Abstract
Purpose of Review
Dysphagia is highly prevalent in Parkinson disease (PD) but is not typically identified nor treated until later in the disease process. This review summarizes current pharmacological, surgical, and behavioral treatments for PD-associated dysphagia and contributions from translational animal research.
Recent Findings
Swallowing is a complex physiologic process controlled by multiple brain regions and neurotransmitter systems. As such, interventions that target nigrostriatal dopamine dysfunction have limited or detrimental effects on swallowing outcomes. Behavioral interventions can help target PD-associated dysphagia in mid-to-late stages. Animal research is necessary to refine treatments and useful in studying prodromal dysphagia.
Summary
Dysphagia is an early, common, and debilitating sign of PD. Current pharmacological and surgical interventions are not effective in ameliorating swallowing dysfunction; behavioral intervention remains the most effective approach for dysphagia treatment. Animal research has advanced our understanding of mechanisms underlying PD and PD-associated dysphagia, and continues to show translational promise for the study of dysphagia treatment options.
Keywords: Parkinson disease, Swallowing, Dysphagia, Pathophysiology, Treatment, Animal models
Introduction
Since its discovery, Parkinson disease (PD) has been known as a disease of the central nervous system, one that results in nigrostriatal dopamine depletion and hallmark motor disturbances (i.e., bradykinesia, resting tremor, rigidity, postural instability). As such, most treatment efforts have been dopamine-centric, aimed at ameliorating these debilitating hallmark motor signs of disease by targeting dopamine depletion in the brain. The disease, however, is now known to be a whole-body disease that begins prior to nigrostriatal involvement and motor sign development. In fact, hallmark motor signs of disease likely represent the mid-to-late stages of disease. Although the etiology is not yet fully understood, it is now accepted that PD onset may occur decades prior to diagnosis.
Some of the earliest noted signs of PD are autonomic, non-motor, and “other” motor features. These include gastrointestinal dysfunction, hyposmia, sleep disturbances, depression, diplopia, anxiety, cardiac dysautonomia, hypophonia, and, the focus of this review, dysphagia [1]. Dysphagia contributes to malnutrition, dehydration, economic burden, decreased quality of life, and mortality [2, 3, 4] in this population. The oral, pharyngeal, and esophageal stages of swallowing may be impaired and ultimately affect the efficient and safe transport of food, liquid, and/or saliva (bolus) from mouth to stomach, which can lead to inefficient oral intake and airway compromise (e.g., aspiration). In fact, aspiration pneumonia is the leading cause of death in PD [3, 4].
Despite the prevalence and impact on patient quality of life, there is limited research on how best to treat dysphagia, as well as other non-motor PD-associated signs. In fact, most of these features do not respond to dopamine replacement and are likely affected by other neurotransmitter systems [5, 6], rendering current pharmacologic and surgical interventions ineffective for the early and holistic treatment of PD. Studies examining mechanisms underlying non-motor signs of PD have unveiled the complexity of PD in terms of catecholaminergic involvement. Different neurotransmitter systems beyond dopamine—including cholinergic, noradrenergic, and serotonergic—are compromised, implicated early, and contribute to dysfunction [1, 7].
It is also important to note that PD is heterogeneous in its presentation, further complicating our understanding of PD in the early stages and how to approach treatment, especially from a preventative standpoint. Leading hypotheses point to several subtypes of PD based on clinical presentation (including motor and non-motor presentation), as well as age of onset, sex, genetics, and major pathologic hallmarks [7]. Improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying differences among patients will aid in the development of individualized therapies. For a detailed review of PD pathophysiology, the heterogeneity of presentation, and current diagnostic approaches, please refer to the complementary article in this issue “Dysphagia in Parkinson disease: Part I—Pathophysiology and Treatment Practices.”
As with other non-classical signs and symptoms, the pathophysiology underlying swallowing dysfunction in PD is poorly understood. Current understanding points to both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic mechanisms being involved in PD-related swallow dysfunction, with the latter likely being implicated sooner [1]. Moreover, alpha-synuclein (α-syn) aggregates (a hallmark protein pathology in PD) have been found throughout the body, including in regions associated with swallowing (e.g., in salivary glands [8]); however, their direct impact on swallow function is not yet fully understood. Despite many differences in the onset, progression, and clinical manifestation of PD, dysphagia frequently occurs at some point in the disease process, with over 90% of people with PD being affected, and often leads to aspiration pneumonia, the leading cause of death in this population [2–4]. Moreover, changes in swallowing occur early in the disease process, often in the prodromal stage prior to diagnosis; however, given co-occurring sensory deficits in PD, individuals are often unaware of their swallowing changes until the disease progresses and severity of the dysfunction worsens.
Behavioral interventions remain the gold standard for dysphagia treatment, as current pharmacological and surgical interventions are not effective in ameliorating swallowing dysfunction [9, 10]. Despite research advancements, our understanding of mechanisms underlying dysphagia in PD, especially in the prodromal stage, is incomplete. This further complicates our ability to diagnose, treat, and study PD-associated dysphagia at its onset. There is a significant role for translational research, including animal models, for studying these underlying mechanisms as well as the efficacy of interventions that are otherwise impossible to conduct in humans. Moreover, research in human participants is limited by the inability to assess central and peripheral tissue changes during disease or after intervention, which is feasible with use of animal models. The contributions of animal models to the PD literature will be discussed in this review, as well as current treatment practices, existing gaps in knowledge, and future directions for PD-associated dysphagia research and clinical practice.
Treatment
Management of PD is categorized into three main intervention approaches: pharmacological, surgical, and behavioral. These interventions can be prescribed concurrently and are based on patient need, which changes over time. Most medical interventions are not directly prescribed for dysphagia management and their primary and secondary effects may have positive, negative, or no effect on swallowing function. Here, we will focus on commonly prescribed medication and neurosurgery for PD in general and how these affect swallow function, and then specifically address treatments for dysphagia and saliva management.
Pharmacological
The current standard of care for pharmacological treatment of PD predominantly targets the nigrostriatal dopamine system through dopamine precursors (e.g., levodopa) [11], clearance enzyme inhibitors (e.g., carbidopa) [11], and dopamine receptor agonists (e.g., pramipexole) [12]. Because dopamine does not cross the blood–brain barrier, dopamine precursors such as levodopa are administered. To prevent levodopa from synthesizing into dopamine in the periphery prior to crossing the blood–brain barrier, carbidopa is often prescribed with levodopa. Combining levodopa with a monoamine oxidase inhibitor (carbidopa) also prevents premature levodopa break-down and clearance, and diminishes side effects associated with increased dopamine in the peripheral tissues [13]. In some cases, dopamine agonists may be clinically indicated as first-line treatment [13]. Pramipexole is clinically efficacious both alone and with levodopa for treating PD motor dysfunction [13]. However, treatments aimed at increasing dopamine signaling are not beneficial for PD-associated dysphagia [14, 15] and levodopa specifically shows limited benefit or adverse effects on swallowing function [16]. As such, it is recommended to assess swallowing function while controlling for drug effects (e.g., FEES-Levodopa-Test) [17].
Surgical
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a surgical treatment option for PD [18]. The procedure involves unilateral or bilateral surgical implantation of electrodes that generate electrical impulses in brain regions, most commonly the subthalamic nucleus (STN) or globus pallidus internus (GBi) [19]. Neither STN or GBi DBS demonstrates improved swallow safety, with some patients even worsening after treatment [20, 21]. Evidence shows a DBS benefit bias towards swallow efficiency, but not safety [22]. Novel stimulation-based treatments for PD-associated dysphagia include DBS for non-STN regions [23], high frequency STN-DBS, and transcranial magnetic stimulation [24]. Work is still ongoing and additional brain regions and stimulation parameters should be considered for optimizing dysphagia treatment.
Behavioral
Behavioral approaches remain the gold standard treatment for PD-associated dysphagia. Interventions are characterized as restorative, compensatory, and adaptive. This review will focus primarily on restorative interventions, as the most recent PD-specific research on the other intervention types is currently sparse or studies were performed on populations beyond PD [25].
Rehabilitative interventions are exercises intended to improve swallow physiology without conscious manipulation of bolus flow or modification. These can be strength-based or skill-based, depending on the physiological goal. Respiratory muscle strength training (RMST) is a strength-based exercise approach which is among the most widely researched treatments for PD-associated dysphagia. Expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) is currently the most researched approach and was originally developed to address reduced expiratory airflow commonly seen in PD [26]. The EMST device is a small tube with manually adjustable valving that allows air to pass through with progressively increased pressure thresholds. The physiological rationale for this exercise program is to provide resistance to the muscles of expiration to facilitate successful airway clearance [27]. EMST elicits improvements in respiratory volumes [28], expiratory pressures [29••, 30], cough physiology [31, 32], and penetration-aspiration outcomes [20, 28]. Inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) focuses on the muscles of inspiration to facilitate a larger volume of inspired air for exhalation. Studies have demonstrated increased recruitment of swallowing-related musculature, including the submental muscles, soft palate, and pharynx [33, 34] through use of ultrasound [34], high-resolution manometry [33], and electromyography [33]. IMST reportedly improves inspiratory muscle endurance; moderately improves maximum inspiratory pressures, maximum phonation time, and peak subglottic pressure; and only trivially (standardized effect size of < 0.2) improves voluntary peak cough flow [30, 32, 35]. Despite promising findings from prior work, additional studies examining efficacy of RMST programs are needed to address heterogeneity of protocol, dosing, and outcome measure across disease stages [28].
Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT-LOUD®) is a well-established treatment program designed to maximize the perceptual characteristics of voice through hierarchical advancement of vocal load via high-effort phonatory tasks [36]. Given that voice and swallowing share many of the same central and peripheral structures, a few small studies have explored the effects of LSVT on swallowing function [37, 38]. El Sharkawi and colleagues found several improvements related to swallow function, including increased anterior-to-posterior lingual propulsion, increased tongue base retraction, decreased oral transit time, decreased oral residue percentage, reduced pharyngeal transit time, and increased oropharyngeal swallow efficiency [37]. Similarly, a study by Miles and colleagues revealed swallowing improvements to swallow function after LSVT including reduced pharyngeal residue, reduced pharyngeal area at rest, increased maximal opening of pharyngoesophageal segment (PES), and increased PES opening duration [38]. Further research is needed to corroborate these effects on a larger scale.
Other strength-based exercise programs have also been studied in PD. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) applies surface electrodes to provide sub-cutaneous electrical stimulation to the muscles and is well-established as an intervention to promote muscle recovery from injury in the skeletal muscles [39]. NMES has emerged as a potential treatment modality for dysphagia. Two studies have assessed NMES in PD, with one demonstrating improvements in hyoid movement and penetration-aspiration scores compared to placebo [40] and the other concluding that NMES did not elicit any further benefits compared to traditional dysphagia therapy [41]. The efficacy of NMES for swallow function in PD remains unclear and further research is warranted to optimize stimulation parameters. Finally, lingual strengthening has been explored in combination with EMST in PD patients, revealing improvements in lingual strength and maintenance of function in regard to clinical swallowing measures [42].
Skill-based interventions are designed to train the patient to improve coordination necessary to complete a specific task, as opposed to increasing muscle strength. Promising effects of respiratory-swallow coordination training and voluntary cough skills are reported for respiratory-swallow coordination, penetration-aspiration, vallecular/pyriform residue, and overall dysphagia severity [43]. Another intervention—sensory-motor training for airway protection (smTAP)—improves measures of reflexive cough including flow rate, volume, and urge-to-cough [29••]. Additionally, video-assisted swallow therapy (VAST), which uses endoscopy-facilitated biofeedback to encourage implicit modifications of swallowing physiology, has been assessed [44, 45]. VAST demonstrated improved pharyngeal clearance and SWAL-QOL scores [45]. Finally, the effects of air stacking have recently been applied to dysphagia therapy in PD [46]. Air stacking involves the manual over-insufflation of the lungs through use of an external insufflator, bypassing the restriction to inspiratory range of motion seen in PD, and capitalizing on the natural elasticity and recoil of the thoracic cavity [46]. Paired with EMST, air stacking elicits the most benefit to aspects of airway protection including reflexive and voluntary peak cough flow [32]. Despite PD affecting range of motion and coordination of swallowing/cough, behavioral interventions appear to be biased towards strength-based treatments [47]. More research is needed to determine the efficacy of skill-based interventions.
Surgical and pharmacological PD interventions are generally not designed to address other motor signs, such as dysphagia, and therefore are limited for or detrimental to swallowing outcomes. This may be, in part, due to the focus on basal ganglia-related dopamine systems and treatment of gross motor signs such as tremor. Because swallowing is a complex physiologic event that is controlled by multiple brain regions and neurotransmitter systems [14, 15, 48], identifying a treatment target (region of interest) is difficult. Although some behavioral interventions for dysphagia are promising, solid evidence remains limited by heterogeneity in patients, small sample sizes, and an overall lack of clinical trials. Most importantly, PD interventions are currently affected by limitations in timely diagnosis. There is a notable effort to shift toward a more proactive model of dysphagia rehabilitation in neurodegenerative populations [49]; however, proactive management of PD is not standard, as our understanding of prodromal PD is still developing.
Saliva
In addition to swallowing, changes to salivation are prevalent in PD across various stages of disease. Although distinct from dysphagia, salivary disturbances can greatly affect one’s swallow. About 50% of individuals with PD experience hyposalivation [50, 51] and xerostomia [50], and 50% experience sialorrhea [52]. Salivary flow in PD is complicated by commonly prescribed first-line medications. Clozapine [53] and levodopa [54] primarily increase salivary flow, while anticholinergic medications used to reduce tremor can result in xerostomia [55]. Sialorrhea is often managed with botulinum toxin injections to the parotid and submandibular glands to reduce salivary flow [56], whereas salivary replacements [57] and sialagogues [58] remain the most common treatments for xerostomia and hyposalivation. Although studies assessing non-pharmacological management of saliva-related deficits in PD are sparse [59], some evidence points to the short-term benefit of behavioral intervention [60] and the long-term benefit of radiotherapy for sialorrhea management [61]. Gum chewing has also been found to promote swallow frequency, which may be an effective strategy for secretion management in PD [62]. Additional research is needed to understand the methods to best manage these conditions considering the contradictory nature of treating xerostomia and sialorrhea.
Animal Research Related to PD-Associated Dysphagia
Human clinical research, especially with regard to dysphagia diagnosis and treatment, is limited by ethical constraint for rigorous placebo controls, inability to access tissues implicated in pathology, and heterogeneity inherent to PD (phenotype, onset, progression) and humans in general (age, diet, lifestyle, medical co-morbidities, medications, genetics, etc.). Furthermore, research typically begins after diagnosis and the ability to study prodromal- and early-stage PD is nearly impossible. Therefore, animal models offer better experimental control and the ability to study multiple aspects of disease pathology across disease progression. Selection of the model species is based on the relevant pathology and associated behavior. For swallowing specifically, rats, non-human primates, and pigs are commonly used, though the latter two have not been used for the study of PD-associated dysphagia treatment [63, 64]. Several approaches to modeling PD in animals include systemic and region-specific neurotoxin administration and genetic manipulation. Each model targets different mechanisms of PD, including, but not limited to, nigral dopaminergic cell death, mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, inflammation, and/or α-syn phosphorylation and aggregation, and should be carefully chosen based on the aspect of pathology that is relevant to the gap in knowledge/research question. Unfortunately, while some research has been conducted to understand the mechanisms underlying dysphagia in PD, there is little research assessing the efficacy of interventions in PD-specific animal models at this time. However, more comprehensive research has been published on the treatment of dysphagia in an aging rat model, discussed below. Because PD is a disease of aging and there is some overlap in swallowing dysfunction, aging models can inform PD models. Moreover, most research has been conducted in males (with a few exceptions) because of the confounds of estrogen, especially in rat models. For example, estrogen is neuroprotective against certain neurotoxins and the rapid (4 days) estrous cycle in rats and mice makes controlling for estrous cycle operations challenging. That being said, animal work is paramount for improving understanding of the mechanisms underlying dysphagia in PD and advancing diagnostic criteria and interventions for optimal dysphagia management.
Neurotoxin Models
Because swallowing deficits in PD are readily apparent in the mid-to-late stages, yet are generally unresponsive to dopamine replacement and DBS, the role of nigrostriatal dopamine depletion in dysphagia is unclear. As such, neurotoxin models can be used to study the effects of nigrostriatal dopamine depletion on oromotor and swallow function (tongue function, licking, chewing, oropharyngeal and esophageal swallowing). 6-Hydroxydopamine (OHDA), for example, is a catecholaminergic neurotoxin that induces neurodegeneration of the nigrostriatal dopamine system via intracerebral or systemic infusion [65–67]. After administration of 6-OHDA, rats demonstrate limb motor deficits, akin to the hallmark motor deficits seen in humans as a result of significant nigrostriatal dopamine depletion. Additionally, 6-OHDA administration in rats leads to swallow-specific changes, including altered tongue function (i.e., reduced tongue force [67], reduced lick force [65]), changes to chewing of uncooked pasta (i.e., reduced intensity, regularity, and rate of acoustic signal [68]), and impaired functional swallowing measured by videofluoroscopy (i.e., increased aberrant tongue movements, decreased bolus areas [69]). These deficits affect swallowing safety and efficiency and translate to clinical findings of dysphagia in the mid-to-late stages of PD [3]. Other neurotoxins, including 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and the pesticide rotenone, also induce nigrostriatal dopamine depletion and have been used to assess mechanisms underlying swallowing dysfunction in PD. The neurotoxin MPTP, for example, induces nigral dopaminergic cell death via complex I inhibition and subsequent oxidative stress and apoptosis [63, 70]. MPTP-induced dopamine depletion in non-human primates causes a series of acute toxic effects with clinical implications including reduced ability to self-feed due to mobility impairments, reduced appetite, and dehydration [63, 71]; in minipigs, MPTP results in motor deficits (muscle rigidity, hypokinesia, abnormal coordination, and position of the limbs), as well as reduced food intake [72]. These models, however, have not been used as extensively as the 6-OHDA rodent in examining the efficacy of dysphagia treatments.
Tongue Exercise in the 6-OHDA Model
6-OHDA animal work reveals that targeted limb training can slow or prevent limb motor deficits and reduce vulnerability of dopaminergic neurons [73, 74, 75]. Based on these findings, the effects of targeted lingual training on tongue function were also assessed and revealed contrasting findings. Tongue training in rats’ post-unilateral 6-OHDA administration resulted in improved tongue force and timing outcomes in a study conducted by Ciucci and colleagues [76]. These findings contrast with those of Plowman and colleagues; however, where progressive lingual resistance rehabilitation did not appear to improve cranial motor (lick) function, only limb motor rehabilitation improved limb motor functions [65]. It should be noted that methods differed slightly across these studies, including site of 6-OHDA infusion (medial forebrain bundle [76] vs. striatum [65]), schedule of water reward (variable ratio 5 schedule [76] vs. fixed-ratio 12 [65]), and the total number of weeks (4 weeks [76] vs. 6 weeks [65]) that rats underwent treatment for the rescue of tongue function. Both studies, however, revealed that tongue exercise was not associated with striatal dopamine content.
Taken together, findings reveal that nigrostriatal dopamine depletion does play a role in certain aspects of PD-associated dysphagia in the mid-to-late stages of disease when significant nigral dopamine is depleted, as evidenced by the development of oromotor deficits after neurotoxin administration. Additionally, targeted exercise may be useful in ameliorating swallowing deficits; however, the mechanisms underlying this rescue ought to be explored further. Moreover, given that swallowing is a complex sensorimotor process involving multiple systems, the use of neurotoxin models may not fully recapitulate swallow deficits as they appear in human PD. Neurotoxin models also exclude other prodromal, early, or later stage degeneration/pathology, which may be key to understanding why dopamine-based interventions are largely ineffective for the treatment of dysphagia in PD.
Genetic Models
Several genes have been linked to PD and have led to the development of genetic animal models. These genes include SNCA, GBA, LRRK2, PRKN, PINK1, and DJ-1, as reviewed elsewhere [77], which can be knocked out, knocked in, or overexpressed in animal models. Genetic models have significantly improved our ability to study other mechanisms involved in the disease, especially in the prodromal stages of PD. Changes to sensorimotor function, including swallowing, occur up to 20 years prior to nigrostriatal dopamine depletion. Animal models that use genetic manipulations that are known to cause PD can model prodromal and early pathologic aspects of PD prior to nigrostriatal cell death. To date, most research related to swallowing has occurred in primarily two genetic models—DJ-1 and PINK1 knockout rats.
In humans, DJ-1 and PINK1 mutations are associated with autosomal recessive, early-onset PD. Both genes are implicated in protecting cells against oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. The deletion or mutation of DJ-1 leads to signs akin to the inherited early-onset form of PD which presents with rigidity, tremors, alterations to vocalizations, and cognitive decline [66]. The DJ-1 knockout (−/−) genetic PD rat model has been used to study the prodromal and early-to-mid stages of disease (i.e., age 2–8 months) and shows oromotor and cranial sensorimotor deficits, including reduced tongue function regulation and impaired chewing [66, 78]. An important finding from this work is that there are significant correlations among limb motor and oromotor dysfunction and noradrenergic cell loss and tyrosine hydroxylase-immunoprotective (TH-ir) cell loss in the locus coeruleus [78]. The locus coeruleus is a brainstem nucleus that synthesizes noradrenaline and has projections to multiple brain regions, including those implicated in swallowing, mood, and cognitive function. In PD, the noradrenergic system is implicated early in the disease process [79•]. Loss of noradrenergic neurons exacerbates damage to dopaminergic neurons, while noradrenaline is anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective on dopaminergic degeneration [79•]. In PD, noradrenaline affects sensorimotor behaviors, including those of the upper airway (e.g., vocalization) [80]. As such, noradrenaline-based pharmacotherapies may be beneficial for PD, including for non-classical signs of disease, such as dysphagia.
Similarly, mutation of PINK1 (PTEN-induced putative kinase; PARK6) leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and progressive non-motor/other motor signs of disease, as well as α-syn aggregation and eventual nigrostriatal dopamine cell death, causing limb motor signs akin to sporadic PD [66, 81, 82, 83]. The Pink1−/− genetic rat model exhibits oromotor and early oral stage deficits that align with human clinical findings in PD [3, 84]. Deficits include decreased mastication rate [82, 84], as well as increased tongue press force, variability, and rate with increased amounts of α-syn in the genioglossus muscle and a change in muscle fiber composition in the styloglossus muscle [84, 85]. Additionally, Pink1−/− rats exhibit increased bolus area and bolus velocity [82], suggesting dyscoordination affecting swallow safety and efficiency [3, 82]. Like DJ-1−/− rats, Pink1−/− rats also show relationships between behavioral deficits and neuropathology. Correlations between decreased mastication rate and TH-ir counts in the locus coeruleus have been reported [82], as well as increased amounts of α-syn protein in the nucleus ambiguus [82] which is a key region in the swallow central pattern generator. Sex differences have also been found in the Pink1−/− genetic rat model, such as differences in limb motor deficits [83, 84] and cranial sensorimotor functions (e.g., vocalizations) [66, 83], but further research is needed to assess potential differences specific to swallowing function.
Overall, findings demonstrate that both central and peripheral pathologies in early stages of disease implicate critical mechanisms for functional oropharyngeal swallowing. These include neurotransmitter systems other than dopamine (e.g., norepinephrine), α-syn pathology, and mitochondrial dysfunction. Genetic models significantly contribute to our evolving understanding of PD pathology and swallowing dysfunction. Although the efficacy of behavioral dysphagia interventions has not yet been assessed in these genetic animal models, findings from this work may be foundational for refining treatment options to better treat swallow-specific deficits in PD.
Tongue Exercise in Aging Models
To date, studies assessing swallowing interventions in PD-specific animal models have been limited; however, aging models (especially rats) have been widely used to study the efficacy of dysphagia interventions and will be briefly described in this review, as well. It is known that with age, muscle composition and function changes, including swallow-related muscles such as the genioglossus (tongue) muscle. While tongue exercises are commonly prescribed to patients, the optimal dosing and exact effects on muscle properties are not fully understood. Tongue training and exercise methods have been used in rats as previously described [86, 87]. Studies reveal that, following progressive resistance tongue exercise, tongue forces increase [86, 88]. This positive change in tongue force generation post-exercise is seen across young, middle-aged, and old rat groups, as well [89]. In a study comparing different exercise doses (1, 3, or 5 day/week), 5 day/week intervention groups showed the greatest increase in tongue forces, and regardless of dose, tongue forces increased following exercise compared to sham groups [90]. Clinically, behavioral interventions may show promise in the short term, but lasting benefits of exercise are also poorly understood. As such, detraining protocols have also been implemented in rat studies and reveal that detraining does not eliminate improved tongue force following exercise, though decline in maintenance is seen in old (aged) groups compared to younger rats [88]. Whether these findings translate to a progressive degenerative model of PD, however, is not yet known. Since PD typically is a disease of aging and affects swallow function, this exercise approach is promising.
In terms of muscle biology, exercise appears to alter some properties, though changes are not as apparent to muscle biology as they are to function (e.g., force, as described above). Schaser and colleagues found brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and receptor TrkB immunoreactivity levels in the rat hypoglossal nucleus to be positively cor-related with exercise in young and middle-aged rats. These associations, however, were weak in the older groups and in no-exercise controls, suggesting that other mechanisms may underlie the increased tongue forces seen post-exercise in older rats. In another study, 8 weeks of tongue exercise significantly increases tongue force as well as the variability of genioglossus (tongue) muscle fiber cross-sectional area [86]. This is in contrast to a more recent study, assessing the role of age and exercise on muscle fiber composition. While age was found to play a role in altering the proportion and size of type I (slow) and type II (fast) tongue muscle fibers, exercise did not alter tongue muscle fiber size or composition [90]. The tongue, however, includes many intrinsic and extrinsic muscles that serve different functions during swallowing [91], as well as speech [92] and airway patency [93]. As such, consideration should be given to the intensity and duration of tongue training, as tongue muscles may naturally have increased endurance due to their multifunctional and frequent use. Tongue exercise was also shown to increase serotonin immunoreactivity in the hypoglossal nucleus, though this neurochemical change was only seen in young rats [94].
Existing Gaps in Knowledge and Future Directions
Despite dysphagia manifesting early in PD, treatment implementation typically occurs later in the disease process when features of dysphagia are more severe [95, 96, 97]. Additionally, our limited understanding of the underlying biologic mechanisms in the prodromal and early stage is a key hindrance to optimizing interventions, especially those that target prevention [98].
A major consideration in PD-associated dysphagia management is, in part, a consequence of the pharmacological and surgical treatments targeting the gross motor disturbances of the disease. These treatment options have been largely successful in managing limb motor and other gross motor functions [99]. Unfortunately, there are limited benefits to swallow function and, in some instances, worsen aspects of dysphagia [3, 17]. Advancements in surgical and pharmacological treatment options that can improve both gross motor and swallowing sensorimotor functions are necessary.
Different clinical presentations in terms of age of onset, phenotype, disease progression, and clinical management considering sex as an important biological variable have not yet been adequately addressed. Failure to substantially include females in previous research, including basic, translational, and clinical studies, has widened gaps in knowledge and minimizes the generalizability of current treatment approaches. The inclusion of females has been highly encouraged in recent years per NIH mandate [100]. This broader inclusion will aid in developing a more complete understanding of PD-associated dysphagia management, including responses to behavioral and pharmacological manipulations.
Conclusion
The pathophysiologic mechanisms that modulate swallow function, especially in the prodrome, are not well understood, and therefore diagnostic and treatment options remain suboptimal. Dopamine-based treatment paradigms aimed at improving gross motor function provide inconsistent benefits to the sensorimotor aspects of PD dysfunction. This encourages the idea that other neurotransmitter pathways in the CNS and PNS are likely involved and could be potential targets for future research to guide pharmacological, surgical, and behavioral treatment optimization. Behavioral treatments are currently the most effective treatment for dysphagia management in PD; however, benefits of these are still unclear and may be difficult to sustain as the disease progresses. Therefore, additional research that addresses these questions in current clinical approaches is necessary to develop and refine more targeted and sustained benefits in PD-related dysphagia. Animal research can contribute significantly to address these gaps in knowledge.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders of the National Institutes of Health (T32DC009401, appointee: Krasko; R01 DC018584, Ciucci; R01 DC014358, Ciucci), the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health (1K76AG068590, Rogus-Pulia), the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and the William S. Middleton Veteran Affairs Hospital in Madison, WI; GRECC article no. 2023-XXX.
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest Dr. Michelle R. Ciucci is on the board of directors of the National Foundation of Swallowing Disorders (NFOSD) and receives no compensation as member of the board of directors.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Disclaimer The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as:
• Of importance
•• Of major importance
- 1.Schapira AHV, Chaudhuri KR, Jenner P. Non-motor features of Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18:435–50. 10.1038/nrn.2017.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Plowman-Prine EK, Sapienza CM, Okun MS, Pollock SL, Jacobson C, Wu SS, Rosenbek JC. The relationship between quality of life and swallowing in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2009;24:1352–8. 10.1002/mds.22617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Suttrup I, Warnecke T. Dysphagia in Parkinson’s disease. Dysphagia. 2016;31:24–32. 10.1007/s00455-015-9671-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fernandez HH, Lapane KL. Predictors of mortality among nursing home residents with a diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8:241–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Del Tredici K, Braak H. Dysfunction of the locus coeruleus-norepinephrine system and related circuitry in Parkinson’s disease-related dementia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:774–83. 10.1136/jnnp-2011-301817. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Beattie DT, Smith JAM. Serotonin Pharmacology in the gastrointestinal tract: a review. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2008;377:181–203. 10.1007/s00210-008-0276-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Marras C, Chaudhuri KR, Titova N, Mestre TA. Therapy of Parkinson’s disease subtypes. Neurotherapeutics. 2020;17(4):1366–77. 10.1007/S13311-020-00894-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Beach TG, Adler CH, Sue LI, Vedders L, Lue LF, White CL, Akiyama H, Caviness JN, Shill HA, Sabbagh MN, et al. Multi-organ distribution of phosphorylated α-synuclein histopathology in subjects with Lewy body disorders. Acta Neuropathol. 2010;119:689–702. 10.1007/s00401-010-0664-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wang E, Kompoliti K, Jiang JJ, Goetz CG. an instrumental analysis of laryngeal responses to apomorphine stimulation in Parkinson disease. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. 2000;8:175–86. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kleiner-Fisman G, Herzog J, Fisman DN, Tamma F, Lyons KE, Pahwa R, Lang AE, Deuschl G. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: summary and meta-analysis of outcomes. Mov Disord. 2006;21:S290–304. 10.1002/mds.20962. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ossig C, Reichmann H. Treatment strategies in early and advanced Parkinson disease. Neurol Clin. 2015;33:19–37. 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Horstink M, Tolosa E, Bonuccelli U, Deuschl G, Friedman A, Kanovsky P, Larsen JP, Lees A, Oertel W, Poewe W, et al. Review of the therapeutic management of Parkinson’s disease. Report of a Joint Task Force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Movement Disorder Society-European Section. Part I: Early (uncomplicated) Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13:1170–85. 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01547.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fox SH, Katzenschlager R, Lim S-Y, Barton B, de Bie RMA, Seppi K, Coelho M, Sampaio C. International Parkinson and movement disorder society evidence-based medicine review: update on treatments for the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2018;33:1248–66. 10.1002/mds.27372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Suttrup I, Warnecke T. Dysphagia in Parkinson’s disease: pathophysiology, diagnosis and therapy. Fortschritte der Neurologie Psychiatrie. 2016;84:S18–23. 10.1055/s-0042-107245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Langmore SE. Evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia: which diagnostic tool is superior? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;11:485–9. 10.1097/00020840-200312000-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Labeit B, Claus I, Muhle P, Suntrup-Krueger S, Dziewas R, Warnecke T. Effect of intestinal levodopa-carbidopa infusion on pharyngeal dysphagia: results from a retrospective pilot study in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsons Dis. 2020;2020:4260501. 10.1155/2020/4260501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Warnecke T, Suttrup I, Schröder JB, Osada N, Oelenberg S, Hamacher C, Suntrup S, Dziewas R. Levodopa responsiveness of dysphagia in advanced Parkinson’s disease and reliability testing of the FEES-levodopa-test. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;28:100–6. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.04.034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hacker ML, Turchan M, Heusinkveld LE, Currie AD, Millan SH, Molinari AL, Konrad PE, Davis TL, Phibbs FT, Hedera P, et al. Deep brain stimulation in early-stage Parkinson disease: five-year outcomes. Neurology. 2020;95:e393–401. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ciucci MR, Barkmeier-Kraemer JM, Sherman SJ. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation improves deglutition in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23:676–83. 10.1002/mds.21891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Troche MS, Okun MS, Rosenbek JC, Musson N, Fernandez HH, Rodriguez R, Romrell J, Pitts T, Wheeler-Hegland KM, Sapienza CM. Aspiration and swallowing in Parkinson disease and rehabilitation with EMST: a randomized trial. Neurology. 2010;75:1912–9. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fef115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–8. 10.1007/BF00417897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gandhi P, Steele CM. Effectiveness of interventions for dysphagia in Parkinson disease: a systematic review. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022;31:463–85. 10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pflug C, Nienstedt JC, Gulberti A, Müller F, Vettorazzi E, Koseki JC, Niessen A, Flügel T, Hidding U, Buhmann C, et al. Impact of simultaneous subthalamic and nigral stimulation on dysphagia in Parkinson’s disease. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020;7:628–38. 10.1002/acn3.51027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Khedr EM, Al-Fawal B, Abdel Wraith A, Saber M, Hasan AM, Bassiony A, Nasr Eldein A, Rothwell JC. The effect of 20 Hz versus 1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: which is more beneficiaL? J Parkinsons Dis. 2019;9:379–87. 10.3233/JPD-181540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ra JY, Hyun JK, Ko KR, Lee SJ. Chin tuck for prevention of aspiration: effectiveness and appropriate posture. Dysphagia. 2014;29:603–9. 10.1007/s00455-014-9551-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Karvonen J, Saarelainen S, Nieminen MM. Measurement of respiratory muscle forces based on maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures. Respiration. 1994;61:28–31. 10.1159/000196299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Sapienza C, Troche M, Pitts T, Davenport P. Respiratory strength training: concept and intervention outcomes. Semin Speech Lang. 2011;32:21–30. 10.1055/s-0031-1271972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.van de Wetering-van Dongen VA, Kalf JG, van der Wees PJ, Bloem BR, Nijkrake MJ. The effects of respiratory training in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. J Parkinsons Dis. 2020;10:1315–33. 10.3233/jpd-202223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.••.Troche MS, Curtis JA, Sevitz JS, Dakin AE, Perry SE, Borders JC, Grande AA, Mou Y, Vanegas-Arroyave N, Hegland KW. rehabilitating cough dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled trial. Mov Disord. 2022. 10.1002/mds.29268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Findings from this trial confirm the efficacy of behavioral interventions for cough-related outcomes in PD.
- 30.Reyes A, Castillo A, Castillo J, Cornejo I. The effects of respiratory muscle training on peak cough flow in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32:1317–27. 10.1177/0269215518774832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Pitts T, Bolser D, Rosenbek J, Troche M, Okun MS, Sapienza C. Impact of expiratory muscle strength training on voluntary cough and swallow function in Parkinson disease. Chest. 2009;135:1301–8. 10.1378/chest.08-1389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Reyes A, Castillo A, Castillo J. Effects of expiratory muscle training and air stacking on peak cough flow in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Lung. 2020;198:207–11. 10.1007/s00408-019-00291-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hutcheson KA, Hammer MJ, Rosen SP, Jones CA, McCulloch TM. Expiratory muscle strength training evaluated with simultaneous high-resolution manometry and electromyography. Laryngoscope. 2017;127:797–804. 10.1002/lary.26397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pauloski BR, Yahnke KM. Using ultrasound to document the effects of expiratory muscle strength training (EMST) on the geniohyoid muscle. Dysphagia. 2022;37:788–99. 10.1007/s00455-021-10328-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Inzelberg R, Peleg N, Nisipeanu P, Magadle R, Carasso RL, Weiner P. Inspiratory muscle training and the perception of dyspnea in Parkinson’s disease. Can J Neurol Sci. 2005;32:213–7. 10.1017/S0317167100003991. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Robertson SJ, Thomson F. Speech therapy in Parkinson’s disease: a study of the efficacy and long term effects of intensive treatment. Br J Disord Commun. 1984;19:213–24. 10.3109/13682828409029837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.el Sharkawi A, Ramig L, Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, Smith CH, Pawlas A, Baum S, Werner C. Swallowing and voice effects of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT®): a pilot study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72:31–6. 10.1136/jnnp.72.1.31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Miles A, Jardine M, Johnston F, de Lisle M, Friary P, Allen J. Effect of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT LOUD®) on swallowing and cough in Parkinson’s disease: a pilot study. J Neurol Sci. 2017;383:180–7. 10.1016/j.jns.2017.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Quittan M, Wiesinger GF, Sturm B, Puig S, Mayr W, Sochor A, Paternostro T, Resch KL, Pacher R, Fialka-Moser V. Improvement of thigh muscles by neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with refractory heart failure: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:206–14. 10.1097/00002060-200103000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Park JS, Oh DH, Hwang NK, Lee JH. Effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with Parkinson’s disease and dysphagia: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2018;42:457–63. 10.3233/NRE-172306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Baijens LWJ, Speyer R, Passos VL, Pilz W, Van Der Kruis J, Haarmans S, Desjardins-Rombouts C. Surface electrical stimulation in dysphagic Parkinson patients: a randomized clinical trial. Laryngoscope. 2013;123:E38–44. 10.1002/lary.24119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Jenks J, Pitts LL. Effects of an intensive exercise-based swallowing program for persons with Parkinson’s disease and complex medical history: a single-case experiment. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019;28:1268–74. 10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Curtis JA, Dakin AE, Troche MS. Respiratory–swallow coordination training and voluntary cough skill training: a single-subject treatment study in a person with Parkinson’s disease. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020;63:472–86. 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Bloem BR, de Vries NM, Ebersbach G. Nonpharmacological treatments for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2015;30:1504–20. 10.1002/mds.26363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Manor Y, Mootanah R, Freud D, Giladi N, Cohen JT. Video-assisted swallowing therapy for patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2013;19:207–11. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sarmento A, de Andrade AFD, Lima ÍNDF, Aliverti A, de Freitas Fregonezi GA, Resqueti VR. Air stacking: a detailed look into physiological acute effects on cough peak flow and chest wall volumes of healthy subjects. Respir Care. 2017;62:432–43. 10.4187/respcare.05189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Hegland KW, Okun MS, Troche MS. Sequential voluntary cough and aspiration or aspiration risk in Parkinson’s disease. Lung. 2014;192:601–8. 10.1007/s00408-014-9584-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Warnecke T, Hamacher C, Oelenberg S, Dziewas R. Off and on state assessment of swallowing function in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20:1033–4. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Rogus-Pulia NM, Plowman EK. Shifting tides toward a proactive patient-centered approach in dysphagia management of neurodegenerative disease. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020;29:1094–109. 10.1044/2020_AJSLP-19-00136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Barbe AG, Heinzler A, Derman S, Hellmich M, Timmermann L, Noack MJ. Hyposalivation and xerostomia among Parkinson’s disease patients and its impact on quality of life. Oral Dis. 2017;23:464–70. 10.1111/odi.12622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Bagheri H, Damase-Michel C, Lapeyre-Mestre M, Cismondo S, O’Connell D, Senard JM, Rascol O, Montastruc JL. A study of salivary secretion in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1999;22:213–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kalf JG, De Swart BJM, Borm GF, Bloem BR, Munneke M. Prevalence and definition of drooling in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. J Neurol. 2009;256:1391–6. 10.1007/s00415-009-5098-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Bird AM, Smith TL, Walton AE. Un Repaso de Las Estrategias de Tratamiento Actuales de La Sialorrea Inducida Por Clozapina. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45:667–75. 10.1345/aph.1P761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tumilasci OR, Cersósimo MG, Belforte JE, Micheli FE, Benarroch EE, Pazo JH. Quantitative study of salivary secretion in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2006;21:660–7. 10.1002/mds.20784. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Arany S, Kopycka-Kedzierawski DT, Caprio TV, Watson GE. Anticholinergic medication: related dry mouth and effects on the salivary glands. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021;132:662–70. 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Isaacson J, Patel S, Torres-Yaghi Y, Pagán F. Sialorrhea in Parkinson’s disease. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12:691. 10.3390/toxins12110691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Łysik D, Niemirowicz-Laskowska K, Bucki R, Tokajuk G, Mystkowska J. Artificial saliva: challenges and future perspectives for the treatment of xerostomia. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:3199. 10.3390/ijms20133199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Gil-Montoya JA, Silvestre FJ, Barrios R, Silvestre-Rangil J. Treatment of xerostomia and hyposalivation in the elderly: a systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2016;21:e355–66. 10.4317/medoral.20969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Srivanitchapoom P, Pandey S, Hallett M. Drooling in Parkinson’s disease: a review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20:1109–18. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.08.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Marks L, Turner K, O’Sullivan J, Deighton B, Lees A. Drooling in Parkinson’s disease: a novel speech and language therapy intervention. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2001;36:282–7. 10.3109/13682820109177898. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Postma AG, Heesters MAAM, van Laar T. Radiotherapy to the salivary glands as treatment of sialorrhea in patients with parkinsonism. Mov Disord. 2007;22:2430–5. 10.1002/mds.21752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.South AR, Somers SM, Jog MS. Gum chewing improves swallow frequency and latency in Parkinson patients: a preliminary study. Neurology. 2010;74:1198–202. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181d9002b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Potts LF, Wu H, Singh A, Marcilla I, Luquin MR, Papa SM. Modeling Parkinson’s disease in monkeys for translational studies, a critical analysis. Exp Neurol. 2014;256:133–43. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.09.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Tieu K A guide to neurotoxic animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2011;1:a009316–a009316. 10.1101/cshperspect.a009316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Plowman EK, Maling N, Thomas NJ, Fowler SC, Kleim JA. targeted motor rehabilitation dissociates corticobulbar versus corticospinal dysfunction in an animal model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28:85–95. 10.1177/1545968313498648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Krasko MN, Hoffmeister JD, Schaen-Heacock NE, Welsch JM, Kelm-Nelson CA, Ciucci MR. Rat models of vocal deficits in Parkinson’s disease. Brain Sci. 2021;11:925. 10.3390/BRAINSCI11070925. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ciucci MR, Russell JA, Schaser AJ, Doll EJ, Vinney LM, Connor NP. Tongue force and timing deficits in a rat model of Parkinson disease. Behav Brain Res. 2011;222:315–20. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.03.057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Kane JR, Ciucci MR, Jacobs AN, Tews N, Russell JA, Ahrens AM, Ma ST, Britt JM, Cormack LK, Schallert T. Assessing the role of dopamine in limb and cranial-oromotor control in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. J Commun Disord. 2011;44:529–37. 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2011.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Russell JA, Ciucci MR, Hammer MJ, Connor NP. Videofluorographic assessment of deglutitive behaviors in a rat model of aging and Parkinson disease. Dysphagia. 2013;28:95–104. 10.1007/s00455-012-9417-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tillerson JL, Caudle WM, Reverón ME, Miller GW. Exercise induces behavioral recovery and attenuates neurochemical deficits in rodent models of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience. 2003;119:899–911. 10.1016/S0306-4522(03)00096-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Waters CM, Hunt SP, Jenner P, Marsden CD. An immunohistochemical study of the acute and long-term effects of 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine in the marmoset. Neuroscience. 1987;23:1025–39. 10.1016/0306-4522(87)90178-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mikkelsen M, MØller A, Jensen LH, Pedersen A, Harajehi JB, Pakkenberg H. MPTP-induced parkinsonism in minipigs: a behavioral, biochemical, and histological study. Neurotoxicol Teratol. 1999;21:169–75. 10.1016/S0892-0362(98)00037-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Anstrom KK, Schallert T, Woodlee MT, Shattuck A, Roberts DCS. Repetitive vibrissae-elicited forelimb placing before and immediately after unilateral 6-hydroxydopamine improves outcome in a model of Parkinson’s disease. Behav Brain Res. 2007;179:183–91. 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Cohen AD, Tillerson JL, Smith AD, Schallert T, Zigmond MJ. Neuroprotective effects of prior limb use in 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats: possible role of GDNF. J Neurochem. 2003;85:299–305. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01657.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Tillerson JL, Cohen AD, Philhower J, Miller GW, Zigmond MJ, Schallert T. Forced limb-use effects on the behavioral and neurochemical effects of 6-hydroxydopamine. J Neurosci. 2001;21:4427–35. 10.1523/jneurosci.21-12-04427.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ciucci MR, Schaser AJ, Russell JA. Exercise-induced rescue of tongue function without striatal dopamine sparing in a rat neurotoxin model of Parkinson disease. Behav Brain Res. 2013;252:239–45. 10.1016/j.bbr.2013.06.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Deng H, Wang P, Jankovic J. The genetics of Parkinson disease. Ageing Res Rev. 2018;42:72–85. 10.1016/j.arr.2017.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Yang KM, Blue KV, Mulholland HM, Kurup MP, Kelm-Nelson CA, Ciucci MR. Characterization of oromotor and limb motor dysfunction in the DJ1 −/− model of Parkinson disease. Behav Brain Res. 2018;339:47–56. 10.1016/j.bbr.2017.10.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.•.Paredes-Rodriguez E, Vegas-Suarez S, Morera-Herreras T, de Deurwaerdere P, Miguelez C. The noradrenergic system in Parkinson’s disease. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:435. 10.3389/fphar.2020.00435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This article demonstrates that other neurotransmitter systems beyond dopamine are implicated during the PD disease process. Specifically, it highlights the role of noradrenaline in PD.
- 80.Hoffmeister JD, Kelm-Nelson CA, Ciucci MR. Quantification of brainstem norepinephrine relative to vocal impairment and anxiety in the Pink1−/− rat model of Parkinson disease. Behav Brain Res. 2021;414:113514. 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Dave KD, De Silva S, Sheth NP, Ramboz S, Beck MJ, Quang C, Switzer RC 3rd, Ahmad SO, Sunkin SM, Walker D, et al. Phenotypic characterization of recessive gene knockout rat models of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiol Dis 2014;70:190–203 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Cullen KP, Grant LM, Kelm-Nelson CA, Brauer AFL, Bickelhaupt LB, Russell JA, Ciucci MR. Pink1 −/− rats show early-onset swallowing deficits and correlative brainstem pathology. Dysphagia. 2018;33:749–58. 10.1007/s00455-018-9896-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Marquis JM, Lettenberger SE, Kelm-Nelson CA. Early-onset Parkinsonian behaviors in female Pink1−/− rats. Behav Brain Res. 2020;377:112175. 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Grant LM, Kelm-Nelson CA, Hilby BL, Blue KV, Paul Rajamanickam ES, Pultorak JD, Fleming SM, Ciucci MR. Evidence for early and progressive ultrasonic vocalization and oromotor deficits in a PINK1 gene knockout rat model of Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci Res. 2015;93:1713–27. 10.1002/jnr.23625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Glass TJ, Kelm-Nelson CA, Szot JC, Lake JM, Connor NP, Ciucci MR. Functional characterization of extrinsic tongue muscles in the Pink1−/− rat model of Parkinson disease. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0240366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Connor NP, Russell JA, Wang H, Jackson MA, Mann L, Kluender K. Effect of tongue exercise on protrusive force and muscle fiber area in aging rats. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;52:732–44. 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/08-0105). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Rudisch DM, Krasko MN, Nisbet AF, Schaen-Heacock NE, Ciucci MR. Assays of tongue force, timing, and dynamics in rat and mouse models. Brain Res Bull. 2022;185:49–55. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2022.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Schaser AJ, Ciucci MR, Connor NP. Cross-activation and detraining effects of tongue exercise in aged rats. Behav Brain Res. 2016;297:285–96. 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.10.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Schaser AJ, Stang K, Connor NP, Behan M. The effect of age and tongue exercise on BDNF and TrkB in the hypoglossal nucleus of rats. Behav Brain Res. 2012;226:235–41. 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Krekeler BN, Weycker JM, Connor NP. Effects of tongue exercise frequency on tongue muscle biology and swallowing physiology in a rat model. Dysphagia. 2020;35:918–34. 10.1007/s00455-020-10105-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Cunningham DP, Basmajian JV. Electromyography of genioglossus and geniohyoid muscles during deglutition. Anat Rec. 1969;165:401–9. 10.1002/ar.1091650309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Bole CT, Lessler MA. Electromyography of the genioglossus muscles in man. J Appl Physiol. 1966;21:1695–8. 10.1152/JAPPL.1966.21.6.1695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Mathew OP, Abu-Osba YK, Thach BT. Influence of upper airway pressure changes on genioglossus muscle respiratory activity. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982;52:438–44. 10.1152/jappl.1982.52.2.438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Behan M, Moeser AE, Thomas CF, Russell JA, Wang H, Leverson GE, Connor NP. The effect of tongue exercise on serotonergic input to the hypoglossal nucleus in young and old rats. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55:919–29. 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0091). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Broadfoot CK, Abur D, Hoffmeister JD, Stepp CE, Ciucci MR. Research-based updates in swallowing and communication dysfunction in Parkinson disease: implications for evaluation and management. Perspect ASHA Spec Interest Groups. 2019;4:825–41. 10.1044/2019_PERS-SIG3-2019-0001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Miller N, Allcock L, Hildreth AJ, Jones D, Noble E, Burn DJ. Swallowing problems in Parkinson disease: frequency and clinical correlates. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80:1047–9. 10.1136/jnnp.2008.157701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kalf JG, de Swart BJM, Bloem BR, Munneke M. Prevalence of oropharyngeal dysphagia in Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2012;18:311–5. 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2011.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Tolosa E, Garrido A, Scholz SW, Poewe W. Challenges in the diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:385–97. 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00030-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Armstrong MJ, Okun MS. Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease: a review. JAMA. 2020;323:548–60. 10.1001/JAMA.2019.22360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.National Institutes of Health. NIH guidelines on the inclusion of women and minorities as subjects in clinical research. Fed Regist. 1994;1994(59):1408–13. [Google Scholar]