Skip to main content
Addiction Biology logoLink to Addiction Biology
. 2024 Apr 10;29(4):e13386. doi: 10.1111/adb.13386

The potential of 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine in the treatment of alcohol use disorder: A first look at therapeutic mechanisms of action

Stephan C Tap 1,
PMCID: PMC11007263  PMID: 38600715

Abstract

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) remains one of the most prevalent psychiatric disorders worldwide with high economic costs. Current treatment options show modest efficacy and relapse rates are high. Furthermore, there are increases in the treatment gap and few new medications have been approved in the past 20 years. Recently, psychedelic‐assisted therapy with psilocybin and lysergic acid diethylamide has garnered significant attention in the treatment of AUD. Yet, they require significant amounts of therapist input due to prolonged subjective effects (~4–12 h) leading to high costs and impeding implementation. Accordingly, there is an increasing interest in the rapid and short‐acting psychedelic 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐DMT). This paper offers a first look at potential therapeutic mechanisms for AUD by reviewing the current literature on 5‐MeO‐DMT. Primarily, 5‐MeO‐DMT is able to induce mystical experiences and ego‐dissolution together with increases in psychological flexibility and mindfulness. This could decrease AUD symptoms through the alleviation of psychiatric mood‐related comorbidities consistent with the negative reinforcement and self‐medication paradigms. In addition, preliminary evidence indicates that 5‐MeO‐DMT modulates neural oscillations that might subserve ego‐dissolution (increases in gamma), psychological flexibility and mindfulness (increases in theta), and the reorganization of executive control networks (increases in coherence across frequencies) that could improve emotion regulation and inhibition. Finally, animal studies show that 5‐MeO‐DMT is characterized by neuroplasticity, anti‐inflammation, 5‐HT2A receptor agonism, and downregulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 with clinical implications for AUD and psychiatric mood‐related comorbidities. The paper concludes with several recommendations for future research to establish the purported therapeutic mechanisms of action.

Keywords: 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine; alcohol use disorder; classic psychedelics


graphic file with name ADB-29-e13386-g001.jpg

1. ALCOHOL USE DISORDER

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) can be defined as a pattern of compulsive heavy alcohol use and a loss of control over alcohol intake despite adverse consequences. 1 Moreover, AUD is characterized by neuroadaptations in three major neurocircuits (i.e., basal ganglia, extended amygdala, and prefrontal cortex [PFC]) that result in dysfunction in (1) incentive salience, (2) negative affect, and (3) executive function systems, respectively. 2 In most countries, AUD remains one of the most prevalent psychiatric disorders 1 with recent estimates of 23 million people in the European Union 3 and 32.6 million people in the United States. 4 , 5 Moreover, AUD is the leading risk factor for global disease burden 6 with approximately 3 million annual deaths, 7 detrimental effects on general health, 8 and high amount of disability‐adjusted life years. 9 In 2010, it was estimated that AUD costs the United States $249 billion, 10 including $28 billion in healthcare, $179 billion in workplace productivity, $13 billion in collisions, and $25 billion in criminal justice. 11 Moreover, the range and magnitude of harm of AUD extends beyond the individual, as it affects families, occupation, and crime and disorder. 12 , 13 Currently available treatments for AUD consist of various pharmacological and/or psychosocial interventions 1 , 14 with modest efficacy and high relapse rates. 15 , 16 Most notably, few new medications have been approved in the past 20 years 17 and AUD remains characterized by a significant treatment gap (untreated percentage) that has increased from 78.1% in 2004 18 to 82.7% in 2021, 19 despite multiple earlier recommendations from the World Health Organization to address this issue. 20 , 21 , 22 Ultimately, this necessitates the investigation of novel treatments for AUD.

2. PAT IN THE TREATMENT OF AUD

In the past decade, numerous authors have alluded to the potential of psychedelic‐assisted therapy (PAT) for the treatment of addiction. 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 For instance, the classic psychedelic lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) has been explored for AUD in the mid‐20th century 29 , 30 and contemporary reviews have shown efficacy in reducing drinking behaviour after only one dose. 31 , 32 Other recent reviews also show preliminary evidence for psilocybin in the treatment of AUD. 33 , 34 Currently, there is a general consensus that the acute subjective experience induced by high doses of classic psychedelics (e.g., LSD and psilocybin) during PAT mediate the therapeutic response in a variety of psychiatric disorders, 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 including AUD. 39 , 40 Yet, this experience lasts approximately 4 to 12 h, 41 which requires a significant amount of time investment regarding therapeutic input during dosing sessions leading to high costs and impeding implementation of PAT. 42 , 43 Accordingly, there is an increasing interest in the clinical investigation of the classic psychedelic 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐DMT), in particular due to its rapid onset and short duration (15–20 min) that could make PAT more cost‐effective. 44 , 45 , 46 The current paper offers a first look at potential therapeutic mechanisms for AUD by giving an overview of the extant literature of 5‐MeO‐DMT (see Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Overview of (pre)clinical studies with 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine and potential therapeutic mechanisms of action in the treatment of alcohol use disorder.

Human studies
Design Population Mechanism Potential symptom improvements
Davis et al. 47 Survey (n = 515) General Mystical experience AUD, MDD, PTSD, anxiety, and SUD
Barsuglia et al. 48 Case study (n = 1) Veteran Mystical experience AUD and PTSD
Kervadec et al. 49 Retrospective survey (n = 160) General Mystical experience AUD
Davis et al. 50 Survey (n = 362) General Mystical experience MDD and anxiety
Cox et al. 51 Survey (n = 99) General Mystical experience PTSD
Ragnhildstveit et al. 52 Case study (n = 1) PTSD Mystical experience PTSD, hopelessness, and suicide risk
Uthaug et al. 53 Observational (n = 42) General Ego‐dissolution MDD, stress, and satisfaction with life
Uthaug et al. 53 Observational (n = 42) General Mindfulness (nonjudgement and awareness) Not related to symptom improvement or subjective effects
Uthaug et al. 54 Observational (n = 11) General Mindfulness (nonjudgement) MDD, anxiety, and stress
Davis et al. 55 Retrospective (n = 51) Veterans Psychological flexibility MDD, PTSD, anxiety, and cognitive functioning change
Kervadec et al. 49 Retrospective survey (n = 160) General Psychological flexibility AUD
Armstrong et al. 56 Prospective (n = 51) Veterans Psychological flexibility a AUD, PTSD, and cognitive functioning change
Uthaug et al. 54 Observational (n = 11) General Anti‐inflammation (decrease in IL‐6) Not related to symptom improvement or subjective effects
Reckweg et al. 57 Phase 1/2 trial (n = 16) TRD NA b MDD
Acosta‐Urquidi et al. 58 EEG study (n = 23) Healthy volunteers Increases in gamma, theta, and coherence in all frequency bands AUD, MDD, and anxiety
Barsuglia et al. 48 SPECT (n = 1) Veterans Increases in brain perfusion in bilateral caudate nuclei, left putamen, and right insula, as well as temporal, occipital, and cerebellar regions AUD and PTSD
Animal studies
Design Population Mechanism Potential symptom improvements
Riga et al. 59 Open field test KO2A and wild‐type C57BL6 mice Modulation of neural oscillations (increases in theta in PFC and beta band coherence between all areas) MDD and AUD
Winne et al. 60 Open field test C57BL6 mice Modulation of neural oscillations (increases in theta and slow gamma oscillations in ventral hippocampus and medial PFC) Anxiety
Vargas et al. 61 In vivo analysis Wild‐type mice and knockout mice Neuroplasticity with increases in dendritic spine density in layer V pyramidal neurons of PFC MDD
Jefferson et al. 62 Head‐twitch response, social ultrasonic vocalization, and longitudinal in vivo two‐photon microscopy C57BL6J mice for behavioural experiments and Thy1 GFP line M mice for imaging experiments Neuroplasticity with long‐lasting increases (1 month) in dendritic spine density in medial frontal cortex MDD
Lima de Cruz et al. 63 In vivo analysis C57BL6J mice Neuroplasticity (more complex dendritic morphology) and neurogenesis (newborn granule cells) in dentate gyrus of hippocampus MDD
Dakic et al. 64 In silico analysis Human cerebral organoids Neuroplasticity (long‐term potentiation and the formation of dendritic spines) through NMDAR, AMPAR, and Eprhin B2 signalling MDD
Dakic et al. 64 In silico analysis Human cerebral organoids Anti‐inflammation through inhibition of NF‐κB signalling pathway (no mention of any cytokines) MDD and AUD
Szabo et al. 65 In vitro analysis Human monocyte‐derived dendritic cells Anti‐inflammation through decreases in pro‐inflammatory cytokines (IL‐1β, IL‐6, TNF‐α, and chemokine IL‐8) and increases in anti‐inflammatory cytokines (IL‐10) through sigma‐1 receptor signalling MDD
Cameron et al. 66 Forced Swim Test and Sucrose Preference Test C57BL6J and knockout mice Activation of 5‐HT2A receptors MDD
Dakic et al. 64 In silico analysis Human cerebral organoids Downregulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 SUD

Abbreviations: AUD, alcohol use disorder; EEG, electroencephalography; MDD, major depressive disorder; PFC, prefrontal cortex; PTSD, post‐traumatic stress disorder; SPECT, single‐photon emission computed tomography; SUD, substance use disorder; TRD, treatment‐resistant depression

a

Indicated by self‐reported changes assessing how bothered individuals were by their cognitive and PTSD symptoms. 56

b

Subjective effects of 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine will be published in a separate paper. 57

3. Incilius alvarius : 5‐MeO‐DMT

5‐MeO‐DMT is a natural psychoactive indole alkylamine found in a variety of plants 67 and the parotid gland secretions of the toad species I. alvarius 68 , 69 , 70 and can be produced synthetically. 71 The acute subjective effects of 5‐MeO‐DMT are most often induced through the inhalation of vapour from dried secretions of I. alvarius reaching peak effects within seconds that last for approximately 15–20 min. 45 Other well‐documented routes of administration include intramuscular injection 72 and intranasal administration, 73 which are featured by a slower onset (1–7 min) and prolonged subjective effects (~60 min).

Compared with classic psychedelics, the subjective experience of 5‐MeO‐DMT has been described as very distinct with feelings of transcendence that often involve ego‐dissolution, nondual awareness, and an increased range and intensity of emotions, spanning the feeling of love, unity, and awe to panic and terror. 44 Notably, 5‐MeO‐DMT has been reported to lack visual effects, 74 possibly due to its high binding affinity for the 5‐HT1A receptor 75 , 76 and the observation that the partial 5‐HT1A receptor agonist buspirone is able to reduce the acute visual effects of psilocybin. 77 Accordingly, 5‐MeO‐DMT is often described as a content‐free experience associated with a loss of sense of self and bodily awareness, including sensory deprivation described as “all‐white light” or “all‐black” with descriptors such as “emptiness,” “nothingness,” or “void.” 78 A rudimentary framework of the complete 5‐MeO‐DMT experience is presented by James Oroc in Tryptamine Palace that include (1) dissolution into fractals of white light upon exhalation of 5‐MeO‐DMT, (2) transportation via white light and potential appearance of spirit guides and various manifestations, (3) sense of unity and that love is the principle that organizes the universe, (4) complete dissociation with ego‐identity and any concept of time, (5) reassertion of identity (return of “my” ego), (6) repossession of the physical body, and (7) return to baseline. 79 This framework serendipitously overlaps with the seven stages reported in The Toad of Dawn and how the 5‐MeO‐DMT experience seemingly progresses from beginning to end. 80 Importantly, however, Oroc (2009) emphasizes that “an infinite variety of experiences for any given individual are possible” (p. 13), which indicates that this framework needs to be confirmed in future clinical trials with follow‐up in‐depth interviews and robust qualitative research methodologies (e.g., Grounded Theory). 81

An overview of observational studies shows that the acute effects of 5‐MeO‐DMT are associated with mild to moderate physiological and psychological adverse events (e.g., fear, sadness, anxiety, confusion, fatigue, crying, paranoia, trembling, vomiting, nausea, headache, pressure on the chest or abdomen, and loss of body perception). 45 Recent clinical trials involving healthy volunteers 82 and individuals with treatment‐resistant depression 57 demonstrate that adverse events are generally transient in nature and resolve spontaneously when 5‐MeO‐DMT is administered in a controlled and supportive environment. However, anecdotal evidence also indicates that 5‐MeO‐DMT can result in so‐called “possession states” with extreme motor outbursts, which can be contained when adhering to various precautions (e.g., having “ground control” or humming soothing incantations). 73 Others report that only a very small percentage of 5‐MeO‐DMT users suffer from severe physical reactions (e.g., bodily tension), but also intense physical “calm,” and that this is a promising area of future research. 79 Furthermore, survey studies show that individuals can experience so‐called reactivations of the acute subjective effects (i.e., flashbacks) 1 week following 5‐MeO‐DMT administration, but these have primarily been reported as either a positive or neutral experience. 83 Most recently, reactivations are estimated to occur in 27% to 73% of individuals. 72 , 84 Finally, reports of psychosis are rare 73 , 85 and might be caused when used in conjunction with ayahuasca. 86 Potentially, this is because ayahuasca contains a monoamine oxidase‐A inhibitor (i.e., Psychotria viridis Banisteriopsis caapi) that has been shown to alter 5‐MeO‐DMT pharmacodynamics. 87

4. POTENTIAL THERAPEUTIC MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF 5‐MeO‐DMT IN THE TREATMENT OF AUD

4.1. The mystical experience

Similar to the other classic psychedelics, 88 , 89 5‐MeO‐DMT reliably occasions so‐called mystical experiences 44 , 45 that are broadly defined as “a sense of unity” or “the experience of becoming one with all that exists.” 90 Notably, one review has identified the psychedelic‐induced mystical experience as the strongest mediator of therapeutic efficacy in addiction 23 and has been considered a significant part of traditional 12‐step facilitation programmes, such as Alcoholics Anonymous. 91 Consistently, one large survey study demonstrated that the 5‐MeO‐DMT‐induced mystical experience is associated with improvements in alcoholism within 66% (n = 340/515) of respondents. 47 Another case study involving a 31‐year‐old veteran showed that the 5‐MeO‐DMT‐induced mystical experience was associated with reduced craving to alcohol 5 days post‐treatment, which were sustained at 1 month, with a partial return to mild alcohol use at 2 months. 48 Most recently, a retrospective online survey (n = 160) demonstrated that the reduction in alcohol consumption was significantly associated (p = 0.03) with the intensity of the mystical experience. 49

Furthermore, survey studies demonstrate that the 5‐MeO‐DMT‐induced mystical experience is associated with improvements in symptoms of depression, 47 , 50 post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), 47 , 51 , 52 and anxiety. 47 , 50 This indicates that 5‐MeO‐DMT could alleviate psychiatric mood‐related comorbidities that are highly prevalent in AUD. 92 Notably, recent studies employing Mendelian randomization indicate that psychiatric mood disorders as major depressive disorder (MDD) 93 and PTSD 94 have a causal effect on AUD. This provides support for the so‐called self‐medication hypothesis in which patients consume alcohol to alleviate negative affect. 95 , 96 , 97 Clinically, this is significant as psychiatric mood disorders are considered as one of the most significant predictors for relapse, 98 potentially due to their implication in craving 99 , 100 , 101 that impedes successful alcohol rehabilitation. 102 Ultimately, 5‐MeO‐DMT‐induced mystical experiences could improve symptoms of AUD due to the alleviation of mood‐related comorbidities.

4.2. Ego‐dissolution

Ego‐dissolution highly correlates with the mystical experience and refers to a reduction or loss of one's sense of self or personal identity. 88 , 103 Recent reviews suggest that psychedelic‐induced ego‐dissolution plays a significant role in mediating therapeutic efficacy in several psychiatric disorders. 104 , 105 To date, only one survey study (n = 42) has shown that high levels of 5‐MeO‐DMT‐induced ego‐dissolution were associated with lower ratings of depression and stress together with increases in life satisfaction. 53 Many authors argue that psychedelic‐induced ego‐dissolution triggers a psychological change through “changes of the sense of self” that helps to reshape one's “self” or identity from a detached standpoint. 104 , 106 Others refer to this as a narrative “inflection point” 35 that ultimately affords the individual to realize alternative pathways of thought and behaviour. 105

This could provide a novel perspective on the well‐established negative reinforcement framework 99 , 100 and self‐medication hypothesis. 96 Specifically, the notion that negative self‐perception underlies mental health problems has a long history in psychology 107 and has been corroborated in a meta‐analysis of 226 effect sizes demonstrating that self‐focussed attention is associated with negative affect (e.g., depression and anxiety). 108 Ego‐dissolution could be beneficial for AUD and attenuate negative reinforcement mechanisms, as it challenges negative self‐perception characterized by significant alterations in narrative selfhood, 109 reducing public self‐consciousness 110 and increasing self‐compassion. 111 Most notably, this notion is consistent with the prominent RElaxed Beliefs Under pSychedelics model, which is a unified theoretical framework positing that psychedelics primarily work by weakening the precision weighting of high‐level Bayesian priors (i.e., having deep‐seated beliefs about the self or ego). 112

4.3. Mindfulness and psychological flexibility

Mindfulness and psychological flexibility are two highly related psychological constructs that are here defined as the ability to be in the present moment with nonjudgement and to act in accordance with one's goals and values. 113 , 114 One observational study (n = 11) suggests that 5‐MeO‐DMT increases nonjudgement that significantly correlated with improvements in symptoms of MDD, anxiety, and stress. 54 Another observational study (n = 42) found significant increases in nonjudgement and awareness but reported no significant relationship with the observed significant decreases in depression, anxiety, and stress at 4 weeks follow‐up. 53 Regarding psychological flexibility, one study with war veterans (n = 51) demonstrated that 5‐MeO‐DMT was associated with significant and large increases in retrospective reports of psychological flexibility that were strongly associated with symptoms of PTSD, MDD, anxiety, and cognitive functioning change. 55 Similarly, a recent retrospective survey demonstrated that increases in psychological flexibility are a significant predictor of reducing alcohol consumption. 49 Finally, another prospective study with war veterans is suggestive of increases in psychological flexibility following 5‐MeO‐DMT, as it asked participants to what degree they were bothered by their symptoms of PTSD and cognitive impairments and found significant decreases in these measures and alcohol use when comparing responders (n = 19) to nonresponders (n = 26). 56 In other words, this finding suggests an improvement in acceptance, which is one of the six core psychological flexibility processes. 114

Addiction is suggested to be characterized by significant experiential avoidance, the opposite of acceptance, whereby individuals consume substances (e.g., alcohol) to avoid or suppress unwanted internal or external experiences. 115 Again, this aligns with the self‐medication hypothesis 96 and negative reinforcement paradigm. 99 , 100 Consistently, several reviews are beginning to demonstrate the therapeutic potential of mindfulness and psychological flexibility‐based interventions in the treatment of AUD, 116 , 117 particularly to reduce mood‐related comorbidities and levels of perceived craving. 116 , 117 , 118 , 119

4.4. Neuroimaging 5‐MeO‐DMT

There is an increasing literature of neuroimaging studies on classic psychedelics that have provided novel insights into brain mechanisms that potentially underly their therapeutic effects. 105 , 120 , 121 , 122 Currently, there are only two 5‐MeO‐DMT neuroimaging studies. 48 , 58

The first neuroimaging study conducted electroencephalography in healthy volunteers (n = 23) and hints towards three potential (sub)acute therapeutic mechanism of action for AUD. 58 First, it found significant acute fronto‐parietal increases in gamma (38–40 Hz). Extensive evidence shows that increases in gamma occur during various meditation practices, 123 , 124 particularly during self‐dissolution meditation. 124 Accordingly, this could reflect a neurological correlate of psychedelic‐induced ego‐dissolution 105 and the aforementioned narrative “inflection point” where individuals disidentify with certain thoughts, emotions, or behaviour. 35 , 105

Second, the study found significant acute increases in theta (6–8 Hz) in most subjects during 5‐MeO‐DMT. 58 Again, several reviews demonstrate parallels with (sub)acute effects of meditation, where increases in theta are associated with anxiolytic effects 124 that signify a state of relaxed alertness conducive to mental health. 125 Moreover, increases in theta in frontal midline regions (i.e., PFC and anterior cingulate cortex) are positively related to increased parasympathetic activity and decreased sympathetic activity with implications for cognitive control. 123 Consistently, two recent studies with opioid users indicate how (sub)acute theta increases in frontal midline regions result in altered self‐referential processing and reduced opioid use over time due to enhanced cognitive control. 126 , 127 Notably, a recent study demonstrated that a single dose of the classic psychedelic psilocybin led to significant increases in theta power compared with placebo 2 weeks after administration that correlated with antidepressant effects in MDD. 128 Together, this suggests that increases in theta oscillations following 5‐MeO‐DMT might improve inhibitory control and negative affect in AUD with implications for craving.

Third, the study found a significant (reversible) increase in coherence across frequency bands. 58 Coherence refers to the degree of coupling of a particular frequency between two different brain regions and can be used as an indicator of functional connectivity. 123 Various meditation practices are known to increase theta, alpha, and gamma coherence. 123 , 124 , 129 Regarding AUD, one study demonstrated higher theta and alpha coherence in long‐term abstinent alcoholics (n = 20) compared with healthy controls (n = 21) that reflects enhanced top‐down executive control (i.e., inhibitory control and emotion regulation). 130 Moreover, several cross‐sectional studies indicate that executive control is amenable to adaptation as the amount of years of abstinence increases. 130 , 131 , 132 Potentially, 5‐MeO‐DMT could reorganize executive control networks after one or several doses, which would be consistent with the neuroplasticity hypothesis of classic psychedelics 133 , 134 , 135 and meditation. 136

The second neuroimaging study conducted single‐photon emission computed tomography and found increases in brain perfusion in various regions of interest associated with AUD 3 days after 5‐MeO‐DMT. 48 Moreover, the authors speculate how 5‐MeO‐DMT's prominent affinity for serotonin receptors, particularly 5‐HT1 and 5‐HT7, 76 could have implications for the treatment of AUD. Specifically, 5‐HT1 is involved in chronic alcohol exposure through the striatum 137 , 138 and glutamatergic and GABAergic neurotransmission that modulate the cingulate cortex and default mode network, 139 whereas 5‐HT7 has been purported to mediate alcohol consumption and seeking/craving behaviour in the ventral tegmental area and striatum. 140 Yet, this report remains highly speculative, as it concerns a case report who also received ibogaine 2 days prior to 5‐MeO‐DMT that confounded the results. 48

4.5. Preclinical animal studies and potential neurobiological mechanisms

Preclinical studies hint towards five potential neurobiological mechanisms of action in AUD (see Table 1). First, preliminary evidence indicates that 5‐MeO‐DMT increases theta (4–6 Hz) and gamma (30–60 Hz) frequencies in the medial PFC and ventral hippocampus and beta band coherence across brain areas. 59 , 60 These results are broadly consistent with the aforementioned neuroimaging study 58 and the extensive literature of meditation where increases in theta, gamma, and coherence have potential implications for antidepressant and anxiolytic effects 124 , 125 but also antiaddictive effects due to improvements in inhibition. 123 , 126 , 127

Second, several studies demonstrate that 5‐MeO‐DMT induces neuroplasticity. Most recently, a single dose of 5‐MeO‐DMT was demonstrated to increase dendritic spine density in layer V pyramidal neurons of the PFC in wild‐type mice compared with 5‐HT2A knockout mice. 61 Others have shown neuroplastic effects in the medial frontal cortex with increases in dendritic spine density lasting for 1 month, 62 whereas others showed both neuroplastic effects and neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus with more complex dendritic morphology and newborn granule cells, respectively. 63 Moreover, 5‐MeO‐DMT has modulatory effects on proteins in human cerebral organoids with long‐term potentiation and the formation of dendritic spines (i.e., cellular protrusion formation, microtubule dynamics, and cytoskeletal reorganization) through several plasticity‐related intracellular pathways, such as NMDAR, AMPAR, and Eprhin B2. 64 Accordingly, many other authors posit that the neuroplastic effects account for the observed antidepressant effects in human use of 5‐MeO‐DMT, 61 , 62 , 63 particularly due to the widely established observation of structural and functional alterations in key brain regions (i.e., medial frontal cortex and hippocampus) involved in the pathophysiology of MDD 141 , 142 and AUD. 2 , 143 , 144

Third, 5‐MeO‐DMT is able to induce anti‐inflammatory effects through inhibition of the NF‐κB signalling pathway 64 and the sigma‐1 receptor that inhibited pro‐inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL‐1β, IL‐6, TNFα, and IL‐8) and increased anti‐inflammatory cytokines (i.e., IL‐10). 65 Both signalling pathways are considered as pivotal regulators of anti‐ and pro‐inflammatory responses. 145 , 146 , 147 Accordingly, 5‐MeO‐DMT could be of therapeutic significance as inflammation has been extensively documented in MDD 148 , 149 , 150 and AUD‐associated neuropsychological impairment. 151 , 152 Indeed, other researchers have recently considered anti‐inflammation as another emerging and promising therapeutic area for psychedelics. 153 , 154 Currently, one small observational study (n = 11) has shown anti‐inflammatory effects in humans following 5‐MeO‐DMT, but these were not significantly related to changes in ratings of mental health or psychedelic experience. 54

Fourth, it seems that 5‐MeO‐DMT's antidepressant effects are particularly mediated by agonism of the 5‐HT2A receptor. 66 The 5‐HT2A receptor is found in cortical layer V pyramidal neurons and purported to be the main mechanism of action for inducing the acute subjective effects of classic psychedelics. 155 It is widely distributed across the brain that could account for classic psychedelics' and 5‐MeO‐DMT's effects on various perceptual, cognitive, and emotional systems, 121 which seems to be consistent with findings from the current review (i.e., mystical experiences, ego‐dissolution, and mindfulness/psychological flexibility).

Finally, 5‐MeO‐DMT is associated with major downregulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5, 64 which is highly implicated in the rewarding effects of alcohol. 156 , 157 , 158 Ultimately, these preclinical findings are broadly consistent with the aforementioned human studies and the main hypothesis of the current review, namely, that 5‐MeO‐DMT could reduce symptoms of AUD through alleviating psychiatric mood‐related comorbidities.

5. DISCUSSION

As suggested by earlier reviews, 44 it is important to note that the therapeutic potential of 5‐MeO‐DMT remains hypothetical as most reported studies were conducted in the general population and primarily comprise observational designs unable to establish causality. Moreover, it is argued that the fundamental mechanism responsible for clinical change remains unknown. 45 Accordingly, the current paper has offered a first look at various potential therapeutic mechanisms for AUD (see Table 1). Future randomized placebo‐controlled clinical trials with several follow‐up assessments have to be conducted to establish causality and the clinical significance of each purported mechanism. The current paper will conclude by providing several recommendations for future researchers.

The current review provides the most evidence for 5‐MeO‐DMT's ability to induce mystical experiences, where decreases in AUD symptoms are potentially mediated through the alleviation of negative affect. 96 , 99 , 100 Yet, the assessment of AUD symptoms in the extant literature lacks methodological rigour. Accordingly, it is highly recommended that future research implements well‐established assessment tools, such as the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, 159 Timeline Follow‐Back, 160 and the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale. 161 Furthermore, 5‐MeO‐DMT is associated with ego‐dissolution that highly correlates with the mystical experience. 88 , 103 Ego‐dissolution triggers a psychological change in the sense of self that affords the individual to realize alternative pathways of thought and behaviour. 35 , 105 Negative self‐perception and negative affect are significantly associated with the sense of self. 107 , 108 The current review hypothesizes that the sense of self forms another salient negative reinforcement/self‐medication mechanism in AUD and that ego‐dissolution induced by 5‐MeO‐DMT along with changes in the sense of self could improve therapeutic efficacy. This should be explored in future clinical trials by assessing the degree of 5‐MeO‐DMT‐induced ego‐dissolution through the Ego Dissolution Inventory 103 and whether this moderates the therapeutic response in AUD, such as reductions in craving and decreases in alcohol consumption assessed through the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale and Timeline Follow‐Back, respectively.

The purported therapeutic salience of the mystical experience and ego‐dissolution prompts the question whether their frequency and/or intensity would provide another argument for the therapeutic use of 5‐MeO‐DMT when compared with other psychedelics. For instance, one study indicates that a “light‐to‐common” dose of 5‐MeO‐DMT (5–7 mg) is already statistically equivalent to a high dose of psilocybin (30 mg/70 kg) when comparing the intensity of mystical effects. 162 Generally, the subjective effects of classic psychedelics are dose‐dependent, 41 which suggests that 5‐MeO‐DMT‐induced mystical experiences and ego‐dissolution should increase with higher doses. Indeed, one phase‐I study of 5‐MeO‐DMT that used individualized dosing regimens (2, 6, 12, and 18 mg) seems to support this. 82 Yet, this dose‐dependent relationship simultaneously negates the purported significance of extra‐pharmacological factors (e.g., set and setting) that modulate the psychedelic experience and therapeutic response. 163 , 164 , 165 , 166 Ultimately, future research should investigate this intricate relationship of (extra‐)pharmacological factors and how it potentially demarcates the therapeutic of a particular classic psychedelic within a clinical setting.

Furthermore, there is preliminary evidence that 5‐MeO‐DMT is associated with subacute increases in mindfulness and psychological flexibility. Generally, these constructs are cultivated through mindfulness‐based interventions (MBIs), such as Acceptance Commitment Therapy (ACT). 114 Several reviews posit that the therapeutic efficacy of MBIs and ACT is similar to conventional AUD treatments, 116 , 117 particularly due to decreases in mood‐related comorbidities and levels of perceived craving. 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 Accordingly, some authors posit that MBIs and ACT should be integrated with PAT due to potential synergistic effects. 167 , 168 , 169 , 170 However, various scholars consider the Western implementation of MBIs to be inadequate due to its failure to integrate the fundamental and essential teachings of Buddhism from which mindfulness originated. 171 , 172 Specifically, these include the Four Noble Truths, the Noble Eightfold Path (the Middle Way), and the Five Precepts, which are posited to be of particular therapeutic significance in addiction recovery. 173 Buddhist recovery peer‐support programmes have integrated these Buddhist teachings, including Refuge Recovery, 174 Recovery Dharma, 175 and Eight Step Recovery. 176 Furthermore, psychodynamic therapy could also be promising as it targets various functions of the ego 177 that potentially facilitates the psychological changes in the sense of self. 35 , 105 Ultimately, future research should explore these therapeutic frameworks and whether their implementation in conjunction with 5‐MeO‐DMT could further facilitate the therapeutic response in AUD by alleviating psychiatric mood‐related comorbidities.

It is important, however, to remember that AUD is a multifactorial psychiatric disorder that is comorbid not only with psychiatric mood disorders but also with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. 92 Such comorbidity increases AUD severity due to various neuropsychological risk factors with worse treatment outcome 178 and increased risk of relapse. 98 Indeed, there is extensive evidence that AUD is comorbid with various neuropsychological impairments (i.e., attention, executive functioning and [working] memory, and social cognition) with significant clinical implications, particularly due to their effect on motivation, decision‐making, complex learning, and interpersonal relationships. 179 , 180 Notably, several authors posit that abstinence of alcohol leads to (partial) recovery of neuropsychological functioning. 181 , 182 Yet, others argue that impairments persist even after sobriety. 183 This discrepancy in recovery could be explained by differences in length of abstinence and the cognitive function targeted 184 but also the degree of polysubstance abuse, number of previous detoxifications, and duration of dependence. 182 The literature on potential neuropsychological improvements following classic psychedelics is scant. Preliminary evidence shows an association between the DMT‐containing brew ayahuasca and subacute improvements in executive functioning, 185 which is an important domain for treatment outcome. 186 There are, however, no reports of 5‐MeO‐DMT and its potential effects on neuropsychological improvement. Accordingly, it is recommended that future clinical trials should conduct pre‐post neuropsychological assessments in AUD to assess whether 5‐MeO‐DMT leads to subacute improvements in neuropsychological functioning and whether this moderates treatment outcome (e.g., decreases in alcohol consumption due to improved executive functioning). Specifically, researchers should use the Hayling Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, and the Iowa Gambling task to assess various components of executive functioning (e.g., inhibition, problem solving, and decision‐making) that are the most sensitive for alcohol effects. 186

Furthermore, animal and human studies indicate that 5‐MeO‐DMT is associated with modulation of neural oscillations. It is argued that observed increases in gamma frequency could reflect a neurological correlate of ego‐dissolution and changes in the sense of self, whereas increases in theta frequency might improve parasympathetic activity, negative affect (e.g., anxiety), and cognitive control. Another observation is that 5‐MeO‐DMT modulates coherence (i.e., functional connectivity) across frequency bands that potentially reorganizes executive control networks with improved inhibitory control and emotion regulation. Future researchers should conduct multimodal neuroimaging studies prior to and following the administration of 5‐MeO‐DMT. First, electroencephalography can confirm the reported increases in theta, gamma, and coherence and should assess whether these effects are sustained during follow‐up assessments. Second, task‐based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigms can explore whether 5‐MeO‐DMT has sustained effects on brain circuits involved in (1) incentive salience, (2) negative affect, and (3) executive function systems that are highly implicated in the pathophysiology of AUD. 2 Respectively, these brain circuits can be assessed by task‐based fMRI methods, such as (1) alcohol cue reactivity paradigms or monetary incentive delay task, (2) negative/emotional stimuli sets, and (3) the Go/No‐Go, Stop Signal Task, or Delay Discounting Task. 187 Such task‐based fMRI paradigms also allow to corroborate whether 5‐MeO‐DMT improves neuropsychological functioning and further exemplifies which therapeutic working mechanisms are deemed most significant in the treatment of AUD. Third, resting‐state fMRI should be conducted prior to and following the administration of 5‐MeO‐DMT including systems‐level dynamical assessments (e.g., brain signal complexity, metastability, and criticality). 188 , 189 Findings could corroborate the RElaxed Beliefs Under pSychedelics framework and the current paper's related argument of how rigid negative beliefs (i.e., high‐level Bayesian priors) of self‐perception mediate drinking behaviour. Moreover, findings can be related to other clinically relevant (neuro)psychological outcome measures (e.g., brain signal complexity and inhibitory control). 190

Finally, animal studies suggest that 5‐MeO‐DMT has several neurobiological mechanisms. Primarily, 5‐MeO‐DMT induces neuroplasticity in the medial PFC and hippocampus that could alleviate symptoms of MDD 141 , 142 and AUD. 2 , 143 , 144 Some implicate NMDAR, AMPAR, and Eprhin B2 to be involved in 5‐MeO‐DMT's neuroplastic effects, 64 whereas others hint to the 5‐HT2A receptor 61 or do not mention any signalling pathways at all. 62 , 63 Recently, preclinical findings with classical serotonergic psychedelics (i.e., psilocybin, LSD, DMT, and DOI) indicate that neuroplasticity primarily involves TrkB and mTor receptors 191 , 192 , 193 and that TrkB‐signalling with psilocybin and LSD is independent of 5‐HT2A activation. 191 Future research should exemplify whether 5‐MeO‐DMT is involved in TrkB‐signalling due to its promotion of brain‐derived neurotrophic factor and subsequent antidepressant effects following the atypical psychedelic ketamine 194 , 195 and conventional antidepressants. 196 , 197 Similarly, mTor‐signalling should be investigated due to its regulation of neuronal development and plasticity. 198 Furthermore, animal studies show that 5‐MeO‐DMT has anti‐inflammatory properties mediated by the NF‐κB signalling pathway 64 and the sigma‐1 receptor 65 with implications for MDD 148 , 149 , 150 and AUD‐associated neuropsychological impairment. 151 , 152 Preliminary evidence indicates that 5‐HT2A receptor agonism is implicated in 5‐MeO‐DMT's antidepressant effects and that downregulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 could reduce craving. It is highly recommended to amalgamate these final findings by conducting animal models of addiction, in particular those that have high and direct translational value to AUD in humans 199 , 200 and ideally assess incentive salience, negative affect, and executive function systems implicated in the pathophysiology of AUD. 2 Indeed, results can be juxtaposed to the aforementioned (neuro)psychological and neuroimaging designs that potentially corroborate the (reverse) translation 201 and establish the therapeutic effects of 5‐MeO‐DMT in the treatment of AUD.

6. CONCLUSION

In conclusion, there is preliminary evidence that 5‐MeO‐DMT could have potential for the treatment of AUD, particularly through the alleviation of psychiatric mood‐related comorbidities that reduce craving and improve successful rehabilitation. The current review offers a first look at several therapeutic mechanisms of action and provides recommendations for future research, including robust AUD assessment tools, exploring the intensity of the mystical experience and extra‐pharmacological factors, assess different therapeutic frameworks, neuropsychological assessment, neuroimaging studies with task‐based and resting‐state fMRI, and investigate neurobiological signalling pathways (e.g., TrkB and/or mT) together with animal models of addiction.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Stephan Tap is the lead author that has contributed to the present review paper.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The author has nothing to declare. The review paper was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Many thanks go to Prof. Dr. Wim van den Brink and Prof. Dr. Robert Schoevers for proofreading the manuscript.

Tap SC. The potential of 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine in the treatment of alcohol use disorder: A first look at therapeutic mechanisms of action. Addiction Biology. 2024;29(4):e13386. doi: 10.1111/adb.13386

Funding information This study is an independent research and no funding was received.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Carvalho AF, Heilig M, Perez A, Probst C, Rehm J. Alcohol use disorders. Lancet. 2019;394(10200):781‐792. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Koob GF, Volkow ND. Neurobiology of Addiction: A Neurocircuitry Analysis [Internet]. Vol. 3; 2016. Available from: www.thelancet.com/psychiatry [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Rehm J, Anderson P, Barry J, et al. Prevalence of and potential influencing factors for alcohol dependence in Europe. Eur Addict Res. 2015;21(1):6‐18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Grant BF, Chou SP, Saha TD, et al. Prevalence of 12‐month alcohol use, high‐risk drinking, and DSM‐IV alcohol use disorder in the United States, 2001‐2002 to 2012‐2013. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(9):911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Grant BF, Goldstein RB, Saha TD, et al. Epidemiology of DSM‐5 alcohol use disorder. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(8):757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Griswold MG, Fullman N, Hawley C, et al. Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet. 2018;392(10152):1015‐1035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. World Health Organization . Global status report on alcohol and health 2018 [internet]. 2018. [cited 2022 Jun 28].Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565639
  • 8. Burton R, Sheron N. No Level of Alcohol Consumption Improves Health. Vol. 392. The Lancet. Lancet Publishing Group; 2018:987‐988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Degenhardt L, Charlson F, Ferrari A, et al. The global burden of disease attributable to alcohol and drug use in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Psychiatry. 2018;5(12):987‐1012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sacks JJ, Gonzales KR, Bouchery EE, Tomedi LE, Brewer RD. National and state costs of excessive alcohol consumption. Am J Prev Med. 2015;49(5):e73‐e79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention . The Cost of Excessive Alcohol Use [Fact Sheet]. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services [Internet]; 2019. [cited 2022 Jun 27] Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/onlinemedia/infographics/cost-excessive-alcohol-use.html [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Ferris JA, Laslett A, Livingston M, Room R, Wilkinson C. The impacts of others' drinking on mental health. Med J Aust. 2011;195(S3):S22‐S26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Laslett AM, Callinan S, Pennay A. The increasing significance of alcohol's harm to others research. Drugs Alcohol Today. 2013;13(3):163‐172. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Witkiewitz K, Litten RZ, Leggio L. Advances in the science and treatment of alcohol use disorder. Sci Adv. 2019;5(9). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Campbell EJ, Lawrence AJ, Perry CJ. New steps for treating alcohol use disorder. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2018;235(6):1759‐1773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Ray LA, Bujarski S, Grodin E, et al. State‐of‐the‐art behavioral and pharmacological treatments for alcohol use disorder. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(2):124‐140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Morley KC, Perry CJ, Watt J, et al. New approved and emerging pharmacological approaches to alcohol use disorder: a review of clinical studies. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2021;22(10):1291‐1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Kohn R, Saxena S, Levav I, Saraceno B. The treatment gap in mental health care. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(11):858‐866. Available from: http://www.who.int/bulletin [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Mekonen T, Chan GCK, Connor J, Hall W, Hides L, Leung J. Treatment Rates for Alcohol Use Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis. Vol. 116. Addiction. John Wiley and Sons Inc; 2021:2617‐2634. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. World Health Organization . Mental Health: A Call for Action by World Health Ministers; 2001:163‐163. [Google Scholar]
  • 21. World Health Organization. The World Health Report . 2001: Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope 2001; [Google Scholar]
  • 22. World Health Organization . Mental health global action programme (mhGAP): close the gap, dare to care. In 2002.
  • 23. Bogenschutz MP, Johnson MW. Classic hallucinogens in the treatment of addictions. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2016;4(64):250‐258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. DiVito AJ, Leger RF. Psychedelics as an Emerging Novel Intervention in the Treatment of Substance Use Disorder: A Review. Vol. 47. Molecular Biology Reports. Springer Science and Business Media B.V.; 2020:9791‐9799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Rieser NM, Herdener M, Preller KH. Psychedelic‐assisted therapy for substance use disorders and potential mechanisms of action In 2021. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 26. Morgan C, McAndrew A, Stevens T, Nutt D, Lawn W. Tripping up addiction: the use of psychedelic drugs in the treatment of problematic drug and alcohol use. In: Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. Vol.13. Elsevier Ltd; 2017:71‐76. [Google Scholar]
  • 27. de Veen BTH, Schellekens AFA, Verheij MMM, Homberg JR. Psilocybin for Treating Substance Use Disorders? Vol. 17. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics. Taylor and Francis Ltd; 2017:203‐212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Zafar R, Siegel M, Harding R, et al. Psychedelic therapy in the treatment of addiction: the past, present and future. Front Psych. 2023;14:1183740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Dyck E. Flashback: psychiatric experimentation with LSD in historical perspective. Can J Psychiatry. 2005;50(7):381‐388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Dyck E. “Hitting highs at rock bottom”: LSD treatment for alcoholism, 1950–1970. Soc Hist Med. 2006;19:313‐329. [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Krebs TS, Johansen PØr. Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) for alcoholism: meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Psychopharmacol. 2012;26:994‐1002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Fuentes JJ, Fonseca F, Elices M, Farré M, Torrens M. Therapeutic Use of LSD in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Randomized‐Controlled Clinical Trials. Vol. 10, Frontiers in Psychiatry. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. van der Meer PB, Fuentes JJ, Kaptein AA, et al. Therapeutic effect of psilocybin in addiction: a systematic review. Front Psych. 2023;14:1134454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Calleja‐Conde J, Morales‐García JA, Echeverry‐Alzate V, Bühler KM, Giné E, López‐Moreno JA. Classic psychedelics and alcohol use disorders: a systematic review of human and animal studies. Addict Biol. 2022;27(6):e13229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Yaden DB, Griffiths RR. The subjective effects of psychedelics are necessary for their enduring therapeutic effects. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. American Chemical Society. 2021;4:568‐572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Nautiyal KM, Yaden DB. Does the trip matter? Investigating the role of the subjective effects of psychedelics in persisting therapeutic effects. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;48(1):215‐216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Breeksema JJ, Niemeijer AR, Krediet E, Vermetten E, Schoevers RA. Psychedelic Treatments for Psychiatric Disorders: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Patient Experiences in Qualitative Studies. Vol. 34. CNS Drugs. Adis; 2020:925‐946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Romeo B, Hermand M, Pétillion A, Karila L, Benyamina A. Clinical and biological predictors of psychedelic response in the treatment of psychiatric and addictive disorders: a systematic review. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;137:273‐282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Nielson EM, May DG, Forcehimes AA, Bogenschutz MP. The psychedelic debriefing in alcohol dependence treatment: illustrating key change phenomena through qualitative content analysis of clinical sessions. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Garcia‐Romeu A, Davis AK, Erowid F, Erowid E, Griffiths RR, Johnson MW. Cessation and reduction in alcohol consumption and misuse after psychedelic use. J Psychopharmacol. 2019;33(9):1088‐1101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Holze F, Ley L, Müller F, et al. Direct comparison of the acute effects of lysergic acid diethylamide and psilocybin in a double‐blind placebo‐controlled study in healthy subjects. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022;47(6):1180‐1187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. dos Santos RG, Bouso JC, Rocha JM, Rossi GN, Hallak JE. The use of classic hallucinogens/psychedelics in a therapeutic context: healthcare policy opportunities and challenges. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:901‐910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Nutt D. Psychedelic drugs—a new era in psychiatry? Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2019;21(2):139‐147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Ermakova AO, Dunbar F, Rucker J, Johnson MW. A narrative synthesis of research with 5‐MeO‐DMT. J Psychopharmacol. 2022;36(3):273‐294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Reckweg JT, Uthaug MV, Szabo A, et al. The clinical pharmacology and potential therapeutic applications of 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐DMT). J Neurochem. 2022;00:1‐19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Kargbo RB. 5‐MeO‐DMT: potential use of psychedelic‐induced experiences in the treatment of psychological disorders. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2021;12(11):1646‐1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Davis AK, Barsuglia JP, Lancelotta R, Grant RM, Renn E. The epidemiology of 5‐methoxy‐ N,N ‐dimethyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐DMT) use: benefits, consequences, patterns of use, subjective effects, and reasons for consumption. J Psychopharmacol. 2018;32(7):779‐792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Barsuglia JP, Polanco M, Palmer R, Malcolm BJ, Kelmendi B, Calvey T. A case report SPECT study and theoretical rationale for the sequential administration of ibogaine and 5‐MeO‐DMT in the treatment of alcohol use disorder. Prog Brain Res. 2018;242:121‐158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kervadec E, Fauvel B, Strika‐Bruneau L, et al. Reduction of alcohol use and increase in psychological flexibility after a naturalistic psychedelic experience: a retrospective survey. Alcohol Alcohol. 2023;59(2):agad078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Davis AK, So S, Lancelotta R, Barsuglia JP, Griffiths RR. 5‐methoxy‐ N,N ‐dimethyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐DMT) used in a naturalistic group setting is associated with unintended improvements in depression and anxiety. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(2):161‐169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Cox K, Lancelotta R, Barsuglia J, Davis A. 5‐MeO‐DMT and Subjective Improvements in Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. Wyoming; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Ragnhildstveit A, Khan R, Seli P, et al. 5‐MeO‐DMT for post‐traumatic stress disorder: a real‐world longitudinal case study. Front Psych. 2023;14:1271152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Uthaug MV, Lancelotta R, van Oorsouw K, et al. A single inhalation of vapor from dried toad secretion containing 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐DMT) in a naturalistic setting is related to sustained enhancement of satisfaction with life, mindfulness‐related capacities, and a decrement of psychopathological symptoms. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019;236(9):2653‐2666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Uthaug MV, Lancelotta R, Szabo A, Davis AK, Riba J, Ramaekers JG. Prospective examination of synthetic 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine inhalation: effects on salivary IL‐6, cortisol levels, affect, and non‐judgment. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020;237(3):773‐785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Davis AK, Averill LA, Sepeda ND, Barsuglia JP, Amoroso T. Psychedelic treatment for trauma‐related psychological and cognitive impairment among US special operations forces veterans. Chronic Stress. 2020;4:247054702093956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Armstrong SB, Xin Y, Sepeda ND, Polanco M, Averill LA, Davis AK. Prospective associations of psychedelic treatment for co‐occurring alcohol misuse and posttraumatic stress symptoms among United States special operations forces veterans. Mil Psychol. 2023;1‐8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Reckweg JT, van Leeuwen CJ, Henquet C, et al. A phase 1/2 trial to assess safety and efficacy of a vaporized 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine formulation (GH001) in patients with treatment‐resistant depression. Front Psych. 2023;14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Acosta‐Urquidi J. QEEG studies of the acute effects of the visionary tryptamine DMT. Cosmos History: J Natural Soc Philos. 2015;11(2):115‐129. Available from: https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/495 [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Riga MS, Lladó‐Pelfort L, Artigas F, Celada P. The serotonin hallucinogen 5‐MeO‐DMT alters cortico‐thalamic activity in freely moving mice: regionally‐selective involvement of 5‐HT1A and 5‐HT2A receptors. Neuropharmacology. 2018;142:219‐230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Winne J, Boerner BC, Malfatti T, et al. Anxiety‐like behavior induced by salicylate depends on age and can be prevented by a single dose of 5‐MeO‐DMT. Exp Neurol. 2020;326:113175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Vargas MV, Dunlap LE, Dong C, et al. Psychedelics promote neuroplasticity through the activation of intracellular 5‐HT2A receptors. Science. 2023;379(6633):700‐706. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Jefferson SJ, Gregg I, Dibbs M, et al. 5‐MeO‐DMT modifies innate behaviors and promotes structural neural plasticity in mice. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023;48(9):1257‐1266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Lima da Cruz RV, Moulin TC, Petiz LL, Leão RN. A single dose of 5‐MeO‐DMT stimulates cell proliferation, neuronal survivability, morphological and functional changes in adult mice ventral dentate gyrus. Front Mol Neurosci. 2018;11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Dakic V, Minardi Nascimento J, Costa Sartore R, et al. Short term changes in the proteome of human cerebral organoids induced by 5‐MeO‐DMT. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Szabo A, Kovacs A, Frecska E, Rajnavolgyi E. Psychedelic N,N‐dimethyltryptamine and 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine modulate innate and adaptive inflammatory responses through the sigma‐1 receptor of human monocyte‐derived dendritic cells. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e106533‐e106533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Cameron LP, Patel SD, Vargas MV, et al. 5‐HT2ARs mediate therapeutic behavioral effects of psychedelic tryptamines. ACS Chem Nerosci. 2023;14(3):351‐358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Ott J. Pharmepéna‐psychonautics: human intranasal, sublingual and oral pharmacology of 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyl‐tryptamine. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2001;33(4):403‐407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Weil AT, Davis W. Bufo alvarius: a potent hallucinogen of animal origin. J Ethnopharmacol. 1994;41(1‐2):1‐8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Lyttle T, Goldstein D, Gartz J. Bufo toads and bufotenine: fact and fiction surrounding an alleged psychedelic. J Psychoactive Drugs. 1996;28(3):267‐290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Most A. Bufo alvarius: The Psychedelic Toad of the Sonoran Desert. Venom Press; 1984. [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Sherwood AM, Claveau R, Lancelotta R, Kaylo KW, Lenoch K. Synthesis and characterization of 5‐MeO‐DMT succinate for clinical use. ACS Omega. 2020;5(49):32067‐32075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Uthaug MV, Lancelotta R, Ortiz Bernal AM, Davis AK, Ramaekers JG. A comparison of reactivation experiences following vaporization and intramuscular injection (IM) of synthetic 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine (5‐MeO‐DMT) in a naturalistic setting. J Psychedelic Stud. 2020;4(2):104‐113. [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Metzner R. The Toad and the Jaguar: A Field Report of Underground Research on a Visionary Medicine: Bufo alvarius and 5‐Methoxy‐Dimethyltryptamine. Regent press; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Erowid. Erowid . 2022. Erowid 5‐MeO‐DMT Vault. [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Halberstadt AL, Nichols DE, Geyer MA. Behavioral effects of α,α,β,β‐tetradeutero‐5‐MeO‐DMT in rats: comparison with 5‐MeO‐DMT administered in combination with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012;221(4):709‐718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Ray TS. Correction: psychedelics and the human receptorome. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(3). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Pokorny T, Preller KH, Kraehenmann R, Vollenweider FX. Modulatory effect of the 5‐HT1A agonist buspirone and the mixed non‐hallucinogenic 5‐HT1A/2A agonist ergotamine on psilocybin‐induced psychedelic experience. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2016;26(4):756‐766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Millière R, Carhart‐Harris RL, Roseman L, Trautwein FM, Berkovich‐Ohana A. Psychedelics, meditation, and self‐consciousness. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Oroc J. Tryptamine Palace: 5‐MeO‐DMT and the Sonoran Desert Toad. Simon and Schuster; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Rettig HO. The Toad of Dawn: 5‐MeO‐DMT and the Rise of Cosmic Consciousness. Divine Arts; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Birks M, Mills J. Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide. Sage; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Reckweg J, Mason NL, van Leeuwen C, Toennes SW, Terwey TH, Ramaekers JG. A phase 1, dose‐ranging study to assess safety and psychoactive effects of a vaporized 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine formulation (GH001) in healthy volunteers. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Davis A. The potential for healing and harm with 5‐MeO‐DMT. Horizons Conference; 2019. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGuFmqnX_Ww
  • 84. Ortiz Bernal AM, Raison CL, Lancelotta RL, Davis AK. Reactivations after 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine use in naturalistic settings: an initial exploratory analysis of the phenomenon's predictors and its emotional valence. Front Psych. 2022;13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Shulgin A, Shulgin A. TiHKAL: The Continuation. Transform Press; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Sauras Quetcuti RB, Farre A, Mateu G, et al. A Psychotic Episode After Ayahuasca and Secretion of Bufo alvarius Toad Consumption: A Case Report. Institute of neuropsychiatry and addictions INAD, Parc de Salut Mar; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Halberstadt AL. Behavioral and pharmacokinetic interactions between monoamine oxidase inhibitors and the hallucinogen 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2016;143:1‐10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Barrett FS, Griffiths RR. Classic hallucinogens and mystical experiences: Phenomenology and neural correlates. In: Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. Springer Verlag; 2018:393‐430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Johnson MW, Hendricks PS, Barrett FS, Griffiths RR. Classic Psychedelics: An Integrative Review of Epidemiology, Therapeutics, Mystical Experience, and Brain Network Function. Vol. 197. Pharmacology and Therapeutics. Elsevier Inc.; 2019:83‐102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Stace W. Mysticism and philosophy. Philosophy. 1960;37:140. [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Yaden DB, Berghella AP, Regier PS, Garcia‐Romeu A, Johnson MW, Hendricks PS. Classic psychedelics in the treatment of substance use disorder: potential synergies with twelve‐step programs. Int J Drug Policy. 2021;98:103380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Castillo‐Carniglia A, Keyes KM, Hasin DS, Cerdá M. Psychiatric comorbidities in alcohol use disorder. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6(12):1068‐1080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Polimanti R, Peterson RE, Ong JS, et al. Evidence of causal effect of major depression on alcohol dependence: findings from the psychiatric genomics consortium. Psychol Med. 2019;49(07):1218‐1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Bountress KE, Wendt F, Bustamante D, et al. Potential causal effect of posttraumatic stress disorder on alcohol use disorder and alcohol consumption in individuals of European descent: a Mendelian randomization study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021;45(8):1616‐1623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Turner S, Mota N, Bolton J, Sareen J. Self‐medication with alcohol or drugs for mood and anxiety disorders: a narrative review of the epidemiological literature. Depress Anxiety. 2018;35(9):851‐860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Khantzian EJ. Addiction as a self‐regulation disorder and the role of self‐medication. Addiction. 2013;108(4):668‐669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Robinson J. Role of self‐medication in the development of comorbid anxiety and substance use disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2011;68(8):800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Sliedrecht W, de Waart R, Witkiewitz K, Roozen HG. Alcohol use disorder relapse factors: a systematic review. Psychiatry Res. 2019;278:97‐115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Koob GF. Drug addiction: hyperkatifeia/negative reinforcement as a framework for medications development. Pharmacol Rev. 2021;73(1):163‐201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Koob GF. Anhedonia, Hyperkatifeia, and Negative Reinforcement in Substance Use Disorders; 2022:147‐165. doi: 10.1007/7854_2021_288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Kwako LE, Koob GF. Neuroclinical framework for the role of stress in addiction. Chronic Stress. 2017;1:247054701769814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Stohs ME, Schneekloth TD, Geske JR, Biernacka JM, Karpyak VM. Alcohol craving predicts relapse after residential addiction treatment. Alcohol Alcohol. 2019;54(2):167‐172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Nour MM, Evans L, Nutt D, Carhart‐Harris RL. Ego‐dissolution and psychedelics: validation of the ego‐dissolution inventory (EDI). Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Kałużna A, Schlosser M, Gulliksen Craste E, Stroud J, Cooke J. Being no one, being one: the role of ego‐dissolution and connectedness in the therapeutic effects of psychedelic experience. J Psychedelic Stud. 2022;6(2):111‐136. [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Stoliker D, Egan GF, Friston KJ, Razi A. Neural mechanisms and psychology of psychedelic ego dissolution. Pharmacol Rev. 2022;74(4):876‐917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Letheby C. Philosophy of Psychedelics. Oxford University Press; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Beck A. Cognitive Therapy and the Emotional Disorders. Penguin; 1979. [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Mor N, Winquist J. Self‐focused attention and negative affect: a meta‐analysis. Psychol Bull. 2002;128(4):638‐662. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Amada N, Lea T, Letheby C, Shane J. Psychedelic experience and the narrative self: an exploratory qualitative study. J Consciousness Stud. 2020;27:6‐33. [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Orłowski P, Ruban A, Szczypiński J, Hobot J, Bielecki M, Bola M. Naturalistic use of psychedelics is related to emotional reactivity and self‐consciousness: the mediating role of ego‐dissolution and mystical experiences. J Psychopharmacol. 2022;36(8):987‐1000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Stansbury K. The Influence of Psychedelic Induced Ego‐Dissolution on Self‐Compassion. California State University; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Carhart‐Harris RL, Friston KJ. REBUS and the anarchic brain: toward a unified model of the brain action of psychedelics. Pharmacol Rev. 2019;71(3):316‐344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Kabat‐Zinn J. Mindfulness. Mindfulness (N Y). 2015;6(6):1481‐1483. [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006;44(1):1‐25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Batten SV, Hayes SC. Acceptance and commitment therapy in the treatment of comorbid substance abuse and post‐traumatic stress disorder. Clin Case Stud. 2005;4(3):246‐262. [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Cavicchioli M, Movalli M, Maffei C. The clinical efficacy of mindfulness‐based treatments for alcohol and drugs use disorders: a meta‐analytic review of randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials. Eur Addict Res. 2018;24(3):137‐162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Byrne SP, Haber P, Baillie A, Costa DSJ, Fogliati V, Morley K. Systematic reviews of mindfulness and acceptance and commitment therapy for alcohol use disorder: should we be using third wave therapies? Alcohol Alcohol. 2019;54(2):159‐166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Maia MFC, Santos BF d, Castro LC d, Vieira NST, Silveira PS d. Acceptance and commitment therapy and drug use: a systematic review. Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto). 2021;31. [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Strauss C, Cavanagh K, Oliver A, Pettman D. Mindfulness‐based interventions for people diagnosed with a current episode of an anxiety or depressive disorder: a meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4):e96110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. McCulloch DEW, Knudsen GM, Barrett FS, et al. Psychedelic resting‐state neuroimaging: a review and perspective on balancing replication and novel analyses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;138:104689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. van Elk M, Yaden DB. Pharmacological, neural, and psychological mechanisms underlying psychedelics: a critical review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022;140:104793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Gattuso JJ, Perkins D, Ruffell S, et al. Default mode network modulation by psychedelics: a systematic review. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2023;26(3):155‐188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Lee DJ, Kulubya E, Goldin P, Goodarzi A, Girgis F. Review of the neural oscillations underlying meditation. Front Neurosci. 2018;12:178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Cahn BR, Polich J. Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies. Psychol Conscious Theory Res Pract. 2013;1(S):48‐96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Lomas T, Ivtzan I, Fu CHY. A systematic review of the neurophysiology of mindfulness on EEG oscillations. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;57(10):401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Hudak J, Hanley AW, Marchand WR, Nakamura Y, Yabko B, Garland EL. Endogenous theta stimulation during meditation predicts reduced opioid dosing following treatment with mindfulness‐oriented recovery enhancement. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021;46(4):836‐843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Garland EL, Hanley AW, Hudak J, Nakamura Y, Froeliger B. Mindfulness‐induced endogenous theta stimulation occasions self‐transcendence and inhibits addictive behavior. Sci Adv. 2022;8(41):eabo4455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Skosnik PD, Sloshower J, Safi‐Aghdam H, et al. Sub‐acute effects of psilocybin on EEG correlates of neural plasticity in major depression: relationship to symptoms. J Psychopharmacol. 2023;37(7):687‐697. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Martínez Vivot R, Pallavicini C, Zamberlan F, Vigo D, Tagliazucchi E. Meditation increases the entropy of brain oscillatory activity. Neuroscience. 2020;431:40‐51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Cardenas VA, Price M, Fein G. EEG coherence related to fMRI resting state synchrony in long‐term abstinent alcoholics. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;17:481‐490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Camchong J, Stenger VA, Fein G. Resting‐state synchrony in short‐term versus long‐term abstinent alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37(5):794‐803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Camchong J, Stenger A, Fein G. Resting‐state synchrony in long‐term abstinent alcoholics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2013;37(1):75‐85. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Calder AE, Hasler G. Towards an understanding of psychedelic‐induced neuroplasticity. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023;48(1):104‐112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. de Vos CMH, Mason NL, KPC K. Psychedelics and neuroplasticity: a systematic review unraveling the biological underpinnings of psychedelics. Front Psych. 2021;12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Olson DE. Biochemical mechanisms underlying psychedelic‐induced neuroplasticity. Biochemistry. 2022;61(3):127‐136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Braboszcz C, Cahn BR, Levy J, Fernandez M, Delorme A. Increased gamma brainwave amplitude compared to control in three different meditation traditions. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1):e0170647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Kelaï S, Renoir T, Chouchana L, et al. Chronic voluntary ethanol intake hypersensitizes 5‐HT 1A autoreceptors in C57BL/6J mice. J Neurochem. 2008;107(6):1660‐1670. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Belmer A, Patkar OL, Pitman KM, Bartlett SE. Serotonergic neuroplasticity in alcohol addiction. Brain Plasticity. 2016;1(2):177‐206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Hahn A, Wadsak W, Windischberger C, et al. Differential modulation of the default mode network via serotonin‐1A receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(7):2619‐2624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Hauser SR, Hedlund PB, Roberts AJ, Sari Y, Bell RL, Engleman EA. The 5‐HT7 receptor as a potential target for treating drug and alcohol abuse. Front Neurosci. 2015;8:448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Qiao H, Li MX, Xu C, Chen HB, An SC, Ma XM. Dendritic spines in depression: what we learned from animal models. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:1‐26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Holmes SE, Scheinost D, Finnema SJ, et al. Lower synaptic density is associated with depression severity and network alterations. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. Ceceli AO, Bradberry CW, Goldstein RZ. The neurobiology of drug addiction: cross‐species insights into the dysfunction and recovery of the prefrontal cortex. In: Neuropsychopharmacology. Vol.47. Springer Nature; 2022:276‐291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Avchalumov Y, Mandyam CD. Synaptic plasticity and its modulation by alcohol. Brain Plasticity. 2020;6(1):103‐111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Yu H, Lin L, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Hu H. Targeting NF‐κB pathway for the therapy of diseases: mechanism and clinical study. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5(1):209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Liu T, Zhang L, Joo D, Sun SC. NF‐κB signaling in inflammation. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2017;2(1):17023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Rosen DA, Seki SM, Fernández‐Castañeda A, et al. Modulation of the sigma‐1 receptor–IRE1 pathway is beneficial in preclinical models of inflammation and sepsis. Sci Transl Med. 2019;11(478):eaau5266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Beurel E, Toups M, Nemeroff CB. The bidirectional relationship of depression and inflammation: double trouble. Neuron. 2020;107(2):234‐256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Majd M, Saunders EFH, Engeland CG. Inflammation and the dimensions of depression: a review. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2020;56:100800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Kohler O, Krogh J, Mors O, Eriksen BM. Inflammation in depression and the potential for anti‐inflammatory treatment. Curr Neuropharmacol. 2016;14(7):732‐742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Coppens V, Morrens M, Destoop M, Dom G. The interplay of inflammatory processes and cognition in alcohol use disorders—a systematic review. Front Psych. 2019;10:632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Feldman DE, McPherson KL, Biesecker CL, et al. Neuroimaging of inflammation in alcohol use disorder: a review. Sci China Information Sci. 2020;63(7):170102. [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Flanagan TW, Nichols CD. Psychedelics and anti‐inflammatory activity in animal models. In: Barrett FS, Preller KH, eds. Disruptive Psychopharmacology. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. Vol 109232. Springer; 2022. doi: 10.1007/7854_2022_367 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Flanagan TW, Nichols CD. Psychedelics as anti‐inflammatory agents. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2018;30(4):363‐375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Nichols DE. Psychedelics. Pharmacol Rev. 2016;68(2):264‐355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Bird MK, Kirchhoff J, Djouma E, Lawrence AJ. Metabotropic glutamate 5 receptors regulate sensitivity to ethanol in mice. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008;11(06):765‐774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Bäckström P, Bachteler D, Koch S, Hyytiä P, Spanagel R. mGluR5 antagonist MPEP reduces ethanol‐seeking and relapse behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2004;29(5):921‐928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Besheer J, Faccidomo S, Grondin JJM, Hodge CW. Regulation of motivation to self‐administer ethanol by mGluR5 in alcohol‐preferring (P) rats. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2008;32(2):209‐221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Saunders JB, Aasland OG, Babor TF, De la Fuente JR, Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption‐II. Addiction. 1993;88(6):791‐804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160. Sobell LC, Sobell MB. Timeline Follow‐Back. In: Measuring Alcohol Consumption. Humana Press; 1992:41‐72. [Google Scholar]
  • 161. Flannery BA, Volpicelli JR, Pettinati HM. Psychometric properties of the Penn Alcohol Craving Scale. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 1999;23(8):1289‐1295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162. Barsuglia J, Davis AK, Palmer R, et al. Intensity of mystical experiences occasioned by 5‐MeO‐DMT and comparison with a prior psilocybin study. Front Psychol. 2018;9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163. Hartogsohn I. Set and setting, psychedelics and the placebo response: An extra‐pharmacological perspective on psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol. 2016;30(12):1259‐1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164. Olson JA, Suissa‐Rocheleau L, Lifshitz M, Raz A, Veissière SPL. Tripping on nothing: placebo psychedelics and contextual factors. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2020;237(5):1371‐1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165. Sepeda ND, Clifton JM, Doyle LY, Lancelotta R, Griffiths RR, Davis AK. Inhaled 5‐methoxy‐N,N‐dimethyltryptamine: supportive context associated with positive acute and enduring effects. J Psychedelic Stud. 2020;4(2):114‐122. [Google Scholar]
  • 166. Carhart‐Harris RL, Roseman L, Haijen E, et al. Psychedelics and the essential importance of context. J Psychopharmacol. 2018;32(7):725‐731. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167. Watts R, Luoma JB. The use of the psychological flexibility model to support psychedelic assisted therapy. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2020;15:92‐102. [Google Scholar]
  • 168. Payne JE, Chambers R, Liknaitzky P. Combining psychedelic and mindfulness interventions: synergies to inform clinical practice. ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci. 2021;4(2):416‐423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169. Eleftheriou ME, Thomas E. Examining the potential synergistic effects between mindfulness training and psychedelic‐assisted therapy. Front Psych. 2021;12:1330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170. Walsh Z, Thiessen MS. Psychedelics and the new behaviourism: considering the integration of third‐wave behaviour therapies with psychedelic‐assisted therapy. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2018;30(4):343‐349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171. Lee K. Demystifying Buddhist mindfulness: foundational Buddhist knowledge for mindfulness‐based interventions. Spirituality Clin Practice. 2018;5(3):218‐224. [Google Scholar]
  • 172. Van Gordon W, Shonin E, Griffiths MD. Buddhist emptiness theory: implications for psychology. Psychol Relig Spiritual. 2017;9(4):309‐318. [Google Scholar]
  • 173. Wang V, Stone BM. Buddhism in addiction recovery. Encyclopedia. 2022;2(1):530‐537. [Google Scholar]
  • 174. Levine N. Refuge Recovery: A Buddhist Path to Recovering From Addiction. Harper Collins; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 175. LaBelle O, Meeks M, Vest N, Hastings M, Harding T. Recovery Dharma: exploration of a Buddhist‐based mutual help organization for the treatment of addiction. J Soc Work Pract Addict. 2022;22(3):175‐187. [Google Scholar]
  • 176. Mason‐John V, Groves P. Eight Step Recovery: Using the Buddha's Teachings to Overcome Addiction. Windhorse Publication; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 177. Buchborn T, Kettner HS, Kärtner L, Meinhardt MW. The ego in psychedelic drug action—ego defenses, ego boundaries, and the therapeutic role of regression. Front Neurosci. 2023;17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178. Luderer M, Ramos Quiroga JA, Faraone SV, Zhang‐James Y, Reif A. Alcohol use disorders and ADHD. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;128:648‐660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179. Le Berre AP, Laniepce A, Segobin S, Pitel AL, Sullivan EV. Alcohol use disorder: permanent and transient effects on the brain and neuropsychological functions. In: Alosco ML, Stern RA, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Adult Cognitive Disorders. Oxford University Press; 2019:306‐337. [Google Scholar]
  • 180. Maillard A, Cabé N, Viader F, Pitel AL. Neuropsychological deficits in alcohol use disorder. In: Cognition and Addiction. Elsevier; 2020:103‐128. [Google Scholar]
  • 181. Stavro K, Pelletier J, Potvin S. Widespread and sustained cognitive deficits in alcoholism: a meta‐analysis. Addict Biol. 2013;18(2):203‐213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182. Schulte MHJ, Cousijn J, den Uyl TE, et al. Recovery of neurocognitive functions following sustained abstinence after substance dependence and implications for treatment. Clin Psychol Rev. 2014;34(7):531‐550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183. le Berre AP, Fama R, Sullivan E, v. Executive functions, memory, and social cognitive deficits and recovery in chronic alcoholism: a critical review to inform future research. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2017;41(8):1432‐1443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184. Petit G, Luminet O, de Sousa C, et al. Differential spontaneous recovery across cognitive abilities during detoxification period in alcohol‐dependence. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(8):e0176638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185. Basedow LA, Riemer TG, Reiche S, Kreutz R, Majić T. Neuropsychological functioning in users of serotonergic psychedelics—a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186. Stephan RA, Alhassoon OM, Allen KE, et al. Meta‐analyses of clinical neuropsychological tests of executive dysfunction and impulsivity in alcohol use disorder. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2017;43(1):24‐43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187. Grodin EN, Ray LA. The use of functional magnetic resonance imaging to test pharmacotherapies for alcohol use disorder: a systematic review. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019;43(10):2038‐2056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188. Hipólito I, Mago J, Rosas FE, Carhart‐Harris R. Pattern breaking: a complex systems approach to psychedelic medicine. Neurosci Conscious. 2023;2023(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189. Girn M, Rosas FE, Daws RE, Gallen CL, Gazzaley A, Carhart‐Harris RL. A complex systems perspective on psychedelic brain action. Trends Cogn Sci. 2023;27(5):433‐445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190. Kaur Y, Weiss S, Zhou C, Fischer R, Hildebrandt A. Exploring neural signal complexity as a potential link between creative thinking, intelligence, and cognitive control. J Intelligence. 2021;9(4):59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191. Moliner R, Girych M, Brunello CA, et al. Psychedelics promote plasticity by directly binding to BDNF receptor TrkB. Nat Neurosci. 2023;26(6):1032‐1041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192. de la Fuente RM, Zhu B, Guevara CA, et al. Prolonged epigenomic and synaptic plasticity alterations following single exposure to a psychedelic in mice. Cell Rep. 2021;37(3):109836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193. Ly C, Greb AC, Cameron LP, et al. Psychedelics promote structural and functional neural plasticity. Cell Rep. 2018;23(11):3170‐3182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194. Medeiros GC, Gould TD, Prueitt WL, et al. Blood‐based biomarkers of antidepressant response to ketamine and esketamine: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Mol Psychiatry. 2022;27(9):3658‐3669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195. Lin PY, Ma ZZ, Mahgoub M, Kavalali ET, Monteggia LM. A synaptic locus for TrkB signaling underlying ketamine rapid antidepressant action. Cell Rep. 2021;36(7):109513. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196. Casarotto PC, Girych M, Fred SM, et al. Antidepressant drugs act by directly binding to TRKB neurotrophin receptors. Cell. 2021;184(5):1299‐1313.e19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197. Cavaleri D, Moretti F, Bartoccetti A, et al. The role of BDNF in major depressive disorder, related clinical features, and antidepressant treatment: insight from meta‐analyses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023;149:105159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198. Switon K, Kotulska K, Janusz‐Kaminska A, Zmorzynska J, Jaworski J. Molecular neurobiology of mTOR. Neuroscience. 2017;341:112‐153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199. Nieto SJ, Grodin EN, Aguirre CG, Izquierdo A, Ray LA. Translational opportunities in animal and human models to study alcohol use disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200. Spanagel R. Animal models of addiction. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2017;19(3):247‐258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201. Kwako LE, Momenan R, Grodin EN, Litten RZ, Koob GF, Goldman D. Addictions neuroclinical assessment: a reverse translational approach. Neuropharmacology. 2017;122:254‐264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.


Articles from Addiction Biology are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES