Skip to main content
PMC home page
Occupational and Environmental Medicine logoLink to Occupational and Environmental Medicine
. 1995 Aug;52(8):515–523. doi: 10.1136/oem.52.8.515

Factors affecting recognition of cancer risks of nuclear workers.

G W Kneale 1, A M Stewart 1
PMCID: PMC1128286  PMID: 7663636

Abstract

OBJECTIVES--To discover whether direct estimates of the risks of cancer for nuclear workers agree with indirect estimates based on survivors of the atomic bomb; whether relations between age at exposure and risk of cancer are the same for workers and survivors, and whether dosimetry standards are sufficiently uniform to allow pooling of data from different nuclear industrial sites. METHOD--Data from five nuclear sites in the United States were included in a cohort analysis that as well as controlling for all the usual factors also allowed for possible effects of three cancer modulating factors (exposure age, cancer latency, and year of exposure). This analysis was first applied to three distinct cohorts, and then to two sets of pooled data. RESULTS--From each study cohort there was evidence of a risk of cancer related to dose, and evidence that the extra radiogenic cancers had the same overall histological manifestations as naturally occurring cancers and were largely the result of exposures after 50 years of age causing deaths after 70 years. There were, however, significant differences between the five sets of risk estimates. CONCLUSIONS--Although the risks of cancer in nuclear workers were appreciably higher than estimates based on the cancer experiences of survivors of the atomic bomb, some uncertainties remained as there were non-uniform standards of dosimetry in the nuclear sites. The differences between nuclear workers and survivors of the atomic bomb were largely the result of relations between age at exposure and risk of cancer being totally different for workers and survivors and, in the occupational data, there were no signs of the special risks of leukaemia found in atomic bomb data and other studies of effects of high doses.

Full text

PDF
518

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Gilbert E. S., Cragle D. L., Wiggs L. D. Updated analyses of combined mortality data for workers at the Hanford Site, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, and Rocky Flats Weapons Plant. Radiat Res. 1993 Dec;136(3):408–421. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gilbert E. S., Marks S. An analysis of the mortality of workers in a nuclear facility. Radiat Res. 1979 Jul;79(1):122–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gilbert E. S., Omohundro E., Buchanan J. A., Holter N. A. Mortality of workers at the Hanford site: 1945-1986. Health Phys. 1993 Jun;64(6):577–590. doi: 10.1097/00004032-199306000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gilbert E. S., Petersen G. R., Buchanan J. A. Mortality of workers at the Hanford site: 1945-1981. Health Phys. 1989 Jan;56(1):11–25. doi: 10.1097/00004032-198901000-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gomer C. J., Rucker N., Ferrario A., Wong S. Properties and applications of photodynamic therapy. Radiat Res. 1989 Oct;120(1):1–18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kato H., Schull W. J. Studies of the mortality of A-bomb survivors. 7. Mortality, 1950-1978: Part I. Cancer mortality. Radiat Res. 1982 May;90(2):395–432. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kendall G. M., Muirhead C. R., MacGibbon B. H., O'Hagan J. A., Conquest A. J., Goodill A. A., Butland B. K., Fell T. P., Jackson D. A., Webb M. A. Mortality and occupational exposure to radiation: first analysis of the National Registry for Radiation Workers. BMJ. 1992 Jan 25;304(6821):220–225. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6821.220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kneale G. W., Mancuso T. F., Stewart A. M. Hanford radiation study III: a cohort study of the cancer risks from radiation to workers at Hanford (1944-77 deaths) by the method of regression models in life-tables. Br J Ind Med. 1981 May;38(2):156–166. doi: 10.1136/oem.38.2.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kneale G. W., Sorahan T., Stewart A. M. Evidence of biased recording of radiation doses of Hanford workers. Am J Ind Med. 1991;20(6):799–803. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700200612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kneale G. W., Stewart A. M. Reanalysis of Hanford data: 1944-1986 deaths. Am J Ind Med. 1993 Mar;23(3):371–389. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700230302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Mancuso T. F., Stewart A., Kneale G. Radiation exposures of Hanford workers dying from cancer and other causes. Health Phys. 1977 Nov;33:369–385. doi: 10.1097/00004032-197711000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Wing S., Shy C. M., Wood J. L., Wolf S., Cragle D. L., Frome E. L. Mortality among workers at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Evidence of radiation effects in follow-up through 1984. JAMA. 1991 Mar 20;265(11):1397–1402. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wing S., Shy C. M., Wood J. L., Wolf S., Cragle D. L., Tankersley W., Frome E. L. Job factors, radiation and cancer mortality at Oak Ridge National Laboratory: follow-up through 1984. Am J Ind Med. 1993 Feb;23(2):265–279. doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700230204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Occupational and Environmental Medicine are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES