Influence of myosin heavy chains on the Ca²⁺-binding properties of light chain, LC₂

Abstract

The association of myosin light chains with heavy chains, i.e. the intact oligomeric structure, profoundly affects the Ca²⁺-binding properties of the light chains. The Ca²⁺-binding affinity of the light chains is more than two magnitudes higher in the presence of heavy chains than in its absence. Modification of the reactive SH₂ thiol of myosin results in an alteration in the conformation of heavy chains of the molecule that influences the Ca²⁺-binding properties of light chains and generation of tension. When the SH₂ moiety is blocked with N-ethylmaleimide the influence of the heavy chains on the Ca²⁺-binding properties of light chain LC₂ is lost; under these conditions the Ca²⁺-binding affinity value of SH₂-N-ethylmaleimide-blocked myosin (3.3×10⁴m⁻¹) decreases to near that expressed with the dissociated light chain LC₂ (0.7×10⁴m⁻¹). Conversely, the presence of actin, nucleotides or modification of either the reactive lysyl residue or SH₂ thiol does not affect Ca²⁺ binding. The native secondary and tertiary structure of myosin seem to be required for Ca²⁺ binding; binding does not occur in the presence of 6m-urea with either native myosin or the dissociated light chains. With SH₂-N-ethylmaleimide-blocked myosin normal Ca²⁺- and (Mg²⁺+actin)-stimulated ATPase activities are expressed; however, there is a loss in K⁺-stimulated ATPase activity and the synthetic actomyosin threads of such myosin express no isometric tension. There are also variances in the binding of Ca²⁺ with alterations in pH values. In the absence of Ca²⁺/EGTA buffer the biphasic Ca²⁺-binding affinity of myosin is twice as high at pH7.4 (site one: 1.2×10⁶m⁻¹ and site two: 0.4×10⁶m⁻¹) as compared with values obtained at pH6.5 (site one: 0.64×10⁶m⁻¹ and site two: 0.2×10⁶m⁻¹). The Ca²⁺-binding affinity of light chain LC₂ and S₁, where the (S-1)–(S-2) junction was absent, were not influenced by changes in pH values. Both expressed a low Ca²⁺-binding affinity, approx. 0.7×10⁴m⁻¹, whereas heavy meromyosin, where both (S-1) and (S-2) myosin subfragments were present, expressed a Ca²⁺-binding affinity value similar to that of native myosin, but was not biphasic. However, it is important to point out than in preparation of S₁ myosin subfragment light chain LC₂ was lost and thus was added back to the purified S₁ fraction. Light chain LC₂ was not, however, added to the heavy meromyosin fraction because it was not lost during preparation of the heavy meromyosin subfragment. In conclusion, it appears that the (S-1)–(S-2) junction is needed for the positioning of light chain LC₂ and thus influences its essential conformation for Ca²⁺ binding.

Full text

PDF

• 925
• 926
• 927
• 928
• 929
• …
• 934
• Next

Images in this article

Fig. 5.
on p.931

Fig. 6.
on p.931

Fig. 8.
on p.932

Fig. 9.
on p.933