Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2024 Oct 7;19(10):e0311502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311502

Ameliorative effects of Penthorum chinense Pursh on insulin resistance and oxidative stress in diabetic obesity db/db mice

Jilei Hu 1,2, Leyu Zheng 2,3, Xi Fan 2, Hongmei Lang 4, Huibo Xie 2, Ning Lin 1,*
Editor: Mehran Rahimlou5
PMCID: PMC11458015  PMID: 39374222

Abstract

Background

Penthorum chinense Pursh (PCP), a medicinal and edible plant, has been reported to protect against liver damage by suppressing oxidative stress. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is associated with liver dysfunction and oxidative stress. In the present study, we aim to investigate the hypoglycemic effect of PCP on db/db mice and further explore the underlying mechanisms.

Methods

Thirty-two db/db mice were randomized into four groups, including a diabetic model control group (MC) and three diabetic groups treated with low (LPCP, 300 mg/kg/d), medium (MPLP, 600 mg/kg/d), and high doses of PCP (HPCP, 1200 mg/kg/d), and the normal control group (NC) of eight db/m mice were included. Mice in the NC and MC groups received the ultrapure water. After four weeks of intervention, parameters of fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin resistance (IR), blood lipid levels, hepatic oxidative stress, and enzymes related to hepatic glucose metabolism were compared in the groups.

Results

PCP administration significantly reduced FBG and IR in diabetic db/db mice, and improved hepatic glucose metabolism by increasing glucose transporter 2 (GLUT2) and glucokinase (GCK) protein expression. Meanwhile, PCP supplementation ameliorated hepatic oxidative stress by decreasing malonaldehyde content and increasing the activities of superoxide dismutase and glutathione peroxidase in db/db mice. Furthermore, PCP treatment reduced obesity and food intake in db/db mice, and improved dyslipidemia demonstrated by increasing high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) while decreasing total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). All doses of PCP treatment decreased the values of LDL-C/HDL-C in a dose-response relationship.

Conclusion

PCP significantly alleviated hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, hyperlipidemia, and obesity, inhibited hepatic oxidative stress, and enhanced hepatic glucose transport in T2DM mice. Based on the above findings, the hypoglycemic effect of PCP may be attributed to the activation of the GLUT2/GCK expression in the liver and the reduction of hepatic oxidative stress.

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic metabolic disease featured by hyperglycemia, which ranks in the top 10 causes of death worldwide. According to the report from the International Diabetes Federation, diabetes may increase from 463 million to 700 million by 2045 [1, 2]. Diabetes has become a severe health problem worldwide due to its high prevalence, disability, and mortality [3]. The characteristic symptoms of diabetes are polyuria, polydipsia, polyphagia, hyperhidrosis, and unexpected weight loss, in addition to hyperglycemia and abnormalities in serum lipids [4]. If not strictly controlled, chronic hyperglycemia can cause organ damage and serious complications such as angiocardiography, neuropathy, and nephropathy [5]. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is the most common form of diabetes, accounting for 90–95% of the diabetic population [6]. The etiology and pathogenesis of T2DM are not clear, but the distinctive pathophysiological feature is the reduced ability of insulin to regulate glucose metabolism manifested as insulin resistance (IR), and/or relatively reduced insulin secretion due to defective islet β-cell function.

Obesity/overweight, genetics, environment, and sedentary lifestyle may be factors associated with T2DM. A cross-sectional survey from China showed that the prevalence of diabetes among normal-weight, overweight, and obese people was 8.8%, 13.8%, and 20.1% respectively [7]. Moderate weight loss in overweight or obese people with T2DM can improve glycemic control and IR, as well as reduce the need for glucose-lowering medication [8]. Additionally, there is compelling evidence that oxidative stress contributes to more severe T2DM by reducing insulin secretion and function. Chronic hyperglycemia leads to the production of excess reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the body causing oxidative stress, which can result in disruption of insulin signaling in target tissues, as well as exacerbate IR and T2DM [9]. Several studies have shown that diabetic patients tend to exhibit higher malonaldehyde (MDA) content and lower superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity in serum and tissues. Furthermore, the levels of oxidative stress markers were reduced after treatment in patients with T2DM [10]. Therefore, the attenuation of oxidative stress is considered an effective strategy to improve IR and T2DM.

Most patients with T2DM require long-term oral medications or insulin injections to control blood glucose, however, their administration may be accompanied by adverse effects including gastrointestinal symptoms, hepatorenal functions, and hypoglycemia [11]. Thus, it is vital to search for natural, safe, and effective substitutes for these medicines.

Chinese edible herbal has the advantage of being more effective and having fewer side effects [12]. Penthorum chinense Pursh (PCP) is a traditional food and medicine widely distributed in East Asian countries. It has been demonstrated to possess potent antioxidant capabilities protecting against hepatic oxidative stress induced by alcohol and carbon tetrachloride [13, 14], but its effect on oxidative stress associated with T2DM has not been reported. In vitro studies found that ethyl acetate extract from PCP activates the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway by binding to Keap1 protein, and significantly reduces the vascular inflammation induced by high glucose levels [15]. Meanwhile, a previous study had shown that PCP possessed a modest hypoglycemic effect by increasing insulin secretion in diabetic rats induced by streptozotocin (STZ) [16]. STZ is a broad-spectrum antibiotic with selective destruction of islet β-cells and is used to induce T1DM or T2DM models by varying doses of it. However, there is a large proportion of diabetic patients characterized by IR, whose insulin levels are equal to or even higher than normal. Consequently, the treatment strategy for this population is to increase insulin sensitivity rather than promote its secretion.

Genetic models, especially db/db mice, are regarded as the closest animal models to human T2DM with IR, which absorb excessive food chronically and spontaneously develop symptoms of obesity, IR, and hyperglycemia [17]. They are more like clinical patients in terms of diabetes production due to their lack of interference from artificially induced factors. To our knowledge, no study has investigated the hypoglycemic effects of PCP on db/db mice. This study aimed to observe the effects of PCP on hyperglycemia, IR, obesity, and oxidative stress in spontaneously T2DM mice, as well as explore the underlying mechanisms. The results of our study will provide more evidence for its application in the treatment of diabetes.

Materials and methods

Herbal materials and preparation

Dried PCP was obtained from Gulin Hongan Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (Luzhou, China). PCP samples were ground into powder and filtered through a 65-mesh sieve. Five hundred grams of the powder was immersed in 5000 mL ultra-pure water for 1h and exhaustively extracted at 100°C for 3 rounds. The three filtrates were mixed, concentrated to 1 g/mL, and refrigerated at 4°C.

Animal experiments

All animal experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of Southwest Medical University (No.201910-235). The 8-week-old male db/db and db/m mice were provided by Changzhou Cavens Co., Ltd. (Changzhou, China). All animals were fed in the SPF Animal Laboratory Center of Southwest Medical University at 12 h light/dark cycle, (23±2) °C, and (60±5) % relative humidity. All mice accessed food and water freely, whose padding was changed daily to keep them dry.

After seven days of acclimatization, the fasting blood glucose (FBG) was monitored by glucometer and glucose test strips (Roche Co., Germany). The db/db mice detected with FBG over 11.1 mmol/L at three executive mornings were defined as diabetic mice. Eight db/m mice were involved in the normal control (NC) group and forty diabetic db/db mice were randomly divided into four groups: model control (MC) group, low dose of PCP (LPCP) group, medium dose of PCP (MPCP) group and high dose of PCP (HPCP) group. The LPCP, MPCP, and HPCP groups were administered with a dose of 300, 600, and 1200 mg/kg/d, respectively. Allometric scaling to a person with a body weight of 60 kg, these doses correspond to 2-, 4-, and 8-gram PCP daily. 8 grams of PCP daily is the recommended upper intake level for humans. Only ultrapure water was given to the animals in the NC and MC. All treatments were administered by gavage once per day for four weeks.

Food consumption and body weight were measured weekly. All animals were given glucose (2g/kg) when an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was conducted, and tail venous blood was collected at 0, 30th, 60th, and 120th minutes after oral gavage to measure blood glucose concentration.

Biochemical analysis

After 4 weeks of intervention, mice were fasted the night before blood and tissue collection, then anesthetized with 1% sodium pentobarbital solution (1.0 mL/100g) according to Animal Veterinary Medical Association Guidelines for the Euthanasia of Animals, and executed. Glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and insulin were detected by ELISA kits (Milian Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). IR is indicated by the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) with the calculation formula of FBG (mmol/L) × serum insulin (μU/mL)/22.5. The content of serum lipids and the hepatic antioxidant enzyme was tested by commercial kits (Jiancheng Co., Ltd., Nanjing, China).

Hematoxylin and eosin staining in liver tissues

Biochemical Analyses. Liver tissue was fixed in a 4% paraformaldehyde solution and embedded in paraffin wax. The slices were sliced, dewaxed, hematoxylin, and eosin stained (H&E), and sealed in sequence. The vacuolar degeneration and steatosis of the hepatic tissue were observed under a light microscope.

Western blotting

Liver tissue was lysed with RIPA buffer to produce lysate. Proteins were divided on 10% SDS-PAGE gels and moved to the PVDF membranes (Hybond, United States). The membranes were blocked with 5% skimmed milk for 120 minutes before being incubated with the primary antibody, and secondary antibody in sequence (Abcam, United Kingdom). Finally, the protein bands were tested by chemiluminescence kits (Affinity, United States) with an ECL chemiluminescence system (Tanon-5200Multi, Shanghai, China).

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed by SPSS 22.0 statistical software and the results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). One-way ANOVA analysis was performed to compare the mean differences among multiple groups. In pairwise comparison, the LSD test was used for those with homogeneous variances, and the Dunnett T3 test was used for those with uneven variances. A P-value of less than 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

Results

PCP improved parameters related to hyperglycemia and IR in db/db mice

According to Fig 1A, the FBG in the NC was significantly lower than those in diabetic mice no matter before or after the intervention (P<0.01). In the second week, only the HPCP showed a significant decrease in FBG levels compared to MC (P<0.05). In the fourth week, the levels of FBG in all PCP-treatment groups significantly decreased to varying degrees compared to the MC (P<0.05). Compared with the MC, the HbA1c in diabetic mice of the LPCP, MPCP, and HPCP decreased in varying degrees, but with no significant difference (Fig 1B).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Effects of PCP on (A) FBG, (B) HbA1c, (C) OGTT, (D) AUC of OGTT, (E) Insulin, and (F) HOMA-IR in db/db mice. Data are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 8 for each experimental group. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. normal control group. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 vs. model control group.

The results of OGTT were shown in Fig 1C. The levels of blood glucose among diabetic mice were always higher than that of the NC (P<0.01). After intragastric administration, the blood glucose of diabetic mice increased rapidly and reached the maximum values at the 30th minute. The blood glucose values in the HPCP were significantly lower than those in the MC at the 60th and 120th min (P<0.01, P<0.05). Additionally, high-dose PCP treatment significantly lowers the AUC of OGTT compared to that in the MC (Fig 1D, P<0.01).

The levels of insulin and HOMA-IR in each group were depicted in Fig 1E and 1F. Insulin and HOMA-IR of diabetic mice increased to different degrees when compared with the NC (P<0.01). Serum insulin was significantly alleviated after treatment with MPCP and HPCP in comparison to the MC group (P<0.05, P<0.01). Meanwhile, the HOMA-IR was significantly decreased by HPCP (P<0.05).

PCP alleviated obesity in db/db mice

After PCP treatment, the food intake of diabetic mice was decreased in various degrees when compared to the MC (Fig 2A). The food intake of the HPCP was consistently significantly lower than the MC from the 1st to 4th week (P<0.05, P<0.01), which of the MPCP was significantly decreased compared with the MC from the 2nd to 4th week after the intervention (P<0.05, P<0.01). Initial body weights of diabetic mice were of no significant differences (Fig 2B). After 2 weeks of PCP treatment, the body weights of diabetic mice in PCP-treatment groups were significantly lower than the MC (P<0.05, P<0.01).

Fig 2.

Fig 2

Effects of PCP on (A) food intake and (B) body weights, and serum lipid levels of (C) TG, (D) TC, (E) LDL-C, (F) HDL-C, (G) TG/HDL, (H) TC/HDL-C and (I) LDL-C/HDL-C in db/db mice. Data are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 8 for each experimental group. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. normal control group. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 vs. model control group. aP<0.05, aaP<0.01 vs. low dose of PCP. bP<0.05, bbP<0.01 vs. medium dose of PCP. cP<0.05, ccP<0.01 vs. high dose of PCP.

Both medium- and high-dose PCP treatments significantly decreased serum TG, while increased HDL-C (P<0.01, P<0.05) (Fig 2C–2F). Additionally, TC and LDL-C were significantly reduced in the HPCP (P<0.05, P<0.01). TG, TC, and LDL-C in LPCP were decreased by 8.84%, 11.06%, and 11.47%, as well as HDL-C was increased by 7.23%, but the changes failed to reach statistical significance after low-dose of PCP treatment (P>0.05). The results of lipid ratio parameters were shown in Fig 2G–2I. Those in the NC, including TC/HDL-C, TG/HDL-C, and LDL-C/HDL-C were significantly higher than those in the diabetic db/db mice (P<0.01). The values of TG/HDL-C in the MPCP and HPCP were significantly lower than those in the MC (P<0.05), while those of LPCP were not significantly different from those of the MC. However, the values of TG/HDL-C in the LPCP were significantly higher than those in the HPCP (P<0.05). All doses of PCP treatment decreased the values of LDL-C/HDL-C in a dose-response relationship (P<0.05), demonstrated by significantly lower values of LDL-C/HDL-C in the HPCP than those in the LPCP and MPCP (P<0.01).

PCP improved hepatic steatosis in db/db mice

H&E stains of the liver tissue were beneficial in evaluating hepatic cell fatty degeneration and injuries (Fig 3A and 3B). In the NC group, the hepatocytes with normal morphology were arranged neatly, and the structures of the hepatic lobules and sinus were intact and clear. Conversely, the hepatocyte cords in the MC group were disorganized and massive hepatocytes with hepatic steatosis or vacuolar degeneration were observed under the light microscope. After four weeks of treatment, the results showed that all doses of PCP had extremely ameliorated fatty or vacuolar degeneration in hepatic cells when compared with the MC group. In the LPCP, there was no steatosis in hepatocytes, although lots of vacuolar degeneration was found. In the MPCP, vacuolar degeneration in hepatocytes was significantly reduced. The hepatocytes in HPCP were arranged neatly and a little microvacuolar degeneration in hepatocytes was observed.

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Representative images of H&E staining in liver tissues of each group (A) ×100, Scale bar, 100 μm; (B) ×400, Scale bar, 10 μm. , steatosis; , vacuolar degeneration.

PCP improved hepatic oxidative stress in db/db mice

Significant increase of activities of SOD in diabetic mice after medium- and high-dose of PCP treatment (P<0.01), together with a reduction of MDA in all PCP-treatment groups were presented by comparison with the MC (P<0.05, P<0.01) (Fig 4A–4C). Additionally, the LPCP, MPCP, and HPCP were found to increase GSH-Px activities of db/db mice by 2.31%, 3.31%, and 5.68%, respectively, when compared with the MC, but no significant differences were found among MC and PCP-treatment groups.

Fig 4.

Fig 4

Effects of PCP on enzymatic antioxidant activities of (A) SOD and (B) GSH-Px, and the lipid peroxidation levels of (C) MDA in the liver of db/db mice. Data are expressed as mean ± SD; n = 8 for each experimental group. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. normal control group. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 vs. model control group.

PCP upregulated the protein expression of GLUT2 and GCK in db/db mice

As shown in Fig 5A and 5B, the protein expression of GLUT2 and GCK was significantly lower in diabetic db/db mice by comparison to the NC (P < 0.01, P < 0.05). However, treatment with PCP significantly increased the expression of GLUT2 and GCK compared to the MC (P < 0.01, P < 0.05). All doses of PCP increased GLUT2 protein expression in the liver, with HPCP being significantly more effective in upregulating GLUT2 expression than MPLP and LPCP (P < 0.01). Compared with the MC group, the relative expression of GCK protein increased by 22.55%, 28.51%, and 33.69% in the LPCP, MPCP, and HPCP groups, respectively (P < 0.05, P < 0.01), but it was not significant in PCP-treatment groups.

Fig 5. Effect of PCP on glucose metabolism-related enzyme activities in the liver of db/db mice.

Fig 5

(A) The protein expression of GLUT2 in the liver expression of db/db mice; (B) The protein expression of GCK in liver tissue of db/db mice. *P<0.05, **P<0.01 vs. normal control group. #P<0.05, ##P<0.01 vs. model control group. aP<0.05, aaP<0.01 vs. low dose of PCP. bP<0.05, bbP<0.01 vs. medium dose of PCP. cP<0.05, ccP<0.01 vs. high dose of PCP.

Discussion

T2DM is characterized by abnormalities in glucose, lipid, and protein metabolism, as well as impairment in insulin secretion and/or IR [18]. In the present study, we demonstrated that PCP significantly reduced FBG, fasting insulin levels, and body weight in db/db mice, and ultimately ameliorated oral glucose tolerance, IR, dyslipidemia, and obesity. Meanwhile, we found that PCP inhibited hepatic oxidative stress and steatosis by increasing SOD and GSH-Px activities and reducing MDA content, with the high dose of PCP being significantly more effective. Mechanistically, the improvement of FBG and IR in db/db mice by PCP may be attributed to the activation of the GLUT2/GCK expression and reduction of hepatic oxidative stress.

Genetic models and a high-fat diet combined with low-dose STZ-induced models are probably the most used models of T2DM at present. Db/db mice, due to gene mutation of the leptin receptor, are insensitive to leptin and absorb excessive food chronically, spontaneously developing symptoms of obesity, IR, and hyperglycemia within the 8th week [19]. In comparison tests between the two models, db/db mice kept hyperglycemia in the whole experiment, whereas the blood glucose of STZ-induced models spontaneously declined after three weeks [20]. It was possible because a part of islet β-cells could repair themselves after STZ failure, which may affect the outcome of the experiment. Therefore, db/db mice were chosen for this study to remove the interference of human intervention on the results.

Insulin, secreted by islet β-cells located in the central part of the pancreas, is the only hormone with a hypoglycemic effect in the body [21]. The fasting serum insulin of db/db mice significantly declined after the intervention of PCP, and HOMA-IR was negatively correlated with the dose of PCP, which suggested that PCP significantly reduced IR in diabetic mice. Our findings were different from Huang’s [16], which considered that PCP could enhance insulin secretion instead of reducing IR in diabetic rats. We further analyzed the reasons, which may be the different animal models chosen for the two studies. Their models were established by STZ, which is selectively toxic to the β-cells, to build diabetic models by disrupting the β-cells function and reducing insulin secretion [22]. In contrast, db/db mice are chronically overfed resulting in obesity, IR, and hyperglycemia, which occurs due to reduced insulin sensitivity rather than decreased insulin secretion [23].

IR is manifested by a decrease in insulin sensitivity that the normal amount of insulin secreted is insufficient to move glucose into target tissues including the liver, adipose, and muscle, which are commonly involved in the regulation of whole-body fuel metabolism [24, 25]. Previous studies have consistently concluded that PCP has a unique protective effect on the liver, which may be its target tissue [26]. The liver, a primary organ of glucose metabolism, is responsible for maintaining blood glucose homeostasis in the body. In hepatocytes, IR is reflected by a decrease in glucose uptake and utilization, a reduction in hepatic glycogen synthesis, and an increase in hepatic glucose production and output, which subsequently leads to fasting hyperglycemia [27]. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common liver injury in diabetes and is characterized by excessive lipid deposition in hepatocytes. According to statistical data, the incidence of NAFLD in the general adult is 20–30%, but it occurs in obese and diabetic patients with an incidence of up to 70–80%. NAFLD is believed to promote insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes to form a vicious circle [28]. In this study, we observed that PCP significantly reduced liver steatosis or vacuolar degeneration in db/db mice. Similarly, Guo et al. [29] found that PCP exerted protective effects against hepatic steatosis and oxidative stress by enhancing the expression of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). It has been demonstrated that the activation of AMPK in the liver can promote glucose metabolism and IR [30]. AMPK is a serine/threonine protein kinase, and the activated AMPK can increase glucose transporter protein expression and glucose uptake, and reduce IR to a greater degree [31]. Therefore, we further examined liver enzymes associated with glucose metabolism. GLUT2 and GCK are mainly secreted exclusively by hepatocytes and work together to maintain hepatic glucose metabolism homeostasis. GLUT-2 transports glucose in hepatic parenchymal cells, but the rate of glucose uptake is limited by the rate of glucose phosphorylation catalyzed by GCK [32]. Increasing the activity of GLUT2 and GCK inhibits hepatic glucose output and promotes glucose phosphorylation, hepatic glycogen synthesis, and aerobic metabolism of glucose in hepatocytes [33]. In the present study, PCP treatment significantly increased the expression of GLUT2 and GCK in db/db mice, with a high dose of PCP showing the best therapeutic effect and a dose-response relationship between the three groups. Based on the above findings, we proposed the hypothesis that PCP may decrease FBG and improve IR by upregulating the expression of GLUT2 and GCK to promote hepatic glucose uptake and utilization.

Hyperglycemia and IR are intimately linked to the overproduction of ROS and oxidative stress [34]. Sun et al. [15] found polyphenols from PCP show strong protective effects against high glucose-induced vascular inflammation by scavenging ROS and enhancing antioxidant activity, suggesting it to be a potential resource for anti-diabetes, which is consistent with our findings. Previous studies have shown that patients with T2DM produce large amounts of ROS during chronic hyperglycemia and that the liver is a major organ of ROS attack, disrupting its ability to scavenge free radicals and creating oxidative stress, thereby causing abnormalities in the insulin signaling pathway [35]. Therefore, the reduction of hyperglycemia-associated oxidative stress is considered to be an effective strategy to improve IR and T2DM [36]. Oxidative stress is usually assessed by measuring parameters including MDA, SOD, and GSH-Px. MDA, a product of lipid peroxidation, indirectly reflects the severity of free radical attack. SOD is responsible for catalyzing the breakdown of free radicals and reducing superoxide levels, which reflects the ability to scavenge free radicals [37]. The main role of GSH-Px is to protect the structural and functional integrity of cell membranes and to reduce the damage and attack of superoxide on the body [38]. In this study, the activities of SOD and GSH-Px were augmented and the levels of MDA were decremented in T2DM mice after PCP treatment, which is consistent with previous findings [39, 40]. These findings demonstrated that PCP can improve free radical scavenging ability by increasing SOD and GSH-Px activity and decreasing MDA content, thereby preventing liver damage under hyperglycemic conditions and regulating blood glucose and IR levels.

In addition to severe hyperglycemia, db/db mice exhibit severe symptoms including overeating and obesity [41]. There is strong evidence that obesity is among the most prominent hazard factors for IR and T2DM [42, 43]. Administration of PCP could potently reduce food consumption and alleviate body weight. No study discussed the effect of PCP on overeating and obesity in db/db mice before our research. However, Li et al. found daily oral administration of PCP for 8 weeks decreased body weight, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance in high-fat diet-induced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) mice by regulating the gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism [44]. Furthermore, quercetin considered one of the key ingredients for PCP has been reported to restrain body weight gain and food intake in obese mice [45, 46]. We supposed that the anti-obesity effect of PCP might be moderately attributable to quercetin, but the hypothesis needs to be validated by further studies.

However, there are some limitations to our study. Firstly, PCP was only approved to be consumed in the form of tea bags in China. Therefore, db/db mice were selected to be intervened with an aqueous extract of PCP to simulate the way of human consumption. Secondly, in consideration of the fact that the markers of PCP are still unclear, we have not purified and identified its components. We will explore more deeply to determine the active components of PCP in alleviating hyperglycemia and IR. Finally, HbA1c in PCP treatment groups was lower than the MC, but no significant difference was observed. HbA1c is formed by continuous and irreversible glycosylation reaction and reflects the blood glucose levels in the previous two or three months [47]. We considered that the intervention time was too short to change HbA1c levels. Whether PCP treatment with a prolonged experimental period can improve the HbA1c of db/db mice needs further study.

Conclusion

In summary, our results showed that PCP treatment decreased FBG and IR in T2DM mice. Moreover, it inhibited oxidative stress by promoting SOD and GSH-Px activities and reducing the MDA content. In addition, our results also showed that PCP regulated glucose transport and absorption by upregulating GLUT2 and GCK protein expression. PCP dose-dependently improved the parameters of oxidative stress and upregulated GLUT2 and GCK protein expression in comparison to the model group. Therefore, a high dose of PCP is more effective in alleviating IR, inducing hypoglycemic effects, and scavenging free radicals. The present study offers a new understanding of the health-promoting role of PCP and its potential significance in the therapy of T2DM.

Supporting information

S1 Raw data

(PDF)

pone.0311502.s001.pdf (57KB, pdf)
S1 Fig. Original image of western blot analysis.

(PDF)

pone.0311502.s002.pdf (107.8KB, pdf)

Data Availability

All raw data and blot/gel images have been uploaded as Supporting information.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by grants from the Key Research and Development of the Science and Technology Plan Project of Luzhou City (2012-NYF-17), the Joint Research Project of the General Hospital of Western Theater Command (KY201900), and the Sichuan Cadre Healthcare Research Project (No. 2021-1303).

References

  • 1.Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2018;138:271–81. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Latest figures show 463 million people now living with diabetes worldwide as numbers continue to rise. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2019;157:107932. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.107932 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet (London, England). 2024;403(10440):2162–203. Epub 2024/05/19. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00933-4 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Gauttam V, Munjal K., Mujwar S., Sawale J., Rohilla M., Gupta S. Comparative Study of Developed Formulation and Market Formulation for Antidiabetic Potential in Alloxan Induced Diabetic Wistar Rats. Journal of Young Pharmacists. 2022;14(4):387–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jellinger PS. Metabolic consequences of hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. Clinical Cornerstone. 2007;8:S30–S42. doi: 10.1016/s1098-3597(07)80019-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice C. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care. 2021;45(Supplement_1):S17–S38. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Li Y, Teng D, Shi X, Qin G, Qin Y, Quan H, et al. Prevalence of diabetes recorded in mainland China using 2018 diagnostic criteria from the American Diabetes Association: national cross sectional study. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2020;369:m997. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m997 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.American Diabetes Association Professional Practice C. 8. Obesity and Weight Management for the Prevention and Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022. Diabetes Care. 2021;45(Supplement_1):S113–S24. doi: 10.2337/dc22-S008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Petersen MC, Shulman GI. Mechanisms of Insulin Action and Insulin Resistance. Physiological Reviews. 2018;98(4):2133–223. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00063.2017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Alsharidah M, Algeffari M, Abdel-Moneim A-MH, Lutfi MF, Alshelowi H. Effect of combined gliclazide/metformin treatment on oxidative stress, lipid profile, and hepatorenal functions in type 2 diabetic patients. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. 2018;26(1):1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.11.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hostalek U, Gwilt M, Hildemann S. Therapeutic Use of Metformin in Prediabetes and Diabetes Prevention. Drugs. 2015;75(10):1071–94. doi: 10.1007/s40265-015-0416-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen Y, Song S, Shu A, Liu L, Jiang J, Jiang M, et al. The Herb Pair Radix Rehmanniae and Cornus Officinalis Attenuated Testicular Damage in Mice With Diabetes Mellitus Through Butyric Acid/Glucagon-Like Peptide-1/Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Pathway Mediated by Gut Microbiota. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:831881. Epub 2022/03/12. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.831881 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Cao Y-W, Jiang Y, Zhang D-Y, Zhang X-J, Hu Y-J, Li P, et al. The hepatoprotective effect of aqueous extracts of Penthorum chinense Pursh against acute alcohol-induced liver injury is associated with ameliorating hepatic steatosis and reducing oxidative stress. Food &Function. 2015;6(5):1510–7. doi: 10.1039/C5FO00098J [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wang M, Zhang X-J, Feng R, Jiang Y, Zhang D-Y, He C, et al. Hepatoprotective properties of Penthorum chinense Pursh against carbon tetrachloride-induced acute liver injury in mice. Chinese Medicine. 2017;12(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13020-017-0153-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sun Y, He L, Wang W, Wang T, Hua W, Li T, et al. Polyphenols from Penthorum chinense Pursh. Attenuates high glucose-induced vascular inflammation through directly interacting with Keap1 protein. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2021;268:113617. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Huang D, Jiang Y, Chen W, Yao F, Huang G, Sun L. Evaluation of hypoglycemic effects of polyphenols and extracts from Penthorum chinense. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2015;163:256–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.01.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wang B, Chandrasekera CP, Pippin JJ. Leptin- and Leptin Receptor-Deficient Rodent Models: Relevance for Human Type 2 Diabetes. Current Diabetes Reviews. 2014;10(2):131–45. doi: 10.2174/1573399810666140508121012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Germoush MO, Elgebaly HA, Hassan S, Kamel EM, Bin-Jumah M, Mahmoud AM. Consumption of Terpenoids-Rich Padina pavonia Extract Attenuates Hyperglycemia, Insulin Resistance and Oxidative Stress, and Upregulates PPARγ in a Rat Model of Type 2 Diabetes. Antioxidants (Basel). 2019;9(1). Epub 2020/01/01. doi: 10.3390/antiox9010022 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Berger C, Klöting N. Leptin Receptor Compound Heterozygosity in Humans and Animal Models. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2021;22(9). doi: 10.3390/ijms22094475 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Furman BL. Streptozotocin-Induced Diabetic Models in Mice and Rats. Current Protocols in Pharmacology. 2015;70(1):5.47.1–5..20. doi: 10.1002/0471141755.ph0547s70 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kalwat MA, Cobb MH. Mechanisms of the amplifying pathway of insulin secretion in the β cell. Pharmacology &Therapeutics. 2017;179:17–30. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2017.05.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Goyal SN, Reddy NM, Patil KR, Nakhate KT, Ojha S, Patil CR, et al. Challenges and issues with streptozotocin-induced diabetes—A clinically relevant animal model to understand the diabetes pathogenesis and evaluate therapeutics. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 2016;244:49–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2015.11.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Suriano F, Vieira-Silva S, Falony G, Roumain M, Paquot A, Pelicaen R, et al. Novel insights into the genetically obese (ob/ob) and diabetic (db/db) mice: two sides of the same coin. Microbiome. 2021;9(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01097-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yaribeygi H, Farrokhi FR, Butler AE, Sahebkar A. Insulin resistance: Review of the underlying molecular mechanisms. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2019;234(6):8152–61. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27603 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.da Silva Rosa SC, Nayak N, Caymo AM, Gordon JW. Mechanisms of muscle insulin resistance and the cross-talk with liver and adipose tissue. Physiological Reports. 2020;8(19):e14607. doi: 10.14814/phy2.14607 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.He L, Zhang S, Luo C, Sun Y, Lu Q, Huang L, et al. Functional Teas from the Stems of Penthorum chinense Pursh.: Phenolic Constituents, Antioxidant and Hepatoprotective Activity. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 2019;74(1):83–90. doi: 10.1007/s11130-018-0701-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zou Y, Wang Y, Zhang S, Wu Y, Liu X. Chitooligosaccharide Biguanide Repairs Islet β‐Cell Dysfunction by Activating the IRS‐2/PI3K/Akt Signaling Pathway in Type 2 Diabetic Rats. Advanced Therapeutics. 2019;2. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arab JP, Arrese M, Trauner M. Recent Insights into the Pathogenesis of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease. 2018;13(1):321–50. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-020117-043617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Guo WW, Wang X, Chen XQ, Ba YY, Zhang N, Xu RR, et al. Flavonones from Penthorum chinense Ameliorate Hepatic Steatosis by Activating the SIRT1/AMPK Pathway in HepG2 Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018;19(9). doi: 10.3390/ijms19092555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ma Y, Ding Q, Qian Q, Feng L, Zhu Q, Si C, et al. AMPK-Regulated Autophagy Contributes to Ursolic Acid Supplementation-Alleviated Hepatic Steatosis and Liver Injury in Chronic Alcohol-Fed Mice. ACS Omega. 2023;8(1):907–14. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c06252 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Wei X, Yang B, Chen X, Wen L, Kan J. Zanthoxylum alkylamides ameliorate protein metabolism in type 2 diabetes mellitus rats by regulating multiple signaling pathways. Food & Function. 2021;12(8):3740–53. doi: 10.1039/d0fo02695f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Thorens B. GLUT2, glucose sensing and glucose homeostasis. Diabetologia. 2015;58(2):221–32. Epub 2014/11/26. doi: 10.1007/s00125-014-3451-1 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hayashi H, Sato Y, Li Z, Yamamura K-i, Yoshizawa T, Yamagata K. Roles of hepatic glucokinase in intertissue metabolic communication: Examination of novel liver-specific glucokinase knockout mice. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2015;460(3):727–32. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.03.097 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mahmoud AM, Ashour MB, Abdel-Moneim A, Ahmed OM. Hesperidin and naringin attenuate hyperglycemia-mediated oxidative stress and proinflammatory cytokine production in high fat fed/streptozotocin-induced type 2 diabetic rats. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications. 2012;26(6):483–90. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Newsholme P, Cruzat VF, Keane KN, Carlessi R, de Bittencourt PIH Jr. Molecular mechanisms of ROS production and oxidative stress in diabetes. Biochemical Journal. 2016;473(24):4527–50. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160503C [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.King GL, Loeken MR. Hyperglycemia-induced oxidative stress in diabetic complications. Histochemistry and Cell Biology. 2004;122(4):333–8. doi: 10.1007/s00418-004-0678-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Keshari AK, Kumar G, Kushwaha PS, Bhardwaj M, Kumar P, Rawat A, et al. Isolated flavonoids from Ficus racemosa stem bark possess antidiabetic, hypolipidemic and protective effects in albino Wistar rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacology. 2016;181:252–62. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Luc K, Schramm-Luc A, Guzik TJ, Mikolajczyk TP. Oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in prediabetes and diabetes. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2019;70(6). Epub 2020/02/23. doi: 10.26402/jpp.2019.6.01 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Adefegha SA, Oboh G, Adefegha OM, Boligon AA, Athayde ML. Antihyperglycemic, hypolipidemic, hepatoprotective and antioxidative effects of dietary clove (Szyzgium aromaticum) bud powder in a high-fat diet/streptozotocin-induced diabetes rat model. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 2014;94(13):2726–37. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Du Y-C, Lai L, Zhang H, Zhong F-R, Cheng H-L, Qian B-L, et al. Kaempferol from Penthorum chinense Pursh suppresses HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Food & Function. 2020;11(9):7925–34. doi: 10.1039/D0FO00724B [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Garris DR. Estrogenic stimulation of ovarian follicular maturation in diabetes (db/db) mutant mice: restoration of euglycemia prevents hyperlipidemic cytoatrophy. Cell and Tissue Research. 2004;318(2):365–73. doi: 10.1007/s00441-004-0967-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ning F, Zhang D, Xue B, Zhang L, Zhang J, Zhu Z, et al. Synergistic effects of depression and obesity on type 2 diabetes incidence in Chinese adults. Journal of Diabetes. 2020;12(2):142–50. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12968 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Garvey WT, Ryan DH, Henry R, Bohannon NJV, Toplak H, Schwiers M, et al. Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Subjects With Prediabetes and Metabolic Syndrome Treated With Phentermine and Topiramate Extended Release. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(4):912–21. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Li X, Zhao W, Xiao M, Yu L, Chen Q, Hu X, et al. Penthorum chinense Pursh. extract attenuates non-alcholic fatty liver disease by regulating gut microbiota and bile acid metabolism in mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2022;294:115333. Epub 2022/05/03. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2022.115333 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Suruga K, Tomita T, Kadokura K, Arai T. Rhus verniciflua leaf extract suppresses obesity in high-fat diet-induced obese mice. Food & Nutrition Research. 2019;63. Epub 2019/09/25. doi: 10.29219/fnr.v63.3601 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Yin J, Ren W, Wei B, Huang H, Li M, Wu X, et al. Characterization of chemical composition and prebiotic effect of a dietary medicinal plant Penthorum chinense Pursh. Food Chemistry. 2020;319:126568. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126568 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Feng L, Nian S, Zhao Y, Bai X, Luo F, Luo X, et al. Higher HbA1c and/or glucose levels alter the association patterns between glycated hemoglobin and fasting glucose levels. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice. 2018;142:353–62. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Mehran Rahimlou

28 Jun 2024

PONE-D-24-18781Ameliorative Effects of Penthorum chinense Pursh on Insulin Resistance and Oxidative Stress in diabetic obesity db/db micePLOS ONE

Dear  Dr. Hu,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 10 2024 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Mehran Rahimlou, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, in your Methods section, please provide additional information regarding the experiments involving animals and ensure you have included details on (1) methods of sacrifice, and (2) efforts to alleviate suffering.

3. We note that the grant information you provided in the ‘Funding Information’ and ‘Financial Disclosure’ sections do not match. 

When you resubmit, please ensure that you provide the correct grant numbers for the awards you received for your study in the ‘Funding Information’ section.

4. In the online submission form, you indicated that all data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The raw data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

All PLOS journals now require all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript to be freely available to other researchers, either 1. In a public repository, 2. Within the manuscript itself, or 3. Uploaded as supplementary information.

This policy applies to all data except where public deposition would breach compliance with the protocol approved by your research ethics board. If your data cannot be made publicly available for ethical or legal reasons (e.g., public availability would compromise patient privacy), please explain your reasons on resubmission and your exemption request will be escalated for approval. 

5. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section. 

6. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels.   

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions.

7. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Comments from PLOS Editorial Office: We note that one or more reviewers has recommended that you cite specific previously published works. As always, we recommend that you please review and evaluate the requested works to determine whether they are relevant and should be cited. It is not a requirement to cite these works. We appreciate your attention to this request.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Dr. Jilei Hu

Based on the comments received from the reviewers regarding this manuscript, we request you to revise your manuscript based on the comments raised by the reviewers.

Many thans

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

********** 

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: 1.A few grammatical and typographical errors noted. For instance, ANIMALS EXPERIMENT, instead of ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS

2. De Ritis ratio and Ferritin could have been included

3. The authors are advised to compute lipid ratios, in view of their link with both diabetes mellitus and steatosis

4. Was the ELISA kit for HbA1c ,a high sensitivity and specificity one with minimal cross reactivity?? Why did the authors not use HPLC ???

Reviewer #2: 1. Language should be improved and spelling mistakes should be corrected.

2. Please abbreviate the text at first instance.

3. Give 2-3 lines about current status of diabetes at global level.

Brauer, Michael, Roth, Gregory A., Aravkin, Aleksandr Y., Zheng, Peng, Abate, Kalkidan Hassen, Abate, Yohannes Habtegiorgis, Abbafati, Cristiana, Kavita Munjal et al., 2024. Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990–2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet. 403, 2162-2203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736 (24)00933-4.

Gauttam, V., Munjal, K., Mujwar, S., Sawale, J., Rohilla, M., Gupta, S. 2022. Comparative Study of Developed Formulation and Market Formulation for Antidiabetic Potential in Alloxan Induced Diabetic Wistar Rats. Journal of Young Pharmacists. 2022; 14(4), 387-393.

Reviewer #3: In this manuscript, the authors demonstrated that PCP significantly alleviated hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, hyperlipidemia, and obesity, inhibited hepatic oxidative stress, and enhanced hepatic glucose transport in T2DM mice. Generally, the paper is well written and the results are of some scientific significance. I recommend this paper to be accepted after minor revision.

Minor points:

1. The inter-group significance shown in the picture is inconsistent with the description in the text. For example, in the result section ‘PCP improved parameters related to hyperglycemia and IR in db/db mice’ (Line 186), according to the figure, it should be ‘P<0.01’?

2. In Fig5-B, the significance may be wrong, especially HPCP Group. Please check through the manuscript to avoid these errors.”.

********** 

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: A.R.SRINIVASAN

Reviewer #2: Yes: Dr. Kavita Munjal

Reviewer #3: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Accept after minor revision.docx

pone.0311502.s003.docx (12.4KB, docx)
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 7;19(10):e0311502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311502.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


3 Aug 2024

Dear Editor and Reviewers,

We sincerely thank you for your valuable feedback which helped to improve the quality of our manuscript entitled “Ameliorative Effects of Penthorum chinense Pursh on Insulin Resistance and Oxidative Stress in diabetic obesity db/db mice” (Manuscript ID: PONE-D-24-18781). We have considered your comments word by word and have made revisions based on your suggestions question by question. We have amended the format according to the Journal Requirements, and the details can be found in the flie of Point-by-point response to reviewers and editors.The reviewers’ comments are listed in blue italics and specific concerns have been numbered. Our response is given in normal font and changes/additions to the manuscript are marked in red. The main amendments in the paper and the responses to your comments are listed as follows:

For reviewer 1#

1. A few grammatical and typographical errors were noted. For instance, ANIMALS EXPERIMENT, instead of ANIMAL EXPERIMENTS.

Response: Thank you for your meticulousness. We felt sorry about this low-grade mistake and the amendment is in red.

2. De Ritis ratio and Ferritin could have been included.

Response: Thank you for your advice. Penthorum chinense Pursh (PCP) is widely utilized in China to treat a variety of liver diseases. Previous studies have demonstrated that the levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were ameliorated in a dose-dependent manner by PCP [1-4]. Therefore, we did not measure liver function-related indicators in this study and unfortunately, we were unable to calculate the De Ritis ratio either. As for ferritin, there is no published literature report on the effect of PCP on it. However, our team's ongoing but unpublished study suggests that total flavonoids of PCP were able to significantly attenuate liver injury of iron-overloaded rats by up-regulating the expression of divalent metal ion transporter protein 1 and transferrin receptor 1. Of course, if we can get new funds, we shall carry out more experiments to dig into the effect of PCP on ferritin.

3. The authors are advised to compute lipid ratios, because of their link with both diabetes mellitus and steatosis.

Response: Thank you for your advice. T2DM patients often present with characteristic plasma lipid and lipoprotein abnormalities, including low HDL-C, high LDL-C, and elevated TC and TG levels [5], which is consistent with our findings. Considering the reviewer’s suggestion, we further analyzed the lipid ratio parameters, including TC/HDL-C, TG/HDL-C, and LDL-C/HDL-C, that considered could predict the risk of T2DM complications by prior studies [6], especially for coronary heart disease. The results of lipid ratio parameters are shown in Fig 2G-I. Those in the NC, including TC/HDL-C, TG/HDL-C, and LDL-C/HDL-C were significantly higher than those in the db/db mice (P<0.01). The values of TG/HDL-C in the MPCP and HPCP were significantly lower than those in the MC (P<0.05), while those of LPCP were not significantly different from those of the MC. However, the values of TG/HDL-C in the LPCP were significantly higher than those in the HPCP (P<0.05). All doses of PCP treatment decreased the values of LDL-C/HDL-C in a dose-response relationship (P<0.05), demonstrated by significantly lower values of LDL-C/HDL-C in the HPCP than those in the LPCP and MPCP (P<0.01).

4. Was the ELISA kit for HbA1c, a high-sensitivity and specificity one with minimal cross-reactivity? Why did the authors not use HPLC?

Response: Thank you for your question. According to the literature, various methods developed for HbA1c examination include immunoassay, boronated affinity, enzymatic, capillary electrophoresis, and Ion-Exchange High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (IE-HPLC) [7], and each has its advantages and limitations. Currently, the two most used methods for HbA1c detection are IE-HPLC and immunoassay, and the results of them are in strong agreement in most cases. In addition to its advantages in detecting HbA1c, IE-HPLC methods can also detect other types of hemoglobin and the presence of hemoglobin variants, which are widely used in clinical practice. However, we did not choose IE-HPLC due to its high price. ELISA kits working on the principle of immunoassay, are one of the methods with high sensitivity, stable efficacy, and low price for the determination of HbA1c, which are widely used in animal experiments [8]. In summary, we finally chose the ELISA kits to measure the HbA1c levels of db/db mice.

For reviewer 2#:

1. Language should be improved and spelling mistakes should be corrected.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We have invited a native English speaker to help polish our manuscript, and we hope the revised manuscript will be acceptable to you.

2. Please abbreviate the text at the first instance.

Response: Thank you for your suggestion. We felt sorry about this low-grade mistake and now all full names with their abbreviations have been added when they first appear. The amendment is in red.

3. Give 2-3 lines about the status of diabetes at the global level.

Response: Thank you for providing valuable references. We have checked the literature carefully and added more description about the status of diabetes at the global level in the INTRODUCTION part of the revised manuscript (Lines 57-60).

For reviewer 3#:

1. The inter-group significance shown in the picture is inconsistent with the description in the text. For example, in the result section ‘PCP improved parameters related to hyperglycemia and IR in db/db mice’ (Line 186), according to the figure, it should be ‘P<0.01’.

Response: Thank you for your meticulousness. We felt sorry about this low-grade mistake and the amendment is in red.

2. In Fig5B, the significance may be wrong, especially HPCP Group. Please check through the manuscript to avoid these errors.

Response: Thank you for your meticulousness. We have checked and reanalyzed the raw data and unfortunately, the results and significance were real. As shown in Fig 5B, when compared to the MC, the relative expression of GCK protein increased in the LPCP, HPCP (P < 0.05), and MPCP (P < 0.01), respectively. However, there was no significant difference in multiple comparisons between the three PCP-treatment groups. We considered the following two possible reasons. Firstly, a smaller p-value does not mean that the difference is larger, only that more reason to think that there is a difference between the two groups. In this study, the relative expression of GCK protein in the MPCP and HPCP was significantly higher than the MC, but the p-value was smaller in the MPCP, which only means that there was more reason to think that the MPCP is different from the MC. Secondly, the above results may be due to the relatively small sample size of the experiment.

Finally, we would like to express our thanks again for your reviews and guidance on our manuscript. We sincerely hope that with the help of your knowledge, we can complete an excellent paper and we also hope our paper can be published in your journal.

Thank you and best regards.

Yours Sincerely,

Ning Lin

Clinical Nutrition, The General Hospital of Western Theater Command, Sichuan, Chengdu 610083, China.

Email: helenmedic@yeah.net

August 3, 2024

Reference

1. Du YC, Lai L, Zhang H, Zhong FR, Cheng HL, Qian BL, et al. Kaempferol from Penthorum chinense Pursh suppresses HMGB1/TLR4/NF-κB signaling and NLRP3 inflammasome activation in acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Food & function. 2020;11(9):7925-34.

2. Jiang Y, Zhong M, Zhan H, Tao X, Zhang Y, Mao J, et al. Integrated strategy of network pharmacology, molecular docking, HPLC-DAD and mice model for exploring active ingredients and pharmacological mechanisms of Penthorum chinense Pursh against alcoholic liver injury. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2022;298:115589.

3. Wang S, Li W, Liu W, Yu L, Peng F, Qin J, et al. Total flavonoids extracted from Penthorum chinense Pursh mitigates CCl(4)-induced hepatic fibrosis in rats via inactivation of TLR4-MyD88-mediated NF-κB pathways and regulation of liver metabolism. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2023;14:1253013.

4. Zhang H, Cui X, Liu W, Xiang Z, Ye JF. Regulation of intestinal microflora and metabolites of Penthorum chinense Pursh on alcoholic liver disease. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2023;14:1331956.

5. Bahiru E, Hsiao R, Phillipson D, Watson KE. Mechanisms and Treatment of Dyslipidemia in Diabetes. Current cardiology reports. 2021;23(4):26.

6. Gu X, Yang X, Li Y, Cao J, Li J, Liu X, et al. Usefulness of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol as Predictors of Cardiovascular Disease in Chinese. The American journal of cardiology. 2015;116(7):1063-70.

7. Rhea JM, Molinaro R. Pathology consultation on HbA(1c) methods and interferences. American journal of clinical pathology. 2014;141(1):5-16.

8. Huang D, Jiang Y, Chen W, Yao F, Huang G, Sun L. Evaluation of hypoglycemic effects of polyphenols and extracts from Penthorum chinense. Journal of ethnopharmacology. 2015;163:256-63.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Point-by-point response to reviewers and editors.docx

pone.0311502.s004.docx (179KB, docx)

Decision Letter 1

Mehran Rahimlou

20 Sep 2024

Ameliorative Effects of Penthorum chinense Pursh on Insulin Resistance and Oxidative Stress in diabetic obesity db/db mice

PONE-D-24-18781R1

Dear Dr. Jilei Hu ,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice will be generated when your article is formally accepted. Please note, if your institution has a publishing partnership with PLOS and your article meets the relevant criteria, all or part of your publication costs will be covered. Please make sure your user information is up-to-date by logging into Editorial Manager at Editorial Manager® and clicking the ‘Update My Information' link at the top of the page. If you have any questions relating to publication charges, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Mehran Rahimlou, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

According to the comments of two reviewers, the manuscript meets the necessary criteria for acceptance.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #3: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #3: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Ameliorative Effects of Penthorum chinense Pursh on Insulin Resistance and Oxidative Stress in diabetic obesity db/db mice is a sound attempt. More light can be thrown by associating the markers of oxidative stress with the available and objective indicators of insulin sensitivity/insulin resistance, both dependent and independent of lipid status

Reviewer #3: The authors have made enough revisions and responses. The manuscript can be accepted in present form.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: A.R.Srinivasan @ Vellore A.R.Srinivasan

Reviewer #3: No

**********

Acceptance letter

Mehran Rahimlou

27 Sep 2024

PONE-D-24-18781R1

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Hu,

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now being handed over to our production team.

At this stage, our production department will prepare your paper for publication. This includes ensuring the following:

* All references, tables, and figures are properly cited

* All relevant supporting information is included in the manuscript submission,

* There are no issues that prevent the paper from being properly typeset

If revisions are needed, the production department will contact you directly to resolve them. If no revisions are needed, you will receive an email when the publication date has been set. At this time, we do not offer pre-publication proofs to authors during production of the accepted work. Please keep in mind that we are working through a large volume of accepted articles, so please give us a few weeks to review your paper and let you know the next and final steps.

Lastly, if your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at customercare@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Mehran Rahimlou

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Raw data

    (PDF)

    pone.0311502.s001.pdf (57KB, pdf)
    S1 Fig. Original image of western blot analysis.

    (PDF)

    pone.0311502.s002.pdf (107.8KB, pdf)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Accept after minor revision.docx

    pone.0311502.s003.docx (12.4KB, docx)
    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Point-by-point response to reviewers and editors.docx

    pone.0311502.s004.docx (179KB, docx)

    Data Availability Statement

    All raw data and blot/gel images have been uploaded as Supporting information.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES