Skip to main content
Briefings in Bioinformatics logoLink to Briefings in Bioinformatics
editorial
. 2024 Apr 5;25(3):bbae158. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbae158

Computational model for drug research

Xing Chen 1,, Li Huang 2
PMCID: PMC10998638  PMID: 38581423

Abstract

This special issue focuses on computational model for drug research regarding drug bioactivity prediction, drug-related interaction prediction, modelling for immunotherapy and modelling for treatment of a specific disease, as conveyed by the following six research and four review articles. Notably, these 10 papers described a wide variety of in-depth drug research from the computational perspective and may represent a snapshot of the wide research landscape.

Keywords: drug research, computational model, interaction prediction, drug treatment, drug interaction


Driven by accumulation of biochemical data [1–3] as well as advances in deep learning and graphics processing units (GPUs) [4, 5], modern computer-aided drug design exhibits considerably improved efficacy [6–10] in more diversified applications [11–13], with increasing success stories of clinical-phase compounds or approved drugs [14–16]. This special issue focuses on computational model for drug research regarding bioactivity prediction, drug-related interaction prediction, modelling for immunotherapy and modelling for treatment of a specific disease, as conveyed by the following six research and four review articles. Notably, these 10 papers may represent a snapshot of the wide research landscape.

Yin et al. [17] put forward a novel algorithm named adversarial feature subspace enhancement (AFSE) that complemented deep graph learning (DGL) models for predicting ligand bioactivities (targeting GPCR proteins) to improve their generalization in real virtual screening scenarios. When applied to DGL models, AFSE deployed bi-directional adversarial learning to dynamically produce plentiful subspace representations, followed by minimizing the maximum loss of molecular divergence and bioactivity to guarantee local smoothness of model outputs, hence promoting generalization.

Zhang et al. [18] concentrated on predicting bioactivities of drug inactive ingredients (DIGs) in drug formulations (DFMs). Since such bioactivity data were not ready-made, they firstly curated vast DIGs and DFMs from public resources and literature into a novel database named biological ACtivities of Drug INActive ingredients (ACDINA), where the entries’ targets were cross-linked to other databases containing their pharmaceutical/biological characteristics. Then, ACDINA was utilized to construct five classical machine learning and two deep learning models for predicting DIGs’ bioactivities and evaluating the viability of adopting the proposed database on drug discovery and precision medicine.

Wang et al. [19] comprehensively overviewed the recent advances in data resources and computational models for inferring correlations between microbes, drugs and diseases. Specifically, major databases related to microbe–disease associations, drug–disease associations and microbe–drug associations were introduced before systematically presenting five categories of models, including network, matrix factorization, matrix completion, regularization and artificial neural network. The review concluded with an outline of research challenges, opportunities and suggestions for future works.

Feng et al. [20] designed a model named Directed Graph Attention Network for predicting asymmetric Drug–Drug Interactions that employed an encoder to learn asymmetric embeddings of the source, target and self-roles of a drug, calculated aggressiveness/impressionability (role-specific items) to capture interaction tendency of the source/target role and used a predictor to identify direction-specific interactions between two drugs by combining the embeddings and role-specific items.

Luo et al. [21] performed large-scale literature mining on PubMed to retrieve MeSH diseases, MeSH drugs and Entrez genes that formed the data basis for building a Drug Set Enrichment Analysis by Text Mining (DSEATM) pipeline. It obtained each investigated disease’s associated drugs and their target genes and utilized the latter to enrich the pathways for the disease. DSEATM was evaluated against several state-of-the-art methods to confirm its effectiveness and potential in disease and drug research.

Rintala et al. [22] provided an overview of network methods for modelling the effect of drugs and diseases to reveal the formers’ mechanism of action and therapeutic effects. Descriptions of methods for constructing different useful biological networks preceded the introduction of network data mining (NDM) algorithms, including graph search, centrality, path finding, community detection, machine learning and graph embeddings. Then, applications of NDM to drug discovery were elucidated with a detailed discussion on drug repurposing for COVID-19.

Li et al. [23] developed HLA3D, an integrated toolkit for the three-dimensional structure analysis of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules to enhance the HLA data application in transplantation and tumour immunotherapy. The toolkit consisted of a risk alignment pipeline that offered alignment and visualization functions as well as risk reports of mismatched HLA molecules in organ transplantation and an antigenic peptide prediction pipeline that implemented mutation prediction, peptide prediction, immunogenicity assessment and docking simulation for tumour vaccine. Both pipelines integrated diverse bioinformatics resources and tools.

Wilman et al. [24] contributed a critical review on opportunities, feasibility and advantages of deep learning models used to assist in the therapeutic design of antibodies. Applications of such models to antibody structure prediction, antibody–antigen binding prediction and humanization of animal antibodies were outlined and analysed along with prospects on language-motivated antibody embeddings and automated antibody sequence generation.

Scafuri et al. [25] reviewed various computational models conducive to the search for pharmacological chaperones (PCs), a type of protein-stabilizing compounds for treating rare genetic diseases resulted from destabilizing mutations. The elaborated model categories include prediction of mutation impacts on protein stability, identification of alternative ligand-binding sites for non-competitive PC and virtual screening of potential PCs for target proteins.

Toro-Domínguez et al. [26] sought to combat the rare disease Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) and established a scoring system to measure the personalized Molecular dYregulated PROfiles of SLE patients. Representing patients’ transcriptome as immunological gene modules, the system computed a dysregulation score for each gene module according to averaged z-scores. Experiments involved 6100 SLE and 750 healthy samples for analysing correlations among dysregulation scores, clinical events and response to the Tabalumab antibody; based on the results, machine learning models were fitted to predict nearly 100 clinical parameters that might collectively achieve personalized medicine.

Apparently, the 10 papers in this special issue described a wide variety of in-depth drug research from the computational perspective. We express our gratitude to the authors for their contributions, the editorial staff members for their support and hard work and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Author Biographies

Xing Chen, PhD, is a professor of School of Science, Jiangnan University. His research interests include complex disease-related non-coding ribonucleic acid biomarker prediction, computational models for drug discovery and early detection of human complex disease based on big data and artificial intelligence algorithms.

Li Huang is a PhD student of The Future Laboratory, Tsinghua University. His research interests include bioinformatics, complex network algorithm, machine learning and visual analytics.

Contributor Information

Xing Chen, School of Science, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, 214122, China.

Li Huang, The Future Laboratory, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 92370131 to X.C.).

References

  • 1. Barnes MR, Harland L, Foord SM, et al. Lowering industry firewalls: pre-competitive informatics initiatives in drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2009;8:701–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zhu H. Big data and artificial intelligence modeling for drug discovery. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2020;60:573–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Brown N, Cambruzzi J, Cox PJ, et al. Big data in drug discovery. Prog Med Chem 2018;57:277–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Pandey M, Fernandez M, Gentile F, et al. The transformational role of GPU computing and deep learning in drug discovery. Nat Mach Intell 2022;4:211–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Gawehn E, Hiss JA, Brown JB, Schneider G. Advancing drug discovery via GPU-based deep learning. Expert Opin Drug Discovery 2018;13:579–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Chandrasekaran SN, Ceulemans H, Boyd JD, Carpenter AE. Image-based profiling for drug discovery: Due for a machine-learning upgrade? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2021;20:145–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Lavecchia A. Deep learning in drug discovery: opportunities, challenges and future prospects. Drug Discov Today 2019;24:2017–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Chan HS, Shan H, Dahoun T, et al. Advancing drug discovery via artificial intelligence. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2019;40:592–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chen H, Engkvist O, Wang Y, et al. The rise of deep learning in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today 2018;23:1241–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Vamathevan J, Clark D, Czodrowski P, et al. Applications of machine learning in drug discovery and development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2019;18:463–77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ou-Yang S-s, Lu J-y, Kong X-q, et al. Computational drug discovery. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2012;33:1131–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Acosta JN, Falcone GJ, Rajpurkar P, Topol EJ. Multimodal biomedical AI. Nat Med 2022;28:1773–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Paul D, Sanap G, Shenoy S, et al. Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development. Drug Discov Today 2021;26:80–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Mak K-K, Balijepalli MK, Pichika MR. Success stories of AI in drug discovery-Where do things stand? Expert Opin Drug Discovery 2022;17:79–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Vincent F, Nueda A, Lee J, et al. Phenotypic drug discovery: recent successes, lessons learned and new directions. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2022;21:899–914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Talele TT, Khedkar SA, Rigby AC. Successful applications of computer aided drug discovery: moving drugs from concept to the clinic. Curr Top Med Chem 2010;10:127–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Yin Y, Hu H, Yang Z, et al. AFSE: towards improving model generalization of deep graph learning of ligand bioactivities targeting GPCR proteins. Brief Bioinform 2022;23:bbac077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Zhang C, Mou M, Zhou Y, et al. Biological activities of drug inactive ingredients. Brief Bioinform 2022;23:bbac160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Wang L, Tan Y, Yang X, et al. Review on predicting pairwise relationships between human microbes, drugs and diseases: from biological data to computational models. Brief Bioinform 2022;23:bbac080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Feng Y-Y, Yu H, Feng Y-H, Shi JY. Directed graph attention networks for predicting asymmetric drug–drug interactions. Brief Bioinform 2022;23:bbac151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Luo Z-H, Zhu L-D, Wang Y-M, et al. DSEATM: drug set enrichment analysis uncovering disease mechanisms by biomedical text mining. Brief Bioinform 2022;23:bbac228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Rintala T, Ghosh A, Fortino V. Network approaches for modeling the effect of drugs and diseases. Brief Bioinform 2022;23:bbac229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Li X, Lin X, Mei X, et al. HLA3D: an integrated structure-based computational toolkit for immunotherapy. Brief Bioinform 2022;23:bbac076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Wilman W, Wróbel S, Bielska W, et al. Machine-designed biotherapeutics: opportunities, feasibility and advantages of deep learning in computational antibody discovery. Brief Bioinform 2022;23:bbac267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Scafuri B, Verdino A, D'Arminio N, Marabotti A. Computational methods to assist in the discovery of pharmacological chaperones for rare diseases. Brief Bioinform 2022;23:bbac198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Toro-Domínguez D, Martorell-Marugán J, Martinez-Bueno M, et al. Scoring personalized molecular portraits identify systemic lupus erythematosus subtypes and predict individualized drug responses, symptomatology and disease progression. Brief Bioinform 2022;23:bbac332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Briefings in Bioinformatics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES