Abstract
Undifferentiated intestinal stem cells (ISCs) are crucial for maintaining homeostasis and resolving injury. Lgr5+ cells in the crypt base constantly divide, pushing daughter cells upward along the crypt axis where they differentiate into specialized cell types. Coordinated execution of complex transcriptional programs is necessary to allow for the maintenance of undifferentiated stem cells while permitting differentiation of the wide array of intestinal cells necessary for homeostasis. Previously, members of the myeloid translocation gene (MTG) family have been identified as transcriptional co-repressors that regulate stem cell maintenance and differentiation programs in multiple organ systems, including the intestine. One MTG family member, myeloid translocation gene related 1 (MTGR1), has been recognized as a crucial regulator of secretory cell differentiation and response to injury. However, whether MTGR1 contributes to the function of ISCs has not yet been examined. Here, using Mtgr1−/− mice, we have assessed the effects of MTGR1 loss specifically in ISC biology. Interestingly, loss of MTGR1 increased the total number of cells expressing Lgr5, the canonical marker of cycling ISCs, suggesting higher overall stem cell numbers. However, expanded transcriptomic and functional analyses revealed deficiencies in Mtgr1-null ISCs, including deregulated ISC-associated transcriptional programs. Ex vivo, intestinal organoids established from Mtgr1-null mice were unable to survive and expand due to aberrant differentiation and loss of stem and proliferative cells. Together, these results indicate that the role of MTGR1 in intestinal differentiation is likely stem cell intrinsic and identify a novel role for MTGR1 in maintaining ISC function.
Subject terms: Epigenetics, Stem-cell research
Introduction
The intestinal epithelium is under constant metabolic, mechanical, and microbial stress and is thus in a continual state of regeneration and renewal. While models for cell function in the gut are evolving, it has been repeatedly demonstrated that intestinal stem cells (ISCs) are key to maintaining intestinal homeostasis and response to injury [1]. Maintenance of intestinal health and regeneration requires the orchestrated execution of stem cell, early progenitor, and differentiation programs, usually via coordinated activation and suppression of transcriptional circuits, to balance stem cell function with downstream lineage allocation [2].
To accommodate the constant cellular turnover of the intestinal epithelium, ISCs rapidly proliferate in the crypt base, pushing their daughter cells out of the crypt and up the intestinal villus while undergoing terminal differentiation into an assortment of secretory and absorptive cell types. These highly proliferative crypt base ISCs, termed crypt base columnar cells (CBCs), are identified by their expression of the leucine-rich repeat containing G-protein coupled receptor 5 (Lgr5) gene [1]. Lgr5 expression is highly regulated, most notably by Wnt and Notch signaling pathways, and is suppressed upon exit of the stem cell niche and activation of cellular differentiation programs [3]. As proliferation continues, daughter cells from CBCs move further up the crypt base into the transit amplifying (TA) compartment. Here, cells proliferate even more rapidly than parental CBCs, yet simultaneously begin lineage commitment and terminal differentiation.
In addition to Lgr5 + CBCs, other populations of ISCs have been identified, many of which are less proliferative than CBCs at homeostasis but are “activated” as part of intestinal regenerative programs. These cell populations, denoted by expression of specific genes such as Bmi1, mTert, Hopx, Lrig1, and Clu, often reside higher in the crypt base than CBCs in the +4/+5 position and may have begun the process of lineage commitment [4, 5]. However, functional compensation by these slowly cycling ISC populations may still require dedifferentiation and interconversion to CBCs, in which ISCs gain expression of Lgr5 and take up residence in the crypt base. Interestingly, the ability to reconstitute the CBC population has even been noted in committed progenitors of the secretory and absorptive lineages [6–9]. Thus, coordinating ISC function and differentiation among differentiated cell types and different ISC populations is a far from linear process, yet remains a crucial component of both intestinal homeostasis and injury responses.
MTGR1 (Cbfa2t2) is a member of the three-protein myeloid translocation gene (MTG) family of transcriptional co-repressors, which were originally identified in translocation fusion proteins driving acute myeloid leukemia [10]. MTGs, also including MTG16 and MTG8, serve as scaffolding proteins that orchestrate the formation of repression complexes containing histone deacetylases, other co-repressor proteins, and DNA binding factors, thereby modifying the chromatin at key loci [11]. In the intestine, MTGs serve important functions, as MTG-deficient mice display a range of unprovoked intestinal phenotypes. For example, loss of MTG8 (Mtg8−/−) resulted in deletion of the midgut, while loss of MTG16 or MTGR1 (Mtg16−/− and Mtgr1−/−) altered intestinal proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and lineage specification [12–15]. Mtgr1−/− mice are also exquisitely sensitive to dextran sodium sulfate (DSS)-induced injury, with marked depletion of viable, regenerative crypts post-injury [16]. Finally, we have previously identified MTGR1 as a key regulator of intestinal differentiation into the secretory cell fate, as Mtgr1−/− mice have greatly reduced numbers of Paneth, goblet, and enteroendocrine cells [14, 17].
Our previous work has uncovered roles for MTGs in modulating Wnt and Notch signaling pathways [17, 18]. Despite contributions to these key ISC-associated signaling pathways, the exact role of MTGR1 in ISC biology remains incompletely understood. Here, we have assessed the impact of Mtgr1 deficiency in the small intestine both in vivo and ex vivo. Together, these studies uncover a crucial role for MTGR1 in maintaining proper ISC function and regulating absorptive differentiation thus expanding our knowledge of the mechanisms regulating intestinal differentiation and regeneration.
Methods and materials
Mouse models
Mtgr1−/− mice were previously established and characterized [14]. Lgr5-EGFP-IRES-creERT2 mice were a generous gift from Dr. Robert Coffey [1]. Male and female age-matched, littermate WT and Mtgr1−/− mice were used for all experiments. Mice were cohoused and maintained on standard chow with 12-hour light/dark cycles. All in vivo procedures were carried out in accordance with protocols approved by the Vanderbilt Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
Enteroid culture
3D small intestinal organoids, or enteroids, were established from duodenal crypts isolated from 8–12-week old WT and Mtgr1−/− mice as previously described ([17, 19], and Supplementary Methods). To determine plating efficiency, the number of viable enteroids was assessed at day 1 post-plating and normalized to the number of crypts plated. Viability was determined by daily enteroid counts per 12-well Matrigel patty and normalized to the number of enteroids established on day 1. ImageJ software (version 1.51) was used to measure enteroid size and count crypt buds. All plating experiments are representative of ≥2 independent experiments, with the total number of wells or enteroids noted in figure legends.
Enteroid hMTGR1 addback
GFP and human MTGR1 were cloned into the pLEX-307 vector (a gift from David Root, Addgene plasmid 41392). pLEX-307-GFP and pLEX-307-MTGR1 were transfected into HEK 293T cells (ATCC CRL-3216) along with psPAX2 and pMD2.g (gifts from Didier Trono, Addgene plasmids 12260 and 12259). After 48 h, supernatants were collected and viral particles were concentrated by overnight centrifugation at 9500 × g at 4 °C. Pelleted lentiviral particles were resuspended in mouse Intesticult media (StemCell Technologies) supplemented with 10 µM Y-27632 (Tocris) and mixed with duodenal crypt isolations from WT or Mtgr1−/− mice. Crypt/virus mixtures were incubated for 2 h at 37 °C prior to washing and plating in Matrigel plugs overlaid with ENR media supplemented with CHIR 99021 (3 µM, Tocris) and Y-27632. After 4 days, CHIR 99021 and Y-27632 were removed. Viability and gene expression were assessed at day 7 post-plating.
Immunohistochemistry
Mice were sacrificed and intestinal tissue was “Swiss-rolled” prior to fixation in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. Intestinal samples were then paraffin-embedded and 5 µm sections were cut by the Vanderbilt Translational Pathology Shared Resource (TPSR). For enteroid staining, cultures were collected and fixed as described previously [20]. Samples were stained as we have done for prior studies [21, 22], with primary antibodies against E-cadherin (BD Biosciences, 1:500), Ki67 (Abcam, 1:1000), phospho-histone H3 (Millipore, 1:400), cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:400), or β-catenin (BD Biosciences, 1:500) and secondary antibodies conjugated to 488 or 594 Alexa Fluor dyes (Invitrogen). Nuclear staining was done with ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI (Invitrogen). Staining was visualized with a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope and Zyla SCMOS camera. Images were processed using Nikon NIS-Elements Basic Research software and quantified by blinded observer.
Tissue processing and brush border analysis was done as described previously [23, 24]. Duodenal segments were excised and fixed for 2 hours in 2% paraformaldehyde, then floated in 30% sucrose at 4o overnight. Samples were then embedded in OCT compound (Tissue-Tek) and snap frozen. 5 µm sections were cut and stained with αVillin (clone 1D2C3, Santa Cruz), phalloidin (A12380; Invitrogen), and DRAQ5 (ThermoFisher). Confocal images were collected using a Nikon W1 spinning disk confocal microscope with a FusionBT SCMOS camera using a 100 × 1.45 N.A. objective lens.
qRT-PCR analysis
Freshly isolated murine small intestinal crypts were collected and homogenized in TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher) using a 21 g needle. RNA was isolated using the Rneasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) with on-column DNAse digestion. cDNA was synthesized using the qScript cDNA synthesis kit (Quantabio). qPCR reactions were run using PerfeCTa SYBR Green SuperMix ROX (Quantabio) and primers designated in Supplementary Table S2. For analysis of human MTGR1, probes for MTGR1 (Hs00602520_m1, Thermo Fisher) and Gapdh (Mm99999915_g1, Thermo Fisher) were used in conjunction with TaqMan Universal Master Mix II (Thermo Fisher). All samples were run in triplicate and target gene expression was analyzed using the delta–delta Ct method normalized to Gapdh.
RNAscope
High-resolution RNA in situ hybridization was performed using the RNAscope® Multiplex Fluorescent V2 assay or RNAscope® 2.5HD Assay – Brown, according to the manufacturer’s instructions (ACDBio). Antigen retrieval was performed under standard pretreatment conditions as specified by the manufacturer. Probes were directed against mouse Cbfa2t2 (#434601), Lgr5 (#312171), or Clu (#427891). Fluorescent assay samples were mounted with ProLong Gold antifade reagent with DAPI and imaged as described above and images quantified by a blinded observer.
Bulk RNA-sequencing
For RNA-sequencing, small intestine crypts were isolated from 3 WT and 3 Mtgr1−/− mice. Following crypt isolation, a portion of the samples were collected and homogenized in TRIzol reagent while the remaining crypts were plated for enteroid culture. After 24 h, half of the plated enteroids were collected for RNA extraction, while the remaining enteroids were cultured for an additional 48 hours and harvested at 72 h post-plating. Additional samples were collected from passaged WT and Mtgr1−/− enteroids, and RNA for all was isolated as described above. For RNA-sequencing studies, mRNA enrichment and cDNA library preparation were performed by the Vanderbilt Technologies for Advanced Genomics (VANTAGE) facility utilizing the Illumina Tru-seq stranded mRNA sample prep kit. Sequencing was performed at Single-Read 50 HT bp on the Illumina HiSeq 2500. Raw reads in FASTQ format were trimmed with fastp (v0.20.0) with default parameters [25]. Quantification was performed using Salmon (v1.3.0) [26] against a decoy transcriptome generated from Mus musculus GENCODE (v21) [27]. Further analysis was performed in R (v3.6.3) as described previously [28]. Briefly, quantification files were imported with tximeta (v1.4.5) [29]. Genes with counts ≤ 1 across all samples were omitted. Differential expression analysis (DEA) was performed on raw transcript counts using DESeq2 (v1.26.0) [30] and annotated with AnnotationDbi (v1.46.1) [31].
Single cell RNA-sequencing data collection
Mouse tissues were used to generate single-cell RNA-seq data, following a methodology similar to previous studies ([32, 33] and Supplementary Methods). Single cell suspensions were generated via crypt isolation and digestion to single cells. The resulting cell suspensions underwent filtration, washing, and quality inspection before being encapsulated for microfluidic capture. The scRNA-seq procedure was carried out according to a modified protocol [34, 35]. Single-cell libraries were prepared for sequencing as detailed in previous documentation [36, 37]. These libraries, each containing an estimated 2000-3000 cell transcriptomes, were then sequenced on the Novaseq6000 platform, generating approximately 125 million reads per library.
Single cell RNA-sequencing data analysis
Data quality was evaluated using ambiQuant [35]; data were then filtered using dropkick [38] and further processed according to an established pipeline ([39] and Supplementary Methods). Briefly, raw scRNA-seq counts were normalized by median library size, log-like transformed with arcsinh, and z-score standardized per gene followed by dimensional reduction and UMAP visualization using Python packages scanpy [40], pandas [41] and numpy [42]. To compare individual gene and gene signature expression between the wild-type and Mtgr1 null groups, the two treatment groups underwent random sub-sampling to keep the same number of total cells in each group. Cell types of interest were extracted, and arcsinh-transformed counts were used for down-stream processes and GSEA using gene sets in the WikiPathways_2019_Mouse library. Relevant code is available at https://github.com/Ken-Lau-Lab/MTGR1_SI_stem_cell_analysis.git.
Electron microscopy
Specimens were processed for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and imaged in the Vanderbilt Cell Imaging Shared Resource: Research Electron Microscopy facility according to their established methods (Supplementary Methods). Following processing and epoxy embedding, 70–80 nm ultra-thin sections were cut, collected on 300-mesh copper grids, and post-stained with 2% uranyl acetate followed by Reynold’s lead citrate. Samples were subsequently imaged on the Philips/FEI Tecnai T12 electron microscope.
Lgr5-EGFP+ cell isolation and sorting
Single cell suspensions were generated from duodenal crypt cells, and flow cytometry for Lgr5-EGFP was performed as previously described ([43] and Supplementary Methods). Notably, 10 μM ROCK inhibitor (Y-27632) (#12-541-0, Fisher Scientific) was added to all buffers and solutions to maximize cell viability. Cell suspensions were stained with 1:100 APC Annexin V (#640919 BioLegend) and 1:4000 propidium iodide (PI) (#281487-000, Invitrogen) prior to FACS analysis in collaboration with the Vanderbilt Flow Cytometry Shared Resource.
Statistics
Unless noted, statistical analysis was performed in Graphpad Prism 8 Software using Student’s t-test (unpaired, two-tailed) or Mann-Whitney Wilcoxon test for single comparisons pending results of data normality. Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison test was used for multiple samples, or two-way ANOVA (repeated measures) and Sidak’s multiple comparison post-test for time course analyses. Samples were excluded if determined to be statistical outliers based on “robust regression and outlier removal” (ROUT) analysis. Center values represent the median for violin plots, but for all studies center values represent experimental mean. Error is represented by standard error of the mean and P < 0.05 is considered significant. Sample sizes are delineated in relevant figure legends and determined by prior experience using these models and generally accepted number of replicates for equivalent types of studies.
Results
MTGR1 is widely expressed in the intestine
Work by our group and others has identified key roles for MTG family members in promoting secretory differentiation. In line with this role, MTG16 is enriched in specific secretory cell populations as well as +4/+5 intestinal cells, often thought to be both reserve stem cells and secretory lineage progenitors [15, 21]. However, the expression pattern of MTGR1 in intestinal cell populations is undefined. To define MTGR1 expression patterns, we first utilized in situ staining to spatially visualize Mtgr1 transcripts in the murine small intestine (Fig. 1A). Here, Mtgr1 expression was dispersed throughout the intestinal crypt-villus axis and did not appear to be specifically localized to distinct cell populations [15]. We next investigated Mtgr1 expression in specific cell types via single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) of the murine ileum and jejunum [32, 44]. These results confirmed widespread Mtgr1 expression in various intestinal cells that was not restricted to specific cellular lineages (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Fig. 1). Similar results were observed in the human small intestine through query of publicly available scRNA-seq data from the Human Protein Atlas (GSE125970), with MTGR1 expression again observed in multiple differentiated and undifferentiated cell types (Fig. 1C) [45, 46]. Thus, Mtgr1 is widely expressed throughout the intestinal epithelium and not restricted to secretory lineage cells and progenitors.
MTGR1 loss expands ISC populations in vivo
Interestingly, higher levels of intestinal epithelial proliferation have been reported in mice globally lacking MTGR1 (Mtgr1−/−), suggesting MTGR1 expression may regulate undifferentiated ISC populations in addition to secretory lineages[14, 18, 47]. First, we again confirmed the expansion of proliferative cells in the crypts of Mtgr1−/− mice, here via quantifying Ki67 expression (Fig. 2A). We next hypothesized that this increase in proliferation may be associated with higher numbers of LGR5+ ISCs, due to their role in maintaining proliferation in the intestine at baseline [14, 18, 47]. Lgr5-expressing cells in the small intestine were identified by in situ hybridization. Here, we determined that Mtgr1−/− mice indeed had higher numbers of Lgr5+ cells per crypt as compared to WT mice (Fig. 2B). Intercross of Mtgr1−/− mice with the Lgr5-Cre-EGFP reporter line, which expresses EGFP from the Lgr5 locus, also showed increased numbers of both high and low-expressing Lgr5-EGFP+ cells in Mtgr1−/− versus WT Lgr5-Cre-EGFP mice (Fig. 2C). Due to the mosaic expression of the Lgr5 reporter, increases in Lgr5+ cells were confirmed by restricting quantification to reporter positive crypts by immunofluorescent staining against GFP (Fig. 2D). Finally, higher levels of Lgr5, Ki67, and Myc transcripts were also observed in Mtgr1−/− crypt isolates by q-RT-PCR (Fig. 2E).
While Lgr5 is often regarded as the canonical identifier of CBCs and a robust ISC marker, we next assayed for expression of other ISC-associated genes. For example, Ascl2 and Olfm4 are highly expressed in CBCs along with Lgr5 [48, 49]. Interestingly, although Lgr5 transcript and Lgr5-EGFP+ cells were consistently increased with MTGR1 loss, neither Ascl2 nor Olfm4 mirrored these changes. Here, we observed that the Ascl2 transcript remained unchanged in Mtgr1−/− crypts, while Olfm4 was nearly undetectable in Mtgr1−/− crypts (Fig. 2E), suggesting broad deregulation of ISC programs in context of MTGR1 loss. Next, to more comprehensively map changes in intestinal cell populations, we performed single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) on WT and Mtgr1−/− duodenal cells. Following UMAP dimension reduction and cell lineage stratification according to our established methods [32, 33, 44], MTGR1 loss was observed to have wide-ranging effects on intestinal cell differentiation (Fig. 2F, G and Supplementary Fig. 2). As observed previously, Mtgr1−/− mice broadly lack secretory Paneth, enteroendocrine, and goblet cells. However, we observed a trend towards increased ISC and TA populations. Together with results from the Lgr5-EGFP reporter mouse, these studies indicate that MTGR1 loss expands total ISC cell numbers in the small intestine.
MTGR1 is required for enteroid viability
As loss of MTGR1 increased Lgr5 + ISCs, and MTGs have been noted to dampen Wnt pathway activity through interaction with TCF4 [18], we next hypothesized that MTGR1 loss would increase ISC number and function. Here, we utilized the small intestinal organoid or “enteroid” system. Since enteroids rely on ISCs for their establishment and growth, enteroid formation efficiency can be used to assess general stem cell function and fitness [3]. Here, enteroids were established from duodenal crypts harvested from WT and Mtgr1−/− mice, and enteroid formation efficiency was assessed after 24 h in culture (Fig. 3A, B). By dividing the number of enteroids formed by the number of crypts plated, we noted an approximately twofold enhancement of enteroid formation in the setting of MTGR1 loss. We also observed higher percentages of Mtgr1−/− enteroids with a cystic, spheroid morphology (Fig. 3C), a phenotype associated with increased Wnt tone [19], compared to WT enteroids.
Despite the initial augmentation of enteroid formation in Mtgr1−/− cultures, we observed striking viability defects in Mtgr1−/− enteroids within 48 h of initial plating. Daily imaging (Fig. 3D) and viable enteroid counts (Fig. 3E) revealed that Mtgr1−/− cultures failed almost completely by day 5 post-plating. While WT enteroids formed crypt buds by day 3, Mtgr1−/− enteroids rarely developed crypt buds, even in the structures that survived until day 5 (Fig. 3F). These findings were also confirmed by live cell imaging, which showed no morphological changes in Mtgr1−/− enteroids throughout the 5-day period, until enteroid death (Supplementary videos SV1 and SV2). Importantly, restoration of MTGR1 expression via lentiviral transduction rescued Mtgr1−/− enteroids and restored branching morphology, confirming the MTGR1 dependency of this phenotype (Fig. 3G, H). Thus, MTGR1 appears to be required for ex vivo enteroid survival and expansion.
Inhibition of cell death pathways does not rescue Mtgr1−/− viability
We next aimed to determine the mechanism driving the viability loss in Mtgr1−/− enteroids. As MTGR1 is a transcriptional co-repressor, we utilized a bulk RNA-sequencing approach to broadly investigate MTGR1-dependent changes in gene expression. Briefly, crypts were isolated from age-matched WT and Mtgr1−/− mice, and mRNA was collected at the time of crypt isolation (day 0) or at day 1 and day 3 post-plating to yield matched crypt, day 1 enteroid, and day 3 enteroid mRNA (Fig. 4A). After RNA-sequencing, differential expression profiles were generated and analyzed using gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) [50, 51].
Due to the rapid loss of established cultures and minor increases in apoptosis previously reported from Mtgr1 null crypts [14], we hypothesized that MTGR1 loss may aberrantly activate programmed cell death pathways to decrease enteroid viability. Indeed, GSEA analysis from the Hallmark gene set collection identified a significant enrichment in apoptosis-associated genes in Mtgr1−/− enteroids at both day 1 and day 3 post-plating (Fig. 4B). Mtgr1−/− enteroids collected at day 1 post-plating also displayed a modest increase in the percentage of apoptotic cells as measured by fluorescent immunohistochemistry (IHC) against cleaved caspase-3 (Fig. 4C). However, inhibiting apoptosis using the cell-permeable pan-caspase inhibitor, Z-VAD-FMK, failed to improve survival of Mtgr1−/− enteroids (Fig. 4D), even at concentrations which improved viability in WT cultures [52]. Likewise, inhibition of necroptosis, which is dysregulated in intestinal inflammatory diseases [53–55], had no effect on Mtgr1−/− enteroid viability (Fig. 4E). Finally, we assessed the impact of p53 inhibition, as p53-related gene sets were also positively enriched in Mtgr1−/− samples by GSEA (Fig. 4F). As with Z-VAD-FMK, inhibition of p53-dependent apoptosis with pifithrin-α had no effect on Mtgr1−/− enteroid survival (Fig. 4G) [56]. Thus, inhibition of these cell death mechanisms is insufficient to rescue Mtgr1−/− enteroid viability, suggesting that altered apoptotic responses are unlikely to be the underlying cause of enteroid failure.
Proliferation and ISC-associated genes are lost in MTGR1-deficient enteroids
Due to constant cell clearance, actively cycling stem cells and high levels of proliferation are necessary to maintain intestinal cell populations [57]. Thus, rather than aberrant apoptosis, we next hypothesized that the viability defect in Mtgr1−/− enteroids may instead be due to reduced proliferation and/or depletion of ISCs. To determine cell proliferation, sections from enteroids embedded at day 1 and day 3 post-plating were assessed by Ki67 IHC (Fig. 5A). Although we observed similar numbers of proliferating cells in day 1 enteroids, by day 3, the enteroid cultures established from Mtgr1−/− mice displayed a drastic, nearly 80% reduction in Ki67+ cells. Cell cycle- and proliferation-associated genes were also highly downregulated in Mtgr1−/− enteroids by day 3 (Fig. 5B), as well as ISC-associated genes and signaling pathways (Fig. 5C), as determined by GSEA. Interestingly, while numbers of Ki67+ cells were similar between WT and Mtgr1−/− enteroids at day 1 post-plating, proliferation-, ISC-, and Wnt-associated genes were still significantly downregulated at this early timepoint (Fig. 5D, E, and Supplementary Table S3). Mtgr1−/− enteroids, at either day 1 or day 3 post-plating, also demonstrated significant upregulation of the cell cycle inhibitors Cdkn1a, Cdkn1c, and Cdkn2b. These results indicate that viability defects in Mtgr1−/− enteroids may arise from proliferation defects and the inability to maintain cycling ISC populations ex vivo.
Terminal differentiation likely drives MTGR1-dependent enteroid loss
After expansion in the TA zone and exit from the intestinal crypt, most ISC-derived cells rapidly undergo differentiation into non-proliferative cell lineages [58]. As cell proliferation and ISC-associated signaling are reduced in Mtgr1−/− enteroids, we next hypothesized that the loss of enteroid viability may be due to terminal differentiation into non-proliferative cells and the inability to sustain further enteroid growth. First, to more clearly assess the overall differentiation status of WT and Mtgr1−/− enteroids, we overlaid our bulk RNA-sequencing results with established gene sets associated with specific intestinal cell types [8]. Here, these data indicate significant enrichment of genes associated with enterocyte populations in day 1 enteroids, and also reflect expected decreases in secretory and ISC-associated genes (Fig. 6A). Likewise, GSEA analysis determined significant enrichment of genes associated with features of absorptive enterocytes, such as the brush border, microvilli, and intestinal absorption at both day 1 (Fig. 6B) and day 3 post-plating (Supplementary Fig. 3). Next, comparison of the cellular structure of day 1 enteroids was investigated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), which further illustrates an expansion of the apical cell surface as well as more pronounced and mature microvilli in Mtgr1−/− enteroids (Fig. 6C). Together with the previous results which show lowered proliferation and Wnt pathway activity, these data indicate rapid differentiation of stem cells into enterocytes in Mtgr1−/− enteroids. Ultimately, this would preclude further ex vivo culture due to lack of ISCs.
We aimed to confirm whether loss of MTGR1 also promotes absorptive differentiation in intestinal crypts, in vivo. As observed in Mtgr1−/− enteroids, transcriptomic analysis again determined enrichment of enterocyte related gene sets in Mtgr1−/− duodenal crypts as compared to WT (Supplementary Fig. 4). To visualize brush border differentiation at the crypt-villus transition, we conducted confocal imaging of Villin and F-actin, core components of the intestinal brush border (Fig. 6D) [59]. Villin typically has an apical cytosolic distribution within crypts, then incorporates into forming microvilli while concentrating in the mature brush border during absorptive differentiation [60–62]. Representative line-scans in the crypts of Mtgr1−/− mice highlight that Villin shifted toward the apical surface with the peak intensity overlapping with the F-actin signal. This difference was not observed in the villi, where F-actin and Villin localization are normal, with peak Villin intensity distal to the peak F-Actin intensity, and lower cytosolic Villin (Fig. 6E). Likewise, greater peak staining intensity was observed for both Villin and F-actin in Mtgr1−/− crypts as compared to WT (Fig. 6F). Taken together, these results indicate that loss of MTGR1 strongly promotes differentiation into absorptive enterocytes and suggests crypt cells from Mtgr1−/− mice are more differentiated than WT crypt cells.
Secretory cells promote the survival of Mtgr1−/− enteroids, but do not fully rescue
We next hypothesized that stabilizing stem cell function and inhibiting this rapid absorptive differentiation would rescue MTGR1-dependent enteroid death. MTGR1 is necessary for the differentiation of multiple secretory lineages (Fig. 2G) [14, 17], and Paneth cells are crucial regulators of ISCs and provide Wnt ligands that maintain ISC stemness and multipotency [63]. Furthermore, crypts from mice lacking Paneth cells cannot form enteroid cultures without Wnt supplementation [63–66]. Therefore, decreased Paneth cells may contribute to the loss of Mtgr1−/− enteroids via decreased ISC support.
While the majority of enteroids from Mtgr1−/− mice died by day 5, a small number of surviving enteroids occasionally could be maintained and passaged. Interestingly, in these cultures, Paneth cells could often be distinguished in the crypt base (Fig. 7A), and secretory cell-associated genes were highly expressed, proportionally, via transcriptomic analysis (Fig. 7B). However, while Paneth cells were associated with these surviving Mtgr1−/− enteroids, passaged Mtgr1−/− enteroids still displayed striking alterations in morphology: an inability to form enteroid buds (Fig. 7C), little expansion in size over time (Fig. 7D), low proliferation as measured by immunofluorescent IHC against the proliferative marker phospho-histone H3 (pH3, Fig. 7E), and lower levels of ISC-associated signaling (Fig. 7F). Thus, while these Paneth-containing enteroids can survive, they still display growth, morphology, and ISC defects.
We next employed various combinations of small molecules in an attempt to more widely promote secretory cell differentiation and survival of Mtgr1−/− ISCs. First, we utilized DAPT, a γ-secretase inhibitor that increased secretory cell numbers ex vivo at the expense of absorptive lineages [17]. However, γ-secretase inhibitor treatment failed to rescue Mtgr1−/− enteroid growth ex vivo (Fig. 7G), even when treatment was begun in vivo prior to and continuing through enteroid establishment (data not shown). Next, we combined DAPT with the Wnt pathway agonist, CHIR 99021, as this combination should greatly promote Paneth cell differentiation [67]. These studies revealed only a modest increase in enteroid survival (Fig. 7H). Paneth cell-deficient enteroids can be rescued by co-culture with intestinal stroma or WT enteroids; however, these co-culture strategies likewise failed to rescue Mtgr1−/− enteroid survival (Supplementary Fig. 5) [64–66]. Taken together, these results suggest that the function of secretory lineage cells, alone, cannot rescue Mtgr1 deficient enteroid survival.
Defective Mtgr1−/− ISCs require hyper Wnt stimulation
As growth and differentiation defects could not be rescued by any mechanism tested thus far, we next hypothesized that MTGR1-dependent changes in ISCs may ultimately be responsible for the failure of Mtgr1−/− enteroids to expand ex vivo, despite the increase in Lgr5+ cells and initial greater enteroid establishment. Therefore, we specifically investigated transcriptomic changes in ISC cells as identified by scRNA-sequencing. Surprisingly, Lgr5 was noted to be reduced on a per cell basis, as were Hopx and Olfm4 (Fig. 8A and Supplementary Fig. 6). GSEA revealed enrichment of genes involved in Wnt signaling in WT crypts (Fig. 8B and Supplementary Fig. 7). Mtgr1−/− ISCs, on the other hand, were highly enriched in transcripts associated with oxidative phosphorylation, a shift to which is associated with ISC differentiation and absorptive intestinal cells [68, 69] (Fig. 8C and Supplementary Fig. 7). Thus, it seems likely that Mtgr1−/− ISCs are inherently functionally deficient and increased total numbers Lgr5+ cells are necessary to maintain intestinal homeostasis.
Finally, we investigated whether Wnt pathway activation alone was sufficient to maintain Mtgr1−/− ISCs. CHIR 99021 treatment at a concentration sufficient to promote WT ISCs and compensate for Paneth cell loss (3 µM) only had a modest effect on Mtgr1−/− enteroid survival (Fig. 8D) [70]. However, enteroid failure could finally be overcome by increasing the concentration of CHIR 99021 to 10 µM, which sustained long-term survival and growth of Mtgr1−/− ISCs ex vivo (Fig. 8D). Altogether, these results indicate that while MTGR1 loss expands Lgr5 + ISC populations, Lgr5 transcripts are reduced on a per cell basis, and that MTGR1 is necessary for maintaining ISC function in the small intestine.
Discussion
In this study, we establish that MTGR1 promotes absorptive differentiation and is required for the proper function of ISCs. While MTGR1 loss led to increased proliferation and Lgr5+ stem cell numbers, our data indicate that individual Mtgr1−/− ISCs, themselves, had reduced levels of ISC-associated gene pathways and were unable to sustain ex vivo culture. Indeed, survival of Mtgr1−/− enteroids was only possible through inducing high Wnt pathway activity, indicating that strong stem cell-promoting signals are necessary to correct cell-intrinsic defects of Mtgr1 deficiency.
MTGR1 belongs to the Myeloid Translocation Gene family, which have been widely implicated in stem cell maintenance and lineage commitment in the hematopoietic system and beyond [12, 15, 71]. In the homeostatic intestine, Mtg16−/− and Mtgr1−/− mice both display increased proliferation and altered secretory lineage allocation [14, 15, 17, 21, 47, 71]. However, while the MTG family members share significant sequence homology and generally similar phenotypes, our data highlights their diverse effects in the gut, particularly in specific cell types. For example, while loss of MTGR1 depleted nearly all intestinal secretory cells, loss of MTG16 appeared to regulate more subtle cell fate decisions between goblet cells and EECs in the colon [21]. Meanwhile, it has recently been reported that MTG16 and MTG8 are both enriched in +4/+5 cells, where they repress ISC-specific genes to control exit from the stem cell niche [15]. On the other hand, enrichment of MTGR1 was not observed in fully undifferentiated ISC populations. Indeed, unlike the results described herein from Mtgr1−/− crypts, neither loss of Mtg8 nor Mtg16 was incompatible with enteroid culture and ISC maintenance ex vivo [15, 71, 72]. Nor could MTG8 or MTG16 functionally compensate for MTGR1 loss, despite the ability of these proteins to form functional heterotetromers [73, 74]. Thus, our data suggests Mtgr1 is uniquely required among its family members to maintain small intestinal ISC function.
Previous studies have also suggested a role for MTGR1 in ISC biology. Studies to date have implicated MTGR1 in two transcriptional networks known as key regulators of ISC identity and function: Wnt and Notch [3]. Indeed, our previous research has determined that MTGR1 can compete with β-catenin for TCF4 occupancy and, in doing so, suppresses Wnt transcriptional targets in cell lines [18]. MTGR1 can also suppress Notch targets via interactions with CSL, a key Notch effector [17]. Yet despite the ability of MTGR1 to repress ISC-related signaling pathways, which one may expect to augment ISC fitness upon MTGR1 loss, we instead noted that MTGR1 deficiency clearly abrogated ISC function. Thus, further investigation of the function of MTGR1 in ISC-related signaling cascades and identification of bona-fide MTGR1 genomic targets, using methodology such as CUT&RUN and ATAC-seq, will be critical in furthering our understanding of how MTGR1 contributes to crypt and intestinal biology.
Taken together, our data indicates that the failure of Mtgr1−/− enteroids is a stem-cell intrinsic defect based on decreased ISC-gene expression signatures and a potential shift in cellular respiration to differentiation-associated oxidative phosphorylation. This is further supported by the lack of rescue by Paneth cells alone, instead requiring hyper-activation of ISC-associated signaling to mediate enteroid rescue [68, 69]. However, despite the striking loss of Mtgr1 null enteroids ex vivo, Mtgr1−/− ISCs survive in vivo and their intestinal crypts even displayed higher levels of proliferation than WT crypts [14, 17]. It is worth noting that, despite the ISC-intrinsic changes outlined here, this difference in survival may also be due to compensatory signals in the intestinal microenvironment that are lost upon ex vivo culture. As a Wnt producing population, we hypothesized that intestinal stromal cells may be providing these signals [75]; however, co-culture with cultured stroma did not rescue Mtgr1−/− enteroids, and secretions from Mtgr1 null fibroblasts stimulate even less Wnt activity than those from WT mice. Further studies are necessary to delineate MTGR1-driven changes to the intestinal microenvironment and how these changes impact ISC biology, particularly as MTGR1 is expressed in multiple intestinal cell types.
It is also notable that the failure and decreased fitness of Mtgr1−/− enteroid cultures may be representative of defective ISC responses in the setting of intestinal injury. In vivo, Mtgr1−/− mice are more sensitive to DSS-induced colitis, which demonstrated reduced epithelial proliferation and failed regeneration [16]. MTGR1 likewise appears to be required for the survival of azoxymethane (AOM)-mutated cells in the setting of AOM/DSS-induced inflammatory tumorigenesis; however, clearance of initiated cells was not observed when tumors were initiated via strong Wnt pathway activation (i.e., Apc1638) [76, 77]. Furthermore, perhaps due to chronically deficient Lgr5 + ISCs, Mtgr1 null epithelia epithelium appeared to display baseline activation of injury responses. While many CBC and “reserve” ISC markers were decreased or unchanged in Mtgr1−/− ISCs, expression of Clusterin was greatly increased in Mgr1−/− ISCs, crypts, and enteroids (Supplementary Fig. 8). This facultative “revival stem cell” is induced by a variety of intestinal injuries, including loss of Lgr5+ cells [5]. Taken together, it is tempting to speculate that lower overall ISC function induces mild, chronic intestinal injury, and further intestinal injury or ISC perturbation likely overwhelms Mtgr1 null stem cell faculty.
In conclusion, our studies more fully elucidate the functional contributions of MTGR1 to small intestinal homeostasis and have identified a novel role for MTGR1 in maintaining Lgr5 + ISC function. While loss of MTGR1 increased Lgr5 expression and total LGR5+ cell numbers, Mtgr1−/− ISCs displayed widespread dysregulation of ISC programs and were functionally deficient as compared to WT ISCs, leading to failure of enteroid cultures. Instead, Mtgr1−/− ISCs lost their proliferative capacity and underwent rapid aberrant differentiation into absorptive enterocytes. Together, these findings indicate that MTGR1 is required for stem cell function in the intestinal epithelium.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank past and present members of the Williams and Hiebert Labs for their critical insights into this manuscript. We would also like to thank the VUMC Translational Pathology Shared Resource (supported by NCI/NIH Cancer Center Support Grant P30CA068485), the Vanderbilt Technologies for Advanced Genomics (VANTAGE), and Vanderbilt Cell Imaging Shared Resource (supported by NIH grants CA68485, DK20593, DK58404, DK59637 and EY08126) for assistance with experiments and analysis.
Author contributions
SPS designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. REB, JW, KMB, JMP, BP, JJ, BAM, LMM, ACB, and YAC performed experiments and analysis. LC, AJS, YX, YY, and KSL generated and analyzed scRNA-Seq data. JAG, SWH, and CSW provided intellectual contributions to the experimental design and analysis. All authors edited and approved the manuscript.
Funding
Financial support includes National Institutes of Health (R01DK099204 to CSW, R01CA255446 to SWH, K01DK123495 to SPS, F30DK120149 to REB, F31CA232272 to JMP, F30DK096718 to BP, U54CA274367 and R01DK103831 to KSL); Office of Medical Research, Department of Veterans Affairs (1I01BX001426 to CSW and 5IK2BX004885 to LMM); Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation (623541 to CSW and 662877 to SPS); the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (Academy Ter Meulen Grant to JJ); Department of Veterans Affairs (Career Development Award-2 IK2BX004648 to YAC); and the Cultuurfonds (Cultural Foundation Grant to JJ).
Data availability
Raw and processed data for sequencing studies are available from NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession numbers GSE270545 (scRNA-seq) and GSE270546 (bulk RNA-seq). All other data is available from the authors upon request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval
All in vivo procedures were carried out in accordance with protocols approved by the Vanderbilt Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee as described in “Methods”.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41418-024-01346-x.
References
- 1.Barker N, van Es JH, Kuipers J, Kujala P, van den Born M, Cozijnsen M, et al. Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature. 2007;449:1003–7. 10.1038/nature06196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bankaitis ED, Ha A, Kuo CJ, Magness ST. Reserve stem cells in intestinal homeostasis and injury. Gastroenterology. 2018;155:1348–61. 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.08.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Beumer J, Clevers H. Regulation and plasticity of intestinal stem cells during homeostasis and regeneration. Development. 2016;143:3639–49. 10.1242/dev.133132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vega PN, Lau KS, Goldenring JR. Not all insults are created equal for awakening dormant stem cell abilities. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;7:619–21. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2018.12.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Ayyaz A, Kumar S, Sangiorgi B, Ghoshal B, Gosio J, Ouladan S, et al. Single-cell transcriptomes of the regenerating intestine reveal a revival stem cell. Nature. 2019;569:121–5. 10.1038/s41586-019-1154-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Davidson LA, Goldsby JS, Callaway ES, Shah MS, Barker N, Chapkin RS. Alteration of colonic stem cell gene signatures during the regenerative response to injury. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1822:1600–7. 10.1016/j.bbadis.2012.06.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yan KS, Chia LA, Li X, Ootani A, Su J, Lee JY, et al. The intestinal stem cell markers Bmi1 and Lgr5 identify two functionally distinct populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:466–71. 10.1073/pnas.1118857109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yan KS, Gevaert O, Zheng GXY, Anchang B, Probert CS, Larkin KA, et al. Intestinal enteroendocrine lineage cells possess homeostatic and injury-inducible stem cell activity. Cell Stem Cell. 2017;21:78–90.e6. 10.1016/j.stem.2017.06.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Tetteh PW, Basak O, Farin HF, Wiebrands K, Kretzschmar K, Begthel H, et al. Replacement of lost Lgr5-positive stem cells through plasticity of their enterocyte-lineage daughters. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18:203–13. 10.1016/j.stem.2016.01.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Calabi F, Cilli V. CBFA2T1, a gene rearranged in human leukemia, is a member of a multigene family. Genomics. 1998;52:332–41. 10.1006/geno.1998.5429 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Rossetti S, Hoogeveen AT, Sacchi N. The MTG proteins: chromatin repression players with a passion for networking. Genomics. 2004;84:1–9. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2004.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Calabi F, Pannell R, Pavloska G. Gene targeting reveals a crucial role for MTG8 in the gut. Mol Cell Biol. 2001;21:5658–66. 10.1128/MCB.21.16.5658-5666.2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McDonough EM, Barrett CW, Parang B, Mittal MK, Smith JJ, Bradley AM, et al. MTG16 is a tumor suppressor in colitis-associated carcinoma. JCI Insight. 2017;2:e78210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 14.Amann JM, Chyla BJ, Ellis TC, Martinez A, Moore AC, Franklin JL, et al. Mtgr1 is a transcriptional corepressor that is required for maintenance of the secretory cell lineage in the small intestine. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:9576–85. 10.1128/MCB.25.21.9576-9585.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Baulies A, Angelis N, Foglizzo V, Danielsen ET, Patel H, Novellasdemunt L, et al. The transcription co-repressors MTG8 and MTG16 regulate exit of intestinal stem cells from their niche and differentiation into enterocyte vs secretory lineages. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:1328–41.e3. 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Martinez JA, Williams CS, Amann JM, Ellis TC, Moreno-Miralles I, Washington MK, et al. Deletion of Mtgr1 sensitizes the colonic epithelium to dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis. Gastroenterology. 2006;131:579–88. 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Parang B, Rosenblatt D, Williams AD, Washington MK, Revetta F, Short SP, et al. The transcriptional corepressor MTGR1 regulates intestinal secretory lineage allocation. FASEB J. 2015;29:786–95. 10.1096/fj.14-254284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Moore AC, Amann JM, Williams CS, Tahinci E, Farmer TE, Martinez JA, et al. Myeloid translocation gene family members associate with T-cell factors (TCFs) and influence TCF-dependent transcription. Mol Cell Biol. 2008;28:977–87. 10.1128/MCB.01242-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Reddy VK, Short SP, Barrett CW, Mittal MK, Keating CE, Thompson JJ, et al. BVES regulates intestinal stem cell programs and intestinal crypt viability after radiation. Stem Cells. 2016;34:1626–36. 10.1002/stem.2307 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Thompson JJ, Short SP, Parang B, Brown RE, Li C, Ng VH, et al. Blood vessel epicardial substance (BVES) reduces LRP6 receptor and cytoplasmic -catenin levels to modulate Wnt signaling and intestinal homeostasis. Carcinogenesis. 2019;40:1086–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 21.Brown RE, Jacobse J, Anant SA, Blunt KM, Chen B, Vega PN, et al. MTG16 regulates colonic epithelial differentiation, colitis, and tumorigenesis by repressing E protein transcription factors. JCI Insight. 2022;7:e153045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 22.Thompson JJ, Short SP, Parang B, Brown RE, Li C, Ng VH, et al. Blood vessel epicardial substance reduces LRP6 receptor and cytoplasmic beta-catenin levels to modulate Wnt signaling and intestinal homeostasis. Carcinogenesis. 2019;40:1086–98. 10.1093/carcin/bgz007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chinowsky CR, Pinette JA, Meenderink LM, Lau KS, Tyska MJ. Nonmuscle myosin-2 contractility-dependent actin turnover limits the length of epithelial microvilli. Mol Biol Cell. 2020;31:2803–15. 10.1091/mbc.E20-09-0582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Postema MM, Grega-Larson NE, Meenderink LM, Tyska MJ. PACSIN2-dependent apical endocytosis regulates the morphology of epithelial microvilli. Mol Biol Cell. 2019;30:2515–26. 10.1091/mbc.E19-06-0352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chen S, Zhou Y, Chen Y, Gu J. fastp: an ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–90. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat Methods. 2017;14:417–9. 10.1038/nmeth.4197 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Frankish A, Diekhans M, Ferreira AM, Johnson R, Jungreis I, Loveland J, et al. GENCODE reference annotation for the human and mouse genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:D766–73. 10.1093/nar/gky955 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Love MI, Anders S, Kim V, Huber W. RNA-Seq workflow: gene-level exploratory analysis and differential expression. F1000Res. 2015;4:1070. 10.12688/f1000research.7035.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Love MI, Soneson C, Hickey PF, Johnson LK, Pierce NT, Shepherd L, et al. Tximeta: reference sequence checksums for provenance identification in RNA-seq. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020;16:e1007664. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007664 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pagès H, Carlson, M, Falcon S, Li N. AnnotationDbi: manipulation of SQLite-based annotations in Bioconductor. R package version 1.54.1. 2021.
- 32.Banerjee A, Herring CA, Chen B, Kim H, Simmons AJ, Southard-Smith AN, et al. Succinate produced by intestinal microbes promotes specification of tuft cells to suppress ileal inflammation. Gastroenterology. 2020;159:2101–15.e5. 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.08.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Simmons AJ, Lau KS. Dissociation and inDrops microfluidic encapsulation of human gut tissues for single-cell atlasing studies. STAR Protoc. 2022;3:101570. 10.1016/j.xpro.2022.101570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Klein AM, Mazutis L, Akartuna I, Tallapragada N, Veres A, Li V, et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2015;161:1187–201. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arceneaux D, Chen Z, Simmons AJ, Heiser CN, Southard-Smith AN, Brenan MJ, et al. A contamination focused approach for optimizing the single-cell RNA-seq experiment. iScience. 2023;26:107242. 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107242 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Southard-Smith AN, Simmons AJ, Chen B, Jones AL, Ramirez Solano MA, Vega PN, et al. Dual indexed library design enables compatibility of in-Drop single-cell RNA-sequencing with exAMP chemistry sequencing platforms. BMC Genomics. 2020;21:456. 10.1186/s12864-020-06843-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vega PN, Nilsson A, Kumar MP, Niitsu H, Simmons AJ, Ro J, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts and squamous epithelial cells constitute a unique microenvironment in a mouse model of inflammation-induced colon cancer. Front Oncol. 2022;12:878920. 10.3389/fonc.2022.878920 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Heiser CN, Wang VM, Chen B, Hughey JJ, Lau KS. Automated quality control and cell identification of droplet-based single-cell data using dropkick. Genome Res. 2021;31:1742–52. 10.1101/gr.271908.120 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Chen B, Ramirez-Solano MA, Heiser CN, Liu Q, Lau KS. Processing single-cell RNA-seq data for dimension reduction-based analyses using open-source tools. STAR Protoc. 2021;2:100450. 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 2018;19:15. 10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McKinney W. Data structures for statistical computing in Python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. Austin Texas: SciPy; 2010. p. 56–61.
- 42.Harris, Millman CR, van der Walt KJ, Gommers R SJ, Virtanen P, Cournapeau D, et al. Array programming with NumPy. Nature. 2020;585:357–62. 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Gracz AD, Puthoff BJ, Magness ST. Identification, isolation, and culture of intestinal epithelial stem cells from murine intestine. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;879:89–107. 10.1007/978-1-61779-815-3_6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Herring CA, Banerjee A, McKinley ET, Simmons AJ, Ping J, Roland JT, et al. Unsupervised trajectory analysis of single-cell RNA-Seq and imaging data reveals alternative tuft cell origins in the gut. Cell Syst. 2018;6:37–51.e9. 10.1016/j.cels.2017.10.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Karlsson M, Zhang C, Mear L, Zhong W, Digre A, Katona B, et al. A single-cell type transcriptomics map of human tissues. Sci Adv. 2021;7:eabh2169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 46.Wang Y, Song W, Wang J, Wang T, Xiong X, Qi Z, et al. Single-cell transcriptome analysis reveals differential nutrient absorption functions in human intestine. J Exp Med. 2020;217:e20191130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Farmer TE, Williams CS, Washington MK, Hiebert SW. Inactivation of the p19(ARF) tumor suppressor affects intestinal epithelial cell proliferation and integrity. J Cell Biochem. 2008;104:2228–40. 10.1002/jcb.21779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Yan KS, Kuo CJ. Ascl2 reinforces intestinal stem cell identity. Cell Stem Cell. 2015;16:105–6. 10.1016/j.stem.2015.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.van der Flier LG, Haegebarth A, Stange DE, van de Wetering M, Clevers H. OLFM4 is a robust marker for stem cells in human intestine and marks a subset of colorectal cancer cells. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:15–7. 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.05.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:15545–50. 10.1073/pnas.0506580102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, et al. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003;34:267–73. 10.1038/ng1180 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Slee EA, Zhu H, Chow SC, MacFarlane M, Nicholson DW, Cohen GM. Benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp (OMe) fluoromethylketone (Z-VAD.FMK) inhibits apoptosis by blocking the processing of CPP32. Biochem J. 1996;315:21–4. 10.1042/bj3150021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gunther C, Martini E, Wittkopf N, Amann K, Weigmann B, Neumann H, et al. Caspase-8 regulates TNF-alpha-induced epithelial necroptosis and terminal ileitis. Nature. 2011;477:335–9. 10.1038/nature10400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Welz PS, Wullaert A, Vlantis K, Kondylis V, Fernandez-Majada V, Ermolaeva M, et al. FADD prevents RIP3-mediated epithelial cell necrosis and chronic intestinal inflammation. Nature. 2011;477:330–4. 10.1038/nature10273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Werts AD, Fulton WB, Ladd MR, Saad-Eldin A, Chen YX, Kovler ML, et al. A novel role for necroptosis in the pathogenesis of necrotizing enterocolitis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;9:403–23. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2019.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Komarov PG, Komarova EA, Kondratov RV, Christov-Tselkov K, Coon JS, Chernov MV, et al. A chemical inhibitor of p53 that protects mice from the side effects of cancer therapy. Science. 1999;285:1733–7. 10.1126/science.285.5434.1733 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Barker N. Adult intestinal stem cells: critical drivers of epithelial homeostasis and regeneration. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2014;15:19–33. 10.1038/nrm3721 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Creamer B, Shorter RG, Bamforth J. The turnover and shedding of epithelial cells. I. The turnover in the gastro-intestinal tract. Gut. 1961;2:110–8. 10.1136/gut.2.2.110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Khurana S, George SP. Regulation of cell structure and function by actin-binding proteins: villin’s perspective. FEBS Lett. 2008;582:2128–39. 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.02.040 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Bretscher A, Weber K. Villin: the major microfilament-associated protein of the intestinal microvillus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1979;76:2321–5. 10.1073/pnas.76.5.2321 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Dudouet B, Robine S, Huet C, Sahuquillo-Merino C, Blair L, Coudrier E, et al. Changes in villin synthesis and subcellular distribution during intestinal differentiation of HT29-18 clones. J Cell Biol. 1987;105:359–69. 10.1083/jcb.105.1.359 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Maunoury R, Robine S, Pringault E, Leonard N, Gaillard JA, Louvard D. Developmental regulation of villin gene expression in the epithelial cell lineages of mouse digestive and urogenital tracts. Development. 1992;115:717–28. 10.1242/dev.115.3.717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Cray P, Sheahan BJ, Dekaney CM. Secretory sorcery: paneth cell control of intestinal repair and homeostasis. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;12:1239–50. 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2021.06.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Sato, van Es T, Snippert JH, Stange DE HJ, Vries RG, van den Born M, et al. Paneth cells constitute the niche for Lgr5 stem cells in intestinal crypts. Nature. 2011;469:415–8. 10.1038/nature09637 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Farin HF, Van Es JH, Clevers H. Redundant sources of Wnt regulate intestinal stem cells and promote formation of Paneth cells. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:1518–29.e7. 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.08.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Durand A, Donahue B, Peignon G, Letourneur F, Cagnard N, Slomianny C, et al. Functional intestinal stem cells after Paneth cell ablation induced by the loss of transcription factor Math1 (Atoh1). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:8965–70. 10.1073/pnas.1201652109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Boonekamp KE, Dayton TL, Clevers H. Intestinal organoids as tools for enriching and studying specific and rare cell types: advances and future directions. J Mol Cell Biol. 2020;12:562–8. 10.1093/jmcb/mjaa034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Rath E, Moschetta A, Haller D. Mitochondrial function - gatekeeper of intestinal epithelial cell homeostasis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15:497–516. 10.1038/s41575-018-0021-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Stringari C, Edwards RA, Pate KT, Waterman ML, Donovan PJ, Gratton E. Metabolic trajectory of cellular differentiation in small intestine by Phasor Fluorescence Lifetime Microscopy of NADH. Sci Rep. 2012;2:568. 10.1038/srep00568 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Yin X, Farin HF, van Es JH, Clevers H, Langer R, Karp JM. Niche-independent high-purity cultures of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and their progeny. Nat Methods. 2014;11:106–12. 10.1038/nmeth.2737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Poindexter SV, Reddy VK, Mittal MK, Williams AM, Washington MK, Harris E, et al. Transcriptional corepressor MTG16 regulates small intestinal crypt proliferation and crypt regeneration after radiation-induced injury. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2015;308:G562–71. 10.1152/ajpgi.00253.2014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Short SP, Barrett CW, Stengel KR, Revetta FL, Choksi YA, Coburn LA, et al. Kaiso is required for MTG16-dependent effects on colitis-associated carcinoma. Oncogene. 2019;38:5091–106. 10.1038/s41388-019-0777-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Liu Y, Cheney MD, Gaudet JJ, Chruszcz M, Lukasik SM, Sugiyama D, et al. The tetramer structure of the Nervy homology two domain, NHR2, is critical for AML1/ETO’s activity. Cancer Cell. 2006;9:249–60. 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Kitabayashi I, Ida K, Morohoshi F, Yokoyama A, Mitsuhashi N, Shimizu K, et al. The AML1-MTG8 leukemic fusion protein forms a complex with a novel member of the MTG8(ETO/CDR) family, MTGR1. Mol Cell Biol. 1998;18:846–58. 10.1128/MCB.18.2.846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Valenta T, Degirmenci B, Moor AE, Herr P, Zimmerli D, Moor MB, et al. Wnt ligands secreted by subepithelial mesenchymal cells are essential for the survival of intestinal stem cells and gut homeostasis. Cell Rep. 2016;15:911–8. 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.03.088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Parang B, Bradley AM, Mittal MK, Short SP, Thompson JJ, Barrett CW, et al. Myeloid translocation genes differentially regulate colorectal cancer programs. Oncogene. 2016;35:6341–9. 10.1038/onc.2016.167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Barrett CW, Fingleton B, Williams A, Ning W, Fischer MA, Washington MK, et al. MTGR1 is required for tumorigenesis in the murine AOM/DSS colitis-associated carcinoma model. Cancer Res. 2011;71:1302–12. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Raw and processed data for sequencing studies are available from NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus and are accessible through GEO Series accession numbers GSE270545 (scRNA-seq) and GSE270546 (bulk RNA-seq). All other data is available from the authors upon request.