Skip to main content
Veterinary World logoLink to Veterinary World
. 2024 Jun 8;17(6):1259–1264. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2024.1259-1264

Developing antibacterial peptides as a promising therapy for combating antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections

Rula M Darwish 1,, Ali H Salama 2
PMCID: PMC11283607  PMID: 39077460

Abstract

Background and Aim:

Antibiotic-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa poses a serious health threat. This study aimed to investigate the antibacterial activity of peptide KW-23 against drug-resistant P. aeruginosa and its potential for enhancing the efficacy of conventional antibiotics.

Materials and Methods:

KW-23 was synthesized from nine amino acids, specifically three tryptophans and three lysines. The purity of the substance was analyzed using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. The peptide was identified through mass spectrometry using electrospray ionization. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of KW-23 in combination with conventional antibiotics against control and multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa were determined utilizing broth microdilution. The erythrocyte hemolytic assay was used to measure toxicity. The KW-23 effect was analyzed using the time-kill curve.

Results:

The peptide exhibited strong antibacterial activity against control and multidrug-resistant strains of P. aeruginosa, with MICs of 4.5 μg/mL and 20 μg/mL, respectively. At higher concentration of 100 μg/mL, KW-23 exhibited a low hemolytic impact, causing no more than 3% damage to red blood. The cytotoxicity assay demonstrates KW-23’s safety, while the time-kill curve highlights its rapid and sustained antibacterial activity. The combination of KW-23 and gentamicin exhibited synergistic activity against both susceptible and resistant P. aeruginosa, with fractional inhibitory concentration index values of 0.07 and 0.27, respectively.

Conclusion:

The KW-23 synthesized in the laboratory significantly combats antibiotic-resistant P. aeruginosa. Due to its strong antibacterial properties and low toxicity to cells, KW-23 is a promising alternative to traditional antibiotics in combating multidrug-resistant bacteria.

Keywords: antimicrobial resistance, peptides, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, synergism

Introduction

Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a globally prevalent Gram-negative bacterium, significantly influences human health as a potent opportunistic pathogen [1]. Known for its adaptability and resilience, P. aeruginosa is linked to various types of infections, from localized skin and soft-tissue infections to serious systemic diseases [2]. This bacterium is known for causing severe infections in immunocompromised patients, including those with cystic fibrosis, burn wounds, and undergoing invasive medical procedures [3]. P. aeruginosa’s strong biofilm formation and resistance acquisition make it a major clinical challenge, resulting in persistent infections that are hard to eliminate [4]. The growing antibiotic resistance in P. aeruginosa strains highlights the critical need for alternative treatment methods [5]. The growing antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa is a significant clinical issue [6]. Utilizing multiple mechanisms, such as efflux pumps, impermeable membranes, and beta-lactamase production, the bacterium exhibits exceptional resistance to antibacterial agents. This resistance complicates treatment regimens and underscores the critical importance of exploring novel avenues for combating P. aeruginosa infections [7].

With antibiotic resistance on the rise, antibacterial peptides (AMPs) have emerged as potential replacements for antibiotics [8]. The naturally occurring AMPs, with potent antibacterial effects, are crucial components of the innate immune system in different organisms [9]. These peptides are active against many bacteria, including Gram-negative strains such as P. aeruginosa. AMPs primarily aim to disrupt bacterial membranes, resulting in cellular damage and frequently avoiding known resistance mechanisms. Due to their distinctive mechanism of functioning, AMPs are an alluring alternative for battling multidrug-resistant microbes [10]. The potential of AMPs to overcome P. aeruginosa resistance mechanisms necessitates their exploration as therapeutic options. By targeting bacterial membranes and disrupting essential cellular processes, AMPs can offer an effective strategy against strains that have developed resistance to traditional antibiotics [11]. The natural abundance of AMPs offers the potential for discovering new compounds with increased specificity and efficacy against P. aeruginosa, thanks to the diversity of AMPs in nature [12].

This study aimed to create new AMPs customized against P. aeruginosa, with a focus on strains resistant to conventional antibiotics. We evaluated the effectiveness of these peptides individually and in conjunction with standard antibiotics toward antibiotic-resistant and susceptible strains of P. aeruginosa. This research advances our knowledge of AMP effectiveness against P. aeruginosa while proposing potential novel therapeutic approaches for combating antibiotic resistance.

Materials and Methods

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was not required for this study.

Study period and location

The study was conducted in December 2023 at the experimental base of the University of Jordan.

Peptide design and synthesis

The peptide used in this study was obtained from GL Biochem Ltd., Shanghai, China, in a freeze-dried state following production through the solid-phase method. KW-23, a hex ultrashort AMP comprising six alternating subunits of lysine and tryptophan, is conjugated with hydrophobic ferulic acid moieties. The peptide was purified using reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography with a C18 Internsil® column (Thermo Fisher, USA). The octadecylsilyl groups column was eluted using an acetonitrile/H2O-trifluoroacetic acid gradient at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. Electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry confirmed the purification and identification of the synthesized peptide [13]. By employing the two positively charged amino acids [14], the design technique lowered the peptide’s cationicity, enabling electrostatic contact with bacterial cells’ negatively charged membranes. The peptide was conjugated with ferulic acid to confer the hydrophobicity necessary for membrane permeabilization. This molecule, highly hydrophobic in nature, functions as an anchor for peptide-membrane hydrophobic interactions. KW-23 has a net charge of +3 and a molecular weight of 1136.34 Da. Figure-1 illustrates the KW-23 peptide’s structure.

Figure-1.

Figure-1

The structure of KW-23 peptide.

Determination of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) for KW-23 and conventional Antibiotics

The MIC and MBC values for KW-23 and conventional antibiotics such as levofloxacin and chloramphenicol were measured. These antibiotics-rifampicin, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, doxycycline, vancomycin, cefixime, and gentamicin-were tested against both strains of P. aeruginosa using the microbroth dilution method as per Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines with sterile 96-well polypropylene microtiter plates [15]. In Mueller Hinton broth (MHB), various bacterial strains resuscitated from frozen glycerol were cultured. Overnight, bacterial cultures in MHB were diluted to 106 colony-forming unit (CFU)/mL. 50 μL of each peptide and 50 μL of the diluted bacterial suspension were added to separate wells of 96-well microtiter plates containing different concentrations of KW-23. Each well held a replicate of six distinct peptide concentrations. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plate reader (Biotech, USA) was used to determine bacterial growth after an 18-h incubation at 37°C by measuring optical density (OD) at λ = 570 nm. The MIC of the antibacterial agent was identified. Each plate contained a positive control with 50 μL bacterial suspension and 50 μL MHB, and a negative control with 100 μL MHB. 10 μL from clear negative and previous turbid positive wells were streaked on sterile nutrient media agar. The MBC value represents the lowest concentration that kills 99.9% of bacteria after a 24-h incubation at 37°C. 15. The MICs and MBCs for each antibiotic were determined using the same method [15]. To guarantee the results’ reliability, all experiments were carried out in threes.

Hemolytic activity of KW-23

The hemolytic activity of KW-23 against normal erythrocytes was measured according to Salama [16]. To ensure the experiment’s robustness and reliability, each one was carried out 3 times. The hemolysis equation for analysis is as follows:

graphic file with name Vetworld-17-1259-g002.jpg

Where A: Is OD 450 with the peptide solution,

A0: Is the OD 450 of the blank.

And AX: Is OD 450 of the control (0.1% Triton X-100).

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cell proliferation assay

In this investigation, we utilized the Vero cell line procured from ATCC (CCL81), a commercially available mammalian cell line. MTT transforms into purple formazan following reduction within the cell by reductase enzymes metabolically active cells catalyze the reaction, generating purple formazan crystals. These purple crystals can be dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), despite their insolubility in water. Spectrophotometry (Thermo Scientific, USA) measured the generated color of these crystals at a wavelength of 550 nm. 5 × 103 cells were seeded in a flat-bottomed 96-well plate for the MTT assay and incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 18–24 h for attachment. The following day, the cells in the plates were treated with Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) media containing varying concentrations of two peptides, which were suspended at 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 mg/mL, and loaded with 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1000 g/mL of these peptides. An untreated medium served as the control. The plates were incubated at 37°C with 5% CO2 for 24 h. 24 h later, each well received 20 μL of 2.5 mg/mL MTT solution and was incubated with 5% CO2 at 37°C for 2–5 h. The wells were emptied post-incubation. 100 μL of DMSO was added to each well and mixed to dissolve formazan crystals, resulting in a clear purple solution. The plates were then placed on an absorbance microplate reader (BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) and the absorbance at 550 nm was measured [17].

Time killing curve

These experiments followed the method outlined in the M26-A document of CLSI. The bacterial suspension of 5 × 105 CFU/ml was cultured in broth for three tubes. The first and second tubes house the test solution at 0.25 × MIC and 1 × MIC concentrations, while the third serves as the growth control. The incubation was conducted for different time durations: 0, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 h. The dead cells percentage was calculated in comparison to the growth control by counting the number of living cells (CFU/mL) with the agar plate method in each tube. In general, the bactericidal effect is obtained with a lethality percentage of 90% for 6 h, which is equivalent to 99.9% of the lethality for 24 h [18].

Fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) determination of KW-23 along with antibiotics

The microbroth checkerboard assay was used to investigate the synergistic activities of KW-23 and antibiotics [19]. The MIC of the antibiotics and KW-23 combination was determined by conducting the procedure in the previous section and adding both agents. Each experiment was repeated 3 times. Synergism was assessed through FIC values calculated by dividing the individual inhibitory concentrations of each antifungal agent in a combination by their combination’s inhibitory concentration [20].

FICI = (MIC peptide in combination/MIC peptide alone) + (MIC fluconazole in combination/MIC fluconazole)

Synergistic (FIC ≤ 0.5), additive (FIC 0.5 < FIC ≤1), indifferent (1 < FIC ≤ 4), or antagonist (FIC > 4).

Results

Antibacterial activity of the peptide

Table-1 shows KW-23’s 4.5 μg/mL and 20 μg/mL activity against P. aeruginosa strains ATCC 9027 and BAA-2108, respectively. One is a control strain, while the other is MDR. The MBC and MIC values were identical for both bacterial strains. The MIC and MBC values of the eight distinct antibiotics are tabulated in Table-1.

Table-1.

The MICs and MBCs (μg/mL) of KW-23 and the nine antibiotics against the tested bacterial strains.

Compound MIC (MBC) (µg/mL)

Control P. aeruginosa (9027) MDR P. aeruginosa (BAA-2108)
KW-23 4.5 (4.5) 20 (20)
Levofloxacin 9 (9) 30 (30)
Chloramphenicol 80 (105) 150 (220)
Rifampicin 15 (15) 50 (50)
Amoxicillin 25 (25) 200 (200)
Clarithromycin 125 (125) 125 (125)
Doxycycline 6 (25) 34 (45)
Vancomycin 200 (350) 260 (400)
Cefixime 6 (10) 82 (110)
Gentamicin 2 (2) 20 (20)

P. aeruginosa=Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MIC=Minimum inhibitory concentration, MBC=Minimum bactericidal concentrations, MDR=Multidrug resistant

Hemolytic activity of the peptides

The hemolysis percentage of the peptides is displayed in Table-2.

Table-2.

Hemolytic activity of KW-23 against human erythrocytes after 60 min’ incubation.

Concentration (µM) Hemolysis %
5 0
10 0
20 0
40 0
60 0
80 1
100 3

The results were recorded at λ = 450 nm

MTT cell proliferation

The half-maximal inhibitory concentration value for KW-23 in the cytotoxicity assay was 148 for the conjugate (Figure-2).

Figure-2.

Figure-2

The 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay for the KW-23.

Time-kill curve

Figure-3 shows that KW-23 reduced the initial bacterial count by three logs.

Figure-3.

Figure-3

Time killing curve.

Antibacterial activity of KW-23 along with conventional antibiotics

The findings in Table-3 demonstrate the impact of various peptide KW-23/antibiotic combinations on both bacterial strains. In the combination of KW-23 and gentamicin, the most significant results were achieved against both control and MDR P. aeruginosa strains, with FICI values of 0.07 and 0.27, respectively.

Table-3.

The checkerboard results of the effect of combinations of the peptide KW-23 with the antibiotics used in the study against the both bacterial strains used.

Bacteria strains Antibiotics MIC FICI*

Antibiotics Antibiotics/KW-23 KW-23 KW-23/antibiotics
Control P. aeruginosa Levofloxacin 9 2 4.5 1.5 0.6
Chloramphenicol 80 15 4.5 2 0.63
Rifampicin 15 3 4.5 0.5 0.3
Amoxicillin 25 10 4.5 0.25 0.45
Clarithromycin 125 65 4.5 2 0.96
Doxycycline 6 2 4.5 0.125 0.36
Vancomycin 200 175 4.5 3.5 1.65
Cefixime 6 0.5 4.5 1 0.3
Gentamicin 2 0.125 4.5 0.025 0.07
MDR P. aeruginosa Levofloxacin 30 15 20 10 1
Chloramphenicol 150 60 20 15 1.15
Rifampicin 50 20 20 5 0.65
Amoxicillin 200 120 20 18 1.5
Clarithromycin 125 80 20 5 0.9
Doxycycline 34 10 20 2 0.4
Vancomycin 260 150 20 15 1.3
Cefixime 82 40 20 12 1.08
Gentamicin 20 5 20 0.5 0.27

Synergistic (FIC ≤ 0.5), additive (FIC 0.5 < FIC ≤ 1), indifferent (1 < FIC ≤ 4), or antagonist (FIC > 4). FICI=Fractional inhibitory concentration index, P. aeruginosa=Pseudomonas aeruginosa, MIC=Minimum inhibitory concentration, MDR=Multidrug resistant

Discussion

Due to the intrinsic antibiotic resistance of P. aeruginosa and its status as a global health crisis due to multidrug-resistant pathogens, innovative strategies are needed to combat this notorious opportunistic pathogen [21, 22]. Novel AMPs were synthesized, specifically targeting P. aeruginosa strains resistant to traditional antibiotics. AMPs, known for their broad-spectrum activity and ability to surpass resistance mechanisms, present an attractive option [23]. Safety concerns have largely hindered drug development for these peptides [24]. Based on the structure-function relationship insights of known AMPs [25], this study proposes a strategy for designing and synthesizing peptides. The ability of these peptides to treat both antibiotic-resistant and susceptible strains of P. aeruginosa was assessed. The novel peptide, KW-23, exhibits antibacterial activity similar to a traditional antibiotic while causing minimal harm to normal erythrocytes. KW-23’s MIC and MBC surpassed the antibiotics of diverse chemical classes against both strains. Both MIC and MBC values were identical, signifying bactericidal effect. The main cause of antibacterial activity in analog peptides lies in their ability to permeabilize bacterial cell membranes [26]. The KW-23 membrane-penetrating ability is most likely due to the use of charge segregation from the hydrophobic center [27]. The unspecified bacterial membrane disruption mechanism of the designed peptide is unlikely to trigger rapid resistance, thereby increasing its therapeutic duration. At concentrations up to 100 μg/mL, KW-23 does not cause human erythrocyte lysis, making it preferential for bacterial membranes over host cells. 6K-F17 selectively targets bacteria and is non-hemolytic to human erythrocytes, even in high concentrations above 500 μg/mL. Beaudoin et al. [28] found that electrostatic attraction to bacterial membranes increases the hydrophobicity of KW-23 beyond the threshold for spontaneous membrane penetration. The peptide demonstrated rapid bactericidal action against both strains within 15 min and continued effectiveness for up to 24 h, making it appealing as an antibacterial agent. In our study, the killing rate was akin to the kinetics observed with soluble peptides as observed by Aiemsaard et al. [29]. Release of ions and larger cellular molecules ensues when the peptide disrupts the cytoplasmic membrane [30]. The new compound KW-23 exhibits promising anti-MDR activity against P. aeruginosa. By decreasing individual drug dosages, delaying the development of resistance, and potentially eradicating resistant strains, combination therapy aims to minimize adverse effects [31]. The most effective outcomes were achieved when KW-23 was used in conjunction with gentamicin. Utilizing this combination may open up new treatment possibilities.

In P. aeruginosa, KW-23 in combination with doxycycline, chloramphenicol, and clarithromycin exhibited synergistic and partial synergy effects. Short peptides likely enhance antibiotic effectiveness by targeting the bacterial membrane. This effect is also attributed to the direct antibacterial activity of the peptide (KW-23) through interactions with intercellular targets, such as DNA, after entering the bacteria [32]. With amoxicillin, cefixime, rifampicin, and levofloxacin, synergy was demonstrated against the control strain, but not against MDR P. aeruginosa. This is expected, probably due to the presence of the AmpC β-lactamase and the MexAB-OprM efflux pump in this bacterium [33]. Within 2 h, KW-23 kills P. aeruginosa by disrupting its membranes and subsequently complexing with intracellular negatively charged components, including DNA and proteins [28]. Impairment of small molecule drug binding to targets by KW-23 could explain the lack of synergistic effects.

Conclusion

Developing new AMPs against antibiotic-resistant P. aeruginosa is crucial for resolving the global antibiotic resistance issue. This study expands our knowledge of AMP’s actions and offers promising opportunities for new treatment strategies against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Synthesized peptides’ potential success could lead to novel clinical treatments, tackling antibiotic resistance. Future research should focus on developing new AMPs to combat antibiotic-resistant P. aeruginosa, leveraging the promising potential observed in this study. This study is limited by its primary focus on in vitro testing, necessitating further in vivo studies and consideration of resistance development and production feasibility for practical clinical application.

Authors’ Contributions

RMD: Conceptualization and supervision. RMD and AHS: Investigation, methodology, and writing – review and editing. All authors have read, reviewed, and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors are thankful to the University of Jordan and the Middle East University for their support in facilitating the use of their laboratories.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Veterinary World remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published institutional affiliation.

References

  • 1.Grosso-Becerra M.V, Santos-Medellìn C, GonzàlezValdez A, Mendèz J.L, Delgado G, Morales-Espinosa R, Servìn-Gonzàlez L, Alcaraz L.D, Soberòn-Chàve G. Pseudomonas aeruginosa clinical and environmental isolates constitute a single population with high phenotypic diversity. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:318. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-318. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ludwig C, de Jong A, Moyaert H, El Garch F, Janes R, Klein U, Morrisey I, Thiry J, Youal M. Antibacterial susceptibility monitoring of dermatological bacterial pathogens isolated from diseased dogs and cats across Europe (ComPath results) J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016;121(5):1254–1267. doi: 10.1111/jam.13287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hall J.L, Holmes M.A, Baine S.J. Prevalence and antibacterial resistance of canine urinary tract pathogens. Vet. Rec. 2013;173(22):549. doi: 10.1136/vr.101482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yoshimura F, Nikaid H. Permeability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa outer membrane to hydrophilic solutes. J. Bacteriol. 1982;152(2):636–642. doi: 10.1128/jb.152.2.636-642.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Aeschlimann J.R. The role of multidrug efflux pumps in the antibiotic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other gram-negative bacteria. Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists. Pharmacotherapy. 2003;23(7):916–924. doi: 10.1592/phco.23.7.916.32722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bagge N, Ciofu O, Hentzer M, Campbell J.I.A, Givskov M, Hoib N. Constitutive high expression of chromosomal -lactamase in Pseudomonas aeruginosa caused by a new insertion sequence (IS1669) located in ampD. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002;46(11):3406–3411. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.11.3406-3411.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pan Y.P, Xu Y.H, Wang Z.X, Fang Y.P, She J.L. Overexpression of MexAB-OprM efflux pump in carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Arch. Microbiol. 2016;198(6):565–571. doi: 10.1007/s00203-016-1215-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Aguiar F.L.L.D, Santos N.C, de Paula Cavalcante C.S, Andreu D, Baptista G.R, Gonçalve S. Antibiofilm activity on Candida albicans and mechanism of action on biomembrane models of the antibacterial peptide Ctn [15–34] Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21(21):8339. doi: 10.3390/ijms21218339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Peng C, Liu Y, Shui L, Zhao Z, Mao X, Li Z. Mechanisms of action of the antibacterial peptide cecropin in the killing of Candida albicans. Life (Basel) 2022;12(10):1581. doi: 10.3390/life12101581. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ma H, Zhao X, Yang L, Su P, Fu P, Peng J, Gu G. Antibacterial peptide AMP-17 affects Candida albicans by disrupting its cell wall and cell membrane integrity. Infect. Drug. Resist. 2020;13(6):2509–2520. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S250278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ting D.S.J, Beuerman R.W, Dua H.S, Lakshminarayanan R, Mohamme I. Strategies in translating the therapeutic potentials of host defense peptides. Front. Immunol. 2020;11(15):983. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Duong L, Gross S.P, Siryapor A. Developing antibacterial synergy with AMPs. Front. Med. Technol. 2021;3:640981. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.640981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Salama A, Almaaytah A, Darwis R.M. The design of alapropoginine, a novel conjugated ultrashort antibacterial peptide with potent synergistic antibacterial activity in combination with conventional antibiotics. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021;10(6):712. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060712. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Park C, Le D.G. Fungicidal effect of antibacterial peptide arenicin-1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2009;1788(9):1790–1796. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2009.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Birteksoz-Tan A.S, Zeybek Z, Hacioglu M, Savage P.B, Bozkurt-Guze C. In vitro activities of antibacterial peptides and ceragenins against Legionella pneumophila. J. Antibiot. (Tokyo) 2019;72(5):291–297. doi: 10.1038/s41429-019-0148-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Salama A. The development of a novel ultrashort antibacterial peptide nanoparticles with potent antibacterial effect. Pharmacia. 2022;69(1):255–260. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sifri Z, Chokshi A, Cennimo D, Horn H. Global contributors to antibiotic resistance. J. Glob. Infect. Dis. 2019;11(1):36–42. doi: 10.4103/jgid.jgid_110_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rahman A.Z.A, Adzahan N.M, Zakaria Z, Mayak A.M. Antibacterial effect of acidic ionized water on horse wounds bacterial isolates. Vet. World. 2021;14(5):1128–1132. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2021.1128-1132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Martinez-Irujo J.J, Villahermosa M.L, Alberdi E, Santiag E. A checkerboard method to evaluate interactions between drugs. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1996;51(5):635–644. doi: 10.1016/s0006-2952(95)02230-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hall M.J, Middleton R.F, Westmacot D. The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index as a measure of synergy. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 1983;11(5):427–433. doi: 10.1093/jac/11.5.427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gibbs E.P.J. The evolution of one health:A decade of progress and challenges for the future. Vet. Rec. 2014;174(4):85–91. doi: 10.1136/vr.g143. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Allen H.K, Donato J, Wang H.H, Cloud-Hansen K.A, Davies J, Handelsma J. Call of the wild:Antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010;8(4):251–259. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Silva T, Gome M.S. Immuno-stimulatory peptides as a potential adjunct therapy against intra-macrophagic pathogens. Molecules. 2017;22(8):1297. doi: 10.3390/molecules22081297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Melvin J.A, Montelaro R.C, Bomberge J.M. Clinical potential of engineered cationic antibacterial peptides against drug-resistant biofilms. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ter. 2016;14(11):989–991. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2016.1236687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lee T.H, Hall K.N, Aguila M.I. Antibacterial peptide structure and mechanism of action:A focus on the role of membrane structure. Curr. Top Med. Chem. 2016;16(1):25–39. doi: 10.2174/1568026615666150703121700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Glukhov E, Burrows L.L, Debe C.M. Membrane interactions of designed cationic antibacterial peptides:The two thresholds. Biopolymers. 2008;89(5):360–371. doi: 10.1002/bip.20917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rubinchik E, Dugourd D, Algara T, Pasetka C, Friedlan H.D. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of a novel cationic antibacterial peptide, omiganan, in experimental skin colonisation models. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2009;34(5):457–461. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Beaudoin T, Stone T.A, Glibowicka M, Adams C, Yau Y, Ahmadi S, Bear C.E, Grasemann H, Waters V, Debe C.M. Activity of a novel antibacterial peptide against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):14728. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33016-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Aiemsaard J, Singh R, Borlace G.N, Sripanidkulchai B, Tabboon P, Thongkha E. Antibacterial activity of Cannabis extract (Cannabis sativa L. subsp. Indica (Lam.)) against canine skin infection bacterium Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. Sci. Asia. 2022;48(3):348–353. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Porto W.F, Irazazabal L, Alves E.S.F, Ribeiro S.M, Matos C.O, Pires Á.S, Fensterseifer I.C.M, Miranda V.J, Haney E.F, Humblot V, Torres M.D.T, Hancock R.E.W, Liao L.M, Ladram A, Lu T.K, De La Fuente-Nunez C, Franc O.L. In silico optimization of a guava antibacterial peptide enables combinatorial exploration for peptide design. Nat. Commun. 2018;9(1):1490. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03746-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Imamovic L, Somme M.O.A. Use of collateral sensitivity networks to design drug cycling protocols that avoid resistance development. Sci. Transl. Med. 2013;5(204):204–ra132. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang N, Luo J, Deng F, Huang Y, Zho H. Antibiotic combination therapy:A strategy to overcome bacterial resistance to aminoglycoside antibiotics. Front. Pharmacol. 2022;13:839808. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.839808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Gan B.H, Siriwardena T.N, Javor S, Darbre T, Reymon J.L. Fluorescence imaging of bacterial killing by antimicrobial peptide dendrimer G3KL. ACS Infect. Dis. 2019;5(12):2164–2173. doi: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Veterinary World are provided here courtesy of Veterinary World

RESOURCES