Skip to main content
PMC home page
The EMBO Journal logoLink to The EMBO Journal
. 1998 Oct 1;17(19):5679–5688. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.19.5679

The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage.

J E Vialard 1, C S Gilbert 1, C M Green 1, N F Lowndes 1
PMCID: PMC1170896  PMID: 9755168

Abstract

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD9 checkpoint gene is required for transient cell-cycle arrests and transcriptional induction of DNA repair genes in response to DNA damage. Polyclonal antibodies raised against the Rad9 protein recognized several polypeptides in asynchronous cultures, and in cells arrested in S or G2/M phases while a single form was observed in G1-arrested cells. Treatment with various DNA damaging agents, i.e. UV, ionizing radiation or methyl methane sulfonate, resulted in the appearance of hypermodified forms of the protein. All modifications detected during a normal cell cycle and after DNA damage were sensitive to phosphatase treatment, indicating that they resulted from phosphorylation. Damage-induced hyperphosphorylation of Rad9 correlated with checkpoint functions (cell-cycle arrest and transcriptional induction) and was cell-cycle stage- and progression-independent. In asynchronous cultures, Rad9 hyperphosphorylation was dependent on MEC1 and TEL1, homologues of the ATR and ATM genes. In G1-arrested cells, damage-dependent hyperphosphorylation required functional MEC1 in addition to RAD17, RAD24, MEC3 and DDC1, demonstrating cell-cycle stage specificity of the checkpoint genes in this response to DNA damage. Analysis of checkpoint protein interactions after DNA damage revealed that Rad9 physically associates with Rad53.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (306.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aboussekhra A., Vialard J. E., Morrison D. E., de la Torre-Ruiz M. A., Cernáková L., Fabre F., Lowndes N. F. A novel role for the budding yeast RAD9 checkpoint gene in DNA damage-dependent transcription. EMBO J. 1996 Aug 1;15(15):3912–3922. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen J. B., Zhou Z., Siede W., Friedberg E. C., Elledge S. J. The SAD1/RAD53 protein kinase controls multiple checkpoints and DNA damage-induced transcription in yeast. Genes Dev. 1994 Oct 15;8(20):2401–2415. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.20.2401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bentley N. J., Holtzman D. A., Flaggs G., Keegan K. S., DeMaggio A., Ford J. C., Hoekstra M., Carr A. M. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad3 checkpoint gene. EMBO J. 1996 Dec 2;15(23):6641–6651. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bork P., Hofmann K., Bucher P., Neuwald A. F., Altschul S. F., Koonin E. V. A superfamily of conserved domains in DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoint proteins. FASEB J. 1997 Jan;11(1):68–76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Brush G. S., Morrow D. M., Hieter P., Kelly T. J. The ATM homologue MEC1 is required for phosphorylation of replication protein A in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 24;93(26):15075–15080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.26.15075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cahill D. P., Lengauer C., Yu J., Riggins G. J., Willson J. K., Markowitz S. D., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Mutations of mitotic checkpoint genes in human cancers. Nature. 1998 Mar 19;392(6673):300–303. doi: 10.1038/32688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Callebaut I., Mornon J. P. From BRCA1 to RAP1: a widespread BRCT module closely associated with DNA repair. FEBS Lett. 1997 Jan 2;400(1):25–30. doi: 10.1016/s0014-5793(96)01312-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cohen-Fix O., Koshland D. The anaphase inhibitor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pds1p is a target of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 23;94(26):14361–14366. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14361. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Critchlow S. E., Bowater R. P., Jackson S. P. Mammalian DNA double-strand break repair protein XRCC4 interacts with DNA ligase IV. Curr Biol. 1997 Aug 1;7(8):588–598. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00258-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Elledge S. J. Cell cycle checkpoints: preventing an identity crisis. Science. 1996 Dec 6;274(5293):1664–1672. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5293.1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Futreal P. A., Liu Q., Shattuck-Eidens D., Cochran C., Harshman K., Tavtigian S., Bennett L. M., Haugen-Strano A., Swensen J., Miki Y. BRCA1 mutations in primary breast and ovarian carcinomas. Science. 1994 Oct 7;266(5182):120–122. doi: 10.1126/science.7939630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Greenwell P. W., Kronmal S. L., Porter S. E., Gassenhuber J., Obermaier B., Petes T. D. TEL1, a gene involved in controlling telomere length in S. cerevisiae, is homologous to the human ataxia telangiectasia gene. Cell. 1995 Sep 8;82(5):823–829. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90479-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Griffiths D. J., Barbet N. C., McCready S., Lehmann A. R., Carr A. M. Fission yeast rad17: a homologue of budding yeast RAD24 that shares regions of sequence similarity with DNA polymerase accessory proteins. EMBO J. 1995 Dec 1;14(23):5812–5823. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1995.tb00269.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Hartwell L. H., Kastan M. B. Cell cycle control and cancer. Science. 1994 Dec 16;266(5192):1821–1828. doi: 10.1126/science.7997877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Hunter T. When is a lipid kinase not a lipid kinase? When it is a protein kinase. Cell. 1995 Oct 6;83(1):1–4. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90225-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jung M., Kondratyev A., Lee S. A., Dimtchev A., Dritschilo A. ATM gene product phosphorylates I kappa B-alpha. Cancer Res. 1997 Jan 1;57(1):24–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Keegan K. S., Holtzman D. A., Plug A. W., Christenson E. R., Brainerd E. E., Flaggs G., Bentley N. J., Taylor E. M., Meyn M. S., Moss S. B. The Atr and Atm protein kinases associate with different sites along meiotically pairing chromosomes. Genes Dev. 1996 Oct 1;10(19):2423–2437. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.19.2423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kiser G. L., Weinert T. A. Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function. Mol Biol Cell. 1996 May;7(5):703–718. doi: 10.1091/mbc.7.5.703. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Koonin E. V., Altschul S. F., Bork P. BRCA1 protein products ... Functional motifs... Nat Genet. 1996 Jul;13(3):266–268. doi: 10.1038/ng0796-266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Longhese M. P., Paciotti V., Fraschini R., Zaccarini R., Plevani P., Lucchini G. The novel DNA damage checkpoint protein ddc1p is phosphorylated periodically during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage in budding yeast. EMBO J. 1997 Sep 1;16(17):5216–5226. doi: 10.1093/emboj/16.17.5216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Lydall D., Weinert T. Yeast checkpoint genes in DNA damage processing: implications for repair and arrest. Science. 1995 Dec 1;270(5241):1488–1491. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5241.1488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Miki Y., Swensen J., Shattuck-Eidens D., Futreal P. A., Harshman K., Tavtigian S., Liu Q., Cochran C., Bennett L. M., Ding W. A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1. Science. 1994 Oct 7;266(5182):66–71. doi: 10.1126/science.7545954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Morgan S. E., Kastan M. B. p53 and ATM: cell cycle, cell death, and cancer. Adv Cancer Res. 1997;71:1–25. doi: 10.1016/s0065-230x(08)60095-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Morrow D. M., Tagle D. A., Shiloh Y., Collins F. S., Hieter P. TEL1, an S. cerevisiae homolog of the human gene mutated in ataxia telangiectasia, is functionally related to the yeast checkpoint gene MEC1. Cell. 1995 Sep 8;82(5):831–840. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90480-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nash R. A., Caldecott K. W., Barnes D. E., Lindahl T. XRCC1 protein interacts with one of two distinct forms of DNA ligase III. Biochemistry. 1997 Apr 29;36(17):5207–5211. doi: 10.1021/bi962281m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Navas T. A., Sanchez Y., Elledge S. J. RAD9 and DNA polymerase epsilon form parallel sensory branches for transducing the DNA damage checkpoint signal in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genes Dev. 1996 Oct 15;10(20):2632–2643. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.20.2632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Paciotti V., Lucchini G., Plevani P., Longhese M. P. Mec1p is essential for phosphorylation of the yeast DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc1p, which physically interacts with Mec3p. EMBO J. 1998 Jul 15;17(14):4199–4209. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.14.4199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Pati D., Keller C., Groudine M., Plon S. E. Reconstitution of a MEC1-independent checkpoint in yeast by expression of a novel human fork head cDNA. Mol Cell Biol. 1997 Jun;17(6):3037–3046. doi: 10.1128/mcb.17.6.3037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Paulovich A. G., Hartwell L. H. A checkpoint regulates the rate of progression through S phase in S. cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Cell. 1995 Sep 8;82(5):841–847. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(95)90481-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Paulovich A. G., Margulies R. U., Garvik B. M., Hartwell L. H. RAD9, RAD17, and RAD24 are required for S phase regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to DNA damage. Genetics. 1997 Jan;145(1):45–62. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.1.45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Paulovich A. G., Toczyski D. P., Hartwell L. H. When checkpoints fail. Cell. 1997 Feb 7;88(3):315–321. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81870-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Rudner A. D., Murray A. W. The spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1996 Dec;8(6):773–780. doi: 10.1016/s0955-0674(96)80077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Ruffner H., Verma I. M. BRCA1 is a cell cycle-regulated nuclear phosphoprotein. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jul 8;94(14):7138–7143. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.14.7138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Saka Y., Esashi F., Matsusaka T., Mochida S., Yanagida M. Damage and replication checkpoint control in fission yeast is ensured by interactions of Crb2, a protein with BRCT motif, with Cut5 and Chk1. Genes Dev. 1997 Dec 15;11(24):3387–3400. doi: 10.1101/gad.11.24.3387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sanchez Y., Desany B. A., Jones W. J., Liu Q., Wang B., Elledge S. J. Regulation of RAD53 by the ATM-like kinases MEC1 and TEL1 in yeast cell cycle checkpoint pathways. Science. 1996 Jan 19;271(5247):357–360. doi: 10.1126/science.271.5247.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Scully R., Chen J., Ochs R. L., Keegan K., Hoekstra M., Feunteun J., Livingston D. M. Dynamic changes of BRCA1 subnuclear location and phosphorylation state are initiated by DNA damage. Cell. 1997 Aug 8;90(3):425–435. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80503-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Siede W., Friedberg A. S., Friedberg E. C. RAD9-dependent G1 arrest defines a second checkpoint for damaged DNA in the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):7985–7989. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.7985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Sun Z., Fay D. S., Marini F., Foiani M., Stern D. F. Spk1/Rad53 is regulated by Mec1-dependent protein phosphorylation in DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways. Genes Dev. 1996 Feb 15;10(4):395–406. doi: 10.1101/gad.10.4.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sun Z., Hsiao J., Fay D. S., Stern D. F. Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint. Science. 1998 Jul 10;281(5374):272–274. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Thelen M. P., Onel K., Holloman W. K. The REC1 gene of Ustilago maydis involved in the cellular response to DNA damage encodes an exonuclease. J Biol Chem. 1994 Jan 7;269(1):747–754. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. Characterization of RAD9 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and evidence that its function acts posttranslationally in cell cycle arrest after DNA damage. Mol Cell Biol. 1990 Dec;10(12):6554–6564. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.12.6554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Weinert T. A., Hartwell L. H. The RAD9 gene controls the cell cycle response to DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Science. 1988 Jul 15;241(4863):317–322. doi: 10.1126/science.3291120. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Weinert T. A., Kiser G. L., Hartwell L. H. Mitotic checkpoint genes in budding yeast and the dependence of mitosis on DNA replication and repair. Genes Dev. 1994 Mar 15;8(6):652–665. doi: 10.1101/gad.8.6.652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Willson J., Wilson S., Warr N., Watts F. Z. Isolation and characterization of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rhp9 gene: a gene required for the DNA damage checkpoint but not the replication checkpoint. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Jun 1;25(11):2138–2146. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.11.2138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Yamamoto A., Guacci V., Koshland D. Pds1p, an inhibitor of anaphase in budding yeast, plays a critical role in the APC and checkpoint pathway(s). J Cell Biol. 1996 Apr;133(1):99–110. doi: 10.1083/jcb.133.1.99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Yang S. S., Yeh E., Salmon E. D., Bloom K. Identification of a mid-anaphase checkpoint in budding yeast. J Cell Biol. 1997 Jan 27;136(2):345–354. doi: 10.1083/jcb.136.2.345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhou Z., Elledge S. J. DUN1 encodes a protein kinase that controls the DNA damage response in yeast. Cell. 1993 Dec 17;75(6):1119–1127. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90321-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. de la Torre-Ruiz M. A., Green C. M., Lowndes N. F. RAD9 and RAD24 define two additive, interacting branches of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway in budding yeast normally required for Rad53 modification and activation. EMBO J. 1998 May 1;17(9):2687–2698. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.9.2687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The EMBO Journal are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES