Abstract
Background
Proprioception, the ability to sense the body’s position and movement, is essential for athletic performance and physical well-being. The literature highlights the importance of proprioceptive training in rehabilitation, sports performance, injury prevention, and motor function enhancement. Targeted training programs can improve balance, coordination, motor learning, and overall physical performance. This systematic review aimed to examine the effects of proprioceptive training methods on sports and athletic performance.
Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted using the Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus databases, and a literature review was performed based on the PICO criteria outlined in the abstract and title.
Results
Following the search, 178 articles were identified using relevant keywords, of which 19 directly addressed sports performance and were included in this study. The findings revealed that proprioceptive training had a positive influence on various aspects of athletic performance, including physiological capacity, balance, explosive strength, speed, agility, postural stability, knee joint position sense, muscle activation, reduction of chronic joint instability, dribbling, passing, and technical ball-control skills.
Conclusions
These results indicate that proprioceptive training can be an effective strategy for experts and coaches to enhance athletes’ physical performance. Primarily, proprioceptive exercises should be used inside and outside the training sessions to enable athletes to interact more effectively with their bodies, reduce the risk of injury, and improve power transfer.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13102-024-00936-z.
Keywords: Athletic performance, Proprioceptive exercise, Sports rehabilitation, Sports performance, Sports and proprioception
Introduction
Body movements are regulated by the somatosensory and sensorimotor systems, which work together to provide efficient proprioception and a sense of joint position awareness that goes beyond the feeling of movement [1]. Proprioception is the capacity to sense and comprehend the body’s position and movement, encompassing balance, motion, and environmental navigation [2, 3]. Therefore, improving movement patterns is vital for improving body awareness and coordination, which can significantly enhance motor skills [4, 5]. Several studies have reported the effects of proprioceptive training on balance, trunk control, gait speed, essential functional mobility [6], motor, somatosensory, and sensorimotor functions [4], balance [7], and knee joint function [8]. Proprioceptive training and exercise specialisation can improve physical performance and reduce injury prevention in sports.
Proprioception significantly affects an individual’s ability to excel in sports, a crucial aspect of athletic performance [7, 9, 10]. Proprioceptive training is a form of exercise that focuses on improving proprioception, which is the body’s ability to sense and interpret stimuli regarding position, movement, and balance [11]. Therefore, understanding body positioning and movements to improve performance, injury prevention, and overall playing skills has become increasingly important. Proprioceptive training is an effective method for running, changing direction, jumping, turning on one leg, stabilizing joints, activating joint position and muscle control, preventing and rehabilitating injuries, and improving motor performance [4, 5]. In conclusion, as proprioceptive training helps athletes adapt to changing situations [12], coaches and performance practitioners focus on improving balance, stability, and body control, which are crucial for athletes to perform optimally in the field.
Proprioception in sports is widely recognised for its role in injury prevention, rehabilitation, talent identification, and performance enhancement [13]. Improved balance, which is closely linked to proprioception, is associated with enhanced athletic performance and reduced lower limb injuries [14]. Research indicates that Proprioceptive training can stabilise joints, prevent injuries, and improve dynamic neuromuscular control in athletes, thereby positively affecting their performance [15, 16]. Proprioceptive training enhances dynamic neuromuscular control in athletes such as fencers by stabilising the ankle joint and preventing injuries [7]. Moreover, core proprioceptive training has been found to improve the quality of executive functions in young female basketball players, highlighting the broader cognitive benefits of proprioceptive training in sports performance [17]. Furthermore, proprioceptive training has been associated with improved shoulder stability, throwing performance in water polo, and shoulder proprioceptive acuity, which is crucial for achieving higher sports performance levels [18, 19]. Proprioception accuracy is crucial for knee stability, efficient movement execution, and injury prevention in various sports [20, 21]. Moreover, long-term neuromuscular training positively impacts ankle joint position sense in athletes, highlighting the enduring benefits of proprioceptive training in sports [22].
The field of sports science necessitates further exploration and study concerning proprioceptive training due to the current lack of comprehensive research in this area. Despite the recognized significance of proprioception in sports performance and injury prevention, more targeted research is needed to address specific knowledge gaps and enhance practical applications. Lauersen et al. [23] conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of exercise interventions for preventing sports injuries, revealing that proprioceptive training reduces injury risks more effectively than interventions such as stretching, underscoring its potential importance in sports injury prevention strategies. Federici et al. [24] identified common flaws in proprioceptive training in sports, paving the way for future improvements in training methodologies. McBain et al. [25] highlighted the lack of research on intermediate outcomes in non-contact sports and upper extremity injuries, emphasizing a critical gap in current knowledge. This underscores the need for more studies on applying proprioceptive training in various sports contexts to address the injury risks associated with upper-extremity movements. The primary objective of this study was to systematically document various interventions employed to improve sports performance. Additionally, we aimed to emphasize the methods used to quantify the impact of proprioceptive training on sports performance and evaluate the efficacy of proprioceptive training as a tool in athletic settings for improving motor function and performance.
Materials and methods
Objective
This study presents a systematic review of peer-reviewed scientific articles investigating the effects of proprioceptive training on athletic performance characteristics in athletes.
Protocol and registration
The systematic literature review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Fig. 1) [26].
Fig. 1.
PRISMA flow diagram template for systematic reviews. The new design is adapted from flow diagrams proposed by Moher
Eligibility criteria
This study presents a systematic review of peer-reviewed scientific articles investigating the effects of proprioceptive training on athletic performance characteristics in athletes. This review focused solely on studies examining the impact of proprioceptive training interventions or training on athletes’ sports performance, encompassing functional and structural aspects within their research protocols. Only experimental studies were included in this study. No limits were placed on the sex, age, sports type, or athletic level of eligible articles. This study only included athletic participants. We had articles that utilised applied methodologies to provide perspective.
Search strategy
A comprehensive search was conducted using a combination of specific keywords likely to be found in the titles or abstracts of studies investigating the sports performance of proprioceptive training. The research comprehensively searched relevant scientific studies published between 01 January 2010 and 01 October 2022 in the Web of Science (WOS), PubMed, and Scopus databases. Keywords were grouped into two distinct categories: those designed to retrieve studies utilising proprioceptive training intervention as an exercise technique or objective (encompassing terms like “central stabilization”, “eyes group exercise”, and “feet group exercise”) and those focused on the balance or injury risk of proprioceptive training intervention. Second, the physiological, physical, and technical outcomes of proprioceptive training include dribbling, explosive power, and strength. This study used ‘’proprioceptive training’’, ‘’proprioceptive exercise and ‘’proprioception training’’ The reference lists of the identified articles were thoroughly examined.
Eligibility assessment
Two assessors were assigned to each intervention (see the authors’ contributions). Two assessors evaluated the articles separately by examining titles and abstracts to determine if they met the criteria for inclusion in the analysis. The criteria were based on four factors: population, intervention, comparison, and outcome (PICO). The assessors participated in a discussion and agreed to any disagreements regarding including publications. Subsequently, the two authors evaluated the complete copies of the listed articles based on the same criteria to determine their final eligibility (See Table 1).
Table 1.
TESTEX methodological quality assessment
| Studies | Criteria | Total TESTEX Point | Methodological quality |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | |||
| Gidu et al., 2022 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | Excellent |
| Souglis et al., 2022 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | Excellent |
| Harry-Leite et al., 2022 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | Good |
| Viran&Canlı, 2022 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | Good |
| Achilleopoulos et al., 2022 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | Moderate |
| Beydağı & Talu, 2021 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | Good |
| Antohe et al., 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | Moderate |
| Domeika et al., 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | Good |
| Rhodes et al., 2020 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | Good |
| Zacharakis et al., 2020 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | Good |
| Yoo et al., 2018 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 11 | Good |
| De Vasconcelos et al., 2020 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | Good |
| Ondra et al., 2017 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 10 | Good |
| Moreria et al., 2017 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | Moderate |
| Winter et al., 2014 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | Moderate |
| Zouita et al., 2013 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | Good |
| Romero-Franco et al., 2013 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | Good |
| Nikolaos et al., 2012 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | Moderate |
| Evangelos et al., 2012 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | Moderate |
TESTEX scale criteria: 1; Eligibility criteria specified (1 point), 2; Randomization specified (1 point), 3; Allocation concealment (1 point), 4; Groups similar at baseline (1 point), 5; Blinding of assessor (1 point), 6; No point – if withdrawals are >15%, 1 Point – if adherence>85%, 1 Point – if adverse events are reported, 1 Point – if exercise attendance is reported, Total possible (3 point), 7; Intention-to-treat analysis (1 point), 8; 1 Point – if between-group statistical comparisons are reported for the primary outcome measure of interest, 1 Point – if between-group statistical comparisons are reported for at least one secondary outcome measure, Between-group statistical comparisons reported (2 point, 9; Point measures and measures of variability for all reported outcome measures (1 point), 10; Activity monitoring in control groups (1 point), 11; Relative exercise intensity remained constant (1 point), 12; Exercise volume and energy expenditure (1 point). Quality points; < 4 as “poor”, 4–7 as “moderate”, 8–11 as “good” and > 11 as excellent
Outcome measures
The primary outcome of interest was to evaluate changes in the measured performance parameters of proprioceptive training practices, as measured by official or validated instruments, before and after the intervention. This review included 19 studies investigating the effects of proprioceptive training on sports performance as an independent variable of the intervention strategy (Table 3). Five hundred fifty-six participants from different branches, aged between 12 and 24 years, participated in this study. Most studies have focused on the effects of proprioceptive training on balance, postural stability, knee joint position sense, muscle activation, and the reduction of chronic joint instability. Some studies have investigated its effects on flexibility, explosive strength, speed, agility, dribbling, passing, and technical ball control skills.
Data extraction
Following the data search, the relevant data were obtained based on the study format. This comprised the following information: (1) author’s name, nationality, and year of publication; (2) sample group; (3) treatment group; (4) duration of intervention; (5) certified instructor; (6) outcome measures; and (7) results. The data were then structured into a standard format, and a database was developed by one reviewer, who subsequently verified it with the help of two additional reviewers.
Quality assessment
The methodological quality of the RCTs was assessed using the Testex Scale [27]. The Testex scale, which consists of 12 items, was developed to evaluate the methodological quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Scores < four were considered “poor quality”, scores between 4 and 7 were considered “moderate quality”, scores between 8 and 11 were considered “good quality”, and scores above 11 were considered “excellent quality” [28]. (Table 2).
Table 2.
PICO criteria
| PICO | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Population | Athletes |
| Intervention | Proprioceptive training application for athletes |
| Comparison |
Control group The experimental group (proprioceptive training, central stabilization, regular training, eyes group exercise, feet group exercise) |
| Outcome | Physical and physiological responses (development of technical skill (dribbling, passing juggling ball), speed, explosive strength, maximal strength, agility, balance, postural stability, shoulder stability, knee joint position sense, muscle activation, reduction of chronic joint instability and physiological capacity) |
Results
Study selection
The initial search yielded many articles, necessitating rigorous exclusion criteria applied consistently by two independent reviewers. Despite these efforts, the field’s diverse terminology and keyword usage have resulted in many irrelevant studies (see Fig. 1). This finding highlights the challenges associated with conducting systematic reviews of this field. Data were synthesised and standardised after retrieving relevant studies through a database search. A standardised search yielded studies from two databases with a significant overlap that fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Careful comparison of the merged references: Only published studies were included. This study was limited to peer-reviewed journals that were published in English. A systematic review of the literature was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [26] (Fig. 1). After obtaining the article results from the databases, titles and abstracts were examined to identify articles related to the keywords. The criteria for including articles in this review were determined using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) approach [29] (Table 2). Following the search, 178 articles were identified using acceptable keywords. Of these, 19 research articles specifically focused on sports performance were selected for inclusion in this study (Fig. 1).
Study characteristics
Overall, the study included 621 participants between the ages of 12 and 24 who engaged in various sports, including soccer (263), basketball (132), handball (22), volleyball (18), taekwondo (30), skaters (28), fencing (19) and athletes (109). This study aimed to examine the acute effects of proprioceptive training. The application times for the remaining 18 studies varied from a minimum of six weeks to a maximum of 20 weeks. These studies show that weekly training days range from 3 to 5 days. The duration of the proprioceptive training sessions ranged from 10 to 60 min. One study was conducted as an acute effect. The measurement methods used in these studies and the results obtained are explained in detail in Table 3.
Table 3.
Physical and physiological responses to proprioceptive training practice
| Reference | Sample | Treatment Group | Duration of Intervention (weeks/frequency) |
Certificated Instructor | Outcome Measure | Results | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gidu et al., 2022 |
Male Soccer Players (N=96) |
EG=48 (14.2±0.4) CG=48 (14.0±0.0) |
8 weeks | 2 days/30 min | NA |
Static Balance Test Vertical, Horizontal, Lateral Jumping Test Arrowhead Agility Test Short Dribbling Test |
Proprioceptive training significantly improved balance, explosive strength, agility, and dribbling skills in male football players. |
| Souglis et al., 2022 |
Female Soccer Players (N=48) |
IG=24 (23.88±3.01) CG=24 (24.4±2.84) |
16 weeks | 5 days/20 min | NA |
Body Fat Measures VO2 Max Test Agility Ladder Drills Test Illinois Agility Test Juggling, Heading, Shooting, Passing, Dribbling, Dribbling and Passing Tests |
Proprioceptive training has improved the physiological capacities and shooting, short and long passing, heading front and side, and juggling technical skills of female soccer players. |
| Harry-Leite et al., 2022 |
Male Athletes (N=60) |
SP=30 (19.4±1.2) BP=30 (20.1±2.4) |
Acute Effects | NA | YES |
Balance Error System Score Test Y-Balance Test Assessment of Joint Position Sense |
The significance of both proprioceptive and non-specific exercise sessions in enhancing knee joint position sense and balance cannot be overstated. However, proprioceptive exercises are more effective at improving joint position sense than non-specific exercises. |
|
Viran & Canlı, 2022 |
Soccer Players (N=30) |
PTG=11 (NA) CG=10 (NA) |
8 weeks | 3 days/25–30 min | NA |
20-Meter Sprint Test Pro-Agility Test Countermovement Jump Test Core Endurance Test Alternate Wall Toss Test Y Balance Test Mor-Christian General Soccer Ability Skill Test Loughborough Test |
There was no significant improvement in hand-eye coordination, vertical jump, core endurance, agility, sprint and balance performance. A significant improvement was observed in pass (shot) and ball control technical performance characteristics. |
| Achilleopoulos et al., 2022 |
Youth Female Volleyball Players (N=18) |
EG= 10 (NA) CG=8 (NA) |
8 weeks | 3 days/ 19–28 min | NA |
Dynamic Balance Test Technical Skill Tests |
8-week proprioception training improved dynamic balance and service and passing technical skills in volleyball players. |
|
Beydağı & Talu, 2021 |
Professional Male Soccer Players (N=20) |
PG=20 (20.55±3.55) | 6 weeks | 3 days/ 10–15 min | YES | Static and Dynamic Balance Tests | Proprioceptive exercises provided improvement in all of the static balance parameters of the football players. In the dynamic balance parameters, it was seen that there was an improvement in other parameters except the one-leg stance position. |
| Antohe et al., 2020 |
Junior Handball Players (N=22) |
EG= 22 (NA) | 15 weeks | 3 days/15–20 min | NA |
Muscle Coactivation Index Chronic Joint İnstability Assessment |
Proprioceptive exercises were found to be effective in reducing chronic joint instability and increasing muscle coactivation values in handball players. |
| Domeika et al., 2020 |
Basketball Players (N=31) |
BTG=17 (NA) CG=14 (NA) |
8 weeks | 3 days/ 20 min | NA |
Y Balance Test Postural Stability Test |
Proprioceptive training program has improved the balance of basketball players. |
| Rhodes et al., 2020 |
Soccer Players (N=16) |
PTG=8 (NA) CT=8 (NA) |
16 weeks | 5 days/10 min | NA | Biodex Dynamic Stability Test | Proprioceptive training program has improved the dynamic balance of football players. |
| Zacharakis et al., 2020 |
Basketball Players (N=55) |
EB Boys=15 (13.2±0.2) CG Boys=15 (13.2±0.1) EG Girls=13 (13.2±0.2) CG Girls=12 (13.2±0.2) |
8 weeks | 3 days/14–26 min | NA |
Dynamic and Static Balance Test Speed and Accurate Shooting Test Passing Accuracy Test Obstacle Dribbling Test Defensive Sliding Test Lay-Up Test No Ball Maneuver Running Test |
It was observed that 8 weeks of proprioceptive training improved passing accuracy in boys and girls, static balance and fast shooting in boys, and dynamic balance in girls. |
| De Vasconcelos et al., 2020 |
Fencing Athletes (N=19) |
IG=10 (16.80±2.34) CG=9 (24.00±6.65) |
12 weeks | 3 days/30 min | NA | Star Excursion Balance Test | 12-week Proprioceptive training program was able to improve dynamic neuromuscular control in fencing athletes. |
| Yoo et al., 2018 |
Taekwondo Athletes (N=30) |
PGT=10 (20.0±2.6) MSTG=10 (19.2±0.8) CG=10 (19.1±0.7) All Groups= 8 male, 2 females consisted |
6 weeks | 3 days/ 60 min | NA | Balance Test | Proprioceptive and muscle strength training have been shown to improve athletic performance and improve athletes’ skill levels in maintaining the taekwondo crane stance. |
| Ondra et al., 2017 |
Male Youth Basketball Players (N=20) |
IG=10 (17.3±1.3) CG=10 (16.5±1.8) |
20 weeks | 3 days/20 min | NA |
Lower Limb Dominancy Test Balance Stability Test |
Proprioceptive and neuromuscular training specifically for basketball players improved postural stability in both the dominant and non-dominant limbs. |
| Moreria et al., 2017 |
Young Soccer Players (N=24) |
PTG=12 (15.60±0.50) CST=12 (15.32±0.51) |
9 weeks | 3 days/16 min | NA |
Square Agility Test Sit Up Abdominal Strength Test Side Hope Balance Test Well Banks Flexibility Test Shuttle Run Speed Test |
Speed performance improved in both groups, but agility performance only improved in the proprioceptive training group. There was no significant difference in balance, abdominal strength, and flexibility performance between the two groups. |
| Winter et al., 2014 |
Young Speed Skaters (N=28) |
IG=14 (12.6±1.5) CG=14 (12.9±1.7) |
12 weeks | 5 days/15 min | NA |
Dynamic balance test (Biodex System) |
12-week Proprioceptive training program improved dynamic balance in young speed skaters |
| Zouita et al., 2013 |
Athletes (N=16) |
FIG=8 (21.56±2.27) NIG=8 (20.62±1.5) |
8 weeks | 3 days/20–30 min | NA |
The Balance Master System Static Balance Assessment Isokinetic Measurement |
Both groups showed an increase in maximal strength and a decrease in plantar flexion acceleration and deceleration times. However, better stability was observed in the injured group than in the healthy group. |
| Romero-Franco et al., 2013 |
Sprinter Athletes (N=33) |
EG=16 (21.18±4.48) CG=17 (22.5 ±5.12) |
6 weeks | 3 days/30 min | NA |
Squat Jump Test Countermovement Jump Test Stabiometry Test 30-meter Sprint Test |
Proprioceptive training improved medial-lateral postural balance and jump performance in athletes. No improvement seen in speed. |
| Nikolaos et al., 2012 |
Basketball Players (N=26) |
EG=13 (22.69±0.70) CG=13 (21.61±0.71) |
12 weeks | NA | NA | Passing Assessment Test | Proprioception training improved passing technique skills in basketball players |
| Evangelos et al., 2012 |
Soccer Players (N=29) |
EG= 15 (16.83±0.24) CG=14 (16.60±0.22) |
10 Weeks | NA | NA |
Jug 200, Jug Body 1, Jog Body 2 Tests Speed Dribbling Test Long and Short Passing Test Shooting Test |
Proprioception training improved shot and long passing and jug ball technique skills in soccer players |
EG: Exercise Group, PTG: Proprioceptive Training Group, MSTG= Muscular Strength Group, CST: Central Stabilization, EB: Experimental Boys, Experimental Girls: EG, IG: Intervention Group, Experimental Groups: EG, Control Groups: CG, Min: Minute, NA: Not Available, EGI: Eyes Group Exercise, FGI: Feet Group Exercise, FIG: Functional Instability Group, NIG: Non-Injured Group, SP: Soccer Players, BP: Basketball Players, TTG: Technical Training Group, BTG: Balance Training Group, PCG; Proprioceptive- Coordinative Group, RTG: Regular Training Group
Physical and physiological performance responses
The results have shown that proprioceptive training enhances accurate passing skills, rapid shooting skills, and dynamic and static balance in basketball players [30], improves passing technique in athletes [31], enhances balance, explosive strength, agility, and dribbling skills in male soccer players [32], improves short passing, long passing, and ball bouncing skills in young male soccer players [33], enhances physiological capacity and technical skills in female soccer players [34], improves knee joint position sense and balance skills in male soccer and basketball players [35], and enhances passing and ball control techniques in male soccer players, but does not improve eye-hand coordination, muscle endurance, agility, sprint, and balance [36], improves static balance in male athletes [37], is effective in developing muscle activation and reducing chronic joint instability in handball players [38], improves balance in basketball players [39], enhances dynamic balance in soccer players [40], improves stance stability in taekwondo athletes [41], enhances postural stability in basketball players [42], improves dynamic balance in skaters [43], improve dynamic neuromuscular control in fencing [7], improves dynamic balance and service and passing technical skills in volleyball players [44], improves speed and agility in young soccer players but does not improve abdominal strength, balance, and flexibility [45], leads to an increase in maximal strength and a decrease in plantar flexion acceleration and deceleration times in athletes [46], and contributes to improvements in postural balance and jumping performance in track and field athletes [47].
Discussion
This systematic review examined the effects of proprioceptive training on athletic performance. The importance of scientific findings that athletes use to prepare for sports competitions, such as national, international, and Olympic events, to achieve better performance is increasing. A literature review revealed that proprioceptive training improves athletes’ technical skills and physical performance in various disciplines. Zacharakis et al. [30] reported that proprioceptive training applied for eight weeks improved passing technique in both female and male basketball players and shooting technique in male players. A similar study found that a 12-week proprioceptive training program improved passing techniques in basketball players [31]. Different studies conducted on soccer players have shown that proprioceptive training improves dribbling skills in male soccer players [32], dribbling, passing, shooting, and heading skills in female soccer players [34], passing and ball control skills in young male soccer players [36], ball bouncing and long and short passing skills in young soccer players [33] and service and passing technical skills in youth female volleyball players [44]. Various studies have reported a positive correlation between proprioception and static and dynamic balance [48–50], balance and shooting technique proficiency [51], and balance, passing, and shooting technique proficiency [52]. Souglis et al. [34] noted that proprioceptive training programs have effectively improved coordination, balance, and proprioception, which are crucial for enhancing technical skills in sports. By improving proprioceptive acuity and dynamic neuromuscular control, athletes can enhance their motor skills and technical abilities, ultimately improving their respective sports performance [7]. Proprioceptive training positively affects athletes’ physiological attributes and technical skills, highlighting its importance for overall athletic performance [34]. Furthermore, proprioceptive training has been linked to improvements in muscle strength, joint stability, and postural balance, which are all essential for mastering technical skills in sports [53]. By improving proprioception and joint position sense, athletes can better control their movements, execute precise technical skills, and adapt to dynamic and challenging sports environments [54]. Proprioceptive training is a significant performance enhancement tool for athletes as it improves perception and coordination, which are essential for technical skills.
Various studies investigating the effects of proprioceptive training on athletes’ physical performance have shown improvements balance in female and male basketball players [30], male basketball players [39], professional soccer players [37, 40], young soccer players [32], youth female volleyball players [44], young speed skaters [43], fencers [7], male soccer and basketball players [35], female soccer players [55], taekwondo athletes [41], and sprinter track and field athletes [47]. Additionally, proprioceptive exercises have been found to enhance postural stability in young basketball players [42] and postural control in taekwondo athletes [56]. Proprioceptive training is essential to enhance athletes’ balance skills through several mechanisms. According to Han et al. [14], proprioceptive training programs effectively improve balance control by optimising ankle proprioceptive information reweighting, which is beneficial for sports performance and injury prevention. These programs have been found to reduce the incidence of ankle sprains in athletes, highlighting the importance of proprioceptive training for maintaining joint stability and preventing injuries [12]. Additionally, proprioceptive training can improve dynamic neuromuscular control in athletes, further emphasising its positive effect on balance skills [7]. Athletes with enhanced proprioceptive acuity and muscle strength, often developed through long-term athletic training, exhibit superior balance abilities compared to non-athletes. This enhanced proprioception contributes to better balance control and coordination, essential for optimal athletic performance. Moreover, proprioceptive training has been linked to improvements in static and dynamic balance values in elite and amateur soccer players, indicating its positive effects on balance ability in athletes [36]. Additionally, studies have shown that neuromuscular training regimens, including protocols that challenge strength, agility, and balance, can significantly improve balance and proprioception in athletes [57]. Moreover, balance training in proprioceptive training has been emphasised as crucial for enhancing performance attributes such as agility and balance, which are essential for executing technical movements precisely and efficiently [58]. Generally, proprioceptive exercises consist of standing on a balance board or ankle disk, standing in balance with eyes closed, throwing and catching a ball while standing on one leg, and dribbling a ball [59]. These exercises can help improve balance skills by activating and strengthening lower extremity muscles.
Several studies have explored the effects of proprioceptive training on athletes and have found that such training enhances speed and agility in male soccer players [45], agility in male soccer players [32, 60], and agility in female soccer players [55]. Additionally, it improves jumping ability in sprinter track and field athletes [47] and increases maximal strength in athletes [46]. Following proprioceptive training, enhanced balance contributes to better stability during complex movements such as acceleration, deceleration, and change of direction, thus making acceleration and quick directional changes easier [32]. Gruber and Golhoffer [61] pointed out that the swift transition from eccentric to concentric muscle contractions in vertical jumps influences explosive force development and that proprioceptive training may involve a higher rate of motor units, potentially affecting rapid power generation. Winter et al. [62] showed that proprioceptive training can improve both proprioceptive and motor performance, with similar advancements in both areas. This indicates that proprioceptive training can comprehensively affect motor skills, encompassing both the sensory and motor aspects of movement. Consequently, it can be asserted that proprioceptive training positively affects speed, agility, and jumping performance, primarily owing to its effect on rapid power generation, acceleration, and smoother changes in direction.
Other studies have shown that proprioceptive training is efficacious in improving muscle activation, reducing chronic joint instability in handball players [38], reducing plantar flexion acceleration and deceleration times in track and field athletes [46], enhancing knee joint position sense in male soccer and basketball players [35], and increasing the physiological capacity of athletes [34]. Enhanced proprioceptive abilities contribute to good joint stability, thus ensuring positive stimulus-response synchronisation, which helps prevent injuries [63]. Park et al. [64] indicated that developing balance and proprioceptive function through exercise can maximize exercise capacity and promote development in joint stability for both athletes and sedentary individuals. A previous study demonstrated that proprioceptive training could lead to rapid learning gains in proprioceptive acuity and untrained motor performance at the practised joint [4]. Proprioceptive training is essential to enhance motor skills in athletes through various mechanisms. Highly trained athletes exhibit enhanced proprioceptive acuity and muscle strength, which can be inherent or developed through long-term athletic training [65]. This improved proprioceptive function enhances motor function, coordination, and, ultimately, better athletic performance [66]. Proprioceptive training programs have stabilised joints, prevented injuries, and enhanced postural balance in athletes [7]. By improving proprioception, athletes can control their movements, maintain balance, and execute precise motor skills required in various sports disciplines [67]. Furthermore, proprioceptive exercises can enhance stability, particularly in lower extremity joints, and protect athletes against injuries.
In recent years, with an increased competitive environment for superior performance, athletes must outperform their opponents in strength, speed, endurance, and stress coping, which can increase the risk of injury [68]. In addition, well-developed proprioceptive abilities provide positive stimulus-response synchronisation and achieve good performance in joint stability to prevent injuries [63]. The relationship between excellent sports performance and proprioceptive ability suggests that coaches should include proprioceptive training in their programs [69].
Proprioception and the vestibular sense are distinct but complementary systems that contribute to balance and coordination. Proprioception, the body’s ability to perceive its own position and movement, is mediated by sensory receptors in muscles, tendons, and joints [70]. Vestibular sense, on the other hand, involves the inner ear’s semicircular canals and otolith organs, which detect head movements and help maintain balance and spatial orientation [71]. Both systems are crucial for balance and coordination, with proprioceptive training focusing on enhancing the sensory feedback loop from the musculoskeletal system, and vestibular training targeting the inner ear’s balance mechanisms [72]. The integration of these systems is essential for the brain’s predictive sensing of head movement during voluntary self-motion [71].
Conclusion
This systematic review assessed the effects of proprioceptive training on athletic performance by analyzing 19 studies involving 621 participants from various sports disciplines. The findings demonstrate that proprioceptive training significantly enhances multiple aspects of athletic performance, although the extent of these effects may vary based on factors such as sex, age, and type of sport.
Key findings include:
Balance and Postural Stability: Nine studies indicated that proprioceptive training significantly enhances balance and postural stability, crucial for reducing injury risk and improving overall athletic performance.
Physiological Capacities and Technical Skills: Three studies reported improvements in physiological capacities, such as VO2 Max and body fat ratio, as well as in technical skills like dribbling, passing, and shooting.
Explosive Power and Muscle Activation: Four studies found positive effects on explosive power, muscle activation, and general strength, essential for sports requiring sudden bursts of strength and speed.
Agility and Speed: Three studies showed that proprioceptive training improves agility and speed, enhancing an athlete’s ability to make rapid movements and direction changes.
Muscle Coactivation and Joint Stability: One study highlighted a reduction in muscle coactivation and chronic joint instability, further supporting the role of proprioceptive training in injury prevention.
In conclusion, proprioceptive training is a valuable component of athletic training programs, as it enhances proprioceptive acuity, muscle strength, motor function, coordination, and balance. By incorporating proprioceptive exercises into their routines, athletes can optimize their motor skills, reduce injury risks, and improve overall performance.
While the existing literature underscores the importance of proprioceptive training, there remains a need for further research to identify optimal training strategies, applications, and outcomes. Future studies should explore the effectiveness of proprioceptive training across different sports, refine training protocols, and examine its impact on specific injury patterns and performance metrics. Integrating these insights can help coaches and athletes develop more effective training regimens that maximize performance and minimize injury risks.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Author contributions
Conception and design of study: OY, YS; Acquisition of data: OY, YS; Analysis and/or interpretation of data: OY, YS; Drafting the manuscript: OY, NE, TK, LB; Revising the manuscript critically for important intellectual content: NE, TK, LB.
Funding
This research was funded by the Ministry of Health, Czech Republic, conceptual development of research organization (FNBr, 65269705).
Data availability
The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Osman Yılmaz, Email: osmanyilmaz@osmaniye.edu.tr.
Ladislav Batalik, Email: batalik.ladislav@fnbrno.cz.
References
- 1.Kaya D, Kaya Yertutanol FD, Calik M. Neurophysiology and Assessment of the Proprioception. In: Kaya D, Yosmaoglu B, Doral MD, editors. Proprioception Orthopaedics, Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation. International Publishing, Berlin, Germany: Springer; 2018. p. 4. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Caroline J. Proprioceptive Training: A Review of Current Research. 2010.
- 3.Guyton AC. Tıbbi Fizyoloji 3. Baskı, Somatik Duyular. İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevi; 1993. pp. 827–43. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aman JE, Elangovan N, Yeh IL, Konczak J. The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor function: a systematic review. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;8:1075. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.01075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Victoria GD, Antoanela O. Benefits of the proprioceptive training in recovery after knee sprain–theoretical grounds. Univ Ann Ser Phys Educ Sport Sci Mov Health. 2016;16(1):69–73. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Apriliyasari RW, Van Truong P, Tsai PS. Effects of proprioceptive training for people with stroke: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil. 2022;36(4):431–48. doi: 10.1177/02692155211057656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.De Vasconcelos GS, Cini A, Lima CS. Proprioceptive training on dynamic neuromuscular control in fencers: a clinical trial. (first published online: 05 May 2020. J Sport Rehabil. 2021;30(2):220–5. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ma J, Zhang D, Zhao T, Liu X, Wang J, Zheng H, Jin S. The effects of proprioceptive training on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2021;35(4):506–21. doi: 10.1177/0269215520970737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hübscher M, Zech A, Pfeifer K, Hänsel F, Vogt L, Banzer W. Neuromuscular training for sports injury prevention: a systematic review. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010;42(3):413–21. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b88d37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ljubojevic A, Popovic B, Bijelic S, Jovanovic S. Proprioceptive training in dance sport: effects of agility skills. Turk j Kinesiol. 2020;6(3):109–17. doi: 10.31459/turkjkin.742359. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lazarou L, Kofotolis N, Pafis G, Kellis E. Effects of two proprioceptive training programs on ankle range of motion, pain, functional and balance performance in individuals with ankle sprain. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2018;31(3):437–46. doi: 10.3233/BMR-170836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Rivera MJ, Winkelmann ZK, Powden CJ, Games KE. Proprioceptive training for the prevention of ankle sprains: an evidence-based review. J Athl Train. 2017;52(11):1065–7. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-52.11.16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Han J, Waddington G, Adams R, Anson J, Liu Y. Assessing proprioception: a critical review of methods. J Sport Health Sci. 2016;5(1):80–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2014.10.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Han J, Anson J, Waddington G, Adams R. LiuY. The role of ankle proprioception for balance control in relation to sports performance and injury. Biomed Res Int. 2015;1–8. 10.1155/2015/842804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Hupperets M, Verhagen E, Van Mechelen W. Effect of unsupervised home based proprioceptive training on recurrences of ankle sprain: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009;339(jul09 1):b2684–2684. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Riva D, Bianchi R, Rocca F, Mamo C. Proprioceptive training and injury prevention in a professional men’s basketball team. J Strength Cond Res. 2016;30(2):461–75. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Makra G, Donka D, Torma E, Sükei Z, Balogh L. Effects of core-proprioceptive training on the quality of executive functions in u13 female basketball players. Stad - Hung J Sports Sci. 2022;5(1). 10.36439/shjs/2022/1/11316.
- 18.Hams A, Evans K, Adams R, Waddington G, Witchalls J. Throwing performance in water polo is related to in-water shoulder proprioception. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(22):2588–95. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1648987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Contemori S, Biscarini A. Shoulder position sense in volleyball players with infraspinatus atrophy secondary to suprascapular nerve neuropathy. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017;28(1):267–75. doi: 10.1111/sms.12888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Suner-Keklik S, Çobanoğlu-Seven G, Kafa N, Uğurlu M, Güzel N. The validity and reliability of knee proprioception measurement performed with inclinometer in different positions. J Sport Rehabil. 2017;26(6). 10.1123/jsr.2017-0010. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 21.Wieber J, Brandt J, Pieper M, Hirschhäuser E, Catalá-Lehnen P, Rein R, Braunstein B. Effects of body orientation and direction of movement on a knee joint angle reproduction test in healthy subjects: an experimental study. Technol Health Care. 2023;31(5):1567–78. doi: 10.3233/thc-220747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kynsburg Á, Pánics G, Halasi T. Long-term neuromuscular training and ankle joint position sense. Hung Acta Physiol. 2010;97(2):183–91. doi: 10.1556/aphysiol.97.2010.2.4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Lauersen J, Bertelsen D, Andersen L. The effectiveness of exercise interventions to prevent sports injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Br J Sports Med. 2013;48(11):871–7. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Federici A, Zumbo F, Lucertini F, Marini C. Proprioceptive training and sports performance. 2020 10.14198/jhse.2020.15.proc4.17.
- 25.McBain K, Shrier I, Shultz R, Meeuwisse W, Klügl M, Garza D, Matheson G. Prevention of sports injury i: a systematic review of applied biomechanics and physiology outcomes research. Br J Sports Med. 2011;46(3):169–73. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.080929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, Ghersi D, Liberati A, Petticrew M. Prisma-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1–9. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Smart NA, Waldron M, Ismail H, Giallauria F, Vigorito C, Cornelissen V, Dieberg G. Validation of a new tool for the assessment of study quality and reporting in exercise training studies: TESTEX. JBI evid. Implement. 2015;13(1):9–18. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Davies TB, Tran DL, Hogan CM, Haff GG, Latella C. Chronic effects of altering resistance training set configurations using cluster sets: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2021;51:707–36. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01408-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Huang X, Lin J, Demner-Fushman D. Evaluation of PICO as a knowledge representation for clinical questions. Volume 359. American Medical Informatics Association. p.; 2006. [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 30.Zacharakis ED, Bourdas DI, Kotsifa MI, Bekris EM, Velentza ET, Kostopoulos NI. Effect of balance and proprioceptive training on balancing and technical skills in 13-14-year-old youth basketball plyers. J Phys Educ Sport. 2020;20(5):2487–500. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2020.05340. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Nikolaos K, Evangelos B, Nikolaos A, Emmanouil K, Panagiotis K. The effect of a balance and proprioception training program on amateur basketball players’ passing skills. J Phys Educ Sport. 2012;12(3):316. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2012.03047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gidu DV, Badau D, Stoica M, Aron A, Focan G, Monea D, Calota ND. The effects of proprioceptive training on balance, strength, agility and dribbling in adolescent male soccer players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2022;19(4), 2028. 10.3390/ijerph19042028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 33.Evangelos B, Georgios K, Konstantinos A, Gissis I, Papadopoulos C, Aristomenis S. Proprioception and balance training can improve amateur soccer players’ technical skills. J Phys Educ Sport. 2012;12(1):81. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Souglis AG, Travlos AK, Andronikos G. The effect of proprioceptive training on technical soccer skills in female soccer. (first published online May, 2022) Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2023;18(3):748–60. doi: 10.1177/17479541221097857. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Harry-Leite P, Paquete M, Teixeira J, Santos M, Sousa J, Fraiz-Brea JA, Ribeiro F. Acute impact of proprioceptive exercise on proprioception and balance in athletes. Appl Sci. 2022;12(2):830. doi: 10.3390/app12020830. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Viran S, Canlı U. The effect of proprioceptive training on high-intensity actions and technique in football players: a training program. Kinesiologia Slov, 2022;28(2).
- 37.Beydagi M, Talu B. The effect of proprioceptive exercises on static and dynamic balance in professional athletes the effect of proprioceptive exercises on balance. Ann Clin Anal Med. 2021;12:49–53. doi: 10.4328/acam.20327. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Antohe B, Marinela RATĂ, Gloria RATĂ. Muscle Coactivation Index Improvement in Junior Handball players by using Propioceptive exercises. BRAIN Broad Res Artif Intell Neurosci. 2011;11(4Sup1):01–12. doi: 10.18662/brain/11.4Sup1/152. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Domeika A, Slapšinskaitė A, Razon S, Šiupšinskas L, Klizienė I, Dubosienė M. Effects of an 8-week basketball-specific proprioceptive training with a single-plane instability balance platform. Technol Health Care. 2020;28(5):561–71. doi: 10.3233/THC-208002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Rhodes D, Leather M, Birdsall D, Alexander J. The effect of proprioceptive training on directional dynamic stabilization. J Sport Rehabil. 2020;30(2):248–54. doi: 10.1123/jsr.2019-0346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Yoo S, Park SK, Yoon S, Lim HS, Ryu J. Comparison of proprioceptive training and muscular strength training to improve balance ability of taekwondo poomsae athletes: a randomized controlled trials. J Sports Sci Med. 2018;17(3):445. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ondra L, Nátěsta P, Bizovská L, Kuboňová E, Svoboda Z. Effect of in-season neuromuscular and proprioceptive training on postural stability in male youth basketball players. Acta Gymnica. 2017;47(3):144–9. doi: 10.5507/ag.2017.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Winter T, Beck H, Walther A, Zwipp H, Rein S. Influence of a proprioceptive training on functional ankle stability in young speed skaters–a prospective randomised study. J Sports Sci. 2015;33(8):831–40. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.964751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Achilleopoulos I, Sotiropoulos K, Tsakiri M, Drikos S, Zacharakis E, Barzouka K. The effect of a proprioception and balance training program on balance and technical skills in youth female volleyball players. J Phys Educ Sport. 2022;22(4):840–7. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2022.04106. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Moreira NB, Alves RC, Ferandes DY, Prestes LF, Cassimiro V, Da Silva VS, Preis C. Effect of proprioceptive training and central stabilization in physical fitness in young soccer players. J Phys Educ Sport. 2017;17(2):810. doi: 10.7752/jpes.2017.02123. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zouita ABM, Majdoub O, Ferchichi H, Grandy K, Dziri C, Salah FB. The effect of 8-weeks proprioceptive exercise program in postural sway and isokinetic strength of ankle sprains of Tunisian athletes. Ann Phys Rehabil. 2013;56(9–10):634–43. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2013.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Romero-Franco N, Martínez-Amat A, Martínez-López EJ. Effect of proprioceptive training on sprinters. Rev Int Med Cienc Ac. 2013;13(51):437–51. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Deshpande N, Simonsick E, Metter EJ, Ko S, Ferrucci L, Studenski S. Ankle proprioceptive acuity is associated with objective as well as self-report measures of balance, mobility, and physical function. Age. 2016;38:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s11357-016-9918-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Chen X, Qu X. Age-related differences in the relationships between lower-limb joint proprioception and postural balance. Hum Factors. 2019;61(5):702–11. doi: 10.1177/0018720818795064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Song Q, Zhang X, Mao M, Sun W, Zhang C, Chen Y, Li L. Relationship of Proprioception, cutaneous sensitivity, and muscle strength with the balance control among older adults. J Sport Health Sci. 2021;10(5):585–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2021.07.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Burhaein E, Ibrahim BK, Pavlovic R. The relationship of limb muscle power, balance, and coordination with instep shooting ability: a correlation study in under-18 football athletes. Int J Hum Mov Sports 2020;Sci.8(5), 265–70. 10.13189/saj.2020.080515.
- 52.Cè E, Longo S, Paleari E, Riboli A, Limonta E, Rampichini S, Esposito F. Evidence of balance training-induced improvement in soccer‐specific skills in U11 soccer players. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28(11):2443–56. doi: 10.1111/sms.13240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Khorjahani A, Mirmoezzi M, Bagheri M, Kalantariyan M. Effects of trx suspension training on proprioception and muscle strength in female athletes with functional ankle instability. Asian J Sports Med. 2021;12(2). 10.5812/asjsm.107042.
- 54.Hajouj E, Hadian M, Mir S, Talebian S, Ghazi S. Effects of innovative land-based proprioceptive training on knee joint position sense and function in athletes with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Neurosci. 2021;8(1). 10.5812/ans.111430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 55.Miyaç Göktepe M, Günay M. The effects of proprioceptive exercise programme given to female footballers their on balance, proprioceptive sense and functional performance. J Hum Sci. 2019;16(4):1051–70. doi: 10.14687/jhs.v16i4.5824. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Arslan F, Kaya M, Baltaci G, Taskin H, Erkmen N. The effect of eight-week proprioception training program on dynamic postural control in taekwondo athletes. Univ Ann Ser Phys Educ Sport Sci Mov Health. 2010;10(1), 93 – 9.
- 57.Lockard M, Gable T. Efficacy of balance training to improve balance of young female gymnasts. Sci Gymnast J. 2023;15(1):87–96. doi: 10.52165/sgj.15.1.87-96. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Shen X. The effect of 8-week combined balance and plyometric on the dynamic balance and agility of female adolescent taekwondo athletes. Medicine. 2024;103(10):e37359. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000037359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hughes T, Rochester P. The effects of proprioceptive exercise and taping on proprioception in subjects with functional ankle instability: a review of the literature. Phys Ther Sport. 2008;9(3):136–47. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2008.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Salot C, Sathya P. Effects of proprioceptive training on agility performance in male football players. Indian J Physiother Occup. 2020;14(1).
- 61.Gruber M, Gollhofer A. Impact of sensorimotor training on the rate of force development and neural activation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2004;92:98–105. doi: 10.1007/s00421-004-1080-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Winter L, Huang Q, Sertic J, Konczak J. The effectiveness of proprioceptive training for improving motor performance and motor dysfunction: a systematic review. Front Rehabil sci. 2022;3. 10.3389/fresc.2022.830166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 63.Ojeda ÁCH, Sandoval DAC, Barahona-Fuentes GD. Proprioceptive training methods as a tool for the prevention of injuries in football players: a systematic review. Arch Med Deporte. 2019;36:173–80. [Google Scholar]
- 64.Park JY, Lee JC, Bae JJ, Cheon MW. The effect of proprioceptive exercise on knee active articular position sense using Biodex System 3pro®. Trans Electr Electron Mater. 2014;15(3):170–3. 10.4313/TEEM.2014.15.3.170.
- 65.Muaidi QI, Nicholson LL, Refshauge KM. Do elite athletes exhibit enhanced proprioceptive acuity, range and strength of knee rotation compared with non-athletes? Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2009;19(1):103–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2008.00783.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Lephart SM, Giraldo JL, Borsa PA, Fu FH. Knee joint proprioception: a comparison between female intercollegiate gymnasts and controls. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;4(2):121–4. doi: 10.1007/bf01477265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Romero-Franco N, López E, Lomas-Vega R, Hita‐Contreras F, Martínez‐Amat A. Effects of proprioceptive training program on core stability and center of gravity control in sprinters. J Strength Cond Res. 2012;26(8):2071–7. doi: 10.1519/jsc.0b013e31823b06e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.George-Sebastian I, Alexandru C. The role of proprioceptive training as a method of functional rehabilitation of ankle sprains in futsal players. Interdisciplinary J Phys Educ Sports. 2019;19(2).
- 69.Bokil C, Bisen R, Kalra K. Effectiveness of upper extremity proprioceptive training on reaction time in table tennis players. Training. 2020;5:7. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Laskowski ER, Newcomer-Aney K, Smith J. Refining rehabilitation with proprioception training: expediting return to play. Phys Sportsmed. 1997;25(10):89–102. doi: 10.3810/psm.1997.10.1476. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Cullen KE, Zobeiri OA. Proprioception and the predictive sensing of active self-motion. Curr Opin Physiol. 2021;20:29–38. doi: 10.1016/j.cophys.2020.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Ogard WK. Proprioception in sports medicine and athletic conditioning. Strength Cond J. 2011;33(3):111–8. doi: 10.1519/SSC.0b013e31821bf3ae. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article.