Long waiting lists have become symbols of the inefficiency of hospital services all over the world, particularly in publicly funded hospitals.1 After decades of attempts, we still do not know what it would take to solve the problem. The dynamics of waiting lists are not well understood.2 Also, the potential productive capacity of the hospitals is hard to estimate, as hospital production is very complex. We believe that most hospitals operate close to their capacity limits, given the way they are organised and given the present methods of coordination and control. We do not know if these methods are the best, or if significant improvements could be achieved by employing other methods.
One way to alleviate the burden for patients waiting weeks or months for admission would be to give them the date of admission right away. A firm date would be of great practical value and probably make long waits less stressful. This requires a booked admission system. An operational research study of such a booked admission system for cardiac surgery is published in this issue (p 280).3 Based on a mathematical model and routinely collected data on more than 7000 patients treated with cardiac surgery in a London hospital, the authors investigate the impact of a simple, hypothetical booking system on the requirement for intensive care beds after surgery. The study shows that due to substantial variations in length of stay, booking is likely to produce frequent operational problems. To avoid cancellations and keep the chances of operational overload to 5% or less, a reserve intensive care bed capacity of more than 30% would be needed. This is possible, but expensive. The authors conclude that even if booked admission systems might work well in some areas, for instance day case surgery, serious operational problems might occur in other areas, in particular if the hospital is operating close to its capacity limits.
The study is well designed, and the conclusions seem to be well founded. The study also shows that operational research is well suited to deal with operational problems in hospitals. It is tempting, however, to go beyond the scope of the study and ask: What is the amount of reserve capacity in the hospital today, not only in terms of intensive care beds, but also in terms of operating teams and theatres? Obviously, if the length of stay cannot be predicted before admission, the only way to reduce the need for reserve intensive care beds would be to adjust the number of operations per day according to the number of occupied postoperative beds. This would require reserve capacity in terms of operating teams and theatres. Therefore, a considerable amount of reserve capacity is needed, even if admissions are not booked. How much would booking worsen the situation? Is it possible to reduce the additional need for reserve capacity, for instance by sharing reserve capacity with other specialties? To answer this, another operational research study would be needed.
Operational research is concerned with the conduct and coordination of activities within complex systems, using tools like mathematical modelling, queuing theory, and simulation to study the consequences of alternative courses of action and to optimise performance of the system. Starting with military and industrial applications during and shortly after the second world war, it soon spread to other areas, including hospitals and health services. The European working group on operational research applied to health services was established in 1975.4
Many hospital applications deal, one way or another, with problems related to the uncertainty and variability in demand for resources and services. A typical application is reported from an outpatient clinic that suffered from a high degree of congestion, with patients often waiting over half an hour, and sometimes much longer, for consultations that lasted a few minutes.5 The investigators used a simple queuing model to analyse the situation, and suggested a revised appointment system. As is often the case, the challenge was not only to devise an improved solution, but also to convince the people concerned that this solution would work. However, by using simple and instructive graphical presentations, the investigators were able to convince hospital managers and medical staff that substantial reductions of patient waiting time would be possible without significantly increasing doctors' idle time. The new system was adopted with great success, and similar solutions were later applied to other clinics in the hospital.
Other applications include scheduling admissions,6 evaluation of priority strategies,7 allocation of operating theatres,8 capacity planning for intensive care units,9 bed capacity analysis and planning,10 and blood bank management.11 In these and other areas, operational research can provide not only numerical answers to problems, but also insights into the nature of the problem, thereby helping hospital staff and managers to ask the right questions, make sense of the answers, and look in the right direction for solutions.
Compared with many other organisations, hospitals have been slow in adopting operational research as a means to improve their performance. Applications are scattered and the results not always used, even if they are relevant and reliable. The implication is that, so far, hospitals have largely failed to use one of the most potent methods currently available for improving the performance of complex organisations.
Information in practice p 280
References
- 1.Gauld R, Derrett S. Solving the surgical waiting list problem? New Zealand's “booking system.”. Int J Health Plann Mgmt. 2000;15:259–272. doi: 10.1002/hpm.596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Frankel S, West R, editors. Rationing and rationality in the National Health Service: the presistence of waiting lists. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1993. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gallivan S, Utley M, Treasure T, Valencia O. Booked inpatient admission and hospital capacity: mathematical modelling study. BMJ. 2002;324:280–282. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7332.280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.ORAHS The European Working Group on Operational Research Applied to Health Services, www.soton.ac.uk/∼orahsweb/ (accessed 23 January 2002).
- 5.Worthington D, Brahimi M. Improving out-patient admission systems. Int J Health Care Quality Assurance. 1993;6:18–23. doi: 10.1108/09526869310025644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hancock WM, Warner DM, Heda S, Fuchs P. Admission scheduling and control systems. In: Griffith JR, Hancock WM, Munson FC, editors. Cost control in hospitals. Ann Arbor: Health Administration Press; 1976. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gallivan S. Evaluation of priority strategies for hospital admission. In: De Angelis V, Ricciardi N, Storchi G, editors. Monitoring, evaluating and planning health services. Singapore: World Scientific; 1999. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Vissers JMH, Bril M, de Roy J. Waiting lists as tool of management for operating theatre allocation. In: Matson E, editor. Operational research applied to health service. Proceedings of the 23rd annual meeting of the EURO-W. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology; 1977. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ridge JC, Jones SK, Nielsen MS, Shahani AK. Capacity planning for intensive care units. Eur J Operational Res. 1998;105:346–355. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Green LV, Nguyen V. Strategies for cutting hospital beds: The impact on patient service. HSR: Health Services Res. 2001;38:421–422. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.De Angelis V, Ricciardi N, Storchi G. A LP model for blood usage planning. In: De Angelis V, Ricciardi N, Storchi G, editors. Monitoring, evaluating and planning health services. Singapore: World Scientific; 1999. [Google Scholar]