Skip to main content
Clinical Kidney Journal logoLink to Clinical Kidney Journal
letter
. 2024 Jun 20;17(7):sfae190. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfae190

Prognosis is still poor in patients with posttransplant C3 glomerulopathy despite eculizumab use

Safak Mirioglu 1,2,, Rabia Hacer Hocaoglu 3, Arzu Velioglu 4, Yasemin Ozluk 5, Ahmet Burak Dirim 6, Aysegul Oruc 7, Ozgur Akin Oto 8, Halil Yazici 9, Yasar Caliskan 10,11
PMCID: PMC11252667  PMID: 39021814

To the Editor,

C3 glomerulopathy (C3G) is known for its tendency to recur after kidney transplantation (KTx), and recurrence has been reported to be as high as 86% in contemporary cohorts with a high rate of graft failure [1]. The usual maintenance immunosuppressive regimen after KTx includes a calcineurin inhibitor, a mycophenolic acid (MPA) derivative and a corticosteroid which may have some therapeutic effect on the recurrent disease itself, and eculizumab can be used as an additive treatment option in patients with high-grade proteinuria and/or progressive estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) loss [2]. However, data from various cohorts are still needed, especially regarding treatment responses and outcomes of patients.

In this retrospective multicenter study conducted across three centers, we collected the data of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who were diagnosed with posttransplant recurrent or de novo C3G between 2014 and 2023 and followed for at least 3 months after diagnosis. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and histopathological characteristics of patients were retrieved from the databases of participating centers. Primary outcome was defined as death-censored graft loss necessitating dialysis or re-transplantation, and secondary outcome was complete (CR) or partial remission (PR). CR was the recovery of baseline eGFR and proteinuria of <0.5 g/g. PR was ≥50% reduction of proteinuria (and to <3 g/g in patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria at baseline) plus stabilization or improvement in kidney function. Included patients provided informed consent to extract their data to the database. Use of this database for research was approved by the Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine Ethical Committee (2016/742), and the study complied with the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Eleven patients were identified, and 10 with follow-up data were included. Detailed features of patients are shown in the Table 1. Five (50%) were male, and mean (± standard deviation) age at the time of KTx was 33.2 ± 8.5 years. Nine KTRs (90%) were diagnosed with recurrent C3G and the etiology of primary kidney disease was not known in one patient. The majority of KTx were performed from living donors (n = 9, 90%). One patient had a history of T-cell-mediated rejection before posttransplant C3G diagnosis, which had shown good response to anti-rejection treatment. Posttransplant C3G was diagnosed at a median of 26 (3–85) months after KTx, and mean age was 36.8 ± 9.1 years. Mean hemoglobin, serum creatinine, serum albumin and proteinuria at the time of diagnosis were 10.5 ± 1.8 g/dL, 1.9 ± 0.7 mg/dL, 4.1 ± 0.5 g/dL and 1.1 ± 0.9 g/g, respectively. Monoclonal disorders were excluded by using serum and urine electrophoresis and serum free light chain assays in all KTRs. Serum C3 was low (67.1 ± 29.7 mg/dL, ref: 90–180 mg/dL) in seven of eight KTRs with available data (87.5%). At the time of diagnosis, eight patients were treated with tacrolimus, MPA and low-dose prednisolone, and the combination of tacrolimus, azathioprine (AZA) and low-dose prednisolone was administered in two patients. Antiproliferative agent was changed from AZA to MPA after diagnosis in one patient. Further immunosuppressive treatment was administered in nine cases for a median of 14.5 (3–24.3) months. Eculizumab was used in eight, and one patient was treated with pulse steroids and therapeutic plasma exchange. Four of eight patients (50%) who were treated with eculizumab showed CR. One patient treated with steroids and therapeutic plasma exchange did not go into remission. Response to treatment was seen in these patients after 3 (1.5–6.8) months (1, 8, 3 and 3 months for patients #1, #2, #8 and #10, respectively). After a median of 27 (12.3–74.5) months, five KTRs (50%) experienced graft loss despite eculizumab use in three of them. Patient #4 progressed to graft failure after 4 months, and patient #6 underwent re-transplantation due to graft failure in 8 months after recurrence. Patients #5 and #7 demonstrated a significant increase in serum creatinine levels at 1 year which resulted in graft loss. No adverse events attributed to treatment were observed in the whole cohort.

Table 1:

Detailed characteristics of all patients with posttransplant C3 glomerulopathy (reference for serum C3 levels: 90–180 mg/dL).

Patient Sex Primary disease Family history Age at KTx Donor type Post-KTx
Diagnosis
Age at
post-KTx
diagnosis
Time from
KTx to
diagnosis (months)
Biopsy
indication
Endocapillary
proliferation
Percentage of
cellular
and/or fibrocellular crescents
Interstitial
inflammation
Percentage of
sclerotic
glomeruli
Interstitial
fibrosis
Tubular
atrophy
SCr at diagnosis (mg/dL) Serum C3
at diagnosis (mg/dL)
SCr 1 year
after diagnosis
(mg/dL)
Time
from
diagnosis to
last
follow-up (months)
Treatment Remission Graft
loss
1 F C3G None 38 Living C3G 40 24 Graft dysfunction and hematuria No 0 Yes 16.7 Mild Mild 2.10 81 1.30 33 ECZ CR No
2 F C3G None 46 Living C3G 49 28 Proteinuria and hematuria No 14.3 Yes 0 None None 1.60 89 1.36 32 ECZ CR No
3 F C3G KTx in aunt 21 Living DDD 21 7 Proteinuria and hematuria No 18.2 Yes 9.1 Mild Mild 1.35 15 0.97 15 ECZ NR No
4 M Unknown None 36 Living C3G 45 109 Graft dysfunction, proteinuria and hematuria No 10 Yes 25 Mild Mild 3.00 56 Graft loss 4 ECZ NR Yes
5 M MPGN None 25 Living C3G 29 48 Proteinuria and hematuria No 0 Yes 40 None Mild 1.39 81 3.28 16 ECZ NR Yes
6 M MPGN None 25 Living C3G 36 139 Graft dysfunction No 0 No 20 Mild Moderate 3.50 NA Graft loss and re-KTx 97 None NA Yes
7 F C3G None 36 Deceased C3GN 43 77 Graft dysfunction and proteinuria Yes 3.2 Yes 12.9 Mild Mild 1.80 NA 2.50 67 ECZ NR Yes
8 M C3G None 29 Living C3G 29 1 Graft dysfunction Yes 0 No 0 None Mild 1.42 40 1.02 22 TPE, then ECZ CR No
9 M MPGN KTx in father 31 Living C3G 31 3 Proteinuria No 0 No 0 None Mild 1.33 109 1.36 121 TPE with steroids NR Yes
10 F C3G None 45 Living C3G 45 3 Graft dysfunction No 0 Yes 0 None None 1.90 66 NA 3 Steroids and ECZ CR No

C3GN: C3 glomerulonephritis; DDD: dense deposit disease; ECZ: eculizumab; F: female; M: male; MPGN: membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis; NA: not available; NR: no remission; SCr: serum creatinine; TPE: therapeutic plasma exchange.

Prognosis was still quite dismal in our cohort despite eculizumab use in the majority of the patients. Our results were in line with the findings of the contemporary cohorts [1, 3, 4]. However, our observations suffer from limitations. This is a retrospective study which precludes any cause–effect relationship, and we do not have information on antibodies for complement proteins or genetic analysis. We could not perform a centralized pathology review for biopsy samples, and reported already available biopsy data which precluded providing further detailed information on all histologic activity parameters [5]. Dichotomization of C3G into C3 glomerulonephritis and dense deposit disease subtypes was not possible in most patients due to the lack of electron microscopy. Eculizumab was not found to be very beneficial in patients with a quiescent progressive course instead of a crescentic rapidly progressive disease in native kidneys [6], which might also be the case in posttransplant disease. Studies on new potentially effective treatment options such as novel inhibitors of the alternative pathway, like iptacopan [7], are urgently needed.

Contributor Information

Safak Mirioglu, Division of Nephrology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; Department of Immunology, Istanbul University Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Rabia Hacer Hocaoglu, Division of Nephrology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Arzu Velioglu, Division of Nephrology, Marmara University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Yasemin Ozluk, Department of Pathology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Ahmet Burak Dirim, Division of Nephrology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Aysegul Oruc, Division of Nephrology, Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.

Ozgur Akin Oto, Division of Nephrology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Halil Yazici, Division of Nephrology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.

Yasar Caliskan, Division of Nephrology, Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey; Center for Abdominal Transplantation, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

S.M. and Y.C. designed the work. S.M. analyzed the data and prepared the draft. All authors were involved in revising the draft critically for important intellectual content, and all authors approved the final version to be submitted.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

Outside the submitted work, S.M. reports receiving support for attending meetings and travel from Amgen and Sanofi Genzyme, and A.V. received honoraria for lectures, presentations, speaker's bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Alexion. The remaining authors have no disclosures. The results presented in this letter have not been published previously in whole or part, except in abstract format.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Regunathan-Shenk  R, Avasare  RS, Ahn  W  et al.  Kidney transplantation in C3 glomerulopathy: a case series. Am J Kidney Dis  2019;73:316–23. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Gonzalez Suarez  ML, Thongprayoon  C, Hansrivijit  P  et al.  Treatment of C3 glomerulopathy in adult kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review. Med Sci (Basel)  2020;8:44. 10.3390/medsci8040044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Zand  L, Lorenz  EC, Cosio  FG  et al.  Clinical findings, pathology, and outcomes of C3GN after kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol  2014;25:1110–7. 10.1681/ASN.2013070715 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kumar  A, Ramachandran  R, Rawat  A  et al.  Poor allograft outcome in Indian patients with post-transplant C3 glomerulopathy. Clin Kidney J  2021;14:291–300. 10.1093/ckj/sfz135 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Bomback  AS, Santoriello  D, Avasare  RS  et al.  C3 glomerulonephritis and dense deposit disease share a similar disease course in a large United States cohort of patients with C3 glomerulopathy. Kidney Int  2018;93:977–85. 10.1016/j.kint.2017.10.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Le Quintrec  M, Lapeyraque  AL, Lionet  A  et al.  Patterns of clinical response to eculizumab in patients with C3 glomerulopathy. Am J Kidney Dis  2018;72:84–92. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.11.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Wong  E, Nester  C, Cavero  T  et al.  Efficacy and safety of iptacopan in patients with C3 glomerulopathy. Kidney Int Rep  2023;8:2754–64. 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.09.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Kidney Journal are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES