Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing problem in African cattle production systems, posing a threat to human and animal health and the associated economic value chain. However, there is a poor understanding of the resistomes in small-holder cattle breeds in East African countries. This study aims to examine the distribution of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda cattle using a metagenomics approach. We used the SqueezeMeta-Abricate (assembly-based) pipeline to detect ARGs and benchmarked this approach using the Centifuge-AMRplusplus (read-based) pipeline to evaluate its efficiency. Our findings reveal a significant number of ARGs of critical medical and economic importance in all three countries, including resistance to drugs of last resort such as carbapenems, suggesting the presence of highly virulent and antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens (ESKAPE) circulating in East Africa. Shared ARGs such as aph(6)-id (aminoglycoside phosphotransferase), tet (tetracycline resistance gene), sul2 (sulfonamide resistance gene) and cfxA_gen (betalactamase gene) were detected. Assembly-based methods revealed fewer ARGs compared to read-based methods, indicating the sensitivity and specificity of read-based methods in resistome characterization. Our findings call for further surveillance to estimate the intensity of the antibiotic resistance problem and wider resistome classification. Effective management of livestock and antibiotic consumption is crucial in minimizing antimicrobial resistance and maximizing productivity, making these findings relevant to stakeholders, agriculturists, and veterinarians in East Africa and Africa at large.
Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance, Cattle, Metagenomics, Resistomes, East Africa, Antimicrobial Resistance Genes (ARGs)
Introduction
According to the World Health Organization, antimicrobials are used for the prevention and/or treatment of infections in animals, humans, and plants. Antimicrobials include antibiotics, antifungals, and antiparasitics (WHO, 2021). Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) refers to the ability of microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, parasites and viruses to evolve and become resistant to antibiotics, and when this happens, infections become more difficult to treat, thereby increasing the risk of disease spread, severe illness, and ultimately death (Prestinaci, Pezzotti & Pantosti, 2015). This has become a global health concern worldwide (Donado-Godoy et al., 2015). The emergence of resistance to antibiotics in microorganisms, especially bacteria, is partially due to the existence of resistance genes (Zalewska et al., 2021), and farm animals, such as cattle being the prime reservoirs for these genes (Kim & Ahn, 2022).
Despite the importance of antimicrobials in the livestock sector, with reference to veterinary medicines used for the treatment of animal infections and growth promotion of animals, the uncontrolled, subtherapeutic doses of antibiotics in cattle farms can promote the growth of bacteria that are antibiotic resistant, which in turn affects the changes in microbial metabolism of the animal’s rumen and the global health crisis associated with antibiotic resistance (Maron, Smith & Nachman, 2013; Economou & Gousia, 2015). The transmission of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) occurs majorly through conjugation, which refers to horizontal gene transfer that exchanges mobile genetic elements, such as plasmids and transposons that code for ARGs between bacterial species (Redondo-Salvo et al., 2020). Bacteria can also develop antibiotic resistance through chromosomal mutation that empowers them with the ability to withstand high concentrations of antimicrobials from recurrent exposure (Baym et al., 2016). In other cases, they have natural resistance due to the presence of an impermeable cell membrane or lack of an inherent target molecule for the antibiotic to counter against (Mann et al., 2021).
In Africa, reports indicate that the continent has the lowest antimicrobial usage in animals worldwide (World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE), 2020), even though a high incidence of resistance to antimicrobials have been observed in foodborne pathogens isolated from animals and animal products (Van Boeckel et al., 2019). However, there is limited data in East Africa on antimicrobial knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) (Kemp et al., 2021). It has been recorded that the extensive usage of antimicrobials/antibiotics for treatment of dairy cattle infected with certain pathogens encourages the development of resistant strains in such host animals (Vincent et al., 2018). Research shows that in East Africa, AMR is linked to human-animal contact, community transmission of resistant bacteria, and ease of access to cheap antibiotics (Omulo et al., 2015) but there is little information on the source, diversity, as well as the distribution of antimicrobial resistant genes in the most non-cultivable environmental bacterial-pathogens in Africa.
The shown ability to project AMR from genetic sequencing data is a significant leap in resistome surveillance. There have been efforts to model the evolution of viral pathogens like SARS-CoV-2 using genomic sequence data (Awe et al., 2023), HIV-1 evolution in sub-Saharan Africa (Obura et al., 2022), biomarker discovery (Chikwambi et al., 2023; Nyamari et al., 2023; El Abed et al., 2023), malaria/CoVID-19 biomarker discovery (Nzungize et al., 2022), analysis of RNA-seq and ChIP-seq data (Ather et al., 2018), and Ebola Virus comparative genomics (Oluwagbemi & Awe, 2018). Genomics and bioinformatics have been reported to be playing a key role in newborn screening (Wesonga & Awe, 2022) and in agriculture. For instance, there have been computational methods to define gene families and their expression in legumes (Die et al., 2019). High sensitivity, which is the ability to recognize AMR determinants associated with antimicrobial resistance phenotype and high specificity, which is the ability to recognize the absence of AMR determinants in an antimicrobial susceptible phenotype have been observed depending on the bacterial species studied (Hendriksen et al., 2019a; Hendriksen et al., 2019b). One of the methods that can be used in analysing DNA sequences is metagenomics. Metagenomics refers to the study of the structure and function of the total nucleotide sequences which is isolated and analysed from the entire community of micro-organisms present in a sample (Thomas, Gilbert & Meyer, 2012). A notable technique called shotgun metagenomics, studies the genetic content of an environmental sample by extracting and sequencing its microbial community’s total genomic DNA. As a result, this technique yields a substantial overview of the microbiota and allows for the simultaneous investigation of the taxonomic classification and functional aspects of the microbial communities (Kibegwa et al., 2020), as compared to its counterpart, amplicon sequencing approach which only targets a particular region of the community’s genomic DNA. Hence, shotgun metagenomics is the most suitable approach for our study.
According to the East Africa Integration agenda, the East African Community (EAC) aims at transforming the region into a single market (Umulisa, 2020). This means goods and services will be moving across different partner states and that includes the most widely used dairy products from cattle. For milk alone, Eastern Africa is recorded as the first and leading milk-producing region in Africa. It represents 68% of the continent’s milk production with Kenya and Tanzania being amongst the biggest dairy producers in Africa (Bingi & Tondel, 2015). All of this, when integrated into the value chain, creates employment opportunities through businesses done by the movement of products around the member states.
An understanding of circulating resistomes is thus crucial since cattle management becomes quite difficult with disease burden, leading to a reduced production as well as increasing production costs, which threatens the economic growth agenda of the EAC. In this case, it is important to understand the emergence of resistomes within the states implicated to better manage livestock in maximizing production and lowering risk and production costs. In addition to the cost-related benefits of the study, the outcomes will assist stakeholders in a large extent to improve the standardization protocols that control the circulation of cattle-derived products and guide veterinarians on informed decisions on how to efficiently manage clinical cases.
Methods
Workflow
Data acquisition
Metagenomics data of Kenyan, Ugandan and Tanzanian cattle gut microbiome was obtained from public repositories. The data was obtained using the search method described in Supplementary methods: Data Search. The Kenyan and Ugandan datasets were retrieved from ENA under bioprojects PRJEB28482 and PRJEB20456 respectively, using fasterq-dump from the NCBI SRA Toolkit (https://github.com/ncbi/sra-tools/wiki/01.-Downloading-SRA-Toolkit). All samples from bioprojects PRJEB28482 (Kenya dataset) were used but only six samples (samples ERR1950666 to ERR1950671) from the bioproject PRJEB20456 (Uganda dataset) were used. This was because Uganda dataset had a significantly higher read depth per sample than the Kenya and Tanzania datasets. The grabseqs tool (Taylor, Abbas & Bushman, 2020) was used to retrieve the Tanzania dataset from MG-RAST server (Meyer et al., 2008) under the project mgp81260. Table 1 highlights the total number of samples and size of dataset obtained from each country.
Table 1. Metadata describing experimental aspects of the samples obtained from each country.
Country | Size (.gz format) | Sample count | Sample type | Sequencing Platform | Collection date |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kenya | 2.6 Gb | 47 (single end) | Rumen liquor and fecal | Illumina Miseq | 2016 |
Tanzania | 1.6 Gb | 36 (single end) | Fecal | Illumina Miseq V3 | 2015 and 2016 |
Uganda | 23.2 Gb | 06 (paired end) | Fecal | Illumina Hiseq X-Ten | 2016 and 2017 |
Quality control
Fastqc was used to assess the quality of the raw reads (Andrews, 2010). Multiqc was used to generate an aggregate report for all fastqc reports per country (Ewels et al., 2016). The retrieved reads were all of good quality with a quality score (Q) greater than 20; thus, we saw no need to further trim them to much higher qualities since from Q ≥ 20 is within tolerable limit for Illumina data without interfering with subsequent downstream analyses.
Metagenomics data analysis
The initial metagenomics analysis of taxonomic abundance and functional annotation was achieved with SqueezeMeta v1.5.1 (Tamames & Puente-Sánchez, 2019), which is a pipeline that constitutes all the steps from assembly of reads to functional annotation. Megahit was used for assembling (Li et al., 2015). Prinseq was used to remove short contigs (<200 bps) and determine contig statistics (Schmieder & Edwards, 2011). Barrnap was used to predict RNAs (Seemann, 2014). RDP classifier was used to taxonomically classify 16S rRNA sequences (Wang et al., 2007). Aragorn was used for predicting tRNA/tmRNA sequences (Laslett, 2004). Prodigal was used to predict open reading frames (ORFs) (Hyatt et al., 2010). Diamond (Buchfink, Xie & Huson, 2014) was used to search for similarity between eggNOG (Huerta-Cepas et al., 2015), GenBank (Clark et al., 2015), and KEGG (Kanehisa, 2000). Searches for HMM homology were performed using HMMER3 (Eddy, 2009) from the Pfam database (Finn et al., 2015). Using Bowtie2 (Finn et al., 2015), reads were mapped against contigs. Binning was conducted using MaxBin2 and Concoct (Wu, Simmons & Singer, 2015), and Metabat2 (Kang et al., 2019).
Detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs)
ARGs were detected from the assembly output of the SqueezeMeta pipeline with abricate version 1.0.1 (tseemann, 2020) using all its built-in databases which include CARD (Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database) and resfinder, NCBI AMRFinderPlus, ARG-ANNOT, EcOH, MEGARES 2.00 (Feldgarden et al., 2019; McArthur et al., 2013; Bortolaia et al., 2020; Gupta et al., 2014; Donado-Godoy et al., 2015; Ingle et al., 2016), which is the default setting for robustness and sensitivity to ARGs detection.
Benchmarking
To benchmark our analysis workflow (Fig. 1A) containing SqueezeMeta for metagenomics analysis and abricate for ARG’s identification, we compared the efficiency of our workflow (Fig. 1A) with our benchmarking workflow (Fig. 1B). The benchmarking workflow contained AMRplusplus v2.0.2 (Gray & Head, 2008) for resistome identification, centrifuge version 1.0.4 (Kim et al., 2016) for taxonomic assignment and Krona version 2.8.1 (Ondov, Bergman & Phillippy, 2011) for the visualisation of taxonomic profiles. It is worth mentioning that generally (Fig. 1A) workflow was assembly based and (Fig. 1B) workflow was read based. In this way we were also assessing the efficiency of assembly-based methods against read based methods in the identification of ARGs in our study.
Data visualization
A key stage in data analysis is the interpretation of the obtained results from different sequence analysis tools. This can be done by using plots, graphs, tables etc, depending on the results you have and the question you are trying to answer. Given our study objectives, which aimed to present taxonomic and functional annotations and the visualization of the identified drug classes and ARGs identified, we relied heavily on the use of R and Python programming languages as well as Krona for the visualisation of centrifuge in particular. Portions of this text were previously published as part of a preprint (Omar et al., 2023).
Results
Taxonomic microbial abundance and functional annotation
Assessment of taxonomic composition is essential in any metagenomics study. It provides you with the insights needed to draw necessary conclusion with regard to your study. In our case where we were interested in detecting antimicrobial resistance, annotating the potential taxonomies found in our samples aids in giving an idea of the severity of resistance and possible mechanism of transmission of these genes across different bacteria if at all certain strains linked with horizontal gene transfers are to be identified. In this section, we highlight the taxonomic and functional abundance of our analysis samples.
Taxonomic Microbial Abundance in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda
Kenya.
Our results highlight some of the details regarding the possible taxonomic composition and functional capacity of microbial communities in samples from each country. In Fig. S1A, a greater proportion of reads were unmapped in the Kenyan dataset. The phyla Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes were observed to be the most abundant in decreasing order, with Proteobacteria being most abundant in some samples. All viruses were unclassified here. Similarly, at the family level of prokaryotic abundance, there was a large percentage of unmapped reads as shown in Fig. S2A, produced by SqueezeMeta in the co-assembly mode and the most abundant families were Prevotellaceae and Bacteriodaceae. Pseudomonadaceae was prevalent in a few of the sample reads with a spiked abundance level.
Figure 2A was generated using the custom pipeline (Fig. 1B) to benchmark taxonomic assignment of the metagenomic results obtained from SqueezeMeta. At the phylum level, Proteobacteria was generally observed to be most abundant as seen in some of the samples from the SqueezeMeta pipeline. However, at the family level, Pseudomonadaceae was observed to be most abundant, which is consistent with what was observed in some samples of the analysis with SqueezeMeta. Here, a better species resolution is observed.
Tanzania.
In the Tanzanian dataset, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes are the most abundant phyla (Fig. S1B), a similar observation to that of Kenya. Based on the co-assembly generated by SqueezeMeta, majority of the reads were abundant for the family—Pseudomonadaceae in a few samples, followed closely by Comamonadaceae and Oxalobacteraceae (Fig. S2B). As seen previously with the Kenyan samples, a high proportion of reads were also unmapped. There were unclassified abundances of bacteria and viruses observed in the taxonomy as well.
The benchmark with Centrifuge i.e., a tool used to implement the custom pipeline, was used to assign taxonomic labels to sequence reads from Tanzania (Fig. 2B). The plot also shows species-level assignment as compared to the plot generated from SqueezeMeta. Interestingly, in both plots (Fig. S1A and Fig. 2B), there is a high percentage of the phylum—Proteobacteria and unmapped reads as well as a minute level of virus abundance. However, in this plot (Fig. 2B), it details and expands more on the Proteobacteria phylum, such as the divisions - Alphaprotobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria, and the gram-negative bacteria - Pseudomonas fluorescens, P. azotoformans, Enterobacteriaceae etc.
Uganda.
With the Ugandan dataset (Fig. S1C), there was an uneven distribution of abundances for each phylum in the few samples retrieved from the dataset. The most abundant were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria and unmapped or unidentified sequence reads. Fusobacteria and Bacteroides were only prevalent in a few of them. The most prevalent families observed were Enterobacteriaceae and Oscillospiraceae.
The benchmark results clearly resolve the most abundant phylum to be Proteobacteria (Figs. S1C and S2C). The taxonomic classification in the Fig. 2C is similar at the family level with SqueezeMeta results having the most abundant family as Enterobacteriaceae. At species level (Fig. 2C), there is a presence of ESKAPE pathogens: Enterobacter spp, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Functional annotation of Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda samples
Functional annotation provides an overview of the possible physiological functions that the microbiome might have while they are in the gut environment. In our case this information may be used to understand the possible mechanisms that underlie development of antimicrobial resistance if any. In our study, a total of 15 KEGG orthologue resistance genes were functionally annotated in the Kenyan samples (Fig. S3A). The analyses show that the orthologue—Iron complex outer membrane receptor protein (K02014)—was enriched in a few of the samples, with expression profiles of TPM (transcripts per million) above 3,000, while other genes expressed were below 3,000. A similar trend was observed in the Tanzanian samples (Fig. S3B), with K02014 having high expression levels. On the other hand, there was a disparity of orthologue resistance genes in the Ugandan samples (Fig. S3C), as there was an absence of K02014. However, there were high gene expression profiles in K06147 (ATP-binding cassette, subfamily B bacterial), with TPM levels above 3,000, K07497 (putative transposase) with TPM levels between 2,000 and 3,000 in a few of the samples. All other gene expression profiles were below 2,000.
Identified AMR drug classes
Understanding the AMR drug classes to which potential AMR genes belong to, helps to provide an overview of the extent of resistance to antimicrobials and the potential threat it poses to public health. In this study, four drug classes of resistance common to Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania were identified from the metagenomic assembled contigs. These were Tetracycline, Beta-Lactam, Sulfonamide and Streptomycin. However, there was a varying prevalence to these drug classes in each of the East African countries. Tetracycline resistance was the highest in Kenya and Uganda, with a prevalence of 27% and 24% respectively (Figs. S4A and S4C). Lincosamide resistance was only detected in the Kenyan cattle samples while Streptomycin, Sulfonamide and Spectinomycin resistance was the lowest at 9% (Fig. S4A). Carbapenem resistance was found solely in Tanzanian cattle samples. Additionally in Tanzania, resistance levels were lowest for Chloramphenicol and Trimethoprim (both at 6%). Ugandan samples had 15 unique drug classes, including Cephalosporin, Streptothricin, Quinolone, Nitroimadazole and others (Fig. S4C). The highest number of resistance drug classes was found in Uganda, with a total of 15 (Fig. 3A and Table 2).
Table 2. Drug classes in which resistance was identified in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania mined from assembled contigs.
Country’s name | Count | ARGs drug class |
---|---|---|
Kenya Tanzania Uganda | 4 | SULFONAMIDE BETA-LACTAM TETRACYCLINE STREPTOMYCIN |
Tanzania Uganda | 2 | TRIMETHOPRIM CHLORAMPHENICOL;FLORFENICOL |
Kenya Uganda | 1 | LINCOSAMIDE |
Uganda | 15 | ERYTHROMYCIN AMIKACIN;KANAMYCIN NITROIMIDAZOLE AMINOGLYCOSIDE AMIKACIN;KANAMYCIN;QUINOLONE;TOBRAMYCIN STREPTOTHRICIN RESISTANCE VANCOMYCIN QUINOLONE PHENICOL;QUINOLONE CHLORAMPHENICOL CEPHALOSPORIN MACROLIDE FOSFOMYCIN LINCOSAMIDE;STREPTOGRAMIN |
Tanzania | 1 | CARBAPENEM |
Kenya | 1 | SPECTINOMYCIN;STREPTOMYCIN |
On benchmarking our assembly-based approach of ARGs identification with the read-based method in AMRplusplus, we identified a broader spectrum of drug classes since the drug classes belonged to ARGs that were directly mined from the reads rather than the assembly (which does not assemble all reads thus leaving out some information). The number of drug classes identified from reads in the 3 countries were reported to be 59. Uganda has all 59 drug classes with 11 unique to Uganda. Tanzania and Kenya had 44 drug classes each (Fig. S5 and Table S1).
Identified AMR genes
AMR genes in the microbiome pose a possible threat of unmanageable bacterial infections when the bacteria have virulence factors or acquires virulence factors. In this study, we evaluated the possibility of antibiotic resistance in the case of an infection by identifying AMR genes. The Ugandan dataset had the highest number of AMR genes detected from the assembly, totalling to 111 genes (Fig. 4 and Table 3). The common AMR genes identified in the three countries studied are aph(6)-id (aminoglycoside phosphotransferase), tet (tetracycline resistance gene), sul2 (sulfonamide resistance gene) and cfxA_gen (betalactamase gene). The two AMR genes unique to Kenya include cfxA6 class A beta (lactamase) and aadA27 (streptomycin/spectinomycin resistance gene) (Table 3).
Table 3. AMR genes present in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania mined from assembled contigs.
Country’s Name | Count | ARGs |
---|---|---|
Kenya Tanzania Uganda | 4 | aph(6)-Id tet(40) sul2 cfxA_gen |
Kenya Uganda | 3 | tet(O) lnu(C) tet(W) |
Tanzania Uganda | 5 | sul1 aadA1 aadS tet(A) aph(3″)-Ib |
Kenya | 2 | cfxA6 aadA27 |
Tanzania | 7 | floR2 blaTHIN-B blaRm3 tet(G) aadA11 aadA4 dfrB1 |
Uganda | 99 | aadA2 dfrA15 tet(44) blaOXY-1-1 blaEC-13 ere(D) fosA4 erm(B) aac(6′)-Ib-cr4 tet(33) erm(Q) msr(D) cmlA1 tet(D) tet(X) mph(B) cfxA2 str dfrA14 lnu(B) vanR-O blaOXA-347 blaEC-5 hugA qnrS1 cmx blaHER-3 tet(S) fosA qnrD1 ant(6)-Ia mef(A) lsa(E) dfrF qnrB6 blaOKP-A-11 tet(M) tet(K) blaOXY-3-1 erm(C) oqxB9 dfrA8 catA14 sul3 tetA(P) blaSED tet(B) erm(F) oqxA10 blaLAP-2 sat2_gen aadA9 tet(32) lnu(AN2) dfrA17 dfrG aad9 fosA8 dfrA23 oqxB20 blaACI-1 catA2 dfrA1 fosA5 blaEC-18 fosA7 aph(3′)-IIIa blaCMY-48 erm(G) qnrB2 tet(Z) qnrB62 tet(L) fosA_gen ant(6)-Ib mef(En2) dfrA12 qnrS13 aadA5 tetB(P) erm(X) dfrA27 blaACT-41 sat4 floR aadE tet(H) blaCMY-157 mph(A) nimE blaCTX-M-152 blaEC-15 dfrA5 blaCMY-151 GENE oqxA9 blaTEM-1 tet(Q) fosA6 |
A total of 1,425 AMR genes were identified from the reads as a benchmark of the assembly-based approach. Uganda had a total of 1,420 ARGs in circulation, 965 of which were unique to Uganda, while Tanzania had 403 AMR genes in circulation with 3 unique to itself. Kenya had 353 genes in circulation which were also found in either Uganda or Tanzania (Fig. S6 and Table S2). There were many genes identified from reads as compared to those mined from assembled contigs. This is because during assembly, assembled contigs exclude some reads which may contain some of the AMR genes.
Discussion
In our study, we performed metagenomic analysis on public datasets generated from cattle rumen and faecal samples in the three East African countries; Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. Our data analysis suggests that Prevotellaceae, Pseudomonadaceae and Enterobacteriaceae are the most abundant families in Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda respectively. These findings agree with previous reports (Kibegwa et al., 2020; Okubo et al., 2018). Enterobacteriaceae, the most abundant family which includes Escherichia coli, the most abundant species in Uganda, has been associated with acquiring antimicrobial-resistance-genes from other bacteria through horizontal gene transfer, hence acting as reservoirs of AMR genes (Bailey et al., 2010; Carattoli, 2008). In addition to E. coli, a higher number of ESKAPE pathogens such as Enterobacter spp, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were identified in Uganda. Thus, the presence of high abundance of E. coli and ESKAPE pathogens could explain the high number of circulating resistomes in Uganda compared to the other East African countries in the study.
In all three countries, Tetracycline antibiotic resistance was observed to be the most prevalent. This may be due to the fact that Tetracycline is the most widely used broad spectrum antibiotic in the East African countries (Kimera et al., 2020). According to Sangeda et al. (2021), the most common antibacterial agents used in Tanzania are aminoglycosides, beta-lactams, quinolones, tetracycline, trimethoprim, sulfonamides, and various antibacterial cocktails, with the tetracycline class topping the list. The aforementioned findings closely align with our study results to a great extent, as we also found similar resistances to the drugs described by Sangeda et al. (2021) in the Tanzania cattle samples. This could be as a result of the all-time culprit, the overuse or incorrect usage of these antibacterial medications.
The read based method further highlighted that aminoglycosides are the common resistance drug class shared by all the three countries followed by tetracyclines. Elfamycins and MLS (macrolides-lincosamides and streptogramins B) resistance was also identified in Kenya and Tanzania using the read based method. These findings were not featured in the assembly-based method, hence highlighting the strength of detecting more AMR genes that read based methods has over assembly-based methods.
The genes identified to be common in the three countries (aph6-id, tet, sul2, cfxA_gen) are of public health significance. In several studies, the gene aph6-id, which is an aminoglycoside resistance gene, has been linked to multi-drug resistant E. coli in cattle farms in Korea (Belaynehe et al., 2017), Jeddah (Yasir et al., 2020) and Pakistan (Ali et al., 2021). This gives an indication of the widespread distribution of this gene and is a critical epidemiological marker that could increase multidrug resistance in other pathogens through horizontal gene transfer. The genes, tet and sul2 enhance resistance to sulfonamides and tetracyclines, which are very important antimicrobial classes according to WHO’s ranking (WHO, 2017). These antibiotics are heavily used in livestock industry in East Africa (Orwa et al., 2017; Sangeda et al., 2021), and over time, the antibiotic residues in beef from cattle may constitute a health risk to humans when consumed. The presence of cfx gene, which encodes for cephalosporin resistance indicates that cephalosporin is also one of the most widely used antibiotics in East Africa. Altogether, this suggests the need for approaches that combat the increasing antimicrobial resistance incidences.
Functional annotation was performed using SqueezeMeta pipeline, which generated heat maps of genes identified in the three EAC countries - Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania. Of the 15 annotated KEGG orthologues, four exhibited significantly elevated gene expression profiles corresponding to the sample genes in the three countries. In Kenya and Tanzania, gene profile K02014 - iron complex outer membrane receptor protein gene, was highly expressed for some samples as seen in Figs. S3A and S3B. This functional profile gives survival advantage to the bacteria by helping the bacteria bind to iron-containing molecules in the environment, thus enabling them to live longer (Palmer & Skaar, 2016; Caza & Kronstad, 2013), potentially leading to the transfer of ARGs or acquiring more ARGs through mutations and horizontal gene transfer.
In Uganda, three KEGG orthologues had a significantly high gene expression profile for some samples as seen in Fig. S3C. These include; functional profiles K06147—ATP-Binding cassette subfamily B, K07497—putative transposase and K07483—transposase, in their respective decreasing expression levels in TPM (Transcripts per million).
According to Vigil-Stenman et al. (2017), transposons play a fundamental role in bacterial genome-plasticity and host-adaptation, although their transcriptional activity in the natural bacterial communities has not been largely explored. Thus, the K07497—putative transposase and K07483—transposase functional profiles as per the KEGG orthologue heat map in Fig. S3C, suggests the possibility that the introduction and use of antibiotics triggered the changes in genomic regions (mediated by transposons) of the bacteria in the samples. Changes in these regions might have resulted into resistant genes with significant expression in some of the sample genes collected from Uganda.
The use of short reads sequences posed challenges in assembling some reads into contigs. Lower sequencing depth in the samples for Kenya and Tanzania in the analysis might have contributed to less observations of drug resistance classes compared to Ugandan samples. Moreover, there was not enough gut metagenomic samples available for all the three countries for our analysis. This hampered having solid conclusion on the resistome status in the three countries.
Conclusions and next steps
Antimicrobial resistance to drugs and other therapeutics is consistently on the rise, as evidenced by the findings of several studies emphasising the numerous routes by which bacteria harbouring AMR genes may be transmitted to humans. Based on the economic value of cattle in Africa, and beef being a common source of protein, we focused on the East African cattle to determine which AMR genes would be found through shotgun metagenomic analysis. Our findings indicate that East African cattle’s gut microbiome has a wide range of antibiotic resistance genes. Thus, the need for the development of new antibiotic drug classes to suppress the effects of bacteria harbouring AMR genes. Furthermore, the potential of transmission from cattle to humans poses a larger threat.
This study gives an overview of the current state of antibiotic resistance in selected East African countries. This includes the identification of a wide range of ARGs, including ARGs linked to multi drug resistance in E. coli such as aph6-id. It also associates high prevalence of ARGs to the high abundance of Enterobacteriaceae and ESKAPE pathogens. This information could serve as a signal to authorities coordinating East African integration, prompting them to modify and/or formulate policies governing antibiotic use and transit of dairy products across the EAC member nations and Africa at large. It is essential for them to recognize that the development agenda has a cost, which involves focusing and incentivizing researchers to conduct more studies on combating antibiotic resistance, to guarantee a prosperous and harmonious integration of EAC.
Our study acts as a pilot in efforts of AMR surveillance using metagenomics samples in the EAC region. Here, we benchmarked assembly-based methods against read-based methods. Based on our two workflows, we noted that read based methods are more robust for the identification of AMR genes. However, this might vary depending on your research questions and design.
Supplemental Information
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Data Science Strategy (ODSS), the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) and the Genetics Society of America for their immense support before and during the October 2022 Omics codeathon organised in collaboration with the African Society for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (ASBCB).
Abbreviations
- AMR
Antimicrobial Resistance
- ARGs
Antibiotic Resistance Genes
- EAC
East African Community
- FDR
False Discovery Rate
- ESKAPE
Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp
Funding Statement
The authors received no funding for this work.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Kauthar M. Omar conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
George L. Kitundu performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Adijat O. Jimoh analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Dorcus N. Namikelwa analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Felix M. Lisso analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Abiola A. Babajide analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Seun E. Olufemi analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Olaitan I. Awe analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the article, and approved the final draft.
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The data is available at GitHub and Zenodo:
- https://github.com/omicscodeathon/amr_cattle
- Dorcus Namikelwa, Kauthar M. Omar, George Kitundu, Olaitan I. Awe, Lisso_, & Johny. (2023). omicscodeathon/amr_cattle: amr_cattle_code (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10253044
The sequences are available at GenBank: PRJEB28482 and PRJEB20456.
The Tanzanian Dataset is available at MG-RAST: mgp81260.
References
- Ali et al. (2021).Ali A, Fontana H, Sano E, Li R, Humayon M, Rahman S, Lincopan N, Mohsin M. Genomic features of a high-risk mcr-1.1-positive Escherichia coli ST10 isolated from cattle farm environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2021;28(38):54147–54152. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15437-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Andrews (2010).Andrews S. Babraham Bioinformatics. FastQC a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ 2010
- Ather et al. (2018).Ather SH, Awe OI, Butler TJ, Denka T, Semick SA, Tang W, Busby B. SeqAcademy: an educational pipeline for RNA-Seq and ChIP-Seq analysis. F1000Research. 2018;7:628. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.14880.4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Awe et al. (2023).Awe OI, En najih N, Nyamari MN, Mukanga LB. Comparative study between molecular and genetic evolutionary analysis tools using African SARS-CoV2 variants. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. 2023;36:101143. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2022.101143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bailey et al. (2010).Bailey JK, Pinyon JL, Anantham S, Hall RM. Commensal Escherichia coli of healthy humans: a reservoir for antibiotic-resistance determinants. Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2010;59(11):1331–1339. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.022475-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baym et al. (2016).Baym M, Lieberman TD, Kelsic ED, Chait R, Gross R, Yelin I, Kishony R. Spatiotemporal microbial evolution on antibiotic landscapes. Science. 2016;353(6304):1147–1151. doi: 10.1126/science.aag0822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Belaynehe et al. (2017).Belaynehe KM, Shin SW, Hong-Tae P, Yoo HS. Occurrence of aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes among isolates of Escherichia coli exhibiting high levels of aminoglycoside resistance isolated from Korean cattle farms. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2017;364(14):fnx129. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnx129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bingi & Tondel (2015).Bingi S, Tondel F. Recent developments in the dairy sector in Eastern Africa. Briefing Note of the European Centre for Development Policy Management. 2015;78:19. [Google Scholar]
- Bortolaia et al. (2020).Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe E, Roberts MC, Schwarz S, Cattoir V, Philippon A, Allesoe RL, Rebelo AR, Florensa AF, Fagelhauer L. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2020;75(12):3491–3500. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buchfink, Xie & Huson (2014).Buchfink B, Xie C, Huson DH. Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND. Nature Methods. 2014;12(1):59–60. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carattoli (2008).Carattoli A. Animal reservoirs for extended spectrum β-lactamase producers. Clinical Microbiology and Infection. 2008;14:117–123. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01851.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Caza & Kronstad (2013).Caza M, Kronstad J. Shared and distinct mechanisms of iron acquisition by bacterial and fungal pathogens of humans. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. 2013 doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2013.00080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chikwambi et al. (2023).Chikwambi Z, Hidjo M, Chikondowa P, Afolabi L, Aketch V, Jayeoba G, Enoma DO, Awe OI. Multi-omics data integration approach identifies potential biomarkers for prostate cancer. bioRxiv. 2023 doi: 10.1101/2023.01.26.522643. [DOI]
- Clark et al. (2015).Clark K, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;44(D1):D67–D72. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Die et al. (2019).Die JV, Elmassry MM, LeBlanc KH, Awe OI, Dillman A, Busby B. geneHummus: an R package to define gene families and their expression in legumes and beyond. BMC Genomics. 2019;20:591. doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5952-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Donado-Godoy et al. (2015).Donado-Godoy P, Castellanos R, León M, Arevalo A, Clavijo V, Bernal J, León D, Tafur MA, Byrne BA, Smith WA, Perez-Gutierrez E. The establishment of the Colombian integrated program for antimicrobial resistance surveillance (COIPARS): a pilot project on poultry farms, slaughterhouses and retail market. Zoonoses and Public Health. 2015;62:58–69. doi: 10.1111/zph.12192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Economou & Gousia (2015).Economou V, Gousia P. Agriculture and food animals as a source of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria. Infection and Drug Resistance. 2015;8:49–61. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S55778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Eddy (2009).Eddy SR. A new generation of homology search tools based on probabilistic inference. Genome Informatics 2009: Genome Informatics Series. 2009;23(1):205–211. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- El Abed et al. (2023).El Abed F, Baraket G, Nyamari MN, Naitore C, Awe OI. Differential expression analysis of miRNAs and mRNAs in epilepsy uncovers potential biomarkers. bioRxiv. 2023 doi: 10.1101/2023.09.11.557132. [DOI]
- Ewels et al. (2016).Ewels P, Magnusson M, Lundin S, Käller M. MultiQC: summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report. Bioinformatics. 2016;32(19):3047–3048. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Feldgarden et al. (2019).Feldgarden M, Brover V, Haft DH, Prasad AB, Slotta DJ, Tolstoy I, Tyson GH, Zhao S, Hsu C-H, McDermott PF, Tadesse DA, Morales C, Simmons M, Tillman G, Wasilenko J, Folster JP, Klimke W. Validating the amrfinder tool and resistance gene database by using antimicrobial resistance genotype-phenotype correlations in a collection of isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2019;63(11):e00483-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00483-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Finn et al. (2015).Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J, Mitchell AL, Potter SC, Punta M, Qureshi M, Sangrador-Vegas A, Salazar GA, Tate J, Bateman A. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;44(D1):D279–D285. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray & Head (2008).Gray ND, Head IM. In: Encyclopedia of ecology. 1st ed. Jorgensen SE, Fath BD, editors. Elsevier Science; Amsterdam: 2008. pp. 2357–2368. [Google Scholar]
- Gupta et al. (2014).Gupta SK, Padmanabhan BR, Diene SM, Lopez-Rojas R, Kempf M, Landraud L, Rolain J-M. ARG-ANNOT, a new bioinformatic tool to discover antibiotic resistance genes in bacterial genomes. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2014;58(1):212–220. doi: 10.1128/aac.01310-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hendriksen et al. (2019a).Hendriksen RS, Bortolaia V, Tate H, Tyson GH, Aarestrup FM, McDermott PF. Using genomics to track global antimicrobial resistance. Frontiers in Public Health. 2019a;7:242. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hendriksen et al. (2019b).Hendriksen RS, Munk P, Njage P, van Bunnik B, McNally L, Lukjancenko O, Röder T, Nieuwenhuijse D, Pedersen SK, Kjeldgaard J, Kaas RS, Clausen PTLC, Vogt JK, Leekitcharoenphon P, van de Schans MGM, Zuidema T, de Roda Husman AM, Rasmussen S, Petersen B, Global Sewage Surveillance project consortium. Amid C, Cochrane G, Sicheritz-Ponten T, Schmitt H, Alvarez JRM, Aidara-Kane A, Pamp SJ, Lund O, Hald T, Woolhouse M, Koopmans MP, Vigre H, Petersen TN, Aarestrup FM. Global monitoring of antimicrobial resistance based on metagenomics analyses of urban sewage. Nature Communications. 2019b;10:1. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07882-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Huerta-Cepas et al. (2015).Huerta-Cepas J, Szklarczyk D, Forslund K, Cook H, Heller D, Walter MC, Rattei T, Mende DR, Sunagawa S, Kuhn M, Jensen LJ, von Mering C, Bork P. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Research. 2015;44(D1):D286–D293. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hyatt et al. (2010).Hyatt D, Chen G-L, LoCascio PF, Land ML, Larimer FW, Hauser LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ingle et al. (2016).Ingle DJ, Valcanis M, Kuzevski A, Tauschek M, Inouye M, Stinear T, Levine MM, Robins-Browne RM, Holt KE. In silico serotyping of E. coli from short read data identifies limited novel O-loci but extensive diversity of O:H Serotype combinations within and between pathogenic lineages. Microbial Genomics. 2016;2(7):e000064. doi: 10.1099/mgen.0.000064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kanehisa (2000).Kanehisa M. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Research. 2000;28(1):27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kang et al. (2019).Kang DD, Li F, Kirton E, Thomas A, Egan R, An H, Wang Z. MetaBAT 2: an adaptive binning algorithm for robust and efficient genome reconstruction from metagenome assemblies. PeerJ. 2019;7:e7359. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kemp et al. (2021).Kemp SA, Pinchbeck GL, Fèvre EM, Williams NJ. A cross-sectional survey of the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of antimicrobial users and providers in an area of high-density livestock-human population in Western Kenya. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2021;8:727365. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.727365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kibegwa et al. (2020).Kibegwa FM, Bett RC, Gachuiri CK, Stomeo F, Mujibi FD. A comparison of two DNA metagenomic bioinformatic pipelines while evaluating the microbial diversity in feces of Tanzanian small holder dairy cattle. BioMed Research International. 2020;2020:1–12. doi: 10.1155/2020/2348560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim & Ahn (2022).Kim J, Ahn J. Emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant foodborne pathogens from farm to table. bioRxiv. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s10068-022-01157-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim et al. (2016).Kim D, Song L, Breitwieser FP, Salzberg SL. Centrifuge: rapid and sensitive classification of metagenomic sequences. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory; 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kimera et al. (2020).Kimera ZI, Mshana SE, Rweyemamu MM, Mboera LEG, Matee MIN. Antimicrobial use and resistance in food-producing animals and the environment: an African perspective. Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control. 2020;9:37. doi: 10.1186/s13756-020-0697-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Laslett (2004).Laslett D. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Research. 2004;32(1):11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li et al. (2015).Li D, Liu CM, Luo R, Sadakane K, Lam TW. MEGAHIT: an ultra-fast single-node solution for large and complex metagenomics assembly via succinct De Bruijn graph. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(10):1674–1676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mann et al. (2021).Mann A, Nehra K, Rana JS, Dahiya T. Antibiotic resistance in agriculture: perspectives on upcoming strategies to overcome upsurge in resistance. Current Research in Microbial Sciences. 2021;2:100030. doi: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maron, Smith & Nachman (2013).Maron DF, Smith TJ, Nachman KE. Restrictions on antimicrobial use in food animal production: an international regulatory and economic survey. Globalization and Health. 2013;9:48. doi: 10.1186/1744-8603-9-48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McArthur et al. (2013).McArthur AG, Waglechner N, Nizam F, Yan A, Azad MA, Baylay AJ, Bhullar K, Canova MJ, De Pascale G, Ejim L, Kalan L. The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2013;57(7):3348–3357. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00419-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meyer et al. (2008).Meyer F, Paarmann D, D’Souza M, Olson R, Glass EM, Kubal M, Paczian T, Rodriguez A, Stevens R, Wilke A, Wilkening J. The metagenomics RAST server—a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nyamari et al. (2023).Nyamari MN, Omar KM, Fayehun AF, Dachi O, Bwana BK, Awe OI. Expression level analysis of ACE2 receptor gene in African-American and non-African-American COVID-19 patients. bioRxiv. 2023 doi: 10.1101/2023.09.11.557129. [DOI]
- Nzungize et al. (2022).Nzungize L, Kengne-Ouafo JA, Wesonga MR, Umuhoza D, Murithi K, Kimani P, Awe OI, Dillman A. Transcriptional profiles analysis of COVID-19 and malaria patients reveals potential biomarkers in children. bioRxiv. 2022 doi: 10.1101/2022.06.30.498338. [DOI]
- Obura et al. (2022).Obura HO, Mlay CD, Moyo L, Karumbo BM, Omar KM, Sinza EM, Rotich GJ, Mudaki W, Kamau BM, Awe OI. Molecular phylogenetics of HIV-1 subtypes in African populations: a case study of Sub-Saharan African countries. bioRxiv. 2022 doi: 10.1101/2022.05.18.492401. [DOI]
- Okubo et al. (2018).Okubo T, Yossapol M, Maruyama F, Wampande EM, Kakooza S, Ohya K, Tsuchida S, Asai T, Kabasa JD, Ushida K. Phenotypic and genotypic analyses of antimicrobial resistant bacteria in livestock in Uganda. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 2018;66(1):317–326. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Oluwagbemi & Awe (2018).Oluwagbemi O, Awe OI. A comparative computational genomics of Ebola Virus disease strains: in-silico Insight for Ebola control. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. 2018;12:106–119. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2018.07.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Omar et al. (2023).Omar KM, Kitundu GL, Jimoh AO, Namikelwa DN, Lisso FM, Babajide AA, Olufemi SE, Awe OI. Investigating antimicrobial resistance genes in Kenya, Uganda and Tanzania cattle using metagenomics. bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) 2023 doi: 10.1101/2023.11.07.565943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Omulo et al. (2015).Omulo S, Thumbi SM, Njenga MK, Call DR. A review of 40 years of enteric antimicrobial resistance research in Eastern Africa: what can be done better? Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control. 2015;4:1. doi: 10.1186/s13756-014-0041-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ondov, Bergman & Phillippy (2011).Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Interactive metagenomic visualization in a web browser. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Orwa et al. (2017).Orwa JD, Matofari JW, Muliro PS, Lamuka P. Assessment of sulphonamides and tetracyclines antibiotic residue contaminants in rural and peri urban dairy value chains in Kenya. International Journal of Food Contamination. 2017;4:1. doi: 10.1186/s40550-016-0046-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Palmer & Skaar (2016).Palmer LD, Skaar EP. Transition metals and virulence in bacteria. Annual Review of Genetics. 2016;50:67. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-035146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Prestinaci, Pezzotti & Pantosti (2015).Prestinaci F, Pezzotti P, Pantosti A. Antimicrobial resistance: a global multifaceted phenomenon. Pathogens and Global Health. 2015;109(7):309–318. doi: 10.1179/2047773215Y.0000000030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Redondo-Salvo et al. (2020).Redondo-Salvo S, Fernández-López R, Ruiz R, Vielva L, De Toro M, Rocha EP, Garcillán-Barcia MP, de la Cruz F. Pathways for horizontal gene transfer in bacteria revealed by a global map of their plasmids. Nature Communications. 2020;11(1):1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sangeda et al. (2021).Sangeda RZ, Baha A, Erick A, Mkumbwa S, Bitegeko A, Sillo HB, Fimbo AM, Chambuso M, Mbugi EV. Consumption trends of antibiotic for veterinary use in Tanzania: a longitudinal retrospective survey from 2010–2017. Frontiers in Tropical Diseases. 2021;2:694082. doi: 10.3389/fitd.2021.694082. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schmieder & Edwards (2011).Schmieder R, Edwards R. Quality control and preprocessing of metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(6):863–864. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Seemann (2014).Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tamames & Puente-Sánchez (2019).Tamames J, Puente-Sánchez F. SqueezeMeta. A highly portable, fully automatic metagenomic analysis pipeline. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2019;9:3349. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.03349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor, Abbas & Bushman (2020).Taylor LJ, Abbas A, Bushman FD. grabseqs: simple downloading of reads and metadata from multiple next-generation sequencing data repositories. Bioinformatics. 2020;36(11):3607–3609. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomas, Gilbert & Meyer (2012).Thomas T, Gilbert J, Meyer F. Metagenomics—a guide from sampling to data analysis. Microbial Informatics and Experimentation. 2012;2:3. doi: 10.1186/2042-5783-2-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- tseemann (2020).tseemann Tseemann/abricate: mass screening of contigs for antimicrobial and virulence genes. GitHub. https://github.com/tseemann/abricate 2020
- Umulisa (2020).Umulisa Y. Estimation of the East African community’s trade benefits from promoting intra-regional trade. African Development Review. 2020;32(1):55–66. doi: 10.1111/1467-8268.12414. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Van Boeckel et al. (2019).Van Boeckel TP, Pires J, Silvester R, Zhao C, Song J. Global trends in antimicrobial resistance in animals in low- and middle-income countries. Science. 2019;365(6459):eaaw1944. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vigil-Stenman et al. (2017).Vigil-Stenman T, Ininbergs K, Bergman B, Ekman M. High abundance and expression of transposases in bacteria from the Baltic Sea. The ISME Journal. 2017;11(11):2611–2623. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vincent et al. (2018).Vincent H, Rawlynce CB, Joshua OA, Felix MK, Dedan G, Joseph OJ. Metagenomic analysis of enteric bacterial pathogens affecting the performance of dairy cows in smallholder productions systems. African Journal of Microbiology Research. 2018;12(17):387–398. doi: 10.5897/AJMR2018.8849. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wang et al. (2007).Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naïve Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007;73(16):5261–5267. doi: 10.1128/aem.00062-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wesonga & Awe (2022).Wesonga RM, Awe OI. An assessment of traditional and genomic screening in newborns and their applicability for Africa. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked. 2022;32:101050. doi: 10.1016/j.imu.2022.101050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- WHO (2017).World Health Organization (WHO) Critically important antimicrobials for human medicine. 5th revision. World Health Organization (WHO); Geneva, Switzerland: 2017. . https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512220. [Google Scholar]
- WHO (2021).World Health Organization (WHO) https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antimicrobial-resistance Antimicrobial resistance. 2021
- World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) (2020).World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE) OIE annual report on antimicrobial agents intended for use in animals—better understanding of the global situation. https://rr-africa.oie.int/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/annual_report_amr_3.pdf Fourth report. 2020
- Wu, Simmons & Singer (2015).Wu YW, Simmons BA, Singer SW. MaxBin 2.0: an automated binning algorithm to recover genomes from multiple metagenomic datasets. Bioinformatics. 2015;32(4):605–607. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yasir et al. (2020).Yasir M, Farman M, Shah MW, Jiman-Fatani AA, Othman NA, Almasaudi SB, Alawi M, Shakil S, Al-Abdullah N, Ismaeel NA, Azhar EI. Genomic and antimicrobial resistance genes diversity in multidrug-resistant CTX-M-positive isolates of Escherichia coli at a health care facility in Jeddah. Journal of Infection and Public Health. 2020;13(1):94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zalewska et al. (2021).Zalewska M, Błazejewska A, Czapko A, Popowska M. Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes in animal manure—consequences of its application in agriculture. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2021;12:610656. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.610656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The data is available at GitHub and Zenodo:
- https://github.com/omicscodeathon/amr_cattle
- Dorcus Namikelwa, Kauthar M. Omar, George Kitundu, Olaitan I. Awe, Lisso_, & Johny. (2023). omicscodeathon/amr_cattle: amr_cattle_code (v1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10253044
The sequences are available at GenBank: PRJEB28482 and PRJEB20456.
The Tanzanian Dataset is available at MG-RAST: mgp81260.