ABSTRACT
The emergence of oxacillin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (OS-MRSA) has imposed further challenges to the clinical management of MRSA infections. When exposed to β-lactam antibiotics, these strains can easily acquire reduced β-lactam susceptibility through chromosomal mutations, including those in RNA polymerase (RNAP) genes such as rpoBC, which may then lead to treatment failure. Despite the increasing prevalence of such strains and the apparent challenges they pose for diagnosis and treatment, there is limited information available on the actual mechanisms underlying such chromosomal mutation-related transitions to reduced β-lactam susceptibility, as it does not directly associate with the expression of mecA. This study investigated the cellular physiology and metabolism of six missense mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility, each carrying respective mutations on RpoBH929P, RpoBQ645H, RpoCG950R, RpoCG498D, RpiAA64E, and FruBA211E, using capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry-based metabolomics analysis. Our results showed that rpoBC mutations caused RNAP transcription dysfunction, leading to an intracellular accumulation of ribonucleotides. These mutations also led to the accumulation of UDP-Glc/Gal and UDP-GlcNAc, which are precursors of UTP-associated peptidoglycan and wall teichoic acid. Excessive amounts of building blocks then contributed to the cell wall thickening of mutant strains, as observed in transmission electron microscopy, and ultimately resulted in decreased susceptibility to β-lactam in OS-MRSA.
IMPORTANCE
The emergence of oxacillin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (OS-MRSA) strains has created new challenges for treating MRSA infections. These strains can become resistant to β-lactam antibiotics through chromosomal mutations, including those in the RNA polymerase (RNAP) genes such as rpoBC, leading to treatment failure. This study investigated the mechanisms underlying reduced β-lactam susceptibility in four rpoBC mutants of OS-MRSA. The results showed that rpoBC mutations caused RNAP transcription dysfunction, leading to an intracellular accumulation of ribonucleotides and precursors of peptidoglycan as well as wall teichoic acid. This, in turn, caused thickening of the cell wall and ultimately resulted in decreased susceptibility to β-lactam in OS-MRSA. These findings provide insights into the mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in OS-MRSA and highlight the importance of continued research in developing effective treatments to combat antibiotic resistance.
KEYWORDS: Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, antimicrobial resistant, beta-lactams, OS-MRSA, oxacillin, RNA polymerases, rpoBC
INTRODUCTION
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most distributed antibiotic-resistant bacterial pathogens in clinical settings, posing a significant threat to human health around the world (1). The breakpoints for diagnosing MRSA in clinical microbiology laboratories are defined as an oxacillin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥ 4 µg/mL (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute) or cefoxitin MIC ≥ 8 µg/mL (European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing). β-Lactam resistance in MRSA is commonly associated with the expression of penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a; also known as PBP2′), a peptidoglycan transpeptidase with low affinity for β-lactam antibiotics (2–4). Although β-lactam resistance is primarily mediated by the mecA gene encoding PBP2a, clinical MRSA isolates usually exhibit varying levels of β-lactam resistance, the diversity of which cannot be simply explained by the expression of PBP2a and the presence of functional mecA and bla regulators (MecI/MecR1/MecR2 and BlaI/BlaR1) (5–8). Oxacillin-susceptible MRSA (OS-MRSA) and borderline oxacillin-resistant S. aureus strains, both carrying mecA gene but exhibiting susceptible or borderline resistance to oxacillin, have been isolated in clinical settings (8–15). Owing to their susceptibility to oxacillin, OS-MRSA might be misidentified as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) by routine diagnostic tests in most clinical microbiology laboratories where mecA and PBP2a detections are unavailable. These oxacillin-susceptible MRSA strains readily express high-level resistance (homogeneous resistance phenotype) following exposure to β-lactams due to the presence of the mecA gene, similar to clinical isolates with a low-level β-lactam resistance phenotype, which are frequently reported to show heterogeneous expression of methicillin resistance due to the presence of a small proportion of resistant bacteria among the populations sensitive to β-lactams (16–19) and consequently cause treatment failure with β-lactam antibiotics that are commonly used to treat MSSA infections (20).
The transition from low- to high-level resistance is complex because the shift is often caused by gene mutations or genetic rearrangements that are not directly relevant to the function of mecA (8, 18, 21–29). Among the genes responsible for β-lactam resistance, RNA polymerase (RNAP) genes, rpoBC, are frequently found mutated in laboratory-derived β-lactam-resistant mutants (8, 21, 25). RNAP is a DNA-dependent RNA polymerase that catalyzes RNA synthesis in all cellular organisms (30). In Gram-positive bacteria, a RNAP holoenzyme consists of four essential (α2ββ′) and four accessory (δεσω) subunits (31). Since RNAP is the major central transcriptional machinery in bacterial cells, mutations in any of the RNAP subunits can affect cellular activities and antimicrobial susceptibility. Mutations in the rpoA gene, which encodes the α subunit of RNAP, have been reported to alter the promoter recognition domain and lead to a change in cellular phenotype (32). Mutations in the rpoB and rpoC genes decrease RNAP fidelity (33) and, as the binding site of rifampicin is located in the β subunit of RNAP at the DNA:RNA binding cleft, the mutations of rpoB gene paralleled a block in RNA extension and caused rifampicin resistance (34). In Mycobacterium tuberculosis, rpoB mutations caused rifampicin resistance while increasing cell wall permeability and susceptibility toward vancomycin (35). Other than conferring β-lactam and rifampicin resistance, rpoBC mutations contributed to vancomycin resistance, autolysis activity, and slow growth in MRSA (36–39). Importantly, MRSA strains carrying rpoB mutations have been isolated from patients who underwent long-term antibacterial treatment, and the isolates were shown to be expressing increased β-lactam resistance (40, 41). Despite the extensive reports on the association between RNAP mutations and antimicrobial susceptibility, the molecular mechanisms of β-lactam resistance mediated by rpoBC mutations have not been fully understood.
Recently, we collected 43 genetically diverse clinical OS-MRSA strains, which could be classified into 11 MLST types and 4 different SCCmec types (8). Mutations associated with oxacillin susceptibility were identified by analyzing the whole genome of 100 mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility derived from 26 representative OS-MRSA strains of seven main phylogenetic clades (8). Among these mutants, rpoBC genes were found to be most frequently mutated regardless of the varied genetic backgrounds in the parent strains. Interestingly, we also found that the expression of mecA and PBP2a was not significantly correlated with the oxacillin MICs of these OS-MRSA-derived mutants, although the mecA gene is essential for high-level β-lactam resistance because mecA deletion in RpoCP358L, RpoBG645H, and RpoCG498D mutants showed a decrease in oxacillin MIC from 4, 32, and 256 µg/mL, respectively, to 0.38 µg/mL, a level similar to that of mecA-knockout mutant JMUB217(∆mecA) (8). These findings emphasized the need for further investigation into the mechanisms underlying reduced oxacillin susceptibility in these mutants. In our present study, we aimed to unravel the mechanism associated with rpoBC-mediated acquisition of β-lactam resistance by investigating the cellular metabolisms of OS-MRSA-derived mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility. We focused on ribonucleotide metabolisms due to a clear downregulation of purine/pyrimidine biosynthesis and nucleotide transporter genes (xprT, purF, guaAB, pyrRP, and hisIG) observed in the transcriptome analysis of the representative rpoBC mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility (8).
RESULTS
Antibiotic susceptibility of mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility
Chromosomal mutations responsible for reduced oxacillin susceptibility in mutant strains derived from OS-MRSA were previously identified (8). These mutations were found to be distributed among 46 genes classified into various functional categories. To gain more insight into the molecular mechanisms regulating the decrease of β-lactam susceptibility in OS-MRSA, six representative mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility derived from the JMUB217 strain were further analyzed (8). JMUB217-7 (RpiAA64E), JMUB217-13 (FruBA211E), JMUB217-23 (RpoBH929P), JMUB217-22 (RpoBQ645H), JMUB217-19 (RpoCG950R), and JMUB217-24 (RpoCG498D) are included in this study because (i) single mutation was detected on their chromosomes, and (ii) RNAP genes (rpoBC), purine biosynthesis gene (e.g., rpiA), and glycolysis gene (e.g., fruB) were the most frequently mutated genes identified among mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility in our previous study (8). In addition, three mutation-repaired strains of JMUB217-7 (RpiAA64E), JMUB217-22 (RpoBQ645H), and JMUB217-24 (RpoCG498D) were constructed. MICs of eight antibiotic agents for all the JMUB217-derived mutants and mutation-repaired strains were determined. As described previously, the oxacillin MIC increased from 1.0 ± 0.0 µg/mL in wild-type strain to 3.0 ± 0.0, 11 ± 2.3, 43 ± 9.2, 171 ± 74, 21 ± 4.6, and 64 ± 0.0 µg/mL in JMUB217-7, JMUB217-13, JMUB217-23, JMUB217-22, JMUB217-19, and JMUB217-24, respectively (Fig. 1). Similar to oxacillin, the JMUB217-derived mutants exhibited increment in MIC of other β-lactam antibiotics, including cefoxitin and imipenem (Fig. 1), while their susceptibility against other cell wall synthesis inhibitors, such as vancomycin, teicoplanin, and fosfomycin, did not differ from wild-type JMUB217. On the other hand, the three mutation-repaired strains showed similar levels of MICs to the wild-type strains. We have also determined the rifampicin MIC of the mutants because it has been reported that mutations in rpoB increased rifampicin MIC (42, 43). However, all mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility were susceptible to rifampicin (Fig. 1).
mecA and purine biosynthesis gene expressions of mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility
Expression of mecA and key enzymes of the purine biosynthesis pathway, purF and guaA, was determined by qRT-PCR (Fig. 2) to confirm our previous findings (8). mecA expression profiles of the six representative mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility and the three mutation-repaired strains were studied, with MRSA strains COL (ST256, SCCmec type I, oxacillin MIC > 256 µg/mL) and USA300_C02 (ST8, SCCmec type IVa, oxacillin MIC of 48 µg/mL) included in the analysis as MRSA reference strains. Our results showed that mecA expressions were not significantly increased in the six mutant strains, with or without oxacillin induction, compared with COL and USA300_C02 (Fig. 2A), indicating that their basal and induced mecA expression levels were lower than those of MRSA. On the other hand, both purF and guaA expressions, which were significantly downregulated in JMUB217-22 (RpoBQ645H), JMUB217-19 (RpoCG950R), and JMUB217-24 (RpoCG498D) (Fig. 2C and D), were rescued in the mutation-repaired strains of JMUB217-22 and JMUB217-24. These results indicated that the rpoBC mutations are mediating downregulations of the purine biosynthesis pathway, comparable to RNA-seq analysis in our previous study.
Metabolic remodeling through oxacillin-induced mutations
Untargeted metabolomics was applied to study metabolic changes in the OS-MRSA strain JMUB217 and its six derivative mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility. Three biological replicates were prepared from the mid-log phase culture, and all samples were analyzed using the capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry (CE-TOF-MS) for metabolomic profiling (44, 45). A total of 273 metabolite peaks (153 in cation and 120 in anion mode) were detected and annotated by the peak library (Fig. 3A). Detailed metabolomic profiles are presented in Table S1. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the metabolic data revealed clear clustering between mutated genes (Fig. 3B), with the first and second principal components (PC1 and PC2) accounting for 32.8% and 13.1% of the total variance, respectively. RNAP mutations were clearly correlated with PC1 because the metabolites of rpoB and rpoC mutated strains were positively aligned with PC1. Moreover, the PCA plots of the rpoB and rpoC groups partially overlapped with each other, indicating that the four different mutations in rpoBC affected the metabolism of S. aureus in a similar manner. This observation was supported by hierarchical clustering analysis of the metabolomics data, which showed a marked difference in the metabolic profiles between rpoBC mutants and wild-type or the other strains carrying rpiA and fruB mutations (Fig. 3C). The heat map has indeed identified a group of metabolites specifically accumulated in rpiA-mutated cells distinct from rpoBC- and fruB-mutated cells (Fig. 3C). To identify co-accumulated metabolites in rpoBC-mutated cells, network analysis was performed. The analysis revealed 15 clusters of co-accumulated metabolites in JMUB217 and its mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility. One of the clusters contains 24 metabolites, which were specifically accumulated in rpoBC mutants (Fig. 3D). The cluster includes (i) ribonucleoside-di/triphosphate (GDP, UDP, CDP, GTP, UTP, and CTP) and its derivatives (UDP-GlcNac, UDP-Glc/Gal); (ii) glutamine/glutamate and its derivatives (Gln, Ser-Glu, Glu-Glu, N-acetylglutamine, N-acetylglutamic acid, N5-ethylglutamine); and (iii) CoA/succinyl CoA divalents (Fig. 3D). Metabolomics profiling clearly demonstrated the accumulation of metabolites in a mutation-specific manner.
Ribonucleoside di/triphosphate accumulation resulted from rpoBC mutations
Network analysis of the metabolomics data revealed an accumulation of ribonucleoside di/triphosphate in the rpoBC mutants. The build-up of excess ribonucleoside di/triphosphate is consistent with the downregulation of purine/pyrimidine biosynthesis and nucleotide transporter genes observed through RNA-seq analysis of the rpoBC mutants (8). To obtain a comprehensive overview of nucleotide metabolisms in rpoBC mutants, the levels of intracellular ribonucleotide/deoxyribonucleotide in mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility are summarized in Fig. 4. Remarkably, GTP achieved 3.6-, 3.0-, 2.5-, and 2.9-fold greater accumulation in JMUB217-23 (RpoBH929P), JMUB217-22 (RpoBQ645H), JMUB217-19 (RpoCG950R), and JMUB217-24 (RpoCG498D), respectively (Fig. 4). CTP also exhibited a respective 6.2-, 7.5-, 3.6-, and 4.8-fold increase, while UTP showed 4.9-, 4.0-, 3.2-, and 3.8-fold increase in JMUB217-23, JMUB217-22, JMUB217-19, and JMUB217-24, respectively (Fig. 4). ATP was slightly accumulated in rpoB mutants but remained unaffected in rpoC mutants. On the contrary, intracellular ribonucleoside monophosphates, especially GMP and AMP, were reduced in the rpoBC mutants. In contrast to ribonucleotide, a modest intracellular accumulation of dGTP and dCTP was observed in the rpoB mutants, while most of the deoxyribonucleoside phosphates were either unchanged or decreased in the mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility. In short, the metabolomics results showed that rpoBC mutations stimulated intracellular ribonucleoside di/triphosphate accumulation in OS-MRSA.
Global metabolic alterations resulted from rpoBC mutations
The accumulation of ribonucleoside di/triphosphate is proposed to be a sequela of RNAP hypofunctioning caused by rpoBC mutations because ribonucleotides are building blocks of RNA (Fig. 5A). To elucidate the effect of rpoBC mutations on the transcription activity of RNAP, the total amount of RNA in mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility was measured. The mutations in rpoBC genes facilitated a substantial decrease in the levels of total RNA (Fig. 5B), whereby a respective 0.56-, 0.44-, 0.84-, and 0.76-fold decrease in total RNAs was observed in JMUB217-23, JMUB217-22, JMUB217-19, and JMUB217-24 (Fig. 5B). In addition, rpiA and fruB mutants also showed a slight decrease in total RNA. Thus, we deduced that rpoBC mutations reduced the general transcription activity of cells in vivo, thereby resulting in the accumulation of intracellular ribonucleoside di/triphosphate.
Nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs) are substrates of nucleoside diphosphate (NDP) sugars, which are important for the biosynthesis of many biological molecules, e.g., lipopolysaccharides, glycoproteins, and peptidoglycans. Therefore, excessive amounts of NTPs found in the rpoBC mutants are hypothesized to be consumed as NDP sugars and lead to peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid production (Fig. 5A). In this study, UDP-glucose/galactose (UDP-Glc/Gal; the two molecules could not be distinguished by CE-TOF-MS because they have the same molecular weight) and UDP-N-acetylglucosamine (UDP-GlcNAc) were measured by metabolomics analysis (Fig. 5C). As expected, intracellular UDP-Glc/Gal significantly increased in the rpoBC mutants, and UDP-GlcNAc (one of the important constituents of peptidoglycan) was significantly accumulated in JMUB217-23. In concordance with the accumulation of UDP-GlcNAc, three of the four amino acids, Gly, Lys, and Ala, required for peptidoglycan biosynthesis were significantly reduced in the rpoBC mutants, while their cellular levels of co-enzyme A divalent (CoA) were found to be increased.
To confirm that the accumulation of NTPs and UDP-carbohydrates are mediated by RNAP gene mutations, we re-extracted metabolites of three representative studied strains: wild-type JMUB217, JMUB217-22 (rpoB2), and its mutation-repaired derivative, and their differential metabolomics profiles were analyzed using CE-TOF-MS. Our results showed that the accumulation of GTP/CTP/UTP, UDP-Glu/Gal and UDP-GlcNac in the JMUB217-22 was recovered in its mutation-repaired derivative to a level similar to that of the wild-type JMUB217 (Fig. 6). The consumption of peptidoglycan precursors in rpoBC mutants suggested that peptidoglycan biosynthesis in these cells could have been promoted.
Ribonucleoside di/triphosphate accumulation reduced oxacillin susceptibility of rpoBC mutants
To confirm the causal relationship between oxacillin susceptibility and the accumulation of ribonucleoside di/triphosphate, rpoBC mutants expressing cyclic UMP (cUMP) and cyclic CMP (cCMP) synthase were constructed, and their oxacillin MIC was determined. cUMP and cCMP synthases encoded in Pycsar (pyrimidine cyclase system for antiphage resistance) were known to consume intracellular UTP and CTP for the generation of cUMP and cCMP, respectively (46), affecting the intracellular ribonucleotide di/triphosphate pool. JMUB217 was found to carry the cUMP synthase gene on the chromosome, though the effector gene was disrupted by the insertion of IS, while the cCMP synthase gene was detected in another OS-MRSA strain, JMUB4998 (8). In this study, JMUB217-22 (rpoB) and JMUB217-24 (rpoC) were, respectively, transformed with aTc-inducible pLC1t2 plasmid containing JMUB217-derived cUMP and JMUB4998-derived cCMP synthase genes. aTc induction increased oxacillin susceptibility in both transformants, suggesting that intracellular UTP and CTP can affect the oxacillin susceptibility of rpoBC mutants. The slight increase in oxacillin susceptibility without aTc induction is probably due to promoter leakage (Fig. 7).
Metabolic alterations caused by fruB and rpiA mutations
FruB (1-phosphofructokinase) catalyzes the ATP-dependent phosphorylation of fructose-1-phosphate to fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (Fru-1,6P2) (47). Therefore, it is expected that a mutation in the fruB gene will affect the intracellular level of these two metabolites. Our results showed that fructose/glucose-1P (Fru/Glc-1P), which could not be distinguished by CE-TOF-MS due to having the same molecular weight, was accumulated in the fruB mutant, while intracellular Fru-1,6P2 was not affected by the fruB mutation (Fig. S1). We concluded that the FruBA211E mutation is a loss-of-function mutation because of the intracellular accumulation of substrate Fru-1P. Most of the other metabolites were not altered by this mutation.
RpiA (ribose 5-phosphate isomerase A) is a key regulator of the pentose phosphate pathway, which catalyzes the conversion of D-ribose 5-phosphate to D-ribulose 5-phosphate (48). Similar to the case of the fruB mutation, the mutation of rpiA facilitated the accumulation of substrate ribulose-5P, while the product ribose-5P was not changed, indicating that the rpiA mutation induces loss of function (Fig. S1). However, in contrast to the fruB mutation, mutated rpiA broadly enhanced the accumulation of metabolites of the pentose phosphate and glycolysis pathways.
Cell wall thickening in the mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility
The cell wall thickness of the mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility was determined in order to investigate the effect of rpoBC mutations on peptidoglycan biosynthesis, as our previous studies have shown alterations in the profile of intracellular metabolites associated with this process. Wild-type OS-MRSA JMUB217 had a cell wall thickness of 22.07 ± 1.39 nm, while the mutants carrying rpoBC mutations with reduced oxacillin susceptibility had significantly thicker cell walls (Fig. 8). The mean cell wall thicknesses were 25.91 ± 1.99, 25.88 ± 1.99, 23.47 ± 3.15, and 28.48 ± 2.41 nm in JMUB217-23 (RpoBH929P), JMUB217-22 (RpoBQ645H), JMUB217-19 (RpoCG950R), and JMUB217-24 (RpoCG498D), respectively. Interestingly, the cell walls of rpiA and fruB mutants were also shown to be thickened (23.83 ± 2.31 and 23.32 ± 1.65 nm, respectively).
DISCUSSION
The emergence and spread of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus have become a major public health concern, as it can cause severe infections that are difficult to treat (1). OS-MRSA is a subtype of MRSA that is sensitive to oxacillin but still resistant to some β-lactam antibiotics (8–15). It has the potential to become highly resistant if exposed to β-lactam antibiotics, leading to treatment failure and further compounding the burden of diseases caused by S. aureus. Over decades, OS-MRSA have been isolated from various sources, including humans (both in the hospitals and community settings), animals, and food (8–15). Mutations in RNAP gene rpoB have been proposed as one of the key chromosomal mutations that contributed to the uniformly high β-lactam-resistant phenotype of OS-MRSA (49). Comparative genomics has revealed that the OS-MRSA JH1 strain acquired three to six mutations, including RpoBD471Y, A473S, A477S, and E478D, during the course of antibiotic treatment, and the resulting mutant derivative JH2 was rendered oxacillin-, vancomycin-, and rifampicin-resistant (40, 50). Another comparative genome analysis of 15 isolates retrieved from a persistent S. aureus infection also identified rpoB mutations as genetic determinants responsible for reduced staphylococcal susceptibility to rifampicin and oxacillin (41).
Mutations in rpoB are known to confer rifampicin resistance because β subunit of RNAP is the target of rifampicin (34). In addition to rifampicin, different rpoB and rpoC mutations have been reported to affect the susceptibility of S. aureus toward various other antibiotics, such as β-lactams, vancomycin, teicoplanin, linezolid, and daptomycin (21, 22, 25, 36–39, 51–53). rpoB mutations, N967I and R644H, caused phenotypic conversion of heterogenous-to-homogeneous and heterogeneous-to-Eagle-type β-lactam resistance, respectively (21). Another rpoB mutation, H481Y, was found to induce vancomycin resistance and promote heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus (hVISA)-to-VISA conversion (51, 54). Moreover, rpoBC mutations have been reported to be accompanied by other phenotypic changes such as prolonged doubling time, decrease in autolysis, and increased linezolid susceptibility, while associated with increased resistance to teicoplanin, vancomycin, and daptomycin (21, 51, 52, 54).
rpoBC-mutated strains included in this study showed reduced susceptibility to oxacillin and other β-lactam antibiotics, such as cefoxitin and imipenem. However, RNAP mutations did not render these strains resistant toward other cell wall synthesis inhibitors (vancomycin, teicoplanin, and fosfomycin) or rifampicin. Considering the distinct antibiotic susceptibility profiles displayed in these JMUB217-derived mutants, rpoB mutations carried in our studied strains are proposed to be associated with β-lactam resistance, while other gene mutations and/or different genomic backgrounds of MRSA might be the factor(s) regulating their glycopeptide susceptibility.
Although the association between mutated RNAP genes and reduced oxacillin susceptibility is well-demonstrated, the sequential events succeeding RNAP mutations that led to homogeneous high-level β-lactam resistance are not fully understood. Here, we unraveled the fundamental molecular mechanism linking RNAP gene mutation and staphylococcal β-lactam resistance through CE-TOF-MS-based metabolomics analysis.
Mutations in RNAP genes broadly affect the metabolic states of bacteria in adaptation to a variety of selection pressures, including antibiotics (8, 55–58), high temperature (59), starvation (60), and radiation (61). However, the rpoBC mutation-mediated metabolic alterations may differ between organisms. Escherichia coli frequently acquired mutations in the rpoBC genes in adaptation to glycerol minimum media (60). One of the mutants, which carries a 27-bp deletion in rpoC, demonstrated improved growth in glycerol media through reorganization of the metabolic network. This included an increase in redox cofactors NADH/NADPH and a decrease in most metabolites (tri/di-ribonucleotides) (62), which is in opposition to the case of OS-MRSA. In E. coli, the mutations in genes encoding RNAP are suggested to mimic the effect of a stringent response effector (p)ppGpp (60), which can directly bind to β′- and ω-subunits of RNAP, whereas in Bacillus subtilis, (p)ppGpp-mediated regulation is indirect and relies on cellular GDP/GTP ratio (63, 64), whereby depletion of cellular GTP is the trigger of the (p)ppGpp-mediated stringent response in Gram-positive bacteria (65). The reduction of oxacillin susceptibility in the rpoBC mutants might therefore not be directly related to (p)ppGpp-mediated response because our metabolome analysis shows an increase in intracellular GTP and undetectable (p)ppGpp level in the rpoBC mutants. On the other hand, rifampicin-treated M. tuberculosis showed dysregulation of nucleotide synthesis. Downregulation of purines (GTP, XTP, dATP, and dADP) and pyrimidines (CDP, dCDP, dCTP, and dTMP), as well as upregulation of ADP, cAMP, UTP, UDP, dUMP, and TDP nucleotides, were detected in M. tuberculosis following rifampicin exposure (66). The reported metabolomes were distinct from our rpoBC-mutated OS-MRSA strains, which showed an intracellular accumulation of ribonucleoside-di/triphosphate. M. tuberculosis with the rpoB mutation also showed a reduction in coenzyme A, while CoA was accumulated in our studied rpoBC mutants.
Nonetheless, certain rpoB-associated metabolic alterations persist across bacterial strains/genera. Exposure of M. tuberculosis to rifampicin is accompanied by degradation of mRNA (66). Likewise, rpoBC mutations were proposed in this study to reduce the general transcription activity of OS-MRSA as implicated by decreased total RNA levels. Apart from that, in concordance with the excessive amount of NTPs detected in our rpoBC-mutated OS-MRSA mutants, a laboratory-derived Mu3-6R strain carrying RpoBR512P showed intracellular ribonucleotide accumulation in addition to slow growth phenotype and vancomycin resistance (39). Extracellular bases and nucleosides, such as inosine, uridine, guanine, cytidine, and guanosine, were also commonly found to be increased in Streptomyces coelicolor M1146 with rpoB mutation (67). Last but not least, increased peptidoglycan precursors and thickened cell walls were shown in the rpoBC mutants included in this study. It is interesting to note that these features were shared with M. tuberculosis carrying rpoB mutation in which alterations in metabolites associated with the maintenance of cell wall biosynthesis/cell wall remodeling and a paralleled change in cell wall structure were observable (68, 69).
Our previous study identified 141 mutations in 46 genes and 8 intergenic regions as potential genetic determinants of reduced oxacillin susceptibility (8). In this study, rpiA and fruB mutants (two other frequently mutated genes in OS-MRSA-derived mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility), in addition to rpoBC mutants, were analyzed. Our metabolomics analysis revealed that both rpiA and fruB mutations cause loss of function as implicated by the accumulation of substrates in the mutants. However, there is yet insubstantial experimental proof to support the deduction of the mechanism of reduced oxacillin susceptibility mediated through rpiA or fruB mutations. Further study is needed to warrant a more comprehensive understanding of the role(s) of rpiA and fruB in the acquisition of reduced oxacillin susceptibility in OS-MRSA.
This study revealed a novel mechanism for the acquisition of reduced β-lactam susceptibility in S. aureus. We proposed that mutations in rpoB and rpoC lead to the dysregulation of RNAP transcription activity and subsequent intracellular accumulation of ribonucleotides. This results in cell wall thickening and reduced β-lactam susceptibility in OS-MRSA. Mutations impacting nucleotide metabolisms [such as purine/pyrimidine metabolism, (p)ppGpp synthesis, and c-di-AMP signal] are often identified after cellular exposure to β-lactams, indicating their importance to β-lactam susceptibility. However, more studies are necessary to establish the intricate connection between chromosomal gene mutations and β-lactam susceptibility in S. aureus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions
The bacterial strains used in this study included one OS-MRSA parent strain JMUB217 (SCCmec type V, ST772, blaI-1 and -2 positive) and six of its representative derivative mutants with reduced susceptibility to oxacillin: JMUB217-7 (RpiAA64E), JMUB217-13 (FruBA211E), JMUB217-23 (RpoBH929P), JMUB217-22 (RpoBQ645H), JMUB217-19 (RpoCG950R), and JMUB217-24 (RpoCG498D) (8). All S. aureus strains were cultivated either in tryptic soy broth/agar (TSB/TSA; Becton Dickinson) or Mueller–Hinton broth/agar (MHB/MHA; Becton Dickinson) and incubated overnight at 37°C with constant agitation at 200 rpm if grown in broth. For plasmid propagation, Escherichia coli BL21 and DH5α strains were grown in Luria–Bertani (LB; Becton Dickinson) medium and incubated overnight at 37°C. To maintain plasmid pIMAY, 10 µg/mL chloramphenicol was added to the growth medium. All strains were stored at −80°C in 40% glycerol (Wako Pure Chemical, Japan) for preservation.
Antibiotic susceptibility tests
The minimum inhibitory concentrations of oxacillin, cefoxitin, imipenem, vancomycin, teicoplanin, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, fosfomycin, and rifampicin were determined using E-test method following the guidelines of the Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (70).
Construction of mutation-repaired strains
pIMAY-mediated allelic exchange (71) was conducted to construct mutation-repaired strains of JMUB217-7 (rpiA), JMUB217-22, (rpoB), and JMUB217-24 (rpoC) to confirm the effects of these mutations on oxacillin susceptibility. Briefly, native rpiA, rpoB, and rpoC of about 2 kbp each were amplified by pIMAY-N43rpiA-F/-R, pIMAY-N52rpoB-F/-R, and pIMAY-N75rpoC-F/R, respectively, using PRIME STAR MAX (TaKaRa, Japan) from template DNA of wild-type JMUB217. Using NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly (New England BioLabs, Inc.), each of the amplified fragment (native rpiA, rpoB, and rpoC) was cloned onto the pIMAY vector backbone linearized by PCR using a primer set of pIMAY-DW-F/pIMAY-DW-R2. The primers used for the construction of plasmids are listed in Fig. S1 and Table S2. The assembled plasmid DNAs were transformed into chemically competent E. coli DH5α, and the transformed cells were plated on LB agar with 10 µg/mL chloramphenicol. All three plasmids extracted from DH5α were then transformed into E. coli BL21 to improve their transformation efficiency into S. aureus. The plasmids extracted from BL21 were electroporated into the corresponding S. aureus mutants JMUB217-7, -22, or -24, and the cells were cultured at 30°C on TSA containing 10 µg/mL chloramphenicol. Single crossover was performed by growing overnight culture of transformants on TSA with 10 µg/mL chloramphenicol at 37°C. Then, double crossover was performed by incubating the single crossover mutants on TSA at 30°C. The double crossover event was confirmed by PCR and Sanger sequencing.
Construction of cCMP and cUMP overexpression mutants
S. aureus JMUB217-22 (rpoB) and JMUB217-24 (rpoC) carrying aTc-inducible pLC1t2 plasmid cloned with JMUB217-derived cUMP and JMUB4998-derived cCMP synthase genes were constructed. At first, the SoxR terminator derived from pBTBX-2 was integrated into the pLC1 plasmid to decrease the downstream expression of an aTc-regulated inducible gene. SoxR terminator of 180 bp and a pLC1 backbone of 6 kbp were amplified by pBTBX2-F3/-R4 and pBTBX2-F3-pLC1dnF/pBTBX2-R4-pLC1upR, respectively, using PRIME STAR MAX and template DNA of pBTBX-2 (72) and pLC1 (73) plasmids. The PCR-amplified fragments were assembled by NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly generating pLC1t2. Next, cUMP and cCMP genes were, respectively, amplified by pLC1t2-N9_cUMPsyt-F1/R1 and pLC1t2-JMUB4998_cCMPsyt-F1/R1 from template DNA of wild-type OS-MRSA JMUB217 and JMUB4998 (8). The cUMP and cCMP gene fragments were then cloned with NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly onto the pLC1t2 vector backbone linearized by PCR using a primer set of pLC1t2-F-1/R-1. The assembled plasmid DNAs were transformed into competent E. coli DH5α cells, and then the extracted plasmids were subsequently transformed into E. coli BL21. The plasmids extracted from BL21 were electroporated into the corresponding S. aureus mutants JMUB217-22 or -24, and the resultant transformants were grown on TSA supplemented with 10 µg/mL chloramphenicol at 37°C. The expression of cUMP and cCMP genes were induced by a final concentration of 50 ng/mL aTC added to MHB/MHA media containing 2 µg/mL chloramphenicol.
Metabolite extraction
Overnight cultures of parent S. aureus JMUB217 and mutant strains were diluted to OD600 = 1.0 with MHB. One milliliter of the culture was added to 50 mL of MHB, and the bacteria were incubated at 37°C with shaking until OD600 = 0.5. Then, the cultures were quickly chilled on ice for 15 min. Forty milliliters of the culture was transferred into a 50 mL tube, and the cells were collected by centrifugation at 5,800 × g for 5 min at 4°C. Pelleted cells were washed twice with Milli-Q water before being treated with 1,600 µL of methanol and ultrasonicated for 30 s to dissolve the pellet. The cell extract was subsequently treated with 1,100 µL of Milli-Q water containing internal standards [H3304-1002, Human Metabolome Technologies, Inc. (HMT), Tsuruoka, Yamagata, Japan] and left at rest for another 30 s. Cell extract containing spiked in internal standards was centrifuged at 2,300 × g for 5 min at 4°C, and 1,400 µL of supernatant was collected. The recovered supernatant was then centrifugally filtered through a Millipore 5 kDa cutoff filter (UltrafreeMC-PLHCC, HMT) at 9,100 × g for 120 min at 4°C to remove macromolecules, and the filtrate was finally centrifugally concentrated and resuspended in 50 µL of Milli-Q water for metabolome analysis at HMT. Three biological replicates were prepared for each OS-MRSA-derived mutant and parent strain.
Metabolome analysis
Metabolome analysis was conducted by Basic Scan package of HMT using capillary electrophoresis time-of-flight mass spectrometry as described previously (45, 74). Briefly, CE-TOF-MS analysis was carried out using an Agilent CE capillary electrophoresis system equipped with an Agilent 6210 time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA). The systems were controlled by Agilent G2201AA ChemStation software version B.03.01 (Agilent Technologies, Inc.). Sample separations were carried out using fused silica capillary (50 µm i.d. × 80 cm total length) with commercial electrophoresis buffer (H3301-1001 and I3302-1023 for cation and anion analyses, respectively, HMT) as electrolyte. The spectrometer was scanned from m/z 50–1,000, and peaks were extracted using MasterHands, an automatic integration software (Keio University, Tsuruoka, Yamagata, Japan), to obtain peak information, which includes m/z, peak area, and migration time (MT) (75). Signal peaks corresponding to isotopomers, adduct ions, and other product ions of known metabolites were excluded. The remaining peaks were annotated according to the HMT metabolite database based on their m/z values with the MT determined by CE-TOF-MS. Areas of the annotated peaks were then normalized against internal standard levels and sample amounts in order to obtain the relative levels of each metabolite. Primary 110 metabolites were absolutely quantified based on one-point calibrations using their respective standard compounds. Hierarchical cluster analysis and principal component analysis (76) were performed by HMT’s proprietary MATLAB and R program, respectively. Detected metabolites were plotted on metabolic pathway maps using VANTED software (77). Network analysis was performed by Miru (Kajeka, UK) using Pearson correlation matrix with correlation coefficients of 0.85.
Quantification of total RNA
Overnight cultures of the parent OS-MRSA JMUB217 and its derivative mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility/mutation-repair grown, respectively, in 1 mL of MHB (Becton Dickinson) were diluted to 1:100 in 10 mL of MHB and incubated at 37°C with constant agitation until OD600 of 0.5. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 15,000 rpm for 1 min, resuspended in 600 µL of T10E10 buffer, pH 8.0 (10 mM Tris-HCl 8.0, 10 mM EDTA, pH 8.0), and lysed with a combination of 2 µL of 2 mg/mL lysostaphin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 2 µL of achromopeptidase (FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemicals, Japan) at 37°C for 5 min. To the lysed cells, 700 µL of acidic phenol saturated with 20 mM sodium acetate (NaOAc) and 60 µL of 3 M NaOAc (pH 4.8) were added. Consequently, total RNA was extracted using the phenol/chloroform method. The extracted RNA was treated with DNase I (Nippon Gene, CO., LTD.) and purified by acidic phenol/ethanol precipitation. The purified total RNA was finally dissolved in an appropriate volume of DEPC water, and the concentration was determined by NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Three biological replicates were prepared for each OS-MRSA-derived mutant, mutation-repaired strain, and parent strain.
qRT-PCR
The extracted total RNA (500 ng per sample) was reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (cDNA) by PrimeScript 1st strand cDNA synthesis Kit (TaKaRa Bio, Japan). qRT-PCR was performed using TB Green Premix Ex Taq II (TaKaRa Bio, Japan). Primer sets used for the amplification of mecA, purF, and guaA are listed in Fig. S1 and Table S2. rho gene was used as the reference gene for normalization during gene expression analysis. The thermal cycling conditions included initial denaturation at 95°C for 30 s followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 5 s and 60°C for 30 s. Three biological replicates were prepared for each strain.
Transmission electron microscopy
To confirm the effects of metabolic alterations on peptidoglycan biosynthesis, cell wall thickness of parent OS-MRSA JMUB217 and its derivative mutants with reduced oxacillin susceptibility/mutation-repair was determined using the transmission electron microscope. Briefly, overnight cultures of the strains grown in MHB were passaged into fresh prewarmed MHB and incubated at 37°C with constant agitation until OD600 of 1.0. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 1 min at 4°C and resuspended with cold 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. Fixation, embedding, and staining of the samples were carried out following the methods described previously (37, 78, 79). The samples were visualized with transmission electron microscopy (Hitachi H-7600, Japan), and cell wall thicknesses were measured at nearly equatorial cut surfaces.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Nos. 19K08960 and 22K19386 to S.W., 20F20104 and 21K19488 to L.C.), JSPS Invitational Fellowship for Research in Japan (Long-term L21543 to S.W. and C.A.N.), Takeda Science Foundation (to S.W.), and the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Grant No. JP21fk0108497 to S.W., JP21fk0108496 and JP21wm0325022 to K.K., JP22ae0121045, JP21gm1610002, and JP20fk0108134 to L.C.). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, the decision to publish, and manuscript preparation.
S.W., C.A.N., and L.C. designed the study, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. K.T., X.-E.T., Y.A., and R.T. contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, and assisted in the preparation of the manuscript. All other authors contributed to data collection and interpretation and critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed on all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Contributor Information
Shinya Watanabe, Email: swatanabe@jichi.ac.jp.
Gerald B. Pier, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Poonam Mudgil, Western Sydney University, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00339-24.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Murray CJL, Ikuta KS, Sharara F, Swetschinski L, Robles Aguilar G, Gray A, Han C, Bisignano C, Rao P, Wool E, et al. 2022. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399:629–655. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02724-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hartman BJ, Tomasz A. 1984. Low-affinity penicillin-binding protein associated with beta-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 158:513–516. doi: 10.1128/jb.158.2.513-516.1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Utsui Y, Yokota T. 1985. Role of an altered penicillin-binding protein in methicillin- and cephem-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 28:397–403. doi: 10.1128/AAC.28.3.397 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Fishovitz J, Hermoso JA, Chang M, Mobashery S. 2014. Penicillin-binding protein 2a of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. IUBMB Life 66:572–577. doi: 10.1002/iub.1289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Foster TJ. 2017. Antibiotic resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Current status and future prospects. FEMS Microbiol Rev 41:430–449. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fux007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Llarrull LI, Fisher JF, Mobashery S. 2009. Molecular basis and phenotype of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and insights into new β-lactams that meet the challenge. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:4051–4063. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00084-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Fuda CCS, Fisher JF, Mobashery S. 2005. β-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus: the adaptive resistance of a plastic genome. Cell Mol Life Sci 62:2617–2633. doi: 10.1007/s00018-005-5148-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Boonsiri T, Watanabe S, Tan X-E, Thitiananpakorn K, Narimatsu R, Sasaki K, Takenouchi R, Sato’o Y, Aiba Y, Kiga K, Sasahara T, Taki Y, Li F-Y, Zhang Y, Azam AH, Kawaguchi T, Cui L. 2020. Identification and characterization of mutations responsible for the β-lactam resistance in oxacillin-susceptible mecA -positive Staphylococcus aureus. Sci Rep 10:16907. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73796-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hiramatsu K, Kihara H, Yokota T. 1992. Analysis of borderline-resistant strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using polymerase chain reaction. Microbiol Immunol 36:445–453. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1992.tb02043.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Saeed K, Ahmad N, Dryden M, Cortes N, Marsh P, Sitjar A, Wyllie S, Bourne S, Hemming J, Jeppesen C, Green S. 2014. Oxacillin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (OS-MRSA), a hidden resistant mechanism among clinically significant isolates in the Wessex region/UK. Infection 42:843–847. doi: 10.1007/s15010-014-0641-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Andrade-Figueiredo M, Leal-Balbino TC. 2016. Clonal diversity and epidemiological characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus: high prevalence of oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus (OS-MRSA) associated with clinical isolates in Brazil. BMC Microbiol 16:115. doi: 10.1186/s12866-016-0733-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Song Y, Cui L, Lv Y, Li Y, Xue F. 2017. Characterisation of clinical isolates of oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus in China from 2009 to 2014. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 11:1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2017.05.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Quijada NM, Hernández M, Oniciuc E-A, Eiros JM, Fernández-Natal I, Wagner M, Rodríguez-Lázaro D. 2019. Oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus associated with processed food in Europe. Food Microbiol 82:107–110. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.01.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hososaka Y, Hanaki H, Endo H, Suzuki Y, Nagasawa Z, Otsuka Y, Nakae T, Sunakawa K. 2007. Characterization of oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus: a new type of MRSA. J Infect Chemother 13:79–86. doi: 10.1007/s10156-006-0502-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Balslev U, Bremmelgaard A, Svejgaard E, Havstreym J, Westh H. 2005. An outbreak of borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) in a dermatological unit. Microb Drug Resist 11:78–81. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2005.11.78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kishii K, Ito T, Watanabe S, Okuzumi K, Hiramatsu K. 2008. Recurrence of heterogeneous methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among the MRSA clinical isolates in a Japanese university hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother 62:324–328. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hartman BJ, Tomasz A. 1986. Expression of methicillin resistance in heterogeneous strains of Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 29:85–92. doi: 10.1128/AAC.29.1.85 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mwangi MM, Kim C, Chung M, Tsai J, Vijayadamodar G, Benitez M, Jarvie TP, Du L, Tomasz A. 2013. Whole-genome sequencing reveals a link between β-lactam resistance and synthetases of the alarmone (p)ppGpp in Staphylococcus aureus. Microb Drug Resist 19:153–159. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2013.0053 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Tomasz A, Nachman S, Leaf H. 1991. Stable classes of phenotypic expression in methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35:124–129. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.1.124 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Skinner S, Murray M, Walus T, Karlowsky JA. 2009. Failure of cloxacillin in treatment of a patient with borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 47:859–861. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00571-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Aiba Y, Katayama Y, Hishinuma T, Murakami-Kuroda H, Cui L, Hiramatsu K. 2013. Mutation of RNA polymerase β-subunit gene promotes heterogeneous-to-homogeneous conversion of β-lactam resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:4861–4871. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00720-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Matsuo M, Yamamoto N, Hishinuma T, Hiramatsu K. 2019. Identification of a novel gene associated with high-level β-lactam resistance in heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus strain Mu3 and methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain N315. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 63:e00712-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00712-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Chung M, Kim CK, Conceição T, Aires-De-Sousa M, De Lencastre H, Tomasz A. 2016. Heterogeneous oxacillin-resistant phenotypes and production of PBP2A by oxacillin-susceptible/mecA-positive MRSA strains from Africa. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:2804–2809. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Gratani FL, Horvatek P, Geiger T, Borisova M, Mayer C, Grin I, Wagner S, Steinchen W, Bange G, Velic A, Maček B, Wolz C. 2018. Regulation of the opposing (p)ppGpp synthetase and hydrolase activities in a bifunctional RelA/SpoT homologue from Staphylococcus aureus. PLoS Genet 14:e1007514. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Panchal VV, Griffiths C, Mosaei H, Bilyk B, Sutton JAF, Carnell OT, Hornby DP, Green J, Hobbs JK, Kelley WL, Zenkin N, Foster SJ. 2020. Evolving MRSA: high-level β-lactam resistance in Staphylococcus aureus is associated with RNA polymerase alterations and fine tuning of gene expression. PLoS Pathog 16:e1008672. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Pozzi C, Waters EM, Rudkin JK, Schaeffer CR, Lohan AJ, Tong P, Loftus BJ, Pier GB, Fey PD, Massey RC, O’Gara JP. 2012. Methicillin resistance alters the biofilm phenotype and attenuates virulence in Staphylococcus aureus device-associated infections. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002626. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002626 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Dordel J, Kim C, Chung M, Pardos de la Gándara M, Holden MTJ, Parkhill J, de Lencastre H, Bentley SD, Tomasz A. 2014. Novel determinants of antibiotic resistance: identification of mutated loci in highly methicillin-resistant subpopulations of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. mBio 5:e01000. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01000-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Berger-Bächi B, Strässle A, Gustafson JE, Kayser FH. 1992. Mapping and characterization of multiple chromosomal factors involved in methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:1367–1373. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.7.1367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Berger-Bächi B. 1983. Insertional inactivation of staphylococcal methicillin resistance by Tn551. J Bacteriol 154:479–487. doi: 10.1128/jb.154.1.479-487.1983 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Barba-Aliaga M, Alepuz P, Pérez-Ortín JE. 2021. Eukaryotic RNA polymerases: the many ways to transcribe a gene. Front Mol Biosci 8:663209. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.663209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Weiss A, Shaw LN. 2015. Small things considered: the small accessory subunits of RNA polymerase in Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39:541–554. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Klein-Marcuschamer D, Santos CNS, Yu H, Stephanopoulos G. 2009. Mutagenesis of the bacterial RNA polymerase alpha subunit for improvement of complex phenotypes. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2705–2711. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01888-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Sydow JF, Cramer P. 2009. RNA polymerase fidelity and transcriptional proofreading. Curr Opin Struct Biol 19:732–739. doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2009.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Campbell EA, Korzheva N, Mustaev A, Murakami K, Nair S, Goldfarb A, Darst SA. 2001. Structural mechanism for rifampicin inhibition of bacterial RNA polymerase. Cell 104:901–912. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00286-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Campodónico VL, Rifat D, Chuang Y-M, Ioerger TR, Karakousis PC. 2018. Altered Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell wall metabolism and physiology associated with RpoB mutation H526D. Front Microbiol 9:494. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Matsuo M, Hishinuma T, Katayama Y, Hiramatsu K. 2015. A mutation of RNA polymerase β′ subunit (RpoC) converts heterogeneously vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (hVISA) into “Slow VISA”. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:4215–4225. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00135-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hanaki H, Kuwahara-Arai K, Boyle-Vavra S, Daum RS, Labischinski H, Hiramatsu K. 1998. Activated cell-wall synthesis is associated with vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical strains Mu3 and Mu50. J Antimicrob Chemother 42:199–209. doi: 10.1093/jac/42.2.199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Yu R, Dale SE, Yamamura D, Stankus V, Lee C. 2012. Daptomycin-nonsusceptible, vancomycin-intermediate, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 23:e48–e50. doi: 10.1155/2012/138470 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Katayama Y, Azechi T, Miyazaki M, Takata T, Sekine M, Matsui H, Hanaki H, Yahara K, Sasano H, Asakura K, Takaku T, Ochiai T, Komatsu N, Chambers HF. 2017. Prevalence of slow-growth vancomycin nonsusceptibility in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00452-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00452-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Mwangi MM, Wu SW, Zhou Y, Sieradzki K, de Lencastre H, Richardson P, Bruce D, Rubin E, Myers E, Siggia ED, Tomasz A. 2007. Tracking the in vivo evolution of multidrug resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by whole-genome sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:9451–9456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0609839104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Klein S, Morath B, Weitz D, Schweizer PA, Sähr A, Heeg K, Boutin S, Nurjadi D. 2022. Comparative genomic reveals clonal heterogeneity in persistent Staphylococcus aureus infection. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 12:817841. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.817841 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Morrow TO, Harmon SA. 1979. Genetic analysis of Staphylococcus aureus RNA polymerase mutants. J Bacteriol 137:374–383. doi: 10.1128/jb.137.1.374-383.1979 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Aubry-Damon H, Soussy C-J, Courvalin P. 1998. Characterization of mutations in therpoB gene that confer rifampin resistance inStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother (Bethesda) 42:2590–2594. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.10.2590 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Mitsuishi Y, Taguchi K, Kawatani Y, Shibata T, Nukiwa T, Aburatani H, Yamamoto M, Motohashi H. 2012. Nrf2 redirects glucose and glutamine into anabolic pathways in metabolic reprogramming. Cancer Cell 22:66–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Ohashi Y, Hirayama A, Ishikawa T, Nakamura S, Shimizu K, Ueno Y, Tomita M, Soga T. 2008. Depiction of metabolome changes in histidine-starved Escherichia coli by CE-TOFMS. Mol Biosyst 4:135–147. doi: 10.1039/b714176a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Tal N, Morehouse BR, Millman A, Stokar-Avihail A, Avraham C, Fedorenko T, Yirmiya E, Herbst E, Brandis A, Mehlman T, Oppenheimer-Shaanan Y, Keszei AFA, Shao S, Amitai G, Kranzusch PJ, Sorek R. 2021. Cyclic CMP and cyclic UMP mediate bacterial immunity against phages. Cell 184:5728–5739. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Reeves RE, Warren LG, Hsu DS. 1966. 1-Phosphofructokinase from an anaerobe. J Biol Chem 241:1257–1261. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)96768-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Zhang R guang, Andersson CE, Savchenko A, Skarina T, Evdokimova E, Beasley S, Arrowsmith CH, Edwards AM, Joachimiak A, Mowbray SL. 2003. Structure of Escherichia coli ribose-5-phosphate isomerase: a ubiquitous enzyme of the pentose phosphate pathway and the calvin cycle. Structure 11:31–42. doi: 10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00933-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Hiramatsu K, Ito T, Tsubakishita S, Sasaki T, Takeuchi F, Morimoto Y, Katayama Y, Matsuo M, Kuwahara-Arai K, Hishinuma T, Baba T. 2013. Genomic basis for methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Chemother 45:117–136. doi: 10.3947/ic.2013.45.2.117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Sieradzki K, Leski T, Dick J, Borio L, Tomasz A. 2003. Evolution of a vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus strain in vivo: multiple changes in the antibiotic resistance phenotypes of a single lineage of methicillin-resistant S. aureus under the impact of antibiotics administered for chemotherapy. J Clin Microbiol 41:1687–1693. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1687-1693.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Katayama Y, Murakami-Kuroda H, Cui L, Hiramatsu K. 2009. Selection of heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus by imipenem. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:3190–3196. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00834-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Cui L, Isii T, Fukuda M, Ochiai T, Neoh H-M, Camargo ILB da C, Watanabe Y, Shoji M, Hishinuma T, Hiramatsu K. 2010. An RpoB mutation confers dual heteroresistance to daptomycin and vancomycin in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:5222–5233. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00437-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Matsuo M, Hishinuma T, Katayama Y, Cui L, Kapi M, Hiramatsu K. 2011. Mutation of RNA polymerase β subunit (rpoB) promotes hVISA-to-VISA phenotypic conversion of strain Mu3. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:4188–4195. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00398-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Watanabe Y, Cui L, Katayama Y, Kozue K, Hiramatsu K. 2011. Impact of rpoB mutations on reduced vancomycin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol 49:2680–2684. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02144-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Severinov K, Soushko M, Goldfarb A, Nikiforov V. 1993. Rifampicin region revisited. New rifampicin-resistant and streptolydigin-resistant mutants in the beta subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. J Biol Chem 268:14820–14825. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)82407-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Reynolds MG. 2000. Compensatory evolution in rifampin-resistant Escherichia coli. Genetics 156:1471–1481. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Duchi D, Mazumder A, Malinen AM, Ebright RH, Kapanidis AN. 2018. The RNA polymerase clamp interconverts dynamically among three states and is stabilized in a partly closed state by ppGpp. Nucleic Acids Res 46:7284–7295. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Degen D, Feng Y, Zhang Y, Ebright KY, Ebright YW, Gigliotti M, Vahedian-Movahed H, Mandal S, Talaue M, Connell N, Arnold E, Fenical W, Ebright RH. 2014. Transcription inhibition by the depsipeptide antibiotic salinamide A. Elife 3:e02451. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02451 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Tenaillon O, Rodríguez-Verdugo A, Gaut RL, McDonald P, Bennett AF, Long AD, Gaut BS. 2012. The molecular diversity of adaptive convergence. Science 335:457–461. doi: 10.1126/science.1212986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Conrad TM, Frazier M, Joyce AR, Cho B-K, Knight EM, Lewis NE, Landick R, Palsson BØ. 2010. RNA polymerase mutants found through adaptive evolution reprogram Escherichia coli for optimal growth in minimal media. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:20500–20505. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911253107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Bruckbauer ST, Trimarco JD, Martin J, Bushnell B, Senn KA, Schackwitz W, Lipzen A, Blow M, Wood EA, Culberson WS, Pennacchio C, Cox MM. 2019. Experimental evolution of extreme resistance to ionizing radiation in Escherichia coli after 50 cycles of selection. J Bacteriol 201:e00784-18. doi: 10.1128/JB.00784-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Cheng K-K, Lee B-S, Masuda T, Ito T, Ikeda K, Hirayama A, Deng L, Dong J, Shimizu K, Soga T, Tomita M, Palsson BO, Robert M. 2014. Global metabolic network reorganization by adaptive mutations allows fast growth of Escherichia coli on glycerol. Nat Commun 5:3233. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Hauryliuk V, Atkinson GC, Murakami KS, Tenson T, Gerdes K. 2015. Recent functional insights into the role of (p)ppGpp in bacterial physiology. Nat Rev Microbiol 13:298–309. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Krásný L, Gourse RL. 2004. An alternative strategy for bacterial ribosome synthesis: Bacillus subtilis rRNA transcription regulation. EMBO J 23:4473–4483. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600423 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Geiger T, Wolz C. 2014. Intersection of the stringent response and the CodY regulon in low GC Gram-positive bacteria. Int J Med Microbiol 304:150–155. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.11.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Yelamanchi SD, Mishra A, Behra SK, Karthikkeyan G, Keshava Prasad TS, Surolia A. 2022. Rifampicin-mediated metabolic changes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Metabolites 12:493. doi: 10.3390/metabo12060493 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Nitta K, Breitling R, Takano E, Putri SP, Fukusaki E. 2021. Investigation of the effects of actinorhodin biosynthetic gene cluster expression and a rpoB point mutation on the metabolome of Streptomyces coelicolor M1146. J Biosci Bioeng 131:525–536. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2021.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Loots DT. 2016. New insights into the survival mechanisms of rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:655–660. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv406 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Rêgo AM, Alves da Silva D, Ferreira NV, de Pina LC, Evaristo JAM, Caprini Evaristo GP, Nogueira FCS, Ochs SM, Amaral JJ, Ferreira RBR, Antunes LCM. 2021. Metabolic profiles of multidrug resistant and extensively drug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis unveiled by metabolomics. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 126:102043. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2020.102043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute . 2013. M100-S23. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; twenty-third informational supplement. CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA. [Google Scholar]
- 71. Monk IR, Shah IM, Xu M, Tan M-W, Foster TJ. 2012. Transforming the untransformable: application of direct transformation to manipulate genetically Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. mBio 3:e00277-11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00277-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Prior JE, Lynch MD, Gill RT. 2010. Broad-host-range vectors for protein expression across gram negative hosts. Biotechnol Bioeng 106:326–332. doi: 10.1002/bit.22695 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Cui L, Neoh H, Iwamoto A, Hiramatsu K. 2012. Coordinated phenotype switching with large-scale chromosome flip-flop inversion observed in bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:E1647–E1656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1204307109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Ooga T, Sato H, Nagashima A, Sasaki K, Tomita M, Soga T, Ohashi Y. 2011. Metabolomic anatomy of an animal model revealing homeostatic imbalances in dyslipidaemia. Mol Biosyst 7:1217–1223. doi: 10.1039/c0mb00141d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Sugimoto M, Wong DT, Hirayama A, Soga T, Tomita M. 2010. Capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometry-based saliva metabolomics identified oral, breast and pancreatic cancer-specific profiles. Metabolomics 6:78–95. doi: 10.1007/s11306-009-0178-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Yamamoto H, Fujimori T, Sato H, Ishikawa G, Kami K, Ohashi Y. 2014. Statistical hypothesis testing of factor loading in principal component analysis and its application to metabolite set enrichment analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 15:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-51 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Junker BH, Klukas C, Schreiber F. 2006. VANTED: a system for advanced data analysis and visualization in the context of biological networks. BMC Bioinformatics 7:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Cui L, Murakami H, Kuwahara-Arai K, Hanaki H, Hiramatsu K. 2000. Contribution of a thickened cell wall and its glutamine nonamidated component to the vancomycin resistance expressed by Staphylococcus aureus Mu50. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:2276–2285. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.9.2276-2285.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Thitiananpakorn K, Aiba Y, Tan X-E, Watanabe S, Kiga K, Sato’o Y, Boonsiri T, Li F-Y, Sasahara T, Taki Y, Azam AH, Zhang Y, Cui L. 2020. Association of mprF mutations with cross-resistance to daptomycin and vancomycin in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Sci Rep 10:16107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73108-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.