ABSTRACT.
Angiostrongylus cantonensis is a globally distributed nematode and the leading cause of eosinophilic meningitis in humans. As a global hotspot for this disease, Hawaii’s agricultural exports may be contributing to the spread of A. cantonensis. Phytosanitary irradiation doses of 150 or 400 Gy provide quarantine security against multiple insect pests. We evaluated the in vitro and in vivo effects of phytosanitary irradiation on infectious, third-stage, A. cantonensis larvae. In vitro experiments directly exposed larvae to irradiation doses ranging from 200 to 1,000 Gy. Results showed low mortality and no dose response across all treatments 27 days post-irradiation. In vivo studies isolated larvae from wild-caught Parmarion martensi after exposure to x-ray irradiation at doses of 0, 150, and 400 Gy and infected them into laboratory rats. Fourteen rats were assigned to each treatment and infected with 50 larvae from their assigned irradiation dose. Results at 3 and 6 weeks post-infection demonstrated a significant negative dose response in regard to the number of larvae that migrated to the brain and adults found in the pulmonary artery. No irradiated larvae that grew into adults were able to produce eggs. These findings indicate that x-ray irradiation does not result in the direct mortality of A. cantonensis larvae; however, it does affect the infectivity and reproduction of A. cantonensis within its definitive host, the rat. Phytosanitary irradiation at doses ≥150 Gy appears to be an effective means of preventing the establishment of viable populations of A. cantonensis, thus reducing the potential for global spread due to agricultural exports from Hawaii.
INTRODUCTION
Neuroangiostrongyliasis (rat lungworm disease) is caused by the parasitic nematode Angiostrongylus cantonensis. The definitive host is the rat (primarily Rattus spp.), and completion of the life cycle of A. cantonensis requires an intermediate gastropod host (slugs and snails). First documented in Canton, China, in 1935, by 1944 A. cantonensis was known to cause human disease.1 Intentional or accidental ingestion of A. cantonensis contaminated food or water is thought to be the primary means of human infection.2–5 Additionally, paratenic hosts such as crustaceans, frogs, lizards, and planarians can also cause human infection.6 Outbreaks of eosinophilic meningitis attributed to A. cantonensis were reported in the Pacific Islands by the early 1960s.7 This parasite now has a global distribution, including the continental United States.8–13
Phytosanitary irradiation doses of up to 1,000 Gy (the unit of absorbed radiation energy) have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration to control quarantine pests and disinfest produce to protect U.S. agriculture, the environment, and importing economies from invasive plant and animal pests and diseases.14 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) approved 150- and 400-Gy doses for tephritid fruit flies and other insects, the International Plant Protection Convention has only adopted the 150-Gy dose for quarantine security.15 Irradiation easily penetrates food products, and regulatory protocols require that the minimum absorbed dose, either 150 or 400 Gy, is achieved throughout the product during commercial treatment.15 X-ray irradiation is used to control quarantine insect pests on some fresh fruits and vegetables exported from Hawaii to the U.S. mainland. With snails acting as intermediate hosts to A. cantonensis, one way to impede the establishment of viable parasite populations is to control species known to be efficient carriers of the nematode. Parmarion martensi, colloquially known as the semi-slug, is an abundant and efficient carrier of A. cantonensis, which has been found on Hawaii produce (e.g., sweet potatoes, taro leaves) exported to the U.S. mainland and was prioritized as a quarantine pest of concern in 2009 by the USDA.16 We have previously completed a study to determine whether irradiation can inhibit P. martensi reproduction and thereby reduce the risk of the establishment of P. martensi on the U.S. mainland and reduce the potential for transmission of A. cantonensis.17,18 Follett et al.18 found irradiation at 150 and 400 Gy caused reduced growth, a higher rate of mortality, and prevented reproduction in P. martensi. Their results were consistent with other snail irradiation studies, concluding that the 150-Gy generic dose may be effective against many snail species. However, the inability of a snail to establish viable populations may only retard the A. cantonensis lifecycle if a rat or other viable intermediate host consumes the snail,19 unless irradiation also affects the parasite within. The effects of irradiation on the life cycle of A. cantonensis within its definitive host have not been thoroughly examined with these generic doses.
Four studies have been conducted to evaluate the infection of irradiated A. cantonensis in rats. Lee20 was the first published report evaluating the antigenicity and immunogenicity of larvae irradiated at 20 and 40 Kr (200 and 400 Gy). Although multiple experiments were performed, they reported that infection was present in one of six rats infected with 400 larvae treated with 40 Kr (400 Gy) and two of two rats infected with 200 larvae treated with 20 Kr (200 Gy). They also reported that a dose of 20 Kr (200 Gy) resulted in the inability of young adult worms to reproduce. Ishii et al.21 irradiated first-stage (L1) A. cantonensisi larvae at doses ranging from 500 to 10,000 R (5–100 Gy) allowed them to develop to L3 in intermediate hosts, and then infected rats with the L3 larvae. They found a negative dose response in terms of overall recovery of adult worms, with some infection observed across all treatments. Their maximum dose of 100 Gy resulted in low infection levels and prevented reproduction with no eggs or L1 observed. After irradiating A. cantonensis infected snails at doses ranging from 250 to 1,000 Gy, Pai et al.22 infected rats and mice (a nonpermissive host) with both irradiated and nonirradiated L3 larvae. A dose of 250 Gy was sufficient to prevent the production of eggs in rats, and a dose of 500 Gy resulted in no worms or pathologic findings found in the heart–lung complex of rats, or brain tissue of mice. Ooi et al.23 only reported on infection levels in mice and rat brains or spinal cord after infection with x-ray– and gamma-ray–irradiated L3 larvae of A. cantonensis and a related species, A. costaricensis, at doses ranging from 500 to 4,000 Gy; no findings related to reproduction were reported. Necropsies occurring approximately 1-week postinfection (PI) found a dose response with a minimal dose of 2,000 Gy needed to inhibit infectivity. Overall, these studies show conflicting results regarding the irradiation dose required to prevent infection of A. cantonensis in rats completely but were consistent in that doses ≥100 Gy prevented reproduction with a lack of eggs or L1 larvae.
Although research has documented some species of nematodes to be quite tolerant of irradiation,24 the previous studies on A. cantonensis (summarized earlier) suggest that the USDA quarantine security dose of 150 or 400 Gy would be effective for quarantine security of this species, which is often accomplished by preventing the reproduction of a pest. The goal of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of x-ray irradiation in limiting A. cantonensis infectivity and reproduction in its definitive rat host at doses recommended for agricultural exports (150 and 400 Gy) from Hawaii. Necropsies at 3 and 6 weeks PI, as well as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis on brain and feces tissues allow for a more in-depth analysis of infection than previous studies.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In vitro irradiation of A. cantonensis larvae.
Angiostrongylus cantonensis larvae were isolated using techniques by Howe et al.5 from wild P. martensi semi-slugs that were collected from east Hawaii Island. Semi-slugs were drowned in 50-mL Falcon tubes (Falcon, Corning, NY) of municipal (tap) water in an air-conditioned laboratory kept at 22°C. After 3 days, nematodes with morphology and swimming behavior consistent with the A. cantonensis third-stage larvae (L3)25 were identified using stereoscopes (Leica Microsystems S9D, Deerfield, IL and Wild Heerbrugg M4A APO, HeerBrugg, Switzerland). Larvae were individually isolated from the water by pipette and placed in a glass Petri dish of fresh tap water. In total, 9,000 larvae were pooled, mixed, and “washed” twice with tap water to remove bacteria and other debris from the water as well as for better oxygenation. Washes were simply the transfer of larvae into fresh water by pipette, using as little water as possible from the previous dish to reduce debris. Early testing also showed that removal of debris was helpful in visualizing larvae during subsequent analysis with the propidium iodide assay.26
Larvae were divided into five technical replicates of 200 larvae for each treatment as independent measures of the x-ray irradiation treatment. Larvae destined to be x-ray irradiated were transferred into 15-mL conical Falcon tubes with 7 mL of tap water for each technical replicate. Three optichromic dosimeters (FWT-70-83M, Far West Technology, Goleta, CA) were used to confirm each irradiation dose, submerged in 7 mL of tap water in a 15-mL Falcon tube. An electron linear accelerator (5 MeV, model TB-5/15; Titan Corp., San Diego, CA) located at the Hawaii Pride commercial x-ray irradiation facility in Keaau, Hawaii, was used for irradiation. This facility was designed to apply low-dose irradiation for phytosanitation of fresh agricultural produce. The target irradiation doses were 0 (unirradiated control), 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1,000 Gy. To control dose uniformity (the ratio of the maximum/minimum dose), the test tube rack holding a single row of upright Falcon tubes with five larvae technical replicates and three dosimeters were placed perpendicular to the x-ray beam and elevated by placement on a fiberboard box and positioned in the center of the carrier for treatment at each dose. The dosimeters were placed at each end and in the middle of the rack, between the tubes of larvae. After irradiation treatment, dosimeters were read with an FWT-200 reader (Far West Technology) at 620-nm absorbance to measure dose accuracy and variation. Mean measured doses (plus range) were 204.1 (189–225), 420.9 (417–424), 603.3 (598–607), 812.0 (799–821), and 978.5 (969–986) Gy.
Parasite mortality was monitored for 23 days postirradiation using a propidium iodide assay.26 After irradiation, larvae were transferred into a 384-well glass-bottom plate (PerkinElmer, 6007460, Waltham, MA) in a total volume of 120 µL of tap water and a final concentration of 1× penicillin–streptomycin (Omega Scientific, PS-20, Tarzana, CA) and 1.25% propidium iodide stain (Biotium, 40017, Freemont, CA). Unirradiated larvae were used for live controls, dead controls, and genetic analysis. Methanol-frozen dead control larvae were used to confirm staining and visualization procedures.26 The plate was imaged every 2 to 3 days on an Operetta High Content Imaging System (Perkin Elmer, HH12000002) to check for propidium iodide staining of the larvae. Penicillin–streptomycin was added every 2 to 3 days to minimize bacteria growth, and the wells with notable water loss from evaporation were topped off. The plate of larvae was stored between imaging in a dark cabinet at an average temperature of 19.8°C with 74.7% relative humidity.
A few larvae in each treatment of the plate were observed moving under a stereoscope at 27 days postirradiation. All larvae were subsequently removed from the 384-well plate and transferred to a gridded Petri dish with 5 mL of fresh tap water, one dish per technical replicate. Each Petri dish was incubated under a stereoscope with a substage light for 5 minutes, and then the number of moving larvae was counted. To stimulate movement, 5 mL of a1% pepsin and 1.4% HCl solution was added to each Petri dish and swirled for a final concentration of 0.5% pepsin–0.7% HCL solution.5 The number of moving larvae was observed after a 5-minute incubation period in the pepsin-HCl solution.
In vivo irradiation of A. cantonensis and isolation from P. martensi (semi-slug).
Potentially infected wild semi-slugs (N = 148) were collected with permission from the landowners of nine locations on Hawaii Island (4–31 individuals per site) and reared for 1–3 days before irradiation at the University of Hawaii at Hilo Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy according to Hamilton et al.17 Semi-slugs from each collection site were divided as evenly as possible into rearing containers for the three irradiation dosage treatment groups of 0 Gy (n = 48), 150 Gy (n = 49), and 400 Gy (n = 51).
For treatment with irradiation, 2 to 3 semi-slugs were placed in Corning Falcon 50-mL conical centrifuge tubes with ventilated caps and transported to a commercial irradiation facility (RLH Hawaii Pride, Keaau, Hawaii) for treatment with x-rays using an electron linear accelerator (5 MeV, model TB-5/15; Titan Corp., San Diego, CA). To optimize dose uniformity (DUR, the ratio of the maximum/minimum dose), Falcon tubes with semi-slugs were placed in the center row of a 3 × 8 test tube rack which was elevated by placement on a plastic box (20 cm height) placed perpendicular to the x-ray beam and positioned in the center of the carrier. Dose mapping was conducted at 150 and 400 Gy with empty Falcon tubes to determine dose variation during treatment. For each dose, four optichromic dosimeters (FWT-70-83M, Far West Technology) were attached to the outer surface at four compass points around each of the three tubes positioned at the ends and in the middle of the test tube rack. Semi-slugs usually crawled to the tops of the tubes, so dosimeters were attached around the upper portion of the tubes. After determining the belt speed to deliver the target doses of 150 and 400 Gy from dose mapping, tubes with the semi-slugs were inserted into the test tube racks for irradiation treatment. During irradiation treatment of semi-slugs, three dosimeters were interspersed along the line of test tubes to confirm dose delivery at the predicted level, for example, within the range of doses determined from the extensive dose mapping. Optichromic dosimeters were read with an FWT-200 reader (Far West Technology) at 620-nm absorbance. The belt speed for the 150- and 400-Gy treatments was 0.366 m/minute and 0.143 m/minute, respectively, and the test tubes containing semi-slugs were treated from one side and then the other in a two-pass treatment. The mean measured doses (plus range) in the 150- and 400-Gy treatments were 155.9 (range 142–164.) Gy and 397.0 (range 372–412) Gy for a DUR of 1.11 to 1.15. Semi-slugs were returned to their rearing containers after irradiation for 24 hours until they were drowned in tap water in 50-mL Falcon tubes, individually, for larvae isolation after 3 days.5
On the fourth day post-irradiation, larvae were isolated from the water of the drowned semi-slugs at a designated station to avoid cross-contamination between treatments. Larvae were isolated in two ways; both individually using a pipette into glass Petri dishes with tap water and using a Baermann’s funnel filled with tap water. Overall, larvae were isolated from 16 semi-slugs of the 0-Gy treatment, and 15 semi-slugs of both the 150- and 400-Gy treatments; no larvae were found in the water of the other drowned semi-slugs. Larvae were pooled by treatment and “washed” to minimize debris and bacteria in the surrounding water column by individually isolating and transferring larvae to a new Petri dish of tap water by pipette. Only nematodes that resembled the morphology and swimming behavior of the third-larval stage (L3) of A. cantonensis were isolated.25 An antibiotic-antimycotic solution (Sigma A5955-100ML, Livonia, CA) was added to the pool of larvae to avoid bacterial and fungal growth at the recommended concentration of 10 mL/L. Larvae were stored for 24 hours, in a dark cabinet until the morning of gavage (6 days post-irradiation) when larvae were isolated into 1.5-mL microcentrifuge tubes, 50 larvae in 500 µL of tap water per tube, and 14 tubes were made per treatment. These larvae were then used to infect rats. Four extra tubes were made for genetic analysis to verify that A. cantonensis was present in the pool of larvae from each treatment. The remaining larvae, roughly 600 larvae per treatment, were transferred into a 384-well plate, along with methanol-frozen dead controls, and monitored for mortality using the propidium iodide assay analysis as described earlier. These larvae were not monitored for motility after the propidium iodide assay as were the in vitro larvae.
Experimental infection of rats with irradiated A. cantonensis.
Fifty-six outbred Wistar IGS laboratory rats (Rattus norvegicus) (Charles River Laboratory Inc, Raleigh, NC) were housed at the USDA-Animal Plant Health Inspection Service-National Wildlife Research Center (USDA-APHIS NWRC) Hawaii Field Station, Hilo, HI. Upon arrival, 8-week-old rats were weighed and allowed to acclimate for 7 days. Throughout the study, rats were maintained in individual polycarbonate shoebox cages, with ad libitum access to water in ball-stoppered bottles, and Laboratory Rodent Diet 5001 (LabDiet, St. Louis, MO) as well as occasional apples and carrots. The room was maintained at a mean temperature of 22.1°C (± 0.02 SE) and a 12:12 h light–dark cycle. With an equal sex ratio, rats were evenly divided across four treatment groups (n = 14 per treatment), which included an uninfected water control, 0- (unirradiated larvae), 150-, and 400-Gy larvae. Rats were infected at 13 days after arrival with A. cantonensis larvae that were 6 days after semi-slug irradiation by gavaging 500 µL of water either with or without larvae to rats according to their designed treatment groups. Individual, sterile gavage tubes (Instech Laboratories, 1-FTP-15-78 and 1-FTP-15-100) were used to deliver the 500 µL of water with or without A. cantonensis larvae to the designated rat.
To facilitate gavage, rats were anesthetized using a Tec III 300P vaporizer (Vaporizer Sales & Services, Rockmart GA) to administer a mixture of isoflurane-oxygen gas. To reduce exposure of personnel to isoflurane, all operations were carried out within a DWS36-A ductless fume hood (Air Science DWS Downflow Workstation, Fort Myers, FL). Initial anesthetization of each rat took place with a sealed APHIS-constructed plexiglass induction chamber with an oxygen flow rate of 2 to 3 LPM and isoflurane concentration of 2–4%.
After collection of final weight data, all rats were humanely euthanized in a CO2 chamber and necropsied. Seven rats (four females, three males) from each treatment (50%) were euthanized at 3 weeks (23–24 days) PI, and the remaining rats euthanized (three females, four males) at 6 weeks (44–45 days) PI. Dissection tools, trays, and tube racks for necropsy were decontaminated by a 10% bleach (Clorox 8.3% v/v sodium hypochlorite diluted 1:10) for 20 minutes, thoroughly rinsed under running tap water, and both sides of the tools exposed to UVC irradiation for either 20 minutes in a UV Crosslinker (UVP, CX-2000) or 60 minutes in a biosafety cabinet (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1387).27 Decontaminated tools were then packaged and sealed as sets in pouches (Fisher Scientific, 01-812-57), which included two forceps, a scalpel handle and blade, dissection scissors, pins, and a new plastic Petri dish. To avoid cross-contamination within and between rats, two clean sets of tools were used for each rat, one was used for the heart, lung, and feces collection and a second set was used for the brain dissection. Tissues were examined both externally and internally for A. cantonensis under microscopy using either a Leica or an Olympus stereoscope (10–50×). Adult A. cantonensis found in the heart/lung complex were placed in 200 µL of DNA lysis buffer (0.1M Tris-HCL, 0.1M EDTA, 2% SDS). Roughly equal proportions of the pulmonary artery, right ventricle, and upper right lobe of the lung were placed in a 2.0-mL microtube with six 2.3-mm zirconia/silica beads (BioSpec Products 11079125z), 0.2 g of 0.5 mm zirconia/silica beads (BioSpec Products, 11079105z), and 500 µL of DNA lysis buffer for bead mill homogenization. The frontal lobe of the brain and any whole larvae observed were placed in 2.0-mL microtubes as described above for bead mill homogenization. Feces were collected for only the 6-week euthanized rats and placed into empty 2.0-mL microtubes. All tissues were frozen at –80°C until processing.
Rats were imported under the State of Hawaii Department of Agriculture permit 22-05-H-L7086a, and all procedures in this study were approved by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (USDA-APHIS NWRC protocol QA-3346 and University of Hawaii protocol 21-3576) and the University of Hawaii Biosafety Committee (protocol 21-03-505-04), in accordance with the Guidelines of the American Society of Mammologists for the use of mammals in research.28
Genetic analyses.
Brain tissue from the 6-week necropsy was thawed on ice and homogenized using a Bead Ruptor Elite (Omni International, 19-2241E, Kennesaw, GA) for three cycles of 8,000 m/s for 1 minute, ice for 5 minutes, and centrifuged at 6,200 g for 3 minutes. DNA was extracted from the larvae and 100 µL of the homogenized brain samples using the Dneasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, 69504, Venlo, The Netherlands) per the respective manufacturer’s protocol with final elution volumes of 100 µL for larvae and 400 µL for brain tissue. DNA was extracted from the feces using the QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, 51604) per the manufacturer’s protocol with 100-µL final elution volume. PCR reactions were run on a QuantStudio 5 Real-Time PCR Instrument (A28134, Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA) with a species-specific multiplex assay, TaqMan Fast Advanced Master Mix (4444965, Applied Biosystems), and the recommended cycling conditions with the exception of using 50 instead of 40 cycles (L. M. Kaluna and S. I. Jarvi, unpublished data). Samples were analyzed using a 0.05 manual threshold and designated as positive based on the cycle threshold (CT value ≤40), negative (CT value 0), or equivocal (where replication of a positive PCR result was not demonstrated).
STATISTICAL ANALYSES
Statistical analyses were performed to investigate significant differences between irradiation treatments for 1) the number of live larvae after the 5 minutes of freshwater incubation in the in vitro experiments, 2) the number of live larvae following pepsin-HCl treatment in the in vitro experiments, 3) the number of larvae found in the brain of rats 3-week PI, 4) the number of adult worms found in the heart-lung complex of rats at 6 weeks PI. For statistical analysis of rat necropsy data, only data from the infected treatment groups were used (all water control rats were excluded from the analysis). Because most of the data was not normally distributed or did not have equal variances, nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for analysis. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for comparisons in the number of live larvae per treatment following a 5-minute incubation period in fresh water, and a two-way ANOVA was used to evaluate percent body weight gain among treatments in male and female rats at 3 and 6 weeks PI. Two-sample t tests were used to compare the number of A. cantonensis worms in the brain at 3 weeks and the heart/lung complex at 6 weeks after normality testing. Analyses were performed in Minitab v. 21 and a significance level of 0.05 was used.
RESULTS
In vitro irradiation of L3 A. cantonensis.
To determine the effects of x-ray exposure on A. cantonensis larvae, 200 larvae were directly exposed to irradiation at doses of 0, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1,000 Gy. Mortality of A. cantonensis larvae remained very low (<3.5%) for all irradiation doses up to 23 days postirradiation, with no observed dose-response. After 27 days postirradiation, a mean of eight to 18 larvae (4–9%) per treatment replicate were actively swimming in fresh tap water, which increased to 42 to 60 larvae (21–30%) per treatment replicate after exposure to the pepsin-HCl solution (Figure 1). Although exposure to pepsin-HCl clearly resulted in greater activation of the larvae, no significant differences were found across treatments for either the number of moving larvae after the 5-minute fresh tap water incubation (P = 0.155) or the pepsin-HCl solution (P = 0.382). The physiological state of the unstained, nonmobile larvae is unknown. Genetic analysis confirmed the presence of A. cantonensis DNA in sample pools used for testing.
In vivo irradiation of P. martensi (semi-slugs) for A. cantonensis isolation.
Similar to the in vitro irradiation propidium iodide assay results, there was almost no mortality observed (≤1.0%) up to 26 days postirradiation of A. cantonensis larvae isolated from semi-slugs exposed to x-ray irradiation for all irradiation doses (0, 150, and 400 Gy). All samples of nematodes saved for genetic analysis of each treatment were positive for A. cantonensis DNA.
Experimental infection of rats with irradiated A. cantonensis.
An equal number (50%) of rats in each treatment was humanely euthanized at 3 PI (n = 7), and the remaining seven rats were euthanized at 6 weeks PI. Larvae were observed in the brain at 3 weeks in all rats infected with 0-Gy larvae (7/7) and 150-Gy larvae (7/7) and most rats (4/7) infected with 400 Gy larvae. Whereas the number of rats with larvae observed in the brain at 6 weeks PI was three of seven in the 0-Gy treatment, four of seven in the 150-Gy treatment, and zero of seven in the 400-Gy treatment. The mean number of A. cantonensis larvae observed in the brain at 3 and 6 weeks PI, and the mean number of adult worms found in the heart-lung complex are shown in Figure 2. Significant differences were observed between infected treatment groups in both the number of larvae observed in the brain upon necropsy at 3 weeks (P = 0.000) and the heart-lung complex at 6 weeks (P = 0.000), with a clear decline corresponding with increasing irradiation dose. As expected, no larvae were detected in the heart–lung complex at 3 weeks (data not shown), and few to no larvae were detected in the brain at 6 weeks. No significant differences were found when comparing the number of A. cantonensis larvae found in the brain at 3 weeks verses adults in the heart–lung complex at 6 weeks in the 0 Gy (P = 0.236), 150 Gy (P = 0.228), or 400 Gy (P = 0.393) treatments. The mean number of larvae found in the brain tissue at 3 weeks was 13 (± 3 SD), 7 (± 1 SD), and 1 (± 1 SD) for the 0, 150 y, and 400 Gy treatments, respectively. Similarly, the mean number of adults found in the heart–lung complex at 6 weeks was 11 (± 3 SD), 5 (± 3 SD), and 1 (± 1 SD), in each respective treatment. Rat body weights were recorded at the start of the study, and at the 3- and 6-week necropsies. Males had significantly higher body weight at the start of the study than females (P <0.0001) (Supplemental Table 1). Mean percent body weight gain at 3 and 6 weeks for females and males was 39.6 (± 8.0 SD) and 57.6 (± 5.5 SD), and 50.0 (± 8.9 SD) and 86.9 (± 11.6 SD), respectively. The effect of treatment on percent weight gain was not significant at 3 weeks (P = 0.31) or 6 weeks (P = 0.75).
Details of infection within individual rats necropsied at 6 weeks are presented in Table 1, including the number of adult worms and presence of eggs or L1 found in the heart–lung complex, as well as the presence of L1 stage found in the feces. All L1 larvae present in the lungs and feces at 6 weeks PI were actively moving. No eggs or L1s were visually detected in the feces of the 150- and 400-Gy treatment groups. Also, in Table 1 the results of PCR detection of A. cantonensis DNA in brain tissue and feces at the 6-week necropsy are given. No amplification was seen in brain samples from control rats that received just water, but PCR amplification was observed among all rats (seven of seven) infected with larvae exposed to 0 Gy irradiation, five of seven rats infected with larvae exposed to 150-Gy irradiation, and six of seven rats infected with larvae exposed to 400-Gy irradiation. PCR amplification from fecal samples was not detected in the water control rats, nor rats subject to exposure to 150- and 400-Gy levels of irradiation, but amplification was detected in rats gavaged with larvae exposed to 0-Gy irradiation, indicating lack of reproduction among irradiated A. cantonensis larvae regardless of dose.
Table 1.
Necropsy Observations | Real-Time PCR Results | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Brain Tissue | Feces | ||||||||||||
Rat ID | Sex | Treatment | No. Adult Worms in Heart/Lungs | Eggs or L1s Present in Heart/Lungs | L1s Present in Feces | Mean CT | CT SD | No. Pos. Reps | Result | Mean CT | CT SD | No. Pos. Reps | Result |
Rat_025 | F | Water | 0 | No | No | 0.00 | – | 0 | N | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_026 | M | Water | 0 | No | No | 0.00 | – | 0 | N | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_027 | F | Water | 0 | No | No | 0.00 | – | 0 | N | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_028 | M | Water | 0 | No | No | 0.00 | – | 0 | N | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_098 | M | Water | 0 | No | No | 0.00 | – | 0 | N | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_101 | M | Water | 0 | No | No | 0.00 | – | 0 | N | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_108 | F | Water | 0 | No | No | 0.00 | – | 0 | N | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_017 | F | 0 Gy | 7 | Yes | No | 33.22 | 0.96 | 3 | P | 18.77 | 0.06 | 3 | P |
Rat_018 | M | 0 Gy | 10 | Yes | No | 29.30 | 0.20 | 3 | P | 19.36 | 0.07 | 3 | P |
Rat_019 | F | 0 Gy | 13 | Yes | Yes | 26.06 | 0.10 | 3 | P | 16.13 | 0.12 | 3 | P |
Rat_020 | M | 0 Gy | 12 | Yes | No | 18.49 | 0.04 | 3 | P | 20.87 | 0.04 | 3 | P |
Rat_046 | F | 0 Gy | 9 | Yes | No | 33.38 | 0.49 | 3 | P | 30.17 | 0.11 | 3 | P |
Rat_051 | M | 0 Gy | 16 | Yes | Yes | 26.57 | 0.07 | 3 | P | 19.85 | 0.02 | 3 | P |
Rat_053 | M | 0 Gy | 9 | Yes | Yes | 18.96 | 0.13 | 3 | P | 25.82 | 0.05 | 3 | P |
Rat_001 | F | 150 Gy | 1 | No | No | 0.00 | – | 0 | N | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_002 | M | 150 Gy | 8 | No | No | 29.70 | 0.46 | 3 | P | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_003 | F | 150 Gy | 2 | No | No | 17.53 | 0.04 | 3 | P | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_004 | M | 150 Gy | 10 | No | No | 17.81 | 0.05 | 3 | P | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_036 | M | 150 Gy | 5 | No | No | 37.08 | 1.81 | 2 | P | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_037 | M | 150 Gy | 4 | No | No | 18.27 | 0.02 | 3 | P | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_038 | F | 150 Gy | 4 | No | No | 0.00 | – | 0 | N | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_009 | F | 400 Gy | 1 | No | No | 39.54 | 1.72 | 2 | P | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_010 | M | 400 Gy | 2 | No | No | 37.90 | – | 1 | E | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_011 | F | 400 Gy | 1 | No | No | 38.41 | 2.01 | 3 | P | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_012 | M | 400 Gy | 0 | No | No | 21.44 | 0.07 | 3 | P | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_041 | M | 400 Gy | 0 | No | No | 32.46 | 0.07 | 3 | P | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_045 | F | 400 Gy | 1 | No | No | 31.28 | 0.03 | 3 | P | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
Rat_047 | M | 400 Gy | 0 | No | No | 39.26 | 3.78 | 2 | P | 0.00 | – | 0 | N |
PCR = polymerase chain reaction. Mean cycle threshold (CT) and cycle threshold standard deviation (CT SD) are reported. All real-time PCR samples were tested in triplicate, with results of negative (N), positive (P), or equivocal (E).
Additional observations were made regarding morphological abnormalities, where we observed but did not quantify that all adult worms recovered from both irradiated treatments exhibited retarded growth, discoloration, flaccidity, and sluggish motility in a dose–response manner. Sex determination in irradiated worms was challenging due to the absence of distinct intertwined uterus and intestine (Figure 3). The sex of adult worms was inferred based on the relative size of worms within a treatment, where female adult worms are substantially larger compared with male adult worms.29
DISCUSSION
Phytosanitary treatments such as irradiation are applied to fresh agricultural commodities to prevent the introduction and spread of quarantine or regulated pests and are often the simplest measure to overcome regulatory trade barriers and gain market access.30 Global trade volume of irradiated produce has increased nearly 10-fold from 2007 to 2019 to ∼47,000 tonnes.31,32 The volume of tropical fruits exported to the United States from foreign countries has grown steadily, with the main fruits including mangos (India, Pakistan, Mexico, and Australia); guava (Mexico), persimmons (South Africa); mangosteen (Thailand); and dragon fruit, longan, and rambutan (Vietnam). Domestically, Hawaii is exporting 5–6 tonnes of tropical fruits and vegetables to the United States mainland annually, with sweet potato being the main export. Australia recently began exporting a variety of irradiated fruits to New Zealand and several Southeast Asian countries and is currently the largest exporter of irradiated fresh produce. Irradiation is approved to treat fresh fruit for export in several countries where A. cantonensis has been confirmed including India, Thailand, China, Laos, and Dominican Republic.6,15
Results from this study show that although x-ray irradiation does not result in the direct mortality of A. cantonensis larvae, it does affect its ability to infect a rat (its definitive host) as well as its reproduction within the host if infection is successful. This is likely due to the energy imparted to the target by the absorbed radiation which causes chemical bond breakage including in the DNA molecule. DNA changes result in disruption of normal cell physiology that leads to an inability to reproduce or the death of the target.33 In this study, the doses applied did not result in immediate death nor completely inhibit growth of the parasite. It has been shown that different stages of the insect life cycle have different tolerances (resistance) to radiation damage and different insects also display different tolerances.15 Phytosanitary irradiation protocols are designed to prevent reproduction through the prevention of adult emergence or through adult or F1 generation sterility, which is what we report in this study. Higher irradiation doses that guarantee near-immediate mortality (in insects) and life stages could be applied but tend to have adverse effects on the sensory qualities of fresh produce, and in some cases might require doses that exceed the 1,000-Gy maximum allowable dose.15
Our necropsy and PCR results of brain tissue are consistent with results from Pai et al.22 and Ooi et al.,23 which show nearly all infected rats had some level of infection with a significant, negative dose response observed in the number of worms that migrated to the brain compared with non-irradiated controls (0 Gy). Despite these findings, it remained unclear whether irradiation causes direct, but delayed mortality of A. cantonensis. As was reported by Pai et al.,22 we also observed motility in larvae following irradiation, thus irradiation of doses ≤1,000 Gy is not immediately fatal to larvae. In our in vitro and in vivo irradiation experiments, results showed very low mortality and no dose response across all larval irradiation treatments 27 days postirradiation. Therefore, irradiation of larvae, isolated or within a snail, does not directly cause mortality of the parasite over the timespan that it would be expected to take for larvae to invade the central nervous system of a host (∼4 hours PI to invade and ∼2 weeks for young adults to appear on the brain).29
Although irradiation is not fatal to A. cantonensis directly, decreased infection levels in brain tissue of definitive and nonpermissive hosts across multiple studies indicate irradiation does have a deleterious effect on a larva’s migration to the brain. Irradiated larvae are unable to migrate to the central nervous system, are more susceptible to the host immune response during migration, or both. In fact, even low doses of irradiation (100 Gy) have been shown to affect larvae’s motility,34 yet it remains unclear how exactly this could affect the migration from the gastrointestinal tract to the brain. Regardless of the mechanism, greatly reduced brain infection from irradiated larvae in both definitive and nonpermissive hosts is promising. A positive correlation between parasite burden and the severity of symptoms is clear, as has been shown in rabbit models35,36 (a nonpermissive host), in the definitive rat host,37 and is additionally supported by human clinical evidence.38 Although theoretically the consumption of infected, irradiated, exported produce may result in neuroangiostrongyliasis, the severity of the infection should be greatly reduced due to fewer larvae penetrating the brain.
Similar to brain infection results, a negative dose response was found in the number of adult worms in the heart–lung complex at 6 weeks in the irradiated treatments. Within each treatment, there were no significant differences in the mean number of adults found in the heart–lung complex at 6 weeks compared with the mean number of larvae found in the brain at 3 weeks (Figure 2). This suggests most larvae that successfully migrated to the brain were able to develop to the adult stage and migrate to the heart and lungs of the rat. Qualitative morphological observations were consistent with Ishii et al.34 and Ooi et al.23 in finding irradiation caused retarded growth and a lack of the “barber’s pole” pattern of intertwined uteri and intestine in females, however, we also observed discoloration and flaccid exoskeletons (Figure 3). Necropsy and PCR results also show that irradiated adult worms, detected in the pulmonary arteries of rats, were not able to produce eggs or L1 larvae. Parasite DNA was only detected in the feces of rats gavaged with larvae exposed to 0-Gy irradiation. Therefore, irradiation doses ≥150 Gy effectively sterilized A. cantonensis, thus rendering it unable to complete its life cycle in rats. These findings are consistent with previous research, where irradiation doses of 100–250 Gy prevented reproduction in rats.20,22,34 Thus, the USDA generic dose of 150 Gy should preclude irradiated A. cantonensis from establishing viable populations in export destinations thereby reducing the potential for global spread and provide quarantine security.
CONCLUSION
Results from our study found a significant negative dose effect in the infectivity of A. cantonensis to the phytosanitary irradiation doses of 150 and 400 Gy, as well as both doses precluding reproduction in adult worms. With irradiated A. cantonensis larvae being unable to produce eggs within their definitive host, feces from infected rats would be sterile and unable to infect snails, and the A. cantonensis life cycle is interrupted. Although it may still be possible that irradiated larvae could cause neurological disease in humans or other accidental hosts, A. cantonensis will be unable to establish viable populations from P. martensi (and likely other snail species) in export destinations. The long-term effects of a reduction in transmission of the parasite to intermediate hosts on the overall parasite population remain to be determined.
Supplemental Materials
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We are grateful to the property owners who allowed access to their property for snail collections and to the owners and staff of the commercial irradiation facility (RLH Hawaii Pride) for use of their facilities.
Note: Supplemental material appears at www.ajtmh.org.
REFERENCES
- 1. Beaver PC, Rosen L, 1964. Memorandum on the first report of Angiostrongylus in man, by Nomura and Lin, 1945. Am J Trop Med Hyg 13: 589–590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Cheng TC, Alicata JE, 1964. Possible role of water in transmission of Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Nematoda-Metastrongylidae). J Parasitol 50: 39–40. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Wang QP, Lai DH, Zhu XQ, Chen XG, Lun ZR, 2008. Human angiostrongyliasis. Lancet Infect Dis 8: 621–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Cowie RH, 2013. Pathways for transmission of angiostrongyliasis and the risk of disease associated with them. Hawaii J Med Public Health 72 ( Suppl 2 ): 70. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Howe K, Kaluna L, Lozano A, Torres Fischer B, Tagami Y, McHugh R, Jarvi S, 2019. Water transmission potential of Angiostrongylus cantonensis: larval viability and effectiveness of rainwater catchment sediment filters. PLoS One 14: e0209813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Turck HC, Fox MT, Cowie RH, 2022. Paratenic hosts of Angiostrongylus cantonensis and their relation to human neuroangiostrongyliasis globally. One Health 15: 100426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Rosen L, Loison G, Laigret J, Wallace GD, 1967. Studies on eosinophilic meningitis 3 Epidemiologic and clinical observations on Pacific islands and the possible etiologic role of Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Am J Epidemiol 85: 17–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. York EM, Creecy JP, Lord WD, Caire W, 2015. Geographic range expansion for rat lungworm in North America. Emerg Infect Dis 21: 1234–1236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Barratt J, Chan D, Sandaradura I, Malik R, Spielman D, Lee R, Marriott D, Harkness J, Ellis J, Stark D, 2016. Angiostrongylus cantonensis: a review of its distribution, molecular biology and clinical significance as a human pathogen. Parasitology 143: 1087–1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Foster CE. et al. , 2016. Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection: a cause of fever of unknown origin in pediatric patients. Clin Infect Dis 63: 1475–1478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Stockdale Walden HD, Slapcinsky JD, Roff S, Mendieta Calle J, Diaz Goodwin Z, Stern J, Corlett R, Conway J, McIntosh A, 2017. Geographic distribution of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in wild rats (Rattus rattus) and terrestrial snails in Florida, USA. PLoS One 12: e0177910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Hammoud AR, Nayes SL, Murphy JR, Heresi GP, Butler IJ, Perez N, 2017. Angiostrongylus cantonensis meningitis and myelitis, Texas, USA. Emerg Infect Dis 23: 1037–1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Liu EW. et al. , 2018. Rat lungworm infection associated with central nervous system disease–eight US States, January 2011–January 2017. MMWR Morb Mort Wkly Rep 67: 825–828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. FDA , 1986. Irradiation in the production, processing, and handling of food. Fed Regist 51: 13376. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Barkai-Golan R, Follett PA, 2017. Irradiation for Quality Improvement, Microbial Safety and Phytosanitation of Fresh Produce. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. [Google Scholar]
- 16. Cowie RH, Dillon RT, Robinson DG, Smith JW, 2009. Alien non-marine snails and slugs of priority quarantine importance in the United States: a preliminary risk assessment. Am Malacol Bull 27: 113–132. [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hamilton L, Tagami Y, Kaluna L, Jacob J, Jarvi S, Follett P, 2021. Demographics of the semi-slug Parmarion martensi, an intermediate host for Angiostrongylus cantonensis in Hawai’i, during laboratory rearing. Parasitology 148: 153–158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Follett P, Hamilton L, Tagami Y, Kaluna L, Jarvi S, 2022. Phytosanitary irradiation using X-rays prevents reproduction in the semi-slug Parmarion martensi (Stylommatophora: Ariophantidae), a host of the human pathogenic nematode Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Rhabditida: Angiostrongylidae). Pest Manag Sci 78: 1187–1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Modrý D, Fecková B, Putnová B, Manalo SM, Otranto D, 2021. Alternative pathways in Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Metastrongyloidea: Angiostrongylidae) transmission. Parasitology 148: 167–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lee SH, 1969. The use of irradiated third-stage larvae of Angiostrongylus cantonensis as antigen to immunize albino rats against homologous infections. Proc Helminthol Soc Wash 36: 95–97. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ishii AI, Honda M, Sano M, 1987. Late development and fertility of adult worms derived from gamma-irradiated first-stage larvae of Angiostrongylus cantonensis. Parasitol Res 73: 159–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Pai HH, Ko YC, Chen ER, 1993. Killing effect of gamma irradiation on Angiostrongylus cantonensis in snails. Am J Trop Med Hyg 48: 827–830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ooi HK, Ishii K, Inohara J, Kamiya M, 1993. Effect of irradiation on the viability of Angiostrongylus cantonensis and A costaricensis infective larvae. J Helminthol 67: 238–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Myers RF, 1960. The sensitivity of some plant-parasitic and free-living nematodes to gamma and X-irradiation. Nematologica 5: 56–63. [Google Scholar]
- 25. Lv S, Zhang Y, Liu HX, Zhang CW, Steinmann P, Zhou XN, Utzinger J, 2009. Angiostrongylus cantonensis: morphological and behavioral investigation within the freshwater snail Pomacea canaliculata. Parasitol Res 104: 1351–1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Jarvi SI. et al. , 2019. Validation of a death assay for Angiostrongylus cantonensis larvae (L3) using propidium iodide in a rat model (Rattus norvegicus). Parasitology 146: 1421–1428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Champlot S, Berthelot C, Pruvost M, Bennett EA, Grange T, Geigl EM, 2010. An efficient multistrategy DNA decontamination procedure of PCR reagents for hypersensitive PCR applications. PLoS One 5: e13042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sikes RS, Gannon WL, Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists , 2011. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J Mammal 92: 235–253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Mackerras MJ, Sandars DF, 1955. The life history of the rat lungworm, Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Chen) (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae). Aust J Zool 3: 1–21. [Google Scholar]
- 30. Follett PA, Neven LG, 2006. Current trends in quarantine entomology. Annu Rev Entomol 51: 359–385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Roberts PB, Follett PA, Ferreira ICFR, Antonio AL, Cabo Verde SC. Food Irradiation Technologies—Concepts, Applications and Outcomes. Cambridge, UK: Royal Society of Chemistry, 169–182. [Google Scholar]
- 32. PsIP (Phytosanitary Irradiation Platform) , 2021. Available at: https://psipglobal.org/phytosanitary-irradiation/. Accessed June 1, 2021.
- 33. Koval TM, 1983. Intrinsic resistance to the lethal effects of x-irradiation in insect and arachnid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80: 4752–4755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Ishii AI, Terada M, Sano M, 1987. Motility and drug susceptibility of Angiostrongylus cantonensis developing from gamma-irradiated first-stage larvae. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 18: 547–551. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Alicata JE, Dawees B. Advances in Parasitology. Vol 3. London, UK and New York, NY: Academic Press, London and New York, 223–248.5334821 [Google Scholar]
- 36. Jindrak K, Magnusson MS, 1981. Polymyositis and polyneuritis in experimental Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection of rabbits. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 75: 205–210. [Google Scholar]
- 37. Ji L. et al. , 2017. Study on the tolerance and adaptation of rats to Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection. Parasitol Res 116: 1937–1945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Prociv P, Turner M, 2018. Neuroangiostrongyliasis: the “subarachnoid phase” and its implications for anthelminthic therapy. Am J Trop Med Hyg 98: 353–359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.