Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2024 Oct 21;14:24743. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-74271-1

Phylogeny and systematics of the colubrid snake genera Liopeltis and Gongylosoma (Squamata: Colubridae) and description of a new Himalayan endemic genus and species

Zeeshan A Mirza 1,, Virender K Bhardwaj 2, Saunak Pal 3, H T Lalremsanga 2, Gernot Vogel 4, Patrick D Campbell 5, Harshil Patel 6
PMCID: PMC11494134  PMID: 39433812

Abstract

The colubrid snakes of the genera Gongylosoma Fitzinger, 1843 and Liopeltis Fitzinger, 1843 are distributed across south and southeast Asia with five and eight nominate species, respectively. Despite their wide distribution, members of these genera are among some of the least-known colubrids. The two genera were considered synonymous in the past only to be separated later, and are defined on rather nebulose characters with a lack of support from molecular data. To test the monophyly of the two genera, we generated molecular data for the type species of Gongylosoma and species representing the two genera, including samples of Liopeltis rappii (Günther, 1860) from the western Himalayas. Results recovered paraphyly of Liopeltis, especially with regard to the genus Gongylosoma. Morphological data supports recognizing the western and eastern populations of L. rappii as two distinct species. The findings from our integrative taxonomic approach advocate establishing a new genus to embody Liopeltis rappii and a new allied species from the central and western Himalayas. A rediagnosis and revised classification of the genera Gongylosoma and Liopeltis is presented. The results further hint at cryptic diversity across members of the two genera, warranting scrutiny of the most widespread members of the group.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-024-74271-1.

Keywords: Cryptic species, MicroCT, Phylogeny, Reptilia, Serpentes, Taxonomy

Subject terms: Herpetology, Phylogenetics, Taxonomy

Introduction

Members of the family Colubridae are diverse serpents distributed across all continents except for Antarctica1. Due to the wide distribution of the family, it has been a subject of interest with regard to the phylogenetic relationship within genera across the family24. However, the lack of molecular data for type species of some genera and missing taxa are a major impediment in inferring robust phylogenies and consequential taxonomic amendments. Furthermore, evolutionary analyses of the dynamics of speciation, extinction and phenotypic evolution are also hindered. One such group are snakes of the genera Gongylosoma Fitzinger, 1843 and Liopeltis Fitzinger, 1843. These snakes are generally small-sized in relation to other members of the family and are ground-dwelling diurnal snakes5,6. Certain species of the two genera are widespread, while others are known from either the type specimens or a few isolated localities710.

The genera Liopeltis and Gongylosoma were described to accommodate L. tricolor (Schlegel, 1837) and G. baliodeira (Boie, 1827). Currently, eight species represent the genus Liopeltis, and Gongylosoma by five species, distributed across South and Southeast Asia7,8,11. In the past, most current members of the two genera had been earlier assigned to the genus Ablabes Dumeril, 185312,13. The members have had a complex taxonomic history, with several nomenclatural changes and species assigned to various genera in the late 19th century to mid-20th century6,9,14. Leviton9, split the then-existing members of the genus Liopeltis based on diagnostic characters and revalidated the genus Gongylosoma3,9,11,15. Nearly all members of the genus Liopeltis and Gongylosoma are poorly known, as they are small and difficult to encounter on surveys, evidenced by the paucity of specimens of some of the species in natural history museums3,6,8,16. A recent study by Lalremsanga et al.17 showed that Gongylosoma scriptum (Theobald, 1868) is embedded within the genus Liopeltis. However, Lalremsanga et al.17 refrained from making taxonomic changes as molecular data for the type species of the genus Gongylosoma, i.e. G. baliodeira and several other members were unavailable8.

Among the eight putative species of the genus Liopeltis, Liopeltis rappii18, which was originally described from Sikkim, India, in the genus Ablabes, thus far remains the least known member of the genus. Günther18 described Ablabes rappii along with Ablabes owenii, which was subsequently treated as a junior synonym of the former6,12. Since then, the species has been reported from several localities across the Himalayas6,13,19, but no new information regarding the systematics of the snake has been published. As part of an ongoing study on Indian colubrid snakes, we reviewed the current knowledge of the species based on existing literature and the re-examination of museum material, including the types, while also paying attention to the osteology of the skull. Furthermore, freshly collected specimens from the Western Himalayas allowed us to elucidate the phylogenetic relationship of the species and those assigned to the genera Liopeltis and Gongylosoma. The results of the assessment are at odds with the current taxonomy of the two genera and species. The present work proposes a new genus to accommodate Liopeltis rappii, an undescribed species, and provides a new classification of the genera Liopeltis and Gongylosoma.

Materials and methods

Morphology

Field collection was performed with permission from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, Government of Himachal Pradesh, and the study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Mizoram University. The methods were performed in accordance with the local legislation and institutional guidelines. The study is based on 30 specimens representing L. rappii, fifteen of these specimens originate (including the holotypes of L. rappii and L. owenii) from the eastern Himalayas, and the other fifteen specimens from the western Himalayas. Two of the specimens from the western Himalayas (Himachal Pradesh) were caught, photographed, and later euthanized using Halothane as per standard euthanasia protocol for reptiles20. A third specimen was killed by locals and subsequently cleaned and preserved. Descriptions and mensural characters were compared with the available literature68. The dorsal scale rows were counted at the first ventral, midbody, and last ventral. Subcaudal scale counts do not include the terminal scute. Values for symmetric head characters are given in right-to-left order. Description style follows Patel et al.21 and Mirza et al.22 with some modifications. Scalation and other comparable characters are described as ventral scales (VS); subcaudal scales (SC); dorsal rows of scales (DSR); supralabial scales (SL); loreal scales (LS); preocular scales (PreO); postocular scales (PostO); temporal scales (T); infralabial scales (IL); snout-vent length (SVL); tail length (TaL); total length (TL); head length (HL); head width (HW). Measurements were taken with the help of a digital caliper to the nearest 0.1 mm, and those for snout to vent length (SVL), and tail length (TaL) were taken with the aid of a piece of string, which was then measured using a scale. Number of scales bordering the posterior border of both parietals were counted (STP, scales touching parietals); these exclude the temporal scales. Multivariate Principal Component Analysis was performed on morphometric and meristic data for members of the genera Liopeltis and Gongylosoma (Supplementary Table S1). Morphometric values were corrected for SVL prior to the analysis and were log-transformed to normalize the data. Meristic data were used in their original state without log-transformation.

The hemipenis of the freshly euthanized male paratype was everted by palpation of the organ until it was everted to the maximum extent, after which the organ was separated by making an incision around its circumference at the cloacal region and was immersed in warm water (50 °C) for about 5 min to soften the tissue. Then, it was slowly everted using a blunt pair of forceps, gently pushing the organ from the distal to proximal end. After eversion, the organ was inflated with 4% formaldehyde and tied at the base with a thread. Observations were made using a stereomicroscope (Omano OM2360-BL). Descriptions of hemipenal morphology and terminology follow Smith6, Dowling and Savage23, and Zaher24.

Acronyms of institutions where comparative material was examined: BNHS- Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai, India; CAS- California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, USA; FMNH- Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA; MCZ- Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, USA; MNHN- Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Paris, France; MZMU- Museum of Zoology, Mizoram University, Aizawl, India; NCBS- Collection Facility of the National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore, India; NHMUK- Natural History Museum, London, U.K.; NHMW- Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Vienna, Austria; NMB- Naturhistorisches Museum, Basel; RMNH- Naturalis-Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Leiden; SMF- Senckenberg Naturmuseum, Frankfurt, Germany; ZMMU- Zoological Museum of Moscow University, Moscow, Russia; ZMH- Zoologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Hamburg, Germany; ZFMK- Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany; ZMB- Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany; ZSI/HARC- Zoological Survey of India, High Altitude Regional Centre, Solan India; ZSIK- Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India. LSID for this publication: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:DE27D881-860B-4362-A669-479F67EDDC19.

Micro-CT scan of the skulls were generated for Liopeltis rappii (BNHS 743), a male specimen from the Himachal Pradesh population (NCBS NRC-AA-0013), L. calamaria (BNHS 666), and Gongylosoma scriptum (MZMU 2041) (Supplementary Figure S1, S2 using a Bruker® Skyscan 1272 (Bruker BioSpin Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA). The head of each of the specimens was scanned for 210 min at a resolution of 5.4 μm and recording data for every 0.4° rotation for 360° with (AL) 1 mm filter. The source voltage for the scan was 65 kV, and source current was 153 µA. Volume rendering was performed with CTVox (Bruker BioSpin Corporation, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA), and images were edited in Adobe Photoshop CS6. Osteological description is based on volume renders retrieved from CTVox following terminology of the skull described by Heatwole25.

Molecular analysis

In order to resolve the phylogenetic position of the focal species, Liopeltis rappii, we also generated molecular data for the type species of the genus Gongylosoma, i.e., G. baliodeira FMNH 269021, in addition to G. scriptum, G. longicauda (Peters, 1871) NHMW 26961:1 and Liopeltis calamaria (Günther, 1858). Genomic DNA was isolated from the preserved tissues of the specimens using QIAGEN DNeasy kits, following protocols directed by the manufacturer. Molecular methods largely follow Mirza et al.22 and Mirza and Patel26. A fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome b (cyt b), 16 S rRNA and nuclear Oocyte Maturation Factor mos (c-mos), neurotrophin-3 (nt3), and recombination-activating protein 1 (rag-1) genes were amplified using primers used by Pyron et al.27 and Mirza et al.21. A 22.4 µl reaction was set for a bi-directional Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR), containing 10 µl of Thermo Scientific DreamTaq PCR Master Mix, 10 µl of molecular grade water, 0.2 µl of each 10 µM primer and 2 µl template DNA, carried out with an Applied Biosystems ProFlex PCR System. Thermo-cycle profile used for amplification were as follows: 95 °C for 3 min, (denaturation temperature 95 °C for 30 s, annealing temperature 48 °C for 45 s for cyt b & 16 S and 55 °C for c-mos, elongation temperature 72 °C for 1 min) × 36 cycles, 72 °C for 10 min, hold at 4 °C. PCR product was cleaned using QIAquick PCR Purification Kit and sequenced with an Applied Biosystems 3730 DNA Analyzer. Besides this, sequences analyzed by Zaher et al.3 of Colubridae available on GenBank® were downloaded for inferring molecular phylogeny, and the sequences were concatenated using SequenceMatrix28. The first dataset comprised three nuclear genes, c-mos, nt3, and rag1, which was subjected to Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogeny to elucidate the placement of Liopeltis rappii. Based on the results of the molecular phylogeny based on three nuclear genes (Supporting Figure S6), we assembled a second dataset of concatenated mitochondrial (16 S, cyt b, nd4) and nuclear (c-mos and nt3) genes, and more sequences were added to the dataset, especially mitochondrial sequences to populate the tree with more species. The sequences of rag-1 were removed from the analysis as data for only a few species was available. Taxa for molecular phylogenetics were selected based on the tree topologies recovered by Zaher et al.3. Sequences were aligned in MegaX29 using ClustalW30 with default settings, and the sequence substitution model was selected with ModelFinder31. The aligned dataset was subject to phylogenetic analysis on the IQ-TREE (http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at/) online portal32. The analysis was implemented with a partition model for the concatenated dataset. The analysis was run with an ultrafast bootstrap option for 1000 iterations to assess clade support. Uncorrected pairwise p-distance (% sequence divergence) was calculated in MegaX with pairwise deletions of missing data and gaps. Sequences used in the phylogenetic analysis are listed in Supplementary Table S2, and sequence evolution model for individual analysis is in Supplementary Table S3.

Results

Molecular data

ML phylogeny based on 2525 bp of nuclear genes (c-mos, nt3, and rag-1) recovered Liopeltis rappii, the genera Liopeltis, and Gongylosoma as members of the colubrid subfamily Colubrinae (Supplementary Figure S6). Based on the results from the nuclear dataset, a dataset comprised of 3647 bp of concatenated mitochondrial (16 S, cyt b, nd4) and nuclear (c-mos and nt3) genes recovered similar results wherein the population of ‘Liopeltis rappii’ from Himachal Pradesh as a member of the subfamily Colubrinae. It was found to be a member of the clade containing the genera Boiga Fitzinger, 1826, Dasypeltis Wagler, 1830, Dipsadoboa Günther, 1858, Gongylosoma, Gonyosoma Fitzinger, 1843, Liopeltis, Lycodon Boie in Fitzinger, 1826, Oligodon Boie in Fitzinger, 1826, Ptyas Fitzinger, 1843, Rhadinophis Vogt, 1922, Stegonotus Duméril et al., 1854, Telescopus Wagler, 1830 and Toxicodryas Hallowell, 1857 (Fig. 1). The species was not embedded within the genera Liopeltis nor Gongylosoma, furthermore, certain species of Liopeltis, namely, L. frenata and L. pallidonuchalis were embedded within the Gongylosoma clade, rendering Liopeltis paraphyletic (Fig. 1). Within Colubrinae, ‘L. rappii’ from Himachal Pradesh was sister to a clade containing Boiga, Dasypeltis, Dipsadoboa, Gonyosoma, Lycodon, Rhadinophis, Stegonotus, Telescopus and Toxicodryas with moderate support (ML bootstrap 83). Phylogenetic relationships within the genera Liopeltis sensus stricto and Gongylosoma sensus stricto are well resolved with moderate to high support (ML bootstrap > 84). The species L. calamaria, L. frenata, and L. pallidonuchalis were recovered sister to the clade containing G. baliodeira and other species of the genus Gongylosoma and not Liopeltis. This finding necessitates the transfer of these three species (L. calamaria, L. frenata, and L. pallidonuchalis) to the genus Gongylosoma.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Maximum Likelihood phylogeny inferred for selected members of Colubrinae based 3647 bp of concatenated mitochondrial (16 S, cyt b, nd4) and nuclear (c-mos and nt3) gene showing phylogenetic relationship of Anguiculus gen. nov., Gongylosoma and Liopeltis. For the complete tree, see supplementary Fig. S7.

Morphology data

Small-sized snakes with smooth 15 DSR throughout, lacking apical pits, broad collar, sub-equal maxillary teeth (no teeth enlargement), loreal present and nostril laterally oriented between two nasals, eye with a rounded pupil, head sparsely distinct from neck and hemipenis extending to the 7th subcaudal, less than half of the organ calyculate; cusps are smaller at its distal portion gradually increasing towards the spinose base; numerous subequal spines except for two large ones at the base; the organ lacks fold which distinguishes Liopeltis rappii sensu lato from most Asian members of the subfamily Colubrinae, except for the genera Liopeltis and Gongylosoma. Anguiculus gen. nov. separates well from the genera Liopeltis and Gongylosoma in a PCA where PC1 + PC2 explain 58 + 41% of the variance observed with maximum loadings for ventral and subcaudal scales (Fig. 2a, Table S1). The new genus Anguiculus gen. nov. has a non-overlapping range of ventral scales with members of the genera Liopeltis and Gongylosoma (Fig. 2b). See comparison section for a detailed comparison with Liopeltis and Gongylosoma. Scalation data, skull osteology, and distribution support two diagnosable populations of Anguiculus gen. nov. The population from eastern Himalayas is here treated as Anguiculus rappii sensu stricto as the type locality is Sikkim, and the population from central and western Himalayas is described as a new species (see Systematics for details).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Principal Component Analysis plot (a) showing segregation of the three genera Anguiculus gen. nov. (red), Gongylosoma (green), and Liopeltis (blue) in PC1 + PC2; (b) boxplot for the three genera showing the range of ventral scales in members of the three genera.

Nomenclature

In order to stabilize the taxonomy, we redefine the genera Liopeltis and Gongylosoma based on the results from the molecular phylogeny and consider both genera as valid. To do so, two species L. frenata and L. pallidonuchalis are here transferred to the genus Gongylosoma as they are embedded within the Gongylosoma clade including the type species of the genus, G. baliodeira. A new genus is proposed to accommodate L. rappii and a new related species.

Systematics

Anguiculus  gen. nov.

urn: lsid: zoobank.org: act:429639F9-1D88-4C76-9ECA-37EF90CE2A83.

Figures 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11; Tables 1, 2 and 3.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Plate contacting the original sketches of Ablabes owenii (= Liopeltis rappii) and Ablabes rappii (= Liopeltis rappii) from Günther (1860).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Holotype NHMUK 1946.1.5.61 of Anguiculus rappii comb. nov., (a) dorsal view, (b) ventral view, (c) head dorsal view, (d) head lateral view, (e) head ventral view.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Holotype NHMUK 1946.1.5.56 of Ablabes owenii (= Anguiculus rappii comb. nov.), (a) dorsal view, (b) head dorsal view, (c) head ventral view, (d) head lateral view.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Anguiculus rappii comb. nov. showing head scalation, ‘a, c, e’ dorsal view and ‘b, d, f’ lateral view; (a,b) BNHS 744, (c,d) BNHS 747, (e,f) BNHS 750.

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

Anguiculus dicaprioi gen. et. sp. nov. holotype female NCBS NRC-AA-0013, (a) dorsal view, (b) ventral view. Scale bar 10 mm.

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8

Anguiculus dicaprioi gen. et. sp. nov. holotype female NCBS NRC-AA-0013 showing head, (a) dorsal view, (b) ventral view, (c) left lateral view, (d) right lateral view.

Fig. 9.

Fig. 9

Schematic representation of head dorsal (a,c) and lateral (b,d) scalation of Anguiculus gen. nov., (a,b) Anguiculus rappii comb. nov. and (c,d) Anguiculus dicaprioi sp. nov. Scale bar 2 mm.

Fig. 10.

Fig. 10

MicroCT images of the skull of Anguiculus gen. nov., (ac) Anguiculus dicaprioi sp. nov. NCBS NRC-AA-0013 & (df) Anguiculus rappii comb. nov. BNHS 743; (a, d) dorsal view, (b, e) lateral view, (c, f) ventral view.

Fig. 11.

Fig. 11

Anguiculus dicaprioi gen. et. sp. nov. in life, (a) holotype female NCBS NRC-AA-0013, Photo by Virender Bharadwaj; (b) uncollected individual from Nainital, Uttarakhand. Photo by Vipul Ramanuj.

Table 1.

Morphometric and meristic data for Anguiculus rappii gen. et comb. nov.

Specimen no. NHMUK 1946.1.5.61 NHMUK 1946.1.5.56 BNHS 743 BNHS 744 BNHS 745 BNHS 746 BNHS 747 BNHS 748 BNHS 751 ZMB 10325
Type status Holotype (Ablabes rappii) Holotype (Ablabes owenii)
Locality Sikkim Sikkim Tindharia, Darjeeling Tindharia, Darjeeling Tindharia, Darjeeling Tindharia, Darjeeling Tindharia, Darjeeling Tindharia, Darjeeling Mishmi Hills Darjeeling
TL 410 184.5 383 395 384* 290* 339 347 431 390
SVL 323 150 303 310 336 279 263 261 327 296
TaL 87 34.5 80 85 48* 11* 76 86 104 94
DSR 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15
VS 185 184 187 187 183 180 182 179 187 189
A Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided
SC 61 59 65 62 29* 6* 69 70 75 68
SL 6/5 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6 5/5 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6
LS 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1
IL 7/7 6/6 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/6 7/7
PreO 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1
PostO 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2
STP 5 5 - 3 - - 4 - 4 5
T 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1
Sex Male Juvenile Male Male Male Female Male Male Male Male

All measurements in ‘mm’, values indicated by ‘*’ are incomplete as the specimen in damaged.

Table 2.

Morphometric and meristic data for Anguiculus dicaprioi gen. et. sp. nov.

Specimen no. NCBS NRC AA-0013 BNHS 3670 NCBS NRC AA-0014 NHMW 26963:1 NHMW 26963:2 NHMW 26962:1 NHMW 26962:2 NHMW 26962:3 ZSI 8370 ZSI 15759 ZSI HARC ZSI HARC/R317
Type status Holotype Paratype Paratype Paratype
Locality Chamba, Himachal Pradesh Chamba, Himachal Pradesh Chamba, Himachal Pradesh Simla Kulu at Kategarh Rangoon Valley Rangoon Valley Rangoon Valley Shimla Bhimtal Chamba Chamba
TL 405 370 518 572 449 420 487 378 540 394 - 557
SVL 330 294 403 455 353 313 381 289 430 314 - 443
TaL 75 76 115 117 96 107 106 89 110 80 - 114
D 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15 15:15:15
VS 190 177 185 190 185 187 190 189 185 185 176 192
A Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided Divided
SC 57 57 60 64 61 64 66 66 62 62 65 63
SL 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/6 6/5 6/6
LS 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1
IL 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 7/7 6/7 7/7
PreO 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1 1/1
PostO 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2 2/2
STP 6 6 6 8 7 7 7 7 6 6 7 6
T 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1 1 + 1/1 + 1
Sex Female Female Male Male Female Male Female Female Female Male Male Male

All measurements in ‘mm’.

Table 3.

Morphological comparison of the two species of the genus Anguiculus gen. nov.

Anguiculus rappii gen. et. comb. nov. (n = 10) Anguiculus dicaprioi gen. et. sp. nov. (n = 10)
SVL 279–336 294–430
TaL 76–104 75–117
TaL/TL 0.18–0.24 0.19–0.25
DSR 15:15:15 15:15:15
STP 3 to 5 6 to 8
V 179–189 176–192
SC 59–75 57–66
Palatine teeth 14 12
Pterygoid teeth 22–23 18–20

Type species: Anguiculus dicaprioi gen. et. sp. nov.

Species included: Anguiculus rappii comb. nov. (Günther, 1860), Anguiculus dicaprioi sp. nov.

Diagnosis: Small-sized snakes characterized by 15 smooth DSR throughout; head not distinct form neck in adults; internasal not fused with nasal; nasal divided bearing a laterally oriented nostril between the two; eye of moderate size (not large) in relation to the head; 177–192 ventral scales; 57–75 subcaudal scales; anal divided; prefrontal not in contact with supralabial, 6 supralabials (rarely 5), extending beyond the angle of the jaw; loreal present; 1 preocular, 2 postoculars and temporals 1 + 1. The supraoccipital is chevron-shaped. The maxilla bears 22–24 subequal functional teeth. The teeth are arranged in a continuous manner, lacking a diastema, and no enlargement of teeth is observed. The basisphenoid bears median foramen. Hemipenis unilobed, distal less than half of the organ calyculate or spinose; numerous subequal spines present except for two large ones at the base; the organ lacks folds.

Etymology: The generic epithet is a Latin masculine noun that refers to a ‘small snake’. The proposed nomen highlights the small size (SVL) of members of the new genus in relation to members of the family Colubridae. Suggested common English name ‘Himalayan snake’.

Skull features (Fig. 10): The skull of Anguiculus gen. nov. is complete and robust (Fig. 10). The skull in dorsal view is nearly twice as long as wide (Fig. 10a, b). The nasals are less calcified compared to other bones, and the connections with the other sets of bones is not clear, as the signal is lost. The premaxilla appears to be connected only to the septomaxilla and not in contact with the nasals. There is a wide space separating the anterior half of the nasals and the septomaxilla. The frontals are twice as long as wide and sub-hexagonal. The parietal is large and nearly as long as wide. The anterior border of the parietal, bordering the frontals, bears a slight inwards curvature, whereas the posterior border bears and deep outwards curvature. In lateral view, the frontal bears a distinct dorso-lateral ridge to which the curvatures of the preocular and postocular align (Fig. 10b, e). The parietal, prootic, and supraoccipital supported by the quadrate, form the robust part of the skull. The supraoccipital is chevron-shaped. The maxilla bears 22–24 subequal functional teeth. The teeth are arranged in a continuous manner, lacking a diastema, and no enlargement of teeth is observed. The teeth are present from the tip of the maxilla to the maxilla-ectopterygoid joint. The palatine is linearly aligned with a slight outward curve in A. rappii comb. nov. (the palatine diverges outward) with a slight inward curve in A. dicaprioi sp. nov., bearing 12–14 subequal teeth. The palatine starts from the midline of the vomer and extends to the level of the maxilla-ectopterygoid joint. The pterygoid bears 22–24 functional teeth throughout its inner margin. The ectopterygoid is slender at the base and gradually widens towards the distal end, which forms a deep fork. The inner arm of the form is slender and terminates into a slender horn, whereas the outer arm is broad. The ectopterygoid process of the maxilla meets the ectopterygoid at its fork (Fig. 10f). The basisphenoid bears median foramen. The dentary bears 18–21 functional teeth; the ones of the posterior end are much smaller than the anterior ones.

Comparison: The new genus shows genetic and morphological characters that overlap with genera related to Asian rat snakes and trinket snakes. Therefore, the morphological comparison of the new genus is restricted to selected genera based on phylogenetic affinity and morphological similarity occurring in the Indian subcontinent. Comparison is made for differing and non-overlapping characters: median basisphenoid foramen present (vs. absent in most colubrid genera in addition to Coelognathus Fitzinger, 1843, Cyclophiops Boulenger, 1888, Elaphe Fitzinger in Wagler, 1833, Euprepiophis Fitzinger, 1843, Gongylosoma, Gonyosoma, Liopeltis, Oligodon, Oreocryptophis Utiger, Schätti, & Helfenberger, 2005, Orthriophis Utiger, Helfenberger, Schätti, Schmidt, Ruf & Ziswiler, 2002, ), maxillary teeth subequal in size, posterior teeth not enlarged (vs. posterior teeth enlarged in Boiga Fitzinger, 1826, Lycodon Boie in Fitzinger, 1826, Ptyas, Oligodon,), DSR 15 throughout the body, smooth (vs. DSR at midbody, usually 17 in Lycodon, 13–17 in Gongylosoma, 23 in Wallaceophis Mirza, Vyas, Patel, & Sanap, 2016 & Wallophis Werner, 1929, 19–27 in Elaphe & Coelognathus, 20–23 in Orthriophis & Euprepiophis), head scarcely distinct from neck in adults (vs. distinct in Boiga, Coelognathus, Elaphe, Euprepiophis, Gongylosoma, Gonyosoma, Lycodon, Oreocryptophis, Orthriophis, Ptyas), loreal present (vs. absent in Archelaphe Schulz, Böhme & Tillack, 2011).

The new genus is most similar to members of the genera Liopeltis and Gongylosoma and is here compared with these in greater detail: median basisphenoid foramen present (vs. absent in most colubrid genera in addition to Liopeltis and Gongylosoma), paired posterior basisphenoid foramen absent (vs. present in Liopeltis and Gongylosoma), head not distinct from neck (vs. head moderately distinct from neck in Liopeltis, head strongly distinct from neck in Gongylosoma), 177–192 ventrals (vs. 139–161 in Liopeltis), supralabials 6 and the 6th supralabial extending beyond the angle of the jaw (vs. 8–9 that do not extend beyond angle of the jaw in Liopeltis, supralabials 6–8 that do not extend beyond angle of the jaw in Gongylosoma), hemipenis with two large & stout spines on each side of sulcus spermaticus (vs. large spines absent in Liopeltis and Gongylosoma).

Anguiculus rappii comb. nov. (Günther, 1860)

Ablabes rappii Günther 1860: 154; Boulenger 1890: 307; Wall 1909: 351; Stoliczka 1870: 107.

Ablabes owenii Günther 1860: 155.

Liopeltis rappi Wall 1924: 865; Smith 1943: 186; Das 1996: 57.

Liopeltis rappii Wallach et al. 2014: 385.

Figures 3, 4, 5 and 6; Table 1.

Holotype. NHMUK 1946.1.5.61, from Sikkim, India (Figs. 3 and 4).

Material Examined (n = 14). NHMUK 1946.1.5.56, from Sikkim, India (holotype of Ablabes owenii Figs. 3 and 5); BNHS 743–748, all from Tindharia, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India, collected by Major Frank Wall; BNHS 749, from Darjeeling, West Bengal, India collected by Oscar Lindyceri; BNHS 750, from Turjur Tea Estate, Darjeeling, West Bengal, India collected by Oscar Lindyceri; BNHS 751, from Mishmi Hills, Assam (now in Arunachal Pradesh), India collected by H. W. Wells; CAS 17244 from an unknown locality collected by Col. R. H. Beddome; male ZMB 10,325 from Darjeeling, West Bengal, India collected by Blanchard, female SMF 19320 and female ZSIK 7175 from Darjeeling, West Bengal, India.

Diagnosis. A small-sized snake characterized by 15 smooth DSR throughout, 179–189 ventral scales; 59–75 subcaudal scales; anal divided; temporals 1 + 1, posterior temporal as long as anterior one; 3–4 rarely 5 scales bordering parietal; dorsum brownish, a broad collar with small dark brown spots and transverse bars on the anterior quarter or third of the body; venter pale yellow. The palatine bears 14 subequal functional teeth. TaL/TL 0.18–0.24.

Comparison. See the comparison section for Anguiculus dicaprioi sp. nov.

Etymology. The specific epithet “rappii” (Günther 1860), is a patronym honouring Wilhelm Ludwig von Rapp, a professor in zoology at the University of Tübingen, Germany. Suggested common name ‘Rapp’s Himalayan snake’.

Description based on examined material. Body long and moderately thin, TL 184.5–431 mm (n = 9), SVL 150–336 mm (n = 9); tail robust, tapering and moderately long, TaL 34.5–104 mm (n = 7), Tal/TL ratio 0.21–0.25 in adults (n = 6); head short, comprising 2.35–2.45% (n = 3) of total length in adults, longer than wide (HL/HW ratio: 1.5–2.1 in adults), slightly distinct from neck in adults; eyes circular with round pupil; nostrils large; snout elongate, extending beyond the lower jaw, body circular.

Head scalation. Details of head scalation of some specimens are shown in Figs. 1, 2, 3 and 4. Head scalation includes 1 rostral, 2 internasals, 2 prefrontals, 2 supraoculars, 1 frontal, and 2 parietals from dorsal view (Figs. 4, 5, 6 and 9). Rostral large, slightly smaller than the width of the frontal, thick, in contact with first supralabial, nasal and internasals posteriorly, well visible from above, curved onto upper snout surface; internasals in contact, wider than long, separated by a median suture; prefrontals in contact, sub-pentagonal, slightly wider than long; frontal large, bell shaped, longer than wide, anterior portion wider than the posterior portion; supraoculars sub-rectangular, longer than wide, anterior narrower; parietals large, longer than wide, longer than frontal, suture between parietals as long as frontal, each parietal in contact with two or three dorsal scales posteriorly; nasal vertically divided, posterior part smaller, nostrils open in anterior part of nasal; one loreal, longer than high; one vertically elongate, rectangular preocular, not reaching the upper surface of head; two vertically elongate, rectangular post oculars; one anterior temporal, sub-rectangular, more than twice longer than wide, one posterior temporal, almost as long or slightly smaller than the anterior one; two pair of chin shields, anterior pair sub-rectangular, elongate, longer than wide, posterior pair sub-rectangular, smaller than the anterior one; six supralabials in most cases (five in BNHS 746 ), 3rd and 4th touch the eye, 5rd longest and 6th highest; seven infralabials in most cases (six on the left side in BNHS 751), 1st pair in contact, 1st− 5th contact with anterior chin shields, 5th largest, touching posterior chin shields.

Body scalation. Ventrals 179–189, feebly angulate laterally; anal divided; subcaudals 59–75, paired, terminal scute forming the tip of the tail. Dorsal scale rows (DSR) smooth, in 15:15:15 rows, lacking apical pits, vertebral scales similar to other dorsal scales in shape and size.

Hemipenial morphology (based on Smith6): Hemipenis less than half of the organ calyculate; cusps are smaller at its distal portion gradually increasing towards the spinose base; numerous subequal spines except for two large ones at the base; the organ lacks folds.

Skull of BNHS 743 (Fig. 5). The skull of Anguiculus rappii comb. nov. is similar to that of Anguiculus dicaprioi gen. et. sp. nov. The maxilla bears 24 subequal teeth throughout the bone lacking a diastema. The palatine is linearly aligned with a slight outward curve (the palatine diverges outward) bearing 14 subequal teeth. The palatine starts from the midline of the vomer and extends to the level of the maxilla-ectopterygoid joint. The pterygoid bears 22–23 functional teeth throughout its inner margin. The palatine-pterygoid arc on either side is nearly parallel to each other.

Coloration in preservative. Dorsal background in a shade of light brown with a broad (4–5) dorsal scales wide dark brown to black band on the nape (Figs. 4 and 5). The posterior border of the band bears a yellowish fringe, which diffuses into the dorsal brown colour. The anterior 1/3rd of the snake bears yellow-edged dark transverse bands which are not connected in the vertebral region and these bands diminish as they progress towards the posterior part of the snake, being entirely absent in the posterior half. The outer lateral edge of the ventral scales to the first four dorsal scale rows in a shade of dark brown prominent from the midbody to the vent, which appears as a broad lateral stripe. The ventral aspect lacks markings and is an off-white to yellowish colour. The bands on juveniles are more prominent than those in the adults (Figs. 3 and 4).

Natural history and distribution (Fig. 12). Our observations coupled with published literature show that all the specimens originated from the Eastern Himalayas ranging from north Bengal to Arunachal Pradesh. The majority of the specimens came from two localities namely, Sikkim (India) and Tindharia (now in Darjeeling, West Bengal, India) except for one (BNHS 751), that originated from Mishmi Hills (Arunachal Pradesh, India). Records from Nepal require further verification as these records lack voucher specimens or images to confirm their identities (see Discussion).

Fig. 12.

Fig. 12

Map of the Himalayas and the Tibetan Plateau showing distribution of Anguiculus gen. nov., Anguiculus dicaprioi sp. nov. marked in black, (1) Chamba, (2) Kullu, (3) Shimla, (4) Nainital, (5) Chitwan; Anguiculus rappii comb. nov. marked in red colour, (1) Sikkim, (2) Darjeeling, (3) Mishmi Hills. Star denotes type locality. Records denoted by a white circle with black dot require verification. Inset image Anguiculus dicaprioi sp. nov. Photo by Vipul Ramanuj.

Comments: The holotype of Ablabes owenii NHMUK 1946.1.5.56 (Figs. 3 and 5) was also described from Sikkim, India. The individual is a juvenile that bears a broad band on its nape and a few scattered spots on its anterior dorsum, that fades slightly in adult animals. The specimen matches all scalation characters that A. rappii comb. nov. exhibits and the difference in colouration can be attributed to ontogenetic variation. Thereby we retain it in the synonymy of A. rappii comb. nov.

Anguiculus dicaprioi  gen. et. sp. nov.

Ablabes rappii Stoliczka 1870: 107 (in part).

Liopeltis rappi Bhattarai et al. 2017: 89, Kuttalam et al. (2022): 85–88.

urn: lsid: zoobank.org: act:63A9F567-13F0-4C44-A840-CE9BB8E9DE6D.

Figures 7, 8, 9, 10 and 1111; Table 1.

Holotype: adult female, NCBS NRC-AA-0013 from near Thanei Kothi village, Churah Valley, Chamba District, Himachal Pradesh, India (32.835467, 76.119381, elevation 1864 m) collected by Virendar K. Bhardwaj on 15th June 2020.

Paratypes (n = 3): adult female BNHS 3670 and adult male NCBS NRC-AA-0014 from the same locality, collected on 22nd June 2020 and 29th June 2020, respectively by Virendar K. Bhardwaj; male NHMW 26963:1 from Shimla (Himachal Pradesh).

Additional referred material (n = 11): male MCZ R-4489 collected from Ambala, Haryana, India; female MCZ R-3137 & male MCZ R-3147 collected from Kooloo (Kullu) Valley, Himachal Pradesh, India; female ZSIK 8370 collected from Shimla, Himachal Pradesh; male ZSIK 15,759 collected from Bhimtal, Uttarakhand, India; female NHMW 26963:2 from Kullu, Himachal Pradesh; male NHMW 26962:1, two females NHMW 26962:2 & NHMW 26962:3 collected from Rangoon Valley by F. Stoliczka; male ZSI/HARC/R317 & juvenile ZSI/HARC/ without a number from Chamba, Himachal Pradesh cited by Kuttalam et al.33.

Diagnosis: A small-sized snake characterized by 15 smooth DSR in 15:15:15, 177–192 ventral scales; 57–66 subcaudal scales; anal divided; temporals 1 + 1, posterior temporal less than half the length of the anterior temporal; 6–8 scales bordering parietal; dorsum brownish, a diffused collar with small dark brown spots at the nape; venter white. The palatine bears 12 subequal functional teeth. TaL/TL 0.19–0.25.

Etymology. The specific epithet “dicaprioi” is a patronym honouring Leonardo DiCaprio, an American actor, film producer, and environmentalist who has been actively involved in creating awareness about global climate change, increased biodiversity loss, and human health issues through pollution. In addition to this, he has made funds available for field conservation activities and research. Suggested common name ‘DiCaprio’s Himalayan snake’.

Comparison: The new species, Anguiculus dicaprioi gen. et. sp. nov. differs from Anguiculus rappii comb. nov. as follows: posterior temporal less than half the length of the anterior temporal (posterior temporal as long as anterior one in A. rappii comb. nov.), 6–8 scales bordering parietal (3–5 in A. rappii comb. nov.), 57–66 subcaudal scales (59–75 in A. rappii comb. nov.), dorsum brownish, a diffused collar with small dark brown spots at the nape (dorsum brownish, a broad collar with small dark brown spots and transverse bars on the anterior quarter or third of the body in A. rappii comb. nov.), palatine with 12 functional teeth (vs. 14 in A. rappii comb. nov.). See Table 3 for a summary of morphological characters.

Description of female holotype NCBS NRC AA-0013:

The specimen is in good condition preserved in a coil with its head resting outside the coil. The specimen bears a small mid-ventral longitudinal incision (7–8 ventrals long) (Fig. 7a, b).

Head short, 6.4 mm comprising 1.6% of total length; high, 4 mm, with steeply domed snout in lateral view; upper jaw visible from ventral side. Head nearly as broad (5 mm) as the neck. Snout tapering to blunt, rounded tip in dorsal view (Fig. 8a). Rostral triangular, barely reaching top of the snout; wider (1.9 mm) than high (0.9 mm). Nostrils large, elliptical, between two sub equal nasal scales; nasal higher than long, posterior nasal deeply inserted between first and second supralabial. Paired internasals, wider (1.5 mm) than long (0.9 mm); smaller than prefrontals. Prefrontals, longer than wide (2 mm). Frontal bell shaped, 2.2 mm at the widest anterior border and much longer (3 mm). Parietals 3.9 mm long, 2.6 mm at its widest anterior. Temporals 1 + 1 on both sides, anterior one 2.5 mm long and 0.6 mm high, posterior one much smaller, 1.3 mm wide. Six scales, some of them slightly larger than adjacent dorsal scales, bordering parietals. Supraocular larger than preocular; preocular large, deeper than wide. Loreal twice as high (0.8 mm) as long (0.4 mm). Two postoculars, upper one larger. Eye circular, 1.5 mm diameter with a rounded pupil. Six supralabials, third and fourth in contact with orbit (Fig. 8c, d). First supralabial smallest and, apart from second supralabial, contacts only rostral and nasal. Second supralabial in contact with nasal, loreal, first + third supralabials and not in contact with the preocular. Third supralabial wider than the anterior ones, fourth subequal to third, fifth largest (long 2.4, high 1.2 mm). Sixth supralabial as long as high (1.2 mm) and extends beyond angle of jaw (Fig. 9c, d).

Mental short, broad, triangluar. Infralabials 7, anterior five infralabials short and thin, fifth onwards larger (Fig. 8b). First five infralabials in contact with the genials. Anterior genials more than twice as long (2.2 mm) as wide (0.8 mm); posterior genials 3 mm long and 1 mm wide and in contact (Fig. 8b).

Body rounded, not compressed laterally, ventral surface a little flattened. Dorsal scales in 15-15-15 rows. Ventral scales 190 (+ 3 preventrals) in number. Anal shield divided, slightly larger than last ventral scale. Subcaudals paired, 57 in number. Nine dorsal scale rows at base of tail reducing to two near the tip. Tail terminates in a sharp, tapering apical spine. Total length 405 mm, tail length 75 mm, tail/total length ratio 0.19.

Hemipenial morphology: the organ is fully everted and expanded (Fig. S3). Hemipenis short, unilobed, stout and unicalyculate; lobe extends for about half of the hemipenis; capitulum restricted to sulcate and dorsal surface. The organ is spinous almost throughout its length, with proximal end with few calyces dorsally; the spines are almost equal in size on the proximal half (truncus) of the hemipenis, gradually decreasing in size in the proximal end; sulcus spermaticus simple; the spine line on the either side of the sulcus spermaticus is weak; two large and stout spines, each on either side of the sulcus spermaticus present; hemipenial base is completely nude.

Colouration in preservative: Overall in a shade of brown dorsally, with vestigial dark brown band at the nape followed by a few disused dark brown spots. Ventrally whitish lacking markings or mottling. Lateral 4–5 rows of dorsal scales in a shade of greyish brown forming a longitudinal broad stripe from half the SVLup to the vent. The dorsum brown colouration barelyreaching half the depth of the supralabials and diffuses into the colouration of the venter. Colouration in life: The snout is olive, which gradually turns into a shade of brown with a tinge of orange from the nape that extends to the tail tip dorsally. A broad faint grey band at the neck. The dark brown to grey longitudinal stripes more distinct in life (Fig. 11).

Variation: The type series do not show any variation other than those noted in Table 1.

Skull of NCBS NRC-AA-0013 (Fig. 10a–c). The skull of Anguiculus dicaprioi sp. nov. is complete and robust, and similar to that of A. rappii comb. nov. in several regards (Fig. 10). The maxilla bears 25 subequal teeth throughout the bone lacking a diastema. The palatine is linearly aligned with a slight inward curve (the palatine converges inwards) bearing 12 subequal teeth. The pterygoid bears 18–20 functional teeth throughout its inner margin. The palatine- pterygoid arc on either side converges inwards.

Natural history and distribution: The holotype and the paratypes were collected from mud roads at the type locality. The individuals were seen basking and remained motionless until caught and made no attempts to bite. All the three type specimens were found in the month of June (2020). Uncollected individuals were observed in the months of July to September; however, no more individuals were seen in other months of the year. Sympatric serpents recorded from the area are Lycodon bicolor Nikolsky, 1903, Oligodon russelius Daudin, 1803, Ptyas mucosa Linnaeus, 1758, Orthriophis hodgsonii Günther, 1860, Sinomicrurus cf. nigriventer Wall, 1908, Naja oxiana Eichwald, 1831, Daboia russelii Shaw & Nodder, 1797 and Gloydius chambensis Kuttalam, Santra, Owens, Selvan, Mukherjee, Graham, Togridou, Bharti, Shi, Shanker & Malhotra, 2022 (Mirza et al.34). Nothing else is known about the biology of this species. Based on reliable reports, the species is currently known from the type locality, i.e. Chamba33, Kullu (MCZ R-3137 & R-3147) and Shimla in Himachal Pradesh, Nainital in Uttarakhand (Fig. 12) and Chitwan National Park in Nepal19.

Gongylosoma Fitzinger, 1843.

Type species: Gongylosoma baliodeira (Boie, 1827).

Species included: Gongylosoma baliodeira, Gongylosoma calamaria (Günther, 1858) comb. nov., Gongylosoma frenata (Günther, 1858) comb. nov., Gongylosoma longicauda, Gongylosoma mukutense Grismer, Das & Leong, 2003, Gongylosoma nicobariensis (Stoliczka, 1870), Gongylosoma pallidonuchalis (Poyarkov, Nguyen & Vogel, 2019) comb. nov., Gongylosoma scriptum.

Diagnosis: Small-sized snakes characterized by 13, 15 or 17 smooth DSR; head sparsely distinct form neck in adults; internasal not fused with nasal; nasal divided or fused with loreal, bearing a laterally oriented nostril between the two; eye of moderate size (not large) in relation to the head; 118–158 ventral scales; 58–125 subcaudal scales; anal divided; 6–8 supralabials, not extending beyond the angle of the jaw; one preocular, two postoculars and temporals 1 + 1 or 2 (1 + 2 in G. nicobariensis). The basisphenoid lacks median foramen. The maxilla bears 20–24 subequal functional teeth. The teeth are arranged in a continuous manner, lacking a diastema and no enlargement of teeth is observed. The basisphenoid lacks median foramen. Hemipenis unilobed or in some species, with weekly differentiated apical lobes; transverse or longitudinal folds present or absent; distal half with small papillae or nodules or with calyces, proximal half with slightly larger spines. See Table 4 for a summary of characters.

Table 4.

Summary of diagnostic characters for the genera Liopeltis, Gongylosoma and Anguiculus gen. nov.

Liopeltis Gongylosoma Anguiculus gen. nov.
DSR 15 13 or 15 or 17 15
V 139–161 118–158 177–192
SC 110–136 58–125 57–75
Head distinct from neck Moderately Strongly Indistinct
Eye Smaller in relation to the head Larger in relation to the head Larger in relation to the head
Suparalabials 8 to 9 6 to 8 5 or 6
Suparalabials exceeding the angle of the jaw no no yes
Temporals 1 + 2 1 + 1 or 2 1 + 1
Maxillary teeth 28–31 20–24 22–24
median basisphenoid foramen Absent Absent Present
Posterior paired basisphenoid foramen Present Present Absent
TailL/TotalL 0.35–0.38 0.23–0.31 0.21–0.25
Hemipenis Distal portion with large thorn-like spines Proximal portion with larger spines; organ with or without folds 2 large & stout spines on each side of sulcus spermaticus; organ lacks folds

Liopeltis Fitzinger, 1843.

Type species: Liopeltis tricolor (Schlegel, 1837).

Species included: Liopeltis philippina (Boettger, 1897), Liopeltis stoliczkae (Sclater, 1891), Liopeltis tiomanica Som, Grismer, Grismer, Wood, Quah, Brown, Diesmos, Weinell & Stuart, 2020, Liopeltis tricolor (Schlegel, 1837).

Diagnosis: Small-sized slender snakes characterized by 15 smooth DSR; head distinct form neck in adults; nasal undivided (may be fused with internasals) bearing a laterally oriented nostril; eye of moderate size (not large) in relation to the head; 139–161 ventral scales; 110–136 subcaudal scales; anal divided; prefrontal not in contact with supralabial, 8–9 supralabials, not extending beyond the angle of the jaw; loreal present; 1–2 preoculars, two postoculars and temporals 1 + 2. The maxilla bears 28–31 teeth. The teeth are arranged in a continuous manner, lacking a diastema, and no enlargement of teeth is observed. The basisphenoid lacks median foramen. See Table 4 for a summary of characters.

Discussion and conclusion

Phylogenetic relationships across most colubrid genera have been well resolved24,35. The lack of molecular data of certain rare species is a major impediment in resolving the phylogenetic position of certain genera. The phylogenetic placement of Anguiculus gen. nov. is uncertain despite employing multiple markers to resolve its phylogenetic position. This uncertainty, largely may be attributed to the lack of molecular data for related taxa, especially A. rappii comb. nov.. The snake, A. rappii comb. nov. is extremely rare and there have been no reports of the species from the eastern parts of its range since Smith’s compilation in 19436. However, our preliminary results show that the new genus is a member of the subfamily Colubrinae and is not embedded in the clades containing Liopeltis and Gongylosoma. Anguiculus gen. nov. bears a broad collar band, 15 DSR, nostril between nasals, and a median foramen on the basisphenoid. The presence of a basisphenoid median foramen in the two species of Anguiculus gen. nov. might serve as a diagnostic character. The distinction between the genera Liopeltis and Gongylosoma morphologically has been difficult in the past8,9; however, molecular data for the type species of the genus Gongylosoma, i.e. for G. baliodeira, made phylogenetic and morphological definition of the genera plausible.

The east Himalayan population of Liopeltis rappii is here referred to as Anguiculus rappii comb. nov. sensu stricto ranging from Darjeeling in West Bengal and Sikkim to the Mishmi hills in Arunachal Pradesh (Fig. 12). After examining a series of specimens of the former, we confirm that Ablabes owenii is indeed a synonym of Anguiculus rappii comb. nov. The population from central and western Himalayas19,33 is treated as a new species, Anguiculus dicaprioi gen. et. sp. nov., that is at present known from Chamba, Kullu, Shimla in Himachal Pradesh, Nainital in Uttarakhand (India) and Chitwan National Park in Nepal. Other records from across Nepal require further verification, as these records were unpublished and lacked images or vouchers19. These records require proof to ascertain if they represent the new species (Anguiculus dicaprioi gen. et. sp. nov.) or Anguiculus rappii comb. nov., especially those records from eastern Nepal. The three specimens NHMW 26962:1–3, were collected by F. Stoliczka from Rangoon Valley. It is quite unclear at this moment if these specimens were incorrectly labelled to refer to Yangon (Myanmar) or a locality in the western Himalayas that Stoliczka visited twice between 1864 and 186536. Records of the species from Yangon (Myanmar) require confirmation as the species has not been reported from Myanmar6,37.

Snakes of the genera Liopeltis, Gongylosoma, and Anguiculus gen. nov. exhibit few diagnostic characters across congeners. Due to this high degree of morphological crypsis, several of these cryptic species have been merged under a single widespread taxon8 or were incorrectly identified38. Examples of morphologically cryptic species groups are Gongylosoma calamaria comb. nov., L. stoliczkae, and G. scriptum evident from high genetic divergence across available sequences17 (Z. Mirza personal observation). An integrated approach corroborating morphology, molecular, and ecological data will have to be employed to dissociate these cryptic species.

Based on the current members of the Liopeltis and their distribution, it is likely that the ancestors of Liopeltis originated in Sundaland and dispersed westwards through the montane and lowland evergreen forests where their current distribution is restricted. Conversely, Gongylosoma is more widespread and occupies varied habitats, and the lack of molecular data of some species makes it difficult to postulate any biogeographic scenarios for this genus.

The Himalayas are a known biodiversity hotspot39, and the eastern front harbors higher diversity than its western counterpart40. However, the findings in the present work support the fact that the biota of the Western Himalayas is distinct34,41,42 and not merely a subset of the East Himalayan biota40. More work across taxa is necessary to document species, especially through an integrated taxonomic approach to unmask hidden diversity currently deprived of recognition and eventual conservation attention.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (15.9KB, docx)
Supplementary Material 2 (25.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Material 3 (21.8KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Material 4 (9.7KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Material 6 (385.2KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 7 (4.2MB, docx)

Acknowledgements

The Singinawa Conservation Foundation and Max Planck Society’s IMPRS ‘From Molecules to Organisms’ program supported the work conducted by ZAM, and VKB through the CSIR-JRF fellowship. Special thanks to the Forest Department of Himachal Pradesh and Mizoram for the permission to carry out the present study. Saunak Pal thanks the entire natural history collection department and the Director of BNHS for permission to study specimens and for their constant support. ZAM is deeply indebted to Shreyas Arvindekar for his help with phylogenetic analysis and data curation. Bryan Stuart kindly generated sequences of G. baliodeira for which we greateful to him. We thank Vipul Ramanuj for sharing images of the species and allowing us to use them in the present work. The following curators helped with access to specimens, tissue samples, images and data: Rahul Khot (BNHS), Lauren Scheinberg (CAS), Joe Martinez (MCZ), Nicolas Vidal & Ivan Ineich (MNHN), Peter Rask Møller & Daniel Klingberg Johansson (ZMUC), Silke Schweiger and Gassner Georg (NHMW), Mark-Oliver Rödel and Frank Tillack (ZMB) and Gunther Köhler and Linda Mogk (SMF), Jakob Hallermann (ZMH), Dennis Rödder and Wolfgang Böhme and Alexander Koenig (ZFMK), Esther Dondorp, Naturalis (RMNH), Valentina F. Orlova and Roman A. Nazarov (ZMMU), Raffael Winkler (NMB), H. M. Yeshwanth and Tarun Karmakar (NCBS). HTL acknowledges DST-SERB, New Delhi (DST No. EEQ/2021/000243), and CSIR (File No. 09/0864(1601)/2022-EMR-I), Government of India for financial assistance.

Author contributions

ZAM wrote the main text, prepared figures; VKB conducted fieldwork; ZAM, SP, GV, PDC, HP examined museum material; VKB, SP, GV, PDC, HTL, HP edited the manuscript, contributed data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.

Data availability

All sequences generated in the present work have been submitted to the National Centre for Biotechnology Information and you may contact the corresponding author for any queries.

Declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Vitt, L. & Caldwell, J. Herpetology: An Introductory Biology of Amphibians and Reptiles (Academic, 2013).
  • 2.Pyron, R. A. et al. The phylogeny of advanced snakes (Colubroidea), with discovery of a new subfamily and comparison of support methods for likelihood trees. Mol. Phylogenet Evol. 58, 329–342 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zaher, H. et al. Large-scale molecular phylogeny, morphology, divergence-time estimation, and the fossil record of advanced caenophidian snakes (Squamata: Serpentes). PLoS One. 14, e0216148 (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Figueroa, A., Mckelvy, A. D., Grismer, L. L. & Bell, C. D. A species-Level phylogeny of extant snakes with description of a New Colubrid Subfamily and Genus. PLoS One. 11, e0161070 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Whitaker, R. & Captain, A. Snakes of India. The Field Guide (Draco Books, 2004), p481.
  • 6.Smith, M. A. Fauna of British India, Ceylon and Burma, Including the Whole of the Indo-Chinese Sub-region. Reptilia and Amphibia. Vol. 3. Serpentes (Taylor and Francis, 1943).
  • 7.Som, H. E. et al. A new Liopeltis Fitzinger, 1843 (Squamata: Colubridae) from Pulau Tioman, Peninsular Malaysia. Zootaxa. 4766, 472–484 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Poyarkov, N. A., Van Nguyen, T. & Vogel, G. A new species of the genus Liopeltis Fitzinger, 1843 from Vietnam (Squamata: Colubridae). J. Nat. Hist. 53, 1647–1672 (2019). [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Leviton, A. E. Contributions to a review of Philippine snakes, II. The snakes of the genera Liopeltis and Sibynophis. Philipp J. Sci. 92, 367–381 (1963). [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Amarasinghe, A. A. T., Karunarathna, D., Campbell, P., Ganesh, S. R. & Vogel, G. Taxonomy and distribution of Liopeltis calamaria (Günther, 1858) (Reptilia: Colubridae), including redescription of the syntypes. Taprobanica. 9, 39–49 (2020). [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Uetz, P. & Hošek, J. The Reptile Database. http://www.reptile-database.org/ (2023).
  • 12.Boulenger, G. The Fauna of British India, Including Ceylon and Burma: reptilia and Batrachia (Taylor & Francis Group, 1890).
  • 13.Stoliczka, F. Observations of some Indian and Malayan Amphibia and Reptilia. Ann. Mag Nat. Hist. 6, 105–109 (1870). [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Günther, A. The Reptiles of British India. Vol. 9. Hardwicke, 1864 (Ray Society, 1864).
  • 15.Wallach, V., Williams, K. & Boundy, J. Snakes of the World: A Catalogue of Living and Extinct Species (Taylor & Francis Group, 2014).
  • 16.David, P. & Vogel, G. The Snakes of Sumatra. An Annotated Checklist and key with Natural History Notes (Bücher Kreth, 1996).
  • 17.Lalremsanga, H. T., Bal, A. K., Vogel, G. & Biakzuala, L. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of lesser known colubrid snakes reveal a new species of Herpetoreas (Squamata: Colubridae: Natricinae), and new insights into the systematics of Gongylosoma scriptum and its allies from northeastern India. SALAMANDRA. 58, 101–115 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Günther, A. C. L. G. Contributions to a knowledge of the reptiles of the Himalaya Mountains. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 28, 148–175 (1860). [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Bhattarai, S. et al. On the distribution of the Himalayan stripe-necked snake Liopeltis rappi (Günther, 1860) (Serpentes: Colubridae) in Nepal. Amphib Reptil Conserv. 11, 88–92 (2017). [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Underwood, W. & Anthony, R. AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2020 edition. 121 (2020).
  • 21.Patel, H., Thackeray, T., Campbell, P. D. & Mirza, Z. A. Hebius beddomei (Günther, 1864) (Serpentes: Colubridae: Natricinae) with Description of a New Genus and a New Allied Species from the Western Ghats, India. Taxonomy 3, 415–434. (2023).
  • 22.Mirza, Z. A., Vyas, R., Patel, H., Maheta, J. & Sanap, R. A new Miocene-divergent lineage of Old World racer snake from India. PLoS One. 11, e0154301 (2016). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dowling, H. & Savage, J. A guide to the snakes hemipenis: a survey of basic structure and systematic characteristics. Zoologica. 45, 17–31 (1960). [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zaher, H. Hemipenial morphology of the south American xenodontine snakes, with a proposal for a monophyletic xenodontinae and a reappraisal of colubroid hemipenes. Bull. Am. Museum Nat. Hist. 240, 1–168 (1999).
  • 25.Heatwole, H. Biology of the Reptilia. Volume 20, Morphology H, The Skull of Lepidosauria. Carl Gans, Abbot S. Gaunt, and Kraig Adler, editors. (2009).
  • 26.Mirza, Z. A. & Patel, H. Back from the dead! Resurrection and revalidation of the Indian endemic snake genus Wallophis Werner, 1929 (Squamata: Colubridae) insights from molecular data. Mitochondrial DNA Part. DNA Mapp. Seq. Anal. 29, 331–334 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Pyron, R. A. et al. Genus-level phylogeny of snakes reveals the origins of species richness in Sri Lanka. Mol. Phylogenet Evol. 66, 969–978 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vaidya, G., Lohman, D. & Meier, R. SequenceMatrix: concatenation software for the fast assembly of multi-gene datasets with character set and codon information. Cladistics. 27, 171–180 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Thompson, J., Higgins, D. & Gibson, T. ClustalW: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680 (1994). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kalyaanamoorthy, S., Minh, B., Wong, T., Von Haeseler, A. & Jermiin, L. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat. Methods. 14, 587–589 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Minh, B. et al. IQ-TREE 2: New models and efficient methods for phylogenetic inference in the genomic era. Mol. Biol. Evol. 37, 1530–1534 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kuttalam, S. et al. Confirmation of Liopletis rappi (Fitzinger, 1943) in Himachal Pradesh, India. Hamadryad. 39, 85–88 (2022). [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mirza, Z. A., Bhardwaj, V. K. & Patel, H. A new species of snake of the genus Oligodon Boie in Fitzinger, 1826 (Reptilia, Serpentes) from the Western Himalayas. Evol. Syst. 5, 335–345 (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Pyron, R., Burbrink, F. & Wiens, J. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evol. Biol. 13:93, 1–53 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hruby, J. F. & Stoliczka Bird. Asia3, 50–56 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zug, G. R. Amphibians and Reptiles of Myanmar: Checklists and Keys (Smithsonian Scholarly, 2022).
  • 38.Hauser, S. Addition of Liopeltis frenatus (Günther, 1858) and Cyclophiops multicinctus (Roux, 1907) to the herpetofauna of Thailand (Squamata: Colubridae). Trop. Nat. Hist. 18, 54–67 (2018). [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. & Kent, J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 403, 853–858 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Mani, M. Ecology and Biogeography in India (Dr. W. Junk b.v., 1974).
  • 41.Mirza, Z. A., Varma, V. & Campbell, P. D. On the systematic status of Calliophis macclellandi nigriventer Wall, 1908 (Reptilia: Serpentes: Elapidae). Zootaxa. 4821, 105–120 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Agarwal, I., Bauer, A. M., Jackman, T. R. & Karanth, K. P. Insights into himalayan biogeography from geckos: a molecular phylogeny of Cyrtodactylus (Squamata: Gekkonidae). Mol. Phylogenet Evol. 80, 145–155 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Material 1 (15.9KB, docx)
Supplementary Material 2 (25.4KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Material 3 (21.8KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Material 4 (9.7KB, xlsx)
Supplementary Material 6 (385.2KB, pdf)
Supplementary Material 7 (4.2MB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

All sequences generated in the present work have been submitted to the National Centre for Biotechnology Information and you may contact the corresponding author for any queries.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES