Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 May 23;14:11839. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60959-x

Characterizing the human intestinal chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycan sulfation signature in inflammatory bowel disease

Kendra L Francis 1,2, Hengqi B Zheng 1, David L Suskind 1, Taylor A Murphree 3, Bao Anh Phan 2, Emily Quah 2, Aarun S Hendrickson 2, Xisheng Zhou 3, Mason Nuding 1, Alexandra S Hudson 1, Miklos Guttman 3, Gregory J Morton 2, Michael W Schwartz 2, Kimberly M Alonge 2,3, Jarrad M Scarlett 1,2,
PMCID: PMC11116513  PMID: 38782973

Abstract

The intestinal extracellular matrix (ECM) helps maintain appropriate tissue barrier function and regulate host-microbial interactions. Chondroitin sulfate- and dermatan sulfate-glycosaminoglycans (CS/DS-GAGs) are integral components of the intestinal ECM, and alterations in CS/DS-GAGs have been shown to significantly influence biological functions. Although pathologic ECM remodeling is implicated in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it is unknown whether changes in the intestinal CS/DS-GAG composition are also linked to IBD in humans. Our aim was to characterize changes in the intestinal ECM CS/DS-GAG composition in intestinal biopsy samples from patients with IBD using mass spectrometry. We characterized intestinal CS/DS-GAGs in 69 pediatric and young adult patients (n = 13 control, n = 32 active IBD, n = 24 IBD in remission) and 6 adult patients. Here, we report that patients with active IBD exhibit a significant decrease in the relative abundance of CS/DS isomers associated with matrix stability (CS-A and DS) compared to controls, while isomers implicated in matrix instability and inflammation (CS-C and CS-E) were significantly increased. This imbalance of intestinal CS/DS isomers was restored among patients in clinical remission. Moreover, the abundance of pro-stabilizing CS/DS isomers negatively correlated with clinical disease activity scores, whereas both pro-inflammatory CS-C and CS-E content positively correlated with disease activity scores. Thus, pediatric patients with active IBD exhibited increased pro-inflammatory and decreased pro-stabilizing CS/DS isomer composition, and future studies are needed to determine whether changes in the CS/DS-GAG composition play a pathogenic role in IBD.

Subject terms: Gastrointestinal diseases, Glycobiology

Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract that affects more than 7 million people worldwide1,2. IBD is generally classified into two main subtypes, Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), with a smaller, third subset encompassing individuals with IBD-unclassified. Despite the increasing emergence of new therapeutic options, including state-of-the-art biologic therapies and small molecule inhibitors that target specific components of the immune response3,4, IBD continues to prove difficult to control, with many patients requiring multiple immunosuppressive medications and surgery57. Mucosal healing has emerged as a key therapeutic goal in the clinical management of IBD3,8, as it is associated with sustained clinical remission (CR), reduced hospitalizations, resection-free survival, and decreased cancer rates911. However, our ability to achieve this outcome for most patients remains limited by our incomplete understanding of underlying mechanisms driving this disease.

Increasing evidence suggests that the pathogenesis of IBD involves a combination of genetic predisposition, environmental triggers, immune dysregulation, and altered intestinal barrier integrity1214. In light of recent work suggesting that intestinal barrier dysfunction plays an important role in IBD pathogenesis1517, strategies aimed at restoring and maintaining intestinal barrier function may represent a novel means to improve disease management and help achieve mucosal healing. Crucial to the integrity of the intestinal barrier is the intestinal extracellular matrix (ECM), a complex, organized network of proteins and glycans that provides physical protection and scaffolding to this tissue1820. The ECM dynamically regulates the ability of the intestinal barrier to interact with the surrounding environment and gut microbiome, and is fundamental in cell-to-cell communication via its close interactions with integrins and related molecules2123. Specific ECM scaffolding components, including proteoglycans (PGs) and their attached glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains, can alter the intestinal microbiota24, suppress the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines25,26, and participate in other mucosal inflammatory processes that are pathologic hallmarks of IBD18,19,27. Based on these considerations, the ECM has emerged as a potential therapeutic target to promote mucosal healing in IBD.

Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs), with their core proteins and attached chondroitin and dermatan sulfate-glycosaminoglycan (CS/DS-GAG) chains, are abundant components of the intestinal ECM (Fig. 1a). CS/DS-GAGs consist of repeating, variably sulfated disaccharides28, each of which are identified by unique sulfation modifications that associate with biological functions specific to the CS/DS isomer (Fig. 1b,c). The mono-sulfated CS-A (4S) isomer, which has a sulfate on the 4th carbon (4S) of the N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), is proposed to contribute to matrix structural stability2931. The di-sulfated CS-B (2S4S) isomer, also commonly identified as DS, is sulfated on the 2nd carbon of the Iduronic acid (IdoA) and 4th carbon of the GalNAc (2S4S) and is implicated in matrix assembly, wound healing, and tissue regeneration3234. This tendency of structurally distinct sugars to share functionality extends to the mono-sulfated CS-C, 6th carbon sulfate attachment to GalNAc (6S), and the di-sulfated CS-E, 4th and 6th sulfate attachment to the GalNAc (4S6S), both of which are associated with inflammatory responses and accelerated cell turnover3540, and the CS-C (6S) isomer is uniquely involved in matrix plasticity and loss of tissue rigidity2931. The di-sulfated CS-D (2S6S) isomer is involved in neuroregeneration41, and finally, the non-sulfated CS-O (0S) isomer is suggested to play a key role in regulating tissue diffusion and permeability of charged molecules within the extracellular space of peripheral and central tissues42,43. The relative abundance of each CS/DS isomer incorporated into the CS/DS-GAG chain influences the interaction between different cell types and their surrounding environment, and moreover, appears altered in multiple inflammatory disease states35,4447.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Human intestinal extracellular matrix contains chondroitin sulfate (CS) and dermatan sulfate (DS) glycosaminoglycan isomers. Diagram of the (a) extracellular matrix highlighting (b) intestinal CS proteoglycans and their attached CS and DS glycosaminoglycan (CS/DS-GAG) chains, including (c) non-sulfated [CS-O (0S)], mono-sulfated [CS-C (6S) and CS-A (4S)], and di-sulfated [DS (2S4S), CS-E (4S6S), and CS-D (2S6S)] isomer units. (d) Outline of tissue processing in which formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE) intestinal biopsies taken during endoscopy are incubated with ChondroitinaseABC (ChABC) enzyme to digest all CS/DS-GAG chains into their individual isomer subunits, which are then collected, purified, and quantitatively analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) (Fig. S1). Post-processing histology is then performed on digested tissues.

In addition to the relative abundance of these six CS/DS isomers, the average number of sulfate attachments per disaccharide unit (i.e., net sulfation) of CS/DS-GAGs is a useful index of ECM physicochemical properties. For example, the brain of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) was recently reported to exhibit ‘hypersulfation’ of CS/DS-GAGs in the middle frontal gyrus in associated with AD neuropathology accumulation35, suggesting CS/DS-GAGs may influence both the binding and diffusion of extracellular factors within the demented brain. In this study, we explored the possibility that individuals with IBD may exhibit similar changes in intestinal CS/DS-GAGs, as observed in other inflammatory conditions, shifting the ECM to a hypersulfated, pro-inflammatory CS/DS-GAG isomer composition in involved intestines. We first performed a detailed analysis of CS/DS-GAG sulfation pattern in the human intestine using mass spectrometry methodology35,54 to analyze duodenum, ileum, and colon CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterns in healthy pediatric and adult patients without intestinal inflammation (Fig. 1d). Based on observations that IBD associates with decreased intestinal barrier functioning and corresponding immune cell infiltration48,49, combined with findings that pathologic changes in the intestinal ECM can compromise mucous barrier function, interfere with glycan-lectin interactions, and alter mucosal immunity and gut microbiota5053, we then asked whether IBD associates with alterations in CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterning (and thus biological function) of intestinal ECM matrices. We accomplished this by comparing the CS/DS-GAG sulfation code in healthy patients to that of cohorts of pediatric patients with active, untreated colonic IBD and with colonic IBD in CR. Our primary goal was to first determine whether areas of inflamed colon exhibit increased pro-inflammatory CS/DS isomers and decreased pro-stabilizing CS/DS isomers, and then explore the role of pro-inflammatory changes in the composition of the colonic ECM in IBD pathogenesis.

Results

Region-specific intestinal CS/DS-GAG composition in pediatric patients without intestinal inflammation

The relative abundance of each of the six intestinal CS/DS isomers (Fig. 1a–c), which comprises the intestinal CS/DS-GAG ‘sulfation code,’ was determined by mass spectrometry (Fig. S1, Fig. 1d) from 13 healthy pediatric/young adult patients without intestinal inflammation (Table 1, age range 12–23) in the duodenum (duo) (n = 6), terminal ileum (TI) (n = 7), and left colon (n = 13) (Fig. 2a). Consistent with what is observed in other tissues (e.g., brain35), the abundance of CS-A (4S) was consistently higher than any other isomer throughout the gastrointestinal tract (Fig. 2a), with the relative abundance of CS-A (4S) increasing from proximal to distal intestine (Fig. 2b, Table S1). CS-C (6S) was the second most abundant isomer found throughout the intestines and exhibited a decreased expression in the colon compared to the duodenum and ileum of the small intestine (Fig. 2c, Table S1). CS-O (0S), CS-E (4S6S), and DS (2S4S) comprised < 10% of total CS isomers throughout the intestine (Fig. 2d–f, Table S1), while CS-D (2S6S) was above the level of detection but below the level of quantification, and thus was not included in our analysis (Fig. S1). We did not observe region-dependent differences in CS/DS-sulfation, with the average number of sulfate groups per CS isomer remaining near an average of 1.0 sulfate per CS/DS isomer irrespective of intestinal location (Fig. 2g, Table S1). Collectively, these results show region-dependent CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterning, but not net sulfation, throughout the extent of human intestines.

Table 1.

Patient demographics.

Control Pediatric colonic IBD at diagnosis Pediatric colonic IBD in clinical remission
Pediatric Adult Total Ulcerative colitis Crohn’s disease Total Ulcerative colitis Crohn’s disease
No. of patients 13 6 32 19 13 24 13 11
Age at scope, years (mean, range) 16.7 (12–23) 36.3 (24–67) 12.8 (6–18) 13.4 (6–18) 12.0 (7–15) 13.2 (7–18) 13.1 (7–18) 13.3 (10–17)
Sex (% female) 46.2% 50.0% 28.1% 31.6% 23.1% 29.2% 23.1% 36.4%
Disease phenotype Pancolitis: 89.4%

L3B1: 84.6%

L3B1 + p: 7.7%

L3B2: 7.7%

Pancolitis

84.6%

L3B1: 54.5%

L3B2: 18.2%

L2B1: 27.3%

Intestinal biopsy samples from 13 pediatric control patients, 6 adult control patients, 32 pediatric patients with colonic IBD at diagnosis (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease with colonic involvement), and 24 pediatric patients with colonic IBD at follow up (ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease with colonic involvement) in clinical remission were included in the study. Montreal classification was used to categorize CD phenotype. Ulcerative colitis group in clinical remission includes one patient with indeterminant colitis. L3B1 ileocolonic non-stricturing, non-penetrating disease. L3B1 + p ileocolonic non-stricturing, non-penetrating disease with perianal disease. L3B2 ileocolonic stricturing disease. L2B1 colonic non-stricturing, non-penetrating disease.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Intestinal CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterns in normal human bowel. (a) CS/DS isomer abundance in 13 pediatric patients without intestinal inflammation in intestinal biopsies from duodenum (duo, n = 6), terminal ileum (TI, n = 7), and colon tissue (n = 13) (p-values represent difference in the overall isomer composition). Isomer percentage compared in each area of bowel (duo, TI, and colon) for (b) CS-A (4S), (c) CS-C (6S), (d) CS-O (0S), (e) CS-E (4S6S), and (f) DS (2S4S) (Table S1). (g) Net sulfation patterns (i.e., average number of sulfate groups per individual disaccharide unit) in each location of bowel in pediatric patients (Table S1). (h) Colonic CS/DS isomer abundance in the above 13 pediatric patients and 6 adult patients without intestinal inflammation plotted by age. p-values not listed in (bg) are > 0.05. Error bars represent SEM.

We next sought to determine the localization of our CS/DS-GAG matrices in human intestines. Histological staining of CS/DS-GAGs is often performed using Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA) lectin labeling in the brain55,56. Although this marker shows specificity for brain CS/DS-GAGs matrices54, WFA cross-labels mucin-type-O glycans in peripheral tissues57 and therefore could not be used as a selective marker for CS/DS-GAGs in our intestinal samples. Instead, we employed an enzymatic approach to identify the location of CS/DS-GAGs in our human samples utilizing ChondroitinaseABC (ChABC). This bacterial endo- and exo-lyase is capable of digesting CS/DS-GAGs into their disaccharide units and produces an unsaturated double bond on the GlcA monomer that is not produced endogenously within the mammalian system58,59, and antibodies raised against this ‘neo-epitope’ are highly specific for the localization of CS/DS-GAGs60. To localize CS/DS-GAGs in the intestine, we stained for these unique CS/DS neoepitopes post-ChABC digestion and found that CS/DS-GAGs are primarily located in the lamina propria of the colon (Fig. S2). Additional histological identification of the CSPG biglycan demonstrates colocalization with CS/DS ‘stub’ cleavage epitopes, further confirming the presence of a CSPG-rich ECM within the human intestinal tract (Fig. S2).

Age does not influence CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterns in patients without intestinal inflammation

Of the 13 ‘control’ patients without any gross or histologic abnormalities on endoscopic evaluation, 4 of these patients were truly healthy controls (HC) (aged 18–23) who were paid to undergo endoscopy without any GI symptoms present, while 9 were patients who had nonspecific GI symptoms that prompted endoscopic evaluation (e.g., abdominal pain) and were termed functional GI disease (FGID). Here, we report that there were no significant differences in the colon CS/DS-GAG isomer profiles between HC and FGID individuals (Fig. S3, Table S2), suggesting that GI symptoms that associate with normal intestinal histopathology are not driven by changes in intestinal CS/DS-GAG patterning. Given the lack of a difference in colon CS/DS-GAGs, both HC and FGID patients are included as controls when comparing to patients with IBD.

In the brain, CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterns are significantly influenced by age31,54. To investigate whether human intestinal CS/DS-GAG composition is also affected by age, we compared isomer patterns from the colons of adult patients (Table 1, n = 6, age range 24–67) to those of pediatric patients without IBD described above. This analysis showed no significant correlation between patient age and the abundance of any individual CS/DS isomer (Fig. 2h). These findings suggest that after 12 years of age, the colon exhibits a similar CS/DS-GAG matrix composition throughout adulthood in individuals without intestinal inflammation, strengthening the idea that changes in the matrix composition may induce or be associated with inflammation.

Patients with active IBD demonstrate altered colonic CS/DS-GAG composition

Next, we compared mass spectrometry analysis of CS/DS isomer composition of colonic biopsy samples obtained from a cohort of pediatric patients with active IBD with colonic involvement at diagnosis (IBD at Dx, UC and CD colitis/ileocolonic disease, n = 32) to values obtained from healthy pediatric controls (n = 13) (Fig. 3a, Table 1). These patients had both active clinical IBD symptoms (defined as Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) or Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (PCDAI) scores > 10) and endoscopic and histologic evidence of chronic and/or active inflammation on biopsies from the left colon. Most patients with UC had pancolitis (89.4%), while most patients with CD had non-penetrating, non-stricturing ileocolonic disease without perianal disease based on the Montreal classification (84.6%) (Table 1). Compared to healthy control patients, patients with IBD at Dx were significantly younger and had a more male predominance (Table 1).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Colonic CS/DS-GAG isomer profiles are altered in active IBD. (a) The relative abundance of CS/DS isomers in the colons of the same control patients in Fig. 1a (n = 13) compared to individuals with IBD with colonic involvement (UC and CD colitis) at diagnosis with active clinical and histopathologic disease (IBD at Dx, n = 32), and individuals with IBD with colonic involvement at diagnosis who were in clinical remission on IBD therapy when biopsies were acquired (IBD in CR, n = 24) (Tables 1, 2). The relative abundance of (b) CS-A (4S) and (c) DS (2S4S) are significantly lower in patients with active colonic IBD at Dx compared to control patients, and CS-A (4S) normalizes in patients with IBD in CR compared to IBD at Dx. In contrast, although DS is increased in IBD in CR compared to IBC at DX, it remains lower than controls. Meanwhile, the relative abundance of (d) CS-C (6S) and (e) CS-E (4S6S) are significantly higher in patients with active colonic IBD at Dx compared to control patients, and both normalize in patients with IBD in CR compared to IBD at Dx. (f) CS-O (0S) isomer abundance is not significantly altered by active IBD compared to controls but is decreased in patients in IBD in CR. (g) Net sulfation per CS/DS isomer increases in IBD at Dx compared to controls patients, reduces significantly in IBD in CR compared to IBD at Dx, but remains elevated compared to controls. p-values not listed in (bg) are > 0.05. Error bars represent SEM.

In pediatric patients with IBD at Dx, we found a significant reduction in the abundance of CS-A (4S) (Fig. 3b, Table 2) and DS (2S4S) isomers (Fig. 3c, Table 2). In contrast, CS-C (6S) (Fig. 3d, Table 2) and CS-E (4S6S) (Fig. 3e, Table 2) isomers were increased. Although the relative abundance of sulfated CS/DS isomers were shifted in the IBD at Dx population when compared to controls (Fig. 3b–e), the non-sulfated CS-O (0S) isomer was unaffected by active IBD (Fig. 3f, Table 2). Interestingly, the colonic CS-GAG composition in patients with UC compared to CD with colonic involvement was not significantly different at diagnosis (Fig. S4, Table S3), implying common CS/DS-GAG-related mechanisms underlying both IBD disorders.

Table 2.

Composition of CS/DS isomers in the colon.

% CS/DS isomers (mean ± SEM) Controls IBD at Dx IBD in CR p-value
Control vs IBD at Dx Control vs IBD in CR IBD at Dx vs. IBD in CR
CS-A (4S) 76.5 ± 0.7 70.1 ± 0.5 77.6 ± 0.5 p < 0.0001 p = 0.51 p < 0.0001
CS-C (6S) 18.1 ± 0.8 21.5 ± 0.6 16.6 ± 0.5 p = 0.0027 p = 0.33 p < 0.0001
CS-O (0S) 2.7 ± 0.4 2.9 ± 0.2 2.2 ± 0.1 p = 0.94 p = 0.12 p = 0.0099
CS-E (4S6S) 1.5 ± 0.2 4.9 ± 0.4 2.6 ± 0.2 p < 0.0001 p = 0.12 p < 0.0001
DS (2S4S) 1.2 ± 0.11 0.6 ± 0.05 1.0 ± 0.04 p < 0.0001 p = 0.0215 p < 0.0001
Avg. # sulfates per CS/DS 0.999 ± 0.011 1.027 ± 0.021 1.015 ± 0.014 p < 0.0001 p = 0.0194 p = 0.0357

Relative percentages of colonic CS/DS isomers among control patients (Control), patients with IBD at diagnosis (IBD at Dx), and patients with IBD in clinical remission (IBD in CR).

The notable shifts in colon CS/DS-GAGs to di-sulfated CS/DS isomers in IBD patients also resulted in a striking shift in overall CS/DS-GAG net sulfation. Compared to healthy controls, patients with IBD (UC and CD with colonic involvement) exhibit hypersulfated colonic CS/DS-GAGs (Fig. 3g, Table 2), driven primarily by a marked increase in the di-sulfated pro-inflammatory CS-E (4S6S) isomer (Fig. 3e, Table 2). The aberrant changes to CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterning and hypersulfation associated with IBD at diagnosis showed a strong trend to decrease the total abundance of colon CS/DS-GAGs (Fig. S5). Overall, pediatric patients with active IBD at diagnosis with colonic involvement exhibit pathologic alterations in their CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterning that favor a more inflammatory and less stable matrix composition compared to individuals without IBD.

CR of IBD associates with normalization of colonic CS/DS-GAG profiles

To determine whether CR of IBD (PUCAI/PCDAI < 10) also associates with changes in the aberrant CS/DS-GAG composition present in IBD at Dx, we analyzed the colonic CS/DS isomer composition in biopsies from restaging endoscopy in patients with colonic IBD while in CR (n = 24, Table 3). Patients with IBD in CR exhibit CS/DS isomer profiles similar to that observed in healthy controls (Fig. 3a). Specifically, compared to IBD patients at diagnosis, IBD patients in CR exhibited an increase in CS-A (4S) (Fig. 3b, Table 2) and DS (2S4S) (Fig. 3c, Table 2). Conversely, the abundance of CS-C (6S) (Fig. 3d, Table 2) and CS-E (4S6S) (Fig. 3e, Table 2) in IBD patients in CR decreased when compared to IBD at Dx patients with clinically active disease. Nevertheless, the CS/DS-hypersulfation characteristic of intestinal CS/DS isomers in active IBD remained detectable in patients in CR (Fig. 3g, Table 2).

Table 3.

Therapy at follow up in patients with IBD in clinical remission.

Pediatric colonic IBD in clinical remission
Total (n = 24) Ulcerative colitis (n = 13) Crohn’s disease (n = 11)
Mean length between diagnosis and follow up scope (months) 51.3 46.9 56.1
Therapy at follow up
 Biologic therapy 19/24 (79.2%) 11/13 (84.6%) 8/11 (72.7%)
 Anti-TNFα 16/24 (66.7%) 8/13 (61.5%) 8/11 (72.7%)
 ADA

9/24 (37.5%)

Mono: 7/9

 + IMM: 2/9

3/13 (23.1%)

Mono: 3/3

 + IMM: 0/3

6/11 (54.5%)

Mono: 4/6

 + IMM: 2/6

 IFX

7/24 (29.2%)

Mono: 6/7

 + IMM: 1/7

5/13 (38.5%)

Mono: 4/5

 + IMM: 1/5

2/13 (15.3%)

Mono: 2/2

 + IMM: 0/2

 VDZ 3/24 (12.5%) 3/13 (33.3%) 0
 MTX

5/24 (20.8%)

Mono: 1/5

 + SCD: 1/5

 + ADA: 2/5

 + IFX: 1/5

1/13 (30.8%)

 + IFX: 1/1

4/11 (36.4%)

Mono: 1/4

 + SCD: 1/4

 + ADA: 2/4

 Mesal 2/24 (8.3%) 2/13 (22.2%) 0
 SCD

2/24 (8.3%)

Mono: 1/2

 + MTX: 1/2

0

2/11 (18.2%)

Mono: 1/2

 + MTX: 1/2

Anti-TNFα anti-tumor necrosis factor α, ADA adalimumab, IFX infliximab, Mono monotherapy, IMM immunomodulator (methotrexate, 6-mercaptopurine, or azathioprine), VDZ vedolizumab, Mesal mesalamine/5-aminosalicylic acid, MTX methotrexate, SCD specific carbohydrate diet.

We also report that there were no significant age differences or sex differences between the IBD at Dx and IBD in CR groups (Table 1). The mean duration between diagnosis and time of follow up scope was 51.3 months, with no difference between UC and CD, and the majority of these patients at follow up in CR were on biologic therapies (Table 3). Notably, the colonic isomer profiles of IBD patients in CR nearly phenocopy those of control patients (Fig. 3a, Table 2), with the exception that DS (2S4S) was slightly lower in IBD patients in CR than in controls (Fig. 3c, Table 2). Furthermore, the isomer profile of these 24 patients with colonic IBD in CR were comparable to 14 patients who were in endoscopic remission (defined as absence of gross and histologic inflammation on endoscopic evaluation) (Fig. S6, Table S4).

Pathogenic shifts in colonic CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterns correlate with histologic and clinical IBD activity

Beyond the discovery that colonic CS/DS isomers are altered in patients with active IBD (Fig. 3, Table 2), we also found that the abundance of these isomers change significantly in proportion to the degree of histologic inflammation present in the colon (Fig. 4a, Table S5). Specifically, the levels of CS-A (4S) and DS (2S4S), which are decreased in active IBD, also decrease in proportion to the degree of histologic inflammation and appeared lower in patients with moderate/severe colonic inflammation than in patients with lesser degrees of inflammation (Fig. 4b,c). Conversely, the abundance of CS-C (6S) and CS-E (4S6S), which are higher in active IBD patients, also increased in proportion to the degree of histologic inflammation present in the colon (Fig. 4d,e). CS-O was not significantly affected by histologic inflammation between patients with mild compared to moderate/severe inflammation (Fig. 4f).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Changes in colonic CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterns correlate with histopathologic and clinical IBD activity. (a) The relative abundance of CS/DS isomers is significantly affected by the degree of histopathologic inflammation (defined as none, mild, or moderate/severe) in patients with IBD. The abundance of pro-stabilizing isomers (b) CS-A (4S) and (c) DS (2S4S) in colonic tissue from patients with and without IBD decreases in a stepwise fashion with the degree of pathologic inflammation, while the abundance of pro-inflammatory isomers (d) CS-C (6S) and (e) CS-E (4S6S) increases in a stepwise fashion in association with the degree of pathologic inflammation. In contrast, (f) CS-O (0S) abundance is not as affected by the degree of pathologic inflammation. (g) The degree of CS/DS sulfation increases with the degree of histopathologic inflammation. Clinical IBD activity in patients with IBD with colonic involvement (UC and CD colitis), as measured by the Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index and the Pediatric Crohn’s Disease Activity Index (PUCAI and PCDAI) scores inversely correlates with the abundance of pro-stabilizing isomers (h) CS-A (4S) and (i) DS (2S4S) in the colon. Conversely, PUCAI/PCDAI scores increase in proportion to the abundance of pro-inflammatory isomers (j) CS-C (6S) and (k) CS-E (4S6S). p-values not listed in (bg) are > 0.05. Error bars represent SEM.

In addition to the correlation between CS/DS isomer sulfation patterns and histologic IBD activity, we also identified a significant correlation between CS/DS isomers and clinical IBD activity. Clinical IBD activity in patients with IBD with colonic disease, as defined by the PUCAI score for UC patients or the PCDAI score for CD patients, inversely correlated with the abundance of the CS-A (4S) and DS (2S4S) isomers, which are decreased in active disease (Fig. 4h,i), and positively correlated with the abundance of the CS-C (6S) and CS-E (4S6S) isomers, which are increased in active disease (Fig. 4j,k).

Discussion

To our knowledge, our use of mass spectrometry to analyze human intestinal CS/DS-GAGs provides the first report of intestinal CS/DS-GAG composition in both healthy and diseased states. A key goal of the current work was to characterize the CS/DS-GAG sulfation code of human intestines for the first time. We found that in young individuals with endoscopically and histologically normal intestinal tissue, CS-A (4S) is the most abundant isomer, and this isomer predominantly increases as one moves from the proximal small intestine into the colon (Fig. 2). Conversely, the abundance of CS-C (6S), the second most abundant isomer, is highest in proximal small bowel and decreases moving to the terminal ileum and colon. Stated differently, the ratio of CS-A (4S) to CS-C (6S) increases as one moves distally from the proximal small bowel to the colon (Table S1). Although the functional significance of this pattern requires additional study, it may reflect a permissive role for CS-C (6S) to facilitate epithelial cell turnover, a process that is more rapid in small intestine than colon61,62. Furthermore, the flatter mucosal surface of the colonic epithelium (where CS-A (4S) content is highest) may benefit from a less plastic and more stable network of CS/DS isomers compared to the villous structure of the small intestine. Additional studies are warranted to investigate these possibilities.

Next, we sought to determine how the intestinal CS/DS-GAG profile is impacted in patients with clinical IBD symptoms and active IBD mucosal inflammation. Here, we report that patients with active IBD exhibit increased expression of “pro-inflammatory” isomers (CS-C (6S) and CS-E (4S6S)) and corresponding decrease in “matrix stabilizing” isomers, (CS-A (4S) and DS (2S4S)), in the colon (Fig. 3, Table 2), a pattern that also occurs in tandem with an apparent overall reduction in CS/DS-GAG abundance (Fig. S5). Pathological changes in the composition of specific CS/DS isomers and total glycan abundance have been reported in other inflammatory disease states, including AD, spinal cord injury, cardiac reperfusion injury, and traumatic brain injury35,40,6365, and GAG disruption has been associated with tumor necrosis factor alpha-positive macrophages, which are implicated in IBD66. In colonic IBD, isomers that are associated with macrophage infiltration and glial scarring in other tissues (CS-C (6S) and CS-E (4S6S))39,67 are also increased in active IBD (Fig. 3). Although causality cannot be inferred from these relationships, our findings are consistent with a model whereby IBD pathogenesis involves pathological changes in ECM composition, likely associated with immune cell infiltration and activation, and future studies are warranted to test this hypothesis.

The pattern created by repeating CS/DS isomers bound to CSPG core proteins in the ECM creates a sulfation code that influences many cellular processes, the outcome of which may contribute to the pathogenesis of specific diseases6870. CS/DS-GAGs appear to be most concentrated in the lamina propria of the intestine, with biglycan as the predominant associated proteoglycan (Fig. S2). Immune cell migration, activation, and cytokine production occur in the lamina propria of the intestine71,72, and biglycan abundance in tissues has been shown to increase in association with active immune cell infiltration and changes in pro-inflammatory CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterning47,73. Thus, it is likely that the CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterning changes we observe in active IBD may be linked to immune cell infiltration and activation. Alternatively, fibroblasts are also prominent in the lamina propria and are involved in ECM synthesis and remodeling74. Regardless of cellular source, CS/DS-GAGs associate with the binding and presentation of extracellular cytokines and chemokines34 to neighboring cells, and future studies investigating the relationship between changes in CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterns and activation of localized intestinal inflammation is of intense interest.

Although IBD patients initially exhibit a shift in colon CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterning, an effect linked to both pathologic severity and clinical IBD scores (Fig. 4), we observed a remarkable normalization of these CS/DS-GAG sulfation patterning in IBD patients in CR (Fig. 3). As such, shifts in CS/DS-GAG isomer profiles appear to develop only in the setting of active IBD pathology and do not represent an underlying predisposition to developing the disease. However, unlike the normalization of CS/DS-GAG patterning in IBC at CR, the colon appears to remain hypersulfated even when CR is achieved (Fig. 3). As such, the degree of colon sulfation may serve as a disease biomarker. Further studies are warranted to follow individuals longitudinally and determine whether the degree of CS/DS-sulfation is associated with a higher likelihood of disease relapse, which can guide treatment decisions and timing of repeat endoscopic evaluation.

Preclinical data from rodent studies provide further support that CS as part of the ECM plays an active role in IBD. Specifically, oral CS administration (a combination of CS isomers, predominantly CS-A (4S)), improves clinical and histologic outcomes in a dextran sodium sulfate colitis (DSS) rat model of IBD75. Notably, this effect was more robust and effective compared to animals receiving 5-aminosalicylic acid administration, the current first line therapy for mild to moderate UC75. Additionally, DSS colitis outcomes in mice were found to be improved in response to an siRNA-based strategy that altered sulfotransferase enzymatic activity, thereby reducing the abundance of pro-inflammatory CS-E (4S6S) in the colon36. Similar outcomes are reported in cardiac tissue, where targeted administration of the stable DS (2S4S) isomer following a cardiac ischemic event was effective in preventing reperfusion inflammation injury65.

One potential confounding factor in our studies is that the control population included in this study tended to be older than patients with IBD. To address this concern, we investigated whether CS/DS isomer composition varied by age in normal subjects and found no correlation between intestinal CS/DS isomer changes with age (Fig. 2). It is therefore unlikely that the differences in CS/DS isomer profiles observed between our control patients and patients with IBD were confounded by an effect of age. This is distinct from our current knowledge about age-associated CS/DS-GAG sulfation pattern changes in the brain, which are shown to change throughout the lifespan of mice as the brain matrix “stiffens” with age and becomes less plastic30,54. Further studies are needed to investigate the intestinal CS/DS-GAG profiles in younger individuals to determine the “critical period” for ECM maturation in the intestines.

A second potential confounder in our study is that patients with IBD (both UC and CD) had a higher male predominance compared to the control group, which had an equal sex distribution (Table 1). While pediatric IBD (CD in particular) has been shown to have a male predominance76, this skew was notably pronounced in our study. Finally, we acknowledge the time from diagnosis to follow-up scope among patients with IBD in CR was variable, thus producing a third limitation in our study. Overall, there was a mean length of 51.3 months between time of diagnosis and time of biopsy acquisition for tissues that were included in this study. Because this analysis utilized banked intestinal biopsy tissues, there was no way to control for therapy duration. At our institution, patients typically have their initial restaging endoscopic evaluation performed within 6–15 months of diagnosis and continue to have restaging endoscopies every few years while they remain in CR, which explains the variable and lengthy duration of time between diagnosis and follow up biopsies in our study.

In summary, our mass spectrometry analysis decodes the CS/DS-GAG sulfation signature of the human intestine for the first time and reveals pathogenic changes of CS/DS-GAG composition in areas of inflamed bowel in IBD, with pro-inflammatory isomers displacing pro-stabilizing isomers. As these ECM changes are both strongly associated with disease activity and reversed by effective IBD treatment, priorities for future studies are to determine (1) the extent to which reversal of pathogenic intestinal ECM compositional changes can improve IBD outcomes without immunosuppression, and (2) whether the intestinal CS/DS-GAG sulfation signature can be monitored as a biomarker of IBD activity.

Methods

Patient selection

Intestinal biopsy samples from pediatric and young adult patients with and without IBD were obtained from deidentified, banked samples through the PREDICT, ISTAT, and LAND-HO studies (PREDICT IRB STUDY00001017, ISTAT IRB STUDY00001308, and LAND-HO IRB STUDY00002018). Experiments were approved by Seattle Children’s Hospital and University of Washington Institutional Review Boards. All methods were conducted in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. Because all tissue samples and corresponding clinical information (age and gender for all patients, and diagnosis, IBD medical therapy, and PUCAI/PCDAI scoring for patients with IBD) were de-identified, informed consent for this analysis was not necessary; however, formal written consent was obtained from the individuals who participated in each of the above studies. While this was primarily a pediatric-focused analysis, young adults between 18 and 23 were included as healthy controls in the original studies because they could give their own consent to participate as healthy endoscopy subjects. We included all control biopsy samples that were available from these studies, and for patients with IBD our inclusion criteria were: biopsies taken from patients at time of diagnosis who were confirmed to have IBD who had clinically active symptoms and were not on treatment, with gross endoscopic and histologic colonic involvement, and/or biopsies from patients with IBD who had colonic involvement (endoscopically and histologically) at diagnosis who had subsequent biopsies taken on restaging evaluation on therapy while in CR. Most of these patients at time of follow up in CR were also in biochemical remission, with normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein lab values, but this was not an inclusion criterion for this study. There were few patients who had a fecal calprotectin collected at the same time as endoscopic evaluation, so this was also not used as an inclusion criterion. A total of 69 pediatric/young adult patients were included: 13 control patients, and 56 with IBD with colonic disease who met the above inclusion criteria (31 patients with ulcerative colitis, 1 patient with indeterminant colitis, and 24 with Crohn’s disease). A limited number of patients had tissues collected at diagnosis and follow up, but most samples were obtained from patients either at diagnosis or follow up. A smaller set of colonic biopsies from 6 deidentified adult control patients without IBD obtained through the University of Washington Gastrointestinal Center for Analytical Research and Exploratory Science (GICaRes) Biorepository (IRB 34095/2161) was also included for comparison to the pediatric population. All human tissue samples used in the analysis were deidentified, and the clinical information was provided for each deidentified sample.

Pathologic and clinical IBD assessment

Researchers had access to pathology reports from each patient at the time of tissue collection/endoscopic evaluation. The degree of histological inflammation was categorized into none, mild, moderate, or severe according to the language used in the original pathology reports. Moderate and severe inflammation groups were combined in our analysis.

Clinical IBD activity scores, specifically PUCAI77 and PCDAI78, were calculated for each patient at the time of endoscopic evaluation based on retrospective chart review. When a numeric score was not explicitly mentioned in the chart, scores were retroactively calculated using available clinical and anthropometric information. Patients were considered to have active disease if PUCAI/PCDAI score was greater than 10. PUCAI/PCDAI scores from 10 to 34 were considered mild disease, 35–64 as moderate disease, and 65 or greater as severe disease. CR of colonic IBD was defined by our study as clinical disease activity scores (PUCAI/PCDAI < 10).

Intestinal tissue processing

Intestinal biopsy samples from the duodenum (duo), terminal ileum (TI), and left/rectosigmoid colon were formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded (FFPE), and 4 µm thick sections were cut and mounted onto slides. FFPE sections were de-waxed using xylenes (Thermo Fischer Scientific, 1330-20-07, Waltham, MA) and a series of graded ethanol washes (100%, 95%, 70%, 50%). Slides were then washed in 0.1 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS) followed by 3 × in Optima liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS)-grade water (Thermo Fisher Scientific, 7732-18-5, Waltham, MA) and 1 × in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 7.6; Sigma, 09830, Burlington, MA) at room temperature. ChondroitinaseABC (ChABC) enzyme (Sigma, C3667, Burlington, MA), a combinatorial lyase/enolase that selectively degrades all CS/DS-GAG chains into individual isomers, or disaccharide units58,59, was reconstituted at a concentration of 500 mU/mL in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 7.6). Using a hydrophobic pen to outline the tissue sections on each slide, reconstituted ChABC enzyme was added to cover each tissue sections (200–500 µL per slide depending on tissue surface area), and slides were incubated at 37 °C in a Thermo Fisher Scientific MaxQ4000 orbital shaker for 24 h. Afterward, the liquid incubation media was collected and spun at 14,000×g for 10 min at room temperature to remove any tissue debris. The supernatant was collected and then dehydrated using a Thermo Fisher Scientific SpeedVac Concentrator and the resulting product was reconstituted in 30 µL of LC/MS-grade water for liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS) analysis. Figure 1d outlines the tissue processing workflow for the intestinal biopsy samples.

LC–MS/MS quantification of isolated CS/DS isomers

After isolating CS/DS isomers (disaccharide units) from duodenum, terminal ileum, and colon tissues as outlined above, samples were analyzed using a triple quadropole mass spectrometer equipped with electrospray ion source (Waters Xevo TQ-S, Milford, MA) operated in negative mode ionization. LC–MS/MS was performed using a Waters Acuity I-class ultraperformance liquid chromatographic system (UPLC) coupled to the Waters Xevo TQ-S system. A Hypercarb column (2.1 Å ~ 50 mm, 3 µm; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was used to resolve the isomers as described previously54, assigning the following multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) channels: DS (2S4S) and CS-E (4S6S), m/z 538 > 300; CS-A (4S), m/z 458 > 300; CS-O (0S) m/z 378 > 175; and CS-C (6S) m/z 458 > 282 (Fig. S1). Data was acquired and quantified using MassLynx software version 4.1 (Waters, Milford, MA). Using the MRM channels described above, the ratios between peak areas resulting from equimolar CS/DS standard mixes were normalized to the highest peak intensity and relative quantification of each isomer within a sample was achieved using a modified peak area normalization function as previously described54. Each sample of tissues was normalized using internal control samples that were repeated in each LC–MS/MS run. Each CS/DS isomer was expressed as a percentage of the relative abundance of each CS/DS isomer within an intestinal sample, which allowed us to account for any variation in absolute tissue size from the biopsy samples. The average number of sulfates per CS/DS isomer was computed using the following formula:

Avg#sulfatesperCS/DSisomer=(i=1)n(xi+wi)/(i=1)nwi

xi = # sulfates (0–2).

wi = percent CS/DS isomer.

Immunohistochemical staining

Following digestion with ChABC enzyme as above, slides were subjected to immunofluorescent staining, along with undigested slides. Antigen-retrieval in 10 mM sodium citrate, pH 6.0 was performed. Sections were then incubated in 0.1 M PBS followed by 0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS, then blocked in 2% donkey serum in 0.05% Triton X-100 for 37 °C for 1 h, and finally incubated overnight with mouse anti-chondroitinase 4-sulfate antibody at 1:1000 dilution (“stub,” Millipore MAB2030, Burlington, MA, United States) and/or rabbit anti-biglycan antibody at 1:1000 dilution (Invitrogen PA5-76821, Carlsbad, CA). Sections were washed, incubated for 2 h with Alexa 555-conjugated donkey anti-mouse antibody or Alexa 647-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit and then stained with DAPI. Immunofluorescence images were captured using the Keyence BZ-X800 microscope at 20 × magnification.

Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) methods to quantify total CS/DS-GAGs

Sample prep: A 20 μL aliquot containing the disaccharide was diluted in 99.9% D2O (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, CIL) to a final Volume of 200 μL. The sample was dried completely under reduced pressure. Following drying the sample was reconstituted in 200 μL of 99.9% D2O and dried completely two additional times. After the third drying cycle, the sample was diluted in 600 μL of 99.9% D2O and transferred to a Norell 508UP NMR tube. The sample was promptly sealed and analyzed (Fig. S4).

NMR experiment/processing

The ERETIC2 technique (Electronic Reference to Access in Vivo Concentration) was used to measure the concentrations of disaccharide analytes. Calibration of the instrument for ERETIC2 was carried out per the manufacturer’s recommendations (see Bruker “TopSpin ERETIC2 User Manual, Version 001”) using a benzoic acid external quantitative NMR (qNMR) standard purchased from CIL. Analysis was carried out on a Bruker Avance 300 MHz NMR Spectrometer equipped with an automatic tune and match probe via the “ERETIC 2 Quantification procedure” provided by Bruker. The 90° pulse was calibrated for each sample using the automated program “pulsecal”. The optimal number of scans (NS) and relaxation delay (D1) were determined for each sample in the usual way. Data processing was completed manually on Bruker TopSpin version 4.1.3. The concentration of each sample was determined via the ERETIC software tool in TopSpin version 4.1.3, using the aforementioned benzoic acid qNMR standard as the reference and the integration of the anomeric proton resonance from each of the disaccharides. To minimize error arising from manual processing, each spectrum was processed three times and the average of the three concentrations provided was reported with error.

Quantification of CS/DS total abundance

Using the molar concentrations of each CS/DS isomer as determined by NMR, an equal molar solution containing all six CS/DS isomers was produced. This concentrated solution of 1 mM disaccharide mix was then diluted 1:100, 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2500, and 1:5000 and ran on the mass spectrometer instrument to produce a standard curve representing total ion counts (TIC) to the molar solution, which was then converted to ng of each CS/DS isomer. TIC produced from each intestinal CS/DS peak was then computed to ng amounts, summed, and normalized to tissue area to produce the total CS/DS-GAGs extraction from each intestinal sample.

Statistical analysis

A mixed-effects, repeated measures two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with matched CS/DS isomers within each patient was used for the primary analysis comparing CS/DS isomer compositional changes between intestinal locations and between individuals without intestinal inflammation, patients with active IBD, and IBD in remission in Figs. 2a, 3a, and 4a. To compare individual isomer abundance or sulfation between each bowel location in Fig. 2b–g, a secondary analysis using Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was conducted to compare individual isomer abundance between each group and each bowel location. Data from colon biopsies for each isomer in control patients was normally distributed. To compare individual isomer abundance between controls groups and IBD groups in Fig. 3b–g, a one-way ANOVA using Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for normally distributed data [CS-A (4S), DS (2S4S), and CS-C (6S)]. A Kruskal–Wallis nonparametric test was used for data that was not normally distributed [CS-O (0S), CS-E (4S6S), and sulfation]. To compare the severity of histologic inflammation for each isomer in Fig. 4b–g, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test was used for normally distributed data [DS (2S4S), CS-C (6S), and CS-E (4S6S)], and a Kruskal–Wallis test was used for data that was not normally distributed [CS-A (4S)]. Normality (Gaussian distribution) was tested for using the D’Agostino-Pearson test using an alpha value of 0.05.

Whether the abundance of each isomer varied with disease activity was determined by linear regression (the 95% confidence interval bands of the best-fit line was used to compare each individual CS/DS isomer to the corresponding clinical IBD severity scores). R-squared analysis was also used to determine the extent to which variance in CS/DS isomer abundance was attributable to variation in IBD severity. GraphPad Prism 9.0 (Graph Pad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA) was used to complete statistical analyses. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean. All differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. An alpha value of 0.05 was used for all analyses. Investigators were blinded to group conditions during quantitative mass spectrometry analysis.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the technical assistance and access to state-of-the-art mass spectrometry machines and equipment provided by the University of Washington School of Pharmacy’s Mass Spectrometry Center. The authors also thank the Seattle Children’s Hospital Laboratory Medicine and Pathology team for assistance with processing FFPE intestinal biopsy tissues and cutting additional slides for this work. The authors would like to acknowledge Edwin deZoeten, MD, PhD for his input. We are also grateful for the individuals and families who participated in the PREDICT, ISTAT, and LAND-HO studies as well as the GICaRes Biorepository to further our understanding of gastrointestinal diseases. Some figures were created with BioRender.com.

Author contributions

KLF, KMA, and JMS conceived the idea behind the study, and KLF and KMA carried out the experiment and were responsible for data collection, analysis, and interpretation. HZ, DLS, and MN were responsible for providing de-identified intestinal biopsy samples for the study. BAP, EQ, ASH, and XZ helped with sample processing, data collection, immunohistochemical staining, and image acquisition and analysis. TAM and MG performed NMR studies. KLF was responsible for drafting the article, and KMA, MWS, GJM, JMS, HZ, DLS, MN, AH, BAP, EQ, ASH, XZ, TAM, and MG were responsible for revising and editing to help create the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding was provided by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Grant Nos. DK131695, DK089056, DK101997, DK017047, DK114474DK035816), National Institute of General Medical Sciences (Grant No. R01 GM127579), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Grant No. AI171150), National Institute on Aging (Grant No. R21 AG074152), U.S. Department of Defense (Grant No. W81XWH2110635), and Office of Research Central, University of Washington (Grant No. A139339).

Data availability

All data are presented within the manuscript or supplementary information files.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors jointly supervised this work: Kimberly M. Alonge and Jarrad M. Scarlett.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-60959-x.

References

  • 1.Atlab S, et al. The global, regional, and national burden of inflammatory bowel disease in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;5:17–30. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30333-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chudy-Onwugaje KO, Christian KE, Farraye FA, Cross RK. A state-of-the-art review of new and emerging therapies for the treatment of IBD. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2018;25:820–830. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Villablanca EJ, Selin K, Hedin CRH. Mechanisms of mucosal healing: Treating inflammatory bowel disease without immunosuppression? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. 2022 doi: 10.1038/s41575-022-00604-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cai Z, Wang S, Li J. Treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: A comprehensive review. Front. Med. 2021;8:765474. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.765474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lichtenstein GR, et al. ACG clinical guideline: Management of Crohn’s disease in adults. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2018;113:481–517. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2018.27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Worley G, et al. Colectomy rates for ulcerative colitis in England 2003–2016. Aliment. Pharm. Ther. 2021;53:484–498. doi: 10.1111/apt.16202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang E, et al. Efficacy and safety of simultaneous treatment with two biologic medications in refractory Crohn’s disease. Aliment. Pharm. Ther. 2020;51:1031–1038. doi: 10.1111/apt.15719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.de Chambrun GP, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Lémann M, Colombel J-F. Clinical implications of mucosal healing for the management of IBD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. 2010;7:15–29. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2009.203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ungaro RC, et al. Deep remission at 1 year prevents progression of early Crohn’s disease. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:139–147. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.03.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Carvalho PB, Cotter J. Mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis: A comprehensive review. Drugs. 2017;77:159–173. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0676-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Neurath MF. New targets for mucosal healing and therapy in inflammatory bowel diseases. Mucosal. Immunol. 2014;7:6–19. doi: 10.1038/mi.2013.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Guan Q. A comprehensive review and update on the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. J. Immunol. Res. 2019;2019:7247238. doi: 10.1155/2019/7247238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhang Y-Z, Li Y-Y. Inflammatory bowel disease: Pathogenesis. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:91–99. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xavier RJ, Podolsky DK. Unravelling the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease. Nature. 2007;448:427–434. doi: 10.1038/nature06005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chang J, et al. Impaired intestinal permeability contributes to ongoing bowel symptoms in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and mucosal healing. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:723–731.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.05.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kang Y, Park H, Choe B-H, Kang B. The role and function of mucins and its relationship to inflammatory bowel disease. Front. Med. 2022;9:848344. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.848344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.d’Aldebert E, et al. Characterization of human colon organoids from inflammatory bowel disease patients. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:363. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Golusda L, Kühl AA, Siegmund B, Paclik D. Extracellular matrix components as diagnostic tools in inflammatory bowel disease. Biology. 2021;10:1024. doi: 10.3390/biology10101024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Petrey AC, de la Motte CA. The extracellular matrix in IBD. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 2017;33:234–238. doi: 10.1097/MOG.0000000000000368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Derkacz A, Olczyk P, Olczyk K, Komosinska-Vassev K. The role of extracellular matrix components in inflammatory bowel diseases. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:1122. doi: 10.3390/jcm10051122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pompili S, Latella G, Gaudio E, Sferra R, Vetuschi A. The charming world of the extracellular matrix: A dynamic and protective network of the intestinal wall. Front. Med. 2021;8:610189. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.610189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Derkacz A, Olczyk P, Jura-Półtorak A, Olczyk K, Komosinska-Vassev K. The diagnostic usefulness of circulating profile of extracellular matrix components: Sulfated glycosaminoglycans (sGAG), hyaluronan (HA) and extracellular part of syndecan-1 (sCD138) in patients with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. J. Clin. Med. 2021;10:1722. doi: 10.3390/jcm10081722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kechagia JZ, Ivaska J, Roca-Cusachs P. Integrins as biomechanical sensors of the microenvironment. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2019;20:457–473. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0134-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Asano K, Yoshimura S, Nakane A. Alteration of intestinal microbiota in mice orally administered with salmon cartilage proteoglycan, a prophylactic agent. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e75008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sashinami H, et al. Salmon proteoglycan suppresses progression of mouse experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis via regulation of Th17 and Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. Life Sci. 2012;91:1263–1269. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Kudo K, Kobayashi T, Kasai K, Nozaka H, Nakamura T. Chondroitin sulfate is not digested at all in the mouse small intestine but may suppress interleukin 6 expression induced by tumor necrosis factor-α. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2023;642:185–191. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.12.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mortensen JH, et al. The intestinal tissue homeostasis: The role of extracellular matrix remodeling in inflammatory bowel disease. Expert. Rev. Gastroenterol. 2019;13:1–17. doi: 10.1080/17474124.2019.1673729. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Mikami T, Kitagawa H. Chondroitin sulfate glycosaminoglycans function as extra/pericellular ligands for cell surface receptors. J. Biochem. 2023;173:329–332. doi: 10.1093/jb/mvac110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Miyata S, Kitagawa H. Chondroitin 6-sulfation regulates perineuronal net formation by controlling the stability of aggrecan. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:1–13. doi: 10.1155/2016/1305801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ryu Y, Iwashita M, Lee W, Uchimura K, Kosodo Y. A shift in tissue stiffness during hippocampal maturation correlates to the pattern of neurogenesis and composition of the extracellular matrix. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:709620. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.709620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Miyata S, Komatsu Y, Yoshimura Y, Taya C, Kitagawa H. Persistent cortical plasticity by upregulation of chondroitin 6-sulfation. Nat. Neurosci. 2012;15:414–422. doi: 10.1038/nn.3023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mizumoto S, Yamada S. The specific role of dermatan sulfate as an instructive glycosaminoglycan in tissue development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:7485. doi: 10.3390/ijms23137485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rizzo-Valente VS, et al. Effects of dermatan sulfate from marine invertebrate styela plicata in the wound healing pathway: A natural resource applied to regenerative therapy. Mar. Drugs. 2022;20:676. doi: 10.3390/md20110676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Trowbridge JM, Gallo RL. Dermatan sulfate: New functions from an old glycosaminoglycan. Glycobiology. 2002;12:117R–125R. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwf066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Logsdon AF, et al. Decoding perineuronal net glycan sulfation patterns in the Alzheimer’s disease brain. Alzheimer’s Dement. 2021 doi: 10.1002/alz.12451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Suzuki K, et al. Pivotal role of carbohydrate sulfotransferase 15 in fibrosis and mucosal healing in mouse colitis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0158967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158967. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ohtake S, et al. Expression of sulfotransferases involved in the biosynthesis of chondroitin sulfate E in the bone marrow derived mast cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2008;1780:687–695. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2008.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Habuchi O, Moroi R, Ohtake S. Enzymatic synthesis of chondroitin sulfate E by N-acetylgalactosamine 4-sulfate 6-O-sulfotransferase purified from squid cartilage. Anal. Biochem. 2002;310:129–136. doi: 10.1016/S0003-2697(02)00277-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gilbert RJ, et al. CS-4,6 is differentially upregulated in glial scar and is a potent inhibitor of neurite extension. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 2005;29:545–558. doi: 10.1016/j.mcn.2005.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Alonge KM, et al. Changes in brain matrix glycan sulfation associate with reactive gliosis and motor coordination in mice with head trauma. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 2021;15:745288. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.745288. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shida M, Mikami T, Tamura J, Kitagawa H. Chondroitin sulfate-D promotes neurite outgrowth by acting as an extracellular ligand for neuronal integrin αVβ3. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gen. Subj. 2019;1863:1319–1331. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2019.06.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Syková E, Nicholson C. Diffusion in brain extracellular space. Physiol. Rev. 2008;88:1277–1340. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00027.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Reine TM, et al. Reduced sulfation of chondroitin sulfate but not heparan sulfate in kidneys of diabetic db/db mice. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 2013;61:606–616. doi: 10.1369/0022155413494392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Scarlett JM, Hu SJ, Alonge KM. The, “loss” of perineuronal nets in Alzheimer’s disease: missing or hiding in plain sight? Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2022;16:896400. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2022.896400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Alonge KM, et al. Hypothalamic perineuronal net assembly is required for sustained diabetes remission induced by fibroblast growth factor 1 in rats. Nat. Metab. 2020;2:1025–1033. doi: 10.1038/s42255-020-00275-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Logsdon AF, et al. Perineuronal net deglycosylation associates with tauopathy-induced gliosis and neurodegeneration. J. Neurochem. 2024 doi: 10.1111/jnc.16067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Han CY, et al. Adipocyte-derived versican and macrophage-derived biglycan control adipose tissue inflammation in obesity. Cell Rep. 2020;31:107818. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Odenwald MA, Turner JR. The intestinal epithelial barrier: A therapeutic target? Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017;14:9–21. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2016.169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Friedrich M, Pohin M, Powrie F. Cytokine networks in the pathophysiology of inflammatory bowel disease. Immunity. 2019;50:992–1006. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kudelka MR, Stowell SR, Cummings RD, Neish AS. Intestinal epithelial glycosylation in homeostasis and gut microbiota interactions in IBD. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. 2020;17:597–617. doi: 10.1038/s41575-020-0331-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Bergstrom K, et al. Defective intestinal mucin-type O-glycosylation causes spontaneous colitis-associated cancer in mice. Gastroenterology. 2016;151:152–164.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Rausch P, et al. Colonic mucosa-associated microbiota is influenced by an interaction of Crohn disease and FUT2 (Secretor) genotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011;108:19030–19035. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106408108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Fu J, et al. Loss of intestinal core 1–derived O-glycans causes spontaneous colitis in mice. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:1657–1666. doi: 10.1172/JCI45538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Alonge KM, et al. Quantitative analysis of chondroitin sulfate disaccharides from human and rodent fixed brain tissue by electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. Glycobiology. 2019;29:847–860. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwz060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Härtig W, Meinicke A, Michalski D, Schob S, Jäger C. Update on perineuronal net staining with Wisteria floribunda agglutinin (WFA) Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2022;16:851988. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2022.851988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hilbig H, Bidmon H-J, Blohm U, Zilles K. Wisteria floribunda agglutinin labeling patterns in the human cortex: A tool for revealing areal borders and subdivisions in parallel with immunocytochemistry. Anat. Embryol. 2001;203:45–52. doi: 10.1007/s004290000135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Taleb V, et al. Structural and mechanistic insights into the cleavage of clustered O-glycan patches-containing glycoproteins by mucinases of the human gut. Nat. Commun. 2022;13:4324. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32021-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Prabhakar V, Capila I, Soundararajan V, Raman R, Sasisekharan R. Recombinant expression, purification, and biochemical characterization of chondroitinase ABC II from Proteus vulgaris*. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:974–982. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806630200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hamai A, et al. Two distinct chondroitin sulfate ABC lyases an endoeliminase yielding tertasaccharides and an exoeliminase preferentially acting on oligosaccharides. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:9123–9130. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.14.9123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yi J, et al. Alterations in sulfated chondroitin glycosaminoglycans following controlled cortical impact injury in mice. J. Comp. Neurol. 2012;520:3295–3313. doi: 10.1002/cne.23156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Darwich AS, Aslam U, Ashcroft DM, Rostami-Hodjegan A. meta-analysis of the turnover of intestinal epithelia in preclinical animal species and humans. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2014;42:2016–2022. doi: 10.1124/dmd.114.058404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.van der Flier LG, Clevers H. Stem cells, self-renewal, and differentiation in the intestinal epithelium. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2009;71:241–260. doi: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.010908.163145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Hussein RK, Mencio CP, Katagiri Y, Brake AM, Geller HM. Role of chondroitin sulfation following spinal cord injury. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:208. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2020.00208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Hong T-T, White AJ, Lucchesi BR. Dermatan disulfate (Intimatan) prevents complement-mediated myocardial injury in the human-plasma-perfused rabbit heart. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2005;5:381–391. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2004.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dehghani T, et al. Selectin-targeting glycosaminoglycan-peptide conjugate limits neutrophil-mediated cardiac reperfusion injury. Cardiovasc. Res. 2020;118:267–281. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Murch SH, et al. Disruption of sulphated glycosaminoglycans in intestinal inflammation. Lancet. 1993;341:711–714. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90485-Y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Habuchi O. Functions of chondroitin/dermatan sulfate containing GalNAc4,6-disulfate. Glycobiology. 2022;32:664–678. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwac030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Testa D, Prochiantz A, Nardo AAD. Perineuronal nets in brain physiology and disease. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2018;89:125–135. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2018.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Morawski M, et al. Involvement of perineuronal and perisynaptic extracellular matrix in Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology. Brain Pathol. 2012;22:547–561. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2011.00557.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pantazopoulos H, Berretta S. In sickness and in health: Perineuronal nets and synaptic plasticity in psychiatric disorders. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:1–23. doi: 10.1155/2016/9847696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Allaire JM, et al. The intestinal epithelium: Central coordinator of mucosal immunity. Trends Immunol. 2018;39:677–696. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2018.04.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wallace KL, Zheng L-B, Kanazawa Y, Shih DQ. Immunopathology of inflammatory bowel disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014;20:6–21. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i1.6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Mohan H, et al. Extracellular matrix in multiple sclerosis lesions: Fibrillar collagens, biglycan and decorin are upregulated and associated with infiltrating immune cells. Brain Pathol. 2010;20:966–975. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2010.00399.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Chalkidi N, Paraskeva C, Koliaraki V. Fibroblasts in intestinal homeostasis, damage, and repair. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:924866. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.924866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hori Y, et al. Effects of chondroitin sulfate on colitis induced by dextran sulfate sodium in rats. Jpn. J. Pharmacol. 2001;85:155–160. doi: 10.1254/jjp.85.155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Severs M, et al. Sex-related differences in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Results of two prospective cohort studies. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2018;24:1298–1306. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Turner D, et al. Appraisal of the pediatric ulcerative colitis activity index (PUCAI) Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2009;15:1218–1223. doi: 10.1002/ibd.20867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Hyams J, et al. Evaluation of the pediatric Crohn disease activity index: A prospective multicenter experience. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2005;41:416–421. doi: 10.1097/01.mpg.0000183350.46795.42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented within the manuscript or supplementary information files.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES