Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2024 Apr 26;19(4):e0300118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300118

Postpartum versus postnatal period: Do the name and duration matter?

Malith Kumarasinghe 1, Manoja P Herath 1, Andrew P Hills 1, Kiran D K Ahuja 1,*
Editor: Douglas Aninng Opoku2
PMCID: PMC11051636  PMID: 38669219

Abstract

Introduction

Guidelines and other strategic documents were collated to understand the extent of the global use of terms postpartum and postnatal along with the duration and schedule of maternal care after delivery.

Methods

Postpartum care guidelines and strategies published in English, by international organisations including the World Health Organization, and countries in either the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development or Group of 20 were included in this scoping review. All documents available online with unrestricted access and published before May 31, 2023, were included. The evolution of the World Health Organization’s definition of the period after delivery for mothers and the changes in the schedule of routine maternal care following delivery over time were displayed pictorially. A summary table was then developed to present the level of similarities and differences in the latest available documents from the international organisations and countries belonging to either the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development or the Group of 20.

Results

Ten documents from the World Health Organization, one from the European Board, and 15 country-level guidelines from six countries met the inclusion criteria. The interchangeable use of ‘postpartum’ and ‘postnatal’ is common. While the World Health Organization mentions the definitive length (six weeks) of the postpartum/ postnatal period, it is not stated in documents from other organisations and countries. Additionally, the length and schedule of routine maternal care after delivery vary substantially between organisations/countries, spanning from six weeks to one year with two to six healthcare contacts, respectively.

Conclusion

Through this review, we make a case for a universal harmonisation of the term postpartum when referring to mothers after delivery; add clarity to the documents on the rationale for and duration of the postpartum period; and extend the routine maternal care schedule after delivery to support women in this vulnerable period.

Introduction

‘Postpartum’ and ‘postnatal’ are commonly used terms when referring to the mother after delivery [1, 2]. Various organisations and countries prefer different terminologies, and some use the two terms interchangeably, causing confusion [1, 2]. The ambiguity in using different terms is further exaggerated when considering the length of the period after delivery i.e., the postpartum/postnatal period [3, 4].

Physiologically, almost one year is required for most organs and systems to return to the pre-pregnancy stage [5]. The period after delivery is commonly divided into three phases: immediate, early, and late postpartum phase [2, 4, 6]. While most agree that the immediate phase commences soon after delivery, there is no consensus on the duration of each phase and when the postpartum/postnatal period concludes. For example, some indicate the immediate phase as the first 24 hours [2], whereas others suggest 6–12 hours post-delivery [4, 6]. The early phase usually commences between 12–24 hours [2, 4, 6] and concludes between the seventh day and sixth week, after delivery [2, 4, 6]. The late phase commences between the eighth day and the sixth week and concludes between the sixth week and the sixth month after delivery [2, 4, 6].

Routine postpartum care is a standard package of services provided to mothers following delivery worldwide. The components of the care package change with the phases of the postpartum period. Overall, the package includes care for the mother immediately after delivery, followed by general well-being and any pregnancy-related issues, psychological screening, and support, breastfeeding, and contraception throughout the postpartum period [3]. There is also variability in the recommended schedule (duration and timing) of postpartum care; while most countries follow routine care packages for 42 days (six weeks) for the mother after delivery [79], some recommend different schedules lasting up to one year [3, 1012].

Considering this diversity, we first aimed to collate historical guidelines published by the WHO, then describe the differences in the latest guidelines from leading organisations and countries belonging to the Group of 20 (G20) and/or Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). This approach was used to understand the progression (if any) in the terminology, duration, and schedule of routine services for the assumed postpartum period. We anticipate that this review will stimulate discussion in the scientific and clinical community to consider harmonising the terminology, length of the postpartum period, and its related provision of routine services worldwide to better support the health of mothers through this vulnerable period.

Materials and methods

Guidelines and strategy documents on routine postpartum care, published in English, available online for unrestricted access, and published before 31 May 2023 were included in this scoping review. The documents were issued by one of the following organisations/ countries:

  • WHO and its regional offices

  • European Board & College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (EBCOG)

  • United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF)

  • International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO)

  • Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (NFOG)

  • Authorised institutions of all countries belonging to either G20 or OECD

Guidelines restricted to a specific disease or subtopic related to the period after delivery, such as postpartum haemorrhage or gestational diabetes, were excluded.

While WHO guidelines are widely used, including by many poor-resourced developing and under-developed countries, the countries in G20 and OECD countries are distributed across all continents and have large populations with diverse cultural and socio-economic status. Hence, the eligibility criteria outlined allowed for the collection of relevant, up-to-date global information.

A multipronged search strategy was used to trace the online publication section of organisations (such as FIGO, UNICEF etc) with an individualised search strategy. For a country-specific guidelines, we used a two-step search strategy. We first searched the fifth round of the Global Sexual, Reproductive, Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health Policy Survey in the WHO repository [13]; and then conducted an online search of official webpages of the responsible authority of the individual countries e.g., Health Department or Ministry of Health.

All retrieved documents were imported to EndNote20 before removing duplicates. The summary, introduction, and conclusions of all documents were screened by the first author (MK). In the case of uncertain eligibility, a second investigator evaluated the document, and a consensus was reached. Reference lists of the selected guidelines and strategy documents were also screened to identify any other relevant documents. Reasons for the exclusion of any reports were noted and relevant data was extracted.

The evolution of the WHO’s definition of the period after delivery for mothers and the changes in the schedule of routine maternal care following delivery over time were displayed pictorially. A summary table was developed to present the latest available information on the definition, duration, and healthcare schedule utilised across organizations, G20, and OECD countries.

Ethics approval was not required for this scoping review.

Results

The initial search yielded 47 guideline/strategy documents from three international organisations and 57 documents from 28 countries. A bibliographic search yielded a further 8 documents by international organisations and a single country-level document. Therefore, the total number of records identified was 55 from five international organisations and 58 from 28 countries (Fig 1). The final count of eligible documents after excluding those in a language other than English, or documents on specific diseases, was 26. This included 10 documents from the WHO, one from the European Board, and 15 country-level guidelines from six countries: namely Australia, Canada, India, South Africa, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States of America (USA) (Fig 1, S1 File).

Fig 1. Progress of guideline and strategy documents from identification to inclusion to review of the terminology associated with the postpartum period and schedule and length of services integrated into routine care.

Fig 1

[1416].

The most recent guidelines concerning routine maternal care aspects after delivery released by international organisations were published between 2014 (EBCOG) and 2022 (WHO), whereas the country-level guidelines (Table 1) were published between 2016 (South Africa) and 2021 (India and the UK). The largest number of documents in English relevant to routine postpartum aspects were from India (n = 5; from 2009 to 2021), followed by South Africa (n = 4, from 2016 to 2023).

Table 1. Definition, duration, length, and frequency of services in routine maternal care after delivery included in the latest guidelines from international organisations, and G20 and OECD countriesa.

International Body/ Country
Institution
Year of publication of the latest guideline/ Position Paper/ Strategy Use of ‘Postpartum’ or ‘Postnatal’ term to refer to care/ services of mothers after delivery* Postpartum/ postnatal period Postpartum/ postnatal care provision
Mother Duration and Rationale Duration and Rationale Frequency
Postpartum Postnatal
Guidelines by international organisations
Europe [23]
European Board & College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
2014
Obstetric and Neonatal Services Standards of Care for Women’s Health in Europe
+ + Not given Not given Not given
World Health Organization [3] 2022
WHO recommendations on maternal and newborn care for a positive postnatal experience
+ + 6 weeks
The most critical period following the birth of the newborn for the women, newborns, partners, parents, caregivers, and families. Maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality are highest during this period
6 weeks
Same rationale as for the postpartum period
• Within 24 hours after childbirth
• On day 3 (48–72 hours)
• Between days 7 and 14
• At 6 weeks
Country-level guidelines
Australia [12]
Council of Australian Governments
2019
Woman-centered Care Strategic Directions for Australian maternity services
- + Not given 52 weeks (1 year)
No rationale provided
Not given
Canada [9]
Public Health Agency of Canada
2020
Family-centered Maternity and Newborn Care: National Guidelines
+ + Not given 6 weeks
The guideline follows the convention of maternal and newborn care covering 6 weeks postpartum
National uniformity is not present with each Province determining its postpartum care plan
India [8]
National Rural Health Mission
2021
Induction Training Module for ASHAs
- + Not given 6 weeks
Not given
• For home delivery visits on days:1, 3, 7, 14, 21, 28, & 42
• For institutional delivery visits on days—3, 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42.
South Africa [7] **
Department of Health
2016
Guidelines for maternity care in South Africa
+ + Not given 6 weeks
Not given
• Immediately
• 3 to 6 days
• 6 weeks
UK [10]
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) & The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists
2021
Postnatal care
+ + Not given 8 weeks
To cater to the most critical period following birth.
• Within 36 hours after discharge
• Health worker home visit within 7–14 days
• 6–8 weeks by GP
USA [11] ***
American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (ACOG)
2018 (Reaffirmed 2021) Optimizing Postpartum Care + - Not given 12 weeks
The postpartum period is considered the fourth trimester in maternal care and the most challenging for women which includes physical, psychological, social, and sexual health challenges
• Blood pressure check- 3–10 days
• High-risk contacts: 1–3 weeks
• If necessary: 3–12 weeks
• 4–12 weeks- comprehensive postpartum visit

aOnly the latest guideline presented from each country/ organisation.

* Use of ‘Postnatal’ or ‘Postpartum’ term to refer to care/ services for mothers following childbirth No:—Yes: +

** South African Department of Health published the South African maternal, perinatal, and neonatal health policy in 2021. However, the authors selected a guideline published in 2016 as it details maternal and newborn care in South Africa and Policy (2021) only provides the direction and overarching vision.

***White House of United States published White House blueprint for addressing the maternal health crisis in 2022. However, the authors selected a guideline published in 2018 as it details maternal care provision after delivery. The White House blueprint for addressing the maternal health crisis, 2022 only provides the direction and overarching vision.

WHO guidelines: Evolution of terminology concerning the postpartum period and provision of routine care over time

A review of 10 documents (1976, 1996, 1998, 2003, 2009, 2010, 2013 –two documents, 2015 and 2022) illustrated that both ‘postpartum’ and ‘postnatal’ terms have been used interchangeably to refer to the mother following childbirth. The only exceptions were the 1976 and 1996 documents, which exclusively used the terms postnatal and postpartum, respectively. Interestingly, on at least two occasions (Box 1) WHO highlighted confusion in the use of terms. However, no further explanation has been given for the use of a single term and the ongoing use of the terms interchangeably in the guideline documents included in this review.

Box 1. Selected phrases from 1998 and 2010 WHO guidelines

WHO (1998) p.7-8

The words “postpartum” and “postnatal” are sometimes used interchangeably. In this report we use the word “postpartum”, except in sections exclusively dealing with the infant. In those sections the word “postnatal” is used.

WHO (2010) pg. 12

The terms “postpartum period” and “postnatal period” are often used interchangeably but sometimes separately, when “postpartum” refers to issues pertaining to the mother and “postnatal” refers to those concerning the baby.

For care after childbirth, the panel agreed that adopting just a single term would aid clarity. Therefore, the panel agreed that the term “postnatal” should be used for all issues pertaining to the mother and the baby after birth.

The length of the postpartum period was first noted in the document published in 1998, followed by documents from 2010, 2013, and 2022 (Fig 2). Except for the 2013 guideline, where it is indicated as days and weeks following childbirth, all other documents indicated six weeks as the length of the postpartum period. The latest document (2022) roughly defined the postpartum period as the most critical period following the birth of the newborn for women, newborns, partners, parents, caregivers, and families. It also referenced that maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality are highest during this period (Table 1).

Fig 2. The evolution (1976 to 2022) of routine postpartum care guidelines by the WHO. [13, 14, 1722].

Fig 2

While there was no mention of the length and frequency of service provision for routine maternal care after delivery in documents prior to 1998, all documents since have specified the length of service provision during the postpartum period to be six weeks. Additionally, documents post-1998 identified the initiation of the postpartum/ postnatal period to be immediately after delivery, whereas the 1998 document indicated routine postpartum care to commence within an hour post-childbirth.

Interestingly, the 1998 document also indicated the schedule of four contacts with health services at approximately six hours, six days, six weeks, and six months, thereby contradicting its statement of six weeks of routine postpartum/ postnatal service provision with the final contact at six months. The subsequent guideline (2003) discontinued the fourth contact schedule, but this was reintroduced in 2010 with all four contacts to conclude in the first 6 weeks after delivery. While the 2010 guideline recommended first contact to be completed within one hour of childbirth, later guidelines extended the time to up to 24 hours after childbirth. The other three contacts are usually between 48–72 hours, 7–14 days, and six weeks since 2010.

Global and country-level guidelines: Terminology in relation to the postpartum period and provision of routine care

None of the country-level guidelines mentioned the definition or the length of the postpartum/ postnatal period (Table 1). Similarly, the document from the European EBCOG did not include any relevant information regarding the definition and length of the postpartum/postnatal period. As for WHO, the terms ‘postpartum’ and postnatal’ have been used interchangeably in these documents to refer to care or service provision for mothers following childbirth. Interestingly, in their latest iteration, India (2021) and Australia (2019) have exclusively used the term ‘postnatal’, while the USA (2018 reaffirmed in 2021) has opted for ‘postpartum’ (S1 Table).

As for WHO, Canada, India, and South Africa have indicated six weeks for the provision of services for postpartum/ postnatal care. In contrast, Australia, the UK, and the USA (i.e., ACOG) indicate one year (52 weeks), 12 weeks, and eight weeks, respectively, for the provision of routine care.

Similar to the concept of the length of service delivery, the frequency of service delivery i.e., contact points, varies substantially between countries, ranging from two to six contacts at various times. Additional exceptions were Australia, where no detail is provided in the document; and Canada, where each province determines the frequency and the method of contact (Table 1 and S1 Table).

Discussion

The interchangeable use of the terms ‘postpartum’ and ‘postanal’ is common. The only exceptions are the latest online documents from Australia, India, and the USA. While Australia and India have exclusively used the term postnatal, the USA has preferred the term postpartum. Except for WHO, the guideline documents on maternal care after delivery from international and country-level organisations do not define the postpartum period and its duration. Furthermore, the length and schedule of routine postpartum care vary substantially ranging from six weeks to one year, with two to six healthcare contacts, respectively. These inconsistencies in terminology, length, service duration, and schedule could result in confusion when consolidating the evidence required for developing and updating clinical guidelines, and therefore, need harmonisation.

Postpartum versus postnatal: What’s in the term?

International Classification of Diseases Version 11 (ICD-11) exclusively uses the term postpartum for mothers after delivery. Some examples include MF35—Postpartum symptom or complaint [24] and QA48—Postpartum care or examination [25], referring to illnesses, ailments, and maternal care post-delivery, respectively. On the other hand, the terms postnatal and perinatal are reserved for the newborn, e.g., KB86—Postnatal intestinal perforation under digestive system disorders of the foetus or newborn [26]. Since the ICD system is used internationally to compare the causes of morbidity and mortality over time and across countries, it is prudent to follow that system and to reduce the ambiguity of terms in clinical and strategic documents.

Secondly, the term postpartum is more widely used in research and scientific publications. To illustrate: we employed the Web of Science database to estimate which term (postpartum or postnatal) is commonly used in records when referring to mothers after delivery published in the year 2023. The test rendered 1,057 original research articles when the search included ((((AB = (woman)) OR AB = (women)) OR AB = (mother*)) AND TI = (postpartum)). In contrast, only 216 records were identified when postpartum was replaced with postnatal in the above search criteria. This substantial disparity between the usage of the two terms highlights the partiality of the scientific community towards the use of the term postpartum over postnatal in the context of mother after delivery.

Postpartum period and service schedule: Does duration matter?

There is no universal consensus on the duration of the postpartum period. This could be because physiologically, different organs and systems return to the pre-pregnancy stage at varying speeds [5, 27]. If we consider that the duration of routine care for the mother after delivery proposed in the strategy guidelines is the default length, then the postpartum period lasts anywhere between six weeks and 52 weeks, as prescribed in the documents reviewed.

Early support of the mother after delivery is crucial to limit maternal morbidity and mortality due to infection, haemorrhage, etc., after childbirth [28]. Support in later times is equally critical to ensure the health and well-being of the mother and her offspring. Documents from the WHO and other countries indicate that the six-week visit (often the last health services contact) should emphasise the importance and need of continuous breastfeeding, contraception, and screening for postpartum depression [5, 28].

Proper contraception to support the optimum time between childbirth and the next pregnancy is important for the short and long-term health outcomes of the mother and the newborn [29]. It is recommended that the minimum birth/delivery to the next pregnancy interval should be six months [3032]. However, in most of the world, formal healthcare contact during the postpartum lasts only for six weeks (as shown in Table 1), thereby limiting the opportunities for providing education to new mothers. A low understanding of the advantages of birth spacing is potentially a predictor for short intervals in addition to low socio-economic and educational status, and a patriarchal society [33, 34].

Optimum birth spacing is critical to ensure the adequate recovery time to maintain overall health following the nutrition and energy burden of the completed pregnancy [35, 36]. Further, it allows the mother to manage their postpartum weight and reduce the risk of entering the subsequent pregnancy at a higher weight status. High preconception weight often leads to high gestational weight gain [37]. Both of these factors are independent predictors of negative short-term outcomes such as gestational diabetes [38], as well as long-term risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease for the mother [39, 40]. An additional outcome of this weight retention and higher gestational weight gain is the negative impact on mental health [41, 42].

Psychological i.e., emotional, and mental health is equally important as physiological health. Globally, there has been a sharp increase in late maternal deaths i.e., deaths occurring between 43 days and one year after delivery, in middle- and high-income countries when viewed as a proportion against total maternal deaths [43]. Mental health disorders including postpartum depression often lead to discontinuation of breastfeeding, increased risk of baby neglect, family dysfunction, increased medical care and cost, and sometimes suicide. In the USA, late maternal mortality (i.e., death between 43 days and one year after delivery) from mental health conditions quadrupled between 2007 and 2016 [44]. Similar data is available from Australia, with the state of Victora attributing close to 50% of its total maternal deaths to suicide in the year 2016 with 37.5% of these deaths occurring between 43 days to one year [45]. The phenomenon of suicide in the latter half of the year after delivery is not limited to high-income countries., However, the data is not clear from low- middle-income countries. These deaths are often grouped into the ‘comprehensive maternal death’ code in ICD-11 due to incomplete reporting and misclassification making it difficult to fully understand the extent of the problem in resource-poor countries [46, 47].

Where to next?

Considering the information discussed above, we have three suggestions. It would be prudent to use the term postpartum over postnatal when referring to the mother after delivery. Secondly, the length of the postpartum period needs to be harmonised and defined in the relevant documents. Finally, the possibility of introducing an additional health service contact for mothers sometime between four to six months after delivery. Interestingly, a six-month contact was included in the WHO documents in 1998 with a focus on general health, contraception, and continuing morbidity at this last visit [1], however, it was not incorporated in the subsequent documents and no explanation was provided on this change. While additional contact(s) between six and 12 months will also be useful, some countries may find it difficult to resource them. Hence, our suggestion of a contact between four and six months after delivery will serve as a refresher/reminder on contraception, weight management, and birth spacing [1]. Additionally, this visit could be used for screening and providing support for postpartum depression, and excessive weight retention post delivery, both of which are on the rise globally including low and middle income countries [48, 49].

Further, with the rising prevalence of maternal morbidity and mortality from mental health conditions, Australian documents suggest screening all mothers for postpartum depression between six to 12 weeks after delivery [50]. Similarly, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening at one, two, four, and six months [51]. The UK has refrained from these additional contacts for mental health conditions due to the lack of appropriate screening tools as they tend to provide a high number of false positives [52].

The WHO’s key priority of improving maternal health is grounded in efforts for universal health coverage and human rights [53]. WHO generates data, research, and clinical guidelines and supports countries in implementing strategies to promote access to quality health services for ending preventable maternal morbidity and mortality. These strategies and health services are the key pillars for achieving the minimum standard to support the health of a mother and her newborn. While this important work has led to significant reductions in early maternal deaths as a consequence of the common direct causes of maternal injury and death, such as blood loss, infection, etc., the balance is slowly shifting in favour of late maternal deaths due to mental health and lifestyle factors. The rise in late maternal morbidity and mortality has influenced the USA to extend maternal healthcare financial support to 12 months postpartum [54]. Therefore, the increase in late maternal deaths must be considered when planning and implementing further strategies for reducing maternal deaths.

While high-income countries can change and enforce additional strategies and policies for the provision of extended service to mothers, this may not be easy for middle- and low-income countries where a large disparity exists between the rich and poor in receiving healthcare. The disparity in the use of healthcare is also prominent in high-income countries like the USA where women with private healthcare have a higher rate of primary care during the first year after delivery than those without private health coverage [55]. Similar inequalities in the use of postpartum care have been reported in developing countries including South Asia with the poor at a disadvantage [56, 57].

Strengths and limitations

Using a systematic approach in searching and retrieving the documents from international organisations, G20 and OECD countries allowed for the review of broader global information to access the similarities and differences between countries. However, the inclusion criteria of documents available online and published in English may have led to missing any guidelines that are different from those reported in this review.

Conclusions

Through this review, we make a case for universal harmonisation of the term ‘postpartum’ when referring to mothers after delivery; add clarity to the strategic documents and guidelines pertaining to the rationale for, and duration of, the postpartum length, and, extend the routine postpartum care schedule. These changes have the potential to support the WHO’s recent strategies toward ending preventable maternal mortality [58] and ensure that mothers achieve the best health and well-being outcomes for their future pregnancies and long-term health.

Supporting information

S1 File. Search strategy.

(PDF)

pone.0300118.s001.pdf (158KB, pdf)
S1 Table. Summary of findings on routine postpartum care published by international organisations, G20 and OECD countries.

(PDF)

pone.0300118.s002.pdf (361.8KB, pdf)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Malith Kumarasinghe was supported by a Tasmania Graduate Research Scholarship Stipend and RTP Fee-Offset Scholarship.

References

Decision Letter 0

Steve Zimmerman

9 Jan 2024

PONE-D-23-34077Postpartum versus postnatal period: Do the name and duration matter?PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ahuja,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

The manuscript has been evaluated by two reviewers, and their comments are available below.

The reviewers are positive about your submission, but make several requests for clarification.Could you please carefully revise the manuscript to address all comments raised?

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 23 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Steve Zimmerman, PhD

Senior Editor, PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that your Data Availability Statement is currently as follows: [All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.]

Please confirm at this time whether or not your submission contains all raw data required to replicate the results of your study. Authors must share the “minimal data set” for their submission. PLOS defines the minimal data set to consist of the data required to replicate all study findings reported in the article, as well as related metadata and methods (https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-minimal-data-set-definition).

For example, authors should submit the following data:

- The values behind the means, standard deviations and other measures reported;

- The values used to build graphs;

- The points extracted from images for analysis.

Authors do not need to submit their entire data set if only a portion of the data was used in the reported study.

If your submission does not contain these data, please either upload them as Supporting Information files or deposit them to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of recommended repositories, please see https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/recommended-repositories.

If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. If data are owned by a third party, please indicate how others may request data access.

3. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for the opportunity to review this paper. The topic is extremely important, and the authors provide a succinct overview of the use of the different terms and the ways to move forward. Below I have minor comments to strengthen the manuscript. Thank you for your work on this topic.

- In your results, you say the initial search yielded 57 documents from 28 countries, but with the additional search, you added one more country-level document. However, in the following statement, you then say the search yield 58 documents from 32 countries. Why is there a discrepancy in countries available from 28 to 32 but you only added one country?

- Please spell out UK and US at first use (line 129)

- Canada has provinces not states (line 193 and table)

Reviewer #2: Although terms postpartum and postnatal are used interchangeably by some as the authors state, in the abstract the focus is on the term postpartum in the results section. Just some suggestions to possibly make this manuscript stronger:

1. Title - Does the....

2. Line 150 - From several recent WHO publications, it looks like they use the term postnatal instead of postpartum pretty consistently. I believe stating this here would provide some additional clarity.

3. Just some additional points about the US for you to consider: Medicaid extension (public insurance) has been recently changed to include the postpartum period up to one year of giving birth and the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System (PMSS) defines a pregnancy-related death as a death while pregnant or within 1 year of the end of pregnancy from any cause related to or aggravated by the pregnancy. For maternal deaths in the US - the time frame is extended up to one year. You may want to consider adding documents that focus on capturing maternal deaths as they too might different in how the length of the postpartum period is defined. (https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2023/12/15/hhs-to-improve-maternal-health-outcomes-with-new-cms-care-model-that-expands-access-to-services-other-proven-maternal-health-approaches.html)

4. Around line 235 - I would suggest extending this paragraph to talk about the timeline used by countries to measure maternal mortality since this time frame also varies from 42 days by WHO to up to one year in the US.

5. Line 278 - how did you decide on 4-6 months here?

6. Line 284 - In the US ACOG suggests a contact with the client within the first three weeks postpartum. (https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2018/05/optimizing-postpartum-care)

The authors provided a thorough review of the terms and timing of postpartum care and make the case for the need to choose one term to be used throughout the world.

Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 1

Douglas Aninng Opoku

18 Feb 2024

PONE-D-23-34077R1Postpartum versus postnatal period: Do the name and duration matter?PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Ahuja,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

You have addressed all the comments that were raised by the reviewers. However, there are a few issues to address and your paper will be ready for publication. These issues relate to the time frame the search was conducted and the type of review.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Apr 04 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Douglas Aninng Opoku, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

1. Indicate the type of review

2. Indicate the time frame of the search (date, from when to when)

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: The authors have addressed my original comments/questions thoroughly. The use of the term postpartum should be clarified and used consistently by all countries.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2024 Apr 26;19(4):e0300118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300118.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


20 Feb 2024

kindly check the Response to Reviewers document. please note - I have tried to change the sequence of files many a times, however the system is not updating it for me. I apologies for this inconvenience.

Attachment

Submitted filename: response to reviewers.docx

pone.0300118.s004.docx (28.9KB, docx)

Decision Letter 2

Douglas Aninng Opoku

22 Feb 2024

Postpartum versus postnatal period: Do the name and duration matter?

PONE-D-23-34077R2

Dear Dr. Ahuja,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Douglas Aninng Opoku, MPH

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Congratulations 

Reviewers' comments:

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 File. Search strategy.

    (PDF)

    pone.0300118.s001.pdf (158KB, pdf)
    S1 Table. Summary of findings on routine postpartum care published by international organisations, G20 and OECD countries.

    (PDF)

    pone.0300118.s002.pdf (361.8KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    pone.0300118.s003.docx (26KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response to reviewers.docx

    pone.0300118.s004.docx (28.9KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES