Skip to main content
ACS AuthorChoice logoLink to ACS AuthorChoice
. 2024 Oct 29;16(44):60103–60121. doi: 10.1021/acsami.4c08804

The Synergic Effect of h-MoO3, α-MoO3, and β-MoO3 Phase Mixture as a Solid Catalyst to Obtain Methyl Oleate

Gabrielle Sophie Medeiros Leão , Marcos Daniel Silva Ribeiro , Rubens Lucas de Freitas Filho , Libertalamar Bilhalva Saraiva , Ramón R Peña-Garcia §, Ana Paula de Carvalho Teixeira , Rochel Montero Lago , Flávio Augusto Freitas , Silma de Sá Barros , Sérgio Duvoisin Junior #, Yurimiler Leyet Ruiz , Francisco Xavier Nobre †,*
PMCID: PMC11551912  PMID: 39467908

Abstract

graphic file with name am4c08804_0016.jpg

Extensive research in the last few decades has conclusively demonstrated the significant influence of experimental conditions, surfactants, and synthesis methods on semiconductors’ properties in technological applications. Therefore, in this study, the synthesis of molybdenum oxide (MoO3) was reported by the addition of 2.5 (MoO3_2.5), 5 (MoO3_5), 7.5 (MoO3_7.5), and 10 mL (MoO3_10) of nitric acid, obtaining the respective concentrations of 0.6, 1.10, 1.6, and 0.6 mol L–1. In this study, all samples were synthesized by the hydrothermal method at 160 °C for 6 h. The materials obtained were structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and structural Rietveld refinement, Raman spectroscopy, and infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), confirming the presence of all crystallographic planes and bands associated with active modes for the pure hexagonal phase (h-MoO3) when the solution’s concentration was 0.6 mol L–1 of nitric acid. For concentrations of 1.10, 1.60, and 2.10 mol L–1, the presence of crystallographic planes and active modes associated with the formation of mixtures of molybdenum oxide polymorphs was confirmed, in this case, the orthorhombic, monoclinic, and hexagonal phases. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy reveals the occurrence of the states Mo4+, Mo5+, and Mo6+, which confirm the predominance of the acid Lewis sites, corroborating the analysis by adsorption of pyridine followed by characterization by infrared spectroscopy. The images collected by scanning electron microscopy confirmed the information presented in the structural characterization, where microcrystals with hexagonal morphology were obtained for the MoO3_2.5 sample. In contrast, the MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples exhibited hexagonal and rod-shaped microcrystals, where the latter morphology is characteristic of the orthorhombic phase. The catalytic tests carried out in the conversion of oleic acid into methyl oleate, using the synthesized samples as a heterogeneous catalyst, resulted in conversion percentages of 52.5, 58.6, 69.1, and 97.2% applying the samples MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10, respectively. The optimization of the catalytic tests with the MoO3_10 sample revealed that the conversion of oleic acid into methyl oleate is a thermodynamically favorable process, with a variation in the Gibbs free energy between −67.3 kJ mol–1 and 83.4 kJ mol–1 as also, the energy value of activation of 24.6 kJ mol–1, for the temperature range from 80 to 140 °C, that is, from 353.15 to 413.15 K, respectively. Meanwhile, the catalyst reuse tests resulted in percentages greater than 85%, even after the ninth catalytic cycle. Therefore, the expressive catalytic performance of the mixture of h-MoO3 and α-MoO3 (MoO3_10) phases is confirmed, associated with the synergistic effect, mainly due to the increase in the surface area and available Lewis sites of these phases.

Keywords: Catalysis, molybdenum oxide, methyl oleate, synergism

1. Introduction

Current population growth and, consequently, growing global demand for energy, has been one of the main factors associated with increased dependence on natural resources, especially those of a nonrenewable nature, as raw material in the production of fuels.13 In this context, oil and derivatives are the main leading greenhouse gases, among others; the carbon dioxide (CO2), sulfur compounds (SO2), fluorides, and various types of metals, in addition to compromising human health, intensify climate change and the increase in natural disasters.46

In recent decades, several studies have sought to mitigate the environmental impacts associated with the unrestrained use of conventional fuels, conducting studies that reinforce the need for the total or partial replacement of these substances with alternative and sustainable sources. Therefore, using biomass to produce biofuels has been one of the efficient measures in obtaining clean energy and using residual biomass sources, such as fats and waste oils.3,7,8 In this context, biodiesel emerges as a promising alternative due to its renewable origin, nontoxic characteristics, and free of sulfur and aromatics, standing out for presenting considerably lower greenhouse gas emissions than that of common diesel.911

Biodiesel comprises fatty acid esters produced from the esterification or transesterification reactions of vegetable oils or animal fat with short-chain alcohols, such as methyl or ethyl. In the esterification or transesterification processes, the product has no elements such as nitrogen, sulfur, or lead, making the product have less impact on the environment when compared to petroleum diesel.1,12,13 This biofuel has similar physical-chemical properties to petroleum-based diesel, making it possible to mix both in different proportions.1416 However, obtaining biodiesel is a process that suffers from the reversibility of the chemical reaction, therefore requiring catalytic species to ensure maximum conversion and reduction of the synthesis time.

Besides increasing the yield of the product of interest, homogeneous, heterogeneous, or enzymatic catalysts are commonly employed to reduce the effect of reversibility and reaction time.1721 However, due to these materials’ corrosive, recalcitrant effect and low cost-benefit ratio, new catalysts, especially heterogeneous ones, have been investigated, increasing the options of promising and economically viable materials for this purpose. Among the classes of heterogeneous catalytic materials used in biofuel synthesis, we can find calcium oxide,22 zeolites,12 ionic liquids,11 hydroxyapatites,23 mesoporous silica,24 Metal–Organic-Frameworks (MOFs),25 semiconductor oxides,26 and waste materials, such as ash,27 biochar,28 and alkaline battery paste.1

Among the semiconductors extensively studied for various technological applications, it is possible to highlight molybdenum oxide (MoO3), a semiconductor known for exhibiting excellent semiconductor,29 optics,30 magnetic,31 catalytic,32 gas sensor,33 adsorptive,34 and electrochemical properties.35 Molybdenum oxide naturally exhibits three defined stoichiometric structures, commonly known as alpha, beta, and monoclinic phases.36 The alpha phase (α-MoO3) is the thermodynamically stable phase, which crystallizes in an orthorhombic structure with a space group of Pbnm and lattice parameters a = 3.9628(7) Å, b = 13.855(3), Å, c = 3.6964(6) Å, with four formulas per unit cell, Z = 4.35 On the other hand, the beta phase (β-MoO3) has a hexagonal structure (P63/m), which displays the lattice parameters a = b = 10.5680 Å and c = 3.7260 Å and two formulas per unit cell, Z = 2.37 In comparison, the monoclinic phase has a space group P121/m1, with lattice parameters a = 3.954(1) Å, b = 3.687(2) Å, and c = 7.095(4) Å and two formulas per unit cell Z = 2.38

In the study carried out by Silva et al.,39 the composite formed by the heterojunction between molybdenum oxide and reduced graphene oxide showed excellent catalytic properties in esterification and transesterification reactions of waste cooking oil under different experimental conditions, obtaining conversion percentages into methyl esters greater than 95.6%. On the other hand, Figueiredo et al.40 studied the catalytic performance of the heterojunction between molybdenum oxide and SBA-15 zeolite, which was found to obtain yields greater than 95% in the transesterification of soybean oil at a temperature of 150 °C and rotation of 500 rpm, adopting a factorial design 23, with time and catalyst dosage as variables. The effect of heat treatment on the calcination of molybdenum trioxide was also investigated by Pinto et al.,41 correlating structural and morphological properties with catalytic performance in converting different vegetable oils into biofuels, resulting in the best performance for the sample obtained under heat treatment at 600 °C. However, the experimental conditions adopted in synthesizing the catalyst directly imply its cost-benefit due to the adoption of high temperatures in the heat treatment process.

Several methodologies are used to obtain molybdenum oxide; however, the characteristics and properties exhibited by these materials differ completely, making it possible to increase or decrease the properties of interest. Therefore, the literature has reported success in synthesizing polymorphs of molybdenum oxide using the conventional hydrothermal route,42 hydrothermal-assisted heat treatment,41 microwave-assisted hydrothermal,37 combustion,14 sonochemistry,43 solid-state synthesis,44 and chemical coprecipitation method.45 Although several scientific publications have been presented over the last few decades for MoO3 polymorphs, little has been explored for the mixture of phases of its polymorphs, considering that the mixture of semiconductors can lead to a synergistic effect, as well as antagonistic, mainly in the field of catalytic applications.

Routray et al.46 present the study of the synergistic properties of the combination between molybdenum oxide and iron molybdate −Fe2(MoO4)3 in the selective oxidation of methanol to formaldehyde, reaching high selectivity (≈80%), for the proportion Mo/Fe = 2.0. In the study carried out by Vibavakumar et al.,47 the synergistic effect on the electrochemical properties of the MoO3/MoS2 mixture was investigated, confirming the increase in the density of active sites capable of promoting the oxidation/reduction of the pair I3/3I, obtaining current density (Jsc) and efficiency (η,%) equal to 11.2 mA/cm2 and 3.9%, respectively; furthermore, in the study reported by Jada et al.,48 the synergistic effect between MoO3 and titanium dioxide (TiO2) was confirmed against the microbiological inhibition of strains of the bacteria Escherichia coli, confirming the increase in photoluminescent and antimicrobial properties for the sample containing 5% supported MoO3 in TiO2.

Considering the discussed facts, this article aims to investigate the catalytic properties of the MoO3 compound, especially the synergistic effect between the hexagonal, monoclinic, and orthorhombic phases obtained by the hydrothermal method at different synthesis temperatures. Furthermore, after being characterized by different analytical techniques, the materials were studied in esterification reactions, acting as a heterogeneous catalyst converting oleic acid into methyl oleate under different experimental conditions.

2. Materials and Method

2.1. Synthesis of Molybdenum Trioxide Samples −MoO3

In the synthesis of MoO3 microcrystals, all reagents were of analytical grade and used without further purity. Therefore, the MoO3 samples were prepared using the hydrothermal method following the steps mentioned by Chithambararaj and Bose et al.49 with adaptations, as seen in the steps shown in Figure 1(a-f).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic representation for (a) preparation of ammonium heptamolybdate solution, (b) addition of concentrated nitric acid, (c) hydrothermal synthesis, (d) collecting, washing, and drying the samples, (e) milling and storage of samples, and (f) characterization and application of all samples as solid catalyst in esterification of oleic acid.

Initially, 3g of ammonium heptamolybdate heptahydrate [(NH4)6Mo7O24·4H2O, Sigma-Aldrich, purity ≥99.0%] was added to 60 mL of distilled water under constant magnetic stirring. After the complete solubilization, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 mL of concentrated nitric acid (HNO3, Sigma-Aldrich, purity >65%) were added drop-by-drop to the reaction medium, which remained under constant magnetic stirring. In this case, we obtained the samples MoO3_2.5 (0.6 mol L–1), MoO3_5 (1.10 mol L–1), MoO3_7.5 (1.60 mol L–1), and MoO3_10 (2.10 mol L–1), respectively.

For each case, the suspension obtained remained for 10 min under constant magnetic stirring, followed by transfer of the solution to an autoclave hydrothermal reactor (100 mL capacity), which was heated in a muffle furnace at 160 °C for 6 h. The precipitate (samples) was collected by centrifugation (4000 rpm for 5 min), washed several times with distilled water, and dried in an oven at 50 °C for 24 h. The materials were stored for characterization and subsequent catalytic tests.

2.2. Characterization

2.2.1. X-ray Diffraction

The XRD patterns were obtained using a Shimadzu X-ray diffractometer, XRD-7000, using copper anode as an X-ray source (Cukα = 1.5406 Å), where the diffraction data were recorded in the 2θ range from 5° to 100°, at current and voltage of 10 mA and 30 kV, respectively. The structural analysis of phase composition (lattices parameters (a, b, c, α, β, γ) of the unit cell and atomic position (x, y, z), background, and crystallite size) was performed in detail using the Rietveld refinement adopting the software FullProf suite for Windows, version 2024, July.

2.2.2. Vibration Raman and FTIR Spectroscopy

The vibrational Fourier transformed infrared spectrum (FTIR) of the samples was collected using a Bruker spectrometer, VERTEX 70 V, coupled with an Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) module, operating with a diamond crystal. The FTIR spectrum for each sample was collected using 32 scans with a resolution of 4 cm–1 in a vacuum transmittance module in the spectral range of 400 to 4000 cm–1. On the other hand, the study of active vibrational modes for molybdenum oxide (MoO3) structures was carried out using Raman spectroscopy. In this case, using a Bruker confocal Raman microscope, SENTERRA, with a laser wavelength of 532 nm (green laser), where the spectra were collected in the range of 50 to 1100 cm–1, with a resolution of 2 cm–1, 10 co-additions, and integration time of 10 s–1.

2.2.3. N2 Adsorption/Desorption

Nitrogen adsorption/desorption analyses were carried out using Autosorb iQ equipment (Quantachrome Instruments, USA) at −196 °C in the relative pressure range of 0.005–1.0, using 300 mg of sample, which was previously degassed at 140 °C for 12 h under vacuum conditions. The surface area of each material was estimated by the BET method (Brunauer, Emmett, Teller), the pore size distribution was estimated by the BJH method (Barrett–Joyner–Halenda), and the total pore volume was obtained in the pressure range of relative 0.95. Experimental data and data processing were acquired using ASiQwin software, version 5.21.

2.2.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX)

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed by using an FEI Company microscope (Quanta FEG 250) to obtain the micrographs. An acceleration voltage of 200 to 30 kV, besides beam current >100 nA, was used, with a resolution of 1.6 nm at 3 kV in low vacuum and magnification between 12 and 1,000,000. All images were captured using the secondary electron detector to collect semiquantitative information by applying energy dispersive X-ray (EDX).

2.2.5. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

The semiquantitative and energy states analysis of molybdenum (Mo), nitrogen (N), and oxygen (O) were carried out by high-resolution XPS spectroscopy using a Thermo ScientificTM K-AlphaTM+ (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) spectrometer equipped with an aluminum monochromator, an X-ray energy of 1487 eV (Al Kα), and pass energy of 50 eV. The equipment was programmed to provide a spot size of 300 μm, while the spectra were acquired with an energy step of 0.1 eV and an acquisition time of 50 ms.

2.6.6. Qualitative Determination of Lewis and Brønsted Sites by Adsorption/Desorption of Pyridine

The samples were dried at 105 °C for 24 h to remove moisture. A portion of each dried sample was stored for control analysis, while the remaining portion was transferred to a hermetically sealed container. This container was connected to a system saturated with pyridine vapor, and the samples were exposed to pyridine in a controlled atmosphere for 24 h. Following the pyridine exposure, both pyridine-treated and untreated samples were immediately subjected to a Bruker Fourier-transform infrared equipment by attenuated total reflectance (ATR) approach in the wavenumber range of 1700 to 1400 cm–1 (32 scans and resolution of 4 cm–1) to evaluate the surface chemistry and potential functional group interactions.

2.3. Catalytic Experiments

The esterification of oleic acid [CH3(CH2)7CH=CH(CH2)7COOH, Sigma-Aldrich, purity = 90%] was carried out in an autoclave reactor (25 mL capacity), utilizing an oil bath and constant magnetic stirring at 650 rpm. The conditions initially adopted to investigate the catalytic performance of the synthesized samples were a reaction time of 3 h; temperature of 120 °C; oleic acid/methanol molar ratio (CH3OH, Sigma-Aldrich, purity ≥99.98%) of 1:10; and catalyst dosage of 5% (m/m) concerning the mass of oleic acid.

According to Reis et al., the yield in the oleic acid esterification reaction was quantified.50 To this end, approximately 0.1 g of each sample was weighed in an Erlenmeyer flask (50 mL capacity), together with 20 mL of ethyl alcohol (Sigma-Aldrich, purity >92.8%), previously neutralized by 0.1 mol L–1 NaOH.

The samples were titrated in triplicate with a standardized solution of 0.1 mol/L NaOH and 2 drops of 1% phenolphthalein. The same procedure was performed using oleic acid as a blank or standard. With this, the acidity index was calculated using eq 1:

2.3. 1

where V is the volume of NaOH solution used in the titration in milliliters (mL), N is the concentration of the titrant solution, m is the mass of the sample weighed in grams, and 56.1 is the conversion constant to obtain the index of acidity in milligrams of potassium hydroxide per gram of sample (mg KOH/g). The catalysis conversion (%R) was determined based on the acidity of oleic acid (blank) and the samples, as reported by Tang and Niu51 available in eq 2:

2.3. 2

where A0 corresponds to the acidity of oleic acid, and Af, to the acidity of the methyl oleate sample.

For all cases, the product from each catalytic experiment was separated by centrifugation, where the residual methanol was collected by using a rotary evaporator and a heating bath with digital temperature control at a rotation speed of 75 rpm and a temperature of 65 °C.

The optimization of catalytic performance was carried out by investigating the parameters: reaction time (0.5, 1, 3, and 5 h); temperature (80, 100, 120, and 140 °C); oleic acid/methanol molar ratio (1:5, 1:10, 1:15, and 1:20); and catalyst dosage (2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10%, m/m). After optimization of the parameters, the stability and reuse of the catalyst in 9 (nine) consecutive cycles was investigated. For these purposes, the catalyst was recovered by centrifugation, washed twice with hexane and twice with distilled water, and dried in an oven for 24 h at 80 °C.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. X-ray Diffraction and Structural Rietveld Refinement

The structural characterization of the synthesized samples was initially conducted by X-ray diffraction (XRD), as shown in Figure 2. The intensity and profile of the diffraction peaks indicate the formation of materials with a high degree of crystallinity and short- and long-range organization, characteristic of materials obtained via hydrothermal synthesis; in addition, there are clear modifications that suggest the structural transition and consequent mixture of phases for the materials obtained. Indexing the diffraction patterns revealed the obtainment of the hexagonal phase with lattice parameters a = b = 10,5680 Å and c = 3,7260 Å, space group of P63/m, and two formulas per unit cell (Z = 2), for molybdenum trioxide synthesized at a concentration of nitric acid at 0.6 mol L–1. All crystallographic planes identified in the 2θ intervals from 5 to 100° agree with the crystallographic information on the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database card No. 35076, where peaks of high crystallinity identified at 2θ = 9.8° and 25.7° correspond to the crystallographic planes (100) and (210)/(101), respectively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

XRD pattern of MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples. For comparison, the XRD diffraction pattern of ICSD card Nos. 87962 (h-MoO3), 76651 (α-MoO3), and 80577 (β-MoO3) was inserted.

It is noted that the increase in the concentration of nitric acid in the reaction medium, in this case, 1.10 and 1.60 mol L–1, resulted in the emergence and gradual increase in the intensity of diffraction peaks, mainly those located at 2θ = 12.8°, 23.5°, 27.3°, and 38.9°. These are associated with the crystallographic planes (020), (110), (021), and (111), respectively. The crystallographic planes mentioned are characteristic of the orthorhombic structure for molybdenum trioxide, also known as the alpha phase (α-MoO3), which has space group Pbnm and lattice parameters of a = 3.9628 Å, b = 13.8550 Å, and c = 3.6964 Å and four formulas per unit cell, Z = 4. Moreover, the XRD peaks for sample MoO3_10, which are obtained at an acid concentration of 2.0 mol L–1, suggest the occurrence of the monoclinic structure (P121/m1), β-MoO3, with lattice parameters a = 3.954(1) Å, b = 3.687(2) Å, and c = 7.095(4) Å and unit cell volume of 100.47(8) Å3, agreeing with the crystallographic information contained in the ICSD card No. 80577.

The phase mixture for molybdenum trioxide was also reported by Chithambararaj and Bose,49 using hydrothermal synthesis at temperatures of 90, 150, and 210 °C, processes for 12 h of reaction. Among other important information, the authors report obtaining the pure hexagonal phase for the sample processed at 90 °C. In comparison, at 150 °C, a mixture of phases was formed between the alpha and hexagonal phases, while at 210 °C, a pure orthorhombic phase was obtained.

The structural analysis by Rietveld refinement has been employed to obtain the phase composition (Xr) as well as the lattice parameters (a, b, c, α, β, and γ), atomic position (x, y, and z), occupation, and crystallite size (hkl). The Rietveld refinement plot for all synthesized samples is shown in Figure 3(a-d).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Structural Rietveld refinement plot for (a) MoO3_2.5, (b) MoO3_5, (b) MoO3_7.5, and (d) MoO3_10 samples.

Based on the plot profile of Yobs, Ycal, and the residual line (YobsYcal), it is confirmed that the computed and experimental data are in good agreement, where a minimum of differences of them is verified in the residual line. For this purpose, the crystallographic information from the ICSD card Nos. 35076, 62123, and 80577 (γ-MoO3), associated with the hexagonal, orthorhombic, and monoclinic structures, was adopted as input data in the analysis. For all cases, the quality of computed data was checked by qui-square (χ2) and values of R_profile (Rp, Rwp, and Rexp), which indicate good and reliable results for computed data using the Pseudo-Voigt axial divergence asymmetry function. Furthermore, the occurrence of the hexagonal phase was confirmed for the h-MoO3_2.5 sample. In contrast, for the h-MoO3_5 and h-MoO3_7.5 samples, there was a mixture of phases between the orthorhombic and hexagonal phase, while for the h-MoO3_10 sample, the three polymorphs coexist; in this case, the emergence of the third polymorph (β-MoO3) emerges with a monoclinic structure.

As displayed in Table S1 (available in Supporting Information), the sample MoO3_2.5 is composed basically of a hexagonal structure, which exhibits lattice parameters a = 10.575(3) Å, b = 10.575(3) Å, and c = 3.725(7) Å and unit cell volume of 360.85(02) Å3. Differently, for the samples MoO3_5 and MoO3_7.5, the percentage of the h-MoO3 polymorph was 97.96% and 95.71%, respectively. Moreover, the lattice parameters were, respectively, 10.574(3) and 10.578(1) Å for a-axis, 10.574(3) and 10.578(1) Å for b-axis, and for c-axis were: 3.725(7) and 361.03(9) Å. On the other hand, the orthorhombic structure is equal to 2.04% (MoO3_5) and 4.29% (MoO3_7.5), with lattice parameters of a = 13.855(9) Å and 13.867(3), b = 3.696(5) Å and 3.6949(4) Å, while the c-axis were 3.959(7) Å and 3.957(7) Å, corresponding to the MoO3_5 and MoO3_7.5 samples, respectively. Finally, for sample MoO3-10, the phase composition reached was 9.38% for h-MoO3, 72.78% for α-MoO3, and 17.84% for β-MoO3, that is, hexagonal, orthorhombic, and monoclinic structures, respectively. Therefore, for the MoO3_10 sample, in addition to the emergence of the monoclinic phase, there was a predominance of the orthorhombic phase in its composition.

The results also show that increasing the concentration of nitric acid during the synthesis of molybdenum trioxide polymorphs not only changes the types of polymorphs formed but also leads to larger crystallite sizes in the hexagonal structure as calculated using the Scherrer equation (Dhkl = 0.91λ/(B cos θ). In this case, B is the full width at half-maximum of the characteristic diffraction peak obtained through the structural Rietveld refinement, while λ is the wavelength from the XRD equipment, which is adopted by the radiation, KαCu = 0.15406 nm, and θ is the diffraction angle characteristic of each crystallographic phase. Thus, it was observed three different plans: (210) for the hexagonal phase at 2θ = 25.9°, (021) for the orthorhombic phase at 2θ = 27.5°, and (011) associated with the monoclinic phase at 2θ = 27.4°. Therefore, resulting in crystallite sizes equal to 46 nm (MoO3_2.5), 55 nm (MoO3_5), 56 nm (MoO3_7.5), and 77 nm (MoO3_10) for the hexagonal phase. Differently, for the α-MoO3 phase, there was the opposite effect, where a decrease was noted from 22 nm (MoO3_5) to 21 nm (MoO3_7.5) and, finally, 20 nm for the MoO3_10 sample. For the monoclinic phase, the determined crystallite size was 120 nm, present only in the MoO3_10 sample.

Wu et al.52 report using different inorganic acids (HNO3, HCl, and H2SO4) to obtain molybdenum oxide polymorphs, using ammonium heptamolybdate as a synthesis precursor, adopting the microwave-assisted hydrothermal method. The authors reveal through the X-ray diffraction technique that when sulfuric acid was used, the predominantly orthorhombic phase was formed for all samples. On the other hand, when nitric and hydrochloric acids were used, the hexagonal phase predominated at temperatures equal to or lower than 170 °C, with the occurrence of phase mixing between the polymorphs h-MoO3 and α-MoO3 at a temperature of 200 °C. According to the authors, the phase conversion is due to the Brownian motion in the system under microwave heating, causing instability in the interaction of the NH4+ groups with the oxygens present in the terminal oxygens of the [MoO6] clusters.

Based on the results, it is believed that the increase in acidity by the addition of gradual volumes of nitric acid in obtaining the solutions used to prepare the samples (MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10) led to the removal of theNH4+ groups from the structure, resulting in the instability of the h-MoO3 phase and the emergence of the α-MoO3 and β-MoO3 polymorphs. In addition, it is noted that the variations observed for the lattice parameters, unit cell volume, and crystallite size are directly related to the occurrence of oxygen vacancies and variations in the length and bond angle of the Mo–O groups in the structures.

Wu et al.52 report the use of different inorganic acids (HNO3, HCl, and H2SO4) to obtain molybdenum oxide microcrystals, in this case, the ammonium heptamolybdate as the precursor, adopting the microwave-assisted hydrothermal method. Therefore, X-ray diffraction analysis confirmed that the orthorhombic phase was predominantly formed for all samples prepared with sulfuric acid. On the other hand, when nitric and hydrochloric acids were used, the hexagonal phase is predominantly at temperatures ≤170 °C. However, phase mixing is confirmed for the polymorphs h-MoO3 and α-MoO3 at 200 °C. According to the authors, the phase conversion is due to the Brownian motion in the system under microwave heating, which caused instability in the interaction of the NH4+ groups with the oxygen present in the terminal oxygens of the [MoO6] clusters.

Based on the results obtained, it is believed that the increase in acidity by the addition of gradual volumes of nitric acid in obtaining the solutions used to prepare the samples MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 led to the removal of the NH4+ groups from the structure, resulting in the instability of the h-MoO3 phase, leading to the emergence of the α-MoO3 and β-MoO3 polymorphs. In addition, it is noted that the variations observed for the lattice parameters, unit cell volume, and crystallite size are directly related to the occurrence of oxygen vacancies and variations in the length and bond angles of the Mo–O groups in the structures.

3.2. Raman and Infrared Vibrational Spectroscopy

To confirm the information obtained in the structural analysis by X-ray diffraction, vibrational Raman spectroscopy was used to characterize the materials, recording the vibrational modes associated with the respective crystalline structures from 50 to 1100 cm–1. In Figure 4(a,b), the spectra collected for samples MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 are graphically presented.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Vibrational Raman spectra of (a) MoO3_2.5 (black balls), MoO3_5 (blue balls), MoO3_7.5 (orange balls), and MoO3_10 (purple balls) samples, and (b) correlation of the band position of all synthesized samples with those reported by literature.54,55,53

The literature reports that the hexagonal structure for space group molybdenum oxide P63/m displays sixty-nine optical modes and three acoustic modes, distributed in the irreducible formula for the point group C6h. However, only 20 active modes are expected in Raman spectroscopy, associated with symmetry elements Ag, E2g, and E1g. On the other hand, Seguin et al.53 report, based on group theory, the existence of forty-five acoustic modes for the orthorhombic structure of MoO3 with space group Pbnm, associated with the elements of symmetry Ag, B1g, B2g, and E3g, based on group theory, and 11 active modes in Raman spectrum associated with the space group of P21/m for the monoclinic structure.

As seen in the Raman vibrational spectrum (Figure 4a) collected for sample MoO3_2.5, all vibrational modes present are characteristic of the hexagonal phase, in excellent agreement with the Raman spectrum presented by Zhang et al.54 They showed that the vibrational modes between 600 and 1000 are related to the vibrations of the octahedral symmetry [MoO6] clusters, while the vibrations between 200 and 400 cm–1 are characteristic of the torsional movements of the Mo–O bonds in the crystal lattice. Wavenumbers lower than 200 cm–1 are due to deformations of the bonds along the crystal lattice. In the spectra for MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples, it is noted that additional vibrational modes associated with the alpha phase were present, gradually increasing the intensity of the bands associated with the vibrational modes. Therefore, this confirms the information presented in the discussion about the collected X-ray patterns, where mixing between the hexagonal and alpha phases occurred for MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples.

Thus, the identified bands agree with the characteristics of the hexagonal phase in positions close to those identified for the MoO3_2.5 sample, as can be observed in the indexing of the bands presented in Figure 4(b). Also, bands associated with the vibrational modes of the alpha phase were identified, where the bands of strong intensity in the range of 800 to 1000 cm–1 are due to the symmetric and asymmetric stretching of the Mo=O bonds, respectively. On the other hand, the bands between 300 and 700 cm–1 are characteristic of torsional and scissor movements of the O–Mo–O bonds, between 190 and 295 cm–1, the vibrational and rotational modes of the Mo=O bonds and rigid units of the [MoO4] clusters, and between 100 and 185 cm–1, are the translational modes of the [MoO4] groups along the crystal lattice.

As Figure 4b shows, all identified experimental band positions for active modes are in excellent agreement with the bands’ positions in the studies reported by Zhang et al.,54 Seguin et al.,53 and Chan et al.55

The complementary analysis to Raman spectroscopy was carried out using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), as shown in Figure 5(a,b). Based on the results presented in Figure 5a, it is possible to confirm the presence of active vibrational modes for the hexagonal phase in the MoO3_2.5 sample, corroborating the other analytical techniques presented in the previous discussions.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Vibrational FTIR spectra of (a) MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples, and (b) depicted interval from 2400 to 3400 cm–1.

In this context, bands associated with Mo=O bond stretching were identified at wavenumbers 450, 812, and 451 cm–1. On the other hand, the bands at 575 and 847 cm–1 are due to the stretching movements of the O–Mo–O bonds in the octahedral symmetry [MoO6] clusters. Scissor-shaped movements for O–Mo–O bonds are associated with a low-intensity band centered at 668 cm–1. Vibrations of the O–H bonds of water molecules adsorbed in the structures were also identified at 1411 cm–1, overlapping the stretching of the N–H bonds from NH4+ ions present in the terminal groups of the [MoO4] clusters, characteristic of the hexagonal phase, mainly when synthesized from ammonium heptamolybdate, through hydrothermal processing.

The latter is confirmed by the presence of symmetric stretch bands at 3022 and 3190 cm–1, as shown in Figure 5(b), which suggests the occurrence of different frequencies for the stretches, which can be related to the proximity of Mo=O groups, which exhibit different electron densities than the O–Mo–O bonds. The vibrational modes identified in the spectra of MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples confirm the observations presented in vibrational Raman spectroscopy, in which the evident emergence and gradual increase in the intensity of the modes is noted at 490, 812, 847, and 969 cm–1, characteristic of the vibrations of the O–Mo–O and Mo=O bonds, present in the orthorhombic and monoclinic structures of MoO3.

3.3. Scanning Electron Microscopy and Energy Dispersive X-ray – SEM/EDX

Semiquantitative textual and morphological analysis of the synthesized samples was carried out using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as energy dispersive X-rays (EDX), as shown in Figure 6(a-l). Based on the information presented, it is possible to clearly distinguish the morphology of the crystals obtained, agreeing with the characteristic morphologies of the crystalline phases present in the structural (XRD) and vibrational (Raman and FITR) characterization. Thus, as predicted in the characterization techniques, sample MoO3_2.5 presents the hexagonal phase as the only phase present for molybdenum oxide (h-MoO3), which is noticeable in the presence of microcrystals shaped like elongated rods (Figure 6a,b). In this study, the crystal length and weight for the MoO3_2.5 sample are, respectively, 27.47 (±3.1) and 12.14 (±1.8) μm. Using the hydrothermal method, Vibavakumar et al.47 report the formation of rod-like microcrystals with length and width of 35 um and 7 um, respectively.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

SEM images of (a, b) MoO3_2.5, (d, e) MoO3_5, (g, h) MoO3_7.5, and (j, k) MoO3_10 samples, and EDS spectrum of elements of (c) MoO3_2.5, (f) MoO3_5, (i) MoO3_7.5, and (l) MoO3_10 samples.

The microcrystals of the MoO3_5 sample (Figures 6(d,e)) show the occurrence of rod-shaped crystals with sub-micrometric dimensions, characteristic of the orthorhombic and monoclinic polymorphs. They are anchored on the surface of microcrystals in hexagons, which is characteristic of the hexagonal phase. Moreover, there was a decrease in crystal length and width for 17.84 μm (±2.5) and 6.0 μm (±0.56), respectively. Submicron crystals are displayed for samples MoO3_7.5 (Figure 5g,h) and MoO3_10 (Figure 5j,k), where the arrangement of crystals with sub-micrometric dimensions and rod shape increases significantly. The crystal lengths for hexagon rod-like microcrystals are 21.8 μm (±1.2) and 22.9 μm (±1.3), MoO3_7.5 and MoO3_10 samples, respectively. At the same time, the respective crystal widths for hexagonal rod-like microcrystals are 6.23 μm (±0.8) and 6.32 μm (±0.6). Thus, this confirms the increase in the orthorhombic phase proportion in composition, as already predicted in the structural characterization by X-ray diffraction.

Semiquantitative analysis by EDS reveals the presence of the elements molybdenum (Mo), oxygen (O), and gold (Au), the latter being used to metalize the samples via sputtering. Therefore, the EDS spectra presented in Figures 6c, 6f, 6i, and 6l refer to MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples, respectively.

Based on these spectra, it is noted that the composition of the matrix indicates high purity of the synthesized samples, with no dispersive energy peaks associated with contaminants being identified. On the other hand, the percentage composition of the matrix elements indicates subtle variations in the amount of Mo (59.1–63.5%) and O (32.4–38.2%), mainly associated with the composition of phases present, which favors the occurrence of vacancies of oxygen, presence of NH4+ ions in the terminal [MoO6] clusters, and anchoring of the structures resulting in overlapping of the structures’ interfaces.

3.4. Surface Area and Pore Diameter by N2 Adsorption/Desorption

The textural analysis of the samples (pore diameter and volume and specific surface area) was carried out by the adsorption/desorption of nitrogen gas (N2) using the method developed by Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (BET). As can be seen in Figure 7(a-d), the profile of N2 gas adsorption and desorption hysteresis obtained for the materials is type IV, with a type H1 curve, according to the classification of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) and literature consulted.40 In this case, it is characteristic of mesoporous materials.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

N2 adsorption/desorption hysteresis of (a) MoO3_2.5, (b) MoO3_5, (c) MoO3_7.5, and (d) MoO3_10 samples.

It is possible to note that the adsorption capacity and the graphic profile for the samples were slightly different, resulting in the gradual increase in the adsorption of N2 molecules for MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples, obtaining surface area values of 1.69, 1.70, 2.72, and 10.2 m2/g, respectively. Meanwhile, the respective pore diameter values were 43.2, 40.0, 39.5, and 37.7 nm. Based on the information obtained, it is possible to suggest that the increase in the percentage of the orthorhombic phase for MoO3, which has crystal dimensions that are significantly lower than compared to the crystals obtained for the hexagonal phase, contributed significantly to the increase in surface area as well as reduction in pore diameter. These values are in agreement with those reported by Manivel et al.,56 who obtained the values of 0.43, 1.15, and 4.85 m2/g for molybdenum trioxide (h-MoO3) nanocrystals, synthesized by thermal decomposition, hydrothermal microwave, and sonochemical methods, respectively. Silva et al.14 also reported the synthesis of α-MoO3 but using the combustion method, obtaining materials with a surface area of 1.36 m2/g.

3.5. Pyridine Probe of Lewis and Brønsted Sites by Vibrational Infrared Spectroscopy

As can be seen in Figure 8(a-b), when analyzing the materials using the pyridine probe technique and FTIR analysis to observe bands related to Brønsted and Lewis acidity, significant differences were observed between the spectra with (Figure 8a) and without (Figure 8b) adsorbed pyridine. Therefore, the vibrational spectrum of the MoO3_2.5 sample did not show any bands related to the pyridine molecule probe in Figure 8(b) between 1400 and 1700 cm–1. On the other hand, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples exhibited bands at approximately 1446, 1485, and 1606 cm–1, corresponding to the Lewis acid sites, and 1536 cm–1, to Brønsted acid sites, demonstrating the presence of acid sites on the catalysts’ surfaces. Based on the structural Rietveld refinement and vibrational Raman spectroscopy, the MoO3_2.5 sample is essentially composed of molybdenum oxide with hexagonal structure (h-MoO3); however, the increase of nitric acid in the hydrothermal synthesis shows the obtention of phase mix of hexagonal and orthorhombic structure for MoO3_5 and MoO3_7.5 samples, while in the MoO3_10 sample there was the occurrence of three polymorphs of molybdenum oxide. Thus, following the XPS analysis (described in the following section), it is confirmed that the combination of these polymorphs leads to the appearance of different states of oxidation for molybdenum, in this case, +4, +5, and +6, which can be associated with the oxygen vacancies in the bulk and lattices of the crystal’s structures. Consequently, the Lewis sites are predominantly present in the samples, corroborating the FTIR analysis for pyridine adsorption and confirming the increase in their acidity.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Vibrational FTIR spectrum of MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples (a) before and (b) after the adsorbed pyridine.

3.6. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

Figure 9(d) presents the survey spectra and high-resolution XPS spectra of the binding energy for the Mo 3d5/2 and Mo 3d3/2 states, as well as the high-resolution spectra for the binding energy of the O 1s and N 1s states, which are present in the composition of the samples MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10. As observed in the survey spectra of the samples, all peaks associated with the states of the molybdenum, oxygen, and nitrogen elements were identified, as well as the peak associated with the C 1s state of carbon, which was used as a standard to calibrate the displacement of the other peaks in the high-resolution spectra.57 Therefore, when analyzing Figures 9(b), 9(c), and 9(d), it is possible to note significant variations in the position and profile of the peaks associated with the energy states of the elements present in the samples, corroborating the other characterization techniques performed, which already predicted variations in the composition of the crystalline phases present,58 especially regarding the gradual conversion of the hexagonal phase into the orthorhombic phase and, subsequently, the emergence of the monoclinic phase in the MoO3_10 sample.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Survey XPS spectrum for (a) MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples and high-resolution XPS spectrum for (b) binding energy of 3d3/2 and 3d5/2 peaks, (c) O 1s peak, and (d) N 1s peaks for all prepared samples.

Figure S1(a-l), available in the Supporting Information, presents the deconvoluted high-resolution spectra, in this case, of the element’s molybdenum, oxygen, and nitrogen. Thus, it is possible to visualize that the deconvolution of the high-resolution spectra of the Mo 3d5/2 and Mo 3d3/2 lines in the MoO3_2.5 sample resulted in significant differences for the position and profile of the Gaussians, with a predominance of the Mo6+ state. However, peaks associated with the Mo5+ state were also identified. The presence of the Mo6+ state indicates the presence of octahedral symmetry clusters [MoO6], where the presence of M=O bonds can also occur. On the other hand, the occurrence of Mo5+ states indicates the presence of distorted [MoO5(OH)] clusters, where the presence of Mo–OH or Mo–O–NH4+ type bonds can occur for terminal oxygen. This statement corroborates the result of deconvolution of the peak associated with the O 1s state, which resulted in the presence of two bands, one of greater intensity centered at 531.2 eV and another of lesser intensity at 532.8, associated with the oxygens of the crystal lattice shared by the molybdenum atoms in Mo–O–Mo bonds and oxygens coordinated to the ammonium ions, respectively. For the high-resolution spectrum of the N 1s state, three bands appeared, one of greater intensity centered at 398.6 eV and two of lesser intensity at 396.2 eV and 401.8 eV, respectively.59 These states are associated with the NH4+ ions from ammonium heptamolybdate, which is used as a synthesis precursor. For the deconvolution of the high-resolution spectra of the MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples, the increase in the Mo5+ state was noticeable, as well as the emergence of the Mo5+ state, in this case, resulting from the acidic force of the reaction medium, which implied an increase in the Brownian motion, and consequent phase transformation, with the occurrence of a gradual increase in the orthorhombic phase (α-MoO3) and monoclinic phase (β-MoO3) for the MoO3_10 sample. This finding implies the presence of a greater density of Lewis acid sites, as already discussed in the analysis by pyridine adsorption, due to the occurrence of tetrahedral symmetry clusters [MoO4(OH)2], where the 3dz2 and 3dx2y2 orbitals are available and favorable sites for interaction with specific substrates, in particular, carboxylic groups in reactions with fatty acids in the presence of alcohols.60 Shifts were also observed for the high-resolution spectra of the N 1s and O 1s states of the respective samples, corroborating the predictions made in infrared vibrational spectroscopy that confirmed the significant increase in Lewis sites for the MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples. The percentages obtained for the 1s state of nitrogen through deconvolution indicate the presence of nitrogen due to contamination, probably from the carbon tape used as a substrate in data acquisition.

Table 1 summarizes the atomic percentages of the Mo, O, and N elements obtained from the deconvolution of the high-resolution spectra, as shown in Figure S1(a-l). Therefore, it is noted that the atomic ratio between oxygen and molybdenum was 0.79, 0.84, 2.5, and 2.8, respectively. These results indicate a decrease in the hexagonal phase, converting it into the orthorhombic phase, where the proportion between oxygen and molybdenum becomes less influenced by nitrogen.

Table 1. Identification, line, binding energy (B.E.), atomic percentage (At.), standard deviation, and O/Mo ratio for a high-resolution deconvoluted spectrum of MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samplesa.

ID Line B.E. (eV) At (%) St. Deviation O/Mo ratio
MoO3_2.5 Mo 3d5/2 233.6 41.57 0.63 0.79
  Mo 3d3/2 236.6      
  O 1s 531.2 33.17 0.07  
  N 1s 399.1 25.25 0.10  
MoO3_5 Mo 3d5/2 234.1 40.89 0.52 0.84
  Mo 3d3/2 237.3      
  O 1s 532.1 34.75 0.03  
  N 1s 400.1 24.37 0.12  
MoO3_7.5 Mo 3d5/2 235.0 13.64 0.073 2.5
  Mo 3d3/2 238.1      
  O 1s 532.7 38.29 0.09  
  N 1s 400.5 48.08 0.08  
MoO3_10 Mo 3d5/2 233.1 13.85 0.72 2.8
  Mo 3d/2 236.1      
  O 1s 530.7 39.34 0.09  
  N 1s 398.8 46.79 0.07  
a

Legend: ID = Identification; B.E. = Binding Energy; At = atomic percentage obtained through the deconvolution of characteristic XPS B.E. peak.

In the study carried out by Leung et al.61 thin films of MoO3 were obtained using the nitridation technique in an NH3 atmosphere and studied using the XPS technique. The authors concluded, through the deconvolution of the high-resolution spectra of the 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 states of molybdenum, that the formation of the orthorhombic phase of molybdenum oxide is temperature-dependent, with the occurrence of the Mo5+ and Mo4+ species. On the other hand, Baltrusaitis et al.62 studied the formation of the crystalline phase of molybdenum oxide from the pyrolysis of ammonium heptamolybdate on ITO substrates at 350 °C, followed by additional heat treatment at 500 °C. The authors observed, through the deconvolution of the high-resolution spectrum of the Mo 3d5/2 and Mo 3d3/2 lines, that the materials obtained exhibit the Mo6+, Mo5+, and Mo4+ states, with molybdenum with oxidation number +5 being predominant.

3.7. Optical Properties by UV–vis by Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy and Colorimetry

The optical properties of the synthesized materials were investigated by diffuse reflectance UV–vis spectroscopy (UV–vis-DRS) and colorimetric analysis, as presented in Figure 10(a-b) and Table 2. The spectrum presented in Figure 10(a) exhibits strong light absorption at wavelengths higher than 400 nm, the visible spectrum region. The optical bandgap was calculated using the Tauc method, initially converting the percentage reflectance (R) data into the Tauc function (α),63 dividing the absorption coefficient (k) and the scattering coefficient (s), which were obtained from eq 4.64

3.7. 4

where the scattering coefficient and the absorption coefficient were obtained by eq 5 and eq 6.

3.7. 5
3.7. 6

The wavelength values for the analysis range of the UV–vis spectrum by diffuse reflectance were converted into energy (photons) using Planck’s equation (Ephot = 1240/λ).29 Therefore, the Egap of the materials was obtained using the Tauc model,63 as shown in eq 7.

3.7. 7

where C1 corresponds to the proportionality constant and n, the nature of the electronic transition between the orbitals involved in chemical bonds, which give rise to the valence band (VB) and conduction band (CB), respectively. In this case, they can be of the type: n = 2 (direct permitted transitions); n = 2/3 (direct prohibited transitions prohibited); n = 1/2 (indirect permitted transitions); and n = 1/3 (indirect prohibited transitions.65

Figure 10.

Figure 10

(a) Tauc plot and (b) conduction and valence band position of MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples.

Table 2. Colorimetric properties of the MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samplesa.

3.7.

a

Legend: HEX = Color-hex codes; Color. Coordinates = colorimetric coordinates; Egap = optical bandgap.

According to the study carried out by Bandaru et al.,65 the electronic transitions between the O 2p and Mo 3d orbitals are of the direct permitted type, with the most significant contribution from the O 2p orbitals in the valence band. In contrast, the conduction band is mainly governed by electronic transitions involving the Mo 3d orbitals. The Egap value was acquired by extrapolating the paraboloid curve obtained from the plot of (αEphot)n vs Ephot, where n = 2.

As shown in Figure 10(b) and Table 2, the Egap values of MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples were 3.69, 3.18, 3.25, and 3.34 eV, respectively. Therefore, it is noted that there was a reduction in the value of Egap from 3.69 eV (MoO3_2.5) to 3.18 eV (MoO3_5), with the MoO3_2.5 sample being composed solely of the h-MoO3 phase, while the MoO3_5 sample, the mixture of h-MoO3 and α-MoO3 phases, in the proportion of 95.7% and 4.3%, respectively. The same does not happen for samples MoO3_7.5 and MoO3_10, observing the increase in the Egap value to 3.25 and 3.34 eV, respectively; thus, the decrease in Egap is not directly related to the increase in the fraction corresponding to the α-MoO3 phase in the composition of the samples.

In the study carried out by Maiti et al.64 nanorods composed of h-MoO3 were efficiently obtained by the epitaxial growth method on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) substrates and silicon substrates - Si (100) and Si (512) under high vacuum, where Egap values between 3.17 and 3.38 eV. On the other hand, Ijeh et al.,31 also studying molybdenum oxide films, observed an Egap value equal to 3.44 eV for pure MoO3, indexed to the orthorhombic phase. In this way, it is confirmed that the values obtained in the present study are consistent with those reported in the literature consulted.30,31,49,64,65

Using eqs 8 and 9, the energy associated with the position of the valence (Evb) and conduction (Ecb) bands was determined from the bandgap values obtained by the Tauc method.

3.7. 9
3.7. 8

where Ee is the energy of the free electron (Ee = 4.5 eV) and χ is the electronegativity of MoO3. In this case, calculated using eq 10, χ(O) and χ(Mo) are 7.54 and 3.90 eV, respectively.

3.7. 10

As shown in Figure 10(b), the ECB values for the MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples are 0.0993, 0.304, −0.0707, and 0.384 eV, respectively. Meanwhile, for EVB, they were 3.69, 3.48, 3.52, and 3.34 eV. These results indicate the semiconductor character of MoO3, pure or comprising a mixture of phases (hexagonal and orthorhombic) with characteristics of an n-type semiconductor, that is, an electron donor in a conjugated system. Furthermore, it is suggested that the reduction in Egap observed for this sample is related to the depletation layer composed of the heterojunction of structures composed of the h-MoO3 and α-MoO3 phases, which introduces intermediate levels between VB and CB, making excitation/recombination of electrons at a lower energy cost.33,66

The colorimetric analysis of the materials, presented in Table 2, was carried out to investigate the characteristic color pattern of each sample obtained. In this case, this is directly related to the increase in acidity of the solution used in the preparation of MoO3_2.5, MoO3_5, MoO3_7.5, and MoO3_10 samples, being, respectively, 0.6, 1.10, 1.60, and 2.10 mol L–1. Therefore, colorimetry is based on investigating the variation of the tristimulus pattern associated with the change in the variables a*, b*, and L*, which indicate the change in the color pattern from red (+a) to green (−a), or from yellow (+b) toward blue (−b), or variation in luminosity (L), starting from the lower limit, i.e., 0 to the upper limit 100, thus highlighting very dark and opaque samples, respectively.

As can be seen in Table 2, it is possible to notice the variation in the color pattern of the materials, with different values of the colorimetric coordinates, because of the electronic transitions between the orbitals, which are affected by the presence and type of ligands to the metal centers, type of coordination, size, and morphology of crystals, and synthesis methods. For sample MoO3_2.5, which displays the hexagonal phase as the only one present in its composition, the color pattern displays maximum luminance value (L*) and coordinate values a* and b*, which is classified as pale-yellow material. It has a strong absorption of photons in the ultraviolet region, associated with an Egap of 3.59 eV.

The increased acidity of the reaction medium to obtain the samples MoO3_5 and MoO3_7.5 resulted in light grayish-yellow (F6F8EB) and light grayish-cyan (E2E7E7) colors, respectively. For sample MoO3_10, the colorimetric coordinates indicate the formation of a pale-yellow material with HEX and Egap codes equal to FFFFFD and 3.34 eV, respectively. The behavior observed for the color pattern is directly related to the mixture of phases for molybdenum oxide, as already confirmed by X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy techniques, which can be related to the presence of the NH4+ and OH groups in the terminal connections of the [Mo–O] units present in the structure. In the study carried out by Mizushima et al.,67 samples of commercial MoO3 were treated with nitric acid, obtaining different color patterns depending on the conversion of the alpha and beta phases of MoO3.

3.8. Catalytic Performance of Samples as Solid Catalysts in the Esterification of Oleic Acid

Figure 11 shows the catalytic performance of the samples synthesized as solid catalysts in the oleic acid esterification reaction. For comparison purposes, the catalytic activity of a molybdenum trioxide sample was synthesized according to the study carried out by Pinto et al.,41 composed of a bare α-MoO3 phase. Based on the data obtained, it is possible to see that the esterification reaction in the absence of a catalyst results in a low level of conversion of oleic acid into methyl oleate, in this case, obtaining only 1.8% conversion. According to the literature,28,39,41,51,68 this is associated with the energetic barrier (activation energy) for reactivity between fatty acid molecules in the presence of alcohols, mainly long-chain alcohols. However, when using the molybdenum oxide samples synthesized in this study, it was possible to observe a significant increase in conversion percentages, which were between 50.7 and 90.9%, with the lower value associated with sample SP1, while the best performance was for the SP4 sample.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Catalytic performance of MoO3_2.5 (SP1), MoO3_5 (SP2), MoO3_7.5 (SP3), and MoO3_10 (SP4) samples over the conversion of oleic acid to methyl oleate. The bare α-MoO3 synthesized by Pinto et al.41 was used as a catalyst for comparison.

Therefore, it is possible to note that the activity of the obtained catalysts is characterized by a gradual growth of the alpha phase of molybdenum trioxide in the material’s composition. However, when the catalyst described as α-MoO3 was used, a conversion equivalent to or greater than the MoO3_10 sample was not obtained.

This observation makes it possible to confirm that the mixture between the hexagonal, orthorhombic, and monoclinic phases, mainly for sample SP4, leads to an improvement in catalytic properties, with a synergistic effect between the structures, which add optical, textural (10.273 m2/g), and catalytic properties of obtained samples. These results agree with the FTIR analysis of pyridine adsorption, where increasing the Lewis sites in the sample MoO3_10 improves the catalytic performance in the esterification of oleic acid, which agrees with the work done by Silva et al.14

Considering that the SP4 catalyst showed a higher yield in the esterification of oleic acid, this sample was used to carry out the study to optimize the reaction conditions. Thus, in Figure 12(a-d), the catalytic activity of the MoO3_10 sample is presented under varying times and temperatures (80, 100, 120, and 140 °C), adopted in the catalytic experiments. Based on these results, a kinetic and thermodynamic study of the reaction was also carried out.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Dependence of conversion percentage for OA in MO at different (a) reaction time, (b) temperature, (c) plot for −ln(1 – x), and (d) plot of ln k against 1/RT (first-order reaction).

Based on the information presented in Figure 12(a), increasing the reaction synthesis time leads to an increase in the conversion percentage, obtaining 86% conversion for the process carried out in 1 h. In contrast, for times of 3, 5, and 7 h, 94, 97.2, and 98.4% conversions were obtained, respectively. These results indicate the dependence on time in the conversion process, a result of the system homogenization process, and the frequency of collisions between the reactants, assisted by the catalyst, leading to a lower energy barrier for the conversion into products. Therefore, due to the slight variation in the percentage of conversion obtained for times longer than 3 h, it was decided to use this synthesis time (3 h) in the catalytic tests involving the variation of the other studied factors.

The results of the conversion of oleic acid into methyl oleate under temperature variation are shown in Figure 12(b). Analysis of the results presented in Figure 12(b) makes it possible to confirm that the reactions conducted in the absence of a catalyst did not result in significant conversion percentages. This is due to the energetic barrier related to activation energy (Ea), which is necessary to reach the transition state and, subsequently, conversion into the products of interest, in this case, water molecules and methyl oleate.

In the study reported by Deus et al.,15 the optimization of the oleic acid esterification process was investigated using factorial planning in the absence of a catalyst, with variables such as temperature (323, 333, and 343 K), flow of oil injected into the system (1.3, 2.6, and 3.9 g min–1), and system pressure (50, 100, and 150 kPa). The results presented by the authors reveal that the best conversion performance of oleic acid into methyl oleate was achieved for the values of temperature, pressure, and flow, corresponding to 343 K, 150 kPa, and 1.3 g min–1, respectively. Furthermore, although all of the factors investigated were significant, according to the Pareto chart analysis reported by the authors, the system temperature was the most significant factor among all of the factors investigated. In addition, the activation energy and the pre-exponential factor (A0) calculated for the process were 59.06 kJ mol–1 and 6.51 × 106 L mol–1 s–1, respectively.

Therefore, corroborating the literature,69 an increase in conversion percentage with increasing temperature is evident, where reactions processed at 80, 100, 120, and 140 °C resulted in conversion percentages of 15.7, 19, 41.4, and 58.8%, respectively. However, the addition of MoO3_2.10 sample as a catalyst for the reaction process increased the conversion, except for the temperature of 140 °C, obtaining percentages of 57.2, 84.5, 97.24, and 97.7%, respectively, at 80, 100, 120, and 140 °C. In this context, based on the literature,70,71 it is suggested that the decrease in catalytic performance at a temperature of 140 °C is due to the chemical shift effect of the reaction, which results in the process’s reversibility.

Based on the reaction involved in the production of methyl oleate and water, using the reagents oleic acid - OA (C18H34O2) and methyl alcohol – MA (CH3OH), as shown in eq 11, it is possible to estimate the reaction ratio (r) as being equivalent to the reaction speed (d[OA]/dt), complying with the literature,15 first-order reaction kinetics (α = 1). In this case, k corresponds to the reaction rate constant, as shown in eqs 12 and 13.

3.8. 11
3.8. 12
3.8. 13

From eq 13, it is possible to obtain the equation in the form presented in eq 14, where, applying the integral on both sides of the expression (eq 15), the relationship presented in eq 16 is obtained.69

3.8. 14
3.8. 15
3.8. 16

It is known that the final concentration of OA is equivalent to the product of the initial concentration by the conversion rate - Cr (Cr = 1 – x’), where x’ is the fractional conversion ratio of oleic acid to methyl oleate. As shown in eq 17, it is possible to rearrange the expression to the form presented in eq 18 and then insert it into eq 19, thus obtaining the expression presented in eq 20. Thus, the expression presented in eq 18 is determined by the reaction rate constant (k) and by the slope of the plot of −ln(1 – x) against t.15,69

3.8. 17
3.8. 18
3.8. 19
3.8. 20

From the conversion rate data as a function of catalysis time, by the variation in reaction time, it was possible to obtain the plot −ln(1 – x’) versus the variation in reaction time (t), as shown in Figure 12(c). Therefore, the rate constants for reactions conducted at temperatures of 80, 100, 120, and 140 °C were 14.34 × 10–2, 27.82 × 10–2, 39.3 × 10–2, and 7.99 × 10–2 h–1. The activation energy by Arrhenius eq (eq 21), enthalpy variation (ΔH), Gibbs free energy variation (ΔG), and entropy variation (ΔS) of the process were calculated using eqs 21, 22, 23, and 24, respectively.72

3.8. 21
3.8. 22
3.8. 23
3.8. 24

where R, T, KB, h, and A0 are the ideal gas constant (R = 8.314 J·K–1 mol–1), the absolute temperature (K), Boltzmann constant (KB = 1.3807 × 10–23 J K–1), Planck’s constant (h = 6.626 × 10–34 J s), and pre-exponential factor, respectively.73 Thus, the value obtained for the activation energy by plotting ln k versus 1/RT was 24.6 ± 3.6 kJ mol–1. In a previous study,71 we reported a value for the activation energy of oleic acid equal to 43.6 kJ mol–1 using similar experimental conditions. Therefore, it is confirmed that using the catalyst in the reaction process decreased the Ea value by approximately 57.1%, as shown in Figure 12(d). Consequently, the energy barrier was reduced, accompanied by an increase in the rate of conversion of the reactants into products.

In Table 3, the values obtained for the thermodynamic variables ΔH, ΔG, and ΔS are summarized as well as the values of Ea and A0 obtained in the kinetic-thermodynamic study for the conversion of oleic acid into methyl oleate in the temperatures of 80 °C (253.15 K), 100 °C (373.15 K), 120 °C (393.15 K), and 140 °C (413.15 K), respectively. Based on the results presented, it is noted that the values obtained for enthalpy variation confirm the endothermic enthalpy nature, that is, the need to add heat for the reaction to occur, corroborating the high activation energy associated with the conversion of reactants into products.51,69,73 According to the values obtained for the Gibbs free energy (ΔG), the increase in the catalysis temperature caused an increase in the spontaneity of the reaction, obtaining values of ΔG in the ranges of −67.4 and −78.1 kJ mol–1, in this case, for the respective temperatures of 353.15 K (80 °C) and 393.15 K (140 °C). Furthermore, the variation in entropy calculated was between 0.252 and 0.253 kJ mol–1, corroborating the reaction’s spontaneity.

Table 3. Thermodynamic parameters for esterification of OA over the MoO3_2.10 sample as a catalyst.

Temperature (K) ΔH (kJ mol–1) ΔG (kJ mol–1) ΔS (kJ mol–1) A0 (s–1) Ea (kJ mol–1) R2
353.15 21.6 –67.3 0.252 0.188 24.6 0.937
373.15 21.5 –72.7 0.252      
393.15 21.3 –78.1 0.253      
413.15 21.1 –83.4 0.253      

The influence of the catalyst dosage on the reaction medium, as well as the oleic acid (OA) and methanol alcohol (MA) ratio, was investigated, as can be seen in Figure 13(a-b). Therefore, the variation in the catalyst mass (dosage), in the amounts of 2.5, 5, 7.5, and 10% (m/m), concerning the OA mass, increased by 14.6% of conversion, increasing the catalyst mass from 2.5 to 5%. However, for values above 5%, there was a gradual decrease in catalytic performance, due to the decrease in mass transfer. The decrease in catalytic performance can be associated with the effective collisions between the reactants; in addition, the increase in matter reduces the homogeneity of the system due to the magnetic agitation of the phases present.1 Therefore, a dosage of 5% is optimal for the catalytic process. In the study carried out by Cantika, Zulfikar, and Rusli74 the decrease in the catalytic performance of ethylenediamine-modified chitosan in the transesterification of palm oil was observed for dosages greater than 0.75 g of the catalyst in the reaction medium. This behavior was attributed to the inefficient interaction of reactant molecules with the catalyst surface, resulting in unstable reaction intermediates and, consequently, the reversibility of the process.

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Dependence of (a) catalyst dosage and (b) proportion of OA/MA (mol/mol) in the conversion percentage of methyl oleate.

On the other hand, when investigating the proportion between the reactants, that is, oleic acid and methanol, in the proportions of 1:5, 1:10, 1:15, and 1:20 (mol/mol), it was noted that there was no significant increase in proportions greater than 1:10, which stabilized at a conversion percentage close to 97.2%. These results confirm the lower cost related to the reaction process when using the catalyst studied, compared to those described in the literature,1,11,12,14,15,41,72 which is due to the reduction in the amount of alcohol used in the esterification of oleic acid. The reduction in the conversion percentage for proportions greater than 1:10 indicates the occurrence of the reversibility effect of the reaction.

The ability to reuse the MoO3_2.10 sample as a catalyst in the oleic acid esterification reaction and its stability in different catalytic cycles was investigated in nine consecutive catalytic tests, as shown in Figure 14(a,b). After each experiment, the catalyst was collected, washed with hexane to remove organic fractions on its surface, and used in the next cycle. Therefore, supported by the results presented, the reuse capacity of the catalyst is confirmed, which showed a decrease of 10.1% at the end of the ninth catalytic cycle. Furthermore, it presented high chemical stability, confirmed by the profile obtained for the diffraction pattern, as shown in Figure 14(b), in which all crystallographic planes are indexed as characteristic of the phase mixture of MoO3, with minor changes in the intensity of diffraction peaks. Therefore, the high stability of samples was suggested after nine consecutive catalytic cycles.

Figure 14.

Figure 14

(a) Reusability and (b) the XRD diffraction pattern of the MoO3_2.10 sample after the ninth run.

Conclusion

Applying the hydrothermal method, it was possible to efficiently synthesize molybdenum oxide microcrystals with a hexagonal and orthorhombic structure at 160 °C, under the influence of nitric acid concentration. The materials obtained were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and Raman spectroscopy, which confirmed the formation of the hexagonal phase for MoO3 at a concentration of 0.6 mol L–1 (MoO3_2.5). On the other hand, the addition of nitric acid at concentrations of 1.10 mol L–1 (MoO3_5), 1.60 mol L–1 (MoO3_7.5), and 2.10 mol L–1 (MoO3_10), where the percentage of the orthorhombic phase, that is the alpha phase, was 72.78%. In contrast, the hexagonal phase was 9.38% and 17.84% for the beta phase for the concentration of 2.10 mol L–1. Furthermore, all vibrational modes for the structure were identified in vibrational Raman and infrared spectroscopy, corroborating to X-ray diffraction analysis. The images collected by scanning electron microscopy revealed the obtainment of microcrystals with hexagonal shapes when using a concentration of 0.6 mol L–1, which is already expected in this respective sample. However, increasing the solution concentration resulted in rod-like microcrystals; a characteristic morphology of the orthorhombic phase for MoO3 was verified, corroborating the other characterization techniques. The XPS analysis confirms the occurrence of different states for molybdenum in the structures, where the presence of Mo4+ and Mo5+ is associated with the available Lewis sites on the structure surface, also confirmed by adsorption/desorption of pyridine in the FTIR spectrum, improves their catalytic performance. The catalytic tests revealed the excellent performance of the obtained materials, emphasizing sample MoO3_10 as a catalyst for the oleic acid esterification reaction to obtain methyl oleate. In this case, obtaining conversion percentages greater than 97%, using a catalyst proportion of 5% (w/w) concerning the mass of oleic acid, oleic acid/methyl alcohol ratio of 1:10 (mol/mol), and temperature of 120 °C. Furthermore, after nine catalytic cycles, it showed a conversion efficiency of 87.1%, confirming the effective reuse capacity of the catalyst.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Departamento de Química, Meio Ambiente e Alimentos (DQA) and Central Analítica of Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia do Amazonas for support in the XRD analysis; the “Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES)” - Finance Code 001; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Amazonas (FAPEAM), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for their financial support. The authors also thank the Brazilian Nanotechnology National Laboratory (LNNano) for assisting with the XPS measurements through Proposal No. 20242354.

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsami.4c08804.

  • The complementary Rietveld refinement results (Table S1) and the High-Resolution deconvoluted XPS spectrum (Figure S1a-l) (PDF)

Author Contributions

(G.S.M.L., M.D.S.R.) These authors have contributed equally to this manuscript.

The Article Processing Charge for the publication of this research was funded by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel - CAPES (ROR identifier: 00x0ma614).

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

am4c08804_si_001.pdf (257.1KB, pdf)

References

  1. de Freitas F. A.; Mendonça I. R. S.; Barros S. de S.; Pessoa W. G. A.; Sá I. S. C.; Gato L. B.; Silva E. P.; Farias M. A. S.; Nobre F. X.; Maia P. J. S.; Iglauer S.; Isla K. K. Y. Biodiesel Production from Tucumã (Astrocaryum Aculeatum Meyer) Almond Oil Applying the Electrolytic Paste of Spent Batteries as a Catalyst. Renew. Energy 2022, 191, 919–931. 10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.083. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Xia M.; Jia L.; Li J.; Liu Y.; Wang X.; Chi B.; Pu J.; Jian L. Effects of Co-Doped Barium Cerate Additive on Morphology, Conductivity and Electrochemical Properties of Samarium Doped Ceria Electrolyte for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43 (33), 16293–16301. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.07.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Li Y.; Taghizadeh-Hesary F. The Economic Feasibility of Green Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles for Road Transport in China. Energy Policy 2022, 160 (Oct), 112703. 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112703. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lelieveld J.; Klingmüller K.; Pozzer A.; Burnett R. T.; Haines A.; Ramanathan V. Effects of Fossil Fuel and Total Anthropogenic Emission Removal on Public Health and Climate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019, 116 (15), 7192–7197. 10.1073/pnas.1819989116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Zhang Y.; Han A.; Deng S.; Wang X.; Zhang H.; Hajat S.; Ji J. S.; Liang W.; Huang C. The Impact of Fossil Fuel Combustion on Children’s Health and the Associated Losses of Human Capital. Glob. Transitions 2023, 5, 117–124. 10.1016/j.glt.2023.07.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Achakulwisut P.; Erickson P.; Guivarch C.; Schaeffer R.; Brutschin E.; Pye S. Global Fossil Fuel Reduction Pathways under Different Climate Mitigation Strategies and Ambitions. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14 (1), 1–15. 10.1038/s41467-023-41105-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Semieniuk G.; Holden P. B.; Mercure J.-F.; Salas P.; Pollitt H.; Jobson K.; Vercoulen P.; Chewpreecha U.; Edwards N. R.; Viñuales J. E. Stranded Fossil-Fuel Assets Translate to Major Losses for Investors in Advanced Economies. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2022, 12 (6), 532–538. 10.1038/s41558-022-01356-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Walker S.; Rothman R. Life Cycle Assessment of Bio-Based and Fossil-Based Plastic: A Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 261, 121158. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121158. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jeyaseelan T.; Ekambaram P.; Subramanian J.; Shamim T. A Comprehensive Review on the Current Trends, Challenges and Future Prospects for Sustainable Mobility. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 157 (Jan), 112073. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Vaithyanathan V. K.; Goyette B.; Rajagopal R. A Critical Review of the Transformation of Biomass into Commodity Chemicals: Prominence of Pretreatments. Environ. Challenges 2023, 11 (Sept), 100700. 10.1016/j.envc.2023.100700. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang Y.; Sun S. A Review on Biodiesel Production Using Basic Ionic Liquids as Catalysts. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 202 (July), 117099. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.117099. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yang G.; Yu J. Advancements in Basic Zeolites for Biodiesel Production via Transesterification. Chemistry (Easton). 2023, 5 (1), 438–451. 10.3390/chemistry5010032. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Topare N. S.; Jogdand R. I.; Shinde H. P.; More R. S.; Khan A.; Asiri A. M. A Short Review on Approach for Biodiesel Production: Feedstock’s, Properties, Process Parameters and Environmental Sustainability. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 57, 1605. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.216. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Silva A. L.; Farias A. F. F.; Meneghetti S. M. P.; Antonio dos Santos Filho E.; Figueiredo de Melo Costa A. C. Optimization of Biodiesel Production via Transesterification of Soybean Oil Using α-MoO3 Catalyst Obtained by the Combustion Method. Arab. J. Chem. 2022, 15 (8), 104012. 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Deus M. S.; Deus K. C. O.; Lira D. S.; Oliveira J. A.; Padilha C. E. A.; Souza D. F. S. Esterification of Oleic Acid for Biodiesel Production Using a Semibatch Atomization Apparatus. Int. J. Chem. Eng. 2023, 2023, 1–14. 10.1155/2023/6957812. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen G.-Y.; Shan R.; Shi J.-F.; Yan B.-B. Transesterification of Palm Oil to Biodiesel Using Rice Husk Ash-Based Catalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 2015, 133, 8–13. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.01.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yao S.; Zhang M.; Di J.; Wang Z.; Long Y.; Li W. Preparation of α-SnWO 4 /SnO 2 Heterostructure with Enhanced Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 357, 1528–1535. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.10.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mulik N. L.; Niphadkar P. S.; Bokade V. V. Synthesis of Ethyl Furfuryl Ether (Potential Biofuel) by Etherification of Furfuryl Alcohol with Ethanol over Heterogenized Reusable H1Cs2PW12O40 Catalyst. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2020, 46 (4), 2309–2325. 10.1007/s11164-020-04093-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kuźniarska-Biernacka I.; Raposo M. M. M.; Batista R. M. F.; Soares O. S. G. P.; Pereira M. F. R.; Parpot P.; Oliveira C.; Skiba E.; Jartych E.; Fonseca A. M.; Neves I. C. Binuclear Furanyl-Azine Metal Complexes Encapsulated in NaY Zeolite as Efficiently Heterogeneous Catalysts for Phenol Hydroxylation. J. Mol. Struct. 2020, 1206, 127687. 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.127687. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. Chang F.; Zhao S.; Lei Y.; Wang X.; Dong F.; Zhu G.; Kong Y. Jointly Augmented Photocatalytic NO Removal by S-Scheme Bi12SiO20/Ag2MoO4 Heterojunctions with Surface Oxygen Vacancies. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2023, 649 (2), 713–723. 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.06.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Zheng M.; Ding Y.; Cao X.; Tian T.; Lin J. Homogeneous and Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Water Oxidation by Polyoxometalates Containing the Most Earth-Abundant Transition Metal, Iron. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 237 (June), 1091–1100. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.07.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Saleem M.; Jamil F.; Qamar O. A.; Akhter P.; Hussain M.; Khurram M. S.; Al-Muhtaseb A. H.; Inayat A.; Shah N. S. Enhancing the Catalytic Activity of Eggshell-Derived CaO Catalyst and Its Application in Biodiesel Production from Waste Chicken Fat. Catalysts 2022, 12 (12), 1627. 10.3390/catal12121627. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Alsaiari R. A.; Musa E. M.; Rizk M. A. Biodiesel Production from Date Seed Oil Using Hydroxyapatite-Derived Catalyst from Waste Camel Bone. Heliyon 2023, 9 (5), e15606 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Fatimah I.; Fadillah G.; Sagadevan S.; Oh W. C.; Ameta K. L. Mesoporous Silica-Based Catalysts for Biodiesel Production: A Review. ChemEngineering 2023, 7, 56. 10.3390/chemengineering7030056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhang Q.; Wang J.; Zhang S.; Ma J.; Cheng J.; Zhang Y. Zr-Based Metal-Organic Frameworks for Green Biodiesel Synthesis: A Minireview. Bioengineering 2022, 9 (11), 700. 10.3390/bioengineering9110700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Dasta P.; Pratap Singh A.; Pratap Singh A. Zinc Oxide Nanoparticle as a Heterogeneous Catalyst in Generation of Biodiesel. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 52, 751–757. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.10.143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. de S Barros S.; Pessoa Junior W. A. G.; Sá I. S. C.; Takeno M. L.; Nobre F. X.; Pinheiro W.; Manzato L.; Iglauer S.; de Freitas F. A. Pineapple (Ananás Comosus) Leaves Ash as a Solid Base Catalyst for Biodiesel Synthesis. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 312 (April), 123569. 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rajendran N.; Kang D.; Han J.; Gurunathan B. Process Optimization, Economic and Environmental Analysis of Biodiesel Production from Food Waste Using a Citrus Fruit Peel Biochar Catalyst. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 365 (June), 132712. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132712. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Çaldıran Z.; Taşyürek L. B. The Role of Molybdenum Trioxide in the Change of Electrical Properties of Cr/MoO3/n-Si Heterojunction and Electrical Characterization of This Device Depending on Temperature. Sensors Actuators, A Phys. 2021, 328, 112765. 10.1016/j.sna.2021.112765. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Singh R.; Ahmad F.; Kumar S.; Kumar N.; Kumar R.; Kumar P. Magnetic, Optical and I-V Characteristics of MoO3 Thin Films. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1947 (1), 012048. 10.1088/1742-6596/1947/1/012048. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Ijeh R. O.; Nwanya A. C.; Nkele A. C.; Madiba I. G.; Bashir A. K. H.; Ekwealor A. B. C.; Osuji R. U.; Maaza M.; Ezema F. Optical, Electrical and Magnetic Properties of Copper Doped Electrodeposited MoO3 Thin Films. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46 (8), 10820–10828. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nikiforov A. I.; Popov A. G.; Chesnokov E. A.; Ivanova I. I. Promoting Effect of MoO3/Al2O3 Catalysts Fluorination on Their Reactivity in Propylene Metathesis. J. Catal. 2022, 415, 58–62. 10.1016/j.jcat.2022.09.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Malik R.; Joshi N.; Tomer V. K. Advances in the Designs and Mechanisms of MoO3nanostructures for Gas Sensors: A Holistic Review. Mater. Adv. 2021, 2 (13), 4190–4227. 10.1039/D1MA00374G. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Thomas P.; Lai C. W.; Johan M. R. Design of Multifunctional C@Fe3O4-MoO3 Binary Nanocomposite for Applications in Triphenylmethane Textile Dye Amelioration via Ultrasonic Adsorption and Electrochemical Energy Storage. Chemosphere 2022, 308 (P1), 136214. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.136214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sumedha H. N.; Shashank M.; Praveen B. M.; Nagaraju G. Electrochemical Activity of Ultrathin MoO3 Nanoflakes for Long Cycle Lithium Ion Batteries. Results Chem. 2022, 4 (July), 100493. 10.1016/j.rechem.2022.100493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Avani A. V.; Anila E. I. Recent Advances of MoO3 Based Materials in Energy Catalysis: Applications in Hydrogen Evolution and Oxygen Evolution Reactions. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47 (47), 20475–20493. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.04.252. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. de Sá M. L.; Nobre F. X.; de Matos J. M. E.; Santos M. R. M. C. Removal of Methyl Orange in Aqueous Medium by H-MoO3Microcrystals Obtained by Hydrothermal Microwave Method. Ceramica 2020, 66 (378), 197–207. 10.1590/0366-69132020663782901. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. McCarron E. M.; Calabrese J. C. The Growth and Single Crystal Structure of a High Pressure Phase of Molybdenum Trioxide: MoO3-II. J. Solid State Chem. 1991, 91 (1), 121–125. 10.1016/0022-4596(91)90064-O. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. da Silva P. M. M.; Gonçalves M. A.; da Luz Corrêa A. P.; da Luz P. T. S.; Zamian J. R.; da Rocha Filho G. N.; da Conceição L. R. V. Preparation and Characterization of a Novel Efficient Catalyst Based on Molybdenum Oxide Supported over Graphene Oxide for Biodiesel Synthesis. Renew. Energy 2023, 211 (April), 126–139. 10.1016/j.renene.2023.04.131. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Figueiredo J. S. B.; Alves B. T. S.; Freire V. A.; Alves J. J. N.; Barbosa B. V. S. Preparation, Characterization and Evaluation of x-MoO3/Al-SBA-15 Catalysts for Biodiesel Production. Mater. Renew. Sustain. Energy 2022, 11 (1), 17–31. 10.1007/s40243-021-00204-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Pinto B. F.; Garcia M. A. S.; Costa J. C. S.; de Moura C. V. R.; de Abreu W. C.; de Moura E. M. Effect of Calcination Temperature on the Application of Molybdenum Trioxide Acid Catalyst: Screening of Substrates for Biodiesel Production. Fuel 2019, 239 (Apr), 290–296. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.11.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sousa R. C.; da Silva J. M.; Costa J. C. S.; de Moura C. V. R.; de Moura E. M. Bimetallic Au-Pd/α-MoO3 Catalyst with High Oxygen Vacancies for Selective Oxidation of Cinnamyl Alcohol. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 2022, 34 (1), 92–102. 10.21577/0103-5053.20220091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  43. Balasubramanian P.; Annalakshmi M.; Chen S. M.; Chen T. W. Sonochemical Synthesis of Molybdenum Oxide (MoO3) Microspheres Anchored Graphitic Carbon Nitride (g-C3N4) Ultrathin Sheets for Enhanced Electrochemical Sensing of Furazolidone. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 50 (Sept), 96–104. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Wang S.; Xie J.; Hu J.; Qin H.; Cao Y. Fe-Doped α-MoO3 Nanoarrays: Facile Solid-State Synthesis and Excellent Xylene-Sensing Performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 512 (Jan), 145722. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145722. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Rathnasamy R.; Alagan V. A Facile Synthesis and Characterization of α-MoO3 Nanoneedles and Nanoplates for Visible-Light Photocatalytic Application. Phys. E Low-Dimensional Syst. Nanostructures 2018, 102 (April), 146–152. 10.1016/j.physe.2018.05.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Routray K.; Zhou W.; Kiely C. J.; Grünert W.; Wachs I. E. Origin of the Synergistic Interaction between MoO3 and Iron Molybdate for the Selective Oxidation of Methanol to Formaldehyde. J. Catal. 2010, 275 (1), 84–98. 10.1016/j.jcat.2010.07.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Vibavakumar S.; Nisha K. D.; Harish S.; Archana J.; Navaneethan M. Synergistic Effect of MoO3/MoS2 in Improving the Electrocatalytic Performance of Counter Electrode for Enhanced Efficiency in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2023, 161 (Jan), 107431. 10.1016/j.mssp.2023.107431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Jada N.; Sankaran K. J.; Sakthivel R.; Sethi D.; Mohapatra P.. Synergistic Effect of MoO3/TiO2 towards Discrete and Simultaneous Photocatalytic Degradation of E. Coli and Methylene Blue in Water. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2021, 44 ( (2), ). 10.1007/s12034-021-02436-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Chithambararaj A.; Bose A. C. Hydrothermal Synthesis of Hexagonal and Orthorhombic MoO3 Nanoparticles. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509 (31), 8105–8110. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.05.067. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Reis M. C.; Freitas F. A.; Lachter E. R.; Gil R. A. S. S.; Nascimento R. S. V.; Poubel R. L.; Borré L. B. BIODIESEL PRODUCTION FROM FATTY ACIDS OF REFINED VEGETABLE OILS BY HETEROGENEOUS ACID CATALYSIS AND MICROWAVE IRRADIATION. Quim. Nova 2015, 38 (10), 1307–1312. 10.5935/0100-4042.20150163. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tang X.; Niu S. Preparation of Carbon-Based Solid Acid with Large Surface Area to Catalyze Esterification for Biodiesel Production. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2019, 69, 187–195. 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.09.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Wu J.; Chen Z.; Xu X.; Wei P.; Xie G.; Zhang X. The Growth Process and Photocatalytic Properties of H-MoO3 and α-MoO3 under Different Conditions. Crystals 2023, 13 (4), 603. 10.3390/cryst13040603. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Seguin L.; Figlarz M.; Cavagnat R.; Lassègues J. C. Infrared and Raman Spectra of MoO3Molybdenum Trioxides and MoO3 · XH2O Molybdenum Trioxide Hydrates. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 1995, 51 (8), 1323–1344. 10.1016/0584-8539(94)00247-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang C. C.; Zheng L.; Zhang Z. M.; Dai R. C.; Wang Z. P.; Zhang J. W.; Ding Z. J. Raman Studies of Hexagonal MoO 3 at High Pressure. Phys. status solidi 2011, 248 (5), 1119–1122. 10.1002/pssb.201000633. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Chan X.; Akter N.; Yang P.; Ooi C.; James A.; Boscoboinik J. A.; Parise J. B.; Kim T. Fundamental Study of Furfuryl Alcohol Dehydration Reaction over Molybdenum Oxide Catalyst. Mol. Catal. 2019, 466 (Jan), 19–25. 10.1016/j.mcat.2019.01.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Manivel A.; Lee G.-J.; Chen C.-Y.; Chen J.-H.; Ma S.-H.; Horng T.-L.; Wu J. J. Synthesis of MoO3 Nanoparticles for Azo Dye Degradation by Catalytic Ozonation. Mater. Res. Bull. 2015, 62 (June), 184–191. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2014.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Nacimiento F.; Cabello M.; Alcantara R.; Perez-Vicente C.; Lavela P.; Tirado J. L. Exploring an Aluminum Ion Battery Based on Molybdite as Working Electrode and Ionic Liquid as Electrolyte. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165 (13), 2994–2999. 10.1149/2.0391813jes. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Wu H.; Lian K. The Development of Pseudocapacitive Molybdenum Oxynitride Electrodes for Supercapacitors. ECS Trans. 2014, 58 (25), 67. 10.1149/05825.0067ecst. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Baltrusaitis J.; Mendoza-Sanchez B.; Fernandez V.; Veenstra R.; Dukstiene N.; Roberts A.; Fairley N. Generalized molybdenum oxide surface chemical state XPS determination via informed amorphous sample model. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 326, 151. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  60. Baltrusaitis J.; Mendoza-sanchez B.; Fernandez V.; Veenstra R.; Dukstiene N.; Roberts A.; Fairley N. Generalized Molybdenum Oxide Surface Chemical State XPS Determination via Informed Amorphous Sample Model. Applied Surface Science 2015, 326, 151–161. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Leung Y. L.; Wong P. C.; Mitchell K. A. R.; Smith K. J. X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Studies of the Reduction of MoO 3 Thin Films by NH 3. Appl. Surf. Sci. 1998, 136 (1–2), 147–158. 10.1016/S0169-4332(98)00341-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Baltrusaitis J.; Mendoza-sanchez B.; Fernandez V.; Veenstra R.; Dukstiene N.; Roberts A.; Fairley N. Applied Surface Science Generalized Molybdenum Oxide Surface Chemical State XPS Determination via Informed Amorphous Sample Model. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 326, 151–161. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.11.077. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Tauc J.; Menth A. States in the Gap. J. Non. Cryst. Solids 1972, 8–10, 569–585. 10.1016/0022-3093(72)90194-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Maiti P.; Guha P.; Singh R.; Dash J. K.; Satyam P. V. Optical Band Gap, Local Work Function and Field Emission Properties of MBE Grown β-MoO3 Nanoribbons. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 476 (Nov), 691–700. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.124. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Bandaru S.; Saranya G.; English N. J.; Yam C.; Chen M. Tweaking the Electronic and Optical Properties of A-MoO3 by Sulphur and Selenium Doping - A Density Functional Theory Study. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8 (1), 1–12. 10.1038/s41598-018-28522-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Peelaers H.; Chabinyc M. L.; Van De Walle C. G. Controlling N-Type Doping in MoO3. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29 (6), 2563–2567. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b04479. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Mizushima T.; Moriya Y.; Phuc N. H. H.; Ohkita H.; Kakuta N. Soft Chemical Transformation of α-MoO3 to β-MoO 3 as a Catalyst for Vapor-Phase Oxidation of Methanol. Catal. Commun. 2011, 13 (1), 10–13. 10.1016/j.catcom.2011.06.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Pan H.; Xia Q.; Wang Y.; Shen Z.; Huang H.; Ge Z.; Li X.; He J.; Wang X.; Li L.; Wang Y. Recent Advances in Biodiesel Production Using Functional Carbon Materials as Acid/Base Catalysts. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 237 (April), 107421. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107421. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Jiang W.; Zhu J.; Yuan Z.; Lu J.; Ding J. Optimization of the Esterification of Oleic Acid and Ethanol in a Fixed Bed Membrane Reactor by Response Surface Method. Fuel 2023, 342 (Nov), 127867. 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.127867. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Teixeira L. L. A.; Araujo R. O.; Santos J. L.; Guimaraes M. N.; Ribeiro V. M. L.; Pocrifka L. A.; Tenório J. A. S.; de Araujo J. R.; de Oliveira S. M.; do Nascimento Batista L.; de Souza L. K. C. Production of Solid Acid Catalyst Using Waste Cigarette Filters for Esterification. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2024, 31 (5), 8072–8081. 10.1007/s11356-023-31771-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Silva Junior J. L.; Nobre F. X.; de Freitas F. A.; de Carvalho T. A. F.; de Barros S. S.; Nascimento M. C.; Manzato L.; Matos J. M. E.; Brito W. R.; Leyet Y.; Couceiro P. R. C. Copper Molybdate Synthesized by Sonochemistry Route at Room Temperature as an Efficient Solid Catalyst for Esterification of Oleic Acid. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2021, 73, 105541. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2021.105541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Li H.; Liu F.; Ma X.; Cui P.; Gao Y.; Yu M.; Guo M. Effects of Biodiesel Blends on the Kinetic and Thermodynamic Parameters of Fossil Diesel during Thermal Degradation. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 198 (June), 111930. 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111930. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Yusuff A. S. Kinetic and Thermodynamic Study on the Esterification of Oleic Acid over SO3H-Functionalized Eucalyptus Tree Bark Biochar Catalyst. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12 (1), 8653. 10.1038/s41598-022-12539-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Cantika I. P.; Zulfikar M. A.; Rusli H. Synthesis of Ethylenediamine Modified Chitosan Beads for Biodiesel Production Catalyst: A Preliminary Study. J. Kim. Sains dan Apl. 2023, 26 (6), 230–237. 10.14710/jksa.26.6.230-237. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

am4c08804_si_001.pdf (257.1KB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES