Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1998 Jul 15;17(14):4199–4209. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.4199

Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p.

V Paciotti 1, G Lucchini 1, P Plevani 1, M P Longhese 1
PMCID: PMC1170752  PMID: 9670034

Abstract

Checkpoints prevent DNA replication or nuclear division when chromosomes are damaged. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae DDC1 gene belongs to the RAD17, MEC3 and RAD24 epistasis group which, together with RAD9, is proposed to act at the beginning of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Ddc1p is periodically phosphorylated during unperturbed cell cycle and hyperphosphorylated in response to DNA damage. We demonstrate that Ddc1p interacts physically in vivo with Mec3p, and this interaction requires Rad17p. We also show that phosphorylation of Ddc1p depends on the key checkpoint protein Mec1p and also on Rad24p, Rad17p and Mec3p. This suggests that Mec1p might act together with the Rad24 group of proteins at an early step of the DNA damage checkpoint response. On the other hand, Ddc1p phosphorylation is independent of Rad53p and Rad9p. Moreover, while Ddc1p is required for Rad53p phosphorylation, it does not play any major role in the phosphorylation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p, which requires RAD9 and MEC1. We suggest that Rad9p and Ddc1p might function in separated branches of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway, playing different roles in determining Mec1p activity and/or substrate specificity.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (451.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aboussekhra A., Vialard J. E., Morrison D. E., de la Torre-Ruiz M. A., Cernáková L., Fabre F., Lowndes N. F. A novel role for the budding yeast RAD9 checkpoint gene in DNA damage-dependent transcription. EMBO J. 1996 Aug 1;15(15):3912–3922. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Araki H., Leem S. H., Phongdara A., Sugino A. Dpb11, which interacts with DNA polymerase II(epsilon) in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, has a dual role in S-phase progression and at a cell cycle checkpoint. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 5;92(25):11791–11795. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker T. A., Kremenstova E., Luo L. Complete transposition requires four active monomers in the mu transposase tetramer. Genes Dev. 1994 Oct 15;8(20):2416–2428. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.20.2416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bentley N. J., Holtzman D. A., Flaggs G., Keegan K. S., DeMaggio A., Ford J. C., Hoekstra M., Carr A. M. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. EMBO J. 1996 Dec 2;15(23):6641–6651. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carr A. M. Control of cell cycle arrest by the Mec1sc/Rad3sp DNA structure checkpoint pathway. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1997 Feb;7(1):93–98. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(97)80115-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Carr A. M., Hoekstra M. F. The cellular responses to DNA damage. Trends Cell Biol. 1995 Jan;5(1):32–40. doi: 10.1016/s0962-8924(00)88934-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cimprich K. A., Shin T. B., Keith C. T., Schreiber S. L. cDNA cloning and gene mapping of a candidate human cell cycle checkpoint protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Apr 2;93(7):2850–2855. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.7.2850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen-Fix O., Koshland D. The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14361–14366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cohen-Fix O., Peters J. M., Kirschner M. W., Koshland D. Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev. 1996 Dec 15;10(24):3081–3093. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.24.3081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Elledge S. J. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science. 1996 Dec 6;274(5293):1664–1672. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5293.1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Garvik B., Carson M., Hartwell L. Single-stranded DNA arising at telomeres in cdc13 mutants may constitute a specific signal for the RAD9 checkpoint. Mol Cell Biol. 1995 Nov;15(11):6128–6138. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.11.6128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gietz R. D., Sugino A. New yeast-Escherichia coli shuttle vectors constructed with in vitro mutagenized yeast genes lacking six-base pair restriction sites. Gene. 1988 Dec 30;74(2):527–534. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90185-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hartwell L. H., Kastan M. B. Cell cycle control and cancer. Science. 1994 Dec 16;266(5192):1821–1828. doi: 10.1126/science.7997877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Jeggo P. A., Taccioli G. E., Jackson S. P. Menage à trois: double strand break repair, V(D)J recombination and DNA-PK. Bioessays. 1995 Nov;17(11):949–957. doi: 10.1002/bies.950171108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kiser G. L., Weinert T. A. Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function. Mol Biol Cell. 1996 May;7(5):703–718. doi: 10.1091/mbc.7.5.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kostrub C. F., Knudsen K., Subramani S., Enoch T. Hus1p, a conserved fission yeast checkpoint protein, interacts with Rad1p and is phosphorylated in response to DNA damage. EMBO J. 1998 Apr 1;17(7):2055–2066. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.7.2055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Lieberman H. B., Hopkins K. M., Laverty M., Chu H. M. Molecular cloning and analysis of Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad9, a gene involved in DNA repair and mutagenesis. Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Apr;232(3):367–376. doi: 10.1007/BF00266239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Lieberman H. B., Hopkins K. M., Nass M., Demetrick D., Davey S. A human homolog of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad9+ checkpoint control gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13890–13895. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.24.13890. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Longhese M. P., Fraschini R., Plevani P., Lucchini G. Yeast pip3/mec3 mutants fail to delay entry into S phase and to slow DNA replication in response to DNA damage, and they define a functional link between Mec3 and DNA primase. Mol Cell Biol. 1996 Jul;16(7):3235–3244. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.7.3235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Longhese M. P., Neecke H., Paciotti V., Lucchini G., Plevani P. The 70 kDa subunit of replication protein A is required for the G1/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Sep 15;24(18):3533–3537. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.18.3533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Longhese M. P., Paciotti V., Fraschini R., Zaccarini R., Plevani P., Lucchini G. The novel DNA damage checkpoint protein ddc1p is phosphorylated periodically during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage in budding yeast. EMBO J. 1997 Sep 1;16(17):5216–5226. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.17.5216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lydall D., Weinert T. From DNA damage to cell cycle arrest and suicide: a budding yeast perspective. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1996 Feb;6(1):4–11. doi: 10.1016/s0959-437x(96)90003-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lydall D., Weinert T. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science. 1995 Dec 1;270(5241):1488–1491. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5241.1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Marini F., Pellicioli A., Paciotti V., Lucchini G., Plevani P., Stern D. F., Foiani M. A role for DNA primase in coupling DNA replication to DNA damage response. EMBO J. 1997 Feb 3;16(3):639–650. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.3.639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Michel B., Ehrlich S. D., Uzest M. DNA double-strand breaks caused by replication arrest. EMBO J. 1997 Jan 15;16(2):430–438. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.2.430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Murray J. M., Carr A. M., Lehmann A. R., Watts F. Z. Cloning and characterisation of the rad9 DNA repair gene from Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Nucleic Acids Res. 1991 Jul 11;19(13):3525–3531. doi: 10.1093/nar/19.13.3525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Navas T. A., Sanchez Y., Elledge S. J. RAD9 and DNA polymerase epsilon form parallel sensory branches for transducing the DNA damage checkpoint signal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 1996 Oct 15;10(20):2632–2643. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.20.2632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Navas T. A., Zhou Z., Elledge S. J. DNA polymerase epsilon links the DNA replication machinery to the S phase checkpoint. Cell. 1995 Jan 13;80(1):29–39. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90448-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Paulovich A. G., Hartwell L. H. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell. 1995 Sep 8;82(5):841–847. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90481-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Paulovich A. G., Margulies R. U., Garvik B. M., Hartwell L. H. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Genetics. 1997 Jan;145(1):45–62. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Paulovich A. G., Toczyski D. P., Hartwell L. H. When checkpoints fail. Cell. 1997 Feb 7;88(3):315–321. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81870-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Sanchez Y., Desany B. A., Jones W. J., Liu Q., Wang B., Elledge S. J. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science. 1996 Jan 19;271(5247):357–360. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5247.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Savitsky K., Bar-Shira A., Gilad S., Rotman G., Ziv Y., Vanagaite L., Tagle D. A., Smith S., Uziel T., Sfez S. A single ataxia telangiectasia gene with a product similar to PI-3 kinase. Science. 1995 Jun 23;268(5218):1749–1753. doi: 10.1126/science.7792600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Schwob E., Böhm T., Mendenhall M. D., Nasmyth K. The B-type cyclin kinase inhibitor p40SIC1 controls the G1 to S transition in S. cerevisiae. Cell. 1994 Oct 21;79(2):233–244. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90193-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Shirayama M., Zachariae W., Ciosk R., Nasmyth K. The Polo-like kinase Cdc5p and the WD-repeat protein Cdc20p/fizzy are regulators and substrates of the anaphase promoting complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO J. 1998 Mar 2;17(5):1336–1349. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.5.1336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Sidorova J. M., Breeden L. L. Rad53-dependent phosphorylation of Swi6 and down-regulation of CLN1 and CLN2 transcription occur in response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 1997 Nov 15;11(22):3032–3045. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.22.3032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Siede W., Allen J. B., Elledge S. J., Friedberg E. C. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MEC1 gene, which encodes a homolog of the human ATM gene product, is required for G1 arrest following radiation treatment. J Bacteriol. 1996 Oct;178(19):5841–5843. doi: 10.1128/jb.178.19.5841-5843.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Siede W., Friedberg A. S., Dianova I., Friedberg E. C. Characterization of G1 checkpoint control in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae following exposure to DNA-damaging agents. Genetics. 1994 Oct;138(2):271–281. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.2.271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Siede W., Friedberg A. S., Friedberg E. C. RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):7985–7989. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.7985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Sugimoto K., Ando S., Shimomura T., Matsumoto K. Rfc5, a replication factor C component, is required for regulation of Rad53 protein kinase in the yeast checkpoint pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Oct;17(10):5905–5914. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.10.5905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Sugimoto K., Shimomura T., Hashimoto K., Araki H., Sugino A., Matsumoto K. Rfc5, a small subunit of replication factor C complex, couples DNA replication and mitosis in budding yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jul 9;93(14):7048–7052. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Sun Z., Fay D. S., Marini F., Foiani M., Stern D. F. Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Genes Dev. 1996 Feb 15;10(4):395–406. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.4.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Walker G. C. SOS-regulated proteins in translesion DNA synthesis and mutagenesis. Trends Biochem Sci. 1995 Oct;20(10):416–420. doi: 10.1016/s0968-0004(00)89091-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. Cell cycle arrest of cdc mutants and specificity of the RAD9 checkpoint. Genetics. 1993 May;134(1):63–80. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.1.63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1988 Jul 15;241(4863):317–322. doi: 10.1126/science.3291120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Weinert T. A., Kiser G. L., Hartwell L. H. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 15;8(6):652–665. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.6.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Yamamoto A., Guacci V., Koshland D. Pds1p, an inhibitor of anaphase in budding yeast, plays a critical role in the APC and checkpoint pathway(s). J Cell Biol. 1996 Apr;133(1):99–110. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.1.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yaneva M., Kowalewski T., Lieber M. R. Interaction of DNA-dependent protein kinase with DNA and with Ku: biochemical and atomic-force microscopy studies. EMBO J. 1997 Aug 15;16(16):5098–5112. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.16.5098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zheng P., Fay D. S., Burton J., Xiao H., Pinkham J. L., Stern D. F. SPK1 is an essential S-phase-specific gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae that encodes a nuclear serine/threonine/tyrosine kinase. Mol Cell Biol. 1993 Sep;13(9):5829–5842. doi: 10.1128/mcb.13.9.5829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhou Z., Elledge S. J. DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Cell. 1993 Dec 17;75(6):1119–1127. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90321-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. al-Khodairy F., Carr A. M. DNA repair mutants defining G2 checkpoint pathways in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. EMBO J. 1992 Apr;11(4):1343–1350. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1992.tb05179.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES