Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes in patients with combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with anterior chamber intraocular lens (ACIOL) to intrascleral haptic fixation (ISHF) using the Agarwal technique with fibrin glue to secure the scleral flap of a posterior chamber intraocular lens.
Methods
Retrospective, consecutive, single-center, comparative case series. 83 eyes were studied. Patients with < 8 months of follow-up were excluded. Detailed pre-, intra-, and post-operative complications were analyzed using mixed model univariate analysis and t-test. Pre- and post-operative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was analyzed.
Results
Twenty-five subjects met entry criteria. Mean age at time of surgery was 70.4 ± 17.7 years in the ACIOL group (n = 12) and 54.6 ± 21.1 years in the ISHF group (n = 13; p = 0.03). Mean follow-up was 38.2 months. Incidence of corneal decompensation was similar in the ACIOL and ISHF lens group (p = 0.93). There was no difference in the BCVA mean change or cystoid macular edema (CME) at the final visit between the groups (p = 0.47; p = 0.08), but there was a trend toward increased CME in the ACIOL group.
Conclusions
PPV with concomitant placement of either ACIOL or ISHF lens result in improvement in BCVA. Both procedures are well tolerated and result in favorable outcomes with long-term follow-up though varying patient populations do not allow precise comparison between the two groups.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40942-024-00572-2.
Keywords: Vitrectomy, ACIOL, Yamane, Sutured IOL, Dislocated IOL, IOL exchange, Agarwal technique
Key messages
What is known:
•Posteriorly dislocated intraocular lenses (IOLs) can be challenging to treat and typically require vitrectomy and lens removal
•There is limited data comparing the long-term outcomes of exchange with different techniques in the setting of vitrectomy
What is new:
•Vitrectomy with concomitant ACIOL or intra-scleral haptic fixation may result in similar long term visual acuity gains
•Complication profile between the two groups are similar, with a trend toward increased cystoid macular edema in the ACIOL group
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40942-024-00572-2.
Introduction
Cataracts are the leading cause of blindness worldwide and their removal is the most commonly performed surgery in the United States Medicare population [1, 2]. However, in many cases, placement of an intraocular lens (IOL) inside the capsular bag is not feasible as in cases of trauma, poor capsular support or lens dislocation (aphakia) [3]. When inadequate capsular or structural support exists, the surgeon can choose amongst a number of options for alternatively fixated lenses that are currently available including anterior chamber (AC), iris fixation, and scleral-fixated intraocular lenses (IOLs) [4]. Despite the growing body of studies, no single secondary lens or technique has been proven to be superior to another [4–6]. Although most of these options are relatively safe procedures, they are not without potential post-surgical complications [3, 7]. To reduce these complications, placement of these IOLs may require concomitant pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), most commonly when there is a need to explant a dislocated IOL and/or remove retained lens fragments from the posterior segment.
Previous studies suggest that despite having an acceptable visual outcome, an ACIOL has a relatively higher rate of late complications, including uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome and cystoid macular edema (CME) [8], compared to posterior chamber IOLs [9–12]. Most notably, ACIOLs have been associated with endothelial cell loss and subsequent corneal decompensation [13, 14]. The exact mechanism for the endothelial cell loss remains unknown, as this is likely multifactorial [13–15]. Previous studies have highlighted direct mechanical trauma from the lens and/or subclinical inflammatory mediators for the morphologic changes and accelerated endothelial cell loss that is reported after successful ACIOL placement [16]. Other authors have noted that an association may be complicated by other confounding variables including intraoperative surgical microtrauma from surgical instrumentation which may be present regardless of lens type [15].
Innovative suture and scleral-fixation techniques have been developed to improve visual acuity outcomes or expand the margin of error for procedure completion while decreasing the complication rate associated with secondary IOL placement [4, 5, 17]. As these alternate lens implantation techniques arise, studies are needed to detail the differences in the long term visual outcomes between ACIOL and scleral-fixated posterior chamber IOL [9, 18, 19] with modified Agarwal technique as no other study has evaluated these two options together specifically in the setting of concurrent PPV, which is required in instances like IOL dislocation to the posterior segment. The goal of our study was to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes in patients with PPV combined with placement of anterior chamber intraocular lens (ACIOL) and posterior chamber intra-scleral-fixated fibrin-glue-assisted lenses (ISFH).
Methods
This was a retrospective, consecutive, comparative case series of patients who underwent PPV with concomitant placement of either ACIOL or ISHF at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics from 2000 to 2018. All experimental protocols were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) committee at the University of Iowa, who waived the need for informed consent. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations, including the Declaration of Helsinki. Potential subjects were identified through personal physician case log and common procedure terminology (CPT) codes such as 996.53 (mechanical complication due to intraocular lens) and 379.34 (posterior dislocation of lens). Baseline subject characteristics were documented including age, sex, pre-existing ocular conditions and etiology for capsular and zonular insufficiency.
Subject selection
Indications for secondary lens surgery included traumatic cataract with lens subluxation, subluxed intraocular or crystalline lens, capsular tear/rupture, IOL exchange, aphakia (primary loss or prior surgery), and phacodonesis. These cases were reviewed to confirm inclusion of those that received combined PPV to address posterior pathology such as lens retrieval or retinal detachment repair. Patients with less than 8 months post-operative follow-up were excluded to assure stable visual outcomes. Intraocular lens selection was determined by surgeon preference and some patient factors such as reasons for previous lens explantation, patient age, and other ocular anatomic considerations. Subject charts were reviewed to document pre-, intra- and-post-operative data including suprachoroidal hemorrhage, choroidal detachment, lens subluxation, uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome, corneal decompensation, hyphema, glaucoma, cystoid macular edema, vitreous hemorrhage, epiretinal membrane and retinal detachment. Snellen best corrected visual acuity (VA) was documented both at the pre-operative and final post-operative visit and converted to the logarithmic minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) equivalent.
Surgical techniques
The surgical technique included a standard 23- or 25-gauge three port PPV with a phacofragmatome in cases of sclerotic retained lens material that could not be removed with the cutter. Posteriorly dislocated IOLs were lifted using the extrusion needle into the anterior vitreous where a 23G low mass pick-forcep could securely grasp the IOL to occasionally place it on the iris where viscoelastic device was already placed in the anterior chamber for protection. More often, the clear corneal or scleral tunnel wound described below would be created at the time the IOL was being elevated so it could be removed without resting on the iris. Before placement of the new IOL scleral depression was performed for 360-degrees and any retinal tears were lasered.
Anterior chamber lens implantation was performed by the vitreoretinal surgeon or anterior segment surgeon: a caliper was used to measure the horizontal white-to-white dimension. A superior peritomy was performed and a 6 mm scleral groove was made into the clear cornea. If necessary, PPV was performed and the lens complex (if applicable) was brought into the anterior chamber and secured with a Duet forceps (MicroSurgical Technology [MST], Redmond, WA). A 2.75 mm keratome blade (BVI, Waltham, MA) was then used to enter the anterior chamber forming a temporal corneal tunnel. The lens/capsule complex was partially bisected and then prolapsed through the incision for explantation [20]. An Alcon MTA3-5UO (Alcon Laboratories, Fort Worth, TX) intraocular lens was inserted into through the corneal incision, guiding the leading haptic into the nasal iridocorneal angle, and trailing haptic was directed to rest easily in the sub-incisional angle. An iridectomy was performed. The wound was closed with 10 − 0 nylon suture and sclerotomies closed with 6 − 0 plain gut suture.
The surgical technique for placement of the ISHF with fibrin glue, first described by Agarwal, [21] is illustrated in the Supplementary video and detailed here: a toric marker is used to indicate the location of the haptics on the cornea. A peritomy is performed before a 300-micron steel blade is used to fashion a 2.5 mm square flap, and a crescent blade used to dissect the flaps into clear cornea. Vitrectomy was performed by the vitreoretinal surgeon and any posterior segment pathology was addressed. If dislocated posteriorly, the IOL was brought into the anterior chamber and explanted through the scleral-corneal wound. The eye was entered under the flaps approximately 1.5 mm from the limbus using the side port blade. A keratome blade was used to enter the anterior chamber forming a corneal tunnel. An Alcon MA50BM lens was inserted into the eye, leaving the trailing haptic protruding through the corneal wound outside the anterior chamber. The Duet micrograspers were used to grasp and externalize the tip of the haptic through the scleral opening. The trailing haptic was brought into the eye and externalized through the other scleral opening using a handshake technique. Scleral tunnels for tucking the haptic were made with a 26-gauge needle. Each of the haptics were tucked into the pockets and adjusted to achieve centration of the lens. If there was significant tilt despite haptic tuck adjustment, a new scleral entry point was made. The vitreoretinal surgeon checked the retinal periphery for tears with careful depression around the scleral tunnels to ensure the haptics were not moved resulting in lens decentration. An air bubble was placed in the anterior chamber. The scleral flaps and overlying conjunctiva were secured using Tisseel© fibrin glue (Baxter, Deerfield, IL).
Statistical analysis
Visual acuity (VA) analysis was performed on patients with at least 8 months of follow up and was converted to logMAR units for standardization. For patients presenting with limited vision such as counting fingers, the acuity was documented as 1/200 or a logMAR equivalent of 2.3. For hand motions, light perception, and no light perception logMAR VA of 3.3, 4.3 and 5.3 were assigned, respectively. A mixed model univariate analysis was then carried on the logMAR pre- and post-operative change in BCVA with respect to type of intraocular lens and number of pre-operative visually significant comorbidities listed above and were intra and post-operative complications. T-tests were used for comparative analysis between the two studied groups. Microsoft Excel and IBM SPSS Statistics (version 26) were used for the statistical analysis. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 for all comparisons.
Results
Eighty-three patients were identified through personal physician case logs and searched CPT codes for secondary lens surgery. Patients who did not have combined PPV (28 patients) or less then 8 months of follow up (28 patients) were excluded; two patients had a sulcus IOL placed that resulted in exclusion (Supplementary figure). Twenty-five eyes from 25 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were analyzed that were operated on by six surgeons. Baseline demographics are detailed in Table 1. Twelve patients underwent combined PPV with implantation of ACIOL (five female patients) and 13 patients underwent combined PPV with implantation of ISHF fibrin glued lenses (two female patients). Mean age at presentation was 62.2 years (median 67, range 19–92). Mean age in the ACIOL group was 70.4 years (median 74, range 27–92) while the mean age of the fibrin-glued group was 54.6 years (median 57, range 19–83; p = 0.027). The mean time to follow-up was 38.2 months (median 27.6 months, range 8-215 months).
Table 1.
ACIOL | ISHF | p value | |
---|---|---|---|
Number of patients | 12 | 13 | |
Mean age (range) | 70.4 (27–92) | 54.6 (19–83) | 0.03* |
Sex | 5 Females | 2 Females | |
Mean follow-up (months) | 44.3 | 32.7 | 0.25 |
Mean preop VA (logMAR) | 1.469 | 0.8262 | 0.07 |
Surgical Indications | |||
Traumatic cataract with subluxation | 0 | 1 | |
Subluxed intraocular lens | 7 | 5 | |
Subluxed crystalline lens | 0 | 2 | |
Capsular tear/rupture | 3 | 1 | |
IOL exchange | 0 | 1 | |
Aphakia | 1 | 3 | |
Phacodonesis of crystalline lens | 1 | 0 | |
Pre-operative co-morbidities | 0.35 | ||
Glaucoma | 3 | 3 | |
Myopia | 1 | 1 | |
Uveitis | 1 | 1 | |
Diabetes | 0 | 2 | |
AMD | 3 | 0 | |
ERM | 2 | 1 | |
CME | 1 | 0 | |
Retinal detachment | 6 | 6 |
Abbreviations IOL: intraocular lens; ACIOL: anterior chamber intraocular lens; ISHF: intrascleral haptic fixated; VA: visual acuity; CME: cystoid macular edema; ERM: epiretinal membrane; AMD: age-related macular degeneration
Pre-operative indication for surgery included aphakia, dislocated IOL, subluxed crystalline lens for which anterior approach would have a reasonably high chance of complete dislocation, and previous significant capsular loss precluding use of a sulcus IOL. The mean number of pre-operative visually significant diagnoses was 1.25 in the ACIOL group and 1.08 in the ISHF lens group (p = 0.47). Eleven of the 12 patients (91.6%) in the ACIOL group had undergone at least one previous surgery in the enrolled eye compared to ten of the 13 patients (76.9%) in the ISHF group.
The mean pre-operative Snellen equivalent VA across all eyes was logMAR 1.14 (20/273). In the ACIOL group, the mean presenting logMAR VA improved from 1.47 (20/587) to 1.23 (20/341) at the final visit (p = 0.35). In the ISHF lens group, the mean presenting logMAR VA improved from 0.83 logMAR (20/134) to 0.65 (20/90) at the final visit (p = 0.3). The mean overall logMAR change in VA for both groups were − 0.205 with no statistical difference between the groups (-0.24 and − 0.18, respectively p = 0.47).
Complication profiles, both intraoperative and post-operative, were similar between the two lens groups. As summarized in Table 2, intra-operatively there was no suprachoroidal hemorrhage or choroidal detachment in either the ACIOL or ISHF lens group. Ten of 12 eyes (83.3%) in the ACIOL group had at least one post-operative complication compared to eight of 13 eyes (61.5%) in the ISHF lens group. There was no difference in the number of post-operative complications between the ACIOL and ISHF lens group (1.67 vs. 1.08, p = 0.097). The most common complication in the cohort was corneal decompensation which was present in 32% of the studied eyes (n = 8) followed by CME at 28% (n = 7). Other post-operative complications in the overall cohort included suprachoroidal hemorrhage in 8% of eyes (n = 2), lens subluxation in 16% of eyes (n = 4), epiretinal membrane in 12% (n = 3), and vitreous hemorrhage in 16% (n = 4) (Table 2). There were no post-operative retinal detachments, glaucoma or uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema (UGH) syndrome in either group. There were no differences in the incidence of post-operative complications between the ACIOL and ISHF lens groups (Table 2). Six eyes, in both the ACIOL (25%, n = 3) and ISHF (23%, n = 3) lens group ultimately required keratoplasty. 16.7% of eyes (n = 2) in the ACIOL group required repeat keratoplasty at three and eight years post-operatively. One eye in the ACIOL group (8.3%) underwent two penetrating keratoplasties, which was further complicated by perforation and ultimately enucleation.
Table 2.
Complications | ACIOL | ISHF lens | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intra-operative | Suprachoroidal hemorrhage | 0 | 0 | n/a |
Choroidal detachment | 0 | 0 | n/a | |
Post-operative | Corneal decompensation | 4 | 4 | 0.93 |
Hyphema | 0 | 0 | n/a | |
Unstable IOL | 2 | 2 | 0.98 | |
UGH | 0 | 0 | n/a | |
Glaucoma | 0 | 0 | n/a | |
Retinal detachment | 0 | 0 | n/a | |
CME | 6 | 1 | 0.08 | |
ERM | 2 | 1 | 0.73 | |
VH | 2 | 2 | 0.98 | |
Suprachoroidal hemorrhage |
2 | 0 | 0.50 | |
Choroidal detachment | 0 | 0 | n/a |
Abbreviations IOL: intraocular lens; ACIOL: anterior change intraocular lens; ISHF: intrascleral haptic fixated; UGH: uveitis-glaucoma-hyphema syndrome; CME: cystoid macular edema; ERM: epiretinal membrane; VH = vitreous hemorrhage
Discussion
In this study, both ISHF fibrin-glued PCIOL and ACIOLs techniques with vitrectomy were well-tolerated and resulted in VA improvement as has been previously reported (albeit with shorter duration of follow-up) [22]. We utilized a multi-specialty, team-based approach to compare two lens implantation techniques, as little direct comparative data exists looking at the long-term complication rates for these primarily in the setting of concurrent PPV. Although there has been some comparative data to suggest ACIOLs and ISHF lenses are equally efficacious [18], to our knowledge, there has not been a long-term follow-up study comparing outcomes of ISHF fibrin-glued PCIOLs to ACIOLs with combined vitrectomy surgery.
It is important to note that both groups had similar presenting pre-operative VA that were similar to the studies previously reported [23]. Our post-operative and end-of-follow-up visual outcomes were similar in both groups. This contrasts to the visual outcomes reported by Omlecki et al [24] who showed a statistically significant improved visual acuity with the use of an ACIOL compared to the scleral-fixated PCIOL. These differences may be accounted for by the differences in mean follow-up time between our study and theirs (38.2 months versus 4.8 months respectively), which may imply that visually significant complications from ACIOLs may manifest in the late post-operative period. Post-operative complications in our study were generally similar between the two lens groups, with no significant difference in the rate of corneal decompensation and retinal complications.
We found a non-significant trend towards more post-operative CME in the ACIOL group compared to the ISHF IOL (Table 2). Increased CME in ACIOLs has not been documented previously although this can occur after any IOL placement [4, 5]. Finn et al. described 50 eyes undergoing ACIOL implantation with concurrent PPV with a lower rate of CME at 15% compared to our ACIOL study group rate of 50%. Interestingly, although still a minority of patients, the post-operative CME complication rate has previously been documented at an increased rate compared to their equivalent SFIOLs, but the significance remains unclear especially given that CME appears to be one of the more common post-operative complications regardless of lens type [23, 25].
Use of an ACIOL in cases of poor capsular support remains a topic of debate due to its associated complications including endothelial cell death and CME [7] increasing the importance of alternate PCIOL techniques [26]. However, a PCIOL sutured at the ciliary sulcus has been associated with complications such as vitreous hemorrhage, retinal detachment and lens destabilization [5, 27]. Fibrin-glue has been used for several off-label indications in ophthalmology including sealing of post cataract corneal wounds and securing of conjunctival grafts with adequate success [28, 29]. Traditionally, the fibrin glue has been highlighted for its ability to provide good hemostasis and offer enhanced rate of adhesion with reduced surgical time and as such has been more recently employed as a technique for suture-less intraocular lens implants [21]. This was first described by Agarwal et al. [21] in 2008 and has since undergone modifications to become the technique described in this study. Thus far, the post-operative complications from this technique appear to be equal if not less than their anterior chamber counterparts, especially in those with aphakia [8, 30]. Other suture-related complications such as suture erosion, exposure and disintegration are also avoided using the glued technique which may account for the reduced infection rate as the fixated haptics are well covered by the sclera [30, 31]. Based on these findings in addition to their reduced operative time, the glued IOL may be a preferred technique for combined procedures, especially in the setting of poor zonular support [30].
Little attention has been drawn to concurrent removal of vitreous during scleral-fixated PCIOLs which may further decrease complication rates. Many anterior segment surgeons performing secondary lens surgery are most comfortable performing limbal based anterior vitrectomy, which allows for faster operating time. In contrast, Nabors et al [32] suggested that complete PPV with concurrent insertion of ciliary sulcus PCIOL may decrease retinal complications. Tsunoda and colleagues [33] confirmed in 30 pig eyes that anterior vitrectomy alone was not enough to remove all the vitreous and the capsule remains at the ciliary sulcus. Thus, one could expect increased vitreous capture of the PCIOL haptics causing an increase in post-operative CME and retinal detachment [27, 33]. Complete PPV might reduce vitreous traction resulting in lower incidence of post-operative retinal complications that we observed.
There are a few limitations to this study aside from its retrospective nature and limited number of patients. The mean age of the ACIOL patients in were older than the ISFH group which may account for subtle differences in the post-operative complications likely due to pre-surgical ocular comorbidities and endothelial health; mitigation was attempted with use of mixed models statistical analysis. The tendency to use an ACIOL instead of sutured or fixated PCIOL in older patients reflect the arguable notions that (1) suture materials have a limited life, (2) surgical time for an ACIOL insertion is shorter making ISFH IOL less appealing to perform in those who may not tolerate a longer procedure (e.g. elderly patients and those with multiple co-morbidities), and/or (3) late complications may be seen more frequently in those with ACIOLs [9]. A prospective study comparing ACIOL and ISFH IOLs with similar enrollment for pre-operative characteristics including age would be valuable to determine whether the short and long-term outcomes between these groups are truly different. In addition, our series included patients with significant ocular comorbidities such as uveitis and retinal detachment of which half were macula off. This would have affected the pre- and post-operative visual acuities which could make this study less applicable to more routine secondary lens surgeries. The postoperative astigmatism from larger ACIOL incisions may also play a role in refractive outcomes that was not accounted for due to lack of complete, final refractive data. Moreover, despite long term follow-up, the smaller sample size may account for the lack of statistical significance between the VA outcomes of the two lens group and ultimately limits some of its clinical application.
We recommend that secondary lens choice be guided by surgeon comfort, expertise and patient-specific factors such as baseline anatomy. We suggest the use of an ACIOL where a large incision is already indicated for explantation of a dislocated polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) IOL or dense Soemmerings ring that cannot be removed with the vitrector. More aggressive use of anti-inflammatory drops should be considered in the case of ACIOLs for CME prophylaxis. Despite corneal decompensation being equally likely in our series, many cornea surgeons may prefer posterior chamber IOLs for combined keratoplasty procedures.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Author contributions
Design and conduct of the study (ATJ, TO, PSK, EHS), collection and management of the data (AW, LC, PSK), analysis and interpretation of the data (AW, PSK, LC, RGC, TO, EHS), manuscript preparation (AW, PSK, EHS), review and approval of the manuscript (AW, PSK, LC, RGC, ATJ, TO, HCB, SRR, EHS).
Funding
P30 EY025580. The sponsor or funding organization had no role in the design or conduct of this research.
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
Declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Portions of this study were presented at the Retina Society Annual Meeting in 2021.
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Alexis Warren and Pavlina S. Kemp contributed equally to this work.
References
- 1.Hansen MS, Hardten DR. Financially efficient cataract surgery in today’s healthcare environment. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2015;26:61–5. 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000120. 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Woodcock M, Shah S, Smith RJ. Recent advances in customising cataract surgery. BMJ. 2004;328:92–6. 10.1136/bmj.328.7431.92. 10.1136/bmj.328.7431.92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Holt DG, Young J, Stagg B, Ambati BK. Anterior chamber intraocular lens, sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens, or glued intraocular lens: where do we stand? Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:62–7. 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834cd5e5. 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834cd5e5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Shen JF, Deng S, Hammersmith KM, et al. Intraocular Lens Implantation in the absence of Zonular support: an outcomes and Safety Update: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:1234–58. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.005. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wagoner MD, Cox TA, Ariyasu RG, et al. Intraocular lens implantation in the absence of capsular support: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2003;110:840–59. 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)02000-6. 10.1016/S0161-6420(02)02000-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Brunin G, Sajjad A, Kim EJ, et al. Secondary intraocular lens implantation: complication rates, visual acuity, and refractive outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:369–76. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.024. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2016.12.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Apple DJ, Loftfield K, Googe JM, et al. Complications of intraocular lenses. A historical and histopathological review. Surv Ophthalmol. 1984;29:441–85. 10.1016/0039-6257(84)90113-9. 10.1016/0039-6257(84)90113-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Biro Z. Results and complications of secondary intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993;19:64–7. 10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80284-2. 10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80284-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chan TCY, Lam JKM, Jhanji V, Li EYM. Comparison of outcomes of primary anterior chamber versus secondary scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation in complicated cataract surgeries. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:221–e2262. 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.016. 10.1016/j.ajo.2014.10.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kwong YYY, Yuen HKL, Lam RF, et al. Comparison of outcomes of primary scleral-fixated versus primary Anterior Chamber intraocular Lens implantation in complicated cataract surgeries. Ophthalmology. 2007;114:80–5. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.024. 10.1016/j.ophtha.2005.11.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bellucci R, Pucci V, Morselli S, Bonomi L. Secondary implantation of angle-supported anterior chamber and scleral- fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:247–52. 10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80227-6. 10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80227-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.LYLE W. Secondary intraocular lens implantation anterior chamber vs posterior chamber lenses. Ophthalmic Surg. 1993;24:375–81. 10.3928/1542-8877-19930601-04. 10.3928/1542-8877-19930601-04 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Matsuda M, Miyake K, Inaba M. Long-term corneal endothelial changes after intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1988;105:248–52. 10.1016/0002-9394(88)90004-9. 10.1016/0002-9394(88)90004-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Pechméja J, Guinguet J, Colin J, Binder PS. Severe endothelial cell loss with anterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2012;38:1288–92. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.022. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2012.04.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ravalico G, Botteri E, Baccara F. Long-term endothelial changes after implantation of anterior chamber intraocular lenses in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:1918–23. 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)02052-7. 10.1016/S0886-3350(02)02052-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Glasser DB, Matsuda M, Gager WE, et al. Corneal endothelial morphology after Anterior Chamber Lens Implantation. Arch Opthamology. 1985;103:1347–9. 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050090099041. 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050090099041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Andrew S, McAllister MBBS, Hons LW, Hirst FRANZCOF. Visual outcomes and complications of scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1263–9. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.02.023. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.02.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Donaldson KE, Gorscak JJ, Budenz DL, et al. Anterior chamber and sutured posterior chamber intraocular lenses in eyes with poor capsular support. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:903–9. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.061. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wong HM, Kam KW, Rapuano CJ, Young AL. A systematic review on three major types of scleral-fixated intraocular Lens Implantation. Asia-Pacific J Ophthalmol. 2021;10:388–96. 10.1097/APO.0000000000000369. 10.1097/APO.0000000000000369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Karamaounas N, Kourkoutas D, Prekates C. Surgical technique for small-incision intraocular lens exchange. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1146–9. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.02.036. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.02.036 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Agarwal A, Kumar DA, Jacob S, et al. Fibrin glue-assisted sutureless posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in eyes with deficient posterior capsules. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1433–8. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.04.040. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2008.04.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Melamud A, Topilow JS, Cai L, He X. Pars Plana Vitrectomy combined with either secondary scleral-fixated or Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;168:177–82. 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.05.006. 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.05.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ali Khan M, Omesh †, Gupta P, et al. PARS PLANA VITRECTOMY WITH ANTERIOR CHAMBER VERSUS GORE-TEX SUTURED POSTERIOR CHAMBER INTRAOCULAR LENS PLACEMENT long-term outcomes. RETINA. 2019;39:860–6. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002042. 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Omulecki W, Wrocki JN, Sempinska-Szewczyk J, Synder A. Transscleral suture fixation and anterior chamber intraocular lenses implanted after removal of posteriorly dislocated crystalline lenses. Eur J Ophthalmol. 1997;7:370–4. 10.1177/112067219700700411. 10.1177/112067219700700411 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Finn AP, Feng HL, Kim T, Mahmoud TH. Outcomes of Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation in patients undergoing pars Plana Vitrectomy. Ophthalmol Retina. 2018;2:895–9. 10.1016/j.oret.2018.02.006. 10.1016/j.oret.2018.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Dyson C. Flexible-loop posterior chamber artificial lenses. Can J Ophthalmol. 1982;17:141–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Johnston RL, Charteris DG, Horgan SE, Cooling RJ. (2000) Combined Pars Plana Vitrectomy and Sutured Posterior Chamber Implant. Arch Ophthalmol 118:905–910. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaophthalmology/fullarticle/413357 [PubMed]
- 28.Hovanesian JA, Karageozian VH. Watertight cataract incision closure using fibrin tissue adhesive. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:1461–3. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.060. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2007.03.060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cohen RA, McDonald MB. Fixation of conjunctival autografts with an organic tissue adhesive. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:1167–8. 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090090017006. 10.1001/archopht.1993.01090090017006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mohan S, John B, Rajan M, et al. Glued intraocular lens implantation for eyes with inadequate capsular support: analysis of the postoperative visual outcome. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017;65:472–6. 10.4103/ijo.IJO_375_16. 10.4103/ijo.IJO_375_16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kumar DA, Agarwal A. Glued intraocular lens: a major review on surgical technique and results. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24:21–9. 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835a939f. 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835a939f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Nabors GVMCS. Ciliary sulcus suturing of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. Ophthalmic Surg. 1990;263–5. 10.3928/1542-8877-19900401-08. [PubMed]
- 33.Tsunoda K, Migita M, Nakashizuka T, Kohzuka T. Treatment of anterior vitreous before suturing an intraocular lens to the ciliary sulcus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22:222–6. 10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80223-9. 10.1016/S0886-3350(96)80223-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.