CH‐223191 (Figure 5G and Supporting Information S1: Figure S8A). Additionally, the inhibitory effect of indole and Indole‐3‐lactic acid on cell cycle progression was eliminated upon the addition of inhibitors (Figure 5H and Supporting Information S1: Figure S8B), suggesting that indole inhibits the proliferation of CRC cells through the activation of the AHR pathway.
Furthermore, we investigated whether the inhibition of the AHR signaling pathway affects gut barrier function. We found that the expression of occludin and claudin‐3 proteins was increased in indole‐treated and indole‐3‐lactic acid‐treated HCT116 and SW620 cells (Figure 5I and Supporting Information S1: Figure S8C). Additionally, the protective effect of indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid on gut barrier function was eliminated upon the addition of inhibitors suggesting that indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid protect intestinal barrier function through the activation of the AHR pathway (Figure 5I and Supporting Information S1: Figure S8C). These findings provide additional evidence supporting the idea that BRD modulates gut microbiota in a manner that promotes the activation of the AHR signaling pathway, ultimately contributing to the attenuation of CRC development.
DISCUSSION
Gut microbiota disorder is one of the potential factors in the pathogenesis of CRC. Dysregulation of intestinal microbiota can increase intestinal mucosa permeability, aggravate intestinal mucosal epithelium damage, and ultimately lead to the deterioration of intestinal tumors [26, 38, 39]. Gut microbiota, shaped by lifestyle and nutritional habits, may play a key role in CRC pathogenesis [39]. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of BRD on intestinal microbiota and metabolism in colon cancer mouse models and their adverse effects on the host, with the goal of regulating tumor development progression (Figure 6).
Black rice, a pigmented rice variant, is abundant in various nutritional and bioactive constituents. The components of this include necessary amino acids, effective fats, dietary fiber, a variety of vitamins and minerals, anthocyanins, phenolic compounds, γ‐oryzanols, tocopherols, tocotrienols, phytosterols, and phytic acid. These diverse constituents contribute to the health‐promoting attributes of black rice, rendering it a valuable dietary component for maintaining overall well‐being [40, 41]. Dietary fiber plays a role in the prevention and treatment of CRC. The consumption of whole grains was found to have a preventive effect, resulting in a modest decrease in the risk of developing CRC [7]. The main functions of dietary fiber are as follows: promotes bowel movement, beneficial gut flora balance, reduces cholesterol, and stabilizes blood sugar levels, antioxidant, and anti‐inflammatory effects [42, 43, 44]. Not only dietary fiber in black rice but also the abundant anthocyanins have a potential preventive and inhibitory effect on the development of CRC. The anthocyanins can inhibit the proliferation of colon cancer cells, protect the intestinal barrier function, and suppress the levels of inflammation in the serum, thus preventing and blocking the occurrence and development of CRC [45, 46].
In the present study, we observed that mice consuming a BRD displayed a reduction in body weight compared to control groups in both Apc Min/+ and AOM/DSS CRC mouse models. Moreover, BRD‐fed mice exhibited a decreased number and size of intestinal adenomas, enhanced integrity of the gut barrier structure, ameliorated gut barrier function, diminished pro‐inflammatory cytokine levels, and elevated anti‐inflammatory cytokine levels. In addition, findings from fecal microbiota transplantation experiments demonstrate that germ‐free mice receiving fecal microbiota from the BRD group had a more complete intestinal barrier function when compared to germ‐free mice receiving the CD group mice. These results suggest that BRD can regulate gut microbial homeostasis to some extent and potentially mitigate the progression of CRC tumors in CRC mouse models.
Next, we revealed that BRD‐fed mice and CD‐fed mice exhibit distinct microbiota composition. We found that BRD increased the number of beneficial gut bacteria in both models, including B. uniformis and Lactobacillus. Studies have demonstrated its ability to reduce high‐fat diet‐induced metabolic changes, improve dendritic cell antigen presentation, and affect the proliferation of CD cells in obesity models, as well as reduce inflammation [47, 48, 49, 50]. Moreover, it has been reported to be more abundant in the feces of healthy volunteers than patients with CRC and increased in a fiber‐rich environment [47, 51]. By analyzing six public data sets, we also verified the conservation of this bacterium in human and mouse guts and its greater enrichment in healthy volunteers. To demonstrate a causal relationship between pathogenic microbiota and disease phenotype, we further evaluated the effects of BRD‐ and CD‐mediated intestinal microbiota on germ‐free mouse guts. The results showed that BRD‐mediated intestinal microbiota induced a less severe degree of intestinal cancer and a more intact intestinal barrier function. Notably, B. uniformis remained more abundant in the black rice fecal microbiota transplantation group. Anthocyanins and anthocyanin monomers derived from black rice have demonstrated prebiotic activity [52, 53]. To further investigate the potential reasons for the enrichment of B. uniformis in the BRD group, we first performed targeted anthocyanin sequencing to examine the black rice extract and diet. The results showed that cyanidin‐3‐glucoside was the most abundant anthocyanin component in both the black rice extract and diet. Addition of an appropriate amount of C3G to the B. uniformis culture medium promoted its growth. These findings suggest that C3G may be a key factor contributing to the enrichment of B. uniformis in the BRD group. Furthermore, both cancer cell lines SW620 and HCT116 exhibited suppressed growth under B. uniformis treatment. These results suggest that black rice inhibits colon cancer development by promoting B. uniformis proliferation.
Lactobacillus gallinarum produces and breaks down l‐tryptophan, releasing ILA, to fight CRC [54]. In our study, the tryptophan metabolic pathway was enriched in healthy, BRD, and WT groups, and related metabolites such as tryptophan, indole, and indole‐3‐lactic acid were utilized and produced by both Lactobacillus and B. uniformis. Indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid are compounds that naturally exist in foods such as vegetables, fruits, grains, and meats and have certain anticancer effects [54, 55]. Indole activates the Nrf2 signaling pathway to promote the self‐repair ability of intestinal mucosal cells and reduce the damage of harmful substances to the intestines [56]. At the same time, indole can also inhibit the Wnt signaling pathway to suppress the growth of intestinal tumors [57]. Indole‐3‐lactic acid also has an anti‐CRC effect, mainly by activating the AHR signaling pathway. Indole‐3‐lactic acid can bind to AHR receptors, thereby activating the AHR signaling pathway, inhibiting the growth and spread of CRC cells, and reducing the incidence of CRC [58]. Moreover, indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid inhibited cancer cell growth in our study. These findings suggest that B. uniformis and Lactobacillus may play a synergistic beneficial role through their metabolites in a BRD.
Furthermore, we investigated the mechanisms through which indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid affect the host. The relationship between the AHR pathway and the development of CRC has been widely studied [36, 59]. AHR activation has been shown to have both protumorigenic and anti‐tumorigenic effects, depending on the context and stage of cancer development. AHR activation can promote tumor growth by inducing the expression of genes involved in cell proliferation and survival, angiogenesis, and inflammation. On the other hand, AHR activation can also have anti‐tumorigenic effects by promoting the differentiation and activation of immune cells that can target and eliminate cancer cells [60]. In this study, we found that AHR and its downstream target genes were upregulated in the BRD‐fed mice at the intestinal gene transcription level. The inhibitory effect of indole disappeared with the addition of AHR pathway inhibitors, indicating that black rice‐enriched indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid acted as an AHR ligand to activate the AHR pathway, thus alleviating CRC development.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, our study uncovers that BRD suppressed colorectal development in both Apc Min/+ and AOM/DSS mice when compared to CD‐fed mice, and it prolonged the life span of CRC model mice. Our findings suggest that BRD may protect against intestinal development by promoting a protective gut microbiome and metabolite profile, which can counteract gut microbial dysbiosis and safeguard gut barrier function in CRC model mice. The results also suggest the great potential value of whole‐grain staple food, especially the black rice staple food, in human health.
METHODS
The BRD
According to the AIN‐93M diets [61], a formula for purified diet used for mice was designed. Firstly, the composition of the rice produced in the current year was determined to ascertain the content of protein, calcium, phosphorus, and other components. Subsequently, the formula was balanced using reference ingredients provided by the AIN‐93M diets. The diet was manufactured by Readydietech Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, China. The rice was first mixed with drikold and then ground into powder at 4°C. It was then uniformly mixed with ingredients such as casein and subjected to extrusion and granulation at room temperature. After granulation, the diet was dried at 32°C for 18 h to ensure presence of 12% moisture content, followed by vacuum packaging and irradiation sterilization and storage at −20°C. The rice used for diet production is produced annually, the ingredients are provided by the company, and diet production is conducted every 3 months to ensure freshness and quality. The detailed feed nutrient formula is displayed in Supporting Information S2: Table S1.
Conventional CRC mouse models
In the AOM/DSS model, 4‐week‐old C57BL/6 mice (Hunan SJA Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd) were acquired and subjected to a 1‐week adaptive feeding period before being randomly divided into two groups based on their body weight, receiving either a BRD (Readydietech Co., Ltd) (45 mice per group) or a CD (45 mice per group). The mice were given an intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg/kg AOM (Merck) at 8 weeks of age. This was followed by three cycles of DSS (MP Biomedicals) administration to model colitis‐associated CRC [62]. Each cycle consisted of 7 days with 2.0% DSS‐supplemented drinking water, followed by 14 days of regular water. The Apc Min/+ mice were provided by a national rodent seed center (SJA Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd). AOM/DSS mice used for phenotypic experiments were euthanized at day 156, and Apc Min/+ models were killed at Day 154 under anesthesia to collect serum and various tissue samples from each group. According to European Directive 2010/63, animals of the same sex (four mice per cage) should be housed in pairs during testing to ensure their social needs are met. The spatial arrangement of the mice within the same group was randomized. The mice were kept in a controlled environment with a specific‐pathogen‐free condition and a 12 h cycle of light and darkness. All procedures complied with the guidelines approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University.
Life span measurement
The Apc Min/+ mice used for survival rate statistics were randomly divided into a BRD group (n = 35) and a control group (n = 37). After a 2‐week adaptation feeding period, they were respectively fed with black rice feed and control group feed. During the life span statistics, we only recorded the life spans of Apc Min/+ mice that developed CRC (the mice in each group were used to determine survival rates until 34 weeks of age) [63]. Autopsies were performed on the intestines to verify the existence of tumors. Mice were killed if they met any of the following criteria: (1) inability to feed or drink, (2) bleeding from a tumor or other ailment, or (3) being laterally recumbent, meaning they did not respond to stimulation or were unable to regain an upright position [64].
Germ‐free mouse models
To investigate the direct impact of gut microbiota modulated by a BRD on healthy colonic mucosa, germ‐free BALB/c mice (Gempharmatech Co., Ltd) at 8 weeks of age were divided into two groups (seven mice per group) and maintained on a CD. The mice were then gavaged with fecal samples obtained from either BRD‐fed or CD‐fed mice. In summary, 1 g of stool samples was thoroughly mixed in 5 mL of phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS). The recipient mice were subsequently transplanted with 200 μL of the solution utilizing gastric gavage. In the first week, fecal microbiota transplantation is conducted daily. In the second week, it is done three times a week, and in the subsequent weeks, it is administered once a week. Animals were killed at 8 weeks postgavage.
Shotgun metagenomics sequencing and analysis
After conducting Sample Quality Control, 500 nanograms of meta‐DNA was fragmented using ultrasound using a Covaris E220 instrument from Covaris, located in Brighton, UK. The fragments were then selected to be within the size range of 300–700 bp using magnetic bead size selection. The DNA segments underwent repair and were then joined together with indexed adaptors. The ligation product was subjected to PCR amplification, followed by exon probe hybridization and streptavidin bead capture. The DNA that was captured was amplified using PCR and then transformed into a single‐stranded circular (ssCir) library. The ssCir library underwent rolling circle amplification to generate DNA nanoballs (DNBs). These DNBs were then loaded onto a flow cell and sequenced using the DNBSEQ Platform.
The fecal metagenomic shotgun sequences underwent quality filtering using the “—trimmomatic‐options” in Kneaddata (v0.10.0). Reads that were <50 nucleotides were excluded. Reads that had been filtered were aligned to the mouse genome (C57BL) using bowtie2 software and any mouse DNA present in the reads was subsequently eliminated. MetaPhlAn3 software, version 3.0.14, was utilized to measure the taxonomic makeup of microbial communities in all metagenomic samples. Additionally, HUMANn3 software version 3.0.1 was employed to examine the abundance of pathways and gene families [65]. LEfSe [66] was utilized to screen differential bacteria, considering candidates meeting the criteria with linear discriminant analysis > 2 and p < 0.05.
Metabolomics analyses and metabolite profiling
The ultra‐performance liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry raw data were transformed into mzXML format using the MSConvert tool (http://proteowizard.sourceforge.net/downloads.shtml) to facilitate subsequent analysis. Nonlinear retention time correction, peak filtration, and extraction were performed using the XCMS package in R (v3.4.1). The profile obtained, which includes the mass‐to‐charge ratio (m/z), retention time, and ion intensity, was subjected to additional analysis using the metaX package in R (v3.4.1). This analysis involved signal correction and peak normalization, which were carried out using quality control samples as a basis.
The missing value in the data was replaced with the smallest value, and then, only the metabolites with a quality control variance less than 0.2 were kept. The metabolomics data underwent logarithmic processing to approach a normal distribution. A t‐test was then employed to identify potential candidates, with the false discovery rate (FDR) p value to be less than 0.05 serving as one of the screenings criteria. The additional requirement was that the variable importance in projection score be >1, as determined by the orthogonal partial least‐squares discrimination analysis using the R package ropls (version 1.20.0) after standardized data [67]. The Spearman correlation was used to calculate the associations between different bacteria and metabolites. The ComplexHeatmap (v2.4.3) package was used to construct the heatmap R package [68]. Metabolite source categorization and metabolite enrichment study were conducted utilizing the MetOrigin database [69]. And the functional items of Deep MetOrigin Analysis confirmed the real association between metabolites and microorganisms and the network construction.
Public cohort metagenomics analysis
Public data for six colon cancer metagenomic sets [70, 71, 72, 73, 74] were downloaded from the curatedMetagenomicData R package [75] and samples for other diseases such as adenomas, type 2 diabetes, fatty liver, and hypertension were excluded from the available data sets. To ensure consistency and data quality, the above standard sample data were then rigorously filtered: (1) samples with low relative readings (≤1,000,000) were subsequently excluded, possibly due to low sequencing depth and contamination of host readings. (2) Removal of outliers and suspected contamination cases, including high species counts (species readings ≥ 50% of the total) and low species counts (species readings ≤ 0.01% * 1/n; N is the number of samples for different disease states in each study). (3) Species with low abundance are discarded (species read count ≤ 0.001 of total number). Public data metagenomic analysis adopts the meta‐analysis method, and the method of identifying major confounding factors is consistent with previous studies [76].
Indole and indole‐3‐lactic acid treatment, cell proliferation, and cell cycle analysis
Indole (catalog number HY‐W001132, MedChemExpressA) and indole‐3‐lactic acid (catalog number HY‐113099, MedChemExpress) were procured from MedChemExpress. CRC cell lines HCT116 and SW620 were seeded in 96‐well plates at 5000 cells/well. Cells were treated with PBS, or vehicle, or 2 μmol/L Indole, or 2 μmol/L Indole‐3‐lactic acid in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum for up to 2 days. For cell counting, cells were trypsinzed and counted daily.
For the analysis of the cell cycle, the cells were deprived of serum for 24 h and kept in DMEM supplemented with either 0.1% fatty acid‐free bovine serum albumin/vehicle or 2 μmol/L indole, or 2 μmol/L indole‐3‐lactic acid in 0.1% fatty acid‐free bovine serum albumin for 12 h. The cells were treated with 70% ethanol to immobilize them, then stained with propidium iodide, and finally examined using flow cytometry.
RNA sequencing and data analysis
FastQC (https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) was used to check the quality of the raw sequence fastq files. High‐quality pruning was performed using fastp (v0.23.2) [77]. Paired end reads were mapped to the reference genome of Ensembl (GRCm39) using HISAT2 (v2.2.1) [78]. SAMtools (v1.14) [79] is used to sort and index align BAM files. Reads were counted using the featureCounts program in the Subread (v2.0.1) [80] package. DESeq. 2 (v1.28.1) [81] was used to screen different groups of differential genes, while ClusterProfiler (v3.16.1) [82] was used for enrichment analysis.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0 (GraphPad Software Inc.) and R software, version 4.0.3. The comparison of categorical variables was performed by the χ 2 test. Nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to compare microbial differences between the three groups (WT, CD, and BRD groups). Standardized (Z‐score) data were used for metabolite analysis. The covariate effect of species diversity was examined by the multiple linear regression method. An intergroup difference test (permutational multivariate analysis of variance) was performed for the Euclidean distance of metabolites and the Bray–Curtis distance of bacteria. p < 0.05 and Benjamini–Hochberg corrected for FDR values were used for statistical significance. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to estimate microbe‐microbe or microbe‐metabolite correlation.
Additional methods are provided in the Supporting Information S1.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Ling Wang, Yi‐Xuan Tu, Lu Chen, Shao‐Zhong Wei, Xin‐Jun Liang, and Zhen‐Xia Chen conceived and designed the research. Ling Wang, Yi‐Xuan Tu, Yuan Zhang, Lu Chen, Shu‐Qiao Yang, Shuai‐Jie Zhang, Ke‐Chun, Yu, Shuo Song, Hong‐Li Xu, Zhu‐Cheng Yin, and Tang Tang performed experiments. Ling Wang, Yi‐Xuan Tu, and Yuan Zhang analyzed the data. Hong‐Kai Wang provided the mouse diets. Ling Wang, Yi‐Xuan Tu, and Zhen‐Xia Chen wrote the manuscript. All authors have read the final manuscript and approved it for publication.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors have declared no competing interests.
ETHICS STATEMENT
The ethics application (No. HZAUMO‐2022‐0146) was approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee of Huazhong Agricultural University.
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Fan Yao, Shuai Zhang, Hong Wei, Ying‐Jie Geng, Qian‐Lin Ni, Xin Fu, and all members of Chen Lab for helpful discussions. We also thank academician Qifa Zhang for providing the mouse diets. This study was supported by the Science and Technology Major Program of Hubei Province (2021ABA011), the Foundation of Hubei Hongshan Laboratory (2021hszd012, 2022hszd024, 2022hszd028), HZAU‐AGIS Cooperation Fund (SZYJY2021010), Research Projects of Biomedical Center of Hubei Cancer Hospital (2022SWZX02, 2022SWZX04), the Health Commission of Hubei Province Scientific Research Project (WJ2021Z001), the National Key Research & Developmental Program of China (2023YFF1001000), and Applied Basic Research Program of Wuhan Science and Technology Bureau (no. 2023020201010174).
Wang, Ling , Tu Yi‐Xuan, Chen Lu, Yu Ke‐Chun, Wang Hong‐Kai, Yang Shu‐Qiao, Zhang Yuan, et al. 2024. “Black Rice Diet Alleviates Colorectal Cancer Development through Modulating Tryptophan Metabolism and Activating AHR Pathway.” iMeta 3, e165. 10.1002/imt2.165
Ling Wang, Yi‐Xuan Tu, and Lu Chen contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Shao‐Zhong Wei, Email: weishaozhong@163.com.
Xin‐Jun Liang, Email: doctorlxj@163.com.
Zhen‐Xia Chen, Email: zhenxia.chen@hzau.edu.cn.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data sets generated in the current study are available in the National Genomics Data Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences/China National Center for Bioinformation (GSA: CRA008369 and OMIX: OMIX001920) and are publicly accessible at https://bigd.big.ac.cn/. Code and all analysis results can be found at https://github.com/Yichel518/Dietary-analysis-for-CRC. Supplementary materials (methods, figures, tables, scripts, graphical abstract, slides, videos, Chinese translated version, and update materials) may be found in the online DOI or iMeta Science http://www.imeta.science/.
REFERENCES
- 1. Siegel, Rebecca L. , Miller Kimberly D., Wagle Nikita S., and Jemal Ahmedin. 2023. “Cancer Statistics, 2023.” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 73: 17–48. 10.3322/caac.21763 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Donovan, Micah G. , Selmin Ornella I., Doetschman Tom C., and Romagnolo Donato F.. 2017. “Mediterranean Diet: Prevention of Colorectal Cancer.” Frontiers in Nutrition 4: 59. 10.3389/fnut.2017.00059 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Jones, Petra , Cade Janet E., Evans Charlotte E. L., Hancock Neil, and Greenwood Darren C.. 2017. “The Mediterranean Diet and Risk of Colorectal Cancer in the UK Women's Cohort Study.” International Journal of Epidemiology 46: 1786–1796. 10.1093/ije/dyx155 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Arima, Kota , Zhong Rong, Ugai Tomotaka, Zhao Melissa, Haruki Koichiro, Akimoto Naohiko, Lau Mai Chan, et al. 2022. “Western‐Style Diet, Pks Island‐Carrying Escherichia coli, and Colorectal Cancer: Analyses From Two Large Prospective Cohort Studies.” Gastroenterology 163: 862–874. 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.06.054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Dmitrieva‐Posocco, Oxana , Wong Andrea C., Lundgren Patrick, Golos Aleksandra M., Descamps Hélène C., Dohnalová Lenka, Cramer Zvi, et al. 2022. “β‐Hydroxybutyrate Suppresses Colorectal Cancer.” Nature 605: 160–165. 10.1038/s41586-022-04649-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Carroll, Kaitlin L. , Frugé Andrew D., Heslin Martin J., Lipke Elizabeth A., and Greene Michael W.. 2022. “Diet as a Risk Factor for Early‐Onset Colorectal Adenoma and Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.” Frontiers in Nutrition 9: 896330. 10.3389/fnut.2022.896330 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Schatzkin, Arthur , Mouw Traci, Park Yikyung, Subar Amy F., Kipnis Victor, Hollenbeck Albert, Leitzmann Michael F., and Thompson Frances E.. 2007. “Dietary Fiber and Whole‐Grain Consumption in Relation to Colorectal Cancer in the NIH‐AARP Diet and Health Study.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 85: 1353–1360. 10.1093/ajcn/85.5.1353 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Song, Mingyang , Garrett Wendy S., and Chan Andrew T.. 2015. “Nutrients, Foods, and Colorectal Cancer Prevention.” Gastroenterology 148: 1244–1260. 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.12.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Slavin, Joanne L. 2000. “Mechanisms for the Impact of Whole Grain Foods on Cancer Risk.” Journal of the American College of Nutrition 19: 300S–307S. 10.1080/07315724.2000.10718964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Cotterchio, Michelle , Boucher Beatrice A., Manno Michael, Gallinger Steven, Okey Allan, and Harper Patricia. 2006. “Dietary Phytoestrogen Intake is Associated with Reduced Colorectal Cancer Risk.” The Journal of Nutrition 136: 3046–3053. 10.1093/jn/136.12.3046 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Mazzola, G. 1965. “Treatment of Grave Neonatal Jaundice with Corticosteroids and Lysozyme.” Minerva Pediatrics 17: 1710–1712. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5860433 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sanjoaquin, Miguel A. , Allen Naomi, Couto Elisabeth, Roddam Andrew W., and Key Timothy J.. 2005. “Folate Intake and Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Meta‐Analytical Approach.” International Journal of Cancer 113: 825–828. 10.1002/ijc.20648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Bazzano, Lydia A. , Song Yiqing, Bubes Vadim, Good Carolyn K., Manson Joann E., and Liu Simin. 2005. “Dietary Intake of Whole and Refined Grain Breakfast Cereals and Weight Gain in Men.” Obesity Research 13: 1952–1960. 10.1038/oby.2005.240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Liu, Simin , Willett Walter C., Manson JoAnn E., Hu Frank B., Rosner Bernard, and Colditz Graham. 2003. “Relation Between Changes in Intakes of Dietary Fiber and Grain Products and Changes in Weight and Development of Obesity Among Middle‐Aged Women.” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 78: 920–927. 10.1093/ajcn/78.5.920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Wong, Sunny H. , and Yu Jun. 2019. “Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer: Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Applications.” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology and Hepatology 16: 690–704. 10.1038/s41575-019-0209-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Fu, Ting , Coulter Sally, Yoshihara Eiji, Oh Tae Gyu, Fang Sungsoon, Cayabyab Fritz, Zhu Qiyun, et al. 2019. “FXR Regulates Intestinal Cancer Stem Cell Proliferation.” Cell 176: 1098–1112. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Belcheva, Antoaneta , Irrazabal Thergiory, Robertson Susan J., Streutker Catherine, Maughan Heather, Rubino Stephen, Moriyama Eduardo H., et al. 2014. “Gut Microbial Metabolism Drives Transformation of MSH2‐deficient Colon Epithelial Cells.” Cell 158: 288–299. 10.1016/j.cell.2014.04.051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hou, Zhaohua , Qin Peiyou, Zhang Yan, Cui Songhuan, and Ren Guixing. 2013. “Identification of Anthocyanins Isolated From Black Rice (Oryza sativa L.) and Their Degradation Kinetics.” Food Research International 50: 691–697. 10.1016/j.foodres.2011.07.037 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kumari, Shivani . 2020. “Black Rice: An Emerging ‘Super Food’.” Pantnagar Journal of Research 18: 15. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Sagnik, Poddar , and Sourik Poddar. 2018. “Role of Black Rice in Health and Diseases.” International Journal of Health Sciences & Research 8: 241–248. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Kushwaha, Ujjawal . 2016. “Rice.” In Black Rice Research, History and Development (pp. 1–19). Cham: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-30153-2_1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Reeves, Philip G. , Nielsen Forrest H., and Fahey George C.. 1993. “AIN‐93 Purified Diets for Laboratory Rodents: Final Report of the American Institute of Nutrition Ad Hoc Writing Committee on the Reformulation of the AIN‐76A Rodent Diet.” The Journal of Nutrition 123: 1939–1951. 10.1093/jn/123.11.1939 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Bardou, Marc , Barkun Alan N., and Martel Myriam. 2013. “Obesity and Colorectal Cancer.” Gut 62: 933–947. 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-304701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Zeng, Zhicheng , Li Yuling, Pan Yangjian, Lan Xiaoliang, Song Fuyao, Sun Jingbo, Zhou Kun, et al. 2018. “Cancer‐Derived Exosomal miR‐25‐3p Promotes Pre‐Metastatic Niche Formation by Inducing Vascular Permeability and Angiogenesis.” Nature Communications 9: 5395. 10.1038/s41467-018-07810-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Gipson, Ilene K. 2016. “Goblet Cells of the Conjunctiva: A Review of Recent Findings.” Progress in Retinal and Eye Research 54: 49–63. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2016.04.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Arthur, Janelle C. , Perez‐Chanona Ernesto, Mühlbauer Marcus, Tomkovich Sarah, Uronis Joshua M., Fan Ting‐Jia, Campbell Barry J., et al. 2012. “Intestinal Inflammation Targets Cancer‐Inducing Activity of the Microbiota.” Science 338: 120–123. 10.1126/science.1224820 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Singh, Rasnik K. , Chang Hsin‐Wen, Yan Di, Lee Kristina M., Ucmak Derya, Wong Kirsten, Abrouk Michael, et al. 2017. “Influence of Diet on the Gut Microbiome and Implications for Human Health.” Journal of Translational Medicine 15: 73. 10.1186/s12967-017-1175-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kåhrström, Christina Tobin , Pariente Nonia, and Weiss Ursula. 2016. “Intestinal Microbiota in Health and Disease.” Nature 535: 47. 10.1038/535047a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Simpson, Eleanor H. 1949. “Measurement of Diversity.” Nature 163: 688. 10.1038/163688a0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Ricotta, Carlo , and Podani Janos. 2017. “On Some Properties of the Bray‐Curtis Dissimilarity and Their Ecological Meaning.” Ecological Complexity 31: 201–205. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2017.07.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Quaglio, Ana Elisa Valencise , Grillo Thais Gagno, De Oliveira Ellen Cristina Souza, Di Stasi Luiz Claudio, and Sassaki Ligia Yukie. 2022. “Gut Microbiota, Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Colorectal Cancer.” World Journal of Gastroenterology 28: 4053–4060. 10.3748/wjg.v28.i30.4053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wang, Chung‐Hsing , Yen Hung‐Rong, Lu Wen‐Li, Ho Hsieh‐Hsun, Lin Wen‐Yang, Kuo Yi‐Wei, Huang Yen‐Yu, Tsai Shin‐Yu, and Lin Hung‐Chih. 2022. “Adjuvant Probiotics of Lactobacillus salivarius subsp. Salicinius AP‐32, L. johnsonii MH‐68, and Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. Lactis CP‐9 Attenuate Glycemic Levels and Inflammatory Cytokines in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.” Frontiers in Endocrinology 13: 754401. 10.3389/fendo.2022.754401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Michels, Nathalie , Zouiouich Semi, Vanderbauwhede Bert, Vanacker Judith, Indave Ruiz B. Iciar, and Huybrechts Inge. 2022. “Human Microbiome and Metabolic Health: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.” Obesity Reviews 23: e13409. 10.1111/obr.13409 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Dong, Fangcong , and Perdew Gary H.. 2020. “The Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor as a Mediator of Host‐Microbiota Interplay.” Gut Microbes 12: 1859812. 10.1080/19490976.2020.1859812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Stockinger, Brigitta , Shah Kathleen, and Wincent Emma. 2021. “AHR in the Intestinal Microenvironment: Safeguarding Barrier Function.” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 18: 559–570. 10.1038/s41575-021-00430-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zhang, Xin , Liu Xiuting, Zhou Wei, Du Qianming, Yang Mengdi, Ding Yang, and Hu Rong. 2021. “Blockade of IDO‐Kynurenine‐AhR Axis Ameliorated Colitis‐Associated Colon Cancer via Inhibiting Immune Tolerance.” Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology 12: 1179–1199. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.05.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Zhao, Bin , DeGroot Danica E., Hayashi Ai, He Guochun, and Denison Michael S.. 2010. “CH223191 is a Ligand‐Selective Antagonist of the Ah (Dioxin) Receptor.” Toxicological Sciences 117: 393–403. 10.1093/toxsci/kfq217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Cheng, Yiwen , Ling Zongxin, and Li Lanjuan. 2020. “The Intestinal Microbiota and Colorectal Cancer.” Frontiers in Immunology 11: 615056. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.615056 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Montalban‐Arques, Ana , and Scharl Michael. 2019. “Intestinal Microbiota and Colorectal Carcinoma: Implications for Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy.” EBioMedicine 48: 648–655. 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.09.050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Ito, Vivian Cristina , and Lacerda Luiz Gustavo. 2019. “Black Rice (Oryza sativa L.): A Review Of Its Historical Aspects, Chemical Composition, Nutritional and Functional Properties, and Applications and Processing Technologies.” Food Chemistry 301: 125304. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125304 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Zhang, Qifa . 2021. “Purple Tomatoes, Black Rice and Food Security.” Nature Reviews Genetics 22: 414. 10.1038/s41576-021-00359-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Chen, Hsiao‐Ling , Cheng Han‐Chung, Wu Wen‐Tsu, Liu Yann‐Jiu, and Liu Su‐Yuan. 2008. “Supplementation of Konjac Glucomannan Into a Low‐Fiber Chinese Diet Promoted Bowel Movement and Improved Colonic Ecology in Constipated Adults: A Placebo‐Controlled, Diet‐Controlled Trial.” Journal of the American College of Nutrition 27: 102–108. 10.1080/07315724.2008.10719681 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Deehan, Edward C. , Yang Chen, Perez‐Muñoz Maria E., Nguyen Nguyen K., Cheng Christopher C., Triador Lucila, Zhang Zhengxiao, Bakal Jeffrey A., and Walter Jens. 2020. “Precision Microbiome Modulation With Discrete Dietary Fiber Structures Directs Short‐Chain Fatty Acid Production.” Cell Host & Microbe 27: 389–404. 10.1016/j.chom.2020.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Bishehsari, Faraz , A. Engen Phillip, Z. Preite Nailliw, E. Tuncil Yunus, Naqib Ankur, Shaikh Maliha, Rossi Marco, et al. 2018. “Dietary Fiber Treatment Corrects the Composition of Gut Microbiota, Promotes SCFA Production, and Suppresses Colon Carcinogenesis.” Genes 9: 102. 10.3390/genes9020102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Zhao, Xin , Feng Panfeng, He Wenqian, Du Xing, Chen Chao, Suo Lianhuan, Liang Min, Zhang Na, Na An, and Zhang Yan. 2020. “The Prevention and Inhibition Effect of Anthocyanins on Colorectal Cancer.” Current Pharmaceutical Design 25: 4919–4927. 10.2174/1381612825666191212105145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. de Sousa Moraes, Luís F. , Sun Xiaofei, Peluzio Maria do C. G., and Zhu Mei‐Jun. 2019. “Anthocyanins/Anthocyanidins and Colorectal Cancer: What is Behind the Scenes?” Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 59: 59–71. 10.1080/10408398.2017.1357533 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. López‐Almela, Inmaculada , Romaní‐Pérez Marina, Bullich‐Vilarrubias Clara, Benítez‐Páez Alfonso, Del Pulgar Eva M. Gómez, Francés Rubén, Liebisch Gerhard, and Sanz Yolanda. 2021. “ Bacteroides iniformis Combined with Fiber Amplifies Metabolic and Immune Benefits in Obese Mice.” Gut Microbes 13: 1–20. 10.1080/19490976.2020.1865706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Fabersani, Emanuel , Portune Kevin, Campillo Isabel, López‐Almela Inmaculada, la Paz Sergio Montserrat‐de, Romaní‐Pérez Marina, Benítez‐Páez Alfonso, and Sanz Yolanda. 2021. “ Bacteroides uniformis CECT 7771 Alleviates Inflammation Within the Gut‐Adipose Tissue Axis Involving TLR5 Signaling in Obese Mice.” Scientific Reports 11: 11788. 10.1038/s41598-021-90888-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Agustí, Ana , Campillo Isabel, Balzano Tiziano, Benítez‐Páez Alfonso, López‐Almela Inmaculada, Romaní‐Pérez Marina, Forteza Jerónimo, Felipo Vicente, Avena Nicole M., and Sanz Yolanda. 2021. “ Bacteroides uniformis CECT 7771 Modulates the Brain Reward Response to Reduce Binge Eating and Anxiety‐Like Behavior in Rat.” Molecular Neurobiology 58: 4959–4979. 10.1007/s12035-021-02462-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Gauffin Cano, Paola , Santacruz Arlette, Moya Ángela, and Sanz Yolanda. 2012. “ Bacteroides niformis CECT 7771 Ameliorates Metabolic and Immunological Dysfunction in Mice With High‐Fat‐Diet Induced Obesity.” PLoS ONE 7: e41079. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041079 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Wang, Tingting , Cai Guoxiang, Qiu Yunping, Fei Na, Zhang Menghui, Pang Xiaoyan, Jia Wei, Cai Sanjun, and Zhao Liping. 2012. “Structural Segregation of Gut Microbiota Between Colorectal Cancer Patients and Healthy Volunteers.” The ISME Journal 6: 320–329. 10.1038/ismej.2011.109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Zhu, Yongsheng , Sun Hanju, He Shudong, Lou Qiuyan, Yu Min, Tang Mingming, and Tu Lijun. 2018. “Metabolism and Prebiotics Activity of Anthocyanins From Black Rice (Oryza sativa L.) In Vitro.” PLoS ONE 13: e0195754. 10.1371/journal.pone.0195754 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Sun, Hanju , Zhang Pingping, Zhu Yongsheng, Lou Qiuyan, and He Shudong. 2018. “Antioxidant and Prebiotic Activity of Five Peonidin‐Based Anthocyanins Extracted From Purple Sweet Potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.).” Scientific Reports 8: 5018. 10.1038/s41598-018-23397-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Sugimura, Naoki , Li Qing, Chu Eagle Siu Hong, Lau Harry Cheuk Hay, Fong Winnie, Liu Weixin, Liang Cong, et al. 2022. “ Lactobacillus gallinarum Modulates the Gut Microbiota and Produces Anti‐Cancer Metabolites to Protect Against Colorectal Tumourigenesis.” Gut 71: 2011–2021. 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323951 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Cui, Qingyu , Zhang Zhe, Tian Xiaoying, Liang Xi, Lu Youyou, Shi Yixin, Kuerman Malina, et al. 2023. “ Bifidobacterium bifidum Ameliorates DSS‐Induced Colitis in Mice by Regulating AHR/NRF2/NLRP3 Inflammasome Pathways Through Indole‐3‐lactic Acid Production.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 71: 1970–1981. 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c06894 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Li, Lei , Peng Peilan, Ding Ning, Jia Wenhui, Huang Canhua, and Tang Yong. 2023. “Oxidative Stress, Inflammation, Gut Dysbiosis: What Can Polyphenols Do in Inflammatory Bowel Disease?” Antioxidants 12: 967. 10.3390/antiox12040967 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Wyatt, Madhur , and Greathouse K. Leigh. 2021. “Targeting Dietary and Microbial Tryptophan‐Indole Metabolism as Therapeutic Approaches to Colon Cancer.” Nutrients 13: 1189. 10.3390/nu13041189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Nolan, Lila S. , Mihi Belgacem, Agrawal Pranjal, Gong Qingqing, Rimer Jamie M., Bidani Shay S., Gale Sarah E., et al. 2021. “Indole‐3‐Carbinol‐Dependent Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Signaling Attenuates the Inflammatory Response in Experimental Necrotizing Enterocolitis.” Immunohorizons 5: 193–209. 10.4049/immunohorizons.2100018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Zhao, Long , Wang Bo, Yang Changjiang, Lin Yilin, Zhang Zhen, Wang Shan, Ye Yingjiang, and Shen Zhanlong. 2021. “TDO2 Knockdown Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Progression via TDO2‐KYNU‐AhR Pathway.” Gene 792: 145736. 10.1016/j.gene.2021.145736 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Stockinger, Brigitta , Shah Kathleen, and Wincent Emma. 2021. “AHR in the Intestinal Microenvironment: Safeguarding Barrier Function.” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology 18: 559–570. 10.1038/s41575-021-00430-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Reeves, Philip G. 1997. “Components of the AIN‐93 Diets as Improvements in the AIN‐76A Diet.” The Journal of Nutrition 127: 838S–841S. 10.1093/jn/127.5.838S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Parang, Bobak , Barrett Caitlyn W., and Williams Christopher S.. 2016. “AOM/DSS Model of Colitis‐Associated Cancer.” Methods in Molecular Biology 1422: 297–307. 10.1007/978-1-4939-3603-8_26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Xie, Guoxiang , Wang Chong‐Zhi, Yu Chunhao, Qiu Yunping, Wen Xiao‐Dong, Zhang Chun‐Feng, Yuan Chun‐Su, and Jia Wei. 2015. “Metabonomic Profiling Reveals Cancer Chemopreventive Effects of American Ginseng on Colon Carcinogenesis in ApcMin/+ Mice.” Journal of Proteome Research 14: 3336–3347. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Hasty, Paul , Livi Carolina B., Dodds Sherry G., Jones Diane, Strong Randy, Javors Martin, Fischer Kathleen E., et al. 2014. “eRapa Restores a Normal Life Span in a FAP Mouse Model.” Cancer Prevention Research 7: 169–178. 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-13-0299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Beghini, Francesco , McIver Lauren J., Blanco‐Míguez Aitor, Dubois Leonard, Asnicar Francesco, Maharjan Sagun, Mailyan Ana, et al. 2021. “Integrating Taxonomic, Functional, and Strain‐Level Profiling of Diverse Microbial Communities with Biobakery 3.” Elife 10: e65088. 10.7554/eLife.65088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Segata, Nicola , Izard Jacques, Waldron Levi, Gevers Dirk, Miropolsky Larisa, Garrett Wendy S., and Huttenhower Curtis. 2011. “Metagenomic Biomarker Discovery and Explanation.” Genome Biology 12: R60. 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Thévenot, Etienne A. , Roux Aurélie, Xu Ying, Ezan Eric, and Junot Christophe. 2015. “Analysis of the Human Adult Urinary Metabolome Variations With Age, Body Mass Index, and Gender by Implementing a Comprehensive Workflow for Univariate and OPLS Statistical Analyses.” Journal of Proteome Research 14: 3322–3335. 10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Gu, Zuguang , Eils Roland, and Schlesner Matthias. 2016. “Complex Heatmaps Reveal Patterns and Correlations in Multidimensional Genomic Data.” Bioinformatics 32: 2847–2849. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Yu, Gang , Xu Cuifang, Zhang Danni, Ju Feng, and Ni Yan. 2022. “MetOrigin: Discriminating the Origins of Microbial Metabolites for Integrative Analysis of the Gut Microbiome and Metabolome.” iMeta 1: e10. 10.1002/imt2.10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Vogtmann, Emily , Hua Xing, Zeller Georg, Sunagawa Shinichi, Voigt Anita Y., Hercog Rajna, Goedert James J., Shi Jianxin, Bork Peer, and Sinha Rashmi. 2016. “Colorectal Cancer and the Human Gut Microbiome: Reproducibility With Whole‐Genome Shotgun Sequencing.” PLoS One 11: e0155362. 10.1371/journal.pone.0155362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Feng, Qiang , Liang Suisha, Jia Huijue, Stadlmayr Andreas, Tang Longqing, Lan Zhou, Zhang Dongya, et al. 2015. “Gut Microbiome Development Along the Colorectal Adenoma‐Carcinoma Sequence.” Nature Communications 6: 6528. 10.1038/ncomms7528 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Hannigan, Geoffrey D. , Duhaime Melissa B., Mack T., Ruffin IV , Koumpouras Charlie C., and Schloss Patrick D.. 2018. “Diagnostic Potential and Interactive Dynamics of the Colorectal Cancer Virome.” mBio 9. 10.1128/mBio.02248-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Thomas, Andrew Maltez , Manghi Paolo, Asnicar Francesco, Pasolli Edoardo, Armanini Federica, Zolfo Moreno, Beghini Francesco, et al. 2019. “Metagenomic Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Datasets Identifies Cross‐Cohort Microbial Diagnostic Signatures and a Link With Choline Degradation.” Nature Medicine 25: 667–678. 10.1038/s41591-019-0405-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Yachida, Shinichi , Mizutani Sayaka, Shiroma Hirotsugu, Shiba Satoshi, Nakajima Takeshi, Sakamoto Taku, Watanabe Hikaru, et al. 2019. “Metagenomic and Metabolomic Analyses Reveal Distinct Stage‐Specific Phenotypes of the Gut Microbiota in Colorectal Cancer.” Nature Medicine 25: 968–976. 10.1038/s41591-019-0458-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Pasolli, Edoardo , Schiffer Lucas, Manghi Paolo, Renson Audrey, Obenchain Valerie, Truong Duy Tin, Beghini Francesco, et al. 2017. “Accessible, Curated Metagenomic Data Through ExperimentHub.” Nature Methods 14: 1023–1024. 10.1038/nmeth.4468 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Wirbel, Jakob , Pyl Paul Theodor, Kartal Ece, Zych Konrad, Kashani Alireza, Milanese Alessio, Fleck Jonas S., et al. 2019. “Meta‐Analysis of Fecal Metagenomes Reveals Global Microbial Signatures That are Specific for Colorectal Cancer.” Nat Med 25: 679–689. 10.1038/s41591-019-0406-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Chen, Shifu , Zhou Yanqing, Chen Yaru, and Gu Jia. 2018. “fastp: An Ultra‐Fast All‐in‐One FASTQ Preprocessor.” Bioinformatics 34: i884–i890. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Kim, Daehwan , Langmead Ben, and Salzberg Steven L.. 2015. “HISAT: A Fast Spliced Aligner With Low Memory Requirements.” Nature Methods 12: 357–360. 10.1038/nmeth.3317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Danecek, Petr , Bonfield James K., Liddle Jennifer, Marshall John, Ohan Valeriu, Pollard Martin O., Whitwham Andrew, et al. 2021. “Twelve Years of SAMtools and BCFtools.” GigaScience 10. 10.1093/gigascience/giab008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Liao, Yang , Smyth Gordon K., and Shi Wei. 2013. “The Subread Aligner: Fast, Accurate and Scalable Read Mapping By Seed‐and‐Vote.” Nucleic Acids Research 41: e108. 10.1093/nar/gkt214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Love, Michael I. , Huber Wolfgang, and Anders Simon. 2014. “Moderated Estimation of Fold Change and Dispersion for RNA‐seq Data With DESeq2.” Genome Biology 15: 550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Wu, Tianzhi , Hu Erqiang, Xu Shuangbin, Chen Meijun, Guo Pingfan, Dai Zehan, Feng Tingze, et al. 2021. “clusterProfiler 4.0: A Universal Enrichment Tool for Interpreting Omics Data.” The Innovation 2: 100141. 10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100141 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data sets generated in the current study are available in the National Genomics Data Center, Beijing Institute of Genomics, Chinese Academy of Sciences/China National Center for Bioinformation (GSA: CRA008369 and OMIX: OMIX001920) and are publicly accessible at https://bigd.big.ac.cn/. Code and all analysis results can be found at https://github.com/Yichel518/Dietary-analysis-for-CRC. Supplementary materials (methods, figures, tables, scripts, graphical abstract, slides, videos, Chinese translated version, and update materials) may be found in the online DOI or iMeta Science http://www.imeta.science/.