Abstract
Tuberculosis remains a large global disease burden for which treatment regimens are protracted and monitoring of disease activity difficult. Existing detection methods rely almost exclusively on bacterial culture from sputum which limits sampling to organisms on the pulmonary surface. Advances in monitoring tuberculous lesions have utilized the common glucoside [18F]FDG, yet lack specificity to the causative pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) and so do not directly correlate with pathogen viability. Here we show that a close mimic that is also positron-emitting of the non-mammalian Mtb disaccharide trehalose – 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxytrehalose ([18F]FDT) – is a mechanism-based reporter of Mycobacteria-selective enzyme activity in vivo. Use of [18F]FDT in the imaging of Mtb in diverse models of disease, including non-human primates, successfully co-opts Mtb-mediated processing of trehalose to allow the specific imaging of TB-associated lesions and to monitor the effects of treatment. A pyrogen-free, direct enzyme-catalyzed process for its radiochemical synthesis allows the ready production of [18F]FDT from the most globally-abundant organic 18F-containing molecule, [18F]FDG. The full, pre-clinical validation of both production method and [18F]FDT now creates a new, bacterium-selective candidate for clinical evaluation. We anticipate that this distributable technology to generate clinical-grade [18F]FDT directly from the widely-available clinical reagent [18F]FDG, without need for either custom-made radioisotope generation or specialist chemical methods and/or facilities, could now usher in global, democratized access to a TB-specific PET tracer.
Subject terms: Carbohydrates, Biocatalysis, Infectious-disease diagnostics, Diagnosis, Positron-emission tomography
Current methods for detection of tuberculosis rely mostly on bacterial culture from sputum. Here, the authors provide preclinical evidence that a positron-emitting mimic of the disaccharide trehalose ([18F]FDT) can be used as a radiotracer for the imaging of tuberculosis-associated lesions and monitoring the effects of treatment.
Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) still remains a serious global health challenge causing an estimated 1.3 million deaths worldwide in 20221. Prompt, short-term diagnoses of TB are crucial for public health infection control measures, as well as for ensuring appropriate treatment for infected patients and controls2. The global number newly diagnosed of 7.5 million is the largest since the WHO began monitoring in 19951. Additionally, long-term accurate monitoring of chronic disease burden and the effectiveness of treatment is critically important in trials of new antitubercular agents and regimens. Sensitive and TB-specific reporters with the potential for ready democratization are therefore urgently required to address the development of new antituberculosis agents and regimens with the potential to shorten the duration of therapy.
Positron emission tomography (PET) integrated with computed tomography (CT) now routinely provides a prominent method in some (and increasing3) national healthcare systems for noninvasively imaging the whole body whilst diagnosing, staging and assessing response to therapy in diseases such as cancer and inflammation. The analysis4 and internationally-agreed monitoring of access to PET-CT (e.g. by the IAEA Medical imAGIng and Nuclear mEdicine global resources database, IMAGINE5) helps, in part, to drive global equity of access to such diagnostic imaging. However, this would be importantly aided by development of (i) novel reporters specific to other (e.g. communicable) diseases of similar, or even greater, relevance to the developing world, such as TB, and (ii) strategies and methods for their ready, distributed implementation.
Existing metabolic PET probes allow pharmacological, immunologic and microbiological aspects of TB lesions to be correlated with anatomic information derived from PET/CT6,7. In particular, 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose ([18F]FDG, often shortened to FDG, Fig. 1), as the most widespread, organic 18F-containing probe, has allowed useful diagnosis and monitoring of the response to treatment of TB8,9. Specifically, the high metabolic uptake of [18F]FDG into the host cells around pulmonary and extra-pulmonary lesions of active TB can allow PET/CT imaging of TB granulomas by inference and so attempts to indirectly assess disease extent and progression or resolution10. [18F]FDG PET exploits enhanced glucose uptake into the anaerobic glycolytic pathway both in tumor cells and in immune cells – [18F]FDG PET in imaging of infections relies therefore typically on enhanced glucose uptake of inflamed cells as a result of associated respiratory burst. However, by virtue of this physiological mechanism, [18F]FDG is also taken up and retained by any metabolically-active tissue and so, as a generic marker of more active metabolism, has a limitation in its lack of specificity and inability to clearly distinguish granulomatous TB disease from other inflammatory conditions, including cancer. This ‘inferred imaging’ mode therefore frequently gives rise to false-positive diagnosis in patients evaluated for active TB11–13. This diagnostic confusion when using [18F]FDG has been further exacerbated by the wide-spread emergence of lung pathology in COVID-19 patients14.
With the aim of improving detection specificity, other [18F]-labeled PET tracers have been investigated for imaging of TB such as 2-[18F]fluoroisonicotinic acid hydrazide15 and [18F]deoxy-fluoro-L-thymidine (FLT)16. However, the sensitivity and specificity of these radiotracers is either only similar to (or worse than) [18F]FDG and so can only help to distinguish TB from malignancy when also combined with [18F]FDG. Moreover, neither probe are yet readily accessible from common precursors; both require specialist generation of radioisotopes (e.g. [18F]fluoride via cyclotron-mediated proton (1H) irradiation of H218O) combined with specific chemical technologies (e.g. appropriate synthetic laboratories and methods).
Trehalose, a nonreducing disaccharide in which the two glucose units are linked in an α,α−1,1-glycosidic linkage (Fig. 1A) has, in the last decade, gathered interest as an agent for selectively imaging TB. Trehalose is found in Mtb, especially in the outer portion of the mycobacterial cell envelope – primarily as its corresponding glycolipids trehalose monomycolate (TMM) and trehalose dimycolate (TDM). These glycolipids appear to play a critical structural, and perhaps pathogenic role, as an essential cell wall component17,18, as has long been noted (TDM was first referred to as ‘cord-factor’ in the 1950s19). The biosynthesis of trehalose mycolates is catalyzed in Mtb by a family of abundant TB-specific, membrane-associated enzymes – the Antigen 85 proteins (Ag85a, Ag85b and Ag85c)20.
The lack of naturally-occurring trehalose in mammalian hosts as well as the uptake of exogenous trehalose by Mtb21 has suggested that trehalose-based probes could function as both highly specific and sensitive reporters (Fig. 1A). Prior work has established that the Ag85 family enzymes (Ag85s) are somewhat plastic in the substrates that they can process – not only can exogenous trehalose be processed by Ag85s but also analogs of trehalose. In this way, they can be metabolically incorporated into the mycobacterial outer membrane21. This allowed fluorescent labeling and monitoring of Mtb in vitro, not only in bacilli but also within infected mammalian macrophages using reagents such as FITC-Tre (Fig. 1B)21. More recently, elegant design has created yet more powerful fluorescent variants, such as the fluorogenic QTF22, and FRET-TDM23 and solvatochromic DMN-Tre24 (Fig. 1B), some of which enable detection of Mtb detection in sputum24, as well as photosensitized variants for possible photodynamic therapy25. However, fluorescence-based methods are not yet amenable to effective, non-invasive clinical in vivo imaging and, to our knowledge, no trehalose-based probe or method has yet demonstrated efficacy in vivo. Here we show that one of the simplest 18F-analogs of trehalose, 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-trehalose [18F]FDT can be generated as an in vivo TB-reporter using one-pot, automatable, pyrogen-free, chemoenzymatic synthesis from readily-available [18F]FDG in a validated manner that does not require specialist expertize (Fig. 1C); initial aspects of these methods were disclosed previously26,27. Toxicological and preclinical testing in diverse species shows that this now creates access to a safe probe that is effective and selective in multiple preclinical models both to visualize TB lesions and to monitor their treatment non-invasively. [18F]FDT is therefore now suggested as a suitable candidate for clinical use, enabled by a distributable synthetic strategy that could help lower global health technology imbalances.
Results
Comparison of four candidate 18F-fluoro-deoxy analogs of trehalose as probes identifies [18F]FDT as a likely radiotracer reporter of TB
To test the effectiveness of different minimal alterations at different sites in the trehalose scaffold (Fig. 1C), we synthesized four radiolabeled 18F-fluoro-analogs of trehalose. We aimed to use complementary, straightforward chemical and enzymatic approaches that were initially developed via semi-analogous ‘cold’ routes (see Figs. S1–S4). In each fluoro-trehalose analog a single hydroxyl at each of the four different sites in the trehalose scaffold was replaced by a fluoro group – specifically at positions 2-, 3-, 4 and 6- giving the corresponding deoxy-[18F]fluoro analogs: [18F]FDT, 3-[18F]FDT, 4-epi-[18F]FDT (chosen as an epimeric target due to synthetic expediency) and 6-[18F]FDT (Fig. 1C).
In our design (Fig. 1C) of these minimally-altered trehalose analogs, we considered not only tolerance for the PET-tracing label (due to minimal structural changes) for co-opted processing by Mtb but also we were mindful of the potential inhibitory properties that such compounds might have upon putative host degrading enzymes28 – 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-sugar substrates, for example, have been elegantly shown to act as irreversible, mechanism-based inhibitors of corresponding sugar hydrolases29.
Specifically, in brief, 4-epi-[18F]FDT and 6-[18F]FDT novel radiochemical syntheses used nucleophilic fluorination protocols that generated product from corresponding triflate precursors in good yields and with high purity (Figs. S3A, B, S4). As such, these synthetic approaches were strategically similar to typical syntheses of, for example, commercially-available [18F]FDG, where aqueous [18F]-fluoride is used as the source of 18F30. Protocols for [18F]FDT, 3-[18F]FDT utilized enzymatic methods (see the Supplementary Methods and following sections for details).
Whilst the syntheses of [18F]FDT, 4-epi-[18F]FDT and 6-[18F]FDT proved sufficiently rapid (complete within one half-life of 18F, t1/2 ~ 110 min), that of 3-[18F]FDT was slower (consistent with results for ‘cold’ analogs) and less efficient (3-[18F]FDT, 10% conversion (n = 2), 60 min to 4 h). Moreover, whilst 4-epi-[18F]FDT and 6-[18F]FDT could be prepared from [18F]-fluoride used at a later stage (substitution then deprotection, see Figs. S2–S4), 3-[18F]FDT required the prior preparation of deprotected 3-[18F]fluoro-3-deoxy-glucose before enzymatic processing, which was itself relatively inefficient31. The particular difficulties in the synthesis of 3-[18F]FDT (length of reaction times, poor conversion and need for early use of radionuclide) led to low specific activities and so this candidate was dismissed at an early stage.
The metabolic stabilities of the remaining three analogs, [18F]FDT, 4-epi-[18F]FDT and 6-[18F]FDT were tested. Although, human trehalose-degrading trehalase activity is low and restricted primarily to the brush-border of the kidney where it is thought to be GPI-anchored28,32, it can be elevated in some diseases28, therefore we also tested degradation of the analogs in vitro using high concentrations of mammalian (porcine) trehalase (0.3 units/mL, 10 mM substrate, Fig. S5). Under conditions that led to complete degradation of trehalose, ‘cold’ analogs [19F]FDT, 4-epi-[19F]FDT showed little or no degradation, whereas 6-[19F]FDT showed low levels (14%).
Finally, putative degradation was also probed directly in vivo using both Mtb-infected and naïve rabbits. Consistent with the in vitro observations, radiotracer 6-[18F]FDT was less stable than [18F]FDT and 4-epi-[18F]FDT; 6-[18F]FDT was entirely metabolized to 6-[18F]FDG within 90 min post-injection, (see Fig. S3D). Whilst 4-epi-[18F]FDT proved more stable, some metabolism (albeit slower) was observed (30% after 3 h (Fig. S3C). However, consistent with design (Fig. 1c), [18F]FDT showed little apparent degradation (see below).
Taken together, the rapid degradation of 6-[18F]FDT and both the partial degradation and less efficient (lower radiochemical yield (RCY) and a need for more stringent purification) synthesis of 4-epi-[18F]FDT led to their dismissal as candidate tracers; [18F]FDT was evaluated further.
Comparison of synthetic routes suggests a flexible one-pot, biocatalytic route to [18F]FDT
Three parallel strategies were envisaged for the synthesis of [18F]FDT (Fig. 1D) and these were tested in the synthesis of [19F]FDT. We aimed from the outset to devise routes that would ultimately utilize [18F]FDG, as this is the most readily-available organic source of 18F, even to those without specialist sources of 18F (e.g. cyclotron facilities). Global access via commercial sources would therefore, in principle, allow the development of synthesis that could be implemented in many locations.
[18F]FDG is typically supplied in aqueous solution and so all routes adopted a protecting-group-free approach that would not only obviate the need for additional (e.g. protection-deprotection) steps, but, through the use of biocatalysts, allow the use of such solutions directly. Given the often highly (chemo-, regio- and stereo-) selective nature of biocatalysts we envisaged that all three routes would have potential for application in a one-pot operation for ease-of-use. Four biocatalyst systems were evaluated for mediating the critical formation of the α,α−1,1-bis-glycosidic linkage that is found in [18F]FDT, due to the nature of its dual cis−1,2-linkage33. This is a particularly difficult linkage to form and control selectively using chemical methods, further highlighting another potential advantage of the use of biocatalysis. Two homologs of the, so-called, trehalose glycosyltransferring synthase enzyme, TreT34, (from T. tenax35–38 and P. horikoshii39) were tested via Route A; and two variant constructs containing the trehalose 6-phosphate synthase domain OtsA40, one in Route B as a fusion to the dephosphorylating enzyme OtsB and one as a single enzyme construct via Route C.
First, for initial syntheses, all enzymes were expressed in and purified from E. coli. The yield for OtsA enzyme as an individual construct was superior to the OtsAB fusion construct and/or TreT homologs. OtsB from E. coli did not express in the soluble fraction but could either be purified from inclusion bodies or its solubility improved through the addition of a fused-N-terminal-MBP-His-tag (see Supplementary Methods and Figs. S6–S8).
Next, we determined kinetic parameters of the various enzyme systems (Fig. S1 and Table 1) using a variety of complementary (continuous or endpoint; coupled-enzyme41, spectrophotometric, HPLC or 1H NMR) methods to monitor substrate consumptions and/or product formation, according to conditions. Again, individual OtsA and OtsB constructs proved superior catalysts (Table 1) to the corresponding OtsAB fusion and, noting the limits on comparisons, to the two TreT enzymes, with OtsA catalytic efficiencies some >2-fold to 4-fold higher, as judged by kcat/KM. Here, it should be noted, we used endogenous Glc or Glc6P as acceptor substrate rather than the deoxyfluoro sugars and so these parameters should be interpreted as a proxy – direct comparisons with the kinetics used for eventual FDT synthesis therefore cannot be made (see also below). The relative efficiency of OtsB was higher ( ~ 4-fold to 10-fold) than OtsA allowing its use in lower concentration, further highlighting the advantage of this separate construct (see below).
Table 1.
Enzyme | Substrate | KM (mM) | kcat (s-1) | kcat/KM (mM-1s-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
OtsA a | UDP-Glc | 1.7 ± 0.3 | 34 ± 1 | 20 |
OtsA a | G6P | 7.3 ± 0.6 | 34 ± 1 | 4.7 |
TreT P. horikoshii b | UDP-Glc | 4.6 ± 0.8 | 25 ± 2 | 5.5 |
TreT P. horikoshii b | Glc | 8.1 ± 0.6 | 13.6 ± 0.4 | 1.7 |
TreT T. tenax c | UDP-Glc | 2.3 ± 0.7 | 13.5 ± 1.4 | 6.2 |
TreT T. tenax b | Glc | 5.0 ± 1.3 | 10.3 ± 1.3 | 2.1 |
OtsAB-fusion d | UDP-Glc | 7.2 ± 5.7 | - | - |
OtsB e | T6P | 3.6 ± 0.8 | 286 ± 34 | 79 |
OtsASf b | UDP-Glc | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 63.5 ± 2.5 | 45.3 |
OtsASf b | G6P | 4.9 ± 0.5 | 57.5 ± 2.3 | 11.9 |
OtsBSf e | T6P | 2.8 ± 0.7 | 740 ± 96 | 264 |
a Taken from reference. 46
b Determined via continuous, coupled-enzyme spectrophotometric assay41 using decrease in NADH absorbance at 340 nm (ε340 = 6220 M-1cm-1) catalyzed by linked spectrophotometric assay at 25 °C.
c Determined via endpoint, HPLC method with fixed Glc concentration at 70 °C.
d Determined via endpoint, HPLC method with fixed Glc concentration at 37 °C.
e Determined using continuous 1H NMR assay at 37 °C. See Supplementary Methods for further details. OtsASf and OtsBSf denote variants expressed from Spodoptera frugiperda rather than E. coli.
These catalytic efficiencies had a direct bearing on synthetic utility. In comparative 10 mM reactions: via Route A (Fig. 1D) TreT from P. horikoshii performed better (40% conversion over 2 h) than the TreT from T. tenax (10% conversion over 2 h); P. horikoshii TreT also displayed reversibility under certain conditions that would contaminate product FDT by converting it back to starting FDG. Via Route B using OtsAB, synthesis failed (even over prolonged periods). By contrast, via Route C using OtsA and OtsB full conversion was observed within 45 min (Fig. S9). Following these evaluations Route C (Fig. 1) was selected over both Routes A and B. It is important to note that these comparisons were conducted under specific conditions that may not have been optimized for the given systems in our hands37,38.
Creation of a pyrogen-free synthetic biocatalyst system enables a safe route to [18F]FDT
Pyrogen or endotoxin presence due to lipopolysaccharide contamination caused, for example, by carryover from E. coli production is prominent and of serious concern in any potential clinical method42. Whilst we were able to successfully utilize extensive, repeated cyclical purification coupled with pyrogen-monitoring using Limulus amoebocyte lysate activity measurements43 to demonstrate low pyrogen production of [19F]FDT (Table S1), it has been argued that depyrogenation methods cannot be fully effective42,44.
We therefore developed an expression system free of endotoxin based on the use of Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) cell culture. An appropriate sequence was designed based on the pFastbac vector system; the coding sequences of E. coli OtsA (CAA48913.1) and E. coli OtsB (CAA48912.1) were refactored according to S. frugiperda MNVP codon usage. Analysis of the resulting gene sequences for E. coli and S. frugiperda constructs confirmed essentially identical protein gene product primary sequence (Fig. S10). This allowed ready implementation of a protein production workflow Fig. S11) using infectious baculovirus generated through transposon-mediated insertion45 (so-called Bac-to-Bac system). Sf9-culture resulted in good yields of proteins OtsASf and OtsBSf (~ 20 mg/L of culture for OtsASf; ~15 mg/L of culture for OtsBSf, Fig. S12) that were essentially endotoxin-free ( < 0.1 EU.mL−1). This was comparable or superior to those found from E. coli expression of OtsA or OtsB and, indeed, of TreT and OtsAB fusion enzymes (both TreT enzymes ~2–3 mg/L, OtsAB fusion ~0.1 mg/L of culture). Both OtsASf and OtsBSf proved stable up to 37 °C (Fig. S13). Moreover, the kinetic parameters of OtsASf and OtsBSf (from Sf9 insect cells) also proved superior to those expressed from E. coli46 (2-to-3-fold more efficient as judged by kcat/KM, Table 1). Finally and importantly, we were able to readily scale enzyme expression in Sf9 up to 10 L in one batch for both, thereby allowing corresponding production of >100 mg of either of the OtsASf and OtsBSf enzymes.
Development of an efficient, scaleable radiosynthesis provides [18F]FDT for pre-clinial testing
With a putative biocatalytic system in hand, we next sought to optimize its application in the synthesis of [19F]FDT as an isotopologue model for [18F]FDT (Fig. 2). Reaction parameters were varied (see Supplementary Methods), including substrate and enzyme concentrations as well as duration of reactions. First, independently-variable, biocatalyst concentrations further verified the choice of flexible Route C (Fig. 2A) and allowed optimization of relative [E]0 consistent with their kinetic parameters (Table 1) to allow maximal flux; this identified of 18.2 µM OtsASf and 6.1 µM OtsBSf (Figs. S14, S15) as efficient. Second, variation of acceptor substrate [19F]FDG concentration in the presence of fixed, maintained amounts of donor substrate UDP-Glc revealed more rapid reaction progress in the presence of equimolar or excess donor, consistent with both a highly efficient glycosylation reaction and also inhibition that could be minimized through control of conditions (Fig. 2B); variation of donor concentration under these constraints then identified concentrations of ~130–260 mM as optimal for later reactions.
With these conditions in hand, we scaled low mg reactions to a scale of 100 s of mg (from 100 mg [19F]FDG). Reaction progress through each step in a one-pot operation was monitored by the measurement of the crude 19F-NMR spectra from reaction mixtures (Fig. 2C). This in turn allowed the testing of repeated batches (Fig. 2D) using fresh enzyme (including from newly expressed preparations) and reactants; we reasoned that such a batch scale would prove sufficient for a dose in man (see below for further details) and was therefore a representative test batch. These experiments revealed that at higher scale steps one and three (Fig. 2A) proved slightly more efficient than step two with the occasional observation of small amounts of unconverted deoxy-fluoro-G6P ([19F]-1) in some batches (Fig. 2D) – advantageously, by virtue of its charge, if present [19F]-1 (and similarly [18F]-1, see below) could be readily removed both during manual and automated syntheses (see below), further confirming the advantage of Route C. In this way we could readily and consistently access [19F]FDT at 100 mg scales through one-pot biocatalytic syntheses; allowing the ready synthesis of grams of [19F]FDT that when characterized (including via 1H-, 13C-, 19F-, 23Na- NMR, 1H qNMR, microanalysis and LC detected by multiple methods – see Figs. S16–29) complied fully with stringent measures of purity ( > 98% organic, with NaCl as the only co-eluent ( ~ 10–12%)) for subsequent in vivo toxicity testing (see below and Supplementary Methods).
Next, with ‘cold’ syntheses in hand, we applied essentially analogous methods for the one-pot syntheses of [18F]FDT: first manually and then in an automated fashion that might prove suitable for good manufacturing practice (GMP) synthesis in Phase 1 studies. Using commercially available aqueous solutions of [18F]FDG with activity of 5–15 mCi we observed full conversion to [18F]FDT in 60 min. Purification was effected simply by adding ethanol to precipitate protein, filtration (5 µm filter) and then purification of the resulting filtrate using ion-exchange (‘Luna’ NH2, see Supplementary Methods). Product [18F]FDT was eluted with ethanol in a non-decay-corrected RCY over three steps of 34 ± 14 % (n = 5) and with a radiochemical purity >99% (Figs. 30) and an overall reaction time of 60 min.
To test possible, ‘real world’ application, these radiosyntheses were repeated from different batches of starting [18F]FDG and also used directly in in vivo studies (see below). Depending on starting material concentration, activity and condition, overall production times for [18F]FDT of 30–120 min were tested. For example, reaction times could be reliably reduced from 60 min to 30 min by increasing concentration of enzymes, (OtsASf, OtsBSf and hexokinase to 9, 15 and 45 μM, respectively) to ensure >99% conversion to provide comparable quantities and the same high purities of [18F]FDT. No detectable, residual protein from the reaction was observed in the final product, as tested by Western blot ( < 1 μg/reaction, Figs. 31).
Next, after this successful manual standardization and variation, a fully automated synthesis was performed in a GE Tracerlab FX-N module (Fig. S32). Even higher, overall decay-corrected radiochemical yield (Table S2) was observed with higher amounts of starting [18F]FDG; under typical conditions (100 mCi [18F]FDG), 41 ± 4 % (n = 2) non-decay corrected yield of [18F]FDT was obtained in 50 min. The identity of product [18F]FDT was confirmed via co-injection of an authentic standard using LC-MS; radiochemical purity was >98%, determined by HPLC (Figs. S33, S34). Specific activity, assessed using an adapted enzymatic assay47 of decayed samples (see Methods), revealed that, as expected, activity was essentially dependent on [18F]FDG source – useful activities could be routinely achieved (average 0.21 ± 0.08 µmol [18F]FDT at specific activity of 69 ± 26 mCi/mg (23.6 ± 8.8 Ci/mmol) at the end of synthesis and formulation; these varied from 8.3 − 86.8 Ci/mmol depending on the FDG batch (see Supplementary Methods).
[19F]FDT and [18F]FDT display useful metabolic stability
For evaluations in vivo, solutions of [19F]FDT were injected into both marmosets (n = 3) and mice (n = 5), and plasma subsequently analyzed (see Methods); both LC-MS and 19F-NMR spectroscopy allowed detection of [19F]FDT and any putative degradation (Figs. S36, S37). Together, these suggested useful stability of [19F]FDT both in plasma and metabolically in vivo with no detectable degradation. This suggested stability was confirmed for [18F]FDT through direct assessment of radiochemical purity maintained >95% in both blood and urine of rabbits (Fig. S3E) (see also above and below). As noted above, this contrasted strongly with the significant metabolism of both 6-[18F]FDT and 4-epi-[18F]FDT.
Finally, in vitro [19F]FDT in human plasma showed no immediate degradation or apparent sequestration and could also be readily detected (Fig. S35). Promising stability was observed ( > 50% after 80 min) in human liver microsomal degradation assays (Fig. S38).
FDT labels mycolate lipids in Mtb
Although we have previously shown that FITC-Tre (Fig. 1B) can be incorporated into the cell surface of Mtb in cultured macrophages21, its use for non-invasive in vivo imaging is not possible. We generated a 14C-radiotracer variant of [19F]FDT, [U-14C, 19F]FDT, using the chemoenzymatic methods detailed above, to allow observations over longer timeframes in Mtb culture. These Mtb-culture experiments revealed incorporation into less polar, lipidic species with TLC Rf values that again match those of prior analyzes for similar mycolates21,48, consistent with incorporation of FDT into corresponding [U-14C, 19F]FDT-MM and [U-14C, 19F]FDT-DM mycolates (Fig. S3F). Together these data suggested that FDT-based probes could act as probes that label mycobacterial lipids, in a manner consistent with the Mycobacterium-selective mechanism outlined in Fig. 1A.
[18F]FDT is a specific, consistent Mtb-radiotracer in vivo with uptake that correlates with bacterial burden in a non-human primate TB model
A useful PET probe for diagnosing tuberculosis should have minimal signal in the absence of Mtb infection, particularly in the lung where the majority of infections occur. Importantly, in a non-human primate (NHP) TB model49 [18F]FDT displayed low background signal in the lung of a naïve marmoset compared to ~45-day Mtb-infected marmoset (Fig. 3A–C). To confirm that this enhanced signal was specific to uptake of tracer, rather than, for example, non-specific uptake (proportional to tissue density) or normal distribution, ‘pre-blocking’ experiments were conducted with ‘cold’ [19F]FDT (administered 1 h and 5 min) prior to injection of [18F]FDT radiotracer. Consistent with specificity and mode-of-action, these reduced average uptake of [18F]FDT into lesions by 40% (Fig. 3G, I, J). Since non-specific uptake resulting from transit or non-bound normal accumulation of the radiotracer should not be displaced by competition with blocker / ‘cold’ compound, a reduction in PET signal is consistent with specific binding.
Optimal imaging time was determined to be 90 min post-dose (Fig. 3); there was no additional improvement in signal-to-noise at 120 min scan. Reproducibility of [18F]FDT uptake was assessed by measuring lesion uptake (SUV) in animals scanned 48 h apart (44 and 46 days-post-infection (dpi)), sufficient time to allow full tracer clearance but short enough to minimize possible infection progression (Fig. 3); consistent [18F]FDT uptake (SUVs) was observed confirming reproducible uptake.
Finally, to determine whether lesion uptake of [18F]FDT correlated with disease, we determined bacterial burden at sites that were imaged by [18F]FDT. Post-necropsy excision of lesions (n = 22) revealed that [18F]FDT uptake into individual lesions (SUV per lesion) was significantly correlated (p = 0.001, ρ = 0.64) with the number of culturable Mtb bacteria (CFU) from each lesion (Fig. 3K, L).
[18F]FDT uptake and radiotracer signal differs from that of [18F]FDG in Mtb-infected models
We reasoned that this designed, mode-of-action of [18F]FDT that correlated well with mycobacterial burden might complement the differing mode-of-action shown by [18F]FDG uptake and hence reveal additional, valuable physiological information when used in tandem. In particular, [18F]FDG in TB appears to label immune cells8,9 that are highly metabolically-active.
To the test the potential for different labeling patterns, we directly compared [18F]FDT and [18F]FDG scans collected sequentially in Mtb-infected marmosets (n = 4), with sufficient intervening time to clear (Fig. 4A–D). These revealed subtle but clear differences in the pattern of labeling in individual lesions and pooling in tissue regions with different characteristics. Fig. 4A shows an example where the apical and lower lesions labeled by [18F]FDG are clearly non-overlapping with those that label most strongly with [18F]FDT. In other cases (see Fig. 4B, C) where there were fewer lesions, these appeared to be similarly labeled with both probes, although FDG was consistently stronger (note scale bar is an MIP of 6 for [18F]FDG and 3 for [18F]FDT). In Fig. 4D, although there are only 5 days between the scans the disease has progressed significantly, and new lesions appear to label most intensely with [18F]FDT, suggesting that these represent areas of active bacterial replication. Further studies will be required to explore potential links between pathology and bacterial burden; these animals were instead used for exploring treatment response and meaningful necropsy samples were therefore unavailable.
[18F]FDT allows direct monitoring of treatment that correlates with reduction in bacterial load
One of the most significant challenges facing current TB diagnosis and treatment programs is a source of reliable information on the disease burden in patients50. This is exacerbated by the often-prolonged treatment regimens that may continue over months and even years. Compliance with continual treatment is vital and direct feedback on progress of treatment would prove invaluable not only to the clinician but also patient51,52. Moreover, direct measurement of the in vivo effectiveness of new therapeutics would provide a powerful new tool in their clinical development53–55.
We therefore tested whether [18F]FDT would report effectively on response to a representative Mtb therapy. Marmosets were treated for 4 weeks (five days per week) with first-line HRZE (combined isoniazid (H), rifampicin (R), pyrazinamide (Z) and ethambutol (E)) therapy and serial images were taken using both [18F]FDT (Fig. 5H–L) along with [18F]FDG as a comparator (Fig. 5A–E). Notably, [18F]FDG showed mixed, refractory and inconsistent uptake as judged by both SUVs and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) (Fig. 5F, G), despite the fact that effective treatment was confirmed by low bacterial burden after treatment (post-necropsy logCFUs of 2.6 and 2.8, respectively). By striking contrast, [18F]FDT scans showed a significant reduction (mean 33 ± 13% SD, p < 0.01) in SUV signal and a lower total [18F]FDT uptake (Fig. 5M, N) during treatment consistent with the determined drop in disease burden. Together, these data suggest that [18F]FDT could provide a more accurate probe of disease treatment.
[18F]FDT is also an Effective Mtb-Radiotracer in an ‘Old World’ Non-Human Primate TB Model
Whilst, NHPs represent the most realistic pre-clinical TB models, species-specific differences are known56. To confirm the results (see above) found in the ‘New World’ (marmoset) NHP models, we also tested the [18F]FDT in ‘Old World’ cynomolgus macaques (n = 3) infected with Mtb (strain Erdman) (Fig. 6). TB in cynomolgus macaques is characterized by heterogeneous granulomas with a spectrum of Mtb burden, from lesions with many culturable bacilli to sterile lesions without live Mtb57. As in marmosets, [18F]FDT proved to be just as effective in specifically visualizing lesions (Fig. 6A) in a manner that again is distinct from and complements [18F]FDG (Fig. 6B). The uptake of [18F]FDT into cynomolgus macaques correlated well with bacterial disease burden, as lesions with culturable Mtb bacilli exhibited higher uptake of [18F]FDT (Fig. 6C, D).
[19F]FDT is non-toxic and [18F]FDT shows rapid clearance resulting in low background dose exposure
No signs of toxicity or adverse effects were observed in any of the imaging studies described above. To confirm this apparent compatibility as well as determine the broader physiological characteristics of this novel radiotracer, both the biodistribution and toxicity of FDT were assessed in healthy animals.
First, dynamic PET imaging was performed in a healthy rhesus macaque for approximately 115 min after bolus intravenous administration of 151 MBq of [18F]FDT (Fig. 7A). This indicated rapid distribution of [18F]FDT from the blood stream through the tissues and prominent accumulation of radioactivity in kidney and urinary bladder, indicating renal excretion with minimal accumulation in other organs. Organ radiation absorbed doses were calculated by extrapolating the rhesus macaque data to humans, with organs receiving the highest doses being the urinary bladder wall (0.143 mSv/mBq; 2 hr voiding interval), kidneys (0.119 mSv/MBq), and adrenals (0.022 mSv/mBq) (Fig. 7B). The effective dose was 0.0154 mSv/MBq. Semi-comparative doses for a 1.5 hr voiding window for FDG are 0.086, 0.020 and 0.013 mSv/MBq, respectively; thus, there is a ~ 2-to-5-fold difference in exposure. Next, additionally, we performed biodistribution studies in two Mtb-infected marmosets injected with 74 MBq/kg [18F]FDT. Small samples of tissue were collected at necropsy 120 min post-injection and the radioactivity was measured in a calibrated gamma counter. In both animals, there was little tissue uptake of the radiotracer in organs other than in kidney (Fig. 7C).
Finally, single (acute) and multiple (chronic) intravenous (iv) dose toxicity studies of [19F]FDT, enabled by ready synthesis (see above), were conducted in both rats and beagle dogs (males and females both) via a contract with SRI International (Menlo Park, CA). The animals were given either daily iv injections of [19F]FDT at 100 × the expected human dose for seven consecutive days or a single iv injection at either 100 × or 1000 × the expected human dose once (see study schema tables in the methods). Mortality and morbidity, clinical observations, body weights, food consumption, hematology, serum chemistry, and coagulation parameters (beagles only), organ weights, and gross pathology / histopathology were evaluated daily for 9 days (acute toxicity) or 21 days (recovery group). There were no adverse findings in any parameters measured in the studies that were outside the expected range of normal. The no observed adverse effect level (NOAEL) in Sprague Dawley rats was at least 13.2 mg/kg when given as a single IV injection or 1.32 mg/kg/day when given by daily IV administration for 7 consecutive days and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached. The NOAEL in beagle dogs was at least 4 mg/kg when given as a single IV injection or 0.4 mg/kg/day when given by daily IV administration for 7 consecutive days and the MTD was not determined. All animals survived until scheduled euthanasia (day 9 or day 21) except for one rat with tail lesions that were judged to not be test article related and that was euthanized earlier.
Discussion
Our results reveal that readily-generated [18F]FDT appears to complement FDG as an effective tracer of TB, with better selectivity and significant correlation to mycobacterial burden in lesions. We suggest that this selectivity is likely a result of its mechanism-based mode-of-action (Fig. 1A) that unlike FDG co-opts specific TB-associated enzymes not present in host, allowing selective incorporation into mycobacterial lipids. Nonetheless, FDG is a known, effective probe of TB. Together these observations suggest that FDG may report on inflammation proximal to but not located directly in a bacterial lesion, whereas [18F]FDT appears to report directly on site of Mtb enzymatic action (and therefore on bacterial viability). The lack of direct co-location (see Fig. 4) suggests that some tubercular lesions may therefore be seemingly less metabolically active than inflammatory hotspots. In this context, it may be that these differences are speculatively indicative of the physiology of host response, including the highly active balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators58, perhaps differentially driven by different cell subpopulations with different metabolic activities and locations within a lesion.
In the context of clinical evaluation of therapeutic response to TB treatment it is noteworthy that FDG avidity is maintained in a large fraction of cured patients even at the end of therapy59. This suggests that inflammation persists even after bacterial viability is lost and so limits the use of FDG-PET in determining the appropriate duration of treatment. Moreover, bacterial viability in sputum is lost months before patients can be safely discontinued without experiencing disease relapse; this suggests clear limits on the use of sputum sampling. Our proposed use of [18F]FDT-PET now offers the important potential to have real-time monitoring of bacterial viability in the absence of culturable bacteria and may be an important tool in creating novel treatment regimens of shorter duration.
Our results also suggest that use of [18F]FDT can now avoid potentially refractory sources of signal from non-TB-associated inflammatory responses that potentiate metabolism in a lesion-like region. This has long been a consideration in patients with other diseases associated with inflammation of the lung, for example cancer11–13,60, but has been further highlighted by confusion generated from FDG-PET in putative COVID-19 patients with lung pathology14. Moreover, other granulomatous disorders, where histopathological distinction from TB proves difficult, such as Crohn’s disease61, might also now be more accurately diagnosed.
Together therefore our results suggest that disease-selectivity demonstrated by [18F]FDT will allow effective monitoring of disease and its treatment. This is likely to be invaluable for clinical evaluation of not only effectiveness in the development of new therapies but also in longitudinal monitoring and hence compliance. The limitations of our study include the use of only small numbers of primates due to reduced number of scans that can be conducted with animals bearing untreated progressive tuberculosis. In addition, the efficacy of [18F]FDT in the presence of other possible lung diseases has yet to be assessed; although direct comparison with [18F]FDT should be made with caution given potentially differential processing, we have previously determined that the analog FITC-Tre does not label several other bacterial species that cause lung infections21. It should be noted that such studies will be required in Phase 1 clinical studies. In this context the additional roles of other trehalose pathways, such as the lpqY-sugA-sugB-sugC-derived ABC transporter system may further modulate selectivity37,62.
The scaleable, pyrogen-free radiosynthesis methods that we describe here now confirm a proposed use21 of highly selective biocatalysis under aqueous conditions that are readily implemented by the non-expert. Other elegant methods37,38,63 and newly emerging enzyme sources64 could also be considered. Such biocatalytic approaches to utilization of FDG as a ready organic source of 18F now complements chemical methods, such as the use of 18F-fluorodeoxysorbitol (FDS) that can be directly generated in a one-step reduction and has shown powerful utility in other bacterial species such as E. coli65; the extension here to a ready, one-pot multi-step method now reveals the potential to consider even more complex sugar-based probes. This now enables potential, distributable radiochemical synthesis of [18F]FDT to be conducted anywhere there is access to FDG; scales of up to grams have now been demonstrated using this method for [19F]FDT. Furthermore, full, pre-clinical assessments (see above) reveal no adverse effects. This, as well as the high specific activities and good radiochemical efficiencies that we disclose here now suggest [18F]FDT as a new, viable radiotracer for TB, suitable for Phase 1 trials.
Methods
Materials
Non-radioactive [19F]FDG was purchased from CarboSynth. For radioactive synthesis, [18F]FDG was purchased from Cardinal Health Ltd. Normal saline was obtained from Quality Biological (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). All other chemicals and solvents were received from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. Column and Sep-Pak cartridges used in this synthesis were obtained from Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Waters (Milford, MA, USA), respectively. Sep-Paks were conditioned prior to use with 5 mL absolute ethanol. Analytical HPLC analyses for radiochemical work were performed on an Agilent 1200 Series instrument equipped with multi-wavelength detectors. Mass spectra (MS) of decayed [18F]-FDT solutions were recorded on a 6130 Quadrupole LC/MS, Agilent Technologies instrument equipped with a diode array detector. LC-MS analysis of [18F]-FDT was performed on Agilent 1260 HPLC system coupled to an Advion expression LCMS mass spectrometer with an ESI source. The LC inlet was Agilent 1200 series chromatographic system equipped with 1260 quaternary pump, 1260 Infinity autosampler, 1290 thermostatted column compartment and radiation detector. Further details of chromatographic conditions are given in Tables S3–S5. Hexokinase enzyme was purchased from Megazyme. Detailed procedures for expression and purification of other enzymes (OtsA also known as TPS, OtsB also known as TPP, OtsAB fusion and TreT variants) both in E. coli and Sf9 insect cells (the latter denoted by use of Sf) are given in the Supplementary Methods and below.
Enzyme Kinetics
Kinetic parameters of TreT-catalyzed synthesis of trehalose were assayed continuously by coupling the formation of UDP to the reactions of pyuruvate kinase and lactate dehydrogenase. The decrease in absorbance of NADH at 340 nm (ε340 = 6220 M−1cm−1) was measured at 37 °C using a spectrophotometer equipped with a thermostat. The rate of UDP formation is proportional to the rate of NADH oxidation where one molecule of NADH is oxidized for each molecule of UDP formed. As the reaction involves two substrates, therefore, the kinetic parameters determined based on pseudo substrate concentration. TreT enzymes were incubated in the presence of fixed acceptor concentration and variable donor concentration, followed by fixed donor concentration and variable acceptor concentration. For continuous assay, each reaction was measured as triplicates by setting up the reactions in 96 well plates. Reactions were initiated by adding TreT enzyme and incubated at 37 °C (see Table S6 and Supplementary Methods for further details).
OtsA kinetic parameters were also determined by monitoring the formation of T6P by NADH-linked continuous assay. The rate of T6P formation is proportional to the rate of NADH oxidation where one molecule of NADH is oxidized for each molecule of T6P formed. OtsB-catalyzed trehalose formation was monitored by Malachite-green assay protocol as described previously66. Some further details of parameters used for optimization of the methods are given in Tables S7, S8).
For the NADH-linked based assays, the absorbance values obtained from the linear range of concentrations were plotted against time to determine the rate of the reaction (velocity). Plots of variable substrate concentrations against rate were analyzed in Graphpad Prism to obtain Michaelis-Menten plots. From these plots kinetic parameters of each enzyme were calculated. All results shown are based on triplicate analysis of the samples.
Enzyme production scale-up in Sf9 cells expression
In order to obtain a reasonable expression level of OtsA and OtsB proteins, the Bac-to-Bac® Baculovirus Expression System was selected. The original coding sequence of E. coli OtsA (otsA, CAA48913.1) and OtsB (otsB, CAA48912.1) was optimized according to S. frugiperda MNPV codon usage. The DNA fragment was then cloned into the EcoRV restriction enzyme site of the pUC57 vector. Then the plasmids pUC57-OtsA and pUC57-OtsB and pFastBac Dual vector were digested with BamHI and NotI, respectively, and ligated to create the recombinant plasmids of OtsA (pFastBac-OtsA) and OtsB (pFastBac-OtsB). The bacmid DNAs of OtsA (Bacmid-OtsA) and OtsB (Bacmid-OtsB) were generated by transformation of the recombinant plasmids pFastBac-OtsA and pFastBac-OtsB into the DH10BacTM E. coli, respectively. Correct insertions of the otsA and otsB genes into bacmid DNA were confirmed by PCR analysis using pUC/M13 standard primers: 5-CCCAGTCACGACGTTGTAAAACG-3 (forward) and 5-AGCGGATAACAATTTCACACAGG-3 (reverse).
Based on the bacmid DNAs, the recombinant baculovirus of OtsA and OtsB were made by transfection of Sf9 cells. Culture and preparation of Sf9 cells were performed according to the protocol provided by manufacturer. A Sf9 cell stock with a viability >95% and a density of 1.5 × 106 – 2.5 × 106 cells/mL was prepared before proceeding to transfection.
Experimental procedures to generate P1 baculovirus for OtsA and OtsB
The P1 baculovirus stocks of OtsA and OtsB were generated using Sf9 cells in 6-well culture plates. Briefly, 2 ml of Sf9 cells were added to each well of two 6-well plates with the cell number of 8 × 105 in each well. Cells were allowed to attach for 15 min at room temperature. Transfectin II was used as the transfection reagent and the transfection experiments were performed according to the protocol provided by manufacturer. Different amount of bacmid DNAs of OtsA and OtsB were used. After transfection, the Sf9 cells were further cultured at 27 °C for 3 days, then the P1 baculovirus (in supernatant) was harvested by centrifugation. The P1 baculovirus are found in the culture medium and the Sf9 cell pellets were used to check protein expression. Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was then added to each P1 baculovirus solution to reach a final concentration of 2%. The P1 baculovirus stock solution were then stored at 4 °C, protected from light.
Amplification of P1 baculovirus of OtsA and OtsB: In order to make baculovirus stock for large-scale protein expression and to increase virus titer, P2 and P3 baculovrius stocks of OtsA and OtsB were prepared from their P1 baculovirus. Briefly, a total of 150 mL of suspended Sf9 cells with a cell density of 2.0 × 106 cells/mL was infected by P1 baculovirus of OtsA or OtsB, respectively. The 150 mL infection culture composition was: 1% P1 baculovirus of OtsA or OtsB, 1% FBS, 1% ethanol, Sf9 cells with a density of 2.0 × 106 cells/mL. After infection at 27 °C with shaking (150 rpm) for 72 h, the P2 baculovirus (in culture medium) was harvested by centrifugation at 1100 rpm for 10 min at room temperature. FBS was added to a final concentration of 2%, then the solution was filtered by syringe filter (0.45 μm) and stored at 4 °C, protected from light. Similar infection procedures were performed to prepare P3 baculovirus, except using P2 baculovirus stock solution for cell infection.
Expression and Purification of C-terminally tagged, recombinant OtsA
Sf9 cells were grown in serum-free medium to a density of 2 × 106 cells/mL and a cell viability of greater than 95%. The cell culture (1 L) was transfected with the viral stock, 2.8 × 109 pfu/mL, at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of unity. At 72 h post-infection, the cells were harvested by centrifugation. After freeze/thaw cycle, the pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (100 mM HEPES, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM βME). DNase 3 mg and 1x Complete® protease inhibitor cocktail was also added into the protein pellet and lysed using a homogenizer. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation and the cell free extract passed through a 0.45 μm membrane filter. The filtrate was applied to a Ni–NTA column equilibrated in lysis buffer. After removal of the cell debris by centrifugation, the protein of interest was purified with a linear gradient of 10–300 mM imidazole in 100 mM HEPES, 200 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM βME, pH 7.5, using Ni-NTA. Protein samples were exchanged into 100 mM Hepes, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, pH 7.5, using a HiloadTM 26/60 SuperdexTM 200 desalting column. The sample was passed through an Acrodisc Mustang E membrane (Pall #MSTG25E3) to reduce endotoxin to 1.9 EU/mL. After the addition of 10% glycerol, the aliquots containing the recombinant enzyme were flash frozen, and stored at −80 °C.
Expression and purification of recombinant OtsB
Insect cells were grown in serum-free medium to a density of 2 × 106 cells/mL and a cell viability of greater than 95%. The cell culture (1 L) was transfected with the viral stock, 2.0 × 109 pfu/mL, at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of unity. At 72 h post-infection, the cells were harvested by centrifugation. After the freeze/thaw cycle, the pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 30 mM imidazole, 1 mM βME). DNase 3 mg, 1x Complete® protease inhibitor cocktail was also added in the pellet and lysed using a homogenizer. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation and the cell free extract passed through a 0.45 µm membrane filter. The filtrate was applied to a Ni–NTA column equilibrated in lysis buffer. After removal of the cell debris by centrifugation, the protein of interest was purified with a linear gradient of 10–300 mM imidazole in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 200 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM βME, pH 7.5, using Ni-NTA. The fractions with potential protein were concentrated using Vivaspin (5 MWCO) and then desalted on HiloadTM 26/60 SuperdexTM 200 with 50 mM Tris-HCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl, pH 7.5. The sample was passed through an Acrodisc Mustang E membrane (Pall #MSTG25E3) to reduce endotoxin to 1.9 EU/mL. After the addition of 10% glycerol, the aliquots containing the recombinant enzyme were flash frozen, and stored at −80 °C. SDS–PAGE analysis revealed the presence of a protein with the correct molecular weight.
FDT Synthesis, purification and characterization
In a 50 mL sterile falcon tube were added; 19F-2-FDG (100 mg, 367 mM), ATP (320 mg, 368 mM) and MgCl2 (2 mg). The contents were dissolved in HEPES (100 mM HEPES) buffer solution containing 100 mM NaCl (100 mM, 1 ml, pH 7.5). The pH was then adjusted to 8.0 with NaOH (5 M). Hexokinase (0.6 mL) was added to the reaction mixture to initiate the reaction. The reaction mixture was incubated at 30 °C, 50 rpm for 1–2 h. Phosphorylation of FDG to 2-FDG6P was monitored by TLC and 19F NMR spectroscopy. Full conversion to 2-FDG6P was observed within 2 h for each batch synthesized.
Within the same pot, UDP-glucose (200 mg, 110 mM), KCl (100 mM) and OtsA enzyme (26 μM) was added. The total reaction volume was then adjusted to 3 mL. The reaction mixture was incubated to similar conditions as above for 24 h to allow appropriate conversion to FDT6P. The conversion of FDG6P to FDT6P was monitored by 19F-NMR spectroscopy. The average maximum conversion after 24 h was between 65–70 %. After 24 h, in the same reaction mixture OtsB enzyme (6.23 μM) was added. The pH was adjusted to 8.0 with NaOH (5 M) and reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C, 50 rpm. Reaction progress was monitored by TLC and 19F NMR. The reaction was usually complete within 2 h.
The enzymes from crude reaction mixture were precipitated by either heating the mixture at 95 °C for 10 min or adding 2 mL EtOH and isolated by centrifugation (Viva spin, 10,000 MWCO) and/or filtration. The resulting filtrate was lyophilized and the crude mixture was further precipitated with MeOH:MeCN 90:10 solution and then purified by flash column chromatography. For purification normal phase silica was used as stationary phase and a mixture of water:isopropanol:ethyl acetate (4:48:48 v:v:v) was used as mobile phase. FDT was separated from residual FDG6P and residual FDG. The fractions containing FDT were pooled, concentrated and then lyophilized to dryness. The lyophilization step was repeated for a further 2–3 times to get rid of any residual water. The freeze-dried compound was then characterized by proton (1H NMR), carbon (13C NMR), fluorine (19F NMR) and ESI-MS.
Manual Radiosynthesis and characterization of [18F]-FDT
For radiosynthesis using 3 enzymes, to a 1.5 or 2 mL microcentrifuge tube containing a solution of commercial [18F]-FDG in 0.9 % NaCl, reactants were added sequentially to achieve final concentration of UDP-glucose 30 mM, MgCl2 10 mM, KCl 100 mM, ATP 10 mM, Hexokinase 640 U, OtsA 0.7 mg and OtsB 0.4 mg and enough HEPES buffer (100 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl and 10 mM MgCl2, pH 7.5) to achieve the desired volume of 1 mL. After gentle mixing, the tube was capped and incubated for 60 min at 37 °C in a thermoshaker inside the hot cell. Reaction progress was monitored by radio-HPLC during this period. After 40 min, reaction was almost 80 % completed. After 60 min, the enzymes in the reaction mixtures were precipitated by adding ethanol solution, filtered through 5 µm filter and then purified by Luna-NH2 Sep-Pak cartridge method (details in the Supplementary Methods).
Radiochemical yield of the purified product was calculated by assaying the activity (mCi) of the vial, reported as non-decay corrected yield and is based on starting activity of [18F]-FDG. The radiochemical purity of the product was analyzed by radio-HPLC using an Agilent 1200 series HPLC coupled with radio detector for monitoring the radioactivity. Radiochemical purity was determined by calculating the area under the curves in the radiochromatogram.
For radiosynthesis using 1 enzyme i.e. TreT similar procedure as described above was adopted. TreT being thermophile allowed the incubation of the reaction at higher temperature, therefore we carried out the reactions both at 37 °C and 60 °C.
Chemoenzymatic synthesis of [18F]-FDT for the animal models
For the biodistribution and blocking studies, [18F]-FDG (20–30 mCi in 0.8 −1 mL) was added to the reaction mixture containing 100 µL 1 M HEPES buffer, pH 7.6, 20 µL 1 M MgCl2, 20 µL 1 M ATP, 60 µL 1 M UDP-glucose, ~50 µL OtsA (1 mg), ~50 µL OtsB (1 mg), 20 µL hexokinase (5 mg). The reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After 30 min, the mixture was diluted with absolute ethanol (4 mL) and passed through a 5 µm syringe filter. The eluent was passed slowly through an amine Sep-Pak SPE cartridge at a flow rate of 1–2 drops per second. The eluent was then concentrated in vacuo. The resulting solution was filter-sterilized into a sterile vial for delivery. Identity of the compound was confirmed by LC-MS.
Automated Synthesis of [18F]-FDT
[18F]-FDG (1480- 3700 MBq; 40–100 mCi in 0.8 −1.8 mL) was transferred under vacuum to the Reactor 1 containing 100 µL 1 M HEPES buffer, pH 7.6, 20 µL 1 M MgCl2, 20 µL 1 M ATP, 60 µL 1 M UDP-glucose, ~50 µL OtsA (1 mg), ~50 µL OtsB (1 mg), 20 µL hexokinase (5 mg). The reaction mixture was incubated for 30 min at 45 °C and absolute ethanol was added (3−6 mL). The reaction mixture was passed through the filter (5 µm) and a stack of three NH2-cartridges and collected in Reactor 2. An additional 1 mL 75% ethanol in water was added to rinse the Reactor 1 and transferred into the Reactor 2. The combined solution was concentrated under nitrogen at 60 °C for 10 min. 2 mL saline was added to the Reactor 2. The final [18F]-FDT solution was transferred to the product vial through a sterile filter (0.22 µm,). The quality of the product was determined by analytical HPLC (Condition: 4.6 × 250 mm, 2.7 µm AdvanceBio Glycan Mapping Column; solvent A = 50 mM ammonium formate, pH 4.5, solvent B = acetonitrile; Flow rate = 0.5 mL/min;gradient 0–15 min 68-62% B; 15–20 min 62–68% B). Identity of the compound was confirmed by LC-MS (Fig. 32).
Specific activity analysis of [18F]FDT
The radioactivity of the final products, [18F]-FDT, was obtained using the radiation detector. To quantify the mass of the decayed [18F]-FDT in the form of [18O]trehalose, a modified version of a trehalose quantification enzymatic assay47 was used. A trehalose standard calibration curve (linear fit, R2 = 0.9984) was generated, following the enzymatic assay using known concentrations of trehalose. The decayed masses of [18F]FDT from the syntheses were calculated based on this calibration curve. Then, the specific activity of the final product was calculated, following the definition, radioactivity at the end of the synthesis/unit mass of compound.
Chemical Synthesis of 4-O-Triflyl-hepta-O-acetyl-trehalose (4-OTf-TreAc7)
In a 10 mL tube, 50 mg of 6,3,2,6´,4´,3´,2´-hepta-O-acetyl-trehalose (0.078 mmol, 1 eq) and 24 mg of 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methylpyridine (0.018 mmol, 1.5 eq) were dissolved in 3 mL of anhydrous dichloromethane. The mixture was cooled to 0 °C and 17 µL of triflic anhydride (0.012 mmol, 1.3 eq) was added slowly. After stirring at 0 °C for 1 h, the mixture was warmed to room temperature for 3 d. The reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness at low temperature and purified by silica column chromatography (9:1 CH2Cl2:EtOAc and then 7:3 of the same mixture, elution completed 15 min after loading) to give 25.9 mg of 4-OTf-TreAc7 as a white solid in 43% yield. TLC (1:1 CH2Cl2:EtOAc) TLC: Rf = 0.58 (1:1 CH2Cl2:EtOAc, starting material Rf = 0.40);1H NMR (400 MHz CDCl3) δ ppm 2.04, 2.07, 2.08, 2.08, 2.11, 2.13 (7x 3H, s, CH3 OAc), 4.02 (1 H, dd, J6b’,6a’ = 12.0 Hz, J6b’,5’ 2.4 Hz, H-6b’ CH2OAc), 4.06 (1H, ddd, J5’,4’ = 10.4 Hz, J5’,6a’ 5.6 Hz, J5’,6b’ = 2.4 Hz, H-5’), 4.22 (3 H, m, H-5, H-6b, H-6a), 4.99 (1H, dd, J4,5 10.0 Hz, J4,3 9.4 Hz, H-4) 5.03 (1 H, dd, J2,3 = 10.4 Hz, J2,1 4.0 Hz, H-2), 5.06 (1H, dd, J2’,3’ = 10.4 Hz, J2’,1’ 4.0 Hz, H-2’), 5.07 (1 H, dd, J4’,5’ = 10.4 Hz, J4’,3’ 9.6 Hz, H-4’), 5.27 (1H, d, J1,2 4.0 Hz, H-1), 5.29 (1H, d, J1’,2’ 4.0 Hz, H-1’), 5.48 (1H, dd, J3’,2’ = 10.4 Hz, J3’,4’ 9.6 Hz, H-3’), 5.70 (1H, dd, J3,2 = 10.4 Hz, J3,2 9.4 Hz, H-3); 13C NMR (101 MHz CDCl3) δ ppm 20.4, 20.5, 20.6, 20.6, 20.6, (7x CH3 acetates), 61.0 (C-6), 61.6 (C-6’), 67.2 (C-5), 68.3, 68.3 (C-5’), 68.4, 68.4 (C-3, C-4’), 69.8 (C-2 and C-2’), 70.0 (C-3’), 78.7 (C-4 OTf), 92.3 (C-1), 92.8 (C-1’), 169.3, 169.5, 169.8, 170.1 (7x C = O acetates); 19F NMR (376.5 MHz, CD3OD):−74.4, s, CF3 OTf; HRMS ESI+ [C27H35O20F3S + Na]+ requires 791.1287, found 791.1246.
Chemical Synthesis of 6-O-Triflyl-hepta-O-acetyl-trehalose (6-OTf-TreAc7)
In a 50 mL flask, 160.6 mg of 4,3,2,6´,4´,3´,2´-hepta-O-acetyl-trehalose (0.252 mmol, 1 eq) and 77 mg of 2,6-di-t-butyl-4-methylpyridine (0.378 mmol, 1.5 eq) were dissolved in 10 mL of anhydrous dichloromethane. The mixture was cooled to 0 °C and 55 µL of triflic anhydride (0.328 mmol, 1.3 eq) was added slowly. The mixture was stirred while monitoring by TLC, 1 h at 0 °C followed by 24 h at r.t. The reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness at low temperature and purified by silica column chromatography (9:1 CH2Cl2:EtOAc and then 7:3 of the same mixture, elution completed 15 min after loading) to give 93.3 mg of 6-OTf Tre Ac7 as a white solid in 48% yield. TLC (1:1 CH2Cl2:EtOAc) Rf=0.58 for the product and Rf=0.40 for starting material 6-OH Tre Ac7. 1H NMR (400 MHz CDCl3-d) δ ppm 2.03, 2.03, 2.04, 2.05, 2.08, 2.09, 2.09 (7x 3H, s, CH3 OAc), 3.99 (1 H, dd, J6b’,6a’ = 12.0 Hz, J6b’,5’ 2.4 Hz, H-6b’ CH2OAc), 4.05 (1H, ddd, J5’,4’ = 10 Hz, J5’,6a’ 5.6 Hz, J5’,6b’ = 2.4 Hz, H-5’), 4.22 (1H, m, H-5) 4.25 (1 H, m, H-6a’ CH2OAc), 4.41 (1 H, dd, J6b,6a = 11.2 Hz, J6b,5 2.4 Hz, H-6b CH2OTf), 4.52 (1 H, dd, J6a,6b = 11.2 Hz, J6a,5 6 Hz, H-6a CH2OTf), 5.00–5.10 (4H, m, H-2, H-2’, H-4, H-4’), 5.28 (1H, d, J1’,2’ 3.6 Hz, H-1’), 5.33 (1H, d, J1,2 3.6 Hz, H-1), 5.48 (1H, dd, J3,4 = 10.0 Hz, J3,2 9.6 Hz, H-3), 5.50 (1H, dd, J3’,4’ = 10.0 Hz, J3’,2’ 9.6 Hz, H-3’); 13C NMR (101 MHz CDCl3-d) δ ppm 20.6, 20.7, 20.7 (7x CH3 acetates), 61.7 (C-6’ OAc), 67.8 (C-5), 68.3 (C-5’), 68.3 (C-4), 68.4 (C-4’), 69.4 (C-2, C2’), 69.5 (C-3’), 70.0 (C-3), 73.3 (C-6 OTf), 92.4 (C-1), 93.1 (C-1’), 169.3, 169.4, 169.5, 169.6, 169.9, 170.0, 170.6 (7x C = O acetates); 19F NMR (376.5 MHz, CD3OD):−74.4, s, CF3 OTf; HRMS (ESI+) calcd. for C27H35F3O20SNa+ (M+Na+): 791.1287, found 791.1259
Animal and ethics assurance
This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. Biodistribution studies with naive rhesus macaques were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the NIH Clinical Centre (Bethesda, MD). The IACUC of the NIAID, NIH approved the experiments described herein with rabbits and marmosets under protocols LCID-3 and LCID-9 respectively (Permit issued to NIH Intramural Research Program as A-4149-01), and all efforts were made to provide intellectual and physical enrichment and minimize suffering. Once infected, female rabbits or marmosets of both sexes were housed individually or paired in biocontainment cages in a biological level 3 animal facility approved for the containment of M. tuberculosis. All NIH studies were performed in accordance with the regulations of the Division of Radiation Safety, at the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA). Two uninfected and eight infected marmosets on protocol LCIM-9 were imaged with [18F]FDT one or more times as well as contributing to other experiments. The marmosets were pair-housed in an approved ABSL3 facility at NIH. Three rhesus macaques from the NIH PET center were imaged dynamically with FDT under protocol PET-14-01. FDT studies in three cynomolgus macaque at University of Pittsburgh were approved by its IACUC and Division of Radiation Safety and all MTB infected animals were pair-housed in an approved ABSL3 facility (Regional Biocontainment Facility, Pittsburgh PA).
Detection of serum [19F]FDT
FDT standards were prepared in human plasma (Sigma Aldrich), whereby 20 μL plasma samples were spiked with various known concentrations of [19F]FDT i.e. 10 μM, 20 μM, 40 μM, 120 μM, 160 μM, and 300 μM in 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube and diluted with up to 50% acetonitrile solution. Samples were vortexed for 1 min and centrifuged at 13000 rpm (15871 x g) for 10 min and supernatant was analyzed directly by LC-MS using LC method 2.
For initial in vivo study, six white mice, CD1, male, weighing between 22–26 grams, were used. Two concentrations of [19F]FDT (500 μM and 50 μM, final concentration in the blood) were injected into the mice, through the tail vein injection. Prior to injection, each mouse was pre-bled (100 μL) and control samples were obtained. Five min post injection, blood samples were drawn up (775 μL) in syringe containing 75 μL sodium citrate as anticoagulant, hence total blood volume was 700 μL. Samples were spun at 13000 rpm (15871 x g) for 10 min and the supernatant (plasma) was used for further analysis. 200 μL of plasma sample was transferred into fresh 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube and diluted with equal amount of acetonitrile to precipitate out blood plasma protein and other macromolecules. Samples were further spun at 13000 rpm (15871 x g) for 5 min. Supernatant was transferred into a mass spectrometry vial and analyzed using LC-MS analysis method 2 & 3 as shown in Table S9.
In order to determine [19F]FDT metabolism in vivo, we assessed concentration vs time in two mammalian species: common marmosets and C57BL/6 mice. For marmosets weighing between 290.3–340.3 g, 20 mg of sterile-filtered FDT in PBS was injected IV (n = 3) and ~200 μL blood samples were taken from the femoral vein at 0 min, 5 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min and 180 min post injection. Samples were spun (4000 rcf for 10 mins at room temp) to separate red cell mass from plasma. Plasma portion was separated and stored at −80 °C for further analysis. Similarly, mice weighing from 18.7–20.5 g were injected (n = 5) with 5 mg of filter-sterilized FDT solution dissolved in PBS solution, pH 7.4. Mandibular blood samples were taken at 2 min, 15 min, 30 min and 45 min post injection. For the last sample in each mouse, the animal was bled out to get maximum sample for NMR analysis. Final urine samples were collected in 3 out of 5 mice through free catch. Blood samples were centrifuged (6500 rcf for 4 mins at room temp) to separate red cell mass from plasma, and plasma was separated and stored at −80 °C prior to analyzes.
Plasma samples from −80 °C were thawed on ice and mixed with 80% acetonitrile to precipitate plasma proteins and other biomolecules. Samples were centrifuged at 10,000 g, 4 °C for 10 min. Supernatant was removed and analyzed by LC-MS in a SIM mode using AdvancedBio glycan column 2.7 µm, 4.6 × 250 mm, flow rate 0.5 mL/min and gradient elution of acetonitrile (solvent A) and water with 50 mM ammonium formate, pH 4.5 (solvent B); gradient composition: 0 min – 10% B, 15 min – 38% B, 25 min – 38% B, 35 min – 38%B, 36 min – 10% B and 46 min – 10% B. Similar to samples, FDT calibration curve was generated and amount of FDT present in the samples was quantified using the calibration curve data.
PET/CT instrumentation, probe administration, and image acquisition
Rabbits and marmosets at NIAID were anaesthetized and maintained during imaging49,67. Syringes of FDG or FDT were measured in a dose calibrator immediately before and after injection, targeting = injected doses of 2 mCi/kg. During uptake and distribution of the probes, a CT scan from the base of the skull spanning the lungs and the upper abdominal cavity was acquired as described for each species on a helical eight-slice Neurological Ceretom CT scanner (NeuroLogicia, Danvers, MA) operated as part of a hybrid pre-clinical PET/CT system utilizing a common bed. The animal bed was then retracted into the microPET gantry (MicroPET Focus 220, Siemens Preclinical Solutions, Knoxville, TN) and sixty minutesβ ± 5 min post FDG injection, a series of 2 or 3, 10 min emission scans with 75 mm thick windows with a 25 mm overlap were acquired caudal to cranial. The FDT scans were acquired beginning at 60, 90, and 120 min ± 5 min post injection with the same duration, window and overlap. For the blocking studies, injections of 150 µg of [19F]FDT synthesized as described above were administered 60 min and 5 min prior to the [18F]-FDT tracer and the scans were acquired as before. Two animals were used in the blocking studies with one animal receiving the blocking agent while the other was administered saline only prior to the FDT tracer. Two days later, the administrations were reversed so that the second animal received the blocking agent. The emission data for all scans were processed and corrected67. Cynomolgus macaques (n = 3) at the University of Pittsburgh were imaged using a Siemens microPET Focus 220 PET scanner and a Neurological Ceretom CT scanner54. Paired FDG and FDT scans were collected on only 2 macaques pre-necropsy. Scans were viewed using OsiriX (Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland) to identify and analyze individual granulomas as described previously68. Uptake of FDG in the myocardium was variable among individuals and scan dates as has been noted previously69.
Uptake/time course analysis PET/CT data analysis
For FDG and FDT activity measurements, PET/CT images were loaded into MIM fusion software (MIM Software Inc, Cleveland, OH USA) to create lung contours using the CT 3D region growing application with upper and lower voxel threshold settings of 2 and −1024 HU respectively with hole filling and smoothing applied. Dense lesion centers were subsequently identified for inclusion in the lung region manually and the program calculated the FDG signal parameters. In addition, each lesion within the lung was marked with a 3-D region of interest (ROI). In uninfected marmosets administered FDT, ROIs with a similar-volume (dia. 5 to 7 mm) were distributed in the lung as mock lesions according to the method of Ordonez et al.70 and the SUV statistics for the ROIs were captured into excel sheets for analysis67.
Biodistribution of [18F]FDT in Rhesus and Marmosets
An adult male rhesus macaque (12.4 kg) was administered 151 MBq of [18F]FDT via saphenous vein catheter after being anesthetized with ketamine and then maintained with 2–4% isoflurane/97% oxygen. Dynamic whole-body PET images were obtained on a Siemens mCT PET/CT scanner. The images were reconstructed using an iterative time-of-flight algorithm with a reconstructed transaxial resolution of about 4.5 mm. The PET acquisition was divided into 22 time frames of increasing durations, 2 × 15 sec, 4 × 30 sec, 8 × 60 sec, and 8 × 120 sec. Each frame in the sequence was gathered from 4 bed positions to obtain whole body dynamic data over the scan duration (see Fig. 7A). Volumes of interest (VOIs) were drawn over major organs, non-decay corrected time-activity curves were generated and integrated, and then used to generate organ residence times that were scaled to human body and organ weights. Organ radiation absorbed doses and the effective dose were then calculated using OLINDA 2.1 (Vanderbilt University, Nashville TN)71,72.
Two marmosets were administered 2 mCi/kg FDT (in ~300 µL PBS) via tail vein catheter while anesthetized with 3% isoflurane/97% oxygen and PET/CT scans were collected as described above and a final 200 μL whole blood sample was drawn via femoral vein puncture and placed immediately into a 1.5 mL tube that was coated with potassium ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid. After euthanasia, the liver, right kidney, skeletal muscle (right quadriceps), brain, and bone (femur) and other organ samples were harvested and weighed. Each of the tissue samples were transferred to gamma counter tubes and counted on a Wallac Wizard 1480 Gamma Counter (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA). Count data were converted to percent injected dose per gram using a dose calibration curve.
Metabolism analysis [18F]FDT or 18F-labeled analogs
Blood (100 µL), urine (100–300 µL) and lesion samples were collected from animals and diluted 2:1 v/v with acetonitrile to sterilize them. These samples were then vortexed, centrifuged and the supernatant analyzed by either HPLC or TLC. The TLC silica gel plates used to assay these metabolism samples and lesion extracts were 150 Å Silica Gel HL 250 µm 10 ×20 cm channeled plates with a pre-adsorbent zone purchased from Analtech/iChromatography (Newark, DE). TLC plates were visualized via exposure to a phosphor screen for 16 h prior to imaging using a phosphor screen and Typhoon FLA7000 (GE Healthcare, Pittsburgh PA) or using a BioScan AR-2000 reader.
14C-labeled-[19F]FDT incorporation into Mtb lipids
For the generation of [U-14C,19F]FDT, in a 15 mL falcon tube, ATP (Sigma Aldrich) 29 mg (52 µmol) was added and dissolved in 400 µL of HEPES buffer solution (HEPES 100 mM, pH 7.4, MgCl2 10 mM and NaCl 200 mM). The pH of the solution was also adjusted to 7.4. 5 mg hexokinase from yeast (Sigma) were added to the solution, to which 150 µL of [U-14C]2-FDG (American Radiolabelled Chemical, Inc., 50 µmol, 15 µCi, 300 µCi/mmol) was then added and incubated without agitation for 1 h at 37 ˚C, 100 rpm. After 1 h, UDP-Glc (34 mg, 60 µmol), OtsA enzyme (2 mg) and OtsB enzyme (1 mg) were added and reaction volume adjusted to 1 mL using HEPES buffer solution and reaction mixture incubated at 37 ˚C, 100 rpm for 15 h. The mixture was then heated at 95 ˚C for 10 min, centrifuged (3000 rpm, 10 min) and the supernatant transferred into a fresh 15 mL falcon tube. Samples were analyzed by TLC for the formation of [U-14C,19F]FDT using TLC silica gel plates as a stationary phase (EtOAc:iPrOH:H2O, 4:4:1 as mobile phase). Plates were visualized via phosphor imaging as above.
For analysis of [U-14C,19F]FDT incorporation into Mtb lipid, 200 mL Mtb culture was grown in 7H9/AGDN/Tween 80 media at 37 ˚ C until OD600 ~ 0.5–0.6. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (3500 rpm, 10 min). Supernatant was discarded and the pellet was re-dissolved in 4 mL of same media. [U-14C,19F]FDT (750 µL, 15 µCi) was added into the culture and incubated for further 24 h. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation (3500 rpm, 10 min), washed with PBS buffer (100 mM PBS, pH 7.4). Lipids were extracted using 5 mL of 2:1 chloroform:methanol by vigorously shaking overnight. After filtering, the filtrate was evaporated using a stream of argon gas. The resulting residue was re-dissolved in 80:20 chloroform:methanol and 30 µL of sample was analyzed by TLC as above using TLC silica gel plates as a stationary phase (chloroform:methanol:water, 90:9:1 and chloroform:methanol:water 75:25:4 as mobile phase, Fig. S3F).
Human Microsomal Stability Assay
Microsomal stability assay was carried out as described previously73. In brief, 10 x reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH)-regenerating system was freshly prepared by dissolving 37.2 mg glucose-6-phosphate (Sigma) in 1 mL of 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, 39.8 mg nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADP, Sigma) in 1 mL of potassium phosphate buffer, 11.5 U glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (Thermo) in 1 mL of potassium phosphate buffer and 26.8 mg MgCl2.6H2O (Sigma) in 1 mL of distilled water. All these solutions were combined and kept on ice. For verapamil analysis, 263 µL phosphate buffer (100 mM, pH 7.4), 16 µL freshly thawed pooled human microsomes (Sigma) and 3 µL of verapamil (1 µM final concentration) were incubated at 37 °C for 5 min. After 5 min, 18 µL of NADPH-regenerating system was added to initiate reaction. Immediately after adding the NADPH regenerating system, 50 µL, 0 min time point sample was taken and quenched with equal volume of ice-cold methanol. Similarly further samples were taken at 10 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min and 120 min. Samples were centrifuged at 10,000 g at 4 °C for 10 min. The supernatant was analyzed by LC/MS under single ionization mode (SIM) mode using poroshell EC-C18 column (2.7 µm, 2.1 × 50 mm), flow rate 0.3 mL/min (Agilent) and gradient elution of water with 0.1% formic acid (solvent A) and Acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid (solvent B) over 21 min, where gradient elution composition was 0 min – 5% B, 1 min – 5% B, 11 min – 95% B, 15 min – 95% B, 17 min – 5% B and 21 min – 5% B. For [19F]FDT, 529 µL potassium phosphate buffer, 32 µL human, pooled liver microsomes (stock 10 mg/mL) and 3 µL of FDT (final concentration 3 µM) were used. After incubating the reaction mix at 37˚C for 5 min, 36 µL of NADPH regenerating system was added to initiate the reaction. 50 µL samples were taken at 0 min, 2.5 min, 5 min, 10 min, 20 min, 40 min and 80 min and reactions were quenched by adding equal amount of ice-cold acetonitrile and kept on ice. Samples were then centrifuged at 10, 000 g at 4 °C for 10 min and supernatant was analyzed by LC-MS under SIM mode using AdvancedBio glycan column (2.7 µm, 4.6 ×250 mm), flow rate 0.5 mL/min and gradient elution of acetonitrile (solvent A) and water with 50 mM ammonium formate, pH 4.5 (solvent B); gradient composition: 0.01 min – 32% B, 15 min – 38% B, 20 min – 32% B and 25 min – 32% B.
Toxicity studies
For toxicity studies, 2 g of [19F]-FDT was synthesized and tested for quality control as described above and in Figs.39 and shipped to a contract research organization. Toxicity studies were conducted by SRI International, Biosciences Division, Menlo Park, CA, USA in rats and dogs. The experimental design is described in Tables S10, S11, respectively.
For studies in rats, male and female Sprague Dawley rats (15/sex/group) were given a single iv administration of [19F]-FDT at 1.32 mg/kg (100 times of human dose; Group 3) or 13.2 mg/kg (1000 times of human dose; Group 4) on day 7 or 1.32 mg/kg/day for 7 consecutive days (total dose 9.24 mg/kg; Group 2. A control group (15/sex; Group 1) was given 7 days of vehicle (50 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.5 with 7.5 mM MgCl2) at an equivalent dose volume of 1 mL/kg on days 1–7. Animals were euthanised on day 9 (main groups) or day 21 (recovery groups).
To assess the toxicity associated with [19F]-FDT in dogs, male and female Beagle dogs (5/sex) were given a daily iv injection of [19F]-FDT at 0.4 mg/kg/day (100 times of human dose; Group 2) for 7 consecutive days, or a single iv administration of [19F]-FDT at 0.4 or 4 mg/kg (100 and 1000 times of human dose in Groups 3 and 4, respectively) on Day 7. A control group (5/sex; Group 1), was given 7 days of vehicle (HEPES buffer, pH 7.5, 50 mM with MgCl2 7.5 mM), at an equivalent dose volume of 0.25 ml/kg on Days 1–7. Animals were sacrificed on Day 9 (3/sex/ group; main groups) or Day 21 (2/sex/group; recovery groups). The single dose administration for Groups 3–4 were initiated on Day 7 so that clinical pathology and necropsy occurred on the same calendar day for all Groups (1–4), thus allowing for sharing of vehicle control data for analysis of clinical pathology and necropsy results between the two dose regimens.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Supplementary information
Source data
Acknowledgements
We thank Becky Sloan for technical assistance with animal procedures and the Comparative Medicine Branch (NIAID) for animal handling. We thank the NIH PET Department for providing excellent technical support. We thank James Collier from the Nasmyth group (Biochemistry, University of Oxford). and Shubhashish Mukhopadhyay from the Burgess-Brown group (NDM, University of Oxford). for their assistance in larger-scale enzyme expressions in insect cells. We also thank Oxford Chemistry Department NMR and Mass Spectrometry teams for their continued support in experimentation and data analysis. Supplementary Figs. 11 (panels G,H), 35 (panel A) and 36 (panel B), created with BioRender.com, released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International license. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Programs of the NIAID, NHLBI, CC and NIBIB, the CAPS program of NIH (1ZIAAI001164 to CEB), the EPSRC University of Oxford Impact Acceleration Account (EP/R511742/1 to BGD) and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (OPP1034408 to JLF, CEB, BGD). The content of this publication does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does the mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The Chemistry theme at the Rosalind Franklin Institute is supported by the EPSRC (V011359/1(P) to BGD).
Author contributions
D.M.W., M.L.S., D.M.S., E.D., P.H., L.E.V., J.L.F., C.A.S., J.A.T., L.J.F., and C.E.B. designed and implemented the various animal studies; R.M.N.K., Y.M.A., G.A.M., F.B., R.S., F.D’H., D.O.K., D.A., B.G.D., and N.S.M. designed and performed the radiochemistry; R.M.N.K., F.D’H., S.S.L., D.A., and B.G.D designed and implemented the various cold chemistry experiments; R.M.N.K. and N.Y. established the insect cell expression system via virus bacmid DNA construction, virus amplification, and initial expression and purification; R.M.N.K., S.S.L., Y.G., and R.R. expressed enzymes and performed kinetic analyzes; K.M.B. performed initial syntheses and proof-of-principle experiments in prototype probes; W.D., M.K.P., F.G., and A.G.W. analyzed PET/CT scans; R.M.N.K., L.E.V., B.G.D., and C.E.B. drafted the manuscript; all authors approved the final version of the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Ismaheel Lawal and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Data availability
Raw NMR spectra, small molecules and protein LC-MS raw data, sequence files and radio-HPLC raw data has been deposited in the Zenodo repository (10.5281/zenodo.10624807). PET-CT data related to infected and naïve marmosets has been deposited into Accessclinical data@NIAID with the link: https://accessclinicaldata.niaid.nih.gov/study-viewer/clinical_trials/MARM-TB-FDT. Source data are provided with this paper.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: R. M. Naseer Khan, Yong-Mo Ahn, Gwendolyn A. Marriner, Laura E. Via.
Contributor Information
Clifton E. Barry, III, Email: CBARRY@niaid.nih.gov.
Benjamin G. Davis, Email: Ben.Davis@rfi.ac.uk
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-024-48691-6.
References
- 1.WorldHealthOrganization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2023. (Geneva (Switzerland), 2023).
- 2.Maitra A, et al. Early diagnosis and effective treatment regimens are the keys to tackle antimicrobial resistance in tuberculosis (TB): A report from Euroscicon’s international TB Summit 2016. Virulence. 2017;8:1005–1024. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2016.1256536. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bhoil A, et al. Challenges using PET-CT for international multicentre coordinated research projects in developing countries. Nucl. Med. Commun. 2019;40:93–95. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gallach M, et al. Addressing global inequities in positron emission tomography-computed tomography (pet-ct) for cancer management: a statistical model to guide strategic planning. Med Sci. Monit. 2020;26:e926544–e926544. doi: 10.12659/MSM.926544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.TheInternationalAtomicEnergyAuthority. IAEA Medical imAGIng and Nuclear Medicine (IMAGINE), accessed 1/5/24, https://humanhealth.iaea.org/HHW/DBStatistics/IMAGINE.html
- 6.Gambhir SS. Molecular imaging of cancer with positron emission tomography. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;2:683–693. doi: 10.1038/nrc882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Langer A. A systematic review of PET and PET/CT in oncology: a way to personalize cancer treatment in a cost-effective manner? BMC Health Serv. Res. 2010;10:283. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim IJ, et al. Double-phase 18F-FDG PET-CT for determination of pulmonary tuberculoma activity. Eur. J. Nucl. Med Mol. Imaging. 2008;35:808–814. doi: 10.1007/s00259-007-0585-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Davis SL, et al. Noninvasive pulmonary [18F]-2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography correlates with bactericidal activity of tuberculosis drug treatment. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother. 2009;53:4879–4884. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00789-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yu WY, et al. Updates on (18)F-FDG-PET/CT as a clinical tool for tuberculosis evaluation and therapeutic monitoring. Quant. Imaging Med Surg. 2019;9:1132–1146. doi: 10.21037/qims.2019.05.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Glaudemans AW, Signore A. FDG-PET/CT in infections: the imaging method of choice? Eur. J. Nucl. Med Mol. Imaging. 2010;37:1986–1991. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1587-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sathekge M, et al. FDG uptake in lymph-nodes of HIV+ and tuberculosis patients: implications for cancer staging. Q J. Nucl. Med Mol. Imaging. 2010;54:698–703. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Corstens FH, van der Meer JW. Nuclear medicine’s role in infection and inflammation. Lancet. 1999;354:765–770. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)06070-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Treglia G. The role of 18F-FDG PET for COVID-19 infection: myth versus reality. Clin. Transl. Imaging. 2020;8:125–126. doi: 10.1007/s40336-020-00367-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Weinstein EA, et al. Noninvasive determination of 2-[18F]-fluoroisonicotinic acid hydrazide pharmacokinetics by positron emission tomography in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012;56:6284–6290. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01644-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Xu B, et al. Can multimodality imaging using 18F-FDG/18F-FLT PET/CT benefit the diagnosis and management of patients with pulmonary lesions? Eur. J. Nucl. Med Mol. Imaging. 2011;38:285–292. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1625-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Elbein AD, Pan YT, Pastuszak I, Carroll D. New insights on trehalose: a multifunctional molecule. Glycobiology. 2003;13:17r–27r. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwg047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Woodruff PJ, et al. Trehalose is required for growth of Mycobacterium smegmatis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:28835–28843. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M313103200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bloch H. Virulence of mycobacteria. Bibl. Tuberculosea. 1955;9:49–61. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kilburn JO, Takayama K, Armstrong EL. Synthesis of trehalose dimycolate (cord factor) by a cell-free system of Mycobacteriumsmegmatis. Biochemical Biophysical Res. Commun. 1982;108:132–139. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(82)91841-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Backus KM, et al. Uptake of unnatural trehalose analogs as a reporter for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2011;7:228–235. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hodges HL, Brown RA, Crooks JA, Weibel DB, Kiessling LL. Imaging mycobacterial growth and division with a fluorogenic probe. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 2018;115:5271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1720996115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Holmes NJ, et al. A FRET-Based Fluorogenic Trehalose Dimycolate Analogue for Probing Mycomembrane-Remodeling Enzymes of Mycobacteria. ACS Omega. 2019;4:4348–4359. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b00130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kamariza, M. et al. Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in sputum with a solvatochromic trehalose probe. Sci. Transl. Med.10, eaam6310 10.1126/scitranslmed.aam6310 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 25.Dutta AK, et al. Trehalose conjugation enhances toxicity of photosensitizers against mycobacteria. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019;5:644–650. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.8b00962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sugars and Proteins, B.G. Davis, XXV International Carbohydrate Symposium, Tokyo, August 1, 2010.
- 27.Khan, R. Development of tuberculosis imaging probes based on sugars and proteins DPhil thesis, University of Oxford, (2020).
- 28.Ishihara R, et al. Molecular cloning, sequencing and expression of cDNA encoding human trehalase1The sequence data reported in this paper have been submitted to the DDBJ, EMBL and GenBank Sequence Databases with Accession Number AB000824.1. Gene. 1997;202:69–74. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(97)00455-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Withers SG, Rupitz K, Street IP. 2-Deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glycosyl fluorides. A new class of specific mechanism-based glycosidase inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:7929–7932. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)68421-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Petroni D, Menichetti L, Poli M. Historical and radiopharmaceutical relevance of [18F]FDG. J. Radioanalytical Nucl. Chem. 2020;323:1017–1031. doi: 10.1007/s10967-020-07013-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tewson TJ, Welch MJ, Raichle ME. [18F]-labeled 3-deoxy-3-fluoro-D-glucose: synthesis and preliminary biodistribution data. J. Nucl. Med. 1978;19:1339–1345. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jiao H, et al. Trehalase gene as a molecular signature of dietary diversification in mammals. Mol. Biol. Evolution. 2019;36:2171–2183. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nigudkar SS, Demchenko AV. Stereocontrolled 1,2-cis glycosylation as the driving force of progress in synthetic carbohydrate chemistry. Chem. Sci. 2015;6:2687–2704. doi: 10.1039/C5SC00280J. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Qu Q, Lee S-J, Boos W. TreT, a novel trehalose glycosyltransferring synthase of the hyperthermophilic archaeon thermococcus litoralis. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:47890–47897. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M404955200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kouril T, Zaparty M, Marrero J, Brinkmann H, Siebers B. A novel trehalose synthesizing pathway in the hyperthermophilic crenarchaeon thermoproteus tenax: the unidirectional TreT pathway. Arch. Microbiol. 2008;190:355. doi: 10.1007/s00203-008-0377-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Urbanek BL, et al. Chemoenzymatic synthesis of trehalose analogues: rapid access to chemical probes for investigating mycobacteria. Chembiochem. 2014;15:2066–2070. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201402288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Rundell SR, et al. Deoxyfluoro-D-trehalose (FDTre) analogues as potential PET probes for imaging mycobacterial infection. Org. Biomolecular Chem. 2016;14:8598–8609. doi: 10.1039/C6OB01734G. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Peña-Zalbidea S, et al. Chemoenzymatic radiosynthesis of 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-trehalose ([18F]-2-FDTre): A PET radioprobe for in vivo tracing of trehalose metabolism. Carbohydr. Res. 2019;472:16–22. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2018.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ryu SI, Park CS, Cha J, Woo EJ, Lee SB. A novel trehalose-synthesizing glycosyltransferase from Pyrococcus horikoshii: molecular cloning and characterization. Biochem Biophys. Res Commun. 2005;329:429–436. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.01.149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Giaever HM, Styrvold OB, Kaasen I, Strom AR. Biochemical and genetic characterization of osmoregulatory trehalose synthesis in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 1988;170:2841–2849. doi: 10.1128/jb.170.6.2841-2849.1988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gosselin S, Alhussaini M, Streiff MB, Takabayashi K, Palcic MM. A continuous spectrophotometric assay for glycosyltransferases. Anal. Biochem. 1994;220:92–97. doi: 10.1006/abio.1994.1303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wakelin SJ, et al. Dirty little secrets”—Endotoxin contamination of recombinant proteins. Immunol. Lett. 2006;106:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.imlet.2006.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Iwanaga S. Biochemical principle of Limulus test for detecting bacterial endotoxins. Proc. Jpn Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2007;83:110–119. doi: 10.2183/pjab.83.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schwarz H, Schmittner M, Duschl A, Horejs-Hoeck J. Residual endotoxin contaminations in recombinant proteins are sufficient to activate human cd1c+ dendritic cells. PloS one. 2014;9:e113840. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Luckow VA, Lee SC, Barry GF, Olins PO. Efficient generation of infectious recombinant baculoviruses by site-specific transposon-mediated insertion of foreign genes into a baculovirus genome propagated in Escherichia coli. J. Virol. 1993;67:4566. doi: 10.1128/jvi.67.8.4566-4579.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Errey JC, et al. Mechanistic insight into enzymatic glycosyl transfer with retention of configuration through analysis of glycomimetic inhibitors. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 2010;49:1234–1237. doi: 10.1002/anie.200905096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Carillo P, et al. A fluorometric assay for trehalose in the picomole range. Plant Methods. 2013;9:21. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-9-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kan-Sutton C, Jagannath C, Hunter RL. Trehalose 6,6′-dimycolate on the surface of mycobacterium tuberculosis modulates surface marker expression for antigen presentation and costimulation in murine macrophages. Microbes Infect. 2009;11:40–48. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2008.10.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Via LE, et al. Differential virulence and disease progression following mycobacterium tuberculosis complex infection of the common marmoset (callithrix jacchus) Infect. Immun. 2013;81:2909–2919. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00632-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Dheda K, Barry CE, 3rd, Maartens G. Tuberculosis. Lancet. 2016;387:1211–1226. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00151-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Vijay S, et al. Risk factors associated with default among new smear positive TB patients treated under DOTS in India. PloS one. 2010;5:e10043–e10043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gleeson L, et al. Recurrent TB in Ireland is predominantly due to relapsed infection and is frequently associated with poor compliance with therapy. Eur. Respiratory J. 2016;48:PA2668. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Matthews PM, Rabiner EA, Passchier J, Gunn RN. Positron emission tomography molecular imaging for drug development. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2012;73:175–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.04085.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Coleman MT, et al. PET/CT imaging reveals a therapeutic response to oxazolidinones in macaques and humans with tuberculosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6:265ra167. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Ankrah AO, et al. PET/CT imaging of mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clin. Transl. Imaging. 2016;4:131–144. doi: 10.1007/s40336-016-0164-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Peña JC, Ho W-Z. Monkey models of tuberculosis: lessons learned. Infect. Immun. 2015;83:852–862. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02850-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lin PL, et al. Sterilization of granulomas is common in active and latent tuberculosis despite within-host variability in bacterial killing. Nat. Med. 2014;20:75–79. doi: 10.1038/nm.3412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sasindran S, Torrelles J. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and inflammation: what is beneficial for the host and for the bacterium? Front. Microbiol. 2011;2:2. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Malherbe ST, et al. Persisting positron emission tomography lesion activity and mycobacterium tuberculosis mRNA after tuberculosis cure. Nat. Med. 2016;22:1094–1100. doi: 10.1038/nm.4177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Sánchez-Montalvá A, et al. Usefulness of FDG PET/CT in the management of tuberculosis. PloS one. 2019;14:e0221516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Limsrivilai J, et al. Validation of models using basic parameters to differentiate intestinal tuberculosis from Crohn’s disease: A multicenter study from Asia. PloS one. 2020;15:e0242879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Kalscheuer R, et al. Trehalose-recycling ABC transporter LpqY-SugA-SugB-SugC is essential for virulence of mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:21761–21766. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014642108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sorlin AM, et al. Chemoenzymatic Syntheses of Fluorine-18-Labeled Disaccharides from [18F] FDG Yield Potent Sensors of Living Bacteria In Vivo. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145:17632–17642. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c03338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mestrom L, et al. Anomeric selectivity of trehalose transferase with rare l-sugars. ACS Catal. 2020;10:8835–8839. doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c02117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Weinstein EA, et al. Imaging Enterobacteriaceae infection in vivo with 18F-fluorodeoxysorbitol positron emission tomography. Sci. Transl. Med. 2014;6:259ra146–259ra146. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3009815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Carter SG, Karl DW. Inorganic phosphate assay with malachite green: An improvement and evaluation. J. Biochemical Biophysical Methods. 1982;7:7–13. doi: 10.1016/0165-022X(82)90031-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Via LE, et al. Infection dynamics and response to chemotherapy in a rabbit model of tuberculosis using [18F] 2-fluoro-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother. 2012;56:4391–4402. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00531-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.White, A. G. et al. Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a Tool for Studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection and Treatment in Non-human Primates. J. Vis. Exp. 127, 56375 10.3791/56375 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 69.Sayed MHM, Abdelnaim AK, Mohamadien NR. Intrapatient variability of 18F-FDG uptake in normal tissues. J. Clin. Imaging Sci. 2022;12:37. doi: 10.25259/JCIS_23_2022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Ordonez Alvaro, et al. Radioiodinated DPA-713 Imaging Correlates with Bactericidal Activity of Tuberculosis Treatments in Mice. Antimicrobial Agents Chemother. 2014;59:642–649. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04180-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Brugarolas P, et al. Development of a PET radioligand for potassium channels to image CNS demyelination. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:607. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18747-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Riemann B, Schäfers K, Schober O, Schäfers M. Small animal PET in preclinical studies: opportunities and challenges. Q J. Nucl. Med Mol. Imaging. 2008;52:215. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Ackley, D. C., Rockich, K. T. & Baker, T. R. in Optimization in Drug Discovery: In Vitro Methods (eds Zhengyin Yan & Gary W. Caldwell) 151–162 (Humana Press, 2004).
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw NMR spectra, small molecules and protein LC-MS raw data, sequence files and radio-HPLC raw data has been deposited in the Zenodo repository (10.5281/zenodo.10624807). PET-CT data related to infected and naïve marmosets has been deposited into Accessclinical data@NIAID with the link: https://accessclinicaldata.niaid.nih.gov/study-viewer/clinical_trials/MARM-TB-FDT. Source data are provided with this paper.