Skip to main content
iScience logoLink to iScience
. 2024 Sep 30;27(11):111074. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111074

Time course transcriptomic profiling suggests Crp/Fnr transcriptional regulation of nosZ gene in a N2O-reducing thermophile

Jiro Tsuchiya 1, Sayaka Mino 1,6,, Fuki Fujiwara 2,3, Nao Okuma 2, Yasunori Ichihashi 2, Robert M Morris 4, Brook L Nunn 5, Emma Timmins-Schiffman 5, Tomoo Sawabe 1
PMCID: PMC11539149  PMID: 39507244

Summary

Nitrosophilus labii HRV44T is a thermophilic chemolithoautotroph possessing clade II type nitrous oxide (N2O) reductase (NosZ) that has an outstanding activity in reducing N2O to dinitrogen gas. Here, we attempt to understand molecular responses of HRV44T to N2O. Time course transcriptome and proteomic mass spectrometry analyses under anaerobic conditions revealed that most of transcripts and peptides related to denitrification were constitutively detected, even in the absence of any nitrogen oxides as electron acceptors. Gene expressions involved in electron transport to NosZ were upregulated within 3 h in response to N2O, rather than upregulation of nos genes. Two genes encoding Crp/Fnr transcriptional regulators observed upstream of nap and nor gene clusters had significant negative correlations with nosZ expression. Statistical path analysis further inferred a significant causal relationship between the gene expression of nosZ and that of one Crp/Fnr regulators. Our findings contribute to understanding the transcriptional regulation in clade II type N2O-reducers.

Subject areas: Aquatic biology, Microbiology, Molecular microbiology, Omics, Transcriptomics

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • Denitrification genes are constitutively expressed under anaerobic conditions

  • Negative regulation of transcriptional regulator on expression of nosZ was inferred

  • Electron-transport activity to NosZ may be increased in response to N2O


Aquatic biology, Microbiology, Molecular microbiology, Omics, Transcriptomics

Introduction

Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a colorless, odorless, and inert gas with an atmospheric lifetime of 109 years. It has recently gained attention as a cause of serious ozone depletion and a potent greenhouse gas that has a global warming potential (GWP) 273 times higher than CO2.1,2 The concentration of atmospheric N2O has increased by more than 20% since the 18th century,3 with large N2O emissions coming from agricultural lands, natural soils, and oceans. In both terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems, N2O production is mainly triggered by microbial nitrogen metabolisms, particularly nitrification and denitrification. While denitrification can lead to the emission of N2O, the final step of denitrification (N2O + 2H+ + 2e → N2 + H2O) is the pathway reducing N2O to harmless dinitrogen gas (N2). This reaction is the only known process for the biological removal of N2O in natural environments4 and has been thoroughly investigated due to its ecological significance and potential application for bioremediation.

Microbial N2O reduction is primarily mediated by N2O reductase (NosZ) and by accessory Nos proteins encoded by nos genes. The key enzyme gene, nosZ, is phylogenetically divided into two clades that differ in the apo-NosZ translocation system across the cell membrane and partially in the structure of the accessory nos genes.4,5 Clade Ⅰ NosZ uses the Tat system and clade Ⅱ NosZ uses the Sec system, with several exceptions. In addition to variations in the nos gene cluster, clade Ⅱ type N2O-reducing microorganisms, which possess a higher affinity for N2O than clade I type N2O-reducers,6 have been found in diverse microbial taxa and are abundant in both terrestrial and marine environments.7 These reports suggest that clade Ⅱ type N2O-reducers are particularly important in curbing N2O emission in nature. However, there are relatively few detailed studies of clade II type nosZ genes, and the remarkable taxonomical diversity in clade Ⅱ type N2O-reducers highlights the need to enhance understanding of their functions and roles in environmental N2O reduction.8

Chemolithoautotrophs are the primary producers in deep-sea hydrothermal systems (e.g., Jørgensen and Boetius9). Members of the class “Campylobacteria” (homotypic synonym of Epsilonproteobacteria) are often the predominant bacteria in these systems10,11,12 and have the ability to utilize a broad range of inorganic compounds for energy. Some species of “Campylobacteria” isolated from deep-sea hydrothermal systems possess the periplasmic nitrate reductase gene (nap) and nos gene clusters, indicating the genetic potential for denitrification.13,14 Since the development of a cultivation method for N2O-reducing chemolithoautotrophs,13 thermophilic “Campylobacteria” belonging to genera Nitrosophilus and Nitratiruptor have been found to grow by utilizing exogenous N2O as the sole electron acceptor.14,15 It also has been shown that deep-sea hydrothermal vent “Campylobacteria” species have clade Ⅱ type nosZ genes.14 Nitrosophilus labii HRV44T is a thermophilic “Campylobacteria” isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent in the Mid-Okinawa Trough, Japan, with the highest N2O-reducing activity observed among its related species.14 However, the molecular mechanisms regulating the N2O-reduction in deep-sea hydrothermal vent “Campylobacteria” have not been investigated.

Physiological responses to nitrogen oxides and patterns of transcriptional regulation for denitrification genes have been studied in several N2O-reducing bacteria by transcriptome and protein analyses. For example, previous study in Pseudomonas stutzeri, which has a clade Ⅰ nosZ, found that N2O is a weak inducer of nosZ expression but that nitrogen oxide (NO) induces the transcriptional regulator, dissimilative nitrate respiration regulator D (DnrD), which leads to higher levels of nosZ transcription.16 A study of Paracoccus denitrificans, which also has a clade Ⅰ nosZ, indicated that its nosZ transcription is regulated by oxygen depletion or NO via fumarate and nitrate reduction (Fnr) transcriptional regulator or nitric oxide reductase regulator (NNR), respectively.17 Wolinella succinogenes is a model “Campylobacteria” with a clade Ⅱ type nosZ. NapA and NosZ proteins in W. succinogenes were upregulated in wild-type cells when nitrate and N2O were supplied as terminal electron acceptors, respectively, possibly due to the regulation by transcriptional regulators of neurotransmitter:sodium symporter (NSS) family NssA, NssB, and NssC, which belong to the Crp/Fnr superfamily protein.18

RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) enables genome-wide gene expression analysis in model organisms. Nanopore-based RNA-seq has been increasingly used in eukaryotes, including mammalians, plants, insects, and crustaceans (e.g., Wang et al.,19 Bayega et al,20 and Wang et al.21). However, its application in prokaryotes has yet to be fully evaluated, and this technology exhibits a relatively high error rate on raw sequences compared to standard next-generation sequencing (NGS) devices such as Illumina. Still, Nanopore-based RNA-seq with amplification of cDNA has an advantage in enabling library preparation from small amounts of RNA extracted from low-growth microorganisms (e.g., cells that are hard to culture or grown under non-optimal growth conditions). Thus, this platform can be ideal for understanding transcriptomic traits of microorganisms that are difficult to recover sufficient amounts of RNA for conventional Illumina RNA-seq, such as chemolithoautotrophs in deep-sea hydrothermal environments, where their cell densities are often low even under optimal growth conditions.

Here, we conduct RNA-seq with a single-molecule long-read sequencing platform and proteome analysis to investigate gene and protein expression in response to N2O in Nitrosophilus labii HRV44T, a model organism of N2O-reducing bacteria isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent.

Results

Cell growth and N2O consumption dynamics

Strain HRV44T showed a low cell density (avg. OD620 nm = 0.05) after 24 h-cultivation at 55°C in media supplemented with H2 (66.6%, v/v), O2 (0.1%, v/v), and CO2 (33.3%, v/v) to serve as an electron donor, electron acceptor, and carbon source in a headspace of each vial, respectively (Figure S1A). The cell density significantly increased from 6 h (avg. OD620 nm = 0.08) after the addition of N2O relative to 0 h at the time of N2O addition (p < 0.05), with visible bubbles at the gas-liquid interphase (Figures 1 and S1A). The OD620 nm value reached more than 0.30 at 24 h after the addition of N2O. N2O concentration in the headspace started to decrease 3 h after the addition of N2O, and N2O consumption during 24 h-cultivation was 14.5 ± 0.85 μmol/mL headspace. No significant growth was detected under the N2O-free treatment. Total RNA was extracted before the addition of N2O at 0 h (N2O-free treatment) and at 3, 6, and 24 h after the addition of N2O (N2O-added treatment) in triplicate. Since the strain can utilize nitrate (NO3) and elemental sulfur (S0) as alternative electron acceptors to N2O,14 HRV44T was also grown in MMJHS medium that contains NO3, thiosulfate (S2O32−), and S0 in the liquid phase as previously described.22 The cell density reached an average of 0.16 of OD620 nm at 24 h, and OD620 nm values did not fluctuate after 24 h (Figures S1C and S1D). No N2O accumulation was detected in the headspace of cultures grown in MMJHS medium over 48 h (Figure S1D). An average 51 μg of total RNA was also extracted after 24 h in MMJHS treatment for comparison to cells grown in N2O-free (0 h) and N2O-added (3, 6, and 24 h) treatments.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Growth and N2O consumption of HRV44T after the addition of N2O

Growth with N2O and N2O concentration in the headspace were measured in triplicate, and growth without N2O was measured in duplicate. (mean ± standard deviation). Orange arrows represent sampling points for total RNA extraction. Asterisk (∗) represents the first time that detected significant cell growth compared to 0 h (p < 0.05).

Transcriptome analyses

We used an Oxford Nanopore PCR-based RNA-seq method to identify genes that were up- and downregulated in response to N2O reduction in HRV44T. More specifically, we evaluated differences in transcript expression levels in N2O-free (0 h) and N2O-added (3, 6, and 24 h) treatments, and in MMJHS (24 h) treatment amended with electron acceptors other than N2O. We excluded expression analyses for genes on a plasmid, as >78% of the genes were annotated as hypothetical with unknown functions. Principal-component analysis (PCA) revealed that biotriplicates from N2O-added (3, 6, and 24 h) and MMJHS treatments (24 h) yielded transcriptomic datasets that formed a cohesive cluster along axis PC1 and, to some extent, along axis PC2, respectively (Figure 2A). That said, there was a large variation in the transcriptomic data, however, resulting from N2O-free (0 h) triplicates. The DESeq2 analysis of the same time course data (0, 3, 6, and 24 h) identified a total of 220 differential expression genes (DEGs) with |log2(fold change)| ≥ 1 and a false discovery rate (FDR) < 0.05, accounting for 10.7% of the genes on the chromosome. Compared to the N2O-free treatment (0 h), 47, 155, and 152 DEGs were identified at 3, 6, and 24 h after the addition of N2O, respectively (Figure 2B). No DEGs were identified between 3 h and 6 h samples. A hierarchical clustering heatmap constructed using expression data from all 220 DEGs produced two major clusters, representing N2O-free and N2O-added treatments (Figure S2). Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was also performed on all protein-coding sequences (CDSs) using only the N2O-added time course data to reduce the effects on DEG detection caused by large data variation in 0 h triplicates. A total of 1,886 genes (92%) were clustered into 18 modules (Figure 2C). A hierarchical clustering heatmap constructed using the first principal component (PC1) of each colored module illustrated that the green (n = 115), brown (n = 146), pink (n = 94), black (n = 108), yellow (n = 128), and blue (n = 193) modules formed a conserved cluster (Figure 2D). Most of the PC1 values for these six modules changed from negative to positive values after N2O was added (0 h versus 3, 6, and 24 h), indicating that genes in all six modules were differentially expressed after the addition of N2O. Similar fluctuation trends were observed in the MMJHS treatment compared to the N2O-free (0 h) treatment, with different magnitudes of log2FC values (Figure 2E). Of the 220 DEGs from the N2O experiment, 183 DEGs were included in the six WGCNA modules: 8 in green, 29 in brown, 8 in pink, 31 in black, 72 in yellow, and 35 in blue modules.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Transcriptome analyses of HRV44T chromosome

(A) PCA plot of time course data without and with N2O (0, 3, 6, 24 h, and MMJHS).

(B) Time course DEG extraction. The list represents the number of the DEGs between N2O-added and N2O-free treatments (upper) and among N2O-added treatments (lower).

(C) Hierarchical cluster tree of 1,886 genes (92%) showing 18 modules of co-expressed genes extracted by WGCNA. The lower panel shows modules in designated colors.

(D) Dendrogram heatmap constructed by PC1 of each color module. The color key represents PC1 values.

(E) Heatmap of log2FC values of genes clustered in the six WGCNA modules (the green, brown, pink, black, yellow, and blue modules).

Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis of the WGCNA-fileted 183 DEGs, assigned to the six WGCNA modules mentioned previously, revealed that 51 (biological process [BP], 21; molecular function [MF], 24; cellular component [CC], 6) and 36 (BP, 15; MF, 15; CC, 6) GO terms were significantly enriched (over-represented p value <0.05) in the filtered up- and downregulated DEGs, respectively. Upregulated DEGs were enriched in DNA replication-related GO terms (GO: 0006260 and 0006261) (Figure 3A). Downregulated DEGs were enriched in cell projection (GO: 0042995), bacterial-type flagellum (GO: 0009288), and bacterial-type flagellum-dependent swarming motility (GO: 0071978) GO terms.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

GO enrichment analysis of the DEGs and DAPs

(A) The top 10 enriched GO terms in up- and downregulated DEGs filtered by WGCNA.

(B) The top 10 enriched GO terms in increased and decreased DAPs.

A comparison of N2O-added (24 h) and MMJHS (24 h) treatments found that 21 genes were significantly upregulated and 18 genes were downregulated in the N2O-added (24 h) treatment relative to the MMJHS (24 h) treatment (Table S1). The top enriched GO terms of the integrated DEGs included homeostatic process (GO: 0042592), cellular homeostasis (GO: 0019725), and oxidoreductase activity, acting on a sulfur group of donors (GO: 0016667) (Figure S3).

Proteome analyses

We performed mass spectrometry-based proteome analyses on cells cultured in N2O-free (0 h, n = 3) and N2O-added (3, 6, and 24 h after the addition of N2O, each n = 1) treatments to elucidate the response of HRV44T to N2O at the protein level. QPROT23 analysis identified 48 differential abundant proteins (DAPs) that were significantly increased and 30 that were significantly decreased in abundance using a threshold of |log2(fold change)| ≥ 0.5 and |z-statistic| ≥ 2 (Figure S4; Table S2). GO enrichment analysis of the DAPs revealed that 43 (BP, 14; MF, 24; CC, 5) and 118 (BP, 70; MF, 30; CC, 18) GO terms were significantly enriched (over-represented p value <0.05) in increased and decreased DAPs, respectively. The top 10 enriched GO terms with increased DAPs in N2O-added versus N2O-free treatments included cellular respiration (GO: 0045333), oxidoreductase activity (GO: 0016491), and generation of precursor metabolites and energy (GO: 0006091) (Figure 3B). Those with decreased DAPs included intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelle (GO: 0043232), structural constituent of ribosome (GO: 0003735), and cytosolic ribosome (GO: 0022626).

Comparison of the DEGs and DAPs

To compare transcriptome and proteome results, DEG analysis was re-performed with the sample group comparison used for the proteomics: N2O-free (0 h, n = 3) and N2O-added data (3, 6, and 24 h, total n = 9). DEGs were then filtered based on the six modules identified by WGCNA, as for the time course DEG analysis to reduce effects on DEG detection caused by large data variation in 0 h samples. The low correlations (0.21 ≤ R ≤ 0.33) were observed between transcriptome and proteome results in this study (Table S3), and there was little correspondence in differential mRNA and protein abundances between the DEGs and DAPs. One upregulated DEG and two downregulated DEGs corresponded to an increased DAP, ribonucleotide reductase of class Ⅲ (anaerobic) large subunit (WP_187646885.1), and decreased DAPs, thiol peroxidase Tpx-type (WP_187647451.1) and cytochrome c oxidase (cbb3-type) subunit CcoO (WP_187647411.1), respectively (Figure S5). In contrast, one upregulated DEG was identified as the decreased DAP, RNA-binding protein (WP_187647811.1), and two downregulated DEGs were identified as increased DAPs, N-acetyltransferase (WP_187648738.1) and nitric-oxide reductase subunit C (WP_187648292.1). Integrated GO enrichment analysis showed that the top 20 GO terms include bacterial-type flagellum hook (GO: 0009424) and DNA-replication-related (GO: 0006260 and 0006261) for the DEGs and intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelle (GO: 0043232) and structural constituent of ribosome (GO: 0003735) for the DAPs (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The top 20 enriched GO terms of the integrated DEGs and DAPs

Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of denitrification genes/proteins

In addition to nos genes, HRV44T possesses all additional genes needed for complete denitrification, including periplasmic nitrate reductase genes (nap, NO3 → NO2), cd1 nitrite reductase genes (nir, NO2 → NO), and nitric oxide reductase genes (nor, NO → N2O) (Figure 5A). The mRNA and protein abundances of those genes were normalized to transcripts per million (TPM) and adjusted normalized spectral abundance factor values (ADJNSAF), respectively. Most of the denitrification genes were constituently expressed, including in the absence of any nitrogen oxides as electron acceptors. Three of the key enzyme genes required for denitrification (napA, nirS, and nosZ) had relatively high TPM values in all samples (Figure 5B). In one replicate from the 0 h time point, nap and nor genes were characterized by higher log2(TPM+1) values compared to the other samples, highlighting the biological variability between cultures. This result is comparable with the proteomics result showing the relatively high log2(ADJNSAF+1) values of the three key enzymes (NapA, NirS, and NosZ) (Figure 5C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Schematic structure of denitrification genes in HRV44T and their gene and protein expression levels

(A) Red, periplasmic nitrate reductase genes (nap); orange, nitric oxide reductase genes (nor); light green, cd1 nitrite reductase genes (nir); light blue, clade Ⅱ nitrous oxide reductase genes (nos); yellow, genes encoding Crp/Fnr superfamily transcriptional regulators; purple, PAS domain-containing protein; white, hypothetical protein genes.

(B) Heatmap of log2(TPM+1) values represents the expression level of the denitrification genes.

(C) Heatmap of log2(ADJNSAF+1) values represents the expression level of the denitrification proteins. Gray, non-detected proteins among all samples. The heatmaps were generated by the Morpheus web tool (https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus/).

Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of genes/proteins involved in electron transport pathway to the respiration systems

HRV44T possesses denitrification respiration systems, a microaerobic respiration system (cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase), and a sulfur reduction system (polysulfide reductase) (Figure S6). It has been demonstrated that HRV44T is able to use elemental sulfur and molecular oxygen (up to 1%, v/v) as sole electron acceptors in addition to N2O.14 The electron donation is attributed solely to the oxidation of H2 (H2 → 2H+ + 2e) in HRV44T catalyzed by H2-uptake [NiFe] hydrogenase.24 The expression fluctuations of the related genes were shown at mRNA and protein levels between N2O-free and N2O-added treatments (Figure 6A). Transcriptome analysis revealed that one subunit gene (hydB) expression was significantly downregulated 6 h after the addition of N2O, whereas expressions of two genes encoding [NiFe] hydrogenase maturation proteins (hypDE) were significantly upregulated 3 h after the addition of N2O. Hydrogenase maturation protease HybP was a decreased DAP in the N2O-added treatment relative to the N2O-free treatment. Gene and protein expression levels involved in menaquinone synthesis did not fluctuate significantly. Genes encoding cytochrome bc1 complex subunits (petAC) were consistently detected as upregulated DEGs at 3 h after the addition of N2O. KEGG pathway and BLAST analyses identified four genes encoding cytochrome c (three cytochrome c553 and one cytochrome c552). All three cytochrome c553 genes were included in the six WGCNA modules mentioned previously (Figure 2D), and the expression of one of them (cccA) was significantly upregulated in the N2O-added treatment. The observed fluctuations in mRNA and protein expressions related to electron transport in respiration did not exhibit consistent trends. Of the 11 nos genes, only the nosZ gene was included in the six WGCNA modules (the blue module) with >0.7 log2FC at FDR ≤0.1 at 3 h and 6 h after the addition of N2O compared to the N2O-free treatment (0 h), although it was not detected as a DEG (Figure S7). This trend for nosZ obtained from transcriptome analysis is consistent with the proteome analysis, for which NosZ was not detected as a DAP (log2FC = 0.498 and z-statistic = 3.73). There were large discrepancies in log2FC values between transcriptomic and proteomic data for denitrification genes other than nos (nap, nir, and nor). Although most of the log2FC values for these genes calculated from RNA-seq data were negative, the key enzymes and their components (NapAB, NirS, and NorC) were increased DAPs in the N2O-added treatment (Table S2A). In addition, the expression levels of the nap, nir, nor, and nos genes did not show statistically significant differences between the N2O-added (24 h) and MMJHS treatments (Table S1). Gene expression for components of polysulfide reductase (psrA1B1CD) did not significantly fluctuate, with the exception of a downregulated chaperone (psrE). One subunit gene of cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase (ccoO) was detected as a downregulated DEG at 3 h after the addition of N2O, while other subunit genes (ccoPQ) exhibited significantly downregulated expressions at 6 h after the addition of N2O. Significant downregulation in CcoO expression was also observed in the proteome (Table S2B).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Expression fluctuations of mRNA and proteins in pathways involved in N2O reduction

Log2FC values of mRNAs and proteins related to respiration (A) and other representative functions (B) between N2O-free and N2O-added treatments. Red and blue points represent the up- and downregulated filtered DEG and DAP, respectively, and green points in mRNA represent “non-DEG, but included in the six WGCNA modules (the green, brown, pink, black, yellow, and blue modules).”

Transcriptomic and proteomic profiling of genes/proteins involved in functions other than respirations

We further examined expression fluctuations of the genes and proteins important for DNA replication, transcription, carbon fixation, biofilm formation, and bacterial motility (Figure 6B). Among the DNA replication- and repair-related genes (DNA replication protein, ko03032; chromosome and associated protein, ko03036; and DNA repair and recombination protein, ko03400), two genes (encoding single-strand DNA-binding protein and ribonuclease HII) were consistently upregulated at 3 h after the addition of N2O. Four additional genes (encoding rod shape-determining protein RodA, ATP-dependent DNA helicase Rep, helicase PriA, and DNA polymerase Ⅲ subunits gamma and tau) were also significantly upregulated. Three increased DAPs related to these functions (DNA-binding protein HU, DNA translocase FtsK, and DNA polymerase X family/PHP domain protein) were also detected (Table S2). Among the genes involved in transcription (transcription machinery, ko03021 and mRNA biogenesis, ko03019), a constant downregulated expression of a gene encoding transcription termination factor Rho was detected in the N2O-added treatment. Whereas, upregulated expressions of genes encoding transcription elongation factor GreA and 6-phosphofructokinase were detected at 6 h and 24 h after the addition of N2O, respectively. Abundances of transcription termination protein NusB and ATP-dependent RNA helicase DeaD were significantly increased and decreased at the protein level, respectively. The expression of prokaryotic carbon fixation-related (ko00720) genes did not significantly fluctuate during the N2O-added treatments, with one exception of a downregulated gene encoding ATP citrate synthase alpha chain. At the protein level, we detected six related proteins with increased abundance (pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase delta subunit, phosphoenolpyruvate synthase, malate dehydrogenase, heterodisulfide reductase subunit B-like protein, biotin carboxylase of acetyl-CoA carboxylase, and acetyl-CoA synthetase). Furthermore, genes associated with biofilm formation were evaluated based on the KEGG pathway (biofilm formation of Vibrio cholerae, ko05111; of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ko02025; and of Escherichia coli, ko02026) as HRV44T cells were more active in forming pellicle-like structures under N2O-added treatments relative to N2O-free and MMJHS treatments (Figures S1B and S1C). Transcriptome analysis did not detect any significant fluctuation of the relevant gene expressions; however, proteomics identified one increased DAP, mannose-1-phosphate guanylyltransferase/mannose-6-phosphate isomerase (AlgA), involved in biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa (ko02025). With regard to bacterial motility (ko02035), expressions of the five flagellar component genes were downregulated (flgBDEK and fliG), while abundances of chemotaxis proteins CheBY and flagellin protein FlaA showed significant increases at the protein level.

Prediction of transcriptional units of the denitrification genes and binding sites of putative transcriptional regulators

HRV44T possesses two genes that encode Crp/Fnr superfamily proteins (NIL_RS03760 and NIL_RS03815) upstream of the nap and nor gene clusters, respectively (Figure 5A). NIL_RS03760 was extracted as a downregulated DEG at 6 h after the addition of N2O and included in the yellow module, which showed a shift in expression before and after the addition of N2O (Table S4). Values of amino acid identities (AAI) of NIL_RS03760 and NIL_RS03815 against NssA, NssB, and NssC, Crp/Fnr superfamily proteins of W. succinogenes were 44.8%, 29.2%, and 26.1% and 33.3%, 50.0%, and 28.2%, respectively (Table S5).

RNA-seq coverage indicates that the number of mapped reads was much lower in non-coding regions of the upstream of nap and nor gene clusters, nosZ, and nosB genes (Figure S8A). We searched the binding sites for Crp/Fnr-type transcriptional regulators by allowing for a two-bp mismatch compared to the consensus sequence (TTGA-N6-TCAA).18 We identified five, three, four, and one binding sequences upstream of the predicted transcription start sites (TSS) of napA, norE, nosZ, and nosB genes, respectively (Figure S8B). These included one exact match upstream of each napA, norE, and nosB gene. Distances from the initial base of the exact Crp/Fnr superfamily protein binding sequence to TSS were 49, 48, and 48 bases upstream of napA, norE, and nosB genes, respectively. The binding sequences overlapping the predicted TSS were identified upstream of the nosZ and accessory nos genes. Distances between each TSS and predicted ribosome binding site (RBS) were 37, 37, 15, and 15 bases upstream of napA, norE, nosZ, and nosB genes, respectively.

Correlation and causal relationship between the denitrification genes and Crp/Fnr superfamily protein genes

Nss proteins belonging to the Crp/Fnr superfamily have been reported to mediate the upregulation of denitrification proteins responding to nitrogen compounds in W. succinogenes.18 We examined to see if there was a correlation between the expression of genes encoding Crp/Fnr superfamily proteins and denitrification genes. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) calculated by time course RNA-seq data normalized with counts per million (CPM) showed that NIL_RS03760 expression had relatively high positive correlations with several nap, nor, and nir gene clusters (R ≥ 0.5), while NIL_RS03815 was not correlated with the same genes (R ≤ 0.2) (Figure S9). In contrast, nosZ expression had strong negative correlations with both NIL_RS03760 (R = −0.67, p < 0.05) and NIL_RS03815 (R = −0.65, p < 0.05).

We also conducted the path analysis using time course RNA-seq data in order to confirm whether the two genes encoding Crp/Fnr superfamily proteins (NIL_RS03760 and NIL_RS03815) contributed to the downregulation of the nosZ gene. The analysis found a significantly negative effect of NIL_RS03760 on nosZ (p < 0.05), while the effect of NIL_RS03815 on nosZ was not significant (Figure S10). In the model with the presence of N2O as an exogenous variable, N2O had a significant effect on both NIL_RS03760 and NIL_RS03815 (Figure S10A). When accounting for the duration of the exposure to N2O, as an exogenous variable, N2O had no significant effect on the gene expressions (Figure S10B). The first model resulted in better model fit scores, indicating that the presence or absence of N2O can better explain the data compared to the duration of N2O exposure. Although the direct effect of N2O on nosZ was not significant in both models, the first model found an indirect effect mediated by NIL_RS03760 (coefficient = 0.69, p < 0.05), indicating the suppression of NIL_RS03760 by N2O and by increased nosZ expression.

Discussion

Transcriptome and proteome profiling

Our experiment was designed to characterize shifts in strain HRV44T gene expression in response to N2O. We showed that HRV44T exhibited a transcriptional response to the addition of N2O within at least 3 h. Statistically significant changes in gene expression were identified in 10% of the chromosome, which were maintained throughout the course of the 24-h experiment. This suggests that HRV44T response to N2O-rich environment is rapid and persistent. GO enrichment analysis of the transcriptomics and proteomics represented that the functions related to DNA replication, respiration, and energy generation were activated under the N2O-added treatment. These indicate that HRV44T increased its cellular activity under the N2O-added condition relative to the N2O-free condition.

N2O was not a crucial inducer of the denitrification genes (nap, nir, nor, and nos) in HRV44T. The induction of those genes may be particularly mediated by anaerobic stimuli that modulate O2-responsive transcriptional regulators (discussed in the following text) or by regulation by sigma factor 70, which is responsible for regulating the transcription of most genes expressed during exponential cell growth.25 HRV44T had the highest growth with N2O-respiration, and none of the other terminal electron acceptors provided comparable cell densities for HRV44T as N2O-respiration (data not shown). Because of this distinctive adaptation and finding, it was difficult to select a control treatment for comparing gene expression during cell growth with N2O. Although we did not perform time course transcriptome analysis on the MMJHS treatment, it should be noted that the shift in gene expression detected in the N2O-added treatment was not specific and also occurred when MMJHS medium was used, which contained S0 and NO3 as alternative electron acceptors. Indeed, no DEGs for sulfur-reduction or nitrate-reduction were detected in the N2O-added treatment compared to the MMJHS treatment, suggesting that HRV44T proliferates at high efficiency by possessing a regulation system that is independent of the electron acceptor type. Further analysis for evaluating time course gene and protein expressions on each electron acceptor is needed to better understand transcript and protein expression responses to different types of electron acceptors.

Putative regulation mechanism of denitrification gene expressions: Negative regulation of nosZ gene expression mediated by Crp/Fnr superfamily protein

Crp/Fnr superfamily proteins are involved in responses to a variety of signals, such as oxygen, carbon monoxide, temperature, nitric oxide, and oxidative and nitrosative stress.26 Our RNA-seq analyses demonstrate that the expression of a Crp/Fnr superfamily protein (NIL_RS03760) located upstream of the nap cluster had a significantly negative causal relation with that of the nosZ gene. This is the study suggesting a negative regulation of Crp/Fnr superfamily regulators on expression of nosZ. HRV44T has two genes encoding Crp/Fnr superfamily proteins (NIL_RS03760 and NIL_RS03815) that are 44.8% and 50.0% identical with NssA and NssB in W. succinogenes, respectively. N2O has been reported as a possible signal of Crp/Fnr superfamily proteins for W. succinogenes, mediating the upregulation of NapA, cytochrome c nitrite reductase (NrfA), and NosZ.18 NssA and NssB, possessing a Dnr-type C-terminal DNA-binding domain, are known as homologues of the nitrosative stress sensing regulator NssR in Campylobacter jejuni.27 The Dnr system is involved in an NO sensory pathway and expressed in the absence of oxygen or lowered oxygen tension and in the simultaneous presence of nitrogen oxide.26 We found binding sequences of a Dnr-type regulator belonging to Crp/Fnr superfamily protein upstream of four transcriptional units of denitrification genes, (1) nap genes, (2) nor and nir genes, (3) nosZ gene, and (4) accessory nos genes, inferred by visualized mapping data (Figure S8). These results suggest that the denitrification genes are under the control of transcription factors belonging to this regulatory family in HRV44T, resulting in the stable expression of the denitrification genes and proteins before and after the addition of N2O under anaerobic conditions. Further explorations, such as conducting transcriptomics at different O2 levels, detection of promoter sequences (−10 and −35 elements), and construction of mutants in these putative transcription regulators, are needed in order to identify the exact function of the transcriptional regulators and the presence of an N2O-sensing mechanism.

Hydrogen oxidation and electron transfer pathway accompanied with N2O-reducing activity of HRV44T

Hydrogen serves as an electron donor for HRV44T during N2O respiration.14 Hydrogen oxidation is known to be catalyzed by the respiratory H2-uptake [NiFe] hydrogenase. The [NiFe] hydrogenase subunit proteins were detected at a relatively high level under both N2O-free and N2O-added treatments, and their abundances did not significantly fluctuate. Prediction of bacterial promoters indicated that there are one (Fur-dependent) and two (sigma70 and Fnr-dependent) promoters upstream of hypB and hypE genes, which are indispensable for maturation of [NiFe] hydrogenase, respectively (data not shown), suggesting a different transcriptional regulation in hyp genes in strain HRV44T given by a variety of stimuli. Since the hyp operon expression is upregulated in anaerobic conditions in E. coli,28 full depletion of O2 or abundant N2O may cause further anaerobic stimuli.

Two electron-transfer pathways have been proposed to be related to bacterial N2O reduction: from cytochrome bc1 complex to NosZ via cytochrome c (common in both clade Ⅰ and Ⅱ N2O-reducing bacteria) and via NosGH, NosBC2 complexes, and NosC1 (unique in clade Ⅱ N2O-reducing bacteria).29,30 In this study, significant upregulation was detected in cccA gene encoding cytochrome c553 and in subunit genes (petAC) of cytochrome bc1 complex. In P. denitrificans, a clade I-type microorganism, a higher level of cytochrome c553 was detected in cells grown N2O-anaerobically than cells grown high-aerobically or NO3-anaerobically.31 Our results present that HRV44T may prefer the electron transport to NosZ via cytochrome c553 rather than via electron-transporting accessory Nos proteins. In addition to transcriptomic data, proteins related to electron transport were included in the top 10 GO term (electron transfer activity) for increased DAPs and detected as two DAPs, i.e., electron transfer flavoprotein (ETF) alpha subunit and electron transfer flavoprotein-ubiquinone oxidoreductase (ETF-QO), which are related to electron transfer to the quinone pool.32 The relation between electron transport and N2O reduction has been mentioned in previous studies. For instance, the N2O-reducing activity of Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens with clade Ⅰ type nosZ with deletion of cycA gene encoding soluble cytochrome c550, which functions as an intermediate electron donor, was decreased by about 65% compared to wild-type cells.33 Taken together, we hypothesize that the electron-transport activity is one of the crucial factors underlying the N2O-reducing ability in HRV44T, which is enhanced at the transcription level under N2O-added treatments. This could occur within 3 h in response to N2O, and such a mechanism may help HRV44T to grow at high efficiency and exhibit high N2O-reducing activity at a bulk level. Denitrification proteins, cbb3-type cytochrome c oxidase, and polysulfide reductase, as well as Nos proteins, were detected in both N2O-free and N2O-added treatments, implying that there is an electron competition among these proteins and a preference for electron transport pathway among respiration systems in HRV44T though we could not evaluate the electron flow into NosZ.

Biofilm formation and motility regulation associated with N2O reduction

Pellicle is known as a floating biofilm formed at the air-liquid interface in static culture conditions. Although transcriptomics did not detect the significant expression changes of the biofilm formation-related genes, the increased abundance of AlgA in N2O-added treatments suggested that the pellicle-like structure is likely to contain alginate. Inhibition of motility of planktonic microbes is required for their biofilm formation,34 and the enrichment of GO terms related to motility in downregulated DEGs confirms that motility was likely decreased after the addition of N2O (Figure 3A). In addition, genes related to twitching motility (pilT) and regulation of flagellar operon expression (fliA), as well as flagellar formation, were significantly downregulated (Table S4). PilT is involved in pilus retraction required for pilus-mediated twitching motility.35 The expression of genes involved in flagellar formation is regulated by three cascades: class 1, 2, and 3 in pathogenic species within “Campylobacteria”, and RNA polymerase sigma factor (σ28), encoded by fliA gene, is classified into class 2.36 FliA regulates the expressions of class 3 genes that contribute to the formation of the major flagellin and minor filament proteins.36 Taken together, our results imply that both swimming and twitching motilities were inhibited directly or indirectly in response to N2O. This may be an adaptative strategy in which cells decrease motility and create a suitable habitat at the air-liquid surface to access the electron donors and acceptors.

Conclusion

This study provides a framework for studying time series transcriptome analysis of deep-sea hydrothermal vent microorganisms with Nanopore PCR-based RNA-seq, which requires only 1 ng of rRNA-depleted poly(A) mRNA, making it useful for transcriptome analysis of low-growth bacteria, from which RNA extraction is difficult. Our findings demonstrate the utility of Nanopore PCR-based RNA-seq for difficult-to-culture microorganisms and highlight their strategy for adaptation to deep-sea hydrothermal environments and the presence of N2O. N2O is, therefore, not a critical inducer of denitrification gene expression in HRV44T, and those genes and proteins are expressed under anaerobic conditions even in the absence of nitrogen oxides as electron acceptors. This feature may contribute to efficient energy metabolisms in deep-sea hydrothermal environments where electron acceptors are occasionally depleted in anaerobic environments. Our transcriptome and proteome analyses suggest that the number of electrons transported to NosZ is regulated at the transcription level, depending on the external environment, such as the amount of N2O. This mechanism likely contributes to high-efficiency growth via N2O respiration, and consequently HRV44T can show high N2O-reducing activity at a bulk level. Gene expression comparisons between N2O-added and MMJHS treatments, however, revealed that responses were not specific to the N2O-added treatment and increased electron-transport efficiency may depend on the existence of the available electron acceptors and on cellular activities. HRV44T can simultaneously reduce N2O and CO2 under the unique conditions of high temperature (45°C–60°C) and acidic (pH 5.4–6.4) conditions,14 making it a particular bioresource that can contribute to mitigating N2O emissions.37 Our finding that Crp/Fnr superfamily regulators negatively regulate the expression of nosZ in HRV44T extends the understanding of regulatory mechanisms of gene expression in clade II type N2O-reducers and may help increase their ability of N2O reduction.

Limitations of the study

Although all cultivations with N2O were conducted under the condition of 33% (v/v) N2O in the headspace, we were unable to evaluate the intracellular concentrations of nitrogen compounds (e.g., NO3, NO2, NO, and N2O) in addition to those in liquid phases.

A limitation in transcriptomics of this study is the lower throughput of Nanopore-based RNA-seq compared to Illumina RNA-seq, e.g., total raw counts averaged 162,061 and 8,852,252 for Nanopore PCR-based and Illumina RNA-seq, respectively, though positive Pearson correlation coefficients were observed between their normalized data (Table S6). A limitation in proteomics of this work is the limited sample size. A clearer link between the transcriptomic and proteomic datasets might be observed if we had sampled more time points.

Resource availability

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Sayaka Mino (sayaka.mino@fish.hokudai.ac.jp).

Materials availability

This study did not generate new unique reagents.

Data and code availability

  • Data: the raw RNA-seq datasets presented in this study (fastq files before quality control) can be found in DDBJ Sequence Read Archive (DRA, https://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/) and are available under BioProject accession number PRJDB15435 (Run: DRR451265-DRR451279 and DRR571757-DRR571759). The mass spectrometry proteomics dataset has been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE38 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD053214.

  • Code: this paper does not report original code.

  • All other requests: any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported will be shared by the lead contact upon request.

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by the Institute for Fermentation, Osaka (S.M.), Takahashi Industrial and Economic Research Foundation (T.S.), JSPS KAKENHI grant numbers 17K15301 (S.M.) and 21K14913 (S.M.), JSPS Overseas Research Fellowships (S.M.), and JSPS Research Fellowships for Young Scientists (J.T.).

Author contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: J.T., S.M., and T.S. Performed transcriptomic experiments: J.T. Performed proteomic mass spectrometry experiments and protein data searches: R.M.M., B.L.N., and E.T.-S. Analyzed transcriptomic and proteomic data: J.T., S.M., F.F., N.O., and Y.I. Performed/contributed reagents/material/analysis tools: S.M., F.F., N.O., Y.I., R.M.M., and T.S. Wrote the draft paper: J.T., S.M., and T.S. All authors have read, edited, and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of interests

The authors have no competing interests.

STAR★Methods

Key resources table

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER
Bacterial and virus strains

Nitrosophilus labii strain HRV44T Fukushi et al.14 JCM 34002

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

EDTA・3Na Dojindo Cat# 342-01875
trisodium citrate dihydrate Wako Cat# 191-01785
ammonium sulfate Wako Cat# 019-03435
sulfuric acid Wako Cat# 192-04696
TRIzol Reagent Invitorgen Cat# 15596026
E. coli Poly(A) Polymerase New England Biolabs Cat# M0276
Terminator 5′-Phosphate-Dependent Exonuclease Lucigen Cat# TER51020
AMPure XP Reagent Beckman Coulter Cat# A63880
Deoxynucleotide (dNTP) Solution Mix New England Biolabs Cat# N0447S
Maxima H Minus Reverse Transcriptase (200U/μL) with 5×RT Buffer ThermoFisher Cat# EP0751
LongAmp Taq 2X Master Mix New England Biolabs Cat# M0287
RNase Inhibitor, Murine New England Biolabs Cat# M0314
Exonuclease Ⅰ New England Biolabs Cat# M0293

Critical commercial assays

RNeasy Min Elute Cleanup Kit Qiagen Cat# 74204
NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module New England Biolabs Cat# E7490
PCR-cDNA Barcoding Kit Oxford Nanopore Technologies SQK-PCB109
Flow Cell Priming Kit Oxford Nanopore Technologies EXP-FLP002
MinION FlowCell Oxford Nanopore Technologies FLO-MIN106D

Deposited data

The raw RNA-Seq datasets presented in this study (fastq files before quality control) This paper BioProject, PRJDB15435; DDBJ Sequence Read Archive, DRR451265-DRR451279 and DRR571757-DRR571759
The mass spectrometry proteomics dataset presented in this study This paper ProteomeXchange, PXD053214
Strain HRV44T reference genome Fukushi et al.14 NCBI database, GCF_014466985.1

Software and algorithms

MinKNOW (ver. 3.6.0, ver. 21.06.13) Oxford Nanopore Technologies https://nanoporetech.com/
Guppy software (ver. 3.4.1; ver. 5.0.16) Oxford Nanopore Technologies https://nanoporetech.com/
NanoFilt (ver. 2.6.0) Coster et al.39 https://github.com/wdecoster/nanofilt
minimap2 (ver. 2.17-r941) Li40 https://github.com/lh3/minimap2
samtools (ver. 1.9) Li et al.41 http://www.htslib.org
featureCounts in Rsubreads software (ver. 1.6.2) Liao et al.42 https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/Rsubread.html
fastp (ver. 0.21.1) Chen et al.43 https://github.com/OpenGene/fastp
Bowtie2 (ver. 2.3.4.3) Langmead and Salzberg44 https://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/bowtie2/index.shtml
iDEP.951 or 0.96 Ge et al.45 http://bioinformatics.sdstate.edu/idep/
DESeq2 Love et al.46 https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html
Morpheus web tool Broad Institute https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus/
egg-NOG mapper v2 Cantalapiedra et al.47 http://eggnog-mapper.embl.de
goseq (ver. 1.50.0) Young et al.48 https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/goseq.html
REVIGO Supek et al.49 http://revigo.irb.hr
Interactive Genomic Viewer (IGV) Thorvaldsdóttir et al.50 https://igv.org/app/
RAST server Aziz et al.51 https://rast.nmpdr.org
in silico MolecularCloning In silico biology https://www.insilico-biology.com/index.php
BlastKOALA Kanehisa et al.52 https://www.kegg.jp/blastkoala/
lavaan (ver. 0.6–13) Rosseel53 https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lavaan/index.html
Skyline MacLean et al.54 https://skyline.ms/project/home/software/Skyline/begin.view
Comet v. 2022.01 rev.0 Eng et al.55,56 https://uwpr.github.io/Comet/
CRAPome Mellacheruvu et al.57 www.crapome.org
PeptideProphet Nesvizhskii et al.58 https://peptideprophet.sourceforge.net
ProteinProphet Nesvizhskii et al.58 https://proteinprophet.sourceforge.net
Abacus Fermin et al.59 https://abacustpp.sourceforge.net
QPROT Choi et al.23 https://sourceforge.net/projects/qprot/

Experimental model and study participant details

Culture conditions

Nitrosophilus labii HRV44T was precultured in 3 mL of N2O-minus modified HNN medium13 for 24 h at 55°C. The medium contained 0.1% (w/v) NaHCO3 per liter of modified MJ synthetic seawater.60 Modified MJ synthetic seawater is composed of 25 g NaCl, 4.2 g MgCl2・6H2O, 3.4 g MgSO4・7H2O, 0.5g KCl, 0.25 g NH4Cl, 0.14 g K2HPO4, 0.7 g CaCl2・2H2O, and 10 mL trace mineral solution per liter of distilled water. To prepare the N2O-minus modified HNN medium, a concentrated solution of NaHCO3 was added before gas purging of 100% CO2. The tubes were then tightly sealed with butyl rubber stopper, autoclaved, and pressurized the headspace to 300 kPa with 100% H2. Then 0.1% (v/v) of O2 was injected into each tube. H2 and O2 were the sole electron donor and acceptor of the medium, respectively. Ammonium was the only source of nitrogen in the medium. A total of 2 mL of preculture was inoculated to 50 mL glass vials of 20 mL of the same medium, and vials were incubated statically at 55°C for 24 h. Vials were depressurized with 27G needles (TERUMO, Japan), and 46 mL of N2O equivalent to the volume of headspace was injected into each vial, which was then pressurized with mixed gas (80% H2 + 20% CO2) to 300 kPa. No other nitrogen oxide was included in this medium. In addition, strain HRV44T was precultured for 24 h at 55°C in MMJHS medium22 that contained nitrate (NO3), thiosulfate (S2O32−), and elemental sulfur (S0) in liquid phase (MJ synthetic seawater), and H2 (80%) and CO2 (20%) in the gas phase. Then, 2 mL of preculture was inoculated to 50 mL glass vials of MMJHS medium, and vials were incubated statically at 55°C for 24 h.

Method details

Measurement of growth and N2O consumption

During cultivation after N2O treatment, 500 μL of culture medium and headspace gas were collected at each time point (t = 0 (before the addition of N2O), 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 h). Then, optical density (OD) and N2O concentration in the headspace were measured using TECAN infinite200 (absorbance, 620 nm) and a gas chromatograph (Shimadzu, Japan) with the SHINCARBON ST 50/80 (2 m × 3 mm) column (Shinwa Chemical Industries, Japan), respectively. The cultivation experiment was carried out in triplicate, and statistical significance was checked by a paired t-test. In addition, 500 μL of culture medium and headspace gas were collected at each time point (t = 0, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h) during cultivation in MMJHS medium, and OD620 nm and N2O concentration in the headspace were measured.

RNA preparation for nanopore PCR-based RNA-Seq

Collecting bacterial samples for RNA extraction was conducted in N2O-free (t = 0 h, before the addition of N2O, n = 3), N2O-added (t = 3, 6, and 24 h after the addition of N2O, n = 3), and MMJHS (t = 24 h, n =3) treatments. 20 mL of culture medium in each vial were transferred into 50 mL plastic centrifuge tubes, and then 10 mL of RNA fixation solution (8.24 g/L EDTA・3Na, 7.36 g/L trisodium citrate dihydrate, and 700 g/L ammonium sulfate in nuclease-free water, pH = 5.2 adjusted by 1 M H2SO4) was added to each centrifuge tubes. This mixed liquid was centrifuged (16,000×g, 20 min, 4°C), and the pellet was dissolved in 1 mL of TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) and stored at -80°C. Total RNA was extracted with the following methods. The frozen TRIzol solution in which the bacterial pellets were suspended was thawed at room temperature (RT) for 30 min, mixed by inverting the tube, and allowed to stand at RT for 5 min. Then, 200 μL chloroform was added, mixed by inversion for 15 sec, and allowed to stand at RT for 15 min. After centrifuge (12,000×g, 4°C, 15 min), a transparent layer (about 500 μL) was transferred into a new tube, then 1 μL glycogen (5 μg/μL) and 500 μL isopropanol were added to the new tube, mixed by inverting and allowed to stand at RT for 10 min. After centrifuge (12,000×g, 4°C, 10 min) and discarding supernatant, the pellet was washed with 1 mL of 75% ethanol and centrifuged (12,000×g, 4°C, 5 min). Discarding the supernatant, the pellet was allowed to dry at RT for 30 min. Added 55 μL nuclease-free water, the tube was incubated at 55°C for 10 min and cooled at 4°C for 1 h, followed by the cleanup process using the RNeasy MinElute Cleanup kit (Qiagen, Germany). Total RNA integrity was measured with a spectrophotometer (BioSpectrometer, Eppendorf, Germany). E. coli Poly(A) polymerase (New England Biolabs, USA) and Terminator 5’-Phosphate-Dependent Exonuclease (Lucigen, USA) were used to perform polyadenylation and remove rRNA, respectively. Poly(A) mRNA was purified using NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (New England Biolabs, USA). All the above steps were performed according to the protocols provided by the manufacturers, if not mentioned.

Library preparation and nanopore PCR-based RNA-Seq

The cDNA library was prepared using the PCR cDNA Barcoding kit (SQK-PCB109) (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, UK). cDNA amplification was performed by 17 PCR cycles (within a range of the protocol provided by Oxford Nanopore Technologies). The cDNA library was loaded into the FlowCell (FLO-MIN106D) on MinION devices (Mk1B or Mk1C) and performed a sequencing run with MinKNOW software (ver. 3.6.0 for time-course data, ver. 21.06.13 for MMJHS data), generating fast5 files. All the above steps were performed according to the protocols provided by the manufacturers, if not mentioned. Sequencing statistics are available in Table S7.

RNA preparation for illumina RNA-Seq

To evaluate the potential application of Nanopore PCR-based RNA-Seq, total RNA for Illumina RNA-Seq was also extracted from the treatments with N2O (24h) in triplicate by the same method mentioned above. rRNA removal and library preparation were conducted using RiboZero Plus rRNA Depletion Kit and TruSeq stranded mRNA, respectively, at Research Institute for Microbial Disease, Osaka University. RNA-Seq was performed (100 bp, single end) in triplicate with Illumina NovaSeq6000.

Pre-processing of nanopore PCR-based RNA-Seq data

The fast5 read files generated from Nanopore PCR-based RNA-seq were basecalled and sorted by barcode with Guppy software (time-course data, accurate model, ver. 3.4.1; MMJHS data, fast model, ver. 5.0.16), generating fastq files. Raw sequence reads were trimmed with NanoFilt39 (ver. 2.6.0) to remove reads with an average quality score below 6 or less length than 100 bases. Trimmed reads were mapped to strain HRV44T genome with minimap240 (ver. 2.17-r941), and then generated sam files were sorted and converted to bam files with samtools41 (ver. 1.9). The number of reads mapped to CDSs of the HRV44T genome successfully was counted with featureCounts42 in Rsubreads software (ver. 1.6.2). High correlations (R2 > 0.99) were confirmed between the raw count of the time-course data basecalled by accurate and fast models. The genome sequence and annotation data of HRV44T were retrieved from the NCBI database (GCF_014466985.1). Gene name and annotation were also referred to data from egg-NOG mapper v247 (http://eggnog-mapper.embl.de) and RAST server51 (https://rast.nmpdr.org), respectively. The functional characterization of the genes and proteins was conducted using BlastKOALA.52 Gene Ontology (GO) information was obtained using egg-NOG mapper v2.

Pre-processing of illumina RNA-Seq data

Raw sequence reads obtained from Illumina RNA-Seq were trimmed with fastp43 (ver. 0.21.1) to remove reads with quality control below 25 or the number of unknown bases (N) per one read above 10. Trimmed reads were mapped to the HRV44T genome with Bowtie244 (ver. 2.3.4.3). The following process was the same as for Nanopore PCR-based RNA-Seq.

Cells for proteomics

HRV44T was cultivated in the same manner as above. Cells grown under N2O-free (t = 0 h, n = 3) and N2O-added (t = 3, 6, and 24 h, n = 1) treatments were harvested by centrifugation at 16,000×g for 15 min at 4°C. Six cell pellets (approx. 1.0 x 109 cells for each sample) were collected in 1.5 mL tubes and stored at -80°C.

Proteomics: sample prep and mass spectrometry

Bacterial cell pellets were resuspended in 200 μL of 10 mM ammonium bicarbonate with protease inhibitors (100X HALT, 1 μL). Mechanical lysis was performed (Branson 250 Sonifier; 20 kHz, 10 X 10s on ice). Samples were dried down using a speedvac to 10 μL and resuspended in 40 μL SDS lysis buffer (5% 1M TEAB, 5% SDS, 0.2% 1M MgCl2). The supernatant was transferred to a clean tube and proteins were quantified using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay (ThermoFisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were reduced, alkylated, and digested directly on spin columns (PROTIFI, S-Trap micro) with the following modifications to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, reduction was done using dithiothreitol (DTT) to a final concentration of 20 mM, followed by incubation (10 min, 60°C). Alkylation was done with iodoacetamide (IAA) at a final concentration of 40 mM, followed by incubation (30 min, room temperature, dark). Samples were then acidified with 12% phosphoric acid to a final concentration of 1.2%, and the pH was verified to be ∼1. Binding/wash buffer (1:10, 1M TEAB: Methanol) was added to each sample, which was then processed using PROTIFI S-trap micro columns for binding and washing proteins with three rounds of the binding/wash buffer. Centrifugation (3000 x g for 3 min) was used for buffer passage. Additional washes were performed with methanol/chloroform (1:1 ratio) and binding/wash buffer. Proteins were digested using 1 μg Trypsin (Promega) per sample in a total volume of 20 μl and incubated for 1 hour at 47°C. Elution of the resulting peptides was performed with 50 mM TEAB followed by 50% acetonitrile with 0.2% formic acid. Peptide samples were evaporated to dryness in a speedvac (Thermo Scientific Savant) and reconstituted in 20 μL 2% acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid.

Protein lysates were analyzed using data-dependent acquisition (DDA) proteomics (see Mudge et al.61). An external standard (PRTC-Peptide Retention Time Calibration Mixture; ThermoFisher, San Jose, CA) was added to monitor chromatography and MS quality, and sample run order was randomized. For each MS experiment, 1 μg of total protein and 50 fmol PRTC standard were injected and analyzed using a ThermoFisher QExactive (QE) with an EASY-nLC 1200 system. Reverse-phase chromatography was performed using an in-house packed PicoTip fused silica capillary column (40 cm x 75 μm i.d., C18 particles Dr. Maisch Reprosil) with a precolumn (3 cm x 100 μm i.d., C18 particles; Dr. Maisch Reprosil). Peptides were eluted with an acidified water-acetonitrile gradient (2% to 35% acetonitrile over 90 minutes). MS2 acquisition involved the top 20 most intense ions selected from precursor ion scans (m/z range 400-1200), with full MS data collected in centroid mode (resolution 70,000, AGC target 1 × 106) and MS2 data collected at a resolution of 35,000 (centroid mode, AGC target 5 × 104). MS2 ions were selected with +2, +3, and +4 charge states, and a dynamic exclusion time of 30 seconds. QC peptide mixtures, including PRTC and BSA, were injected every fifth MS experiment to monitor chromatography and MS sensitivity, with QC peptides visualized in Skyline54 to ensure standard peptides did not deviate more than 10%. The mass spectrometry data can be found in the ProteomeXchange Consortium via PRIDE with the data set identifier/accession PXD053214.

Homology search of Crp/Fnr superfamily

Wolinella succinogenes, the model organisms of the clade Ⅱ type nosZ microorganism, possess NssA, NssB, and NssC as Crp/Fnr superfamily proteins that are homologues of Campylobacter jejuni nitrosative stress sensing regulator NssR27 and regulate the expression of the several denitrification genes.18 Homology search and amino acid identities (AAIs) calculation of these three proteins were performed on HRV44T using in silico MolecularCloning (https://www.insilico-biology.com/index.php) and BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi), respectively. The binding site of Crp/Fnr superfamily protein (consensus sequence: TTGA-N6-TCAA) was searched upstream of predicted transcriptional units with up to two base mismatches permitted using in silico MolecularCloning.

Quantification and statistical analysis

Transcriptome analyses

Since this is the first study to apply Nanopore PCR-based RNA-Seq to time-series transcriptome analysis of deep-sea vent chemolithoautotrophs, Illumina and Nanopore PCR-based RNA-Seq datasets were compared. In the comparison of 24 h samples, total raw counts averaged 162,061 (103,793 ∼ 269,795) and 8,852,252 (7,759,593 ∼ 10,293,742) for Nanopore PCR-based and Illumina RNA-Seq datasets, respectively. In order to evaluate the correlation of data obtained from both Nanopore PCR-based and Illumina RNA-Seq, each raw count data was normalized by counts per million (CPM) and transcripts per million (TPM). TPM value was calculated by following Equations 1 and 2.

Tt=YtLt×103(Yt=rawreadcount,Lt=genelength) (Equation 1)
TPMt=TttTt×106 (Equation 2)

Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC, R) showed a positive correlation at Log2(CPM+4) (R = 0.57) and Log2(TPM+4) (R = 0.48) normalized data, respectively (Table S6). Regularized Log (rlog) transformed data showed a high correlation (R ≥ 0.78) across all gene length ranges. Positive correlations were confirmed in their Log2(CPM+4) and Log2(TPM+4) normalized data. We, therefore, decided to conduct downstream analysis using the Nanopore PCR-based RNA-Seq dataset.

For further analyses, raw count data were uploaded into iDEP.951 or .9645 (http://bioinformatics.sdstate.edu/idep/). Principal component analysis (PCA), differential gene expression analysis, and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) were performed. Count data results were transformed to Log2(CPM+4) with edgeR for hierarchical clustering.

Differential expression genes (DEG) (|Log2(fold change)| ≥ 1 and FDR < 0.05) were extracted using DESeq2.46 A hierarchical heatmap of DEGs was generated by the Morpheus web tool (https://software.broadinstitute.org/morpheus/) using relative expression data obtained from iDEP. Functions or families of DEGs encoding hypothetical proteins were predicted with Pfam (https://pfam.xfam.org/search). WGCNA was conducted on all CDSs with a soft threshold of 6 and minimum module size of 20 using time-course data, and the first principal component (PC1) was extracted from each color module, and a hierarchical clustering heatmap was constructed. GO enrichment analysis was performed using the R package, goseq48 (ver. 1.50.0), and GO terms were considered significantly enriched with an over-represented p-value < 0.05. REVIGO49 (http://revigo.irb.hr) was used to summarize enriched GO terms. P-value was sorted in ascending order, and top enriched GO terms were visualized using ggplot2 R package (ver. 3.4.4). For prediction of the transcriptional units and transcription start site, bam files were uploaded into Interactive Genomic Viewer (IGV) software50 (https://igv.org/app/), and coverage and alignment data were visualized. Furthermore, the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) of expression level between predicted transcriptional regulators and denitrification genes in HRV44T was calculated by CPM normalized data.

Data analysis of proteomics

Raw mass spectrometry files were searched against a strain-specific database using Comet55,56 v. 2022.01 rev.0. The database included quality control sequences (enolase and PRTC) and common lab contaminants from the CRAPome.57 Comet search parameters included a concatenated decoy search, peptide mass tolerance of 20 ppm, 2 allowed missed cleavages, fragment bin tolerance of 0.02, and a fragment bin offset of 0. Search results were processed with PeptideProphet and ProteinProphet58 with a probability cut-off of 0 and then with Abacus59 where the false discovery rate cut-off was set at 0.01 (corresponding to a combined ProteinProphet probability of 0.64). Adjusted normalized spectral abundance factor values (ADJNSAF) were calculated in Abacus.

Proteins with ADJNSAF values of zero across all six samples were removed, and differential abundance proteins (DAPs) (|Log2(fold change)| ≥ 0.5 and |z-statistic| ≥ 2) were determined using QPROT23 and the qspec-paired command (burn-in = 2,000, iterations = 10,000, normalized = 1). Venn diagram of the DEGs and DAPs was visualized by Venny (ver. 2.1.0) (https://bioinfogp.cnb.csic.es/tools/venny/). For GO enrichment analysis of the DAPs, goseq was used with a correction of protein length. Abundance of the protein was evaluated based on Log2(ADJNSAF+1) values.

Path analysis of time-course transcriptomic data

To statistically test the effects of the N2O exposure and the Crp/Fnr superfamily proteins (NIL_RS03760 and NIL_RS03815) on the expression of the denitrification genes, the path analysis was performed using the lavaan53 package in R (ver. 0.6-13). The presence or absence of N2O (a categorical variable) or the duration of N2O exposure (a numerical variable) were used as exogenous variables. We built two models assuming each exogenous variable affects expressions of NIL_RS03760 and NIL_RS03815 and regulates expressions of each denitrification gene. Model fit was evaluated using the result of the chi-squared test, root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA), standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), goodness of fit index (GFI), and comparative fit index (CFI) calculated by the lavaan. Standardized path coefficients were used to visualize the model structure, and the Wald t-test was performed to confirm the significance of each path.

Published: September 30, 2024

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2024.111074.

Supplemental information

Document S1. Figures S1–S10 and Tables S1–S7
mmc1.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)
Data S1. Abacus output from HRV44T cells cultured under N2O-added (3, 6, 24 h, n = 1) and N2O-free (0 h, n = 3) treatments
mmc2.xlsx (698.3KB, xlsx)

References

  • 1.IPCC . In: Climate change 2022: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. contribution of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Pörtner H.-O., Roberts D.C., Tignor M., Poloczanska E.S., Mintenbeck K., Alegría A., Craig M., Langsdorf S., Löschke S., Möller V., et al., editors. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge University Press; 2022. p. 3056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ravishankara A.R., Daniel J.S., Portmann R.W. Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science. 2009;326:123–125. doi: 10.1126/science.1176985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tian H., Xu R., Canadell J.G., Thompson R.L., Winiwarter W., Suntharalingam P., Davidson E.A., Ciais P., Jackson R.B., Janssens-Maenhout G., et al. A comprehensive quantification of global nitrous oxide sources and sinks. Nature. 2020;586:248–256. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2780-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hallin S., Philippot L., Löffler F.E., Sanford R.A., Jones C.M. Genomics and ecology of novel N2O-reducing microorganisms. Trends Microbiol. 2018;26:43–55. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.07.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Jones C.M., Graf D.R.H., Bru D., Philippot L., Hallin S. The unaccounted yet abundant nitrous oxide-reducing microbial community: a potential nitrous oxide sink. ISME J. 2013;7:417–426. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yoon S., Nissen S., Park D., Sanford R.A., Löffler F.E. Nitrous oxide reduction kinetics distinguish bacteria harboring clade I NosZ from those harboring clade II NosZ. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;82:3793–3800. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00409-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sanford R.A., Wagner D.D., Wu Q., Chee-Sanford J.C., Thomas S.H., Cruz-García C., Rodríguez G., Massol-Deyá A., Krishnani K.K., Ritalahti K.M., et al. Unexpected nondenitrifier nitrous oxide reductase gene diversity and abundance in soils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:19709–19714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211238109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shan J., Sanford R.A., Chee-Sanford J., Ooi S.K., Löffler F.E., Konstantinidis K.T., Yang W.H. Beyond denitrification: the role of microbial diversity in controlling nitrous oxide reduction and soil nitrous oxide emissions. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021;27:2669–2683. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jørgensen B.B., Boetius A. Feast and famine - microbial life in the deep-sea bed. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007;5:770–781. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1745. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nakagawa S., Takai K., Inagaki F., Hirayama H., Nunoura T., Horikoshi K., Sako Y. Distribution, phylogenetic diversity and physiological characteristics of epsilon-Proteobacteria in a deep-sea hydrothermal field. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;7:1619–1632. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00856.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sievert S., Vetriani C. Chemoautotrophy at deep-sea vents, past, present, and future. Oceanography. 2012;25:218–233. doi: 10.5670/oceanog.2012.21. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Muto H., Takaki Y., Hirai M., Mino S., Sawayama S., Takai K., Nakagawa S. A simple and efficient RNA extraction method from deep-sea hydrothermal vent chimney structures. Microbes Environ. 2017;32:330–335. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME17048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mino S., Yoneyama N., Nakagawa S., Takai K., Sawabe T. Enrichment and genomic characterization of a N2O-reducing chemolithoautotroph from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2018;6:184. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2018.00184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fukushi M., Mino S., Tanaka H., Nakagawa S., Takai K., Sawabe T. Biogeochemical implications of N2O-reducing thermophilic Campylobacteria in deep-sea vent fields, and the description of Nitratiruptor labii sp. nov. iScience. 2020;23 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fukazawa S., Mino S., Tsuchiya J., Nakagawa S., Takai K., Sawabe T. Nitrosophilus kaiyonis sp. nov., a hydrogen-sulfur- and thiosulfate-oxidizing chemolithoautotroph within “Campylobacteria” isolated from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent in the Mid-Okinawa Trough. Arch. Microbiol. 2022;205:12. doi: 10.1007/s00203-022-03350-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vollack K.U., Zumft W.G. Nitric oxide signaling and transcriptional control of denitrification genes in Pseudomonas stutzeri. J. Bacteriol. 2001;183:2516–2526. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.8.2516-2526.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bergaust L., van Spanning R.J.M., Frostegård Å., Bakken L.R. Expression of nitrous oxide reductase in Paracoccus denitrificans is regulated by oxygen and nitric oxide through FnrP and NNR. Microbiology. 2012;158:826–834. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.054148-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kern M., Simon J. Three transcription regulators of the Nss family mediate the adaptive response induced by nitrate, nitric oxide or nitrous oxide in Wolinella succinogenes. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;18:2899–2912. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wang F., Chen Z., Pei H., Guo Z., Wen D., Liu R., Song B. Transcriptome profiling analysis of tea plant (Camellia sinensis) using Oxford Nanopore long-read RNA-Seq technology. Gene. 2021;769 doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2020.145247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bayega A., Oikonomopoulos S., Gregoriou M.E., Tsoumani K.T., Giakountis A., Wang Y.C., Mathiopoulos K.D., Ragoussis J. Nanopore long-read RNA-seq and absolute quantification delineate transcription dynamics in early embryo development of an insect pest. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:7878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86753-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang D., Liu X., Zhang J., Gao B., Liu P., Li J., Meng X. Identification of neuropeptides using long-read RNA-Seq in the swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus, and their expression profile under acute ammonia stress. Front. Physiol. 2022;13 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.910585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Takai K., Inagaki F., Nakagawa S., Hirayama H., Nunoura T., Sako Y., Nealson K.H., Horikoshi K. Isolation and phylogenetic diversity of members of previously uncultivated ε-Proteobacteria in deep-sea hydrothermal fields. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003;218:167–174. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2003.tb11514.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Choi H., Kim S., Fermin D., Tsou C.-C., Nesvizhskii A.I. QPROT: Statistical method for testing differential expression using protein-level intensity data in label-free quantitative proteomics. J. Proteomics. 2015;129:121–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.07.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Adam N., Perner M. Microbially mediated hydrogen cycling in deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:2873. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gruber T.M., Gross C.A. Multiple sigma subunits and the partitioning of bacterial transcription space. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2003;57:441–466. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Körner H., Sofia H.J., Zumft W.G. Phylogeny of the bacterial superfamily of Crp-Fnr transcription regulators: exploiting the metabolic spectrum by controlling alternative gene programs. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2003;27:559–592. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00066-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Elvers K.T., Turner S.M., Wainwright L.M., Marsden G., Hinds J., Cole J.A., Poole R.K., Penn C.W., Park S.F. NssR, a member of the Crp-Fnr superfamily from Campylobacter jejuni, regulates a nitrosative stress-responsive regulon that includes both a single-domain and a truncated haemoglobin. Mol. Microbiol. 2005;57:735–750. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04723.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Messenger S.L., Green J. FNR-mediated regulation of hyp expression in Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003;228:81–86. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00726-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Hein S., Witt S., Simon J. Clade II nitrous oxide respiration of Wolinella succinogenes depends on the NosG, -C1, -C2, -H electron transport module, NosB and a Rieske/cytochrome bc complex. Environ. Microbiol. 2017;19:4913–4925. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hein S., Simon J. Bacterial nitrous oxide respiration: electron transport chains and copper transfer reactions. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 2019;75:137–175. doi: 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2019.07.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Matsubara T. Studies on denitrification: XIII. some properties of the N2O-anaerobically grown cell. J. Biochem. 1971;69:991–1001. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jbchem.a129572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Weidenhaupt M., Rossi P., Beck C., Fischer H.-M., Hennecke H. Bradyrhizobium japonicum possesses two discrete sets of electron transfer flavoprotein genes: fixA, fixB and etfS, etfL. Arch. Microbiol. 1996;165:169–178. doi: 10.1007/BF01692858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Jiménez-Leiva A., Cabrera J.J., Bueno E., Torres M.J., Salazar S., Bedmar E.J., Delgado M.J., Mesa S. Expanding the regulon of the Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens NnrR transcription factor: new insights into the denitrification pathway. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1926. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Guttenplan S.B., Kearns D.B. Regulation of flagellar motility during biofilm formation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 2013;37:849–871. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.McBride M.J. Bacterial gliding motility: multiple mechanisms for cell movement over surfaces. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2001;55:49–75. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lertsethtakarn P., Ottemann K.M., Hendrixson D.R. Motility and chemotaxis in Campylobacter and Helicobacter. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;65:389–410. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Hiis E.G., Vick S.H.W., Molstad L., Røsdal K., Jonassen K.R., Winiwarter W., Bakken L.R. Unlocking bacterial potential to reduce farmland N2O emissions. Nature. 2024;630:421–428. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07464-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Perez-Riverol Y., Bai J., Bandla C., García-Seisdedos D., Hewapathirana S., Kamatchinathan S., Kundu D.J., Prakash A., Frericks-Zipper A., Eisenacher M., et al. The PRIDE database resources in 2022: a hub for mass spectrometry-based proteomics evidences. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50:D543–D552. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab1038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.De Coster W., D’Hert S., Schultz D.T., Cruts M., Van Broeckhoven C. NanoPack: visualizing and processing long-read sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:2666–2669. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Li H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:3094–3100. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Li H., Handsaker B., Wysoker A., Fennell T., Ruan J., Homer N., Marth G., Abecasis G., Durbin R., 1000 Genome Project Data Processing Subgroup The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Liao Y., Smyth G.K., Shi W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:923–930. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chen S., Zhou Y., Chen Y., Gu J. Fastp: An ultra-fast all-in-one FASTQ preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:i884–i890. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Langmead B., Salzberg S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ge S.X., Son E.W., Yao R. iDEP: an integrated web application for differential expression and pathway analysis of RNA-Seq data. BMC Bioinf. 2018;19:534. doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2486-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Love M.I., Huber W., Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cantalapiedra C.P., Hernández-Plaza A., Letunic I., Bork P., Huerta-Cepas J. eggNOG-mapper v2: Functional annotation, orthology assignments, and domain prediction at the metagenomic scale. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2021;38:5825–5829. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Young M.D., Wakefield M.J., Smyth G.K., Oshlack A. Gene ontology analysis for RNA-seq: accounting for selection bias. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R14. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-2-r14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Supek F., Bošnjak M., Škunca N., Šmuc T. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One. 2011;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021800. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Thorvaldsdóttir H., Robinson J.T., Mesirov J.P. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief. Bioinform. 2013;14:178–192. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbs017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Aziz R.K., Bartels D., Best A.A., DeJongh M., Disz T., Edwards R.A., Formsma K., Gerdes S., Glass E.M., Kubal M., et al. The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008;9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kanehisa M., Sato Y., Morishima K. BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG tools for functional characterization of genome and metagenome sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 2016;428:726–731. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Rosseel Y. Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. J. Stat. Softw. 2012;48:1–36. doi: 10.18637/jss.v048.i02. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.MacLean B., Tomazela D.M., Shulman N., Chambers M., Finney G.L., Frewen B., Kern R., Tabb D.L., Liebler D.C., MacCoss M.J. Skyline: an open source document editor for creating and analyzing targeted proteomics experiments. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:966–968. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Eng J.K., Jahan T.A., Hoopmann M.R. Comet: An open-source MS/MS sequence database search tool. Proteomics. 2013;13:22–24. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201200439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Eng J.K., Hoopmann M.R., Jahan T.A., Egertson J.D., Noble W.S., MacCoss M.J. A deeper look into comet—implementation and features. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2015;26:1865–1874. doi: 10.1007/s13361-015-1179-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mellacheruvu D., Wright Z., Couzens A.L., Lambert J.P., St-Denis N.A., Li T., Miteva Y.V., Hauri S., Sardiu M.E., Low T.Y., et al. The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification–mass spectrometry data. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:730–736. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Nesvizhskii A.I., Keller A., Kolker E., Aebersold R. A statistical model for identifying proteins by tandem mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2003;75:4646–4658. doi: 10.1021/ac0341261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Fermin D., Basrur V., Yocum A.K., Nesvizhskii A.I. Abacus: a computational tool for extracting and pre-processing spectral count data for label-free quantitative proteomic analysis. Proteomics. 2011;11:1340–1345. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201000650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sako Y., Takai K., Ishida Y., Uchida A., Katayama Y. Rhodothermus obamensis sp. nov., a modern lineage of extremely thermophilic marine bacteria. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1996;46:1099–1104. doi: 10.1099/00207713-46-4-1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Mudge M.C., Nunn B.L., Firth E., Ewert M., Hales K., Fondrie W.E., Noble W.S., Toner J., Light B., Junge K.A. Subzero, saline incubations of Colwellia psychrerythraea reveal strategies and biomarkers for sustained life in extreme icy environments. Environ. Microbiol. 2021;23:3840–3866. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Figures S1–S10 and Tables S1–S7
mmc1.pdf (1.6MB, pdf)
Data S1. Abacus output from HRV44T cells cultured under N2O-added (3, 6, 24 h, n = 1) and N2O-free (0 h, n = 3) treatments
mmc2.xlsx (698.3KB, xlsx)

Data Availability Statement

  • Data: the raw RNA-seq datasets presented in this study (fastq files before quality control) can be found in DDBJ Sequence Read Archive (DRA, https://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp/) and are available under BioProject accession number PRJDB15435 (Run: DRR451265-DRR451279 and DRR571757-DRR571759). The mass spectrometry proteomics dataset has been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE38 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD053214.

  • Code: this paper does not report original code.

  • All other requests: any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported will be shared by the lead contact upon request.


Articles from iScience are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES