Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 2002 Dec 7;325(7376):1362.

Retaining nurses in the NHS

Extent of shortage will be known only when nurses spend all their time nursing

Steven J Lewis 1
PMCID: PMC1124813  PMID: 12468494

Editor—Finlayson et al chronicled the problems affecting nursing and the environmental factors contributing to the current shortages.1 Embedded in their story is, however, a crucial element of the problem. Evidence from the United States, Canada, and Germany has found that nurses spend time performing functions not related to their professional skills, such as cleaning rooms or moving food trays. Nurses also reported more pressure to take up management responsibility, taking them away from the direct care of patients.

This means that, although a shortage of professional nursing may exist, a shortage of nurses might not. Nurses spend much of their time doing things that should be delegated to others and not enough of their time doing what they are educated to do. This is inefficient and demoralising and accounts for at least some of the widespread job dissatisfaction in the profession. Thus far, policy responses have come in one of two forms: raising salaries (favoured in Canada) and increasing capacity in nursing education programmes (favoured in many jurisdictions).

Paying nurses more money may be just, but it will not by itself produce more nurses or make them more content with their working conditions once the transitory glow of the extra money dims. Increasing the supply of new nurses may turn out to be perversely ineffective if overall numbers grow, nurses perform even more non-nursing tasks, and system costs rise because highly trained people are used inefficiently.

The problem is not restricted to nursing. A recent systematic review reported that nurse practitioners can do what general practitioners typically do in a wide variety of settings.2 In health care it has proved difficult to get the division of labour right, and the complex array of professions, regulatory and licensing bodies, and organisational structures renders rapid adaptation to changing circumstances difficult.

These realities show that we should not rush headlong towards solutions that leave some fundamental problems unaddressed. The first obligation to the health system and to nurses is to ensure that the nursing practice matches their skills. Only when nurses are allowed to withdraw from areas of non-nursing activity and do what they should be doing will we know the true extent of the nursing shortage—if it exists at all. Achieving a proper division of labour that respects and maximises professionals' competencies will make the healthcare system more effective and efficient. It will also create a better motivated and contented workforce.

References

  • 1.Finlayson B, Dixon J, Meadow S, Blair G. Mind the gap: the extent of the NHS nursing shortage. BMJ. 2002;325:538–541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7363.538. . (7 September.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Horrocks S, Anderson E, Salisbury C. Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. BMJ. 2002;324:819–823. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7341.819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
BMJ. 2002 Dec 7;325(7376):1362.

Nurses' loyalty may be underestimated

Heather M Gage 1,2,3, Rosemary Pope 1,2,3, Fiona Lake 1,2,3

Editor—The nursing shortage described by Finlayson et al is not new.1-1 It has been a recurrent problem over decades, and it is set to worsen. The proposed new expenditure on the NHS will have a profound, but as yet unknown, effect on the demand for nursing staff, such that serious shortages in the short run are likely to constrain planned capacity expansions.

The authors conclude that recruitment is less problematic than retention. Our own analysis indicates that attrition from the nursing profession is not as severe as from teaching.1-2 We used data from the British household panel survey (a representative sample of the United Kingdom's population) to trace all qualified nurses and teachers under the age of 60. We found that 42.6% of nurses, compared with 53.9% of teachers, had left their professions between 1991 and 1996. Roughly equal proportions were not working (14.5% v 15.1%). Of those who had left the nursing profession for other work, 50% were employed in other caring occupations, such as social or child care; only 20% of leaving teachers remained employed in education.

Comparing nurses who stayed and left, those who left were significantly older and less likely to be doing two jobs. They reported less shift working, earned on average 7% less, and expressed more satisfaction with their jobs than those remaining in nursing. Some amount of wastage is to be expected from any profession, and nurses seem to compare favourably with teachers. But 33% of working nurses, compared with 13% of teachers, reported that they were not satisfied with their jobs. What keeps these nurses in nursing? Is it dedication to the profession, home ties, or lack of better opportunities?

Deepening shortages in future years may generate higher rewards that mitigate pay inequalities in nursing: teachers in the sample from the British household panel survey averaged 50% higher incomes than nurses. The concern is, however, that we will continue to rely on nurses' goodwill.

References

  • 1-1.Finlayson B, Dixon J, Meadow S, Blair G. Mind the gap: the extent of the NHS nursing shortage. BMJ. 2002;325:538–541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7363.538. . (7 September.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 1-2.Gage H, Pope R, Lake F. Keeping nurses nursing: a quantitative analysis. Nursing Times. 2001;97:35–37. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
BMJ. 2002 Dec 7;325(7376):1362.

People starting nurse training should think again

Janet M Pinder 1

Editor—With reference to the article by Finlayson et al on the problems retaining nurses in the NHS,2-1 I worked as a nurse in the NHS for 18 years, 15 years of which were spent in emergency medicine as both a staff nurse and a sister. I encountered a lot of violence and aggression from patients during this time.

After a particularly frightening assault on me—in which I was jumped on from behind, beaten over the head with a telephone, and strangled—I became concerned about my safety and that of my colleagues. I voiced my concerns to the management and said that I did not feel that I could carry on working in emergency care unless we were provided with full time security. I was told that this cost could not be justified.

I therefore resigned my post and left the NHS as soon as I was able to secure a position. I have found that there is life outside the NHS where my work is appreciated by both my managers and my clients and where my opinion is both sought and valued. I was (and still am) a highly qualified emergency nurse and emergency nurse practitioner, but nothing could now compel me to return to the NHS. I would advise anyone thinking of starting nurse training to think again.

References

  • 2-1.Finlayson B, Dixon J, Meadow S, Blair G. Mind the gap: the extent of the NHS nursing shortage. BMJ. 2002;325:538–541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7363.538. . (7 September.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
BMJ. 2002 Dec 7;325(7376):1362.

Poor pay is not the only reason

F David Beggs 1

Editor—Finlayson et al highlighted the problems of retaining nurses in the NHS.3-1 Those of us working in the NHS are not surprised that 30% of newly qualified nurses seem not to want to stay in the new “modernised” health service. What is surprising is that is has taken so long for this to become apparent.

Most feel undervalued, overworked, and abused by a government whose main message seems to be that these workers, who for years have devoted themselves to an under-resourced and badly run NHS, know less well than newly elected politicians how they should perform their duties. Worse, when things go wrong, a whole industry emerges dedicated to finding, humiliating, and destroying a scapegoat.

Most workers in the NHS have already shown their intelligence, application, and dedication to sick people by undergoing arduous professional training. They are then quizzed about their HIV status and possible criminal record before they work in the crumbling edifices that are typical of most NHS hospitals. Here they are pressured to do their job and cover for the unreasonable expectations encouraged by government dogma.

Naturally, mistakes can happen, and a few will abuse the system in which they work. The spin doctors are then wheeled out, Health Secretary Alan Milburn puts on his enraged face, more millions are diverted from frontline health care, and if someone can be humiliated on the steps of the General Medical Council or have their pension threatened, so much the better. By contrast, the destruction of lives, sickness, or death resulting from stock exchange losses, government mistakes, or dubious insurance deals seems to be accepted as due to market forces: someone retires with a golden handshake.

Poor pay is often cited as the problem but, although this is undoubtedly a factor, the realities of recent supposed pay increases (up to 20% for consultants widely announced in the media) have been much less attractive. Take a look round where you live, and see who has the big house, the fine furniture, the new large car, and the trips abroad. How many of these got their lifestyle working for the NHS? Unfortunately, the idealism that fired us in youth declines as we approach retirement, and the new generation questions whether it wishes to follow in our footsteps.

References

  • 3-1.Finlayson B, Dixon J, Meadow S, Blair G. Mind the gap: the extent of the NHS nursing shortage. BMJ. 2002;325:538–541. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7363.538. . (7 September.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES