Skip to main content
Bone Research logoLink to Bone Research
. 2024 Jul 10;12:39. doi: 10.1038/s41413-024-00342-8

Wnt/β-catenin signaling components and mechanisms in bone formation, homeostasis, and disease

Lifang Hu 1, Wei Chen 2, Airong Qian 1,, Yi-Ping Li 2,
PMCID: PMC11237130  PMID: 38987555

Abstract

Wnts are secreted, lipid-modified proteins that bind to different receptors on the cell surface to activate canonical or non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways, which control various biological processes throughout embryonic development and adult life. Aberrant Wnt signaling pathway underlies a wide range of human disease pathogeneses. In this review, we provide an update of Wnt/β-catenin signaling components and mechanisms in bone formation, homeostasis, and diseases. The Wnt proteins, receptors, activators, inhibitors, and the crosstalk of Wnt signaling pathways with other signaling pathways are summarized and discussed. We mainly review Wnt signaling functions in bone formation, homeostasis, and related diseases, and summarize mouse models carrying genetic modifications of Wnt signaling components. Moreover, the therapeutic strategies for treating bone diseases by targeting Wnt signaling, including the extracellular molecules, cytosol components, and nuclear components of Wnt signaling are reviewed. In summary, this paper reviews our current understanding of the mechanisms by which Wnt signaling regulates bone formation, homeostasis, and the efforts targeting Wnt signaling for treating bone diseases. Finally, the paper evaluates the important questions in Wnt signaling to be further explored based on the progress of new biological analytical technologies.

Subject terms: Bone, Homeostasis

Introduction

Wnt signaling, an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway from nematodes to mammals, plays key roles in regulating multiple biological processes, including embryonic development, organogenesis, tissue homeostasis in adults, and numerous diseases.1,2 The term “Wnt” is the combination of the terms “wingless” and “int”.3 Int-1, which was later renamed Wnt1, is the first Wnt gene discovered in mouse breast tumors induced by mouse mammary tumor virus in 1982.4 The wingless gene, which controls segment pattern during the development of Drosophila larva,5 was identified as the homolog of Wnt1 (int-1) in 1987.6 Later, researchers demonstrated the Wnt signal transduction in Drosophila by delineating the components of the signaling, including zeste-white 3 (the homolog of mammalian glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3)), disheveled (Dvl), and armadillo (the homolog of vertebrate β-catenin).79 Further, injection of Xenopus eggs with mouse Wnt1 RNA caused duplication of the embryonic axis, suggesting a critical role of Wnt signaling in vertebrate development.10 These foundational studies reveal the importance of Wnt signaling in development. Since these pioneering discoveries, there is an explosion of research on the Wnt signaling pathway, ranging from signal transduction and complex regulation to its role in normal development and diseases.

There are 19 known Wnt proteins that either function through the canonical Wnt signaling pathway or the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway. The best-studied Wnt signaling pathway is the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, which is also referred to as the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway for its dependency on β-catenin transcriptional function. Otherwise, the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway is a β-catenin independent pathway. There are two well-known non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways: the Wnt/planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway and the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway. Both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways play crucial roles in normal tissue development and homeostasis.1113 Moreover, the Wnt signaling pathway plays key roles in the pathogenesis of human diseases. In the early 1990s, the Kinzler and Nishisho groups independently found the adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) gene in familial adenomatous polyposis, a hereditary cancer syndrome, which was the first connection of the Wnt signaling pathway to human disease.14,15 Later, the APC protein was found to interact with β-catenin16,17 and APC deficiency resulted in constitutively active β-catenin/TCF (T-cell factor) signaling in colon carcinoma cells.18 These findings demonstrated the close link between Wnt signaling and human disease. After decades of research, evidence show that Wnt signaling pathways is involved in many human diseases, including numerous tissue diseases, metabolic diseases, and cancers.2,1921

As an evolutionarily conserved complex signaling pathway, Wnt signaling is involved in multiple key events during embryo development and adult tissue homeostasis. Wnt signaling shows versatility not only in the signaling components but also in its physiological and pathological functions. This review summarizes the current knowledge of Wnt signaling pathways and reviews the advances of Wnt signaling pathways in bone formation, homeostasis, and disease. Furthermore, the therapeutic treatment of bone disease by targeting Wnt signaling is also discussed. Overall, this review will provide researchers with a comprehensive understanding of Wnts, the role of Wnt signaling pathways in bone homeostasis and disease, and therapeutics that target Wnt signaling and will serve as a reference for future studies.

Wnt proteins, wnt receptors, and wnt signaling pathway

Wnt proteins (Wnts)

The Wnt proteins (Wnts) act as intercellular signals and regulate a wide range of cellular behavior including cell fate specification, cell proliferation, survival, migration, polarity, and differentiation.19 Wnt proteins are conserved in all metazoan animals along with multiple associated genes. There are 19 in mammals, 16 in Xenopus, 11 in chicks, 12 in zebrafish, 7 in Drosophila, and 5 in C. elegans (http://www.stanford.edu/rnusse/wntwindow.html). Wnts encoded by Wnt genes are ~40 kD-secreted glycoproteins that are structurally related, containing 23 or 24 cysteine residues.22 The demonstration of Wnts as a lipid-modified protein was confirmed through the first successful purification of Wnt3a.23 The lipid modification involves the attachment of a palmitoleic acid (a mono-unsaturated fatty acid) to a highly conserved serine residue.24 The palmitoylation of Wnt is required for its binding to the Frizzled (Fzd) receptor, initiating signal transduction, and the glycosylation of Wnt that is necessary for its eventual secretion.25

Wnts were historically categorized as either canonical or noncanonical Wnts.26 However, the distinction is questionable because some Wnts can stimulate both canonical and noncanonical Wnt signaling pathways and typically noncanonical Wnts can activate canonical Wnt signaling.2730

Wnt receptors and co-receptors

Wnt signal transduction involves the binding of Wnts to cell-surface Wnt receptors and co-receptors, which primarily contain members of the Fzd family31 and the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) family.32 Further, the receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor-1 (ROR1), ROR2,33 an atypical receptor tyrosine kinase (Ryk),34,35 protein tyrosine kinase 7 (PTK7),36 muscle-specific kinase (MuSK),37 and other molecules were also demonstrated as Wnt co-receptors.

Frizzled (Fzd) proteins

Fzd proteins are widespread high-affinity Wnt receptors. From the first Wnt receptor identified,38 the Fzd family now contains 10 members in humans, Fzd1 to Fzd10.39 They are seven-transmembrane receptors containing a large extracellular N-terminal cysteine-rich domain (CRD), which is conserved among the receptor family and mediates high-affinity binding to Wnts.31,4042 Fzds transmit signaling through both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways by cooperating with other co-receptors (Fig. 1). In the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, Wnt–Fzd form a ternary complex with low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5/6 (LRP5/6), whereas, in Wnt/PCP signaling pathway, Wnt–Fzd interact with ROR32,33,43 (see below: Wnt signaling pathways, Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Schematic representation of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway. a The canonical Wnt signaling pathway in inactive and active status. Without Wnt binding, β-catenin is sequestered by a destruction complex composed of GSK3β, Axin, APC, and CK1, which leads to the phosphorylation of β-catenin at serine/threonine residues. Phosphorylated β-catenin is then undergoing the proteosomal degradation mediated by polyubiquitination. The Wnt signaling is in inactive status. When Wnt binds to its receptor complex, including the seven-transmembrane receptor Fzd and the co-receptor LRP5 or LRP6, Wnt/β-catenin is initiated. This binding mobilizes GSK3β and CK1 to the cell membrane, where they phosphorylate serines on Lrp5/6, promoting the formation of a signalosome, and the recruitment of Dvl and Axin. Then, β-catenin is released from the destruction complex, accumulates in the cytoplasm and translocates into the nucleus to activate target gene expression by binding to TCF/LEF. Thus, The Wnt signaling is in active status. b Non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway includes Wnt/PCP and Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway. In the Wnt/PCP signaling pathway, non canonical Wnts bind to Fzd and the coreceptor (e.g., ROR2) to initiate the signaling. The Dvl is recruited to Fzds, which further activates the small GTPases Rac1 and RhoA. The activated GTPases induces changes in the actin cytoskeleton, and activates JNK and ROCK to regulate downstream signals. In the Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway, Wnts bind to Fzd to mediate the activation of a G protein, which in turn activate the PLC. The activated PLC leads to the generation of IP3 and DAG, which increase intracellular Ca2+ concentration. Alternatively, Wnt/Fzd activates cGMP-specific PDE6, which results in decrease of cGMP and the inactivation of PKG, thus increases intracellular Ca2+ concentration. The Ca2+ activates CaMKII, calcineurin, or PKC, which further activates various transcription factors

Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related proteins (LRPs)

The LRP family is an evolutionarily conserved single-pass transmembrane receptor family. Beyond the Fzds, the members of the LRP family are required for Wnt signaling. Arrow in Drosophila and LRP5 and LRP6 in vertebrates are identified to function as co-receptors in the Wnt signaling pathway.32,44,45 The primary structures of LRP5 and LRP6 are more than 70% identical to each other and are widely co-expressed during embryogenesis and in adult tissues.46,47 The intracellular domain of LRP5 interacts with Axin and stabilizes β-catenin, and thus induces lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF-1) activation.48 LRP6 is the best-studied LRP. The extracellular domain (ECD) of LRP6 mediates the interaction with Wnt and Fzd, resulting in ternary complex formation. The ECD contains multiple independent Wnt-binding sites to allow different Wnts to bind simultaneously in conjunction with Fzd.49

Receptor tyrosine kinase-like orphan receptor -1 and -2 (ROR1 and ROR2)

The receptors of the Ror family are membrane-spanning tyrosine kinases that bind Wnts either alone or as Fzds co-receptors to activate non-canonical Wnt signaling.33,50 ROR1 and ROR2 are also co-receptors for Wnt5a and mostly transduce Wnt/PCP signaling.5153 Wnt5a can induce ROR1/ROR2 hetero-oligomerization.54 Wnt5a-ROR1/ROR2 signaling is involved in tissue development and cancer.5557 Moreover, via ROR2, Wnt5a inhibits Wnt3a-induced Wnt/β-catenin signaling.58

Receptor related to tyrosine kinases (Ryk)

Ryk is an atypical member of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) family,59 showing no detectable intrinsic protein tyrosine kinase activity.60 It is a single-pass transmembrane protein that contains an extracellular Wnt inhibitory factor (WIF) domain, an intracellular atypical kinase domain, and a PSD95/DlgA/ZO-1 (PDZ) binding motif.60 It was previously shown that Derailed, the Ryk homolog in Drosophila, is another receptor for Wnt, which binds to Wnt5a in the absence of Fzd or Dvl.34 However, Lu et al. demonstrated that mammalian Ryk, unlike Derailed, functions as a co-receptor along with Fzd for Wnts.35 Furthermore, Ryk also binds to Dvl, providing a link between Wnt and Dvl, thereby activating the canonical Wnt signaling pathway.35

Protein tyrosine kinase 7 (PTK7)

PTK7, originally identified as colon carcinoma kinase 4,61 is another single-pass transmembrane Wnt receptor.36 It contains seven extracellular immunoglobulin domains, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular catalytically inactive tyrosine kinase domain, which serves as an interaction site for several intracellular signaling molecules (e.g., Dvl, β-catenin).62,63 PTK7 can interact with Wnt3a, Wnt8, Fzd7, LRP6, and ROR2,6466 suggesting its involvement in both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways.67 The up-regulation of the PCP signaling pathway by PTK7 is well established in current literature. PTK7 cooperates with Fzd to recruit Dvl to the plasma membrane to activate the Wnt/PCP signaling.62 However, there are conflicting findings on the function of PTK7 in canonical Wnt (Wnt/β-catenin) signaling. Peradziryi et al. reported that PTK7 inhibits Wnt/β-catenin signaling in Xenopus and Drosophila model systems.64 The inhibition effect of PTK7 on Wnt/β-catenin signaling was also observed in zebrafish during late gastrula and segmentation stages.68 In contrast, Puppo et al. found that PTK7 interacts with β-catenin in a yeast two-hybrid assay, and mammalian cells and PTK7-deficient cells show weakened Wnt/β-catenin activity.63 Bin-Nun and colleagues also reported that PTK7 protein depletion inhibits embryonic Wnt/β-catenin signaling by strongly decreasing LRP6 protein levels.65 These findings demonstrate the activating role of PTK7 in regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Thus, further experiments will be needed to uncover the underlying molecular mechanism of PTK7 regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Muscle-specific kinase (MuSK)

MuSK, also known as unplugged, is required for neuromuscular junction (NMJ) formation by responding to a critical nerve-derived signal agrin.69,70 MuSK functions as a Wnt receptor and has an extracellular region that contains the CRD, which is homologous to the CRD of Fzd.37 Evidence demonstrates that Wnt11, Wnt4, and Wnt9a all play important roles in regulating NMJ formation through binding to MuSK via the CRD.7173 Wnt11 interacts with MuSK to activate PCP signaling in regulating synapse formation during neuromuscular development.71 Wnt4 contributes to the formation of vertebrate NMJ by binding to MuSK and initiating an increase in associated MuSK phosphorylation level.72 Moreover, Wnt9a and Wnt11 induce acetylcholine receptor clustering in muscle cells by binding to MuSK and inducing MuSK dimerization along with tyrosine phosphorylation in an LRP4-dependent manner.73

Wnt signaling pathway

Wnts can induce different signaling pathways by binding to different receptors. Generally, Wnt signaling is divided into two branches depending on the different requirements for β-catenin, a cytoplasmic adaptor protein with membrane and nuclear functions. The β-catenin-dependent pathway is also known as the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, otherwise, the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway is independent of β-catenin transcriptional function.74 The canonical Wnt signaling pathway is also called the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway (Fig. 1a). For non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway, there are two major types: the Wnt/PCP pathway and Wnt/calcium (Ca2+) pathway, in which Wnts trigger signal transduction in different ways (Fig. 1b).

Canonical Wnt signaling pathway (Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway)

The canonical Wnt signaling pathway is well-known and extensively referred to as the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. This pathway plays important and versatile roles from embryologic development to adult tissue homeostasis, and its aberrations cause numerous diseases.1,2,19 In the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, β-catenin functions as a key transcriptional co-activator and transmits extracellular signals to activate the target genes (Fig. 1a). Without Wnt, β-catenin is sequestered by a destruction complex composed of glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β), Axin, APC, and casein kinase 1 (CK1). This complex is then constitutively phosphorylated, after which it is degraded by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis (Fig. 1a). However, the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway initiates with the binding of a Wnt to its receptor complex, including the seven-transmembrane receptor Fzd and the co-receptor LRP5 or LRP6. This binding of Wnt to its receptor complex further mobilize GSK3β and CK1 to the cell membrane, where they phosphorylate serines on Lrp5/6, promoting the formation of a signalosome, and the recruitment of Dvl, and Axin.75,76 This results in the release of β-catenin from the destruction complex and induces the accumulation of cytosolic β-catenin, which enters into the nucleus and binds to TCF/LEF to activate the target gene expression (Fig. 1a).

Non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway

Wnt/planar cell polarity (PCP) signaling pathway

The Wnt/PCP signaling pathway is the most extensively studied of the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways. PCP specifically refers to the organization of the epithelium orthogonally to the apicobasal polarity axis. The Wnt/PCP pathway mainly functions in regulating cell polarity in morphogenetic processes, such as coordinating cell polarity and morphology during the morphological polarization of hair follicles, pulmonary angiogenesis, morphogenetic movements, and the closure of caudal neural plate.66,7779 The pathway also shows a key role in determining eventual cell fate.80 Wnt/PCP pathway can be activated by various Wnts, especially Wnt5a, Wnt7, and Wnt11. Fzds act as receptors in the Wnt/PCP pathway, with Fzd3, Fzd6, and Fzd7 favoring this signaling pathway. Instead of LRP5/6, the members of the receptor tyrosine kinase family (ROR2, RYK, and PTK7) and other membrane proteins (VANGL2, Glypican, Syndecan 4) are adopted as co-receptors in Wnt/PCP pathway.52,66,8183 The binding of Wnts recruits Dvl to Fzds and activates the small GTPases Rac1 and RhoA, which in turn induce changes in the actin cytoskeleton, and activate JUN-N-terminal kinase (JNK) and RHO kinase (ROCK) to regulate downstream signals.84 (Fig. 1b).

Wnt/calcium (Ca2+) signaling pathway

Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway is another non-canonical (β-catenin-independent) Wnt signaling pathway that was initially identified in X. laevis and zebrafish.85 This pathway functions as a key mediator in development86,87 and is involved in physiological (e.g., hematopoiesis, neuronal excitability, neuron regeneration) and pathological (e.g., inflammation, neurodegeneration, and cancer) processes.8892 In Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway, the binding of Wnts to Fzd mediates the activation of a G protein. In turn, the G protein activates phospholipase C (PLC), leading to the generation of inositol 1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) which increases intracellular Ca2+ concentration. Moreover, Wnt/Fzd additionally activates cGMP (cyclic guanosine monophosphate) - specific phosphodiesterase 6 (PDE6), resulting in a decrease of cellular cGMP and the inactivated protein kinase G (PKG), which in turn increases intracellular Ca2+ concentration. The Ca2+ activates calcium calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), calcineurin, or protein kinase C (PKC), which further activates various transcription factors (NF-κB (nuclear factor κB), NFAT (nuclear factor associated with T cells) and CREB (cAMP-responsive element-binding protein)) that regulate downstream gene expression90,93 (Fig. 1b). Notably, the Wnt/Ca2+ signaling and Wnt/β-catenin are coupled in cells, which challenges the canonical and non-canonical categorization of Wnt signaling.94,95

For both the canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling transduction, the Dvl proteins are involved in and regarded as the hub of Wnt signaling.96 In the canonical Wnt signaling pathway, Dvl is recruited by the receptor Fzd and prevents the phosphorylation and degradation of cytosolic β-catenin. In the non-canonical Wnt/PCP signaling pathway, Dvl functions via the DAAM-RhoA axis and the Rac1 axis. In the non-canonical Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway, Dvl signals through the PLC or PDE6 to induce the downstream Ca2+ signaling.

Activators/agonists of Wnt signaling

Besides Wnts, there are additional described proteins known to activate Wnt signaling, including R-spondin (RSpo) proteins97 and Norrin proteins,98100 two different families of growth factors. In addition, microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1 (MACF1), a versatile spectraplakin101 and FOXB2, an uncharacterized forkhead box family transcription factor, are demonstrated as potent activators to promote Wnt signaling102,103 (Fig. 2a, Table 1).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Activators/agonists and inhibitors/antagonists of Wnt signaling. a Activators/agonists of Wnt signaling. RSpo maintains the Wnt signal by binding to LGR and RNF43/ZNRF3 to prevent the polyubiquitination and endocytosis of Fzd induced by RNF43/ZNRF3. Norrin, acting as a mimic of Wnts, specifically binds to Fzd4 with high affinity and activates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in a LRP5/6-dependent manner. MACF1 promotes Wnt/β-catenin signaling by translocating the Axin complex (Axin, β-catenin, and GSK3β) from cytoplasm to cell membrane, where GSK3β is inactivated by phosphorylation and β-catenin is released and enters the nucleus to activate target genes. FOXB2 interacts with multiprotein transcriptional complex to induce multiple Wnt ligands, including Wnt1 and Wnt7b to increase TCF/LEF-dependent transcription. b Inhibitors/antagonists of Wnt signaling. Sclerostin, DKK and Wise bind to LRP5/6 to interfere with the binding between LRP5/6 and Fzd to inhibit Wnt signaling. Krm1 and Krm2 (Krm1/2) cooperate with Dkks to form a complex with LRP6 and inhibit the Wnt signaling. Wise also binds to LRP4 to inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling. sFRPs, WIF-1 and Cerberus inhibit Wnt signaling by interacting with Wnts. IGFBP-4 binds to both Fzd and LRP6 to antagonize Wnt signaling. Bighead, Tiki, Waif1/5T4, and APCDD1 prevent ligand–receptor interaction to antagonize Wnt signaling. Shisa impairs Fzd maturation to inhibit Wnt signaling

Table 1.

Activators/agonists and inhibitors/antagonists of Wnt signaling

Category Name/Family Name Type Main Action Mechanism Key Reference
Activators/agonists RSpos Secretory

1. Synergize with Wnts

2. Interfere DKK1 action

3. Interact with Fzd8 and LRP6

4. Bind to LGR4/5/6

105111
Activators/agonists Norrin Secretory Bind to Fzd4 to activate Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in a LRP5/6-dependent manner 98,118120
Activators/agonists MACF1 Non-secretory Translocating the Axin complex (Axin, β-catenin, and GSK3β) from cytoplasm to cell membrane, facilitating β-catenin translocation into nucleus by phosphorylating GSK3β 102,125
Activators/agonists FOXB2 Non-secretory Induce multiple Wnt ligands to increase TCF/LEF-dependent transcription 103
Inhibitors/antagonists DKK (Dkk1-Dkk4) Secretory

1. Bind to the LRP5/6 to disrupt the Fzd-LRP5/6 complex formation

2. Bind to Krm1 and Krm2 to form complex with LRP6 to inhibit Wnt-Fzd-Lrp6 function

129,143145
Inhibitors/antagonists sFRPs (sFRP1- sFRP5) Secretory Bind to Wnts and prevent the interaction of Wnts and their receptors 127,152
Inhibitors/antagonists WIF-1 Secretory Bind to and sequester Wnts 131,160
Inhibitors/antagonists Sclerostin Secretory Bind to Wnt co-receptors LRP5 and LRP6 and disrupt the formation of Wnt-receptor complex 133,164,165
Inhibitors/antagonists Wise Secretory Bind to LRP5, LRP6, or LRP4 132,168,169
Inhibitors/antagonists IGFBP-4 Secretory Bind to both Fzd and LRP6 134
Inhibitors/antagonists Cerberus Secretory Through proteolysis 135
Inhibitors/antagonists Bighead Secretory Induce LRP6 endocytosis and lysosomal degradation 136
Inhibitors/antagonists Shisa Transmembrane Physically interact with immature forms of Fzd within the ER to impair Fzd maturation 137,178
Inhibitors/antagonists Tiki1 Transmembrane Cleave eight amino-terminal residues of a Wnt and impair the receptor binding capacity of Wnt 138
Inhibitors/antagonists Waif1/5T4 Transmembrane

1. Modify LRP6 subcellular localization

2. Structurally, Tyr325 plus the LRR1 surface centered on a second exposed aromatic residue, Phe97, are essential for inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling

139,180
Inhibitors/antagonists APCDD1 Transmembrane Physically interact with Wnt3a and LRP5, and impair the formation of Wnt receptor complex 140

APCDD1 adenomatosis polyposis coli down-regulated 1, DKK Dickkopf, ER endoplasmic reticulum, Fzd frizzled, GSK3β glycogen synthase kinase 3β, IGFBP insulin-like growth factor binding protein, Krm Kremen, LGR leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor, LRP low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, LRR leucine-rich repeats, MACF1 microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1, RSpo R-spondin, sFRP secreted Frizzled related protein, TCF/LEF T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer binding factor, Waif1 Wnt-activated inhibitory factor 1, WIF Wnt inhibitory factor

R-Spondin (RSpo)

The R-spondin (RSpo) is a family of cysteine-rich secretory proteins. There are four members, RSpo1, RSpo2, RSpo3, and RSpo4, who show an overall similarity of 40%–60% sequence homology and structural homologies.104 All four RSpos are composed of an N-terminal signal peptide, two furin-like CRDs, one thrombospondin type I domain, and a C-terminal basic acid-rich domain. All RSpos are demonstrated as activators of the Wnt signaling pathway, showing that RSpo2 and RSpo3 are more potent than RSpo1, while RSpo4 is relatively inactive.105,106 The RSpos synergize with Wnts and require the presence of Wnts and LRP6 to activate Wnt/β-catenin signal transduction.105108 The activation effect of RSpos on Wnt/β-catenin signaling is implemented by interfering with Dickkopf1 (Dkk1)-mediated LRP6 and Kremen association.105,106 In addition, RSpo3 interacts with Fzd8 and LRP6 to enhance Wnt signaling.107 Recent evidence demonstrates that the leucine-rich repeat-containing G-protein-coupled receptor 4/5/6 (LGR4/5/6) functions as a receptor of RSpos to potentiate Wnt/β-catenin signaling.109,110 The RSpo/LGR5 complex functions by neutralizing ring finger 43 (Rnf43) and zinc and ring finger 3 (Znrf3), two transmembrane E3 ligases that function as negative feedback regulators of Wnt signaling by removing Wnt receptors Fzd and LRP6 on the cell surface.111 The interaction between RSpos and LGR4/5/6 is mediated by the furin-like CRD of RSpos.110,112 Besides the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, RSpos also modulate the non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway. RSpo3 promotes the Wnt/PCP signaling pathway113 while RSpo1 inhibits the non-canonical Wnt7a/Fzd7/Rac1 signaling pathway.114 RSpo2 suppresses Wnt5a/Fzd7-driven non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway115 while RSpo3 activates the non-canonical Wnt/Ca2+/NFAT signaling pathway.116 These differences may be due to the different components of non-canonical signaling pathways.

Norrin

Norrin is a small, highly conserved secreted signaling molecule that exhibits a cystine-knot motif and functions as an atypical Wnt ligand by forming complex with Fzd4 and LRP5/6.100,117 Norrin specifically binds to Fzd4 with high affinity and activates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in a LRP5/6-dependent manner.98,118 Although showing similarity with Wnt in activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, the structure of Norrin is completely different from Wnt. The Norrin structure contains a cystine-knot motif and forms a homodimer via intermolecular disulfide bonds.119 Moreover, Norrin is not lipid-modified like Wnt. The crystal structure analysis of the Fzd4CRD-Norrin complex reveals the specific interaction between Norrin and Fzd4 via the CRD of Fzd4.119 More recently, Bang et al. evaluated the conformational change of Fzd4 upon Norrin binding and demonstrated that the linker domain (the region between CRD and transmembrane domain) of Fzd4 is responsible for its tight binding to Norrin rather than CRD.120 Therefore, Norrin functions as an activator of Wnt signaling through binding to Fzd4.

Microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1 (MACF1)

MACF1 was first discovered as a member of the actin crosslinker superfamily and named actin crosslinking factor 7 (ACF7).121 Subsequent studies reveal the association of ACF7 with both actin and microtubules (MTs), thus renaming it MACF/MACF1.122 As a versatile spectraplakin, MACF1 is widely involved in multiple cellular processes (e.g., cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation), embryo development, tissue homeostasis, and disease.101,123 Given the similar phenotype of MACF1−/− embryo and Wnt3−/− and LRP5/6 double-knockout embryos,47,124 which lacks the primitive streak, node, and mesoderm, a relationship between MACF1 and Wnt signaling was indicated. Chen et al. firstly reported that the reduction of MACF1 resulted in the suppression of Wnt-induced TCF/β-catenin-dependent transcriptional activation, suggesting a positive role of MACF1 in regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling.102 They demonstrated that MACF1 positively regulated the Wnt/β-catenin signaling by translocating the Axin complex (Axin, β-catenin, and GSK3β) from cytoplasm to cell membrane, where GSK3β was inactivated by phosphorylation and β-catenin was released and entered into the nucleus to activate target genes.102 Similarly, we found that MACF1 played a positive role in increasing β-catenin level in osteoblasts, facilitating β-catenin translocation into the nucleus and increasing its transcription activity by phosphorylating GSK3β.125,126 Therefore, MACF1 can be considered a novel activator for Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

FOXB2

FOXB2, an uncharacterized forkhead-box family transcription factor, was recently identified as a potent activator of Wnt signaling in normal and cancer cells by Moparthi et al.103 They found that FOXB2 induced multiple Wnt ligands, including Wnt7b, to increase TCF/LEF-dependent transcription without activating Wnt co-receptor LRP6 or β-catenin. Several transcription regulators, including YY1, JUN, and DDX5, act as cofactors in FOXB2-dependent Wnt signaling. Moreover, Moparthi et al. found that FOXB2-controlled Wnt signaling was induced in the neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer cells, implicating FOXB2 expression in advanced prostate cancer. Their findings suggest that FOXB2 is a tissue-specific Wnt activator.103

Inhibitors/antagonists of Wnt signaling

There exists both secreted and transmembrane Wnt signaling inhibitors/antagonists127 (Fig. 2b, Table 1). The secreted inhibitors mainly contain six families, including the Dkk family of proteins,128,129 secreted Frizzled related proteins (sFRPs),130 Wnt inhibitory factor 1 (WIF-1),131 Wise, Sclerostin (SOST),132,133 insulin-like growth factor binding protein 4 (IGFBP-4),134 and Cerberus.135 Additionally, Bighead, a secreted protein, was identified as a novel Wnt inhibitor.136 The transmembrane inhibitors mainly contain Shisa proteins,137 Tiki1,138 Wnt-activated inhibitory factor 1 (Waif1/5T4),139 and adenomatosis polyposis coli down-regulated 1 (APCDD1).140 These factors antagonize Wnt signaling by preventing ligand-receptor interactions or Wnt receptor maturation (Fig. 2b, Table 1).

Secreted inhibitors/antagonists of Wnt signaling

Dickkopf (Dkk) family

The Dkk family of cysteine-rich secretory proteins are well-characterized inhibitors for Wnt signaling. Since the discovery of Dkk1,141 4 main members (Dkk1, Dkk2, Dkk3, and Dkk4) were identified in the Dkk family.142 They specifically inhibit the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Dkk1, Dkk2, and Dkk4 bind to LRP5/6 to disrupt the Fzd-LRP5/6 complex formation, thus inhibiting Wnt signaling,129,143,144 while Dkk3 does not bind to LRP5 or LRP6 and does not affect Wnt signaling.129 Besides LRP5/6, Dkks also bind to Kremen (Krm) proteins (Krm1 and Krm2), which are single-pass transmembrane receptors. Krms greatly enhance the inhibitory ability of Dkks on Wnt signaling.145 Krm1 and Krm2 cooperate with Dkk1 to form a complex with LRP6 and inhibit the Wnt-Fzd-LRP6 function.145 However, the study of Krm1−/−/Krm2−/− double-mutant mice demonstrates that Krms is not completely required for Dkk1 function,146 suggesting that the inhibitory effect of Dkk1 on Wnt-LRP6 interaction may be sufficient to suppress Wnt signaling. Notably, Dkk2 acts not only as an inhibitor but also as an activator for Wnt signaling depending on the cellular context. In Xenopus embryos, Dkk2 synergizes with Fzd receptor147 or interacts with LRP6148 to activate rather than inhibit the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. However, Dkk2 inhibits the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in HEK293T cells.147 This dual role of Dkk2 may be modulated by the Krm2, which converts Dkk2 from an agonist to an antagonist of LRP6.149

Secreted Frizzled-related proteins (sFRPs)

The sFRPs, the largest family of Wnt inhibitors, resemble the ligand-binding CRD found in the Fzds of Wnt receptors.150 The first sFRP member, Fzdb (Frizzled motif associated with bone development), was discovered as a chondrogenic factor151 and was subsequently shown as a Wnt antagonist.152 Subsequently, other sFRPs were identified.153 In humans, there are five members in the sFRP family, including sFRP1, sFRP2, sFRP3, sFRP4, and sFRP5.150 Sharing sequence similarity with CRDs of Fzds, sFRPs directly bind to Wnts, preventing the interaction of Wnts and their receptors, and thus inhibiting Wnt signaling.127,152 sFRPs are demonstrated to inhibit both canonical Wnt signaling and non-canonical Wnt/PCP signaling.154,155 However, Holly et al. demonstrated that sFRP proteins functioned as facilitators of Wnt signaling within the dorsal retina.156 Further investigation of sFRP1 by Xavier et al. showed that sFRP1 either inhibited or enhanced Wnt3a/β-catenin signaling, depending on its concentration and the specific cellular context.157

Wnt inhibitory factor 1 (WIF-1)

Similar to sFRPs, WIF-1 is a secreted inhibitor for Wnt signaling by directly binding to and sequestering Wnts.131 WIF-1 is composed of an N-terminal secretion signal sequence, a unique and highly conserved WIF domain, five epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats, and a hydrophilic C-terminal domain. The WIF domain is responsible for the binding of WIF-1 to Wnts. Moreover, the crystal structure analysis of human WIF-1 in combination with biophysical and cellular assays reveals that Wnts bind to both the WIF domain and the EGF-like domains of WIF-1.131 By binding to both types of Wnts and sequestering them, WIF-1 suppresses both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling.158160

Sclerostin (SOST)

Sclerostin is the product of the Sost/SOST gene that is localized to human chromosome region 17q12-q21.161 It is an osteocyte-expressed glycoprotein.162 Sclerostin was first considered as an antagonist of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling due to its competition with type I and type II BMP receptors for binding to BMPs and decreased BMP signaling.163 However, subsequent studies demonstrate that it is also an antagonist/inhibitor of Wnt signaling by binding to Wnt co-receptors LRP5 and LRP6, thereby disrupting the formation of the Wnt-receptor complex.133,164,165 In addition, LRP4, another LRP family member, facilitates the inhibitory action of sclerostin on Wnt signaling.166 Evidence shows that the suppressive action of sclerostin on Wnt signaling transduction occurs in both osteoblasts and osteocytes in both paracrine and autocrine manner.167

Wise

Wise, also refered as sclerostin domain containing 1, Ectodin, and uterine sensitization-associated gene-1, is a secreted factor that was identified by a functional screen for novel factors with the potential to alter the anteroposterior character of neutralized Xenopus animal caps.132 In Xenopus, Wise either inhibits or activates Wnt signaling in different assays, suggesting it as a context-dependent regulator of Wnt signaling.132 By sharing 38% amino acid identity with sclerostin, Wise also inhibits Wnt signaling by binding to LRP5 or LRP6.168 Moreover, Wise binds to LRP4 to inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling.169

IGFBP-4

IGFBP-4 is a member of the family of IGFBPs that regulate numerous cellular processes by modulating the actions of insulin-like growth factors.170 IGFBP-4 was identified as an inhibitor of canonical Wnt signaling required for cardiogenesis.134 It inhibits Wnt signaling by binding to both Fzd and LRP6.134 Interestingly, both IGFBP-4 and Dkk1 are inhibitors of canonical Wnt signaling and are crucial for heart development, but they play opposing roles in cardiac ischemia by differentially targeting LRP5/6 and β-catenin.171 IGFBP-4 protects the ischemic heart by inhibiting β-catenin while Dkk1 enhances the injury response by inducing LRP5/6 endocytosis and degradation.171 Moreover, IGFBP-4 activates canonical Wnt signaling in human renal cell carcinoma.172 These different findings on the role of IGFBP-4 in modulating Wnt signaling may be dependent on the cellular context.

Cerberus

Cerberus was discovered in Xenopus as a head-inducing secreted factor that is expressed in the anterior endoderm of Spemann’s organizer173 and was identified as a multifunctional inhibitor of Nodal, BMP, and Wnt signaling.135,174 Subsequently, Cerberus-like proteins were identified in other vertebrates (e.g., mouse, chick, zebrafish) and grouped in the Cerberus/Dan family, showing key roles in the regulation and generation of asymmetries in the early embryo.175 Furthermore, Cerberus also contains a cystine-knot domain. However, proteolytically processed isoforms of Xenopus Cerberus that still contain the cystine-knot domain cannot bind to Wnt8, suggesting that the inhibitory ability of Cerberus on Wnt signaling might be regulated by proteolysis.135

Bighead

Like Cerberus, Bighead was also screened in the Spemann organizer as a secreted protein and identified as a novel inhibitor of Wnt signaling by causing LRP6 endocytosis and lysosomal degradation.136 Bighead overexpression within embryos leads to the development of larger fetal heads, while its deficiency reduces head development by regulating Wnt signaling.136,176 As a novel Wnt inhibitor, the role of Bighead in modulating Wnt signaling needs further investigation.

Transmembrane inhibitors/antagonists of Wnt signaling

Shisa proteins

Shisa proteins compose a big family that consists of nine subfamilies in vertebrates at present.177 Shisa proteins are characterized by an N-terminal cysteine-rich domain and a proline-rich C-terminal region and are a novel family of modulators of both Wnt and FGF signaling. Xenopus Shisa (Xenopus Shisa 1), the founding member of the Shisa family, was first identified as a novel antagonist of Wnt signaling for head formation by Yamamoto et al.137 Thereafter, Xenopus Shisa 2 was demonstrated to inhibit Wnt signaling.178 Moreover, mShisa, a mouse homolog of Xenopus Shisa 1, also antagonizes Wnt signaling.179 Shisa proteins inhibit Wnt signaling by physically interacting with immature forms of Fzd within the endoplasmic reticulum to impair Fzd maturation.137,178

Tiki1

Tiki1 is another transmembrane Wnt antagonist that is identified by functional cDNA screening as a Spemann-Mangold Organizer-specific gene required for anterior development.138 It antagonizes Wnt function by acting as a protease to cleave eight amino-terminal residues of a Wnt, leading to oxidized Wnt oligomers that exhibit impaired receptor-binding capability.138

Wnt-activated inhibitory factor 1 (Waif1/5T4)

Waif1/5T4 is a single-pass transmembrane protein with eight leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) in the extracellular region and Waif1a was recently identified as a transcriptional target of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in zebrafish embryos.139 Moreover, Waif1 acts as an antagonist of Wnt8-mediated β-catenin signaling by controlling LRP6 availability, while activating non-canonical Wnt/PCP Wnt signaling through enhancing a non-canonical function of DKK1.139 Zhao et al. identified the crystal structures of the extracellular domain of Waif1/5T4, which reveal a highly glycosylated rigid core containing eight LRRs.180 Besides, they suggested that Tyr325 plus the LRR1 surface centered on a second exposed aromatic residue, Phe97, are essential for the inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling.180

Adenomatosis polyposis coli down-regulated 1 (APCDD1)

APCDD1 is a novel inhibitor of Wnt signaling identified by Shimomura et al. when studying hereditary hypotrichosis simplex.140 It is a membrane-bound glycoprotein and is abundant in human hair follicles. APCDD1 is shown to inhibit Wnt signaling by physically interacting with Wnt3a and LRP5, which impairs the formation of the Wnt receptor complex.140 Being broadly expressed in various tissues and cell types, APCDD1 plays important roles in other Wnt-regulated biological processes, and further coordinates vascular pruning and barrier maturation by precisely modulating Wnt/Norrin signaling activity.181 Moreover, APCDD1 promotes adipogenic differentiation by inhibiting Wnt signaling182 but maintains the expression and activation of β-catenin during the osteogenic differentiation of human dental follicle cells.183 These contrary findings suggest that APCDD1 may regulate Wnt signaling depending on the cellular context.

Interaction of the Wnt signaling pathway with other signaling pathways

As a versatile signaling pathway, Wnt signaling pathway interacts with multiple other signaling pathways such as Notch, Hedgehog, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β)/BMP, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and estrogen signaling pathways (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

The interaction of Wnt signaling pathway with other signaling pathways. Wnt signaling interacts with Notch signaling pathway. β-catenin, the key component of Wnt signaling, activates Notch signaling by targeting Jagged 1 to activate Notch signaling. GSK3β also activates Notch signaling by phosphorating NICD. However, Dvl inhibits Notch signaling by inducing NICD degradation. In contrast, Notch negatively regulates β-catenin stability by inducing its lysosomal degradation. Wnt signaling inhibits Hedgehog signaling by regulating the expression of Gli3, the main repressor of Hedgehog signaling. TGFβ/BMP signaling and Wnt signaling determine the expression of ligand and components (e.g., Wnts, LRP5, Sost, Axin, BMP2, and TGFβ) of each other and the interaction between Smad7 and Axin links these two signaling pathways. Moreover, Dvl is targeted for degradation by Smurf2, a regulator of TGF-β/BMP signaling pathway. Conversely, Dvl activates Smurf2. PTH signal stabilizes the β-catenin to activate Wnt/β-catenin signaling. In addition, PTH inhibits sclerostin expression by promoting nuclear accumulation of HDACs to repress MEF2C-dependent Sost enhancer. Estrogen signaling interacts with Wnt signaling. The estrogen 17β-Estradiol (E2) activates estrogen signaling by binding to ERα to suppress the expression of WNT5B, but to increase the expression and activation levels of β-catenin. Besides, ERβ mediates the E2 suppression on the expression of Sost, an antagonist of Wnt signaling

Wnt signaling and Notch signaling

The Notch signaling pathway is a highly conserved pathway that is important in controlling cell function and tissue homeostasis. Both Notch signaling and Wnt signaling are found in all multicellular animals and they represent two major pathways in controlling cell behavior during development. Therefore, a strong interaction between Wnt signaling and Notch signaling is supposed. The interaction between these two signaling pathways was initially reported in the context of development.184 Furthermore, increasing evidence demonstrates the strong interaction between Wnt and Notch signaling pathways.185,186 β-catenin activates Notch signaling by targeting Jagged 1, the Notch ligand, indicating that the Notch pathway is downstream of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.187,188 In contrast, Notch negatively regulates β-catenin stability.189 Moreover, components of Wnt signaling including GSK3β and Dvl play key roles in Notch signaling by modulating the Notch intracellular domain.185

Wnt signaling and Hedgehog signaling

The Hedgehog signaling pathway shows critical roles in both physiological and pathological processes.190 There are three vertebrate Hedgehog homologs, including Sonic Hedgehog (Shh), Desert Hedgehog (Dhh), and Indian Hedgehog (Ihh). Shh mainly functions in neuronal development,191 Dhh exerts its main role in the gonads,192 while Ihh is important for skeletal development.193 Similar to Wnt signaling, Hedgehog signaling also plays a key role throughout embryonic development. Therefore, the interaction between Hedgehog and Wnt signaling pathways shows profound physiological effects, such as regulating embryogenesis, tumorigenicity, and blood-brain barrier development.194,195 sFRP1, an inhibitor of Wnt signaling, is an important cross-point between Wnt signaling and Hedgehog signaling.194 Hedgehog signaling negatively regulates Wnt signaling by activating sFRP1 expression, while Wnt signaling inhibits Hedgehog signaling through regulating the expression of glioma-associated oncogene homolog 3 (Gli3), the main repressor of Hedgehog signaling.194

Wnt signaling and TGF-β/BMP signaling

The TGF-β superfamily is composed of more than 40 members, including TGF-βs (TGF-β1, TGF-β2, and TGF-β3), BMPs (14 BMPs), and activins and growth differentiation factors.196 These members are involved in two main pathways, the TGF-β signaling pathway, and the BMP signaling pathway. Like Wnt signaling, TGF-β signaling also regulates cell fate and proliferation during development and tissue maintenance. Therefore, the interaction between the TGF-β/BMP and Wnt pathways is the focus of many studies. Throughout an animal’s lifespan, the two pathways are interconnected, and they interact at many stages of the signal transduction pathway, including at the extracellular, cytoplasmic, and nuclear levels.197 Extracellularly, TGF-β/BMP and Wnt regulate the production of their respective ligands in a reciprocal manner. In the cytoplasm, there are interactions between the components of these signaling pathways, such as Dvl-1 and Smad1 interaction.198 Moreover, Dvl is targeted for degradation by Smurf2 (SMAD ubiquitination regulatory factor 2), which is a regulator of TGF-β/BMP signaling pathway. Conversely, Dvl activates Smurf2 to allow Smurf2 ubiquitinate the substrates from Wnt/PCP pathway and TGF-β/BMP pathway.199 In the nucleus, these signaling pathways interact to regulate a variety of shared target genes synergistically.197 Numerous studies demonstrate the interaction between TGF-β/BMP signaling and Wnt signaling in patterning the mesoderm, cell differentiation, and tissue development.200202

Wnt signaling and PTH signaling

PTH (parathyroid hormone) is an 84-amino-acid polypeptide hormone and is essential in regulating calcium homeostasis. As a major regulator of bone remodeling, PTH interacts with the Wnt signaling pathway.203 Studies reveal that PTH induces osteoblast differentiation by regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling, while Wnt/β-catenin signaling regulates chondrocyte differentiation via PTH.204 PTH shows increased effects on the expression of Wnts and decreased effects on inhibitors of Wnt signaling, such as sclerostin, DKK1, and sFRP1.205,206 Evidences demonstrate that PTH inhibits sclerostin expression in osteocytes by promoting nuclear accumulation of histone deacetylases to repress myocyte enhancer factor 2 type C (MEF2C)-dependent Sost enhancer.207209 Furthermore, Li et al. showed that LRP6 was required for PTH suppression of Sost expression through MEF2C.210 Moreover, PTH exhibits a regulatory effect on the expression of Wnt signaling components, such as LRP5, LRP6, FZD-1, β-catenin, and TCF/LEF.211 Furthermore, Wnt/β-catenin signaling also exhibits a regulatory effect on PTH signaling. Wnt/β-catenin signaling inhibits parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) signaling activity.212

Wnt signaling and estrogen signaling

Estrogens are the main female sex steroids that control many cellular processes, such as cell proliferation and differentiation. Estrogens exert their biological actions by binding to one of two specific estrogen receptors (ERs) ERα and ERβ.213 As a key regulator of bone mass, estrogen deficiency is one main cause of osteoporosis. Evidence indicates that estrogen levels are inversely associated with the production of sclerostin, an antagonist of Wnt signaling, suggesting the interaction between Wnt signaling and estrogen signaling.214 Kim et al. found that estrogen 17β-Estradiol (E2) suppressed the SOST expression induced by BMP2, but increases the expression and activation levels of β-catenin in osteoblasts.215 ERα antagonist abolishes the effect of E2 on SOST expression, demonstrating that estrogen signaling in osteoblasts negatively regulates SOST expression.215 In addition, ERα is requisite for the effectiveness of Wnt/β-catenin signaling contributing to bone cell early response to mechanical strain.216 ER and Wnt signaling interacts to regulate bone mass adaption in response to mechanical loading.217,218 However, Galea et al. reported that the inhibitory effect of estrogen signaling on Sost expression in osteoblasts was mediated by ERβ but not ERα.219 This contrary result with Kim’s finding may be due to the different cell type adopted in experiments. Recently, Suthon et al. found that 17β-Estradiol (E2) suppressed WNT5B expression through its receptor ERα binding at the enhancer containing single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2887571.220 As WNT5B suppresses osteoblast differentiation via ROR1/2, which inhibits β-catenin activity, the above findings demonstrate that estrogen promotes osteoblast differentiation by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling.220

Wnt signaling in bone formation and homeostasis

Bone is a rigid organ that provides support and physical protection to various organs, and stores minerals for the body. Bone is formed through two major ways, either intramembranous ossification or endochondral ossification.221 Intramembranous ossification is responsible for the formation of flat bone and is initiated by the condensation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The MSCs differentiate into osteoblasts that secrete osteoid matrix and further differentiate into osteocytes.221 Endochondral ossification occurs in the formation of long bone and begins with the MSCs condensation. As opposed to intramembranous ossification, endochondral ossification begins with a deposited cartilaginous template that is later replaced by bone formation.222 In adult bone, bone homeostasis is maintained by the intricate balancing of bone remodeling, bone formation conducted by osteoblasts, and bone resorption conducted by osteoclasts. Disruption of this balance results in bone diseases, such as osteoporosis and osteopetrosis.

The first connection between the Wnt signaling pathway and skeletal development was demonstrated in 1994 when Takada et al. found that Wnt3a-deficient mouse embryos exhibited axial defects.223 Additionally, studies of various mouse models reveal that abnormality of the components within Wnt signaling causes bone defects (reviewed by refs.,204,224 Table 2). Wnt signaling regulates bone development and maintains bone homeostasis by regulating the functions of bone cells, mainly including bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes (Fig. 4).

Table 2.

Bone phenotypes in mouse model carrying genetic modifications of Wnt signaling components

Gene Loss or Gain of Function/Method/Cre line Phenotype Key Reference
Functional Group: Wnt ligands
Wnt3 Loss of function/cKO/RARβ-Cre or Msx2-Cre Wnt3n/c; RARCre mutant mice display defects only in the forelimb (RARβ-Cre) with variable severity. Wnt3n/c; Msx2Cre mutant mice exhibit defective hindlimbs with variable severity. 453
Wnt3a Loss of function/KO/Germline Homozygotes show absent somites for forelimb at 9.5 dpc and show embryonic lethality between 10.5 and 12.5 dpc (days postcoitum). 223
Wnt4 Loss of function/KO/Germline Enhance synovial chondroid metaplasia in some joints with concomitant loss of Wnt9a. Suppress chondrogenic potential. 454
Wnt4 Gain of function/Transgene/Col2α1-Cre Dwarfism with decreased bone formation, increased hypertrophic chondrocytes, and normal BMD. 455
Wnt5a Loss of function/KO/Germline Homozygotes show perinatal lethality. Truncation of the proximal skeleton and absence of distal digits. Delayed chondrocyte hypertrophy and skeletal ossification. Delayed osteoblast differentiation. 456,457
Wnt5a Gain of function/Transgene/Col2α1 transgenic vector Severe skeletal defects. Short skeletal elements in the limb and delayed ossification. Thick cartilage and delayed chondrocyte hypertrophy. Delayed chondrocyte differentiation and proliferation. 457
Wnt5b Gain of function/Transgene/Col2α1 transgenic vector Similar phenotype with Wnt5a (Col2α1) transgenic mice. Delayed chondrocyte hypertrophy and reduced bone ossification. Open skull. Delayed chondrocyte differentiation, but increased chondrocyte proliferation. 457
Wnt7a Loss of function/KO/Germline Loss of posterior skeletal elements in mutant limbs. 458
Wnt7b Loss of function/cKO/Dermo-Cre Wnt7b mutant mice were viable. Bone development defects. Diminution in ossification. Less bone in mouse embryos. Delayed maturation of chondrocyte and osteoblast differentiation. 233
Wnt8 Gain of function/Transgene/human β-actin promoter Duplicated axes or a severely dorsalised phenotype. 459
Wnt9a/Wnt14 Loss of function/KO or cKO/Germline or Prx1-Cre Homozygotes die at birth displaying partial joint fusions of carpal and tarsal elements and chondroid metaplasia in synovial and fibrous joints. Reduction of the length of appendicular long bones and the size of the mineralized regions. Ectopic cartilage nodules present within the midline sutures. Fusions of major joints. 454
Wnt9a/Wnt14 Gain of function/Transgene/Col2αl promoter/enhancer Homozygotes die around 16.5 dpc. Short limbs. Reduced cartilage formation and endochondral ossification. Fused joints. 460
Wnt9b Loss of function/cKO/CMV-Cre Homozygotes die within 24 h of birth. No obvious difference in the dimension of the skull. Developmental defects of the upper jaw skeleton. 461,462
Wnt10b Loss of function/KO/Germline Decreased trabecular bone mass and serum osteocalcin. Age-dependent loss of bone mass. Osteopenia and reduction of osteoprogenitors. Reduced bone formation. 239,241,463
Wnt10b Gain of function/Transgene/osteocalcin promoter Increased mandibular bone and impaired eruption of incisors during postnatal development. High bone mass. Increased bone formation caused by increases in osteoblast number per bone surface, rate of mineral apposition, and percent mineralizing surface. 463
Wnt10b Gain of function/Transgene/FABP4-promoter Increased bone mass and strength. Resistance to the loss of bone that occurs with aging or estrogen deficiency. 239
Wnt16 Loss of function/KO/Germline Thinner bone cortices, reduced bone strength and increase risk of fracture. 338
Functional Group: Wnt receptors
Fzd8 Loss of function/KO/Germline Osteopenia with normal bone formation and increased osteoclastogenesis. Reduction of the trabecular bone volume. 321
Fzd9 Loss of function/KO/Germline Osteopenia caused by decreased bone formation. Low trabecular number. Normal osteoclast activity. 258
Lrp4 Loss of function/KO/Germline Penetrant polysyndactyly in fore and hind limbs, and partially penetrant abnormalities of tooth development. Fused digital cartilage. Shortened total femur length, reduced cortical femoral perimeter, and reduced total femur BMC and BMD. Reduced Lumbar spine trabecular BV/TV. Increased serum and urinary bone turnover markers ALP, osteocalcin and desoxypyridinoline. 264,464
Lrp5 Loss of function/KO/Germline Low bone mass. Decreased BMD. Both heterozygotes and homozygotes display limb defects. Decreased cancellous and cortical bone mass. Low cancellous bone volume in the distal femur and the lumbar vertebra. Decrease in both osteoblast surface and osteoclast surface. Kato et al. reported that there is no change in the number of osteoclast and chondrogenesis. Kato et al. reported decreased osteoblast proliferation while Yadav et al. reported normal osteoblast proliferation ex vivo. 261,432,465467
Lrp5 Loss of function/cKO/CMV-Cre Low bone mass postnatally. 468
Lrp5 Loss of function/cKO/Col1α1-Cre or Villin-Cre Normal bone mass with Col1a1-Cre. Decreased bone mass in Villin-Cre due to a decrease in osteoblast numbers and bone formation. No change in osteoclast number. 467
Lrp5 Loss of function/cKO/DMP1-Cre or Villin-Cre Decreased bone mass with Dmp1-Cre. Normal bone mass with Villin-Cre. 263
Lrp5 Gain of function/G171V, A214V Increased bone mass, bone strength, and bone formation. Increased mechanical properties of tibiae in Lrp5 A214V mice but not in G171V mice. 263,469
Lrp6 Loss of function/GT1.8TM or cKO/Germline or CMV-Cre Heterozygotes display limb defects. Homozygotes die at birth. Truncation of the axial skeleton. Limb defects. 45,465,468
Lrp6 Loss of function/cKO/Dermo1-Cre Normal skeleton. Only a slight delay in ossification of the skull at E17.5. Mice die shortly after birth with concomitant loss of Lrp5, exhibiting misshaped skull and limbs, shortening of all skeletal elements, profound defect in the ossification of the craniofacial, the axial and the appendicular skeleton, extra cartilage elements. 468
Lrp6 Loss of function/Point mutation, R886W Dysmorphologies of the axial skeleton and digits. Delayed ossification at birth and osteoporosis in adult. Decreased bone density. Reduced bone thickness. 470
Functional Group: Wnt antagonist
Dkk1 Loss of function/KO/Germline Homozygotes die at birth. Absence of skull derivatives anterior of the parietal bone, including nasal, mandibular, and maxillary bones. Duplications and fusions of limb digits. Heterozygotes display an increase in all bone formation parameters, with no change in bone resorption. Significant increase of the number of osteoblasts, mineral apposition, and bone formation rate. High bone mass. 283,471
Dkk1 Gain of function/Overexpression/Adenoviral vector encoding full-length chick Dkk1 Deletion of distal limb tissue. Reduced limb bud. Truncation of limbs and lack of the medial and distal limb elements in both fore- and hindlimbs. 471
Dkk1 Gain of function/Overexpression/Retroviral expression of Dkk1 in primary calvaria cells in vitro Complete inhibition of osteoblast differentiation and formation of mineralized nodules and decrease in the ALP expression. 283
Dkk1 Gain of function/Transgene/3.6 kb Col1A1 promoter, 2.3 kb Col1A1 promoter Transgenic mice constructed by 3.6 kb Col1A1 promoter show osteopenia with forelimb deformities. Transgenic mice constructed by 2.3 kb Col1A1 promoter show severe osteopenia without limb defects. Decreased bone mass. 282
Dkk1 Gain of function/Transgene/2.3 kb ColIα1 promoter Reduced bone mass, bone formation and trabecular bone volume. Reductions in osteoblast surface per bone surface and in the number of osteoblasts per total bone area. Normal osteoclast surface per bone surface and the number of osteoclasts per total bone area. 472
Dkk1 Gain of function/Transgene/Col2α1 promoter and enhancer, Tie2 promoter and enhancer, Col10α1 promoter and enhancer Chondrocyte-specific (Col2α1) and hypertrophic chondrocytes-specific (Col10α1) Dkk1 transgenic mice show normal cartilage and bone development. Endothelial cell-specific (Tie2) Dkk1 transgenic mice show defects in endochondral ossification and reduced skeletal length, but no defects in cartilage development. Endothelial cell-specific (Tie2) Dkk1 transgenic mice also show reduced total trabecular area, reduced trabecular thickness, increased trabecular number, and increase in the hypertrophic zone. 473
Dkk2 Loss of function/KO/Germline Osteopenia. Defects in mineralization. Increased numbers of osteoids. Increase in the number of osteoclasts. 285
Dkk2 Gain of function/Transgene/Col2α1 promoter and enhancer, Tie2 promoter and enhancer Normal cartilage, bone development, bone length and mineralization. 473
Sfrp1 Loss of function/KO/Germline Increase trabecular bone mineral density, volume, and mineral apposition rate. Reduced osteoblast and osteocyte apoptosis. No change of bone resorption in vivo. 278
Sfrp2 Loss of function/KO/Germline Brachydactyly, mild mesomelic shortening and posterior soft-tissue syndactyly. Decreased chondrocyte proliferation and delayed differentiation in distal limb chondrogenic elements. 280
Sfrp3/Frzb Loss of function/cKO/EIIa-Cre Increased articular cartilage loss during arthritis. Stiff bone due to increased cortical bone thickness and density. Increased periosteal anabolic response to mechanical loading. 474
Sfrp4 Gain of function/Transgene/2.3 kb Col1α1 promoter Reduction of trabecular bone mass. Decreases in both osteoblast numbers and bone formation rate. 281
Sfrp4 Gain of function/Transgene/SAP promoter No change of BMD at 5 weeks of age. Decreased gain of BMD with advancing age. Low trabecular BV/TV and Tb.Th. 475
Sost Loss of function/KO/Germline High bone mass characterized by marked increases in BMD, bone volume, bone formation, and bone strength. Significantly increased cortical bone. Enhanced trabecular bone architectural properties. Increased parietal thickness. Increased mechanical properties. 290,469
Sost Gain of function/Transgene/Osteocalcin promoter Osteopenia. Low bone mass. Disorganized bone architecture, thin cortices, reduced trabecular bone, and chondrodysplasia. Decreased bone strength. Reduction in osteoblast activity and bone formation. No significant change in bone resorption. 163
Functional Group: Effectors in cytoplasm
GSK3β Loss of function/KO/Germline Homozygotes die within 24 h after birth. Heterozygotes display increased bone formation. High bone mass. 476478
GSK3β Loss of function/cKO/Sox2-Cre Homozygotes died 24 h after birth. Complete cleft palate defect. 479
GSK3β Loss of function/cKO/Col2α1-Cre Normal skeletal growth or development. 480
GSK3α and GSK3β Loss of function/KO/Germline Dwarfism with shortened long bone and vertebra, and impairment of chondrocyte differentiation. 481
Axin1 Loss of function/KO/Germline Homozygotes die at E9.5. Heterozygotes display rib fusion. 482
Axin2 Loss of function/KO/Germline Malformations of skull structures (craniosynostosis). Accelerated ossification and increases in mineralization. Increased trabecular bone mass and bone formation rates. Increased osteoblast proliferation and differentiation. Decreased osteoclast formation. Shorter hypertrophic zones in the growth plate. Accelerated chondrocyte maturation. 483485
Apc Loss of function/cKO/Osteocalcin-Cre APC cKO mice die within 2 weeks. Early onset, severe osteopetrosis. Significant accumulation of bone matrix in the femur. Significantly increased bone deposition associated with disturbances in bone architecture and composition. Rapid bone formation rate. Lack of osteoclasts. Marked abnormalities in vertebrae, long bones, and calvaria. 486
Apc Loss of function/cKO/Col2α1-Cre Homozygous APC cKO mice die perinatally due to severe defects in skeletogenesis. Craniofacial abnormalities, short trunk, an incomplete closure of both thoracic and abdominal cavities. Severe truncation of both upper and lower limbs. No cartilaginous primordia of pelvic bones. Heterozygotes do not show skeletal defect. 487
Functional Group: Transcription regulation
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/Brn4-Cre (β-catenin exons 3–6) Severe malformations of the hindlimbs. Truncation of tibia and fibula, and an absence of digits I–IV. 488
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/Prx1-Cre Mice die at birth. Bone development defect. Shortened. Appendicular bones are shortened, partially fused, and lacked some distal structures. lack of mineralization in distal skeletal elements in the hindlimb. Delayed chondrocyte maturation. 228
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/Dermo1-Cre Severe defects in skeletogenesis. Shortened limbs and a twisted body axis. Lack of bone but cartilage is present. No ossification. Disrupted osteoblast differentiation. Long bones are shortened, thickened, and bowed. Ectopic cartilage formation. 227
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/Col2α1-Cre Mice die shortly after birth. Shortened limbs. Joint fusion. Some joints between the future tarsal bones in the ankle region were either missing or incompletely formed. Increased cartilage nodule formation. Craniofacial deformities characterized by a domed skull and a short snout, as well as short limbs. 460,489
β-catenin Gain of function/Transgene/ Col2α1 promoter/enhancer (N-terminally truncated form of β-catenin) Perinatal lethal. Dome-shaped heads and shorter limbs. Reduced cartilage formation and endochondral ossification. Joint fusion. Loss of cartilage tissue. 460
β-catenin Gain of function/cKO/Prx1-Cre (β-catenin exon 3) Mice die at birth. Limbs contain only tiny remnants of skeletal elements. Loss of skull bones. 228
β-catenin Gain of function/cKO/Col2α1-Cre (β-catenin exon3) Heterozygotes die around E18-E18.5 characterized by a very severe and generalized chondrodysplasia. Extremely small ribs, limbs, and vertebrae. Defective cartilage formation. 489
β-catenin Gain of function/cKO/Brn4-Cre (Exon 3) Enlarged limb size. 488
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/Col1α1-Cre Low bone mass. Increased osteoclast activity. No change in osteoblasts. 272
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/Osteocalcin-Cre β-catenin cKO mice die within 5 weeks. early onset, severe osteoporosis and is associated with defective osteoblast differentiation in vitro. Reductions in both the trabecular and cortical bone compartments. Dramatic reduction in mineralized cortical and trabecular bone. Marked abnormalities in vertebrae, long bones, and calvaria. Increased osteoclast number. 486
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/Osterix1-GFP::Cre (Tet-off) Lack the membranous bone of cranial ossification center and complete loss of bone deposition. Failure of osteoblast progression to terminal Osteocalcin+ osteoblasts instead convert to a chondrocyte fate. 269
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/Osterix -Cre Increased bone marrow adiposity and decrease in trabecular bone. Increased osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and decreased osteoblast-mediated bone formation. Cell fate shift of preosteoblasts to adipocytes. 270
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/LysM -Cre Osteopenia. Reduction of the trabecular bone volume. Normal bone formation rate, osteoblast number and surface. Increased osteoclastogenesis. 321
β-catenin Gain of function/cKO/Osterix1-GFP::Cre (Tet-off) (β-catenin exon3) Heterozygotes die at birth. Shortened limbs. Intense and broader ossification center in the long bones. Delayed ossification in the skull bones. Abnormal wedge-shaped growth plate with very few identifiable hypertrophic chondrocytes. Lack of osteoclast. 269
β-catenin Gain of function/cKO/Col2α1-Cre-ERT2 (β-catenin exon3) Tamoxifen is administered to induce overexpression of β-catenin. Reduced articular cartilage. Complete loss of articular cartilage layers and formation of new woven bone in the subchondral bone area. Premature chondrocyte differentiation and OA-like phenotype. Lengthening of the hypertrophic region of cartilage. Advanced chondrocyte maturation and primary ossification center development. 361,490
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/Col2α1-Cre-ERT2 Delayed onset of chondrocyte hypertrophy and stunted progression to mature chondrocyte. Small hypertrophic zone, disorganized pre-hypertrophic cells, and no primary ossification center. 490
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/Osterix-Cre-ERT2 Tamoxifen is administered to induce conditional knockout of β-catenin. Severe osteopenia. Impaired osteoblast activity and increased osteoblast turnover. Increase in osteoclast number and activity. Marked increase in bone marrow adiposity. 491
β-catenin Gain of function/cKO/Axin2-rtTA (Wnt responsive cells) + TRE-Cre (functions as a Doxycycline inducible Axin2-Cre) (β-catenin exon3) Increases in expansion of skeletogenic precursors and the enhancement of bone ossification. Inhibition of osteoblast maturation into terminally differentiated osteoblasts. 492
β-catenin Gain of function/cKO/PPARγ-tTA (Osteoclast progenitors) + TRE-Cre (functions as a Doxicycline inhibitable PPARγ-Cre) (β-catenin exon3) Severe osteopetrosis. Increased trabecular BV/TV ratio, greater bone surface, Tb.N., and Tb.Th., accompanied by a smaller BS/BV ratio and Tb.Sp. Normal osteoclast proliferation but decreased osteoclast differentiation. Decreased osteoclast surface and numbers. Normal bone formation rate and mineral apposition rate. 493
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/PPARγ-tTA (Osteoclast progenitors) + TRE-Cre (functions as a Doxicycline inhibitable PPARγ-Cre) Heterozygotes show osteoporosis. Reduced trabecular bone with a smaller BV/TV ratio, less bone surface, Tb.N, and Tb.Th, and a greater BS/BV ratio and Tb.Sp. Increased bone resorption and osteoclast surface/numbers. No change in bone formation, osteoblast surface/numbers, and bone formation/mineral apposition rates. Homozygotes display osteopetrosis, similar to the β-catenin gain-of-function mice. Decreased osteoclast precursor proliferation. 493
β-catenin Loss of function/cKO/Dmp1-Cre Homozygotes display low bone mass. Impaired bone mass accrual due to early-onset, progressive bone loss in the appendicular and axial skeleton with mild growth retardation and premature lethality. Growth retardation. Absence of Cancellous bone mass. Reduced cortical bone thickness. Increased osteoclast number and activity. Normal osteoblast function and osteocyte density. 494
β-catenin Gain of function/cKO/Col1α1-Cre (β-catenin exon3) Mice die a few days after weaning. Osteopetrosis. High bone mass. Defect in osteoclast differentiation. Normal osteoblast number. 272
Tcf1 Loss of function/KO/Germline No overt phenotype. Low bone mass. Increased bone resorption. No change in bone formation parameters. 272
Tcf1 Dominant negative (Col2α1) Gain of function/Transgene (dominant-negative)/Col2α1 promoter Dwarfism. Retarded mineralization in limbs, ribs, and vertebrae. Retarded endochondral ossification due to decelerated chondrocyte maturation. Reduced chondrocyte proliferation. 495
Tcf4/Tcf7l2 Loss of function/KO/Germline Homozygotes Tcf4−/− die shortly after birth. Mice carrying compound null mutations in Tcf4 and Lef1 show disrupted midfacial development and malformed teeth. Severe disruption of the morphology of facial skeletal elements but unimpeded chondrogenesis and osteogenesis. 496,497
Lef1 Loss of function/KO/Germline Homozygotes show postnatal lethality. Lack of teeth. Lef1+/- female mice show reduced trabecular bone mass, decreased osteoblast activity and bone formation. There is an age- and gender-dependent role for Lef1 in regulating bone formation and bone mass. Mice carrying compound null mutations in Lef1 and Tcf1 display defects in the development of limb buds. 498500
Lef1ΔN (a short isoform of Lef1 Gain of function/Transgene/2.3 kb Col1α1 promoter High bone mass. Increased trabecular bone volume and trabecular thickness. Increased bone formation and mineral apposition rates. Normal osteoblast surface area, osteoid surface area, and osteoid thickness. Normal osteoclast surface and activity. 501

ALP alkaline phosphatase, APC adenomatous polyposis coli, BMC bone mineral content, BMD bone mineral density, BS/BV bone surface/bone volume, BV/TV bone volume per total volume, cKO conditional knockout, Col1A1/ColIα1 collagen type I alpha 1, Col2α1 collagen type II alpha 1, Col10α1 collagen type X alpha 1, Dkk Dickkopf, DMP1 dentin matrix protein 1, E17.5 embryonic day 17.5, Fzd Frizzled, GSK3α glycogen synthase kinase 3α, GSK3β glycogen synthase kinase 3β, KO knockout, LEF lymphoid enhancer-binding factor, Lrp low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, OA osteoarthritis, SAP serum amyloid P, Sfrp secreted Frizzled related protein, Tb.N. trabecular number, Tb.Th trabecular thickness, Tb.Sp. trabecular separation, TCF T-cell factor

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Schematic representation of Wnt signaling modulates bone homeostasis. Wnt signaling regulates bone homeostasis by modulating the biological function of bone cells, including BM-MSCs, osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes. The canonical Wnt signaling promotes bone formation, inhibits bone resorption and adipocyte differentiation during maintaining bone homeostasis. When canonical Wnt signaling is activated by Wnts binding to the receptors or by the activators of Wnt signaling (e.g., RSpo, Norrin, and MACF1), β-catenin accumulates in the cytoplasm and translocates into the nucleus to regulate the target gene expression in bone cells to control bone cell capacity. Runx1 activates Wnt signaling by increasing Wnts expression to promote osteoblast differentiation. ZBP1 facilitates β-catenin nuclear translocation to promote Wnt signaling, while β-catenin in turn induces ZBP1 expression. HMGA1 transcriptionally regulates LRP5 expression to activate Wnt signaling. The non-canonical Wnt signaling promotes bone formation and bone resorption and inhibits adipocyte differentiation. Non-canonical Wnt5a signals through ROR2 to activate RhoA that is necessary and sufficient for osteogenic differentiation. Wnts also promote osteoblast differentiation and bone formation via PLC/PKCδ signaling. Wnt5a-ROR2 signals increase the expression of RANK by activating c-Jun to enhance RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis and also promote actin ring formation via Rho to increase bone resorption. Besides, sFRP4, a Wnt inhibitor, dramatically suppresses the osteoclast differentiation by inhibiting non-canonical Wnt/ROR2/JNK signaling

Wnt signaling in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs)

BM-MSCs are MSCs residing in the bone marrow. As the common origins of osteoblasts, adipocytes, and chondrocytes, the tightly controlled lineage commitment of BM-MSCs is crucial in the maintenance of bone formation and homeostasis. The alteration of the commitment of BM-MSCs to osteoblasts and adipocytes occurs in bone pathological conditions, such as osteoporosis.225,226

Among the numerous signaling pathways involved in regulating the lineage commitment of BM-MSCs (BMP, Hedgehog, Notch, Wnt), Wnt signaling inhibits BM-MSC’s commitment to the adipogenic and chondrogenic lineages while promoting their differentiation into the osteoblasts.227229 Wnt3a-induced canonical Wnt signaling stimulates osteogenic differentiation of MSCs by activating transcriptional co-activator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ), which is a key transcriptional modulator of MSC differentiation.230,231 Furthermore, Wnt3a also enhances osteoblast differentiation and suppresses adipocyte differentiation of human BM-MSCs via non-canonical JNK signaling.232 Wnt3a and Wnt7b also promotes osteogenic differentiation and bone formation via PKCδ-mediated non-canonical Wnt signaling.233 The non-canonical Wnt5a suppresses PPARγ activation to suppress adipogenic differentiation and promote the osteogenic differentiation of MSCs234 and also induces osteoblast differentiation of BMSCs under mechanical stimulation.235 Wnt5a also shows promotion effect on chondrogenesis of MSCs by activating non-canonical Wnt signaling, such as Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway.236,237 Recently, Wnt7a shows the role to promote osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs by increasing Runx2 expression, which is mechanistically conducted by Wnt7a to promote the binding of TCF1 to the Runx2 promoter.238 Wnt10b enhances osteoblastogenesis and suppresses adipogenesis of mesenchymal progenitors, thus increasing bone formation and bone mass.239 The further study demonstrates that Wnt10b shifts mesenchymal cells toward osteoblasts, rather than adipocytes, by increasing the expression of osteogenic transcription factors (runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx2), Dlx5, and Osterix) and suppressing the expression of adipogenic transcription factors (C/EBPα and PPARγ).239,240 Conversely, Wnt10b deficiency decreases mesenchymal progenitor activity and number, resulting in bone loss.241 In addition, Wnt6 and Wnt10a also facilitate osteogenic differentiation and suppress adipogenic differentiation of MSC via β-catenin.242 Besides, Dvl shows a role in regulating osteogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs.243 Following the osteogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs, the methylation level of Dvl decreases, which results in the elevated expression of Dvl,243 demonstrating Dvl as a promoter for osteogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs. Moreover, β-catenin is required for promoting osteoblast differentiation and inhibiting chondrocyte differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells, and the inactivation of β-catenin results in defective skeletal development.227,228 More recently, Matsushita et al. demonstrated that Wnt-mediated transformation of the bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC) identity orchestrates skeletal regeneration.244 They found that quiescent Cxcl12-creER+ perisinusoidal BMSCs differentiate into cortical bone osteoblasts solely during regeneration and quiescent Cxcl12-creER+ BMSCs transform into osteoblast precursor cells in a manner mediated by canonical Wnt signaling.244

Wnt signaling also shows key roles in mediating the function of numerous molecules in BM-MSCs to regulate cell differentiation capacity. Core-binding factor subunit β (Cbfβ), a non-DNA-binding partner of Runt-related transcription factors (Runx1, Runx2, and Runx3), plays a key role in governing osteoblast−adipocyte lineage commitment by enhancing β-catenin signaling.229 Z-DNA binding protein 1 (ZBP1), a member of the Zα family, increases osteogenic differentiation while suppressing adipogenic differentiation of mouse BM-MSCs.245 It was demonstrated that ZBP1 is required for β-catenin translocation into nuclei and is a novel regulator of bone and fat trans-differentiation via Wnt/β-catenin signaling.245 Serpin Family B Member 2 (SerpinB2) is a member of the clade B subgroup of serine protease inhibitors (serpins). Exogenous SerpinB2 protein inhibits osteoblast differentiation while the silencing of SerpinB2 promotes osteoblast differentiation of human BM-MSCs via the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.246 Our previous work demonstrated that conditional knockout (cKO) of MACF1 in mesenchymal stem cells inhibited osteogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs and elevated bone surface adipocyte number, which results in decreased bone formation.247 Wu et al. identified a novel nuclear factor I/X (NFIX) - high-mobility group AT-Hook 1 (HMGA1) - Wnt/β-catenin regulatory axis that governs the cell fate of mouse BM-MSCs, favoring osteoblast differentiation and blocking adipocyte formation.248 HMGA1, as a downstream target of NFIX, functions by transcriptionally regulating LRP5 expression and thereafter activating canonical Wnt signaling.248 Moreover, Circ-FBLN1 (a circular RNA acting as a sponge for let-7i-5p) promotes cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human BM-MSCs by regulating the let-7i-5p/FZD4 axis and repressing Wnt/β-catenin pathway.249 More recently, non-canonical Wnt signaling is shown to mediate the regulation of phosphate on human MSCs’ osteogenic differentiation.250 Phosphate treatment upregulated the expression of Wnt5b, Wnt11, and phosphorylated-c-Jun to promote osteogenic differentiation of human MSCs.250 Overall, by interacting with and regulating the activity of the aforementioned proteins and biomolecules, Wnt signaling plays a critical role in regulating BM-MSCs differentiation capacity.

Wnt signaling in osteoblasts

Osteoblasts originate from BM-MSCs and are responsible for bone formation. Wnt signaling is critical for osteoblast function and most of its signaling components play important roles in regulating bone development and maintenance.224,251

The components of Wnt signaling in osteoblasts

Multiple Wnts including Wnt1, Wnt3a, Wnt5b, Wnt7b, Wnt10b, Wnt11, and Wnt16 regulate osteoblast differentiation and bone formation.220,252256 Canonical Wnt signaling promotes osteoblast differentiation by directly activating the expression of the key bone-related transcription factor Runx2 via β-catenin/TCF1 signaling.252 Wnt16 promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone formation through canonical Wnt signaling.256 Besides, Tu et al. reported that non-canonical Wnt signaling promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone formation via activating G-protein-linked PKCδ.253 Recently, Lawson et al. demonstrated that inhibition of osteoblast-specific Wnt secretion alters skeletal homeostasis by suppressing bone formation and increasing bone resorption, reducing the anabolic response to mechanical loading, and demonstrating that Wnt ligand secretion is required for adult bone formation and homeostasis. Additionally, this indicates that osteoblast-derived Wnts are important in mediating the bone anabolic response to mechanical loading.257 Besides, Wnt primary receptors Fzds play an important role in osteoblast and bone formation. Albers et al. demonstrated that Fzd9 is required for osteoblast mineralization and bone formation.258 They developed an Fzd9−/− mouse line and found that Fzd9−/− mice displayed lower bone mass caused by decreased bone formation, with Fzd9−/− primary osteoblasts showing defective matrix mineralization.258 Two co-receptors of Wnt signaling, LRP5/6, are required for optimal Wnt signaling in osteoblasts, and each plays a key distinct role in bone formation. Lrp6, rather than Lrp5, is crucial for mediating Wnt3a signaling in osteoblasts and shows different effects on osteoblastic gene expression.259 Lrp5 is required for the late stages of differentiation while Lrp6 is required for the early stages of osteoblast differentiation.260 Mice with a targeted disruption of Lrp5 develop a low bone mass phenotype, which becomes evident postnatally and is secondary to decreased osteoblast proliferation.261 A LRP5 gain of function mutation in osteoblasts causes increased bone mass/bone mineral density (BMD) in human and transgenic mice and an increase in the number of active osteoblasts, further confirming the important role of LRP5 in bone formation and homeostasis.262,263 LRP6 knockout mice were perinatal fatal, with truncations of the axial skeleton and limb defects.45,47 Moreover, Lrp4 and Lrp8 were demonstrated to play important roles in bone remodeling by modulating Wnt signaling.264,265 Lrp4 binds to sclerostin to facilitate the inhibitory effect of sclerostin on Wnt/β-catenin signaling, thus inhibiting bone formation.166 The osteoblast/osteocyte-specific Lrp4 knockout induces elevated serum sclerostin, promotes osteoblast function, and results in an increase in bone mass.266 Lrp8 was demonstrated to play a role in Wnt3a-induced osteoblast differentiation.267 Furthermore, Dvl is involved in osteoblast differentiation. Zhou et al. found that ubiquitin-specific peptidase 4 (USP4) inhibited Wnt/β-catenin signaling by removing Lysine-63 linked poly-ubiquitin chain from Dvl and promoting β-catenin polyubiquitination, which leads to decreased cytosolic β-catenin and downstream signaling.268 USP4 inhibits osteoblast differentiation while USP4 depletion promotes osteoblast differentiation.268 These findings demonstrate Dvl as a target of USP4 in regulating osteoblast differentiation. In addition, several studies reveal the necessity of β-catenin in the osteoblast lineage.227,269,270 Deletion of β-catenin in a different stage of osteoblastic differentiation in mice causes low bone mass phenotype due to both defective osteoblast differentiation along with increased osteoclastic bone resorption that is caused by decreased OPG (osteoprotegerin)/RANKL (receptor activator of NF-κB ligand) ratio.271,272 All these findings together reveal the importance of Wnt signaling components in controlling osteoblast function.

The modulators of Wnt signaling in osteoblasts

The modulators of Wnt signaling also play important roles in osteoblast. R-spondins, activators of Wnt signaling, are highly expressed in skeletal tissues and promote osteoblast differentiation.273,274 MACF1, an activator of Wnt/β-catenin, shows promotion effects on osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and bone formation.125,126,275277 sFRPs, the largest family of Wnt inhibitors, are demonstrated as important regulators of osteoblast function and bone formation. Deletion of sFRP1 activates Wnt canonical signaling, which increases the expression of Runx2 and osteocalcin, thus enhancing osteoblast differentiation and bone formation.252 Besides, sFRP1 deficiency inhibits osteoblast lineage apoptosis and enhances osteoblast proliferation.278 sFRP1−/− mice exhibit increased trabecular bone mineral density while sFRP1 transgenic mice display decreased bone formation and trabecular bone mass.278,279 Moreover, sFRP2 and sFRP4 are critical for proper distal limb formation and bone formation.280,281 Dkk1, a member of the Dkk family (Wnt inhibitor), is a key negative regulator of osteoblasts. Endogenous Dkk1 is primarily expressed in osteoblasts and osteocytes.282 Dkk1 suppresses osteoblast differentiation and bone formation by binding to LRP5/6 to inhibit Wnt signaling.282 Osteoblast overexpression of Dkk1 in transgenic mice induces diminished osteoblastic bone formation and severe osteopenia,282 while heterozygous Dkk1-deficient (Dkk1+/-) mice display increased osteoblast number, mineral apposition, bone formation, and bone mass.283 Dkk1 overexpression in primary calvaria cells completely inhibits osteoblast differentiation and mineralized nodules in vitro.283 Dkk4 also functions as an inhibitor of osteoblast differentiation by suppressing Wnt/β-catenin signaling.284 Unlike Dkk1 and Dkk4, Dkk2 is required for terminal osteoblast differentiation and mineralized matrix formation, with Dkk2−/− mice showing decreased bone formation.285 Krm1 and Krm2, co-receptors of Dkk1, interact with Dkk1 to attenuate Wnt/β-catenin signaling during limb development, as shown by Krm1−/−Krm2−/− mice presenting with increased bone formation.146 Overexpression of Krm2 in osteoblasts in transgenic mice leads to severe osteoporosis.286 In addition, sclerostin, another inhibitor of Wnt signaling, is crucial for osteoblast function and bone formation.287 Sclerostin suppresses proliferation/differentiation and promotes apoptosis of osteoblasts and overexpression of sclerostin suppressing bone formation.133,163,288,289 SOST−/− mice exhibit increased high bone mass due to increased bone formation, while SOST transgenic mice exhibit low bone mass due to decreased bone formation290,291 (for review, see Sebastian et al.292).

Other molecules modulate osteoblast function via Wnt signaling

Wnt signaling is also involved in mediating the function of numerous biomolecules in osteoblasts. Runx1, a highly expressed protein in osteoblast, maintains osteoblast differentiation by up-regulating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.293 Chemerin, a novel adipocyte-derived signaling molecule, shows an inhibitory effect on osteoblast differentiation and proliferation through the inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling.294 Large conductance calcium-activated potassium (BK) channels encoded by the Kchma1 gene are among the K+ channels that have unusually large single-channel conductance.295 Jiang et al. uncovered that the BK channel is essential for osteoblast proliferation, differentiation, and bone formation via the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.296 Conditional knockout of Kcnma1, which encodes the pore-forming α-subunits of BK, results in a decrease in β-catenin in the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, which inhibits Runx2 expression and leads to bone loss.296 More recently, miR-12200-5p was demonstrated to significantly inhibit osteoblast differentiation and bone formation by simultaneously targeting multiple members of the Wnt signaling, including APC, TCF4, TCF7, Wnt3a, Wnt5a, and LRP6.297

Recently, Wnt signaling was demonstrated to be crucial for modulating cellular metabolism in osteoblasts.298 Wnt signaling stimulates aerobic glycolysis, glutamine catabolism, and fatty acid oxidation in osteoblast-lineage cells.298

Wnt signaling in osteocytes

Osteocytes are the most abundant cells in bone. They are terminally differentiated osteoblasts embedded within the mineralized matrix.299 Osteocytes help orchestrate the signaling that regulates osteoblasts and osteoclasts during bone remodeling.299 Moreover, they are believed as mechanosensory cells.299,300 During the terminal mineralization process, the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is downregulated. The activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in osteocytes suppresses dendrite development, inhibits dentin matrix protein 1 (DMP1) expression, and alters normal mineral crystallinity.301 Moreover, Wnt signaling is involved in osteocytes sensing mechanical stimuli and regulating bone remodeling to coordinate normal bone homeostasis.291,302,303

The components of Wnt signaling in osteocytes

Joeng et al. reported that osteocyte-specific Wnt1 loss- or gain-of-function mice presents low bone mass or high bone mass, respectively.304 Besides, Wnt receptor LRP5 shows a key role in osteocytes. LRP5-mediated Wnt signaling in osteocytes contributes to the maintenance of mechanical properties and bone mass.305 Mice with an osteocyte-specific deletion of Lrp5 exhibit reduced bone mass, lower Young’s modulus of bone, and significantly diminish load-driven bone formation.305 In addition, β-catenin, a key mediator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, is necessary for maintaining osteocyte viability and for the ability of osteocytes to respond to mechanical stimuli. Osteocyte-specific β-catenin deficient mice exhibit low bone mass phenotype in association with increased osteoclast number and bone resorption303 and do not respond to mechanical loading.306 Tu et al. also found that activation of osteocytic β-catenin signaling increases both osteoclasts and osteoblasts, resulting in bone gain,307 identifying osteocytes as central target cells of the anabolic actions of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in bone. Therefore, the components of Wnt signaling are critical in osteocytes by mediating osteocyte mechanotransduction and the regulatory role of osteocytes in osteoblasts and osteoclasts.

The modulators of Wnt signaling in osteocytes

Osteocytes express several inhibitors of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, including sclerostin, Dkk1, and sFRP1, all of which regulate bone mass. Sclerostin is well known for its specific expression in osteocytes,163,308 with osteocytes secreting sclerostin via their dendritic attachments.309 The secreted sclerostin functions on osteoblasts to suppress the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, thus inhibiting osteoblast differentiation and bone formation133 (see Wnt signaling in osteoblasts for detail). Moreover, in line with the mechanical response of osteocytes, sclerostin expressed by osteocytes is demonstrated as a mechanosensitive protein, and its expression is regulated by mechanical stimuli. Mechanical loading reduces the sclerostin expression and promotes bone formation, while mechanical unloading increases sclerostin expression and inhibits bone formation, both processes involving Wnt signaling.291,310 Interestingly, both SOST−/− mice and DMP1-SOST transgenic mice exhibit reduced sensitivity to mechanical stimulation.291,311 SOST−/− mice are resistant to mechanical unloading-induced bone formation reduction in association with unaltered Wnt/β-catenin signaling.291 While DMP1-SOST transgenic mice exhibit reduced load-induced bone formation and unaltered Wnt signaling.311 Therefore, sclerostin is critical for mechano-transduction and mechanical stimuli regulating bone formation via Wnt signaling. Besides sclerostin, osteocytes express sFRP1 and Dkk1 to inhibit osteoblast differentiation and bone formation (see Wnt signaling in osteoblasts for detail). The expression of Dkk1 is also regulated by mechanical stimuli.310

Wnt signaling in osteoclasts

Osteoclasts are the bone-resorbing cells that originated from hematopoietic monocyte/macrophage lineage cells and are involved in the bone remodeling process.312 Recent studies demonstrate that Wnt signaling plays a direct role in regulating osteoclast function. Targeted deletion of β-catenin in osteoclast precursors inhibits the precursor proliferation and accelerates osteoclast differentiation, while deletion of β-catenin in more committed stages of osteoclast differentiation enhances the rate of cell specialization.313315 Additionally, Ruiz et al. reported that conditional deletion of β-catenin in Cathepsin K-expressing cells increases osteoclast activity.315 These findings demonstrate that Wnt signaling promotes osteoclast progenitor proliferation and suppresses osteoclast commitment and differentiation. In addition, Dvl, a key component of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, plays a role in regulating osteoclastogenesis by interacting with PTH1R (type 1 parathyroid hormone receptor).316 Mutation of Dvl results in inhibition of β-catenin activation and blocks osteoclastogenesis under PTH induction.316 More recently, Weivoda et al. found that Wnt signaling suppresses osteoclast differentiation by activating canonical and non-canonical cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)/protein kinase A (PKA) pathways.317 Besides, sFRP4, a Wnt inhibitor, dramatically suppresses the osteoclast differentiation by suppressing non-canonical Wnt/ROR2/JNK signaling.318

Wnt signaling in osteoblasts and osteocytes also indirectly regulates osteoclast differentiation. Wnt signaling in osteoblasts inhibits osteoclast differentiation by suppressing the expression of RANKL and increasing the expression and secretion of the RANKL decoy receptor, OPG.271,272,319,320 In addition, osteocyte Wnt signaling also represses osteoclast differentiation by increasing the expression of OPG, thus decreasing the RANKL/OPG ratio.303 However, Albers et al. reported that there is increased osteoclastogenesis in Fzd8-deficient mice, which was independent of OPG, suggesting a direct negative influence of canonical Wnt signaling on osteoclastogenesis.321 Moreover, non-canonical Wnt5a secreted from osteoblast lineage cells promotes osteoclastogenesis and bone resorbing ability by increasing RANK (receptor activation of nuclear factor-κB) in bone marrow macrophages via the ROR2/JNK non-canonical signaling.322,323 Wnt5a-ROR2 noncanonical signaling is also required for the formation of actin ring and the bone-resorbing activity of osteoclasts.324,325 In contrast, Wnt16 suppresses osteoclast differentiation by activating non-canonical Wnt signaling and suppressing RANKL-induced activation of NF-κB and expression of NFATC1.326 Although most components of the Wnt signaling pathway (e.g., Wnts, Fzds, and LRPs) are expressed by osteoclasts,327 the role of Wnt signaling in osteoclasts still needs further investigation.

Wnt signaling in bone disease

The necessity of Wnt signaling (including Wnt ligands, receptors, intracellular components, transcription factors, and antagonists) for bone development, formation, and homeostasis has been broadly studied in mouse models (Table 2). Given the necessity of Wnt signaling for bone, it is not surprising that aberrant Wnt signaling results in various bone diseases, such as osteoporosis, sclerosteosis, osteoarthritis (OA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (Table 3, Fig. 5).328332

Table 3.

Wnt signaling in bone diseases

Molecule Nature of miscues Diseases Symptoms Key reference
Wnt1 Mutation Osteoporosis, osteogenesis imperfecta Low BMD and bone strength, low-impact vertebral and peripheral fractures 333336
Wnt3 Homozygous nonsense mutation Tetra-amelia Complete absence of all four limbs and other anomalies 337
Wnt10b Decreased expression Osteoporosis Severe osteoporosis with substantial accumulation of marrow adipocytes 229
Wnt11 Loss-of-function mutation Early onset osteoporosis Low bone mineral density that results in increased risk of fracture in children and young adults 344
Wnt16 Missense mutation Osteoporotic fractures Low cortical bone thickness, BMD, and bone strength, and increase of risk of fracture 338
LRP5 Homozygous mutation Autosomal recessive disorder OPPG Severe, early-onset osteoporosis and abnormal eye vasculature 340,342
SOST Loss-of-function mutation Sclerosteosis, van Buchem disease High bone mass, progressive bone overgrowth due to increased bone formation 161,289
LRP5 Point mutation HBM trait Dense bones 262,345
LRP4 Mutation Sclerosteosis Bilateral syndactyly of the third and fourth finger, severe sclerosis of the calvarium, femur, radius, and ulna. 346
Wnt5a Increased expression OA Inflammation, ECM destruction, cartilage damage 349,350
Wnt5b Increased expression OA Inflammation, cartilage damage 349,351
Wnt7a Decreased expression OA Inflammation, cartilage damage 354
Wnt10a Decreased expression OA Accumulation of senescent cells, inflammation, cartilage damage 91
Wnt16 Decreased expression OA Inflammation, deteriorated articular cartilage integrity, chondrocyte apoptosis 355357
LRP5 Haplotype (C-G-C-C-A) OA Bone spur (osteophyte), joint space narrowing and pathological hardening of subchondral bone (sclerosis) 358
LRP6 Heterozygous loss-of-function mutation OA Cartilage degradation, bone spur (osteophyte) formation, joint space narrowing and pathological hardening of subchondral bone (sclerosis) 360
β-catenin Activation or Overexpression OA Cartilage degradation, inflammation (in knee joint, hip joint, temporomandibular joint, and facet joint) 361364,374
β-catenin β-catenin-knockout specific in SFZ OA Cartilage degradation, inflammation 367
Dkk1 Increased expression OA Cartilage deterioration, inflammation, chondrocyte apoptosis 368371
WIF-1 Low expression OA Cartilage degradation, bone spur (osteophyte) formation, joint space narrowing and pathological hardening of subchondral bone (sclerosis) 372
Sclerostin Increased expression OA Joint degeneration, inflammation 373
Wnt5a Increased expression RA Inflammation, joint destruction, FLS migration and invasion 375377,380
Dkk1, Sost, Krm1, LRP5 SNP RA Inflammation, joint destruction 382
Dkk1 and SOST Increased expression RA Inflammation, joint destruction 383387
sFRP2 Decreased expression RA Inflammation, joint destruction, FLS activation 388
sFRP4 Decreased expression RA Inflammation, joint destruction, FLS activation 389
sFRP5 Decreased expression RA Inflammation, joint destruction, FLS activation 390

BMD bone mineral density, Dkk Dickkopf, FLS fibroblast-like synoviocytes, GSK3β glycogen synthase kinase 3β, HBM high bone mass, LRP low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, OA osteoarthritis, OPPG osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome, RA rheumatoid arthritis, sFRP secreted Frizzled related protein, SFZ superficial zone, SNPs single nucleotide polymorphisms, WIF Wnt inhibitory factor

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Wnt signaling involved in bone disease. The Wnt signaling is involved in bone disease. including osteoporosis, sclerosteosis, osteoarthritis (OA), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), as shown in Table 3 for detail

Wnt signaling and osteoporosis

Osteoporosis is a degenerative disease characterized by low bone mass and deteriorative microarchitecture of bone. The alteration of Wnts causes human skeletal diseases, with mutations in Wnts such as Wnt1 causing osteoporosis and osteogenesis imperfecta.333336 Studies demonstrate that Wnt1 mutation results in decreased β-catenin and thus the decreased Wnt/β-catenin signaling, which causes osteoporosis.333,335 Wnt3 expression is essential at the early stages of human limb formation. The homozygous nonsense mutation in the Wnt3 gene, which truncates Wnt3 at its amino terminus, results in tetra-amelia, a rare human genetic disorder characterized by the complete absence of all four limbs and other anomalies.337 Moreover, missense mutations of Wnt16 are associated with osteoporotic fractures.338 Jing et al. found that Wnt signaling is inhibited persistently in BM-MSCs during osteoporosis and histone acetylation levels on Wnt genes (Wnt1, Wnt6, Wnt10a, and Wnt10b) are decreased in BM-MSCs from ovariectomized (OVX) mice.339 Besides, the homozygous mutation in LRP5, a co-receptor for Wnts, results in the autosomal recessive disorder osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome (OPPG),340 a syndrome exhibiting severe, early-onset osteoporosis and abnormal eye vasculature.341 More recently, Astiazaran et al. identified a novel homozygous LRP5 mutation in Mexican patients with OPPG.342 In addition, Wnt10b expression is regulated by Cbfβ/Runx2 and the Cbfβ deficient mice in osteoblast lineage exhibit severe osteoporosis.229 Besides, ROR1/2, the coreceptor for activating non-canonical Wnt signaling, plays important roles in development, regeneration, and diseases of the bone.343 More recently, Wnt11 is identified as a new gene associated with early onset osteoporosis with loss-of-function inhibiting bone formation through both canonical and non-canonical pathways.344

Wnt signaling and sclerosteosis

Sclerosteosis is a rare bone disease characterized by increased bone density in association with bone overgrowth. The discovery of sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease, which are rare high bone mass genetic disorders caused by SOST loss-of-function mutations, exemplifies the critical role of sclerostin in bone health.161,289 Humans lacking sclerostin display progressive bone overgrowth due to increased bone formation. Moreover, point mutation of LRP5 (G171V) causes high bone mass trait.262,345 Mechanistically, point mutation of LRP5 (G171V) impairs the inhibition effect of Dkk1 on Wnt signaling and thus results in increased Wnt signaling activity, which leads to high bone density.345 Fijalkowski et al. detected a novel LRP4 mutation in a patient with sclerosteosis.346 They found the replacement of the arginine residue on position 1 170 of LRP4 by glutamine, which impaired the binding between LRP4 and sclerostin, resulting in decreased inhibition of sclerostin on Wnt/β-catenin signaling.346 This study indicates that LRP4 is an anchor for sclerostin and responsible for sequestering the sclerostin.

Wnt signaling and osteoarthritis (OA)

OA is the most common age-related degenerative joint disease, which is characterized by cartilage damage, synovial inflammation, osteophyte formation, and subchondral bone sclerosis.347 Wnts also play a key role in OA. Wnt5a is upregulated in OA-like chondrocytes and is involved in Col2A1 degradation.348 Furthermore, the elevated Wnt5a is detected in OA patients.349,350 Wnt5a promotes chondrocyte catabolic activity presented as reducing the expression of ACAN and Col2A1 but increasing the expression and secretion of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP1, 3, and 13) via non-canonical Wnt signaling including CaMKII and JNK,349 while Wnt5a induces the abnormal differentiation in osteoblast via both the non-canonical Wnt/PCP signaling and Wnt/Ca2+ signaling in OA osteoblasts.350 Similarly, upregulation of Wnt5b is observed in OA,351,352 suggesting the promotion effect of Wnt5b on OA. Wnt5b inhibits chondrogenic differentiation, promotes fibrosis by increasing collagen type I expression, and increases MMP13 expression in SMSCs (synovial resident mesenchymal stem cells), leading to joint degeneration.353 All these findings demonstrate the promotion effect of Wnt5a and Wnt5b on OA development. However, Wnt7a and Wnt10a show a protective effect on OA. There is a negative correlation between Wnt7a expression and the expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) and IL-1β in human OA cartilage specimens.354 Wnt7a suppresses IL-1β-induced MMP and iNOS gene expression in primary human articular chondrocytes and attenuates articular cartilage damage in OA mice.354 Wnt10a specifically cleans up the senescent OA SMSCs (synovial resident mesenchymal stem cells) by inducing cell apoptosis.91 Mechanistically, Wnt10a activates non-canonical Wnt/Ca2+ signaling.91 Wnt16 also shows protective effect on OA.355 This is indicated by the findings that global knockout of Wnt16 (Wnt16−/−) or chondrocyte-specific knockout of Wnt16 in mice promote OA development with decreased expression of lubricin, increased chondrocyte apoptosis, upregulated MMP13 and Col10a1 (Collagen type X alpha 1) expression, and deteriorated articular cartilage integrity.356,357 Mechanistically, Wnt16 functions through both canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling. Nalesso et al. demonstrated that Wnt16 antagonizes excessive Wnt/β-catenin activation by reducing the capacity of Wnt3a to activate the signaling, thus protecting cartilage in OA.356 Tong et al. found that Wnt16 activates PCP/JNK and crosstalks with the mTORC1-PTHrP pathway to inhibit chondrocyte hypertrophy during OA pathogenesis.357 Besides, LRP5 shows a key role in the pathogenesis of OA at a genetic level.358,359 Heterozygous loss-of-function mutation in LRP6 also leads to suppression of Wnt/β-catenin signaling and deterioration of degenerative OA after ligament and meniscus injury.360 Evidences demonstrate the important role of β-catenin in OA. Activation or overexpression of β-catenin leads to OA development in knee joint,361 hip joint,362 temporomandibular joint363 and facet joint.364 Therefore, inhibition of β-catenin signaling shows therapeutic effect on OA. Zhu et al. found that AMPK (adenosine 5’-monophosphate-activated protein kinase) activator metformin blocked β-catenin nucleus translocation by inhibiting β-cateninS552 phosphorylation and showed chondro-protective effect in OA progression,365,366 suggesting that AMPK activation may inhibit OA development partially through inhibition of β-catenin signaling. However, Xuan et al. found that superficial zone (SFZ)-specific β-catenin-knockout accelerates OA development while SFZ-specific β-catenin activation suppresses cartilage degeneration.367 They found that β-catenin deficiency decreases the expression of Prg4, the encoding gene for lubricin, while β-catenin activation increases Prg4 expression in SFZ cells.367 Moreover, Wnt inhibitors, such as Dkk1, WIF-1, and sclerostin, also play a role in OA. Dkk1 is indicated to be positively correlated with OA. Weng et al. found the increase of Dkk1 in the cartilages of OA patients in association with increased inflammatory cytokines.368 They demonstrated that Dkk1 mediates chondrocyte apoptosis by suppressing nuclear β-catenin accumulation and Akt activation and contributes to cartilage deterioration and OA.368 They further found that Dkk1 antisense oligonucleotide (Dkk1-AS) treatment decreased the OA-associated increase of Dkk1 and abrogated chondrocyte apoptosis in OA in rats.369 Dkk1 is also upregulated in OA cartilage370 and synovial fluid, but there is no significant difference in the serum Dkk1 concentration between the OA patients and healthy controls.371 However, a significant lower expression of WIF-1 is found in OA chondrocytes than in normal chondrocytes.372 Overexpression of WIF-1 increases cell proliferation and suppresses apoptosis of OA chondrocytes by eliminating high reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reducing the secretion of MMPs.372 Most studies show that sclerostin is increased in chondrocytes as a protective mechanism in OA to prevent further degeneration of joint.373 Besides the Wnt signaling-related components, Runx1, one key transcription regulator for cartilage formation, inhibits OA development by reducing the level of active β-catenin, thus inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin signaling.374

Wnt signaling and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

RA is an autoimmune disease characterized by damage of cartilage and bone due to inflammation. Wnt signaling shows critical roles in RA. Wnt5a is highly expressed in synovial fibroblasts in RA patients and promotes the expression of inflammatory cytokines in synovial fibroblasts.375377 Transfection of normal fibroblasts with a Wnt5a expression vector induces the expression of inflammatory cytokines.378 Meanwhile, inflammatory cytokine enhances Wnt5a expression in RA synoviocytes.379 Recently, Rodriguez-Trillo et al. found that Wnt5a specifically promoted migration and invasion of RA FLS (fibroblast-like synoviocytes) and induced the expression of inflammatory cytokines through non-canonical Wnt/Ca2+ and ROCK pathways.380 All these findings demonstrate the promotion effect of Wnt5a on RA (for review, see Huang et al.381). LRP5 and Krm1 are associated with joint destruction in RA patients.382 By studying 1 418 patients with RA in four cohorts, de Rooy et al. found that in the Leiden early arthritis clinic cohort, six Dkk1, three Sost, one Krm1, and 10 LRP5 SNPs are significantly associated with radiological progression of joint destruction.382 Studies further indicate the important involvement of sclerostin and Dkk1 in RA development.383 The serum sclerostin/SOST and Dkk1 are significantly higher in RA patients than in controls and correlate with bone erosion and inflammation.383,384 Sclerostin is upregulated in FLS of RA patients but inhibition of sclerostin accelerates TNFα-dependent inflammatory joint destruction in RA mice, demonstrating a protective role of sclerostin in TNF-mediated inflammation.385 Since Dkk1 is upregulated by TNFα, some studies indicate that treatment with TNFα inhibitors, such as Certolizumab pegol, decreases the serum concentration of Dkk1 in RA patients.386,387 In addition, RA-associated osteoporosis might be the result of both increased bone resorption and decreased bone formation, due to increased TNFα-driven osteoclast activity and overexpression of Dkk1.387 Besides, Dkk1 and Sost SNPs and the interactions between SNPs on Dkk1 and Sost are associated with RA.382 sFRP2, sFRP4, and sFRP5, antagonists of Wnt signaling, show a suppressive effect on RA.388390 sFRP2 inhibits the proliferation of RA fibroblast-like synovial cells and the expression of IL-6 and IL-8 and inhibits RA pathogenesis through suppressing Wnt/β-catenin signaling.388 Mechanistically, DNA methylation plays a key role in regulating the expression of sFRP2 and sFRP4 and the activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in RA.388,389 sFRP5 shows an anti-inflammatory role in FLS in RA patients by downregulating c-Jun N-terminal kinase.390 Furthermore, other molecules are also involved in RA by regulating Wnt signaling. Acid-sensing ion channel 1a (ASIC1a), phospholipase D1 (PLD1), Aquaporin 1, and neuron navigator 2 (NAV2) all show a promotive effect on RA by activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling.391394 ASIC1a, PLD1, Aquaporin 1, and NAV2 promote cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and inflammation of RA FLS through activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.391394 Moreover, noncoding RNAs are involved in RA by regulating Wnt signaling. Sun et al. found that long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) OIP5-AS1 promotes the occurrence and development of RA by downregulating the expression of miR-410-3p, which increases Wnt7b expression and activates the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.395 Wang et al. reported that LINC00152 increased the proliferation of RA FLS by promoting the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.396 Mir-125a-3p suppresses cell proliferation and inflammation of RA fibroblast-like synovial cells by inactivating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.397

Targeting wnt signaling in bone disease treatment

The important involvement of Wnt signaling in bone formation, homeostasis and diseases drives extensive research efforts to target Wnt signaling for treating bone diseases. Studies show the therapeutic effects on bone diseases in both animal models and clinical trials by targeting either the extracellular molecules, cytosol components, or nuclear components of Wnt signaling (Table 4).

Table 4.

Modifiers for Wnt signaling to treat bone diseases

Modifier Molecular Target Function Effect on Wnt Signaling Pathway Diseases/Therapeutic effect Key Reference
Overexpression Wnt4 Overexpresses Wnt4 Activates non-canonical Wnt signaling Osteoporosis/Prevention 398
Genetic deletion Wnt5a Inhibits Wnt5a expression Inhibition RA/Alleviation 406,407
Ginkgolide B Wnt5a Inhibits Wnt5a expression Inhibition RA/Alleviation 409
Resveratrol Wnt5a Inhibits Wnt5a expression Inhibition RA/Alleviation 410
miR-21 Wnt Inhibits Wnt expression Inhibition RA/Alleviation 411
Adenovirus-Wnt16 Wnt16 Increase Wnt16 expression Activates PCP/JNK OA/Alleviation 357
Wnt mimetics Wnt Binds to Fzd and LRPs Activation Osteoporosis, aging and long bone fracture/Induce rapid and robust bone building effects, correct bone mass deficiency and bone defects, improve the therapeutic effects of antiresorptive bisphosphonates and anti-sclerostin antibody 412
Wnt-induced osteogenic tissue model Wnt Maintain Wnt. Activation Bone defects/Maintain the osteogenesis of human skeletal stem cells and repair bone defects 413
SM04690 (Lorecivint, LOR) Wnt pathway Inhibits Wnt signaling pathway Inhibition OA/Improve the pain and cartilage degradation 402405
Dkk1-AS Dkk1 Inhibits Dkk1 expression Activation Estrogen deficiency induction of bone loss and glucocorticoid-induced bone loss/Alleviation 414,415
Exosomal miR-196a from BM-MSCs Dkk1 Inhibits Dkk1 expression Activation Osteoporosis/In vitro study shows the promotion effect on osteogenic differentiation 416
MiR-483-3p Dkk2 Inhibits Dkk2 expression Activation Osteoporosis/In vitro study shows the promotion effect on bone formation process by increasing osteoblast proliferation, preosteoblast differentiation into mature osteoblasts, and new bone matrix formation 417
AdDkk1 Dkk1 Upregulates Dkk1 expression Inhibition OA/Inhibits OA cartilage destruction 370
Dkk1-AS Dkk1 Inhibits Dkk1 expression Activation OA/Reduce the OA-associated increase of Dkk1 and abrogate chondrocyte apoptosis 369
Romosozumab (a humanized monoclonal anti-sclerostin antibody) Sclerostin Inhibit the function of sclerostin by binding to sclerostin Activation Osteoporosis/Increase BMD and reduces fragility fractures in both male and female osteoporotic patients 420426
Sclerositn small-molecule inhibitors Sclerostin Inhibit the function of sclerostin Activation Bone defects/Promote osteogenesis 427
Bispecific antibody Sclerostin and Dkk1 Inhibit the function of sclerostin and Dkk1 Activation Bone fracture/Superior bone repair activity 428
Sclerostin antibody/Dkk1 antibody combination Sclerostin and Dkk1 Inhibits the function of sclerostin and Dkk1 Activation Osteoporosis/Increase more cancellous bone mass 429
WIF-1 cDNA plasmid transfection WIF-1 Overexpression of WIF-1 Inhibition OA/Promote proliferation and suppress apoptosis of OA chondrocytes 372
Lithium/Lithium chloride GSK3β Inhibition of GSK3β from phosphorylating β-catenin Activation Osteoporosis/Promotes osteogenic differentiation and increases bone mass 431,432
Transgene method MACF1 Overexpression of MACF1 Activation Osteoporosis/Prevent aging induced osteoporosis 433
Daphnetin Not clear Increase the nucleus level of β-catenin and the p-GSK3β expression Activation Osteoporosis/Increase the DEX-induced reduction in BMC and microstructure parameters, and restore the levels of bone turnover markers in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis 434
Gentiopicroside β-catenin Increase β-catenin level Activation Osteoporosis/Promote BM-MSCs osteogenic differentiation, promote bone formation in OVX mice 435
Ahs GSK3β Bind to and inhibit GSK3β Activation Osteoporosis/Enhance osteoblast differentiation and bone formation, ameliorate prednisolone-induced osteoporosis 436
Troxerutin Not clear Increase the expression of β-catenin and downstream target genes of Wnt signaling Activation Bone fracture/Promote osteogenic differentiation of human BM-MSCs, stimulate new bone formation and accelerate the fracture healing in femur fracture rats 437
Small molecule inhibitors Dvl-CXXC5 interaction Inhibits Dvl-CXXC5 interaction Activation Osteoporosis/Enhance osteoblast differentiation, and rescue bone loss 438
Apigenin Not clear Increase the expression of β-catenin and downstream target genes of Wnt signaling Activation Bone fracture/Promote osteogenesis and facilitate the fracture healing 439
Glycyrrhizic acid (GA) Not clear Increase both active β-catenin and total β-catenin protein Activation Bone fracture/Promote osteogenic differentiation of human BM-MSCs and promote bone fracture healing 440
BM-MSCs-derived exosomal miR-335 VapB Inhibit VapB expression Activation Bone fracture/Promote osteoblast differentiation and bone fracture recovery 442
BM-MSC-derived exosomes carrying miR-136-5p LRP4 Inhibit LRP4 expression Activation Bone fracture/promote osteoblast proliferation and differentiation and fracture healing 443
Exosomes derived from platelet-rich plasma Not clear Reduce the protein levels of β-catenin, Runx2, and Wnt5a Activation OA/Promote proliferation and migration, inhibit apoptosis of OA chondrocyte and prevent OA progression 444
BM-MSC-derived exosomal miR-127-3p CDH11 Inhibit CDH11 Inhibition OA/Promote cell viability, suppresses apoptosis of OA chondrocyte and alleviates OA 445
PiR-63049 Wnt2b Inhibit Wnt2b expression Inhibition Osteoporosis/PiR-63049-antagonist attenuates bone loss in OVX rats by promoting bone formation 446
miR-129-5p TCF4 Inhibit TCF4 expression Inhibition Osteoporosis/Inhibition of miR-129-5p rescues osteoporosis 448
miR-320-3p β-catenin Inhibit the relative transcriptional activity of the β-catenin/TCF complex Inhibition OA/Injection of mmu-miR-320-3p attenuates OA progression in the OA mouse model 449

AdDkk1 Dickkopf 1-expressing adenovirus, BMC bone mineral content, BM-MSCs bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, DEX dexamethasone, Dkk Dickkopf, Dkk1-AS Dickkopf 1 antisense, Fzd frizzled, GA glycyrrhizic acid, GSK3β glycogen synthase kinase 3β, hASCs human adipose-derived stem cells, LEF lymphoid enhancer-binding factor, LRP low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, MSCs mesenchymal stem cells, OA osteoarthritis, OCN osteocalcin, OPN osteopontin, OVX ovariectomized, PTH parathyroid hormone, RUNX2 runt-related transcription factor 2, TCF T-cell factor, VapB vesicle-associated membrane protein B, WIF Wnt inhibitory factor

Targeting extracellular molecules of Wnt signaling

Targeting extracellular molecules taking part in Wnt signaling is of prime importance for treating bone diseases. To date, various biomolecules have been studied to target the extracellular molecules of the Wnt signaling pathway to treat bone disease.

Wnt ligands are attractive targets for treating bone diseases. Due to the promotion effect of Wnt signaling on bone mass, the addition of Wnts can improve osteoporosis by increasing bone mass. Yu et al. reported that Wnt4 prevents bone loss in osteoporosis by inhibiting NF-κB via non-canonical Wnt signaling.398 Jiang et al. suggested that stimulation using a pulsed electromagnetic field can activate the Wnt10b/LRP5/β⁃catenin pathway, which results in upregulation of Wnt10b, LRP5, β-catenin, OPG, and Runx2 and downregulation of Axin2, PPAR-γ, and Dkk-1 to prevent bone loss and improve lipid metabolism disorders in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis rats.399 In line with the findings of Jiang et al., Fan et al. also found that the application of electroacupuncture stimulation leads to increased expression of Wnt3α, β⁃catenin, and Runx2, which affects bone formation and promotes bone metabolism in rats with postmenopausal osteoporosis.400 More recently, Diegel et al. showed the significance of inhibiting Wnt secretion in alleviating high bone mass in three mouse models due to Sost loss-of-function and Lrp5 gain-of-function mutations.401 For OA treatment, Wnt pathway is also an attractive target. SM04690, a Wnt pathway inhibitor, appeared safe and well tolerated and showed disease-modifying OA drug properties for OA treatment in a phase 1 clinical trial (NCT02095548).402 Further phase 2 clinical trial of SM04690 (Lorecivint, LOR) for intra-articular therapy of moderate to severe knee OA showed that SM04690 improved the pain and cartilage degradation (NCT03122860).403405 The involvement of Wnt5a produced by synoviocytes in RA suggests that suppression of Wnt5a is a potential treatment of RA.406,407 Wnt5a knockout mice were resistant to RA development, presenting as reduced inflammation parameters and less cartilage destruction.406 As Wnt5a promotes RA via ROCK signaling, ROCK inhibitor Y-27632 inhibits Wnt5a-induced RA FLS migration and reduced inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, MMP3, MMP9 and MMP13 levels.408 Moreover, traditional Chinese medicine, such as Ginkgolide B and Resveratrol, show anti-RA effect for reducing articular cartilage and bone destruction and decreasing inflammatory cytokine levels through suppressing Wnt5a level.409,410 All these results suggest Wnt5a a critical drug target for treating RA (for review, see Huang et al.381). Liu et al. found that miR-21 overexpression inhibits the expression of IL-6 and IL-8 and relieves RA by suppressing Wnt expression.411 In addition, upregulation of Wnt16 through intra-articular injection of adenovirus-Wnt16 into mouse knee joint dramatically attenuated all the OA parameters.357 Fowler et al. designed an antibody-based platform to generate potent and selective Wnt mimetics and engineer bi-specific Wnt mimetics that target Fzd and LRPs.412 They found that the synthetic Wnt mimetics induce rapid and robust bone-building effects and that the Wnt mimetics correct bone mass deficiency and bone defects in various disease models, including osteoporosis, and long bone fracture.412 Additionally, these Wnt mimetics show improvement in the therapeutic effects of antiresorptive bisphosphonates and anti-sclerostin antibody.412 All these findings demonstrate Wnt mimetics as promising agents for treating bone disease. One recent study reveals a promising effect of a Wnt-induced osteogenic tissue model on maintaining the osteogenesis of human skeletal stem cells and repairing bone defects, demonstrating manipulation of Wnt signaling as promising strategy in treating bone disease.413

Secreted Wnt inhibitors/antagonists, such as Dkk1, sclerostin, WIF-1, and RSpo2, become attractive targets for the treatment of skeletal diseases. Exogenous end-capped phosphorothioate Dkk1-AS treatment significantly alleviates both estrogen depletion-induced bone loss in OVX rats and glucocorticoid-induced bone loss.414,415 Moreover, exosomal miR-196a from BM-MSCs significantly promotes osteoblast differentiation by targeting Dkk1 to activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, providing a novel therapeutic strategy for bone diseases such as osteoporosis.416 In human osteoblasts, miR-483-3p directly binds to and negatively regulates DKK2, an antagonist of Wnt signaling, thus increasing the expression of Wnt1, β-catenin, and cyclin D1. This increase in expression promotes the bone formation process by increasing osteoblast proliferation, pre-osteoblast differentiation into mature osteoblasts, and new bone matrix formation.417 Oh et al. found the upregulation of Dkk1 in both human and mouse experimental OA cartilage and showed that overexpression of Dkk1 by intraarticular injection of AdDkk1 significantly inhibits OA in mice, suggesting Dkk1 as a therapeutic target for OA treatment.370 However, Weng et al. found that Dkk1-AS treatment decreases the OA-associated increase of Dkk1 and abrogates chondrocyte apoptosis in OA in rats.369 These contrary findings may be due to different stages of OA progression and further clinical experiments are necessary.

The genetic linkage of sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease (two high bone mass diseases) to the SOST gene and the specificity of sclerostin in osteocytes strongly demonstrate that sclerostin is a target for osteoporosis therapy. Gao et al. demonstrated sclerostin as a target for enhancing the osteogenesis of BM-MSCs in the treatment of osteoporosis.418 They found that SOST overexpression significantly inhibited BM-MSCs proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, while Icariin promoted osteogenesis of BM-MSCs by regulating sclerostin, which activated Wnt/β-catenin signaling.418 Besides, a sclerostin antibody has been developed to improve bone mineral density. Anti-sclerostin antibody treatment significantly improves the bone quantity and quality of a Wnt1-related osteogenesis imperfecta mouse model.304 Presently, various studies that adopted animal models of human low bone mass diseases show the effectiveness and safety by targeting sclerostin for the treatment of osteoporosis, osteogenesis imperfecta, and osteoporosis pseudoglioma.419 Currently, romosozumab, a fully humanized monoclonal anti-sclerostin antibody, has been approved for the clinical application of treating osteoporosis in humans and shows efficacy in increasing BMD and reducing fragility fractures in both male and female osteoporotic patients.420,421 Phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials (NCT00896532, NCT01575834, NCT01796301) show that romosozumab increases bone mineral density and bone formation, decreases bone resorption and reduces fracture risk in both postmenopausal women with osteoporosis and men with osteoporosis422426 (for review, see Sølling et al.421 and Kerschan-Schindl420). More recently, sclerostin small-molecule inhibitors induced de novo bone to promote bone fusion, showing the potential to be used in novel, cost-effective bone graft substitutes for bone fusion and fracture defects healing.427 In addition, a bispecific antibody against both sclerostin and Dkk1 shows superior bone repair activity compared with monotherapies.428 Further, Choi et al. found that a sclerostin antibody/Dkk1 antibody combination approach was highly efficacious in the cancellous bone mass, suggesting that the osteoanabolic effects of Wnt pathway targeting can be made more efficient if multiple antagonists are simultaneously targeted.429

Zhu et al. showed that overexpression of WIF-1 promotes proliferation and suppresses apoptosis of OA chondrocytes by eliminating ROS and reducing the secretion of MMPs via blocking the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, providing a new therapeutic theory for OA treatment.372 Melnik et al. demonstrated that miR-181a targets RSpo2, which is the activator of Wnt signaling and repressor of BMP signaling, to promote chondrogenesis of MSC.430 Moreover, they observed the disruption of a tight correlation between miR-181a and miR-218 expression levels in OA cartilage, highlighting the importance of the Wnt-BMP signaling crosstalk for preventing OA.430

The combination of these findings suggests that targeting either components or regulators of the Wnt signaling pathway could provide anabolic treatments for bone diseases.

Targeting cytosol components of Wnt signaling

Cytosolic components of Wnt signaling like GSK3β, Dvl, and APC, and its modulators, such as MACF1, also play significant roles in targeting agents involved in treating bone disorders.

GSK3β, a cytosolic component of Wnt signaling, shows promise as a potential treatment target for treating various bone disorders. The inhibition of GSK3β from phosphorylating β-catenin through using lithium, which results in osteogenic differentiation and increasing bone mass in mouse models.431,432 Moreover, we demonstrated MACF1, the activator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, as a promotor for osteoblast differentiation and bone formation125,126,276 and a novel potential therapeutic target for treating osteoporosis.433 Overexpression of MACF1 specifically in mesenchymal stem cells prevented aging-induced osteoporosis in 18- and 21-month-old mice.433

Small molecules cause great attention for their convenient application in the treatment of disease. Some small molecules show therapeutic effects on bone disease by targeting Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Wang et al. discovered that Daphnetin, a major active component of daphne odora var. marginatai, increases the dexamethasone (DEX)-induced reduction in bone mineral content (BMC) and microstructure parameters, and restores the levels of bone turnover markers in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis in vivo.434 Additionally, they found that Daphnetin promotes proliferation, differentiation, and mineralization in DEX-treated pre-osteoblasts in vitro and showed that Daphnetin activates Wnt/GSK3β/β-catenin signaling.434 Their findings demonstrate the potential therapeutic effect of Daphnetin on osteoporosis by targeting Wnt/GSK3β/β-catenin signaling.434 Gentiopicroside, a class of natural compounds, promotes BM-MSC osteogenesis by regulating the β-catenin-BMP signaling pathway both in vitro and in vivo.435 As silencing of β-catenin blocks the osteogenic differentiation induced by Gentiopicroside in BM-MSCs, β-catenin was revealed as the target for Gentiopicroside.435 The recent increase in understanding of Gentiopicroside may provide a novel strategy for the treatment of osteoporosis.435 Anthocyanin-enriched polyphenols from the petal of H. syriacus L. (Ahs) enhance osteoblast differentiation and bone formation both in vitro and in vivo while ameliorating prednisolone-induced osteoporosis.436 Ahs is able to bind to GSK3β and exerts the promotional effect on osteogenic activities by inhibiting GSK3β and subsequently activating β-catenin, leading to anti-osteoporosis.436 Troxerutin, a semi-synthetic derivative of the natural bioflavonoid rutin, enhances osteogenic differentiation of human BM-MSCs by stimulating the expression of the critical transcription factor β-catenin and several downstream target genes of Wnt signaling, such as Cmyc, CD44, and Survivin, thus activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling.437 Besides, Dvl-CXXC5 interaction is targeted for treating osteoporosis. CXXC5 is a negative feedback regulator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling through interacting with Dvl. By targeting Dvl-CXXC5 interaction, small molecules activate Wnt/β-catenin signaling, enhance osteoblast differentiation, and rescue bone loss in OVX mouse by inhibiting Dvl-CXXC5 interaction,438 demonstrating that targeting Dvl-CXXC5 interaction is a new strategy for treating osteoporosis. Furthermore, troxerutin stimulates new bone formation and accelerates the healing of femur fractures in rats.437 Apigenin, a natural plant flavone, promotes osteogenesis in vitro and facilitates the healing of fractures in vivo by enhancing β-catenin expression and activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling, indicating that Apigenin is a promising therapeutic candidate for bone fracture repair.439 Bai et al. found that glycyrrhizic acid (GA), a major triterpene glycoside isolated from licorice root, promotes osteogenic differentiation of human BM-MSCs by increasing both active β-catenin and total β-catenin protein, with GA-GelMA hydrogels promoting bone fracture healing, demonstrating GA as a potential and cost-effective treatment of bone defects.440

Recent findings demonstrate exosomes and noncoding RNAs as novel strategies for bone disease treatment. BM-MSCs-derived exosomes overexpressing miR-424-5p suppress osteogenesis by regulating the WIF-1/Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, demonstrating miR-424-5p as a new biomarker for the treatment of osteoporosis.441 BM-MSCs-derived exosomal miR-335 promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone fracture recovery via activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway by targeting VapB (vesicle-associated membrane protein B), which is a regulator of vesicle trafficking. This finding provides a novel insight into therapeutic approaches in bone fracture treatment.442 BM-MSC-derived exosomes carrying miR-136-5p target and inhibit LRP4 expression to activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, thus promoting osteoblast proliferation and differentiation and initiating the healing of fractures.443 Exosomes derived from platelet-rich plasma (PRP-Exos) promote proliferation and migration, inhibit apoptosis of OA chondrocytes and prevent OA progression by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway.444 Exosomal miR-127-3p derived from BM-MSCs promotes cell viability, suppresses apoptosis of OA chondrocyte, and alleviates OA by inhibiting CDH11, thereby blocking the Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation.445 Chen et al. found that piRNA-63049 is significantly increased in both bone tissues and plasma of osteoporotic rats and postmenopausal osteoporotic patients.446 Overexpression of piR-63049 inhibits osteoblastogenesis of BM-MSCs while knockdown of piR-63049 promotes the osteoblastogenesis of BM-MSCs through the upregulation of the Wnt2b/β-catenin signaling pathway.446 PiR-63049-antagonist can attenuate bone loss in OVX rats by promoting bone formation, suggesting piR-63049 as a possible novel target for treating osteoporosis.446

Targeting the nuclear components of Wnt signaling

Like extracellular molecules and cytosolic components, the nuclear components of Wnt signaling can also be targeted for treating bone diseases. As a key mediator of Wnt/β-catenin signaling, β-catenin translocates into the nucleus to bind to TCF/LEF transcription factors that regulate the transcription of the downstream target genes. Therefore, targeting β-catenin, TCF/LEF, or the interaction of β-catenin and TCF/LEF in the nucleus is an opportunity for disease therapy.

MicroRNAs show possible therapeutic potential by targeting the nuclear components of Wnt signaling. Let-7i-3p negatively regulates the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway by targeting LEF1 and inhibiting osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells (hASCs) under cyclic strain in vitro.447 Therefore, either inhibition of Let-7i-3p or overexpression of LEF1 promotes osteogenic differentiation of hASCs,447 demonstrating the targeting of LEF1 as a therapeutic strategy for treating disease. Moreover, miR-129-5p targets TCF4 to inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling, thus inhibiting osteoblast differentiation and bone formation.448 Thus, inhibition of miR-129-5p enhances osteoblast differentiation and bone formation, showing a rescue effect on osteoporosis.448 Recently, Hu et al. demonstrated that miR-320c can inhibit chondrogenic degeneration during OA by downregulating the β-catenin protein level in the nucleus and decreasing the relative transcriptional activity of the β-catenin/TCF complex.449 Intra-articular injection of mmu-miR-320-3p attenuates OA progression in the OA mouse model, demonstrating miR-320-3p as a novel therapeutic agent for OA treatment.449

Taken together, from the extracellular components, cytosol components to the nuclear components of the Wnt signaling pathway, multiple components have been studied as drug targets to modulate Wnt signaling, making Wnt signaling a perfect target for treating bone diseases.

Conclusions and perspectives

Wnt signaling is a universal signaling pathway involved in development, physiology, and pathology. Here we highlight data exploring the role of both canonical (Wnt/β-catenin) and noncanonical Wnt signaling pathways in bone physiology and pathology by discussing Wnt proteins, receptors, activators, and inhibitors, and their interactions. Moreover, the efforts targeting Wnt signaling for treating bone disease are summarized. Human bone diseases and skeletal abnormalities resulting from aberrant Wnt signaling mimicked in mutant mice reveal the importance of Wnt signaling in bone development. Different animal models and human diseases studies establish a complex Wnt signaling pathway network with multiple players. Defects in Wnt ligands and agonists may lead to bone development disorders, joint formation abnormality, or osteoporosis.450 Mutation in LRP5/6, the Wnts receptors, leads to various bone diseases. Sclerostin is an extracellular antagonist that is involved in several bone diseases, including van Buchem disease and sclerosteosis. The mutation of other inhibitors such as WIF and Dkk causes altered bone density. In addition, the Wnt signaling pathway overlaps with other pathways related to bone development such as the PTH pathway, the Ihh pathway, and the TGF-β/BMP pathway. Through this interconnected network of signaling pathways, Wnt signaling regulates both bone remodeling and the determination of mesenchymal stem cell fate.

The Wnt signaling pathway has been studied for decades, however, many important questions regarding Wnt signaling remain unanswered. What are the molecular structures of Wnt pathway components? What is their mechanism of interaction, the complicated network between the canonical Wnt pathway, noncanonical Wnt pathway, and other pathways? Where does Wnt signaling take place in cell organelles? What is the insight into the mechanisms of action of these Wnt receptors? Can we identify a truly potent Wnt inhibitor or agonist? Whether further complexity of Wnt-regulated gene expression will be uncovered through comparative analyses of Wnt-responsive transcription programs that depend on TCF/LEF versus others?

As Wnt signaling plays an important role in bone formation, homeostasis and diseases, it become the topic of drug development for bone diseases. The approach to the Wnt pathway focuses on extracellular mediators such as Sclerostin, which is selectively and highly expressed in bone. Agents that specifically target Sclerostin show great promise for simultaneously treating osteoporosis and repairing bone fractures. The FDA approved the first-in-class anti-sclerostin antibody for osteoporosis in 2019. While current osteoporosis drugs decrease bone breakdown and bone formation, the anti-sclerostin antibody simultaneously increases bone formation and decreases bone breakdown.451 The Wnt signaling pathway consists of numerous antagonists, ligands, and intracellular proteins that alter the development of bone as well as the pathogenesis of bone diseases. Thus, it would be useful to investigate more upstream targets in the Wnt canonical pathway for further drug discovery, which could yield more promise than targeting β-catenin and downstream events.

New biological analytical technologies, including single-cell RNA-seq analysis and spatial transcriptomics should enable us to dissect where, when, and how Wnt signaling occurs inside the cells. New imaging technologies, such as spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells452 will facilitate the visualization of the dynamic Wnt signaling events in vivo. Novel regulators will likely continue to be identified using classical genetic, molecular, modern genomic, proteomic approaches, bioinformatics, and protein structure biology using cryo-electron microscopy and Deep learning system, AlphaFold, an artificial intelligence (AI) program, which performs predictions of protein structure. As there are multiple components in Wnt signaling, identification of the key regulator or the key interaction between these components involved in specific tissue physiology or disease will be helpful for both understanding the underlying mechanism and providing a target for specific disease therapy. Besides, it will be helpful to identify specific activators and inhibitors of the specific components of Wnt signaling based on their structure, both for studying their physio-pathological role and for investigating therapeutic methods. Answering these questions and identifying these issues will provide a deeper understanding of the physiological and pathological role of Wnt signaling and will make Wnt signaling a more suitable target for bone disease therapy.

Acknowledgements

We apologize to the many researchers whose important primary papers could not be cited in the References due to space limitations. We thank Ms. Abigail McVicar, Mr. Alasdair Masson, and Dr. Matthew McConnell for their excellent assistance with manuscript editing. We thank Figdraw for the support concerning the Figure drawing. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81772017 to [L.F.H.], and 82072106 and 32371371 to [A.R.Q.]), The Project Supported by Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (2023-JC-YB-163 to [L.F.H.]) and the National Institutes of Health [AR-070135 and AG-056438 to W.C., and AR075735, DE023813, AR074954, and DE028264 to Y.P.L.].

Author contributions

Y.P.L. and L.F.H. designed the manuscript writing. L.F.H., W.C., A.R.Q., and Y.P.L. wrote the manuscript. L.F.H. and Y.P.L. designed and drew the Figures, L.F.H., W.C., and A.R.Q. designed the tables. L.F.H., W.C., A.R.Q., and Y.P.L. reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Contributor Information

Airong Qian, Email: qianair@nwpu.edu.cn.

Yi-Ping Li, Email: yli81@tulane.edu.

References

  • 1.Steinhart Z, Angers S. Wnt signaling in development and tissue homeostasis. Development. 2018;145:dev146589. doi: 10.1242/dev.146589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nusse R, Clevers H. Wnt/β-catenin signaling, disease, and emerging therapeutic modalities. Cell. 2017;169:985–999. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nusse R, et al. A new nomenclature for int-1 and related genes: the Wnt gene family. Cell. 1991;64:231. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90633-A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nusse R, Varmus HE. Many tumors induced by the mouse mammary tumor virus contain a provirus integrated in the same region of the host genome. Cell. 1982;31:99–109. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90409-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nusslein-Volhard C, Wieschaus E. Mutations affecting segment number and polarity in Drosophila. Nature. 1980;287:795–801. doi: 10.1038/287795a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rijsewijk F, et al. The Drosophila homolog of the mouse mammary oncogene int-1 is identical to the segment polarity gene wingless. Cell. 1987;50:649–657. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90038-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Siegfried E, Chou TB, Perrimon N. wingless signaling acts through zeste-white 3, the Drosophila homolog of glycogen synthase kinase-3, to regulate engrailed and establish cell fate. Cell. 1992;71:1167–1179. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(05)80065-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Noordermeer J, Klingensmith J, Perrimon N, Nusse R. dishevelled and armadillo act in the wingless signalling pathway in Drosophila. Nature. 1994;367:80–83. doi: 10.1038/367080a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Peifer M, Sweeton D, Casey M, Wieschaus E. Wingless signal and Zeste-white 3 kinase trigger opposing changes in the intracellular distribution of Armadillo. Development. 1994;120:369–380. doi: 10.1242/dev.120.2.369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.McMahon AP, Moon RT. Ectopic expression of the proto-oncogene int-1 in Xenopus embryos leads to duplication of the embryonic axis. Cell. 1989;58:1075–1084. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(89)90506-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Munoz-Descalzo S, Hadjantonakis AK, Arias AM. Wnt/ß-catenin signalling and the dynamics of fate decisions in early mouse embryos and embryonic stem (ES) cells. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2015;47-48:101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Rudnicki MA, Williams BO. Wnt signaling in bone and muscle. Bone. 2015;80:60–66. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2015.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lojk, J. & Marc, J. Roles of non-canonical wnt signalling pathways in bone biology. Int. J. Mol. Sci.22 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Kinzler KW, et al. Identification of FAP locus genes from chromosome 5q21. Science. 1991;253:661–665. doi: 10.1126/science.1651562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nishisho I, et al. Mutations of chromosome 5q21 genes in FAP and colorectal cancer patients. Science. 1991;253:665–669. doi: 10.1126/science.1651563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rubinfeld B, et al. Association of the APC gene product with beta-catenin. Science. 1993;262:1731–1734. doi: 10.1126/science.8259518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Su LK, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW. Association of the APC tumor suppressor protein with catenins. Science. 1993;262:1734–1737. doi: 10.1126/science.8259519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Korinek V, et al. Constitutive transcriptional activation by a beta-catenin-Tcf complex in APC−/− colon carcinoma. Science. 1997;275:1784–1787. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5307.1784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/β-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149:1192–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ackers I, Malgor R. Interrelationship of canonical and non-canonical Wnt signalling pathways in chronic metabolic diseases. Diabetes Vasc. Dis. Res. 2018;15:3–13. doi: 10.1177/1479164117738442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Krishnamurthy N, Kurzrock R. Targeting the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway in cancer: Update on effectors and inhibitors. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2018;62:50–60. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.11.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Miller JR. The Wnts. Genome Biol. 2002;3:Reviews3001. doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-3-1-reviews3001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Willert K, et al. Wnt proteins are lipid-modified and can act as stem cell growth factors. Nature. 2003;423:448–452. doi: 10.1038/nature01611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Takada R, et al. Monounsaturated fatty acid modification of Wnt protein: its role in Wnt secretion. Dev. Cell. 2006;11:791–801. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kurayoshi M, Yamamoto H, Izumi S, Kikuchi A. Post-translational palmitoylation and glycosylation of Wnt-5a are necessary for its signalling. Biochem. J. 2007;402:515–523. doi: 10.1042/BJ20061476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Du SJ, et al. Identification of distinct classes and functional domains of Wnts through expression of wild-type and chimeric proteins in Xenopus embryos. Mol. Cell Biol. 1995;15:2625–2634. doi: 10.1128/MCB.15.5.2625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tao Q, et al. Maternal wnt11 activates the canonical wnt signaling pathway required for axis formation in Xenopus embryos. Cell. 2005;120:857–871. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Toyama T, et al. Noncanonical Wnt11 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell proliferation and migration. Mol. Cancer Res. 2010;8:254–265. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-09-0238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tian S, et al. Secreted AGR2 promotes invasion of colorectal cancer cells via Wnt11-mediated non-canonical Wnt signaling. Exp. Cell Res. 2018;364:198–207. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mikels AJ, Nusse R. Wnts as ligands: processing, secretion and reception. Oncogene. 2006;25:7461–7468. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Hsieh JC, Rattner A, Smallwood PM, Nathans J. Biochemical characterization of Wnt-frizzled interactions using a soluble, biologically active vertebrate Wnt protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;96:3546–3551. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tamai K, et al. LDL-receptor-related proteins in Wnt signal transduction. Nature. 2000;407:530–535. doi: 10.1038/35035117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grumolato L, et al. Canonical and noncanonical Wnts use a common mechanism to activate completely unrelated coreceptors. Genes Dev. 2010;24:2517–2530. doi: 10.1101/gad.1957710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bonkowsky JL, et al. Axon routing across the midline controlled by the Drosophila Derailed receptor. Nature. 1999;402:540–544. doi: 10.1038/990122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lu W, Yamamoto V, Ortega B, Baltimore D. Mammalian Ryk is a Wnt coreceptor required for stimulation of neurite outgrowth. Cell. 2004;119:97–108. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Peradziryi H, Tolwinski NS, Borchers A. The many roles of PTK7: a versatile regulator of cell-cell communication. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2012;524:71–76. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2011.12.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Masiakowski P, Yancopoulos GD. The Wnt receptor CRD domain is also found in MuSK and related orphan receptor tyrosine kinases. Curr. Biol. 1998;8:R407. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(98)70263-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Bhanot P, et al. A new member of the frizzled family from Drosophila functions as a Wingless receptor. Nature. 1996;382:225–230. doi: 10.1038/382225a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.MacDonald, B. T. & He, X. Frizzled and LRP5/6 receptors for Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.4 a007880 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 40.Dann CE, et al. Insights into Wnt binding and signalling from the structures of two Frizzled cysteine-rich domains. Nature. 2001;412:86–90. doi: 10.1038/35083601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Janda CY, et al. Structural basis of Wnt recognition by Frizzled. Science. 2012;337:59–64. doi: 10.1126/science.1222879. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Agostino M, Pohl, S O, Dharmarajan A. Structure-based prediction of Wnt binding affinities for Frizzled-type cysteine-rich domains. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:11218–11229. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M117.786269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nishita M, et al. Ror2/frizzled complex mediates Wnt5a-induced AP-1 activation by regulating Dishevelled polymerization. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;30:3610–3619. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00177-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Wehrli M, et al. arrow encodes an LDL-receptor-related protein essential for Wingless signalling. Nature. 2000;407:527–530. doi: 10.1038/35035110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pinson KI, et al. An LDL-receptor-related protein mediates Wnt signalling in mice. Nature. 2000;407:535–538. doi: 10.1038/35035124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Houston DW, Wylie C. Cloning and expression of Xenopus Lrp5 and Lrp6 genes. Mech. Dev. 2002;117:337–342. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00205-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kelly OG, Pinson KI, Skarnes WC. The Wnt co-receptors Lrp5 and Lrp6 are essential for gastrulation in mice. Development. 2004;131:2803–2815. doi: 10.1242/dev.01137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Mao J, et al. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 binds to Axin and regulates the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. 2001;7:801–809. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00224-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bourhis E, et al. Reconstitution of a frizzled8.Wnt3a.LRP6 signaling complex reveals multiple Wnt and Dkk1 binding sites on LRP6. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:9172–9179. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.092130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Minami Y, Oishi I, Endo M, Nishita M. Ror-family receptor tyrosine kinases in noncanonical Wnt signaling: their implications in developmental morphogenesis and human diseases. Dev. Dyn. 2010;239:1–15. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Fukuda T, et al. Antisera induced by infusions of autologous Ad-CD154-leukemia B cells identify ROR1 as an oncofetal antigen and receptor for Wnt5a. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:3047–3052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712148105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Oishi I, et al. The receptor tyrosine kinase Ror2 is involved in non-canonical Wnt5a/JNK signalling pathway. Genes Cells. 2003;8:645–654. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2003.00662.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hikasa H, Shibata M, Hiratani I, Taira M. The Xenopus receptor tyrosine kinase Xror2 modulates morphogenetic movements of the axial mesoderm and neuroectoderm via Wnt signaling. Development. 2002;129:5227–5239. doi: 10.1242/dev.129.22.5227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yu J, et al. Wnt5a induces ROR1/ROR2 heterooligomerization to enhance leukemia chemotaxis and proliferation. J. Clin. Investig. 2016;126:585–598. doi: 10.1172/JCI83535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ho HY, et al. Wnt5a-Ror-Dishevelled signaling constitutes a core developmental pathway that controls tissue morphogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:4044–4051. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1200421109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Qi X, Okinaka Y, Nishita M, Minami Y. Essential role of Wnt5a-Ror1/Ror2 signaling in metanephric mesenchyme and ureteric bud formation. Genes Cells. 2016;21:325–334. doi: 10.1111/gtc.12342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wu X, Yan T, Hao L, Zhu Y. Wnt5a induces ROR1 and ROR2 to activate RhoA in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma cells. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:2803–2815. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S190999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Mikels AJ, Nusse R. Purified Wnt5a protein activates or inhibits beta-catenin-TCF signaling depending on receptor context. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:e115. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Hovens CM, et al. RYK, a receptor tyrosine kinase-related molecule with unusual kinase domain motifs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1992;89:11818–11822. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.24.11818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Halford MM, Stacker SA. Revelations of the RYK receptor. Bioessays. 2001;23:34–45. doi: 10.1002/1521-1878(200101)23:1<34::AID-BIES1005>3.0.CO;2-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mossie K, et al. Colon carcinoma kinase-4 defines a new subclass of the receptor tyrosine kinase family. Oncogene. 1995;11:2179–2184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Shnitsar I, Borchers A. PTK7 recruits dsh to regulate neural crest migration. Development. 2008;135:4015–4024. doi: 10.1242/dev.023556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Puppo F, et al. Protein tyrosine kinase 7 has a conserved role in Wnt/beta-catenin canonical signalling. EMBO Rep. 2011;12:43–49. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Peradziryi H, et al. PTK7/Otk interacts with Wnts and inhibits canonical Wnt signalling. EMBO J. 2011;30:3729–3740. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bin-Nun N, et al. PTK7 modulates Wnt signaling activity via LRP6. Development. 2014;141:410–421. doi: 10.1242/dev.095984. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Martinez S, et al. The PTK7 and ROR2 protein receptors interact in the vertebrate WNT/Planar Cell Polarity (PCP) pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:30562–30572. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.697615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Berger H, Wodarz A, Borchers A. PTK7 faces the Wnt in development and disease. Front Cell Dev. Biol. 2017;5:31. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2017.00031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hayes M, et al. Ptk7 promotes non-canonical Wnt/PCP-mediated morphogenesis and inhibits Wnt/beta-catenin-dependent cell fate decisions during vertebrate development. Development. 2013;140:1807–1818. doi: 10.1242/dev.090183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.DeChiara TM, et al. The receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK is required for neuromuscular junction formation in vivo. Cell. 1996;85:501–512. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81251-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Glass DJ, et al. Agrin acts via a MuSK receptor complex. Cell. 1996;85:513–523. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81252-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Gordon LR, Gribble KD, Syrett CM, Granato M. Initiation of synapse formation by Wnt-induced MuSK endocytosis. Development. 2012;139:1023–1033. doi: 10.1242/dev.071555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Strochlic L, et al. Wnt4 participates in the formation of vertebrate neuromuscular junction. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029976. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhang B, et al. Wnt proteins regulate acetylcholine receptor clustering in muscle cells. Mol. Brain. 2012;5:7. doi: 10.1186/1756-6606-5-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Angers S, Moon RT. Proximal events in Wnt signal transduction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009;10:468–477. doi: 10.1038/nrm2717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Bilic J, et al. Wnt induces LRP6 signalosomes and promotes dishevelled-dependent LRP6 phosphorylation. Science. 2007;316:1619–1622. doi: 10.1126/science.1137065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Niehrs C, Shen J. Regulation of Lrp6 phosphorylation. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2010;67:2551–2562. doi: 10.1007/s00018-010-0329-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Devenport D, Fuchs E. Planar polarization in embryonic epidermis orchestrates global asymmetric morphogenesis of hair follicles. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008;10:1257–1268. doi: 10.1038/ncb1784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yuan K, et al. Activation of the Wnt/planar cell polarity pathway is required for pericyte recruitment during pulmonary angiogenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 2015;185:69–84. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.09.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Lopez-Escobar, B. et al. The non-canonical Wnt-PCP pathway shapes the mouse caudal neural plate. Development145, dev157487 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 80.Huang YL, Niehrs C. Polarized Wnt signaling regulates ectodermal cell fate in Xenopus. Dev. Cell. 2014;29:250–257. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.03.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Andre P, et al. The Wnt coreceptor Ryk regulates Wnt/planar cell polarity by modulating the degradation of the core planar cell polarity component Vangl2. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:44518–44525. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.414441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sakane H, et al. Localization of glypican-4 in different membrane microdomains is involved in the regulation of Wnt signaling. J. Cell Sci. 2012;125:449–460. doi: 10.1242/jcs.091876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Carvallo L, et al. Non-canonical Wnt signaling induces ubiquitination and degradation of Syndecan4. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:29546–29555. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.155812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Sebbagh M, Borg JP. Insight into planar cell polarity. Exp. Cell Res. 2014;328:284–295. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Kuhl M, et al. The Wnt/Ca2+ pathway: a new vertebrate Wnt signaling pathway takes shape. Trends Genet. 2000;16:279–283. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02028-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Anakwe K, et al. Wnt signalling regulates myogenic differentiation in the developing avian wing. Development. 2003;130:3503–3514. doi: 10.1242/dev.00538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Saneyoshi T, Kume S, Amasaki Y, Mikoshiba K. The Wnt/calcium pathway activates NF-AT and promotes ventral cell fate in Xenopus embryos. Nature. 2002;417:295–299. doi: 10.1038/417295a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Undi RB, et al. Wnt signaling: role in regulation of haematopoiesis. Indian J. Hematol. Blood Transfus. 2016;32:123–134. doi: 10.1007/s12288-015-0585-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.McQuate A, Latorre-Esteves E, Barria A. A Wnt/calcium signaling cascade regulates neuronal excitability and trafficking of NMDARs. Cell Rep. 2017;21:60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.De A. Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway: a brief overview. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2011;43:745–756. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmr079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Cao X, et al. WNT10A induces apoptosis of senescent synovial resident stem cells through Wnt/calcium pathway-mediated HDAC5 phosphorylation in OA joints. Bone. 2021;150:116006. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhen H, et al. The Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway is essential for the regeneration of GABAergic neurons in planarian Dugesia japonica. Faseb J. 2020;34:16567–16580. doi: 10.1096/fj.201903040RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Semenov MV, Habas R, Macdonald BT, He X. SnapShot: noncanonical Wnt signaling pathways. Cell. 2007;131:1378. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Thrasivoulou C, Millar M, Ahmed A. Activation of intracellular calcium by multiple Wnt ligands and translocation of beta-catenin into the nucleus: a convergent model of Wnt/Ca2+ and Wnt/beta-catenin pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:35651–35659. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.437913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wu S, Yu Q, Lai A, Tian J. Pulsed electromagnetic field induces Ca2+-dependent osteoblastogenesis in C3H10T1/2 mesenchymal cells through the Wnt-Ca2+/Wnt-beta-catenin signaling pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;503:715–721. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Gao C, Chen YG. Dishevelled: the hub of Wnt signaling. Cell Signal. 2010;22:717–727. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Jin YR, Yoon JK. The R-spondin family of proteins: emerging regulators of WNT signaling. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2012;44:2278–2287. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2012.09.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Xu Q, et al. Vascular development in the retina and inner ear: control by Norrin and Frizzled-4, a high-affinity ligand-receptor pair. Cell. 2004;116:883–895. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00216-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Braunger BM, et al. Constitutive overexpression of Norrin activates Wnt/beta-catenin and endothelin-2 signaling to protect photoreceptors from light damage. Neurobiol. Dis. 2013;50:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2012.09.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Ke J, et al. Structure and function of Norrin in assembly and activation of a Frizzled 4-Lrp5/6 complex. Genes Dev. 2013;27:2305–2319. doi: 10.1101/gad.228544.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Hu L, et al. MACF1, versatility in tissue-specific function and in human disease. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2017;69:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.05.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Chen HJ, et al. The role of microtubule actin cross-linking factor 1 (MACF1) in the Wnt signaling pathway. Genes Dev. 2006;20:1933–1945. doi: 10.1101/gad.1411206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Moparthi L, Pizzolato G, Koch S. Wnt activator FOXB2 drives the neuroendocrine differentiation of prostate cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:22189–22195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906484116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.He Z, et al. R-spondin family biology and emerging linkages to cancer. Ann. Med. 2023;55:428–446. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2023.2166981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Binnerts ME, et al. R-Spondin1 regulates Wnt signaling by inhibiting internalization of LRP6. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:14700–14705. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702305104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Kim KA, et al. R-Spondin family members regulate the Wnt pathway by a common mechanism. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19:2588–2596. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e08-02-0187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Nam JS, et al. Mouse cristin/R-spondin family proteins are novel ligands for the Frizzled 8 and LRP6 receptors and activate beta-catenin-dependent gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:13247–13257. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M508324200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Wei Q, et al. R-spondin1 is a high-affinity ligand for LRP6 and induces LRP6 phosphorylation and beta-catenin signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:15903–15911. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M701927200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Carmon KS, et al. R-spondins function as ligands of the orphan receptors LGR4 and LGR5 to regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:11452–11457. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1106083108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.de Lau W, et al. Lgr5 homologues associate with Wnt receptors and mediate R-spondin signalling. Nature. 2011;476:293–297. doi: 10.1038/nature10337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.de Lau W, Peng WC, Gros P, Clevers H. The R-spondin/Lgr5/Rnf43 module: regulator of Wnt signal strength. Genes Dev. 2014;28:305–316. doi: 10.1101/gad.235473.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Wang D, et al. Structural basis for R-spondin recognition by LGR4/5/6 receptors. Genes Dev. 2013;27:1339–1344. doi: 10.1101/gad.219360.113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Ohkawara B, Glinka A, Niehrs C. Rspo3 binds syndecan 4 and induces Wnt/PCP signaling via clathrin-mediated endocytosis to promote morphogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2011;20:303–314. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Lacour F, et al. R-spondin1 controls muscle cell fusion through dual regulation of antagonistic Wnt signaling pathways. Cell Rep. 2017;18:2320–2330. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Dong X, et al. RSPO2 suppresses colorectal cancer metastasis by counteracting the Wnt5a/Fzd7-driven noncanonical Wnt pathway. Cancer Lett. 2017;402:153–165. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2017.05.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Scholz B, et al. Endothelial RSPO3 controls vascular stability and pruning through non-canonical WNT/Ca2+/NFAT signaling. Dev. Cell. 2016;36:79–93. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Ye X, et al. Norrin, frizzled-4, and Lrp5 signaling in endothelial cells controls a genetic program for retinal vascularization. Cell. 2009;139:285–298. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Smallwood PM, et al. Mutational analysis of Norrin-Frizzled4 recognition. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:4057–4068. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609618200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Chang, T. H. et al. Structure and functional properties of Norrin mimic Wnt for signalling with Frizzled4, Lrp5/6, and proteoglycan. Elife4, e06554 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 120.Bang I, et al. Biophysical and functional characterization of Norrin signaling through Frizzled4. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:8787–8792. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1805901115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Byers TJ, Beggs AH, McNally EM, Kunkel LM. Novel actin crosslinker superfamily member identified by a two step degenerate PCR procedure. FEBS Lett. 1995;368:500–504. doi: 10.1016/0014-5793(95)00722-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Leung CL, et al. Microtubule actin cross-linking factor (MACF): a hybrid of dystonin and dystrophin that can interact with the actin and microtubule cytoskeletons. J. Cell Biol. 1999;147:1275–1286. doi: 10.1083/jcb.147.6.1275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Hu L, et al. Isoforms, structures, and functions of versatile spectraplakin MACF1. BMB Rep. 2016;49:37–44. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2016.49.1.185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Liu P, et al. Requirement for Wnt3 in vertebrate axis formation. Nat. Genet. 1999;22:361–365. doi: 10.1038/11932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Hu L, et al. Microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1 promotes osteoblast differentiation by promoting β-catenin/TCF1/Runx2 signaling axis. J. Cell Physiol. 2018;233:1574–1584. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Zhang Y, et al. MACF1 overexpression by transfecting the 21 kbp large plasmid PEGFP-C1A-ACF7 promotes osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Hum. Gene Ther. 2018;29:259–270. doi: 10.1089/hum.2017.153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Cruciat CM, Niehrs C. Secreted and transmembrane wnt inhibitors and activators. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013;5:a015081. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a015081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Fedi P, et al. Isolation and biochemical characterization of the human Dkk-1 homologue, a novel inhibitor of mammalian Wnt signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:19465–19472. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.27.19465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Mao B, et al. LDL-receptor-related protein 6 is a receptor for Dickkopf proteins. Nature. 2001;411:321–325. doi: 10.1038/35077108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Galli LM, et al. Differential inhibition of Wnt-3a by Sfrp-1, Sfrp-2, and Sfrp-3. Dev. Dyn. 2006;235:681–690. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Malinauskas T, et al. Modular mechanism of Wnt signaling inhibition by Wnt inhibitory factor 1. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2011;18:886–893. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Itasaki N, et al. Wise, a context-dependent activator and inhibitor of Wnt signalling. Development. 2003;130:4295–4305. doi: 10.1242/dev.00674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Li X, et al. Sclerostin binds to LRP5/6 and antagonizes canonical Wnt signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:19883–19887. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413274200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Zhu W, et al. IGFBP-4 is an inhibitor of canonical Wnt signalling required for cardiogenesis. Nature. 2008;454:345–349. doi: 10.1038/nature07027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Piccolo S, et al. The head inducer Cerberus is a multifunctional antagonist of Nodal, BMP and Wnt signals. Nature. 1999;397:707–710. doi: 10.1038/17820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Ding Y, et al. Bighead is a Wnt antagonist secreted by the Xenopus Spemann organizer that promotes Lrp6 endocytosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:E9135–e9144. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1812117115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Yamamoto A, et al. Shisa promotes head formation through the inhibition of receptor protein maturation for the caudalizing factors, Wnt and FGF. Cell. 2005;120:223–235. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Zhang X, et al. Tiki1 is required for head formation via Wnt cleavage-oxidation and inactivation. Cell. 2012;149:1565–1577. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Kagermeier-Schenk B, et al. Waif1/5T4 inhibits Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and activates noncanonical Wnt pathways by modifying LRP6 subcellular localization. Dev. Cell. 2011;21:1129–1143. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Shimomura Y, et al. APCDD1 is a novel Wnt inhibitor mutated in hereditary hypotrichosis simplex. Nature. 2010;464:1043–1047. doi: 10.1038/nature08875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Glinka A, et al. Dickkopf-1 is a member of a new family of secreted proteins and functions in head induction. Nature. 1998;391:357–362. doi: 10.1038/34848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Niehrs C. Function and biological roles of the Dickkopf family of Wnt modulators. Oncogene. 2006;25:7469–7481. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Bafico A, et al. Novel mechanism of Wnt signalling inhibition mediated by Dickkopf-1 interaction with LRP6/Arrow. Nat. Cell Biol. 2001;3:683–686. doi: 10.1038/35083081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Patel S, et al. Structural and functional analysis of Dickkopf 4 (Dkk4): new insights into Dkk evolution and regulation of Wnt signaling by Dkk and Kremen proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:12149–12166. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.002918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Mao B, et al. Kremen proteins are Dickkopf receptors that regulate Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Nature. 2002;417:664–667. doi: 10.1038/nature756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Ellwanger K, et al. Targeted disruption of the Wnt regulator Kremen induces limb defects and high bone density. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008;28:4875–4882. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00222-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Wu W, Glinka A, Delius H, Niehrs C. Mutual antagonism between dickkopf1 and dickkopf2 regulates Wnt/beta-catenin signalling. Curr. Biol. 2000;10:1611–1614. doi: 10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00868-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Brott BK, Sokol SY. Regulation of Wnt/LRP signaling by distinct domains of Dickkopf proteins. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;22:6100–6110. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.17.6100-6110.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Mao B, Niehrs C. Kremen2 modulates Dickkopf2 activity during Wnt/LRP6 signaling. Gene. 2003;302:179–183. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1119(02)01106-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Zhang W, et al. Secreted frizzled-related proteins: a promising therapeutic target for cancer therapy through Wnt signaling inhibition. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023;166:115344. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.115344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Hoang B, Moos M, Jr., Vukicevic S, Luyten FP. Primary structure and tissue distribution of FRZB, a novel protein related to Drosophila frizzled, suggest a role in skeletal morphogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:26131–26137. doi: 10.1074/jbc.271.42.26131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Leyns L, et al. Frzb-1 is a secreted antagonist of Wnt signaling expressed in the Spemann organizer. Cell. 1997;88:747–756. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81921-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Rattner A, et al. A family of secreted proteins contains homology to the cysteine-rich ligand-binding domain of frizzled receptors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1997;94:2859–2863. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.7.2859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Li Y, et al. Sfrp5 coordinates foregut specification and morphogenesis by antagonizing both canonical and noncanonical Wnt11 signaling. Genes Dev. 2008;22:3050–3063. doi: 10.1101/gad.1687308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Satoh W, et al. Sfrp1, Sfrp2, and Sfrp5 regulate the Wnt/beta-catenin and the planar cell polarity pathways during early trunk formation in mouse. Genesis. 2008;46:92–103. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Holly VL, Widen SA, Famulski JK, Waskiewicz AJ. Sfrp1a and Sfrp5 function as positive regulators of Wnt and BMP signaling during early retinal development. Dev. Biol. 2014;388:192–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2014.01.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Xavier CP, et al. Secreted Frizzled-related protein potentiation versus inhibition of Wnt3a/beta-catenin signaling. Cell Signal. 2014;26:94–101. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.09.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Zhang J, et al. Wnt inhibitory factor-1 functions as a tumor suppressor through modulating Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in neuroblastoma. Cancer Lett. 2014;348:12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Vassallo I, et al. WIF1 re-expression in glioblastoma inhibits migration through attenuation of non-canonical WNT signaling by downregulating the lncRNA MALAT1. Oncogene. 2016;35:12–21. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Surmann-Schmitt C, et al. Wif-1 is expressed at cartilage-mesenchyme interfaces and impedes Wnt3a-mediated inhibition of chondrogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 2009;122:3627–3637. doi: 10.1242/jcs.048926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Balemans W, et al. Increased bone density in sclerosteosis is due to the deficiency of a novel secreted protein (SOST) Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001;10:537–543. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.5.537. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.van Bezooijen RL, et al. Sclerostin is an osteocyte-expressed negative regulator of bone formation, but not a classical BMP antagonist. J. Exp. Med. 2004;199:805–814. doi: 10.1084/jem.20031454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Winkler DG, et al. Osteocyte control of bone formation via sclerostin, a novel BMP antagonist. EMBO J. 2003;22:6267–6276. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Holdsworth G, et al. Characterization of the interaction of sclerostin with the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) family of Wnt co-receptors. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:26464–26477. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.350108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Kim J, et al. Sclerostin inhibits Wnt signaling through tandem interaction with two LRP6 ectodomains. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:5357. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19155-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Leupin O, et al. Bone overgrowth-associated mutations in the LRP4 gene impair sclerostin facilitator function. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:19489–19500. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.190330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Krause C, et al. Distinct modes of inhibition by sclerostin on bone morphogenetic protein and Wnt signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:41614–41626. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.153890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Ahn Y, Sanderson BW, Klein OD, Krumlauf R. Inhibition of Wnt signaling by Wise (Sostdc1) and negative feedback from Shh controls tooth number and patterning. Development. 2010;137:3221–3231. doi: 10.1242/dev.054668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Ahn Y, et al. Lrp4 and Wise interplay controls the formation and patterning of mammary and other skin appendage placodes by modulating Wnt signaling. Development. 2013;140:583–593. doi: 10.1242/dev.085118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Firth SM, Baxter RC. Cellular actions of the insulin-like growth factor binding proteins. Endocr. Rev. 2002;23:824–854. doi: 10.1210/er.2001-0033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Wo D, et al. Opposing roles of Wnt inhibitors IGFBP-4 and Dkk1 in cardiac ischemia by differential targeting of LRP5/6 and beta-catenin. Circulation. 2016;134:1991–2007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Ueno K, et al. IGFBP-4 activates the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway and induces M-CAM expression in human renal cell carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer. 2011;129:2360–2369. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25899. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Bouwmeester T, et al. Cerberus is a head-inducing secreted factor expressed in the anterior endoderm of Spemann’s organizer. Nature. 1996;382:595–601. doi: 10.1038/382595a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Zhang Y-J, Shi D-L. Diversification of amphioxus and vertebrate Cerberus protein function in modulating Nodal, BMP and Wnt signals. Mar. Life Sci. Technol. 2020;2:16–23. doi: 10.1007/s42995-019-00024-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Belo JA, et al. Generating asymmetries in the early vertebrate embryo: the role of the Cerberus-like family. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 2009;53:1399–1407. doi: 10.1387/ijdb.072297jb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Colozza, G. Purified Bighead protein efficiently promotes head development in the South African clawed frog, Xenopus laevis. microPubl. Biol.2021, 10.17912/micropub.biology.000347 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 177.Pei J, Grishin NV. Unexpected diversity in Shisa-like proteins suggests the importance of their roles as transmembrane adaptors. Cell Signal. 2012;24:758–769. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2011.11.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Nagano T, et al. Shisa2 promotes the maturation of somitic precursors and transition to the segmental fate in Xenopus embryos. Development. 2006;133:4643–4654. doi: 10.1242/dev.02657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Furushima K, et al. Mouse homologues of Shisa antagonistic to Wnt and Fgf signalings. Dev. Biol. 2007;306:480–492. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2007.03.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Zhao Y, Malinauskas T, Harlos K, Jones EY. Structural insights into the inhibition of Wnt signaling by cancer antigen 5T4/Wnt-activated inhibitory factor 1. Structure. 2014;22:612–620. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2014.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Mazzoni J, et al. The Wnt inhibitor Apcdd1 coordinates vascular remodeling and barrier maturation of retinal blood vessels. Neuron. 2017;96:1055–1069.e1056. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Yiew NKH, et al. A novel role for the Wnt inhibitor APCDD1 in adipocyte differentiation: Implications for diet-induced obesity. J. Biol. Chem. 2017;292:6312–6324. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.758078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Viale-Bouroncle S, Klingelhoffer C, Ettl T, Morsczeck C. The WNT inhibitor APCDD1 sustains the expression of beta-catenin during the osteogenic differentiation of human dental follicle cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015;457:314–317. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.12.107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Hayward P, Kalmar T, Arias AM. Wnt/Notch signalling and information processing during development. Development. 2008;135:411–424. doi: 10.1242/dev.000505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Collu GM, Hidalgo-Sastre A, Brennan K. Wnt-Notch signalling crosstalk in development and disease. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2014;71:3553–3567. doi: 10.1007/s00018-014-1644-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Gao J, Fan L, Zhao L, Su Y. The interaction of Notch and Wnt signaling pathways in vertebrate regeneration. Cell Regen. 2021;10:11. doi: 10.1186/s13619-020-00072-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Estrach S, et al. Jagged 1 is a beta-catenin target gene required for ectopic hair follicle formation in adult epidermis. Development. 2006;133:4427–4438. doi: 10.1242/dev.02644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Pannequin J, et al. The wnt target jagged-1 mediates the activation of notch signaling by progastrin in human colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69:6065–6073. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Kwon C, et al. Notch post-translationally regulates β-catenin protein in stem and progenitor cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011;13:1244–1251. doi: 10.1038/ncb2313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Bale AE. Hedgehog signaling and human disease. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 2002;3:47–65. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genom.3.022502.103031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Martí E, Bovolenta P. Sonic hedgehog in CNS development: one signal, multiple outputs. Trends Neurosci. 2002;25:89–96. doi: 10.1016/S0166-2236(02)02062-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.O’Hara WA, et al. Desert hedgehog is a mammal-specific gene expressed during testicular and ovarian development in a marsupial. BMC Dev. Biol. 2011;11:72. doi: 10.1186/1471-213X-11-72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Long F, et al. Ihh signaling is directly required for the osteoblast lineage in the endochondral skeleton. Development. 2004;131:1309–1318. doi: 10.1242/dev.01006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Ding M, Wang X. Antagonism between Hedgehog and Wnt signaling pathways regulates tumorigenicity. Oncol. Lett. 2017;14:6327–6333. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.7030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Gozal E, Jagadapillai R, Cai J, Barnes GN. Potential crosstalk between sonic hedgehog-WNT signaling and neurovascular molecules: implications for blood-brain barrier integrity in autism spectrum disorder. J. Neurochem. 2021;159:15–28. doi: 10.1111/jnc.15460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Feng XH, Derynck R. Specificity and versatility in tgf-beta signaling through Smads. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2005;21:659–693. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.022404.142018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Guo X, Wang X-F. Signaling cross-talk between TGF-β/BMP and other pathways. Cell Res. 2009;19:71–88. doi: 10.1038/cr.2008.302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Liu Z, et al. A dishevelled-1/Smad1 interaction couples WNT and bone morphogenetic protein signaling pathways in uncommitted bone marrow stromal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:17156–17163. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M513812200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Bernatik, O., Paclikova, P., Sri Ganji, R. & Bryja, V. Activity of Smurf2 ubiquitin ligase is regulated by the Wnt pathway protein dishevelled. Cells9, 1147 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 200.Hoppler S, Moon RT. BMP-2/-4 and Wnt-8 cooperatively pattern the Xenopus mesoderm. Mech. Dev. 1998;71:119–129. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4773(98)00004-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Nishita M, et al. Interaction between Wnt and TGF-beta signalling pathways during formation of Spemann’s organizer. Nature. 2000;403:781–785. doi: 10.1038/35001602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Song D, et al. Functional interaction between Wnt and Bmp signaling in periosteal bone growth. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:10782. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90324-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Bergenstock MK, Partridge NC. Parathyroid hormone stimulation of noncanonical Wnt signaling in bone. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2007;1116:354–359. doi: 10.1196/annals.1402.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Wang Y, et al. Wnt and the Wnt signaling pathway in bone development and disease. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 2014;19:379–407. doi: 10.2741/4214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Lee M, Partridge NC. Parathyroid hormone signaling in bone and kidney. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2009;18:298–302. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e32832c2264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Tamura Y, Kaji H. Parathyroid hormone and Wnt signaling. Clin. Calcium. 2013;23:847–852. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Leupin O, et al. Control of the SOST bone enhancer by PTH using MEF2 transcription factors. J. Bone Min. Res. 2007;22:1957–1967. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.070804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Wein MN, et al. SIKs control osteocyte responses to parathyroid hormone. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:13176. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Sun N, et al. Effects of histone deacetylase inhibitor Scriptaid and parathyroid hormone on osteocyte functions and metabolism. J. Biol. Chem. 2019;294:9722–9733. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.007312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Li C, et al. Lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 is required for parathyroid hormone-induced Sost suppression. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 2016;1364:62–73. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Kulkarni N, et al. Effects of parathyroid hormone on Wnt signaling pathway in bone. J. Cell. Biochem. 2005;95:1178–1190. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Guo X, Mak KK, Taketo MM, Yang Y. The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway interacts differentially with PTHrP signaling to control chondrocyte hypertrophy and final maturation. PLoS One. 2009;4:e6067. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Matthews J, Gustafsson JA. Estrogen signaling: a subtle balance between ER alpha and ER beta. Mol. Int. 2003;3:281–292. doi: 10.1124/mi.3.5.281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Mirza FS, Padhi ID, Raisz LG, Lorenzo JA. Serum sclerostin levels negatively correlate with parathyroid hormone levels and free estrogen index in postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010;95:1991–1997. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Kim RY, et al. Estrogen modulates bone morphogenetic protein-induced sclerostin expression through the Wnt signaling pathway. Tissue Eng. Part A. 2015;21:2076–2088. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Armstrong VJ, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is a component of osteoblastic bone cell early responses to load-bearing and requires estrogen receptor alpha. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:20715–20727. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M703224200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Liedert A, et al. Estrogen receptor and Wnt signaling interact to regulate early gene expression in response to mechanical strain in osteoblastic cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010;394:755–759. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.03.065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Liedert, A. et al. Effects of estrogen receptor and wnt signaling activation on mechanically induced bone formation in a mouse model of postmenopausal bone loss. Int. J. Mol. Sci.21, 8301 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 219.Galea GL, et al. Estrogen receptor α mediates proliferation of osteoblastic cells stimulated by estrogen and mechanical strain, but their acute down-regulation of the Wnt antagonist Sost is mediated by estrogen receptor β. J. Biol. Chem. 2013;288:9035–9048. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.405456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Suthon S, et al. Estrogen receptor alpha and NFATc1 bind to a bone mineral density-associated SNP to repress WNT5B in osteoblasts. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2022;109:97–115. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.11.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Franz-Odendaal TA. Induction and patterning of intramembranous bone. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed) 2011;16:2734–2746. doi: 10.2741/3882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Karaplis, A. Embryonic development of bone and the molecular regulation of intramembranous and endochondral bone formation. Princ. Bone Biol. 33–58 (2002).
  • 223.Takada S, et al. Wnt-3a regulates somite and tailbud formation in the mouse embryo. Genes Dev. 1994;8:174–189. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.2.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Vlashi R, Zhang X, Wu M, Chen G. Wnt signaling: essential roles in osteoblast differentiation, bone metabolism and therapeutic implications for bone and skeletal disorders. Genes Dis. 2023;10:1291–1317. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2022.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Zhou S, et al. Age-related intrinsic changes in human bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells and their differentiation to osteoblasts. Aging Cell. 2008;7:335–343. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00377.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Kawai M, de Paula FJ, Rosen CJ. New insights into osteoporosis: the bone-fat connection. J. Intern. Med. 2012;272:317–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2012.02564.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Day TF, Guo X, Garrettbeal L, Yang Y. Wnt/β-catenin signaling in mesenchymal progenitors controls osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation during vertebrate skeletogenesis. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:739–750. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Hill TP, et al. Canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling prevents osteoblasts from differentiating into chondrocytes. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:727–738. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Wu M, et al. Cbfβ governs osteoblast-adipocyte lineage commitment through enhancing β-catenin signaling and suppressing adipogenesis gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:10119–10124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1619294114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Byun MR, et al. Canonical Wnt signalling activates TAZ through PP1A during osteogenic differentiation. Cell Death Differ. 2014;21:854–863. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Hong JH, et al. TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science. 2005;309:1074–1078. doi: 10.1126/science.1110955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Qiu W, Chen L, Kassem M. Activation of non-canonical Wnt/JNK pathway by Wnt3a is associated with differentiation fate determination of human bone marrow stromal (mesenchymal) stem cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011;413:98–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Tu X, et al. Noncanonical Wnt signaling through G protein-linked PKCδ activation promotes bone formation. Dev. Cell. 2007;12:113–127. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Okamoto M, et al. Noncanonical Wnt5a enhances Wnt/beta-catenin signaling during osteoblastogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:4493. doi: 10.1038/srep04493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Gu Q, et al. Wnt5a/FZD4 mediates the mechanical stretch-induced osteogenic differentiation of bone mesenchymal stem cells. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018;48:215–226. doi: 10.1159/000491721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Qi Y, et al. An oriented-collagen scaffold including Wnt5a promotes osteochondral regeneration and cartilage interface integration in a rabbit model. FASEB J. 2020;34:11115–11132. doi: 10.1096/fj.202000280R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Deng Y, et al. Biomaterial-mediated presentation of wnt5a mimetic ligands enhances chondrogenesis and metabolism of stem cells by activating non-canonical Wnt signaling. Biomaterials. 2022;281:121316. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Yang, L. et al. Wnt7a promotes the osteogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Int. J. Mol. Med.47, 94 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 239.Bennett CN, et al. Regulation of osteoblastogenesis and bone mass by Wnt10b. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:3324–3329. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408742102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Kang S, et al. Wnt signaling stimulates osteoblastogenesis of mesenchymal precursors by suppressing CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein alpha and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:14515–14524. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M700030200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Stevens JR, et al. Wnt10b deficiency results in age-dependent loss of bone mass and progressive reduction of mesenchymal progenitor cells. J. Bone Min. Res. 2010;25:2138–2147. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Cawthorn WP, et al. Wnt6, Wnt10a and Wnt10b inhibit adipogenesis and stimulate osteoblastogenesis through a beta-catenin-dependent mechanism. Bone. 2012;50:477–489. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.08.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Han X, Li X, Zhong G, Liu Z. Regulation of osteogenic differentiation by DNA methylation of the dishevelled gene in bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2017;9:4848–4855. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Matsushita Y, et al. A Wnt-mediated transformation of the bone marrow stromal cell identity orchestrates skeletal regeneration. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:332. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14029-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Zhao X, et al. ZBP1 (DAI/DLM-1) promotes osteogenic differentiation while inhibiting adipogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells through a positive feedback loop of Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Bone Res. 2020;8:12. doi: 10.1038/s41413-020-0085-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Hang K, et al. Knockdown of SERPINB2 enhances the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells via activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling pathway. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021;12:525. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02581-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Zhao, F. et al. Mesenchymal MACF1 facilitates SMAD7 nuclear translocation to drive bone formation. Cells9, 616 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 248.Wu X, et al. High-mobility group AT-Hook 1 mediates the role of nuclear factor I/X in osteogenic differentiation through activating canonical Wnt signaling. Stem Cells. 2021;39:1349–1361. doi: 10.1002/stem.3418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Zhang Z, et al. Circ_FBLN1 promotes the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by regulating let-7i-5p/FZD4 axis and Wnt/β-catenin pathway. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2021;53:561–572. doi: 10.1007/s10863-021-09917-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Rui S, et al. Phosphate promotes osteogenic differentiation through non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway in human mesenchymal stem cells. Bone. 2022;164:116525. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2022.116525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Haffner-Luntzer, M. et al. Wnt1 boosts fracture healing by enhancing bone formation in the fracture callus. J. Bone Miner. Res.38, 749–762 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 252.Gaur T, et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:33132–33140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500608200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Tu X, et al. Noncanonical Wnt signaling through G protein-linked PKCdelta activation promotes bone formation. Dev. Cell. 2007;12:113–127. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Friedman MS, Oyserman SM, Hankenson KD. Wnt11 promotes osteoblast maturation and mineralization through R-spondin 2. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:14117–14125. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808337200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Shin HR, et al. Pin1-mediated modification prolongs the nuclear retention of beta-catenin in Wnt3a-induced osteoblast differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 2016;291:5555–5565. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.698563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Alam I, et al. Osteoblast-specific overexpression of human WNT16 increases both cortical and trabecular bone mass and structure in mice. Endocrinology. 2016;157:722–736. doi: 10.1210/en.2015-1281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Lawson LY, et al. Osteoblast-specific Wnt secretion Is required for skeletal homeostasis and loading-induced bone formation in adult mice. J. Bone Min. Res. 2022;37:108–120. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Albers J, et al. Control of bone formation by the serpentine receptor Frizzled-9. J. Cell Biol. 2011;192:1057–1072. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201008012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Sebastian A, et al. Wnt co-receptors Lrp5 and Lrp6 differentially mediate Wnt3a signaling in osteoblasts. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0188264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Riddle RC, et al. Lrp5 and Lrp6 exert overlapping functions in osteoblasts during postnatal bone acquisition. PLoS One. 2013;8:e63323. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063323. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Kato M, et al. Cbfa1-independent decrease in osteoblast proliferation, osteopenia, and persistent embryonic eye vascularization in mice deficient in Lrp5, a Wnt coreceptor. J. Cell Biol. 2002;157:303–314. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200201089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Little RD, et al. A mutation in the LDL receptor-related protein 5 gene results in the autosomal dominant high-bone-mass trait. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2002;70:11–19. doi: 10.1086/338450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Cui Y, et al. Lrp5 functions in bone to regulate bone mass. Nat. Med. 2011;17:684–691. doi: 10.1038/nm.2388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Choi, H. Y., Dieckmann, M., Herz, J. & Niemeier, A. Lrp4, a novel receptor for dickkopf 1 and sclerostin, is expressed by osteoblasts and regulates bone growth and turnover in vivo. PLoS One4, e7930 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 265.Simon-Chazottes D, et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the low-density lipoprotein receptor LRP4 cause abnormal limb development in the mouse. Genomics. 2006;87:673–677. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2006.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Chang MK, et al. Disruption of Lrp4 function by genetic deletion or pharmacological blockade increases bone mass and serum sclerostin levels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E5187–E5195. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1413828111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Zhang J, et al. LRP8 mediates Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and controls osteoblast differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2012;27:2065–2074. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Zhou F, et al. Ubiquitin-specific protease 4 antagonizes osteoblast differentiation through dishevelled. J. Bone Min. Res. 2016;31:1888–1898. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Rodda SJ, McMahon AP. Distinct roles for Hedgehog and canonical Wnt signaling in specification, differentiation and maintenance of osteoblast progenitors. Development. 2006;133:3231–3244. doi: 10.1242/dev.02480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Song L, et al. Loss of Wnt/β-catenin signaling causes cell fate shift of preosteoblasts from osteoblasts to adipocytes. J. Bone Min. Res. 2012;27:2344–2358. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Holmen SL, et al. Essential role of beta-catenin in postnatal bone acquisition. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:21162–21168. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501900200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Glass DA, 2nd, et al. Canonical Wnt signaling in differentiated osteoblasts controls osteoclast differentiation. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:751–764. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.02.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Sharma AR, et al. Rspo 1 promotes osteoblast differentiation via Wnt signaling pathway. Indian J. Biochem. Biophys. 2013;50:19–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Knight MN, et al. R-spondin-2 is a Wnt agonist that regulates osteoblast activity and bone mass. Bone Res. 2018;6:24. doi: 10.1038/s41413-018-0026-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Hu L, et al. Knockdown of microtubule actin crosslinking factor 1 inhibits cell proliferation in MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells. BMB Rep. 2015;48:583–588. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2015.48.10.098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Hu L, et al. MACF1 promotes osteoblast differentiation by sequestering repressors in cytoplasm. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28:2160–2178. doi: 10.1038/s41418-021-00744-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Yin C, et al. MACF1 alleviates aging-related osteoporosis via HES1. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2021;25:6242–6257. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Bodine PV, et al. The Wnt antagonist secreted frizzled-related protein-1 is a negative regulator of trabecular bone formation in adult mice. Mol. Endocrinol. 2004;18:1222–1237. doi: 10.1210/me.2003-0498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Yao W, et al. Overexpression of secreted frizzled-related protein 1 inhibits bone formation and attenuates parathyroid hormone bone anabolic effects. J. Bone Min. Res. 2010;25:190–199. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.090719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Morello R, et al. Brachy-syndactyly caused by loss of Sfrp2 function. J. Cell Physiol. 2008;217:127–137. doi: 10.1002/jcp.21483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Nakanishi R, et al. Osteoblast-targeted expression of Sfrp4 in mice results in low bone mass. J. Bone Min. Res. 2008;23:271–277. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.071007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Li J, et al. Dkk1-mediated inhibition of Wnt signaling in bone results in osteopenia. Bone. 2006;39:754–766. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.03.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Morvan F, et al. Deletion of a single allele of the Dkk1 gene leads to an increase in bone formation and bone mass. J. Bone Min. Res. 2006;21:934–945. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.060311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Hiramitsu S, Terauchi M, Kubota T. The effects of Dickkopf-4 on the proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of osteoblasts. Endocrinology. 2013;154:4618–4626. doi: 10.1210/en.2013-1387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Li X, et al. Dkk2 has a role in terminal osteoblast differentiation and mineralized matrix formation. Nat. Genet. 2005;37:945–952. doi: 10.1038/ng1614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Schulze J, et al. Negative regulation of bone formation by the transmembrane Wnt antagonist Kremen-2. PLoS One. 2010;5:e10309. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.ten Dijke P, et al. Osteocyte-derived sclerostin inhibits bone formation: its role in bone morphogenetic protein and Wnt signaling. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2008;90:31–35. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Sutherland MK, et al. Sclerostin promotes the apoptosis of human osteoblastic cells: a novel regulation of bone formation. Bone. 2004;35:828–835. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2004.05.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Loots GG, et al. Genomic deletion of a long-range bone enhancer misregulates sclerostin in Van Buchem disease. Genome Res. 2005;15:928–935. doi: 10.1101/gr.3437105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Li X, et al. Targeted deletion of the sclerostin gene in mice results in increased bone formation and bone strength. J. Bone Min. Res. 2008;23:860–869. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Lin C, et al. Sclerostin mediates bone response to mechanical unloading through antagonizing Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. J. Bone Min. Res. 2009;24:1651–1661. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.090411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Sebastian A, Loots GG. Genetics of Sost/SOST in sclerosteosis and van Buchem disease animal models. Metabolism. 2018;80:38–47. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2017.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Tang CY, et al. Runx1 is a central regulator of osteogenesis for bone homeostasis by orchestrating BMP and WNT signaling pathways. PLoS Genet. 2021;17:e1009233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Han L, et al. Loss of chemerin triggers bone remodeling in vivo and in vitro. Mol. Metab. 2021;53:101322. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Gonzalez-Perez V, Lingle CJ. Regulation of BK channels by beta and gamma subunits. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2019;81:113–137. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Jiang L, et al. BK channel deficiency in osteoblasts reduces bone formation via the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Mol. Cells. 2021;44:557–568. doi: 10.14348/molcells.2021.0004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Li, H. et al. MiR-12200-5p Targets multiple members of Wnt signaling pathway to inhibit osteoblast differentiation and bone formation. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets23,1254–1264 (2023). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 298.Karner CM, Long F. Wnt signaling and cellular metabolism in osteoblasts. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2017;74:1649–1657. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2425-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Delgado-Calle J, Bellido T. The osteocyte as a signaling cell. Physiol. Rev. 2022;102:379–410. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00043.2020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Klein-Nulend J, et al. Mechanosensation and transduction in osteocytes. Bone. 2013;54:182–190. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Zhou Y, et al. Aberrant activation of Wnt signaling pathway altered osteocyte mineralization. Bone. 2019;127:324–333. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2019.06.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Osorio J. Osteocyte-specific activation of the canonical Wnt-beta catenin pathway stimulates bone formation. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2015;11:192. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2015.11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.Kramer I, et al. Osteocyte Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is required for normal bone homeostasis. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;30:3071–3085. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01428-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Joeng KS, et al. Osteocyte-specific WNT1 regulates osteoblast function during bone homeostasis. J. Clin. Investig. 2017;127:2678–2688. doi: 10.1172/JCI92617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Zhao L, et al. Inactivation of Lrp5 in osteocytes reduces young’s modulus and responsiveness to the mechanical loading. Bone. 2013;54:35–43. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.01.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Javaheri B, et al. Deletion of a single beta-catenin allele in osteocytes abolishes the bone anabolic response to loading. J. Bone Min. Res. 2014;29:705–715. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307.Tu X, et al. Osteocytes mediate the anabolic actions of canonical Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in bone. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2015;112:E478–E486. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1409857112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Weidauer SE, et al. NMR structure of the Wnt modulator protein Sclerostin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009;380:160–165. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.01.062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.Poole KE, et al. Sclerostin is a delayed secreted product of osteocytes that inhibits bone formation. FASEB J. 2005;19:1842–1844. doi: 10.1096/fj.05-4221fje. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.Robling AG, et al. Mechanical stimulation of bone in vivo reduces osteocyte expression of Sost/sclerostin. J. Biol. Chem. 2008;283:5866–5875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M705092200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Tu X, et al. Sost downregulation and local Wnt signaling are required for the osteogenic response to mechanical loading. Bone. 2012;50:209–217. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.10.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Vaananen HK, Laitalaleinonen T. Osteoclast lineage and function. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2008;473:132–138. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2008.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Otero K, et al. TREM2 and beta-catenin regulate bone homeostasis by controlling the rate of osteoclastogenesis. J. Immunol. 2012;188:2612–2621. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Wei W, et al. Biphasic and dosage-dependent regulation of osteoclastogenesis by beta-catenin. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011;31:4706–4719. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05980-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.Ruiz P, et al. CathepsinKCre mediated deletion of betacatenin results in dramatic loss of bone mass by targeting both osteoclasts and osteoblastic cells. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:36201. doi: 10.1038/srep36201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Romero G, et al. Parathyroid hormone receptor directly interacts with dishevelled to regulate beta-Catenin signaling and osteoclastogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:14756–14763. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.102970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Weivoda MM, et al. Wnt signaling inhibits osteoclast differentiation by activating canonical and noncanonical cAMP/PKA pathways. J. Bone Min. Res. 2016;31:65–75. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Chen K, et al. Sfrp4 repression of the Ror2/Jnk cascade in osteoclasts protects cortical bone from excessive endosteal resorption. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2019;116:14138–14143. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1900881116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Spencer GJ, et al. Wnt signalling in osteoblasts regulates expression of the receptor activator of NFkappaB ligand and inhibits osteoclastogenesis in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 2006;119:1283–1296. doi: 10.1242/jcs.02883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Fujita K, Janz S. Attenuation of WNT signaling by DKK-1 and -2 regulates BMP2-induced osteoblast differentiation and expression of OPG, RANKL and M-CSF. Mol. Cancer. 2007;6:71. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-6-71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.Albers J, et al. Canonical Wnt signaling inhibits osteoclastogenesis independent of osteoprotegerin. J. Cell Biol. 2013;200:537–549. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201207142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Maeda K, et al. Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling between osteoblast-lineage cells and osteoclast precursors enhances osteoclastogenesis. Nat. Med. 2012;18:405–412. doi: 10.1038/nm.2653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Kobayashi Y, Uehara S, Koide M, Takahashi N. The regulation of osteoclast differentiation by Wnt signals. Bonekey Rep. 2015;4:713. doi: 10.1038/bonekey.2015.82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.Uehara, S. et al. Protein kinase N3 promotes bone resorption by osteoclasts in response to Wnt5a-Ror2 signaling. Sci Signal10 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 325.Uehara S, Udagawa N, Kobayashi Y. Non-canonical Wnt signals regulate cytoskeletal remodeling in osteoclasts. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2018;75:3683–3692. doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-2881-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326.Movérare-Skrtic S, et al. Osteoblast-derived WNT16 represses osteoclastogenesis and prevents cortical bone fragility fractures. Nat. Med. 2014;20:1279–1288. doi: 10.1038/nm.3654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Qiang YW, et al. Characterization of Wnt/beta-catenin signalling in osteoclasts in multiple myeloma. Br. J. Haematol. 2010;148:726–738. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2009.08009.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Baron R, Kneissel M. WNT signaling in bone homeostasis and disease: from human mutations to treatments. Nat. Med. 2013;19:179–192. doi: 10.1038/nm.3074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Cheng J, Li M, Bai R. The Wnt signaling cascade in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis and related promising treatment strategies. Front. Physiol. 2022;13:954454. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.954454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Cici, D., Corrado, A., Rotondo, C. & Cantatore, F. P. Wnt signaling and biological therapy in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 331.van Andel H, Kocemba KA, Spaargaren M, Pals ST. Aberrant Wnt signaling in multiple myeloma: molecular mechanisms and targeting options. Leukemia. 2019;33:1063–1075. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0404-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332.Yuan Y, Guo M, Gu C, Yang Y. The role of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in the pathogenesis and treatment of multiple myeloma (review) Am. J. Transl. Res. 2021;13:9932–9949. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.Laine CM, et al. WNT1 mutations in early-onset osteoporosis and osteogenesis imperfecta. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:1809–1816. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1215458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Fahiminiya S, et al. Mutations in WNT1 are a cause of osteogenesis imperfecta. J. Med. Genet. 2013;50:345–348. doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2013-101567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335.Hu, J. et al. Genotypic and phenotypic spectrum and pathogenesis of WNT1 variants in a large cohort of patients with OI/osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.108, 1776-1786 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 336.Peris P, et al. Osteoporosis related to WNT1 variants: a not infrequent cause of osteoporosis. Osteoporos. Int. 2023;34:405–411. doi: 10.1007/s00198-022-06609-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337.Niemann S, et al. Homozygous WNT3 mutation causes tetra-amelia in a large consanguineous family. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2004;74:558–563. doi: 10.1086/382196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338.Zheng HF, et al. WNT16 influences bone mineral density, cortical bone thickness, bone strength, and osteoporotic fracture risk. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1002745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 339.Jing H, et al. Epigenetic inhibition of Wnt pathway suppresses osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs during osteoporosis. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:176. doi: 10.1038/s41419-017-0231-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 340.Gong Y, et al. LDL receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) affects bone accrual and eye development. Cell. 2001;107:513–523. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00571-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 341.Beighton P. Osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome. Clin. Genet. 1986;29:263. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1986.tb00823.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342.Astiazaran MC, et al. Novel homozygous LRP5 mutations in Mexican patients with osteoporosis-pseudoglioma syndrome. Genet Test. Mol. Biomark. 2017;21:742–746. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2017.0118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343.Kamizaki K, Endo M, Minami Y, Kobayashi Y. Role of noncanonical Wnt ligands and Ror-family receptor tyrosine kinases in the development, regeneration, and diseases of the musculoskeletal system. Dev. Dyn. 2021;250:27–38. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344.Caetano da Silva C, et al. WNT11, a new gene associated with early onset osteoporosis, is required for osteoblastogenesis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2022;31:1622–1634. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddab349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345.Boyden LM, et al. High bone density due to a mutation in LDL-receptor-related protein 5. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;346:1513–1521. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa013444. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346.Fijalkowski I, et al. A novel domain-specific mutation in a sclerosteosis patient suggests a role of LRP4 as an anchor for sclerostin in human bone. J. Bone Min. Res. 2016;31:874–881. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 347.Loeser RF, Goldring SR, Scanzello CR, Goldring MB. Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:1697–1707. doi: 10.1002/art.34453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348.Shi S, et al. Silencing of Wnt5a prevents interleukin-1β-induced collagen type II degradation in rat chondrocytes. Exp. Ther. Med. 2016;12:3161–3166. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3788. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 349.Huang G, Chubinskaya S, Liao W, Loeser RF. Wnt5a induces catabolic signaling and matrix metalloproteinase production in human articular chondrocytes. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2017;25:1505–1515. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.05.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 350.Martineau X, et al. Alteration of Wnt5a expression and of the non-canonical Wnt/PCP and Wnt/PKC-Ca2+ pathways in human osteoarthritis osteoblasts. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0180711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351.Hopwood B, Tsykin A, Findlay DM, Fazzalari NL. Microarray gene expression profiling of osteoarthritic bone suggests altered bone remodelling, WNT and transforming growth factor-beta/bone morphogenic protein signalling. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2007;9:R100. doi: 10.1186/ar2301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352.Shi FL, Ren LX. Up-regulated miR-374a-3p relieves lipopolysaccharides induced injury in CHON-001 cells via regulating Wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 5B. Mol. Cell Probes. 2020;51:101541. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2020.101541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353.Huang J, et al. Dysregulation of the Wnt signaling pathway and synovial stem cell dysfunction in osteoarthritis development. Stem Cells Dev. 2020;29:401–413. doi: 10.1089/scd.2019.0260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 354.Gibson AL, et al. Wnt7a inhibits IL-1β induced catabolic gene expression and prevents articular cartilage damage in experimental osteoarthritis. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:41823. doi: 10.1038/srep41823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355.Ye X, Liu X. Wnt16 signaling in bone homeostasis and osteoarthristis. Front. Endocrinol. 2022;13:1095711. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1095711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356.Nalesso G, et al. WNT16 antagonises excessive canonical WNT activation and protects cartilage in osteoarthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2017;76:218–226. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 357.Tong W, et al. Wnt16 attenuates osteoarthritis progression through a PCP/JNK-mTORC1-PTHrP cascade. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2019;78:551–561. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 358.Smith AJ, et al. Haplotypes of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) gene: are they a risk factor in osteoarthritis? Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2005;13:608–613. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2005.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 359.Yerges-Armstrong LM, et al. Association analysis of BMD-associated SNPs with knee osteoarthritis. J. Bone Min. Res. 2014;29:1373–1379. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 360.Joiner DM, et al. Heterozygosity for an inactivating mutation in low-density lipoprotein-related receptor 6 (Lrp6) increases osteoarthritis severity in mice after ligament and meniscus injury. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2013;21:1576–1585. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.05.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 361.Zhu M, et al. Activation of β-catenin signaling in articular chondrocytes leads to osteoarthritis-like phenotype in adult β-catenin conditional activation mice. J. Bone Min. Res. 2009;24:12–21. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.080901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 362.Xia C, et al. Activation of β-catenin in Col2-expressing chondrocytes leads to osteoarthritis-like defects in hip joint. J. Cell Physiol. 2019;234:18535–18543. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 363.Hui T, et al. Activation of β-catenin signaling in aggrecan-expressing cells in temporomandibular joint causes osteoarthritis-like defects. Int. J. Oral. Sci. 2018;10:13. doi: 10.1038/s41368-018-0016-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 364.Lu K, et al. Upregulation of β-catenin signaling represents a single common pathway leading to the various phenotypes of spinal degeneration and pain. Bone Res. 2023;11:18. doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00253-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 365.Zhu Z, et al. AMPK activator decelerates osteoarthritis development by inhibition of β-catenin signaling in chondrocytes. J. Orthop. Transl. 2022;38:158–166. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2022.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 366.Li J, et al. Metformin limits osteoarthritis development and progression through activation of AMPK signalling. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2020;79:635–645. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 367.Xuan F, et al. Wnt/β-catenin signaling contributes to articular cartilage homeostasis through lubricin induction in the superficial zone. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2019;21:247. doi: 10.1186/s13075-019-2041-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 368.Weng LH, et al. Inflammation induction of Dickkopf-1 mediates chondrocyte apoptosis in osteoarthritic joint. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2009;17:933–943. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 369.Weng LH, et al. Control of Dkk-1 ameliorates chondrocyte apoptosis, cartilage destruction, and subchondral bone deterioration in osteoarthritic knees. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62:1393–1402. doi: 10.1002/art.27357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 370.Oh H, Chun CH, Chun JS. Dkk-1 expression in chondrocytes inhibits experimental osteoarthritic cartilage destruction in mice. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2568–2578. doi: 10.1002/art.34481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 371.Theologis T, et al. Association between serum and synovial fluid Dickkopf-1 levels with radiographic severity in primary knee osteoarthritis patients. Clin. Rheumatol. 2017;36:1865–1872. doi: 10.1007/s10067-017-3640-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 372.Zhu Z, et al. A study on the mechanism of Wnt inhibitory factor 1 in osteoarthritis. Arch. Med. Sci. 2020;16:898–906. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2020.95667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 373.Chin KY, Ekeuku SO, Pang KL. Sclerostin in the development of osteoarthritis: a mini review. Malays. J. Pathol. 2022;44:1–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 374.Zhang Y, et al. Runx1 is a key regulator of articular cartilage homeostasis by orchestrating YAP, TGFβ, and Wnt signaling in articular cartilage formation and osteoarthritis. Bone Res. 2022;10:63. doi: 10.1038/s41413-022-00231-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 375.Sen M, et al. Blockade of Wnt-5A/frizzled 5 signaling inhibits rheumatoid synoviocyte activation. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:772–781. doi: 10.1002/1529-0131(200104)44:4<772::AID-ANR133>3.0.CO;2-L. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 376.Sen M, Carson DA. Wnt signaling in rheumatoid synoviocyte activation. Mod. Rheumatol. 2002;12:5–9. doi: 10.3109/s101650200001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 377.Lories RJ, Corr M, Lane NE. To Wnt or not to Wnt: the bone and joint health dilemma. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2013;9:328–339. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2013.25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 378.Sen M, et al. Expression and function of wingless and frizzled homologs in rheumatoid arthritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:2791–2796. doi: 10.1073/pnas.050574297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 379.Miao P, et al. Regulatory effect of anti-gp130 functional mAb on IL-6 mediated RANKL and Wnt5a expression through JAK-STAT3 signaling pathway in FLS. Oncotarget. 2018;9:20366–20376. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.23917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 380.Rodriguez-Trillo A, et al. Non-canonical WNT5A signaling through RYK contributes to aggressive phenotype of the rheumatoid fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:555245. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.555245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 381.Huang Y, et al. Wnt5a: a promising therapeutic target for inflammation, especially rheumatoid arthritis. Cytokine. 2023;172:156381. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2023.156381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 382.de Rooy DP, et al. Genetic studies on components of the Wnt signalling pathway and the severity of joint destruction in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013;72:769–775. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 383.Singh A, Gupta MK, Mishra SP. Study of correlation of level of expression of Wnt signaling pathway inhibitors sclerostin and dickkopf-1 with disease activity and severity in rheumatoid arthritis patients. Drug Discov. Ther. 2019;13:22–27. doi: 10.5582/ddt.2019.01011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 384.Wang SY, et al. Circulating Dickkopf-1 is correlated with bone erosion and inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2011;38:821–827. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.100089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 385.Wehmeyer C, et al. Sclerostin inhibition promotes TNF-dependent inflammatory joint destruction. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016;8:330ra335. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aac4351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 386.Fassio A, et al. Inhibition of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis results in acute changes of bone modulators. Int Immunopharmacol. 2019;67:487–489. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.12.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 387.Adami G, et al. Effects of TNF inhibitors on parathyroid hormone and Wnt signaling antagonists in rheumatoid arthritis. Calcif. Tissue Int. 2016;99:360–364. doi: 10.1007/s00223-016-0161-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 388.Miao, C. et al. DNA hypermethylation of SFRP2 influences the pathology of rheumatoid arthritis through the canonical Wnt signaling in model rats. Autoimmunity 1–14 (2018). 10.1080/08916934.2018.1516760 [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 389.Miao CG, et al. MeCP2 modulates the canonical Wnt pathway activation by targeting SFRP4 in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rats. Cell Signal. 2013;25:598–608. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.11.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 390.Kwon YJ, et al. Secreted frizzled-related protein 5 suppresses inflammatory response in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes through down-regulation of c-Jun N-terminal kinase. Rheumatology. 2014;53:1704–1711. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keu167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 391.Xu Y, et al. Acid sensor ASIC1a induces synovial fibroblast proliferation via Wnt/β-catenin/c-Myc pathway in rheumatoid arthritis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2022;113:109328. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 392.Zhang Z, et al. PLD1 knockdown reduces metastasis and inflammation of fibroblast-like synoviocytes in rheumatoid arthritis by modulating NF-κB and Wnt/β-catenin pathways. Autoimmunity. 2021;54:398–405. doi: 10.1080/08916934.2021.1963957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 393.Zhou MY, et al. Lentivirus-mediated overexpression or silencing of aquaporin 1 affects the proliferation, migration and invasion of TNF-α-stimulated rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes by Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. J. Inflamm. Res. 2021;14:1945–1957. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S312783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 394.Wang R, et al. NAV2 positively modulates inflammatory response of fibroblast-like synoviocytes through activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin. Transl. Med. 2021;11:e376. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 395.Sun Y, et al. LncRNA OIP5-AS1/miR-410-3p/Wnt7b axis promotes the proliferation of rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes via regulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Autoimmunity. 2023;56:2189136. doi: 10.1080/08916934.2023.2189136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 396.Wang, W. et al. FOXM1/LINC00152 feedback loop regulates proliferation and apoptosis in rheumatoid arthritis fibroblast-like synoviocytes via Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Biosci. Rep.40, BSR20191900 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 397.Wang Y, et al. MiR-125a-3p inhibits cell proliferation and inflammation responses in fibroblast-like synovial cells in rheumatoid arthritis by mediating the Wnt/β-catenin and NF-κB pathways via targeting MAST3. J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal Interact. 2021;21:560–567. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 398.Yu B, et al. Wnt4 signaling prevents skeletal aging and inflammation by inhibiting nuclear factor-κB. Nat. Med. 2014;20:1009–1017. doi: 10.1038/nm.3586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 399.Jiang Y, et al. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on bone formation and lipid metabolism of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis rats through canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2016;2016:4927035. doi: 10.1155/2016/4927035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 400.Fan H, et al. Electroacupuncture stimulation at CV4 prevents ovariectomy-induced osteoporosis in rats via Wnt-beta-catenin signaling. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016;13:2485–2491. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2016.4849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 401.Diegel CR, et al. Inhibiting WNT secretion reduces high bone mass caused by Sost loss-of-function or gain-of-function mutations in Lrp5. Bone Res. 2023;11:47. doi: 10.1038/s41413-023-00278-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 402.Yazici Y, et al. A novel Wnt pathway inhibitor, SM04690, for the treatment of moderate to severe osteoarthritis of the knee: results of a 24-week, randomized, controlled, phase 1 study. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2017;25:1598–1606. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 403.Yazici Y, et al. A phase 2b randomized trial of lorecivivint, a novel intra-articular CLK2/DYRK1A inhibitor and Wnt pathway modulator for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr. Cartil. 2021;29:654–666. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 404.Tambiah JRS, et al. Individual participant symptom responses to intra-articular lorecivivint in knee osteoarthritis: post hoc analysis of a phase 2B trial. Rheumatol. Ther. 2021;8:973–985. doi: 10.1007/s40744-021-00316-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 405.Tambiah JRS, et al. Comparing patient-reported outcomes from sham and saline-based placebo injections for knee osteoarthritis: data from a randomized clinical trial of lorecivivint. Am. J. Sports Med. 2022;50:630–636. doi: 10.1177/03635465211067201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 406.MacLauchlan S, et al. Genetic deficiency of Wnt5a diminishes disease severity in a murine model of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2017;19:166. doi: 10.1186/s13075-017-1375-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 407.Cao W, et al. Depleting the carboxy-terminus of human Wnt5a attenuates collagen-induced arthritis in DBA/1 mice. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;504:679–685. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.09.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 408.Rodríguez-Trillo A, et al. ROCK inhibition with Y-27632 reduces joint inflammation and damage in serum-induced arthritis model and decreases in vitro osteoclastogenesis in patients with early arthritis. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:858069. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.858069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 409.Xie C, et al. Ginkgolide B attenuates collagen-induced rheumatoid arthritis and regulates fibroblast-like synoviocytes-mediated apoptosis and inflammation. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020;8:1497. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-6420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 410.Oz B, et al. Resveratrol inhibits Src tyrosine kinase, STAT3, and Wnt signaling pathway in collagen induced arthritis model. Biofactors. 2019;45:69–74. doi: 10.1002/biof.1463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 411.Liu XG, et al. MiR-21 relieves rheumatoid arthritis in rats via targeting Wnt signaling pathway. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 2019;23:96–103. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201908_18635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 412.Fowler TW, et al. Development of selective bispecific Wnt mimetics for bone loss and repair. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:3247. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23374-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 413.Okuchi Y, et al. Wnt-modified materials mediate asymmetric stem cell division to direct human osteogenic tissue formation for bone repair. Nat. Mater. 2021;20:108–118. doi: 10.1038/s41563-020-0786-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 414.Wang FS, et al. Knocking down dickkopf-1 alleviates estrogen deficiency induction of bone loss. A histomorphological study in ovariectomized rats. Bone. 2007;40:485–492. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2006.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 415.Wang FS, et al. Modulation of Dickkopf-1 attenuates glucocorticoid induction of osteoblast apoptosis, adipocytic differentiation, and bone mass loss. Endocrinology. 2008;149:1793–1801. doi: 10.1210/en.2007-0910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 416.Peng, Z. et al. Exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promoted osteogenic differentiation by delivering miR-196a that targeted Dickkopf-1 to activate Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Bioengineered14, 1996015 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Retracted]
  • 417.Zhou B, et al. miR‑483‑3p promotes the osteogenesis of human osteoblasts by targeting Dikkopf 2 (DKK2) and the Wnt signaling pathway. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2020;46:1571–1581. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2020.4694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 418.Gao J, et al. Icariin promotes the osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells through regulating sclerostin and activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Biomed. Res. Int. 2021;2021:6666836. doi: 10.1155/2021/6666836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 419.Marini, F., Giusti, F., Palmini, G. & Brandi, M. L. Role of Wnt signaling and sclerostin in bone and as therapeutic targets in skeletal disorders. Osteoporosis Int.34, 213–238 (2022). [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 420.Kerschan-Schindl K. Romosozumab: a novel bone anabolic treatment option for osteoporosis? Wien. Med. Wochenschr. 2020;170:124–131. doi: 10.1007/s10354-019-00721-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 421.Sølling ASK, Harsløf T, Langdahl B. The clinical potential of romosozumab for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Ther. Adv. Musculoskelet. Dis. 2018;10:105–115. doi: 10.1177/1759720X18775936. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 422.McClung MR, et al. Romosozumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014;370:412–420. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 423.Cosman F, et al. Romosozumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016;375:1532–1543. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1607948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 424.Eriksen EF, et al. Modeling-based bone bormation after 2 months of romosozumab treatment: results from the FRAME clinical trial. J. Bone Min. Res. 2022;37:36–40. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 425.Langdahl BL, et al. Romosozumab (sclerostin monoclonal antibody) versus teriparatide in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis transitioning from oral bisphosphonate therapy: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;390:1585–1594. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31613-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 426.Lewiecki EM, et al. A phase III randomized placebo-controlled trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of romosozumab in men with osteoporosis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2018;103:3183–3193. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-02163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 427.Sangadala, S. et al. Sclerostin small-molecule inhibitors promote osteogenesis by activating canonical Wnt and BMP pathways. Elife12, e63402 (2023). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 428.Florio M, et al. A bispecific antibody targeting sclerostin and DKK-1 promotes bone mass accrual and fracture repair. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:11505. doi: 10.1038/ncomms11505. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 429.Choi RB, et al. Improving bone health by optimizing the anabolic action of Wnt inhibitor multitargeting. JBMR. 2021;5:e10462. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 430.Melnik S, et al. MiR-181a targets RSPO2 and regulates bone morphogenetic protein—WNT signaling crosstalk during chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stromal cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;9:747057. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.747057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 431.Chen Y, et al. Beta-catenin signaling plays a disparate role in different phases of fracture repair: implications for therapy to improve bone healing. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e249. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 432.Clément-Lacroix P, et al. Lrp5-independent activation of Wnt signaling by lithium chloride increases bone formation and bone mass in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102:17406–17411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505259102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 433.Zhang K, et al. MACF1 overexpression in BMSCs alleviates senile osteoporosis in mice through TCF4/miR-335-5p signaling pathway. J. Orthop. Transl. 2023;39:177–190. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2023.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 434.Wang Y, et al. Daphnetin ameliorates glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis via activation of Wnt/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling. Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 2020;409:115333. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2020.115333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 435.Jiang, H. et al. Gentiopicroside promotes the osteogenesis of bone mesenchymal stem cells by modulation of β-catenin-BMP2 signalling pathway. J. Cell Mol. Med.25, 10825–10836 (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 436.Karunarathne W, et al. Anthocyanin-enriched polyphenols from Hibiscus syriacus L. (Malvaceae) exert anti-osteoporosis effects by inhibiting GSK-3β and subsequently activating β-catenin. Phytomedicine. 2021;91:153721. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2021.153721. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 437.Yang X, et al. Troxerutin stimulates osteoblast differentiation of mesenchymal stem cell and facilitates bone fracture healing. Front. Pharm. 2021;12:723145. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.723145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 438.Kim HY, et al. Small molecule inhibitors of the Dishevelled-CXXC5 interaction are new drug candidates for bone anabolic osteoporosis therapy. EMBO Mol. Med. 2016;8:375–387. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201505714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 439.Pan FF, et al. Apigenin promotes osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and accelerates bone fracture healing via activating Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 2021;320:E760–e771. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00543.2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 440.Bai J, et al. Glycyrrhizic acid promotes osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow stromal cells by activating the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Front. Pharm. 2021;12:607635. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.607635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 441.Wei Y, et al. miR-424-5p shuttled by bone marrow stem cells-derived exosomes attenuates osteogenesis via regulating WIF1-mediated Wnt/β-catenin axis. Aging. 2021;13:17190–17201. doi: 10.18632/aging.203169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 442.Hu H, et al. Role of microRNA-335 carried by bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles in bone fracture recovery. Cell Death Dis. 2021;12:156. doi: 10.1038/s41419-021-03430-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 443.Yu H, Zhang J, Liu X, Li Y. microRNA-136-5p from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes facilitates fracture healing by targeting LRP4 to activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Bone Jt. Res. 2021;10:744–758. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.1012.BJR-2020-0275.R2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 444.Liu X, et al. Exosomes derived from platelet-rich plasma present a novel potential in alleviating knee osteoarthritis by promoting proliferation and inhibiting apoptosis of chondrocyte via Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2019;14:470. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1529-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 445.Dong J, Li L, Fang X, Zang M. Exosome-encapsulated microRNA-127-3p released from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells alleviates osteoarthritis through regulating CDH11-mediated Wnt/β-catenin pathway. J. Pain. Res. 2021;14:297–310. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S291472. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 446.Chen G, et al. PiRNA-63049 inhibits bone formation through Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2021;17:4409–4425. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.64533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 447.Luo Y, et al. The osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells is regulated through the let-7i-3p/LEF1/β-catenin axis under cyclic strain. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019;10:339. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1470-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 448.Yin C, et al. miR-129-5p inhibits bone formation through TCF4. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2020;8:600641. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.600641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 449.Hu S, et al. MicroRNA-320c inhibits development of osteoarthritis through downregulation of canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Life Sci. 2019;228:242–250. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 450.Rawadi G. Wnt signaling and potential applications in bone diseases. Curr. Drug Targets. 2008;9:581–590. doi: 10.2174/138945008784911778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 451.Mullard A. FDA approves first-in-class osteoporosis drug. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2019;18:411. doi: 10.1038/d41573-019-00083-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 452.Chen KH, et al. RNA imaging. Spatially resolved, highly multiplexed RNA profiling in single cells. Science. 2015;348:aaa6090. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa6090. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 453.Barrow JR, et al. Ectodermal Wnt3/beta-catenin signaling is required for the establishment and maintenance of the apical ectodermal ridge. Genes Dev. 2003;17:394–409. doi: 10.1101/gad.1044903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 454.Spater D, et al. Wnt9a signaling is required for joint integrity and regulation of Ihh during chondrogenesis. Development. 2006;133:3039–3049. doi: 10.1242/dev.02471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 455.Lee, H. H. & Behringer, R. R. Conditional expression of Wnt4 during chondrogenesis leads to dwarfism in mice. PLoS One2, e450 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 456.Yamaguchi TP, Bradley A, McMahon AP, Jones S. A Wnt5a pathway underlies outgrowth of multiple structures in the vertebrate embryo. Development. 1999;126:1211–1223. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.6.1211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 457.Yang Y, Topol L, Lee H, Wu J. Wnt5a and Wnt5b exhibit distinct activities in coordinating chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Development. 2003;130:1003–1015. doi: 10.1242/dev.00324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 458.Parr BA, Mc Mahon AP. Dorsalizing signal Wnt-7a required for normal polarity of D−V and A−P axes of mouse limb. Nature. 1995;374:350–353. doi: 10.1038/374350a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 459.Pöpperl H, et al. Misexpression of Cwnt8C in the mouse induces an ectopic embryonic axis and causes a truncation of the anterior neuroectoderm. Development. 1997;124:2997–3005. doi: 10.1242/dev.124.15.2997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 460.Guo X, et al. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling is sufficient and necessary for synovial joint formation. Genes Dev. 2004;18:2404–2417. doi: 10.1101/gad.1230704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 461.Carroll TJ, et al. Wnt9b plays a central role in the regulation of mesenchymal to epithelial transitions underlying organogenesis of the mammalian urogenital system. Dev. Cell. 2005;9:283–292. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 462.Jin YR, Han XH, Taketo MM, Yoon JK. Wnt9b-dependent FGF signaling is crucial for outgrowth of the nasal and maxillary processes during upper jaw and lip development. Development. 2012;139:1821–1830. doi: 10.1242/dev.075796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 463.Bennett CN, et al. Wnt10b increases postnatal bone formation by enhancing osteoblast differentiation. J. Bone Min. Res. 2007;22:1924–1932. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.070810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 464.Johnson EB, Hammer RE, Herz J. Abnormal development of the apical ectodermal ridge and polysyndactyly in Megf7-deficient mice. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2005;14:3523–3538. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 465.Holmen SL, et al. Decreased BMD and limb deformities in mice carrying mutations in both Lrp5 and Lrp6. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2004;19:2033–2040. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.040907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 466.Iwaniec UT, et al. PTH stimulates bone formation in mice deficient in Lrp5. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2007;22:394–402. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.061118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 467.Yadav VK, et al. Lrp5 controls bone formation by inhibiting serotonin synthesis in the duodenum. Cell. 2008;135:825–837. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 468.Joeng KS, et al. Lrp5 and Lrp6 redundantly control skeletal development in the mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 2011;359:222–229. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.08.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 469.Niziolek PJ, et al. High-bone-mass-producing mutations in the Wnt signaling pathway result in distinct skeletal phenotypes. Bone. 2011;49:1010–1019. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 470.Kokubu C, et al. Skeletal defects in ringelschwanz mutant mice reveal that Lrp6 is required for proper somitogenesis and osteogenesis. Development. 2004;131:5469–5480. doi: 10.1242/dev.01405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 471.Mukhopadhyay M, et al. Dickkopf1 Is required for embryonic head induction and limb morphogenesis in the mouse. Dev. Cell. 2001;1:423–434. doi: 10.1016/S1534-5807(01)00041-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 472.Yao GQ, Wu JJ, Troiano N, Insogna K. Targeted overexpression of Dkk1 in osteoblasts reduces bone mass but does not impair the anabolic response to intermittent PTH treatment in mice. J. Bone Min. Metab. 2011;29:141–148. doi: 10.1007/s00774-010-0202-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 473.Oh H, et al. Misexpression of Dickkopf-1 in endothelial cells, but not in chondrocytes or hypertrophic chondrocytes, causes defects in endochondral ossification. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2012;27:1335–1344. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 474.Lories RJU, et al. Articular cartilage and biomechanical properties of the long bones in Frzb-knockout mice. Arthritis Rheumat. 2007;56:4095–4103. doi: 10.1002/art.23137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 475.Cho HY, et al. Transgenic mice overexpressing secreted frizzled-related proteins (sFRP)4 under the control of serum amyloid P promoter exhibit low bone mass but did not result in disturbed phosphate homeostasis. Bone. 2010;47:263–271. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2010.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 476.Hoeflich KP, et al. Requirement for glycogen synthase kinase-3β in cell survival and NF-κB activation. Nature. 2000;406:86–90. doi: 10.1038/35017574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 477.Kugimiya, F. et al. GSK-3β controls osteogenesis through regulating Runx2 activity. PLoS One2, e837 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 478.Nelson, E. R. et al. Role of GSK-3β in the osteogenic differentiation of palatal mesenchyme. PLoS One6, e25847 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 479.He F, et al. Gsk3β is required in the epithelium for palatal elevation in mice. Dev. Dyn. 2010;239:3235–3246. doi: 10.1002/dvdy.22466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 480.Gillespie JR, et al. Deletion of glycogen synthase kinase-3β in cartilage results in up-regulation of glycogen synthase kinase-3α protein expression. Endocrinology. 2011;152:1755–1756. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-1412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 481.Itoh S, et al. GSK-3α and GSK-3β proteins are involved in early stages of chondrocyte differentiation with functional redundancy through RelA protein phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:29227–29236. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.372086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 482.Perry Iii WL, et al. Phenotypic and molecular analysis of a transgenic insertional allele of the mouse fused locus. Genetics. 1995;141:321–332. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.1.321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 483.Yu HMI, et al. The role of Axin2 in calvarial morphogenesis and craniosynostosis. Development. 2005;132:1995–2005. doi: 10.1242/dev.01786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 484.Yan Y, et al. Axin2 controls bone remodeling through the β-catenin-BMP signaling pathway in adult mice. J. Cell Sci. 2009;122:3566–3578. doi: 10.1242/jcs.051904. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 485.Dao DY, et al. Axin2 regulates chondrocyte maturation and axial skeletal development. J. Orthop. Res. 2010;28:89–95. doi: 10.1002/jor.20954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 486.Holmen SL, et al. Essential role of β-catenin in postnatal bone acquisition. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:21162–21168. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501900200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 487.Miclea, R. L. et al. Adenomatous polyposis coli-mediated control of β-catenin is essential for both chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of skeletal precursors. BMC Dev. Biol.9, 26 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 488.Soshnikova N, et al. Genetic interaction between Wnt/β-catenin and BMP receptor signaling during formation of the AER and the dorsal-ventral axis in the limb. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1963–1968. doi: 10.1101/gad.263003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 489.Akiyama H, et al. Interactions between Sox9 and β-catenin control chondrocyte differentiation. Genes Dev. 2004;18:1072–1087. doi: 10.1101/gad.1171104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 490.Dao DY, et al. Cartilage-specific β-catenin signaling regulates chondrocyte maturation, generation of ossification centers, and perichondrial bone formation during skeletal development. J. Bone Min. Res. 2012;27:1680–1694. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 491.Chen J, Long F. Beta-catenin promotes bone formation and suppresses bone resorption in postnatal growing mice. J. Bone Min. Res. 2012;27:2344–2358. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 492.Mirando, A. J. et al. Β-catenin/cyclin D1 mediated development of suture mesenchyme in calvarial morphogenesis. BMC Dev. Biol.10, 116 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 493.Wei W, et al. Biphasic and dosage-dependent regulation of osteoclastogenesis by β-catenin. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2011;31:4706–4719. doi: 10.1128/MCB.05980-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 494.Kramer I, et al. Osteocyte Wnt/β-catenin signaling is required for normal bone homeostasis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2010;30:3071–3085. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01428-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 495.Mikasa M, et al. Regulation of Tcf7 by Runx2 in chondrocyte maturation and proliferation. J. Bone Miner. Metab. 2011;29:291–299. doi: 10.1007/s00774-010-0222-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 496.Korinek V, et al. Depletion of epithelial stem-cell compartments in the small intestine of mice lacking Tcf-4. Nat. Genet. 1998;19:379–383. doi: 10.1038/1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 497.Brugmann SA, et al. Wnt signaling mediates regional specification in the vertebrate face. Development. 2007;134:3283–3295. doi: 10.1242/dev.005132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 498.Van Genderen C, et al. Development of several organs that require inductive epithelial- mesenchymal interactions is impaired in LEF-1-deficient mice. Genes Dev. 1994;8:2691–2703. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.22.2691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 499.Galceran J, et al. Wnt3a-/–like phenotype and limb deficiency in Lef1−/−Tcf1−/− mice. Genes Dev. 1999;13:709–717. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.6.709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 500.Noh T, et al. Lef1 haploinsufficient mice display a low turnover and low bone mass phenotype in a gender- and age-specific manner. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5438. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 501.Hoeppner LH, et al. Lef1ΔN binds β-catenin and increases osteoblast activity and trabecular bone mass. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:10950–10959. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.165100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bone Research are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES