Abstract
Background
Loss-of-function mutations of ZBTB24 cause immunodeficiency, centromeric instability, and facial anomalies syndrome 2 (ICF2). ICF2 is a rare autosomal recessive disorder with immunological defects in serum antibodies and circulating memory B cells, resulting in recurrent and sometimes fatal respiratory and gastrointestinal infections. The genotype–phenotype correlation in patients with ICF2 indicates an essential role of ZBTB24 in the terminal differentiation of B cells.
Methods
We used the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPER)/Cas9 technology to generate B cell specific Zbtb24-deficient mice and verified the deletion specificity and efficiency by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) and western blotting analyses in fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS)-sorted cells. The development, phenotype of B cells and in vivo responses to T cell dependent or independent antigens post immunization were analyzed by flow cytometry and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Adoptive transfer experiment in combination with in vitro cultures of FACS-purified B cells and RNA-Seq analysis were utilized to specifically determine the impact of Zbtb24 on B cell biology as well as the underlying mechanisms.
Results
Zbtb24 is dispensable for B cell development and maintenance in naive mice. Surprisingly, B cell specific deletion of Zbtb24 does not evidently compromise germinal center reactions and the resulting primary and secondary antibody responses induced by T cell dependent antigens (TD-Ags), but significantly inhibits T cell independent antigen-elicited antibody productions in vivo. At the cellular level, Zbtb24-deficiency specifically impedes the plasma cell differentiation of B1 cells without impairing their survival, activation and proliferation in vitro. Mechanistically, Zbtb24-ablation attenuates heme biosynthesis partially through mTORC1 in B1 cells, and addition of exogenous hemin abrogates the differentiation defects of Zbtb24-null B1 cells.
Conclusions
Zbtb24 seems to regulate antibody responses against TD-Ags B cell extrinsically, but it specifically promotes the plasma cell differentiation of B1 cells via heme synthesis in mice. Our study also suggests that defected B1 functions contribute to recurrent infections in patients with ICF2.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s11658-024-00641-2.
Keywords: ICF2, Zbtb24, B1 cells, Plasma cell differentiation, Heme synthesis
Introduction
Immunodeficiency, centromeric instability, and facial anomalies syndrome (ICF [OMIM 242860]) is a rare autosomal recessive and genetically heterogeneous disorder that manifests with multiple system failures [1, 2]. Apart from the hypomethylated pericentromeric regions in specific chromosomes, and varying degrees of facial abnormalities and mental/motor defects, most patients with ICF suffer from recurrent respiratory/gastrointestinal infections in early childhood owing to reduced antibody levels [1, 3]. Approximately 50% of ICF cases (ICF1) have mutations in the DNA methyltransferase 3B (DNMT3B, OMIM 602900), and about 30% of patients (ICF2) carry nonsense or missense mutations in the zinc finger and BTB domain containing 24 (ZBTB24, OMIM 614064) [3–5]. Although mutations in the cell division cycle associated 7 (CDCA7, OMIM 609937), helicase, lymphoid-specific (HELLS, OMIM 603946), and ubiquitin-like with plant homeodomain and ring finger domains 1 (UHRF1, OMIM 607990) have been recently shown to be associated with ICF3, ICF4, and an atypical ICF case, respectively, there are still few ICF cases (ICFX) left with unidentified disease genes [6, 7]. In line with the similar molecular and clinical characteristics across different ICF subtypes, these disease genes act sequentially/corporately to modulate chromatin accessibilities and DNA methylations [7–13].
Zbtb24 belongs to a large and evolutionary conserved family of transcriptional regulators with about 60 different members, many of which have prominent roles in hematopoietic development, differentiation and function [14–16]. For instance, Bcl6 (Zbtb27) promotes germinal center (GC) reactions by driving the differentiation of both GC B cells (GCB) and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, and thereby is indispensable for the generation of high-affinity memory B cells (Bm) and long-lived antibody-secreting plasma cells (PCs) in vivo [14, 16, 17]. In addition, depletion of the ICF4 gene Hells in B cell compartment accelerates the premature decay of GCB cells and impairs the generation of high-affinity Bm and antibodies [18]. Thus, the absence of GC structures and circulating memory (but not total) B cells in patients with ZBTB24-disrupted ICF2 indicate that ZBTB24 may possess similar functions in antibody responses in vivo [3, 4, 16, 19]. Indeed, ZBTB24 modulates the function of human B lymphoblastoid cell line Raji by indirectly repressing IRF4 and PRDM1 in a BCL6-independent manner [20]. Moreover, ZBTB24 participates in the nonhomologous end joining process, and thereby promotes the class-switch recombination (CSR) in B cells either directly via binding to PARP1 or indirectly by inducing the expression of CDCA7 [21, 22]. Nonetheless, the roles of Zbtb24 in the development/function of B cells and in vivo antibody responses remain largely unknown.
As the effectors of humoral immunity, B cells are comprised of two populations, the predominant B2 subset and the minor B1 compartment [23]. B2 cells are continuously produced in the bone marrow (BM) from hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) throughout life, and the newly formed B cells traffic to the spleen where they eventually mature into either follicular B (FOB) or marginal zone B (MZB) cells. By contrast, B1 cells are mainly seeded during fetal and early neonatal life, and the major population is maintained by self-renewal thereafter, although the adult BM may remain limited potential for B1 development [24, 25]. Upon activation by T cell dependent antigens (TD-Ags), the conventional FOB cells enter the GC structure, where they undergo massive proliferation, somatic hypermutation (SHM) and CSR, and ultimately differentiate into Bm or PCs with the capacity to produce high-affinity antibodies [26]. Conversely, MZB and B1 cells are innate-like B cells with limited B cell receptor (BCR) repertoire, and are able to rapidly respond to T cell independent antigens (TID-Ags)/self-antigens by secretion of natural antibodies [24, 25, 27, 28]. They promptly and massively differentiate into mature PCs, and thereby provide antibody-mediated innate immune protection during microbial infections [25, 29]. Given that B1 cells normally reside in the pleura, peritoneum, and intestines, they play an important role in barrier immunity to control microbes at mucosal surfaces. Apart from antimicrobial activities, natural antibodies, most of which are produced by B1 cells, help maintain tissue homeostasis by cross-reacting to epitopes expressed on dead/dying autologous cells [24, 25, 27, 28].
It has been well established that the function and fate of B cells are finely controlled by the proper expressions of different transcription factors (TFs). BCL6/BACH2/PAX5 maintains the phenotype of FOB cells, and promotes their proliferation, SHM and CSR in GC reactions, whereas PRDM1 and XBP1 augment the differentiation of PCs. IRF4 regulates both of these processes, as intermediate IRF4 induces BCL6 and activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), which initiates SHM and CSR, while its high expression upregulates PRDM1 [30]. In addition to the timely and spatially regulated expressions of these TFs, recent studies showed that metabolic reprogramming/adaptation shapes the differentiation and function of B cells as well [31–33]. mTORC1 coordinates the increased anabolism and thus plays an essential role in the activation, proliferation and protein synthesis of cells that demand increased energy and building blocks [34]. PKC signaling dictates B cell fate by regulating the mitochondrial biogenesis/function partially through mTORC1 signaling [35]. Coinciding with their instant actions against pathogens, innate-like B1 and MZB cells exhibit augmented glucose/lipid uptake and metabolism as compared to FOB cells [32, 36]. Moreover, high mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) in activated B cells promotes CSR but dampens the generation of PCs via inhibiting the synthesis of heme, which inactivates BACH2 and thus releases its inhibition on PRDM1 expression and PC differentiation [37, 38].
As the germline deletion of Zbtb24 is embryonic lethal in mice [8], we herein generated B cell specific Zbtb24 knockout mice (Zbtb24B−CKO) to investigate its cell-intrinsic role in B cell development and function both in vitro and in vivo. Our data reveal that cell autonomous Zbtb24 is dispensable for the development/maintenance of B cells in naive mice and the TD-Ag-induced GC reactions and antibody responses, but greatly promotes the PC differentiation of peritoneal B1 cells via augmenting mTORC1 activity and heme biosynthesis upon activation. Thus, our study not only suggests that the barrier defenses against pathogens might be impaired, owing to hampered differentiation of B1 cells, in respiratory and gastrointestinal tracts of patients with ICF2, but also provides mechanistic insights into the specific role of Zbtb24 in regulating B1 cell function. Our data also indicated that Zbtb24 may promote antibody responses against TD-Ags, at least in mice, in a B cell and even hematopoietic-cell extrinsic manner.
Materials and methods
Mice
The Zbtb24 conditional allele (Zbtb24loxp/+) was generated using the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPER)/Cas9 strategy (Beijing CasGene Biotech. Co., Ltd). Briefly, C57BL/6 embryonic stem cells (ES) were transfected with the targeting vectors via electroporation. Correctly targeted clones, containing two loxp sites inserted into the flanking regions of Zbtb24 exon 2 with the translation starting site (Fig. 1A), were identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and injected into blastocytes to generate chimeric mice. Chimeric mice were then crossed with C57BL/6 wild type (WT) mice to obtain F1 mice with the germline-transmitted Zbtb24loxp/+ allele. After multiple-step crossing the heterozygous Zbtb24loxp/+ mouse with Cd19Cre/+ mouse on a C57BL/6 background (kindly provided by Prof. Biao Zheng, East China Normal University), mice with the specific deletion of Zbtb24 in CD19+ B cells (Zbtb24B−CKO, Cd19Cre/+Zbtb24loxp/loxp) were generated. Primers used for ES clone selection and genotyping were listed in Table S1. To exclude the impact of Cd19-driven Cre expression on B cells [39], littermate Cd19Cre/+Zbtb24+/+ (Cd19Cre/+) mice were used as controls in all the analysis unless otherwise indicated. Immunodeficient Rag2−/− C57BL/6 mice with no mature T and B cells (Changzhou Cavens Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd) were used as recipients in adoptive transfer experiments. Mice were housed under specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions.
Immunizations
Mice were immunized with the TD-Ag 4-Hydroxy-3-nitrophenylacetyl hapten conjugated to ovalbumin (NP19-OVA) emulsified in incomplete Freund adjuvant (IFA, Sigma, 1:1) or adsorbed onto Imject Alum (Thermo Scientific, 1:1), or with the TID-Ag NP-AECM-Ficoll (NP-Ficoll)/NP-LPS intraperitoneally. NP19-OVA, NP-Ficoll and NP-LPS were all obtained from Biosearch Technologies.
B cell isolation and culture
BM cells were harvested by flushing the femurs of mouse, and peritoneal cells were isolated by lavaging the peritoneal cavities (PeC) with 10 ml phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Splenocytes were obtained by mechanically dissociating spleens in PBS, followed by passing through a 70 μM nylon mesh (BD Biosciences). Erythrocytes were removed by addition of ammonium chloride lysis buffer. Total CD19+ B, CD19+CD23highCD21low FOB and CD19+CD23lowCD21high MZB cells in spleens, or peritoneal CD19+B220lowCD23− B1 and CD19+B220highCD23+ B2 cells were sorted out via a FACS Aria cell sorter III (BD Biosciences) with > 95% purity. MojoSort™ Mouse Pan B Cell Isolation Kit II (Biolegend) were used to enrich CD19+ B cells in splenocytes before sorting.
Purified B cells were cultured in medium, LPS (L2630, Sigma), goat F(ab’)2 anti-mouse IgM (αIgM, SouthernBiotech) or rat anti-mouse CD40 (αCD40, 1C10, Biolegend) in the absence/presence of recombinant mouse IL-4, human TGF-β1 and B cell activating factor (BAFF) (all from Peprotech) in 96 U-bottom plates at 37 °C for indicated times. The complete culture medium was Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI)-1640 (Hyclone) supplemented with non-essential amino acids (Sigma), 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco), 100 U/ml penicillin (Beyotime), 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Beyotime), 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma), 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 10 mM HEPES (Hyclone). In some cases, L-ascorbic acid (L-AC, #A92902, Sigma), hemin (#9039, Sigma), rapamycin (Absin), and corresponding vehicle controls were added at indicated concentrations from the beginning of culture.
Adoptive transfer experiments
CD4+ T cells were isolated with MojoSort™ Mouse CD4 T cell isolation kit (Biolegend) from spleens of WT mice with > 90% purity. Purified splenic CD19+ B cells, from Cd19Cre/+ or Zbtb24B−CKO mice, were mixed with CD4+ T cells at the ratio of 2:1 before being injected into Rag2−/− recipients via the tail vein (5 × 106 B cells plus 2.5 × 106 CD4+ T cells/200 μl PBS/mouse). At 1 day later, recipient mice were immunized with NP19-OVA emulsified in IFA. To analyze the function of B1 cells in vivo, FACS-sorted peritoneal B1 cells were injected into Rag2−/− recipients intraperitoneally (2 × 105 cells/200 μl PBS/mouse) followed by NP-LPS immunization.
ELISA
Mouse sera or B cell culture supernatants were collected at indicated time points and immediately stored at –20 ℃ until the analysis for antibody levels by ELISA. In brief, ELISA plates (Nunc) were coated with goat anti-mouse Ig (SouthernBiotech, 1010–01, 1:1000) or NP25-BSA (Biosearch Technologies, 5 μg/ml) to capture all murine Igs or NP-specific antibodies, respectively. After washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20, wells were blocked with PBS containing 3% BSA before incubation with diluted sera or culture supernatants. The optimal dilutions for each Ig subtype were determined by preliminary experiments. Total or NP-specific IgM, IgG1, IgG2b, IgG2c, IgG3, and IgA levels were detected by using HRP-coupled goat anti-mouse subtype-specific secondary antibodies (SouthernBiotech).
Western blot and Q-PCR analysis
Cells were lysed for 1 h on ice in RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime) supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors (Selleck). Proteins were separated in an SDS-PAGE 10% gel and subsequently blotted onto a PVDF membrane (Millipore). After incubation with blocking buffer (Tris-buffered saline with 5% nonfat milk), the membrane was incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C, followed by a further incubation with secondary antibodies at room temperature (RT) for 2 h. Signals were visualized with the Tanon 3500 Gel Imaging System (Tanon). The following antibodies were used: anti-ZBTB24 (PM085, MBL Life Science, 1:1000), phospho-CD19 (Tyr531) antibody (3571 T, CST, 1:1000), anti-GAPDH (AG012, Beyotime, 1:5000), anti-β-ACTIN (T0022, Affinity Bioscience, 1:5000), HRP-coupled donkey anti-Guinea pig (H + L, 706–035-148, Jackson ImmunoResearch Lab), HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG (G-21234, Thermo Scientific), and HRP-linked horse anti-mouse IgG (7076P2, CST).
Total RNA was extracted from indicated cells by the Total RNA Kit II (OMEGA). cDNA was subsequently synthesized using Reverse Transcriptase M-MLV (TakaRa) according to manufacturer’s instructions. mRNA levels of indicated genes were quantitatively determined by SYBR-green technology on an ABI-StepOnePlus Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). Sequence of primers used for RT-qPCR analysis were listed in Table S1.
Flow cytometric analysis
Single cell suspensions were prepared and surface molecules were stained at 4 °C for 30 min with optimal dilutions of each antibody. The following antibodies were used: anti-mouse B220 (RA3-6B2), CD45 (30-F11), CD19 (6D5), CD23 (B3B4), CD5 (53–7.3), CD38 (90), CXCR4 (L276F12), CD69 (H1.2F3), CD86 (PO3), IgG1 (RMG1-1), and IgG2b (RMG2b-1) (all from Biolegend); anti-mouse CD21/35 (eBio4E3 or eBio8D9), CD43 (eBioR2/60), CD93 (AA4.1), and IgM (II/41) (all from eBioscience); and anti-mouse CD138 (281–2), CD95 (Jo2), and IgG3 (R40-82) (all from BD Biosciences). Sometimes 7-AAD (Biolegend) and NP-Ficoll-FITC (NP-FITC, Biosearch Technologies) were additionally used to visualize NP-specific B cells as previously reported [39]. After staining, cells were washed twice with PBS, suspended in 300 μl PBS, and fixed volumes of cells were processed with the Attune® NxT Acoustic Focusing Cytometer (Thermo Scientific). Data were analyzed by FlowJo software (BD Biosciences).
To measure the mitochondrial membrane potential and intracellular ROS, cells were incubated in prewarmed RPMI-1640 containing MitoTracker™ Orange CMTMRos (Thermo Scientific, 50 nM) and DCFH-DA (Beyotime, 5 μM) at 37 °C for 30 min. After extensive washing, cells were further stained with antibodies against surface molecules as indicated above.
For intracellular detection of TFs, cells were fixed/permeabilized with Foxp3 staining buffer set (eBioscience) before incubation with antibodies against BCL6 (7D1), PRDM1 (5E7) and IRF4 (IRF4.3E4) (all from Biolegend). To measure AKT and mTORC1 activity, cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized by ice-cold methanol for 30 min on ice, and then stained with the primary antibody recognizing phosphor-AKT (Ser473) (D9E, CST) or phosphor-S6 ribosomal protein (Ser235/236) (D57.2.E, CST), followed by incubating with the secondary APC-coupled AffinityPure F(ab’)2 fragment donkey anti-rabbit IgG antibody (711–606-152, Jackson Immunolab).
RNA-sequencing and analysis
Total cellular RNA was extracted with the Total RNA Kit II (OMEGA). Library construction and sequencing was performed on a HiSeq or Novaseq 2 × 150 platform by AZENTA Life Sciences (Suzhou). Sequenced reads were mapped to reference murine genome (mm10 assembly) using bowtie2 with default parameters, and Cufflinks was used to estimate the abundance of transcripts [40, 41]. Quantifications of gene expression were performed using RSEM, and the expression levels of genes in each sample were normalized by means of fragments per kilobase of transcript per million mapped reads (FPKM). These RNA-seq data were deposited in the GEO database with the accession number GSE241746 and GSE241747.
After eliminating absent features (zero counts), differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between two groups with two–three replicates (one mouse per replicate for splenic B cells) were compared via DEseq2. Owing to limited cell numbers post FACS-sorting, PeC B1 cells from two mice of the same genotype were pooled before RNA-extraction and served as one replicate. Genes were considered to be differentially expressed with the cutoff of fold change ≥ 0.414 and P value < 0.05. To identify signaling pathways enriched in different samples, we used R package clusterProfiler and software gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of MSigDB gene sets (Hallmark, KEGG, and GO) [42, 43]. GSEA was performed for each pairwise comparison using gene lists ranked by the Wald statistic.
Protoporphyrin IX (PPIX) measurement
Levels of PPIX in cells were analyzed by flow cytometry with excitation at 405 nm and emission at 610/20 nm as described previously [35, 37].
Statistical analysis
The GraphPad Prism 8.0 software (GraphPad) was used to generate graphs and perform statistical analysis. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. An unpaired nonparametric Mann–Whitney test was utilized to compare differences among groups unless otherwise indicated. Values at P < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Little effect of Zbtb24-deficiency on the development and phenotype of B cells in mice
Given that the germline knockout of Zbtb24 is embryonic lethal in mice [8], we generated mice harboring a conditional Zbtb24loxp/+ allele with two loxp sites flanking the exon 2, which contains the translation starting site (Fig. 1A). The N-terminal 316 amino acids, including the BTB domain, the AT-hook domain and the first C2H2 Zinc finger motif, of ZBTB24 protein would be specifically removed in Cre-expressing cells/tissues, which results in a frame shift in the protein coding sequence and thereby generates a premature stop codon. To address cell-intrinsic roles of Zbtb24 in the development and function of B cells in vivo, we crossed the Zbtb24loxp/+ mice with the Cd19-driven Cre-expressing mouse strain (Cd19Cre/+) to generate B cell specific Zbtb24 deficient (Zbtb24B−CKO, Cd19Cre/+Zbtb24loxp/loxp) and the littermate control (Cd19Cre/+, Cd19Cre/+Zbtb24+/+) mice. Zbtb24B−CKO mice grew normally, and were phenotypically indistinguishable from the control Cd19Cre/+ mice.
In Zbtb24B−CKO mice, Zbtb24 was specifically and efficiently deleted from CD19-expressing pre-B and pro-B cells onward in the BM and periphery, while its expressions in CD19-negative BM pre-pro B cells, splenocytes and thymocytes were intact as analyzed by Q-PCR and/or western blot (Fig. 1B–D). Notably, lack of Zbtb24 affected neither the percentages/absolute numbers of different developing stages of B cells in the BM (Fig. 1E), nor the numbers of splenic FOB/MZB cells as well as the peritoneal B2, B1a/B1b cells in the periphery (Fig. S1A and B). Moreover, the percentages of GCB in the spleens, mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) and Peyer’s Patches (PP), and serum total IgM, IgG, and IgA levels were all normal in Zbtb24B−CKO mice (Fig. S1C and Fig. 1F). Thus, depletion of B cell Zbtb24 has little impact on the early BM B cell development, the phenotype and maintenance of peripheral B cells, and serum antibody levels in naive mice.
Largely normal humoral responses to TD-Ags in Zbtb24B−CKO mice
The major immunological features of patients with ICF2 are hypogammaglobulinemia and lack of circulating Bm cells, possibly owing to the disrupted germinal center reactions [3, 19, 20, 44]. We thus first characterized TD-Ag-induced humoral responses in mice with B cell specific Zbtb24 deficiency. Then, 1 week after immunization with NP19-OVA emulsified in IFA (NP-OVA/IFA), serum levels of NP-specific IgM, IgG1, and IgG2c were significantly reduced in Zbtb24B−CKO mice. Surprisingly, on day 14 only NP-specific IgG2c was still slightly decreased, while the other two subtypes were reverted to normal levels in Zbtb24B−CKO mice (Fig. 2A, B). Moreover, the percentages and numbers of CD19+CD95highCD38low GCB as well as CD19lowCD138++ PC in spleens were all comparable between control and Zbtb24B−CKO mice (Fig. 2C, D). Within gated GCB cells, percents of CD86lowCXCR4high dark zone centroblasts and CD86highCXCR4low light zone centrocytes were comparable between the two genotypes of mice as well (Fig. 2C). Consistent with our previous findings in human cells, lack of ZBTB24 did not affect the expressions of BCL6, the key driving TF for GC reactions, in gated either GCB (defined as CD19+CD95highCD38low) compartment or total CD19+ B cells (Fig. S2A, B). In addition, the numbers of splenic GCB and PC cells were comparable in Cd19Cre/+ and Zbtb24B−CKO mice immunized with sheep red blood cells (SRBC) as well (Fig. S2C), further corroborating the dispensability of Zbtb24 on their differentiations in vivo. Notably, ZBTB24 was efficiently depleted in purified GCB cells (Fig. S2D), thus it is unlikely that ZBTB24-expressing cells outcompete ZBTB24-null ones to fill the GCB compartment in TD-Ag-immunized Zbtb24B−CKO mice.
Given that the generation of specific antibodies appeared to be delayed in Zbtb24B−CKO mice upon immunization, we immunized mice with NP-OVA/IFA on day 0, and boosted the mice with the same antigen intraperitoneally once again on day 53 to further determine the impact of B cell Zbtb24 on humoral responses elicited by TD-Ags in vivo (Fig. 2E). Akin to previous results, control mice produced significantly more NP-specific IgG1 and IgG2c on day 10, and the differences went down greatly on day 20 post the primary immunization (Fig. 2F). Of note, comparable levels of NP-specific antibodies were detected between the two groups thereafter, even on day 7 and 17 post the secondary challenge (Fig. 2F). The numbers of PCs were normal in spleens of Zbtb24B−CKO as well (Fig. 2G).
We also immunized mice with a high dose of NP19-OVA (100 μg/mouse) adsorbed on alum, which predisposes to Th2 immune responses instead of Th1 triggered by IFA in vivo. Again, reduced antigen-specific IgG1 were only observed early (day 7) post the primary immunization (Fig. S3A, B). Moreover, specific deletion of Zbtb24 in B cell compartment did not affect the ratios of high-affinity to low-affinity (against NP2-BSA and NP25-BSA, respectively) IgG1 and IgG2c before (i.e., day 70) and two weeks (i.e., day 84) post the secondary immunization (Figure S3C, D). Given that ZBTB proteins may act redundantly to maintain the integrity and function of immune cells [16], we conducted RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) analysis on purified splenic B cells before and after LPS stimulation to determine if any ZBTB proteins were evidently upregulated to compensate for the loss of Zbtb24. Levels of all ZBTB proteins, except ZBTB24, did not differ significantly between time-matched control and Zbtb24B−CKO splenic B cells (Table S2).
To exclude any potential off-target deletions of Zbtb24 in Zbtb24B−CKO mice, we next adoptively transferred purified splenic control or Zbtb24-deficient CD19+ B cells, together with WT CD4+ Th cells, into Rag2−/− recipients before immunization (Fig. S4A). Although the total IgM and IgG levels were reduced in Rag2−/− mice reconstituted with Zbtb24-depleted B cells, serum levels of antigen-specific IgG, and total numbers of splenic CD19+ B cells or CD19lowCD138++ PCs did not differ in Rag2−/− recipients implanted with control versus Zbtb24-deficient B cells (Fig. S4B–D). Decreased total polyreactive IgM might underlie the reduced levels of NP-specific IgM in Zbtb24B−CKO mice (Fig. S4B, C), as ablation of Zbtb24 did not profoundly affect the CSR ability of murine splenic B cells in vitro (Fig. S5).
Collectively, these data indicate that B cell intrinsic Zbtb24 does not play an essential role in the generation and maintenance of GCB cells, their affinity maturation as well as later differentiation toward Bm or PCs after immunization, albeit that Zbtb24B−CKO mice show delayed/mitigated early antibody productions induced by TD-Ag. Notably, mice with a specific depletion of Zbtb24 in T cells (Cd4-Cre) or the whole hematopoietic lineages (Vav1-Cre) exhibit largely intact antibody responses in vivo before and after TD-Ag immunizations (Fig. S6A–D), implying that Zbtb24 may modulate TD-Ag-elicited GC reactions and antibody responses outside of the hematopoietic system.
Significantly reduced humoral responses to TID-Ags in Zbtb24B−CKO mice
The reduced total serum IgM and IgG in Rag2−/− mice reconstituted with Zbtb24-deficient total splenic B cells, most of which likely react against autoantigens and commensal gut bacteria, indicate that lack of Zbtb24 hampers antibody responses elicited by TID-Ags (Figure S4B). Indeed, Zbtb24B−CKO mice produced significantly decreased amounts of NP-specific IgM, IgG1, and IgG3, three major antibody subtypes against soluble protein or carbohydrate antigens in mice [39], in the first 2 weeks after immunization with the type II TID-Ag NP-Ficoll. On day 21 and 35, levels of IgG1 were still reduced, and the other two antibody subtypes tended to decrease as well (Fig. 3A). Likewise, significantly less NP-specific IgM, IgG1, IgG3, and IgG2b were detected in Zbtb24B−CKO mice after immunization with the type I TID-Ag NP-LPS (Fig. 3F). As expected, reduced percentages/numbers of CD19lowCD138++ PCs were detected in spleens and/or peritoneal cavities (PeC) of Zbtb24B−CKO mice (Fig. 3B–E and G–H). Moreover, depletion of Zbtb24 in hematopoietic cells resulted in diminished antibody productions induced NP-Ficoll as well (Fig. S6E). These data strongly indicate that B cell intrinsic Zbtb24 promotes the differentiation of PC and production of antibodies against TID-Ags in vivo.
B1 and MZB cells are considered the main responders to TID-Ags [45]. We thus tried to delineate which cell type was responsible for the diminished antibody levels in TID-Ag-immunized Zbt24B−CKO mice via detailed flow cytometry analyses. At 5 weeks post NP-Ficoll immunization, the numbers of NP-specific cells in gated different B cell compartments were all comparable in the spleens and PeC between Cd19Cre/+ and Zbtb24B−CKO mice (Fig. S7), possibly owing to the late analyzing time point. Of note, significantly less NP+ B1, but not FOB or MZB, cells were observed in the spleens of Zbtb24B−CKO mice 3 weeks post NP-LPS inoculation, and NP+ B1 cells tended to decrease in their PeC as well (Fig. S8), indicating that B1 was the target B cell subset through which Zbtb24 promoted TID-Ag-induced antibody responses in vivo.
Zbtb24-deficiency impairs the differentiation and antibody-producing ability of B1 cells in vivo
To unambiguously reveal the roles of Zbtb24 in B1 cells in vivo, we adoptively transferred peritoneal B1 cells, purified from Cd19Cre/+ or Zbtb24B−CKO mice by FACS-sorting, into Rag2−/− mice with no mature T/B cells and serum antibodies (Fig. 4A). Total IgM levels were reduced by ~ 70% in Rag2−/− recipients received Zbtb24-deficient B1 cells (Fig. 4B). Moreover, 7 days after NP-LPS immunization (i.e., day 27 post transfer), Zbtb24-deficient B1-reconstituted Rag2−/− recipients produced significantly less NP-specific IgM than those harboring control Cd19Cre/+ B1 cells (Fig. 4C). Total or NP-specific IgG was barely detectable in recipients implanted with Zbtb24-deficient or sufficient B1 cells (data not shown).
Upon activation, some peritoneal B1 cells transit to the spleen to divide and differentiate into PCs, while others stay in PeC and rapidly differentiate into PCs even without division [46]. We thus compared the number of B and PCs in the spleens and PeC of recipients. The percentages of Zbtb24-deficient CD19+ B cells and CD138+ PCs were significantly reduced in spleens, while only the latter was decreased in the PeC of recipients (Fig. 4D, E).
In sum, our data (depicted in Figs. 3, 4, and S6E, S7, S8) indicate that lack of ZBTB24 protein suppresses the differentiation of B1 cells toward PCs and thereby reduces the antibody levels against TID-Ags in vivo. Given that surface levels of CD11b, which couples with CD18 to form MAC-1/CR3 and governs the migration of B1 cells from the PeC into the spleens [46, 47], and surface IgM were comparable on Zbtb24-deficient and -sufficient peritoneal B1 cells (Fig. S9A, B), it is unlikely that reduced PC differentiation of B1 cells was attributable to impaired migration or BCR-triggering.
Zbtb24-deficiency impedes the PC differentiation of B1 cells without compromising their survival, activation and proliferation in vitro
Upon activation by LPS in vitro, the differentiation of purified peritoneal B1, but not B2, cells towards CD138+ PCs was significantly impaired by Zbtb24 depletion (Fig. 5A, B). Accordingly, levels of IgM and IgG3 in culture supernatants were reduced in LPS-cultivated Zbtb24-null B1 cells (Fig. 5D). Given that B1 cells are more sensitive to TLR agonists-induced PC differentiation than FOB cells [29], we further cultured splenic B cells with anti-IgM/CD40 or high amounts of LPS to mimic the T-cell dependent or independent stimulations, respectively. Again, deficiency of Zbtb24 did not suppress the PC differentiation of splenic B2 cells as well as their antibody producing abilities in these conditions (Fig. S9C–E), corroborating our in vivo findings depicted in Figs. 2D, G and S4D. Zbtb24-deficiency did not reduce the viabilities and cell numbers in these B1/B2 cultures (Figs. 5C, and S10A, D, E). Moreover, the ability of B1/B2 cells to upregulate surface activation makers (CD69 and CD86) were not impaired by Zbtb24 depletion (Fig. S10B, C, F), excluding a generally disrupted signaling transduction downstream of TLR4 in B cells deprived of Zbtb24.
As reported previously [48], B1 cells were anergic to BCR triggering and thus failed to undergo activation upon anti-IgM stimulation in vitro (Fig. S10B, C, F). To further determine the role of ZBTB24 in cell proliferation, we labeled B1 cells with cell division tracker CFSE before culture. Interestingly, LPS stimulation induced massive PC differentiation accompanied by minimal cell divisions, whereas anti-CD40 elicited robust proliferation concurrent with little CD138 upregulation (Fig. 5E), implying that B1 cells were able to uncouple PC differentiation from the cell division process. Of note, Zbtb24-depletion significantly repressed PC differentiation of B1 cells without impeding their mitoses induced by LPS or anti-CD40 in vitro (Fig. 5E).
On the basis of these data, we conclude that ZBTB24 promotes the PC differentiation of B1 cells independent of their survival, activation and proliferation in vitro.
Zbtb24-deficiency inhibits the PC differentiation of B1 cells via attenuating heme synthesis
We next performed RNA-Seq analysis to explore how ZBTB24 regulates the differentiation of B1 cells. Upon activation by LPS, Zbtb24-deficient peritoneal B1, but not splenic B2 cells, expressed significantly lower levels of hallmark genes involved in PC differentiation, unfolded protein response (UPR), and protein secretion, such as Prdm1 (the driving force of PC differentiation), Sdc1 (encoding CD138), Il10, Irf4, and Xbp1 (Fig. 6A, B, E, and Table S2). Of note, expressions of Bach2 and Bcl6, two major TFs repressing Prdm1, were not influenced by Zbtb24 depletion in B1 cells (Fig. 6B). Therefore, it is unlikely that the B1-specific effect of ZBTB24 on PC differentiation is attributable to its direct binding and regulation of these key regulators.
Enormous studies recently showed that the activation and function of lymphocytes are intertwined with metabolic reprogramming and adaption [31–33]. In association with the altered function, multiple genes relating to nutrients uptake and metabolism, such as Slc2a1/Glut1, Slc16a3/Mct3, Ak4, Pdk1, Pfkl, and Tpi1, were significantly upregulated in Zbtb24B−CKO B1 cells (Fig. S11A). Accordingly, GSEA identified a positive enrichment of gene sets regulating the glycolysis and pyruvate metabolism in Zbtb24-null B1 cells (Fig. S11B). By contrast, a panel of genes involved in heme metabolism were downregulated in Zbtb24B−CKO cells, albeit that the differences did not reach the cutoff value and thus were much milder compared with Zbtb24 direct targets, such as Cdca7 and Ostc (Figs. 6A, C, and S11C). Expressions of Alad (5-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase) and Cpox (Coproporphyrinogen oxidase), two enzymes that directly catalyze reactions along the heme synthesis pathway in cytosol and mitochondrial intermembrane space, respectively [49], were consistently reduced in Zbtb24-null B1 but not B2 cells (Fig. 6C, D, S11C, and Table S2). Moreover, the level of Hmox1, a heme-induced oxygenase that mediates its degradation and serves as a readout for intracellular heme content [38], was mildly decreased in Zbtb24B−CKO B1 cells as well (Fig. 6C). Given that heme promotes PRDM1 expression and PC differentiation of B cells by inactivating BACH2 [38], we reasoned that heme biosynthesis may be attenuated in Zbtb24-depleted B1 cells, thereby leading to impaired PC differentiation.
Indeed, Zbtb24-depletion significantly mitigated LPS-induced upregulation of PPIX, the final substrate of heme biosynthesis [49], in B1 cells, albeit no differences were observed in resting cells (Fig. 6F). Notably, ablation of Zbtb24 resulted in a more pronounced PPIX reduction in CD138− non-PC cells than that in CD138+ PC cells (26.2% versus 10.1%, Fig. 6F). Moreover, addition of exogenous hemin in cultures almost completely abrogated the differentiation defects of Zbtb24-deficient B1 cells (Fig. 6G, I), while its supplementation similarly promoted/suppressed PC differentiation/CSR in control versus Zbtb24B−CKO splenic B cells (Fig. S12A, B). Together, these data indicate that ZBTB24 specifically promotes the PC differentiation of B1 cells via augmenting heme synthesis. Exogenous hemin only slightly potentiated the PC differentiation of control B1 cells (Fig. 6G, I), implying that activated peritoneal B1 cells may contain abundant intracellular heme to facilitate their accelerated and heightened PC differentiation.
Zbtb24-depletion represses the heme synthesis partially through mTORC1 in B1 cells
The rather mildly downregulated genes along heme synthesis pathway, compared with Zbtb24-direct targets, such as Cdca7, implied that ZBTB24 exerts the modulation of former genes indirectly. It has been recently shown that endogenous ROS inhibits heme synthesis, and activated splenic B cells with intermediate mitochondrial mass/membrane potential are predisposed to become PCs [37]. We thus wondered whether ZBTB24 promoted heme synthesis in B1 cells via regulating intracellular ROS and/or mitochondrial function. Compared with activated splenic B cells, B1 cells had significantly higher levels of ROS, which were further increased by Zbtb24-depletion (Figs. 6H, J, and S12C, D). However, addition of the antioxidant L-ascorbic acid (L-AC) failed to promote PC differentiation in peritoneal B1 cells, albeit that it did reduce ROS levels in B1 cell and augment the PC differentiation of splenic B2 cells (Figs. 6G–J, and S12). The mitochondrial mass/membrane potential was markedly lower in splenic B2-derived PCs as previously reported [37], but no such differences were observed in B1 cultures, and no significant impact of Zbtb24-deficiency was observed (Figs. 6H, J, and S12C, D). Thus, the metabolic reprogramming and mitochondrial function differ significantly between B1 versus B2 cells along their differentiation toward PCs. Because ROS represses the final step of heme synthesis by inhibiting the addition of ferrous ions to PPIX [37], it is unlikely that disturbed ROS levels were responsible for the attenuated PPIX accumulation in Zbtb24-deficient B1 cells.
Expressions of Slc3a2 and Slc7a5, encoding the respective heavy and light chain of CD98, positively correlate with mTORC1 activity in B cells [35]. RNA-Seq data showed that levels of Slc3a2 and Slc7a5 were decreased, coinciding with the disturbed mTORC1 signaling in activated Zbtb24-null B1 cells as revealed by GSEA (Fig. S11A, B). mTORC1 activity regulates the protein synthesis and metabolism of mammalian cells, and promotes PC differentiation of murine splenic B cells partially via augmenting heme synthesis [35]. In keeping with these findings obtained in B2 cells, inclusion of an mTORC1 specific antagonist, rapamycin, significantly suppressed the PC differentiation and PPIX accumulation in peritoneal B1 cells (Fig. 7A, B), demonstrating that mTORC1 promotes heme synthesis and PC differentiation of B1 cells as well. In line with this notion, Zbtb24-depletion significantly repressed the expression of phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 (p-S6), an event controlled by mTORC1 activity [35], in LPS-stimulated B1 cells, albeit that no differences were observed in the upstream AKT activity (Fig. 7C, D). Notably, the inhibition of p-S6 was more pronounced, akin to PPIX contents, in CD138− cells as compared with that in CD138+ PCs (Figs. 6F, and 7C, D), indicating that the impaired mTORC1 activity underlies, at least partially, the attenuated heme synthesis and PC differentiation of Zbtb24-null B1 cells.
We noticed that PC differentiation and intracellular PPIX levels were still considerably reduced in mTORC1 repressed (i.e., cultured with LPS plus rapamycin) Zbtb24-null B1 cells (Fig. 7A, B). To determine the extent to which the two factors (mTORC1 activity versus heme accumulation) contribute to the defected PC generation of Zbtb24-deficient B1 cells, we differentiated B1 cells in the presence of rapamycin/hemin alone or both (Fig. 7E, F). Supplementation of hemin not only completely reverted the defects caused by Zbtb24-depletion as previously observed in Fig. 6G, I, but also partially relieved the inhibitory effect of rapamycin on PC differentiation of B1 cells. Of note, control and Zbtb24-null B1 cells exhibited comparable PC differentiation in the presence of both rapamycin and hemin (Fig. 7E, F), implying that attenuated intracellular heme synthesis is mainly responsible for the differentiation defects of Zbtb24-deficient B1 cells.
Collectively, our data show that ZBTB24 promotes the PC differentiation of B1 cells mainly through augmenting heme synthesis, and the attenuated heme biosynthesis in Zbtb24-depleted B1 cells is partially attributed to their impaired mTORC1 activity.
No effect of Zbtb24-deficiency on PC differentiation of MZB cells
Akin to B1 cells, MZB cells are specialized in responses to TID-Ags and are more sensitive, compared to conventional FOB cells, to TLR agonists-induced proliferation (Fig. 8A) and PC differentiation [29]. We thus questioned whether Zbtb24 exerts a similar function in this innate-like B cell subset as well. LPS stimulation induced robust cell division and PC differentiation of MZB cells, while BCR-crosslinking elicited massive proliferation accompanied by mild PC generation (Fig. 8A–C). Notably, neither the proliferation nor the PC differentiation of LPS-cultivated MZB cells were affected by Zbtb24 depletion, and the addition of exogenous hemin enhanced PC differentiation of Zbtb24 deficient or sufficient MZB cells to the same extent (Fig. 8A–D). Hence, depletion of Zbtb24 does not impact the PC differentiation of MZB cells.
Notably, in stark contrast to the massive PC differentiation but little proliferation of peritoneal B1 cells (Fig. 5E), the vigorously LPS-elicited differentiation of MZB cells was accompanied by extensive cell division (Fig. 8A–C). Moreover, depletion of Zbtb24 resulted in a subtle but nevertheless consistent decrease of divided CFSElow MZB cells in anti-IgM-stimulated cultures (Fig. 8A, B). This slightly reduced BCR-elicited proliferations of MZB cells may contribute to the decreased antibody levels in Zbtb24B−CKO mice after TID-Ag immunization as well. We speculated that the distinct metabolic adaptation and energy/substrate allocation between proliferation and differentiation in B1 versus MZB cells, triggered by different stimuli, might underlie the distinct effects of Zbtb24 in these cells.
Discussion
The clinical and immunological presentations of ZBTB24-disrupted patients with ICF2 imply a prominent role of ZBTB24 in the terminal differentiation and antibody secretion of human B lymphocytes in vivo [3, 44], which prompted us to investigate the cell autonomous role of ZBTB24 in B cell development, differentiation and function by using the conditional knockout mice. Unexpectedly, our data demonstrate that B cell Zbtb24 is virtually dispensable for TD-Ag-induced GC reactions and antibody responses in vivo, but its deficiency specifically impedes the PC differentiation B1 cells and thereby reduces TID-Ag-induced antibody productions. Although it is thought that the recurrent infections observed in ZBTB24-deficient patients with ICF2 mainly stem from the lack of memory humoral responses, our study indicates that defected B1 cell function may contribute to their commonly occurred respiratory and gastrointestinal infections. Thus, ZBTB24 may represent an important regulator in B1 cell-mediated barrier defenses and immune regulations. In addition, our data suggest that ZBTB24 regulate humoral responses in vivo, especially those directed against TD-Ags, beyond the hematopoietic system in mice.
Despite the reduced levels of serum antibodies and peripheral CD19+CD27+ Bm cells, total amounts of circulating T and B lymphocytes are normal in most ICF cases [3, 44]. Moreover, detailed anatomical and immunological examinations revealed the absence of GC structure in one patients with ICF2 devoid of ZBTB24, and downregulating its expression inhibits the proliferation of a human B cell line by indirectly repressing PRDM1 and IRF4 in vitro [3, 19, 20]. Given the essential role of GC in the propagation of Bm and antibody-secreting PCs [26], these findings strongly indicate that ZBTB24 controls in vivo antibody responses through regulating the GC structure/reaction rather than the general development/maintenance of lymphocytes in humans. In partial agreement of this notion, specific deletion of Zbtb24 in B cell compartment from the CD19+ pro-B stage onward (Cd19-Cre) has no effect on the later development, maintenance and phenotype of B cells in the BM and periphery of mice. However, contrary to the Bm and antibody defects in patients with ZBTB24-disrupted ICF2, neither the GCB numbers, nor the primary/secondary antibody responses elicited by TD-Ags are significantly decreased in Zbtb24B−CKO mice, regardless of antigen doses and adjuvant types used for immunization. In keeping with these in-vivo findings, Zbtb24-depletion does not impair the in vitro survival, activation, proliferation and differentiation of FOB cells, the main responders to TD-Ags.
Apart from B cells, many other immune cells, such as CD4+ Th cells and antigen-presenting cells (macrophages and dendritic cells etc.), participate in TD-Ag-induced antibody responses as well. Thus, it is possible that Zbtb24 modulates humoral responses against TD-Ags in a B cell extrinsic manner. However, mice with a specific depletion of Zbtb24 in T cells (Cd4-Cre) or the whole hematopoietic lineages (Vav1-Cre) exhibit intact TD-Ag-induced antibody responses in vivo as well, indicating that hematopoietic Zbtb24 is dispensable for B cell development/maintenance and the canonical TD-Ag-induced antibody responses via GC reactions in mice. The latter is clearly distinct from patients with ZBTB24-disrupted ICF2 with hypo- or a-gammaglobulinemia and lack of circulating Bm cells [3, 44]. The discrepancies in (memory) humoral responses between patients with ICF2 and aforementioned Zbtb24-deficient mice may stem from the distinct functions of ZBTB24 across species as evidenced by the fact that Zbtb24-null embryo is only viable in humans but not in mice [8]. It is also possible that ZBTB24 may regulate TD-Ag-induced GC reaction and antibody responses beyond the hematopoietic system, for instance, through supporting the formation of proper B cell follicular networks that steers the GC output [50]. In addition, considering the prominent intellectual defects of patients with ICF2 and the recently discovered neuron-spleen axis in regulating GC responses [3, 51], germline Zbtb24-deficiency might impair humoral responses against TD-Ags via disrupting the neuron-immune crosstalk as well. Nonetheless, a functional substitution of ZBTB24 by other ZBTB proteins, albeit unlikely based on our RNA-Seq data in splenic B cells, could not be completely excluded.
By contrast, our data highlight an important role of B cell Zbtb24 in humoral responses against TID-Ags in vivo. Upon immunization with a type I or type II TID-Ag, Zbtb24B−CKO mice generate significantly less antibody-secreting PCs in the presence of normal amounts of B1, FOB, and MZB cells. At the cellular level, depletion of Zbtb24 markedly restrains the ability of B1 cells to differentiate into PCs and produce antibodies both in vitro upon LPS stimulation and in vivo after transfer into Rag2−/− recipients without impairing their in vitro survival, activation and proliferation. MZB cells are the other main responders, beyond B1 cells, to TID-Ags, and these two innate-like B cell subsets behave similarly in many aspects. For example, both B1 and MZB are hypersensitive to TLR agonists-induced PC differentiation [29]. Strikingly, Zbtb24-ablation does not markedly impact the proliferation and PC differentiation of MZB cells. Therefore, our study demonstrates that B1 cells are the main target B cell subset through which ZBTB24 augments TID-Ag-elicited antibody productions mainly by promoting PC differentiation in vivo. Of note, despite the comparable B1 numbers in naive Zbtb24B−CKO mice and the little impact of Zbtb24-depletion on the survival, activation and anti-CD40-triggered proliferation of B1 cells in vitro, the reduced numbers of Zbtb24-null B1 cells in spleens of Rag2−/− recipients implies that the latter’s long-term survival/maintenance is impaired in some circumstances and thereby contributes to reduced antibody levels in vivo.
Unlike conventional FOB cells that need to undergo extensive proliferation before terminal differentiation, B1 cells do not respond readily to BCR-induced clonal expansion, possibly owing to the highly expressed inhibitory co-receptors like CD5 and LYN. Instead, B1 cells secrete natural IgM at steady state in the absence of antigenic stimulation, and upon encountering with non-specific inflammatory/pathogen-associated stimuli, they promptly and vigorously differentiate into antibody (mainly IgM)-secreting cells [29, 48, 52]. These polyreactive IgM not only participate in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis and prevention of autoimmune reactions, but also constitutes an important first-line defense against infections before activation of the adaptive immune system by facilitating the clearance of autologous dead/dying cells or invading pathogens, respectively [53]. Moreover, B1 cells may regulate the immune response independent of antibody secretion. Both at steady state and after activation, B1 cells may function as a sort of regulatory B (Breg) cells by producing copious amounts of anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [54]. Zbtb24-deficient B1 cells produce less IgM and IL-10, it is thus tempting to speculate that the dysfunctional B1 cells contribute to the commonly-occurred infections as well as the uncommonly-observed autoimmune manifestations in patients with ICF2 [44], albeit that the putative surface markers defining human B1 cells remain controversial so far [55]. As such, B cell intrinsic roles of Zbtb24 in these aspects, such as infections of S. pneumoniae where B1 cells are involved [56], warrant further studies.
The promptly upregulated PC differentiation and antibody-producing ability of B1 cells upon activation imply that they are transcriptionally and metabolically well prepared for the high secretory capacity. Indeed, innate-like B1 and MZB cells constitutively express more PRDM1 while less BCL6, and are bioenergetically more active than conventional FOB cells [29, 32]. Moreover, sustained mTORC1 signaling coordinates an immediate UPR-affiliated transcriptome profile preceding the expression of XBP1, and confers MZB cells the ability to undergo rapid and robust PC differentiation even in the presence of cell cycle inhibitors [57, 58], which mirrors the unique mitosis-independent PC differentiation of B1 cells as we showed here. In activated conventional splenic B cells, mTORC1 promotes heme synthesis partially by reducing intracellular ROS, and thereby augments their PC differentiation because heme induces PRDM1 by inactivating its repressor molecule BACH2 [35, 37, 38]. Once synthesized, heme enhances mTORC1 activity, possibly through PRDM1 induction or modulating the mitochondrial function [35, 59]. We here showed that mTORC1 exerts a similar function in B1 cells as rapamycin-mediated mTORC1 inhibition greatly inhibits the PC differentiation and heme accumulation in B1 cells as well. Given that Zbtb24-depletion reduces mTORC1 activity and PPIX content, and that hemin supplementation almost completely reverts the differentiation defects of Zbtb24-null B1 cells even in the presence of rapamycin, our data reveal that ZBTB24 promotes the PC differentiation of B1 cells mainly via heme synthesis, which is partially mediated through mTORC1. Detailed mechanisms underlying the regulations of mTORC1 activity and heme synthesis in B1 cells by ZBTB24 merit further investigation.
Both human and murine Bm cells possess an enhanced heme signature compared to naive B cells, and supplementation of hemin promotes their differentiation toward PCs [59]. Thus, increased heme biosynthesis seems to be a conserved feature of B cells with accelerated and augmented PC differentiation potential, including B1, MZB, and Bm cells. The comparable antibody levels between control and Zbtb24B−CKO mice after secondary TD-Ag challenge indicate that ZBTB24 has little effect on heme metabolism and PC differentiation of murine Bm cells. Why ZBTB24 only influences the heme biosynthesis and PC differentiation of B1, but not other B cells, at least in mice, is intriguing. Although MZB and B1 cells are considered innate-like B cells and able to mount rapid antibody responses against invading pathogens before the adaptive immune responses are properly propagated and matured, these two cell types are functionally distinct at many aspects. For instance, our data demonstrate that only B1 cells are able to voluntarily uncouple PC differentiation from cell division upon activation, albeit that MZB cells may differentiate into PCs in the presence of cell cycle blockers [58]. It is thus conceivable that B1 cells, depending on the types of stimulation (i.e., LPS versus anti-CD40 triggering), adopt distinct metabolic pathways to devote most of the anergy and biomolecule building blocks either to the PC differentiation/antibody secretion pathway or to the mitosis process. We hypothesize that in case of the PC differentiation pathway, B1 cells immensely and sharply elevate heme biosynthesis, and ZBTB24 somehow participates in this metabolic adaptation process partially by regulating mTORC1 activity in an AKT-independent fashion. In MZB cells, this metabolic reprogramming is much milder and thus less affected by Zbtb24 deficiency. Of note, despite that mice deficient in Hmox1, the heme degrading enzyme, have increased serum antibody levels, administration of hemin to mice does not augment antibody responses against TD- or TID-Ags [38, 59, 60], indicating a complex effect of heme in vivo.
During the preparation of this manuscript, Chen’s group reported that ablation of Zbtb24 in B cell compartment (Cd19-Cre) had no effect on basal serum antibody levels and TD-Ag-induced GC reactions in mice [61], corroborating our findings in this aspect. They found that Zbtb24-depletion upregulates Il5ra expression, which results in augmented CD19 activity and impaired MZB proliferation induced by BCR [61]. In partial agreement with their findings, BCR-triggered proliferation of MZB cells were impaired upon Zbtb24-depletion in our hands, albeit that the defect was far milder. Moreover, our RNA-Seq and/or WB analyses reveal no upregulations in Il5ra expression and phosphorylation of CD19 in our Zbtb24-depleted B cells (Figs. S11C and S13 and Table S2). These discrepancies may relate to different strategies used to generate the conditional knockout mice. In addition, given the similar phenotypes (largely intact/significantly impaired antibody responses against TD/TID-Ags, respectively) between our Cd19Cre/+ versus Zbtb24B−CKO mice (both contain one Cd19 allele) or control versus Vav1Cre/+Zbtb24loxp/loxp mice (both contain two Cd19 alleles), it is unlikely that heterogeneous lack of Cd19 compensates for the loss of Zbtb24 and thereby results in the grossly normal functions of Zbtb24-depleted B2 cells in our study. Nonetheless, we here extend the role of Zbtb24 in humoral immune response by showing that lack of ZBTB24 significantly impedes the mTORC1 activity, heme synthesis and PC differentiation of peritoneal B1 cells, leading to diminished TID-Ag-induced antibody productions in vivo. Thus, ZBTB24 may represent an important factor involved in regulating barrier defenses against pathogens through B1 cells, and impaired function of B1 cells likely contributes to the clinical presentations of patients with ICF2.
Conclusions
Our study reveals that ZBTB24 represents a key molecule that specifically promotes the plasma cell differentiation of B1 cells via heme synthesis, at least in mice, which is relevant for barrier defenses against invading pathogens in our bodies. Our study also suggests that defected B1 functions contribute to recurrent infections in patients with ICF2.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- ICF
Immunodeficiency, centromeric instability, and facial anomalies syndrome
- GC
Germinal center
- GCB
GC B cells
- Tfh
T follicular helper cells
- Bm
Memory B cells
- PCs
Plasma cells
- CSR
Class-switch recombination
- BM
Bone marrow
- FOB
Follicular B cells
- MZB
Marginal zone B cells
- TD-Ags
T cell dependent antigens
- SHM
Somatic hypermutation
- BCR
B cell receptor
- TD-Ags
T cell independent antigens
- TFs
Transcriptional factors
- Zbtb24B−CKO
B cell specific Zbtb24 knockout mice (Cd19Cre/+Zbtb24loxp/loxp)
- WT
Wild type
- PPIX
Protoporphyrin IX
Author contributions
H.G., Y.Z., S.Z., X.Y.Q., W.L.Z., T.T.H., N.Z., C.Z., and J.W. conducted experiments; H.G., Y.Z., S.Z., X.Q.D., X.Y.Q., and J.W. analyzed data; H.M.W., W.P., and X.M.Z. assisted in some experiments; X.M.G., J.F.D., and F.Y.G. were involved in study design and coordination; J.W. conceived and coordinated the study, and wrote the manuscript.
Funding
This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32170914/81970371/31670888 and 81470564); and Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).
Availability of data and materials
The RNA-Seq data were deposited in the GEO database with the accession numbers GSE241746 and GSE241747. The majority of data supporting the findings of this study are presented within the article and its Supplemental Material. Data that are not directly included are available from the lead corresponding author (Dr. Jun Wang) upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
All animal experiments were performed in accordance with procedures approved by the ethics committee of Soochow University (approval no. SUDA20231130A02). The local ethics committee follows the rules of the Basel Declaration.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
He Gao, Ying Zhao and Sai Zhao contribute equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Jian-Feng Dai, Email: daijianfeng@suda.edu.cn.
Fang-Yuan Gong, Email: gongfangyuan@suda.edu.cn.
Jun Wang, Email: jwang79@suda.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Sterlin D, Velasco G, Moshous D, Touzot F, Mahlaoui N, Fischer A, et al. Genetic, cellular and clinical features of ICF syndrome: a French national survey. J Clin Immunol. 2016;36(2):149–59. 10.1007/s10875-016-0240-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hu H, Chen C, Shi S, Li B, Duan S. The gene mutations and subtelomeric DNA methylation in immunodeficiency, centromeric instability and facial anomalies syndrome. Autoimmunity. 2019;52(5–6):192–8. 10.1080/08916934.2019.1657846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Weemaes CM, van Tol MJ, Wang J, van Ostaijen-ten Dam MM, van Eggermond MC, Thijssen PE, et al. Heterogeneous clinical presentation in ICF syndrome: correlation with underlying gene defects. Eur J Hum Genet. 2013;21(11):1219–25. 10.1038/ejhg.2013.40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.de Greef JC, Wang J, Balog J, den Dunnen JT, Frants RR, Straasheijm KR, et al. Mutations in ZBTB24 are associated with immunodeficiency, centromeric instability, and facial anomalies syndrome type 2. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88(6):796–804. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.04.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Xu GL, Bestor TH, Bourc’his D, Hsieh CL, Tommerup N, Bugge M, et al. Chromosome instability and immunodeficiency syndrome caused by mutations in a DNA methyltransferase gene. Nature. 1999;402(6758):187–91. 10.1038/46052 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Thijssen PE, Ito Y, Grillo G, Wang J, Velasco G, Nitta H, et al. Mutations in CDCA7 and HELLS cause immunodeficiency-centromeric instability-facial anomalies syndrome. Nat Commun. 2015;6:7870. 10.1038/ncomms8870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Unoki M, Velasco G, Kori S, Arita K, Daigaku Y, Yeung WKA, et al. Novel compound heterozygous mutations in UHRF1 are associated with atypical immunodeficiency, centromeric instability and facial anomalies syndrome with distinctive genome-wide DNA hypomethylation. Hum Mol Genet. 2023;32(9):1439–56. 10.1093/hmg/ddac291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wu H, Thijssen PE, de Klerk E, Vonk KK, Wang J, den Hamer B, et al. Converging disease genes in ICF syndrome: ZBTB24 controls expression of CDCA7 in mammals. Hum Mol Genet. 2016;25(18):4041–51. 10.1093/hmg/ddw243 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Jenness C, Giunta S, Muller MM, Kimura H, Muir TW, Funabiki H. HELLS and CDCA7 comprise a bipartite nucleosome remodeling complex defective in ICF syndrome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(5):E876–85. 10.1073/pnas.1717509115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Thompson JJ, Kaur R, Sosa CP, Lee JH, Kashiwagi K, Zhou D, et al. ZBTB24 is a transcriptional regulator that coordinates with DNMT3B to control DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(19):10034–51. 10.1093/nar/gky682 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ren R, Hardikar S, Horton JR, Lu Y, Zeng Y, Singh AK, et al. Structural basis of specific DNA binding by the transcription factor ZBTB24. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(16):8388–98. 10.1093/nar/gkz557 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hardikar S, Ying Z, Zeng Y, Zhao H, Liu B, Veland N, et al. The ZBTB24-CDCA7 axis regulates HELLS enrichment at centromeric satellite repeats to facilitate DNA methylation. Protein Cell. 2020;11(3):214–8. 10.1007/s13238-019-00682-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Funabiki H, Wassing IE, Jia Q, Luo JD, Carroll T. Coevolution of the CDCA7-HELLS ICF-related nucleosome remodeling complex and DNA methyltransferases. Elife. 2023;12:RP86721. 10.7554/eLife.86721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Cheng ZY, He TT, Gao XM, Zhao Y, Wang J. ZBTB transcription factors: key regulators of the development, differentiation and effector function of T cells. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 713294. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.713294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Maeda T. Regulation of hematopoietic development by ZBTB transcription factors. Int J Hematol. 2016;104(3):310–23. 10.1007/s12185-016-2035-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Zhu C, Chen G, Zhao Y, Gao XM, Wang J. Regulation of the development and function of B cells by ZBTB transcription factors. Front Immunol. 2018;9:580. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Toyama H, Okada S, Hatano M, Takahashi Y, Takeda N, Ichii H, et al. Memory B cells without somatic hypermutation are generated from Bcl6-deficient B cells. Immunity. 2002;17(3):329–39. 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00387-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Cousu C, Mulot E, De Smet A, Formichetti S, Lecoeuche D, Ren J, et al. Germinal center output is sustained by HELLS-dependent DNA-methylation-maintenance in B cells. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):5695. 10.1038/s41467-023-41317-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kloeckener-Gruissem B, Betts DR, Zankl A, Berger W, Gungor T. A new and a reclassified ICF patient without mutations in DNMT3B and its interacting proteins SUMO-1 and UBC9. Am J Med Genet A. 2005;136(1):31–7. 10.1002/ajmg.a.30767 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Liang J, Yan R, Chen G, Feng J, Wu WW, Ren W, et al. Downregulation of ZBTB24 hampers the G0/1- to S-phase cell-cycle transition via upregulating the expression of IRF-4 in human B cells. Genes Immun. 2016;17(5):276–82. 10.1038/gene.2016.18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Helfricht A, Thijssen PE, Rother MB, Shah RG, Du L, Takada S, et al. Loss of ZBTB24 impairs nonhomologous end-joining and class-switch recombination in patients with ICF syndrome. J Exp Med. 2020;217(11): e20191688. 10.1084/jem.20191688 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Unoki M, Funabiki H, Velasco G, Francastel C, Sasaki H. CDCA7 and HELLS mutations undermine nonhomologous end joining in centromeric instability syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(1):78–92. 10.1172/JCI99751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Montecino-Rodriguez E, Dorshkind K. New perspectives in B-1 B cell development and function. Trends Immunol. 2006;27(9):428–33. 10.1016/j.it.2006.07.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Clarke AJ, Riffelmacher T, Braas D, Cornall RJ, Simon AK. B1a B cells require autophagy for metabolic homeostasis and self-renewal. J Exp Med. 2018;215(2):399–413. 10.1084/jem.20170771 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Baumgarth N. The double life of a B-1 cell: self-reactivity selects for protective effector functions. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011;11(1):34–46. 10.1038/nri2901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Victora GD, Nussenzweig MC. Germinal centers. Annu Rev Immunol. 2022;40:413–42. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-120419-022408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Palm AE, Kleinau S. Marginal zone B cells: from housekeeping function to autoimmunity? J Autoimmun. 2021;119: 102627. 10.1016/j.jaut.2021.102627 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Aziz M, Holodick NE, Rothstein TL, Wang P. The role of B-1 cells in inflammation. Immunol Res. 2015;63(1–3):153–66. 10.1007/s12026-015-8708-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Genestier L, Taillardet M, Mondiere P, Gheit H, Bella C, Defrance T. TLR agonists selectively promote terminal plasma cell differentiation of B cell subsets specialized in thymus-independent responses. J Immunol. 2007;178(12):7779–86. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.12.7779 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ochiai K, Maienschein-Cline M, Simonetti G, Chen J, Rosenthal R, Brink R, et al. Transcriptional regulation of germinal center B and plasma cell fates by dynamical control of IRF4. Immunity. 2013;38(5):918–29. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Boothby M, Rickert RC. Metabolic regulation of the immune humoral response. Immunity. 2017;46(5):743–55. 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.04.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jellusova J. Cross-talk between signal transduction and metabolism in B cells. Immunol Lett. 2018;201:1–13. 10.1016/j.imlet.2018.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Foh B, Buhre JS, Sina C, Ehlers M. Influence of nutrients and metabolites on the differentiation of plasma cells and implications for autoimmunity. Front Immunol. 2022;13:1004644. 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1004644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Boothby MR, Brookens SK, Raybuck AL, Cho SH. Supplying the trip to antibody production-nutrients, signaling, and the programming of cellular metabolism in the mature B lineage. Cell Mol Immunol. 2022;19(3):352–69. 10.1038/s41423-021-00782-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Tsui C, Martinez-Martin N, Gaya M, Maldonado P, Llorian M, Legrave NM, et al. Protein kinase C-beta dictates B cell fate by regulating mitochondrial remodeling, metabolic reprogramming, and heme biosynthesis. Immunity. 2018;48(6):1144-59 e5. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.04.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Muri J, Thut H, Bornkamm GW, Kopf M. B1 and marginal zone B cells but not follicular b2 cells require Gpx4 to prevent lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis. Cell Rep. 2019;29(9):2731–44. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.10.070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Jang KJ, Mano H, Aoki K, Hayashi T, Muto A, Nambu Y, et al. Mitochondrial function provides instructive signals for activation-induced B-cell fates. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6750. 10.1038/ncomms7750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Watanabe-Matsui M, Muto A, Matsui T, Itoh-Nakadai A, Nakajima O, Murayama K, et al. Heme regulates B-cell differentiation, antibody class switch, and heme oxygenase-1 expression in B cells as a ligand of Bach2. Blood. 2011;117(20):5438–48. 10.1182/blood-2010-07-296483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Zhao Y, Zhao S, Qin XY, He TT, Hu MM, Gong Z, et al. Altered phenotype and enhanced antibody-producing ability of peripheral B cells in mice with Cd19-driven Cre expression. Cells. 2022;11(4):700. 10.3390/cells11040700 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–9. 10.1038/nmeth.1923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010;28(5):511–5. 10.1038/nbt.1621 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102(43):15545–50. 10.1073/pnas.0506580102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yu G, Wang LG, Han Y, He QY. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS. 2012;16(5):284–7. 10.1089/omi.2011.0118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Banday AZ, Jindal AK, Kaur A, Kumar Y, Nameirakpam J, Patra PK, et al. A young girl with hypogammaglobulinemia and granulomatous hepatitis caused by a novel mutation in ZBTB24 gene: A case based analysis. Immunobiology. 2020;225(3): 151912. 10.1016/j.imbio.2020.151912 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Haas KM. Programmed cell death 1 suppresses B-1b cell expansion and long-lived IgG production in response to T cell-independent type 2 antigens. J Immunol. 2011;187(10):5183–95. 10.4049/jimmunol.1101990 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yang Y, Tung JW, Ghosn EE, Herzenberg LA. Division and differentiation of natural antibody-producing cells in mouse spleen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104(11):4542–6. 10.1073/pnas.0700001104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Franke K, Pillai SY, Hoogenboezem M, Gijbels MJJ, Matlung HL, Geissler J, et al. SIRPalpha on mouse B1 cells restricts lymphoid tissue migration and natural antibody production. Front Immunol. 2020;11: 570963. 10.3389/fimmu.2020.570963 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Sindhava VJ, Bondada S. Multiple regulatory mechanisms control B-1 B cell activation. Front Immunol. 2012;3:372. 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ajioka RS, Phillips JD, Kushner JP. Biosynthesis of heme in mammals. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1763(7):723–36. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lutge M, De Martin A, Gil-Cruz C, Perez-Shibayama C, Stanossek Y, Onder L, et al. Conserved stromal-immune cell circuits secure B cell homeostasis and function. Nat Immunol. 2023;24(7):1149–60. 10.1038/s41590-023-01503-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wu M, Song G, Li J, Song Z, Zhao B, Liang L, et al. Innervation of nociceptor neurons in the spleen promotes germinal center responses and humoral immunity. Cell. 2024;187(12):2935-51 e19. 10.1016/j.cell.2024.04.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Holodick NE, Rothstein TL. Atypical response of B-1 cells to BCR ligation: a speculative model. Front Immunol. 2013;4:457. 10.3389/fimmu.2013.00457 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Morris G, Puri BK, Olive L, Carvalho AF, Berk M, Maes M. Emerging role of innate B1 cells in the pathophysiology of autoimmune and neuroimmune diseases: association with inflammation, oxidative and nitrosative stress and autoimmune responses. Pharmacol Res. 2019;148: 104408. 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104408 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Catalan D, Mansilla MA, Ferrier A, Soto L, Oleinika K, Aguillon JC, et al. Immunosuppressive mechanisms of regulatory B cells. Front Immunol. 2021;12: 611795. 10.3389/fimmu.2021.611795 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sanz I, Wei C, Jenks SA, Cashman KS, Tipton C, Woodruff MC, et al. Challenges and opportunities for consistent classification of human B cell and plasma cell populations. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2458. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02458 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Haas KM, Poe JC, Steeber DA, Tedder TF. B-1a and B-1b cells exhibit distinct developmental requirements and have unique functional roles in innate and adaptive immunity to S. pneumoniae. Immunity. 2005;23(1):7–18. 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.04.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gaudette BT, Jones DD, Bortnick A, Argon Y, Allman D. mTORC1 coordinates an immediate unfolded protein response-related transcriptome in activated B cells preceding antibody secretion. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):723. 10.1038/s41467-019-14032-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gaudette BT, Roman CJ, Ochoa TA, Gomez Atria D, Jones DD, Siebel CW, et al. Resting innate-like B cells leverage sustained Notch2/mTORC1 signaling to achieve rapid and mitosis-independent plasma cell differentiation. J Clin Invest. 2021;131(20): e151975. 10.1172/JCI151975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Price MJ, Scharer CD, Kania AK, Randall TD, Boss JM. Conserved epigenetic programming and enhanced heme metabolism drive memory B cell reactivation. J Immunol. 2021;206(7):1493–504. 10.4049/jimmunol.2000551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kapturczak MH, Wasserfall C, Brusko T, Campbell-Thompson M, Ellis TM, Atkinson MA, et al. Heme oxygenase-1 modulates early inflammatory responses: evidence from the heme oxygenase-1-deficient mouse. Am J Pathol. 2004;165(3):1045–53. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63365-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ying Z, Hardikar S, Plummer JB, Hamidi T, Liu B, Chen Y, et al. Enhanced CD19 activity in B cells contributes to immunodeficiency in mice deficient in the ICF syndrome gene Zbtb24. Cell Mol Immunol. 2023;20(12):1487–98. 10.1038/s41423-023-01106-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The RNA-Seq data were deposited in the GEO database with the accession numbers GSE241746 and GSE241747. The majority of data supporting the findings of this study are presented within the article and its Supplemental Material. Data that are not directly included are available from the lead corresponding author (Dr. Jun Wang) upon reasonable request.