Abstract
Background
Despite advancements in coronary artery disease (CAD) treatment with drug-eluting stent, its morbidity and mortality remain high. In context, intravascular imaging-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly recommended for better clinical outcomes in patient with CAD. Near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS), as one of the intravascular imaging methods, is effective in detecting lipid-rich plaques, which is crucial for identifying high-risk or vulnerable plaques employing near-infrared light. High lipid core burden, as identified by NIRS-IVUS, correlates with an increased risk of adverse cardiac events and shows varying degrees of efficacy in plaque management and event prevention.
Summary
This article addresses about how NIRS-IVUS can be used to predict event of CAD. The study highlights the crucial role of NIRS-IVUS in predicting future cardiovascular events. Findings indicate that the presence of high lipid core burden is related to increased risks of periprocedural myocardial infarction and reduced coronary flow during PCI. The study also outlines the predictive value of NIRS-IVUS in non-culprit lesions, where plaques with high lipid core burden significantly increase the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events as demonstrated in the PROSPECT II trial. In terms of therapeutic strategies, the study reviews the effectiveness of high-intensity lipid-lowering strategies in stabilizing vulnerable plaques, as evidenced in trials such as the YELLOW and PACMAN AMI trials.
Key Messages
NIRS-IVUS emerges as a valuable diagnostic tool in treating CAD. It effectively identifies vulnerable plaques and aids in predicting and preventing future adverse cardiac events. However, to enhance its practicality and promote widespread adoption in clinical settings, further long-term outcome research of NIRS-IVUS-guided PCI is necessary. These efforts can potentially make NIRS-IVUS a more accessible and indispensable tool in cardiovascular disease management.
Keywords: Near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound, Lipid core burden, Lipid-rich plaque, Subsequent cardiovascular event
Introduction
Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a significant contributor to morbidity and mortality on a global scale [1, 2]. Although the development and utilization of novel devices and pharmaceuticals have brought better clinical outcomes for CAD, the efficacy of stent implantation continues to rely heavily on the expertise and skill of physicians. In context, it is essential to furnish operating physicians with comprehensive knowledge on the lesion characteristics in order to enhance clinical outcomes. The invasive coronary angiography images were used for assessment of lesions during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the resolution of coronary angiography was not enough to discriminate detailed lesion characteristics such as vulnerable plaque, which had high-risk cause of cardiovascular events. Thus, the current guidelines recommended that intravascular imaging can be led better clinical outcomes in patient with PCI [1–4]. And there were randomized controlled studies that demonstrated better clinical outcomes of image-guided PCI than those of angiographic-guided PCI [5, 6]. However, there was a lack of knowledge about the role of intravascular imaging in predicting subsequent future cardiovascular events. In context, near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) might be used as a way to predict subsequent future cardiovascular event by detecting vulnerable plaque especially in lipid-rich plaque. So, this study reviews the possible medical and scientific uses of NIRS-IVUS for lipid plaques in the coronary arteries in people with CAD.
Near-Infrared Spectroscopy-Intravascular Ultrasound
The near-infrared light spectrum (wavelength: 700–2,500 nm; not visible to the naked eye) is optimal for diagnostic applications, because its low energy does not cause tissue damage [7]. NIRS establishes a unique fingerprint for each chemical by analyzing the manner in which organic molecules within the target react with NIR light in accordance with the configuration of their molecular bonds. Specifically, in cases of positive remodeling of the vessel with lipid-laden necrotic foci [8, 9], NIRS-IVUS is a viable option for determining the lipid content of atherosclerotic plaques.
The TVC Imaging System™ and Makoto Intravascular Imaging System™, both of which are presently available commercially (Infraredx Inc., Bedford, MA, USA), are utilized for the purpose of atherosclerotic plaque detection in coronary artery. The Makoto system, in its most recent iteration, employs a velocity of 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mm/s for the retraction of the imaging core and an 1,800 rpm rotational speed. This configuration enables the acquisition of approximately 130,000 NIRS measurements per 100 mm over a maximal imaging length of 150 mm. The TVC System discriminates the presence of lipid core by decoding complex composite signals in near real time using NIRS-IVUS. Yellow signifies the maximum probability of a lipid core’s presence; the results are displayed as a chemogram utilizing a color scale ranging from red to yellow. For the purpose of generating an easier-to-understand image, the probability score is correlated with the corresponding color at each location where the measurement was taken, as well as the minuscule spaces between measurements [10].
A numerical lipid core burden index (LCBI) is automatically generated as a quantitative image metric. It denotes that the proportion of valid pixels of a lipid core plaque being present is greater than 0.6, multiplied by one thousand. LCBI provides a number value to the lipid core plaque that is found in a scanned coronary artery [11]. In addition, number value of LCBI is present by using segments of scans or defined width windows within segments, such as the maxLCBI4mm, a 4-mm sliding window with the highest LCBI value.
Predict Subsequent Cardiovascular Events Using NIRS-IVUS
Vulnerable Plaque
The abundance of lipids is a significant factor in the characterization of vulnerable plaques [12]. The significance of lipid-rich plaques, commonly referred to as high-risk plaques, has been underscored due to the considerable proportion of sudden death by acute coronary syndrome [12–14]. Therefore, the occurrence of acute coronary syndrome and sudden cardiac death should be mitigated through the enhancement of treatments targeting susceptible plaques. Naghavi et al. [12, 15] introduced a set of histopathological diagnostic criteria for identifying susceptible plaques, which gained widespread consensus among researchers. The primary diagnostic criteria encompass the presence of inflammatory activation within the plaque, characterized by either monocyte/macrophage infiltration or T lymphocyte infiltration. Additionally, a thin fibrous cap with a thickness less than 65 μm and a large lipid core occupying more than 40% of the plaque area are one of major criteria. Other indicators include vascular endothelial cell ablation accompanied by platelet aggregation on the surface, the presence of fissures or damaged plaques, and severe luminal stenosis exceeding 90%. Additional diagnostic criteria that can be considered are intraplaque hemorrhage, endothelial dysfunction, superficial nodules or calcifications, yellow plaques, and positive remodeling of vascular walls [12]. Several techniques have been developed and employed to evaluate vulnerable plaques, including coronary computed tomography, angiography, intravascular ultrasound, optical coherence tomography, positron emission tomography, and computational fluid dynamics analysis [12, 13]. Meanwhile, the implementation of NIRS-IVUS came about at a later stage compared to the aforementioned modalities. Consequently, there exists a scarcity of data regarding the potential clinical applications using NIRS-IVUS. In comparison with other modalities, NIRS has demonstrated particular validated label claims pertaining to the detection of the lipid core of the atherosclerotic plaque. Furthermore, a proper assessment of significant lipid-rich core burden in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction can serve as a reliable predictor for both culprit and non-culprit lesions [10, 16, 17].
Predict Cardiovascular Events of Culprit Lesion Using NIRS-IVUS
In terms of the procedural features, the presence of high lipid core burden is related to an increased risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction or the incidence of reduced coronary flow during PCI [18, 19] (Table 1) (Fig. 1a). Although there is still insufficient evidence for the association between degree of lipid-rich plaques detectable by NIRS-IVUS and procedural success, the PREVENT NO-REFLOW trial (NCT05427786), which is examining the effects of preprocedural administration of nicorandil via intracoronary in patients undergoing PCI with lipid-rich plaques confirmed by NIRS-IVUS, will possibly answer this question. In addition, NIRS-IVUS can provide additional information on lipid-rich plaque regions to evaluate stent location or stent length [20], in comparison with IVUS-guided PCI. This information can be used to determine the stent length.
Table 1.
The use of NIRS-IVUS for predicting subsequent cardiovascular event
| Publication | Aim | Design | Sample size | Primary endpoint | Results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culprit | ||||||
| Goldstein et al. [11] | 2011 | To determine whether intracoronary NIRS-IVUS can identify plaques that are likely to cause periprocedural MI in patients undergoing elective PCI | Cohort | 62 | Rate of periprocedural MI | 50% (high LCBI) versus 4.2% (low LCBI) (p = 0.0002) |
| Lim et al. [19] | 2022 | To identify association between LCBI and decreased TIMI flow in patients undergoing PCI | Cohort | 636 | Association between a decreased TIMI flow and LCBI | Odds ratio of high LCBI for decreased TIMI flow (2.59, 95% CI 1.33–5.04; p = 0.005) |
| Non-culprit | ||||||
| Waksman et al. [21] | 2019 | Assessing the ability of NIRS-IVUS imaging to detect vulnerable patients and vulnerable plaques | Cohort | 1,271 | Association between maxLCBI4mm and non-culprit major adverse cardiovascular events | Hazard ratio of high LCBI for NC-MACE (1.89, 95% CI 1.26–2.83; p = 0.0021) |
| Stone et al. [22] | 2020 | Pilot randomized trial of PCI treatment of vulnerable plaques to inform a future large-scale pivotal study | RCT | 182 | IVUS-derived minimum lumen area | BVS versus GDMT alone |
| Target lesion failure | MLA: 6.9±2.6 mm2 versus 3.0±1.0 mm2; p < 0.0001 | |||||
| TLF: 4.3% versus 10.7%; p = 0.12 | ||||||
| Erlinge et al. [23] | 2021 | To validate the use of NIRS-IVUS for identification of non-obstructive lipid-rich plaques that are prone to cause future cardiac events | Cohort | 898 (3,629 vessel) | Composite endpoint including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or progressive angina arising from untreated non-culprit lesions | Hazard ratio of high LCBI for NC-MACE (2.27, 95% CI 1.25–4.13; p = 0.0071) |
| Biccirè et al. [24] | 2023 | To analyze the proportions, determinants, and prognostic implications of triple regression (atheroma volume reduction, lipid content reduction, and increase in fibrous cap) | RCT | 265 | The composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization | Triple regression for composite endpoints (yes vs. no; 8.3% vs. 18.2%; p = 0.04) |
Fig. 1.
Use of NIRS-IVUS in assessing coronary artery plaques, showing cross-sectional imaging and lipid core burden chemogram to predict future cardiovascular events in both culprit (a) and non-culprit (b) arteries.
Predict Cardiovascular Events of Non-Culprit Lesion Using NIRS-IVUS
According to a prospective cohort analysis of Lipid-Rich Plaque trial, atherosclerotic plaque with high lipid core burden and a maxLCBI4mm value of 400 or above had a significantly increased occurrence of major adverse cardiac events on non-culprit lesion, with an incidence rate four times greater than those without these characteristics [21, 25]. In addition, the utilization of NIRS-IVUS to acquire further information on lipid-rich plaque composition may predict the likelihood of future cardiovascular events [21, 26–28]. The findings of the PROSPECT II trial were consistent with those of the Lipid-Rich Plaque trial [23]. The PROSPECT II trial encompassed a cohort of 898 individuals who had experienced a recent myocardial infarction. In addition, the study was conducted using NIRS-IVUS on a total of 3,629 non-culprit lesions to investigate the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events, such as cardiac death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and progressive angina regarding the presence of lipid-rich cores (NIRS) and significant plaque volume (IVUS). The results showed individuals presenting with either of lipid-rich core or significant plaque volume exhibited a high risk of subsequent adverse cardiovascular events [23] (Table 1) (Fig. 1b).
Prevent Subsequent Cardiovascular Events Using NIRS-IVUS
The aforementioned observations have necessitated the development of a therapeutic modality for vulnerable plaques in order to mitigate the occurrence of subsequent adverse cardiovascular events. The PROSPECT ABSORB trial conducted a small-scale randomized control trial to examine the potential benefits of preventative stent implantation for vulnerable plaque [22]. A cohort of 182 individuals were subjected to a random allocation of two treatment modalities for their lesions: either the insertion of a bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) or GDMT alone. The findings of the study suggest that the group receiving BVS exhibited a decreased target lesion failure compared to patients who had GDMT alone without statistical significance [22]. And even though BVS is no longer used in clinical practice, there are still some issues with using drug-eluting stents as a preventative strategy to treat vulnerable plaques.
Meanwhile, high-intensity lipid-lowering strategy showed stabilizing of vulnerable plaque through several studies. The YELLOW trial demonstrated the utility of NIRS-IVUS as a quantitative indicator of lipid-rich plaque in the context of comparing intensive statin therapy with standard statin therapy [29]. In this randomized controlled trial, the administration of 40 mg of rosuvastatin on a daily basis as part of intensive statin therapy demonstrated a significant reduction in the maxLCBI4mm in a significant coronary artery stenosis (fractional flow reserve ≤0.8) as compared to standard statin therapy [29] (Table 1). The PACMAN AMI trial recently reported the impact of adding alirocumab (PCSK9i) to high-intensity statin therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction [30]. The trial revealed that after 52 weeks, the group receiving alirocumab experienced a significantly greater regression of coronary plaque in non-infarct-related arteries as well as superior reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared to the placebo group [24, 30]. These findings suggest that lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol as much as possible is crucial to increase benefit for people who had acute myocardial infarction, reduce the amount of plaque, and prevent subsequent adverse cardiovascular events.
Conclusion
Despite the inherent limitations associated with its invasiveness, the combined utilization of NIRS and IVUS represents a valuable diagnostic approach for the identification of vulnerable plaques. Consequently, NIRS-IVUS has the potential to effectively identify individuals who are at risk of experiencing subsequent adverse coronary events, regardless of whether the events are attributed to culprit or non-culprit lesions.
Nevertheless, to enhance its practicality in clinical settings and promote widespread adoption, further research is necessary. Moreover, research on the long-term outcomes of NIRS-IVUS-guided PCI will provide crucial insights into its effectiveness and potential to revolutionize CAD treatment. By focusing on these research areas, NIRS-IVUS can potentially become a more accessible and indispensable tool in cardiovascular disease.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Funding Sources
All authors have nothing to declare regarding funding.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, investigation, and visualization, J.-J.C. and S.J.H.; methodology and writing – original draft preparation, J.-J.C.; writing– review and editing, S.J.H., S.L., J.H.K., H.J.J., J.H.P., C.W.Y., and D.-S.L.; supervision, S.L., J.H.K., H.J.J., J.H.P., C.W.Y., and D.-S.L.; project administration, S.J.H.; all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding Statement
All authors have nothing to declare regarding funding.
References
- 1. Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. 2019;139(10):e56–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Stone GW, Maehara A, Lansky AJ, de Bruyne B, Cristea E, Mintz GS, et al. A prospective natural-history study of coronary atherosclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):226–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, Bates ER, Beckie TM, Bischoff JM, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145(3):e18–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Neumann F-J, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87–165.30165437 [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hong SJ, Kim BK, Shin DH, Nam CM, Kim JS, Ko YG, et al. Effect of intravascular ultrasound-guided vs angiography-guided everolimus-eluting stent implantation: the IVUS-XPL randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;314(20):2155–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Lee JM, Choi KH, Song YB, Lee JY, Lee SJ, Lee SY, et al. Intravascular imaging-guided or angiography-guided complex PCI. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(18):1668–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Okuyama S, Nagaya T, Ogata F, Maruoka Y, Sato K, Nakamura Y, et al. Avoiding thermal injury during near-infrared photoimmunotherapy (NIR-PIT): the importance of NIR light power density. Oncotarget. 2017;8(68):113194–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Gardner CM, Tan H, Hull EL, Lisauskas JB, Sum ST, Meese TM, et al. Detection of lipid core coronary plaques in autopsy specimens with a novel catheter-based near-infrared spectroscopy system. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1(5):638–48. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sum ST, Madden SP, Hendricks MJ, Chartier SJ, Muller JE. Near-infrared spectroscopy for the detection of lipid core coronary plaques. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2009;2(4):307–15. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Waxman S, Dixon SR, L’Allier P, Moses JW, Petersen JL, Cutlip D, et al. In vivo validation of a catheter-based near-infrared spectroscopy system for detection of lipid core coronary plaques: initial results of the SPECTACL study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(7):858–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Goldstein JA, Maini B, Dixon SR, Brilakis ES, Grines CL, Rizik DG, et al. Detection of lipid-core plaques by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy identifies high risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;4(5):429–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003;108(14):1664–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Mintz GS. Clinical utility of intravascular imaging and physiology in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(2):207–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Stefanadis C, Antoniou CK, Tsiachris D, Pietri P. Coronary atherosclerotic vulnerable plaque: current perspectives. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(3):e005543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells SW, Litovsky S, Rumberger J, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II. Circulation. 2003;108(15):1772–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Abdel-Karim AR, Rangan BV, Banerjee S, Brilakis ES. Intercatheter reproducibility of near-infrared spectroscopy for the in vivo detection of coronary lipid core plaques. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;77(5):657–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Cassis LA, Lodder RA. Near-IR imaging of atheromas in living arterial tissue. Anal Chem. 1993;65(9):1247–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Goldstein JA, Grines C, Fischell T, Virmani R, Rizik D, Muller J, et al. Coronary embolization following balloon dilation of lipid-core plaques. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(12):1420–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lim S, Cha JJ, Hong SJ, Kim JH, Joo HJ, Park JH, et al. Association between high lipid burden of target lesion and slow TIMI flow in coronary interventions. J Clin Med. 2022;11(18):5401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Dixon SR, Grines CL, Munir A, Madder RD, Safian RD, Hanzel GS, et al. Analysis of target lesion length before coronary artery stenting using angiography and near-infrared spectroscopy versus angiography alone. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(1):60–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Waksman R, Di Mario C, Torguson R, Ali ZA, Singh V, Skinner WH, et al. Identification of patients and plaques vulnerable to future coronary events with near-infrared spectroscopy intravascular ultrasound imaging: a prospective, cohort study. Lancet. 2019;394(10209):1629–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Stone GW, Maehara A, Ali ZA, Held C, Matsumura M, Kjøller-Hansen L, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for vulnerable coronary atherosclerotic plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(20):2289–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Erlinge D, Maehara A, Ben-Yehuda O, Bøtker HE, Maeng M, Kjøller-Hansen L, et al. Identification of vulnerable plaques and patients by intracoronary near-infrared spectroscopy and ultrasound (PROSPECT II): a prospective natural history study. Lancet. 2021;397(10278):985–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Biccirè FG, Häner J, Losdat S, Ueki Y, Shibutani H, Otsuka T, et al. Concomitant coronary atheroma regression and stabilization in response to lipid-lowering therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;82(18):1737–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Waksman R, Torguson R, Spad MA, Garcia-Garcia H, Ware J, Wang R, et al. The Lipid-Rich Plaque Study of vulnerable plaques and vulnerable patients: study design and rationale. Am Heart J. 2017;192:98–104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Danek BA, Karatasakis A, Karacsonyi J, Alame A, Resendes E, Kalsaria P, et al. Long-term follow-up after near-infrared spectroscopy coronary imaging: insights from the lipid cORe plaque association with CLinical events (ORACLE-NIRS) registry. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017;18(3):177–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Madder RD, Husaini M, Davis AT, VanOosterhout S, Khan M, Wohns D, et al. Large lipid-rich coronary plaques detected by near-infrared spectroscopy at non-stented sites in the target artery identify patients likely to experience future major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(4):393–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Oemrawsingh RM, Cheng JM, García-García HM, van Geuns RJ, de Boer SPM, Simsek C, et al. Near-infrared spectroscopy predicts cardiovascular outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(23):2510–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Kini AS, Baber U, Kovacic JC, Limaye A, Ali ZA, Sweeny J, et al. Changes in plaque lipid content after short-term intensive versus standard statin therapy: the YELLOW trial (reduction in yellow plaque by aggressive lipid-lowering therapy). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(1):21–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Räber L, Ueki Y, Otsuka T, Losdat S, Häner JD, Lonborg J, et al. Effect of alirocumab added to high-intensity statin therapy on coronary atherosclerosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the PACMAN-AMI randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;327(18):1771–81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

