ABSTRACT
Vibrio cholerae is a Gram-negative gastrointestinal pathogen responsible for the diarrheal disease cholera. Expression of key virulence factors, cholera toxin and toxin-coregulated pilus, is regulated directly by ToxT and indirectly by two transmembrane transcription regulators (TTRs), ToxR and TcpP, that promote the expression of toxT. TcpP abundance and activity are controlled by TcpH, a single-pass transmembrane protein, which protects TcpP from a two-step proteolytic process known as regulated intramembrane proteolysis (RIP). The mechanism of TcpH-mediated protection of TcpP represents a major gap in our understanding of V. cholerae pathogenesis. The absence of tcpH leads to unimpeded degradation of TcpP in vitro and a colonization defect in a neonate mouse model of V. cholerae colonization. Here, we show that TcpH protects TcpP from RIP via direct interaction. We also demonstrate that α-linolenic acid, a dietary fatty acid, promotes TcpH-dependent inhibition of RIP via co-association of TcpP and TcpH molecules within detergent-resistant membranes (DRMs) in a mechanism requiring the TcpH transmembrane domain. Taken together, our data support a model where V. cholerae cells use exogenous α-linolenic acid to remodel the phospholipid bilayer in vivo, leading to co-association of TcpP and TcpH within DRMs where RIP of TcpP is inhibited by TcpH, thereby promoting V. cholerae pathogenicity.
IMPORTANCE
Vibrio cholerae continues to pose a significant global burden on health and an alternative therapeutic approach is needed, due to evolving multidrug resistance strains. Transcription of toxT, stimulated by TcpP and ToxR, is essential for V. cholerae pathogenesis. Our results show that TcpP, one of the major regulators of toxT gene expression, is protected from proteolysis by TcpH, via direct interaction. Furthermore, we identified a gut metabolite, α-linolenic acid, that stimulates the co-association of TcpP and TcpH within detergent-resistant membranes (also known as lipid-ordered membrane domains), thereby supporting TcpH-dependent antagonism of TcpP proteolysis. Data presented here extend our knowledge of RIP, virulence gene regulation in V. cholerae, and, to the best of our knowledge, provides the first evidence that lipid-ordered membranes exist within V. cholerae. The model presented here also suggests that TTRs, common among bacteria and archaea, and co-component signal transduction systems present in Enterobacteria, could also be influenced similarly.
KEYWORDS: virulence, regulated intramembrane proteolysis, α-linolenic acid, detergent-resistant membrane
INTRODUCTION
Vibrio cholerae tightly regulates the expression of its virulence factors, such as cholera toxin (CtxAB) and the toxin co-regulated pilus (TcpA-F) to reach the optimal site of infection, the crypt of intestinal villi (1–6). Transcription of these essential virulence factors is regulated by ToxT, an AraC-like transcription factor (7–10). Similarly, transcription of toxT is highly regulated and positively stimulated by TcpP and ToxR, two transmembrane transcription regulators (TTRs) each contain a cytoplasmic DNA-binding domain, a single transmembrane domain, and a periplasmic domain (11–14). Both ToxR and TcpP directly bind to the promoter region of toxT, at −180 to −60 and −55 to −37 respectively, and are required for toxT transcription (9, 15, 16).
TcpP is regulated via transcription and post-translational mechanisms (17–24). Post-translational regulation of TcpP occurs by two proteases, Tail-specific protease (Tsp) and YaeL, through a process known as Regulated Intramembrane Proteolysis (RIP) (25–27). RIP is a form of gene regulation conserved across all domains of life that allows organisms to rapidly respond to extracellular cues, commonly by liberating a transcription factor or a sigma factor, from membrane sequestration (28). Two well-characterized bacterial systems controlled by RIP mechanisms are the extracytoplasmic stress response in E. coli and sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. These systems require RIP of RseA and SpoIVFB, respectively, to release their respective sigma factors (σE and pro-σK) from the membrane and stimulate gene expression (29–35). Similarly, both systems have their respective TcpH analog, RseB and BofA, which function to prevent RIP of RseA and SpoIVFB via different mechanisms (30, 36–41). Regulation of TcpP by this mechanism diverges from these systems because the transcription activity of TcpP is not activated by RIP but, rather, is inactivated by RIP, removing TcpP from the cytoplasmic membrane and thereby decreasing toxT transcription (25–27). Recent work has demonstrated that TTRs are common to both archaea and bacteria, with TTRs encompassing up to 41% of all transcription factors for certain species (42). In addition, other TTRs systems similar to TcpPH, otherwise known as co-component signal transduction systems, are common among the Enterobacteria and are rapidly evolving (43, 44). There has been substantial work detailing how some co-component systems respond to bile salts, but our current understanding of RIP of TcpP is limited (43–50).
Under RIP-permissive conditions in vitro, TcpP is sensitive to proteolysis by tail-specific protease (Tsp; site-1 protease) and subsequently by YaeL protease (site-2 protease) (25–27). RIP of TcpP is inhibited by its associated protein, TcpH, under specific in vitro conditions (25–27). In cells lacking TcpH, TcpP is constitutively degraded via RIP (25–27). However, the mechanism by which TcpH inhibits RIP and how TcpH-dependent RIP inhibition is modulated by extracellular stimuli remains unknown.
In this report, we provide evidence that TcpH protects TcpP from RIP via direct interaction. Furthermore, we explore the role of the membrane, specifically detergent-resistant and detergent-soluble membranes (DRM and DSM, respectively), in regulating TcpP-TcpH association. DRM and DSM (i.e., lipid-ordered and lipid-disordered membrane domains) are known to form in both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms (51–57). In prokaryotes, DRMs are small phospholipid domains that exist within both inner and outer membranes (52, 53, 57). They are composed of saturated phospholipids and hopanoids that tightly interact, resulting in a structured membrane region with low fluidity. Conversely, DSMs are enriched in unsaturated phospholipids resulting in high fluidity (51–53, 55–64).
Our model suggests that in vivo TcpP and TcpH preferentially associate with DRMs. This leads to enhanced inhibition of RIP by TcpH, thereby resulting in elevated TcpP levels and toxT transcription. We also show that utilization of exogenous α-linolenic acid, a long-chain poly-unsaturated fatty acid present in vivo, stimulates TcpP and TcpH association within DRMs. Data generated here support a model where, once V. cholerae cells enter the gastrointestinal tract, cellular uptake of α-linolenic acid results in modification of the phospholipid profile and leads to an increase in the abundance of TcpP and TcpH molecules within DRMs, thereby stimulating inhibition of RIP. Our work indicates that TcpH is also likely responsive to α-linolenic acid in many V. cholerae strains, due to high conservation of the TcpH transmembrane domain. The work discussed here further expands our current understanding of co-component signal transduction systems common to enteric pathogens among Enterobacteria and provides an example as to how the cytoplasmic membrane can modulate TTR activity, common among bacteria and archaea.
RESULTS
Altering the transmembrane and periplasmic domains does not disrupt TcpH activity in vitro
To identify regions within TcpH critical for its role in protecting TcpP from RIP, we constructed transmembrane (TM) domain chimeric fusions and periplasmic TcpH deletions (Peri). Two TM chimeras and one Peri deletion strain (ToxSTcpH, EpsMTcpH, and TcpH∆103-119, respectively) were tested, and the allele encoding each was recombined into the V. cholerae genome so as not to disrupt the tcpP coding sequence, and under normal tcpPH transcriptional control (Fig. 1A). Growth of the resulting strains was unaffected in comparison with wild-type V. cholerae in virulence inducing (Vir Ind) conditions (i.e., LB pH 6.5, 30°C) (Fig. S1A). Modification of the TcpH TM or Peri domain still supported protection of TcpP, WT toxT transcription, and regulated virulence factor production similar to WT TcpH and better than ΔtcpH (Fig. 1B through D; Fig. S1B).
While the TM TcpH supports higher levels of TcpP in vitro compared to ΔtcpH, we sought to determine whether the TM TcpH chimeras specifically inhibited RIP of TcpP. RIP of TcpP can be measured directly in a ΔyaeL mutant as the substrate of YaeL is a TcpP degradation intermediate (TcpP*) (27). Thus, TcpP* accumulates under RIP permissive conditions (i.e., LB pH 8.5, 37°C) or in the absence of tcpH in ΔyaeL cells (27). TcpP* lacks most of its periplasmic domain and therefore has a lower molecular weight (~17 KDa) compared to TcpP (~29 KDa), thus enabling us to determine the RIP status of TcpP via western blot. When TcpH is active and RIP is thereby inhibited, we observe only full-length TcpP and no TcpP*. When TcpH, ToxSTcpH, or EpsMTcpH constructs were ectopically expressed, we observed only full-length TcpP and no TcpP* (Fig. 1E). Taken together, our data indicate that ToxSTcpH and EpsMTcpH inhibit RIP of TcpP in vitro.
TcpH TM domain is critical for the colonization of infant mice
The TM and Peri domain of TcpH can withstand considerable modifications and maintain function during in vitro experiments. Despite their wild-type activity in vitro, strains expressing ToxSTcpH, and EpsMTcpH colonized infant mice to levels significantly lower than the wild type, more closely resembling colonization levels of ΔtcpH (Fig. 2A). TcpH∆103-119 supported the same level of TcpH-dependent virulence gene expression in vitro as both ToxSTcpH and EpsMTcpH but colonized infant mice to a similar degree as wild type (Fig. 2A). As TcpA expression is critical for V. cholerae to colonize infant mice, we examined TcpA levels in the inocula of ToxSTcpH and EpsMTcpH used to infect infant mice. We found that ToxSTcpH and EpsMTcpH produced similar levels of TcpA compared to wild type (Fig. S2A).
We also quantified fluid accumulation (which requires a higher inoculum cell density) in infected mice, which is dependent on CtxAB synthesis. Due to no observable differences between EpsMTcpH and ToxSTcpH colonization of infant mice, ToxSTcpH was not included in these experiments. Mice infected with EpsMTcpH and ΔtcpH exhibited lower fluid accumulation compared to those infected with wild-type V. cholerae, and EpsMTcpH was unable to colonize infant mice to wild-type levels (Fig. 2B and C). These data support our hypothesis that EpsMTcpH is unable to colonize infant mice due to an inability to support virulence factor production in vivo.
To determine whether the presence of other microbes in the gastrointestinal tract might influence the ability of the TM TcpH strains to support pathogenicity, we cultured wild type and the TM TcpH constructs (TM and Peri) aerobically in both filter-sterilized and non-filtered mouse fecal media for 21 hours (Fig. S2B and C). Given that V. cholerae colonizes the small intestine and that this area of the gastrointestinal tract is relatively oxygen limited, these testing conditions are sub-optimal. However, all strains exhibited similar cell densities at the indicated time points in both filtered and non-filtered fecal media (Fig. S2B and C). While end-point cell densities of all strains were similar, those expressing ToxSTcpH and EpsMTcpH produced TcpA levels below that of wild type, although not statistically significant (Fig. S2D). Deletion of TcpH periplasmic residues had no effect on TcpA production (Fig. S2D). These data do not suggest that members of the mouse gastrointestinal microflora negatively impact the growth of the TM TcpH strains. Taken together, these data suggest that the TcpH TM domain is critical for TcpH function in the gastrointestinal tract to protect TcpP from RIP, thereby supporting downstream virulence factor production. In support of this, we also found that the TcpH TM domain is highly conserved among V. cholerae strains (Fig. S3). Due to its wild-type levels of colonization and ability to support wild-type levels of TcpA synthesis in mouse fecal media, we excluded the TcpH Peri deletion strain from further experiments.
toxT transcription is enhanced with crude bile and is dependent on the TcpH TM domain
Data presented here and elsewhere indicate that TcpH-dependent RIP inhibition is affected by different in vitro and in vivo environmental signals and that the TM domain of TcpH is critical for that function (25–27). Vibrio species can use exogenous fatty acids present in bile (e.g., linoleic, linolenic, dihomo-gamma-linolenic, arachidonic, eicosapentaenoic, and docosahexaenoic acid) via the VolA and FadL/FadD pathways (67–71), resulting in modification of phospholipid composition (71, 72). As our data suggested that the TM domain of TcpH is important in vivo, we sought to determine whether there are fatty acids present in the infant mouse gastrointestinal tract that can be utilized directly by V. cholerae. We identified 62 different fatty acids within the infant mouse gastrointestinal tract, see Table S1. Among the 12 most abundant fatty acids, we found that linoleic (18:2), linolenic (18:3), dihomo-gamma-linolenic (20:3), arachidonic (20:4), eicosapentaenoic (20:5), and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6) are present in the infant mouse gut (Fig. 2D; Table S1). Moreover, the fatty acid profile within infant mice is similar to humans with oleic acid (18:1), linolic (18:2), α-linolenic (18:3), stearic (14:0), and palmitic acid (16:0) as the major fatty acids present (Table S1) (73) As our data demonstrate that the infant mouse gut contains fatty acids that V. cholerae utilizes to modify its membrane, we sought to determine whether phospholipid changes could influence TcpH-dependent inhibition of TcpP RIP. We measured toxT expression from a transcription reporter (pBH6119-toxT::GFP) in cells grown in media supplemented with Bovine Crude Bile (0.4%), which contains various fatty acids that are utilized by V. cholerae to remodel its membrane (71). Transcription of toxT from this reporter was elevated in the presence of crude bile in WT cells, which is consistent with prior studies (74), but not in cells expressing EpsMTcpH or ToxSTcpH (Fig. S4A). This suggested that native TcpH responds to changes in phospholipid composition to inhibit RIP and that the TM domain of TcpH is essential to sense and/or respond to this change. As a negative control, we measured toxT transcription under non-inducing conditions known to stimulate RIP of TcpP (25–27), and in these conditions, toxT expression was indeed reduced (Fig. S4A). In addition, we measured toxT expression in ∆tcpH cells with and without crude bile present, observing no increase in toxT expression (Fig. S4A). This confirms that the conditions used here do not simply promote TcpP function in the absence of TcpH.
We also measured toxT transcript levels directly via RT-qPCR with RNA isolated from wild-type cells grown in the presence of crude bile (Fig. S4B) and observed a similar increase in toxT transcription. Lastly, we found that cells expressing native TcpH or TcpH TM chimeras grew with similar rates in crude bile-supplemented media (Fig. S1C). Taken together, these data support a model that TcpH responds to host stimuli, specifically fatty acids or constituents of crude bile, through a mechanism requiring its native TM, and antagonizes RIP of TcpP, leading to increased toxT transcription.
α-Linolenic acid enhances toxT expression by promoting TcpH-dependent inhibition of RIP
Crude bile is a mixture of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, as well as bile salts (e.g., cholate and deoxycholate). To determine whether bile salts or fatty acids in crude bile were responsible for elevated toxT transcription in WT, we supplemented virulence-inducing media with cholate/deoxycholate (Purified Bile) (100 µM of each), palmitic acid (500 µM), stearic acid (500 µM), linoleic (500 µM), α-linolenic acid (500 µM), arachidonic acid (500 µM), and docosahexaenoic acid (500 µM). The concentration of bile and fatty acids chosen has also been used in prior studies (71). Using the toxT::GFP transcription reporter plasmid, we observed elevated toxT transcription in wild-type cells with only crude bile or α-linolenic acid present (Fig. 3A; Fig. S4A). Increased toxT expression with crude bile or α-linolenic acid was not observed in ∆tcpH,EpsMTcpH or ToxSTcpH cells (Fig. S4A), demonstrating that TcpH, and its native TM domain, is still needed to inhibit RIP and TcpP is necessary to promote toxT transcription in the presence of these compounds. In addition to the results obtained with the toxT::GFP reporter, we measured toxT mRNA levels using RT-PCR in WT cells grown under the same conditions. Consistent with the reporter plasmid data, we observed elevated toxT mRNA in the presence of α-linolenic acid (~2.5 fold) (Fig. S4B). Using a toxT::GFP fusion, we determined that the optimal concentration for elevated expression is 50 µM linolenic acid (Fig. S4C). There was no difference in growth rate in cells expressing either native TcpH or TcpH TM chimeras when cultured with purified bile or α-linolenic acid (Fig. S1D and E). Similar concentrations of other unsaturated fatty acids (linoleic, arachidonic, and docosahexaenoic acid) did not lead to an increase in toxT expression (Fig. S4D).
We reasoned that enhanced toxT transcription in the presence of crude bile or α-linolenic acid was due to enhanced inhibition of RIP, leading, in turn, to elevated levels of TcpP. Thus, we quantified TcpP levels under Vir Ind conditions supplemented with crude bile or α-linolenic acid (Fig. 3B). TcpP levels in wild-type cells were significantly elevated in the presence of crude bile or α-linolenic acid (Fig. 3B). By contrast, growth in α-linolenic acid had no effect on TcpP levels in cells expressing EpsMTcpH (Fig. 3B). Loss of TcpH led to degradation of TcpP under all conditions indicating that Tsp and YaeL activity is not inhibited by the addition of crude bile or α-linolenic acid (Fig. S10B). We conclude that (i) elevated toxT transcription in the presence of crude bile or α-linolenic acid is due to enhanced inhibition of RIP via TcpH and (ii) altering the phospholipid composition of the cells with exogenous crude bile or α-linolenic acid enhances TcpH function in RIP inhibition through a mechanism that requires the native transmembrane domain.
As TcpP levels are elevated upon supplementation of crude bile or α-linolenic acid, we considered it possible that elevated tcpP transcription could contribute to elevated TcpP levels. One possible mechanism is that tcpP transcription is directly influenced by α-linolenic within the cytoplasm. Prior studies have shown that linoleic acid can rapidly diffuse into the cytoplasm of V. cholerae where we reasoned it might influence tcpP gene expression (75, 76). To determine whether tcpP transcription is influenced by crude bile or α-linolenic acid, we measured tcpP transcription in wild-type V. cholerae cells using both RT-qPCR and a transcription reporter, tcpP::lacZ. Neither crude bile nor α-linolenic acid supplementation led to increased tcpP transcription (Fig. 3C; Fig. S5A). These data indicate that crude bile and α-linolenic acid influence TcpP levels post-transcriptionally.
To confirm that V. cholerae cells incorporate α-linolenic acid into phospholipids under our growth conditions, we analyzed the fatty acid profile of phospholipids from V. cholerae cells cultured with and without α-linolenic acid (Fig. S5B). In the presence of α-linolenic acid, more than 80% of acyl chains within V. cholerae were 18:3. This is consistent with prior published data (71, 72). Furthermore, prior studies indicate that V. cholerae does not synthesize 18:3 fatty acids under standard laboratory conditions (77, 78) Taken together, these data suggest that V. cholerae cells are utilizing exogenous α-linolenic acid for phospholipid synthesis (Fig. S5B).
We next sought to determine whether WT and EpsMTcpH were equally capable of utilizing exogenous fatty acids. We cultured cells with cerulenin, an inhibitor of de novo fatty acid synthesis, or with cerulenin plus exogenous fatty acids (79–82). Cerulenin alone led to a growth defect irrespective of which form of TcpH was being expressed (Fig. S5C). The inclusion of saturated or unsaturated fatty acids restored partial growth of both WT and EpsMTcpH (Fig. S5C). These data indicate that WT and EpsMTcpH are equally capable of incorporating exogenous fatty acids into their phospholipid bilayer.
Co-association of TcpP and TcpH with detergent-resistant membranes is required for enhanced RIP inhibition
Our work demonstrates that under conditions that modify phospholipid composition, TcpP levels are enhanced, and toxT transcription is increased. Elevated levels of TcpP are due to enhanced inhibition of RIP by TcpH rather than increased tcpP transcription, and this inhibitory function requires the native TcpH TM domain. In addition to α-linolenic acid, arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acid also modify phospholipid composition in V. cholerae (71). Despite causing similar changes to the phospholipid profile, these polyunsaturated fatty acids do not have a significant effect on toxT transcription (Fig. 3A; Fig. S4AD). These data indicate the phospholipid profile does not predict TcpH-dependent inhibition of RIP. Exogenous fatty acids can be utilized directly as acyl chains in de novo phospholipid synthesis (83, 84). Thus, while gross phospholipid composition can remain similar with supplementation of α-linolenic, arachidonic, and docosahexaenoic acid, (i.e., relative abundance of cardiolipin, phosphatidylglycerol, and phosphatidylethanolamine), the overall biophysical properties of the cytoplasmic membrane (i.e., membrane fluidity) can differ due to differences in acyl chain composition. We reasoned that the differences in observed TcpH-dependent enhanced RIP inhibition could be due to differences in the biophysical properties of the cytoplasmic membrane (e.g., membrane fluidity). To test this, we quantified membrane fluidity in WT and EpsMTcpH with and without exogenous fatty acids using a fluorescent lipophilic pyrene-based probe (Fig. 4A). Cells cultured with α-linolenic acid demonstrated elevated membrane fluidity, observed as a higher ratio of dimeric to monomeric pyrene probe (Fig. 4A). We did not observe a change in membrane fluidity in WT or EpsMTcpH cells cultured with linoleic, arachidonic, or docosahexaenoic acid (Fig. 4A).
Poly-unsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), such as omega-3 fatty acids, influence lipid-ordered membrane domains within the cytoplasmic membrane of T-cells (85, 86). Lipid-ordered membrane domains, also called lipid rafts, are regions of the membrane enriched in saturated fatty acids, cholesterol (or, in some bacterial species, hopanoids), and proteins with specific TM domain qualities (e.g., long TM domain(s) and low TM surface area) (56, 64, 87). As a result, lipid-ordered membrane domains tend to be thicker and less fluid than other areas of the membrane (55). n3-PUFA (i.e., omega-3 fatty acids) increase the size and stability of lipid-ordered membrane domains and thereby can influence membrane protein association within lipid rafts (56, 85, 86). We hypothesized that TcpP and TcpH molecules can associate within lipid-ordered membrane domains and that α-linolenic acid (an omega-3 fatty acid) supplementation increases the association of TcpP and TcpH molecules within lipid-ordered membrane domains.
Lipid-ordered membrane domains, also known as DRMs, are defined due to their insolubility in Triton X-100 (61, 88). Triton X-100 has been used in the study of both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms to isolate lipid-ordered and lipid-disordered membrane domains (51–56). Thus, to test our hypotheses, we used Triton X-100 to separate lipid-ordered and lipid-disordered membrane domains from cellular lysates.
Under Vir Ind conditions, TcpP and TcpH associate with Triton X-100 insoluble (TI; considered to be enriched with lipid-ordered membrane domains) and Triton X-100 soluble membrane fractions (TS; considered to be enriched with lipid-disordered membrane domains) (Fig. 4B and C). Supplementation with α-linolenic acid resulted in increases in both TcpP and TcpH in the TI fraction in WT cells (Fig. 4B and C). Like TcpH, EpsMTcpH is also associated with both the TI and TS membrane fractions (Fig. 4C). In contrast to WT, there was no observable increase in EpsMTcpH or TcpP levels in the TI fraction upon growth with α-linolenic acid in EpsMTcpH expressing cells (Fig. 4B and C). Surprisingly, we observed a decrease in EpsMTcpH abundance in the TS fraction during growth with α-linolenic acid (Fig. 4C). It is unclear why EpsMTcpH levels decrease in the TS fraction when α-linolenic acid is present. Our data indicate that there is a trend of lower TcpP levels in the TS fraction in EpsMTcpH cells cultured with α-linolenic acid (Fig. 4B; Fig. S6A and B). TcpH stability has been reported to be improved by TcpP and, thus, reduction of TcpP abundance in the TS fraction could contribute to lower EpsMTcpH levels in the TS fraction (89). However, it is also possible that α-linolenic acid utilization simply reduces the stability of EpsMTcpH in the TS fraction specifically. Regardless, it remains unclear why EpsMTcpH levels decrease in the TS fraction when α-linolenic acid is present. Taken together, these data suggest that the native TM domain of TcpH enables enhanced association within TI fractions (i.e., lipid-ordered membrane domains), and thereby supports elevated TcpP abundance within the TI fraction, during growth with α-linolenic acid.
Prior studies revealed that studying lipid-ordered membrane domains with this biochemical method can yield dramatically different results with changes in detergent concentration and temperature (90). We thus performed similar experiments using an alternative TI extraction method, which still relies on Triton X-100, that differs in cell lysis temperature. Using this method, we observed the same trend of increased TcpH and TcpP abundance within the TI fraction in WT cells with α-linolenic acid present (Fig. S6). Similarly, we did not detect an increase in TcpP or EpsMTcpH abundance in the TI fraction when α-linolenic acid was present for EpsMTcpH cells (Fig. S6). Lastly, our data indicate that both arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acid do not stimulate TcpH-dependent protection of TcpP. Thus, to further test our model, we quantified TcpP and TcpH abundance in TI and TS membrane fractions upon exposure to either arachidonic or docosahexaenoic acid (Fig. S7). We did not observe any change in the abundance of TcpH or TcpP within TI or TS membrane fractions. These data indicate that the effect of α-linolenic acid on TcpP and TcpH abundance in TI membranes is indeed specific and not the result of our Triton X-100-based biochemical separation of TI and TS membranes.
Excluding EpsMTcpH, it remained unclear if α-linolenic acid supplementation induced a general association of membrane proteins to the TI fraction. To test this, we quantified levels of a 19 KDa non-specific membrane protein in TI and TS fractions with and without α-linolenic acid (Fig. S8A). We observed no change in the abundance of this protein in the TI or TS fractions with α-linolenic acid supplementation (Fig. S8A). These data indicate that α-linolenic acid supplementation does not induce a general association of proteins with the TI fraction. Furthermore, we also observed that with α-linolenic acid supplementation, the TI fraction had a higher association of 16:0 fatty acids and a lower association of 18:3 fatty acids than the TS fraction (Fig. S8B). This is consistent with prior studies indicating that lipid-ordered membrane domains are enriched with saturated fatty acids (62).
TcpP and TcpH interaction is critical for inhibition of RIP
Our data indicate that increased association of TcpP and TcpH molecules in the TI fraction results in enhanced RIP inhibition. The mechanism underlying this RIP inhibition remains unclear. Lipid-ordered membrane domains function as protein concentrators and thereby promote interaction between membrane-localized proteins (58). We hypothesized that enhanced co-association within the TI fraction increased RIP inhibition due to direct interaction between TcpP and TcpH.
To test direct TcpP-TcpH interaction, we used a co-affinity precipitation approach. We genetically fused a His(6 x)-Hsv or Hsv-His(6 x) tag to the C-terminus and N-terminus, respectively, of TcpP, resulting in tcpP-His-Hsv and Hsv-His-tcpP. We could then extract TcpP from membrane fractions using NTA-Ni beads and identify TcpH and TcpP in elution fractions with ɑ-TcpH and ɑ-Hsv antibody. Proteins tagged at the amino terminus are described with the tag noted first (e.g., Hsv-His-TcpP), while those tagged at the carboxy terminus are described with the tag noted second (e.g., TcpP-His-Hsv).
First, we tested whether both the N- and C- terminally tagged TcpP function like native TcpP by measuring CtxB production. CtxB production was similar to WT, expressing native TcpP, irrespective of which terminus the tag was placed (Fig. S8C).
Co-precipitation experiments indicated that the C-terminally tagged TcpP could associate with TcpH, while the N-terminally tagged TcpP could not (Fig. 5A and B). Physical interaction between the C-terminally tagged TcpP and TcpH also correlated to protection from RIP, as determined by lack of accumulation of TcpP degradation intermediates in ΔyaeL cells expressing C-terminally tagged TcpP (Fig. 5C). In such cells, the product of Tsp action on TcpP accumulates because the second-site protease YaeL is not present to eliminate it (26, 27). We observed a greater accumulation of TcpP degradation intermediates (between 24 KDa and 19 KDa) in cells expressing N-terminally tagged TcpP compared to those expressing C-terminally tagged TcpP (Fig. 5C). The 24 kDa TcpP degradation intermediate from N-terminally tagged TcpP is also observed in cells expressing native TcpP in the absence of TcpH (Fig. 5C and D). Considering that the N-terminally tagged TcpP is sensitive to RIP even with TcpH present suggests a defect in its association with TcpH and its recognition by the RIP proteases. Despite this defect, N-terminally tagged supports WT CtxB production (Fig. S8C). We conclude this is the result of overexpression of N-terminally tagged TcpP. Native expression of tcpP leads to accumulation of only TcpP* in a ΔtcpH ΔyaeL background (Fig. 1E), but overexpression of tcpP in a ΔtcpP ΔtcpH ΔyaeL background yields both full length and TcpP* (Fig. 5D). These data indicate that artificial elevation of TcpP levels, via overexpression, can outpace RIP.
Our data demonstrate that TcpP-His-Hsv is less sensitive to RIP in the presence of TcpH. Prior studies have demonstrated that modification of the C-terminus of TcpP can lead to TcpH-independent resistance to RIP (91). To determine whether the addition of His-Hsv to the C-terminus of TcpP promotes resistance to RIP independent of TcpH, we expressed tcpP-His-Hsv, Hsv-His-tcpP, and tcpP in a ΔtcpP ΔtcpH ΔyaeL background. We observed TcpP degradation intermediates, including TcpP* (~17 KDa), in all strains (Fig. 5D). To determine whether our Hsv-His tagged TcpP variants are equally sensitive to RIP, we quantified the abundance of full-length TcpP and the detected degradation intermediates (Fig. 5E). These data indicate that both N and C-terminally tagged TcpP are equally sensitive to degradation. These data show that the addition of His(6 x)-Hsv to the C-terminus of TcpP does abrogate the need for TcpH to protect TcpP-His-Hsv from RIP (Fig. 5D). In summary, our data indicate that TcpP and TcpH interact and that this interaction is important for inhibition of RIP of TcpP. These data support a model whereby increased association of TcpP and TcpH molecules in the TI leads to enhanced RIP inhibition due to interaction. To further test this hypothesis, we performed additional co-precipitation experiments by expressing TcpP-His-Hsv in cells cultured with and without α-linolenic acid. We found that TcpH co-precipitated with TcpP-His-Hsv in the TI fraction with and without α-linolenic acid (Fig. S9). Due to the poor growth of cells expressing TcpP-His-Hsv in media containing α-linolenic acid, relative to the abundance of TcpP-His-Hsv was lower when α-linolenic acid was present. To account for this growth defect, we normalized TcpH levels to the abundance of TcpP-His-Hsv in the TI fraction. With this normalization, we found that more TcpH co-precipitated when cells were cultured with α-linolenic acid (Fig. S9B). These data support our hypothesis that α-linolenic acid supports elevated interaction between TcpP and TcpH molecules in TI membranes.
It remains unclear why Hsv-His-TcpP is unable to interact with TcpH. Single-molecule tracking studies indicate that TcpP may be sensitive to RIP while interacting with the toxT promoter (91). The Hsv tag is enriched with negatively charged amino acids (Hsv amino acid sequence: QPELAPEDPED). Given that DNA has an intrinsic negative charge, the addition of Hsv-His(6 x) to the N-terminus of TcpP may promote a conformation similar to the conformation that TcpP molecules adopt when actively interacting with DNA. This hypothesis requires additional experiments to test.
DISCUSSION
TTRs are broadly distributed and highly diverse among bacteria and archaea (42). Within archaea, TTRs have been found to regulate motility and pilin gene transcription in response to dangerous temperatures and nutrient-limiting conditions (92, 93). Within bacteria, TTRs have been found to regulate bile salt resistance, toxin production, antibiotic resistance, acid resistance, natural competence, pilin/fimbriae transcription, type-3 secretion systems, biofilm formation, metabolism, and have been implicated in the modulation of the human immune system (13, 94–107). In addition, both TcpP and ToxR have accessory proteins, TcpH and ToxS, respectively, that protect them from RIP (14, 25, 26, 48, 108–111). RIP is a form of gene regulation conserved across all domains of life that allows organisms to rapidly respond to extracellular cues, commonly by liberating a transcription factor or a sigma factor, from membrane sequestration (28). Canonical bacterial RIP systems act by releasing an anti-sigma factor fro m the cytoplasmic membrane to influence gene expression (28, 112). TTRs are sensitive to RIP (e.g., CadC) (86). However, RIP of TTRs, such as TcpP, results in their inactivation, typically leading to decreased gene expression. The fundamental mechanisms of RIP for TcpP are understood in terms of the primary proteases that work in the two-step pathway (26, 27), but the regulatory mechanisms influencing these activities have been less well studied. It is clear that TcpH is essential to inhibit RIP of TcpP and that its ability to protect TcpP from RIP changes in response to temperature and pH (14, 25–27). Our data indicate that RIP of TcpP is inhibited by direct interaction with TcpH which regulates the production of virulence factors, CT and TcpA, which thereby impacts the colonization of the gastrointestinal tract. We also provide evidence that α-linolenic acid, a host dietary fatty acid, plays a role in inhibiting RIP by increasing the local concentration of TcpP and TcpH within DRM. This is the first indication that the membrane environment itself influences the activity of both a TTR and a co-component signal transduction system, and these data demonstrate that a dietary fatty acid, in addition to taurocholate, influences TcpP activity (43, 74). Whether α-linolenic acid or other omega-3 or omega-6 fatty acids influences other co-component signal transduction systems remains to be tested.
α-Linolenic acid is an essential omega-3 fatty acid used to synthesize arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acid in humans and mice (113, 114). α-Linolenic acid is acquired via dietary supplementation and has health benefits ranging from anti-carcinogenic, anti-atherogenic, anti-inflammatory, improved memory, and anti-diabetic activity (113–130). V. cholerae uses exogenous long-chain fatty acids, such as α-linolenic acid, to remodel its phospholipid composition (71, 72). Long-chain fatty acids are transported across the outer membrane by FadL into the periplasmic space where FadD covalently modifies the fatty acids by adding an acyl-CoA group, resulting in the formation of long-chain fatty acyl-CoA (LCFA-CoA) (67–70). Utilization of exogenous fatty acids impacts Vibrio spp. pathogenicity, motility, and antibiotic resistance (71, 72, 131). Moreover, fadL is highly expression by V. cholerae during the colonization of infant rabbits, and loss of fadL results in a large fitness disadvantage in vivo (132). Our work is aligned with these findings and demonstrates that (i) toxT transcription is enhanced in the presence of α-linolenic acid; (ii) TcpP levels are elevated in the presence of α-linolenic acid; (iii) tcpP transcription is not increased with exogenous α-linolenic acid; (iv) TcpP and TcpH avidly associate within DRM in the presence of α-linolenic acid; (v) TcpP-TcpH interaction is important for inhibition of RIP; and (vi) enhanced toxT expression in the presence of α-linolenic acid is dependent on co-association of TcpP and TcpH in the DRM.
Our data support a model where, once present in the gastrointestinal tract (GI), V. cholerae cells take up and incorporate α-linolenic acid, present in the GI tract of infant mice (Fig. 2D), into phospholipids, thereby altering the composition of the cytoplasmic membrane. This influences TcpH and TcpP molecules to increase their association with lipid-ordered membrane domains. n-3 polyunsaturated lipids (i.e., omega-3 fatty acids) are known to increase lipid-ordered domain size in eukaryotes by promoting aggregation of existing lipid-ordered membrane microdomains (83, 84). As lipid-ordered membrane domains are known to be relatively small in size (6–200 nm) (58, 60), we hypothesize that this leads to an increase in the local concentration of TcpP and TcpH molecules, thereby allowing TcpH to enhance RIP inhibition of TcpP via increased interactions with TcpP (Fig. 6).
Previous studies have investigated the role of exogenous fatty acids in the pathogenesis of V. cholerae. These concluded that FadD is required for wild-type toxT expression through a mechanism involving its effect on TcpP levels (138, 139). These prior publications support our model as an accumulation of α-linolenic acid in the periplasmic space or within the cytoplasmic membrane, due to loss of fadD, results in a reduction in TcpP levels, rather than an increase (138, 139). This work indicates that free α-linolenic acid (i.e., not incorporated in phospholipids) within the periplasmic space, cytoplasm, or within the cytoplasmic membrane, does not promote TcpH-mediated inhibition of RIP. In conjunction with the data presented here, this indicates that α-linolenic acid needs to be incorporated into the cytoplasmic membrane as a phospholipid to influence TcpH function.
Transmembrane domain length and surface area are major factors in determining the preference of a protein for lipid-ordered (enriched with proteins having longer TM domain and low surface area) or lipid-disordered (enriched with proteins having shorter TM domain and high surface area) membrane domains (140). We demonstrated that TcpH and TcpP increase localization within DRM domains in the presence of α-linolenic acid while EpsMTcpH does not (Fig. 4). EpsMTcpH has a shorter TM domain than TcpH (20 amino acids vs 22 amino acids) and a higher overall surface area (108 Å2 vs 92 Å2). Our data suggests that the TM domain properties of EpsMTcpH molecules inhibit its transition from the TS fraction to the TI fraction in the presence of α-linolenic acid, and thereby the ratio of EpsMTcpH to TcpP molecules within the TI fraction is insufficient to enhance the protection of TcpP and support elevated toxT expression. In support of this, the TM domain of TcpH is also highly conserved across V. cholerae strains (Fig. S3). Alternatively, it is also possible that TcpH, and not EpsMTcpH, undergoes post-translational modification (e.g., palmitoylation) within its TM domain. We view this as unlikely as TcpH is not predicted to have a palmitoylation site within its TM domain. Furthermore, TcpH-like proteins in other co-component signal transduction systems in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis also have comparable surface area per TM residue to TcpH (STM0345: 97 Å2, BZ17_3282: 94 Å2, BZ17_3565: 101Å2). This indicates that host dietary fatty acids may also influence these co-component systems in S. Typhimurium and Y. pseudotuberculosis.
Unexpectedly, EpsMTcpH supports an overall higher level of toxT gene expression than wild-type TcpH, despite having lower levels of TcpP with α-linolenic acid present. It is unclear how this is occurring. Super-resolution imaging experiments aimed at understanding how TcpP molecules locate the toxT promoter from the cytoplasmic membrane revealed that TcpP molecules transition to a slow diffusion state before interacting with the toxT promoter (91, 141, 142). As EpsM has been shown to interact with EpsL (a component of the Eps Type-II secretion system) (65), we hypothesize that elevated levels of toxT expression in EpsMTcpH are due to reduced TcpP diffusion rates via interaction with the Type-II secretion system (i.e., TcpP-epsMTcpH-Eps).
In addition, it also appears that the surface area of the transmembrane domain of TcpP influences its function. Prior analysis of TcpP transmembrane domain revealed that mutation of L152 and W162/S163 with alanine (which reduces the overall surface area of the transmembrane domain) increased toxT expression (143). It remains unclear why these mutations increase TcpP function, but given the data presented here, it is possible that TcpPL152A and TcpP W162A/S163A may have a greater propensity than TcpP, in the absence of α-linolenic acid, to associate within DRMs (i.e., lipid-ordered membrane domain). Prior work has also noted that many TTRs have a similar transmembrane surface area and also an overall lower amount of sensory domains (42). Further indicating that TTRs, like TcpP, respond to the cytoplasmic membrane.
Based on our data here and other literature, we hypothesize that phospholipid remodeling of V. cholerae occurs in the lumen during the initial stages of infection. Our data suggest that this remodeling promotes TcpH-mediated inhibition of RIP and promotes toxT transcription. However, unsaturated fatty acids can also inhibit the degradation and activity of ToxT (73, 74, 133). This likely prevents premature expression of TCP which is known to stimulate microcolony formation and thereby could inhibit penetration of the mucus layer (134). Bicarbonate present at high concentrations at the surface of epithelial cells, competes with unsaturated fatty acids to activate ToxT once V. cholerae reaches the surface of epithelial cells, its primary site of infection (135–137). There is also evidence that bicarbonate represses toxT transcription (136). This indicates that expression of toxT, stimulated by enhanced RIP antagonism, during early infection (i.e., the lumen) is critical for V. cholerae to cause disease. Due to the essential nature of omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, it is technically challenging to test the role of α-linolenic acid directly in vivo and will require future sophisticated in vivo studies. Evaluating the in vivo model proposed here will be the subject of future experiments. α-Linolenic acid represents the first in vivo signal that modulates RIP of TcpP, and, to the best of our knowledge, the first evidence that lipid-ordered and lipid-disordered membrane domains exist in V. cholerae. The data presented here further expand our knowledge of the complex virulence regulatory cascade in V. cholerae, our knowledge of rapidly evolving co-component signal transduction systems in enterobacteria, and TTRs in bacteria and archaea.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial culture conditions
Unless otherwise stated Escherichia coli and V. cholerae were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani broth (LB) with vigorous shaking (210 rpm). LB was prepared as previously described (144). To stimulate virulence factor production, V. cholerae strains were subcultured, to an O.D. of 0.01, and grown under virulence inducing conditions (Vir Ind; 30°C, LB pH 6.5 ± 0.5, and 110 rpm) or non-virulence inducing conditions (non-Vir Ind; 37°C, LB pH 8.5 ± 0.5, and 210 rpm). Media used for both Vir Ind and non-Vir Ind were sterilized using 1L 0.22 µm vacuum filtration units (Sigma) after pH adjustment. Unless otherwise stated, antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: ampicillin (100 µg/mL), chloramphenicol (30 µg/mL), streptomycin (100 µg/mL), and cerulenin (10 µg/mL). Overexpression of constructs by pBAD18 was induced by culturing strains in LB containing 0.1% arabinose. For additional information on growth conditions for ex-vivo mouse fecal experiments, experiments with components of crude bile (including α-linolenic acid), and a complete list of bacterial strains see SI Appendix, Materials and Methods and Table S2.
Plasmid construction
Briefly, DNA fragments 500 bp upstream and downstream of the target gene were connected to the DNA insert by splicing via overlap extension PCR (Thermo Scientific) (see Table S3). Plasmid vectors were then digested with KpnI-HiFi and XbaI (New England BioLabs) at 37°C for 2 hours. Insert and vector fragments were then added to the Gibson assembly master mix (New England BioLabs) and incubated at 50°C for 30 minutes. Plasmids were then introduced to E. coli ET12567 ∆dapA (λpir +) by electroporation. pKAS32 plasmids were then transferred to V. cholerae strains via mating on LB agar plates at 30°C overnight. pBAD18 plasmids were introduced into V. cholerae strains via electroporation.
Mutant construction
Briefly, mutants were constructed using allelic exchange as previously described (145). V. cholerae harboring pKAS32 derivatives were grown in 2 mL LB for 2 hours (37°C), and then an additional 2 hours with added streptomycin (2,500 µg/mL). After a total of 4 hours of incubation, 20 µL of culture was spread on LB agar plates containing streptomycin (2,500 µg/mL) and incubated at 37°C overnight. Colonies that were resistant to streptomycin were screened via colony PCR. Mutants were confirmed by sequencing the region of interest (GeneWiz).
Growth curves
V. cholerae strains were subcultured from an overnight culture to a final optical density (600 nm) of 0.01 in 200 µL of virulence-inducing media, LB, or M9 minimal media (supplemented with 0.05% glucose) per well of a 96-well plate. The plate was then incubated at 30°C or 37°C in a SPECTROstar Omega plate reader (BMG LABTECH), with shaking and optical density measurements every 30 minutes.
Western blots
Western blots were performed as previously described (26). Briefly, after cell lysis, samples were normalized by total protein concentration, determined via a Bradford assay or Bicinchoninic acid assay (Sigma Aldrich). Samples were run on SDS page gels (12.5% acrylamide) for 1.5 hours at 90–120 volts and then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes overnight at 35 mA or for 2 hours at 200 mA. Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat milk, 2% bovine serum albumin, 0.5% Tween-20, in Tris-buffered saline for 1 hour followed by incubation with primary antibodies for 1 hour. Membranes were washed three times with Tris-buffered saline. Secondary antibodies were incubated with the membrane for 1 hour. Membranes were washed three times with Tris-buffered saline and then incubated with SuperSignal HRP Chemiluminescence substrate (Thermo Fisher). Membranes were imaged with an Amersham Imager 600. For additional information see SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
Enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISAs) were performed as previously described (26, 146). Briefly, 10 µL of culture supernatant was added to 140 µL PBS-T (phosphate-buffered saline, 0.05% Tween-20, 0.1% BSA) in row A of plates coated with GM1 (monosialotetrahexosylganglioside) and then diluted down each column. After 1 hour of incubation, plates were then washed with PBS-T three times. Primary (α-CtxB 1:8000, Sigma Aldrich) and secondary antibodies (Goat anti-Rabbit IgG-HRP 1:5,000, Sigma Aldrich) were diluted in PBS-T. 100 µL of diluted antibody was added to each well and incubated for 1 hour at room temperature, with three rounds of washing after incubation. 100 µL of TMB (3,3′,5,5′-tetramentylbenzidine, Sigma) was added to each well and the reaction stopped by addition of 100 µL of 2M sulfuric acid. The optical density (450 nm) was measured for each well using SPECTROstar Omega plate reader (BMG LABTECH). For additional information, see SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
Infant mouse colonization
Infant mouse colonization experiments were performed as previously described (147, 148). Briefly, 3- to 6-day-old infant mice were orogastrically inoculated with ~1×106 bacterial cells. Infant mice were kept at 30°C in sterile bedding and euthanized either 18 hours or 21 hours after infection. For fluid accumulation studies, a higher inoculum dose was used (~1×108) and infant mice were weighed prior to collection of mouse intestines, and mouse intestines were weighed after blotting on absorbent paper. Homogenates were then serially diluted in PBS, spread on LB plates containing streptomycin, and incubated at 37°C overnight. For additional information see SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
Real-time quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)
RT-qPCR experiments were performed as previously described (149). Briefly, RNA was preserved in 1 mL of Trizol (Sigma Aldrich) and then extracted from cells using an RNEasy kit (Qiagen). RNA was then treated with Turbo DNase. cDNA was generated from DNase-treated RNA using Superscript III reverse transcriptase (Thermo Scientific) as previously described (150). 5 ng of cDNA was used with SYBR green master mix (Applied Biosystems) to perform the RT-qPCR. recA was used as a housekeeping gene (150). See Table S3 for primers. For additional information, see SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
β-Galactosidase activity assay
β-galactosidase activity and Miller units were determined as previously described (151). Cells were resuspended in 1 mL of Z-buffer (Na2HPO4 60 mM, NaH2PO4 40 mM, KCl 10 mM, MgSO4 1 mM, β-mercaptoethanol 50 mM, pH 7.0). Cells were permeabilized with 60 µL of SDS (0.1%) and chloroform and then incubated at 30°C for 10 minutes. 200 µL of ortho-Nitrophenyl-ß-galactoside (4 mg/mL) was added and incubated at room temperature until a color change was observed. 500 µL of sodium bicarbonate was added to stop the reaction. The optical density for each sample was measured (at both 420 nm and 55 nm). For additional information, see SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
Triton X-100 subcellular fractionation
Cells were collected and washed with PBS. For spheroplast fractionation, cells were resuspended in 100 µL of 200 mM Tris HCl. After resuspension, components were added sequentially to each sample: 200 µL of 200 mM Tris HCl and 1M sucrose, 20 µL of 10 mM EDTA, 20 µL of lysozyme (10 mg/mL), 10 µL of protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), and 600 µL of H2O. Samples were then incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. After room temperature incubation, 700 µL of 2% Triton X-100, 50 mM Tris HCl, and 10 mM MgCl2 were added. For gentle cell lysis, pelleted cells were resuspended in 10 mL of TS buffer (1% Triton X-100, 10 mM imidazole, 500 mM HEPES, 10% glycerol, 2M MgCl2). Samples then underwent three rounds of freeze-thaw lysis in 180-proof ethanol at −80°C. Triton X-100 soluble and insoluble membrane fractions were then separated by ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g 1 hour). The supernatant (i.e., the Triton X-100 soluble fraction; TS) and the pellet (i.e., the Triton X-100 insoluble fraction; TI) were collected. The TI fraction was resuspended in 500 µL of TI buffer (1% Tween 20, 0.5M MOPS, and 10 mM imidazole). The TS fraction was concentrated using Amicon protein concentrators with a 10 KDa cutoff (Sigma).
Subcellular fractionation
Cells were fractionated following the Tris-sucrose-EDTA method (152, 153). Briefly, spheroplast fractions were resuspended in 500 µL 0.45% NaCl. To lyse the spheroplasts, 50 µL of 10% SDS was added, and samples were then boiled for 5–10 minutes. Periplasmic fractions were concentrated using trichloroacetic acid (TCA) (1, 2). Pelleted whole cells were resuspended in 50–200 µL of resuspension buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 50 mM EDTA, pH 8.0). Cells were then lysed by the addition of lysis buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl, 1% SDS) and boiled for 5–10 minutes. All fractions were stored at −20°C until use. For additional information see SI Appendix, Materials and Methods.
Co-affinity precipitation
V. cholerae strains were grown under Vir Ind for 6–8 hours. After incubation, cells were resuspended in PBS, proteins were cross linked by the addition of 1 mM Dithiobis (succinimidyl propionate) or 1 mM Suberic acid bis (N-hydroxysuccinimide ester) and incubated on ice for 30 minutes. 50 µL of Tris HCl pH 8.5 was added (1M final concentration) and samples were incubated on ice for an additional 15 minutes. Cells were then pelleted (2,450 × g 15 minutes) and TI and TS fractions were collected via the gentle cell lysis method. After collection of TI and TS fractions, 100 µL of washed His-affinity gel (i.e., Ni-NTA Magnetic Agarose Beads) (ZYMO Research) and 10 µL of protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma) were added to the TI and TS fractions, and samples were incubated on a rocking platform overnight at 4°C. Samples were then centrifuged to collect the Ni-NTA agarose beads (2,450 × g 15 minutes). After collection, the Ni-NTA agarose beads were washed three times with their respective buffers (i.e., TS buffer for TS samples). An equal volume of laemmli buffer was added to each sample (BIO-RAD) and then boiled for 5 minutes. Boiled samples were then used directly for western blot analysis.
Fatty acyl methylester analysis
Analysis of fatty acids from whole V. cholerae cells was done as previously described (154). Briefly, cells were lysed via the addition of 300 µL of extraction solvent [composed of methanol, chloroform, and formic acid (20:10:1, vol/vol/vol)]. After lipids were extracted, the fatty acyl methylester (FAME) reactions were carried out as described (154). After the FAME reactions, fatty acid content was measured via Gas-Liquid Chromatography using a DB-23 column (Agilent, part number: 122–2332). Molar values of each peak were then normalized to an internal standard (15:0) to calculate the total molar percentage of each fatty acid detected.
Membrane fluidity
Membrane fluidity was measured as previously described (155) using a membrane fluidity kit that quantifies the fluorescence of a lipophilic dye (Pyrenedecanoic acid) (Abcam). Ethanol was used as a positive control (156). Briefly, WT and EpsMTcpH cells were grown under specified conditions for 8 hours, for additional information see SI Appendix, Materials and Methods. After incubation, cells were collected from 1 mL of culture and resuspended in 500 µL LB. Cells were incubated with the fluorescent lipid reagent for 30 minutes at room temperature. Cells were then washed twice with LB and fluorescence (excitation, 350 nm, and emission, 400 nm and 470 nm) was quantified for each sample. Unlabeled cells and non-Vir ind conditions were used as negative controls.
Mass spectrometry
Sample fatty acid and metabolite extraction was performed by protein precipitation with ethanol, as previously described (157). For each sample, 20 ng of d8-arachidonic acid was used as an internal control. Samples were homogenized in a bead mill for 2 minutes (ThermoFisher). Samples were incubated at –20°C for 1 hour and then protein was removed by centrifugation (15,000 x g for 20 minutes). The supernatants underwent an additional round of protein precipitation, as described above. Samples were dried via speedvac, and then reconstituted in 200 µl of acetonitrile. Chromatographic alignment, isotope correction, peak identification, and peak area calculations were performed using MAVEN software. Concentrations of each analyte were determined against the peak area of the d8-arachidonic acid internal standard. Additional fatty acids (C24–C28) were identified by comparison against certified reference materials and natural products as no reference standards are readily available. For additional information, see SI Appendix, Materials and Methods
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Rudolph Hugh Endowment at Michigan State University (V.J.D.), the Wentworth fellowship, the Rudolph Hugh fellowship, the Michigan State University College of Natural Science Dissertation Continuation and Completion fellowships, and the Integrated Pharmacological Sciences Training Program at MSU (2T32 GM092715), where L.M.D. was a trainee.
We thank Ron Cook and Dr. Christoph Benning for conducting the FAME analysis of the TI and TS membrane fractions. We thank Dr. Andrew Van Alst, Beth Ottosen, and Rhiannon Leveque for the critical review of the manuscript.
L.M.D. and V.J.D.: Conceptualization; L.M.D.: Methodology; L.M.D. and R.S.: Investigation; L.M.D.: Writing—Original Draft; L.M.D., R.S., and V.J.D.: Writing—Review and Editing; L.M.D.: Visualization; V.J.D.: Project Administration; V.J.D.: Funding Acquisition.
Footnotes
This article is a direct contribution from Victor J. DiRita, a Fellow of the American Academy of Microbiology, who arranged for and secured reviews by Jun Zhu, University of Pennsylvania, and Jyl S. Matson, University of Toledo Medical Center.
Contributor Information
Victor J. DiRita, Email: diritavi@msu.edu.
K. Heran Darwin, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
ETHICS APPROVAL
The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Michigan State University approved all animal experiments (PROTO201900421).
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
The following material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.00721-24.
ASM does not own the copyrights to Supplemental Material that may be linked to, or accessed through, an article. The authors have granted ASM a non-exclusive, world-wide license to publish the Supplemental Material files. Please contact the corresponding author directly for reuse.
REFERENCES
- 1. Angelichio MJ, Spector J, Waldor MK, Camilli A. 1999. Vibrio cholerae intestinal population dynamics in the suckling mouse model of infection. Infect Immun 67:3733–3739. doi: 10.1128/IAI.67.8.3733-3739.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Millet YA, Alvarez D, Ringgaard S, von Andrian UH, Davis BM, Waldor MK. 2014. Insights into Vibrio cholerae intestinal colonization from monitoring fluorescently labeled bacteria. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004405. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Taylor RK, Miller VL, Furlong DB, Mekalanos JJ. 1987. Use of phoA gene fusions to identify a pilus colonization factor coordinately regulated with cholera toxin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84:2833–2837. doi: 10.1073/pnas.84.9.2833 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Nelson EJ, Harris JB, Morris JG, Calderwood SB, Camilli A. 2009. Cholera transmission: the host, pathogen and bacteriophage dynamic. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:693–702. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2204 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Camilli A, Beattie DT, Mekalanos JJ. 1994. Use of genetic recombination as a reporter of gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:2634–2638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.7.2634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Nielsen AT, Dolganov NA, Rasmussen T, Otto G, Miller MC, Felt SA, Torreilles S, Schoolnik GK. 2010. A bistable switch and anatomical site control Vibrio cholerae virulence gene expression in the intestine. PLoS Pathog 6:e1001102. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Higgins DE, Nazareno E, DiRita VJ. 1992. The virulence gene activator ToxT from Vibrio cholerae is a member of the AraC family of transcriptional activators. J Bacteriol 174:6974–6980. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.21.6974-6980.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Higgins DE, DiRita VJ. 1994. Transcriptional control of toxT, a regulatory gene in the ToxR Regulon of Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol 14:17–29. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb01263.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Krukonis ES, Yu RR, Dirita VJ. 2000. The Vibrio cholerae ToxR/TcpP/ToxT virulence cascade: distinct roles for two membrane-localized transcriptional activators on a single promoter. Mol Microbiol 38:67–84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.02111.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. DiRita VJ, Parsot C, Jander G, Mekalanos JJ. 1991. Regulatory cascade controls virulence in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 88:5403–5407. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.12.5403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Miller VL, Taylor RK, Mekalanos JJ. 1987. Cholera toxin transcriptional activator toxR is a transmembrane DNA binding protein. Cell 48:271–279. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(87)90430-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Crawford JA, Krukonis ES, DiRita VJ. 2003. Membrane localization of the ToxR winged-helix domain is required for TcpP-mediated virulence gene activation in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol 47:1459–1473. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03398.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Häse CC, Mekalanos JJ. 1998. TcpP protein is a positive regulator of virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae . Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A 95:730–734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.2.730 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Carroll PA, Tashima KT, Rogers MB, DiRita VJ, Calderwood SB. 1997. Phase variation in tcpH modulates expression of the ToxR regulon in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol 25:1099–1111. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.5371901.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Krukonis ES, DiRita VJ. 2003. DNA binding and ToxR responsiveness by the wing domain of TcpP, an activator of virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Cell 12:157–165. doi: 10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00222-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Goss TJ, Seaborn CP, Gray MD, Krukonis ES. 2010. Identification of the TcpP-binding site in the toxT promoter of Vibrio cholerae and the role of ToxR in TcpP-mediated activation. Infect Immun 78:4122–4133. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00566-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Kovacikova G, Skorupski K. 2002. Regulation of virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae by quorum sensing: HapR functions at the aphA promoter. Mol Microbiol 46:1135–1147. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03229.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Kovacikova G, Lin W, Skorupski K. 2010. The LysR-type virulence activator AphB regulates the expression of genes in Vibrio cholerae in response to low pH and anaerobiosis. J Bacteriol 192:4181–4191. doi: 10.1128/JB.00193-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Liu Z, Yang M, Peterfreund GL, Tsou AM, Selamoglu N, Daldal F, Zhong Z, Kan B, Zhu J. 2011. Vibrio cholerae anaerobic induction of virulence gene expression is controlled by thiol-based switches of virulence regulator AphB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:810–815. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1014640108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Liu Z, Wang H, Zhou Z, Naseer N, Xiang F, Kan B, Goulian M, Zhu J. 2016. Differential thiol-based switches jump-start Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis. Cell Reports 14:347–354. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Zhu J, Miller MB, Vance RE, Dziejman M, Bassler BL, Mekalanos JJ. 2002. Quorum-sensing regulators control virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:3129–3134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.052694299 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Behari J, Stagon L, Calderwood SB. 2001. Calderwood, pepA, a gene mediating pH regulation of virulence genes in Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol 183:178–188. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.1.178-188.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Skorupski K, Taylor RK. 1997. Cyclic AMP and its receptor protein negatively regulate the coordinate expression of cholera toxin and toxin-coregulated pilus in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:265–270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.1.265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kovacikova G, Skorupski K. 2001. Overlapping binding sites for the virulence gene regulators AphA, AphB and cAMP-CRP at the Vibrio cholerae tcpPH promoter. Mol Microbiol 41:393–407. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02518.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Beck NA, Krukonis ES, DiRita VJ. 2004. TcpH influences virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae by inhibiting degradation of the transcription activator TcpP. J Bacteriol 186:8309–8316. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.24.8309-8316.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Teoh WP, Matson JS, DiRita VJ. 2015. Regulated intramembrane proteolysis of the virulence activator TcpP in Vibrio cholerae is initiated by the tail-specific protease (Tsp). Mol Microbiol 97:822–831. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Matson JS, DiRita VJ. 2005. Degradation of the membrane-localized virulence activator TcpP by the YaeL protease in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:16403–16408. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0505818102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Brown MS, Ye J, Rawson RB, Goldstein JL. 2000. Regulated Intramembrane proteolysis: a control mechanism conserved from bacteria to humans. Cell 100:391–398. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80675-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. De Las Peñas A, Connolly L, Gross CA. 1997. The σE ‐mediated response to extracytoplasmic stress in Escherichia coli is transduced by RseA and RseB, two negative regulators of σE. Mol Microbiol 24:373–385. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.3611718.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Alba BM, Leeds JA, Onufryk C, Lu CZ, Gross CA. 2002. DegS and YaeL participate sequentially in the cleavage of RseA to activate the sigma E-dependent extracytoplasmic stress response. Genes Dev 16:2156–2168. doi: 10.1101/gad.1008902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Dartigalongue C, Missiakas D, Raina S. 2001. Characterization of the Escherichia ColiςE regulon. J Biol Chem 276:20866–20875. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M100464200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Rhodius VA, Suh WC, Nonaka G, West J, Gross CA. 2006. Conserved and variable functions of the σE stress response in related genomes. PLoS Biol 4:e2. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Zhou R, Kroos L. 2005. Serine proteases from two cell types target different components of a complex that governs regulated Intramembrane proteolysis of pro-σK during Bacillus subtilis development. Mol Microbiol 58:835–846. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04870.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Wakeley PR, Dorazi R, Hoa NT, Bowyer JR, Cutting SM. 2002. Proteolysis of SpoIVB is a critical determinant in signalling of pro-σK processing in Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol 36:1336–1348. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2000.01946.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Kroos L, Yu YT. 2000. Regulation of sigma factor activity during Bacillus subtilis development. Curr Opin Microbiol 3:553–560. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(00)00140-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Cezairliyan BO, Sauer RT. 2007. Inhibition of regulated proteolysis by RseB. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:3771–3776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0611567104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Wollmann P, Zeth K. 2007. The structure of RseB: a sensor in periplasmic stress response of E. coli. J Mol Biol 372:927–941. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Wilken C, Kitzing K, Kurzbauer R, Ehrmann M, Clausen T. 2004. Crystal structure of the DegS stress sensor: how a PDZ domain recognizes misfolded protein and activates a protease. Cell 117:483–494. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00454-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Zhou R, Kroos L. 2004. BofA protein inhibits intramembrane proteolysis of pro-σK in an intercompartmental signaling pathway during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:6385–6390. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307709101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Resnekov O. 1999. Role of the sporulation protein BofA in regulating activation of the Bacillus subtilis developmental transcription factor sigmaK. J Bacteriol 181:5384–5388. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.17.5384-5388.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Ricca E, Cutting S, Losick R. 1992. Characterization of bofA, a gene involved in Intercompartmental regulation of pro-Sigma K processing during sporulation in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 174:3177–3184. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.10.3177-3184.1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Demey LM, Gumerov VM, Xing J, Zhulin IB, DiRita VJ. 2023. Transmembrane transcription regulators are widespread in bacteria and archaea. Microbiol Spectr 11:e0026623. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00266-23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Kinch LN, Cong Q, Jaishankar J, Orth K. 2022. Co-component signal transduction systems: fast-evolving virulence regulation cassettes discovered in enteric bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 119:e2203176119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2203176119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Li P, Rivera-Cancel G, Kinch LN, Salomon D, Tomchick DR, Grishin NV, Orth K. 2016. Bile salt receptor complex activates a pathogenic type III secretion system. Elife 5:e15718. doi: 10.7554/eLife.15718 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Okada R, Matsuda S, Iida T. 2017. Vibrio parahaemolyticus VtrA is a membrane-bound regulator and is activated via oligomerization. PLoS One 12:e0187846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Lembke M, Höfler T, Walter A-N, Tutz S, Fengler V, Schild S, Reidl J. 2020. Host stimuli and operator binding sites controlling protein interactions between virulence master regulator ToxR and ToxS in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol 114:262–278. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14510 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Lembke M, Pennetzdorfer N, Tutz S, Koller M, Vorkapic D, Zhu J, Schild S, Reidl J. 2018. Proteolysis of ToxR is controlled by cysteine-thiol redox state and bile salts in Vibrio cholerae . Mol Microbiol 110:796–810. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14125 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Midgett CR, Almagro-Moreno S, Pellegrini M, Taylor RK, Skorupski K, Kull FJ. 2017. Bile salts and alkaline pH reciprocally modulate the interaction between the periplasmic domains of Vibrio choleraeToxR and ToxS. Mol Microbiol 105:258–272. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13699 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Midgett CR, Swindell RA, Pellegrini M, Jon Kull F. 2020. A disulfide constrains the ToxR periplasmic domain structure, altering its interactions with ToxS and bile-salts. Sci Rep 10:9002. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66050-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Gubensäk N, Wagner GE, Schrank E, Falsone FS, Berger TMI, Pavkov-Keller T, Reidl J, Zangger K. 2021. The periplasmic domains of Vibrio cholerae ToxR and ToxS are forming a strong heterodimeric complex independent on the redox state of ToxR cysteines. Mol Microbiol 115:1277–1291. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Bramkamp M, Lopez D. 2015. Exploring the existence of lipid rafts in bacteria. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79:81–100. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00036-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Toledo A, Huang Z, Coleman JL, London E, Benach JL. 2018. Lipid rafts can form in the inner and outer membranes of Borrelia burgdorferi and have different properties and associated proteins. Mol Microbiol 108:63–76. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13914 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Huang Z, Zhang X-S, Blaser MJ, London E. 2019. Helicobacter pylori lipids can form ordered membrane domains (rafts). Biochim Biophys Acta Biomembr 1861:183050. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2019.183050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Koch G, Wermser C, Acosta IC, Kricks L, Stengel ST, Yepes A, Lopez D. 2017. Attenuating Staphylococcus aureus virulence by targeting flotillin protein scaffold activity. Cell Chem Biol 24:845–857. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2017.05.027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. López D, Kolter R. 2010. Functional microdomains in bacterial membranes. Genes Dev 24:1893–1902. doi: 10.1101/gad.1945010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Sezgin E, Levental I, Mayor S, Eggeling C. 2017. The mystery of membrane organization: composition, regulation and roles of lipid rafts. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 18:361–374. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Nickels JD, Chatterjee S, Stanley CB, Qian S, Cheng X, Myles DAA, Standaert RF, Elkins JG, Katsaras J. 2017. The in vivo structure of biological membranes and evidence for lipid domains. PLoS Biol 15:e2002214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002214 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Nicolau DV, Burrage K, Parton RG, Hancock JF. 2006. Identifying optimal lipid raft characteristics required to promote nanoscale protein-protein interactions on the plasma membrane. Mol Cell Biol 26:313–323. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.1.313-323.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Simons K, Vaz WLC. 2004. Model systems, lipid rafts, and cell membranes. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 33:269–295. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.32.110601.141803 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Pike LJ. 2006. Rafts defined: a report on the keystone symposium on lipid rafts and cell function. J Lipid Res 47:1597–1598. doi: 10.1194/jlr.E600002-JLR200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Yu J, Fischman DA, Steck TL. 1973. Selective solubilization of proteins and phospholipids from red blood cell membranes by nonionic detergents. J Supramol Struct 1:233–248. doi: 10.1002/jss.400010308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Simons K, Ikonen E. 1997. Functional rafts in cell membranes. Nature 387:569–572. doi: 10.1038/42408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Ourisson G, Rohmer M. 1992. Hopanoids. 2. Biohopanoids: a novel class of bacterial lipids. Acc Chem Res 25:403–408. doi: 10.1021/ar00021a004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Sáenz JP, Grosser D, Bradley AS, Lagny TJ, Lavrynenko O, Broda M, Simons K. 2015. Hopanoids as functional analogues of cholesterol in bacterial membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:11971–11976. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515607112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Sandkvist M, Hough LP, Bagdasarian MM, Bagdasarian M. 1999. Direct interaction of the EpsL and EpsM proteins of the general secretion apparatus in Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol 181:3129–3135. doi: 10.1128/JB.181.10.3129-3135.1999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. DiRita VJ, Mekalanos JJ. 1991. Periplasmic interaction between two membrane regulatory proteins, ToxR and ToxS, results in signal transduction and transcriptional activation. Cell 64:29–37. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90206-e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Kameda K, Nunn WD. 1981. Purification and characterization of acyl coenzyme A synthetase from Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 256:5702–5707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Klein K, Steinberg R, Fiethen B, Overath P. 1971. Fatty acid degradation in Escherichia coli. An inducible system for the uptake of fatty acids and further characterization of old mutants. Eur J Biochem 19:442–450. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1971.tb01334.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Nunn WD, Simons RW. 1978. Transport of long-chain fatty acids by Escherichia coli: mapping and characterization of mutants in the fadL gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 75:3377–3381. doi: 10.1073/pnas.75.7.3377 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Nunn WD, Colburn RW, Black PN. 1986. Transport of long-chain fatty acids in Escherichia coli. Evidence for role of fadL gene product as long-chain fatty acid receptor. J Biol Chem 261:167–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Giles DK, Hankins JV, Guan Z, Trent MS. 2011. Remodeling of the Vibrio cholerae membrane by incorporation of exogenous fatty acids from host and aquatic environments. Mol Microbiol 79:716–728. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07476.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Moravec AR, Siv AW, Hobby CR, Lindsay EN, Norbash LV, Shults DJ, Symes SJK, Giles DK. 2017. Exogenous polyunsaturated fatty acids impact membrane remodeling and affect virulence phenotypes among pathogenic Vibrio species. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e01415-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01415-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Batta AK, Salen G, Batta P, Stephen Tint G, Alberts DS, Earnest DL. 2002. Simultaneous quantitation of fatty acids, sterols and bile acids in human stool by capillary gas–liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr B 775:153–161. doi: 10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00289-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Yang M, Liu Z, Hughes C, Stern AM, Wang H, Zhong Z, Kan B, Fenical W, Zhu J. 2013. Bile salt–induced intermolecular disulfide bond formation activates Vibrio cholerae virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:2348–2353. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218039110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Plecha SC, Withey JH. 2015. Mechanism for inhibition of Vibrio cholerae ToxT activity by the unsaturated fatty acid components of bile. J Bacteriol 197:1716–1725. doi: 10.1128/JB.02409-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Withey JH, Nag D, Plecha SC, Sinha R, Koley H. 2015. Conjugated linoleic acid reduces cholera toxin production in vitro and in vivo by inhibiting Vibrio cholerae ToxT activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:7471–7476. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01029-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Brian BL, Gardner EW. 1968. A simple procedure for detecting the presence of cyclopropane fatty acids in bacterial lipids. Appl Microbiol 16:549–552. doi: 10.1128/am.16.4.549-552.1968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Guckert JB, Hood MA, White DC. 1986. Phospholipid ester-linked fatty acid profile changes during nutrient deprivation of Vibrio cholerae: Increases in the trans/cis ratio and proportions of cyclopropyl fatty acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 52:794–801. doi: 10.1128/aem.52.4.794-801.1986 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Trajtenberg F, Altabe S, Larrieux N, Ficarra F, de Mendoza D, Buschiazzo A, Schujman GE. 2014. Structural insights into bacterial resistance to cerulenin. FEBS J 281:2324–2338. doi: 10.1111/febs.12785 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Porrini L, Cybulski LE, Altabe SG, Mansilla MC, de Mendoza D. 2014. Cerulenin inhibits unsaturated fatty acids synthesis in Bacillus subtilis by modifying the input signal of desk thermosensor. Microbiologyopen 3:213–224. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.154 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Buttke TM, Ingram LO. 1978. Inhibition of unsaturated fatty acid synthesis in Escherichia coli by the antibiotic cerulenin. Biochemistry 17:5282–5286. doi: 10.1021/bi00617a031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Goldberg I, Walker JR, Bloch K. 1973. Inhibition of lipid synthesis in Escherichia coli cells by the antibiotic cerulenin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 3:549–554. doi: 10.1128/AAC.3.5.549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Jiang Y, Morgan-Kiss RM, Campbell JW, Chan CH, Cronan JE. 2010. Expression of Vibrio harveyi acyl-ACP synthetase allows efficient entry of exogenous fatty acids into the Escherichia coli fatty acid and lipid A synthetic pathways. Biochemistry 49:718–726. doi: 10.1021/bi901890a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Yao J, Rock CO. 2017. Exogenous fatty acid metabolism in bacteria. Biochimie 141:30–39. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2017.06.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Kim W, Fan Y-Y, Barhoumi R, Smith R, McMurray DN, Chapkin RS. 2008. n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids suppress the localization and activation of signaling proteins at the immunological synapse in murine CD4 T cells by affecting lipid raft formation. J Immunol 181:6236–6243. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.181.9.6236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Chapkin RS, Wang N, Fan Y-Y, Lupton JR, Prior IA. 2008. Docosahexaenoic acid alters the size and distribution of cell surface microdomains. Biochim Biophys Acta 1778:466–471. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Lorent JH, Diaz-Rohrer B, Lin X, Spring K, Gorfe AA, Levental KR, Levental I. 2017. Structural determinants and functional consequences of protein affinity for membrane rafts. Nat Commun 8:1219. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-01328-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Schuck S, Honsho M, Ekroos K, Shevchenko A, Simons K. 2003. Resistance of cell membranes to different detergents. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:5795–5800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0631579100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Morgan SJ, French EL, Thomson JJ, Seaborn CP, Shively CA, Krukonis ES. 2016. Formation of an intramolecular periplasmic disulfide bond in TcpP protects TcpP and TcpH from degradation in Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol 198:498–509. doi: 10.1128/JB.00338-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Lichtenberg D, Goñi FM, Heerklotz H. 2005. Detergent-resistant membranes should not be identified with membrane rafts. Trends Biochem Sci 30:430–436. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Calkins AL, Demey LM, Karslake JD, Donarski ED, Biteen JS, DiRita VJ. 2021. Independent promoter recognition by TcpP precedes cooperative promoter activation by TcpP and ToxR. mBio 12:e0221321. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02213-21 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Bischof LF, Haurat MF, Albers S-V. 2019. Two membrane-bound transcription factors regulate expression of various type-IV-pili surface structures in Sulfolobus acidocaldarius. PeerJ 7:e6459. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6459 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Lassak K, Peeters E, Wróbel S, Albers S-V. 2013. The one-component system ArnR: a membrane-bound activator of the crenarchaeal archaellum. Mol Microbiol 88:125–139. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12173 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Kodama T, Gotoh K, Hiyoshi H, Morita M, Izutsu K, Akeda Y, Park K-S, Cantarelli VV, Dryselius R, Iida T, Honda T. 2010. Two regulators of Vibrio parahaemolyticus play important roles in enterotoxicity by controlling the expression of genes in the Vp-PAI region. PLoS ONE 5:e8678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008678 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Alam A, Tam V, Hamilton E, Dziejman M. 2010. vttRA and vttRB encode ToxR family proteins that mediate bile-induced expression of type three secretion system genes in a non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae strain. Infect Immun 78:2554–2570. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01073-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Miller KA, Hamilton E, Dziejman M. 2012. The Vibrio cholerae trh gene is coordinately regulated in vitro with type III secretion system genes by VttRA/VttRB but does not contribute to Caco2-BBE cell cytotoxicity. Infect Immun 80:4444–4455. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00832-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Ante VM, Bina XR, Howard MF, Sayeed S, Taylor DL, Bina JE. 2015. Vibrio cholerae leuO transcription is positively regulated by ToxR and contributes to bile resistance. J Bacteriol 197:3499–3510. doi: 10.1128/JB.00419-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Provenzano D, Schuhmacher DA, Barker JL, Klose KE. 2000. The virulence regulatory protein ToxR mediates enhanced bile resistance in Vibrio cholerae and other pathogenic Vibrio species. Infect Immun 68:1491–1497. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.3.1491-1497.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Manson JM, Keis S, Smith JMB, Cook GM. 2004. Acquired bacitracin resistance in Enterococcus faecalis is mediated by an ABC transporter and a novel regulatory protein, BcrR . Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:3743–3748. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.10.3743-3748.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Kuper C, Jung K. 2005. CadC-mediated activation of the cadBA promoter in Escherichia coli. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 10:26–39. doi: 10.1159/000090346 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Gu D, Wang K, Lu T, Li L, Jiao X. 2021. Vibrio parahaemolyticus CadC regulates acid tolerance response to enhance bacterial motility and cytotoxicity. J Fish Dis 44:1155–1168. doi: 10.1111/jfd.13376 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Choi SH. 2008. Activation of the Vibrio vulnificus cadBA operon by leucine-responsive regulatory protein is mediated by CadC. J Microbiol Biotechnol:1755–1761. doi: 10.4014/jmb.0800.121 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Dalia AB, Lazinski DW, Camilli A. 2014. Identification of a membrane-bound transcriptional regulator that links chitin and natural competence in Vibrio cholerae. mBio 5:e01028–13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01028-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Goss TJ, Morgan SJ, French EL, Krukonis ES. 2013. ToxR recognizes a direct repeat element in the toxT, ompU, ompT, and ctxA promoters of Vibrio cholerae to regulate transcription. Infect Immun 81:884–895. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00889-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Santamaría L, Reverón I, López de Felipe F, de Las Rivas B, Muñoz R. 2018. Unravelling the reduction pathway as an alternative metabolic route to hydroxycinnamate decarboxylation in Lactobacillus plantarum. Appl Environ Microbiol 84:e01123-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01123-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Steele MI, Lorenz D, Hatter K, Park A, Sokatch JR. 1992. Characterization of the mmsAB operon of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO encoding methylmalonate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase and 3-hydroxyisobutyrate dehydrogenase. J Biol Chem 267:13585–13592. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)42252-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Olson ME, King JM, Yahr TL, Horswill AR. 2013. Sialic acid catabolism in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 195:1779–1788. doi: 10.1128/JB.02294-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Meijerink M, van Hemert S, Taverne N, Wels M, de Vos P, Bron PA, Savelkoul HF, van Bilsen J, Kleerebezem M, Wells JM. 2010. Identification of genetic loci in Lactobacillus plantarum that modulate the immune response of dendritic cells using comparative genome hybridization. PLoS One 5:e10632. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Almagro-Moreno S, Root MZ, Taylor RK. 2015. Role of ToxS in the proteolytic cascade of virulence regulator ToxR in Vibrio cholerae. Mol Microbiol 98:963–976. doi: 10.1111/mmi.13170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Miller VL, DiRita VJ, Mekalanos JJ. 1989. Identification of toxS, a regulatory gene whose product enhances toxR-mediated activation of the cholera toxin promoter. J Bacteriol 171:1288–1293. doi: 10.1128/jb.171.3.1288-1293.1989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Almagro-Moreno S, Kim TK, Skorupski K, Taylor RK. 2015. Proteolysis of virulence regulator ToxR is associated with entry of Vibrio cholerae into a dormant state. PLoS Genet 11:e1005145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Heinrich J, Wiegert T. 2009. Regulated intramembrane proteolysis in the control of extracytoplasmic function sigma factors. Res Microbiol 160:696–703. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2009.08.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Burdge GC. 2006. Metabolism of α-linolenic acid in humans. Prostaglandins Leukot Essent Fatty Acids 75:161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.plefa.2006.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Aluko RE. 2012. Functional foods and nutraceuticals. In Food science text series [Google Scholar]
- 115. Destaillats F, Trottier JP, Galvez JMG, Angers P. 2005. Analysis of α-linolenic acid biohydrogenation intermediates in milk fat with emphasis on conjugated linolenic acids. J Dairy Sci 88:3231–3239. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)73006-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Plourde M, Destaillats F, Chouinard PY, Angers P. 2007. Conjugated α-linolenic acid isomers in bovine milk and muscle. J Dairy Sci 90:5269–5275. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Bu DP, Wang JQ, Dhiman TR, Liu SJ. 2007. Effectiveness of oils rich in linoleic and linolenic acids to enhance conjugated linoleic acid in milk from dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 90:998–1007. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71585-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Burdge GC, Calder PC. 2005. Conversion of alpha-linolenic acid to longer-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids in human adults. Reprod Nutr Dev 45:581–597. doi: 10.1051/rnd:2005047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Yang B, Chen H, Stanton C, Chen YQ, Zhang H, Chen W. 2017. Mining bifidobacteria from the neonatal gastrointestinal tract for conjugated linolenic acid production. Bioengineered 8:232–238. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2016.1222996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Valenzuela R, Bascuñán K, Chamorro R, Barrera C, Sandoval J, Puigrredon C, Parraguez G, Orellana P, Gonzalez V, Valenzuela A. 2015. Modification of docosahexaenoic acid composition of milk from nursing women who received alpha linolenic acid from chia oil during gestation and nursing. Nutrients 7:6405–6424. doi: 10.3390/nu7085289 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Oosting A, Verkade HJ, Kegler D, van de Heijning BJM, van der Beek EM. 2015. Rapid and selective manipulation of milk fatty acid composition in mice through the maternal diet during lactation. J Nutr Sci 4:e19. doi: 10.1017/jns.2015.13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Dupertuis YM, Meguid MM, Pichard C. 2007. Colon cancer therapy: new perspectives of nutritional manipulations using polyunsaturated fatty acids. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 10:427–432. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e3281e2c9d4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Larsson SC, Kumlin M, Ingelman-Sundberg M, Wolk A. 2004. Dietary long-chain n−3 fatty acids for the prevention of cancer: a review of potential mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr 79:935–945. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/79.6.935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Coakley M, Banni S, Johnson MC, Mills S, Devery R, Fitzgerald G, Paul Ross R, Stanton C. 2009. Inhibitory effect of conjugated α‐linolenic acid from bifidobacteria of intestinal origin on SW480 cancer cells. Lipids 44:249–256. doi: 10.1007/s11745-008-3269-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Suzuki R, Noguchi R, Ota T, Abe M, Miyashita K, Kawada T. 2001. Cytotoxic effect of conjugated trienoic fatty acids on mouse tumor and human monocytic leukemia cells. Lipids 36:477–482. doi: 10.1007/s11745-001-0746-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Wahle KWJ, Heys SD, Rotondo D. 2004. Conjugated linoleic acids: are they beneficial or detrimental to health? Prog Lipid Res 43:553–587. doi: 10.1016/j.plipres.2004.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. Tricon S, Burdge GC, Williams CM, Calder PC, Yaqoob P. 2005. The effects of conjugated linoleic acid on human health-related outcomes. Proc Nutr Soc 64:171–182. doi: 10.1079/pns2005418 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Bhattacharya A, Banu J, Rahman M, Causey J, Fernandes G. 2006. Biological effects of conjugated linoleic acids in health and disease. J Nutr Biochem 17:789–810. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2006.02.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Leikin-Frenkel A, Liraz-Zaltsman S, Hollander KS, Atrakchi D, Ravid O, Rand D, Kandel-Kfir M, Israelov H, Cohen H, Kamari Y, Shaish A, Harats D, Schnaider-Beeri M, Cooper I. 2021. Dietary alpha linolenic acid in pregnant mice and during weaning increases brain docosahexaenoic acid and improves recognition memory in the offspring. J Nutr Biochem 91:108597. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2021.108597 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Zhuang P, Shou Q, Wang W, He L, Wang J, Chen J, Zhang Y, Jiao J. 2018. Essential fatty acids linoleic acid and α-linolenic acid sex-dependently regulate glucose homeostasis in obesity. Mol Nutr Food Res 62:e1800448. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201800448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Yang S, Xi D, Wang X, Li Y, Li Y, Yan J, Cao B. 2020. Vibrio cholerae VC1741 (PsrA) enhances the colonization of the pathogen in infant mice intestines in the presence of the long-chain fatty acid, oleic acid. Microb Pathog 147:104443. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104443 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Rivera-Chávez F, Mekalanos JJ. 2019. Cholera toxin promotes pathogen acquisition of host-derived nutrients. Nature 572:244–248. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1453-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133. Chatterjee A, Dutta PK, Chowdhury R. 2007. Effect of fatty acids and cholesterol present in bile on expression of virulence factors and motility of Vibrio cholerae. Infect Immun 75:1946–1953. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01435-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134. Lim MS, Ng D, Zong Z, Arvai AS, Taylor RK, Tainer JA, Craig L. 2010. Vibrio cholerae El Tor TcpA crystal structure and mechanism for pilus-mediated microcolony formation. Mol Microbiol 77:755–770. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07244.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135. Thomson JJ, Withey JH. 2014. Bicarbonate increases binding affinity of Vibrio cholerae ToxT to virulence gene promoters. J Bacteriol 196:3872–3880. doi: 10.1128/JB.01824-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136. Abuaita BH, Withey JH. 2009. Bicarbonate induces Vibrio cholerae virulence gene expression by enhancing ToxT activity. Infect Immun 77:4111–4120. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00409-09 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137. Thomson JJ, Plecha SC, Withey JH. 2015. A small unstructured region in Vibrio cholerae ToxT mediates the response to positive and negative effectors and ToxT proteolysis. J Bacteriol 197:654–668. doi: 10.1128/JB.02068-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138. Chatterjee E, Chowdhury R. 2013. Reduced virulence of the Vibrio cholerae fadD mutant is due to induction of the extracytoplasmic stress response. Infect Immun 81:3935–3941. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00722-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139. Ray S, Chatterjee E, Chatterjee A, Paul K, Chowdhury R. 2011. A fadD mutant of Vibrio cholerae is impaired in the production of virulence factors and membrane localization of the virulence regulatory protein TcpP. Infect Immun 79:258–266. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00663-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140. Lorent J, Diaz-Rohrer BB, Lin X, Gorfe A, Levental KR, Levental I. 2018. Structural determinants and functional consequences of protein association with membrane domains. Biophys J 114:380a. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.11.210329401435 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 141. Karslake JD, Donarski ED, Shelby SA, Demey LM, DiRita VJ, Veatch SL, Biteen JS. 2021. SMAUG: analyzing single-molecule tracks with nonparametric bayesian statistics. Methods 193:16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.03.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142. Calkins AL, Demey LM, Rosenthal BM, DiRita VJ, Biteen JS. 2023. Achieving single-molecule tracking of subcellular regulation in bacteria during real-time environmental perturbations. Anal Chem 95:774–783. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143. Li N, Zheng Y, Shi M, Xue Y, Zhang T, Ji S, Yang M. 2019. TcpP L152A constitutively activating virulence gene expression in Vibrio cholerae. Curr Microbiol 76:583–589. doi: 10.1007/s00284-019-01659-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144. LB solid or liquid medium: Cold spring harbor protocols. 2016. doi: 10.1101/pdb.rec088203 [DOI]
- 145. Skorupski K, Taylor RK. 1996. Positive selection vectors for allelic exchange. Gene 169:47–52. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00793-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146. Lycke N, Tsuji T, Holmgren J. 1992. The adjuvant effect of Vibrio cholerae and Escherichia coli heat-labile enterotoxins is linked to their ADP-ribosyltransferase activity. Eur J Immunol 22:2277–2281. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830220915 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147. Anthouard R, DiRita VJ. 2013. Small-molecule inhibitors of toxT expression in Vibrio cholerae. mBio 4:e00403-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00403-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148. Baselski V, Briggs R, Parker C. 1977. Intestinal fluid accumulation induced by oral challenge with Vibrio cholerae or cholera toxin in infant mice. Infect Immun 15:704–712. doi: 10.1128/iai.15.3.704-712.1977 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149. Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. 2008. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nat Protoc 3:1101–1108. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150. Marashi SMA, et al. 2013. Determination of ctxAB expression in Vibrio cholerae classical and El Tor strains using real-time PCR. Int J Mol Cell Med 2:9–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151. Miller JH. 1974. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold spring harbor laboratory. [Google Scholar]
- 152. Quan S, Hiniker A, Collet J-F, Bardwell JCA. 2013. Isolation of bacteria envelope proteins. Methods Mol Biol 966:359–366. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-245-2_22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153. Jiang L, He L, Fountoulakis M. 2004. Comparison of protein precipitation methods for sample preparation prior to proteomic analysis. J Chromatogr A 1023:317–320. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2003.10.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154. Wang Z, Benning C. 2011. Arabidopsis thaliana polar glycerolipid profiling by thin layer chromatography (TLC) coupled with gas-liquid chromatography (GLC). J Vis Exp:2518. doi: 10.3791/2518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155. Bryant JA, Morris FC, Knowles TJ, Maderbocus R, Heinz E, Boelter G, Alodaini D, Colyer A, Wotherspoon PJ, Staunton KA, et al. 2020. Structure of dual BON-domain protein DolP identifies phospholipid binding as a new mechanism for protein localization. Elife 9:e62614. doi: 10.7554/eLife.62614 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156. Dombek KM, Ingram LO. 1984. Effects of ethanol on the Escherichia coli plasma membrane. J Bacteriol 157:233–239. doi: 10.1128/jb.157.1.233-239.1984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157. Watrous JD, Niiranen TJ, Lagerborg KA, Henglin M, Xu Y-J, Rong J, Sharma S, Vasan RS, Larson MG, Armando A, Mora S, Quehenberger O, Dennis EA, Cheng S, Jain M. 2019. Directed non-targeted mass spectrometry and chemical networking for discovery of eicosanoids and related oxylipins. Cell Chem Biol 26:433–442. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2018.11.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.