Abstract
There is a growing interest in the utilization of metal oxide nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents. This review will focus on titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs), which have been demonstrated to exhibit high antimicrobial activity against bacteria and fungi, chemical stability, low toxicity to eukaryotic cells, and therefore high biocompatibility. Despite the extensive research conducted in this field, there is currently no consensus on how to enhance the antimicrobial efficacy of TiO2 NPs. The aim of this review is to evaluate the influence of various factors, including particle size, shape, composition, and synthesis parameters, as well as microbial type, on the antibacterial activity of TiO2 NPs against bacteria and fungi. Furthermore, the review offers a comprehensive overview of the methodologies employed in the synthesis and characterization of TiO2 NPs. The antimicrobial activity of TiO2 exhibits a weak dependence on the microorganism species. A tendency towards increased antibacterial activity is observed with decreasing TiO2 NP size. The dependence on the shape and composition is more pronounced. The most pronounced antimicrobial potential is exhibited by amorphous NPs and NPs doped with inorganic compounds. This review may be of interest to specialists in biology, medicine, chemistry, and other related fields.
Keywords: nanoparticles, TiO2, nano-titania, titanium oxide, antibacterial activity, antifungal activity, photocatalysis
1. Introduction
Resistance of microorganisms to antimicrobial drugs is one of the key global health problems [1]. Antibiotic resistance was known at the dawn of the “antibiotic era” since the discovery of penicillin. Already 10 years after the introduction of penicillin into medical practice, it turned out to be largely ineffective [2]. A temporary solution to this problem was the synthesis of new classes of antibiotics; however, new resistant strains soon emerged [3,4,5]. Bacteremia caused by antibiotic-resistant strains is the reason for over 1.2 million illnesses worldwide, 23,000 deaths annually in the USA alone and over 25,000 in Europe [6]. Among the antibiotic-resistant strains with the greatest epidemiological significance, it is worth noting the methicillin-resistant bacteria Staphylococcus aureus [7,8,9], vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis, drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae [10,11], drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumonia [12,13,14,15], drug-resistant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis [16,17], etc. Among the bacteria Streptococcus pneumonia in patient isolates in Japan, up to 80% of strains are penicillin-resistant [13]. Today, there is an active search for a solution to this problem, as evidenced by the continuing increase in the number of publications and citations on “antibacterial resistant bacteria” [18]. Unfortunately, a single effective solution to the given problems has been discovered. The five mechanisms of bacterial antimicrobial resistance have been described: enzymatic degradation of antibiotics (for example, by bacterial β-lactamases); modification of the antibiotic target, i.e., the target becomes modified so that the antibiotic is no longer able to bind to its site of action; control of drug entry through mutations in bacterial cell wall porin molecules and membrane modifications; activation of efflux pump systems that are able to pump antibiotics out of the cell before interactions of antibiotic with a target [19]. Possible paths to overcoming microbial resistance include the use of antibiotic adjuvants (inhibitors of β-lactamase, inhibitors of efflux pumps, and outer membrane permeabilizers, antivirulence compounds), bacteriolytic enzymes, metal and metal oxide nanoparticles [20,21,22,23]. It is now suggested that the problem of microbial resistance is not a private problem of hospitals and human homes. A concept is being developed according to which microbial resistance affects not only humans but also animals and the environment. This concept received the title “The interdisciplinary One Health (OH) approach” [24]. If we accept this doctrine, it becomes obvious that methods for overcoming microbial resistance should find easy application not only in medicine but in other areas of economic activity, in particular, agriculture.
A potential way to overcome microbial resistance is the application of metal and metal oxide nanoparticles [22,23]. Nanotechnology and nanobiotechnology are currently at a stage of rapid development and are already successfully applied in a variety of fields: agriculture and the food industry, wastewater treatment, environmental monitoring, biology and medicine, cancer therapy, and targeted drug delivery systems [23,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. The market for nanotechnology is experiencing consistent growth on an annual basis. In 2016, the production of nanoproducts reached a value of $12.7 billion, representing an annual growth rate of approximately 9.5%. In 2016, the contribution of nanotechnology products to the global gross domestic product (GDP) was 0.01%. As forecast by Rosnanotech, the percentage of nanoproducts in GDP is expected to reach 0.5% by 2018, 2% by 2020, and 40% by 2035 [34]. The market value of these products is estimated to be between $4.1 billion and $14.7 billion, depending on the evaluation criteria [35].
Titanium (Ti) is a chemical element in group 4 of period 4 of the periodic table of chemical elements, with atomic number 22 and a molar mass of 47.867 g/mol [36]. It is classified as a transition metal. Ti is capable of forming a wide range of oxides with different O/Ti stoichiometry: Ti3O, Ti2O2, Ti6O, Ti5O9, Ti4O7, TiO, TiO2, and Ti2O and their combinations [37]. Non-stoichiometric titanium oxides or titanium suboxides (TiO2−x and TinO2n−1) have increased electrical conductivity and visible light absorptivity [38]. Due to their unique properties, NPs and nanostructures based on non-stoichiometric titanium oxides can find applications in the development of new generation batteries and solar panels, anti-corrosion coatings, optoelectric devices, volatile organic compound gas sensors, wastewater treatment devices, etc. [37,38,39]. TiO2 is usually represented in NPs when studying antibacterial properties. Titanium dioxide (TiO2) has several crystalline forms. An anatase, brookite, and rutile are the three most common [40]. All three crystal structures are composed of TiO6 octahedra; however, their spatial arrangement differs. Rutile has a tetragonal structure in which the two opposite edges of each octahedron are separated to form linear chains along the direction. The TiO6 chains are then joined to each other via a corner bond. Anatase does not share corners but shares four edges per octahedron. The crystal structure of anatase can be viewed as zigzag chains of octahedra linked together by their shared edges. In the crystal lattice of brookite, the octahedra share three edges as well as corners, and the dominant structural feature is the edge-sharing chain, the TiO6 octahedra being parallel to the c-axis and cross-linked by the shared edges. The crystal structure and some physical properties of brookite appear to be between those of anatase and rutile. Titanium, its compounds, and Ti-containing alloys find numerous applications in a wide variety of areas of human economic activity: aerospace, mechanical engineering, chemical, automotive, agricultural, food industries, electronics, and jewelry production [41,42,43,44]. Titanium alloys are used in medicine (prosthetics) due to their inertness and high biocompatibility with human tissues [45,46]. Antibacterial and antifungal properties have been found in titanium dioxide nanoparticles TiO2 [47,48,49]. According to the PubMed database alone, the antimicrobial properties of TiO2 NPs have been described in >1000 articles since 2000 (Figure 1a). It is noteworthy that the share of papers devoted to medical applications and antimicrobial activity of TiO2 NPs increased from 4% to 39% of the total number of publications devoted to TiO2 NPs over the period 2005–2023, and the share of publications with the keywords “antibacterial” or “antifungal” increased from 2% to 18%. These statistics indicate the high potential of TiO2 NPs as antimicrobial agents. The share of papers devoted to the study of the antibacterial properties of TiO2 NPs is 10 times higher than the number of papers studying the antifungal properties of TiO2 NPs (Figure 1b). This may be due to the methodological features of the study of antifungal effects. The high inertness of TiO2 NPs makes it a more attractive candidate for the creation of antimicrobial NPs compared to a number of other metals and their oxides, such as ZnO or iron oxides [50,51].
Figure 1.
PubMed database information (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ accessed on 27 August 2024): (a) The dynamics of the number of publications according to the search by keywords «titanium oxide nanoparticles» (blue color, group I) and «titanium oxide nanoparticles + [«antibacterial» or «antifungal» or «medicine»]» (orange, group II); (b) the shares of publications in individual categories in group II for the entire analyzed time interval (2005–2023).
A large amount of accumulated literature data requires systematization and generalized quantitative analysis to identify more promising directions of work and recommendations for future studies. Recently, several detailed reviews on the antimicrobial effects of TiO2 NPs have been published [52]. These reviews describe in detail the structural features of TiO2 NPs, methods of synthesis and modification, and attempt to quantify the dependence of the antimicrobial activity of TiO2 NPs. on their morphology and surface modification [52,53]. However, at the moment, there is still no unified picture of what factors determine the magnitude of antimicrobial activity of TiO2 NPs. In this review, we have attempted to summarize the literature data on the antimicrobial properties of TiO2 NPs in order to identify new dependencies of antimicrobial potential on the systematic affiliation of microorganisms, the morphology of the NPs (size and shape), the method of synthesis and the method of surface modification/composition of TiO2 NPs. In addition, approaches and methods of synthesis of TiO2 NPs, as well as methods of their investigation and characterization, will be briefly described.
2. TiO2 NPs Synthesis Methods
The methods of synthesis of TiO2 NPs are quite diverse and include methods and their modifications. All synthesis methods can be divided into two large groups according to the “Bottom-up” and “Top-down” approach (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Methods for the synthesis of TiO2 NPs (references in the text).
The first approach is based on the formation of NPs by aggregation of individual molecules into a particle, or, in other words, the transformation of precursor solutions into NP colloids. This group includes chemical synthesis methods: sol−gel method, hydrolysis of precursors, for example, TiCl4, electrochemical method, sonochemical (ultrasonic) method, hydrothermal method, photocatalysis (proton-induced), microwave method, co-precipitation of a mixture of salts [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61]. Halogenates, hydroxides, or organic compounds of titanium are used as precursors for chemical synthesis, for example, titanium tetrabutylate Ti(OBu)4 titanium oxy sulfate or titanil sulfate TiOSO4, tetraethyl orthotitanate, titanium tetraisopropoxide Ti(OH)2 [62,63,64,65,66].
In some cases, the surface of the nanoparticles is modified using polymers, such as bacterial cellulose or chitosan [67,68]. The addition of polymers is intended to reduce the aggregation of NPs in the colloid. In the case of TiO2 NPs, studies on surface modification with polymers are relatively rare. Apparently, TiO2 NPs are quite stable without surface modification. Separately, it is worth noting the chemical synthesis by precipitation in a medium of plant extracts (Aloe barbadensis, Avicennia Marina, Caesalpinia pulcherrima, Citrus sinensis, Nervilia aragoan etc.), mushrooms (Pleurotus djamor), or bacterial components (Staphylococcus aureus, bacillus subtilis, etc.) [64,66,69,70,71,72]. This approach is called “green synthesis”. Green synthesis is often called biosynthesis; however, this is erroneous since the method is usually a modification of classical chemical methods, the sol−gel method, the hydrothermal method, the microwave method, etc. [66,73]. However, in the case of synthesis using bacterial culture in a medium with the addition of Ti-containing precursors, the term “biosynthesis” can be applied if the growth of NPs inside the bacteria is proven. An example is the absorption of Ti3+ ions by bacteria, their enzymatic reduction, and the growth of NPs inside the bacterial cell [74].
The second approach is usually represented by physical methods of synthesis, which consist of breaking down a large target into micro- and nanoparticles, for example, ball milling technique, physics vapor deposition, and laser ablation of anatase or rulite in a liquid [75,76,77,78,79]. In the case of physical synthesis methods, surface modification with biologically active compounds, such as antibiotics, is also possible [75].
Green synthesis methods are traditionally considered to be more environmentally friendly and cheaper than classical physical and chemical methods. The former requires the use of chemical reagents that can pollute the environment. Physical methods can require high electricity costs and/or expensive equipment [80]. However, we believe that with the right choice of conditions, a number of physical synthesis methods (e.g., laser ablation) can be cost-effective and require no additional reagents (surfactants or counterions) other than the target [81].
The size of the NPs may depend on the method of their synthesis [82]. We attempted to estimate the dependence of the size of TiO2 NPs on the synthesis method (Figure 3). It is worth noting that TiO2 NPs have a fairly narrow size distribution. Most NPs have sizes in the range of ~6–200 nm. This spread is much narrower than for a number of other metal NPs and their oxides. For example, the sizes for ZnO NPs ranged from units to thousands of nm [50].
Figure 3.
The dependence of TiO2 NPs sizes on the synthesis method (references in the text). *—p < 0.05, Kruskal−Wallis One Way ANOVA. The sizes of the analyzed samples are shown by numbers in brackets under the corresponding designations of the synthesis methods.
We have found some trends in the change in the sizes of ZnO NPs depending on the synthesis method. First, the NPs obtained by green synthesis methods are larger in size compared to the NPs obtained by chemical (sonochemical) and physical (laser ablation in liquid) methods. The NPs obtained by laser ablation in a liquid have a narrower size distribution than the NPs obtained by chemical methods. TiO2 NPs obtained by the hydrothermal method are greater than those obtained by the ultrasonic method.
The antimicrobial activity of NPs may depend on their size; therefore, knowledge of the method-size-antimicrobial activity relationship will allow the future selection of the most optimal methods for synthesizing TiO2 NPs.
3. Methods for Studying the Physical and Chemical Properties of TiO2 NPs
The methods for studying the physical and chemical properties of TiO2 NPs are the same as for other NPs. NPs are classically characterized by morphology (size, shape) and chemical composition.
The assessment of the sizes of NPs can be performed in two principal ways. The first is the assessment of the sizes of “dry” NPs using microscopy methods: transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and atomic force microscopy (AFM) [83,84,85]. The advantage of these methods is the ability to simultaneously assess both the size and shape of NPs. The disadvantages are the need for additional sample preparation and the impossibility of determining the size of the hydrate shell by assessing the hydrodynamic radius of NPs in a colloid. The latter is critical since NPs in biological experiments are in colloids.
The second approach is the assessment of “wet” NPs in colloids (most often, aqueous solutions) using the dynamic light scattering method (DLS) and analytical separation on a disk centrifuge [86,87]. The undoubted advantage of the DLS method is the ability to assess the distribution of NPs precisely by hydrodynamic diameter, which gives more accurate information about their real size in colloids, taking into account the hydration shell. In addition, analyzing the distribution of NPs by the value of the ζ-potential is simultaneously possible with measurements by the DLS method. ζ-potential carries additional information about the stability of NPs in colloids to aggregation [86,88]. The method of differential centrifugal sedimentation allows not only to determine their distribution by size (mass) but also to purify interested individual NPs fractions from a heterogeneous population [89]. The disadvantages of the method include the impossibility of obtaining additional information and the duration of execution (hours) [87].
The sizes of NPs can also be investigated using the Coulter principle, which is based on the fact that particles moving in an electric field cause measurable disturbances in the same field. The magnitude of these disturbances is proportional to the size of the particles in the field [90]. A method for measuring the sizes of NPs based on this principle is called ion occlusion scanning (SIOS) [91]. Less common are other methods for assessing the size of NPs: particle size mobility scanning (SMPS) and nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA) [92,93]. The first method allows us to estimate the size of NPs in aerosol, and the second gives additional information about the diffusion rate of NPs in colloids.
The chemical composition of NPs can be evaluated/validated using several methods. Energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDX) is commonly used to determine the chemical composition [94,95], which is very convenient since this method is usually integrated into modern transmission electron microscopes. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) is also often used [96]. In addition, the crystal structure of nanoparticles is often studied using X-ray diffraction (XRD) [97]. Pure TiO2 NPs and their conjugates are usually characterized using UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy. Pure TiO2 NPs have prominent absorption peaks at 300 and 370 nm. [75]. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) is also an informative spectral method [98]. For TiO2 NPs, characteristic absorption peaks in the regions of ~3400 cm−1 and 1640–1160 cm−1 have been described [75,98].
In the case of the inclusion of NPs in composite polymer materials, differential scanning calorimetry and the Brunauer−Emmett−Teller (BET) method are used [99]. This method is used to study the surface area of NPs and the rheological properties of nanomaterials. Modulation interference microscopy (MIM) is used to study the spatial distribution of nanoparticles within the polymer matrix [100,101]. The stability of NPs colloids in a solvent is studied by measuring the ζ-potential, as mentioned above [102]. The magnitude of the ζ-potential (by modulus): >60 mV—excellent stability of NPs colloids, 40–60 mV—good stability, 30–40 mV—average stability, <30 mV—moderate stability and the ability of NPs to aggregate over time, <5—low stability, rapid aggregation of NPs [103,104].
4. Factors Determining the Magnitude of the TiO2 NPs Antimicrobial Effects
4.1. Target Microorganism
The antimicrobial effects of TiO2 NPs against a fairly wide range of microorganisms of epidemiological significance are described, including Gram-negative (Gr−), Gram-positive (Gr+) bacteria and fungi. The most frequently encountered microorganism types in the analyzed works and the proportions of publications in which they were studied are shown below (Figure 4). In the analyzed works, the bacteriostatic effect was most often shown against Gram-negative bacteria (in total ~56%), while Gram-positive bacteria were studied less frequently (in total ~34%). Studies of antifungal potential were much less common (~9%).
Figure 4.
Frequency of occurrence of the studied microorganism species in the analyzed articles (references in the text).
Among Gram-negative microorganisms, the antibacterial effect of TiO2 NPs against Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumonia was often described. Vibrio cholerae and Salmonella enterica serotype typhimurium were studied less commonly. Among Gram-positive bacteria, the most frequently studied species were Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis. All of the listed bacterial species are of high epidemiological significance, and many of them are characterized by the presence of antibiotic-resistant strains [71,105,106,107,108,109,110,111]. Among fungi, special attention is paid to the causative agent of thrush Candida albicans (about half of all analyzed works on antifungal action). Infections caused by antifungal drugs-resistant C. albicans strains are especially dangerous in immunodeficiency states [112]. In this case, the search for alternative methods of combating fungal infections becomes a priority.
There are emerging data on the antiviral activity of TiO2 NPs, in particular against the H3N2 influenza virus [113,114].
The greater number of publications indicating antibacterial action against Gram-negative bacteria may indicate potentially greater effectiveness of TiO2 NPs against this particular group of bacteria. Higher effectiveness against Gram-negative bacteria may be of interest since, due to the peculiarities of the structure of the cell wall, it is among them that aggressive antibiotic-resistant forms are more common [115].
We decided to compare the dependence of MIC on the studied microorganism group to test our hypothesis (Figure 4). First, we divided all microorganisms into large groups: Gram-positive, Gram-negative bacteria, and fungi (Figure 5a). One can see a tendency for MIC to depend on the group: Gram-positive bacteria appear to be more susceptible to TiO2 NPs than Gram-negative bacteria and fungi. However, we did not find any statistically significant differences when testing statistical significance using the Kruskal−Wallis One Way ANOVA and Mann−Whitney Rank Sum test.
Figure 5.
Dependence of MIC of TiO2 NPs from group (a) and species (b) of microorganisms. The data are presented as distribution histograms with box plots. Sample sizes are indicated to the left of the corresponding distribution histograms. Different colors represent different groups (a) or species (b) of microorganisms.
When assessing the dependence of MIC on the type of microorganism, no statistically significant differences were found among epidemiologically significant ones (Figure 5b). However, for a number of microorganisms, Candida albicans, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa in some of the works, a shift of MIC distribution towards higher values can be detected, which may indicate significant differences in sensitivity to TiO2 NPs between different strains of the same species. For S. aureus and B. subtillis, the opposite picture was observed: a narrow shape of the distribution, indicating small differences in sensitivity to TiO2 NPs between strains.
The weak dependence of MIC on the species of microorganisms may indicate a number of features of NPs. Firstly, the universality of their antimicrobial action and a wide range of potential applications. Secondly, there are other factors (shape and size, presence and type of dopants, etc.) that can determine the magnitude of antimicrobial activity to a greater extent than the type of microorganism. Thirdly, the weak dependence of MIC of TiO2 NPs on the type of microorganism under study allows us, if necessary, to conduct a further search for factors determining the antimicrobial potential without taking into account the systematic affiliation of microorganisms.
4.2. Morphology of NPs
The influence of NPs morphology (shape and size) on their antibacterial activity has been shown for NPs of many other metals and their oxides, for example, ZnO, Ag2O, iron oxides, and others [50,51,116,117,118]. The most obvious dependence of MIC on the size of NPs and their shape seems to be. A decrease in the size of NPs should increase the ratio “surface area/volume (S/V)” and increase their biological activity [119]. We did not find any noticeable trends in the average assessment of the size-MIC dependence, so we then assessed the dependence of MIC on the size of NPs for different groups of microorganisms (Figure 6).
Figure 6.
Dependences of MIC on the TiO2 NPs size for Gram-negative (a), Gram-positive (b) bacteria, and fungi (c). The dots indicate individual values in the size-MIC pairs taken from the published works. The straight lines correspond to the trend lines; the shaded areas correspond to the confidence interval of 0.95.
For all groups, a tendency towards a decrease in MIC and, consequently, an increase in antimicrobial activity with decreasing size is observed. This tendency corresponds to the classical concept described in the literature for other NPs [120,121,122]. In the case of fungi, this tendency is more pronounced (Figure 6c). It is also worth noting that at sizes <20 nm for Gram-negative bacteria and <5 nm for Gram-positive bacteria, an increase in MIC is observed. Thus, the size-MIC dependence has a complex shape, and the optimal size of NPs with the highest antibacterial activity is 40–60 nm and 10–30 nm for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, respectively. Perhaps the weak expression of the detected dependencies still depends on the type of microorganism. For further analysis, we constructed the size-MIC dependences for the most frequently encountered types of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria in the works: E. coli and S. aureus, respectively (Figure 7).
Figure 7.
Dependences of MIC on the size of TiO2 NPs for E. coli (a) S. aureus (b) shown separately and on one graph (c). The dots indicate individual values in the size-MIC pairs, taken from the published works. The straight lines correspond to the trend lines; the shaded areas correspond to the confidence interval of 0.95.
The dependence of MIC on the size of TiO2 NPs differs between microorganisms: pronounced for S. aureus and practically absent for E. coli. However, in the size range of 20–50 nm, the MIC for both bacteria is practically the same. The weak, pronounced dependence of the MIC of TiO2 NPs (R2~3) on the species of the microorganism under study allows us to conduct further searches for factors determining antimicrobial potential without taking into account the systematic affiliation of microorganisms.
The second important parameter determining the antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of NPs is their shape [123,124,125]. TiO2 NPs can take several different forms depending on the conditions used for their synthesis. We identified the most common groups of shapes: spherical, oval (ellipses and rods), polygonal (including tetragonal, cuboid, hexagonal, and quasi-spherical), and amorphous. When choosing the shape, we relied on such criteria as the presence/absence of angles and the ratio of length to width. The result of comparing the MIC in the groups by shape is shown below (Figure 8). Polygonal, spherical, and oval NPs have high MIC values compared to amorphous NPs. Amorphous TiO2 NPs demonstrate a more pronounced antimicrobial effect compared to other forms. For amorphous NPs, the expected surface area/volume (S/V) ratio with equal dimensions will be greater than for formed ones (especially compact ones: spheres or quasi-spheres) [126]. Consequently, the value of the S/V ratio significantly affects the antimicrobial activity of TiO2 NPs.
Figure 8.
Dependence of MIC on the form of TiO2 NPs. *—p < 0.05, Kruskal−Wallis One Way ANOVA. The volumes of the analyzed samples are shown by numbers in brackets under the corresponding descriptions of the forms. Different colors represent different groups (a) or species (b) of microorganisms.
4.3. Modification of the Composition of NPs
Modifications of the surface and/or composition of NPs using inorganic and/or organic compounds (antibiotics, polymers, components of plant extracts, and bacterial cultures) are the main ways to increase the antimicrobial activity of NPs [127,128,129,130,131,132]. It is difficult to cover the entire variety of methods for modifying NPs within the framework of one review. However, we attempted to combine all the modifications we encountered in the literature into four general groups based on the type of dopant introduced into the NPs: (1) unmodified (Pure); (2) inorganic dopants (metals and non-metals); (3) organic dopants of known composition (antibiotics, polymers); (4) components of plant extracts modifying NPs as a result of “green synthesis” (Figure 9).
Figure 9.
Dependence of MIC on the method of LF modification. *—p < 0.05, Kruskal−Wallis One Way ANOVA and Mann−Whitney Rank Sum Test. The volumes of the analyzed samples are shown by numbers in brackets under the corresponding descriptions of the forms.
We have found that the greatest antimicrobial effect is exhibited by TiO2 NPs modified with inorganic compounds: metals (Ba, Ag, Nd, and Mg) or non-metals (sulfur) [60,133,134,135,136]. Pure TiO2 NPs and those modified with organic compounds have less pronounced antimicrobial activity. TiO2 NPs modified with components of plant extracts or components of bacterial nature have an intermediate activity between pure and modified inorganic compounds of TiO2 NPs.
5. Mechanisms of Antimicrobial Action, Photocatalysis and Characteristics of Excitation Light
The mechanisms of antimicrobial action for the vast majority of metal oxide PMs are the release of metal ions, Fenton reaction in the case of variable valences metals and direct destruction of the cell wall by adhesion of NPs to cells, mutagenic and genotoxic action, enzyme inactivation and photocatalysis [50,51,117]. Unlike most metal oxide NPs, for TiO2 NPs, the most pronounced and studied mechanism of antibacterial action is photocatalysis [137].
The second mechanism of antimicrobial action is the enhancement of the effectiveness of antimicrobial compounds, in particular antibiotics, as exemplified by amoxicillin [75]. This effect is logical since TiO2 NPs have excellent structure for creating targeted drug delivery systems [113,138,139].
The third mechanisms of toxicity of TiO2 NPs are genotoxicity and mutagenicity, but the exact mechanisms are still unknown [140].
Antimicrobial activity in the dark through disruption of the cell wall integrity has also been shown in principle; however, in the presence of light, the process of cell wall lysis is accelerated. The addition of carbon quantum dots significantly enhances the photocatalytic toxicity of TiO2 NPs against bacteria [141]. It has been shown that TiO2 NPs when in contact with the outer cell membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, are capable of causing its depolarization, which entails disruption of the membrane barrier function [142]. The molecular targets of TiO2 NPs, in this case, are membrane proteins, lipopolysaccharides (Gram-negative bacteria), and lipoteichoic acids (Gram-positive bacteria) [40,143]. Osmotic stress has also been described as a mechanism of dark toxicity against bacteria [144]. The generalization of ‘dark’ non-photocatalytic mechanisms of antibacterial activity of TiO2 NPs is presented in Figure 10.
Figure 10.
Generalized scheme of non-photocatalytic antibacterial actions of TiO2 NPs (references in the text).
The reason for the high photocatalytic activity of TiO2 NPs is the ability of TiO2 to absorb light and fluoresce in wide wavelength ranges. Pure TiO2 absorbs light in the range of λ 200–300 nm and releases light with wavelengths from 400 to 700 nm. [145,146]. The broadening of the absorption region of TiO2 NPs up to 520 nm can be observed when organic compounds capable of fluorescence (e.g., indole) are added to TiO2 NPs [145]. Enhancement of absorption in the IR region (according to FTIR data) for TiO2 NPs in the presence of indole has also been shown.
Light can interact with TiO2 NPs and lead to the formation of ROS such as superoxide anion radical O2−• and hydroxyl radical •OH [147]. TiO2 has a very high wide value band gap of 3.2 eV, due to which, upon absorption of UV radiation (optimally, ≤385 nm), electron-“hole” pairs with high energy are formed. The energy of electron-“hole” pairs can then be transferred to surrounding molecules [148].
The generalized equations of the processes of ROS generation on TiO2 NPs surface during photolysis are shown below:
TiO2 + hv(UV−visible) → TiO2 + (eCB−) + hVB+ | (1) |
eCB− + O2 → O2−• | (2) |
hVB+ + OH− → •OH | (3) |
where CB is the conduction band, VB is the valence band, hVB+ is the electron “hole”, eCB− is the “knocked out” photon electron. If photocatalytic transformations formed ROS (Figure 11) significantly accumulated in the cell in concentrations exceeding the limit of the antioxidant system, the ROS causes oxidative stress [149,150]. During oxidative stress, chemical modifications of both protein molecules and DNA occur [151,152,153].
Figure 11.
Generalized scheme of photocatalytic antibacterial action of TiO2 NPs [149,150,151,152,153].
The first can lead to disruption of enzyme activity. The second leads to genotoxicity, which disrupts DNA duplication processes. ROS are also capable of damaging the structure of bacterial cell walls and destroying bacterial biofilms [86].
Unfortunately, not all articles indicate the wavelengths of light in the study. In addition, the authors do not indicate the radiation power, which makes it difficult to compare the results with each other. However, we will try to describe the main points.
The first is the wavelength. A decrease in light wavelength significantly enhances the antimicrobial (bacteriostatic) effect of TiO2 NPs: a change in λ from 425 to 365 nm reduced the number of CFU E. coli by 3.5 orders of magnitude [154]. TiO2 NPs, in combination with UV-B (~280 nm), cause significant inhibition of the expression of bacterial genes responsible for DNA replication, cell division, toxin detoxification, metabolism, ion transport, and others [137]. However, UV-B without TiO2 NPs has a significantly smaller effect on the expression of bacterial genes.
The second is the presence of organic compounds. TiO2-induced photocatalysis can successfully occur at wavelengths of ~555 and ~608 nm after the addition of organic compounds, such as dyes [155]. It is noteworthy that TiO2 NPs modified with compounds of Achyranthes aspera extract, on the contrary, can act as antioxidants in the dark [155]. Therefore, both the presence of light and the properties of the chemical environment are important for the implementation of the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 NPs.
Third is a production method. The method of production of TiO2 NPs and “freshness” of NPs also influence their photocatalytic activity. For example, TiO2 NPs obtained by laser ablation just before the test had a more pronounced UV-induced bacteriostatic effect than commercially available NPs obtained by chemical methods [156].
Fourth is the radiation power (Figure 12). Higher irradiation power naturally increases the antibacterial activity of TiO2 NPs, e.g., the MIC for UV powers of 11 W/m2 and 30 W/m2 are 25 and 1 µg/mL, respectively [156,157]. The shape of the NPs can also affect the efficiency of photocatalysis. For example, the MIC for amorphous TiO2 NPs is lower than for spherical ones [17,157].
Figure 12.
Main methods of photocatalytic antibacterial action of TiO2 NPs improving (reference in the text).
Thus, the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 NPs may depend on the wavelength of the exciting light, its power, NP morphology, and the presence of organic compounds capable of fluorescence or light absorption in the NP colloid. However, it should be noted that the diversity of experimental conditions and their modifications in published works complicates the unambiguous interpretation of the analyzed data.
Other methods for increasing the antimicrobial activity of TiO2 NPs usually involve modification of classical synthesis methods. Laser ablation in a constant magnetic field of 1.2 T allowed the synthesis of TiO2 NPs with 20–30% greater bacteriostatic activity than without the use of a magnetic field [158]. Modification of the surface of nanoparticles with polymers in the case of TiO2 increases their bacteriostatic effect by 50–100% compared to untreated nanoparticles. This effect is realized in the dark [67]. TiO2 NPs synthesized in a modified atmosphere with 50% or 75% argon showed more pronounced bacteriostatic properties than TiO2 NPs synthesized in a normal atmosphere [159]. The combined use of antibiotics and TiO2 NPs can provide a synergistic bacteriostatic effect even against antibiotic-resistant strains [160]. TiO2 NPs modified with silver and components of pyrolyzed diatomaceous algae biomass made it possible to achieve a significant bacteriostatic effect against Gram-positive S. aureus and Gram-negative K. pneumoniae and E. coli bacteria both in laboratory tests and in the case of clinical isolates [161].
Modification with plant extract components can enhance the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activity of TiO2 NPs via capturing of AL-2 QS signaling molecules and strong oxidative stress, which in turn causes disturbances in enzyme activities, protein and nucleic acid integrity, and biofilm matrix [162].
As mentioned earlier, although TiO2 NPs are generally considered titanium dioxide, they are actually a mixture of rutile and anatase in different ratios [75]. Rutile and anatase have slightly different O/Ti stoichiometry, namely 1.9 and 2.0, respectively [37]. Increasing the proportion of rutile compared to anatase in the NPs mixture (reducing the O/Ti stoichiometry from 2.0 to 1.9) was found to enhance the antibacterial activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria due to enhanced photocatalysis [163]. Microcoatings containing individual rutile crystals in anatase also demonstrated good antibacterial potential both in the dark and under visible UV light illumination [164]. The authors of the work attribute the increase in antimicrobial activity to the larger surface area of rutile crystals than anatase. A more pronounced antimicrobial effect against E. coli and S. aureus of rutile/anatase NPs compared to “pure” anatase NPs is also found in a number of studies [75,95]. It is worth noting that the synthesis of titanium oxide-based NPs and nanocoatings with a given O/Ti stoichiometry is a complex methodological task that requires careful selection of synthesis conditions, precursor ratios during synthesis, and/or surface modification [163,164].
6. Biocompatibility with Eukaryotic Cells
Despite the canonical view of TiO2 NPs as biosafe for eukaryotic cells, a wealth of data are emerging on the potential cytotoxicity of TiO2 NPs [165]. The dependence of TiO2 NPs cytotoxicity against hamster lung fibroblasts on NPs geometry was shown [79]. The mechanism of cytotoxic action includes genotoxic action induction of cell apoptosis [79].
It is worth noting that cytotoxic concentrations for eukaryotic cells of ~100 μg/mL can be in the order of magnitude of the average MIC of TiO2 NPs for microorganisms [79]. The TiO2 NPs’ cytotoxicity increased with decreasing of size in the range from 10 to 170 nm [79]. The dependence of cytotoxicity on the size of NPs is well illustrated by the following example.
As a rule, cytotoxicity rises with increasing NPs concentration (from 0.1 to 100 μg/mL) and exposure time (from 1 to 4 days) [166]. On the other hand, it was shown on A549 lung cells that TiO2 NPs prepared by different methods with large sizes of ~100 and ~1000 nm do not have a toxic effect on cells. They did not cause cell death, DNA fragmentation, or oxidative stress or change the activity of dehydrogenases and the concentration of glutathione [167]. The only alarming fact is the ability of TiO2 NPs to penetrate into the cell and accumulate there, which was shown by TEM methods [167]. However, no experimental evidence of cell death and/or cell cycle modification from the accumulation of TiO2 NPs in the cell has been found.
In addition, the TiO2 NPs cytotoxicity depends on the Ti4+, Ti3+, and Ti2+ ratio in NPs and the type of cells studied. In particular, TiO2 NPs did not affect the viability of rat fibroblasts but caused the death of rat erythrocytes through oxidative stress and calcium overload. NPs with a higher Ti4+/Ti3+ ratio caused more pronounced oxidative stress and Ca2+ influx into erythrocytes [168]. Differences in the cytotoxic concentrations of TiO2 NPs were shown for different hepatocyte lines: SMMC-7721 human hepatocarcinoma, normal human liver cells HL-7702, rat tumor cells CBRH-791, and normal rat cells BRL-3A. Rat cells were more sensitive to TiO2 NPs. TiO2 NPs showed greater toxicity and ROS production in the case of hepatocarcinoma cells of both species compared to normal cells [166]. Therefore, TiO2 NPs have potential as an anticancer agent, but, in our opinion, additional methods are required to increase their specificity. Work in this direction is underway. In particular, the addition of silver TiO2 NPs increases their cytotoxicity against human hepatocarcinoma HepG2 cells due to disruption of mitochondrial function and induction of apoptosis. [169].
To summarize the above, the cytotoxicity of TiO2 NPs depends on a wide range of conditions: concentration, time of action, shape and size of the NPs themselves, their composition modifications, and cell type. TiO2 NPs can be used as antimicrobial and anticancer agents with the right combination of conditions.
7. Prospects and Limitations
In this review, we attempted to evaluate the dependence of the antimicrobial activity of TiO2 NPs on their characteristics (morphology, composition, synthesis method), as well as on the systematic position of microorganisms. It was somewhat unexpected for us that the antibacterial properties were very weakly dependent on the Gram’s count of the bacteria and were little dependent on the species. The dependence of MIC on the size of TiO2 NPs was observed but was weakly expressed. The optimal size of TiO2 NPs is 20–100 nm when MIC is minimal. A more pronounced effect on antimicrobial activity was exerted by such factors as the surface modification of TiO2 NPs and, consequently, the synthesis method, as well as the shape of the NPs. The most pronounced antimicrobial activities were shown by amorphous TiO2 NPs or modified with other metals, such as Mg, Ag, etc. The key mechanism of the antimicrobial activity of TiO2 NPs is photocatalytic activity. According to the analyzed literature data, the efficiency of photocatalysis against bacteria and fungi depends on the wavelength of the exciting light, its power, NPs morphology, and the presence of organic compounds in the NP colloid capable of fluorescence or light absorption. However, it should be noted that the diversity of experimental conditions and their modifications in published works complicates the unambiguous interpretation of the analyzed data.
In most studies, the assessment of antibacterial activity was performed using standardized microbiological methods based on the optical density of the suspension, the number of colony-forming units (CFU), and the size of the inhibition zone. [154,160]. For the cultivation of microorganisms, the authors of the works used classical media MHA, BHI, SDA, and a number of others and conditions close to the human body (37 °C) [170,171,172,173].
However, the difference in the methods of culturing bacteria and fungi and assessing the antimicrobial potential complicates the unambiguous interpretation of the obtained dependences. In some studies, the authors separately determined MIC using serial dilutions (Table 1, work numbers are in bold) [136,174]. In other studies, the authors did not directly indicate MIC, but it can be determined based on graphical and/or digital/tabular data in the articles. In the second case, the accuracy of MIC determination may be low and limited to the lower value of the concentration of the studied NPs. This limitation of the accuracy of MIC determination in a number of studies requires special care when searching for quantitative patterns. For example, this may mean that in studies without indicating a separate determination, MIC itself may be artificially inflated. In future studies, it may be worth adding additional criteria for analyzing MIC dependencies, such as the influence of the cultivation environment. However, it is worth remembering that the introduction of additional conditions may not clarify but, on the contrary, “confuse” the researcher. Therefore, the addition of new analysis conditions must be weighed and justified.
In this paper, we attempted a fairly simple and obvious quantitative analysis: assessing the possible relationship between a pair of features. In the future, for a more correct analysis, it may be possible to use multivariate analysis methods, such as the principal component method, multiple correlation, and others.
The final limitation of TiO2 NPs application is the development of bacterial resistance against metal NPs and their oxides. Among the main mechanisms of NP resistance described in the literature are activation of ion pumps (protection against free ions), electrostatic repulsion, changes in cell morphology, biofilm formation and modification of the extracellular matrix (protection against contact toxicity), gene transfer, metabolic reactions and mutations (protection against genotoxic action and oxidative stress) [40,175]. In the case of TiO2 NPs, it is necessary to overcome the bacterial defense mechanisms against contact and ROS-mediated action. The search for ways to overcome bacterial resistance against NPs should become one of the most pressing tasks in this area.
Table 1.
Parameters of TiO2 NPs reported in the literature.
No. | Synthesis Method | Composition | Size, nm | Shape | MIC | Microorganism | Medium, Conditions | Effect | Notes | Ref. | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Group | Species | ||||||||||
1 | Laser ablation in water | TiO2 amoxicillin + TiO2 |
11–26 (200 mJ; 10 min) 2–23 (80 mJ, 20 min) |
Sph | 400 µg/mL >> >> >> |
Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, P. aeruginosa P. vulgaris, S. aureus |
NA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Amoxicillin addition significantly increased antibacterial activity. | [75] |
2 | Aeromonas hydrophila mediated biosynthesis | TiO2 | 28–54 40.50 (individ.) |
Sph | 25 µg/mL 20 µg/mL 30 µg/mL 10 µg/mL 10 µg/mL 15 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr+ Gr+ Gr+ |
A. hydrophila, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. pyogenes, S. aureus, E. faecalis |
NA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The antibacterial activity of the synthesized TiO2 NPs was assessed by well diffusion method toward A. hydrophila, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. pyogenes, and E. faecalis and showed effective inhibitory activity against S. aureus (33 mm) and S. pyogenes (31 mm). | [95] |
3 | Aspergillus flavus mediated biosynthesis | TiO2 | 62–74 | Sph, Oval |
40 µg/mL 40 µg/mL 80 µg/mL 70 µg/mL 45 µg/mL |
Gr+ Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr+ |
S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae, B. subtilis |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Fungus-mediated synthesized TiO2 NPs have proved to be a good novel antibacterial material. | [98] |
4 | Sol–gel method | TiO2 | 6(S1)–25.8(S2) 25.8–33(S3) |
Sph | 150 µg/mL (S1, S2) 200 µg/mL (S3) 200 µg/mL (S1, S3) 200 µg/mL (S1) 150 µg/mL (S1) 200 µg/mL (S3) 150 µg/mL (S2) |
Gr+ Gr+ Gr+ Gr− Gr− Gr− Fungus |
S. aureus, S. pneumonia, B. subtilis, P. vulgaris, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, C. albicans |
MHA, 12–24 h, 37 ± 1 °C (bacteria) and 27 ± 1 °C (fungus) | BS | The synthesized TiO2 NPs were found to be effective in visible light against S. pneumonia, S. aureus, P. vulgaris, P. aeruginosa, and C. albicans. The powder samples at different calcination temperatures are defined as S1 (400 °C), S2 (600 °C), and S3 (800 °C). |
[17] |
5 | Commercial TiO2 from Evonik Industries | LDPE-TiO2 | 25 | Sph | 500 µg/mL | Gr− | E. coli | LB, 24 h, 37 °C | BS, FS | The antimicrobial activity of the TiO2 NP-coated films exposed under both types of lighting was found to increase with an increase in the TiO2 NP concentration and the light exposure time. The antimicrobial activity of the films exposed under UV light was higher than that under fluorescent light. |
[154] |
6 | Microwave-assisted one-step biosynthesis | TiO2 | 20–40 | Sph | 30 µg/mL >> >> >> >> |
Gr+ Gr+ Gr− Gr− Gr+ |
Bacillus, S. mutans, E. coli, K. pneumonia, C. absonum |
NA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The developed TiO2 NPs demonstrate significant antibacterial activity against bacillus at the concentration of 70 mg/mL. | [155] |
7 | Pulsed laser ablation in water | TiO2 | 34 | Sph | 25 µg/mL | Gr− | E. coli | LB, 12 h. (overnight), 37 °C | BS, BC | The best activity was obtained at the highest TiO2 concentration (100 µg/mL) and laser-ablated NPs compared with commercial. | [156] |
8 | Magnetic Field-Assisted Laser Ablation in Water | TiO2 | 25–35 | Sph | - | Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, S. aureus |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The antibacterial effect assay revealed the largest inhibition zone in S. aureus and E. coli, with a more potent effect for TiO2 NPs prepared by a magnetic field when compared with that prepared without the presence of a magnetic field. | [158] |
9 | Commercial TiO2 from Jinan Haidebei Bioengineering Co., Ltd. Jinan City, Shandong, China | Chitosan-TiO2 | 30 | Sph | 100 µg/mL | Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, S. aureus |
NA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The chitosan-TiO2 nanocomposite exhibited an inhibitory effect on the growth of E. coli and S. aureus. When the TiO2 NPs concentration was 0.05%, the maximum inhibition zone was found, 11.37 ± 0.76 mm, indicating that, under this concentration, the treatment showed a strong bacteriostasis effect on E. coli. | [67] |
10 | Hydrolysis of Titanium Tetrachloride (TiCl4) as precursor | TiO2 | 70–100 | Sph | 5.14 µg/mL 5.35 µg/mL |
Fungus Fungus |
C. albicans ATCC 10231 (Fluconazole-susceptible)
C. albicans ATCC 76615 (Fluconazole-resistant) |
YNB, 48 h, 37 °C | FS | Yeast cells of C. albicans, due to their thick cell wall consisting of glucan and chitin, are more resistant than bacteria. It was reported that TiO2 NPs, by producing intracellular reactive oxygen species, induce destructive effects inside the microbial cells, oxidation of intra-cellular Coenzyme A, and peroxidation of the plenty of lipids, which decrease respiratory activity and subsequently cause cell death. | [54] |
11 | Sol–gel method | TiO2 | ~100 | Amorph | 1 µg/mL | Gr− | E. coli | MHB, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The results indicate that in the first 30 min of exposure of the bacteria to the activated amorphous TiO2, the presence of E. coli colonies was significantly reduced, with no presence being detected in the culture. | [157] |
12 | Electrochemical method (current density was varied from 10 mA/cm2 to 14 mA/cm2) | TiO2 | 25–30 | Amorph | 50 μL 1 >> |
Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, S. aureus |
NB, 24 h, 37 °C |
BS | TiO2 NPs synthesized at 14 mA/cm2 (15.99 nm) exhibited maximum (19.1 mm) bacterial growth inhibition against S. aureus and (17.0 mm) against E. coli in the form of zone-of-inhibition studies. | [56] |
13 | Green synthesis using ginger and garlic crude aqueous extracts (in varying proportions) | TiO2 | 23.38–58.64 | Sph | 10000 µg/mL | Gr+ | S. aureus | MHA, 12 h. (overnight), 37 °C | BS | Garlic-reduced TiO2 NPs at elevated concentration exhibited significantly (p < 0.05) improved antibacterial activity against MDR S. aureus. | [170] |
14 | Sonochemical method | TiO2 | 8 | Sph | 6.67 µg/mL 4.32 µg/mL 3.96 µg/mL 2.24 µg/mL 3.46 µg/mL 5.54 µg/mL 21.21 µg/mL 3.79 µg/mL 5.7 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr+ Gr+ Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− |
P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, B. aureus, E. aerogenes, E. coli, MRSA, S. marcescens, A. baumannii, S. flexneri |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BC, AV | Results indicated that Gram-positive bacteria were more susceptible compared to Gram-negative bacteria. | [57] |
15 | Synthesis using propolis extract | TiO2 | 57.3 ± 4 | Cub, Rect | 16 µg/mL 8 µg/mL 32 µg/mL 32 µg/mL 64 µg/mL 64 µg/mL 128 µg/mL 64 µg/mL |
Gr+ Gr+ Fungus Gr− Gr− Gr+ Gr− Gr− |
MRSA, S. epidermidis, C. albicans, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, L. monocytogenes, P. vulgaris, A. baumannii |
-(commercial) | BS | The synthesized NPs had higher antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria than yeast and Gram-negative bacteria, respectively. P. vulgaris was the most resistant strain among the tested microorganisms, while S. epidermidis was the most susceptible microorganism. | [176] |
16 | Laser ablation in distilled water (DW) and alcohol | TiO2 | 36 | Circular | 9.45 µg/mL (DW) 4.72 µg/mL (Alc) 18.91 µg/mL(DW) 9.45 µg/mL (Alc) |
Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, S. aureus |
BHI, 18–24 h, 37 °C | BS | The mechanism of inhibitory activity of TiO2 NPs initiated by laser removal on microorganisms could be by their bond to the cell layer and further infiltration inside or by cooperation with phosphorus-containing mixes like DNA exasperating the replication procedure or, ideally, by their assault on the respiratory chain. | [171] |
17 | Hydrothermal method | TiO2 | 10 | Quasi-Sph | 50 µg/mL >> >> >> >> >> |
Gr− Gr+ Gr+ Gr− Fungus Fungus |
E. coli, S. aureus, B. subtilis, P. aeruginosa, C. albicans, A.niger |
MHB, 24 h, 37 °C | BS, Antimicrobial | The green synthesized TiO2 NPs had high antibacterial activity against Gram-positive than Gram-negative bacteria. | [86] |
18 | Hydrothermal method | TiO2 | 5–15 | Semisph | 100 µg/mL >> >> |
Gr+ Gr− Gr− |
MRSA, E. coli, P. aeruginosa |
LB, 12 h. (overnight), 37 °C | BS | The smallest nanocrystallite size showed a pronounced inhibitory effect and high reduction in the growth rate of bacteria with increasing the concentrations of TiO2 nanocrystallites for the three strains of bacteria. | [177] |
19 | Laser ablation in water | TiO2 | 3–30 | Sph | 400 µg/mL >> |
Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, S. aureus |
NB, 24 h, 37 °C | BC | The bacterial cell number was dropped in both types of pathogens, and the inhibition was concentration-dependent. | [178] |
20 | Sol−gel method | TiO2 | 64.77 ± 0.14 | Sph | <1024 µg/mL | Gr− | 25 isolates P. aeruginosa | MHA, 18 h, 34 °C | BS | It was found that TiO2 NPs showed a significant reduction in biofilm formation (96%) and represented superior antibacterial activity against P. aeruginosa strains in comparison to titanium dioxide powder. |
[179] |
21 | Sol−gel method | TiO2 | 35 (anatase), 65 (rutile) | Sph | 30 µg/mL 40 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, S. aureus |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Antimicrobial activity results showed a strong bactericidal effect against Gram-positive bacteria and demonstrated greater sensitivity to TiO2 NPs at lower concentrations when compared to Gram-negative bacteria. | [180] |
22 | Photon-induced method (solar-light photocatalyst anatase TiO2 NPs) |
TiO2 | 40–50 (anatase) 50–70 (mixed phase) 95–110 (rutile) 130–160 (rutile) |
Sph | 25 µg/mL >> |
Gr+ Gr− |
S. aureus, E. coli |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BC | Anatase TiO2 NPs (25 nm, 100 μg/mL) demonstrated AB activity against extracellular S. aureus with 80% and E. coli with 82% killing efficacy. | [59] |
23 | Green synthesis using mulberry plant extract | Mulberry Plant Extract + TiO2 | 24 (anatase) | Sph | 20 µg/mL >> |
Gr+ Gr− |
S. aureus, E. coli |
MHA, 12 h, 37 °C | BS | The Gr+ bacterial strain is more sensitive due to its weak cell wall membrane. | [181] |
24 | Calcination temperature (500 °C, 900 °C) | TiO2 + Geraniol (GER) |
300 ± 100 (anatase) 100(rutile) |
Amorph | 1.125 µg/mL 2.05 µg/mL 1.55 µg/mL |
Gr+ Gr+ Gr− |
S. aureus CCM 4223, MRSA CCM 7110, E. coli CCM 3954 |
MHB, 24 h, 37 °C | BC | GER enhances antimicrobial properties due to its high solubility and controlled toxicity. | [182] |
25 | Hydrolysis precipitation method with Ti(OBu)4, silver nitrate and ammonia | TiO2 N-TiO2 Ag-N-TiO2 |
19.8 39.2 20.7 |
Sph | 5000 µg/mL >> |
Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli
B. Subtilis |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Both Ag- and N-doped TiO2 show increased antibacterial properties of TiO2 NPs under fluorescent light irradiation | [62] |
26 | Biosynthesis by Using Streptomyces sp. HC1 | TiO2 | 30–70 | Sph | <2000 µg/mL >> >> >> >> |
Gr+ Gr− Fungus Fungus Gr− |
S. aureus ATCC 29213, E. coli ATCC 35218, C. albicans ATCC 10231, A. niger ATCC 6275, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 |
MHA (bacteria) SDA (fungus) 37 °C for 24 h |
BS | TiO2 NPs showed higher antimicrobial activity against bacteria (12 mm) than against fungi. | [173] |
27 | Sol−gel method | TiO2 Mg-doped: 0.014 g/mL 0.028 g/mL 0.042 g/mL |
9.7 7 6.8 6.5 |
- | 14,000 µg/mL 14,000 µg/mL 42,000 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr+ Gr− |
E. coli
B. subtilis Pseudomonas |
- | BS, Antimicrobial |
The 0.14 gm Mg solution doped TiO2 NPs were found to be a good antibiotic compared to others against the E. coli and B. subtilis bacteria. | [135] |
28 | Sol–gel electrospinning technique | TiO2 | 200–300 | Rods | 5 µg/mL >> >> >> |
Gr+ Gr− Gr− Gr− |
S. aureus
E. coli S. typhimurium K. pneumonia |
NA or TSB, 24 h, 37 °C | BC | The mechanisms by which the UV light-induced photocatalytic activated TiO2 nanorods kill bacteria are suggested to be initial oxidative damage to the cell wall and the cell membrane, followed by damage to the interior DNA molecules, eventually causing death. | [172] |
29 | Ionic liquid-assisted hydrothermal method | TiO2 | 35 (TEM) |
Sph | 10,000 µg/mL >> >> >> |
Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr+ |
K. aerogenes
E. coli P. desmolyticum S. aureus |
NA, 24–36 h, 37 °C | BS | TiO2 nanoparticles exhibited excellent photocatalytic activity for the degradation of methylene blue organic dye. | [183] |
30 | Two-step sol−gel method using citric acid and alpha dextrose as double surfactants | TiO2 | 20 | >500 µg/disc >> |
Gr+ Gr+ |
S. aureus
MRSA |
NB, 24 h, 30 °C | BS | In the case of nalidixic acid, TiO2 nanoparticle showed a Synergic effect on the antibacterial activity of this antibiotic against the test strain | [160] | |
31 | Sol−gel method | TiO2 Nd-TiO2 |
14–10 | Sph | 40 µg/mL >> |
Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli
S. aureas |
NA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Neodymium (Nd) doped TiO2 enhanced the photocatalytic activity. Nd-doped TiO2 NPs showed good antibacterial activity when compared with TiO2 nanoparticles. | [134] |
32 | Hydrothermal method | TiO2 | <100 (FE-SEM) |
Sph | 100 µg/mL >> >> >> |
Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr+ |
P. eruginosa (ATCC® 10145), E. coli (ATCC® 33876), K. pneumonia (ATCC® BAA-1144), S. ureus (ATCC® 11632) |
NA, 12 h. (overnight), 37 °C | BS | TiO2 NPs are found to have the maximum antibacterial activity against Gram-negative bacterial strains rather than Gram-positive bacteria. TiO2 NPs have been shown to prevent or destroy bacterial cells by adhering to the cell wall, causing the leakage and damage of intracellular contents, hydroxyl radicals, the generation of reactive oxygen species, and the release of Ti4+ ions. | [184] |
33 | Hydrothermal post-treatment of amorphous titania at different temperatures (250 °C or 310 °C) without using any additives or doping agent | TiO2 | ~10–80 | Sph, faceted | 500 µg/mL >> >> >> |
Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− |
A. vitis
E. amylovora P. syringae X. juglandis |
LB agar plates, 48 h, 30 °C | BS | Under UV-irradiation, A310C (310 °C) showed a pronounced antimicrobial activity on all the investigated plant pathogenic bacteria. The kinetic curves reveal that the order of susceptibility of tested bacteria using A310C is the following: A. vitis >> E. amylovora > P. syringae > X. juglandis. | [17] |
34 | Sol−gel and electrospinning approaches in the presence of different amounts of air–argon mixtures | TiO2 | 50–300 | Electrospun nanofibers | 3000 µg/mL 6000 µg/mL |
Gr+ Gr− |
MRSA
P. aeruginosa |
TSB, 18 h, 30 °C | BC | TiO2 NFs were more operative against Gram-negative P. aeruginosa than Gram-positive S. aureus. | [159] |
35 | Microwave-assisted method | TiO2 Ba-TiO2 |
8–18 4–10 |
Sph | 100 µg/mL >> >> >> |
Gr+ Gr− Gr− Gr− |
B. subtilis
V. cholera P. aeruginosa S. flexneri |
NA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The antibacterial activity was found to be higher for Ba-doped TiO2 nanoparticles compared to pure TiO2 NPs due to reduced particle size and high specific surface area, leading to enhanced particle surface reactivity to light and H2O adsorption. | [60] |
36 | Ultrasonic vibration of Ag-TiO2 compound nanoparticles (obtained by picosecond laser ablation in deionized water) | TiO2/Ag (TiO2 core, Ag shell) |
~10–180 (average: 27) |
Sph | 20 μg/mL | Gr− | E. coli | Lysogeny broth (LB), 6 h, 37 °C + LB agar dish, 2 d, ~22 °C |
BS | The antibacterial activity of the core-shell NPs was slightly better than that of the compound NPs at the same concentration under standard laboratory light conditions, and both were better than the TiO2 NPs but not as good as the Ag NPs. | [133] |
37 | Green synthesis of Ag-doped TiO2 nanoparticles using maple leaf extract | Ag/TiO2 | 45.90 | Rods | 4000 μg/mL >> |
Gr+ Gr− |
S. aureus
E. coli |
NA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The doping of Ag into TiO2 reveals the enhancement of inhibition growth against Gram-positive (S. aureus) and Gram-negative (E. coli). | [185] |
38 | A low-temperature sol−gel process using organic solvents (TO) and aqueous extract of mangrove leaves (TM) as media | TiO2 | 13.1 (TO) 8.3 (TM) |
Amorph | 5 μg/mL >> >> |
Gr+ Gr+ Gr− |
S. aureus, E. faecalis, V. damsela |
NA, 12 h. (overnight), 37 ± 2 °C | BS | The green method utilising TM demonstrated resistance to all three bacteria types, while TO exhibited greater resistance, specifically against V. damsela. Notably, TM NPs exhibited inhibition comparable to Ciprofloxacin when used as a positive control. | [186] |
39 | Sol−gel method loaded with cardamom essential oil (CEO) | CEO@ TiO2 | 100–1000 (average: 335.6) |
Capsule-like | 18.75 μg/mL 25 μg/mL 18.75 μg/mL |
Gr− Gr+ Gr− |
E. coli, B. subtilis, K. pneumoniae |
NB, 24 h, 37 °C | BC | The results demonstrate that CEO/TiO2 conjugates exhibit more potent antibacterial activity against all the tested bacteria than CEO or TiO2 nanoparticles alone. | [187] |
40 | Synthesis from TiOSO4 (NPs) and hydrothermal method (NWs) | TiO2 | ~80 ~100 |
Sph, Wire |
20,000 μg/mL | Gr+ | S. aureus | LB agar, 12 h. (overnight), 37 °C | BC | The anti-staphylococcal activity of TiO2 nanowires was better than the nanoparticles. | [188] |
41 | Green synthesis using an enzyme alpha-amylase | TiO2 | 30–70 (average: 50) |
Sph | 62.50 μg/mL >> |
Gr+ Gr− |
S. aureus, E. coli |
NA, 18 h, 37 °C | BC | The morphology and shape depend upon the concentration of the alpha-amylase enzyme. The biosynthesized NPs show good bactericidal effects against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. |
[174] |
42 | Green synthesis using Azadirachta indica leaf extract | TiO2 | 25–87 (SEM) |
Sph | 20.83 μg/mL 16.66 μg/mL 25 μg/mL 10.42 μg/mL 10.42 μg/mL |
Gr+ Gr− Gr+ Gr− Gr− |
S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, B. subtilis, S. typhi, E. coli, |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BC | Green synthesis of TiO2 NPs was achieved because of the presence of terpenoids, flavonoids, and proteins in Azadirachta indica, as these bioactive compounds were responsible for the synthesis of these NPs. | [189] |
43 | Sol−gel method | TiO2 | 64.77 ± 0.14 | Irregular sph | 8–64 μg/mL (av: 46.90) <1 μg/mL |
Gr− >> |
22 P. aeruginosa Isolates (wound exudate, ear discharge) 3 P. aeruginosa Isolates (urine specimen) |
MHA, 18–24 h, 37 °C | BS | The combination of TiO2 NPs and cefepime was found to show synergistic activity against all tested isolates, followed by ceftriaxone (96%), amikacin (88%), and ciprofloxacin (80%). | [190] |
44 | Hydrothermal and solvothermal conditions. | TiO2 | 3~8 | - | 100 μg/mL >> >> |
Gr+ Gr− Gr− |
MRSA, P. aeruginosa, E. coli |
LB agar, 12 h. (overnight), 37 °C | BS | The antibacterial activity against pathogens was as follows: MRSA > E. coli > P. aeruginosa. The synthesized TiO2 NPs were genotoxic/mutagenic. | [140] |
45 | Microwave-irradiation-assisted hybrid chemical approach | TiO2 | 28.3 ± 3.1 | - | 15 µg/mL | Gr− | E. coli | LB, 37 °C | BC | The one reason that can be assured for microbial cell death after treatment with nano-titania is reactive oxygen generation and an increase in membrane permeabilization, not superoxide generation. | [191] |
46 | Hydrothermal technique | TiO2 TiO2 TiO2 S-TiO2 S-TiO2 S-TiO2 |
25–32 >> >> 27–45 >> >> |
Sph >> >> Sph >> >> |
0.1 µg/mL 0.1 µg/mL 100 µg/mL 0.01 µg/mL 0.1 µg/mL 0.1 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− |
V. cholerae, E. coli, P. aeruginosa V. cholera E. coli, P. aeruginosa |
LB, 24 h, 37 °C | BS, BC |
The 40% Sulfur (S) doped TiO2 sample showed the highest antibacterial activity against the V. cholerae by killing 71% bacteria at a minimum inhibitory concentration of 0.01 μg/mL. NPs are non-cytotoxic against hepatocellular carcinoma (Huh-7) human cell lines | [136] |
47 | Ultrasound method | TiO2 | 33.56 | Amorph | 9.7 µg/mL 19.5 µg/mL 19.0 µg/mL 9.7 µg/mL 19.5 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr+ Gr− Fungus Gr+ |
E. coli, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, C. albicans, B. subtilis |
NA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS, FS |
The TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized by ultrasound method can be good inorganic antimicrobial agents. | [192] |
48 | Hydrothermal synthesis | TiO2 | 70.80 | Sph | 50 µg/mL >> >> |
Gr+ Gr− Gr− |
B. subtilis, K. pneumoniae, S. typhi |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | At the maximum concentration tested (150 mg/L), TiO2 NPs showed strong inhibitory action against B. subtilis (zone of inhibition 8.4 mm), K. pneumoniae (zone of inhibition 8.8 mm), and S. typhi (zone of inhibition 9.3 mm). | [193] |
49 | Sol−gel method using diethanolamine, acetic acid, and propionic acid solvents | TiO2 | 5–25 | Sph | 250 mg/mL >> >> >> |
Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− |
ATCC. E. coli, MDR. E. coli, ATCC P. aeruginosa, MDR. P. aeruginosa |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The diethanolamine, acetic acid, and propionic acid solvents showed comparatively good antibacterial activity due to the rutile phase and pH of these solvents, which modify the properties of TiO2. | [194] |
50 | Sol–gel method | TiO2 | 68 | Sph | 50,000 µg/mL >> |
Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, S. aureus |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | MMT test showed no toxicity of TiO2 NPs; the antibacterial inhibitory effect of TiO2 NPs at 200 mg/mL concentrations exhibited superior antibacterial activity at 15.9 ± 0.1 and 14.0 ± 0.1 against S. aureus and E. coli, respectively. In conclusion, colloidal solutions with high stability were successfully synthesized, contributing to decreased dimensions and increased antibacterial properties. | [195] |
51 | Green synthesis using Iranian propolis extracts | TiO2 | 21 | Quasi-sph | 10 mg/mL 1.25 mg/mL 5 mg/mL 2.5 mg/mL 5 mg/mL 5 mg/mL |
Fungus Gr+ Gr+ Gr+ Gr+ Gr+ |
C. albicans, S. sobrinus, S. mutans, S. sanguinis, S. salivarius, L. acidophilus |
TSB (bacteria) or YPD (fungus), 24 h, 37 °C | BC | There were no significant cytotoxicity effects. NPs from propolis extracts have less toxic effects and are user-friendly, eco-friendly, and economical materials. Pro1TiO2 (Khalkhal sample) NPs may be considered the best candidate for clinical application. | [196] |
52 | Green synthesis from Juniperus phoenicea (L.) leaf extract | TiO2 | 10–30 | Sph | 40 µg/mL 40 µg/mL 80 µg/mL 80 µg/mL 40 µg/mL 20 µg/mL 40 µg/mL |
Gr+ Gr+ Gr− Gr− Fungus Fungus Fungus |
S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. cerevisiae, Asp. niger, Pen. digitatum |
SDA (fungus) and MHA (bacteria), 24 h, 37 °C | BS, FS |
Some components such as elemol, linalool, and hydrocinnamic acid in Juniperus phoenicea plant due to having hydroxyl functional groups act as reducing agents. | [197] |
53 | Synthesis NPs by sonication with Ganoderma lucidum extract | TiO2 + Ganoderma extract |
- | - | 156.2 µg/mL 78.12 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr+ |
P. aeruginosa, MRSA |
TSB, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Collectively, the combination of TiO2 NPs and Ganoderma extract was more able to reduce viable cells, especially against MRSA isolate, and had almost the same effect as vancomycin. | [198] |
54 | Synthesis by plant extracts | TiO2 | 12 | hexagonal | 25 µg/mL >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> |
Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr+ Fungus Fungus Fungus Fungus Fungus |
E. coli, P. mirabilis, V. cholerae, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, S. aureus, A. nidulans, A. fumigatus, A. niger, A. terreus, A. flavu |
MHA, 48 h, 37 °C (bacteria), PDA, 5 d, 28 °C (fungus) |
BS FS |
TiO2 NPs have concentration-dependent antibacterial activity against bacterial pathogens such as E. coli, P. mirabilis, V. cholerae, P. aeruginosa, S. typhimurium, and S. aureus at 100 μg/mL concentration. Furthermore, these TiO2 NPs showed remarkable antifungal activity against aspergillosis-causing fungal pathogens such as A. niger, A. fumigatus, A. nidulans, and A. flavus at 100 μg/mL. | [199] |
55 | Green synthesis mediated by extract of clove and ginger herbal formulation | TiO2 | - | - | 25 µL | Gr+ | Lactobacillus | MHA, 4 h, 37 °C | BS | The results show that as the concentration increases, the value of optical density decreases, which proves that a bactericidal process occurs that results in a reduced bacterial count. | [200] |
56 | The metabolic doping of cultured diatom cells with titanium, pyrolysis of the doped biomass, and chemical doping of silver | AgNPs/TiO2/DBP | 10–20 | Quasi-sph | 2.5 mg/mL 1.25 mg/mL 2.5 mg/mL |
Gr+ Gr− Gr− |
S. aureus, K. pneumonia, E. coli |
- | BS | Remarkably high antibacterial activity was observed for the synthesized nanocomposites against Gram-positive S. aureus and Gram-negative K. pneumoniae and E. coli strains, both laboratory-cultivated and clinical isolates. DPB—diatom pyrolysed biomass | [161] |
57 | Hydrothermal-assisted synthesis using a novel β-galactosidase isolated from the seed extract of Melilots indica | β-gal-TiO2 | 27 | Sph | 10 µg/mL 5 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, S. aureus |
NA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The decrease in inhibitory efficacy at increased β-gal-TiO2 NPs concentrations could be attributed to the aggregation of some particles, thereby increasing the particle size and reducing the accessible surface area for nanoparticles. | [201] |
58 | Co-precipitation method using titanium tetra isopropoxide and hydrochloric acid as a precursor | α-TiO2 (Rutile) |
16.65 | Cuboid | 10 g/disc | Gr− Gr− Gr+ |
K. pneumoniae, E. coli, S. aureus |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | TiO2-based NPs have highly developed surface chemistry, chemical stability, and a smaller size than a microorganism, making it easier for them to interact with the microorganisms. | [61] |
59 | Bio-modification of TiO2 nanoparticles surface | Tryptophan-TiO2 | 5–27 | Amorph | 45.7 µg/mL (EC_50) |
Parasite | T. gondii | DMEM, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Tryptophan-TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) show selective anti-parasitic activity. Surface modification with amino acids, such as l-tryptophan not only enhanced the anti-parasitic action of TiO2 but also improved the host biocompatibility. | [202] |
60 | Green synthesis from leaf extracts of two plant species (Trianthema portulacastrum, Chenopodium quinoa) | TiO2 | 6–8 | Granule | 25 μL/mL | Fungus | U. Tritici | PDA, 5 days., 25 ± 2 °C | FS | The calcinated TiO2 NPs exhibited substantial antifungal activity against U. tritici compared to non-calcinated NPS. All of the NPs produced using different procedures (also used the sol−gel method for comparison) and at different doses showed considerable antifungal activity against U. tritici. | [203] |
61 | Biosynthesis using Aloe vera L. aqueous leaf extract | TiO2 + T. cf. asperellum extract |
10–25 | Tetragonal | 25 µg/mL | Fungus | B. sorokiniana | PDA, 5 d, 28 °C | BS, BC |
Green synthesized TiO2 NPs positively increased the host plant’s tolerance against this disease by inducing osmolytes and antioxidant defense-related enzyme production. | [204] |
62 | Commercial from US Research Nanomaterials | TiO2 | 30 | - | 200 µg/mL >> >> >> |
Gr+ Gr+ Gr+ Gr+ |
L. reuteri, L. gasseri, B. animalis, B. longum |
MRS, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The inhibitory effects of TiO2 NPs were associated with cell membrane damage. TiO2 NPs caused alterations in multiple metabolic pathways of gut bacteria. |
[205] |
63 | Synthesis using Beta vulgaris (beetroot) extract | TiO2/Beta vulgaris extract | 12 | Sph | 1000 µg/mL 500 µg/mL Nil Nil |
Gr− Gr− Gr+ Gr+ |
E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, S. mutans |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Antibacterial assays reveal moderate activity against Gram-negative bacterial strains, while no activity is observed against Gram-positive bacterial strains. | [206] |
64 | Biosynthesis using probiotic Bifidobacterium bifidum | TiO2/B. bifidum components | 81 | Oval | 16 mg/mL 16 mg/mL 16 mg/mL 32 mg/mL 32 mg/mL |
Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− |
P. aeruginosa, A. baumani, K. pneumonia, E. coli, S. typhi |
NA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Bifidobacteria were found to engage in huge inhibition activity against Gram-negative bacteria, i.e., intestinal Salmonella serovar Typhimurium SL1344 and Escherichia coli C1845. The inhibition mechanism was examined and found to be dependent on lowering the pH in the medium and producing organic acids, especially acetic acid and lactic acid. | [207] |
65 | Hydrothermal route using novel biogenic source Piper betel leaf extract and chemogenic source nitric acid as capping and reducing agents | TiO2/Piper betel extract | 8 75 |
Sph | 25 µg/mL 50 µg/mL |
Gr+ Gr− |
S. aureus, E. coli |
NA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Biogenic synthesized NPs act as more effective antibacterial agents than chemogenic-synthesized NPs. | [208] |
66 | Modification of commercial PAMAM and TiO2 to novel nanocomposite | PAMAM/TiO2 | 50 | Sph | 4 µg/mL 2 µg/mL |
Gr+ Gr− |
S. aureus, E. coli |
NB, 24 h, 37 °C | BC | FE-SEM analysis revealed morphological variations and the mechanism of killing and trapping the bacteria by nanocomposite. In the MIC and MBC values range, the cytotoxicity effect of nanocomposite on the AGS cell line was relatively lower. PAMAM—poly-amidoamine dendrimer macromolecule |
[209] |
67 | Green synthesis method using Orange peel extract (Citrus sinensis) and chemical method | TiO2/Citrus sinensi extract | 21.61 17.30 |
Porous angular | 6.75 mg/mL >> >> |
Gr+ Gr− Gr− |
S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa |
NB, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | TiO2 nanoparticles prepared using the biological method exhibit good results compared to nanoparticles prepared by the chemical method. | [72] |
68 | Hydrothermal method | CQD-TiO2 BC/CQD-TiO2 |
22.23 | Porous fibers | Nil 0.5 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, S. aureus |
Netrin agar, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The antibacterial activity against E. coli was much lower than when it was against S. aureus. This concept is because of the discrepancy in the structure of the cell walls between Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. | [68] |
69 | Synthesis porous TiO2 NPs and PVA-PEG/TiO2 composites using the sol−gel technique | PVA-PEG/TiO2 | 15 | Sph | 100 µL | Gr− | E. coli | LB, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Antibacterial activity experiments, TiO2 19.9%, PVA/TiO2 24.4%, and PEG/TiO2 26.2% eliminated E. coli bacteria. | [210] |
70 | Microwave-assisted green method using Andrographis paniculata as fuel | TiO2/Andrographis paniculata extract | 25 | Sph | 41 µg/mL 36 µg/mL 35 µg/mL 42 µg/mL 30 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr+ Gr− |
E. coli, S. flexneri, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae |
NB, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | NPs TiO2 NPs led to mechanical damage of cell membrane and significant cell division inhibition compared to standard antibiotics (Streptomycin). | [211] |
71 | Sol−gel technique using titanium tetra isopropoxide (TTIP) as a precursor | TiO2 Ag-TiO2 |
15 16 |
Sph | 1 µg/mL >> >> |
Gr− Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus |
NA, 12 h, 37 °C | BS | Significant increases in the sizes of zones of inhibition with the increase in silver capping (3–7%) as compared to pure TiO2-NPs were observed against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. | [212] |
72 | One-pot and one-step green synthesis using Grape seed extract (GSE) proanthocyanin (PAC) polyphenols | Grape seed extract/TiO2 | 18.42 ± 1.3 | Sph | 1.56 µg/mL 0.78 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr+ |
P. aeruginosa, S. saprophyticus |
BHI, 24 h, 37 °C | BC | PACs on the GSE-TiO2-NPs surface significantly enhanced the antibacterial activities in terms of confinement of the biofilm formation, plausibly through the entrapment of AL-2 QS signal molecules, attenuating the bio-actives (e.g., proteins, enzymes, nucleic acids, and EPS), biofilm matrix, increasing cellular uptake and ROS mediated robust oxidative stress. | [162] |
73 | Biosynthesis using titanium tetrabutoxide as a precursor in the presence of Kniphofia foliosa root extract within different ratios | TiO2/Kniphofia foliosa extract | ~9 | Sph | 35 mg/mL >> >> >> |
Gr+ Gr+ Gr− Gr− |
S. aureus, S. pyogenes, E. coli, K. pneumonia |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Among the different ratios, TiO2 (1:1) NP shows better performance towards Gram-negative bacteria due to its smaller average crystalline size and uniform morphology than the other two ratios of TiO2 NPs. The antibacterial activity of the ethanolic root extract of Kniphofia foliosa itself showed better performance towards Gram-negative bacteria than NPs of TiO2, which might be due to the antibacterial activity of the residue of ethanol left with the plant extract. | [63] |
74 | Green synthesis using aqueous extract of Acacia nilotica as bio-reductant | Ag-TiO2/Acacia nilotica extract | 11.25 | Sph | 64 µg/mL 64 µg/mL 128 µg/mL 64 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr+ Gr− Yeast |
E. coli, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, C. albicans |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The order of antimicrobial activity was found to be E. coli > C. albicans > MRSA > P. aeruginosa. | [213] |
75 | Green synthesis using aqueous leaf extract of Coleus aromaticus | TiO2/Coleus aromaticus extract | 12–33 | Sph | 15 µg/mL >> >> >> >> >> |
Gr− Gr− Gr+ Gr− Gr+ Gr+ |
S. boydii, V. cholerae, B. cereus, A. hydrophila, E. faecalis, B. megaterium |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The synthesized TiO2 NPs had an excellent antibacterial potential against E. faecalis (33 mm), followed by S. boydii (30 mm) | [214] |
76 | Green synthesis using Cymodocea serrulate aqueous extract | TiO2/Cymodocea serrulate extract | 55–117 | Sph | 180 μg/mL 160 μg/mL |
Gr+ Gr− |
MRSA, V. cholerae |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The TiO2 NPs treated results were exhibited maximum antibacterial activity against MRSA and V. cholerae comparatively. | [215] |
77 | Green synthesis mediated Spirulina | TiO2/Spirulina components | 55 ± 15 | Sph | 3.906 µg/mL 15.625 µg/mL 15.625 µg/mL 31.25 µg/mL |
Gr+ Gr− Gr+ Gr− |
S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. faecalis, E. coli |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The nanoparticles exhibited significant inhibitory zones of 22 ± 3, 17 ± 4, 11 ± 2, and 15 ± 3 nm at 80 μg/mL against MRSA, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and E. faecalis, respectively. | [216] |
78 | Green synthesis using leaf extract of Mentha arvensis | TiO2/Mentha arvensis extracts | 20–70 | Sph | 10 mg/mL Nil Nil 10 mg/mL Nil Nil |
Gr− Gr+ Gr− Fungus Fungus Fungus |
P. vulgaris, S. aureus, E. coli, A. niger, A. cuboid, A. fumigates |
NA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles show maximum zone of inhibition against the Proteus vulgaris bacteria (at 30 mg/mL) and show significant antifungal activity against Aspergillus niger. | [217] |
79 | Green synthesis using Psidium guajava extract | TiO2/Psidium guajava extract | 32.58 | Sph | 20 µg/mL >> >> >> >> |
Gr+ Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− |
S. aureus, E. coli, A. hydrophila, P. mirabilis, P. aeruginosa |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The synthesized TiO2 NPs showed more antibacterial activity than the standard tetracycline antibiotic | [218] |
80 | Green synthesis using Acorus calamus leaf extract | TiO2/Acorus calamus extract | 15–40 | Globular | 10 µg/mL >> >> >> |
Gr− Gr− Gr+ Gr+ |
E. coli, P. aeruginosa, B. subtilis, S. aureus |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Biosynthesized TiO2 showed excellent antimicrobial activity against the selected Gram-positive over Gram-negative pathogenic bacteria in comparison to bare TiO2. NPs disrupt the outer cell of bacteria, which is primarily responsible for bacterial death. |
[219] |
81 | Green Synthesis via Eucalyptus globulus L. Extract | Ag-TiO2/Eucalyptus globulus extract | 11–14 | Sph | 13.33 μg/μL | Gr+ Gr− |
S. aureus, E. coli |
LB, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The effect of NPs is more significant for Gram-negative bacteria because of their thinner cell wall, compared to 30 nm for Gram-positive bacteria. | [220] |
82 | Green synthesis using aqueous extract of W. somnifera | TiO2/W. somnifera extract | 50–90 | Sph, Square |
64 µg/mL 8 µg/mL 32 µg/mL 32 µg/mL 32 µg/mL 64 µg/mL |
Gr+ Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr+ Yeast |
L. monocytogenes, S. marcescens, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, MRSA, C. albicans |
NB, 24 h, 37 °C | BC | Among bacteria, the highest inhibition of 71% was recorded in MRSA, and the lowest was recorded in L. monocytogenes (43%). | [221] |
83 | Green synthesis using Aloe barbadensis mill | TiO2/Aloe barbadensis extract | 20 | Sph | 31.25 µg/mL | Gr− | P. aeruginosa | MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BC | A noticeable suppression in the cell viability by 30.76 ± 3.96% of P. aeruginosa in the biofilm mode was found in the presence of TiO2 NPs | [222] |
84 | Bacterial-mediated Bacillus subtilis MTCC 8322 using TiCl4 as a precursor | TiO2/Bacillus subtilis components |
80–120 | Sph | 5 µg/mL 8 µg/mL |
Gr+ Gr− |
B. subtilis, E. coli |
NA | BS | The TiO2 NPs exhibited antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis MTCC 8322 at a lower dose, while against E. coli 8933, only a higher dose exhibited antibacterial activity. | [64] |
85 | Bacterial-mediated Staphylococcus aureus | TiO2/Staphylococcus aureus components | 20 | Sph | 10 mg/mL >> |
Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, B. subtilis |
NA, 12 h. (overnight), 37 °C | BS | The differential sensitivity of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria towards nanoparticles may depend upon their cell outer layer attribute and their interaction with the charged TiO2 nanoparticles. It was observed that Gram-negative bacteria are more sensitive than Gram-positive bacteria. | [70] |
86 | Green synthesis using Caesalpinia pulcherrima flower extract, Nervilia aragoana leaf extract, and Manihot esculenta peel extract | TiO2/C. pulcherrima, N. aragoana, M. esculenta plants extracts | 15–28 | Sph | 50 µg/mL >> >> >> |
Gr+ Gr− Gr− Yeast |
S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, C. albicans |
MHA, 12 h. | BS | The obtained results showed that the TiO2 sample revealed better antibacterial activity in S. aureus than in the E. coli bacterial strain. | [223] |
87 | Synthesis using Planomicrobium sp. | TiO2/Planomicrobium components | >8.89 | Amorph | 0.1 µg/mL >> |
Gr+ Gr− |
B. subtilis, K. Planticola |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The differential sensitivity of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria towards NPs may depend upon their cell outer layer attribute and their interaction with the charged TiO2 NPs. | [224] |
88 | Green synthesis using Edible Mushroom (Pleurotus djamor) Extract | TiO2/Pleurotus djamor) extract | 31 | Sph | 5 mg/mL >> >> >> >> >> >> |
Gr+ Gr+ Gr+ Gr− Gr+ Gr− Gr− |
B. cereus, B. subtilis MDB, C. diphtheriae, E. coli, S. aureus, P. fluorescens, Serratia sp. |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | The highest rate of inhibition zone was recorded in P. fluorescens (33 ± 0.2 mm), S. aureus (32 ± 0.4 mm), and C. diphtheriae (32 ± 0.1 mm) followed by others. | [69] |
89 | Commercial Degussa-P25 TiO2 | TiO2 | 25 | - | 350 μg/mL | Gr− | P. aeruginosa | MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | Exposure to UV irradiation of 60 min has been shown to greatly enhance the antibacterial efficacy of TiO2 nanoparticles against MDR P. aeruginosa. | [225] |
90 | Biosynthesis-mediated Avicennia marina | TiO2/Avicennia marina extract | 30 | Sph | 100 μg/mL >> |
Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli, S. aureus |
LB, 24 h, 37 °C | BS | It was found that the bactericidal effect of the biosynthesized TiO2 increased with increasing concentrations from 100 to 300 μg/mL; thereafter, a decrease was observed, and again, the bactericidal effect was increased from 400 to 1000 μg/mL. This trend was observed for both E. coli and S. aureus. | [66] |
91 | Green synthesis using Artemisia haussknechtii leaf extract | TiO2/Artemisia haussknechtii extract | 92.58 ± 56.98 | Sph | 40 μg/mL 20 μg/mL 4 μg/mL 4 μg/mL |
Gr− Gr+ Gr+ Gr− |
E. coli, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. marcescens |
MHA, 24 h, 37 °C | BC | TiO2 NPs had no significant effect on E. coli ATCC 25,922 and S. aureus ATCC 43300, but there was antibacterial impact on S epidermidis ATCC 12258, S. marcescens ATTC13880 as lack of growth. The results of the synthesis and antibacterial properties of silver and copper nanoparticles were also presented in the study. | [65] |
92 | Green synthesis using Limon citrus extract | TiO2/Limon citrus extract | 200 * | Sph | 12.5 µg/mL 12.5 µg/mL 18.75 µg/mL 12.5 µg/mL |
Gr− Gr− Gr+ Gr+ |
E. coli, Klebsiella sp., MRSA, Bacillus |
NB, 24 h, 37 °C | The most accepted mechanism for antibacterial activity is based on the generation of reactive oxygen species associated with the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 nanostructures. Also, the antibacterial efficiency of the green-prepared TiO2 NPs was compared with NPs prepared via a chemical process. | [226] | |
93 | Sol−gel method | TiO2 | 22.41 | Sph | 65 mg/mL 200 mg/mL 100 mg/mL 144 mg/mL 72 mg/mL 100 mg/mL 100 mg/mL 20 mg/mL |
Gr+ Gr+ Gr+ Gr+ Gr− Gr− Gr− Gr− |
S. fecalis
S. pyogenes S. saprophyticus S. epidermidis E.coli MDR E.coli A. hydrophila S. dysenteriae |
MHA, 24–48 h, 37 ± 2 °C | BS | Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles demonstrated antifungal and antibacterial activities. |
[227] |
94 | Hydrothermal method | Commercial TiO2 | 8–10 (*) 90–100 (*) |
- | 10 µg/mL (*) 50 µg/mL (**) 10 µg/mL (*) 50 µg/mL (**) |
Gr− Gr+ |
E. coli NCIM 2065
S. aureus ATCC 6538 |
NB, 12 h. (overnight), 37 °C | BC | TiO2 NPs 8–10 nm have profound action on E. coli, while S. aureus was not affected. TiO2 NPs 90–100 nm have very little effect on both organisms. | [142] |
95 | Hydrothermal method | TiO2 | 67.60 | Rods | 240 µg/mL | Gr− | R. solanacearum | - | BS | Genomic DNA injury might be due to the intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (O2, O2− and OH) which was stimulated by TiO2 NPs. | [228] |
Notes: The article numbers in bold include a test to determine the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC); the remaining articles present the lowest concentrations used in studies on antibacterial activity. 1—here and below, quantitative data in dimensions different from µg/mL are taken from the original works. “-”—a characteristic that was not unspecified by the authors. >>—the value repeats the previous one. *—size determined by the image provided by the authors. **—concentration at which the maximum bactericidal effect was observed. Nil—no result. Gr−—Gram-negative bacteria. Gr+—Gram-positive bacteria.
8. Conclusions
The growth of antibiotic resistance is one of the most dangerous challenges to global healthcare. Metal oxide NPs, and TiO2 in particular, look like attractive candidates for the role of new antimicrobial agents. TiO2 NPs are already used in many areas of technology, medicine, and agriculture. In addition, TiO2 NPs are biologically inert and have low toxicity to humans and animals. All this makes TiO2 NPs attractive as antimicrobial agents. The mechanisms of antimicrobial action of TiO2 NPs include contact, photocatalytic, and ROS-mediated action. Antibacterial and antifungal properties of TiO2 NPs weakly depend on the type of microorganism against which they are used. Therefore, TiO2 NPs can be considered as a universal antimicrobial agent of a broad spectrum of action. The dependence of antimicrobial properties on their size is somewhat more pronounced: the dependence has a complex form. The shape, method of synthesis, and modification of the composition of TiO2 NPs have a more pronounced effect on their resulting antibacterial and antifungal activity. The greatest antimicrobial potential is possessed by amorphous NPs with a size of 20–60 nm, modified with metals or components of plant extracts and/or bacterial nature compounds. The patterns shown by us can be useful in the development of new methods and approaches for the synthesis of TiO2 NPs with improved antimicrobial activity. We believe that further ways to improve the antimicrobial properties of TiO2 NPs lie in the development of new and improvement of known methods of surface modification of TiO2 NPs with metals and/or plant extracts components. Methods for synthesizing amorphous NPs also look promising. However, the strategies for increasing the antimicrobial activity of TiO2 NPs are not exhausted by the above. New approaches to the analysis of the dependence of the antimicrobial activity value on the characteristics of NPs are needed to search for new factors to increase antibacterial activity.
Abbreviations
AV | Antivirus |
BC | Bacterial cellulose |
BC | bactericidal effect |
BHI | Brain heart infusion broth |
BS | bacteriostatic effect |
CQD | Carbon Quantum Dots; |
DMEM | Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium |
DMEM | Modified Eagle Medium |
LB | Luria brother |
MDR | multidrug-resistant |
MHA | Mueller-Hinton agar |
MHB | Mueller-Hinton Brotherhood |
MRSA | Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus |
NA | Nutrient agar |
NB | Nutrient broth |
PAMAM | poly-amidoamine dendrimer macromolecule |
PDA | Potato Dextrose Agar |
PEG | polyethylene glycol |
PVA | Polyvinyl alcohol |
SDA | Sabouraud dextrose agar |
TSB | Trypticase soy broth |
YNB | Yeast nitrogen base |
YPD | Yeast peptone dextrose broth |
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, S.V.G. and A.V.S.; methodology, A.V.S.; software, A.V.G.; validation, S.V.G.; formal analysis, D.A.S.; investigation, D.A.S. and A.V.G.; resources, S.V.G. and F.M.Y.; data curation, F.M.Y.; writing—original draft preparation, D.A.S., A.V.G. and A.V.S.; writing—review and editing, S.V.G. and F.M.Y.; visualization, D.A.S. and A.V.G.; supervision, S.V.G. and F.M.Y.; project administration, S.V.G.; funding acquisition, S.V.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors without undue reservation.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by a grant from the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, grant number 075-15-2024-646.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
References
- 1.Ventola C.L. The antibiotic resistance crisis: Part 1: Causes and threats. Pharm. Ther. 2015;40:277–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Spellberg B., Gilbert D.N. The Future of Antibiotics and Resistance: A Tribute to a Career of Leadership by John Bartlett. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014;59:S71–S75. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sengupta S., Chattopadhyay M.K., Grossart H.-P. The multifaceted roles of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in nature. Front. Microbiol. 2013;4:47. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.The antibiotic alarm. Nature. 2013;495:141. doi: 10.1038/495141a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Annunziato G. Strategies to overcome antimicrobial resistance (AMR) making use of non-essential target inhibitors: A review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:5844. doi: 10.3390/ijms20235844. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gross M. Antibiotics in crisis. Curr. Biol. 2013;23:R1063–R1065. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gostev V., Ivanova K., Kruglov A., Kalinogorskaya O., Ryabchenko I., Zyryanov S., Kalisnikova E., Likholetova D., Lobzin Y., Sidorenko S. Comparative genome analysis of global and Russian strains of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST22, a ‘Gaza clone’. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2021;57:106264. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Skachkova T.S., Zamyatin M.N., Orlova O.A., Yumtsunova N.A., Lashenkova N.N., Fomina V.S., Gusarov V.G., Mikhaylova Y.V., Shelenkov A.A., Goloveshkina E.N., et al. Monitoring Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus strains in the Moscow Medical and Surgical Center using Molecular-Biological Methods. Epidemiol. Vaccinal Prev. 2021;20:44–50. doi: 10.31631/2073-3046-2021-20-1-44-50. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Turner N.A., Sharma-Kuinkel B.K., Maskarinec S.A., Eichenberger E.M., Shah P.P., Carugati M., Holland T.L., Fowler V.G. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An overview of basic and clinical research. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;17:203–218. doi: 10.1038/s41579-018-0147-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Crank C., O’Driscoll T. Vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections: Epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and optimal management. Infect. Drug Resist. 2015;8:217–230. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S54125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kolodzieva V. Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium prevalent in Russian neonatal intensive care units. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2012;16:e376. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.05.484. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jacobs M.R. Drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: Rational antibiotic choices. Am. J. Med. 1999;106:19–25. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(98)00351-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Song J.H., Lee Nam Y., Ichiyama S., Yoshida R., Hirakata Y., Fu W., Chongthaleong A., Aswapokee N., Chiu C.H., Lalitha M.K., et al. Spread of Drug—Resistant Streptococcus pneumoniaein Asian Countries: Asian Network for Surveillance of Resistant Pathogens (ANSORP) Study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 1999;28:1206–1211. doi: 10.1086/514783. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Setchanova L., Alexandrova A., Pencheva D., Sirakov I., Mihova K., Kaneva R., Mitov I. Rise of multidrug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae clones expressing non-vaccine serotypes among children following introduction of the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Bulgaria. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 2018;15:6–11. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2018.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Savinova T., Brzhozovskaya E., Alyabieva N., Lazareva A., Shagin D., Mayanskiy N. Multiple-Drug Resistant Nasopharyngeal Streptococcus pneumoniae Isolated in Russia: Serotypes, Antimicrobial Susceptibility, and Molecular Characterization of the Emergent Serotype 13/ST2754 Lineage. Microb. Drug Resist. 2022;28:39–47. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2021.0074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Palomino J., Martin A. Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Antibiotics. 2014;3:317–340. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics3030317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kostyukova I., Pasechnik O., Mokrousov I. Epidemiology and Drug Resistance Patterns of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in High-Burden Area in Western Siberia, Russia. Microorganisms. 2023;11:425. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sun G., Zhang Q., Dong Z., Dong D., Fang H., Wang C., Dong Y., Wu J., Tan X., Zhu P., et al. Antibiotic resistant bacteria: A bibliometric review of literature. Front. Public Health. 2022;10:1002015. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1002015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Murugaiyan J., Kumar P.A., Rao G.S., Iskandar K., Hawser S., Hays J.P., Mohsen Y., Adukkadukkam S., Awuah W.A., Jose R.A.M., et al. Progress in Alternative Strategies to Combat Antimicrobial Resistance: Focus on Antibiotics. Antibiotics. 2022;11:200. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11020200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kudryakova I., Afoshin A., Tarlachkov S., Leontyevskaya E., Suzina N., Leontyevskaya N.L. Lysobacter gummosus 10.1.1, a Producer of Antimicrobial Agents. Microorganisms. 2023;11:2853. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11122853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Clatworthy A.E., Pierson E., Hung D.T. Targeting virulence: A new paradigm for antimicrobial therapy. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2007;3:541–548. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2007.24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Udegova E.S., Gildeeva K.A., Rukosueva T.V., Baker S. Metal nanoparticle antibacterial effect on antibiotic-resistant strains of bacteria. Russ. J. Infect. Immun. 2021;11:771–776. doi: 10.15789/2220-7619-MNA-1359. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gudkov S.V., Sarimov R.M., Astashev M.E., Pishchalnikov R.Y., Yanykin D.V., Simakin A.V., Shkirin A.V., Serov D.A., Konchekov E.M., Gusein-Zade N.G., et al. Modern physical methods and technologies in agriculture. Phys. Usp. 2024;67:194–210. doi: 10.3367/UFNe.2023.09.039577. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ajayi A.O., Odeyemi A.T., Akinjogunla O.J., Adeyeye A.B., Ayo-ajayi I. Review of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes within the one health framework. Infect. Ecol. Epidemiol. 2024;14:2312953. doi: 10.1080/20008686.2024.2312953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wang E.C., Wang A.Z. Nanoparticles and their applications in cell and molecular biology. Integr. Biol. 2014;6:9–26. doi: 10.1039/c3ib40165k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Santás-Miguel V., Arias-Estévez M., Rodríguez-Seijo A., Arenas-Lago D. Use of metal nanoparticles in agriculture. A review on the effects on plant germination. Environ. Pollut. 2023;334:122222. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Semenova N.A., Burmistrov D.E., Shumeyko S.A., Gudkov S.V. Fertilizers Based on Nanoparticles as Sources of Macro- and Microelements for Plant Crop Growth: A Review. Agronomy. 2024;14:1646. doi: 10.3390/agronomy14081646. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shurygina I.A., Shurygin M.G. Perspectives of Metal Nanoparticles Application for the Purposes of Regenerative Medicine. Sib. Med. Rev. 2018;4:31–37. doi: 10.20333/2500136-2018-4-31-37. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Couto C., Almeida A. Metallic Nanoparticles in the Food Sector: A Mini-Review. Foods. 2022;11:402. doi: 10.3390/foods11030402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Khan S., Naushad M., Al-Gheethi A., Iqbal J. Engineered nanoparticles for removal of pollutants from wastewater: Current status and future prospects of nanotechnology for remediation strategies. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021;9:5. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.106160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rassaei L., Marken F., Sillanpää M., Amiri M., Cirtiu C.M., Sillanpää M. Nanoparticles in electrochemical sensors for environmental monitoring. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2011;30:1704–1715. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2011.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Silant’ev V.E., Shmelev M.E., Belousov A.S., Patlay A.A., Shatilov R.A., Farniev V.M., Kumeiko V.V. How to Develop Drug Delivery System Based on Carbohydrate Nanoparticles Targeted to Brain Tumors. Polymers. 2023;15:2516. doi: 10.3390/polym15112516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tang S., Wang Z., Li P., Li W., Li C., Wang Y., Chu P.K. Degradable and Photocatalytic Antibacterial Au-TiO2/Sodium Alginate Nanocomposite Films for Active Food Packaging. Nanomaterials. 2018;8:930. doi: 10.3390/nano8110930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Golubev S.S., Sekerin V.D., Gorokhova A.E., Gayduk N.V. Nanotechnology market research: Development and prospects. Rev. Espac. 2018;39:4–8. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Bratan S., Inshakova E., Inshakov O., Gorbatyuk S., Leonov S., Roshchupkin S. World market for nanomaterials: Structure and trends. MATEC Web Conf. 2017;129:02013. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201712902013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Meija J., Coplen T.B., Berglund M., Brand W.A., De Bièvre P., Gröning M., Holden N.E., Irrgeher J., Loss R.D., Walczyk T., et al. Atomic weights of the elements 2013 (IUPAC Technical Report) Pure Appl. Chem. 2016;88:265–291. doi: 10.1515/pac-2015-0305. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ramanavicius S., Ramanavicius A. Insights in the Application of Stoichiometric and Non-Stoichiometric Titanium Oxides for the Design of Sensors for the Determination of Gases and VOCs (TiO2−x and TinO2n−1 vs. TiO2) Sensors. 2020;20:6833. doi: 10.3390/s20236833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xu B., Sohn H.Y., Mohassab Y., Lan Y. Structures, preparation and applications of titanium suboxides. RSC Adv. 2016;6:79706–79722. doi: 10.1039/C6RA14507H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wu X., Wang H., Wang Y. A Review: Synthesis and Applications of Titanium Sub-Oxides. Materials. 2023;16:6874. doi: 10.3390/ma16216874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ammendolia M.G., De Berardis B. Nanoparticle Impact on the Bacterial Adaptation: Focus on Nano-Titania. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:3616. doi: 10.3390/nano12203616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gialanella S., Malandruccolo A. Aerospace Alloys. Springer Nature Switzerland; Cham, Switzerland: 2020. Titanium and Titanium Alloys; pp. 129–189. Topics in Mining, Metallurgy and Materials Engineering. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sevost’yanov M.A., Nasakina E.O., Baikin A.S., Sergienko K.V., Konushkin S.V., Kaplan M.A., Seregin A.V., Leonov A.V., Kozlov V.A., Shkirin A.V., et al. Biocompatibility of new materials based on nano-structured nitinol with titanium and tantalum composite surface layers: Experimental analysis in vitro and in vivo. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 2018;29:33. doi: 10.1007/s10856-018-6039-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Villechaise P., Oryshchenko A.S., Leonov V.P., Mikhailov V.I., Kuznetsov P.A., Alexandrov A.V., Appolaire B., Castany P., Dehmas M., Delaunay C., et al. Titanium in Shipbuilding and Other Technical Applications. MATEC Web Conf. 2020;321:02001. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/202032102001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Pushp P., Dasharath S.M., Arati C. Classification and applications of titanium and its alloys. Mater. Today Proc. 2022;54:537–542. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jackson M.J., Kopac J., Balazic M., Bombac D., Brojan M., Kosel F. Surgical Tools and Medical Devices. Springer Nature Switzerland; Cham, Switzerland: 2016. Titanium and Titanium Alloy Applications in Medicine; pp. 475–517. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Sarraf M., Rezvani Ghomi E., Alipour S., Ramakrishna S., Liana Sukiman N. A state-of-the-art review of the fabrication and characteristics of titanium and its alloys for biomedical applications. Bio-Des. Manuf. 2021;5:371–395. doi: 10.1007/s42242-021-00170-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mutalik C., Lin I.H., Krisnawati D.I., Khaerunnisa S., Khafid M., Widodo, Hsiao Y.-C., Kuo T.-R. Antibacterial Pathways in Transition Metal-Based Nanocomposites: A Mechanistic Overview. Int. J. Nanomed. 2022;17:6821–6842. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S392081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Genchi G.G. Titanium Dioxide (Tio2) and Its Applications. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2021. Titanium dioxide–based nanomaterials: Application of their smart properties in biomedicine; pp. 337–352. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Amiri M.R., Alavi M., Taran M., Kahrizi D. Antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, and photocatalytic activities of TiO2 nanoparticles, nanocomposites, and bio-nanocomposites: Recent advances and challenges. J. Public Health Res. 2022;11:22799036221104151. doi: 10.1177/22799036221104151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gudkov S.V., Burmistrov D.E., Serov D.A., Rebezov M.B., Semenova A.A., Lisitsyn A.B. A Mini Review of Antibacterial Properties of ZnO Nanoparticles. Front. Phys. 2021;9:641481. doi: 10.3389/fphy.2021.641481. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gudkov S.V., Burmistrov D.E., Serov D.A., Rebezov M.B., Semenova A.A., Lisitsyn A.B. Do Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Have Significant Antibacterial Properties? Antibiotics. 2021;10:884. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10070884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Younis A.B., Haddad Y., Kosaristanova L., Smerkova K. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Recent progress in antimicrobial applications. WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotechn. 2022;15:e1860. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jonidi Jafari A., Moslemzadeh M. The effect of TiO2 nanoparticles on bacterial growth: The effect of particle size and their structure—A systematic review. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2023;34:697–707. doi: 10.1080/09603123.2022.2163990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Haghighi F., Roudbar Mohammadi S., Mohammadi P., Hosseinkhani S., Shidpour R. Antifungal activity of TiO2 nanoparticles and EDTA on Candida albicans biofilms. Infect. Epidemiol. Med. 2013;1:33–38. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Priyanka K.P., Sukirtha T.H., Balakrishna K.M., Varghese T. Microbicidal activity of TiO2 nanoparticles synthesised by sol–gel method. IET Nanobiotechn. 2016;10:81–86. doi: 10.1049/iet-nbt.2015.0038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Anandgaonker P., Kulkarni G., Gaikwad S., Rajbhoj A. Synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles by electrochemical method and their antibacterial application. Arab. J. Chem. 2019;12:1815–1822. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.12.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Akhtar S., Shahzad K., Mushtaq S., Ali I., Rafe M.H., Fazal-ul-Karim S.M. Antibacterial and antiviral potential of colloidal Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles suitable for biological applications. Mater. Res. Express. 2019;6:105409. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab3b27. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Sundrarajan M., Bama K., Bhavani M., Jegatheeswaran S., Ambika S., Sangili A., Nithya P., Sumathi R. Obtaining titanium dioxide nanoparticles with spherical shape and antimicrobial properties using M. citrifolia leaves extract by hydrothermal method. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2017;171:117–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.05.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Nagaraj G., Tamilarasu S. Visible Light Photocatalyst Anatase Phased TiO2 Nanoparticles for Enhanced Antibacterial Performance. J. Clust. Sci. 2020;32:1701–1709. doi: 10.1007/s10876-020-01939-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Vijayalakshmi K., Sivaraj D. Synergistic antibacterial activity of barium doped TiO2 nanoclusters synthesized by microwave processing. RSC Adv. 2016;6:9663–9671. doi: 10.1039/C5RA28125C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Batool M., Allwin Joseph L., Joel Abraham J., Isaac Emmanuel J., Prince Joshua J. Structural and biological effects of rutile (α-TiO2) nanoparticles synthesized by co-precipitation method. Mater. Today Proc. 2023. in press . [DOI]
- 62.Yuan Y., Ding J., Xu J., Deng J., Guo J. TiO2 Nanoparticles Co-Doped with Silver and Nitrogen for Antibacterial Application. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2010;10:4868–4874. doi: 10.1166/jnn.2010.2225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bekele E.T., Gonfa B.A., Zelekew O.A., Belay H.H., Sabir F.K. Synthesis of titanium oxide nanoparticles using root extract of Kniphofia foliosa as a template, characterization, and its application on drug resistance bacteria. J. Nanomater. 2020;2020:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2020/2817037. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Rathore C., Yadav V.K., Amari A., Meena A., Chinedu Egbosiuba T., Verma R.K., Mahdhi N., Choudhary N., Sahoo D.K., Chundawat R.S., et al. Synthesis and characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticles from Bacillus subtilis MTCC 8322 and its application for the removal of methylene blue and orange G dyes under UV light and visible light. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2024;11:1323249. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1323249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Subhapriya S., Gomathipriya P. Green synthesis of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles by Trigonella foenum-graecum extract and its antimicrobial properties. Microb. Pathog. 2018;116:215–220. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2018.01.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Shahin Lefteh M., Sourinejad I., Ghasemi Z. Avicennia marina mediated synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles: Its antibacterial potential against some aquatic pathogens. Inorg. Nano-Met. Chem. 2020;51:1775–1785. doi: 10.1080/24701556.2020.1852431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Xing Y., Li X., Guo X., Li W., Chen J., Liu Q., Xu Q., Wang Q., Yang H., Shui Y., et al. Effects of Different TiO2 Nanoparticles Concentrations on the Physical and Antibacterial Activities of Chitosan-Based Coating Film. Nanomaterials. 2020;10:1365. doi: 10.3390/nano10071365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Malmir S., Karbalaei A., Pourmadadi M., Hamedi J., Yazdian F., Navaee M. Antibacterial properties of a bacterial cellulose CQD-TiO2 nanocomposite. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020;234:115835. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Manimaran K., Murugesan S., Ragavendran C., Balasubramani G., Natarajan D., Ganesan A., Seedevi P. Biosynthesis of TiO2 Nanoparticles Using Edible Mushroom (Pleurotus djamor) Extract: Mosquito Larvicidal, Histopathological, Antibacterial and Anticancer Effect. J. Clust. Sci. 2020;32:1229–1240. doi: 10.1007/s10876-020-01888-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Landage K.S., Arbade G.K., Khanna P., Bhongale C.J. Biological approach to synthesize TiO2 nanoparticles using Staphylococcus aureus for antibacterial and antibiofilm applications. J. Microbiol. Exp. 2020;8:36–43. doi: 10.15406/jmen.2020.08.00283. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Morozova M.V., Korkina V.I., Makarova M.A., Litvinova E.A. Effect of the Bacillus subtilis BS20 on physiological and immune parameters in mutant mice Muc2−/−. J. Microbiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol. 2024;101:208–216. doi: 10.36233/0372-9311-441. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Mobeen Amanulla A., Sundaram R. Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using orange peel extract for antibacterial, cytotoxicity and humidity sensor applications. Mater. Today Proc. 2019;8:323–331. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.02.118. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Karthik K., Shashank M., Revathi V., Tatarchuk T. Facile microwave-assisted green synthesis of NiO nanoparticles from Andrographis paniculata leaf extract and evaluation of their photocatalytic and anticancer activities. Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 2019;673:70–80. doi: 10.1080/15421406.2019.1578495. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Alfryyan N., Kordy M.G.M., Abdel-Gabbar M., Soliman H.A., Shaban M. Characterization of the biosynthesized intracellular and extracellular plasmonic silver nanoparticles using Bacillus cereus and their catalytic reduction of methylene blue. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:12495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16029-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Khashan K.S., Sulaiman G.M., Abdulameer F.A., Albukhaty S., Ibrahem M.A., Al-Muhimeed T., AlObaid A.A. Antibacterial Activity of TiO2 Nanoparticles Prepared by One-Step Laser Ablation in Liquid. Appl. Sci. 2021;11:4623. doi: 10.3390/app11104623. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kumari S., Raturi S., Kulshrestha S., Chauhan K., Dhingra S., András K., Thu K., Khargotra R., Singh T. A comprehensive review on various techniques used for synthesizing nanoparticles. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2023;27:1739–1763. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.09.291. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zeng H., Du X.W., Singh S.C., Kulinich S.A., Yang S., He J., Cai W. Nanomaterials via Laser Ablation/Irradiation in Liquid: A Review. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012;22:1333–1353. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201102295. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Simakin A.V., Baimler I.V., Uvarov O.V., Rakov I.I., Gudkov S.V. Laser ablation method for the generation of chromium, iron, manganese, nickel, scandium, titanium and vanadium, nanoparticles: Control of size and properties. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020;921:012024. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/921/1/012024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Hamzeh M., Sunahara G.I. In vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity studies of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles in Chinese hamster lung fibroblast cells. Toxicology in Vitro. 2013;27:864–873. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2012.12.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Rathore C., Yadav V.K., Gacem A., AbdelRahim S.K., Verma R.K., Chundawat R.S., Gnanamoorthy G., Yadav K.K., Choudhary N., Sahoo D.K., et al. Microbial synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and their importance in wastewater treatment and antimicrobial activities: A review. Front. Microbiol. 2023;14:1270245. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1270245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kazakevich P.V., Simakin A.V., Voronov V.V., Shafeev G.A. Laser induced synthesis of nanoparticles in liquids. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2006;252:4373–4380. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.06.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Bykov I., Malyshko V.V., Shashkov D.I., Moiseev A.V., Basov A., Sokolov M.E., Pavlyuchenko I., Esaulenko E.E. Dependence of the size and number of silver nanoparticles on the ligand concentration in the reaction system. Med. News North Cauc. 2024;19:169–172. doi: 10.14300/mnnc.2024.19038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Nagajyothi P.C., Sreekanth T.V.M., Tettey C.O., Jun Y.I., Mook S.H. Characterization, antibacterial, antioxidant, and cytotoxic activities of ZnO nanoparticles using Coptidis Rhizoma. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2014;24:4298–4303. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2014.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Rao K., Imran M., Jabri T., Ali I., Perveen S., Shafiullah, Ahmed S., Shah M.R. Gum tragacanth stabilized green gold nanoparticles as cargos for Naringin loading: A morphological investigation through AFM. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017;174:243–252. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.06.071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Song Z., Hrbek J., Osgood R. Formation of TiO2 Nanoparticles by Reactive-Layer-Assisted Deposition and Characterization by XPS and STM. Nano Lett. 2005;5:1327–1332. doi: 10.1021/nl0505703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Das B., Dash S.K., Mandal D., Ghosh T., Chattopadhyay S., Tripathy S., Das S., Dey S.K., Das D., Roy S. Green synthesized silver nanoparticles destroy multidrug resistant bacteria via reactive oxygen species mediated membrane damage. Arab. J. Chem. 2017;10:862–876. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2015.08.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Bell N.C., Minelli C., Tompkins J., Stevens M.M., Shard A.G. Emerging Techniques for Submicrometer Particle Sizing Applied to Stöber Silica. Langmuir. 2012;28:10860–10872. doi: 10.1021/la301351k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Varenne F., Botton J., Merlet C., Vachon J.-J., Geiger S., Infante I.C., Chehimi M.M., Vauthier C. Standardization and validation of a protocol of zeta potential measurements by electrophoretic light scattering for nanomaterial characterization. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2015;486:218–231. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2015.08.044. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Robertson J.D., Rizzello L., Avila-Olias M., Gaitzsch J., Contini C., Magoń M.S., Renshaw S.A., Battaglia G. Purification of Nanoparticles by Size and Shape. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:27494. doi: 10.1038/srep27494. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Shigimaga V.A. Pulsed conductometer for biological cells and liquid media. Meas. Tech. 2013;55:1294–1300. doi: 10.1007/s11018-013-0124-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Henriquez R.R., Ito T., Sun L., Crooks R.M. The resurgence of Coulter counting for analyzing nanoscale objects. Analyst. 2004;129:478–482. doi: 10.1039/b404251b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Ehara K., Sakurai H. Metrology of airborne and liquid-borne nanoparticles: Current status and future needs. Metrologia. 2010;47:S83. doi: 10.1088/0026-1394/47/2/S09. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Neville F., Broderick M.J.F., Gibson T., Millner P.A. Fabrication and Activity of Silicate Nanoparticles and Nanosilicate-Entrapped Enzymes Using Polyethyleneimine As a Biomimetic Polymer. Langmuir. 2011;27:279–285. doi: 10.1021/la1033492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Singh V., Shrivastava A., Wahi N. Biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles by plants crude extracts and their characterization using UV, XRD, TEM and EDX. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2015;14:2554–2567. doi: 10.5897/AJB2015.14692. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Jayaseelan C., Rahuman A.A., Roopan S.M., Kirthi A.V., Venkatesan J., Kim S.-K., Iyappan M., Siva C. Biological approach to synthesize TiO2 nanoparticles using Aeromonas hydrophila and its antibacterial activity. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2013;107:82–89. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2012.12.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Naraginti S., Li Y. Preliminary investigation of catalytic, antioxidant, anticancer and bactericidal activity of green synthesized silver and gold nanoparticles using Actinidia deliciosa. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2017;170:225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Zad Z.R., Davarani S.S.H., Taheri A., Bide Y. A yolk shell Fe3O4 @PA-Ni@Pd/Chitosan nanocomposite -modified carbon ionic liquid electrode as a new sensor for the sensitive determination of fluconazole in pharmaceutical preparations and biological fluids. J. Mol. Liq. 2018;253:233–240. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.01.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Rajakumar G., Rahuman A.A., Roopan S.M., Khanna V.G., Elango G., Kamaraj C., Zahir A.A., Velayutham K. Fungus-mediated biosynthesis and characterization of TiO2 nanoparticles and their activity against pathogenic bacteria. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2012;91:23–29. doi: 10.1016/j.saa.2012.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Venkateswarlu S., Natesh Kumar B., Prasad C.H., Venkateswarlu P., Jyothi N.V.V. Bio-inspired green synthesis of Fe3O4 spherical magnetic nanoparticles using Syzygium cumini seed extract. Phys. B Condens. Matter. 2014;449:67–71. doi: 10.1016/j.physb.2014.04.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Burmistrov D.E., Serov D.A., Simakin A.V., Baimler I.V., Uvarov O.V., Gudkov S.V. A Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and Nano-Al2O3 Based Composite Coating with a Bacteriostatic Effect against E. coli and Low Cytotoxicity. Polymers. 2022;14:4764. doi: 10.3390/polym14214764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Simakin A.V., Sarimov R.M., Smirnova V.V., Astashev M.E., Serov D.A., Yanykin D.V., Chausov D.N., Shkirin A.V., Uvarov O.V., Rotanov E., et al. New Structural Nanocomposite Based on PLGA and Al2O3 NPs as a Balance between Antibacterial Activity and Biocompatibility with Eukaryotic Cells. J. Compos. Sci. 2022;6:298. doi: 10.3390/jcs6100298. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Mühling M., Bradford A., Readman J.W., Somerfield P.J., Handy R.D. An investigation into the effects of silver nanoparticles on antibiotic resistance of naturally occurring bacteria in an estuarine sediment. Mar. Environ. Res. 2009;68:278–283. doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2009.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Pochapski D.J., Carvalho Dos Santos C., Leite G.W., Pulcinelli S.H., Santilli C.V. Zeta Potential and Colloidal Stability Predictions for Inorganic Nanoparticle Dispersions: Effects of Experimental Conditions and Electrokinetic Models on the Interpretation of Results. Langmuir. 2021;37:13379–13389. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.1c02056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Németh Z., Csóka I., Semnani Jazani R., Sipos B., Haspel H., Kozma G., Kónya Z., Dobó D.G. Quality by design-driven zeta potential optimisation study of liposomes with charge imparting membrane additives. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1798. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14091798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Doua J., Geurtsen J., Rodriguez-Baño J., Cornely O.A., Go O., Gomila-Grange A., Kirby A., Hermans P., Gori A., Zuccaro V., et al. Epidemiology, clinical features, and antimicrobial resistance of invasive Escherichia coli disease in patients admitted in tertiary care hospitals. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2023;10:ofad026. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Edelstein M.V., Sukhorukova M.V., Skleenova E.Y., Ivanchik N.V., Mikotina A.V., Sheck E.A., Dekhnich A.V., Azizov I.S., Kozlov R.S. The antibiotic resistance of nosocomial strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Russian hospitals: The results of multicenter epidemiological study MARAFON 2013–2014. Clin. Microbiol. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017;19:27–42. [Google Scholar]
- 107.Kolotova O.N., Kataeva L.V., Bakshtanovskaya I.V., Stepanova T.F., Stepanova K.B. Resistance factors of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteria during COVID-19 pandemic. Russ. J. Infect. Immun. 2022;12:563–568. doi: 10.15789/2220-7619-RFO-1837. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Noskov A.K., Kruglikov V.D., Moskvitina E.A., Monakhova E.V., Levchenko D.A., Yanovich E.G., Vodop’yanov A.S., Pisanov R.V., Nepomnyashchaya N.B., Ezhova M.I., et al. Characteristics of the Epidemiological Situation on Cholera in the World and in the Russian Federation in 2020 and Forecast for 2021. Probl. Part. Danger. Infect. 2021;1:43–51. doi: 10.21055/0370-1069-2021-1-43-51. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Egorova S.A., Kuleshov K.V., Kaftyreva L.A., Matveeva Z.N. The antimicrobial susceptibility, resistance mechanisms and phylogenetic structure of S. Typhi isolated in 2005–2018 in the Russian Federation. Russ. J. Infect. Immun. 2020;10:99–110. doi: 10.15789/10.15789/2220-7619-asm-1171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Gostev V., Kruglov A., Kalinogorskaya O., Dmitrenko O., Khokhlova O., Yamamoto T., Lobzin Y., Ryabchenko I., Sidorenko S. Molecular epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus circulating in the Russian Federation. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017;53:189–194. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Adamski P., Byczkowska-Rostkowska Z., Gajewska J., Zakrzewski A.J., Kłębukowska L. Prevalence and antibiotic resistance of Bacillus sp. Isolated from raw milk. Microorganisms. 2023;11:1065. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11041065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Nesvizhsky Y.V., Voropaev A.D., Afanasiev S.S., Volchkova E.V., Afanasiev M.S., Voropaeva E.A., Suleimanova M.E., Budanova E.V., Urban Y.N. The association between Candida albicans sensitivity to antimycotic drugs and the architecture of their microbial community in the oropharynx of HIV infected patients. J. Microbiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol. 2023;100:26–33. doi: 10.36233/0372-9311-326. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Levina A.S., Repkova M.N., Ismagilov Z.R., Shikina N.V., Malygin E.G., Mazurkova N.A., Zinov’ev V.V., Evdokimov A.A., Baiborodin S.I., Zarytova V.F. High-performance method for specific effect on nucleic acids in cells using TiO2~DNA nanocomposites. Sci. Rep. 2012;2:756. doi: 10.1038/srep00756. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Schutte-Smith M., Erasmus E., Mogale R., Marogoa N., Jayiya A., Visser H.G. Using visible light to activate antiviral and antimicrobial properties of TiO2 nanoparticles in paints and coatings: Focus on new developments for frequent-touch surfaces in hospitals. J. Coat. Technol. Res. 2023;20:789–817. doi: 10.1007/s11998-022-00733-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Breijyeh Z., Jubeh B., Karaman R. Resistance of Gram-Negative Bacteria to Current Antibacterial Agents and Approaches to Resolve It. Molecules. 2020;25:1340. doi: 10.3390/molecules25061340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Gudkov S.V., Serov D.A., Astashev M.E., Semenova A.A., Lisitsyn A.B. Ag2O Nanoparticles as a Candidate for Antimicrobial Compounds of the New Generation. Pharmaceuticals. 2022;15:968. doi: 10.3390/ph15080968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Gudkov S.V., Burmistrov D.E., Smirnova V.V., Semenova A.A., Lisitsyn A.B. A Mini Review of Antibacterial Properties of Al2O3 Nanoparticles. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:2635. doi: 10.3390/nano12152635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Kadiyala U., Kotov N.A., VanEpps J.S. Antibacterial Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: Challenges in Interpreting the Literature. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2018;24:896–903. doi: 10.2174/1381612824666180219130659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Laroui H., Wilson D.S., Dalmasso G., Salaita K., Murthy N., Sitaraman S.V., Merlin D. Nanomedicine in GI. Am. J. Physiol. -Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2011;300:G371–G383. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00466.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Schnur J.M., Li L.-H., Yen M.-Y., Ho C.-C., Wu P., Wang C.-C., Maurya P.K., Chen P.-S., Chen W., Hsieh W.-Y., et al. Non-Cytotoxic Nanomaterials Enhance Antimicrobial Activities of Cefmetazole against Multidrug-Resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e64794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0064794. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Mukherjee A., Dong Y., Zhu H., Shen Y., Zhang W., Zhang L. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles of different particle size against Vibrio natriegens. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0222322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Skomorokhova E.A., Sankova T.P., Orlov I.A., Savelev A.N., Magazenkova D.N., Pliss M.G., Skvortsov A.N., Sosnin I.M., Kirilenko D.A., Grishchuk I.V., et al. Size-Dependent Bioactivity of Silver Nanoparticles: Antibacterial Properties, Influence on Copper Status in Mice, and Whole-Body Turnover. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2020;13:137–157. doi: 10.2147/NSA.S287658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Kladko D.V., Falchevskaya A.S., Serov N.S., Prilepskii A.Y. Nanomaterial Shape Influence on Cell Behavior. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:5266. doi: 10.3390/ijms22105266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Menichetti A., Mavridi-Printezi A., Mordini D., Montalti M. Effect of Size, Shape and Surface Functionalization on the Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles. J. Funct. Biomater. 2023;14:244. doi: 10.3390/jfb14050244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Soleimani F.F., Saleh T., Shojaosadati S.A., Poursalehi R. Green Synthesis of Different Shapes of Silver Nanostructures and Evaluation of Their Antibacterial and Cytotoxic Activity. BioNanoScience. 2017;8:72–80. doi: 10.1007/s12668-017-0423-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Jog R., Burgess D.J. Pharmaceutical Amorphous Nanoparticles. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017;106:39–65. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2016.09.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Hu Z., Chan W.L., Szeto Y.S. Nanocomposite of chitosan and silver oxide and its antibacterial property. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008;108:52–56. doi: 10.1002/app.26822. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Gul S., Rehan Z.A., Khan S.A., Akhtar K., Khan M.A., Khan M.I., Rashid M.I., Asiri A.M., Khan S.B. Antibacterial PES-CA-Ag2O nanocomposite supported Cu nanoparticles membrane toward ultrafiltration, BSA rejection and reduction of nitrophenol. J. Mol. Liq. 2017;230:616–624. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2016.12.093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Haq S., Rehman W., Waseem M., Meynen V., Awan S.U., Saeed S., Iqbal N. Fabrication of pure and moxifloxacin functionalized silver oxide nanoparticles for photocatalytic and antimicrobial activity. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2018;186:116–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Zare M., Namratha K., Alghamdi S., Mohammad Y.H.E., Hezam A., Zare M., Drmosh Q.A., Byrappa K., Chandrashekar B.N., Ramakrishna S., et al. Novel Green Biomimetic Approach for Synthesis of ZnO-Ag Nanocomposite; Antimicrobial Activity against Food-borne Pathogen, Biocompatibility and Solar Photocatalysis. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:8303. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-44309-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Eremeeva N. Nanoparticles of metals and their compounds in films and coatings: A review. Foods Raw Mater. 2023;12:60–79. doi: 10.21603/2308-4057-2024-1-588. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Iudin D., Vasilieva M., Knyazeva E., Korzhikov-Vlakh V., Demyanova E., Lavrentieva A., Skorik Y., Korzhikova-Vlakh E. Hybrid Nanoparticles and Composite Hydrogel Systems for Delivery of Peptide Antibiotics. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022;23:2771. doi: 10.3390/ijms23052771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Hamad A.H., Li L., Liu Z., Zhong X.L., Wang T. Sequential laser and ultrasonic wave generation of TiO2@Ag core-shell nanoparticles and their anti-bacterial properties. Lasers Med. Sci. 2015;31:263–273. doi: 10.1007/s10103-015-1855-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Nithya N., Bhoopathi G., Magesh G., Kumar C.D.N. Neodymium doped TiO2 nanoparticles by sol-gel method for antibacterial and photocatalytic activity. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2018;83:70–82. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2018.04.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Sinha S., Patel V., Verma H., Kumar Akhani T., Singh Rathore M. Structural, optical and antibacterial performance of the Mg doped TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized using sol–gel method. Mater. Today Proc. 2022;67:694–700. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.543. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Tariq F., Hussain R., Noreen Z., Javed A., Shah A., Mahmood A., Sajjad M., Bokhari H., Rahman S.u. Enhanced antibacterial activity of visible light activated sulfur-doped TiO2 nanoparticles against Vibrio cholerae. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2022;147:106731. doi: 10.1016/j.mssp.2022.106731. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Kubacka A., Diez M.S., Rojo D., Bargiela R., Ciordia S., Zapico I., Albar J.P., Barbas C., Martins dos Santos V.A.P., Fernández-García M., et al. Understanding the antimicrobial mechanism of TiO2-based nanocomposite films in a pathogenic bacterium. Sci. Rep. 2014;4:4134. doi: 10.1038/srep04134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Pulit-Prociak J., Długosz O., Staroń A., Radomski P., Domagała D., Banach M. In vitro studies of titanium dioxide nanoparticles modified with glutathione as a potential drug delivery system. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2023;12:20230126. doi: 10.1515/ntrev-2023-0126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Ion R., Necula M.G., Mazare A., Mitran V., Neacsu P., Schmuki P., Cimpean A. Drug Delivery Systems Based on Titania Nanotubes and Active Agents for Enhanced Osseointegration of Bone Implants. Curr. Med. Chem. 2020;27:854–902. doi: 10.2174/0929867326666190726123229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Alhadrami H.A., Shoudri R.A.M. Titanium Oxide (TiO2) Nanoparticles for Treatment of Wound Infection (Preprint) Preprints. 2020;2020:110307. doi: 10.20944/preprints202011.0307.v1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Yan Y., Kuang W., Shi L., Ye X., Yang Y., Xie X., Shi Q., Tan S. Carbon quantum dot-decorated TiO2 for fast and sustainable antibacterial properties under visible-light. J. Alloys Compd. 2019;777:234–243. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.10.191. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Khater M.S., Kulkarni G.R., Khater S.S., Gholap H., Patil R. Study to elucidate effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on bacterial membrane potential and membrane permeability. Mater. Res. Express. 2020;7:035005. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab731a. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Wickham J.R., Rice C.V. Solid-state NMR studies of bacterial lipoteichoic acid adsorption on different surfaces. Solid State Nucl. Magn. Reson. 2008;34:154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.ssnmr.2008.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Pagnout C., Jomini S., Dadhwal M., Caillet C., Thomas F., Bauda P. Role of electrostatic interactions in the toxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles toward Escherichia coli. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2012;92:315–321. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Pitre S.P., Yoon T.P., Scaiano J.C. Titanium dioxide visible light photocatalysis: Surface association enables photocatalysis with visible light irradiation. Chem. Commun. 2017;53:4335–4338. doi: 10.1039/C7CC01952A. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.Lee S.C., Hasan N., Lintang H.O., Shamsuddin M., Yuliati L. Photocatalytic removal of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide on copper oxide/titanium dioxide prepared by co-precipitation method. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016;107:012012. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/107/1/012012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Modi S., Yadav V.K., Choudhary N., Alswieleh A.M., Sharma A.K., Bhardwaj A.K., Khan S.H., Yadav K.K., Cheon J.-K., Jeon B.-H. Onion Peel Waste Mediated-Green Synthesis of Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Phytotoxicity on Mung Bean and Wheat Plant Growth. Materials. 2022;15:2393. doi: 10.3390/ma15072393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.López de Dicastillo C., Guerrero Correa M., Martínez F.B., Streitt C., José Galotto M. Antimicrobial Resistance—A One Health Perspective. IntechOpen; Rijeka, Croatia: 2021. Antimicrobial Effect of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- 149.Gomaa E.Z. Silver nanoparticles as an antimicrobial agent: A case study on Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli as models for Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2017;63:36–43. doi: 10.2323/jgam.2016.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Xia T., Kovochich M., Brant J., Hotze M., Sempf J., Oberley T., Sioutas C., Yeh J.I., Wiesner M.R., Nel A.E. Comparison of the abilities of ambient and manufactured nanoparticles to induce cellular toxicity according to an oxidative stress paradigm. Nano Lett. 2006;6:1794–1807. doi: 10.1021/nl061025k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Bruskov V.I., Karp O.E., Garmash S.A., Shtarkman I.N., Chernikov A.V., Gudkov S.V. Prolongation of oxidative stress by long-lived reactive protein species induced by X-ray radiation and their genotoxic action. Free Radic. Res. 2012;46:1280–1290. doi: 10.3109/10715762.2012.709316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Bruskov V.I., Malakhova L.V., Masalimov Z.K., Chernikov A.V. Heat-induced formation of reactive oxygen species and 8-oxoguanine, a biomarker of damage to DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:1354–1363. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.6.1354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Burmistrov D.E., Simakin A.V., Smirnova V.V., Uvarov O.V., Ivashkin P.I., Kucherov R.N., Ivanov V.E., Bruskov V.I., Sevostyanov M.A., Baikin A.S., et al. Bacteriostatic and Cytotoxic Properties of Composite Material Based on ZnO Nanoparticles in PLGA Obtained by Low Temperature Method. Polymers. 2022;14:49. doi: 10.3390/polym14010049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Othman S.H., Abd Salam N.R., Zainal N., Kadir Basha R., Talib R.A. Antimicrobial Activity of TiO2 Nanoparticle-Coated Film for Potential Food Packaging Applications. Int. J. Photoenergy. 2014;2014:945930. doi: 10.1155/2014/945930. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Ahmad W., Kumar S., Ahmed S. Microwave-assisted one-step biosynthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Antibacterial, antioxidant, and photocatalytic properties. Kuwait J. Sci. 2024;51:100203. doi: 10.1016/j.kjs.2024.100203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Zimbone M., Buccheri M.A., Cacciato G., Sanz R., Rappazzo G., Boninelli S., Reitano R., Romano L., Privitera V., Grimaldi M.G. Photocatalytical and antibacterial activity of TiO2 nanoparticles obtained by laser ablation in water. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015;165:487–494. doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2014.10.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Vargas M.A., Rodríguez-Páez J.E. Amorphous TiO2 nanoparticles: Synthesis and antibacterial capacity. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2017;459:192–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.01.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Bahjat H.H., Ismail R.A., Sulaiman G.M., Jabir M.S. Magnetic Field-Assisted Laser Ablation of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles in Water for Anti-Bacterial Applications. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2021;31:3649–3656. doi: 10.1007/s10904-021-01973-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Ansari M.A., Albetran H.M., Alheshibri M.H., Timoumi A., Algarou N.A., Akhtar S., Slimani Y., Almessiere M.A., Alahmari F.S., Baykal A., et al. Synthesis of Electrospun TiO2 Nanofibers and Characterization of Their Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Potential against Gram-Positive and Gram-Negative Bacteria. Antibiotics. 2020;9:572. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9090572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Roy A.S., Parveen A., Koppalkar A.R., Prasad M.V.N.A. Effect of nano-titanium dioxide with different antibiotics against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biomater. Nanobiotechn. 2010;1:37–41. doi: 10.4236/jbnb.2010.11005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Brzozowska W., Wojtczak I., Railean V., Bekissanova Z., Trykowski G., Buszewski B., Sprynskyy M. Pyrolized Diatomaceous Biomass Doped with Epitaxially Growing Hybrid Ag/TiO2 Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterisation and Antibacterial Application. Materials. 2023;16:4345. doi: 10.3390/ma16124345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Alomary M.N., Ansari M.A. Proanthocyanin—Capped biogenic TiO2 nanoparticles with enhanced penetration, antibacterial and ros mediated inhibition of bacteria proliferation and biofilm formation: A comparative approach. Chem. A Eur. J. 2021;27:5817–5829. doi: 10.1002/chem.202004828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Pavlović V.P., Vujančević J.D., Mašković P., Ćirković J., Papan J.M., Kosanović D., Dramićanin M.D., Petrović P.B., Vlahović B., Pavlović V.B. Structure and enhanced antimicrobial activity of mechanically activated nano TiO2. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2019;102:7735–7745. doi: 10.1111/jace.16668. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Krumdieck S.P., Boichot R., Gorthy R., Land J.G., Lay S., Gardecka A.J., Polson M.I.J., Wasa A., Aitken J.E., Heinemann J.A., et al. Nanostructured TiO2 anatase-rutile-carbon solid coating with visible light antimicrobial activity. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1883. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-38291-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Grande F., Tucci P. Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles: A Risk for Human Health? Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2016;16:762–769. doi: 10.2174/1389557516666160321114341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Sha B., Gao W., Wang S., Xu F., Lu T. Cytotoxicity of titanium dioxide nanoparticles differs in four liver cells from human and rat. Compos. Part B Eng. 2011;42:2136–2144. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Bacova J., Knotek P., Kopecka K., Hromadko L., Capek J., Nyvltova P., Bruckova L., Schröterova L., Sestakova B., Palarcik J., et al. Evaluating the Use of TiO2 Nanoparticles for Toxicity Testing in Pulmonary A549 Cells. Int. J. Nanomed. 2022;17:4211–4225. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S374955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Prokopiuk V., Yefimova S., Onishchenko A., Kapustnik V., Myasoedov V., Maksimchuk P., Butov D., Bespalova I., Tkachenko A. Assessing the Cytotoxicity of TiO2−x Nanoparticles with a Different Ti3+(Ti2+)/Ti4+ Ratio. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022;201:3117–3130. doi: 10.1007/s12011-022-03403-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Ahamed M., Khan M.A.M., Akhtar M.J., Alhadlaq H.A., Alshamsan A. Ag-doping regulates the cytotoxicity of TiO2 nanoparticles via oxidative stress in human cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:17662. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17559-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Ul-Hamid A., Baig N., Haider A., Hakeem A.S., Ikram M. Using biologically synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles as potential remedy against multiple drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus of bovine mastitis. Sci. Rep. 2023;13:18785. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45762-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Abdul-Hassan I.A., Abbas A.K., Ibrahim I.M., Shallal Z.S. Characterization and antimicrobial effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles produced by laser ablation. Indian J. Nat. Sci. 2018;8:14286–14292. [Google Scholar]
- 172.Hassan M.S., Amna T., Mishra A., Yun S.-I., Kim H.-C., Kim H.-Y., Khil M.-S. Fabrication, Characterization and Antibacterial Effect of Novel Electrospun TiO2 Nanorods on a Panel of Pathogenic Bacteria. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2012;8:394–404. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2012.1393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Ağçeli G.K., Hammachi H., Kodal S.P., Cihangir N., Aksu Z. A Novel Approach to Synthesize TiO2 Nanoparticles: Biosynthesis by Using Streptomyces sp. HC1. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2020;30:3221–3229. doi: 10.1007/s10904-020-01486-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Ahmad R., Mohsin M., Ahmad T., Sardar M. Alpha amylase assisted synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles: Structural characterization and application as antibacterial agents. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015;283:171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.08.073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Niño-Martínez N., Salas Orozco M.F., Martínez-Castañón G.-A., Torres Méndez F., Ruiz F. Molecular Mechanisms of Bacterial Resistance to Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:2808. doi: 10.3390/ijms20112808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Hamed M.T., Bakr B.A., Shahin Y.H., Elwakil B.H., Abu-Serie M.M., Aljohani F.S., Bekhit A.A., Keramidas A. Novel Synthesis of Titanium Oxide Nanoparticles: Biological Activity and Acute Toxicity Study. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2021;2021:8171786. doi: 10.1155/2021/8171786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Alhadrami H.A., Baqasi A., Iqbal J., Shoudri R.A., Ashshi A.M., Azhar E.I., Al-Hazmi F., Al-Ghamdi A., Wageh S. Antibacterial Applications of Anatase TiO2 Nanoparticle. Am. J. Nanomater. 2017;5:31–42. doi: 10.12691/ajn-5-1-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Khashan K.S., Sulaima G.M., Ameer F.A.A., Marzoog T.R. Antibacterial Activity of TiO2 Nanoparticles Suspension Induced by Laser Ablation in Liquid. Eng. Technol. J. 2014;32:877–884. doi: 10.30684/etj.32.5B.4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Ahmed F.Y., Aly U.F., Abd El-Baky R.M., Waly N.G.F.M. Effect of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on the expression of efflux pump and quorum-sensing genes in MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates. Antibiotics. 2021;10:625. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10060625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Abd Alrazaq Hassan M., Hassan N.A., Khudhair Khalaf S., Hakiem Tawfieq A. Nanoparticles on pathogenic strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Diyala J. Med. 2024;26:79–91. doi: 10.26505/DJM.26017911015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Shimi A.K., Ahmed H.M., Wahab M., Katheria S., Wabaidur S.M., Eldesoky G.E., Islam M.A., Rane K.P., Zeng W. Synthesis and Applications of Green Synthesized TiO2 Nanoparticles for Photocatalytic Dye Degradation and Antibacterial Activity. J. Nanomater. 2022;2022:060388. doi: 10.1155/2022/7060388. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Younis A.B., Milosavljevic V., Fialova T., Smerkova K., Michalkova H., Svec P., Antal P., Kopel P., Adam V., Zurek L., et al. Synthesis and characterization of TiO2 nanoparticles combined with geraniol and their synergistic antibacterial activity. BMC Microbiol. 2023;23:207. doi: 10.1186/s12866-023-02955-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Manjunath K., Reddy Yadav L.S., Jayalakshmi T., Reddy V., Rajanaika H., Nagaraju G. Ionic liquid assisted hydrothermal synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles: Photocatalytic and antibacterial activity. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2018;7:7–13. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2017.02.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Razzaq Z., Khalid A., Ahmad P., Farooq M., Khandaker M.U., Sulieman A., Rehman I.U., Shakeel S., Khan A. Photocatalytic and Antibacterial Potency of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles: A Cost-Effective and Environmentally Friendly Media for Treatment of Air and Wastewater. Catalysts. 2021;11:709. doi: 10.3390/catal11060709. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Hidayat R., Fadillah G., Ohira S.-I., Fajarwati F.I., Setyorini D.A., Saputra A. Facile green synthesis of Ag doped TiO2 nanoparticles using maple leaf for bisphenol-A degradation and its antibacterial properties. Mater. Today Sustain. 2024;26:100752. doi: 10.1016/j.mtsust.2024.100752. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Baamer D.F., Helmy E.T., Mostafa M.M.M., Pan J.H. Synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using different routes with enhanced photocatalytic and antibacterial properties. Ceram. Int. 2024;50:15780–15789. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.02.058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Ouerghi O., Geesi M.H., Ibnouf E.O., Ansari M.J., Alam P., Elsanousi A., Kaiba A., Riadi Y. Sol-gel synthesized rutile TiO2 nanoparticles loaded with cardamom essential oil: Enhanced antibacterial activity. J. Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2021;64:102581. doi: 10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102581. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Nataraj N., Anjusree G.S., Madhavan A.A., Priyanka P., Sankar D., Nisha N., Lakshmi S.V., Jayakumar R., Balakrishnan A., Biswas R. Synthesis and Anti-Staphylococcal Activity of TiO2 Nanoparticles and Nanowires in Ex Vivo Porcine Skin Model. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2014;10:864–870. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2014.1756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Thakur B.K., Kumar A., Kumar D. Green synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Azadirachta indica leaf extract and evaluation of their antibacterial activity. S. Afr. J. Bot. 2019;124:223–227. doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2019.05.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Youssef F., Farghaly U., Abd El-Baky R.M., Waly N. Comparative Study of Antibacterial Effects of Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles Alone and in Combination with Antibiotics on MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains. Int. J. Nanomed. 2020;15:3393–3404. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S246310. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Ranjan S., Ramalingam C. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles induce bacterial membrane rupture by reactive oxygen species generation. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2016;14:487–494. doi: 10.1007/s10311-016-0586-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Pişkin S., Palantöken A., Yılmaz M.S. Antimicrobial activity of synthesized TiO2 nanoparticles; Proceedings of the ICETET; Phuket, Thailand. 7–8 December 2013; pp. 91–94. [Google Scholar]
- 193.Murugan K., Dinesh D., Kavithaa K., Paulpandi M., Ponraj T., Alsalhi M.S., Devanesan S., Subramaniam J., Rajaganesh R., Wei H., et al. Hydrothermal synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Mosquitocidal potential and anticancer activity on human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) Parasitol. Res. 2015;115:1085–1096. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4838-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Bilal M., Ambreen B., Ali J., Shahid I. Effects of solvent on the structure and properties of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity. Iran. J. Chem. Chem. Eng. 2019;38:261–272. doi: 10.30492/IJCCE.2019.31718. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Albukhaty S., Al-Bayati L., Al-Karagoly H., Al-Musawi S. Preparation and characterization of titanium dioxide nanoparticles andin vitroinvestigation of their cytotoxicity and antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Anim. Biotechnol. 2020;33:864–870. doi: 10.1080/10495398.2020.1842751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Tahmasebi E., Mohammadi M., Yazdanian M., Alam M., Abbasi K., Hosseini H.M., Tavakolizadeh M., Khayatan D., Hassani Z., Tebyaniyan H. Antimicrobial properties of green synthesized novel TiO2 nanoparticles using Iranian propolis extracts. J. Basic Microbiol. 2023;63:1030–1048. doi: 10.1002/jobm.202300221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Al Masoudi L.M., Alqurashi A.S., Abu Zaid A., Hamdi H. Characterization and Biological Studies of Synthesized Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles from Leaf Extract of Juniperus phoenicea (L.) Growing in Taif Region, Saudi Arabia. Processes. 2023;11:272. doi: 10.3390/pr11010272. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Marzhoseyni Z., Rashki S., Nazari-Alam A. Evaluation of the inhibitory effects of TiO2 nanoparticle and Ganoderma lucidum extract against biofilm-producing bacteria isolated from clinical samples. Arch. Microbiol. 2023;205:59. doi: 10.1007/s00203-023-03403-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Anupong W., On-uma R., Jutamas K., Salmen S.H., Alharbi S.A., Joshi D., Jhanani G.K. Antibacterial, antifungal, antidiabetic, and antioxidant activities potential of Coleus aromaticus synthesized titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Environ. Res. 2023;216:114714. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Rieshy V., Chokkattu J.J., Rajeshkumar S., Neeharika S. Mechanism of Action of Clove and Ginger Herbal Formulation-Mediated TiO2 Nanoparticles Against Lactobacillus Species: An In Vitro Study. J. Adv. Oral Res. 2023;14:61–66. doi: 10.1177/23202068221142440. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Korde S.A., Thombre P.B., Dipake S.S., Sangshetti J.N., Rajbhoj A.S., Gaikwad S.T. Neem gum (Azadirachta indicia) facilitated green synthesis of TiO2 and ZrO2 nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2023;153:110777. doi: 10.1016/j.inoche.2023.110777. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Adeyemi O.S., Ishii K., Kato K. L-tryptophan-titanium oxide nanoparticles showed selective anti-Toxoplasma gondii activity and improved host biocompatibility. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023;162:114597. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2023.114597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Alabdallah N.M., Irshad M.A., Rizwan M., Nawaz R., Inam A., Mohsin M., Khurshid I., Alharby H.F., Bamagoos A.A., Ali S. Synthesis, characterization and antifungal potential of titanium dioxide nanoparticles against fungal disease (Ustilago tritici) of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Environ. Res. 2023;228:115852. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Metwally R.A., Soliman S.A., Abdalla H., Abdelhameed R.E. Trichoderma cf. asperellum and plant-based titanium dioxide nanoparticles initiate morphological and biochemical modifications in Hordeum vulgare L. against Bipolaris sorokiniana. BMC Plant Biol. 2024;24:118. doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-04785-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Wu Y., Cao X., Du H., Guo X., Han Y., McClements D.J., Decker E., Xing B., Xiao H. Adverse effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on beneficial gut bacteria and host health based on untargeted metabolomics analysis. Environ. Res. 2023;228:115921. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.115921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Pillai A.M., Harisankar A., Salini P.S., John B., SarojiniAmma S., Devassy M.T. Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using Beta vulgaris extract and the evaluation of their photocatalytic and antibacterial activity. Ionics. 2024;30:4257–4270. doi: 10.1007/s11581-024-05577-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Hkeem Ibrahem K., Ali F.A., Abdulla Sorchee S.M. Biosynthesis and characterization with antimicrobial activity of TiO2 nanoparticles using probiotic Bifidobacterium bifidum. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2020;66:111–117. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2020.66.7.17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Hunagund S.M., Desai V.R., Kadadevarmath J.S., Barretto D.A., Vootla S., Sidarai A.H. Biogenic and chemogenic synthesis of TiO2 NPs via hydrothermal route and their antibacterial activities. RSC Adv. 2016;6:97438–97444. doi: 10.1039/C6RA22163G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Matboo S.A., Nazari S., Niapour A., Niri M.V., Asgari E., Mokhtari S.A. Antibacterial effect of TiO2 modified with poly-amidoamine dendrimer—G3 on S. aureus and E. coli in aqueous solutions. Water Sci. Technol. 2022;85:605–616. doi: 10.2166/wst.2022.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Tekin D., Birhan D., Kiziltas H. Thermal, photocatalytic, and antibacterial properties of calcinated nano-TiO2/polymer composites. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020;251:123067. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Karthik K., Vijayalakshmi S., Phuruangrat A., Revathi V., Verma U. Multifunctional Applications of Microwave-Assisted Biogenic TiO2 Nanoparticles. J. Clust. Sci. 2019;30:965–972. doi: 10.1007/s10876-019-01556-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Bahadur J., Agrawal S., Panwar V., Parveen A., Pal K. Antibacterial properties of silver doped TiO2 nanoparticles synthesized via sol-gel technique. Macromol. Res. 2016;24:488–493. doi: 10.1007/s13233-016-4066-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Rao T.N., Riyazuddin, Babji P., Ahmad N., Khan R.A., Hassan I., Shahzad S.A., Husain F.M. Green synthesis and structural classification of Acacia nilotica mediated-silver doped titanium oxide (Ag/TiO2) spherical nanoparticles: Assessment of its antimicrobial and anticancer activity. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019;26:1385–1391. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.09.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Narayanan M., Vigneshwari P., Natarajan D., Kandasamy S., Alsehli M., Elfasakhany A., Pugazhendhi A. Synthesis and characterization of TiO2 NPs by aqueous leaf extract of Coleus aromaticus and assess their antibacterial, larvicidal, and anticancer potential. Environ. Res. 2021;200:111335. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Narayanan M., Srinivasan S., Gnanasekaran C., Ramachandran G., Chelliah C.K., Rajivgandhi G., Maruthupandy M., Quero F., Li W.-J., Hayder G., et al. Synthesis and characterization of marine seagrass (Cymodocea serrulata) mediated titanium dioxide nanoparticles for antibacterial, antibiofilm and antioxidant properties. Microb. Pathog. 2024;189:106595. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2024.106595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Mathesh A., Mohanprasanth A., Saravanan M. Synthesis and characterization of Spirulina-mediated titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Antimicrobial activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria. Nano-Struct. Nano-Objects. 2024;39:101225. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoso.2024.101225. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Ahmad W., Jaiswal K.K., Soni S. Green synthesis of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles by using Mentha arvensis leaves extract and its antimicrobial properties. Inorg. Nano-Met. Chem. 2020;50:1032–1038. doi: 10.1080/24701556.2020.1732419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Santhoshkumar T., Rahuman A.A., Jayaseelan C., Rajakumar G., Marimuthu S., Kirthi A.V., Velayutham K., Thomas J., Venkatesan J., Kim S.-K. Green synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles using Psidium guajava extract and its antibacterial and antioxidant properties. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2014;7:968–976. doi: 10.1016/S1995-7645(14)60171-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Ansari A., Siddiqui V.U., Rehman W.U., Akram M.K., Siddiqi W.A., Alosaimi A.M., Hussein M.A., Rafatullah M. Green synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles using Acorus calamus leaf extract and evaluating its photocatalytic and in vitro antimicrobial activity. Catalysts. 2022;12:181. doi: 10.3390/catal12020181. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Torres-Limiñana J., Feregrino-Pérez A.A., Vega-González M., Escobar-Alarcón L., Cervantes-Chávez J.A., Esquivel K. Green Synthesis via Eucalyptus globulus L. Extract of Ag-TiO2 Catalyst: Antimicrobial Activity Evaluation toward Water Disinfection Process. Nanomaterials. 2022;12:1944. doi: 10.3390/nano12111944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Al-Shabib N.A., Husain F.M., Qais F.A., Ahmad N., Khan A., Alyousef A.A., Arshad M., Noor S., Khan J.M., Alam P., et al. Phyto-Mediated Synthesis of Porous Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles From Withania somnifera Root Extract: Broad-Spectrum Attenuation of Biofilm and Cytotoxic Properties Against HepG2 Cell Lines. Front. Microbiol. 2020;11:1680. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01680. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Rajkumari J., Magdalane C.M., Siddhardha B., Madhavan J., Ramalingam G., Al-Dhabi N.A., Arasu M.V., Ghilan A.K.M., Duraipandiayan V., Kaviyarasu K. Synthesis of titanium oxide nanoparticles using Aloe barbadensis mill and evaluation of its antibiofilm potential against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2019;201:111667. doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2019.111667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Rathi V.H., Jeice A.R. Green fabrication of titanium dioxide nanoparticles and their applications in photocatalytic dye degradation and microbial activities. Chem. Phys. Impact. 2023;6:100197. doi: 10.1016/j.chphi.2023.100197. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Malarkodi C., Chitra K., Rajeshkumar S., Gnanajobitha G., Paulkumar K., Vanaja M., Annadurai G. Novel eco-friendly synthesis of titanium oxide nanoparticles by using Planomicrobium sp. and its antimicrobial evaluation. Der Pharm. Sin. 2013;4:59–66. [Google Scholar]
- 225.Arora B., Murar M., Dhumale V. Antimicrobial potential of TiO2 nanoparticles against MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2014;10:819–827. doi: 10.1080/17458080.2014.902544. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Ouerghi O., Geesi M.H., Riadi Y., Ibnouf E.O. Limon-citrus extract as a capping/reducing agent for the synthesis of titanium dioxide nanoparticles: Characterization and antibacterial activity. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2022;15:483–490. doi: 10.1080/17518253.2022.2094205. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Akhtar S., Iftikhar A., Tauseef S., Ahmed F., Shuja A., Sherwani S. Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles. Fuuast J. Biol. 2016;6:141–147. [Google Scholar]
- 228.Pan X., Nie D., Guo X., Xu S., Zhang D., Cao F., Guan X. Effective control of the tomato wilt pathogen using TiO2 nanoparticles as a green nanopesticide. Environ.Sci. Nano. 2023;10:1441–1452. doi: 10.1039/D3EN00059A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors without undue reservation.