Skip to main content
F1000Research logoLink to F1000Research
. 2023 Oct 24;12:1403. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.141849.1

Comparative analysis of psychological well-being and emotional education in graduate students

Jenniffer Sobeida Moreira-Choez 1,a, Tibisay Milene Lamus de Rodríguez 1, Eduardo Javier Espinoza-Solís 1, Graciela Josefina Castro-Castillo 1
PMCID: PMC11380077  PMID: 39246583

Abstract

Background: The growing importance of emotional intelligence in academic and professional contexts has generated a need to explore its linkage with psychological well-being. Furthermore, understanding how various demographic and academic factors can influence students' emotional perception and management is crucial for optimizing educational and intervention strategies. In this context, the primary purpose of this study was to analyze the existing relationship between emotional education and psychological well-being in graduate students.

Methods: The objective was to conduct a comparative analysis of perceived emotional intelligence (PEI) in different study programs offered at a specific university. The methodology, framed within a positivist paradigm, was based on a quantitative approach and examines the responses of 1,522 university students using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS-24).

Results: This tool, which is divided into three dimensions (emotional attention, emotional clarity, and emotional repair), was analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and ANOVA tests to determine demographic and academic influences on the scores. The findings indicate deficiencies in the areas of Emotional Attention and Emotional Repair, contrasting with a marked prevalence in Emotional Clarity. Variables such as sex, age, and field of study demonstrated an influence on the dimensions of PEI. Notably, significant differences in emotional perception were found between sex and academic fields.

Conclusions: Specifically, training directed towards empathy proved to be a prominent factor in the perception of emotional competencies. This study highlights the influence of demographic and academic variables on emotional competencies, underscoring the need to adapt strategies in education and therapy.

Keywords: Emotional intelligence, psychological well-being, emotional education, educational strategies, graduate students

Introduction

In recent years, emotional education has garnered considerable attention across various societal sectors. Zhang and Adegbola (2022) define emotional education as the capability to identify, comprehend, and manage one’s and others’ emotions, a fundamental skill for the holistic development of individuals. It fosters healthy interpersonal relationships and effective handling of intricate emotional situations.

Despite the escalating focus on emotional education, noteworthy gaps exist in contemporary research, particularly regarding its implication for graduate students. Recognizing its pivotal role in their academic journey, there is an imperative need for an enriched understanding of its influence on their psychological well-being and academic outcomes. For graduate students, the stakes are higher, given the demanding and intricate nature of their academic pursuits. Drigas and Papoutsi (2018) postulated that emotional education is crucial for cultivating essential social, cognitive, and emotional competencies, thereby becoming an integral component for the holistic development and thorough preparation of graduate students.

Existing research has yet to fully explore the interplay between emotional education and the psychological well-being of graduate students. A knowledge void persists regarding the impact of emotional education on managing stress, anxiety, and the unique emotional challenges encountered by this demographic. A nuanced exploration of how training in emotional education fosters the development of pertinent emotional and social skills, crucial for their academic and professional trajectories, is warranted.

Furthermore, emotional education is instrumental in enhancing the emotional well-being and mental health of graduate students. Housman (2017) contends that it is integral for honing emotional self-regulation skills, thereby positively influencing emotional well-being and mental health. In a strenuous academic milieu, proficiency in emotional education can equip graduate students with the tools to adeptly navigate negative emotions and cultivate resilience.

Addressing the research deficit in this domain underscores the necessity of a study exploring the correlation between emotional education and psychological well-being among graduate students. This exploration is pivotal for identifying and addressing the lacunae in the emotional education provided and for discerning avenues for enhancement in the graduate programs at Milagro State University. The study aims to pinpoint specific facets of emotional well-being and education requiring refinement to elevate the educational quality at this institution.

The impetus for this study stems from the imperative to bridge the research gaps concerning emotional education in graduate students. By delving deeper into the nexus between emotional education and psychological well-being, the study aims to forge robust strategies and programs to bolster student well-being and academic accomplishments.

Moreover, the study holds particular relevance for Milagro State University, aiming to spotlight areas warranting refinement in terms of emotional education within graduate programs. The insights gleaned will be instrumental in shaping the development and rollout of tailored workshops, courses, and initiatives addressing the emotional requisites of graduate students.

It is anticipated that the study will amplify awareness about the significance of emotional education in the higher education landscape. By underscoring the importance of emotional education for both personal well-being and academic and professional success, the study aspires to advocate for its incorporation into curricula and the professional development of educators and practitioners interacting with graduate students.

In today's scenario, the recognition of the importance of imparting emotional education to graduate students by Milagro State University is paramount. Accordingly, this research endeavors to scrutinize the relationship between emotional education and psychological well-being among graduate students, conducting a comparative analysis across diverse programs offered by the university. The ultimate objective is to identify the elements of emotional well-being and education that warrant enhancement, thereby optimizing the educational quality provided by the institution.

Additionally, given the diversity in participants, potential differences in outcomes related to sex may emerge in the study. Sex-specific distinctions in emotional education and psychological well-being could offer valuable insights, adding a nuanced layer to the research findings and contributing to the customization of interventions. By considering sex as a variable, the study aims to enrich the understanding of the interaction between emotional education and psychological well-being in the context of graduate students, thus enabling a more comprehensive and tailored approach to improving emotional education.

Methods

The research presented in this document adheres to the positivist paradigm, which aims to uncover the true nature of reality through a quantitative approach ( Sparkes, 1992). This approach is grounded in a deductive and logical framework that allows for numerical measurement of variables and the utilization of descriptive statistics to address the research hypotheses. The unit of analysis comprises 1,522 randomly selected students, who are enrolled in various master's programs at Milagro State University.

To maintain an inclusive and comprehensive approach, the sex of the participants was defined based on self-identification. Participants were given the opportunity to identify themselves as male, female, or other, thereby recognizing the diversity and spectrum of sex identities. This approach is aligned with contemporary scientific and ethical standards, promoting inclusivity and respecting individual autonomy in self-identification.

For the collection of the necessary data, the Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS-24) questionnaire, created by Salovey et al. (1995), was administered. This questionnaire consists of 24 items that assess individual differences in the ability to be aware of and regulate one's own emotions. Participants responded to the questionnaire using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 equates to “Strongly Disagree” and 5 to “Strongly Agree”. It is worth noting that this instrument is open access, and is under a Creative Commons license, guaranteeing its availability and accessibility for future research and studies in the field of emotional regulation.

The scale is divided into three dimensions: emotional attention, emotional clarity, and emotional repair. In the process of assessing perceived emotional intelligence (PEI), a comprehensive numerical representation of each dimension is generated by aggregating the scores corresponding to each of the items that make up that dimension. The index of perceived emotional intelligence (PEI) is then computed by summing the total scores of the three dimensions, serving as a composite measure encapsulating the individual's perceived emotional capacity.

A reliability analysis is conducted for each dimension to ensure the internal consistency of the scales. Subsequently, descriptive statistics of the scores obtained in each dimension and the PEI were generated, offering a general overview of the data behavior. A correlation analysis was carried out to examine the specific relationships between the scores obtained in the different measurements and the PEI.

Lastly, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed to investigate the impact of variables such as sex, age, and field of study on the dimensional scores and the PEI. This analysis aids in discerning if there are significant differences in scores based on these demographic and academic categories, thereby providing valuable insights into the influence of these factors on perceived emotional intelligence. The inclusion of sex as a variable, defined through self-identification, contributes to a nuanced understanding of its role and influence on the outcomes of the study, ensuring a robust and comprehensive exploration of the relationship between emotional education and psychological well-being.

Ethical considerations

All participants in this study provided informed consent, in compliance with ethical standards for research involving human subjects. They were assured that their participation was voluntary and that they could withdraw from the study at any time without penalty. Confidentiality was maintained by anonymizing all personal data. The research was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Milagro State University, under the approval “Oficio Nro. UNEMI-VICEINVYPOSG-DP-155-2023-OF,” dated February 13, 2023.

Results and discussion

The evaluation of the PEI construct, as measured by the TMMS, is critical for understanding various psychological phenomena. The robustness and validity of such an instrument are therefore essential. First, the reliability of an instrument can be assessed through its internal consistency. When examining the dimensions of the TMMS, it's evident that Cronbach's alpha values are in a satisfactory range. The dimensions of Attention, Clarity, and Repair showed alphas of 0.87, 0.89, and 0.85, respectively. These values not only exceed the conventionally accepted threshold for good internal consistency but also closely resembled those found by Extremera and Fernández-Berrocal (2006). This parallel suggests the replicability and stability of the TMMS structure across different samples.

Based on the thorough analysis delineated in Table 1, a noteworthy trend was discerned in the scores across the dimensions of PEI. The confluence of minimum scores for Attention and Repair aligning with the lower limit of the scale invites multifaceted interpretations. For example, as postulated by Fiske (2018), this pattern could be indicative of a pronounced deficit in these particular emotional competencies among certain individuals, suggesting a reduced propensity to attend to or modulate emotions in challenging contexts.

Table 1. Descriptive statistics: minimum, range, mean, and standard deviation for the scores of the dimensions and PEI.

Dimension Min Range Mean SD
Attention 8.00 32.00 27.4987 6.06336
Clarity 11.00 29.00 31.1196 5.91481
Repair 8.00 32.00 31.9619 5.75433
PEI 39.00 81.00 90.58 13.94

Conversely, the scores in the Clarity dimension do not reach the lower extremity of the scale, intimating that even those with diminished emotional capacities retain some level of insight into their emotions. This finding is congruent with the proposition by Lee et al. (2020), positing that emotional clarity is a rudimentary competency, foundational for everyday functioning.

Analyzing the mean and dispersion revealed a congruent pattern between Clarity and Repair, inferring a potential interrelation. This correlation supports the theory by Extremera and Fernández-Berrocal (2005), which underscores the necessity of comprehending emotions (Clarity) as a precursor to effective management (Repair). In contrast, the Attention dimension manifested a broader distribution, indicative of the heterogeneity in individuals’ propensity to perceive and acknowledge their emotions, a variability echoed by Mauss and Robinson (2009).

Incorporating sex into the analysis offered an enriched perspective, enabling a nuanced exploration of how sex dimensions might interplay with individuals' emotional competencies. This incorporation is pivotal, shedding light on potential disparities or similarities in emotional intelligence across sex identities, thereby contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the subject.

The examination of the interdimensional correlations of PEI unfolded patterns consistent with existing literature on emotional intelligence. The substantial correlation between Clarity and Repair (coefficient of 0.637) underscores the symbiotic relationship between the comprehension and modulation of emotions, aligning with insights from Haver et al. (2021).

Conversely, the subdued correlations between Attention and the other two dimensions might suggest that heightened awareness does not invariably lead to enhanced understanding or adept emotional regulation—a notion corroborated by Sekreter (2019).

Finally, the strong correlations across all dimensions with the overarching PEI substantiate the framework posited by Alzoubi and Aziz (2021), affirming the integral role each dimension plays in the holistic ability to perceive, comprehend, and regulate emotions. This implies that each dimension, while pivotal independently, also significantly informs and shapes the comprehensive construct of PEI.

Table 2, detailed below, offers a concise representation of these Pearson correlations between the TMMS dimensions and PEI. Each numerical value in the table reflects the strength and direction of the relationship between the dimensions, providing a solid foundation for deeper interpretations and future research in this area.

Table 2. Pearson Correlations.

Attention Clarity Repair PEI
Attention 1 0.369** 0.283** 0.708
0.000 0.000 0.000
Clarity 1 0.637** 0.847
0.000 0.000
Repair 1 0.806
0.000

Note: Correlations marked with ** are significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).

Within the sphere of scientific inquiry, elucidating the potential ramifications of diverse factors on principal variables is paramount. This research embarked on a nuanced exploration of how distinct elements, notably sex, age, and educational attainment, might modulate the dimensions of emotional intelligence—Attention, Clarity, and Repair—and the composite measure of PEI.

The discernible variance in the relationship between these elements and the PEI dimensions within the context of the TMMS necessitates scrupulous scrutiny. The manifestation of sex, age, and educational attainment as independent variables substantiates the concept that individual and demographic attributes engage in intricate interplays with emotional intelligence, resonating with earlier studies ( Deng, 2021; Manca et al., 2019).

In particular, the significant influence of age and educational attainment on the Attention and Clarity dimensions aligns with the extant literature. The evolution of emotional maturity, concomitant with aging, can potentially enhance the faculties to discern and clarify emotions ( Gao et al., 2021; Vaish et al., 2008). Concurrently, educational attainment, emblematic of proficiency and aptitude in a particular field, could furnish a structured paradigm, thereby facilitating the processes of emotional discernment and clarification.

The integration of sex as a variable in this discourse enriches the analysis, offering a lens through which to examine its interaction with emotional intelligence dimensions. This integration is pivotal as it delves into the nuances of how sex may uniquely contribute to the dynamics of emotional intelligence, thereby augmenting the comprehensiveness of the study.

Interestingly, the singular impact of age on the Repair dimension prompts contemplation, positing that the capability to amend and regulate emotions might be more contingent upon accrued experience and maturity than on elements such as proficiency in a particular domain. This observation presents a divergence from the findings of Herd and Kim-Spoon (2021), who elucidated the progressive enhancement and adaptation of emotional regulation through time and experience.

Moreover, the salience of educational attainment as the sole significant determinant in the overarching measure of PEI underscores the pivotal role of domain-specific competence and expertise in shaping the holistic perception of emotional intelligence. This inference aligns with the conceptualization by Dolev and Leshem (2017), proposing that the manifestation of emotional intelligence in academic and professional realms is predominantly influenced by competence within those domains.

These results underline the complexity and specificity of the interactions between the dimensions of emotional intelligence and the demographic and academic factors under study. For a more detailed and visual understanding of these findings, Table 3 provides a comprehensive breakdown of the variance analysis performed.

Table 3. Sum of squares for the sources of variation in the analysis of variance model.

Origin df Attention Clarity Repair PEI
Corrected Model 6 1073.22 838.67 438.74 3693.22
Intercept 1 229960.87 275653.11 294560.43 2394147.66
Sex 1 3.44 14.91 3.10 .059
Age 3 568.87* 584.56* 344.07* 1472.74
Mastery 2 541.39* 207.15* 97.280 2210.82*
Error 1511 59310.53 52230.28 49873.11 309081.72
Total 1,518 1,274,641.00 1,522,426.00 1,600,331.00 12,979,978.00
Corrected Total 1,517 60,383.76 53,068.962 50,311.864 312,774.954

The multifaceted nature of emotional intelligence, illuminated by a plethora of studies examining it from diversified vantage points, accentuates the imperative of identifying underlying patterns within the amassed data ( Azevedo et al., 2013; Gooty et al., 2014). This present investigation meticulously underscores the capacity to extract such nuanced patterns, thereby offering an intricate framework elucidating the interplay between certain demographic, academic factors, and distinctive dimensions of emotional intelligence.

The study's results, particularly those relating to the “attention” dimension, unveil a noteworthy convergence between students in the 21 to 30 years age bracket and those surpassing 50 years. Such a pattern potentially alludes to the existence of distinct life phases where attentiveness to emotions experiences amplification. Dickerson and Quas (2021) have theorized that emotional awareness might be particularly amplified both in youth—attributed to the transitions and revelations inherent to this life stage—and in older age, characterized by heightened reflection and self-awareness.

Delving into the dimensions of “clarity” and “repair,” the ascension in mean scores concurrent with aging intimates an enhancement associated with accrued life experiences and the refinement of emotional regulation competencies—a proposition corroborated by preceding research ( Blasco-Belled et al., 2020; Martínez-Marín et al., 2021). Concurrently, the prominent scores of Early Education students in pivotal dimensions of emotional intelligence may be ascribed to the inherent characteristics of their scholastic curriculum. Education, predominantly at the foundational level, invariably necessitates profound empathy and refined interpersonal acumen ( Blakemore and Agllias, 2020). The cultivation and comprehension of emotions, both personal and of others, are indispensable in this field, thereby potentially manifesting in the elevated scores observed among these students.

Moreover, incorporating sex as an analytical variable in this discourse augments the depth of the study, furnishing a nuanced perspective to discern its potential interactions with the facets of emotional intelligence. This inclusion is quintessential, elucidating the intricate ways in which sex may shape and influence the dynamics of emotional intelligence, thereby enriching the holistic understanding of this complex construct. The intersectionality of sex with other demographic and academic variables provides a fertile ground for further exploration, potentially unveiling additional layers of complexity and contributing to a more comprehensive and nuanced appreciation of emotional intelligence in diverse populations.

Table 4 provides a detailed analysis of the interaction between demographic and academic variables with the dimensions of emotional intelligence. Through the DMS Test for mean comparison, significant differences and similarities were determined among the groups. The assigned letters (A, B, C) denote the statistical significance between the means; means with the same letter show no significant differences at the 0.05 level.

Table 4. DMS analysis of mean comparison for age and mastery variables.

Factors and ranges Attention Clarity Repair IEP
Age (years)
21 to 30 29.40 A1 29.87 C 31.04 C 90.33 A
31 to 40 27.92 B 30.55 BC 31.79 C 90.26 A
41 to 50 27.33 B 31.18 AB 32.20 AB 90.72 A
Over 50 28.32 AB 32.07 A 32.82 A 93.21 A
Mastery
Education 26.79 B 30.26 B 31.65 A 88.71 B
Basic education 28.37 B 30.84 B 31.82 A 91.04 B
Early education 29.56 A 31.66 A 32.41 A 93.64 A

Note: Means with the same letter (A, B, C) in each column indicate that there are no statistically significant differences between them, according to the DMS Test criteria at a significance level of p<0.05.

A pivotal insight emanating from the conducted analysis pertains to the substantial correlation between emotional clarity and age. The existing corpus of research has consistently underscored the evolution of the capacity to interpret and comprehend emotions, a progression modulated by a confluence of biological underpinnings and accrued socio-emotional learning ( Averill, 1980; Mayer et al., 2016). The Chi-squared value of 22.27 manifested in this investigation fortifies this conceptualization, emphasizing that emotional clarity is a dynamic attribute, subject to vicissitudes across the chronological trajectory of an individual's existence.

Concurrently, the discerned disparities in the dimensions of attention and clarity associated with sex, substantiated by Chi-squared values of 53.96 and 18.83, cohere with the existing scholarly discourse. This body of literature posits that variations exist in the ways men and women process and engage with emotions, potentially attributable to a matrix of sociocultural constructs and inherent biological determinants ( Averill, 1976; Meyers-Levy and Loken, 2015; Whittle et al., 2017). It is imperative to elucidate that such differences do not insinuate a hierarchical dichotomy or superiority of one over the other; rather, they signify diversification in the modalities of experiencing and conceptualizing emotions.

Furthermore, the discernible association between one's field of mastery and the dimensions of emotional intelligence, corroborated by Chi-squared values of 13.34 and 9.93, intimates the influential role of academic training and experiential learning in sculpting emotional perception and discernment. It emerges as plausible that distinct academic disciplines, by virtue of their inherent characteristics and thematic emphasis, foster competencies germane to emotional recognition and clarity ( Chen and Lu, 2022; Denham and Brown, 2010).

Figure 1, presented below, illustrates this interaction. It provides a visual representation of the frequencies of categorized clarity according to different age cohorts. This type of graphical representation allows for a more intuitive interpretation of the data, highlighting trends, consistencies, or possible anomalies among the groups.

Figure 1. Frequencies of categorized clarity crossed with age.

Figure 1.

The graphical representation in Figure 1 highlights these temporal dynamics of emotional perception in relation to age. It is revealing to observe that, with advancing age, there is an increase in the “excessive” category. This trend could align with the idea that accumulated experiences and introspection throughout life enrich emotional perception ( Bukor, 2015). Older individuals may have a more finely-tuned ability to recognize and understand the depth and complexity of their emotions, resulting in an “excessive” perception of emotional clarity.

In contrast, the “improve” category exhibits a notable decline with age. This could be interpreted as increased confidence and certainty in emotional perception acquired over the years. The fact that this trend starts high in the youngest group and decreases with age suggests that, over time and experience, there is a consolidation of emotional understanding ( Casale et al., 2022).

However, while these trends provide a fascinating insight into the evolution of emotional clarity throughout life, it is essential, as in all research, to maintain a critical perspective. Individual differences, cultural factors, socioeconomic factors, and life experiences can modulate these patterns ( Gross and John, 1995; Seixas et al., 2021).

Next, Figure 2 is presented, where a visual representation of the frequencies of categorized emotional attention based on sex is displayed. This graph provides a revealing perspective on how sex differences may be associated with variations in attention directed towards emotions.

Figure 2. Frequencies of categorized attention crossed with sex.

Figure 2.

In Figure 2, which illustrates the distribution of attention frequencies according to sex, distinctive patterns are observed in relation to the categories of emotional attention, mainly in the “adequate,” “little,” and “much” categories.

The female sex appears to predominate in the “adequate” and “little” categories, suggesting that females, in this study, tended to report levels of emotional attention that range between moderate and low. On the other hand, in the “much” category, a predominance of the male sex was observed, indicating that men in this sample report a high level of attention towards their own emotions or those of others.

These observations are consistent with literature in Psychology and Neuroscience that has explored sex differences in emotional perception and regulation. For example, Kashdan et al. (2009) posited that, in general, women may be more attuned to emotions, which could translate into more balanced or “adequate” levels of emotional attention. However, this does not necessarily imply that women pay less attention to emotions than men. Instead, it suggests that women may be more efficient in regulating the amount of attention they give to emotions, avoiding extremes.

On the other hand, the fact that men stand out in the “much” category could reflect a tendency among some men to be hyper-aware or excessively attentive to certain emotions. This pattern could be related to sociocultural norms that, in many contexts, discourage emotional expression among men, leading them to greater introspection and self-awareness ( Dworkin and Weaver, 2021).

However, it is crucial not to generalize these findings to all populations or interpret them as reflecting fixed biological differences between sex The observed differences may be influenced by sociocultural, educational factors, and individual life experiences.

In the following Figure 3, it is illustrated how the frequencies of categorized emotional clarity vary according to sex. This visualization will allow the exploration of whether there are distinctive patterns between sex concerning the clarity of their emotions.

Figure 3. Frequencies of categorized emotional clarity crossed with sex.

Figure 3.

In the field of emotional intelligence, emotional clarity denotes an individual's ability to identify and understand their own emotions, an aspect that is of great importance as it provides insights into how people process and manage their emotions in daily life. Figure 3 offers a detailed view of the frequencies of categorized emotional clarity according to sex.

According to the data presented in Figure 3, it is observed that women tend to report higher frequencies of levels of emotional clarity considered “adequate” or “excessive” compared to men. However, in the “improve” category, men surpass women in frequency, suggesting a greater inclination on their part to feel that they need to improve in this aspect.

These differences can be interpreted from various perspectives. According to Doherty (1997), women tend to be more introspective and are socially conditioned to be more expressive and aware of their emotions, which could explain the higher frequencies in the “adequate” and “excessive” categories observed in females. In contrast, men, subject to certain sociocultural norms, might feel less encouraged to explore and understand their emotions, which could influence their perception of the need to “improve” in this area.

Additionally, it is interesting to highlight the hierarchy observed in the frequencies for both categories: “adequate”, “excessive”, and “improve”. These findings underline that, regardless of sex, most individuals feel that they possess an acceptable degree of emotional clarity. However, it is in the “improve” category where the most significant contrast between the sexes is found, prompting reflections on the differences in emotional self-assessment and the potential sociocultural influences underlying this perception.

Finally, it is imperative to emphasize that, while these findings are revealing, they should not be interpreted simplistically. Differences in the self-perception of emotional clarity can be multifactorial and, as suggested by Gomez-Baya et al. (2017), may be influenced by both biological and sociocultural factors. In this context, a detailed understanding of the observed patterns related to emotional clarity and sex opens doors for future research and reflections in the field of Emotional Psychology.

The following Figure 4 offers a revealing perspective on the interaction between emotional clarity and academic specialization at the Master's level. Through this graphic representation, the aim is to analyze the possible influence of academic training on the perception and understanding of emotions among postgraduate students.

Figure 4. Frequencies of categorized clarity crossed with type of Master's program.

Figure 4.

Emotional attention refers to an individual's ability to tune into and be aware of their own emotions as well as those of others. This construct has crucial implications in the academic and professional world, as the way an individual pays attention to emotions can influence their learning and teaching abilities, as well as their capacity to interact with others in educational contexts.

According to Figure 4, a notable relationship is evident between attention categories and the type of Master's program students are enrolled in. This relationship provides information on how different specializations may influence students' self-perception of emotional attention.

A key finding observed is the gradient in the “adequate” category. Parada-Cabaleiro et al. (2020) argued that adequate perception of emotions is crucial for effective emotional processing. Students in "Early Childhood Education," who often work with young children, might develop more finely-tuned emotional attention due to the intuitive and non-verbal nature of communication at early ages. This finding is corroborated by results obtained in studies like that of Joss et al. (2020), who argue that working with younger populations can cultivate greater sensitivity and attention to emotions.

On the other hand, the “low” category suggests a perception of insufficient emotional attention. Here, the highest frequency corresponds to students in the "Education" Master's program. According to Jamil et al. (2023), traditional education often prioritizes cognitive skills over emotional skills. However, it is essential to consider that the type of population or educational context these programs target may influence these results.

Lastly, the “high” category presents an interesting pattern. The "Basic Education" Master's holds the highest point, indicating that these students perceive elevated emotional attention. Aguado et al. (2018) argue that emotional attention can be influenced by the demands of the context. Basic education often requires a greater capacity to tune into a wide range of emotions due to the diversity of ages and issues.

In Figure 5, the distribution of frequency categories of clarity, which have been crossed with different types of Master's programs, is illustrated. This graphic representation aims to establish a relationship between the perception of clarity and different postgraduate students, allowing for a more detailed evaluation and a deeper interpretation of the collected data.

Figure 5. Frequencies of categorized clarity crossed with type of Master's program.

Figure 5.

Figure 5 offers a detailed view of how emotional clarity relates to the academic specialization that students choose at the Master's level. This graphical representation indicates a notable dependency between the perception of emotional clarity and the nature of the academic program being pursued.

Analysis of the graph reveals that the categories of “adequate” and “excessive” in emotional clarity exhibit a pattern of consecutive increase from students in "Education" to those in "Early Childhood Education" ("Ed. Inicial" in the original text). This finding is consistent with previous research that suggests that certain academic programs, especially those oriented towards initial training in education, may place a stronger emphasis on emotional development ( Hodson, 2003; McCoy and Wolf, 2018).

On the other hand, it is intriguing to note that the “improve” category reflects an inverse trend. Specifically, those students in the "Education" Master's program show higher percentages, which could imply a greater awareness of their areas for improvement in emotional understanding or, alternatively, a program that has yet to fully emphasize this domain, as suggested by some authors ( Yang et al., 2022).

It is essential to point out that while these patterns may reflect the influence of curriculum and pedagogy on the perception of emotional clarity, they could also possibly reflect preexisting characteristics of the students who choose these programs. For example, those with intrinsically high emotional clarity may be more attracted to programs like "Early Childhood Education," given their direct and profound interaction with child development ( Ryan and Deci, 2020).

Conclusions

Initiating a study that seeks to decipher the relationship between demographic and emotional variables represents a challenge. However, the results of this research shed light on this complex interaction, with a specific focus on emotional clarity and attention. Based on rigorous quantitative methodology, detailed relationships were discovered that model these emotional capacities in various populations.

The relationship evidenced between age and emotional clarity is undeniable. As the years pass, lived experiences and maturity have a positive impact on people's interpretation and response to their emotions. This relationship not only reinforces traditional concepts about the wisdom associated with aging but also offers opportunities, especially in tailoring interventions according to age groups for better outcomes.

On the other hand, when considering gender, differences were found in emotional attention and clarity, which are not only notable but also enlightening. It could be deduced that these differences arise from a combination of factors, from socio-cultural constructs to biological differences. Understanding these variations is essential, and from this perspective, it becomes imperative to reconsider and adapt intervention and education strategies for an equitable approach.

Following this line of research, the link between academic training and emotionality also stood out, particularly regarding Master's levels. It was revealed that certain academic specializations play a significant role in the development of people's introspection and emotional awareness. This relationship strengthens the bond between formal education and emotional skills.

In light of this revelation, it would be appropriate to consider that the adaptation and refinement of specific pedagogical methods could strengthen emotional clarity and attention according to the academic realm. This adaptation in teaching provides a scenario where future professionals could develop with greater emotional acumen and self-awareness.

However, it is essential to take into account the practical implications of these findings. It is evident that any educational or therapeutic planning must consider these demographic variables. Ignoring these differences carries the risk of implementing less effective or incorrect interventions.

Emphasizing this aspect, it is essential for professionals in education, therapy, and mental health to be aware of these discoveries. With this information, they can design and apply strategies tailored to individual needs, enhancing their beneficial impact.

Although this work contributes to the academic field, it should not be considered as a definitive answer. It should be viewed more as a foundation for future research. The dynamics between demography and emotional skills have multiple facets, and it is likely that many aspects remain to be explored.

From this perspective, the study does not end a debate, but invites future research. The questions that arise, particularly regarding how other socio-economic or demographic factors might influence emotional clarity and attention, have great potential. This work aims to encourage future explorations in an area of such relevance and fascination.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Graduate Program of the State University of Milagro, Ecuador.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 1; peer review: 2 approved with reservations]

Data availability

Figshare: Data-Comparative Analysis of Psychological Well-being.xlsx. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24148155.v1

The project contains the following underlying data:

  • -

    Data-Comparative Analysis of Psychological Well-being.xlsx

Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).

References

  1. Aguado L, Martínez-García N, Solís-Olce A, et al. : Effects of affective and emotional congruency on facial expression processing under different task demands. Acta Psychol. 2018;187:66–76. 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alzoubi HM, Aziz R: Does Emotional Intelligence Contribute to Quality of Strategic Decisions? The Mediating Role of Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. 2021;7(2):130. 10.3390/joitmc7020130 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Averill JR: Emotion and Anxiety: Sociocultural, Biological, and Psychological Determinants. Zuckerman M, Spielberger CD, editors. Emotions and Anxiety (PLE: Emotion). Psychology Press;1976; (p.44). 10.4324/9781315744643 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Averill JR: A Constructivist view of emotion. Theories of Emotion. Elsevier;1980; (pp.305–339). 10.1016/B978-0-12-558701-3.50018-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Azevedo R, Harley J, Trevors G, et al. : Using Trace Data to Examine the Complex Roles of Cognitive, Metacognitive, and Emotional Self-Regulatory Processes During Learning with Multi-agent Systems. International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. 2013;427–449. 10.1007/978-1-4419-5546-3_28 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Blakemore T, Agllias K: Social media, empathy and interpersonal skills: social work students’ reflections in the digital era. Soc. Work. Educ. 2020;39(2):200–213. 10.1080/02615479.2019.1619683 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blasco-Belled A, Rogoza R, Torrelles-Nadal C, et al. : Emotional Intelligence Structure and Its Relationship with Life Satisfaction and Happiness: New Findings from the Bifactor Model. J. Happiness Stud. 2020;21(6):2031–2049. 10.1007/s10902-019-00167-x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bukor E: Exploring teacher identity from a holistic perspective: reconstructing and reconnecting personal and professional selves. Teachers and Teaching. 2015;21(3):305–327. 10.1080/13540602.2014.953818 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Casale M, Yates R, Gittings L, et al. : Consolidate, conceptualize, contextualise: key learnings for future intervention acceptability research with young people in Africa. Psychol. Health Med. 2022;27(sup1):181–192. 10.1080/13548506.2022.2108078 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Chen X, Lu L: How classroom management and instructional clarity relate to students’ academic emotions in Hong Kong and England: A multi-group analysis based on the control-value theory. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2022;98:102183. 10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102183 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Deng R: Emotionally Engaged Learners Are More Satisfied with Online Courses. Sustainability. 2021;13(20):11169. 10.3390/su132011169 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Denham SA, Brown C: “Plays Nice With Others”: Social–Emotional Learning and Academic Success. Early Educ. Dev. 2010;21(5):652–680. 10.1080/10409289.2010.497450 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Dickerson KL, Quas JA: Emotional awareness, empathy, and generosity in high-risk youths. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 2021;208:105151. 10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Doherty RW: La escala de contagio emocional: una medida de las diferencias individuales. J. Nonverbal Behav. 1997;21(2):131–154. 10.1023/A:1024956003661 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dolev N, Leshem S: Developing emotional intelligence competence among teachers. Teach. Dev. 2017;21(1):21–39. 10.1080/13664530.2016.1207093 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Drigas A, Papoutsi C: A New Layered Model on Emotional Intelligence. Behav. Sci. 2018;8(5):45. 10.3390/bs8050045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dworkin ER, Weaver TL: The impact of sociocultural contexts on mental health following sexual violence: A conceptual model. Psychol. Violence. 2021;11(5):476–487. 10.1037/vio0000350 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Extremera N, Fernández-Berrocal P: Perceived emotional intelligence and life satisfaction: Predictive and incremental validity using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2005;39(5):937–948. 10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.012 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fernández‐Berrocal P, Alcaide R, Extremera N: The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Anxiety and Depression among Adolescents. Individual Differences Research .2006;4(1):16–26. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
  20. Fiske ST: Social Cognition. Routledge;2018. 10.4324/9781315187280 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gao L, Mun K, Kim S-W: Using Socioscientific Issues to Enhance Students’ Emotional Competence. Res. Sci. Educ. 2021;51(S2):935–956. 10.1007/s11165-019-09873-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gomez-Baya D, Mendoza R, Paino S, et al. : Perceived emotional intelligence as a predictor of depressive symptoms during mid-adolescence: A two-year longitudinal study on gender differences. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2017;104:303–312. 10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gooty J, Gavin MB, Ashkanasy NM, et al. : The wisdom of letting go and performance: The moderating role of emotional intelligence and discrete emotions. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2014;87(2):392–413. 10.1111/joop.12053 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gross JJ, John OP: Facets of emotional Expressivity: Three self-report factors and their correlates. Personal. Individ. Differ. 1995;19(4):555–568. 10.1016/0191-8869(95)00055-B [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Haver A, Akerjordet K, Robinson L, et al. : Investigating Emotion Regulation Strategies to Facilitate the Well-Being of Managers. Scandinavian Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology. 2021;6(1). 10.16993/sjwop.147 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Herd T, Kim-Spoon J: A Systematic Review of Associations Between Adverse Peer Experiences and Emotion Regulation in Adolescence. Clin. Child. Fam. Psychol. Rev. 2021;24(1):141–163. 10.1007/s10567-020-00337-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hodson D: Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2003;25(6):645–670. 10.1080/09500690305021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Housman DK: The importance of emotional competence and self-regulation from birth: a case for the evidence-based emotional cognitive social early learning approach. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy. 2017;11(1):13. 10.1186/s40723-017-0038-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jamil N, Belkacem AN, Lakas A: On enhancing students’ cognitive abilities in online learning using brain activity and eye movements. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023;28(4):4363–4397. 10.1007/s10639-022-11372-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Joss D, Lazar SW, Teicher MH: Nonattachment Predicts Empathy, Rejection Sensitivity, and Symptom Reduction After a Mindfulness-Based Intervention Among Young Adults with a History of Childhood Maltreatment. Mindfulness. 2020;11(4):975–990. 10.1007/s12671-020-01322-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kashdan TB, Mishra A, Breen WE, et al. : Gender Differences in Gratitude: Examining Appraisals, Narratives, the Willingness to Express Emotions, and Changes in Psychological Needs. J. Pers. 2009;77(3):691–730. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00562.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Lee H, Mandalapu V, Kleinsmith A, et al. : Distinguishing Anxiety Subtypes of English Language Learners Towards Augmented Emotional Clarity. Artificial Intelligence in Education. 2020;157–161. 10.1007/978-3-030-52240-7_29 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Manca F, Sivakumar A, Polak JW: The effect of social influence and social interactions on the adoption of a new technology: The use of bike sharing in a student population. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. 2019;105:611–625. 10.1016/j.trc.2019.02.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Martínez-Marín MD, Martínez C, Paterna C: Gendered self-concept and gender as predictors of emotional intelligence: a comparison through of age. Curr. Psychol. 2021;40(9):4205–4218. 10.1007/s12144-020-00904-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mauss IB, Robinson MD: Measures of emotion: A review. Cognit. Emot. 2009;23(2):209–237. 10.1080/02699930802204677 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mayer JD, Caruso DR, Salovey P: The Ability Model of Emotional Intelligence: Principles and Updates. Emot. Rev. 2016;8(4):290–300. 10.1177/1754073916639667 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. McCoy DC, Wolf S: Changes in classroom quality predict Ghanaian preschoolers’ gains in academic and social-emotional skills. Dev. Psychol. 2018;54(8):1582–1599. 10.1037/dev0000546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Meyers-Levy J, Loken B: Revisiting gender differences: What we know and what lies ahead. J. Consum. Psychol. 2015;25(1):129–149. 10.1016/j.jcps.2014.06.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Parada-Cabaleiro E, Costantini G, Batliner A, et al. : DEMoS: an Italian emotional speech corpus. Lang. Resour. Eval. 2020;54(2):341–383. 10.1007/s10579-019-09450-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ryan RM, Deci EL: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2020;61:101860. 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Salovey P, Mayer JD, Goldman SL, et al. : Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Emotion, Disclosure, & Health. 1995;125–154. 10.1037/10182-006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Seixas R, Pignault A, Houssemand C: Emotion regulation questionnaire-adapted and individual differences in emotion regulation. Eur. J. Psychol. 2021;17(1):70–84. 10.5964/ejop.2755 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Sekreter G: Emotional Intelligence as a Vital Indicator of Teacher Effectiveness. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies. 2019;5(3). [Google Scholar]
  44. Sparkes A: Research In Physical Educ. & Sp. Sparkes A, editor. Routledge;1992. 10.4324/9780203046302 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Vaish A, Grossmann T, Woodward A: Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development. Psychol. Bull. 2008;134(3):383–403. 10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Whittle S, Simmons JG, Allen NB: Emotion and Gender-Specific Neural Processing in Men and Women. Principles of Gender-Specific Medicine. Elsevier;2017; (pp.183–201). 10.1016/B978-0-12-803506-1.00013-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yang Y, Zhu G, Chan CKK: Evolution of the academic emotions of academically low-achieving students in knowledge building. Int. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. 2022;17(4):539–571. 10.1007/s11412-022-09380-y [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Zhang W, Adegbola O: Emotional intelligence and public relations: An empirical review. Public Relat. Rev. 2022;48(3):102199. 10.1016/j.pubrev.2022.102199 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
F1000Res. 2024 May 16. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.155333.r218145

Reviewer response for version 1

Maira Alejandra Pulgarín Rodríguez 1

The study conducted by Moreira et al. constitutes an important contribution to the study of sustainability in the context and well-being of students in higher education. The objective of the research, which was to compare the perceived emotional intelligence in different programs, can be clearly identified. Thus, enlightening results were obtained through the application of the quantitative method that sought to examine the responses of 1,522 university students using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale (TMMS-24).

Although carrying out quantitative studies allows to recognize a factual vision of the object of study, it is necessary to make an exhaustive tracking of the same that allows to have a global context of what is analyzed, in that case in the introduction it is required to make an extension in the existing foundations regarding the categories defined for the study, only three referents are located, although it is a novel topic there are different optics that could give a better support for what they present later in the method and the results. Likewise, the conclusions of the study do not have any reference that allows validating or corroborating a previously established theory or if new knowledge would be generated.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Yes

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Education process.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2023 Nov 21. doi: 10.5256/f1000research.155333.r218147

Reviewer response for version 1

Adriana Beatriz Sánchez-Urdaneta 1

I consider that the bibliography used partially corresponds to the research. Although relevant references on emotional intelligence and psychological well-being are included, there is a need to go deeper into specific studies on emotional education in graduate students, which is what the study refers to. On the other hand, I also consider that some paragraphs need to support the information provided with certain bibliographical references. It is also important to point out that, although a high percentage of the bibliography used is updated in the last 5 years, only one reference corresponding to 2023 is used.

It is true that this is a quantitative study with a considerably large sample and validated instruments are used, which is appropriate. However, I believe it is necessary to expand on the details of the sample selection process and the statistical analyses performed. I consider that the methods and analyses are not described in sufficient detail to allow an exact replication of the study.

It is also important to note that the authors have followed appropriate guidelines regarding informed consent of the participants and approval by an ethics committee. However, I believe it is unclear whether specific guidelines were followed in the development and reporting of the quantitative research.

As for statistical analysis, appropriate tests such as ANOVA, Pearson correlations and descriptive statistics are used. However, more detail is needed on the specific procedures and parameters used in these tests in order to adequately evaluate their implementation.

The source data according to the information provided are available, so with the results presented in tables and figures and the data, the reproducibility of the information is feasible.

Regarding the conclusions presented, they are partially based on the results, making very general statements about the differences between sex and age that would require a more robust support from the statistical analysis. For example, differences between men and women are mentioned, but no statistical evidence is reported to validate these differences. Nor do they support them through the use of bibliographic references related to this aspect.

The discussion acknowledges some limitations regarding the possible influence of cultural factors and individual experiences. However, important limitations such as the cross-sectional design of the study are not discussed.

In summary, the study has a solid technical basis, but I consider that it is necessary to deepen the bibliography, to better detail the methods and to strengthen the information generated by the study. On the other hand, the statistical analysis seems appropriate, but lacks detail. The conclusions are not always solidly supported by the results presented. Further discussion of methodological limitations is required. I believe that, with these adjustments, the article could provide interesting results, and the solidity and reproducibility of the article on a relevant topic such as emotional education in graduate students would be improved.

Is the work clearly and accurately presented and does it cite the current literature?

Partly

If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate?

Yes

Are all the source data underlying the results available to ensure full reproducibility?

Yes

Is the study design appropriate and is the work technically sound?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn adequately supported by the results?

Partly

Are sufficient details of methods and analysis provided to allow replication by others?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

F1000Res. 2024 May 17.
Jenniffer Sobeida Moreira Choez

Distinguished reviewer,

Thank you for your valuable suggestions that have significantly contributed to improving the quality of our article. Below, we describe the changes made in response to your recommendations:

  1. In-depth focus on specific studies about emotional education in graduate students: We have enriched the theoretical framework by incorporating current research that directly addresses emotional education in graduate contexts. Recent studies have been added to provide a more solid and contextualized foundation on the relevance of the topic in the current academic landscape.

  2. Support with additional bibliographic references: We have enhanced the bibliographic support in key sections of the manuscript by integrating recent and relevant academic sources to strengthen the claims and conclusions derived from our data analysis. This approach ensures that all significant statements are backed by relevant and up-to-date empirical evidence.

  3. Details on the sample selection process and statistical analyses: We provided detailed descriptions of the sample design and analytical procedures, including details on the sample size calculations and specific statistical techniques used, such as ANOVA and Pearson correlations. This level of detail is essential to allow for the replication of the study and to enhance methodological transparency.

  4. Clarity in ethical guidelines and informed consent: Information on compliance with ethical standards has been expanded, detailing procedures for informed consent and ethical approval of the study, which is crucial to ensure the integrity and ethics of the research process.

  5. Robustness of statistical analysis and caution in conclusions: The study's conclusions were revised to reflect a more conservative interpretation based on the data of observed differences by sex and age, highlighting the need for further research to allow a more robust validation of these findings.

  6. Discussion on the limitations of the cross-sectional design: A critical discussion on the limitations imposed by the cross-sectional design used has been integrated, emphasizing the importance of future longitudinal studies to confirm and extend the presented findings.

These adjustments have been made to ensure that the study not only responds to the specific needs identified by your review but also enhances its contribution to the field of emotional education in graduate contexts. We appreciate your essential input in the review process and hope that the changes made meet the expectations of rigor and clarity required for the publication and indexing of our work.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    Figshare: Data-Comparative Analysis of Psychological Well-being.xlsx. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.24148155.v1

    The project contains the following underlying data:

    • -

      Data-Comparative Analysis of Psychological Well-being.xlsx

    Data are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC-BY 4.0).


    Articles from F1000Research are provided here courtesy of F1000 Research Ltd

    RESOURCES