Skip to main content
Cureus logoLink to Cureus
. 2024 May 22;16(5):e60877. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60877

Towards Optimal Cardiovascular Health: A Comprehensive Review of Preventive Strategies

Philip Branigan 1, Y V Duong 2, Ammar Y Abdulfattah 3,, Jacob Sabu 4, Mary Mallappallil 5, Sabu John 1
Editors: Alexander Muacevic, John R Adler
PMCID: PMC11192625  PMID: 38910676

Abstract

Heart disease remains a prominent global health concern, with cardiovascular disease (CVD) standing as a leading cause of death worldwide. Preventing heart disease not only decreases the risk of premature death but also mitigates complications like heart attacks, strokes, and arrhythmias, thereby enhancing overall health and quality of life. The economic burden of heart disease treatment highlights the importance of implementing preventive measures, such as lifestyle changes and early interventions, which can alleviate healthcare costs. These strategies, targeting risk factors like hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidemia, and obesity, not only prevent heart disease but also reduce the risk of other health issues. Herein, this review covers various preventive measures, including dietary interventions, exercise, controlling HTN, DM, cholesterol, and weight, smoking cessation, and pharmacological interventions. By critically analyzing the guidelines and leveraging robust data alongside variations in recommendations, this review aims to elucidate effective primary prevention strategies for CVD.

Keywords: diabetes, cholesterol, exercise, diet, hypertension, heart disease prevention

Introduction and background

Heart disease stands as one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Prevalent cases of total cardiovascular disease (CVD) nearly doubled from 271 million in 1990 to 523 million in 2019 [1]. Moreover, the number of CVD-related deaths steadily increased, from 12.1 million in 1990 to 18.6 million in 2019 [1]. Heart disease can lead to various complications, including heart attacks, strokes, heart failure, and arrhythmias. Preventing heart disease mitigates the risk of these complications, thereby enhancing quality of life and improving overall health [2].

Treatment for heart disease and its associated complications results in substantial healthcare costs [3]. Implementing preventive measures, such as lifestyle modifications and early interventions, has the potential to alleviate the economic burden on healthcare systems and individuals [4]. Heart disease can significantly impede an individual's daily life, limiting physical abilities and causing discomfort [5]. Prevention measures empower individuals to maintain an active, healthy lifestyle, thereby facilitating improved physical and mental well-being. These strategies primarily target managing risk factors like high cholesterol, high blood pressure, diabetes, obesity, and smoking [6]. Educating individuals about heart disease risk factors, symptoms, and preventive measures encourages them to take charge of their health, promoting early detection and effective intervention [7].

Review

The 2019 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline on primary prevention of CVD aims to offer evidence-based recommendations for preventing CVD in individuals without a history of the condition. This guideline primarily emphasizes lifestyle factors, other determinants affecting CVD risk, patient-centered approaches, and considerations regarding the cost and value of primary prevention [8]. Its goal is to ensure optimal dissemination of information and aid clinicians and individuals in making informed decisions to prevent CVD [8].

The ACC/AHA 2019 guideline serves as a resource for healthcare professionals seeking to prevent CVD in patients. Within this guideline, several significant recommendations are highlighted, including the promotion of a collaborative approach to care involving teams in managing risk factors associated with atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD). Additionally, there is an emphasis on supporting shared decision-making during discussions concerning the most suitable strategies for lowering ASCVD risk. Moreover, the guideline stresses the importance of integrating social determinants of health into treatment plans to enhance recommendations for preventing ASCVD [8].

These recommendations underscore the significance of adopting a healthy lifestyle, comprising dietary habits, physical activity, and addressing other factors influencing CVD risk like obesity, diabetes mellitus (DM), blood cholesterol, high blood pressure, smoking, and aspirin use [9]. The guideline emphasizes patient-centered care, integrating team-based care delivery, shared decision-making, and recognizing social determinants of health in ASCVD prevention efforts [8]. The social determinants of health are “the structural determinants and conditions in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age” [9]. These structural determinants and conditions include the physical environment, socioeconomic status, education, employment, and social support networks, as well as access to healthy food and health care.

Healthcare professionals can effectively implement the recommendations outlined in the 2019 ACC/AHA guidelines through several strategies. Adopting a team-based care approach involves leveraging multidisciplinary health professionals to enhance the quality and sustainability of ASCVD prevention [8]. It facilitates collaboration among various clinicians, promotes clinical decision-making, and encourages patient and family engagement to support treatment goals [8].

Another strategy involves integrating shared decision-making into patient discussions regarding optimal ASCVD risk reduction strategies. This approach actively engages patients in the decision-making process, considering their values, preferences, and associated health conditions [8]. Additionally, healthcare professionals should account for social determinants of health while implementing treatment recommendations for ASCVD prevention [8]. Understanding the social and economic factors influencing patients' health can tailor interventions and enhance outcomes [8].

Fegers-Wustrow et al. conducted a comparative analysis between the 2019 ACC/AHA guidelines and the 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines. Both the ESC and ACC/AHA guidelines acknowledge the significance of addressing nonclassical risk factors for CVD. While the ESC guideline adopts a holistic approach, extending risk assessment beyond individual patients to encompass global population-level risk, it recognizes the impact of environmental factors like air and noise pollution, workplace environment, and city planning on CVD risk [10]. The ESC guideline advocates legislative action at various governance levels to address these nonclassical risk factors [10].

Diet and cardiovascular health

Embracing healthy eating patterns such as the Mediterranean, Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), or plant-based diets can notably decrease the likelihood of CVD. These dietary approaches, including the Mediterranean diet, which advocates for a rich intake of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, seeds, and healthy fats like olive oil, with moderate consumption of fish and poultry while limiting red meat and processed foods [11]; the DASH diet, which prioritizes fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean proteins, and low-fat dairy to lower blood pressure and reduce heart disease risk [12,13]; and the plant-based diet, which mainly consists of plant-derived foods such as vegetables, fruits, legumes, nuts, and seeds, with minimal or no animal products, have been associated with a reduced risk of CVD [14]. Focusing on the quality of nutrients is crucial, prioritizing foods rich in fiber, antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals while minimizing saturated fats, trans-fats, sodium, and added sugars [14]. Managing cholesterol and fat intake involves limiting saturated and trans fats to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels while advocating for healthy fats like those found in olive oil, avocados, nuts, and seeds [11]. To maintain healthy blood pressure, reducing sodium intake by avoiding processed and high-sodium foods is essential [14]. Moderation in alcohol consumption is emphasized, as excessive intake can elevate blood pressure and contribute to heart disease [15]. Portion control and balanced meals are encouraged to manage weight, considering obesity as a significant risk factor for heart disease [15]. Adopting a heart-healthy diet can lower the risk of developing CVD, help manage existing conditions like high blood pressure and cholesterol, and contribute to overall well-being [15]. It is essential to consult with a healthcare professional or a registered dietitian for personalized dietary recommendations based on individual health needs and goals [15].

Mediterranean Diet

The Mediterranean diet's richness in monounsaturated fatty acids, predominantly from sources like olive oil, contributes to diminishing LDL-C levels and ameliorating overall lipid profiles [11]. Abundant consumption of fruits, vegetables, and nuts within this dietary pattern furnishes a broad spectrum of antioxidants and anti-inflammatory agents, thus mitigating inflammation and oxidative stress within the body [11]. Moreover, this diet's association with enhanced insulin sensitivity facilitates the regulation of blood sugar levels, reducing the susceptibility to metabolic conditions such as type 2 DM [11]. By amalgamating healthy fats, fiber, and antioxidants, the Mediterranean diet contributes to cardiovascular well-being by thwarting blood clot formation, diminishing blood pressure, and curbing the likelihood of CVDs [11]. Enriched with phytochemicals, vitamins, and minerals renowned for their anti-cancer attributes, this dietary regimen potentially lowers cancer risks [11].

Various studies underscore the Mediterranean diet's correlation with reduced blood pressure and improved cholesterol profiles, highlighting its composition abundant in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, and healthy fats like olive oil [11-15]. Emphasizing lean protein sources like fish and poultry while limiting red meat and processed food intake, coupled with reduced consumption of saturated and trans-fats commonly found in fried and processed foods, aids in cholesterol level management [15]. Incorporating foods high in soluble fiber, like oats, barley, and legumes, also improves cholesterol levels [15]. 

The concept of synergistic effects of various foods and nutrients on cardiovascular health postulates that certain food and nutrient combinations exert a more substantial positive impact when consumed together than when individually consumed [16]. This concept highlights the holistic quality of dietary patterns over singular nutrients or foods, accentuating their collective potential in promoting cardiovascular health [16].

Jimenez-Torres et al. delve into two preventive strategies against coronary artery disease (CAD): the Mediterranean diet and a low-fat diet [17]. The Mediterranean dietary pattern has exhibited numerous health advantages, notably a reduced risk of CVD. In the context of the study, adhering to a Mediterranean diet demonstrated improvements in endothelial function and bolstered endothelial repair mechanisms [17]. This finding suggests the Mediterranean diet’s potential to safeguard the endothelium and decrease cardiovascular event risks in individuals with CAD. The low-fat diet advocated in the study aligns with the AHA guidelines, focusing on decreasing total fat, cholesterol, and saturated fats while augmenting complex carbohydrate intake [8-17]. However, in contrast to the Mediterranean diet, the low-fat diet did not exhibit comparable positive effects on endothelial function [17]. The study found the Mediterranean diet to be more efficacious in improving endothelial function and fostering a superior balance in endothelial vascular homeostasis [17]. Overall, the findings propose that adopting a Mediterranean diet might constitute the optimal preventive strategy against CAD, primarily due to its efficacy in enhancing endothelial function and diminishing cardiovascular event risks in individuals with CAD [17].

DASH Diet

The DASH diet is a specialized regimen designed to mitigate elevated blood pressure and enhance cardiovascular well-being [12,13]. It advocates heightened consumption of fruits and vegetables rich in potassium, magnesium, and fiber [12,13]. These nutrients play a pivotal role in blood pressure regulation and diminishing CVD risks [12,13]. Essential components of whole grains, like brown rice, whole wheat bread, and oats, integral to the DASH diet, provide ample fiber and heart-supporting nutrients, contributing to reduced cholesterol levels. Encouraging the intake of lean proteins such as poultry, fish, beans, and nuts [12,13], which are lower in saturated fats compared to red and processed meats, assists in managing cholesterol levels. Additionally, the DASH diet recommends low-fat or fat-free dairy products that are rich in calcium and protein while maintaining a lower saturated fat content compared to full-fat dairy options [12,13].

The DASH diet advocates limiting sodium intake, which is crucial for blood pressure management, preventing fluid retention, and reducing cardiovascular strain [12,13]. Studies affirm the DASH diet's efficacy in reducing blood pressure, improving cholesterol profiles, and decreasing CVD risks [18]. Its emphasis on whole, nutrient-rich foods and sodium restriction renders it an efficacious dietary regimen, particularly for individuals managing or preventing hypertension (HTN) [18]. Notably, among participants initially averaging a systolic blood pressure of 130 mm Hg, the DASH-type diets elicited a 10 mm Hg reduction in blood pressure [18]. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of the DASH diet may fluctuate based on individual adherence and baseline blood pressure levels [18].

While sharing commonalities, the DASH diet and a fruit- and vegetable-focused diet (F/V) exhibit distinctive features. The former encompasses fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean proteins, and low-fat dairy, targeting blood pressure reduction and CVD prevention through controlled sodium, saturated fat, and sugar intake [19]. Conversely, the F/V diet emphasizes a diverse array of nutrient-dense plant-based foods, advocating a spectrum of colors and varieties in fruit and vegetable consumption [19].

An investigation on their impact on 10-year ASCVD risk scores observed that both the DASH and F/V diets reduced risks by approximately 10% over eight weeks compared to a typical American diet [19]. Notably, the DASH diet exhibited a more pronounced reduction in systolic blood pressure, while the F/V diet did not significantly affect blood pressure levels. Furthermore, the DASH diet resulted in decreased high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels, whereas the F/V diet did not influence HDL-C [19].

Vegetarian Diet (Plant-Based)

A vegetarian diet, particularly when carefully structured and centered on whole, nutrient-dense foods, holds the potential to yield several advantages for cardiovascular well-being [14]. Typically, well-organized vegetarian diets contain lower levels of saturated fat and cholesterol in comparison to meat-inclusive diets [14]. This distinction may contribute to reduced LDL-C ("bad") cholesterol levels, thereby mitigating the risk associated with arterial plaque buildup [14]. Emphasizing fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts, and seeds, vegetarian diets are rich in fiber, antioxidants, vitamins, and minerals, facilitating blood pressure reduction, enhancing blood vessel function, and attenuating inflammation, supporting overall heart health [14]. Often accentuating healthy fats present in avocados, nuts, seeds, and olive oil [14], particularly monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, these diets might ameliorate cholesterol profiles and diminish the susceptibility to heart disease. Additionally, their association with reduced body weight and a lowered risk of obesity contributes to enhanced heart health, reducing the likelihood of conditions like high blood pressure and type 2 DM [14].

A systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by the European Journal of Nutrition, encompassing 13 prospective cohort studies, explored the correlation between vegetarian diets and CVD, ischemic heart disease, and stroke [20]. The findings highlighted a lower risk of CVD and ischemic heart disease associated with vegetarian diets in comparison to non-vegetarian diets. However, no significant association was observed between vegetarian diets and stroke risk [20], suggesting potential protective effects against certain cardiovascular ailments. Nevertheless, additional research is imperative to comprehensively comprehend the relationship between vegetarian diets and stroke risk [20].

Contrasting evidence emerges from another systematic review regarding the cardiovascular advantages of a vegan diet [21]. While certain studies suggest potential benefits, such as averting recurrent cardiovascular events and exhibiting reduced carotid artery intima-media thickness, others fail to establish a substantial connection between adherence to a vegan diet and the risks associated with primary cardiovascular events, or CAD [22]. Interestingly, one study hints at a potentially elevated risk of ischemic stroke among vegans compared to those consuming animal products [23]. Overall, the limited number of high-quality studies has weakened the evidence supporting the role of a vegan diet in CVD prevention or development [21].

Obesity and CVD

Obesity, defined as excessive fat accumulation in adipose tissue, poses significant health risks [24]. It is a well-established risk factor for CVD [24]. Waist circumference serves as an optimal indicator of visceral fat and is superior in predicting metabolic syndromes like DM, HTN, and dyslipidemia [25]. Inflammatory cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-𝛼), CRP, and interleukins (IL-6, IL-18), along with resistin and visfatin, are dysregulated in obesity [26,27]. Elevated levels of these markers are associated with increased CVD risk, potentially contributing to its pathogenesis [28-30]. These changes are linked to insulin resistance, HTN, atherosclerosis, CVD, and certain cancers [31,32].

Visceral adipose tissue and pericardial fat are implicated in CAD and myocardial infarction, likely through systemic and vascular inflammation promoting atherosclerosis [33,34]. Obese adolescents with elevated inflammatory markers and low adiponectin levels face increased risks of CAD and type 2 DM [35]. Studies such as the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events Trial have shown that elevated CRP levels post-myocardial infarction are linked to coronary events [36]. Dietary interventions and exercise for weight loss, as reviewed here, can effectively reduce inflammation and decrease CVD incidence [37].

Exercise and cardiovascular health

Physical activity stands as a fundamental element of cardiovascular well-being, yielding a plethora of advantages that positively influence both the heart and blood vessels [38]. Consistent exercise strengthens the cardiac muscle, enhancing its efficiency in pumping blood across the body, therefore reducing the resting heart rate and alleviating strain on the heart [38]. Its role in managing blood pressure is evident through the enhancement of blood vessel flexibility and health, mitigating resistance to blood flow, and resulting in reduced overall blood pressure levels [38]. Additionally, physical activity aids in averting arterial plaque buildup by improving cholesterol levels and curbing inflammation, subsequently diminishing the risk of health disease associated with atherosclerosis [39,40].

According to the AHA guidelines, it is recommended to engage in at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise weekly, coupled with muscle-strengthening activities on two or more days [40]. Activities encompassing brisk walking, running, cycling, swimming, and strength training all contribute substantially to improved cardiovascular health [41]. Before initiating a new exercise regimen, particularly for individuals with pre-existing health conditions, seeking counsel from a healthcare provider is advisable to ensure safety and receive personalized exercise guidance [42]. Interestingly, a study that looked into the relative effects of concentrated exercise in one to two days per week, also referred to as Weekend Warriors, versus more evenly distributed activity over four to five days or the whole week concluded that concentrated exercise within one to two days was associated with a similarly lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes to more evenly distributed activity [43].

When coupled with a balanced diet, exercise contributes significantly to weight control or weight reduction [44]. The positive effect of physical activity extends to enhanced blood circulation, ensuring efficient delivery of oxygen and nutrients to the tissues and organs of the body, including the heart [38-45].

Preventive Effects of Exercise on CAD

Exercise assumes a key role in the prevention of CAD, offering a multitude of preventive advantages. Consistent physical activity enhances cardiovascular fitness by fortifying the heart muscle and augmenting its efficiency in pumping blood [38]. This improvement diminishes the cardiac workload and mitigates the risk of CAD development. In addition, exercise effectively manages various CAD-related risk factors, including elevated cholesterol levels, high blood pressure, obesity, and DM [38-45], thereby contributing to a reduced chance of CAD onset [38].

Empirical evidence consistently supports the protective impacts of exercise against CAD [42]. A blend of aerobic exercises such as walking, jogging, cycling, or swimming, coupled with strength training, promotes significant benefits in CAD prevention and management [42]. Moreover, exercise exhibits the potential to slow or avert atherosclerosis progression, characterized by arterial plaque buildup [38-45]. Regular physical activity helps in improving cholesterol profiles, dampening inflammation, and thwarting arterial rigidity, collectively reducing the risk of heart disease associated with atherosclerosis [38]. Enhancing blood circulation through exercise facilitates enhanced oxygen delivery to the heart muscle, thereby diminishing the chance of ischemic heart disease, which stems from insufficient blood and oxygen supply due to narrowed arteries [38-45].

Furthermore, consistent engagement in exercise plays a crucial role in regulating heart rate and blood pressure, fostering healthy levels of these crucial indicators. This not only alleviates strain on the heart and blood vessels but also provides reassurance about lowering the risk of CAD [46].

Strategies to reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death during exercise

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) signifies an unforeseen and sudden cessation of heart function, typically arising from an electrical disturbance that halts its beating [47]. This event occurs within minutes of symptom onset and frequently results in mortality if not promptly addressed [47].

Individuals engaged in habitual exercise often exhibit heightened body awareness, enabling them to discern potential warning signs of cardiac issues [38]. This perceptiveness prompts timely medical intervention, potentially averting instances of SCD [38]. Nonetheless, in specific scenarios, vigorous or intense physical activity, particularly among individuals with pre-existing heart conditions, may trigger SCD [48]. While this risk remains relatively low within the general populace, it escalates in individuals harboring underlying cardiac conditions [48].

Before initiating an exercise regimen, individuals with established cardiac conditions or predisposing factors should engage in consultations with healthcare providers to evaluate whether specific exercise types and intensities are appropriate for them [42]. Incrementally elevating exercise duration and intensity over time helps the body acclimatize and diminishes the probability of sudden cardiac strain [38]. Recognizing indicators like chest discomfort, lightheadedness, breathlessness, or irregular heartbeats during physical activity is crucial, warranting immediate medical attention when noticed [42].

Implementation of proper warm-up and cool-down routines preceding and following exercise sessions serves to prime the heart and alleviate stress on the cardiovascular system [49]. Although exercise yields multifaceted advantages for cardiac well-being, individuals with established cardiac ailments or heightened susceptibility to SCD should seek advice from healthcare professionals to ascertain a safe exercise regimen that is tailored to their needs [49]. This personalized strategy aids in curtailing the risk of SCD during physical exertion [49].

Congestive heart failure: risk factors and prevention

Congestive heart failure (CHF) occurs when the heart muscle becomes weakened and cannot pump blood as effectively as it should [50]. Various risk factors contribute to the development of CHF. CAD, characterized by blockages in the coronary arteries leading to heart attacks, poses a significant risk as it can damage the heart muscle, heightening the likelihood of CHF. HTN is another prominent risk factor, placing increased strain on the heart over time, potentially leading to CHF. Previous heart attacks also elevate the risk by causing damage to the heart muscle. Malfunctioning heart valves can force the heart to work harder, increasing the risk of CHF, while conditions like cardiomyopathy directly affecting the heart muscle can also contribute to CHF [50,51]. Additionally, uncontrolled DM can harm blood vessels and nerves, impairing the heart's function and increasing the risk of CHF. Obesity, through its association with conditions like HTN and DM, further strains the heart, contributing to the risk of CHF [50].

Addressing HTN through lifestyle modifications and medication significantly reduces the risks associated with CHF [51]. Managing blood sugar levels via dietary adjustments, exercise, medications, and consistent monitoring plays an important role in preventing DM-related complications associated with CHF [52].

Regular health assessments aid in monitoring conditions such as CAD, HTN, and other potential risk factors for CHF [53]. Early identification and management of risk factors, combined with lifestyle adjustments and appropriate medical intervention, substantially delay or prevent the onset of CHF [6]. Consistent consultations with healthcare professionals for personalized guidance and monitoring are fundamental aspects of strategies aimed at preventing CHF [54]. Adhering to prescribed medications under healthcare supervision is essential to prevent further cardiac damage that could lead to CHF [54].

Relationship between HTN and CAD

Both HTN and CAD share common risk factors, including obesity, DM, high cholesterol levels, smoking, and an unhealthy lifestyle [46]. These factors contribute to the development and progression of both HTN and CAD [46]. HTN causes damage to the walls of blood vessels, making them less flexible and more susceptible to atherosclerosis (narrowing due to plaque buildup) [55]. This atherosclerosis can affect the coronary arteries, leading to CAD [55].

HTN accelerates the process of atherosclerosis, which can lead to the buildup of plaque in the coronary arteries [55]. These blockages restrict blood flow to the heart, causing angina (chest pain) or leading to a heart attack [55]. HTN is a significant risk factor for heart attacks, heart failure, and other complications associated with CAD [56]. Uncontrolled HTN significantly raises the risk of adverse cardiovascular events. Controlling HTN is essential to managing CAD and preventing its progression [57]. Addressing high blood pressure through lifestyle changes and medications can slow down the development of CAD and reduce the risk of associated complications [58].

Managing both HTN and CAD involves lifestyle modifications, medications (if prescribed), regular medical check-ups, and adherence to treatment plans [59]. Consulting with healthcare providers for personalized guidance and treatment strategies tailored to individual health needs is essential in managing this relationship between HTN and CAD [60].

Prevention Strategies for HTN

Regularly checking your blood pressure can help detect any changes or abnormalities early on. Following a balanced diet that is low in sodium, saturated fats, and cholesterol can help prevent HTN [61]. Engaging in regular physical activity, such as brisk walking, jogging, swimming, or cycling, can help lower blood pressure and maintain a healthy weight [61]. Maintaining a healthy weight or losing weight if overweight can significantly reduce the risk of developing HTN. Additionally, excessive alcohol consumption can raise blood pressure [61].

Smoking can raise blood pressure and damage blood vessels. Quitting smoking can significantly reduce the risk of HTN and other CVDs [61]. Chronic stress can contribute to high blood pressure. Engaging in stress-reducing activities like meditation, deep breathing exercises, or hobbies can help manage stress levels [61].

In addition, consuming too much sodium can increase blood pressure. It is recommended to limit sodium intake to less than 2,300 mg per day (or even lower for certain individuals) [61]. If prescribed medication for HTN, it is essential to take it as directed by a healthcare professional and attend regular check-ups [61,62]. Regular visits with a healthcare professional can help monitor blood pressure levels and identify any potential risk factors for HTN [61,62].

Gyamfi et al. discuss the health benefits of the task-shifting strategy for HTN control in Ghana [63]. The study found that nurses who received training in the management and control of HTN showed a marked improvement in their knowledge and practice related to HTN detection and treatment [63]. Specifically, the nurses demonstrated increased proficiency in HTN management, including accurate measurement of blood pressure, initiation of treatment, monitoring of adverse drug reactions, and identification of complicated cases requiring specialist referral [63]. The nurses also reported positive outcomes, such as improved interpersonal skills and patient education [63]. These findings suggest that if all nurses receive even brief training in HTN management, significant public health benefits can be achieved in low-income countries like Ghana.

A study by Zhang et al. mentions the cost-effectiveness of intensive HTN control in China as a preventive strategy for CVD [64]. The study specifically focuses on the cost-effectiveness of folic acid therapy for the primary prevention of stroke in hypertensive patients [64]. It refers to the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT), which demonstrated that treatment with enalapril-folic acid reduced the risk of primary stroke compared to enalapril alone [64].

Prevention Strategies for CAD

Preventive strategies highlighted by van Bakel et al. include cardiac rehabilitation and physical activity, lifestyle modifications, sedentary behavior intervention, and the use of wearable technology for heart rate and activity tracking [65]. Cardiac rehabilitation and physical activity have been shown to have positive impacts on CAD prevention. They can improve cardiovascular risk factor control, reduce sedentary behavior, increase physical activity levels, and improve the overall quality of life for patients with CAD [65]. Lifestyle modifications, such as a healthy diet, smoking cessation, and weight management, are also important preventive strategies. These lifestyle changes can help control cardiovascular risk factors and reduce the risk of CAD [65].

Elgendy et al. discuss two preventive strategies against CAD: a beta-blocker-based regimen and a calcium antagonist-based strategy [66]. These strategies were used to lower blood pressure and achieve excellent blood pressure control in hypertensive patients with CAD disease [66]. The study found that both strategies were associated with similar long-term benefits in terms of all-cause mortality [66]. There was no significant difference in long-term all-cause mortality between the two treatment strategies [66].

A study by Merino et al. discusses two preventive strategies against CAD: lifestyle intervention and metformin treatment [67]. This strategy involves adopting healthy lifestyle behaviors such as improving diet and increasing physical activity [68]. The study found that participants who underwent lifestyle intervention had greater improvements in various cardiometabolic risk factors (CRFs) compared to those in the placebo group [67]. These improvements included glycemia, anthropometric measures, LDL-C, HDL-C, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), and CRP [67]. In the study, participants who received metformin treatment also showed significant improvements in glycemia, anthropometric measures, LDL-C, HDL-C, tPA, and CRP compared to the placebo group [67].

Making lifestyle modifications such as regular exercise, a healthy diet, weight management, and smoking cessation can have a significant impact on reducing the risk of CAD [68]. These interventions can provide comprehensive education, promote risk reduction, and improve patient outcomes. The use of health IT systems, including tele-based and web-based interventions, has emerged as an effective alternative model for improving secondary prevention of CAD [68]. Health IT interventions can support risk reduction, patient safety, and lifestyle outcomes. Nurse-led telehealth interventions have been shown to be more efficient than traditional education interventions in improving CAD risk reduction [68].

Therapeutic interventions for CVD prevention

Statins

Dyslipidemia, particularly elevated LDL-C levels, is strongly associated with CVD, especially CAD [69-71]. Large-scale clinical trials in the 1990s onwards consistently show statin therapy's cardiovascular benefits in reducing lipid levels. The Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) meta-analysis in 2005 demonstrated a 21% decrease in major cardiovascular events per 1 mmol reduction in LDL-C, regardless of baseline levels [72]. Subsequent analyses in 2010 reaffirmed these findings and suggested that more intensive statin regimens lead to greater reductions in cardiovascular events [73]. The 2019 ESC/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) guidelines advocate aggressive LDL-C reduction for high-risk patients, with goals ranging from <1.4 mmol/L for very high-risk individuals to <3.0 mmol/L for low-risk individuals [74].

Different types and doses of statins offer varying reductions in LDL-C levels, with high-intensity regimens achieving around a 50% reduction and medium-intensity therapy reaching 30-50% [75]. Potent statins like rosuvastatin, pitavastatin, and atorvastatin effectively lower triglyceride levels by 10-20% [76]. Ford et al. demonstrated an 18% reduction in all-cause mortality over more than 20 years in non-diabetic patients with a 10-year ASCVD risk below 7.5% [77]. Statins show efficacy in preventing ASCVD in older adults, but their effectiveness in heart failure and hemodialysis patients is uncertain [63]. Additionally, it has been proposed that the protective impact of statins against ASCVD might extend beyond cholesterol reduction. In the Jupiter trial, rosuvastatin was found to decrease cardiovascular events in individuals with normal LDL-C levels but elevated CRP levels [78]. Beyond cholesterol reduction, statins have been proposed to prevent ASCVD through various mechanisms, including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, endothelial function-improving, plaque-stabilizing, and platelet aggregation-inhibiting effects [79-81]. The benefits of statin therapy outweigh the risks for patients at high cardiovascular risk, with minimal risks of severe muscle damage, hepatotoxicity, and newly diagnosed DM [82]. Statins significantly reduce the risk of stroke and other adverse cardiovascular events, but there is no convincing evidence linking them to various health issues.

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists

Type 2 DM patients face an increased CVD risk compared to nondiabetic patients, which had already been apparent in the Farmingham and Merit trials [83,84]. Furthermore, CVD in diabetic patients is three times more likely to result in a fatal outcome compared to the general population. GLP-1 exhibits cardiovascular benefits, including effects on blood pressure regulation, vascular endothelial function, atherosclerosis progression, inflammation, myocardial ischemia, and heart failure, which will be discussed in detail later on [85].

In patients with type 2 DM, dyslipidemia is a common and significant comorbidity due to insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction. This dyslipidemia, termed atherogenic dyslipidemia, is characterized by reduced levels of HDL-C and elevated levels of LDL-C, total cholesterol, and triglycerides. The interplay between dyslipidemia and poor glycemic control is crucial to the progression of atherosclerosis [86]. The Quebec Cardiovascular Study indicates that individuals with DM, high LDL-C, and high apolipoprotein B are at a significantly increased risk, up to 20-fold, of experiencing cardiovascular events [87].

Semaglutide showed a decrease in cardiovascular events and acute cerebral events among patients with an average age of 65 years and an average HbA1c level of 8.7%. However, it exhibited comparable rates of cardiovascular mortality [88]. Both exenatide and liraglutide have been shown to lower total cholesterol and triglyceride values to different degrees [86]. A meta-analysis of the LEAD trials showed that liraglutide reduced total cholesterol, LDL-C, and triglycerides when compared to the standard treatment [89]. The DURATION trials showed similar results with exenatide [86].

Another major contributor to the development of both type 2 DM and CVD is obesity. Patients who experience moderate weight loss have been shown to have better glycemic control and a greater number of medications for controlling cardiovascular risk factors. The AMIGO and DURATION-2 trials have shown weight-loss effects of exenatide [90-92]. Moreover, liraglutide in the LEAD and SCALE trials showed dose-dependent and high-dose regimen weight loss, respectively [93-95]. Similar results were reported for dulaglutide and albiglutide in the AWARD and HARMONY studies, respectively [96-98].

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors

Several clinical trials have showcased the remarkable cardiovascular benefits of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in both DM and non-DM patients suffering from heart failure. These positive outcomes have spurred various theories aimed at explaining their mechanisms. These theories encompass a broad spectrum of potential advantages, including but not limited to mitigating inflammation and oxidative stress, reducing blood pressure, enhancing weight loss, promoting diuresis and natriuresis, optimizing glycemic control, preventing cardiac remodeling, suppressing the sympathetic nervous system, and improving vascular function while increasing circulating provascular progenitor cells [99-103]. Inflammation significantly contributes to the severity of heart failure, with proinflammatory biomarkers often elevated in affected patients and correlating with disease severity [104,105]. Empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin have demonstrated the ability to mitigate or improve the inflammatory profile in diabetic patients [106-108]. 

Various trials and meta-analyses have underscored the cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2i in patients with DM and CVD. In the EMPA-REG trial, empagliflozin showed significant reductions in cardiovascular death, hospitalizations for heart failure, and overall mortality among heart failure patients [109]. Similarly, for canagliflozin, the CANVAS trial demonstrated a lower risk of cardiovascular death in DM patients with cardiovascular disease [110,111]. The DECLARE-TIMI 58 (Dapagliflozin Effect on Cardiovascular Events) trial indicated reductions in cardiovascular deaths and heart failure hospitalizations in diabetic patients on dapagliflozin, irrespective of their ASCVD status [112]. The DAPA-HF (Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure) trial results suggested that dapagliflozin reduced cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalizations in all patients, regardless of DM diagnosis [113]. The CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes With Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation) trial further confirmed the cardiovascular benefits of SGLT2i in diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease [114]. Meta-analyses have consistently shown reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality with SGLT2i treatment [115-117]. These findings indicate that SGLT2i offers cardiovascular protection beyond its glucose-lowering effects, although their precise mechanism of action requires further investigation [118].

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors

Patients with dyslipidemia, especially those with high LDL-C, carry a significant risk factor for ASCVD [73,119]. To control LDL-C levels and avoid future CVD in those patients, statins have always been considered the first-line treatment [120]. However, there has always been an urgent need for new agents to further control unmanageable and unresponsive LDL-C levels in high-risk patients. Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, which were approved within the last decade, have been included in the most recent guidelines to be combined with ezetimibe and statin drugs to lower cardiovascular risk in these individuals [120]. Normally, PCSK9 promotes the breakdown of LDL-C receptors, causing decreased clearance of LDL-C from circulation. PCSK9 inhibitors function by modulating LDL-C receptor expression on hepatocytes’ surfaces; thus, they may decrease LDL-C and, subsequently, significant CVD [121]. The primary indication for PCSK9 is secondary prevention among patients with a very high risk of ASCVD events [122]. It has been shown that PCSK9 inhibitors are potent agents for the lowering of LDL-C. Furthermore, when compared to statins, PCSK9 inhibitors resulted in a greater decrease in LDL-C [123,124]. As a monotherapy, PCSK9 inhibitors have been shown to reduce LDL-C by 47-57% [125,126]. PCSK9 inhibitors, evolocumab and alirocumab, have been shown to reduce LDL-C from baseline, ranging from 36% to 62% at 24 weeks when added to high intensity or maximally tolerated statin therapy [127-129]. Additionally, when combined with statins, PCSK9 inhibitors have been shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes. The ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial showed that adding alirocumab to maximally tolerated statin therapy reduces the risk of CVD [130]. Comparatively, in the FOURIER trial, evolocumab was shown to lower the risk of CVD when combined with statin medication [131].

When choosing appropriate therapy, the 2019 ESC/EAC guidelines recommend a stepwise approach, starting with a high-intensity statin (maximally tolerated) with the addition of ezetimibe, followed by PCSK9 inhibitor therapy in order to reach the LDL-C goals. However, it is also possible to directly add PCSK9 inhibitors to statin therapy [74]. In comparison with the average LDL-C reduction from combining a high-intensity statin and ezetimibe, which is around 65%, adding a PCSK9 inhibitor to a high-intensity statin can reduce LDL-C by an average of 75% [74]. The 2018 ACC/AHA Multi-society Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol recommends the use of PCSK9 inhibitors for secondary prevention patients at very high risk of ASCVD [132]. In addition, it also recommends the initiation of PCSK9 inhibitors on top of high-intensity or maximally tolerated statin therapy and ezetimibe if LDL-C remains ≥70 mg/dL or non-HDL-C remains ≥100 mg/dL [133].

Conclusions

In summary, proactive measures are crucial for preserving cardiovascular health amid the interconnected risks of HTN, DM, dyslipidemia, and CAD. Lifestyle adjustments, including a heart-healthy diet, exercise, weight control, stress management, and tobacco/alcohol cessation, play a fundamental role in preventing HTN and CAD. Regular monitoring of blood pressure, cholesterol, and overall cardiovascular health allows for early detection and targeted management of risk factors. Embracing these preventive measures, alongside medical guidance, substantially reduces the risks of HTN, CAD, and associated complications, promoting enhanced heart health and overall wellness. Future directions in prevention research involve exploring innovative technologies, personalized prevention strategies based on genetics, improved remote monitoring, refining risk prediction models, addressing healthcare disparities, and implementing cost-effective preventive measures globally.

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Author Contributions

Concept and design:  Ammar Y. Abdulfattah, Philip Branigan, Y. V. Duong, Jacob Sabu, Mary Mallappallil, Sabu John

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data:  Ammar Y. Abdulfattah, Philip Branigan, Y. V. Duong, Jacob Sabu

Drafting of the manuscript:  Ammar Y. Abdulfattah, Philip Branigan, Y. V. Duong, Jacob Sabu, Mary Mallappallil

Critical review of the manuscript for important intellectual content:  Ammar Y. Abdulfattah, Mary Mallappallil, Sabu John

Supervision:  Mary Mallappallil, Sabu John

References

  • 1.Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990-2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:2982–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Olvera Lopez E, Ballard BD, Jan A. StatPearls Publishing. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Cardiovascular Disease. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cost analysis of treating cardiovascular diseases in a super-specialty hospital. Kumar A, Siddharth V, Singh SI, Narang R. PLoS One. 2022;17:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Impact of lifestyle modifications on cardiovascular health: a narrative review. Ghodeshwar GK, Dube A, Khobragade D. Cureus. 2023;15:0. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cardiovascular risk factors and physical activity for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases in the elderly. Ciumărnean L, Milaciu MV, Negrean V, et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;19:207. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lifestyle medicine: the health promoting power of daily habits and practices. Rippe JM. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2018;12:499–512. doi: 10.1177/1559827618785554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Self-care for the prevention and management of cardiovascular disease and stroke: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Riegel B, Moser DK, Buck HG, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6:0. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. Circulation. 2019;140:0–646. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Association of social determinants with the severity of congenital heart disease. Forero-Manzano MJ, Triana-Palencia E, Figueroa-Rueda JA, Flórez-Rodríguez CX, Castro-Monsalve JM, Quintero-Lesmes DC, Gamboa-Delgado EM. Pediatr Res. 2023;93:1391–1398. doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-02205-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Comparison of American and European Guidelines for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: JACC Guideline comparison. Fegers-Wustrow I, Gianos E, Halle M, Yang E. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:1304–1313. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mediterranean diet and health status: active ingredients and pharmacological mechanisms. Schwingshackl L, Morze J, Hoffmann G. Br J Pharmacol. 2020;177:1241–1257. doi: 10.1111/bph.14778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Dash dietary pattern: a treatment for non-communicable diseases. Suri S, Kumar V, Kumar S, Goyal A, Tanwar B, Kaur J, Kaur J. Curr Hypertens Rev. 2020;16:108–114. doi: 10.2174/1573402115666191007144608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Challa HJ, Ameer MA, Uppaluri KR. StatPearls Publishing. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. DASH Diet To Stop Hypertension. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vegetarian diet: an overview through the perspective of quality of life domains. Hargreaves SM, Raposo A, Saraiva A, Zandonadi RP. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:4067. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.A heart-healthy diet for cardiovascular disease prevention: where are we now? Diab A, Dastmalchi LN, Gulati M, Michos ED. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2023;19:237–253. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S379874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.The Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular health. Martínez-González MA, Gea A, Ruiz-Canela M. Circ Res. 2019;124:779–798. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mediterranean diet reduces atherosclerosis progression in coronary heart disease: an analysis of the CORDIOPREV randomized controlled trial. Jimenez-Torres J, Alcalá-Diaz JF, Torres-Peña JD, et al. Stroke. 2021;52:3440–3449. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.033214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Effect of a 6-month vegan low-carbohydrate ('Eco-Atkins') diet on cardiovascular risk factors and body weight in hyperlipidaemic adults: a randomised controlled trial. Jenkins DJ, Wong JM, Kendall CW, et al. BMJ Open. 2014;4:0. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Effects of diet and sodium reduction on cardiac injury, strain, and inflammation: the dash-sodium trial. Juraschek SP, Kovell LC, Appel LJ, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;77:2625–2634. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.03.320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vegetarian and vegan diets and the risk of cardiovascular disease, ischemic heart disease and stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Dybvik JS, Svendsen M, Aune D. Eur J Nutr. 2023;62:51–69. doi: 10.1007/s00394-022-02942-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.A systematic review of the association between vegan diets and risk of cardiovascular disease. Kaiser J, van Daalen KR, Thayyil A, Cocco MT, Caputo D, Oliver-Williams C. J Nutr. 2021;151:1539–1552. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Poore J, Nemecek T. Science. 2018;360:987–992. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.A plant-based diet and stroke. Campbell T. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017;14:321–326. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.C reactive protein and the risk of cardiovascular disease. Keavney B. BMJ. 2011;342:0. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.ABC of obesity. Assessment of obesity and its clinical implications. Han TS, Sattar N, Lean M. BMJ. 2006;333:695–698. doi: 10.1136/bmj.333.7570.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Serum visfatin, resistin and IL-18 in A group of Egyptian obese diabetic and non diabetic individuals. Mabrouk R, Ghareeb H, Shehab A, Omar K, El-Kabarity RH, Soliman DA, Mohamed NA. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23888552/ Egypt J Immunol. 2013;20:1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Relationship of obesity and visceral adiposity with serum concentrations of CRP, TNF-alpha and IL-6. Park HS, Park JY, Yu R. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005;69:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2004.11.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Inflammatory markers and onset of cardiovascular events: results from the Health ABC study. Cesari M, Penninx BW, Newman AB, et al. Circulation. 2003;108:2317–2322. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000097109.90783.FC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Plasma concentration of interleukin-6 and the risk of future myocardial infarction among apparently healthy men. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Stampfer MJ, Hennekens CH. Circulation. 2000;101:1767–1772. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.15.1767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Elevation of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and increased risk of recurrent coronary events after myocardial infarction. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer M, Sacks F, Lepage S, Braunwald E. Circulation. 2000;101:2149–2153. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.101.18.2149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Effects of canagliflozin versus glimepiride on adipokines and inflammatory biomarkers in type 2 diabetes. Garvey WT, Van Gaal L, Leiter LA, et al. Metabolism. 2018;85:32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2018.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.JNKs, insulin resistance and inflammation: a possible link between NAFLD and coronary artery disease. Tarantino G, Caputi A. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:3785–3794. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v17.i33.3785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Association of pericardial fat, intrathoracic fat, and visceral abdominal fat with cardiovascular disease burden: the Framingham Heart Study. Mahabadi AA, Massaro JM, Rosito GA, et al. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:850–856. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehn573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Obesity, inflammation, and atherosclerosis. Rocha VZ, Libby P. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2009;6:399–409. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2009.55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cardiovascular risk factors in adolescents: role of insulin resistance and obesity. Lopez-Sandoval J, Sanchez-Enriquez S, Rivera-Leon EA, Bastidas-Ramirez BE, Garcia-Garcia MR, Gonzalez-Hita ME. Acta Endocrinol (Buchar) 2018;14:330–337. doi: 10.4183/aeb.2018.330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Inflammation, pravastatin, and the risk of coronary events after myocardial infarction in patients with average cholesterol levels. Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Investigators. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer MA, et al. Circulation. 1998;98:839–844. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.9.839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Physical activity considerations for the treatment and prevention of obesity. Jakicic JM, Otto AD. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:226–229. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/82.1.226S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Cardiovascular effects and benefits of exercise. Nystoriak MA, Bhatnagar A. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2018;5:135. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Atherosclerosis and physical activity. Al-Mamari A. Oman Med J. 2009;24:173–178. doi: 10.5001/omj.2009.34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of coronary artery disease. Winzer EB, Woitek F, Linke A. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7:0. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.An overview of current physical activity recommendations in primary care. Yang YJ. Korean J Fam Med. 2019;40:135–142. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.19.0038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Exercise for prevention and relief of cardiovascular disease: prognoses, mechanisms, and approaches. Tian D, Meng J. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:3756750. doi: 10.1155/2019/3756750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Accelerometer-derived “Weekend Warrior” physical activity and incident cardiovascular disease. Khurshid S, Al-Alusi MA, Churchill TW, Guseh JS, Ellinor PT. JAMA. 2023;330:247–252. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.10875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Role of physical activity for weight loss and weight maintenance. Cox CE. Diabetes Spectr. 2017;30:157–160. doi: 10.2337/ds17-0013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Effects of exercise to improve cardiovascular health. Pinckard K, Baskin KK, Stanford KI. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2019;6:69. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2019.00069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence. Warburton DE, Nicol CW, Bredin SS. CMAJ. 2006;174:801–809. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Tackling G, Borhade MB. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; [ Jan; 2024 ]. 2023. Hypertensive Heart Disease. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Is exercise helpful or harmful in dealing with specific arrhythmia. El Masri I, Kayali SM, Blount C, Kirolos I, Khouzam JP, Kabra R. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2021;46:100740. doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sudden cardiac death in athletes. Wasfy MM, Hutter AM, Weiner RB. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2016;12:76–80. doi: 10.14797/mdcj-12-2-76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Regmi M, Siccardi MA. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; [ Jan; 2024 ]. 2023. Coronary Artery Disease Prevention. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lifestyle management of hypertension: International Society of Hypertension position paper endorsed by the World Hypertension League and European Society of Hypertension. Charchar FJ, Prestes PR, Mills C, et al. J Hypertens. 2024;42:23–49. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Yardley JE, et al. Diabetes Care. 2016;39:2065–2079. doi: 10.2337/dc16-1728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Malik A, Brito D, Vaqar S, Chhabra L. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2023. Congestive Heart Failure. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Self-care of heart failure patients: practical management recommendations from the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology. Jaarsma T, Hill L, Bayes-Genis A, et al. Eur J Heart Fail. 2021;23:157–174. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.2008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hypertension as a risk factor for atherosclerosis: cardiovascular risk assessment. Poznyak AV, Sadykhov NK, Kartuesov AG, Borisov EE, Melnichenko AA, Grechko AV, Orekhov AN. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:959285. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.959285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hypertensive heart disease: risk factors, complications and mechanisms. Masenga SK, Kirabo A. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1205475. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1205475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Optimal medical treatment of hypertension in patients with coronary artery disease. Mahtta D, Elgendy IY, Pepine CJ. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018;16:815–823. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2018.1534069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Prevention and control of hypertension: JACC health promotion series. Carey RM, Muntner P, Bosworth HB, Whelton PK. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1278–1293. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Patient medication adherence: measures in daily practice. Jimmy B, Jose J. Oman Med J. 2011;26:155–159. doi: 10.5001/omj.2011.38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Patient self-management support: novel strategies in hypertension and heart disease. Bosworth HB, Powers BJ, Oddone EZ. Cardiol Clin. 2010;28:655–663. doi: 10.1016/j.ccl.2010.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Impact of hypertension and subclinical organ damage on the incidence of cardiovascular disease among Japanese residents at the population and individual levels - the circulatory risk in Communities Study (circs) Kitamura A, Yamagishi K, Imano H, et al. Circ J. 2017;81:1022–1028. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-16-1129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.A nomogram for identifying subclinical atherosclerosis in chronic kidney disease. Xiong J, Yu Z, Zhang D, Huang Y, Yang K, Zhao J. Clin Interv Aging. 2021;16:1303–1313. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S312129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Training nurses in task-shifting strategies for the management and control of hypertension in Ghana: a mixed-methods study. Gyamfi J, Plange-Rhule J, Iwelunmor J, et al. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:104. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2026-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Cost-effectiveness of folic acid therapy for primary prevention of stroke in patients with hypertension. Zhang T, Liang Z, Lin T, et al. BMC Med. 2022;20:407. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02601-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Effectiveness of an intervention to reduce sedentary behaviour as a personalised secondary prevention strategy for patients with coronary artery disease: main outcomes of the SIT LESS randomised clinical trial. van Bakel BM, Kroesen SH, Bakker EA, et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023;20:17. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01419-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Long-term mortality in hypertensive patients with coronary artery disease: Results from the United States cohort of the International Verapamil/Trandolapril Study. Elgendy IY, Bavry AA, Gong Y, Handberg EM, Cooper-DeHoff RM, Pepine CJ. Hypertension. 2016;68:1110–1114. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Interaction between type 2 diabetes prevention strategies and genetic determinants of coronary artery disease on cardiometabolic risk factors. Merino J, Jablonski KA, Mercader JM, et al. Diabetes. 2020;69:112–120. doi: 10.2337/db19-0097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Impact of routine coronary catheterization in low extremity artery disease undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty: study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial. Chen IC, Lee CH, Chao TH, et al. Trials. 2016;17:112. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1237-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Serum triglycerides as a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in the Asia-Pacific region. Patel A, Barzi F, Jamrozik K, Lam TH, Ueshima H, Whitlock G, Woodward M. Circulation. 2004;110:2678–2686. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000145615.33955.83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10,158 incident cases among 262,525 participants in 29 Western prospective studies. Sarwar N, Danesh J, Eiriksdottir G, et al. Circulation. 2007;115:450–458. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.637793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Relation between serum total cholesterol level and cardiovascular disease stratified by sex and age group: a pooled analysis of 65 594 individuals from 10 cohort studies in Japan. Nagasawa SY, Okamura T, Iso H, et al. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1:0. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.001974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM, et al. Lancet. 2005;366(9493):1267–1278. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67394-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, et al. Lancet. 2010;376:1670–1681. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:111–188. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Very low levels of atherogenic lipoproteins and the risk for cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of statin trials. Boekholdt SM, Hovingh GK, Mora S, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:485–494. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Managing the residual cardiovascular disease risk associated with HDL-cholesterol and triglycerides in statin-treated patients: a clinical update. Reiner Z. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2013;23:799–807. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2013.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Long-term safety and efficacy of lowering low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with statin therapy: 20-year follow-up of West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study. Ford I, Murray H, McCowan C, Packard CJ. Circulation. 2016;133:1073–1080. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Reduction in C-reactive protein and LDL cholesterol and cardiovascular event rates after initiation of rosuvastatin: a prospective study of the Jupiter trial. Ridker PM, Danielson E, Fonseca FA, et al. Lancet. 2009;373(9670):1175–1182. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60447-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Reduced susceptibility of low density lipoprotein (LDL) to lipid peroxidation after fluvastatin therapy is associated with the hypocholesterolemic effect of the drug and its binding to the LDL. Hussein O, Schlezinger S, Rosenblat M, Keidar S, Aviram M. Atherosclerosis. 1997;128(1):11–18. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(96)05972-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Atorvastatin normalizes endothelial function in healthy smokers. Agewall S, Hernberg A. Clin Sci (Lond) 2006;111:87–91. doi: 10.1042/CS20060033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Novel cardioprotective effects of pravastatin in human ventricular cardiomyocytes subjected to hypoxia and reoxygenation: beneficial effects of statins independent of endothelial cells. Verma S, Rao V, Weisel RD, Li SH, Fedak PW, Miriuka S, Li RK. J Surg Res. 2004;119:66–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2003.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Statin safety and associated adverse events: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Newman CB, Preiss D, Tobert JA, et al. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019;39:0–81. doi: 10.1161/ATV.0000000000000073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The Framingham study. Kannel WB, McGee DL. JAMA. 1979;241:2035–2038. doi: 10.1001/jama.241.19.2035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Diabetes, other risk factors, and 12-yr cardiovascular mortality for men screened in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Stamler J, Vaccaro O, Neaton JD, Wentworth D. Diabetes Care. 1993;16:434–444. doi: 10.2337/diacare.16.2.434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.GLP-1 receptor agonists and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Del Olmo-Garcia MI, Merino-Torres JF. J Diabetes Res. 2018;2018:4020492. doi: 10.1155/2018/4020492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on lipid profiles among type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sun F, Wu S, Wang J, et al. Clin Ther. 2015;37:225–241. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Low-density lipoprotein subfractions and the long-term risk of ischemic heart disease in men: 13-year follow-up data from the Québec Cardiovascular Study. St-Pierre AC, Cantin B, Dagenais GR, Mauriège P, Bernard PM, Després JP, Lamarche B. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:553–559. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000154144.73236.f4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. Marso SP, Bain SC, Consoli A, et al. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:1834–1844. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Reductions in lipids and CV risk markers in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with liraglutide: a meta-analysis. Plutzky J, Garber A, Falahati A, Toft AD, Poulter NR. Can J Diabetes. 2009;33(3):209–210. doi: 10.1016/S1499-2671(09)33072-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Interim analysis of the effects of exenatide treatment on A1C, weight and cardiovascular risk factors over 82 weeks in 314 overweight patients with type 2 diabetes. Blonde L, Klein EJ, Han J, et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2006;8:436–447. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2006.00602.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Exenatide elicits sustained glycaemic control and progressive reduction of body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by sulphonylureas with or without metformin. Riddle MC, Henry RR, Poon TH, et al. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2006;22:483–491. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial. Bergenstal RM, Wysham C, Macconell L, et al. Lancet. 2010;376(9739):431–439. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60590-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Liraglutide versus glimepiride monotherapy for type 2 diabetes (LEAD-3 Mono): a randomised, 52-week, phase III, double-blind, parallel-treatment trial. Garber A, Henry R, Ratner R, et al. Lancet. 2009;373(9662):473–481. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61246-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with metformin, in type 2 diabetes: the LEAD (liraglutide effect and action in diabetes)-2 study. Nauck M, Frid A, Hermansen K, et al. Diabetes Care. 2009;32:84–90. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.A randomized, controlled trial of 3.0 mg of liraglutide in weight management. Pi-Sunyer X, Astrup A, Fujioka K, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:11–22. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy versus metformin in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-3) Umpierrez G, Tofé Povedano S, Pérez Manghi F, Shurzinske L, Pechtner V. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2168–2176. doi: 10.2337/dc13-2759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist albiglutide (HARMONY 1 trial): 52-week primary endpoint results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus not controlled on pioglitazone, with or without metformin. Reusch J, Stewart MW, Perkins CM, et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014;16:1257–1264. doi: 10.1111/dom.12382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.HARMONY 3: 104-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of albiglutide compared with placebo, sitagliptin, and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes taking metformin. Ahrén B, Johnson SL, Stewart M, Cirkel DT, Yang F, Perry C, Feinglos MN. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:2141–2148. doi: 10.2337/dc14-0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.SGLT2 inhibitors and mechanisms of cardiovascular benefit: a state-of-the-art review. Verma S, McMurray JJ. Diabetologia. 2018;61:2108–2117. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4670-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Cardiovascular protection by sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: potential mechanisms. Staels B. Am J Cardiol. 2017;120:0–36. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in patients with and without type 2 diabetes: implications for incident and prevalent heart failure. Butler J, Handelsman Y, Bakris G, Verma S. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020;22:604–617. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.SGLT2 inhibitors and cardioprotection: a matter of debate and multiple hypotheses. Filippatos TD, Liontos A, Papakitsou I, Elisaf MS. Postgrad Med. 2019;131:82–88. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2019.1581971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.SGLT-2 inhibitors in heart failure: current management, unmet needs, and therapeutic prospects. Lam CS, Chandramouli C, Ahooja V, Verma S. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:0. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Chronic heart failure and inflammation: what do we really know? Dick SA, Epelman S. Circ Res. 2016;119:159–176. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Inflammation in heart failure: the holy grail? Mehta JL, Pothineni NV. Hypertension. 2016;68:27–29. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.116.07307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin ameliorates the inflammatory profile in type 2 diabetic patients and promotes an antioxidant response in leukocytes. Iannantuoni F, M de Marañon A, Diaz-Morales N, et al. J Clin Med. 2019;8:1814. doi: 10.3390/jcm8111814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Canagliflozin reduces inflammation and fibrosis biomarkers: a potential mechanism of action for beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetic kidney disease. Heerspink HJ, Perco P, Mulder S, Leierer J, Hansen MK, Heinzel A, Mayer G. Diabetologia. 2019;62:1154–1166. doi: 10.1007/s00125-019-4859-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.The SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin attenuates the activity of ROS-NLRP3 inflammasome axis in steatohepatitis with diabetes mellitus. Leng W, Wu M, Pan H, et al. Ann Transl Med. 2019;7:429. doi: 10.21037/atm.2019.09.03. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes. Zinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:2117–2128. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Canagliflozin and cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes. Neal B, Perkovic V, Mahaffey KW, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:644–657. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1611925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Canagliflozin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based review of its place in therapy. Karagiannis T, Bekiari E, Tsapas A. Core Evid. 2017;12:1–10. doi: 10.2147/CE.S109654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Effect of dapagliflozin on heart failure and mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Kato ET, Silverman MG, Mosenzon O, et al. Circulation. 2019;139:2528–2536. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. McMurray JJ, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, et al. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1995–2008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Canagliflozin for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events: results from the CANVAS Program (canagliflozin cardiovascular assessment study) Mahaffey KW, Neal B, Perkovic V, et al. Circulation. 2018;137:323–334. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.The effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular and renal outcomes in diabetic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lo KB, Gul F, Ram P, Kluger AY, Tecson KM, McCullough PA, Rangaswami J. Cardiorenal Med. 2020;10:1–10. doi: 10.1159/000503919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis. Zou CY, Liu XK, Sang YQ, Wang B, Liang J. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:0. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000018245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular, renal and safety outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Toyama T, Neuen BL, Jun M, et al. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21:1237–1250. doi: 10.1111/dom.13648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Cardiac and renal effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors in diabetes: JACC state-of-the-art review. Zelniker TA, Braunwald E. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:1845–1855. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Interpretation of the evidence for the efficacy and safety of statin therapy. Collins R, Reith C, Emberson J, et al. Lancet. 2016;388(10059):2532–2561. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31357-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.A Bayesian network meta-analysis of PCSK9 inhibitors, statins and ezetimibe with or without statins for cardiovascular outcomes. Khan SU, Talluri S, Riaz H, et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2018;25:844–853. doi: 10.1177/2047487318766612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.PCSK9 inhibitors for secondary prevention in patients with cardiovascular diseases: a bayesian network meta-analysis. Wang X, Wen D, Chen Y, Ma L, You C. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022;21:107. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01542-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.PCSK9 inhibitors in the management of cardiovascular risk: a practical guidance. Jia X, Al Rifai M, Saeed A, Ballantyne CM, Virani SS. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2022;18:555–566. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S275739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Efficacy and safety of intracoronary epinephrine versus conventional treatments alone in STEMI patients with refractory coronary no-reflow during primary PCI: the RESTORE observational study. Navarese EP, Frediani L, Kandzari DE, et al. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;97:602–611. doi: 10.1002/ccd.29113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Long-term efficacy and safety of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9 monoclonal antibodies: a meta-analysis of 11 randomized controlled trials. Bai J, Gong LL, Li QF, Wang ZH. J Clin Lipidol. 2018;12:277–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jacl.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Monotherapy with the PCSK9 inhibitor alirocumab versus ezetimibe in patients with hypercholesterolemia: results of a 24 week, double-blind, randomized Phase 3 trial. Roth EM, Taskinen MR, Ginsberg HN, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2014;176:55–61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.06.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Anti-PCSK9 monotherapy for hypercholesterolemia: the MENDEL-2 randomized, controlled phase III clinical trial of evolocumab. Koren MJ, Lundqvist P, Bolognese M, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2531–2540. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.PCSK9 inhibitors: a new era of lipid lowering therapy. Chaudhary R, Garg J, Shah N, Sumner A. World J Cardiol. 2017;9:76–91. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v9.i2.76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Efficacy and safety of alirocumab in reducing lipids and cardiovascular events. Robinson JG, Farnier M, Krempf M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1489–1499. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1501031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.A 52-week placebo-controlled trial of evolocumab in hyperlipidemia. Blom DJ, Hala T, Bolognese M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1809–1819. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1316222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Alirocumab and cardiovascular outcomes after acute coronary syndrome. Schwartz GG, Steg PG, Szarek M, et al. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:2097–2107. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1801174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Evolocumab and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. Sabatine MS, Giugliano RP, Keech AC, et al. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:1713–1722. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1615664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.2018 AHA/ACC/Aacvpr/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/Ada/AGS/APHA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. Circulation. 2019;139:0–143. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.The 2018 cholesterol management guidelines: topics in secondary ASCVD prevention clinicians need to know. Jia X, Al Rifai M, Birnbaum Y, Smith SC Jr, Virani SS. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2019;21:20. doi: 10.1007/s11883-019-0784-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Cureus are provided here courtesy of Cureus Inc.

RESOURCES