Skip to main content
eLife logoLink to eLife
. 2024 Nov 7;13:RP97854. doi: 10.7554/eLife.97854

Mechano-regulation of GLP-1 production by Piezo1 in intestinal L cells

Yanling Huang 1,, Haocong Mo 1,, Jie Yang 2,, Luyang Gao 1,, Tian Tao 1, Qing Shu 1, Wenying Guo 1, Yawen Zhao 1, Jingya Lyu 1, Qimeng Wang 3, Jinghui Guo 4, Hening Zhai 5, Linyan Zhu 6, Hui Chen 3,, Geyang Xu 1,7,
Editors: Jonathan S Bogan8, Dolores Shoback9
PMCID: PMC11542922  PMID: 39509292

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is a gut-derived hormone secreted by intestinal L cells and vital for postprandial glycemic control. As open-type enteroendocrine cells, whether L cells can sense mechanical stimuli caused by chyme and thus regulate GLP-1 synthesis and secretion is unexplored. Molecular biology techniques revealed the expression of Piezo1 in intestinal L cells. Its level varied in different energy status and correlates with blood glucose and GLP-1 levels. Mice with L cell-specific loss of Piezo1 (Piezo1 IntL-CKO) exhibited impaired glucose tolerance, increased body weight, reduced GLP-1 production and decreased CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway under normal chow diet or high-fat diet. Activation of the intestinal Piezo1 by its agonist Yoda1 or intestinal bead implantation increased the synthesis and secretion of GLP-1, thus alleviated glucose intolerance in diet-induced-diabetic mice. Overexpression of Piezo1, Yoda1 treatment or stretching stimulated GLP-1 production and CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway, which could be abolished by knockdown or blockage of Piezo1 in primary cultured mouse L cells and STC-1 cells. These experimental results suggest a previously unknown regulatory mechanism for GLP-1 production in L cells, which could offer new insights into diabetes treatments.

Research organism: Mouse

Introduction

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract represents the largest endocrine organ in the human body. The enteroendocrine cells (EECs) located throughout the GI tract secrete a large number of gastrointestinal hormones to regulate a variety of physiological processes and are key regulators for energy homeostasis (Bany Bakar et al., 2023). GLP-1 is one of the gut-derived peptide hormones essential for postprandial glycemic control (Song et al., 2019). It is produced from Proglucagon (Gcg) by proprotein convertase in the intestinal L cells, a group EECs predominantly situated in the distal gut (Drucker, 2006; Rouillé et al., 1997). The circulating GLP-1 levels rapidly increase after meal and reduce postprandial blood glucose fluctuations by augmenting insulin secretion, suppressing glucagon secretion and slowing gastric emptying (Drucker, 2006; Willms et al., 1996). Nowadays, GLP-1-based therapy is well-recognized and commonly used in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; Saxena et al., 2021; Tan et al., 2022). Elucidation of the mechanism that regulates GLP-1 production is essential for the development of new drug targets for the treatment of diabetes.

EECs can be divided into two categories according to their morphology: open type and closed type. The open type EECs possess microvilli protruding into the gut lumen and have direct contact with the luminal contents. In contrast, the closed type EECs are located basolaterally without direct contact with the lumen (Gribble and Reimann, 2016). Both types of EECs synthesize and store peptides or hormones in secretory granules and release them by exocytosis at the basolateral membrane (Atanga et al., 2023). As open-type EECs, L cells received both chemical and mechanical signals from the luminal contents, and neural signals from the nerves (Furness et al., 2013). It has been well-documented that nutrients such as glucose, lipids, and amino acids in the intestinal lumen can stimulate the secretion of GLP-1 from L cells (Diakogiannaki et al., 2012). GLP-1 secretion can also be stimulated by intrinsic cholinergic nerves (Anini et al., 2002; Drucker, 2006). However, whether and how L cells coordinate mechanical stimuli from intestinal lumen to regulate GLP-1 production remain poorly understood.

Piezo channels, including Piezo1 and Piezo2 have recently been identified as mechanosensitive ion channels involved in the sensation of multiple mechanical stimuli, such as shear stress, pressure, and stretch (Gudipaty et al., 2017; Li et al., 2014; Romac et al., 2018). They allow the influx of cations such as Ca2+ and Na+ in response to mechanical tension and converts mechanical stimuli into various electrical and chemical signals. Piezo1 plays a crucial role in blood pressure regulation, red blood cell volume regulation, bone homeostasis, pulmonary and cardiac functions (Cahalan et al., 2015; Lai et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2016). Previous studies have reported that Piezo1 is expressed in the intestinal epithelium, regulating gut peristalsis, barrier function, mucus secretion, and inflammation (Jiang et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2022a; Sugisawa et al., 2020; Xu et al., 2021). Interestingly, accumulating evidence demonstrates the regulation of insulin and ghrelin secretion by Piezo1 (Deivasikamani et al., 2019; Ye et al., 2022; Zhao et al., 2024). Recent studies have also reported that Piezo2 is expressed in a population of EECs and convert force into serotonin release (Alcaino et al., 2018; Treichel et al., 2022). These findings suggest a critical role of Piezo channels in the mechano-regulation of hormone production. However, whether Piezo channels are expressed L cells and play a role in GLP-1 production remain unknown.

The current study has shown that Piezo1 channels on intestinal L cells mediate mechanosensing of intestinal contents and regulate glucose homeostasis by triggering GLP-1 synthesis and secretion via the CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway. This finding provides new insights into the treatment of T2DM and lays a theoretical foundation for the development of antidiabetic drugs targeting Piezo1.

Results

Assessment of Piezo1 in human and mouse intestine in different energy status

Piezo1 mRNA was found to be highly expressed in both mouse ileal mucosa and STC-1 cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1A). Moreover, Piezo1 was co-localized with GLP-1 in immunofluorescent staining on NCD fed mouse ileal sections, indicating its expression in L cells (Figure 1—figure supplement 1B). Interestingly, increased body weight and impaired glucose tolerance were observed in high-fat diet-induced diabetic mice, while Piezo1 and Proglucagon expression levels in the ileal mucosa of diabetic mice were significantly lower than that in mice feed with normal chow diet (Figure 1—figure supplement 1C–F). Moreover, ileal mucosal Piezo1 mRNA levels were positively correlated with Gcg mRNA levels (Figure 1—figure supplement 1G), but negatively correlated with the AUC of glucose tolerance test (Figure 1—figure supplement 1H). Obese T2DM patients who underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery showed decreased BMI (Figure 1—figure supplement 1I) and increased Piezo1 and GLP-1 in ileal mucosa (Figure 1—figure supplement 1J, K) compared to that before surgery. These findings indicated that Piezo1 is expressed in intestinal L cells and its level varies in different energy status.

Generation and characterization of Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice

To investigate the potential role of Piezo1 in GLP-1 production, we tried to knockout Piezo1 in L cells by Cre-loxP system driven by an L cell-specific promoter. Proglucagon (encoded by Gcg gene) is mainly expressed in both L cells and pancreatic α cells (Jin, 2008). Villin-1 (encoded by Vil1 gene) is expressed in gastrointestinal epithelium, including L cells, but not in pancreatic α cells (Maunoury et al., 1992; Rutlin et al., 2020). Since neither Gcg nor Villin are specific markers for L cells, we tried to generate a new line of mice enabling loss of Piezo1 expression specifically in the intestine L cell by combination of FLP-Frt and Cre-loxP system. We inserted a Flippase (FLP) expression cassette in the 3’UTR of Vil1 to generate a Vil1 promoter-driven FLP mice (Vil1FLP; Figure 1A). Then, we generated Flippase-dependent Gcg promoter driven-Cre (GcgCre) mice by inserting an Frt-flanked Cre expression cassette in reverse orientation within the 3’- UTR of Gcg gene (Figure 1A). We further crossed the Vil1FLP mice with GcgCre mice to obtain L-cell-specific Cre mice (Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre), in which Vil1 promoter-driven Flippase flipped the reverse Cre cassette into a correct orientation in Villin-positive cells (including L cells, but not pancreatic α cells), and thus Cre can only be expressed under the Gcg promoter in L cells. The genotypes of the Vil1FLP, GcgCre and Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre mice were identified by PCR with specific primers (Figure 1B). The flipping of the reverse Cre cassette was validated by PCR, which confirmed that the flipping only occurred the intestine, but not in the pancreas (Figure 1C). To confirm the cell type specificity of Cre activity, we crossed Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre mice to Rosa26mT/mG reporter mice. All tissues and cells of Rosa26mT/mG mice express red fluorescence (membrane-targeted tdTomato; mT) at baseline, and switch to membrane-targeted EGFP in the presence of cell-specific Cre (Figure 1D). EGFP expression was only observed scatteredly in the intestine, but not in the pancreas, indicating the intestine-specific Cre activity in the Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre mice (Figure 1E). Finally, we bred Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre mice with Piezo1loxp/loxp mice to generate Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice (Figure 1F).

Figure 1. Generation, validation, and characterization of Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice.

(A) Schematic description for the generation of Vil1FLP and Flippase-dependent GcgCre mice. Vil1FLP flip the inverted Cre gene in the GcgCre cassette in Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre mice to restrict Cre expression in intestinal L cells. As shown, locations of genotyping primers are also indicated. (B) Tail DNA genotyping PCR results using genotyping primer for Vil1FLP, GcgCre and Flippase-activated Cre (Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre) mice. (C) Intestine and pancreas DNA genotyping results. The ‘Original’ band represents the original GcgCre cassette with inverted Cre, while the ‘Flipped’ band represents recombined GcgCre cassette with Cre flipped into the correct direction. (D) Schematic description for the validation of Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre efficacy by crossing with Rosa26mT/mG reporter mice. (E) Fluorescence was detected in the ileal and pancreatic tissues from Rosa26mT/mG and Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre-Rosa26mT/mG mice by frozen tissue confocal microscopy. Green fluorescence represents successful deletion of TdTomato and reactivation of EGFP in the Cre-expressing cells. (F) Schematic description for the generation of Intestinal L cell-Piezo1-/- mice (Piezo1 IntL-CKO) by crossing Piezo1loxp/loxp mice with Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre mice. (G) Body weight of 14- to 16-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). (H, I) IPGTT (H) and ITT (I) and associated area under the curve (AUC) values of 14- to 16-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). (J) Gcg mRNA levels in ileum of 14- to 16-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). (K) The plasma GLP-1 levels in 14- to 16-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). (L) Representative images for Piezo1 RNA-FISH and GLP-1 immunofluorescent staining in the ileum of 14-week-old male mice of indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). (M) Percentage of Piezo1-positive GLP-1 cells in total GLP-1 cells in the ileal mucosa of 14-week-old male mice of indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). (N) A schematic diagram depicting the potential mechanisms linking the CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling pathway and GLP-1 production. (O) Representative western blots are shown for indicated antibodies in the ileal mucosa (n=6/group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by Student’s t test for comparison between two groups, and by one-way ANOVA for comparison among three groups or more, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original gels and blots for Figure 1B, C and O, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
Figure 1—source data 2. Original files for gel and western blot analysis displayed in Figure 1B, C and O.
Figure 1—source data 3. Original data for Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1. Assessment of Piezo1 and GLP-1 in mouse and human ilea.

Figure 1—figure supplement 1.

(A) Piezo1 mRNA levels in STC-1 cells and various tissues of 14-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice fed with normal chow diet (NCD). (B) Double immunofluorescent staining of Piezo1 (red) and GLP-1 (green) in the NCD mouse ileum. (C) Body weight of 14-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice were fed with either normal chow diet (NCD) or high-fat diet (HFD) (n=6/group). (D) IPGTT and associated area under the curve (AUC) values of 14-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice fed with NCD or HFD (n=6/group). (E) Representative western blots are shown for Piezo1 and β-actin protein levels in the ileal mucosa of 14-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice fed with NCD or HFD (n=6/group). (F) Piezo1 and Proglucagon (Gcg) mRNA levels in the ileal mucosa of 14-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice fed with NCD or HFD detected by qPCR (n=6/group). (G) Pearson’s correlation analysis of the correlation between ileal mucosal Piezo1 and Gcg mRNA levels in 14-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice fed with NCD or HFD. (H) Pearson’s correlation analysis of the correlation between area under the curve (AUC) for glucose excursion and ileal mucosal Piezo1 mRNA level in 14-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice fed with NCD or HFD. (I) Body mass index (BMI) of post-RYGB subjects and obese type 2 diabetics (n=6/group). (J) Piezo1 mRNA levels in the ileal mucosa of post-RYGB subjects and obese type 2 diabetics by qPCR (n=6/group). (K) Double immunofluorescent staining of Piezo1 and GLP-1 in the ileum of post-RYGB patients and obese type 2 diabetic patients. (n=6/group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by Student’s t test for comparison between two groups, and by one-way ANOVA for comparison among three groups or more. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 1—figure supplement 1E, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 1—figure supplement 1E.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 3. Original data for Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2. Food intake and water intake of Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2.

(A) Food intake and (B) water intake of 12- to 14-week-old male Piezo1loxp/loxp and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with normal chow diet (n=8/group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by Student’s t test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Original files for food intake analysis displayed in Figure 1—figure supplement 2.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3. Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice preserve normal pancreatic morphology and Proglucagon expression under normal diet feeding.

Figure 1—figure supplement 3.

(A) HE staining of pancreatic sections from 14- to 16-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD. (B, C) Piezo1 (B) and Gcg (C) mRNA levels in pancreas of 14- to 16-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD. (n=6/group). (D) Western blot analysis of Proglucagon protein levels in pancreas of 14- to 16-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by Student’s t test for comparison between two groups, and by one-way ANOVA for comparison among three groups or more, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 1—figure supplement 3D, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 1—figure supplement 3D.
Figure 1—figure supplement 3—source data 3. Original data for Figure 1—figure supplement 3.
Figure 1—figure supplement 4. Intestinal morphology of Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice.

Figure 1—figure supplement 4.

(A, B) HE staining of ileal sections from 14- to 16-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (A) or HFD (B). (C, D) The length of small intestine from male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (C) or HFD (D) (n=6/group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by Student’s t test for comparison between two groups, and by one-way ANOVA for comparison among three groups or more.
Figure 1—figure supplement 4—source data 1. Original files for length of small intestine analysis displayed in Figure 1—figure supplement 4C, D.
Figure 1—figure supplement 5. Double immunostaining of Piezo1 and GLP-1 in the intestines of Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice.

Figure 1—figure supplement 5.

(A) Representative images for Piezo1 and GLP-1 immunofluorescent staining from different regions of the intestine of 14-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). (B) Percentage of Piezo1-positive GLP-1 cells in total GLP-1 cells in the different regions of intestinal mucosa of 14-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group).
Figure 1—figure supplement 5—source data 1. Original files for the analysis of the percentage of Piezo1-positive GLP-1 cells among total GLP-1 cells in various regions of the intestinal mucosa are shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 5.
Figure 1—figure supplement 6. Expression of Piezo1 in intestinal ghrelin cells and pancreatic α cells.

Figure 1—figure supplement 6.

(A) Representative images for Piezo1 and Ghrelin immunofluorescent staining in the ileum of 14-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). (B) Representative images for Piezo1 and Glucagon immunofluorescent staining in the pancreas of 14-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed NCD (n=6/group).
Figure 1—figure supplement 7. Assessment of L cell hormones and CCK in the ileum of Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice.

Figure 1—figure supplement 7.

(A) Representative images for Peptide YY (PYY) immunofluorescent staining in the ileum of 14-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). (B) Percentage of PYY-positive cells in ileal mucosal cells (n=6/group). (C) Representative images for GLP-1 immunofluorescent staining in the ileum of 14-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). (D) Percentage of GLP-1-positive cells in ileal mucosal cells (n=6/group). (E) Ileal mucosal CCK mRNA levels of 14- to 16-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group).
Figure 1—figure supplement 7—source data 1. Original data for Figure 1—figure supplement 7B, D and E.
Figure 1—figure supplement 8. Effect of L cell-specific Piezo1 deletion on intestinal barrier function and tight junction proteins.

Figure 1—figure supplement 8.

(A) Representative images for ZO-1 immunofluorescent staining in the ileum of 14-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). (B) Representative images for Occludin immunofluorescent staining in the ileum of 14-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD (n=6/group). (C) Representative western blots are shown for ZO-1, Occludin and β-actin protein levels in the ileal mucosa of 14-week-old male mice of the indicated genotypes fed with NCD or HFD (n=6/group).
Figure 1—figure supplement 8—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 1—figure supplement 8C, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
Figure 1—figure supplement 8—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 1—figure supplement 8C.

Under normal chow diet, Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice exhibited increased body weight (Figure 1G) and greater glycemic excursions compared to control groups (Piezo1loxp/loxp, Vil1FLP, GcgCre and Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre; Figure 1H and I), while the food and water intake were not changed (Figure 1—figure supplement 2A, B). The morphology of islet (Figure 1—figure supplement 3A) and ileum (Figure 1—figure supplement 4A) were not affected. Ileal mucosal Proglucagon expression and plasma GLP-1 level were significantly lower in Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice than that in all littermate controls such as Piezo1loxp/loxp, Vil1FLP, GcgCre and Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre mice (Figure 1J and K), while no significant alteration was observed in the expression of pancreatic Piezo1 and Proglucagon (Figure 1—figure supplement 3B–D). According to in situ hybridization of Piezo1 and immunofluorescence analysis of GLP-1, the expression of Piezo1 disappeared in GLP-1 positive cells, suggesting successful knockout of Piezo1 in L cells in Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice (Figure 1L and M). Also depicted in Figure 1—figure supplement 5, Piezo1 is expressed in GLP-1-positive cells of the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon in control mice, but not in Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice. However, Piezo1 remains expressed in intestinal ghrelin positive cells and pancreatic glucagon-positive cells of Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice (Figure 1—figure supplement 6). Moreover, while GLP-1 levels were reduced in L cells of Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice, levels of PYY, another hormone secreted by L cells, were unaffected (Figure 1—figure supplement 7A–D). Additionally, ileal mucosal cholecystokinin (CCK), a hormone secreted by I cells with metabolic effects similar to GLP-1, was also unchanged in Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice (Figure 1—figure supplement 7E). Previous study showed that Piezo1 affected intestinal tight junctions and epithelial integrity (Jiang et al., 2021). To access whether loss of Piezo1 in L cells affect epithelial integrity of the intestine, we examined the expression of tight junction proteins, including ZO-1 and Occludin. As shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 8, the expression of ZO-1 and Occludin remained unchanged in Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice when compared to littermate controls.

Piezo1 is a non-selective cationic channel that allows passage of Ca2+ and Na+. CaMKKβ is the main calcium/calmodulin dependent protein kinase kinase involved in the regulation of metabolic homeostasis (Marcelo et al., 2016). It is activated by binding calcium-calmodulin (Ca2+/CaM), resulting in downstream activation of kinases CaMKIV. The activation of CaMKIV modulate the gene expression of nutrient- and hormone-related proteins (Ban et al., 2000; Chen et al., 2011; Takemoto-Kimura et al., 2017). Previous studies have reported that Ca2+ and mTOR signaling regulate the production of GLP-1 (Tolhurst et al., 2011; Xu et al., 2015; Yu and Jin, 2010). Drawing from these findings, this research study proposed a hypothesis that Piezo1 may regulate GLP-1 synthesis via the CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling pathway (Figure 1N). As shown in Figure 1O, abrogated GLP-1 production was associated with decreased CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling in the ileal mucosa of Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice (Figure 1O).

Derangements of glucose metabolism and GLP-1 production were induced by HFD in Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice, which was mitigated by Exendin-4

We next assessed the effect of L-cell-specific Piezo1 gene deletion on GLP-1 and glucose tolerance in diet-induced diabetic mice. Piezo1 IntL-CKO and control mice were exposed to HFD for 10 weeks. Compared to the controls, higher body weight (Figure 2A), greater glucose excursions (Figure 2B) were observed in Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice exposed to HFD. Ileal mucosal Proglucagon expression levels were lower in Piezo1 IntL-CKO than control mice (Figure 2C–F). Impaired CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway in ileal mucosa as evidenced by a decrease in CaMKKβ, reduced phosphorylation levels of CaMKIV, mTOR, S6K, and S6 was also observed in Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice (Figure 2F). No significant alteration in morphology, Piezo1 or Proglucagon levels were observed in the pancreas of Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A–D). Together these data demonstrate that Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice with prolonged HFD feeding exhibit impaired glucose metabolism phenotype and reduced GLP-1.

Figure 2. Validation and phenotype of Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with high-fat diet.

(A) Body weight of 14- to 16-week-old male Piezo1loxp/loxp and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks (n=6/group). (B) IPGTT and associated area under the curve (AUC) values of 14- to 16-week-old male Piezo1loxp/loxp and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with HFD (n=6/group). (C) Gcg mRNA levels in the ileal mucosa of 14- to 16-week-old male Piezo1loxp/loxp and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with HFD (n=6/group). (D) The plasma GLP-1 level in 14- to 16-week-old male Piezo1loxp/loxp and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with HFD (n=6/group). (E) Double immunofluorescent staining of Piezo1, and GLP-1 in the ilea of 14- to 16-week-old male Piezo1loxp/loxp and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with HFD (n=6/group). (F) Representative western blots are shown for indicated antibodies in the ileal mucosa (n=6/group). (G) Body weight after 7 consecutive days infusion of saline or Ex-4 (100 µg/kg body weight) in 14- to 16-week-old male Piezo1loxp/loxp and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with HFD (n=6/group). (H, I) IPGTT (H) and ITT (I) and associated area under the curve (AUC) values after consecutive infusion of saline or Ex-4. (J) Gcg mRNA levels in the ileal mucosa (n=6/group) after consecutive infusion of saline or Ex-4. (K) The plasma GLP-1 level after consecutive infusion of saline or Ex-4 (n=6/group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by Student’s t test for comparison between two groups, and by one-way ANOVA for comparison among three groups or more, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 2—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 2F, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
Figure 2—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 2F.
Figure 2—source data 3. Original data for Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1. Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice preserve normal pancreatic morphology and proglucagon expression under HFD.

Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

(A) HE staining of pancreatic sections from 14- to 16-week-old male Piezo1loxp/loxp and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with HFD. (B) Piezo1 and (C) Gcg mRNA levels in pancreas of 14- to 16-week-old male Piezo1loxp/loxp and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with HFD (n=6/group). (D) Western blot analysis of Proglucagon protein levels in pancreas of 14- to 16-week-old male Piezo1loxp/loxp and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with HFD (n=6/group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by Student’s t test for comparison between two groups, and by one-way ANOVA for comparison among three groups or more, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 2—figure supplement 1D, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 2—figure supplement 1D.
Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 3. Original data for Figure 2—figure supplement 1.

Injection of GLP-1 analog Exendin-4 (Ex-4) decreased the body weight (Figure 2G) and improved both glucose tolerance (Figure 2H) and insulin resistance (Figure 2I) in control and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice, while endogenous synthesis of GLP-1 was not changed by Ex-4 injection in Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice (Figure 2J and K). These data suggested that decreased GLP-1 synthesis and secretion contribute to impaired glucose metabolism in Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice.

The pharmacological and mechanical activation of ileal Piezo1 stimulates GLP-1 synthesis

We next examined whether activation of Piezo1 could rescued the impaired glucose metabolism in diet-induced diabetic mice. Injection of Piezo1 activator Yoda1 after 10 weeks of high-fat diet, led to reduced body weight and improved the impaired glucose metabolism significantly in diabetic mice, while Piezo1 antagonist GsMTx4 reversed the weight loss and glucose-lowering effect of Yoda1 (Figure 3A and B). Yoda1 remarkably induced an increase in GLP-1 synthesis and secretion (Figure 3C and D), as well as an increment of CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling in ileal mucosa (Figure 3E), while GsMTx4 abolished the effect of Yoda1 (Figure 3C–E). However, weight loss, improved plasma glucose and increased GLP-1 production induced by Yoda1 were not observed in Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice (Figure 3F–J).

Figure 3. Chemical and mechanical interventions of Piezo1 regulate GLP-1 synthesis in mice.

(A–E) 14- to 16-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks were infused with vehicle, Yoda1 (2 μg per mouse) or GsMTx4 (250 μg/kg) by i.p. for 7 consecutive days. (n=6/group). (A) Body weight after consecutive drug infusion. (B) IPGTT and associated area under the curve (AUC) values. (C) Gcg mRNA levels in the ileal mucosa. (D) Plasma GLP-1. (E) Representative western blots are shown for indicated antibodies in the ileal mucosa. (F–J) 14- to 16-week-old male Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with HFD for 10 weeks were infused with vehicle, Yoda1 (2 μg per mouse) by i.p. for 7 consecutive days. (n=4 or 5/group). (F) Body weight after 7 consecutive days’ drug infusion. (G) Fasting blood glucose levels. (H) Ileal mucosal Gcg mRNA levels. (I) Plasma GLP-1 levels. (J) Ileal mucosal Proglucagon protein levels. (K–R) 14- to 16-week-old male C57BL/6 J mice fed with HFD were subjected to sham operation, or intestinal bead implantation (n=6/group). (K) Fasting blood glucose levels. (L) IPGTT and associated area under the curve (AUC) values. (M) Body weight. (N, O) Piezo1 (N) and Gcg (O) mRNA levels in the ileal mucosa. (P) The plasma GLP-1 levels. (Q) Immunofluorescence staining of GLP-1 in ileum and quantification of GLP-1-positive cells. (R) Representative western blots images and densitometry quantification for indicated antibodies in the ileal mucosa. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by Student’s t test for comparison between two groups, and by one-way ANOVA for comparison among three groups or more, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 3—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 3E, J and R, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
Figure 3—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 3E, J and R.
Figure 3—source data 3. Original data for Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1. Effect of intestinal bead implantation on fecal weight, gastrointestinal transit time and abdominal pain in C57BL/6 J mice.

Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

(A) Fecal weight of sham and bead implanted mice fed with HFD. (n=9/group). (B) Gastrointestinal transit time of sham and bead-implanted mice fed with HFD. (n=5/group). (C) Assessment of abdominal mechanical sensitivity. Mechanical sensitivity of the abdomen was assessed using calibrated von Frey filaments (0.07 g, 0.16 g, and 1 g) in sham and bead-implanted mice (n=5 per group). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. Significance was determined by Student’s t test for comparison between two groups, and by one-way ANOVA for comparison among three groups or more, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

The intestine receives mechanical stimulation from the chyme, which may activate Piezo1 in the intestine epithelium, including L cells. To mimic the mechanical pressing and stretching induced by intestinal contents, a small silicon bead was implanted into the high-fat diet-induced diabetic mouse ileum. To exclude the possibility of bowel obstruction and abdominal pain caused by bead implantation, we measured the fecal mass and gastrointestinal transit time, and accessed abdominal mechanical sensitivity in both sham and bead-implanted mice. As shown in Figure 3—figure supplement 1A, B, there was no significant difference in fecal mass and gastrointestinal transit time between the sham-operated mice and those implanted with beads. The results of abdominal mechanical sensitivity indicated that no difference in abdominal pain threshold was observed between sham and bead implanted mice (Figure 3—figure supplement 1C). Intestinal bead implantation improved the impaired glucose metabolism in diabetic mice (Figure 3K and L). Body weight loss, activated ileal mucosal CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling, increased mRNA and protein levels of ileal mucosal Piezo1 and Proglucagon, as well as the circulating levels of GLP-1 were observed in diabetic mice after operation (Figure 3M–R). The above data suggest that mechanical stimuli induced by intestinal bead implantation activates ileal Piezo1 in diabetic mice, stimulating GLP-1 production via CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling axis, thus improving glucose homeostasis.

Piezo1 regulates GLP-1 synthesis and secretion in primary cultured mouse L cells and isolated mouse ileum

To obtain primary L cells, we isolated cell from the ileum of Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre-Rosa26mT/mG mice, in which tdTomato expression switched to EGFP expression in L cells as shown in Figure 1E. EGFP-positive cells (mouse L cells) were then sorted from isolated single cells (Figure 4A). Immunofluorescence showed that the sorted EGFP+ cells were Piezo1 positive (Figure 4B).

Figure 4. Piezo1 regulates GLP-1 synthesis and secretion in primary cultured mouse L cells and isolated mouse ileum.

Figure 4.

(A) Isolation of mouse L cells (GFP positive) from ileal tissue by FACS. The gating in flowcytometry for sorting of GFP-positive cells. (B) Immunofluorescent staining of Piezo1 in sorted GFP-positive L cells. (C) Intracellular Ca2+ imaging by fluo-4-AM calcium probe. The change of fluorescent intensity (ΔF/F0) was plotted against time. (D–F) L cells were treated with vehicle or Yoda1 (5 μM) for 24 hr. (D) Gcg mRNA expression. (E) GLP-1 concentrations in the culture medium. (F) Western blot images and densitometry quantification for the indicated antibodies. (G–J) Knockdown of Piezo1 in L cells by shRNA for 48 hours. (G) Piezo1 mRNA expression. (H) Gcg mRNA expression. (I) GLP-1 levels in the culture medium. (J) Western blot images and densitometry quantification for the indicated antibodies. (K–N) Ileal tissues from Piezo1loxp/loxp and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice were subjected to tension force (n=6/group). (K) A representative photograph showing the traction of isolated ileum. (L) Gcg mRNA levels. (M) GLP-1 concentrations in the medium. (N) Western blot images and densitometry quantification for the indicated antibodies. Data are represented as mean ± SEM and are representative of six biological replicates. Significance was determined by Student’s t test for comparison between two groups, and by one-way ANOVA for comparison among three groups or more, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 4—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 4F, J and N, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
Figure 4—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 4F, J and N.
Figure 4—source data 3. Original data for Figure 4.

Yoda1 at the dose of 5 μM triggered an increase in intracellular Ca2+ level in primary cultured mouse L cells, which was blocked by pre-incubation of cells with GsMTx4 (0.1 μM) for 15 min (Figure 4C). Yoda1 also stimulated Proglucagon expression and GLP-1 secretion, as well as CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling pathway in primary cultured mouse L cells (Figure 4D–F). In contrast, knockdown of Piezo1 by shRNA led to significant decrease in Proglucagon expression and GLP-1 secretion, as well as inhibition of CaMKKβ/CaMKIV/mTOR signaling pathway (Figure 4G–J).

Given the ability of Piezo1 in sensing mechanical force, tension of 1.5 g was applied to the isolated mouse ileum bathed in Tyrode’s solution for four hours. Tension stimulated Proglucagon expression, GLP-1 secretion and activated CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling pathway in the ileum of control mice, but not in Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice (Figure 4K–N), suggesting the involvement of Piezo1 of the L cells in mediating the force-induced GLP-1 production and CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling.

Pharmacological, mechanical and genetic activation of Piezo1 stimulates GLP-1 synthesis and secretion in STC-1 cells

To further validate the role of Piezo1 in regulating GLP-1, we examined the effect of manipulating Piezo1 on GLP-1 production in an intestinal neuroendocrine cell line STC-1. Pharmacological activation of Piezo1 by Yoda1 triggered an inward current in STC-1 cell recorded by whole cell patch-clamp, which could be inhibited by pre-incubation of GsMTx4 (Figure 5A). Yoda1 also triggered an increase in intracellular Ca2+ level in STC-1 cells. Pre-incubation of cells with GsMTx4 (0.1 μM) for 15 min inhibited [Ca2+]i increase (Figure 5B and C). Yoda1 induced a concentration-dependent activation of CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR pathway and GLP-1 synthesis and secretion (Figure 5D–F). GsMTx4 blocked the effect of Yoda1 on STC-1 cells in both GLP-1 and CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR activation (Figure 5G–I).

Figure 5. Modulation of GLP-1 synthesis and secretion by pharmacological and mechanical activation of Piezo1 in STC-1 cells.

Figure 5.

(A) Whole-cell currents induced by Yoda1 (5 μM) were recorded from STC-1 cells or STC-1 cells pretreated with GsMTx4 for 30 min. (B, C) Intracellular calcium imaging in STC-1 cells. (B) STC-1 cells were loaded with fluo-4 AM for 1 hr. The representative time-lapse image showing the intracellular Ca2+ signals. (C) The change of fluorescent intensity (ΔF/F0) was plotted against time. (D–F) STC-1 cells were treated with various concentrations of Yoda1 for 24 hr. (D) Whole-cell extracts underwent western blot with indicated antibodies. (E) Gcg mRNA levels. (F) GLP-1 concentrations in the culture medium. (G–I) STC-1 cells were treated with Yoda1 (5 μM) in the presence or absence of GsMTx4 (0.1 μM) for 24 hr. (G) Whole-cell extracts underwent western blot with indicated antibodies. (H) Gcg mRNA levels. (I) GLP-1 concentrations in the culture medium. (J–N) STC-1 were subjected to mechanical stretch. (J) STC-1 cells were cultured in elastic chambers and the chambers were subjected to mechanical stretch by 120% extension of their original length. (K) The medium GLP-1 concentrations were detected at indicated time. (L) Piezo1 mRNA levels. (M) Gcg mRNA levels. (N) Whole-cell extracts underwent western blot with indicated antibodies. Data are represented as mean ± SEM and are representative of six biological replicates. Significance was determined by Student’s t test for comparison between two groups, and by one-way ANOVA for comparison among three groups or more, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 5—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 5D, G and N, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
Figure 5—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 5D, G and N.
Figure 5—source data 3. Original data for Figure 5.

To mimic the activation of Piezo1 by mechanical stretching in vivo, STC-1 cells grown on elastic chambers were subjected to mechanical stretch to 120% of their original length. Mechanical stretch upregulated Piezo1 and Proglucagon expression, promoted GLP-1 secretion (Figure 5J–N), and activated CaMKKβ/CaMKIV- mTOR signaling pathways (Figure 5N).

Consistent to the pharmacological and mechanical activation of Piezo1, over-expression of Piezo1 in STC-1 cells resulted in a significant increase in GLP-1 production, as well as activation of the CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling pathway (Figure 6A–D). Conversely, knockdown of Piezo1 by shRNA led to a significant decrease in GLP-1 production and inhibition of CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling pathway (Figure 6E–H).

Figure 6. Genetic interference of Piezo1 regulates GLP-1 production in STC-1 cells.

Figure 6.

(A–D) STC-1 cells were transfected with mouse control or Piezo1 expression plasmids for 48 hr. Piezo1 (A) and Gcg (B) mRNA levels in STC-1 cells. (C) GLP-1 concentrations in culture medium. (D) Whole-cell extracts underwent western blot with indicated antibodies. (E–H) Stable knockdown of Piezo1 in STC-1 cells. Piezo1 (E) and Gcg (F) mRNA levels in STC-1 cells. (G) GLP-1 concentrations in culture medium. (H) Whole-cell extracts underwent western blot with indicated antibodies. Data are represented as mean ± SEM Data are represented as mean ± SEM and are representative of six biological replicates. Significance was determined by Student’s t test, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 6—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 6D and H, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
Figure 6—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 6D and H.
Figure 6—source data 3. Original data for Figure 6.

Piezo1 regulates GLP-1 production through CaMKKβ/CaMKIV and mTOR in STC-1 cells

Next, we examined whether CaMKKβ/CaMKIV and mTOR signaling mediates the effects of Piezo1 on GLP-1 production. Overexpression of CaMKKβ or CaMKIV increased CaMKKβ/CaMKIV and mTOR signaling activity, resulting in increased synthesis and secretion of GLP-1 (Figure 7A–C). In contrast, the CaMKKβ inhibitor STO-609, downregulated CaMKKβ/CaMKIV and mTOR signaling, as well as GLP-1 synthesis and secretion (Figure 7D–F). Inhibition of mTORC1 activity by rapamycin suppressed GLP-1 production induced by Yoda1, which was associated with inhibition of mTOR signaling (Figure 7G–I).

Figure 7. Modulation of GLP-1 production by CaMKKβ/CaMKIV and mTOR signaling activity in STC-1 cells.

Figure 7.

(A–C) STC-1 cells were transfected with GFP, CaMKKβ or CaMKIV plasmids for 48 hr. (A) Gcg mRNA levels in STC-1 cells. (B) GLP-1 concentrations in culture medium. (C) Whole-cell extracts underwent western blot with indicated antibodies. (D–F) STC-1 cells were treated with CaMKKβ inhibitor STO-609 (10 μmol/L) for 24 hr. (D) Gcg mRNA levels in STC-1 cells. (E) GLP-1 concentrations in culture medium. (F) Whole-cell extracts underwent western blot with indicated antibodies. (G–I) STC-1 cells were pretreated with Rapamycin (50 nmol/L) for 1 hr, then treated with Yoda1 (5 μmol/L) for 24 hr. (G) Gcg mRNA levels in STC-1 cells. (H) GLP-1 concentrations in the culture medium. (I) Whole-cell extracts underwent western blot with indicated antibodies. Data are represented as mean ± SEM and are representative of six biological replicates. Significance was determined by Student’s t test for comparison between two groups, and by one-way ANOVA for comparison among three groups or more, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Figure 7—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 7C, F and I, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
Figure 7—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 7C, F and I.
Figure 7—source data 3. Original data for Figure 7.

Discussion

It has been known for decades that GLP-1 secretion from the intestinal L cells is stimulated by meal intake and is essential for postprandial glycemic control (Drucker, 2006; Song et al., 2019). However, the mechanism underlying the regulation of GLP-1 production is not completely understood. One of the problems that impeded the investigation of regulation mechanism of GLP-1 is the lack of an L-cell-specific genetically engineered animal model. Here, an L-cell-specific Cre mouse line was generated for the first time through the combination of the FLP-Frt and Cre-LoxP systems. This enables genetic manipulation specifically in the L cells and creates a valuable tool for investigating molecular mechanisms in L cells.

Previous studies have shown that L cells are able to sense nutrients in the intestinal lumen such as glucose and other carbohydrates, lipids and amino acids, which induce GLP-1 secretion through different mechanisms, including membrane depolarization-associated exocytosis, Ca2+/Calmodulin (Tolhurst et al., 2011), cAMP (Yu and Jin, 2010), mTORC1 (Xu et al., 2015), and AMPK (Jiang et al., 2016) signaling pathways. However, it is innegligible that as open type endocrine cells, L cells not only receive the chemical stimulations from the nutrients, but also mechanical stimulation when the chyme passing through the intestine, including stretching, pressure and shear force (Sensoy, 2021). While the food needs to be digested and nutrients absorbed before L-cells can detect the nutritive signals, mechanical stimulation may be more direct and faster. The expression of Piezo1, a mechanosensitive ion channel, was demonstrated in human and mouse intestinal sections, primary mouse L cell culture, and intestinal neuroendocrine cell line STC-1, indicating the mechanosensing ability of L cells and the potential regulatory effect of GLP-1 on mechanical stimulation. The results showed a significant increase in GLP-1 secretion by implantation of intestinal beads, stretching of intestinal tissue, or stretching of STC-1 cells, providing further evidence that mechanical regulation of GLP-1 secretion does exist. In addition, the selective deletion of Piezo1 (Piezo1 IntL-CKO) mice showed reduced circulating GLP-1 level, increased body weight, and impaired glucose homeostasis, while pharmacological activation of Piezo1 in mice, primary L cells, and STC-1 cells showed opposite effects. More importantly, Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice was unable to response to the tension-induced GLP-1 production. These further suggested a Piezo1-mediated mechanical sensing mechanism in L cells that regulates GLP-1 production and glucose metabolism by sensing the stimulation of intestinal luminal contents.

Interestingly, this intestinal Piezo1-mediated mechanical sensing mechanism may severely impaired in diabetic patients and rodents. Reduced expression of Piezo1 was demonstrated in the ileal mucosa of diet-induced diabetic mice, along with reduced GLP-1 production. When challenged with high-fat diet, Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice exhibited more severe symptoms of diabetes which was mitigated by Ex-4. These findings suggest that the impairment of Piezo1-mediated mechanical sensing function in the intestine is an important mechanism for the pathogenesis of T2DM. It is noteworthy that RYGB, a commonly performed weight-loss and hypoglycemic surgery (Cummings et al., 2004), significantly increased Piezo1 expression in L cells of obese diabetic patients. Yoda1 treatment or intestinal bead implantation enhanced GLP-1 production and improved glucose metabolism in the diet-induced diabetic mouse model, suggesting that restoring the mechano-sensing or enhancing the function of Piezo1 either pharmacologically or mechanically, may be a new strategy to improve the secretion of GLP-1 and alleviate T2DM. However, various data suggest that Piezo1-mediated regulation of GLP-1 production has only been demonstrated in transgenic mice, mouse primary L cells, and enteric neuroendocrine cell lines derived from mice. Whether Piezo1 plays the same role in human L cells awaits to be investigated. A number of studies have generated L cells culture from human intestinal organoid culture or human intestinal stem cell monolayer culture by manipulating the growth factors in the media (Goldspink et al., 2020; Petersen et al., 2014; Villegas-Novoa et al., 2022). It is worthy to validate our finding in human L cells in order to prove its translational potential in T2DM treatment.

The intragastric balloon is a current clinical weight loss measure that involves placing a space-occupying balloon in the stomach to reduce food intake and generate satiety signals, thus maintaining satiety. Investigations illustrated that intragastric balloon alter the secretion of hormones such as cholecystokinin and pancreatic polypeptide, delay the emptying of food in the stomach and reduce the appetite (Mathus-Vliegen and de Groot, 2013). Intragastric balloon provides a feasible weight loss intervention for obese people (Kim et al., 2016). In this study, a new intestinal implantation surgery of beads was adopted, which may offer a novel approach for weight loss and glucose control by activating the intestinal Piezo1-GLP-1 axis in the future.

Mechanistically, cellular and mouse models revealed that Piezo1 regulates GLP-1 production through the CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling pathway. CaMKKβ/CaMKIV has been reported to mediate the Ca2+ signaling in many metabolic processes, including liver gluconeogenesis and de novo lipogenesis, adipogenesis, insulin sensitivity, and β cell proliferation (Anderson et al., 2012; Lin et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2022b). mTOR plays a central role in nutrient and energy sensing and regulates cellular metabolism and growth in response to different nutrient and energy status (Howell and Manning, 2011). Here, the data suggest that mTOR can also response to mechanical stimuli through a mechano-sensitive Ca2+ channel-mediated CaMKKβ/CaMKIV activation. Although it has not been demonstrated that CaMKIV directly phosphorylates mTOR or S6K in L cells, a previous study reported that CaMKKβ could serve as a scaffold to assemble CaMKIV with key components of the mTOR/S6K pathway and promote liver cancer cell growth (Lin et al., 2015), which lended support to the CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling in our study. Recently, Knutson et. al. found that ryanodine and IP3-triggered calcium release from intracellular calcium store could amplified the initial Peizo2 - Ca2+ signal triggered by mechanical stimulation, and was required for the mechanotransduction in the serotonin release from enterochromaffin cells (Knutson et al., 2023). Primary L-cell and STC-1 cell results showed a persistent intracellular Ca2+ increase triggered by Yoda1, which also suggests that intracellular Ca2+ stores are involved in Ca2+ relay. Beside Ca2+, cyclic AMP (cAMP) is another signaling molecule that active Gcg gene expression and GLP-1 production (Drucker et al., 1994; Jin, 2008; Simpson et al., 2007). cAMP was found to play a critical role in nutrients-induced GLP-1 secretion, including glucose (Ong et al., 2009), lipids (Hodge et al., 2016), and amino acids (Tolhurst et al., 2011). Previous study reported that Ca2+ can activate soluble adenylyl cyclase (sAC) to increase intracellular cAMP (Jaiswal and Conti, 2003). Whether sAC-cAMP can be activated by Piezo1-mediated Ca2+ influx and whether it is an alternative signaling pathway that mediates the Piezo1-regulated GLP-1 production remain to be explored.

Furthermore, recent studies have highlighted the role of Piezo1 in enhancing insulin secretion (Deivasikamani et al., 2019; Ye et al., 2022), while inhibiting ghrelin (Zhao et al., 2024) and glucagon production (Guo et al., 2024), as well as reducing intestinal nutrient absorption (Tao et al., 2024). The diverse functions of Piezo1 across various cell types can be attributed to several factors, including cellular context, specific signaling pathways, and the microenvironment surrounding the cells. The current study reveals Piezo1-mediated mechanosensory properties of intestinal L cells that play an important role in regulating GLP-1 production and glucose metabolism. This finding suggests the existence of a new mechanoregulatory mechanism in enteroendocrine cells in addition to chemical and neural regulation, which may provide new ideas for the treatment of metabolic diseases such as diabetes and obesity.

Materials and methods

Key resources table.

Reagent type (species) or resource Designation Source or reference Identifiers Additional information
Strain, strain background (Mus musculus, C57BL/6 J) Vil1FLP,
GcgCre
Shanghai Model Organisms Center N/A
Strain, strain background (M. musculus, C57BL/6 J) Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre This paper N/A Please refer to the "Genetic mouse generation" section.
Strain, strain background (M. musculus, C57BL/6 J) Rosa26mTmG Jackson Laboratory Stock No. 007676
Strain, strain background (M. musculus, C57BL/6 J) B6.Cg-Piezo1tm2.1Apat/J Jackson laboratory RRID:IMSR_JAX:029213
Cell line (M. musculus, mouse) STC-1 ATCC CRL-3254
Biological sample (Mouse) Primary mouse ileal L cells, Ileum, Pancreas, Liver, Skeletal muscle, Epididymal adipose, Hypothalamus This paper N/A Freshly isolated from Mice.
Transfected construct (M. musculus) pLKO.1-shPiezo1 This paper N/A Lentiviral construct to transfect and express the shRNA.
Antibody Anti-Piezo1 (Rabbit polyclonal) Affinity Biosciences Cat# DF12083,
RRID:AB_2844888
WB: 1:1000
IF: 1:400
Antibody Anti-CaMKKβ
(mouse monoclonal)
Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-271674,
RRID:AB_10708844
WB: 1:1000
Antibody Anti-Phospho-
CaMKIV (Thr200) (Rabbit polyclonal)
Affinity Biosciences Cat# AF3460,
RRID:AB_2834898
WB: 1:1000
Antibody Anti-CaMKIV
(Rabbit polyclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 4032,
RRID:AB_2068389
WB: 1:1000
Antibody Anti-Phospho- mTOR (Ser2448)
(Rabbit Monoclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 5536,
RRID:AB_10691552
WB: 1:1000
Antibody Anti-mTOR
(Rabbit monoclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 2983,
RRID:AB_2105622
WB: 1:1000
Antibody Anti-phospho-p70 S6 Kinase (Thr389)
(Rabbit monoclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 9234,
RRID:AB_2269803
WB: 1:1000
Antibody Anti-p70 S6 Kinase
(Rabbit Monoclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 2903,
RRID:AB_1196657
WB: 1:1000
Antibody Anti-phospho-S6 Ribosomal Protein (Ser235/236)
(Rabbit Monoclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 4858,
RRID:AB_916156
WB: 1:1000
Antibody Anti-S6 Ribosomal Protein
(Rabbit monoclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 2217,
RRID:AB_331355
WB: 1:1000
Antibody Anti-GLP-1 (Mouse monoclonal) Abcam Cat# ab23468,
RRID:AB_470325
WB: 1:1000
IF: 1:500
Antibody Anti-β-actin
(Mouse monoclonal)
Cell Signaling Technology Cat# 3700,
RRID:AB_2242334
WB: 1:1000
Antibody Horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated, Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 111-035-003,
RRID:AB_2313567
1:10,000
Antibody Horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated, Goat Anti-Mouse IgG Jackson ImmunoResearch Labs Cat# 115-035-003,
RRID:AB_10015289
1:10,000
Antibody Goat anti-mouse fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated IgG EarthOx LLC Cat# E031210-01 1:100
Antibody Dylight 594 affinipure donkey anti-rabbit IgG EarthOx LLC Cat# E032421-01 1:100
Recombinant DNA reagent pcDNA3.1-mPiezo1-IRES-GFP Addgene Cat# 80925
Recombinant DNA reagent pcDNA3.1-IRES-GFP Addgene Cat# 51406
Recombinant DNA reagent CaMKKβ
(Plasmid)
This paper N/A Gifted by Professor Koji Murao from Kagawa University
Recombinant DNA reagent CaMKIV
(Plasmid)
This paper N/A Gifted by Professor Koji Murao from Kagawa University
Sequence-based reagent P1 This paper PCR primers GACCTTTGCCCTCTGGTCTC
Sequence-based reagent P2 This paper PCR primers GAGTGACGGTGCCAGAGAAA
Sequence-based reagent P3 This paper PCR primers GACTCCAGCTGCCTTCTCTG
Sequence-based reagent P4 This paper PCR primers CGGTGATCTCCCAGATGCTC
Sequence-based reagent P5 This paper PCR primers CCCTAACTCAGTCTCCAGCA
Sequence-based reagent P6 This paper PCR primers CGGTTACCAGGTGGTCATGT
Sequence-based reagent P7 This paper PCR primers CCCTAACTCAGTCTCCAGCA
Sequence-based reagent P8 This paper PCR primers CTGCAAAGGGTCGCTACAGA
Sequence-based reagent P9 This paper PCR primers AATGGCTCTCCTCAAGCGTAT
Sequence-based reagent P10 This paper PCR primers ACAGGAGGTAGTCCCTCACAT
Sequence-based reagent P11 This paper PCR primers TGTCGGGGAAATCATCGTCC
Sequence-based reagent Piezo1_F
(Human)
This paper PCR primers ATCGCCATCATCTGGTTCCC
Sequence-based reagent Piezo1_R
(Human)
This paper PCR primers TGGTGAACAGCGGCTCATAG
Sequence-based reagent GCG_F
(Human)
This paper PCR primers GCACATTCACCAGTGACTACAGCA
Sequence-based reagent GCG_R
(Human)
This paper PCR primers TGGCAGCTTGGCCTTCCAAATA
Sequence-based reagent β-actin_F
(Human)
This paper PCR primers TCATGAAGATCCTCACCGAG
Sequence-based reagent β-actin_R
(Human)
This paper PCR primers CATCTCTTGCTCGAAGTCCA
Sequence-based reagent Piezo1_F
(Mouse)
This paper PCR primers GCAGTGGCAGTGAGGAGATT
Sequence-based reagent Piezo1_R
(Mouse)
This paper PCR primers GATATGCAGGCGCCTATCCA
Sequence-based reagent Gcg_F
(Mouse)
This paper PCR primers ATTGCCAAACGTCATGATGA
Sequence-based reagent Gcg_R
(Mouse)
This paper PCR primers GGCGACTTCTTCTGGGAAGT
Sequence-based reagent CCK_F
(Mouse)
This paper PCR primers TAGCGCGATACATCCAGCAGGT
Sequence-based reagent CCK_R
(Mouse)
This paper PCR primers GGTATTCGTAGTCCTCGGCACT
Sequence-based reagent Actb_F
(Mouse)
This paper PCR primers CCACAGCTGAGAGGGAAATC
Sequence-based reagent Actb_R
(Mouse)
This paper PCR primers AAGGAAGGCTGGAAAAGAGC
Commercial assay or kit Mouse Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) ELISA Kit Millipore Cat# EGLP-35K Mouse Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 (GLP-1) ELISA Kit
Commercial assay or kit RT-PCR kit Takara Cat# RR014A RT-PCR kit
Chemical compound, drug 0.1% gelatine Biological Industries Cat# 01-944-1B
Chemical compound, drug DMEM high sugar medium Gibco Cat# 11965092
Chemical compound, drug Fetal bovine serum Gibco Cat# 12484028
Chemical compound, drug Equine serum Gibco Cat# 16050122
Chemical compound, drug Immobilon western chemiluminescent HRP substrate Millipore Cat# WBKLS0500
Chemical compound, drug Diprotin A Sigma-Aldrich Cat# 90614-48-5
Chemical compound, drug Thermo Scientific TurboFect Transfection Reagent Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# R0531
Chemical compound, drug TRIzol Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# 15596026
Chemical compound, drug RIPA Lysis Buffer Beyotime Biotechnology Cat# P0013B
Chemical compound, drug GsMTx4 Alomone Labs Cat# STG-100
Chemical compound, drug Rapamycin Santa Cruz Biotechnology Cat# sc-3504B
Chemical compound, drug STO-609 Selleck Cat# S8274
Chemical compound, drug Yoda1 Sigma-Aldrich Cat# SML1558
Chemical compound, drug Dimethyl sulfoxide Sigma-Aldrich Cat# D2650
Chemical compound, drug Exendin-4 Sigma-Aldrich Cat# E7144
Chemical compound, drug Fluo-4 AM Thermo Fisher Scientific Cat# F14201
Software, algorithm GraphPad Prism GraphPad Software,
https://www.graphpad.com/
RRID:SCR_002798
Software, algorithm ImageJ ImageJ,
https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
RRID:SCR_003070
Software, algorithm Adobe photoshop Adobe,
https://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/desktop-app.html
RRID:SCR_014199
Other Normal chow diet Research Diets Cat# D12450B Feed for feeding mice.
Other High fat diet Research Diets Cat# D12492 Feed for feeding mice.

Collection of human intestine samples

Male obese participants with type 2 diabetes (n=6, BMI = 45.87 ± 4.889 kg/m2) and one-year post-RYGB patients (n=6, BMI = 25.48 ± 1.085 kg/m2) were recruited in current study. Written informed consent was obtained from each donor. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jinan University. Mucosal biopsies were obtained from human intestines by using a colonoscopy (CF-HQ290I; Olympus).

Genetic mouse generation

Vil1FLP mice

Vil1FLP knock-in mouse model was developed by Shanghai Model Organisms Center, Inc. The targeting construct was designed to insert a 2A-Flp-WPRE-pA coexpression cassette into the stop codon of mouse Vil1 gene via homologous recombination using CRISPR/Cas9 system. 5'-AGCCCCTACCCTGCCTTCAA-3' was chosen as Cas9 targeted guide RNA (sgRNA). The donor vector, sgRNA and Cas9 mRNA was microinjected into C57BL/6 J fertilized eggs. F0 generation mice positive for homologous recombination were identified by long PCR. The primers (I-IV) used for detection of the correct homology recombination were I: 5’-ACTTCAGGCCTAACGCTCAC-3’ and II: 5’-TGTCCTGCAGGCAGAGAAAG-3’ for the correct 5’ homology arm recombination, and III: 5’-GTGCCGTCTCTAAGCACAGT-3’and IV: 5’-TGTTGGTGCTTCGGAGTGTT-3’for the correct 3' homology arm recombination. The PCR products were further confirmed by sequencing. F0 mice were crossed with C57BL/6 J mice to obtain Vil1FLP heterozygous mice.

FLP-dependent glucagon-Cre (GcgCre) mice

GcgCre mouse model was developed by Shanghai Model Organisms Center, Inc. The targeting construct was designed to insert an IRES-F3-Frt-Wpre-pA-Cre-Frt-F3 expression cassette into the 3’ UTR of mouse Gcg gene of via homologous recombination using CRISPR/Cas9 system. 5’-ATGCAAAGCAATATAGCTTC-3’ was chosen as Cas9 targeted guide RNA (sgRNA). The donor vector, sgRNA and Cas9 mRNA was microinjected into C57BL/6 J fertilized eggs. F0 generation mice positive for homologous recombination were identified by long PCR. The primers (I-IV) used for detection of the correct homology recombination were I: 5’-TGCTACACAGGAGGTCTGTC-3’ and II: 5’-AGGCATGCTCTGCTATCACG-3’ for the correct 5’ homology arm recombination, and III: 5'-CCCTCCTAGTCCCTTCTCAGT-3' and IV: 5'-GCCAAGGACATCTTCAGCGA-3’ for the correct 3’ homology arm recombination. The PCR products were further confirmed by sequencing. F0 mice were crossed with C57BL/6 J mice to obtain Gcgcre heterozygous mice.

Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre mice

Vil1FLP mice were crossed with Gcgcre mice to obtain Intestinal L cell-specific Cre (Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre) mice.

Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice

Piezo1loxp/loxp mice (B6.Cg-Piezo1tm2.1Apat/J) purchased from Jackson laboratory were crossed with Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre mice to generate Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice.

PCR is used to identify the genotype of mice during the subsequent mating and breeding process. The primers required for mouse genotyping are shown in the Key Resources Table.

Mouse validation

Rosa26mT/mG reporter mice were purchased from Jackson laboratory, Inc Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre mice were bred with Rosa26mT/mG reporter mice to further validate Cre recombinase activity and specificity. Every single Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre mouse was confirmed by Rosa26mT/mG reporter mice before breeding with Piezo1loxp/loxp mice to generate Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice.

Frozen tissue confocal imaging

Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre-Rosa26mT/mG reporter mice were sacrificed. Fresh ileum and pancreas tissues were collected and embedded in O.C.T. compound for histological analysis immediately. Slices of the tissues were cut for confocal imaging, which was protected from light. Fluorescence was detected by laser scanning confocal microscopy (Li et al., 2022).

Animal housing and treatment

Male mice were maintained on a 12 hr light/12 hr dark cycle environment. Normal chow diet (NCD) or a high-fat diet (HFD) and water were available ad libitum unless specified otherwise. The animal protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Jinan University (IACUC-20230517–01).

Male Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice and age-matched control littermates (Piezo1loxp/loxp, Vil1FLP, GcgCre, Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre mice) fed with NCD or HFD were used in the experiments.

Male Piezo1loxp/loxp and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice fed with 10 week-high fat diet were intraperitoneally injected with normal saline (NS) or the GLP-1R agonist Exendin-4 (100 µg/kg body weight) for 7 consecutive days.

High fat diet induced diabetic mice were randomly divided into 3 groups. When indicated, animals were injected intraperitoneally with Vehicle, Yoda1 (2 μg per mouse) or GsMTx4 (250 μg/kg) plus Yoda1 for 7 consecutive days.

High fat diet treated Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice were randomly divided into 2 groups. When indicated, animals were injected intraperitoneally with Vehicle, Yoda1 (2 μg per mouse) for 7 consecutive days.

Diet induce diabetic C57BL/6 J mice were divided into sham and intestinal bead implantation groups.

Food and water intake detection

The food and water intake were quantified using metabolic cages (Cat 41853, Ugo Basile, Comerio, Italy). The mice were individually housed in these specialized cages and given a period of 3 days to acclimate before data collection began. They had unrestricted access to food and water, which was continuously monitored throughout the study. The 41850–010 software/interface package, consisting of EXPEDATA (for data analysis) and METASCREEN (for data collection) software, along with the IM-2 interface module, was employed to record and analyze the data.

Intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test

Mice were fasted for 12 hr before measuring their fasting glucose levels. An intraperitoneal glucose tolerance test (IPGTT) was performed by administering 1.5 g/kg body weight of glucose. Blood glucose concentrations were measured at specified time points using a glucometer by collecting tail vein blood samples.

Insulin tolerance test

Mice were subjected to a 4 hr fast before measurement of fasting glucose were taken. Insulin tolerance tests (ITT) were conducted with a dose of 0.75 U/kg body weight of insulin. Blood glucose levels were measured at specified time points.

Intestinal bead implantation

High-fat diet-induced type 2 diabetic C57BL/6 J mice were fasted 6–8 hr before the operation. Standard aseptic procedures were used throughout the operation. Intestinal bead implantation was similar to gastric bead implantation described in our previous study (Zhao et al., 2024). Briefly, a 1 cm incision was made on the abdominal wall to expose the intestine. A 1 cm incision was made approximately 1 cm above the ileocecal region. A 2.5 mm diameter bead was implanted into the ileum of the mouse through an incision. Then the wound was closed with suture. Finally, the abdominal wall was closed with suture. For sham operation, all the procedures were the same as the bead implantation except that the bead was not implanted.

Detection of abdominal mechanical sensitivity

The mice were familiarized with a metal mesh floor covered with plastic boxes for 2 hr each day for 2 days prior to testing. Their abdominal fur was shaved 1 day before the experiments. The abdominal area was then stimulated using calibrated von Frey filaments (VFFs) that applied varying forces: subthreshold mechanical stimuli (indicative of allodynia, 0.07 g force) and painful stimuli (indicative of hyperalgesia, 0.16 and 1 g force). Each filament was applied 10 times for 5–8 s with 10 s intervals between applications. To prevent learning or sensitization, the same area was not stimulated more than once consecutively. The data were presented as the number of withdrawal responses out of 10 applications, with 0 indicating no withdrawal and 10 indicating the maximum withdrawal. A withdrawal response was defined as (1) the mouse withdrawing its abdomen from the VFFs, (2) subsequent licking of the abdominal area, or (3) withdrawal of the entire body. All tests were conducted in a blinded manner.

Gastrointestinal transit time

The whole-gut transit time test was conducted as previously described (Qin et al., 2017). The duration between the oral administration of charcoal and the appearance of the first stained fecal pellet was recorded as the total gastrointestinal transit time.

Stretching of isolated ileum

About 2 cm ileum was isolated from control and Piezo1 IntL-CKO mice and kept in the specimen chamber filled with Tyrode’s solution (KCl 0.2 g/L, NaCl 8 g/L, CaCl2 0.2 g/L, MgCl2 0.1 g/L, NaHCO3 1 g/L, NaH2PO4 0.05 g/L, Glucose 1 g/L) of 37℃ gassed with oxygen. The specimen was connected to the force transducer of organ bath system (HW200S, Techman, Chengdu, CN). Adjust the transducer to apply traction force of 1.5 g on the tissue and maintained for 4 hr.

Measurement of GLP-1 secretion

The measurement of GLP-1 secretion was carried out according to previously described methods (Zhai et al., 2018). Samples were collected in the presence of aprotinin (2 μg/mL), EDTA (1 mg/mL) and diprotin A (0.1 mmol/L), and stored at –80 °C before use. GLP-1 levels were assayed using enzyme immunoassay kits following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Histological analysis

Tissues were collected, fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 4 μm sections. Standard protocols were followed for staining the sections with hematoxylin-eosin. Photomicrographs were captured under an inverted microscope (Leica, Germany).

Immunofluorescence

Paraffin-embedded tissue sections were dewaxed and rehydrated, followed by boiling in 0.01 mol/L citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 min. Subsequently, the sections were blocked with 5% goat serum for 1 hr and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following primary antibodies: Piezo1 (1:400), Glucagon (1:200), Ghrelin (1:100), GLP-1(1:500), PYY (1:100), ZO-1 (1:200), or Occludin (1:200). The sections were then incubated with a mixture of secondary antibodies. Images were taken by laser scanning confocal microscopy (Leica SP8). Fluorescence intensity was quantified by ImageJ software.

In situ hybridization

Paraffin sections were dewaxed and rehydrated. After antigen retrieval in in citrate buffer (pH6.0), the sections were incubated with Proteinase K (5 µg/ml) at 37 °C for the 15 min. Then the sections were hybridized with the probes overnight in a temperature-controlled chamber at 40 °C. The Piezo1 probe sequences were as follows: 5′-CTGCAGGTGGTTCTGGATATAGCCC-3′,5′-AAGAAGCAGATCTCCAGCCCGAAT-3′, 5′-GCCATGGATAGTCAATGCACAGTGC-3′. After washing with SSC buffers, the sections were hybridized in pre-warmed branch probes at 40 °C for 45 min. After washing with SSC buffers, the sections were hybridized with signal probe at 42 °C for 3 hr. After washing with SSC buffers, the sections were blocked with normal serum and then incubated with mouse anti-GLP-1 (1:500) antibody at 4 °C overnight followed by secondary antibody. Images were taken laser scanning confocal microscopy and the fluorescence signals were quantified by ImageJ.

Western blot analysis

Tissues and cells were harvested. Ileal mucosa was scraped for protein extraction. Protein extraction was performed by using RIPA lysis buffer (50 mM Tris PH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 1% Sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM PMSF and protease inhibitor cocktail.), then 40 µg of proteins were loaded onto an SDS-PAGE gel for separation. After the separation, the proteins were transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was then incubated in blocking buffer at room temperature for 1 hur. For overnight incubation, the membrane and primary antibody (at the recommended dilution as stated in the product datasheet) were immersed in primary antibody dilution buffer, with gentle agitation, at 4 °C. Subsequently, the membrane was incubated with a secondary antibody that specifically recognizes and binds to the primary antibody. Finally, western blotting luminol reagent was used to visualize bands. The grey scale values of the bands were measured using ImageJ software.

RNA extraction, quantitative real-time PCR

RNA was extracted and reverse-transcribed into cDNAs using RT-PCR kit. Real-time PCR was performed as previously described (Zhai et al., 2018). Sequences for the primer pairs used in this study were shown in Key Resources Table.

Isolation of mouse intestinal L cells

A 5~6 cm long ileum segment was collected from the Vil1FLP::GcgfrtCre-Rosa26mT/mG mouse. The tissue was washed with ice-cold PBS twice to remove the chyme in the lumen. The tissue was minced into 0.5 mm3 pieces in ice-cold PBS and then digested in 100mIU collagenase I and 0.01 g/mL trypsin at 37 °C for 30 min with rotation. After digested tissue was passed through 40 μm and 30 μm cell strainers sequentially, then centrifuged for 7 min at 4 °C. The cell pellet was resuspended in red cell lysis buffer and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The unlysed cells were collected by centrifugation and resuspended with 1 mL cold PBS. The GFP positive cells was sorted by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FASC) on Beckman Coulter MoFlo XDP cell sorter system.

Cell culture and treatments

STC-1 cells were maintained in DMEM medium supplemented with 2.5% fetal bovine serum and 10% equine serum at 37 °C with 5% CO2 air. L cells were maintained in DMEM medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum.

For cell transfection, cells were plated at optimal densities and grown for 48 hr. Cells were then transfected with GFP, Piezo1 (Addgene, MA, USA), CaMKKβ and CaMKIV constructs (Murao et al., 2009) by using lipofectamine reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

For stable knockdown of Piezo1 in STC-1 cells, short hairpin RNA (shRNA) sequences for mouse Piezo1 interference were cloned in to pLKO.1 vector. To produce lentivirus, psPAX2, pMD2G and pLKO.1 or pLKO.1-shPiezo1 plasmids (siPiezo1: CCAACCTTATCAGTGACTT) were co-transfected into 293T cells with lipofectamine 2000 reagent. Supernatant containing lentivirus was collected 48 hr after transfection and filtered through 0.45 μm filter. The virus-containing supernatant was used to infect STC-1 cells. Forty-eight hours after infection, the STC-1 cells were subjected to 1 µg/mL puromycin selection for 2–3 days.

For cell stretching, cells were grown in silicone elastic chambers coated by 0.1% gelatin solution. After incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 hr, The chambers were subjected to mechanical stretch to 120% of their original length.

Calcium imaging

Cells were plated onto confocal dishes at optimal densities and grown for 24 hr. Cells were loaded with the calcium fluorescent probe fluo-4 AM (1 μM) for 1 hr at 37 °C, then the cells were treated with Yoda1 (5 μM) or GsMTx4. The intracellular calcium ions were measured at room temperature using a laser confocal microscope with an excitation wave length of 494 nm and an emission wave length of 516 nm. The change of fluorescent signal was presented as ΔF/F0 and plotted against time.

Whole-cell patch-clamp recording

Borosilicate glass-made patch pipettes (BF150-86-7.5, Sutter Instrument Co, USA) were pulled with micropipette puller (P-1000, Sutter Instrument Co, USA) to a resistance of 3–5  MΩ after being filled with pipette solution: 138 mM KCl, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Glucose and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4). Cells were bathed in Margo-Ringer solution: 130 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 2.5 mM CaCl2, 10 mM Glucose, 20 mM HEPES (pH7.4). Whole-cell calcium currents of STC-1 cells were recorded with the EPC10 USB patch-clamp amplifier (HEKA, Germany) controlled by PatchMaster software.

Statistical analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Statistical differences were evaluated by one-way ANOVA or Student’s t-test. The correlation was determined by Pearson analysis. p<0.05 was considered significant. (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, *** p<0.001, ns = not significance). In this study, the data collection and analysis processes were not conducted in a blinded manner with respect to the experimental conditions. For the administration of drugs to animals, we allocated mice of the same genetic background to various experimental cohorts using a randomization protocol. No data were excluded during the data analysis.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170818, 81770794), Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2024A1515010686), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (21620423), Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project Funding (202201011353).

Funding Statement

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Contributor Information

Hui Chen, Email: chenh567@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Geyang Xu, Email: xugeyangliang@163.com.

Jonathan S Bogan, Yale School of Medicine, United States.

Dolores Shoback, University of California, San Francisco, United States.

Funding Information

This paper was supported by the following grants:

  • National Natural Science Foundation of China 82170818 to Geyang Xu.

  • National Natural Science Foundation of China 81770794 to Geyang Xu.

  • Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation 2024A1515010686 to Geyang Xu.

  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities 21620423 to Geyang Xu.

  • Guangzhou Science and Technology Plan Project Funding 202201011353 to Jie Yang.

Additional information

Competing interests

No competing interests declared.

Author contributions

Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft.

Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Methodology.

Data curation, Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing - original draft.

Data curation, Investigation, Methodology.

Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation.

Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation.

Formal analysis, Validation, Investigation.

Resources, Formal analysis, Validation.

Formal analysis, Validation.

Resources, Investigation.

Resources, Investigation.

Resources, Investigation, Methodology.

Conceptualization, Resources, Software, Formal analysis, Supervision, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing – review and editing.

Conceptualization, Resources, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review and editing.

Ethics

Written informed consent was obtained from each donor. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Jinan University. Mucosal biopsies were obtained from human intestines by using a colonoscopy (CF HQ290I; Olympus).

The animal protocols were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Jinan University (IACUC-20230517-01).

Additional files

MDAR checklist

Data availability

All of the data supporting the findings of this study are included in the article and source data files.

References

  1. Alcaino C, Knutson KR, Treichel AJ, Yildiz G, Strege PR, Linden DR, Li JH, Leiter AB, Szurszewski JH, Farrugia G, Beyder A. A population of gut epithelial enterochromaffin cells is mechanosensitive and requires Piezo2 to convert force into serotonin release. PNAS. 2018;115:E7632–E7641. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1804938115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson KA, Lin F, Ribar TJ, Stevens RD, Muehlbauer MJ, Newgard CB, Means AR. Deletion of CaMKK2 from the liver lowers blood glucose and improves whole-body glucose tolerance in the mouse. Molecular Endocrinology. 2012;26:281–291. doi: 10.1210/me.2011-1299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Anini Y, Hansotia T, Brubaker PL. Muscarinic receptors control postprandial release of glucagon-like peptide-1: in vivo and in vitro studies in rats. Endocrinology. 2002;143:2420–2426. doi: 10.1210/endo.143.6.8840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Atanga R, Singh V, In JG. Intestinal enteroendocrine cells: Present and future druggable targets. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023;24:8836. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ban N, Yamada Y, Someya Y, Ihara Y, Adachi T, Kubota A, Watanabe R, Kuroe A, Inada A, Miyawaki K, Sunaga Y, Shen ZP, Iwakura T, Tsukiyama K, Toyokuni S, Tsuda K, Seino Y. Activating transcription factor-2 is a positive regulator in CaM kinase IV-induced human insulin gene expression. Diabetes. 2000;49:1142–1148. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.7.1142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bany Bakar R, Reimann F, Gribble FM. The intestine as an endocrine organ and the role of gut hormones in metabolic regulation. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2023;20:784–796. doi: 10.1038/s41575-023-00830-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cahalan SM, Lukacs V, Ranade SS, Chien S, Bandell M, Patapoutian A. Piezo1 links mechanical forces to red blood cell volume. eLife. 2015;4:e07370. doi: 10.7554/eLife.07370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chen K, Yu X, Murao K, Imachi H, Li J, Muraoka T, Masugata H, Zhang GX, Kobayashi R, Ishida T, Tokumitsu H. Exendin-4 regulates GLUT2 expression via the CaMKK/CaMKIV pathway in a pancreatic β-cell line. Metabolism. 2011;60:579–585. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2010.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cummings DE, Overduin J, Foster-Schubert KE. Gastric bypass for obesity: mechanisms of weight loss and diabetes resolution. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2004;89:2608–2615. doi: 10.1210/jc.2004-0433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Deivasikamani V, Dhayalan S, Abudushalamu Y, Mughal R, Visnagri A, Cuthbertson K, Scragg JL, Munsey TS, Viswambharan H, Muraki K, Foster R, Sivaprasadarao A, Kearney MT, Beech DJ, Sukumar P. Piezo1 channel activation mimics high glucose as a stimulator of insulin release. Scientific Reports. 2019;9:16876. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51518-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Diakogiannaki E, Gribble FM, Reimann F. Nutrient detection by incretin hormone secreting cells. Physiology & Behavior. 2012;106:387–393. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Drucker DJ, Jin T, Asa SL, Young TA, Brubaker PL. Activation of proglucagon gene transcription by protein kinase-A in A novel mouse enteroendocrine cell line. Molecular Endocrinology. 1994;8:1646–1655. doi: 10.1210/mend.8.12.7535893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Drucker DJ. The biology of incretin hormones. Cell Metabolism. 2006;3:153–165. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Furness JB, Rivera LR, Cho HJ, Bravo DM, Callaghan B. The gut as a sensory organ. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2013;10:729–740. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Goldspink DA, Lu VB, Miedzybrodzka EL, Smith CA, Foreman RE, Billing LJ, Kay RG, Reimann F, Gribble FM. Labeling and Characterization of Human GLP-1-Secreting L-cells in Primary Ileal Organoid Culture. Cell Reports. 2020;31:107833. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Gribble FM, Reimann F. Enteroendocrine cells: Chemosensors in the intestinal epithelium. Annual Review of Physiology. 2016;78:277–299. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physiol-021115-105439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gudipaty SA, Lindblom J, Loftus PD, Redd MJ, Edes K, Davey CF, Krishnegowda V, Rosenblatt J. Mechanical stretch triggers rapid epithelial cell division through Piezo1. Nature. 2017;543:118–121. doi: 10.1038/nature21407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Guo W, Gao L, Mo H, Deng H, Zhao Y, Xu G. Mechano-sensor Piezo1 inhibits glucagon production in pancreatic α-cells. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. Molecular Basis of Disease. 2024;1870:167185. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2024.167185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Hodge D, Glass LL, Diakogiannaki E, Pais R, Lenaghan C, Smith DM, Wedin M, Bohlooly-Y M, Gribble FM, Reimann F. Lipid derivatives activate GPR119 and trigger GLP-1 secretion in primary murine L-cells. Peptides. 2016;77:16–20. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2015.06.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Howell JJ, Manning BD. mTOR couples cellular nutrient sensing to organismal metabolic homeostasis. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2011;22:94–102. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2010.12.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jaiswal BS, Conti M. Calcium regulation of the soluble adenylyl cyclase expressed in mammalian spermatozoa. PNAS. 2003;100:10676–10681. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1831008100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jiang S, Zhai H, Li D, Huang J, Zhang H, Li Z, Zhang W, Xu G. AMPK-dependent regulation of GLP1 expression in L-like cells. Journal of Molecular Endocrinology. 2016;57:151–160. doi: 10.1530/JME-16-0099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiang Y, Song J, Xu Y, Liu C, Qian W, Bai T, Hou X. Piezo1 regulates intestinal epithelial function by affecting the tight junction protein claudin-1 via the ROCK pathway. Life Sciences. 2021;275:119254. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Jin T. Mechanisms underlying proglucagon gene expression. The Journal of Endocrinology. 2008;198:17–28. doi: 10.1677/JOE-08-0085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim SH, Chun HJ, Choi HS, Kim ES, Keum B, Jeen YT. Current status of intragastric balloon for obesity treatment. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2016;22:5495–5504. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i24.5495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Knutson KR, Whiteman ST, Alcaino C, Mercado-Perez A, Finholm I, Serlin HK, Bellampalli SS, Linden DR, Farrugia G, Beyder A. Intestinal enteroendocrine cells rely on ryanodine and IP3 calcium store receptors for mechanotransduction. The Journal of Physiology. 2023;601:287–305. doi: 10.1113/JP283383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lai A, Cox CD, Chandra Sekar N, Thurgood P, Jaworowski A, Peter K, Baratchi S. Mechanosensing by Piezo1 and its implications for physiology and various pathologies. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 2022;97:604–614. doi: 10.1111/brv.12814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Li J, Hou B, Tumova S, Muraki K, Bruns A, Ludlow MJ, Sedo A, Hyman AJ, McKeown L, Young RS, Yuldasheva NY, Majeed Y, Wilson LA, Rode B, Bailey MA, Kim HR, Fu Z, Carter DA, Bilton J, Imrie H, Ajuh P, Dear TN, Cubbon RM, Kearney MT, Prasad RK, Evans PC, Ainscough JF, Beech DJ. Piezo1 integration of vascular architecture with physiological force. Nature. 2014;515:279–282. doi: 10.1038/nature13701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Li Z, Bowers E, Zhu J, Yu H, Hardij J, Bagchi DP, Mori H, Lewis KT, Granger K, Schill RL, Romanelli SM, Abrishami S, Hankenson KD, Singer K, Rosen CJ, MacDougald OA. Lipolysis of bone marrow adipocytes is required to fuel bone and the marrow niche during energy deficits. eLife. 2022;11:e78496. doi: 10.7554/eLife.78496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Lin F, Ribar TJ, Means AR. The Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase, CaMKK2, inhibits preadipocyte differentiation. Endocrinology. 2011;152:3668–3679. doi: 10.1210/en.2011-1107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lin F, Marcelo KL, Rajapakshe K, Coarfa C, Dean A, Wilganowski N, Robinson H, Sevick E, Bissig KD, Goldie LC, Means AR, York B. The camKK2/camKIV relay is an essential regulator of hepatic cancer. Hepatology. 2015;62:505–520. doi: 10.1002/hep.27832. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Liu B, Barbosa-Sampaio H, Jones PM, Persaud SJ, Muller DS. The CaMK4/CREB/IRS-2 Cascade Stimulates Proliferation and Inhibits Apoptosis of β-Cells. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e45711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Liu H, Hu J, Zheng Q, Feng X, Zhan F, Wang X, Xu G, Hua F. Piezo1 Channels as Force Sensors in Mechanical Force-Related Chronic Inflammation. Frontiers in Immunology. 2022a;13:816149. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.816149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Liu J, Li Y, Gao N, Ji J, He Q. Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase IV regulates vascular autophagy and insulin signaling through Akt/mTOR/CREB pathway in ob/ob mice. Journal of Physiology and Biochemistry. 2022b;78:199–211. doi: 10.1007/s13105-021-00853-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Marcelo KL, Means AR, York B. The Ca(2+)/Calmodulin/CaMKK2 Axis: Nature’s Metabolic CaMshaft. Trends in Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2016;27:706–718. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2016.06.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Mathus-Vliegen EMH, de Groot GH. Fasting and meal-induced CCK and PP secretion following intragastric balloon treatment for obesity. Obesity Surgery. 2013;23:622–633. doi: 10.1007/s11695-012-0834-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Maunoury R, Robine S, Pringault E, Léonard N, Gaillard JA, Louvard D. Developmental regulation of villin gene expression in the epithelial cell lineages of mouse digestive and urogenital tracts. Development. 1992;115:717–728. doi: 10.1242/dev.115.3.717. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Murao K, Li J, Imachi H, Muraoka T, Masugata H, Zhang GX, Kobayashi R, Ishida T, Tokumitsu H. Exendin-4 regulates glucokinase expression by CaMKK/CaMKIV pathway in pancreatic beta-cell line. Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism. 2009;11:939–946. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01067.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Ong WK, Gribble FM, Reimann F, Lynch MJ, Houslay MD, Baillie GS, Furman BL, Pyne NJ. The role of the PDE4D cAMP phosphodiesterase in the regulation of glucagon-like peptide-1 release. British Journal of Pharmacology. 2009;157:633–644. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00194.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Petersen N, Reimann F, Bartfeld S, Farin HF, Ringnalda FC, Vries RGJ, van den Brink S, Clevers H, Gribble FM, de Koning EJP. Generation of L cells in mouse and human small intestine organoids. Diabetes. 2014;63:410–420. doi: 10.2337/db13-0991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Qin X, Liu S, Lu Q, Zhang M, Jiang X, Hu S, Li J, Zhang C, Gao J, Zhu M-S, Feil R, Li H, Chen M, Weinstein LS, Zhang Y, Zhang W. Heterotrimeric G stimulatory protein α subunit is required for intestinal smooth muscle contraction in mice. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:1114–1125. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Romac JM-J, Shahid RA, Swain SM, Vigna SR, Liddle RA. Piezo1 is a mechanically activated ion channel and mediates pressure induced pancreatitis. Nature Communications. 2018;9:1715. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-04194-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rouillé Y, Kantengwa S, Irminger JC, Halban PA. Role of the prohormone convertase PC3 in the processing of proglucagon to glucagon-like peptide 1. The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1997;272:32810–32816. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.52.32810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rutlin M, Rastelli D, Kuo WT, Estep JA, Louis A, Riccomagno MM, Turner JR, Rao M. The villin1 gene promoter drives cre recombinase expression in extraintestinal tissues. Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2020;10:864–867. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmgh.2020.05.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Saxena AR, Gorman DN, Esquejo RM, Bergman A, Chidsey K, Buckeridge C, Griffith DA, Kim AM. Danuglipron (PF-06882961) in type 2 diabetes: a randomized, placebo-controlled, multiple ascending-dose phase 1 trial. Nature Medicine. 2021;27:1079–1087. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01391-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sensoy I. A review on the food digestion in the digestive tract and the used in vitro models. Current Research in Food Science. 2021;4:308–319. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.04.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Simpson AK, Ward PS, Wong KY, Collord GJ, Habib AM, Reimann F, Gribble FM. Cyclic AMP triggers glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion from the GLUTag enteroendocrine cell line. Diabetologia. 2007;50:2181–2189. doi: 10.1007/s00125-007-0750-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Song Y, Koehler JA, Baggio LL, Powers AC, Sandoval DA, Drucker DJ. Gut-proglucagon-derived peptides are essential for regulating glucose homeostasis in mice. Cell Metabolism. 2019;30:976–986. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2019.08.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Sugisawa E, Takayama Y, Takemura N, Kondo T, Hatakeyama S, Kumagai Y, Sunagawa M, Tominaga M, Maruyama K. RNA Sensing by Gut Piezo1 Is Essential for Systemic Serotonin Synthesis. Cell. 2020;182:609–624. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Takemoto-Kimura S, Suzuki K, Horigane SI, Kamijo S, Inoue M, Sakamoto M, Fujii H, Bito H. Calmodulin kinases: essential regulators in health and disease. Journal of Neurochemistry. 2017;141:808–818. doi: 10.1111/jnc.14020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tan Q, Akindehin SE, Orsso CE, Waldner RC, DiMarchi RD, Müller TD, Haqq AM. Recent advances in incretin-based pharmacotherapies for the treatment of obesity and diabetes. Frontiers in Endocrinology. 2022;13:838410. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.838410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Tao T, Shu Q, Zhao Y, Guo W, Wang J, Shi Y, Jia S, Zhai H, Chen H, Wang C, Xu G. Mechanical regulation of lipid and sugar absorption by Piezo1 in enterocytes. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica. B. 2024;14:3576–3590. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2024.04.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tolhurst G, Zheng Y, Parker HE, Habib AM, Reimann F, Gribble FM. Glutamine triggers and potentiates glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion by raising cytosolic Ca2+ and cAMP. Endocrinology. 2011;152:405–413. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Treichel AJ, Finholm I, Knutson KR, Alcaino C, Whiteman ST, Brown MR, Matveyenko A, Wegner A, Kacmaz H, Mercado-Perez A, Gajdos GB, Ordog T, Grover M, Szurszewski J, Linden DR, Farrugia G, Beyder A. Specialized mechanosensory epithelial cells in mouse gut intrinsic tactile sensitivity. Gastroenterology. 2022;162:535–547. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.10.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Villegas-Novoa C, Wang Y, Sims CE, Allbritton NL. Development of a Primary Human Intestinal Epithelium Enriched in L-Cells for Assay of GLP-1 Secretion. Analytical Chemistry. 2022;94:9648–9655. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c00912. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Wang S, Chennupati R, Kaur H, Iring A, Wettschureck N, Offermanns S. Endothelial cation channel PIEZO1 controls blood pressure by mediating flow-induced ATP release. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2016;126:4527–4536. doi: 10.1172/JCI87343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Wang J, Sun YX, Li J. The role of mechanosensor Piezo1 in bone homeostasis and mechanobiology. Developmental Biology. 2023;493:80–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2022.11.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Willms B, Werner J, Holst JJ, Orskov C, Creutzfeldt W, Nauck MA. Gastric emptying, glucose responses, and insulin secretion after a liquid test meal: effects of exogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-(7-36) amide in type 2 (noninsulin-dependent) diabetic patients. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 1996;81:327–332. doi: 10.1210/jcem.81.1.8550773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Xu G, Li Z, Ding L, Tang H, Guo S, Liang H, Wang H, Zhang W. Intestinal mTOR regulates GLP-1 production in mouse L cells. Diabetologia. 2015;58:1887–1897. doi: 10.1007/s00125-015-3632-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Xu Y, Bai T, Xiong Y, Liu C, Liu Y, Hou X, Song J. Mechanical stimulation activates Piezo1 to promote mucin2 expression in goblet cells. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2021;36:3127–3139. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Ye Y, Barghouth M, Dou H, Luan C, Wang Y, Karagiannopoulos A, Jiang X, Krus U, Fex M, Zhang Q, Eliasson L, Rorsman P, Zhang E, Renström E. A critical role of the mechanosensor PIEZO1 in glucose-induced insulin secretion in pancreatic β-cells. Nature Communications. 2022;13:4237. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31103-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yu Z, Jin T. New insights into the role of cAMP in the production and function of the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) Cellular Signalling. 2010;22:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Zhai H, Li Z, Peng M, Huang Z, Qin T, Chen L, Li H, Zhang H, Zhang W, Xu G. Takeda G Protein-Coupled Receptor 5-Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1 Signaling Contributes to the Increment of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Production after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. EBioMedicine. 2018;32:201–214. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.05.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Zhao Y, Liu Y, Tao T, Zhang J, Guo W, Deng H, Han M, Mo H, Tong X, Lin S, Yang J, Zhai H, Wang Q, Hu Z, Zhang W, Chen H, Xu G. Gastric mechanosensitive channel Piezo1 regulates ghrelin production and food intake. Nature Metabolism. 2024;6:458–472. doi: 10.1038/s42255-024-00995-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

eLife Assessment

Jonathan S Bogan 1

This study focuses on the regulation of GLP-1 in enteroendocrine L cells and how this may be stimulated by the mechanogated ion channel Piezo1 and the CaMKKbeta-CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway. The work is innovative and is considered valuable, as the hypothesis that is being tested may have significant mechanistic and translational implications. Data to support the proposed mechanism were considered incomplete, yet data to support the overall physiological characterization were considered solid.

Reviewer #1 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

In this manuscript, authors intended to prove that gut GLP-1 expression and secretion can be regulated by Piezo1, and hence by mechanistic/stretching regulation. For this purpose, they have assessed Piezo1 expression in STC-1 cell line (a mouse GLP-1 producing cell line) and mouse gut, showing the correlation between Piezo1 level and Gcg levels (Fig. S1). They then aimed to generate gut L cell-specific Piezo1 KO mice and claimed the mice show impaired glucose tolerance and GLP-1 production, which can be mitigated by Ex-4 treatment (Fig. 1-2). Pharmacological agents (Yoda1 and GsMTx4) and mechanic activation (intestinal bead implantation) were then utilized to prove the existence of ileal Piezo1-regulated GLP-1 synthesis (Fig. 3). This was followed by testing such mechanism in a limited amount of primary L cells and mainly in the STC-1 cell line (Fig. 4-7).

While the novelty of the study is somehow appreciable, the bio-medical significance is not well demonstrated in the manuscript. The authors stated (in lines between lines 78-83) a number of potential side effects of GLP-1 analogs, how can the mechanistic study of GLP-1 production on its own be essential for the development of new drug targets for the treatment of diabetes. Furthermore, the study does not provide a clear mechanistic insight how the claimed CaMKKbeta/CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway upregulated both GLP-1 production and secretion. This reviewer also has concerns about the experimental design and data presented in the current manuscript, including the issue of how can proglucagon expression can be assessed by Western blotting.

Strengths:

Novelty of the concept.

Weaknesses:

Experimental design and key experiment information.

Reviewer #2 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

The study by Huang and colleagues focuses on GLP-1 producing enteroendocrine (EEC) L-cells and their regulation of GLP-1 production by a mechanogated ion channel Piezo1. The study describes Piezo1 expression by L-cells and using an exciting intersectional mouse model (villin to target epithelium and Gcg to target GLP-1 producing cells and others like glucagon producing pancreatic endocrine cells), which allows L-cell specific Piezo1 knockout. Using this model, they find an impairment of glucose tolerance, increased body weight, reduced GLP-1 content, and changes to the CaMKKbeta-CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway using normal diet and then high fat diet. Piezo1 chemical agonist and intestinal bead implantation reversed these changes and improved the disrupted phenotype. Using primary sorted L-cells and cell model STC-1, they found that stretch and Piezo1 activation increased GLP-1 and altered the molecular changes described above.

Strengths:

This is an interesting study testing a novel hypothesis that may have important mechanistic and translational implications. The authors generated an important intersectional genetics mouse model that allowed them to target Piezo1 L-cells specifically, and the surprising result of impaired metabolism is intriguing.

Weaknesses:

However, there are several critical limitations that require resolution before making the conclusions that the authors make. (1) A potential explanation for the data, and one that is consistent with existing literature [see for example, PMC5334365, PMC4593481], is that epithelial Piezo1, which is broadly expressed by the GI epithelium, impacts epithelial cell density and survival, and as such, if Piezo1 is involved in L-cell physiology, it may be through regulation of cell density. Thus, it is critical to determine L-cell densities and epithelial integrity in controls and Piezo1 knockouts systematically across the length of the gut, since the authors do not make it clear which gut region contributes to the phenotype they see. Current immunohistochemistry data are not convincing. (2) Calcium signaling in L-cells is implicated in their typical role of being gut chemosensors, and Piezo1 is a calcium channel, so it is not clear whether any calcium-related signaling mechanism would phenocopy these results. (3) Intestinal bead implantation, while intriguing, does not have clear mechanisms - and is likely to provide a point of intestinal obstruction and dysmotility. (4) previous studies, some that are very important, but not cited, contradict the presented results (e.g., epithelial Piezo1 role in insulin secretion) and require reconciliation.

Overall, this study makes an interesting observation but the data are not currently strong enough to support the conclusions.

- There needs to be data localizing Piezo1 to L-cells and importantly, this needs to be quantified - are all L-cells (small bowel and colon) Piezo1 positive? This is because several studies show Piezo1 affecting epithelial cell densities. If there are changes in L-cell or other EEC densities in Piezo1 knockout, that shift can potentially explain the changes that the authors see in glucose metabolism and weight.

- The intersectional model for L-cell transduction needs a deeper validation. Images in Fig 1e are not convincing for transduction of GFP in L-cells. The co-localization studies are not convincing, especially because Piezo1 labeling is very broad. There needs to be stronger validation of the intersectional Gcg-Villin-Piezo1 KO model. It is important to determine whether L-cell Piezo1 localization epithelium in small bowel and colon is present (above) and affected specifically in the knockout.

- The authors state that "Villin-1 (encoded by Vill1 gene) is expressed in the gastrointestinal epithelium, including L cells, but not in pancreatic α cells" (line 378-379). However, Villin is highly expressed in whole mouse islets (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2016.05.015, Figure 1A).

- There needs to be quantification of L-cells in Piezo1 knockout. This is because several studies show Piezo1 affecting epithelial cell densities. If there are changes in L-cell or other EEC densities in Piezo1 knockout, that shift can potentially explain the changes that the authors see in glucose metabolism and weight.

- L-cells are classically considered to be chemosensors. Do nutritive signals, which presumably also increase calcium compete or complement or dominate L-cell GLP1 synthesis regulation?

- The mechanism of Glp1 synthesis vs release downstream of Piezo1 is not clear. The authors hypothesize that "Piezo1 might regulate GLP-1 synthesis through the CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling pathway". However, references cited suggest that Ca2+ or cAMP lead to GLP-1-release, while mTOR primarily acts on the regulation of gene expression by promoting Gcg gene expression. These pathways do not clearly link to Piezo1 GLP-1 production. These mechanisms need to be reconciled.

- Previous study PMID 32640190 (not cited here) found that Villin-driven Piezo1 knockout, which knocks out Piezo1 from all epithelial intestinal cells (including L-cells), showed no significant alterations in blood glucose or body weight. This is opposite of the presented findings and therefore the current results require reconciliation.

Comments on revised version:

The authors have addressed several comments that were common to the reviewers - specificity and validity of the intersectional model, mechanism of signaling downstream of Piezo1 and reconciliation of the results with previous studies. The authors have provided extensive experiments and revisions which have made the manuscript stronger. However, many important questions remain, and unfortunately, the intersectional mouse model and mechanisms remain unclear.

- I appreciate the authors quantifying the density of L cells in the intersectional Piezo knockout. There is a very clear >50% drop-off in GLP-1+ cells with the Piezo1 knockout (Supp fig 7c, d). Interestingly, there was not a decrease in PYY+ cells, which is curious because GLP1 and PYY are co-expressed in L cells. The mechanism of regulation of one hormone but not the other in the same cell requires clarification and would be relevant for this work. To begin with, co-labeling PYY and GLP1 and showing that one hormone can be found without the other would be useful.

- Piezo1 immunofluorescence has very high background and overall poor specificity (Fig supp 5 and Fig supp 6B are good examples of poor Piezo1 immunofluorescence). Another method for labeling Piezo1 (e.g. via RNAscope) is required - and where tried (e.g., Fig 1L), the results are not convincing.

- The intersectional mouse model requires further validation. The data presented in Fig 1E do not help - the GFP positive cells do not look like L-cells and there appear to be GFP positive cells in the muscle and submucosa.

- Since Piezo1 is known to affect epithelial cell life span, barrier function maybe compromised. While I appreciate that the authors have obtain some images and measured zonular and occluded, this is unfortunately a suboptimal evaluation of barrier function.

- The mechanisms of calcium signaling that will presumably lead to GLP1 release due to Piezo1 activation and mTOR which authors link to GLP1 synthesis remain unreconciled.

- Intestinal bead implantation may provide an important area of obstruction, in addition to potential mechanical stimulation. Unfortunately whole gut transit time and fecal weight do not assay these functions well.

- I believe that the explanation regarding lack of previous findings connecting Piezo1 in the epithelium and glucose tolerance remain poorly reconciled with the current findings.

Reviewer #3 (Public review):

Anonymous

Summary:

In this work, the authors proposed that the mechano-gated ion channel Piezo1 enhances GLP-1 production and secretion possibly through stimulating Ca2+-CaMKKbeta-CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway. By using intestinal L cell-specific piezo1 knock-out mice, intestinal bead implantation mice model, and the chemical agonist Yoda1, the authors claimed that piezo1 promotes pro-glucagon expression, GLP-1 production and secretion. In sorted primary intestinal L cells and STC-1 cells, the authors validated that CaMKKbeta-CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway positively regulated GLP-1 production and secretion. This study provides new evidence about the specific role of piezo1 in intestinal L cells, broadening the understanding of metabolic functions of piezo1.

Strengths:

The new concept and innovative in vivo and in vitro models.

Weaknesses:

Although the authors have addressed most of the issues in the revised manuscript, there are still some questions that need to be clarified.

(1) This study claimed that piezo1 enhances proglucagon expression, GLP-1 production and secretion through Ca2+-CaMKKbeta-CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway, which is a highly time-consuming process. However, as a mechano-gated ion channel, it should exert functions promptly. Is it possibly that piezo1 directly stimulates GLP-1 release by influx of Ca2+? if so, have authors measured intracellular Ca2+ concentration?

(2) The authors proposed that the CaMKKbeta-CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway mediated the effects of piezo1. However, the data is not convincing. At least, chemical inhibitors of CaMKKbeta/CaMKIV/mTORC1 should be used in intL-piezo1 KO mice or STC-1 cells to see if piezo1-induced GLP-1 secretion was abrogated by these chemical inhibitors.

(3) According to previous studies of the team, piezo1 could enhance insulin, ghrelin and GLP-1 secretion while inhibit glucagon production in pancreatic α-cells. In a recent work, the authors found that piezo1 in enterocytes suppresses nutrient absorption. Why an ion channel has these various effects in different cells? What is the fundamental and common mechanism underlying its metabolic functions? Its value as a drug target? These questions need to be discussed in more details.

eLife. 2024 Nov 7;13:RP97854. doi: 10.7554/eLife.97854.3.sa4

Author response

Yanling Huang 1, Haocong Mo 2, Jie Yang 3, Luyang Gao 4, Tian Tao 5, Qing Shu 6, Wenying Guo 7, Yawen Zhao 8, Jingya Lyu 9, Qimeng Wang 10, Jinghui Guo 11, Hening Zhai 12, Linyan Zhu 13, Hui Chen 14, Geyang Xu 15

The following is the authors’ response to the original reviews.

Public Reviews:

Reviewer #1 (Public Review):

Summary:

In this manuscript, the authors intended to prove that gut GLP-1 expression and secretion can be regulated by Piezo1, and hence by mechanistic/stretching regulation. For this purpose, they have assessed Piezo1 expression in STC-1 cell line (a mouse GLP-1 producing cell line) and mouse gut, showing the correlation between Piezo1 level and Gcg levels (Figure S1). They then aimed to generate gut L cell-specific Piezo1 KO mice, and claimed the mice show impaired glucose tolerance and GLP-1 production, which can be mitigated by Ex-4 treatment (Figures 1-2). Pharmacological agents (Yoda1 and GsMTx4) and mechanic activation (intestinal bead implantation) were then utilized to prove the existence of ileal Piezo1-regulated GLP-1 synthesis (Figure 3). This was followed by testing such mechanism in a limited amount of primary L cells and mainly in the STC-1 cell line (Figures 4-7).

While the novelty of the study is somehow appreciable, the bio-medical significance is not well demonstrated in the manuscript. The authors stated (in lines between lines 78-83) a number of potential side effects of GLP-1 analogs, how can the mechanistic study of GLP-1 production on its own be essential for the development of new drug targets for the treatment of diabetes. Furthermore, the study does not provide a clear mechanistic insight on how the claimed CaMKKbeta/CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway upregulated both GLP-1 production and secretion. This reviewer also has concerns about the experimental design and data presented in the current manuscript, including the issue of how proglucagon expression can be assessed by Western blotting.

Strengths:

The novelty of the concept.

Weaknesses:

Experimental design and key experiment information.

We appreciate the reviewer's comments. Nowadays, GLP-1-based therapy is well-recognized and commonly used in treatment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, elucidation of the mechanism that regulates GLP-1 production is essential for the development of new drug targets for the treatment of diabetes. We have revised the relevant wording in the manuscript.

In our previous studies, we have elucidated the role of mTOR/S6K pathway in regulating GLP-1 production in L cells. Using STC-1 cell line and different mouse models, including Neurog3-Tsc1−/− mice, rapamycin or L-lucine treatment to stimulate mTOR activity, we have demonstrated that mTOR stimulates proglucagon gene expression and thus GLP-1 production (Diabetologia 2015;58(8):1887-97; Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015 Nov 15:416:9-18.). Based on our previous studies, we found that Piezo1 regulated mTOR/S6K pathway and thus proglucagon expression and GLP-1 production through a Ca2+/CaMKKbeta/CaMKIV pathway in our present study. Although we could not exclude involvement of other signaling pathways downstream of Piezo1 in regulating the cleavage of proglucagon, granule maturation and the final release of GLP-1, our present study provided evidence to support the involvement of the Ca2+/CaMKKbeta/CaMKIV/mTOR pathway in mediating the role Piezo1 in proglucagon expression and GLP-1 production.

The reviewer also expressed concerns on the use of western blot to detect proglucagon expression. Proglucagon is encoded by the GCG gene and is cleaved by PC1/3 in L cells to form mature GLP-1. In fact, measurement of intestinal proglucagon protein is a common approach for assessing GLP-1 production in the intestine. Here are some examples from other researchers: Diabetes. 2013 Mar;62(3):789-800. Gastroenterology. 2011 May;140(5):1564-74. 2004 Jul 23;279(30):31068-75. The proglucagon antibody used in our study was purchased from abcam (Cat#ab23468), which can detect proglucagon at 21 kDa.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Summary:

The study by Huang and colleagues focuses on GLP-1 producing entero-endocrine (EEC) L-cells and their regulation of GLP-1 production by a mechano-gated ion channel Piezo1. The study describes Piezo1 expression by L-cells and uses an exciting intersectional mouse model (villin to target epithelium and Gcg to target GLP-1-producing cells and others like glucagon-producing pancreatic endocrine cells), which allows L-cell specific Piezo1 knockout. Using this model, they find an impairment of glucose tolerance, increased body weight, reduced GLP-1 content, and changes to the CaMKKbeta-CaMKIV-mTORC1 signaling pathway using a normal diet and then high-fat diet. Piezo1 chemical agonist and intestinal bead implantation reversed these changes and improved the disrupted phenotype. Using primary sorted L-cells and cell model STC-1, they found that stretch and Piezo1 activation increased GLP-1 and altered the molecular changes described above.

Strengths:

This is an interesting study testing a novel hypothesis that may have important mechanistic and translational implications. The authors generated an important intersectional genetics mouse model that allowed them to target Piezo1 L-cells specifically, and the surprising result of impaired metabolism is intriguing.

Weaknesses:

However, there are several critical limitations that require resolution before making the conclusions that the authors make.

(1) A potential explanation for the data, and one that is consistent with existing literature [see for example, PMC5334365, PMC4593481], is that epithelial Piezo1, which is broadly expressed by the GI epithelium, impacts epithelial cell density and survival, and as such, if Piezo1 is involved in L-cell physiology, it may be through regulation of cell density. Thus, it is critical to determine L-cell densities and epithelial integrity in controls and Piezo1 knockouts systematically across the length of the gut, since the authors do not make it clear which gut region contributes to the phenotype they see. Current immunohistochemistry data are not convincing.

We appreciate the reviewer's comment and agree that Piezo1 may impact L-cell density and epithelial integrity. To address this, we have incorporated quantification of L-cell density in new Figure Supplement 7. The quantitative results demonstrate that the specific deletion of the piezo1 gene in L cells did not significantly impact L-cell density.

Regarding epithelial integrity, we assessed the expression of tight junction proteins (ZO-1 and Occludin). As demonstrated in new Figure Supplement 8, the expression of tight junction proteins such as ZO-1 and Occludin did not show significant changes in IntL-Piezo1-/- mice compared to littermate controls.

Furthermore, we conducted double immunofluorescence of Piezo1 and GLP-1 in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon of control and IntL-Piezo1-/- mice. As illustrated in new Figure Supplement 5, Piezo1 is expressed in GLP-1-positive cells of the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon of control mice, but not in IntL-Piezo1-/- mice.

(2) Calcium signaling in L-cells is implicated in their typical role of being gut chemo-sensors, and Piezo1 is a calcium channel, so it is not clear whether any calcium-related signaling mechanism would phenocopy these results.

We agree with the reviewer that Piezo1 is a calcium channel (validation of the Ca2+ influx-mediated Piezo1 in primary L cells and STC-1 cells are shown in figure 4A-C and figure 5A-C). According to our study, calcium-related signaling mechanism such as calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase 2 (CaMKKβ) -Calcium/Calmodulin Dependent Protein Kinase IV (CaMKIV) may contribute the phenotype seen in the _IntL-Piezo1-/_mice. In addition, we also discussed other potential calcium-related signaling mechanisms in the article's discussion section (lines645-656).

(3) Intestinal bead implantation, while intriguing, does not have clear mechanisms and is likely to provide a point of intestinal obstruction and dysmotility.

We appreciate the reviewer’s comment. To ascertain if intestinal bead implantation led to intestinal obstruction and dysmotility, we conducted a bowel transit time test and detected the postoperative defecation (As shown in new Figure Supplement 9). The results revealed no difference in bowel transit time and fecal mass between the sham-operated mice and those implanted with beads. Furthermore, to assess whether the animals were in pain or under any discomfort after intestinal bead implantation, we performed abdominal mechanical sensitivity test three days after the surgery. As indicated in Figure Supplement 9C, no difference in abdominal pain threshold was observed between sham and bead-implanted mice. These results suggest that the mice did not experience discomfort during the experiment.

(4) Previous studies, some that are very important, but not cited, contradict the presented results (e.g., epithelial Piezo1 role in insulin secretion) and require reconciliation.

Thanks a lot for the point. We have cited more previous studies. The lack of changes in blood glucose seen in Villin-Piezo1-/- mice reported by Sugisawa et. al. is not surprising (Cell. 2020 Aug 6;182(3):609-624.e21.). Actually, in another recent study from our group, we found similar results when the Villin-Piezo1-/- mice Piezo1fl/fl control mice were fed with normal chow diet. Since Villin-1 is expressed in all the epithelial cells of the gut, including enterocytes and various types of endocrine cells, the effect of L-cell Piezo1 loss may be masked by other cell types under normal condition. However, impaired glucose tolerance was seen in Villin-Piezo1-/- mice compared to the Piezo1fl/fl control mice after high fat diet for 8 weeks. We further found that Piezo1 in enterocytes exerted a negative effect on the glucose and lipid absorption. Loss of Piezo1 in enterocytes led to over-absorption of nutrients under high-fat diet. (Tian Tao, Qing Shu, Yawen Zhao, Wenying Guo, Jinting Wang, Yuhao Shi, Shiqi Jia, Hening Zhai, Hui Chen, Cunchuan Wang*, Geyang Xu*, Mechanical regulation of lipid and sugar absorption by Piezo1 in enterocytes, Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B , Accepted, 2024. (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2024.04.016).

Overall, this study makes an interesting observation but the data are not currently strong enough to support the conclusions.

Recommendations for the authors:

Reviewer #1 (Recommendations For The Authors):

Major concerns

(1) Figure 1L was labeled wrong, and the co-localization was not clear. The KO leads to such a strong effect on the percentage of GLP-1 positive cells (panel M) but was not clearly demonstrated with immune-staining. Additional experiments are needed to prove tissue-specific knockout in gut GLP-1-producing cells only, but not in other cell lineages or elsewhere. If so, how was the change in gut Gcg mRNA expression? Importantly, this review is not clear on how to use Western blotting to measure proglucagon expression in the tissue samples. What is the size of the product? The antibody information was not provided in the manuscript. Figure 1N, a potential mechanism that affects GLP-1 production involving mTORC and downstream molecules. This comes from nowhere.

We appreciate the reviewer's feedback. The incorrect label has been corrected in the new Figure 1L. As suggested, we have performed additional experiments to demonstrate tissue-specific knockout of Piezo1 in gut GLP-1-producing cells exclusively, excluding other cell lineages or locations.

As shown in Figure Supplement 6, Piezo1 remains expressed in ileal ghrelin-positive cells and pancreatic glucagon-positive cells of IntL-Piezo1-/mice, suggesting that Piezo1 was specifically knocked out in L cells, but not in other endocrine cell types. Furthermore, the decrease was only observed in GLP-1 levels, but not PYY levels, in L cells of IntL-Piezo1-/- mice compared to controls, suggesting that the loss of Piezo1 in L cells affects GLP-1 levels specifically, but not the secretion of other hormones produced by L cells (Figure Supplement 7A-D).

In our previous studies, we have elucidated the role of mTOR/S6K pathway in regulating GLP-1 production in L cells. Using STC-1 cell line and different mouse models, including Neurog3-Tsc1−/− mice, rapamycin or L-lucine treatment to stimulate mTOR activity, we have demonstrated that mTOR stimulates proglucagon gene expression and thus GLP-1 production (Diabetologia 2015;58(8):1887-97; Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2015 Nov 15:416:9-18.). Based on our previous studies, we found that Piezo1 regulated mTOR/S6K pathway and thus proglucagon expression and GLP-1 production through a Ca2+/CaMKKbeta/CaMKIV pathway in our present study.

Although we could not exclude involvement of other signaling pathways downstream of Piezo1 in regulating the cleavage of proglucagon, granule maturation and the final release of GLP-1, our present study provided evidence to support the involvement of the Ca2+/CaMKKbeta/CaMKIV/mTOR pathway in mediating the role Piezo1 in proglucagon expression and GLP-1 production.

The reviewer also expressed concerns on the use of western blot to detect proglucagon expression. Proglucagon is encoded by the GCG gene and is cleaved by PC1/3 in L cells to form mature GLP-1. In fact, measurement of intestinal proglucagon protein is a common approach for assessing GLP-1 production in the intestine. Here are some examples from other researchers: Diabetes. 2013 Mar;62(3):789-800. Gastroenterology. 2011 May;140(5):1564-74. 2004 Jul 23;279(30):31068-75. The proglucagon antibody used in our study was purchased from abcam (Cat#ab23468), which can detect proglucagon at 21 kDa.

(2) In Figure 2, the LFD control mouse group was missing. Again, I don't understand the detection of proglucagon by Western blotting in this figure.

We appreciate the reviewer's comments. The figure 1 presents the phenotypic changes of transgenic mice under low-fat diet feeding, while figure 2 focuses on the phenotypic changes of transgenic mice under high-fat diet feeding. As we mentioned before, western blot is often used in detection of the precursor of GLP-1 named proglucagon.

(3) Why show body weight change but not body weight itself? How are the changes compared (which one serves as the control)? Again, how to do Western blotting on pro-glucagon detection?

We appreciate the reviewer's comments. Body weight has been added in new figure3. Proglucagon is the precursor of GLP-1. Intestinal proglucagon protein measurement is commonly used to assess GLP-1 production in the intestine.

(4) After reading the whole manuscript, this reviewer cannot get a clear picture of how the claimed CaMKKbeta-mTORC1 pathway mediates the function of Pieo1 activation (via the utilization of Yoda1 or intestinal bead implantation) on Gcg expression (at the transcription level or mRNA stability level?), hormone production, the genesis of GLP-1 producing cells, and the secretion of the hormone.

We appreciate the reviewer's comments. Figure 7 showed that overexpression of CaMKKbeta and CaMKIV enhanced mTOR and S6K phosphorylation, proglucagon expression and GLP-1 secretoin, while CaMKKbeta inhibitor STO609 inhibited mTOR and S6K phosphorylation, proglucagon expression and GLP-1 secretoin, suggesting CaMKKbeta and CaMKIV was involved in GLP-1 production. Moreover, mTOR inhibitor rapamycin inhibited Yoda1-induced proglucagon expression and GLP-1 secretion. These results suggested that CaMKKbeta/CaMKIV/mTOR mediated the effect of Piezo1 on GLP-1 production.

I strongly suggest that authors focus on more solid findings and dissect the mechanistic insight on something more meaningful, but not on everything (hormone coding gene expression, hormone production, and hormone secretion).

GLP-1 production involves multiple steps, including proglucagon expression, protein cleavage, granule packaging and final release. In our present study, we focused on how mechanical signals regulated proglucagon expression in L-cells and thus promote GLP-1 production. We did not exclude the possibility that mechanical signals could also affect other step of GLP-1 production and we discussed this possibility in the discussion section.

Minor concerns

(1) Figure S1A. STC-1 is a Gcg expression cell line, which shows less amount of Peio1 mRNA when compared with most primary tissue samples tested. This does not support the fundamental role of Peio1 in regulating Gcg expression. Maybe qRT-PCR will be more helpful for establishing the correlation.

Thanks a lot for the comments. As suggested, the results of qRT-PCR have been added in new Figure S1A.

(2) There are numerous scientific presentation problems in the written manuscript. Necessary literature citations are missing especially for key methods (such as bean implantation).

Thank you very much for your comments. We have made every effort to enhance the scientific presentation and have included the necessary literature citations.

Reviewer #2 (Recommendations For The Authors):

Overall, this study makes an interesting observation but the data are not currently strong enough to support the conclusions.

(1) There needs to be data localizing Piezo1 to L-cells and importantly, this needs to be quantified - are all L-cells (small bowel and colon) Piezo1 positive?

Thank you very much for your comments. We performed double immunofluorescence of Piezo1 and GLP-1 in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon of control and IntL-Piezo1-/- mice. As shown in new Figure Supplement 5, Piezo1 is expressed in about 90% of GLP-1-positive cells in the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon of control mice, but not in IntL-Piezo1-/- mice.

(2) The intersectional model for L-cell transduction needs deeper validation. Images in Figure 1e are not convincing for the transduction of GFP in L-cells. The co-localization studies are not convincing, especially because Piezo1 labeling is very broad. There needs to be stronger validation of the intersectional Gcg-Villin-Piezo1 KO model. It is important to determine whether L-cell Piezo1 localization epithelium in the small bowel and colon is present (above) and affected specifically in the knockout.

Thanks a lot for the comments. In our study, we conducted a double immunofluorescence analysis for Piezo1 and GLP-1 across various segments of the gastrointestinal tract, including the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and colon, in both control and IntL-Piezo1-/- mice. As illustrated in the newly incorporated Figure Supplement 5, it was observed that Piezo1 is indeed expressed within the cells of the aforementioned gastrointestinal segments in control mice, which are also positive for GLP-1 expression. In stark contrast, no evidence of Piezo1 expression was detected in the IntL-Piezo1-/- mice. Consistent with these findings, in situ hybridization experiments corroborated the absence of Piezo1 expression within GLP-1 positive cells in the IntL-Piezo1-/- mice, offering evidence for the successful knockout of Piezo1 in the L cells of these knockout mice. (Figure 1L and M).

In Figure 1E, IntL-Cre mice were bred with mT/mG reporter mice to further validate Cre recombinase activity and specificity. All tissues and cells of mT/mG mice express red fluorescence (membrane-targeted tdTomato; mT) at baseline, and switch to membrane-targeted EGFP in the presence of cell-specific Cre. EGFP expression was only observed scatteredly in the intestine, but not in the pancreas, indicating the intestinal-specific Cre activity in the IntL-Cre mice (Figure 1E). We have revised the relevant expressions in the main text.

(3) The authors state that "Villin-1 (encoded by Vill1 gene) is expressed in the gastrointestinal epithelium, including L cells, but not in pancreatic α cells" (lines 378-379). However, Villin is highly expressed in whole mouse islets (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmet.2016.05.015, Figure 1A).

Thanks a lot for the comments. Although Hassan Mziaut et al. reported that Villin is highly expressed in whole mouse islets, in that article, only the co-localization of insulin cells with Villin is mentioned, while the co-localization of glucagon and Villin is lacking.

According to our research (refer to Author response image 1 below) and previous study (Rutlin, M. et al, 2020, The Villin1 Gene Promoter Drives Cre Recombinase Expression in Extraintestinal Tissues. Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol, 10(4), 864-867.e865.), Villin is sparsely expressed in pancreatic tissue but not highly expressed in islets. We did not observed co-localization of glucagon and Villin in the pancreas (see Author response image 1A and B below). The same antibody was used to stain intestine, which show specific expression on the apical side of the intestinal villi (see Author response image 1C below).

Author response image 1.

Author response image 1.

(4) There needs to be quantification of L-cells in Piezo1 knockout. This is because several studies show Piezo1 affecting epithelial cell densities. If there are changes in L-cell or other EEC densities in Piezo1 knockout, that shift can potentially explain the changes that the authors see in glucose metabolism and weight.

We appreciate the reviewer’s comment. We agree that Piezo1 may affect L-cell density and epithelial integrity.

To assess epithelial integrity we examined the expression of tight junction proteins (ZO-1 and Occludin). As shown in new Figure Supplement 8, the expression of tight junction proteins, including ZO-1 and Occludin, remained unchanged in IntL-Piezo1-/- mice when compared to littermate controls.

To assess the L-cell density, we stained PYY, another hormone mainly secreted by L cells, in both control and IntL-Piezo1-/- mice. As shown in new Figure Supplement 7A and B, the percentage of PYY positive cells were not significantly different between control and IntL-Piezo1-/- mice, suggesting that the L-cell density was not affected by Piezo1 knockout.

(5) L-cells are classically considered to be chemosensors. Do nutritive signals, which presumably also increase calcium compete or complement or dominate L-cell GLP1 synthesis regulation?

We appreciate the reviewer ’ s comment and agree that L-cells are traditionally considered to be chemosensors. It is also recognized that nutritive signals regulate L-cell GLP1 synthesis. We have addressed these points in lines 568-595. Both nutritive and mechanical signals regulate GLP-1 production. While the food needs to be digested and nutrients absorbed before L-cells can detect the nutritive signals, mechanical stimulation provides a more direct and rapid response. However, determining whether nutritive signals compete, complement with mechanical signals or dominate in L-cell GLP-1 production will require to be further explored.

(6) The mechanism of Glp1 synthesis vs release downstream of Piezo1 is not clear. The authors hypothesize that "Piezo1 might regulate GLP-1 synthesis through the CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR signaling pathway". However, references cited suggest that Ca2+ or cAMP leads to GLP-1-release, while mTOR primarily acts on the regulation of gene expression by promoting Gcg gene expression. These pathways do not clearly link to Piezo1 GLP-1 production. These mechanisms need to be reconciled.

Thanks a lot for the point. The effect of Piezo1-mediated Ca2+ increase on GLP-1 production may be two-fold: promote Gcg gene expression through CaMKKβ/CaMKIV-mTOR and promote GLP-1 release by degranulation. Both gene expression and release are important to sustained GLP-1 production.

(7) Previous study PMID 32640190 (not cited here) found that Villin-driven Piezo1 knockout, which knocks out Piezo1 from all epithelial intestinal cells (including L-cells), showed no significant alterations in blood glucose or body weight. This is the opposite of the presented findings and therefore the current results require reconciliation.

We have cited PMID 32640190 in our revised manuscript. The lack of changes in blood glucose seen in Villin-Piezo1-/- mice reported by Sugisawa et. al. is not surprising (Cell. 2020 Aug 6;182(3):609-624.e21.). Actually, in another recent study from our group, we found similar results when the _Villin-Piezo1-/_mice Piezo1fl/fl control mice were fed with normal chow diet. Since Villin-1 is expressed in all the epithelial cells of the gut, including enterocytes and various types of endocrine cells, the effect of L-cell Piezo1 loss may be masked by other cell types under normal condition. However, impaired glucose tolerance was seen in Villin-Piezo1-/- mice compared to the Piezo1fl/fl control mice after high fat diet for 8 weeks. We further found that Piezo1 in enterocytes exerted a negative effect on the glucose and lipid absorption. Loss of Piezo1 in enterocytes led to over-absorption of nutrients under high-fat diet (Tian Tao, Qing Shu, Yawen Zhao, Wenying Guo, Jinting Wang, Yuhao Shi, Shiqi Jia, Hening Zhai, Hui Chen, Cunchuan Wang, Geyang Xu, Mechanical regulation of lipid and sugar absorption by Piezo1 in enterocytes, Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, Accepted, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsb.2024.04.016).

Reviewing Editor (Recommendations For The Authors):

Your paper - while innovative in concept and interesting - has many flaws that in my opinion need to be corrected before the paper and pre-print should be published or uploaded as pre-print. Can you please make every effort to address the missing data that the Reviewers have asked for and correct the lack of references as noted in the reviews? Thank you.

Thank you for the invaluable suggestions provided by the editors and reviewers. In response to these suggestions, we have included the missing data as requested and rectified the lack of references to the best of our ability. We hope that these revisions will effectively address the concerns raised by the editors and reviewers.

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Figure 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original gels and blots for Figure 1B, C and O, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
    Figure 1—source data 2. Original files for gel and western blot analysis displayed in Figure 1B, C and O.
    Figure 1—source data 3. Original data for Figure 1.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 1—figure supplement 1E, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 1—figure supplement 1E.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 1—source data 3. Original data for Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 2—source data 1. Original files for food intake analysis displayed in Figure 1—figure supplement 2.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 3—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 1—figure supplement 3D, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 3—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 1—figure supplement 3D.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 3—source data 3. Original data for Figure 1—figure supplement 3.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 4—source data 1. Original files for length of small intestine analysis displayed in Figure 1—figure supplement 4C, D.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 5—source data 1. Original files for the analysis of the percentage of Piezo1-positive GLP-1 cells among total GLP-1 cells in various regions of the intestinal mucosa are shown in Figure 1—figure supplement 5.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 7—source data 1. Original data for Figure 1—figure supplement 7B, D and E.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 8—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 1—figure supplement 8C, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
    Figure 1—figure supplement 8—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 1—figure supplement 8C.
    Figure 2—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 2F, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
    Figure 2—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 2F.
    Figure 2—source data 3. Original data for Figure 2.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 2—figure supplement 1D, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 2—figure supplement 1D.
    Figure 2—figure supplement 1—source data 3. Original data for Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
    Figure 3—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 3E, J and R, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
    Figure 3—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 3E, J and R.
    Figure 3—source data 3. Original data for Figure 3.
    Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Original data for Figure 3—figure supplement 1.
    Figure 4—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 4F, J and N, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
    Figure 4—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 4F, J and N.
    Figure 4—source data 3. Original data for Figure 4.
    Figure 5—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 5D, G and N, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
    Figure 5—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 5D, G and N.
    Figure 5—source data 3. Original data for Figure 5.
    Figure 6—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 6D and H, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
    Figure 6—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 6D and H.
    Figure 6—source data 3. Original data for Figure 6.
    Figure 7—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for Figure 7C, F and I, indicating the relevant bands and treatments.
    Figure 7—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in Figure 7C, F and I.
    Figure 7—source data 3. Original data for Figure 7.
    MDAR checklist

    Data Availability Statement

    All of the data supporting the findings of this study are included in the article and source data files.


    Articles from eLife are provided here courtesy of eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd

    RESOURCES